Skip to main content
Brain logoLink to Brain
. 2016 Oct 27;140(1):171–183. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww263

Energy expenditure in frontotemporal dementia: a behavioural and imaging study

Rebekah M Ahmed 1,2,3,4,, Ramon Landin-Romero 1,2,3, Tinh-Hai Collet 5, Agatha A van der Klaauw 5, Emma Devenney 1,2,3,4, Elana Henning 5, Matthew C Kiernan 4, Olivier Piguet 1,2,3, I Sadaf Farooqi 5, John R Hodges 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC5379863  PMID: 27789521

See Finger (doi:10.1093/aww312) for a scientific commentary on this article.

Behavioural variant FTD is associated with changes in eating behaviour. Ahmed et al. report changes in heart rate and energy expenditure suggestive of hypermetabolism. The alterations correlate with atrophy of a network involving the limbic system, extending knowledge of the disease beyond cognition and aiding its physiological phenotyping.

Keywords: frontotemporal dementia, metabolism, heart rate, physiology, autonomic function

Abstract

See Finger (doi:10.1093/aww312) for a scientific commentary on this article.

Abnormal eating behaviour and metabolic parameters including insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia and body mass index are increasingly recognized as important components of neurodegenerative disease and may contribute to survival. It has previously been established that behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia is associated with abnormal eating behaviour characterized by increased sweet preference. In this study, it was hypothesized that behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia might also be associated with altered energy expenditure. A cohort of 19 patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, 13 with Alzheimer’s disease and 16 (age- and sex-matched) healthy control subjects were studied using Actiheart devices (CamNtech) to assess resting and stressed heart rate. Actiheart devices were fitted for 7 days to measure sleeping heart rate, activity levels, and resting, active and total energy expenditure. Using high resolution structural magnetic resonance imaging the neural correlates of increased resting heart rate were investigated including cortical thickness and region of interest analyses. In behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, resting (P = 0.001), stressed (P = 0.037) and sleeping heart rate (P = 0.038) were increased compared to control subjects, and resting heart rate (P = 0.020) compared to Alzheimer disease patients. Behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia was associated with decreased activity levels compared to controls (P = 0.002) and increased resting energy expenditure (P = 0.045) and total energy expenditure (P = 0.035). Increased resting heart rate correlated with behavioural (Cambridge Behavioural Inventory) and cognitive measures (Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination). Increased resting heart rate in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia correlated with atrophy involving the mesial temporal cortex, insula, and amygdala, regions previously suggested to be involved exclusively in social and emotion processing in frontotemporal dementia. These neural correlates overlap the network involved in eating behaviour in frontotemporal dementia, suggesting a complex interaction between eating behaviour, autonomic function and energy homeostasis. As such the present study suggests that increased heart rate and autonomic changes are prevalent in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, and are associated with changes in energy expenditure. An understanding of these changes and neural correlates may have potential relevance to disease progression and prognosis.

Introduction

Traditionally frontotemporal dementia (FTD) has been viewed as a syndrome characterized by behavioural and cognitive changes, although increasingly it is being recognized that there is involvement of networks that affect physiological processing including somatosensory processing including pain and temperature (Fletcher et al., 2015a, b), autonomic processing (Ahmed et al., 2015a; Guo et al., 2016), and neuroendocrine and metabolic changes (Ahmed et al., 2014b, 2015b). In behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), eating behavioural changes are common, including hyperphagia, increased sweet preference and changes in food preference that may be associated with increased body mass index (BMI), dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance (Ahmed et al., 2014b).

In several neurodegenerative diseases it is established that there are changes in metabolic parameters. One such condition is amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which shares a clinical and pathological overlap with FTD and where consistent changes have been found (Ahmed et al., 2016b), including increased resting energy expenditure in up to 50% of patients (Bouteloup et al., 2009; Vaisman et al., 2009). It has also been suggested that the hypermetabolic state (defined as increased energy expenditure) is intrinsically linked to the process of neurodegeneration with several animal models of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43, encoded by TARDBP) and the C9orf72 gene expansion exhibiting hypermetabolism and weight loss (Dupuis et al., 2004; Chiang et al., 2010; Shan et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2010; Koppers et al., 2015).

Given the significant overlap between FTD and ALS at a clinical, pathological and genetic level, it seems plausible that changes in energy expenditure may also be present in FTD (Ahmed et al., 2016b). In addition, the changes in appetite appear to exceed the minor increments in BMI and weight gain seen in bvFTD, suggesting increased energy expenditure may also contribute to the body weight changes seen in patients (Woolley et al., 2007; Ahmed et al., 2014a). This is also suggested by the fact that in studies measuring caloric intake in FTD, BMI does not correlate with caloric intake (Ahmed et al., 2016a). Energy expenditure, which includes basal metabolic rate (amount of energy expended at rest) and active energy expenditure (a combination of activity levels and heart rate), has not been investigated in bvFTD. Intrinsically linked with energy expenditure are potential alterations in autonomic activity including heart rate, heart rate variability, and sympathetic and parasympathetic drive (Messina et al., 2013). Changes in the autonomic nervous system, particularly in the sympathetic nervous system have also been proposed to affect glucose and fat metabolism (Nonogaki, 2000; Penicaud et al., 2000). Increases in heart rate have been found to predict an increase in metabolic rate and energy expenditure, via an increase in circulatory rate and oxygen consumption (Berggren and Hohwu Christensen, 1950).

Measurement of energy expenditure in free-living individuals is challenging. In this study, we used digital heart rate/activity monitoring (Brage et al., 2004, 2005; Crouter et al., 2008) to examine changes in heart rate (rest, stressed and sleep), activity levels and energy expenditure and the potential correlations that this has to autonomic function in a large group of bvFTD patients, compared to a disease comparison group (Alzheimer’s disease) and healthy control subjects. This approach has been used previously in genetic obesity research but not in patients with neurodegeneration (Pearce et al., 2013). The potential neurobiological underpinnings of increases in heart rate were further examined using structural MRI to provide insight into the neural correlates controlling energy expenditure and autonomic function in FTD.

Materials and methods

Participants

Thirty-two patients with dementia (19 bvFTD, 13 Alzheimer’s disease) were recruited from Forefront, Neuroscience Research Australia. These individuals were compared with 16 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. All patients underwent neurological review, cognitive assessment and met current clinical diagnostic criteria for probable bvFTD or Alzheimer’s disease (McKhann et al., 2001, 2011; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011; Rascovsky et al., 2011). Disease severity was established using the Frontal Rating Scale (FRS) (Mioshi et al., 2010). Controls were recruited from the Neuroscience Research Australia Volunteer database. Healthy controls scored >88/100 on the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (Hsieh et al., 2013) and 0 on the sum of boxes score of the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (Morris, 1993). Exclusion criteria for patients and controls included concurrent psychiatric disturbance, other neurodegenerative conditions or neurological disorders and/or history of substance abuse.

Patient medical history and medications

Patients medical records and list of medications were obtained from their general practitioner. Given that the study measured heart rate variations, patients with a known cardiac rhythm disorder e.g. atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia or conduction delays were excluded from the study (one bvFTD and one Alzheimer’s disease patient). Patients, their carers and control subjects were asked about their current smoking status and alcohol intake.

Ethics

This study was approved by the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District and the University of New South Wales human ethics committees. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant and/or their primary caregiver.

Physiological measurements: Actiheart device

Participants were fitted with the Actiheart device (CamNtech), a compact device designed to quantify heart rate, activity and energy expenditure (Brage et al., 2004, 2005; Crouter et al., 2008). The Actiheart has two clips, which are attached directly to standard ECG electrodes. One electrode was attached to V1 on the chest (fourth right intercostal space) and the second electrode was placed 10 cm away on the left mid-clavicular line. The number of R waves detected is recorded at 15-s epochs and from this the heart rate is derived. An internal triaxial accelerometer senses the frequency and intensity of the participant’s torso movements including walking and pacing, from which activity counts are derived. When placed in short-term mode, the Actiheart measures heart rate variability, heart rate and interbeat interval (IBI) of the heart rate, with an epoch length of 15 s. Long term recordings in long-term mode provide mean heart rate and activity levels over an epoch of 15 s and recordings can be made for up to 11 days (Brage et al., 2004, 2005; Crouter et al., 2008).

Measurement of heart rate

To measure resting and stressed heart rate, participants wore the Actiheart in short-term recording mode for a period of 6 h following a standard protocol, described briefly. After arriving fasted (10 h) and an initial period of introduction patients were given a set breakfast that measured caloric intake (Ahmed et al., 2016a). No caffeine or tea was included in this breakfast to avoid their chronotropic effects. Participants were then asked to rest in a lounge environment and their resting heart rate was obtained over a period of 30 min. Following this, participants were taken into a room and took part in 2 h of cognitive testing. The initial 30 min of this period was taken as the stressed heart rate. Resting and stressed heart rates and measures of autonomic function were obtained after entering the beat-to-beat RR interval data obtained by the Actiheart into Kubios HRV, an advanced and easy to use software for heart rate variability (HRV) analysis (Tarvainen et al., 2014). The following measurements were obtained: the root mean squared of successive differences (RMSSD), which is a measure of vagal control of the heart (DeGiorgio et al., 2010); the low frequency (LF), which corresponds to the 0.10 Hz slow fluctuations of arterial pressure and reflects sympathetic and parasympathetic tone; the high frequency (HF), which corresponds to ∼0.25 Hz fluctuations and is a measure of respiratory sinus arrhythmias and can be considered an index of vagal modulation; and the LF/HF ratio, which is used to indicate balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic tone.

Long-term Actiheart recordings

Following the short term analyses, participants were fitted with the Actiheart in long-term mode and asked to wear this at home for 7 days to provide continuous heart rate and activity monitoring. The participants wore the device continuously and were allowed to shower with the device. Carers were given instructions to refit the device if it became loose or was removed. From the long-term recording, sleeping heart rate and activity counts were calculated.

Measurement of sleeping heart rate

Sleeping heart rate was calculated over a period of one night. For each participant, the one night was selected from the 7-day long-term recording, where a period of recording of uninterrupted sleep was obtained, between midnight and 5 am, where no activity was detected. From this period, the average sleeping heart rate, minimum and maximum heart rate was calculated for each participant. Investigators were blinded to the patient ID and diagnoses for this selection.

Measurement of activity over 24 h

An average activity count over 24 h was calculated for each participant. This was obtained by selecting a 24-h period in the 7-day long-term recording where continuous recording was available for each patient. This was found to be Day 2 in each patient as the Actiheart had been firmly attached and had not been removed, which tended to occur as the long-term recording proceeded. The average activity counts for each patient over these 24 h was obtained and expressed as an activity count per 24 h. Significance levels between group means were examined after correcting for age and sex.

Measurement of energy expenditure

The Actiheart measures heart rate and activity simultaneously and these data are transferred to the Actiheart software, which uses a validated branched model equation (Brage et al., 2004, 2005) to derive active energy expenditure for each epoch using a combination of heart rate and activity. Using the branched model equation, group Cal JAP2007 (CamNtech) measures of daily energy expenditure were calculated for each participant every day for 7 days and an average over this period obtained. The following measures were obtained: Active Energy Expenditure (AEE) derived from the branched model equation, which includes a combination of heart rate and activity measures; resting energy expenditure (REE) derived from the Schofield equation, designed to measure basal metabolic rate adjusted for weight (Schofield, 1985); dietary induced thermogenesis (DIT) estimated as 10% of total energy expenditure (TEE). Total energy expenditure (TEE) = REE + AEE + DIT; physical activity level (PAL) = TEE/REE.

Behavioural measurements

In addition to measurements of heart rate variability, activity and energy expenditure, changes in eating behaviour were measured using caregiver-based questionnaires: the Appetite and Eating Habits Questionnaire (APEHQ) (Ikeda et al., 2002; Ahmed et al., 2014a) and the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory (CBI) (Bozeat et al., 2000). These surveys were completed on the same day that the short-term recordings were obtained and were felt to be representative of intake over the proceeding 7 days when the long-term recordings were obtained. The APEHQ provides measures of nicotine and alcohol consumption. Height and weight were measured barefoot and BMI calculated (weight in kilograms/height in metres squared).

Imaging

MRI acquisition and preprocessing

All participants underwent whole-brain structural MRI with a 3 T Phillips scanner using a standard 8-channel head coil. 3D high-resolution turbo field echo T1-weighted sequences were acquired with the following parameters: coronal orientation, matrix 256 × 256, 200 slices, 1 mm2 in-plane resolution, slice thickness 1 mm, echo time/repetition time 2.6/5.8 ms, flip angle α = 8°. MRI scans were obtained on the same day as the physiological and behavioural assessment.

Before analyses, the two T1 volumes were merged and averaged to increase the signal-to-noise ratio and the grey matter–white matter contrasts in brain structures. FreeSurfer software, version 5.3.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) was used for surface-based cortical processing (Dale et al., 1999; Fischl et al., 1999) using standard methods (Fischl and Dale, 2000). Cortical thickness was smoothed with a 20 mm full-width at half-height Gaussian kernel. This level of blurring kernel was chosen to reduce the impact of imperfect alignment between cortices and thereby improve the signal-to-noise ratio (Lerch and Evans, 2005).

In addition, the following subcortical structures were automatically segmented and extracted for both hemispheres: thalamus, caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, hippocampus, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens. For these subcortical structures, measurements from both hemispheres were averaged and adjusted for total intracranial volume, in line with previous methodology (Voevodskaya et al., 2014).

All the resulting images were visually inspected and manually corrected in the event of tissue segmentation errors. One patient with bvFTD and two healthy controls were excluded due to excessive surface or subcortical segmentation errors. Thus, 18 bvFTD, 13 Alzheimer’s disease and 14 healthy controls were included in the imaging analyses.

Statistical analyses

Demographic and physiological variables

Analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS statistics (version 21.0). Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were run to determine suitability of variables for parametric analyses. ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc tests, were used to determine group differences in demographic and clinical variables (age, ACE-III). Categorical variables were analysed using chi-square analyses. Independent t-tests were used to determine differences between bvFTD and Alzheimer’s disease for disease duration, abnormal behaviour (total CBI, CBI behavioural) and eating behaviour (APEHQ, CBI eating, and BMI) (P ≤ 0.05 regarded as significant). Measurements of heart rate (resting and stressed), autonomic function (resting and stressed LF, HF, RMSSD after log transformation), activity counts and energy measures (REE, AEE, DIT, PAL) were also explored using ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc tests. The relationship between resting heart rate and disease duration, BMI, eating behaviour (APEHQ total score) cognitive status (ACE-III) and behavioural measures (CBI total, eating and behavioural) were further explored using Pearson rank correlations corrected for multiple comparisons (P ≤ 0.01 regarded as significant).

Imaging data analyses

For cortical thickness, sets of vertex-by-vertex analyses were performed using general linear models aimed to examine differences in cortical thickness between groups and then to estimate the neural correlates for the physiological variables where bvFTD showed significant differences with both Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls (resting heart rate and stressed heart rare). In the first set of analyses, overall cortical thickness of both hemispheres was modelled including cortical thickness as a dependent variable and group (bvFTD, Alzheimer’s disease, healthy controls) as an independent variable. In the second set of analyses, we created separate linear models, one for each physiological variable under examination. Each model included the following repressors: group (bvFTD, Alzheimer’s disease, healthy controls), the physiological variable (resting heart rate, stressed heart rare) and the interaction between group and the physiological variable. To determine physiological associations with cortical thickness specific to diagnostic group, we focused on the interaction effect between each diagnosis and each physiological variable. Correlations between physiological variables and cortical thickness were investigated first by combining all participants (behavioural variant FTD, Alzheimer’s disease, controls) and then in each patient group combined with controls, to identify neural correlates of resting and stressed heart rate to each patient group. As the groups were matched at baseline for age, sex and duration of disease, no covariates were included in the models. Statistical significance was set at P = 0.001 uncorrected for multiple comparisons. In addition, we used a conservative cluster extent threshold of k > 50 mm2. This approach is designed to minimize type I error while balancing the risk of type II error (Lieberman and Cunningham, 2009).

For the subcortical regions, group comparisons of subcortical volumes between bvFTD, Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls were performed using ANOVA. Post hoc analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons using a Sidak adjustment. Next, to uncover the subcortical grey matter correlates of resting heart rate and stressed heart rate, correlations were investigated using the same approach outlined above. Pearson two-tailed correlational analyses were conducted with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (P < ∝/k = 0.007).

Region of interest analyses

In addition to the whole-brain analyses, a set of cortical regions of interest were selected and computed and averaged from the regional parcellations provided by FreeSurfer for both hemispheres. These regions were selected according to previous findings in the literature examining associations between autonomic function (e.g. pain and temperature and heart rate) and brain regions in bvFTD and Alzheimer’s disease and normal control subjects (Critchley et al., 2003; Jones, 2011; Fletcher et al., 2015a). The regions selected included the prefrontal, mesial temporal and anterior cingulate cortices, and the insula. Details on the computation of these measurements can be found in Supplementary Table 1. Pearson two-tailed correlations were used to examine associations between these regions of interest and the resting and stressed heart rate. These analyses were Bonferroni corrected to control for multiple comparisons (P < ∝/k = 0.0125).

Results

Participants groups were representative of the diseases studied and did not differ in sex distribution, age or disease duration (Table 1, all P-values > 0.365). Group differences were observed on measures of cognition (ACE-III), behavioural measures and eating behaviour (Table 1) and were in keeping with the known behaviour of the diagnostic groups. On the ACE-III as expected the patient groups scored lower than controls (P < 0.001). The bvFTD group was more functionally impaired relative to Alzheimer’s disease (FRS; t = 3.3, P = 0.03). The bvFTD group, as expected, scored higher than the Alzheimer’s disease group on the total CBI score (t = 3.6, P = 0.001), and CBI behavioural score (t = 4.1, P < 0.001).

Table 1.

Demographics and clinical characteristics in bvFTD, Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls

bvFTD AD HC F value P-value Post hoc
(n = 19) (n = 13) (n = 16)
Sex (F:M) 8:11 7:6 6:10 0.83b ns -
Age (years) 62 ± 6.7 66 ± 8.2 65 ± 7.7 1.1 ns -
BMI (kg/m2) 31.0 ± 6.9 23.6 ± 3.1 27.2 ± 5.9 9.6 P < 0.001 bvFTD > AD, HC
ACE-III, total (max 100) 67.1 ± 20.7 64.3 ± 11.2 95.1 ± 1.9 21.6 P < 0.001 HC > patients
Disease duration (years) 3.5 ± 1.9 4.7 ± 4.5 - 0.972c ns -
FRS Rasch scorea −1.7 ± 1.2 −0.02 ± 1.4 - 17.7c P < 0.01 bvFTD < AD
APEHQ, total 68.9 ± 38.6 15.1 ± 20.2 - 4.1c P < 0.001 bvFTD > AD
CBI, total 86.3 ± 24.7 51.3 ± 27.3 - 3.6c P < 0.01 bvFTD > AD
CBI eating, total 9.3 ± 3.8 3.2 ± 4.5 - 4.1c P < 0.001 bvFTD > AD
Treatment with cholinesterase inhibitor (n) 2 9 0 22.2b P < 0.001 AD > bvFTD and HC
Treatment with chronotropic medication (n) 2 1 1 0.21b ns -
Current smokers (n) 2 0 2 1.7b ns -
Alcohol consumption (n) 8 5 10 2.1b ns -

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. AD = Alzheimer’s disease; HC = healthy controls; ACE-III = Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III; FRS = Frontotemporal dementia Rating Scale; APEHQ = Appetite and Eating Habits Questionnaire; CBI = Cambridge Behavioural Inventory; ns = not significant.

aThe FRS provides logit scores ranging from 4.12 (very mild) to −4.99 (very severe).

bChi-square test.

ct-value.

n = number of patients reporting alcohol consumption and regular smokers. All alcohol consumption was within normal guidelines (see text).

Medications, smoking and alcohol intake

A higher number of Alzheimer’s disease patients were on cholinesterase inhibitors (nine patients) compared to the bvFTD (two patients) and control (no patient) groups. There was no difference in the number of patients treated with a medication likely to affect heart rate and cardiac conduction (e.g. beta blocker, calcium channel blocker) between the groups. One bvFTD patient was on stable and adequate thyroxine treatment. Two bvFTD patients and two control subjects were current smokers. The carers of eight bvFTD patients reported alcohol consumption, less than weekly in four and several times per week in four. Ten control subjects reported alcohol consumption, four less than weekly and six several times a week. Five Alzheimer’s disease patients reported regular alcohol intake, two several times a week and three less than weekly. No patient or control participant stated that they consumed more alcohol than the recommended amount by the Australian National Health and Medical research council.

Eating behaviour and body mass index

On both the APEHQ and CBI eating score the bvFTD group showed more severe eating disturbance based on caregiver surveys compared with Alzheimer’s disease patients (t = 4.1, P < 0.001). The bvFTD group had an increased BMI (Supplementary Fig. 2) compared to the Alzheimer’s disease (P = 0.001) and control groups (P = 0.008) (Table 1).

Heart rate and autonomic function

Significant group differences were present for both resting (F = 8.6, P = 0.001) and stressed (F = 3.2, P = 0.047) heart rate measures. The bvFTD group (mean = 81.8 bpm) had an increased resting heart rate compared to both the control (mean = 68.5 bpm, P = 0.001) and Alzheimer’s disease groups (mean = 72.5 bpm, P = 0.020) and an increased stressed heart rate compared to the control group (bvFTD = 81.5 bpm, Alzheimer’s disease = 76.1 bpm, controls = 71.9 bpm; P = 0.037) (Fig. 1). On measures of autonomic function (Table 2), no significant group differences were detected; however, a trend for the bvFTD group to have a decreased RMSSD value, in both resting (P = 0.076) and stressed states (P = 0.063), was present .

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Resting and stressed heart rate in bvFTD, Alzheimer’s disease and healthy control subjects. *bvFTD > Alzheimer’s disease (P = 0.028); **bvFTD > Controls (P = 0.037); ***bvFTD > Controls (P = 0.001). AD = Alzheimer’s disease.

Table 2.

Measures of heart rate variability and autonomic function

bvFTD AD HC F-value P-value
(n = 19) (n = 13) (n = 16)
Resting LF 0.06 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.02 0.06 ± 0.01 0.38 ns
Resting HF 0.20 ± 0.08 0.20 ± 0.07 0.26 ± 0.07 2.6 ns
Resting RMSSD 21.7 ± 11.1 29.2 ± 18.6 41.7 ± 35.1 2.7 ns
Stressed LF 0.08 ± 0.10 0.07 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.03 0.10 ns
Stressed HF 0.21 ± 0.07 0.22 ± 0.09 0.22 ± 0.07 0.08 ns
Stressed RMSSD 23.3 ± 15.3 31.6 ± 17.9 41.7 ± 31.9 2.9 ns
Rested LF/HF 0.34 ± 0.10 0.35 ± 0.20 0.29 ± 0.14 1.7 ns
Stressed LF/HF 0.48 ± 0.65 0.38 ± 0.17 0.37 ± 0.15 1.8 ns

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses performed on Log transformed values. AD = Alzheimer’s disease; HC = healthy controls; LF = low frequency; HF = high frequency; RMSSD = the square root of the mean squared difference of successive beat to beat intervals and a measure of vagal control of the heart.

Correlations of resting heart rate with behavioural measures

When all groups were combined, resting heart rate was positively correlated with behavioural and eating changes as reflected by the CBI total (r = 0.417, P = 0.004), CBI behavioural (r = 0.451, P = 0.001), and total CBI eating score (r = 0.307, P = 0.01), and negatively correlated with cognitive function on the ACE-III (r = −0.314, P = 0.01), functional ability on the FRS (r = −0.308, P = 0.05). As in prior studies, an increased BMI correlated with behavioural changes on the CBI total (r = 0.369, P = 0.01), CBI behavioural (r = 0.334, P = 0.01), and total CBI eating score (r = 0.397, P = 0.006), and the APEHQ (r = 0.461, P = 0.01). BMI did not correlate with resting heart rate (r = 0.206, P = 0.160).

Long-term Actiheart recordings

Long-term recordings over 7 days were obtained for 12 bvFTD, 10 Alzheimer’s disease, and 11 control participants to measure sleeping heart rate and activity levels. Several bvFTD patients refused to wear the Actiheart or disposed of it when at home. The patients in the subset analyses did not differ from the larger group in which short-term recordings and imaging correlation were conducted.

Sleeping heart rate

As with resting and stressed heart rate, significant group differences were also detected in mean sleeping heart rate (Fig. 2A) (F = 3.9, P = 0.032) with the bvFTD group (mean = 71.6 bpm) having an increased sleeping heart rate compared to the control group (mean = 61.5 bpm, P = 0.038) and a trend compared to the Alzheimer’s disease group (mean = 62.8 bpm, P = 0.085). No group differences (F = 1.4, P = 0.270) in mean minimum heart rate were detected between the bvFTD (58.9 ± 7.3 bpm), Alzheimer’s disease (54.7 ± 8.2 bpm) and control groups (55.1 ± 5.2 bpm). By contrast, the bvFTD group (100.2 ± 13.9 bpm) had an increased maximum heart rate compared to the control group (95.7 ± 14.3 bpm; F = 4.2, P = 0.025).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Long-term Actiheart results. (A) Mean sleeping heart rate. ***bvFTD > controls (P = 0.038). (B) Mean activity counts per 24 h. *Alzheimer’s disease < Controls (P = 0.05); **bvFTD < Controls (P = 0.002). AD = Alzheimer’s disease.

Activity levels

Group differences were detected on activity counts (Fig. 2B) over a 24 h period, after correcting for age and sex. Contrary to what was expected, both the bvFTD (P = 0.002) and Alzheimer’s disease groups (P = 0.05) showed significantly decreased activity counts per hour compared with the controls, suggesting that the bvFTD group has particularly reduced activity levels.

Energy expenditure

On examination of energy expenditure, group differences were present (Table 3), with the bvFTD group having an increased resting energy expenditure compared to the control (P = 0.045) and Alzheimer’s disease (P = 0.005) groups. The bvFTD group also had an increased diet-induced thermogenesis and total energy expenditure compared to the other groups. Despite the finding of decreased activity counts in bvFTD, no significant group differences in active energy expenditure were observed (calculated as a combination of heart rate and activity levels), suggesting that the decreased activity counts in bvFTD may not have affected the active energy expenditure, due to the increased heart rate seen in this group.

Table 3.

Average energy expenditure (kcal) per day in patients with bvFTD, Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls

bvFTDa ADa HCa F value P-value Post hoc
Resting energy expenditure 1656.9 ± 245.0 1356.4 ± 170.5 1442.1 ± 173.7 6.4 0.005 bvFTD > HC (P = 0.045)
bvFTD > AD (P = 0.005)
Active energy expenditure 676.9 ± 428.3 471.1 ± 278.8 525.1 ± 141.1 1.3 0.291 -
Diet-induced thermogenesis 259.2 ± 53.6 202.9 ± 43.9 218.3 ± 24.6 5.0 0.013 bvFTD > HC (P = 0.035)
bvFTD > AD (P = 0.013)
Total energy expenditure 2592.4 ± 533.9 2028.5 ± 440.9 2182 ± 246.4 5.0 0.013 bvFTD > HC (P = 0.035)
bvFTD > AD (P = 0.013)
Physical activity level 1.6 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.1 0.6 0.531 -

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. AD = Alzheimer’s disease; HC = healthy controls.

aData missing for seven patients with bvFTD, three patients with Alzheimer’s disease and five healthy control subjects.

Imaging analyses

Atrophy analyses

Group comparisons between each clinical group and controls revealed the characteristic profiles of brain atrophy previously reported as consistent with a diagnosis of bvFTD and Alzheimer’s disease. These results are presented in Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2. In brief, bvFTD patients showed atrophy in the insula and inferior frontal and anterior temporal cortices. In contrast, Alzheimer’s disease patients demonstrated widespread and bilateral atrophy involving parietal, temporal and to a lesser extent frontal regions, compared with controls. In addition, both clinical groups showed atrophy in all subcortical structures measured compared with controls, with the exception of the thalamus and the globus pallidus (Supplementary Table 2). The amount of atrophy in these structures was of similar magnitude in bvFTD and Alzheimer’s disease.

Neural correlates of resting and stressed heart rate

Unbiased whole brain analyses yielded a significant association between increasing resting heart rate and cortical thinning in the right posterior cingulate and right inferior parietal cortex when combining bvFTD and Alzheimer’s disease patients together (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Regions showing significant correlations between cortical thinning and increasing resting heart rate in bvFTD and Alzheimer’s disease in whole-brain imaging analyses. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.001 uncorrected for multiple comparisons.

In bvFTD but not in Alzheimer’s disease, increased resting heart rate was associated with volume reductions in the thalamus (r = −0.349, P = 0.05), caudate (r = −0.334, P = 0.06), putamen (r = −0.342, P = 0.05), hippocampus (r = −0.529, P = 0.002), amygdala (r = −0.353, P = 0.04) and nucleus accumbens (r = −0.446, P = 0.01), structures that are known in normal control subjects to be involved in autonomic regulation. Of these correlations, only the association between reduced hippocampal volume and increased resting heart rate survived conservative Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (Table 4).

Table 4.

Correlations between subcortical volumes and resting heart rate in patients with bvFTD and Alzheimer’s disease

Thalamus Caudate Putamen Pallidum Hippocampus Amygdala Accumbens
bvFTD −0.349a −0.334 −0.342a −0.197 −0.529b −0.352a −0.446a
AD 0.031 0.173 0.159 0.257 0.056 −0.004 0.026

Values as expressed in Pearson’s correlation coefficient scores.

aThe correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.

bThe correlation is significant at the 0.01 level. Significant correlations after correction for multiple comparisons are highlighted in bold.

AD = Alzheimer’s disease. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.007 Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons.

Also in bvFTD but not in Alzheimer’s disease, region of interest analyses uncovered significant associations between increased resting heart rate and cortical thinning in the mesial temporal cortex (r = −0.520, P = 0.002) and the insula (r = −0.490, P = 0.004). Additional correlations were also found with the prefrontal (r = −0.359, P = 0.04) and anterior cingulate cortices (r = −0.352, P = 0.04), again structures known to be integral to autonomic control, although these did not survive correction for multiple comparisons (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Significant associations between cortical thickness in preselected regions of interest and resting heart rate in bvFTD and healthy controls. No significant associations were seen in Alzheimer’s disease and controls. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.0125 Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons. HC = healthy controls.

No further significant associations were found between stressed heart rate and cortical or subcortical regions in either bvFTD or Alzheimer’s disease.

Discussion

BvFTD is characterized by an increased resting, stressed and sleeping heart rate compared to both Alzheimer’s disease and healthy control subjects. Given that changes in heart rate are indicative of changes in metabolic rate and energy expenditure (Berggren and Hohwu Christensen, 1950; Penzel et al., 2003), via the relationship between pulse rate, circulation and oxygen consumption, these changes suggest the presence of a hypermetabolic state in bvFTD. BvFTD is also characterized by increased resting energy expenditure, total energy expenditure and decreased activity levels. Changes in heart rate correlate to a neural network involving the mesial temporal cortex, insula, nucleus accumbens and cingulate.

In ALS, which overlaps clinically, pathologically and genetically with bvFTD, changes in heart rate (Chida et al., 1989) and a state of hypermetabolism (Desport et al., 2001) have also been documented, with an increased heart rate on formal autonomic function testing being found secondary to increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic input (Chida et al., 1989). In the present study, indications of decreased vagal tone and parasympathetic input in bvFTD were also present, with a trend towards decreased RMSSD, which is a measure of heart rate variability and reflects the integrity of vagus nerve-mediated control of the heart (DeGiorgio et al., 2010). There is good experimental evidence in rodents and humans that changes in autonomic tone induced directly or indirectly (for example through thyroid disorders) affect energy expenditure and peripheral metabolism (lipolysis) (Nonogaki, 2000; Penicaud et al., 2000; Messina et al., 2013). It is therefore readily plausible that changes in heart rate may alter energy expenditure in patients with FTD. However, this remains to be established in studies using indirect calorimetry, although we note these can be quite challenging in patients with complex behavioural problems.

Anecdotally, patients with bvFTD are described as being restless with pacing behaviour or alternatively, to show inertia (Piguet et al., 2009), but activity levels have not been systematically examined. It has also been suggested that bvFTD patients may not show the degree of weight gain expected in the setting of their increased eating due to hyperactivity (Woolley et al., 2007). Here, however, we have demonstrated that bvFTD patients show decreased activity levels compared with healthy controls. This decreased activity may be secondary to the increased apathy seen in this disorder, which has been related to atrophy in the right caudate, ventral striatum and cortical basal ganglia circuits (Eslinger et al., 2012), brain regions commonly affected in bvFTD.

In addition, patients with bvFTD exhibited an increased resting energy expenditure (REE), a measure of the resting metabolic rate, and total energy expenditure. The increased REE and basal metabolic state may in part be explained by the increased BMI seen in the bvFTD group, but may also be influenced by the presence of a hypermetabolic state. This finding is in keeping with results in ALS showing that ALS patients may show total energy expenditure well above their REE and activity levels and potentially secondary to hypermetabolism (Kasarskis et al., 2014).

Increased resting heart rate was also found to correlate with increasing cognitive impairment (lower ACE-III scores) and increasing behavioural impairment (higher CBI scores). Changes in neurodegeneration have been linked to alterations in energy homeostasis with animal models of ALS and FTD associated with weight loss and hypermetabolism (Dupuis et al., 2004; Chiang et al., 2010; Shan et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2010). Additional studies in patients with the language variants of FTD, particularly semantic dementia, may be informative. It is suspected that there may well be changes in energy expenditure in semantic dementia given that they have similar changes in BMI to bvFTD in the context of eating behavioural changes (Ahmed et al., 2014) and a similar pathology to ALS (TDP-43), where energy changes are prominent (Dupuis et al., 2011; Ahmed et al., 2016b).

It may be suggested that the changes seen in heart rate in bvFTD i.e. an increased resting and stressed and sleeping heart, may be secondary to environmental factors such as caffeine, nicotine or alcohol consumption. This seems unlikely given that there was no difference in reported smoking frequency and alcohol consumption between the groups, with only two bvFTD and two control subjects reported to be smokers, and similar rates of reported regular alcohol consumption, which were within recommended national guidelines. It is also unlikely that caffeine and tea intake would have affected the short-term heart rate recordings (resting and stressed heart rate) as patients attended fasted and then received a breakfast with no caffeine available. Caffeine and tea intake was not measured during the long-term measurements and this could potentially confound the long-term recordings; however, this is unlikely given that resting heart was elevated in the setting of the controlled environment of no caffeine consumption for the short-term recordings. When considering these results, it should be noted that changes in heart rate may potentially be related to decreased physical fitness associated with increasing disease severity, decreased activity secondary to apathy or loss of independence. However, as increases in heart rate did not correlate with BMI changes, this suggests that changes in heart rate are far more complex than just being related to physical fitness and likely represent a complex interaction between atrophy in key cortical areas affecting autonomic function, and energy expenditure, and are likely to be centrally rather than peripherally mediated.

Whilst medications that potentially affect heart rate may affect the results of our study, there was no significant difference in use of chronotropic drugs between the groups. Cholinesterase inhibitor treatment has been linked with bradycardia in a small proportion of patients (Hernandez et al., 2009). Despite the high number of Alzheimer’s disease patients on this medication, this is unlikely to be a confounding issue in the current study as the mean resting heart rate in the Alzheimer’s disease group was above that seen in the normal control population.

In this study, an increased resting heart rate in bvFTD was found to correlate with atrophy of the mesial temporal cortex including hippocampus, together with the amygdala, nucleus accumbens, insula and cingulate, all structures known to be integral to autonomic control of the human body and involving the limbic system, which is known to be involved in FTD (Seeley et al., 2008; Jones, 2011). In bvFTD, pathological changes in these structures have traditionally being linked to disturbance of memory and social cognition (Galton et al., 2001; Kipps et al., 2009; Kumfor et al., 2013; Irish et al., 2014). Recently, decreased cardiac vagal tone has been found in bvFTD and linked to reduced agreeableness and a network involving left-lateralized functional and structural frontoinsular and cingulate cortex deficits (Guo et al., 2016). Our findings suggest that in addition, these structures may have a fundamental role in autonomic, energy expenditure and metabolic control in bvFTD.

The anterior cingulate cortex has been shown to participate in decision-making, response selection (Devinsky et al., 1995), anticipation of reward, task reinforcement (Amiez et al., 2006; Rushworth et al., 2007) and in controlling visceromotor, endocrine and skeletomotor outputs (Vogt et al., 1992), potentially via integration of cognitive with autonomic information (Critchley et al., 2001). In healthy individuals, activity of the anterior cingulate cortex has been associated with increased BMI (Volkow et al., 2009), suggesting a role for this structure in regulating eating and metabolism. It has also been shown that the anterior cingulate cortex is related to sympathetic modulation of heart rate dissociable from cognitive and motor-related activity and that focal damage to this brain region can result in both an increase and decrease in heart rate (Critchley et al., 2003). Although the cingulate cortex responds to emotional stimuli, it is also metabolically active at rest (Raichle et al., 2001; Luu and Posner, 2003), suggesting a pivotal role for this brain region in the normal physiological control of the body.

Several studies and meta-analyses have shown the integral role that the amygdala plays in controlling heart and heart rate variability, particularly in times of emotional response and threat (Thayer et al., 2012). The fact that the amygdala correlated with increased resting heart rate in bvFTD in the current study, suggests that this structure plays a role in the physiological and metabolic changes seen in bvFTD and not simply in response to emotional stimuli. The insula is involved early in the course of bvFTD (Seeley et al., 2008) and has been found on voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to correlate to pain and temperature symptoms in bvFTD, with the suggestion that it forms a network hub for sensory homeostatic signalling with the thalamus in bvFTD (Fletcher et al., 2015a). Our findings suggest that the insula also forms an important part of the network involved in heart rate, energy expenditure, autonomic and metabolic control in bvFTD.

It is of interest that several of the structures found to correlate with increased resting heart rate namely the cingulate cortex, insula and amygdala, have been found to correlate with hyperphagia and abnormal eating behaviour in bvFTD. Moreover, all of these structures have connections to the hypothalamus (Kullmann et al., 2014; Ahmed et al., 2016a), which has been found to be atrophied in bvFTD and correlate with BMI measures (Ahmed et al., 2015b). This suggests a complex interaction between cortical, subcortical structures and the hypothalamus in the control of eating behaviour, heart rate and energy expenditure, all of which are affected in bvFTD.

In Alzheimer’s disease, by contrast, it has been speculated that weight loss occurs with disease progression and low body weight has previously been correlated to mesial temporal cortex atrophy (Grundman et al., 1996). Further studies using direct measurements of energy intake and expenditure in large numbers of patients and age-and BMI-matched controls (both normal and Alzheimer’s disease patients) longitudinally are required to assess the relative contributions of these parameters to weight changes in FTD.

BvFTD is characterized by an increased resting and sleeping heart rate indicative of changes in metabolic rate and resting energy expenditure, which may moderate the weight gain in the setting of prominent changes of eating behaviour. BvFTD is also accompanied by decreased activity levels suggesting that energy expenditure changes are likely secondary to intrinsic processes, driven by changes in heart rate, rather than by an increase in activity levels. Changes in heart rate correlated with atrophy of cingulate and limbic systems including the insula and amygdala, which overlap with networks known to control eating behaviour in bvFTD. Further studies are required to document changes in heart rate and energy expenditure across the ALS-FTD spectrum and in presymptomatic genetic cohorts, to ascertain when changes first develop during the course of the disease. An approach combining longitudinal clinical studies and animal models of FTD and ALS will prove crucial. The current study is the first study to measure the interaction between heart rate, autonomic function and energy expenditure in FTD, using methods from obesity research that allow for measurements over both short-term and long-term (7 days) in the patient’s normal environment. Further studies using indirect calorimetry to measure basal metabolic rate and total energy expenditure are warranted to further examine these interactions. An understanding of the potential changes in energy expenditure, autonomic function and their neural correlates including involvement of the mesial temporal cortex, cingulate cortex, amygdala and insula in energy expenditure aids in the physiological phenotyping of FTD and extends our knowledge of the disease beyond cognition and emotion processing.

Funding

This work was supported by funding to Forefront, a collaborative research group dedicated to the study \of frontotemporal dementia and motor neurone disease, from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) program grant (#1037746 to M.K. and J.H.) and the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders Memory Node (#CE110001021 to O.P. and J.H.) and other grants/sources (NHMRC project grant #1003139). We are grateful to the research participants involved with the ForeFront research studies. R.A. is a Royal Australasian College of Physicians PhD scholar and MND Australia PhD scholar. O.P. is an NHMRC Fellow. I.S.F. is supported by the Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, European Research Council, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and The Bernard Wolfe Endowment. A.A.vdK. is supported by the Wellcome Trust. THC is supported by research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PBLAP3-145870, P3SMP3-155318).

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Brain online.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Glossary

Abbreviations

ALS

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

BMI

body mass index

bvFTD

behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia

FTD

frontotemporal dementia

RMSSD

root mean squared of successive differences

References

  1. Ahmed RM, Irish M, Kam J, van Keizerswaard J, Bartley L, Samaras K, et al. Quantifying the eating abnormalities in frontotemporal dementia. JAMA Neurol 2014a; 71: 1540–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed RM, MacMillan M, Bartley L, Halliday GM, Kiernan MC, Hodges JR, et al. Systemic metabolism in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2014b; 83: 1812–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed RM, Iodice V, Daveson N, Kiernan MC, Piguet O, Hodges JR. Autonomic dysregulation in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015a; 86: 1048–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmed RM, Latheef S, Bartley L, Irish M, Halliday GM, Kiernan MC, et al. Eating behavior in frontotemporal dementia: peripheral hormones vs hypothalamic pathology. Neurology 2015b; 85:1310–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmed RM, Irish M, Henning E, Dermody N, Bartley L, Kiernan MC, et al. Assessment of eating behavior disturbance and associated neural networks in frontotemporal dementia. JAMA Neurol 2016a; 73: 282–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahmed RM, Irish M, Piguet O, Halliday GM, Ittner LM, Farooqi S, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia: distinct and overlapping changes in eating behaviour and metabolism. Lancet Neurol 2016b; 15: 332–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amiez C, Joseph JP, Procyk E. Reward encoding in the monkey anterior cingulate cortex. Cereb Cortex 2006; 16: 1040–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berggren G, Hohwu Christensen E. Heart rate and body temperature as indices of metabolic rate during work. Arbeitsphysiologie 1950; 14: 255–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bouteloup C, Desport JC, Clavelou P, Guy N, Derumeaux-Burel H, Ferrier A, et al. Hypermetabolism in ALS patients: an early and persistent phenomenon. J Neurol 2009; 256: 1236–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bozeat S, Gregory CA, Ralph MA, Hodges JR. Which neuropsychiatric and behavioural features distinguish frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 178–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wong MY, Andersen LB, et al. Branched equation modeling of simultaneous accelerometry and heart rate monitoring improves estimate of directly measured physical activity energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2004; 96: 343–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ. Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005; 59: 561–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chiang PM, Ling J, Jeong YH, Price DL, Aja SM, Wong PC. Deletion of TDP-43 down-regulates Tbc1d1, a gene linked to obesity, and alters body fat metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 16320–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chida K, Sakamaki S, Takasu T. Alteration in autonomic function and cardiovascular regulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 1989; 236: 127–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Critchley HD, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ. Neural activity in the human brain relating to uncertainty and arousal during anticipation. Neuron 2001; 29: 537–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Critchley HD, Mathias CJ, Josephs O, O'Doherty J, Zanini S, Dewar BK, et al. Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence. Brain 2003; 126: 2139–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Crouter SE, Churilla JR, Bassett DR Jr. Accuracy of the Actiheart for the assessment of energy expenditure in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 2008; 62: 704–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999; 9: 179–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. DeGiorgio CM, Miller P, Meymandi S, Chin A, Epps J, Gordon S, et al. RMSSD, a measure of vagus-mediated heart rate variability, is associated with risk factors for SUDEP: the SUDEP-7 Inventory. Epilepsy Behav 2010; 19: 78–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Desport JC, Preux PM, Magy L, Boirie Y, Vallat JM, Beaufrere B, et al. Factors correlated with hypermetabolism in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 74: 328–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Devinsky O, Morrell MJ, Vogt BA. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 1995; 118 (Pt 1): 279–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dupuis L, Oudart H, Rene F, Gonzalez de Aguilar JL, Loeffler JP. Evidence for defective energy homeostasis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: benefit of a high-energy diet in a transgenic mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 11159–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dupuis L, Pradat PF, Ludolph AC, Loeffler JP. Energy metabolism in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 75–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Eslinger PJ, Moore P, Antani S, Anderson C, Grossman M. Apathy in frontotemporal dementia: behavioral and neuroimaging correlates. Behav Neurol 2012; 25: 127–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 1999; 9: 195–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fischl B, Dale AM. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 11050–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fletcher PD, Downey LE, Golden HL, Clark CN, Slattery CF, Paterson RW, et al. Pain and temperature processing in dementia: a clinical and neuroanatomical analysis. Brain 2015a; 138: 3360–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fletcher PD, Nicholas JM, Shakespeare TJ, Downey LE, Golden HL, Agustus JL, Clark CN, Mummery CJ, Schott JM, Crutch SJ, Warren JD. Physiological phenotyping of dementias using emotional sounds. Alzheimers Dement 2015b; 1: 170–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Galton CJ, Gomez-Anson B, Antoun N, Scheltens P, Patterson K, Graves M, et al. Temporal lobe rating scale: application to Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 70: 165–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011; 76: 1006–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Grundman M, Corey-Bloom J, Jernigan T, Archibald S, Thal LJ. Low body weight in Alzheimer's disease is associated with mesial temporal cortex atrophy. Neurology 1996; 46: 1585–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Guo CC, Sturm VE, Zhou J, Gennatas ED, Trujillo AJ, Hua AY, et al. Dominant hemisphere lateralization of cortical parasympathetic control as revealed by frontotemporal dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016; 113: E2430–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hernandez RK, Farwell W, Cantor MD, Lawler EV. Cholinesterase inhibitors and incidence of bradycardia in patients with dementia in the veterans affairs new England healthcare system. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57: 1997–2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hsieh S, Schubert S, Hoon C, Mioshi E, Hodges JR. Validation of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013; 36: 242–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ikeda M, Brown J, Holland AJ, Fukuhara R, Hodges JR. Changes in appetite, food preference, and eating habits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: 371–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Irish M, Piguet O, Hodges JR, Hornberger M. Common and unique gray matter correlates of episodic memory dysfunction in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35: 1422–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jones SE. Imaging for autonomic dysfunction. Cleve Clin J Med 2011; 78 (Suppl 1): S69–S74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kasarskis EJ, Mendiondo MS, Matthews DE, Mitsumoto H, Tandan R, Simmons Z, et al. Estimating daily energy expenditure in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr 2014; 99: 792–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kipps CM, Nestor PJ, Acosta-Cabronero J, Arnold R, Hodges JR. Understanding social dysfunction in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: the role of emotion and sarcasm processing. Brain 2009; 132: 592–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Koppers M, Blokhuis AM, Westeneng HJ, Terpstra ML, Zundel CA, Vieira de Sa R, et al. C9orf72 ablation in mice does not cause motor neuron degeneration or motor deficits. Ann Neurol 2015; 78: 426–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kullmann S, Heni M, Linder K, Zipfel S, Haring HU, Veit R, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity of the human hypothalamus. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35: 6088–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kumfor F, Irish M, Hodges JR, Piguet O. Discrete neural correlates for the recognition of negative emotions: insights from frontotemporal dementia. PLoS One 2013; 8: e67457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lerch JP, Evans AC. Cortical thickness analysis examined through power analysis and a population simulation. Neuroimage 2005; 24: 163–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lieberman MD, Cunningham WA. Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2009; 4: 423–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Luscher C, Malenka RC. NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation and long-term depression (LTP/LTD). Cold Spring Harbo perspect Bio 2012; 4(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Luu P, Posner MI. Anterior cingulate cortex regulation of sympathetic activity. Brain 2003; 126: 2119–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. McKhann GM, Albert MS, Grossman M, Miller B, Dickson D, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Clinical and pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: report of the Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick's Disease. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 1803–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7: 263–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Messina G, De Luca V, Viggiano A, Ascione A, Iannaccone T, Chieffi S, et al. Autonomic nervous system in the control of energy balance and body weight: personal contributions. Neurol Res Int 2013; 2013: 639280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mioshi E, Hsieh S, Savage S, Hornberger M, Hodges JR. Clinical staging and disease progression in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2010; 74: 1591–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 1993; 43: 2412–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nonogaki K. New insights into sympathetic regulation of glucose and fat metabolism. Diabetologia 2000; 43: 533–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Pearce LR, Atanassova N, Banton MC, Bottomley B, van der Klaauw AA, Revelli JP, et al. KSR2 mutations are associated with obesity, insulin resistance, and impaired cellular fuel oxidation. Cell 2013; 155: 765–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Penicaud L, Cousin B, Leloup C, Lorsignol A, Casteilla L. The autonomic nervous system, adipose tissue plasticity, and energy balance. Nutrition 2000; 16: 903–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Penzel T, Kantelhardt JW, Lo CC, Voigt K, Vogelmeier C. Dynamics of heart rate and sleep stages in normals and patients with sleepapnea. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003; 28 (Suppl 1): S48–S53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Piguet O, Hornberger M, Shelley BP, Kipps CM, Hodges JR. Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2009; 72: 732–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 676–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011; 134: 2456–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rushworth MF, Behrens TE, Rudebeck PH, Walton ME. Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11: 168–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Schofield WN. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1985; 39 (Suppl 1): 5–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Seeley WW, Crawford R, Rascovsky K, Kramer JH, Weiner M, Miller BL, et al. Frontal paralimbic network atrophy in very mild behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 249–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Shan X, Chiang PM, Price DL, Wong PC. Altered distributions of Gemini of coiled bodies and mitochondria in motor neurons of TDP-43 transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 16325–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tarvainen MP, Niskanen JP, Lipponen JA, Ranta-Aho PO, Karjalainen PA. Kubios HRV–heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2014; 113: 210–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Thayer JF, Ahs F, Fredrikson M, Sollers JJ 3rd Wager TD. A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012; 36: 747–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Vaisman N, Lusaus M, Nefussy B, Niv E, Comaneshter D, Hallack R, et al. Do patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have increased energy needs? J Neurol Sci 2009; 279: 26–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Voevodskaya O, Simmons A, Nordenskjold R, Kullberg J, Ahlstrom H, Lind L, et al. The effects of intracranial volume adjustment approaches on multiple regional MRI volumes in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2014; 6: 264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vogt BA, Finch DM, Olson CR. Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. Cereb Cortex 1992; 2: 435–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Goldstein RZ, Alia-Klein N, et al. Inverse association between BMI and prefrontal metabolic activity in healthy adults. Obesity 2009; 17: 60–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Woolley JD, Gorno-Tempini ML, Seeley WW, Rankin K, Lee SS, Matthews BR, et al. Binge eating is associated with right orbitofrontal-insular-striatal atrophy in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2007; 69: 1424–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Xu YF, Gendron TF, Zhang YJ, Lin WL, D'Alton S, Sheng H, et al. Wild-type human TDP-43 expression causes TDP-43 phosphorylation, mitochondrial aggregation, motor deficits, and early mortality in transgenic mice. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 10851–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Brain are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES