Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2017 Apr 13;5:e3174. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3174

Susceptibility of Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) H103 and H376 cell lines to Retroviral OSKM mediated reprogramming

Nalini Devi Verusingam 1, Swee Keong Yeap 2,8, Huynh Ky 3, Ian C Paterson 4, Suan Phaik Khoo 5, Soon Keng Cheong 1,6, Alan HK Ong 1,, Tunku Kamarul 7
Editor: Tokuko Haraguchi
PMCID: PMC5392249  PMID: 28417059

Abstract

Although numbers of cancer cell lines have been shown to be successfully reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), reprogramming Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) to pluripotency in relation to its cancer cell type and the expression pattern of pluripotent genes under later passage remain unexplored. In our study, we reprogrammed and characterised H103 and H376 oral squamous carcinoma cells using retroviral OSKM mediated method. Reprogrammed cells were characterized for their embryonic stem cells (ESCs) like morphology, pluripotent gene expression via quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), immunofluorescence staining, embryoid bodies (EB) formation and directed differentiation capacity. Reprogrammed H103 (Rep-H103) exhibited similar ESCs morphologies with flatten cells and clear borders on feeder layer. Reprogrammed H376 (Rep-H376) did not show ESCs morphologies but grow with a disorganized morphology. Critical pluripotency genes Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog were expressed higher in Rep-H103 against the parental counterpart from passage 5 to passage 10. As for Rep-H376, Nanog expression against its parental counterpart showed a significant decrease at passage 5 and although increased in passage 10, the level of expression was similar to the parental cells. Rep-H103 exhibited pluripotent signals (Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and Tra-1-60) and could form EB with the presence of three germ layers markers. Rep-H103 displayed differentiation capacity into adipocytes and osteocytes. The OSCC cell line H103 which was able to be reprogrammed into an iPSC like state showed high expression of Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog at late passage and may provide a potential iPSC model to study multi-stage oncogenesis in OSCC.

Keywords: Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Reprogramming, Cancer cells, Induced pluripotent stem cells, Differentiation capacity, Pluripotency, Embryonic stem cells

Introduction

Oral cancer is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide and is more prevalent in the developing than developed countries (Warnakulasuriya, 2009). More than 90% of oral cancer cases are classified as Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) which is a malignant epithelial cancer that arises from oral keratinocytes (Scully & Bagan, 2009). As there are no reliable diagnostic markers and early stage OSCC is asymptomatic, patients with OSCC are often presented for treatment with advanced stage cancer resulting in a poor prognosis (Warnakulasuriya, 2009; Markopoulos, Michailidou & Tzimagiorgis, 2010).

In spite of the advancement in molecular based detection of cancer stages (Bose et al., 2012; Rhandawa & Archaraya, 2015), the underlying biological mechanisms that take place within the OSCC progression have not been well established. Existing models for OSCC study derived from xenograft of primary tumours have been problematic as in-vitro studies having resulted in a low percentage of cell number and induced mutations with prolonged culture. Furthermore, human cell models of OSCC from tumour cell lines generally can only mimic the advanced tumour state which does not allow the different stages of cancer to be monitored and studied (Shirako et al., 2015). Hence, these unresolved issues necessitate an approach to establish human cancer models that recapitulate OSCC progression.

Originally, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were established from adult human somatic stem cells through the transient expression of Yamanaka’s Oct4, Sox2, KLf4 and c-Myc (OSKM) transcription factors reprogramming technology (Takahashi et al., 2007) and used as a promising stem cell source to overcome ethical and immune rejection issues that often surfaced when using human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESCs) (Yamanaka, 2007). Subsequent studies demonstrated that reprogrammed cancer cells were able to exhibit pluripotent capacity and differentiation tendency, which were distinct from that of their parental cells with much of the observable changes owing to epigenetic effects of reprogramming (Miyoshi et al., 2009; Carette et al., 2010; Mahalingam et al., 2012; Gandre-Babbe et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Choong et al., 2014; Koga et al., 2014; Kotini et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2015). Interestingly, while the majority of the reprogrammed cancer cells showed either lower or a loss of tumorigenicity, Carette et al., 2010 and Gandre-Babbe et al., 2013 indicated a re-establishment of the oncogenic dominance over the pluripotent cell phenotype when the reprogrammed cell types were differentiated into hematopoietic lineage cells and Kim and colleagues (2013) showed that the reprogrammed human pancreatic cancer cells were able to recapitulate its cancer progression from early to late stage of cancer development upon differentiation. In contrast, MCF-7 breast cancer cell line which was reprogrammed via retroviral-OSKM method, failed to show distinct pluripotent signals and was unable to differentiate into 3 primary germ layers but displayed instead a typical cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotype (Corominas-Faja et al., 2013). These reprogrammed phenotypes of cancer cells have made the study of cancer development and underlying cellular systems more feasible, much of which were not previously encountered from any available cancer models especially in addressing cancer progression, discovery of cancer specific biomarkers and more effective therapy (Lang, Shi & Chin, 2013; Lee et al., 2015; Kim & Zaret, 2015).

To the best of our knowledge, no studies have previously reported on the reprogramming of OSCC cancer cells and therefore in the present study, we examined the susceptibility of two OSCC cell lines to be reprogrammed into pluripotency and their respective pluripotent gene expression patterns.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma cell lines (OSCC), H103 (STNMP Stage I) and H376 (STNMP StageIII), were obtained from Prof Ian Patterson, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Cell lines were cultured in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco/Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) and Hydrocortisone (0.5 ug/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2. Reprogrammed OSCC cells were maintained in conditioned hESC medium consisting of DMEM/F12 (Gibco/Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA), supplemented with 20% knock-out serum replacement (Gibco/Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (Gibco/Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA), 4 mM L-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10 ng/mL fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 0.1 mM 2-mecaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The medium was changed every 48 h.

Retrovirus production and infection

Retroviral vectors were produced via packaging cell lines, 293FT cell lines (human embryonal kidney cells) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using the Yamanaka Factors (Oct4, Sox2. Klf4, c-Myc). Vectors pMX-based retroviral hOct4 (Plasmid 17217) (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA), hSox2 (Plasmid 17218) (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA), hKlf4 (Plasmid 17219) (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA), hc-Myc (Plasmid 17220) (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA), retroviral gag–pol packaging plasmid (Plasmid 8449) (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA), VSV-G expression plasmid (Plasmid 8454) (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA) and pMX-GFP (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA) used in these experiments were provided by Dr. Shigeki Sugii, DUKE-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore. Human embryonal kidney cell lines were plated at 3.6 × 106 (70%–80% confluency) one day before transduction. The packaging cell lines were then transfected with Retro-GFP/OSKM vectors along with the transfection reagent LIPOFECTAMINE 2000 (Life Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The supernatant was collected at 48 h post-transfection and filtered with PVDF (45 uM) (Merck Milipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Polybrene (0.5 ul/ml from 10 mg/ml) was then added into the supernatant containing Retroviral Vectors to enhance the transduction efficiency within the target cell types. Presence of selection marker, green fluorescent protein (GFP) in H103 and H376 were counted manually using the cell count option in ImageJ program.

Retroviral infection and iPSCs cell generation

Human Oral Squamous Carcinoma Cells (H103 and H376) were seeded at 7.5 × 104 cells/well on 6 well plates, 24 h before transduction. Equal amounts of supernatant containing each of the four retroviruses were collected and mixed prior to transduction of OSCC cell lines. Infected cells were incubated overnight. The medium was changed at 24 h post-infection to H103 and H376 specific medium. Transduced cancer cells were then subjected to spinfection at 1 h and 30 min (32 °C) before placing the plates into a hypoxic incubator (5% O2). At day 3 post infection, OSCC cell lines were harvested by trypsinization and re-plated with 1 × 104 cells/well on 6 well plates containing irradiated Mouse Embryonic Feeder Layer (MEF) (GlobalStem, Rockville, MD, USA). After 24 h, the medium was replaced with hESCs medium. Fifteen days after transduction, formed colonies were picked up and transferred onto a new mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder layer (GlobalStem, Rockville, MD, USA). These colonies were propagated at least up to five passages before being subjected to pluripotency characterization.

Gene expression assessment in OSCC-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from parental H103 and H376 and respective reprogrammed counterparts using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Total RNA was then converted into complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) via reverse transcription (QuantiTech Reverse Transcriptase Kit).The fluorescent signals from each sample were plotted against cycle numbers which represented the accumulation of product over the duration of the quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) experiment. Quantitative real-time PCR amplification efficiency generated with primers (Table S1) were optimized using hESC, a commonly used gold standard for pluripotency characterization. Beta-actin (ACTB) was used as a house keeping gene in this experiment. Briefly, the condition used in this experiment comprises initial denaturation at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s with annealing at 60 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C. Following qRT-PCR, fluorescence data collection was performed during extension. Real-time PCR was performed with iQ5 Bio-Rad qPCR machine (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using Quantitect Sybr Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). iQ5 Optical System Software, Version 2.0 was used for the analysis (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

Immunofluorescense staining

Cells were fixed using 4% v/v paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), washed three times with PBS containing 1% BSA and permeablized using Perm Buffer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) for 15 min at room temperature (Intracellular markers). After permeabilization, cells were blocked with PBS containing 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature after the blocking solution was removed and cells were washed three times with PBS. Cells were then incubated with conjugated antibodies in PBS containing 1% BSA overnight at 4 °C. Antibodies used were at 1:50 dilution factor for Oct4-PE (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), Sox2-PE (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) Nanog-ALexa Fluor 488 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and Tra-1-60-PE (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). After the overnight incubation, cells were washed three times with PBS and stained with DAPI ANTIFADE GOLD (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) prior to viewing under Zeiss Imager A.1 Fluorescence Microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

Embryoid bodies (EB’s) formation

Rep-H103 cells were seeded onto ultra-low attachment plates (Corning) containing commercialize embryoid bodies medium (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Transferred cells were grown in suspension for 8 days. The medium was consistently changed every 2–3 days up to 8 days without disrupting the EBs. EBs formed were carefully collected for immunofluorescence staining to determine the presence of three germ layers specific markers (Ectoderm: OTX2, Sox1; Endoderm: Sox17, Gata4; Mesoderm: Brachyury) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Human Three Germ Layer 3-Color Immunostainining Kit) (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Stained cells were observed under Zeiss Imager A.1 Fluorescence Microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

Directed differentiation of human H103 iPSCs like cells

Since H103 cell line is of the ectoderm and endoderm lineage (Jones & Klein, 2013), reprogrammed H103 was subjected to directed differentiation into adipocytes and osteocytes which is of the mesoderm lineages in order to access its differentiation potential.

Osteogenic assay

Osteogenic differentiation medium (ODM) (Erenpreisa & Cragg, 2013) was used to induce mineralization or osteogenesis in reprogrammed H103. IPSC-like cells were plated on gelatine coated six-well plates and cultured in 3ml of ODM consisting of 90% DMEM/F12 (Gibco/Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA), 10% FBS (Gibco/Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10nM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 20 mM β-glycerol phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 50 µM L-ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The medium was changed every 2–3 days. After 21 days of incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO2, cells were stained in Alizarin Red for visualization of calcium deposits. Stained cells were then evaluated under Eclipse TS100 inverted microscope (Nikon, Japan) and images were captured for analysis. Presence of mineralized osteoblasts indicated bright orange-red precipitate.

Adipogenic assay

Colonies plated on gelatine coated six-well plates and were cultured in 3ml of adipogenic differentiation medium (ADM) (Erenpreisa & Cragg, 2013) per well. ADM consisted of 90% DMEM/F12 (Gibco/Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA), 10% FBS (Gibco/Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 0.5 µM dexamethasone, 0.5 µM isobuthylmethylxanthine and 50 µM indometacin. The medium was changed every 2–3 days. After 21 days of incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO2, cells were stained in Oil Red O for visualization of lipid droplets. Stained cells were then viewed under Eclipse TS100 inverted microscope (Nikon, Japan) and images were captured for analysis. Mature adipocytes containing intracellular lipid vesicles were stained bright red.

Statistical analysis

Statistical data analysis was carried out with Paired t-Tests to compare the quantitative outcome of parental, reprogrammed counterparts at passage 5 and reprogrammed counterparts at passage 10 of H103 and H376 cell lines using SPSS, Software version 22.0 (IBM Corp, USA). All tests were conducted at 95% confidence level and all data were presented as mean  ± standard error of mean SEM. The differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Transfection efficiencies in oral squamous cells carcinoma cell lines

Green Fluorescence Protein (GFP) serves as an internal control and used for evaluating transduction efficiency. Uptake of vector pMX-GFP was tested using the highly transfectable human embryonic kidney cells (293FT) (Fig. S1). Subsequently, transduction efficiencies were examined in OSCC cell lines using vector pMX-GFP (16.5 µg) which encodes for green fluoresecent protein signals to confirm the uptake of transgenes prior to OSKM transduction. GFP signals were detected in H103 and H376 at 48 h confirming the uptake of transgenes (Fig. 1A). The transduction efficiency of 75.50% ± 1.52 and 38.20% ± 0.60 obtained from H376 and H103 cells respectively showed an almost 2-fold increase in H376 (Fig. 1B). Negative control was performed to access the potential influence of reprogramming on the viability of the cells (Fig. S2).

Figure 1. Transduction efficiency of retroviruses in OSCC.

Figure 1

(A) Oral squamous carcinoma cell lines (H103 and H376) were introduced with ecotropic pMXs retroviruses containing GFP cDNA. The upper panel shows the images of bright-field and fluorescent microscope, Zeiss Axiovert inverted microscope, original magnification: 20×. (B) The lower panel shows the percentages of cells transduced with GFP. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Reprogramming of oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines

Clones were picked approximately two weeks after transduction (Fig. 2A) in both H103 and H376 cells. Distinct morphological patterns and changes were observed between the parental cancer cells and their reprogrammed counterparts (Fig. 2B i–iii and 2C i–iv). Only Rep-H103 clones were able to be passaged above passage 5 (Fig. 2B-iv) while clones derived from Rep-H376 differentiated at passage 2 onwards and were unable to sustain iPS-like cell morphology (Fig. 2C-v). Although higher GFP transfection capacity was achieved in H376, stable clones were successfully generated only from H103 cell line as these clones were able to be expanded up to passage 20 and still maintained an ESC-like morphology (Fig. 2B iv–v). Morphologies of all derived clones from H103 are highly distinct from its parental cells with clear borders on the mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder layer, high nucleus to cytoplasm ratio and the colonies displayed small cells morphology with spaces between them (Fig. 2B iv–v).

Figure 2. Induction of Pluripotent cells from OSCC.

Figure 2

(A) Timeline of iPSCs induction. (B-i) Morphology of H103. (B-ii) Morphology of transduced H103 at 24 h post infection. (B-iii) Emergence of iPSCs like colonies from reprogrammed H103 on MEF feeder layer at day 15 (Red arrow). (B-iv-v) Images of established stable H103 iPSCs like cells at passage number 10. (C-i) Morphology of H376. (C-ii) Morphology of transduced H376 at 24 h post infection. (C-iii) Emergence of iPSC like colonies from H376 on MEF feeder layer at day 15 (Red arrow). (C-vi) Image of iPSC like cells from H376 at P2. (C-v) Differentiated reprogrammed H376 (Red arrows), collected at P5 and P10 for real time expressions analysis.

Differential gene expression

Overall, the expressions of endogenous Oct4, Sox2 in Rep-H103 cells were much higher than that of Rep-H376. However, suppression of Klf4 and c-Myc was seen in both reprogrammed cells (Fig. 3). Pluripotent marker expression levels of the reprogrammed cells relative to the parental counterparts which were quantified using qRT-PCR (Fig. 3A) showed down-regulation of Oct4 expression in rep-H103 at passage 5 but increased with a 2.80 fold change at passage 10. Expression of Sox2 (Fig. 3B) showed gradual up-regulation in Rep-H103 at passage 5 and passage 10 with 55 and77 fold change respectively. Oncogenic Klf4 (Fig. 3C) gene expression in reprogrammed H103 was significantly down regulated upon reprogramming and the level of expression maintained throughout passage 5 and passage 10. Similar gene expression pattern as Klf4 was observed in c-Myc gene (Fig. 3D) but at a much lower expression level. Nanog expression was also up-regulated gradually across passage 5 with 2.84 fold change to passage 10 with 7.07 fold change relative to its parental counterpart (Fig. 3E).

Figure 3. In-Vitro mRNA expression of pluripotent genes in reprogrammed H103 and H376 relative to parental (n-3).

Figure 3

(A–E) Data presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences are indicated with * for P < 0.05, ** for P < 0.01 and *** for P < 0.001 using paired t-test.

In the case of Rep-H376, Oct4 expression showed an initial reduction at passage 5 of −4.35 fold change but was up-regulated at passage 10 with 1.07 fold change (Fig. 3A). Gradual increase of Sox2expression (Fig. 3B) from passage 5 to passage 10 was observed in Rep-H376, a similar pattern to that of Rep-H103. Down-regulation of Klf4 expression was observed at passage 5 but slightly increased from −3.13 fold change to −1.89 respectively at passage 10 (Fig. 3C). Expression of c-Myc was almost not detected with −14.29 fold change at passage 5 and −100 at passage 10 (Fig. 3D). Nanog expression was found reduced in Rep-H376 at passage 5 with −1.79 fold change and showed little increase at passage 10 with 1.86 fold change (Fig. 3E).

Expression of pluripotency associated transcription factors

Rep-H103 continuously proliferated as adherent, flat colonies under feeder conditions and captured satisfactory pluripotent signals from real-time PCR analysis compared to reprogrammed H376. Therefore, successful Rep-H103 cells were characterised further for its pluripotency protein expression via immunofluorescence analysis. Rep-H103 expressed the pluripotency markers of Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and Tra-1-60 indicating a distinct difference between H103 derived iPS-like cells (Fig. 4A) over its parental cancer cell line (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4. Expression of pluripotent marker.

Figure 4

(A) REP-H103 expressed markers common to pluripotent cells including OCT4, SOX2, NANOG and TRA-1-60. (B) Pluripotency markers (OCT4, SOX2, NANOG and TRA-1-60) were not expressed in the parental cancer cell.

Differentiation: embryoid body formation

Three dimensional (3D) sphere-shaped structures in suspension culture formed within a week in EB specific medium. At day 8, EBs were then evaluated for the presence of three germ layers via immunofluorescence staining. EBs was also induced from the parental cell line of H103 to serve as control (Fig. 5A-i). Rep-H103 showed morphologically compact round borders EB (Fig. 5A-ii). As H103 cell line was derived from both ectodermal and endodermal lineage expressions, signals from these two lineages were expected to be detected in EBs from both the parental and the reprogrammed counterpart (Figs. 5B-i and 5B-ii). However, mesoderm (Fig. 5B-iii) expression was only detected in EBs derived from Rep-H103 indicating the cross lineage differentiation ability of the Rep-H103 upon reprogramming into an iPS-like cell.

Figure 5. Embryoid bodies (EBs) formation and immunofluorescence staining.

Figure 5

Representative images of (A-i) parental H103-EB cells and (A-ii) reprogrammed H103-EB. The better showed compact structure and round borders-EB exhibited by reprogrammed H103-EB which is lacking in parental H103-EB structure (Red arrow). Nikon inverted microscope, original magnification: 10×. Immunostaining analysis indicates the presence of three germ layers of (B-i) ectoderm—OTX2/SOX1, (B-ii) endoderm—GATA4/SOX17 and (B-iii) mesoderm—BRACHYURY.

Directed differentiation assay

Crystal formation was observed during the osteogenesis process whereby the volume of the matrix mineralization increased during the 21 days of incubation as indicated from the Alizarin Red S stained calcium deposits (Fig. 6A-ii). In addition, tiny vesicles containing lipid droplets had formed in the cytoplasm of the cells after 21 days of incubation. The accumulation of lipid droplets was stained positive with Oil Red O staining (Fig. 6A-iv).

Figure 6. Directed differentiations into osteocytes and adipocytes.

Figure 6

(A-i) Control parental H103 cells showing negative for the Alizarin red staining (A-ii) H103 iPSCs like cells showing positive for the Alizarin red staining indicating calcium deposits (Red arrow). (A-iii) Negative staining for Oil-Red-O in control parental H103 cells. (A-iv) Adipogenesis induced lipid droplets observed red in colour stain after Oil-O-Red staining. (Red arrow) indicates the tiny lipid droplets. Nikon inverted microscope, original magnification: (A-i & ii) 10×, (A-iii & iv) 40×.

Discussion

Overall, different responses towards retroviral-OSKM mediated reprogramming were observed in two different grade OSCC cell lines (H103-STNMP Stage I and H376-STNMP Stage III). Rep-H103 exhibit ESCs like morphology, are distinguishable from the parental cell line and generated H103 iPS-like cells could undergo in-vitro expansion more than 20 passages. The ESC-like morphological changes in Rep-H103 corresponded to other reprogrammed cancer cell lines including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cancer cell line (KBM7 cells) (Carette et al., 2010), lung cancer cells (Mahalingam et al., 2012), liver cancer cells (Zhang et al., 2014) melanoma cells (Lin et al., 2008) and osteosarcoma (Zhang et al., 2013; Choong et al., 2014). On the other hand, reprogrammed H376 tended to differentiate into its original phenotype and the ESC-like features were no longer observable after passage 2 (Fig. 2C-v).

Although Rep-H103 cell had successfully acquired pluripotent ectopic expressions and sustained its pluripotency potentiality, it possessed lower GFP transgene uptake efficiency as compared to that of Rep-H376 (Fig. 1).This feature is consistent with a previous reported study in which, reprogramming of four different osteosarcoma cell lines (Saos-2, MG-63, U-2 OS and G-292) via Retroviral-OSKM mediated system demonstrated that U-2 OS cell line, which was highly responsive to GFP transduction, eventually lost its pluripotency capacity upon reprogramming and could not be maintained in prolonged in-vitro culture. Presence of various intrinsic factors between the osteosarcoma cancer cell lines was hypothesized to contribute to multiple responses towards reprogramming (Choong et al., 2014). As such, depending on the cell type, uptake of OSKM transgenes may not necessarily be correlated with transduction efficiency.

Reprogramming resistance was observed in H376 cell line in which the expressions of key pluripotent genes were insignificant and the ESC-like morphological features eventually diminishes with subsequent passage. Reprogramming roadblocks contributed by diverse molecular properties and biophysical nature of the cell type could result in inefficient reprogramming (Vierbuchen & Wernig, 2012). Notably, the tumour suppressor gene, p53 which safeguards the cellular genome integrity was shown to lower reprogramming efficiency and kinetics by removing DNA damaged cells at the early stages of the reprogramming stepwise process via apoptosis (Vierbuchen & Wernig, 2012; Spike & Wahl, 2011). Although both H103 and H376 harbours the mutant p53 gene, H376 carries a p53 gene, a nonsense mutation that expresses the truncated form of the protein which basically does not show any detectable mutant p53 expression (Yeudall et al., 1995). Despite the fact that the mutated form of p53 gene may provide a more favourable condition for reprogramming cancer cells (Ebrahimi, 2015; Vierbuchen & Wernig, 2012; Spike & Wahl, 2011), the presence rather than the absence of the mutant p53 expression has been reported to enhance reprogramming efficiency (Sarig et al., 2010; Tapia & Schöler, 2010) as in the case of H103 which was able to maintain its pluripotent features under prolonged passage. Furthermore, it has been shown that TGF-β triggers epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (Ebrahimi, 2015) and the presence of transforming growth factor beta-I (TGF-β) signal transduction was previously reported to be among the root causes of roadblocks in reprogramming (Li et al., 2010). Moreover, successful reprogramming towards pluripotency was shown to be facilitated by mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) followed by suppression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) regulation (Chen, Han & Pei, 2012). Paterson and colleagues determined the effect of transforming growth factor beta-I (TGF-β) in OSCC H-series cell lines in which H376 cell line was shown to be more responsive to TGF-β than H103 (Paterson et al., 1995). As such, H376 may potentially harbour higher EMT activity which makes it more resistance towards reprogramming.

It was previously showed that extensive passaging enhances the reprogramming process (Chin et al., 2009) in which the hierarchical pluripotency gene activation takes place in a gradual manner upon prolong in-vitro passaging (Shan et al., 2014). Notably, in our study, down-regulation of Oct4 in P5 for Rep-H103 may indicate that its expression was not fully activated at the initial phase at P5 but its expression was more distinct at a later phase at P10 whereby more stable expression of pluripotent genes are expected to occur within the reprogramming process. Nevertheless, the fundamental pluripotency regulators (Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog) in Rep-H103 were expressed at higher levels than that of Rep-H376 at both passage 5 and passage 10. We observed that Nanog expression indicated a distinct difference between the two cell types and their susceptibility towards reprogramming. The interactions between Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog had been demonstrated via mutagenesis in-vitro assay and in-vivo functional study described previously in which suppression of Oct4 and Sox2 expression respectively decreases the promoter activity of Nanog (Rodda et al., 2005). Furthermore, the deficiency in Nanog expression results in partially reprogrammed cells which are unable to shift into pluripotency state due to impaired regulation of pluripotency network (Festuccia et al., 2013). Such was the case as reported by Miyoshi et al. (2009) in which gastrointestinal cell lines selected for reprogramming were shown to express low level of Nanog mRNA, but gradually acquired significant up-regulation of Nanog expression upon reprogramming with four pluripotent transcription factors. In our studies, further evidence of pluripotency was confirmed on successfully Rep-H103 via the immunofluorescence staining for common intracellular (Oct4, Sox2, Nanog) and extracellular (Tra-1-60) pluripotent markers, which were used in pluripotent stem cells characterization. All intracellular and extracellular pluripotent markers were detected on reprogrammed H103 indicating pluripotency expressions were achieved at the protein level.

As Klf4 is known to act either as a tumour suppressor gene or an oncogene, depending on the need of the tumour cells and the types of cancer (Evans & Liu, 2008) and c-Myc is a crucial oncogene that confers immortality in cancer cells via a shift from senescence state to oncogenic progression (Erenpreisa & Cragg, 2013), these transcription factors have been highly implicated in influencing cancer progression. The down-regulation pattern of oncogenic gene expression, namely c-Myc and Klf4 in both H103 and H376 were also observed in reprogrammed human osteosarcoma cells (Zhang et al., 2013). Furthermore, when teratoma formations were assessed, it was found that the parental cancer cells formed tumours at a faster rate than that of the reprogrammed counterpart which exhibited a reduced aggressive cancer phenotype. Down-regulation of both c-Myc and Klf4 in reprogrammed OSCC suggests reprogramming may initiate an epigenetic reversal process on the oncogenic gene networks in cancer cells and this phenomenon could be utilized as a therapeutic strategy for treatment of OSCC.

The differentiation potential demonstrated that Rep-H103 which initially originated from ectoderm and endoderm lineage (Jones & Klein, 2013), portrays its capability of differentiating into osteocytes and adipocytes which are of the mesoderm lineage. The ability to differentiate into all three germ layers has been commonly observed in successfully reprogrammed cells including iPS-like cancer cells (Carette et al., 2010; Rizzino, 2013) and is crucial in generating post-iPSCs to unravel the underlying tumorigenesis development of the specific cancer.

Reprogrammed OSCC cell lines (H103 and H376) were used as a cancer-specific model to provide a conceptual study on the cells ability to be reprogrammed into a pluripotent state and their pluripotent characteristics at the in-vitro level. Since our study involves a stage I (H103) and stage III (H376) OSCC cell lines, the findings obtained do not address the effect of reprogramming on stage IV OSCC (the final stage in the STNMP classification) and the outcomes of the pluripotent signals at the in-vivo level. The next phase of the study is being planned to address the current limitation of the findings.

In summary, the maintenance of stem cell like morphology and pluripotent expressions upon reprogramming was only observed in Rep-H103 cells. This may be due to the differences in the inherent genetic make-ups between H103 and H376 cell lines, which determined their capacity to be reprogrammed into iPS-like cells. Our findings indicated a typical up-regulation pattern of endogenous transcription factors Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog in the reprogrammed H103 cell. However, down-regulation of oncogenes, c-Myc and Klf4 was observed in both Rep-H103 and Rep-376 cells. As such, the OSCC reprogrammed cells are potential models for further studies on cancer progression in OSCC by enabling access to cancer properties from the initial tumour initiation to the later malignant/metastatic states as well as models for the discovery of novel anti-cancer drugs.

Supplemental Information

Data S1. RT-qPCR Fold Changes—H103.

Quantitative data obtained by RT-qPCR from H103 RNA

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3174/supp-1
Data S2. RT-qPCR Fold Changes—H376.

Quantitative data obtained by RT-qPCR from H376 RNA

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3174/supp-2
Supplemental Information 1. Supplementary Figures and Table.

Post-transfection of 293FT at 48 hours. (A–B) 293FT cell line transfected with retro—pMX GFP plasmid served as positive control. (C-D)Transfection of 293FT without retro-pMX GFP used as negative control. Zeiss Axiovert inverted microscope, original magnification: 10×. (PPT).

Supplementary Figure 2. Transduction of (A–B) H103 and (C-D) H376 without retro-pMX GFP used as negative control. No GFP signals detected. Zeiss Axiovert inverted microscope, original magnification: 20x. (PPT) .

Supplementary Table 1.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3174/supp-3

Acknowledgments

We would like take this opportunity to thank Assistant Professor Dr. Shigekii Sugii from DUKE-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, for sharing his iPSCs knowledge and technology with us. We would also like to thank Dr. Teoh Hoon Koon, Teh Hui Xin and Choong Pei Fen who sequenced the plasmids.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by University of Malaya HIR-MOHE Grant Initiative (Reference number-UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/CHAN/03) and University Tunku Abdul Rahman Research Funding (Vote number-UTARRF 6200/A11). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Nalini Devi Verusingam conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Swee Keong Yeap conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Huynh Ky performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Ian C. Paterson, Suan Phaik Khoo and Tunku Kamarul contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Soon Keng Cheong analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Alan H.K. Ong conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplementary File.

References

  • Bose et al. (2012).Bose P, Klimowicz AC, Kornaga E, Petrillo SK, Matthews TW, Chandarana S, Magliocco AM, Brockton NT, Dort JC. Bax expression measured by AQUA analysis is an independent prognostic marker in oral squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Carette et al. (2010).Carette JE, Pruszak J, Varadarajan M, Blomen VA, Gokhale S, Camargo FD, Wernig M, Jaenisch R, Brummelkamp TR. Generation of iPSCs from cultured human malignant cells. Blood. 2010;115(20):4039–4042. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-231845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen, Han & Pei (2012).Chen J, Han Q, Pei D. EMT and MET as paradigms for cell fate switching. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology. 2012;4(2):66–69. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjr045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chin et al. (2009).Chin MH, Mason MJ, Xie W, Volinia S, Singer M, Peterson C, Ambartsumyan G, Aimiuwu O, Richter L, Zhang J, Khvorostov I. Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. Cell stem Cell. 2009;5(1):111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Choong et al. (2014).Choong PF, Teh HX, Teoh HK, Ong HK, Choo KB, Sugii S, Cheong SK, Kamarul T. Heterogeneity of osteosarcoma cell lines led to variable responses in reprogramming. International Journal of Medical Science. 2014;11:1154–1160. doi: 10.7150/ijms.8281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Corominas-Faja et al. (2013).Corominas-Faja B, Cufí S, Oliveras-Ferraros C, Cuyàs E, López-Bonet E, Lupu R, Alarcón T, Vellon L, Manuel Iglesias J, Leis O, Martin A. Nuclear reprogramming of luminal-like breast cancer cells generates Sox2-overexpressing cancer stem-like cellular states harboring transcriptional activation of the mTOR pathway. Cell Cycle. 2013;12(18):3109–3124. doi: 10.4161/cc.26173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ebrahimi (2015).Ebrahimi B. Reprogramming barriers and enhancers: strategies to enhance the efficiency and kinetics of induced pluripotency. Cell Regeneration. 2015;4 doi: 10.1186/s13619-014-0014-3. Article 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Erenpreisa & Cragg (2013).Erenpreisa J, Cragg MS. Three steps to the immortality of cancer cells: senescence, polyploidy and self-renewal. Cancer Cell International. 2013;13 doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-13-92. Article 92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Evans & Liu (2008).Evans PM, Liu C. Roles of Krüpel-like factor 4 in normal homeostasis, cancer and stem cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2008;40(7):554–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2008.00439.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Festuccia et al. (2013).Festuccia N, Osorno R, Wilson V, Chambers I. The role of pluripotency gene regulatory network components in mediating transitions between pluripotent cell states. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 2013;23(5):504–511. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gandre-Babbe et al. (2013).Gandre-Babbe S, Paluru P, Aribeana C, Chou ST, Bresolin S, Lu L, Sullivan SK, Tasian SK, Weng J, Favre H, Choi JK. Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells recapitulate hematopoietic abnormalities of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2013;121(24):4925–4929. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-01-478412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones & Klein (2013).Jones KB, Klein OD. Oral epithelial stem cells in tissue maintenance and disease: the first steps in a long journey. International Journal of Oral Sciences. 2013;5(3):121–129. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2013.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim et al. (2013).Kim J, Hoffman JP, Alpaugh RK, Rhim AD, Reichert M, Stanger BZ, Furth EE, Sepulveda AR, Yuan CX, Won KJ, Donahue G. An iPSC line from human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoes early to invasive stages of pancreatic progression. Cell Reports. 2013;3(6):2088–2099. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim & Zaret (2015).Kim J, Zaret KS. Reprogramming of human cancer cells to pluripotency for models of cancer Progression. The EMBO Journal. 2015;34(6):739–747. doi: 10.15252/embj.201490736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Koga et al. (2014).Koga C, Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Tomimaru Y, Hama N, Wada H, Kawamoto K, Eguchi H, Konno M, Ishii H, Umeshita K. Reprogramming using microRNA-302 improves drug sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2014;21(4):591–600. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3705-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kotini et al. (2015).Kotini AG, Chang CJ, Boussaad I, Delrow JJ, Dolezal EK, Nagulapally AB, Perna F, Fishbein GA, Klimek VM, Hawkins RD, Huangfu D. Functional analysis of a chromosomal deletion associated with myelodysplastic syndromes using isogenic human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotechnology. 2015;33(6):646–655. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lang, Shi & Chin (2013).Lang JY, Shi Y, Chin YE. Reprogramming cancer cells: back to the future. Oncogene. 2013;32(18):2247–2248. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee et al. (2015).Lee DF, Su J, Kim HS, Chang B, Papatsenko D, Zhao R, Yuan Y, Gingold J, Xia W, Darr H, Mirzayans R. Modeling familial cancer with induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell. 2015;161(2):240–254. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2010).Li R, Liang J, Ni S, Zhou T, Qing X, Li H, He W, Chen J, Li F, Zhuang Q, Qin B. A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7(1):51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin et al. (2008).Lin SL, Chang DC, Chang-Lin S, Lin CH, Wu DT, Chen DT, Ying SY. Mir-302 reprograms human skin cancer cells into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. RNA. 2008;14(10):2115–2124. doi: 10.1261/rna.1162708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mahalingam et al. (2012).Mahalingam D, Kong CM, Lai J, Tay LL, Yang H, Wang X. Reversal of aberrant cancer methylome and transcriptome upon direct reprogramming of lung cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2012;2:592. doi: 10.1038/srep00592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Markopoulos, Michailidou & Tzimagiorgis (2010).Markopoulos AK, Michailidou EZ, Tzimagiorgis G. Salivary markers for oral cancer detection. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2010;4(1):172–178. doi: 10.2174/1874210601004010172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Miyoshi et al. (2009).Miyoshi N, Ishii H, Nagai KI, Hoshino H, Mimori K, Tanaka F, Nagano H, Sekimoto M, Doki Y, Mori M. Defined factors induce reprogramming of gastrointestinal cancer cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;107(1):40–45. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912407107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Paterson et al. (1995).Paterson IC, Patel V, Sandy JR, Prime SS, Yeudall WA. Effects of transforming growth factor beta-1 on growth-regulatory genes in tumour-derived human oral keratinocytes. British Journal of Cancer. 1995;72(4):805–1064. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rhandawa & Archaraya (2015).Rhandawa V, Archaraya V. Integrated network analysis and logistic regression modeling identify stage-specific genes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. BMC Medical Genomics. 2015;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0114-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rizzino (2013).Rizzino A. Concise review: the Sox2Oct4 connection: critical players in a much larger interdependent network integrated at multiple levels. Stem Cells. 2013;31(6):1033–1039. doi: 10.1002/stem.1352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rodda et al. (2005).Rodda DJ, Chew JL, Lim LH, Loh YH, Wang B, Ng HH, Robson P. Transcriptional regulation of nanog by OCT4 and SOX2. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280:24731–24737. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502573200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarig et al. (2010).Sarig R, Rivlin N, Brosh R, Bornstein C, Kamer I, Ezra O, Molchadsky A, Goldfinger N, Brenner O, Rotter V. Mutant p53 facilitates somatic cell reprogramming and augments the malignant potential of reprogrammed cells. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2010;207(10):2127–2140. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Scully & Bagan (2009).Scully C, Bagan J. Oral squamous cell carcinoma overview. Oral Oncology. 2009;45(4–5):301–308. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shan et al. (2014).Shan ZY, Wu YS, Li X, Shen XH, Wang ZD, Liu ZH, Shen JL, Lei L. Continuous passages accelerate the reprogramming of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Cellular Reprogramming. 2014;16(1):77–83. doi: 10.1089/cell.2013.0067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shirako et al. (2015).Shirako Y, Taya Y, Sato K, Chiba T, Imai K, Shimazu Y, Aoba T, Soeno Y. Heterogeneous tumor stromal microenvironments of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in tongue and nodal metastatic lesions in a xenograft mouse model. Journal of Oral Pathology of Medicine. 2015;44(9):656–668. doi: 10.1111/jop.12318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Spike & Wahl (2011).Spike BT, Wahl GM. P53, stem cells, and reprogramming tumor suppression beyond guarding the genome. Genes & Cancer. 2011;2(4):404–419. doi: 10.1177/1947601911410224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Takahashi et al. (2007).Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tapia & Schöler (2010).Tapia N, Schöler HR. P53 connects tumorigenesis and reprogramming to pluripotency. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2010;207(10):2045–2048. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vierbuchen & Wernig (2012).Vierbuchen T, Wernig M. Molecular roadblocks for cellular reprogramming. Molecular Cell. 2012;47(6):827–838. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Warnakulasuriya (2009).Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncology. 2009;45(4):309–316. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yamanaka (2007).Yamanaka S. Strategies and new developments in the generation of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yeudall et al. (1995).Yeudall WA, Paterson IC, Patel V, Prime SS. Presence of human papillomavirus sequences in tumour-derived human oral keratinocytes expressing mutant p53. European Journal of Cancer Part B: Oral Oncology. 1995;31(2):136–143. doi: 10.1016/0964-1955(94)00030-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2014).Zhang DM, Li JJ, Yan P, Hu JT. Establishment and identification of induced pluripotent stem cells in liver cancer patients. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2014;7(4):253–256. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60032-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2013).Zhang X, Cruz FD, Terry M, Remotti F, Matushansky I. Terminal differentiation and loss of tumorigenicity of human cancers via pluripotency-based reprogramming. Oncogene. 2013;32(18):2249–2260. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data S1. RT-qPCR Fold Changes—H103.

Quantitative data obtained by RT-qPCR from H103 RNA

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3174/supp-1
Data S2. RT-qPCR Fold Changes—H376.

Quantitative data obtained by RT-qPCR from H376 RNA

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3174/supp-2
Supplemental Information 1. Supplementary Figures and Table.

Post-transfection of 293FT at 48 hours. (A–B) 293FT cell line transfected with retro—pMX GFP plasmid served as positive control. (C-D)Transfection of 293FT without retro-pMX GFP used as negative control. Zeiss Axiovert inverted microscope, original magnification: 10×. (PPT).

Supplementary Figure 2. Transduction of (A–B) H103 and (C-D) H376 without retro-pMX GFP used as negative control. No GFP signals detected. Zeiss Axiovert inverted microscope, original magnification: 20x. (PPT) .

Supplementary Table 1.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3174/supp-3

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplementary File.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES