Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Mar 17;7:44762. doi: 10.1038/srep44762

Enhancing the sensitivity of magnetic sensors by 3D metamaterial shells

Carles Navau 1, Rosa Mach-Batlle 1, Albert Parra 1, Jordi Prat-Camps 2,3, Sergi Laut 1, Nuria Del-Valle 1, Alvaro Sanchez 1,a
PMCID: PMC5355979  PMID: 28303951

Abstract

Magnetic sensors are key elements in our interconnected smart society. Their sensitivity becomes essential for many applications in fields such as biomedicine, computer memories, geophysics, or space exploration. Here we present a universal way of increasing the sensitivity of magnetic sensors by surrounding them with a spherical metamaterial shell with specially designed anisotropic magnetic properties. We analytically demonstrate that the magnetic field in the sensing area is enhanced by our metamaterial shell by a known factor that depends on the shell radii ratio. When the applied field is non-uniform, as for dipolar magnetic field sources, field gradient is increased as well. A proof-of-concept experimental realization confirms the theoretical predictions. The metamaterial shell is also shown to concentrate time-dependent magnetic fields upto frequencies of 100 kHz.

In the current information age, sensors are key elements that provide the monitoring information essential to our interconnected society. Magnetic sensors are one of the most important components of these technologies1,2. Computers have large memories that are read by magnetic sensors. Airplanes, cars - particularly, self-driving ones - and other vehicles are routinely running safely thanks to the inputs obtained by complex arrays of magnetic sensors. Factories and even whole cities (particularly, within the concept of smart cities) heavily rely on magnetic sensors to improve efficiency and sustainability. Magnetic sensors play essential roles in space exploration as well3.

Different kinds of magnetic sensors exist based on several physical principles1,2. They include Hall-effect4, fluxgate5, magnetoresistive of both AMR6 and GMR7 types, magnetic tunnel junctions8, SQUIDs9, or recent proposals based on nitrogen vacancies on diamond10. A common strategy to improve their sensitivity is using magnetic materials2 to concentrate magnetic fields around the sensor, typically by simply placing it in the gap between two high-permeability magnetic material pieces. This has been used for example in Hall-effect sensors11,12 and in magnetoresistive ones13,14,15.

A specially important branch of applications of magnetic sensors deals with detecting tiny magnetic fields16,17. The enormous progress in sensor sensitivities has allowed magnetic sensors to be applied to the demanding biomagnetic applications18,19, including magnetoencephalography20 or ultra-low-field magnetic resonance imaging21. In these applications, it is common to measure not only the magnetic field but also its spatial gradient in order to help eliminate noise from undesired field sources17.

The continuously increasing demand for higher sensitivity of magnetic sensors requires new ideas or solutions. We present in this work a novel way to increase their sensitivity using the special properties for shaping magnetic fields provided by magnetic metamaterials.

Metamaterials, whose electromagnetic properties depend on their internal structure rather than on their chemical constitution, have represented a revolution in the ways of controlling electromagnetic fields22,23,24. Magnetic metamaterials are a particularly useful type25,26,27. They have enabled the realization of novel devices for controlling magnetic fields, including magnetic cloaks or magnetic hoses to transfer fields to long distances27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35.

One of the properties that can be enhanced by the use of metamaterials is the concentration of electromagnetic fields36. For electromagnetic waves, however, concentration in a volume surrounded by metamaterials is not practical: using transformation optics22,37 it can be seen that a material is required in the hole of the device, preventing the placement of a sensor36. Metamaterials have also been used for concentrating thermal energy38,39 and acoustic waves40,41. For the magnetic case, using transformation optics it was shown that significant concentration of magnetic fields can be achieved in an empty region surrounded by a long hollow cylinder placed perpendicular to the field30,31,42. This was done using extreme anisotropic magnetic metamaterials (media with very large permeability in one direction and very small in the perpendicular one). However, a real application to enhance magnetic sensors would require a three-dimensional (3D) spatial concentration, instead of the more idealized studied two-dimensional (2D) geometry of a long cylindrical shell, to take full advantage of the field penetration along all dimensions.

In this work, we analytically show and experimentally demonstrate that a 3D spherical metamaterial shell surrounding a magnetic sensor can concentrate both the magnetic field and gradient in its vicinity to large values and therefore increase its sensitivity. Analytic expressions obtained from Maxwell equations allow to derive the transfer function from the measured to the actual external fields, both in the case of an external uniform field and a dipolar field. We demonstrate how the fully 3D geometry (a spherical shell) is fundamentally different from the 2D case, which results in important advantages. Finally, we show how the ideal metamaterial shells can be discretized in practice into devices composed of soft ferromagnetic (e. g. ferrites or steel) and diamagnetic (e. g. superconducting) components. A proof-of-concept realization of an all-ferromagnetic concentrating shell is constructed to experimentally demonstrate the theoretical results. Experimentally, our device exhibits an almost constant field concentration ratio in a wide frequency range, from 1 Hz to 100 kHz.

Results

Spherical concentrators in a uniform applied field

In order to study the magnetic concentration properties of a spherical shell in an applied field, we derive the analytic solutions of the magnetostatic Maxwell equations. Consider a spherical shell of inner radius R1 and outer radius R2 made of a linear, homogeneous and anisotropic magnetic material. A uniform magnetic field H0 is applied in the z direction. The shell is characterized by its radial, azimuthal, and polar relative permeabilities, μr, μφ, and μθ, respectively, such that Br = μ0μrHr, Bφ = μ0μφHφ, and Bθ = μ0μθHθ, being Br,φ,θ and Hr,φ,θ the radial, azimuthal, and polar components of the magnetic induction B and the magnetic field H, respectively, and μ0 the permeability of free space. We choose μφ = μθ for simplicity. By applying magnetostatic boundary conditions, Maxwell equations are analytically solved in all regions of space (see Supplementary Discussion 1 for the full derivation).

The solutions show two important properties. First, the field inside the spherical hole is a uniform field in the direction of the applied magnetic field,

graphic file with name srep44762-m1.jpg

where Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic. Second, the field created by the shell at the external region is the field of a dipole located at the shell center, pointing to the direction of the applied magnetic field with magnetic moment

graphic file with name srep44762-m5.jpg

Non-distortion field cases

For the 2D case of an infinitely long hollow cylinder in a transverse applied magnetic field H0 it was demonstrated that the maximum concentration of field in the cylinder hole is obtained when the shell has radial and angular permeabilities μρ → ∞ and μφ → 0, respectively30,42. In that case there is no distortion of the field outside the cylinder, so it becomes magnetically undetectable.

We can now explore in the case of a 3D spherical shell the field concentration that corresponds to a non-distortion solution. The magnetic dipole moment mEXT in Eq. (2) controls the distortion of the field outside the shell. Depending on its sign, the magnetic field lines will be attracted towards the shell (mEXT > 0) or expelled from it (mEXT < 0). The solutions of Eq. (2) for mEXT = 0 are the cases of non-distortion of the uniform applied field, occurring when

graphic file with name srep44762-m6.jpg

Considering the permeability relation of Eq. (3) and Eq. (1), one obtains that the magnetic field inside the hole for the non-distortion solutions is

graphic file with name srep44762-m7.jpg

which resembles the analogous relation Inline graphic for a cylindrical shell with permeabilities μρ and μφ and inner and outer radii R2 and R1, respectively, in a perpendicularly applied magnetic field H030,42. In Eq. (4) the larger the value of μr, the higher the value of the concentrated field inside the shell. In the limit μr → 0 (μθ → ∞) the field in the hole is zero (Fig. 1a), i. e. it is a cloaking case, while in the opposite limit μr → ∞ (Inline graphic = 1/2), one obtains Inline graphic (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1. Comparison of spherical shells.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Magnetic induction B lines and energy density (1/2 H · B; in colours) when a uniform external magnetic field is applied in the presence of a shell with radii ratio R2/R1 = 2 and magnetic permeabilities (a) μr = 104 and μθ = 104, (b) μr = 10−4 and μθ = 1/2, and (c) μr = 104 and μθ = 10−4.

Maximum field concentration

We are now ready to tackle the question of whether in the 3D spherical case the non-distortion case (μr, μθ) = (∞, 1/2) is the one providing maximum concentrated field in the hole, or if instead there are other solutions providing even more concentration. By analysing Eq. (1) fixing the value of μθ, the maximum field inside the hole is achieved when μr → ∞, and when fixing the value of μr, the maximum field inside the hole is achieved when μθ → 0. Therefore, the absolute maximum is found in the limit μr → ∞ and μθ → 0 and is

graphic file with name srep44762-m11.jpg

which enhances the applied field by a factor that increases with R2/R1. In particular, this enhancement can ideally be made arbitrarily large by making R1 arbitrarily small. The concentration in this case is larger than the one that can be achieved with a non-distorting spherical shell, Inline graphic for all possible R2/R1 values. This is fundamentally different from the cylindrical case, for which the non-distorting shell yields the maximum concentration in the hole.

The differences between the shells with (μr, μθ) = (∞, 1/2) and (μr, μθ) = (∞, 0) can be seen in Fig. 1b and c. Interestingly, in the case of maximum concentration, the sphere expels some of the magnetic field lines, i.e, it has a diamagnetic behavior.

We thus conclude that a 3D spherical shell with (μr, μθ) = (∞, 0) can yield a large concentration of an applied magnetic field in its hole, and that the maximum field concentration is not a non-distortion situation. This maximum field concentration shell is the one that, once appropriately discretized, is experimentally tested below.

Energy analysis

To further understand the concentration properties for the different 3D spherical shells, we now analyze these cases in terms of their magnetic energy. From the analytic expressions of the magnetic scalar potential in the shell region (see Supplementary Discussion 1), it can be seen that for the maximum concentration shell (μr, μθ) = (∞, 0) the magnetic induction Inline graphic has radial direction and the magnetic field Inline graphic has angular one inside the shell volume. Thus, the energy density in the shell is Inline graphic = 0, as happened for the cylindrical shell with maximum field concentration30,42. Using Eq. (5) one obtains that the total energy inside the hole of the shell in the case of maximum concentration is Inline graphic. This energy is smaller than the energy that would be in the volume between r = 0 and r = R2 without the presence of the shell Inline graphic, for all radii ratio. Since the total energy inside the shell is zero, having an energy inside the hole smaller than E0 can only be understood if part of the energy is expelled towards the exterior. Hence, in the case of maximum concentration, part of the energy that would be in the region Inline graphic if there was no shell, is moved into the hole of the shell and the rest is placed in the external region, which results in the observed external field distortion (Fig. 1c).

In contrast, for the case (μr, μθ) = (∞, 1/2), which is a case of non-distortion of the external field (Fig. 1b), the sum of the energy inside the hole and the energy in the shell is E0. This energy is larger than the energy concentrated in the spherical hole Inline graphic. We thus see that not all the energy that was in the shell has been redistributed and placed inside the hole, because part of the energy is kept in the shell (Inline graphic), in contrast to the case of a cylindrical shell with the equivalent properties30,42.

The analytic expressions for the energy in all these cases can be found in Supplementary Discussion 1 and Supplementary Figure S1.

Field and gradient enhancement for a dipolar source

We have demonstrated that a spherical shell with (μr, μθ) = (∞, 0) yields the largest concentration in its hole. One could then use it as a field enhancer to increase the sensitivity of a magnetic sensor by surrounding the sensor with the shell [Eq. (5)]. However, all the results above were derived for a uniform applied field. Interestingly, our results also hold for a non-uniform applied magnetic field. We next analyze the response of a spherical shell to the most typical inhomogeneous field, that of a dipolar source. The details of the derivations in this section can be found in the Supplementary Discussion 2.

Consider a magnetic dipole placed outside the spherical shell at a position Inline graphic Inline graphic with a magnetic moment Inline graphic. The origin of coordinates is set at the center of the spherical shell.

For a shell with permeabilities (μr, μθ )= (∞, 0) the magnetic field at its center, r = 0, is

graphic file with name srep44762-m24.jpg

We can compare this value with the magnetic field at r = 0 created by the dipole, Inline graphic, to find that by using the spherical concentrator the magnetic field at r = 0 is increased by a factor,

graphic file with name srep44762-m26.jpg

Actually, this enhancement factor at r = 0 is exactly the same as the shell concentration ratio for a uniform applied field in all the volume r < R1 [Eq. (5)].

The derivative of the z component of the field with respect to z at r = 0 when using a spherical concentrator is also increased, in this case by a factor,

graphic file with name srep44762-m27.jpg

Interestingly, when considering the case of an external dipole with its magnetic moment not pointing to the sphere but perpendicular to it, it can be demonstrated that field and its derivative along z are enhanced by the same factors as for the dipole pointing radially [Eqs. (7) and (8)]. Therefore, the same relations will thus be valid for an arbitrary orientation of the dipole. Current applications that use magnetic sensors to find the strength and position of an external source can then benefit from the use of our metamaterial shells since both field and gradient are enhanced by known factors. This is especially important in applications such as geophysical explorations43 or magnetoencephalography20.

Shell design and discretization

We next experimentally demonstrate that our spherical shells can enhance the sensitivity of actual magnetic sensors, with a proof-of-concept realization. We have seen above that the spherical shell that concentrates the field the most has (μr, μθ) = (∞, 0). This case is chosen for our demonstration, not only because it provides maximum concentration but also because it is more feasible to construct than other options, like the case of maximum concentration for non-distortion, (μr, μθ) = (∞, 1/2), which involves intermediate (neither very small nor very large) values of μθ.

There are different possibilities to emulate the spherical shell concentrator. In previous works in 2D cylindrical geometry30,42,44 shells for concentrating magnetic fields (having μρ → ∞ in the radial direction and μϕ → 0 in the angular one) were devised and constructed using metamaterials composed of alternated sheets of soft ferromagnetic and superconducting material radially aligned. The ferromagnetic layers (FM, with high permeability) provided the required large μρ values whereas the superconducting (SC, with low permeability) - or simply conducting in ref. 44- layers prevented undesired angular components of field.

Many actual magnetic sensors measure only one component of the field1. For simplicity, we focus our experimental realization on such a case, by designing a discretization of our 3D spherical concentrating shell that is anisotropic, i. e., it mainly concentrates the field coming from one direction. We discretize the shell as a metamaterial composed of concentric and equidistant funnels made of soft ferromagnetic material (Fig. 2 and Methods).

Figure 2. Shell discretizations.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) 3D image of a funnel discretization of the spherical shell with (μr → ∞, μθ → 0). (b) View of the actual device. Finite-element calculations of Bz/B0 considering 5 funnels (c) and 8 funnels (d) placed on each side of the sphere.

We have numerically studied the field concentration for different numbers of funnels by finite-elements simulations (see Methods). Assuming an ideal anisotropic shell with a radii ratio R2/R1 = 3 in a uniform applied magnetic field Inline graphic, the field is concentrated as Inline graphic [Eq. (5)]. The simulation for shells consisting of 5 and 8 funnels on each side are shown in Fig. 2c and d, respectively. Placing 5 funnels on each side of the spherical shell yields a concentration factor of 2.22 at the center. This factor is increased by only about 4% when placing 8 + 8 funnels, so we construct our shell with the simpler case of 5 + 5 funnels.

In order to provide a more feasible realization, we have not included any superconducting funnel. The finite-element simulations show that if 5 + 5 ideal superconducting funnels were added alternated with the ferromagnetic ones, then the concentration ratio would be increased to 3.33. However, the use of superconductors would require complex cryogenics, whereas our device operates at room temperature under normal conditions.

Experimental results

We first fed a pair of Helmholtz coils with a dc current I = 0.5 A to provide a uniform magnetic field in the z direction, B0 = 0.41 ± 0.01 mT. We place the spherical shell between the coils to measure the Inline graphic-component of B along the z-axis with a Hall probe [Fig. 3a]. The measured field concentration ratio Inline graphic at the center (z = 0) of the spherical shell is approximately 2.12; the field is rather uniform in the concentration region except in the zones close to the funnels. Results are in agreement with the finite-element simulations (blue line in Fig. 3a), taking into account that the funnels are not perfectly cut and positioned in the setup.

Figure 3. Experimental results for an applied dc field.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Measurements (red circles) and finite-elements simulations (blue lines) of the z component of the magnetic induction B along the z-axis when placing the spherical shell in (a) a uniform field created by a pair of Helmholtz coils and (b) a non-uniform field created by a single coil. Measured (black triangles) and analytic (green lines) values of the applied fields Bz are also depicted. The shadowed regions indicate the shell hole. In the experimental data, errors bars fit within the symbol size.

Since the discretization of the metamaterial shell is optimized to concentrate the field coming from a given direction (its axis), it is interesting to explore the concentrated fields when applying a uniform field in other directions. In the Supplementary Figure S2a we show the experimentally measured angle of the field concentrated at the center of the spherical shell, Inline graphic, as a function of the angle of the applied field, Inline graphic. It can be observed that Inline graphic is always lower than Inline graphic, so that B at the center tends to bend towards the z direction, because the discretization is designed to concentrate fields in this direction (θ = 0). This is illustrated in Supplementary Figure S2b, where the measured Bz is shown to be amplified by the shell the same factor for all angles, whereas Bx is not only not amplified by the shell, but reduced.

We next experimentally study the concentration effect for non-uniform fields, for which we connect only one of the Helmholtz coils. Following the same procedure and feeding a steady current of 0.5 A in the coil, we measure Bz along the z direction with and without the concentrating shell [Fig. 3b]. Good agreement between experiments and finite-element calculations is found also in this case. Bz decreases linearly in the hole region. The experimental enhancement of Bz right at the center is approximately $C$ = 2.12. We observe that not only the field but its gradient in the hole is enhanced as well.

Our metamaterial shells maintain the field concentration properties also when the applied field is sinusoidally varying with time. In Fig. 4a we show the measured rms amplitude of Bz along the z axis when a sinusoidal current Inline graphic is fed in the Helmholtz coils (I0 = 10 mA rms and the frequency Inline graphic is 200 Hz; the field generated at the center is 7.43 μT rms). The overall pattern is very similar to the dc results (Fig. 3a). Actually, the measured concentration ratio C at the center is basically constant with varying frequency for 5 orders of magnitude (from 1 Hz to 100 kHz), as shown in Fig. 4b. Interestingly, besides concentrating the field, the shell is not modifying the phase of the applied field, as shown in Supplementary Figure S3, except for frequencies larger than 10 kHz, at which ohmic losses probably develop because of the conductivity of the funnels. Similarly as previous experimental results35,44,45,46,47, we confirm the validity of our magnetic metamaterial, originally derived for the dc case, in the quasistatic region of low frequency electromagnetic waves.

Figure 4. Experimental results for an applied ac field.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Measurements (red circles) of the z-component of the magnetic induction B (rms value) along the z-axis when placing the spherical shell in a uniform field created by a pair of Helmholtz coils excited by a sinusoidal current at at frequency f = 200 Hz. Measured (black triangles) and analytic (green lines) values of the applied field Bz are also depicted. The shadowed region indicates the shell hole. (b) Concentration ratio at the center of the shell Inline graphic as a function of the frequency f.

Discussion

We have presented the theory and a proof-of-concept demonstration of a general way to increase the sensitivity of a magnetic sensor by surrounding it with a spherical shell that concentrates the magnetic field in the vicinity of the sensor. The practical realization is only one among many different implementations that can be made. The particular realization studied in this work is chosen for its practical feasibility. After an adequate optimization process, the scale of our metamaterial could be reduced and the concentration factor could be largely increased, for example, by decreasing the inner radius of the shell [Eq. (5)], something feasible taken into account the very small size of many current magnetic sensors.

Many of the most important applications of magnetic sensors involve detecting tiny magnetic fields, in fields like biomedecine, oil prospection, space exploration or geomagnetism16,17,18,19. In this limit of very small fields, our assumption that soft ferromagnetic materials have a linear non-hysteretic behavior should be well fulfilled, so our ideas can be readily applied. When concentrating larger fields, non-linear and hysteretic effects in the ferromagnetic parts should be taken into account.

Our proof-of-concept realization involves only ferromagnetic parts arranged in a particular discretization. Numerical simulations show that the addition of alternated superconducting parts would increase the concentration efficiency, at the cost of requiring cryogenics to cool the superconductors below their critical temperature. Actually, in setups involving SQUID sensors, for example, the same cryogenic environment used for the sensors could be used for cooling the concentration shells.

We have experimentally realized a discretization that involves a preferential direction of the applied field. Other concentrators that preserve the spherical symmetry could be realized (e. g. with ferromagnetic spires radially aligned); they would be able to enhance an applied field coming from an arbitrary direction.

In summary, we have theoretically predicted and experimentally demonstrated that the magnetic field in the sensor area is enhanced by our metamaterial shell and that, when the applied field is non-uniform, field gradient is increased as well. The field enhancement is maintained for time-dependent fields upto a frequency of 100 kHz. We thus conclude that magnetic metamaterials can represent a new paradigm for increasing the sensitivity of many kinds of magnetic sensors.

Methods

For the concentrating spherical shell we build a system consisting of 5 concentric and equidistant funnels (on each side), supported with a non-magnetic material which has openings along the z and x directions, to emulate a spherical shell with inner and outer radii R1 = 30 mm and R2 = 90 mm, respectively (see Fig. 2). Each funnel is made from nickel alloy foil (mu-metal) 0.1 mm thick. Its relative permeability is nominally 8 × 104 at a field of 4 mT, with very low anisotropy, and its resistivity is around 50 μΩ·cm.

The discretized sphere is placed equidistantly between a pair of Helmholtz coils, which provide a uniform field in the sphere region. The coils have a self-inductance of 18.1 mH and a series parasitic resistance of 2.4 Ω. The sphere is supported with a structure made of non-magnetic material.

For the dc measurements, an adjustable dc current is supplied in the coils (only one coil is energized in the non-uniform field measurements). Static dc field measurements are performed by a Hall probe Arepoc.

For the ac measurements, an ac signal at a fixed frequency (from 1 Hz to 100 kHz) is applied to the Helmholtz coils. The field is measured by the voltage induced in a hand-made coil with 110 turns and an average area of 1.61 × 10−5 m2. The voltage is measured with a Signal Recovery 7265 DSP Lock-In Amplifier and later converted through the following equation,

graphic file with name srep44762-m38.jpg

where Inline graphic is the coil measured voltage, ω is the angular frequency, N is the number of turns, S is the average area and k is a conversion variable that depends on the operating frequency.

Finite-elements calculations are performed using the AC/DC module of the Comsol Multiphysics software. The value of the relative permeability used for funnels simulating the experiments is 8 × 104, and we have assumed the material isotropic.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Navau, C. et al. Enhancing the sensitivity of magnetic sensors by 3D metamaterial shells. Sci. Rep. 7, 44762; doi: 10.1038/srep44762 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figures and Discussions
srep44762-s1.pdf (469.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank projects MAT2016-79426-P (Agencia Estatal de Investigación/Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional) and 2014-SGR-150 for financial support. A.S. acknowledges a grant from ICREA Academia, funded by the Generalitat de Catalunya.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions All authors developed the theory, conceived the experiments, and discussed the results. A.P., J.P.-C., and S.L. designed and performed the experiments. A.S. drafted the paper and all authors contributed to the writing.

References

  1. Lenz J. & Edelstein A. S. Magnetic Sensors and Their Applications. IEEE Sensors Journal, 6, 631 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  2. Ripka P. & Janosek M. Advances in Magnetic Field Sensors IEEE Sensors Journal 10, 1108 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  3. Díaz-Michelena M. Small Magnetic Sensors for Space Applications. Sensors 9, 2271 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Popovic R. S. Hall Effect Devices, (London, Institute of Physics, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  5. Ripka P. Advances in fluxgate sensors. Sensors and Actuators A 106, 8 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  6. McGuire T. R. Anisotropic magnetoresistance in ferromagnetic 3d alloys. IEEE Trans. Magn. 11, 1018 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  7. Freitas P. P. et al. Spin valve sensors. Sensors and Actuators A 81, 2 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  8. Moodera J. S., Kinder L. R., Wong T. M. & Meservey R. Large magnetoresistance at room temperature in ferromagnetic thin film tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3273 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drung D. et al. Highly Sensitive and Easy-to-Use SQUID Sensors. IEEE Trans. on Appl. Supercond. 17, 699 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  10. Schirhagl R., Chang K., Lorentz M. & Degen C. L. Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond: Nanoscale Sensors for Physics and Biology. Annual Reviews in Physical Chemistry 65, 83 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Leroy P. et al. Use of magnetic concentrators to highly improve the sensitivity of Hall effect sensors. Sensor Lett. 5, 162 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  12. Leroy P. et al. An ac/dc magnetometer for space missions: Improvement of a Hall sensor by the magnetic flux concentration of the magnetic core of a searchcoil. Sens. Act. A 142, 503 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  13. Arif O. et al. Magnetic-field dependence of the noise in a magnetoresistive sensor having MEMS flux concentrators. IEEE Trans. Magn. 42, 3306 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang W. & Zhenye J. Thermally modulated flux concentrator for minimizing noise in magnetoresistance-based field sensors. IEEE Trans. Magn. 44, 4003 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  15. Pannetier-Lecoeur M. et al. RF response of superconducting-GMR mixed sensors, application to NQR. IEEE Trans. Appl. Superc. 2, 598 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  16. Robbes D. et al. Highly Sensitive Uncooled Magnetometers: State of the Art. Superconducting Magnetic Hybrid Magnetometers, an alternative to SQUIDS? IEEE Trans. on Appl. Supercond. 11, 629 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  17. Robbes D. Highly sensitive magnetometer—a review. Sensors and Actuators A 129, 86 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  18. Pizzella V., Della Penna S., Del Gratta C. & Romani G. L. SQUID systems for biomagnetic imaging. Supercond. Sci. and Techn. 14, R79 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  19. Korber R. et al. SQUIDs in biomagnetism: a roadmap towards improved healthcare. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29, 113001 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  20. Del Gratta C., Pizzella V., Tecchio F. & Romani G. L. Magnetoencephalography - a noninvasive brain imaging method with 1 ms time resolution. Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 1759 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  21. McDermott R. et al. Liquid-state NMR and scalar couplings in microtesla magnetic fields. Science 295, 2247 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pendry J. B., Schurig D. & Smith D. R. Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science 312, 1780 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cui T. J., Smith D. R. & Liu R. Metamaterials: Theory, Design and Applications(New York: Springer, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  24. Zheludev N. I. & Kivshar Y. S. From metamaterials to metadevices. Nature Materials 11, 917 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wood B. & Pendry J. B. Metamaterials at zero frequency. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19, 076208 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Magnus F. et al. A d.c. magnetic metamaterial. Nat. Mater. 7, 295 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sanchez A., Navau C., Prat-Camps J. & Chen D.-X. Antimagnets: controlling magnetic fields with superconductor–metamaterial hybrids. New J. Phys. 13, 093034 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  28. Narayana S. & Sato Y. DC Magnetic Cloak. Adv. Mat. 24, 71 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gomory F. et al. Experimental realization of a magnetic cloak. Science 335, 1466 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Navau C., Prat-Camps J. & Sanchez A. Magnetic Energy Harvesting and Concentration at a Distance by Transformation Optics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 263903 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun F. & He S. Static magnetic field concentration and enhancement using magnetic materials with positive permeability. Progress In Electromagnetics Research 142, 579 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  32. Jung P., Ustinov A. V. & Anlage S. M. Progress in superconducting metamaterials. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, 073001 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  33. Navau C., Prat-Camps J., Romero-Isart O., Cirac J. I. & Sanchez A. Long-Distance Transfer and Routing of Static Magnetic Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 253901 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Prat-Camps J., Navau C. & Sanchez A. A magnetic wormhole. Sci. Rep. 5, 12488 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhu J. et al. Three-dimensional magnetic cloak working from dc to 250 kHz. Nat. Commun. 6, 8931 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rahm M. et al. Design of electromagnetic cloaks and concentrators using form-invariant coordinate transformations of Maxwell’s equations. Photon. Nanostruct.: Fundam. Applic. 6, 87 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  37. Pendry J. B., Holden A. J., Robbins D. J. & Stewart W. J. Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 47, 2075 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  38. Guenneau S., Amra C. & Veynante D. Transformation thermodynamics: cloaking and concentrating heat flux. Optics Express 20, 8207 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Narayana S. & Sato Y. Heat Flux Manipulation with Engineered Thermal Materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 214303 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang J., Huang M., Yang C. & Cai G. A Metamaterial Acoustic Concentrator With Regular Polygonal Cross Section J. Vib. Acoust 133, 061016 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen Y., Liu H., Reilly M., Bae H. & Yu M. Enhanced acoustic sensing through wave compression and pressure amplification in anisotropic metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 5, 5247 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Prat-Camps J., Navau C. & Sanchez A. Experimental realization of magnetic energy concentration and transmission at a distance by metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 234101 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  43. Foley C. P. ‘Geophysical applications of SQUIDs’, In 100 years of Superconductivity, ed. by Rogalla H. & Kes P. H. (CRC Press, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  44. Prat-Camps J., Navau C. & Sanchez A. Quasistatic Metamaterials: Magnetic Coupling Enhancement by Effective Space Cancellation. Adv. Mater. 28, 4898 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Souc J., Solovyov M., Gömöry F., Prat-Camps J., Navau C. & Sanchez A. A quasistatic magnetic cloak. New J. Phys. 15, 53019 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Solovyov M., Šouc J. & Gömöry F. Magnetic cloak for low frequency AC magnetic field. IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconduct. 25, 1 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  47. Jiang W., Ma Y., Zhu J., Yin G., Liu Y., Yuan J. & He S. Room-temperature broadband quasistatic magnetic cloak. NPG Asia Materials 9 e341 (2017). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures and Discussions
srep44762-s1.pdf (469.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES