ABSTRACT
Progression of cells through distinct phases of the cell cycle, and transition into out-of-cycling states, such as terminal differentiation and senescence, is accompanied by specific patterns of gene expression. These cell fate decisions are mediated not only by distinct transcription factors, but also chromatin modifiers that establish heritable epigenetic patterns. Lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) that mediate methylation marks on histone and non-histone proteins are now recognized as important regulators of gene expression in cycling and non-cycling cells. Among these, the SUV39 sub-family of KMTs, which includes SUV39H1, SUV39H2, G9a, GLP, SETDB1, and SETDB2, play a prominent role. In this review, we discuss their biochemical properties, sub-cellular localization and function in cell cycle, differentiation programs, and cellular senescence. We also discuss their aberrant expression in cancers, which exhibit de-regulation of cell cycle and differentiation.
KEYWORDS: Cancer, cell cycle, chromatin modifiers, differentiation, gene regulation, heterochromatin, histones, methylation
Abbreviations
- AML
Acute myeloid leukemia
- Ankrd 1
Ankyrin repeat domain containing protein 1
- APC/C-cdh1
Anaphase protein complex/cyclosome-CDC20 homolog 1 protein
- BRAF
B-Raf proto oncogene
- CBP
CREB-binding protein
- cdk2
Cyclin dependent kinase 2
- Cdk4
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4
- CENP
Centromere protein
- DHFR
Dihydrofolate reductase
- DNMT1
DNA methyltransferase 1
- DOT1L
DOT1 like protein
- EHMT1
Euchromatin histone lysine methyltransferase 1
- E2F
E2 factor
- ERMS
Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma
- EZH
Enhancer of zeste homolog
- GLP
G9a like protein
- HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
- hMLH1
human MutL homolog 1
- HOXA9
Homeobox A9
- HP1
Heterochromatin protein 1
- IL6
Interleukin 6
- KMT
Lysine(K) methyltransferase
- mAM/Ham
mouse ATFa-associated modulator /human ATFa-associated modulator
- MDM2
Mouse double minute 2 homolog
- MEF2
Myocyte enhancer factor-2
- MLL
Mixed lineage leukemia
- MyoD
Myogenic differentiation
- ORC1
Origin recognition complex subunit 1
- PCAF
P300/CBP-associated factor
- PCNA
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen
- Pin1
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase NIMA-interacting 1
- PML-NB
Promyelocytic leukemia-nuclear bodies
- PRDM
PR/SET domain 1
- PUMA
p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis
- Rb1
Retinoblastoma protein 1
- SAHF
Senescence associated heterochromatic foci
- SASP
Senescent associated secretory phenotype
- SET
Su(var)3–9, enhancer of zeste, trithorax
- SET1and2
Su(var)3–9,enhancer of zeste, trithorax protein 1and2
- SETDB1and2
SET domain bifurcated 1and2
- SIRT1
Sirtuin1
- SMYD
SET and MYND domain-containing proteins
- Ser
Serine
- SUV39H1,H2
Suppressor of variegation 3–9 homolog1,2
- TNAP-Cre
Tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase - Cre recombinase
- UHRF1
Ubiquitin-like containing PHD and RING finger domain 1
- YY1
Yin Yang-1
Introduction
Chromatin modifications are mainly achieved through posttranslational modifications (PTMs) such as phosphorylation, sumoylation, acetylation, and methylation of histone tails.1 Histone phosphorylation on serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues by various protein kinases signal for recruitment of chromatin modifiers leading to either chromatin relaxation or compaction. Similarly, sumoylation of histones causes changes in chromatin and influences gene expression and genome integrity. Histone acetylation causes relaxation of chromatin and gene activation, whereas histone methylation can mark chromatin either to activate or repress gene expression, depending on the lysine residue modified and the degree of methylation (mono-, di-, and tri-methylation). In general, methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) and H3K27 is associated with transcriptional repression, whereas H3K4 and H3K36 methylation is associated with transcriptional activation. Thus, PTMs have myriad consequences on several biologic processes from embryonic development to disease. Lysine methylation mediated by histone lysine methyltransferases (HKMTs) enzymes has emerged as a critical PTM of histones.2,3 As increasing evidence suggests that these enzymes target non-histone proteins as well, they have been renamed as lysine methyltransferases (KMTs).
With the exception of DOT1L (KMT4) family, which methylates K79, most KMTs contain an evolutionarily conserved SET domain and are referred to as SET domain family proteins.4,5 The conserved SET domain was first characterized in 3 Drosophila melanogaster proteins: Suppressor of variegation 3–9 (Su(var)3–9), Enhancer of zeste (E(z)), and Trithorax (Trx).4 Based on the sequence homology in and around SET domain, KMTs are further classified into various sub-families, including SUV39, EZH, SET1, SET2, PRDM, and SMYD.6-8 Each of these subfamilies are comprised of several KMTs. Since the discovery of the first KMT, there has been a surge in understanding their function and specificities under physiologic and pathological conditions. In this review, we focus on SUV39 sub-family of KMTs, which includes SUV39H1 (KMT1A),9 SUV39H2 (KMT1B),10 G9a (EHMT2/KMT1C),11 G9a-like protein 1; GLP (EHMT1/KMT1D),12 SETDB1 (KMT1E),13 and SETDB2 (KMT1F).14 We discuss their function in regulation of cellular proliferation, differentiation, and senescence (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
SUV39 KMTs in cycling and non-cycling cells. In cycling cells, SUV39H1, G9a, and SETDB1 are required for chromosomal segregation and cell division during mitosis and meiosis. While SUV39H1 inhibits proliferation, G9a and SETDB1 promote proliferation (G1/S transition) of cells. In non-cycling states, all 3 KMTs inhibit myogenic and adipogenic differentiation but differentially regulate senescence.
Biochemical properties
SUV39 KMTs mediate methylation by transferring a methyl group from S-adenosyl-L-methionine onto ε amino group on lysine residues in target proteins. They show high specificity for the lysine residue on the substrate, and the degree of methylation defines distinct functional domains of chromatin such as euchromatin and heterochromatin. SUV39H1 and SUV39H2 catalyze H3K9 dimethylation (me2) and trimethylation (me3) by preferentially binding to monomethylated (me1) H3K9.15,16 G9a and GLP are responsible for the majority of H3K9me1 and H3K9me2 in euchromatin.12,15 SETDB1 mediates H3K9me1, H3K9me2, and, in association with mAM/hAM—an ATFa associated factor, is able to convert H3K9me2 to H3K9me3 in both euchromatin and heterochromatin.8,17 SETDB2 also mediates H3K9me3.14
SUV39 KMTs also have the ability to read methylation marks. SUV39H1 and SUV39H2 have a Chromo domain, which helps in recognition of methylated lysines.18 G9a and GLP possess Ankyrin domain required for protein-protein interaction and recognition of H3K9me1 and H3K9me2 marks.19 The SET domain of SETDB1 and SETDB2 is interrupted by a 347 amino acid insertion, which is conserved from human to lower eukaryotes. The insertion does not affect their catalytic activity.13,20 SETDB1 and SETDB2 possess a methyl-CpG binding domain that binds to methylated DNA,21 and, in addition, SETDB1 contains a Tudor domain that helps in methyl-lysine binding.22 A subset of these KMTs (G9a, GLP, SETDB1, and SUV39H1) have been shown to co-exist in the same complex. Moreover, the stability of KMTs is interlinked as SUV39H1 and G9a null cells show destabilization of all other KMTs.23
Sub-cellular localization during cell cycle
While SUV39H1 protein levels do not vary during different phases of the cell cycle, its distribution is regulated at mitosis. A weak nuclear staining is observed in interphase to early prophase cells. At metaphase, SUV39H1 is concentrated at centromeres that are significantly reduced during anaphase and telophase.24 The concentration of SUV39H enzymes at centromeres results in heterochromatin compaction that is important for chromosome segregation during mitosis. Posttranslational modifications of SUV39H1 could play a role in its dynamic distribution during mitosis. Indeed, SUV39H1 is phosphorylated at several serine residues at mitosis—potentially at serine (S) 36, S72, S268, S376, S381, S391, and S406, which correlate with centromeric accumulation at metaphase.24 Cdk2-mediated phosphorylation of SUV39H1 at S391 during S phase leads to its dissociation from chromatin and causes heterochromatin replication.25 The dynamic distribution during mitosis implies that SUV39H1 may play a role during cell division that has indeed been confirmed by gene disruption studies in mice.
G9a and GLP form homo-and hetero-dimeric complexes and can exert independent functions, although the heterodimeric complex is thought to be functional in vivo.12,26 Similar to SUV39H1, G9a remains nuclear at all phases of the cell cycle, but oscillates with a peak in protein expression at S and M phase.27 G9a localizes at replication forks through interactions with PCNA and DNMT1. This results in increased binding of DNMT1 to the replication fork and helps in reinstating heterochromatinization through histone and DNA methylation.28-30
Interestingly, unlike SUV39H1 and G9a, SETDB1 shows both nuclear and cytoplasmic localization. Within the nucleus, SETDB1 exhibits diffuse staining in euchromatin as well as punctate staining corresponding to PML-NB foci.31 Moreover, overexpressed SETDB1 is localized mainly in the cytoplasm in various human cell lines, including HeLa, HEK293, HepG2, and A549 cells.32 Several mechanisms modulate SETDB1 localization. Among these, canonical Wnt signaling is involved in SETDB1 export during muscle differentiation and concomitantly release its occupancy on target genes such as Ankyrin repeat domain 1 (Ankrd1), whose expression is crucial for myogenic differentiation.33 During the S phase, SETDB1 is localized to pericentric heterochromatin suggesting its function in heterochromatic H3K9me3 during replication.34
Developmental functions
SUV39H1 and SUV39H2 show overlapping expression during embryonic development suggesting functional redundancy between these enzymes.10 Single gene disruption of SUV39H1 or SUV39H2 does not affect viability or fertility in mice.35 However, knockout of both SUV39H1/H2 results in pre-natal lethality with a substantial reduction in global H3K9me3 levels. The embryos develop normally until E12.5, but later show growth retardation. Loss of SUV39H1/H2 in mice leads to delayed meiotic prophase, and spermatocytes undergo apoptosis at the pachytene stage. Moreover, defects in pericentric heterochromatin lead to genome instability and SUV39H1 knockout mice show an increased risk of late onset B-cell lymphomas resembling non-Hodgkin lymphomas in humans. A significant reduction in H3K9 methylation leading to altered gene expression and chromosomal mis-segregation was evident in these lymphomas.35
G9a is expressed in several tissues including thymus, skeletal muscle, lymph node, and fetal liver during development.36,37 Loss of both G9a and GLP in mice leads to embryonic lethality at E9.5 with a global reduction in H3K9me1 and H3K9me2. The embryos show severe growth retardation due to increased apoptosis.11,12,15 The role of G9a in cell division is apparent by conditional deletion of G9a in the germ-lineage using TNAP-Cre, which leads to sterility and aborted meiosis at pachytene stage in germ cells. In addition, a drastic loss in H3K9me1 and H3K9me2 was apparent during meiotic prophase.38 Similar studies indicate that knockdown of GLP in mouse zygotes induces apoptosis and reduced blastocyst formation.39
Conditional knockout of G9a/GLP in forebrain leads to defect in learning and memory in mice.40 Deletion of GLP (chromosome 9q) have been linked to mental retardation and brachycephaly.41 Consistently, GLP heterozygous mice show delayed postnatal development with brachycephalic crania, a short nose, and hypotonia, resembling features of Kleefstra syndrome.42 Genetic evidence using SNP genotyping from meduloblastomas has revealed deletions of GLP and SYMD4 genes implicating that histone lysine methylation (H3K9me) could be an important target in these tumors.43
SETDB1, but not SUV39H1 and G9a, is expressed in germinal vesicles and metaphase II arrested oocytes. Immunostaining of mouse zygotes revealed a higher level of SETDB1 expression in the male pronucleus localized at the peri-nucleolar rim.44 Consistent with its unique and early expression, SETDB1 null embryos show peri-implantation lethality at the blastocyst stage at E4.5 compared with SUV39H1 (non-essential) and G9a/GLP (embryos die around E9.5).44-46 SETDB1-null blastocysts show defective inner cell mass signifying its role in embryonic stem cell formation. In SETDB1 null oocytes, the transition from prophase to metaphase is delayed, and in vitro culture of zygotes with maternal SETDB1 deficiency results in a failure to reach the 2-cell stage. The embryos show defects in chromosome segregation and arrest at G2/M.46 The physiologic function of SETDB2 is lesser characterized although reduction of SETDB2 results in loss of CENP proteins and delayed mitosis.14 Overexpression of SETDB1 in the adult forebrain of mice results in an anti-depressant like phenotype and impairment in learning.47 Interestingly, SETDB1, G9a and GLP expression is elevated in patients having schizophrenia.48 From these studies it is apparent that de-regulation of SUV39 KMTs is associated with neuropathologies. In addition to this, a vast number of studies have also reported that SUV39 KMTs are de-regulated in cancers, which is discussed below in a separate section.
Function in cellular proliferation
In highly orchestrated events during cell cycle, histones and DNA synthesis occur during the S phase, and chromosome segregation and cell division occur during the mitotic M phase. These 2 critical phases are preceded by growth preparatory and checkpoint control known as Gap1 (G1) and Gap2 (G2), respectively. Chromatin modifications are crucial for appropriate gene expression at each cell cycle phase to maintain genome integrity and appropriate progression. SUV39H1 plays a role in the G1/S transition which is regulated by the Rb1/E2F complex. It is now well established that Rb1 associates with E2F1 and creates a repressive complex on cell cycle genes, which ensures their permanent silencing. Repression by Rb1 is partly achieved through recruitment of specific KMTs.49-51 SUV39H1 associates with Rb1 and mediates repression of cyclin genes by mediating H3K9me3 on their promoters. Consistently, CyclinE and CyclinA2 activity are elevated in SUV39H1 null fibroblasts.51 Similarly, during early G1, origin recognition complex (ORC1) large subunit interacts with Rb1 and recruits SUV39H1 to the CyclinE promoter to mediate repressive H3K9me3 marks. This provides buffering time for daughter cells to decide whether to proliferate or exit the cell cycle.52 In G0 and early G1, Rb1-SUV39H1 mediated H3K9 methylation is also apparent on the DHFR promoter. As the cells progress toward G1/S, Rb1-SUV39H1 dissociates from E2F1 possibly due to hyper-phosphorylation of Rb1, which is correlated with hyperacetylation at the DHFR promoter.53 Interestingly, erythroblasts cultured ex vivo from E12.5 fetal liver of SUV39H1 overexpressing transgenic mice show aberrant cell cycle profiles with lower G0/G1, and higher S phase populations. These erythroblasts escape senescence possibly due to reduced p21 and increased Rb1 and p53 expression.54
G9a plays a positive role in regulating proliferation of cells.55 Gene expression studies using microarrays indicate that G9a targets an array of cell cycle genes.27,56 G9a overexpressing cells progress faster into the S phase, and, conversely, G9a knockdown leads to lower S phase cells compared with controls.27,57 In cultured myoblasts, G9a promotes proliferation via 2 different mechanisms. First, consistent with its repressor role, G9a mediates H3K9me2 marks at promoters of cell cycle inhibitors such as p21 and Rb1 in a methylation-dependent manner.27 Indeed, G9a is well known to transcriptionally repress the expression of p21, in several other cell lines.27,58-60 In addition, G9a interacts with E2F1 and the acetyltransferase PCAF and actively drives the expression of CyclinD1 and DHFR in a methylation-independent manner. G9a occupancy co-relates with active H3K9ac marks while no changes in H3K9me2 are observed on E2F1 target gene promoters.27 Consistent with these findings, G9a overexpressing myoblasts have increased and sustained CyclinD1 levels.61 Interestingly, G9a preferentially associates with transcription factor E2F1 during G1/S phase.27 Evidence indicating higher acetylation at the DHFR promoter during G1/S53 is consistent with the interaction of G9a with the E2F1/PCAF complex during this phase. Human G9a, unlike its mouse counterpart, is also associated with p300/CBP leading to acetylation of PUMA promoter that results in apoptosis.62,63 These studies highlight the methyltransferase dependent and independent function of G9a.
Similar to G9a, SETDB1 is required for proliferation of myoblasts. Knockdown of SETDB1 reduces S phase cells and results in slower growth.64 Genome wide analysis revealed SETDB1 occupancy correlated with H3K9me3 on target genes. Interestingly, SETDB1 occupancy was also apparent on promoters with active H3K9ac marks that did not correlate with H3K9me3. This indicates that, similar to G9a, SETDB1 could also be involved in mediating gene activation.33 In contrast to these observations, in P19 cells, SETDB1 represses the E2F1 promoter upon thyroid hormone treatment. Depletion of SETDB1 led to increased colony formation and cells in the S phase. This study indicates a negative role for SETDB1 in proliferation during thyroid hormone receptor regulated transcription.65
Function in cellular differentiation and senescence
Cell fate decisions are taken during G1 phase of the cell cycle. In response to distinct stimuli, cells exit the cell cycle and enter into non-cycling states such as differentiation, senescence, and quiescence. The role of SUV39 KMTs has been studied in differentiation of skeletal myoblasts. In muscle cells, differentiation of proliferating myoblasts involves an irreversible arrest that blocks the re-entry of myotubes into the cell cycle. SUV39H1 plays crucial role in silencing of E2F1 target genes in differentiating myotubes by mediating repressive H3K9me3 on CyclinA and DHFR promoters. In addition, SUV39H1 positions E2F1 target genes close to pericentromeric heterochromatin ensuring silencing of proliferation genes in myotubes. Consistently, knockdown of SUV39H1 led to inhibition of myogenic differentiation.66,67 In contrast to these studies, SUV39H1 was shown to inhibit myogenic differentiation by interaction with MyoD and deposition of repressive H3K9 methylation at myogenic promoters.68 SUV39H1 also functions to inhibit adipogenic differentiation through transcriptional repression of CEBPα, a regulator of adipogenesis. Recruitment of both G9a and SUV39H1 by AP2α at the CEBPα promoter leads to H3K9me2 by G9a, which is further tri-methylated by SUV39H1 to inhibit its expression during adipogenic differentiation.69
Several groups have addressed the role of G9a and GLP in muscle differentiation using cultured myoblast cell lines as well primary myoblasts.37,70-74,61 G9a inhibits myogenesis by preventing cell cycle exit through repression of p21 and Rb127. In addition, G9a negatively regulates MyoD and MEF2 transcriptional activity.70,73,74 Surprisingly, G9a was recently reported to be dispensable for muscle development and regeneration in vivo. Satellite cells derived from G9a conditional knockout mice (MyoD-Cre) had similar proliferation and myogenic differentiation kinetics compared with controls. Muscle regeneration was also unaffected in G9a knockout mice (Pax7-Cre).75 Given that GLP inhibits myogenesis,61 and G9a/GLP are thought to function as a heterodimer, it is possible that GLP compensates for G9a loss in vivo. In addition, genetic background, which influences mouse phenotypes in many genetically engineered strains, may also account for these findings. Similar to SUV39H1, G9a inhibits adipogenic differentiation.76-78 This inhibition is mediated via repression of PPARγ expression as well as activation of Wnt10a expression, a negative regulator of adipogenesis. Deletion of G9a or inhibition of its activity with BIX01294, reduced H3K9me2 on PPARγ promoter but, interestingly, increased H3K9ac at the Wnt10a promoter. Thus, similar to its role in myogenic differentiation, G9a functions in a methyltransferase-dependent and -independent manner to regulate adipogenesis.77 Furthermore, CEBPβ activates G9a expression during mitotic clonal expansion reiterating a role for G9a in proliferation of preadipocytes.78
In contrast to G9a, knockdown of SETDB1 decreased myogenic differentiation through downregulation of MyoD and myogenin expression indicating that SETDB1 is required for their expression and differentiation. However, surprisingly, overexpression of SETDB1 does not promote differentiation.64 Another study indicated that SETDB1 promotes the expansion of muscle progenitor cells isolated from muscle fibers and its overexpression inhibits myogenic differentiation. Consistently, similar to G9a, knockdown of SETDB1 at the onset of differentiation led to enhanced differentiation.33 SETDB1 is also involved in inhibition of adipogenic differentiation. SETDB1 mediates H3K9 methylation on CEBPα promoter, and its knockdown led to a decrease in H3K9 methylation and enhanced adipogenic differentiation.79 Overall, these studies indicate that SUV39 KMTs play a crucial role in cellular differentiation by regulating lineage specific transcription factors (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.
Regulation of cellular differentiation by SUV39 KMTs. G9a associates with both activator as well as repressor complexes in proliferating myoblasts and pre-adipocytes. SUV39H1 and SETDB1 are mainly involved in repression of myogenic and adipogenic genes. In differentiating myotubes SUV39H1 represses E2F1 target genes and ensures permanent cell cycle exit. The transcription factors that recruit SETDB1 in myoblasts and pre-adipocytes and G9a in pre-adipocytes have yet to be identified.
Senescent cells exhibit characteristic heterochromatin structures called senescence associated heterochromatin foci (SAHF), which repress expression of proliferation genes.80 SUV39H1, along with HP1 and Rb1, regulate chromatin changes and silence E2F target genes in senescent cells.81 Prohibitin, a tumor suppressor gene with anti-proliferative activity interacts with SUV39H1 and HP1 in SAHFs leading to repression of E2F-responsive promoters.82 Interestingly, SUV39H1 inactivated lymphocytes are refractory to oncogene-induced senescence.83 Consistently, in Myc driven mouse lymphomas, genetic deletion of SUV39H1 accelerates tumor development by inactivating cellular senescence.84 G9a and GLP have also been implicated senescence. Proteosomal degradation of G9a and GLP by APC/Ccdh1, an ubiquitin ligase, was observed during Ras-induced senescence. This led to an apparent decrease in H3K9me2 globally as well as on promoters of IL-6 and IL-8, major components of senescent associated secretory phenotype (SASP), suggesting that G9a-GLP plays a role in senescence.85 G9a and GLP also play a role in cellular quiescence. E2F6, a repressor member of E2F family, which lacks Rb1 family binding domain, complexes with G9a and GLP in quiescent G0 cells, and silences E2F and Myc responsive promoters.86 G9a mediated H3K9me2 on HIV1 long-terminal repeat promoter has been implicated in establishment of latent HIV 1 provirus.87
De-regulation in cancer
Consistent with its role in suppressing genes required for proliferation, SUV39H1 plays a tumor suppressor role. Mutations in Rb1 disrupt its interaction with SUV39H1 in many cancers.51 In a zebrafish model for embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS), SUV39H1 exerts its tumor suppressive effect by reducing tumor initiation. SUV39H1 overexpression resulted in senescence and growth arrest of ERMS cells by silencing the expression of CyclinB1, an E2F1 target gene.88
SUV39H1 activity is regulated by PTMs that impinge on its function in cell cycle progression and tumorigenesis. For instance, SUV39H1 stability is negatively regulated by Pin1 and positively by SIRT1. Ser16 phosphorylation of Pin1 leads to its association with SUV39H1 and marks it for ubiquitin mediated degradation. Pin1-dependent degradation of SUV39H1 promotes carcinogenesis via upregulation of CyclinD1 which under normal conditions is repressed by SUV39H1. Upregulation of CyclinD1 results in increased proliferation and tumorigenesis.89 SIRT1 increases SUV39H1 half-life by inhibiting its polyubiquitination at K87 by MDM2, and thus maintains genome stability.90 Upon DNA damage, SUV39H1 is methylated at K105 and K123 by SET 7/9 methyltransferase. This leads to a decrease in its methyltransferase activity and a drop in H3K9me3 leading to heterochromatin relaxation and genomic instability in cancer cells.91 On the other hand, deacetylation of lysine 266 by SIRT1 increases SUV39H1 activity resulting in increased H3K9me3 at heterochromatin regions.92
In most instances, G9a regulates cell cycle either by suppression of tumor suppressors or activating oncogenes. Not surprisingly therefore, G9a and GLP are upregulated in various human cancers.93-96 G9a is significantly increased in stage 4 neuroblastomas. Inhibition of G9a results in decreased CyclinD1, Cdk4, and Cdk6 expression causing G1 arrest.97 Similarly, high expression of G9a in colorectal cancer is associated with tumor progression and maintenance of malignancy. Silencing of G9a in colorectal cancer cells is associated with increased DNA damage resulting in the upregulation of senescence markers, such as p21 and senescence-associated β-galactosidase.98 In mouse models of acute myeloid leukemia, loss of G9a alters proliferation and delays disease progression. G9a loss in AML leads to G0/G1 arrest, which is partially mediated by HoxA9 dependent gene expression.99 In contrast to its potential oncogenic role, some lines of evidence indicate it may function as a tumor suppressor. G9a is an upstream regulator of Ubiquitin like with PHD and Ring Finger Domains 1 (UHRF1), a master regulator that controls the expression of many tumor suppressors, such as p16INK4A, hMLH1 (mutL homolog), p21, and Rb1 in various cancers. G9a, along with the co-repressor YY1 was found to silence the expression of UHRF1. Downregulation of UHRF1 led to a delay in S phase progression, thereby preventing tumor progression in leukemic cells.57 Thus, the effects of G9a may be cancer specific.
The role of SETDB1 in tumorigenesis is less understood. p53 seems to play an important role in most of the effects of SETDB1 in tumorigenesis. SETDB1 is overexpressed in human prostate cancer cells and is associated with tumor progression. Silencing of SETDB1 led to a decrease in proliferation primarily due to a cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase.100 Increasing reports indicate a critical role for SETDB1 in liver carcinogenesis.101,102 In liver cancer cells, p53 undergoes a gain of function mutation (R249S), and also show an overexpression of SETDB1. SETDB1 methylates p53 at lysine 370 and, thereby, stabilizes it to regulate cell growth. Attenuation of SETDB1 abrogates the methylation of mutant p53, resulting in a decrease in S phase cells and proliferation.102 Paclitaxel, a chemotherapeutic drug, negatively regulates SETDB1 expression. The repressive action of paclitaxel on SETDB1 is mediated by p53-dependent recruitment of SUV39H1 at the SETDB1 promoter resulting in increased H3K9 repressive marks.103 In glioma cell lines and tissue samples, SETDB1 and SUV39H1 expression is elevated. Inhibition of SETDB1 and SUV39H1 independently led to a decrease in proliferation as a result of increased apoptosis.104
Future perspectives
SUV39 KMTs have emerged as critical determinants of cell cycle progression and cell fate decisions (Table 1). As discussed above, aberrant expression of KMTs is apparent in cancer and, although not a focus of this review, in neurologic disorders.105,106 Since KMTs are reliant on S-adenosyl methionine as a cofactor, their role in linking metabolism to tumorigenesis is an interesting avenue for further investigation. Epigenetic modifications are selective and reversible. As such, KMTs are being intensively investigated as drug targets. Indeed, ongoing efforts toward understanding biochemical and structural properties of KMTs have led to the development of highly selective small molecule inhibitors that target enzymatic activity. In exciting advances, DOT1L and EZH2 inhibitors have entered clinical trials for AML and MLL respectively.107 It is, however, important to note that recent studies have identified methyltransferase activity independent functions of KMTs.27,62,108 In addition, although each SUV39 KMT is known to regulate gene expression and exert independent functions, a subset (G9a, GLP, SETDB1, and SUV39H1) have been shown to co-exist in the same complex, and their stability is interlinked.23 Thus multiple KMTs may function synergistically in human pathologies. However, the inhibition of both H3K9 and H3K27 methylation may not be desirable as it can lead to age related pathologies.109 Thus, a broader understanding of their mechanisms of action and regulatory circuits is essential to develop targeted therapies in human pathologies.
Table 1.
A summary of the roles of SUV39 KMTs in cell cycle progression, differentiation, senescence, and their de-regulation role in cancer.
CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION | DIFFERENTIATION | SENESCENCE | CANCER | |
---|---|---|---|---|
SUV39H1/H2 | Loss of SUV39H1/H2 delays meiotic prophase in spermatocytes.34 | Inhibits myogenic differentiation by repressing MyoD activity68 | Promotes senescence by repressing E2F1-target genes.81 | Functions as a tumor suppressor. Knockout results in increased B-cell lymphomas34 |
Inhibits proliferation by repressing E2F1 target genes.51-53 | Inhibits adipogenic differentiation by repressing C/EBPα expression.69 | Overexpression in ERMS leads to delay in tumor initiation.88 | ||
G9a/GLP | Loss of G9a in germ cells aborted meiosis at pachytene stage.38 Promotes proliferation by inducing expression of E2F1 target genes. Prevents cell cycle exit through repression of p21 and Rb127. | Inhibits myogenic differentiation by repressing MEF2 and MyoD activity.70,73,74 | Inhibits senescence by repressing IL6 and IL8 expression.85 | Overexpressed in several cancers including breast, lung ovarian and colorectal cancer93-96 |
Inhibits adipogenic differentiation by repressing PPARγ and activating Wnt10a expression.77 | Loss leads to delay in disease progression in acute myeloid leukemia.61 | |||
SETDB1/B2 | SETDB1 null oocytes show delayed transition from prophase to metaphase.46 | Overexpression inhibits muscle differentiation46 | Prevents BRAF induced oncogenic senescence in melanoma.110 | Overexpressed in prostrate and liver cancer100-102 |
Promotes expansion of muscle progenitor cells.33 | Inhibits adipogenesis by repressing CEBPα.79 | |||
Knockdown slows growth in myoblasts.64 |
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Funding
Work in the authors' laboratory is supported by the National Medical Research Council and the National University Health System Aspiration Grant.
References
- 1.Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 2011; 21:381-95; PMID:21321607; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/cr.2011.22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Greer EL, Shi Y. Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13:343-57; PMID:22473383; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrg3173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang Y, Reinberg D. Transcription regulation by histone methylation: interplay between different covalent modifications of the core histone tails. Genes Dev 2001; 15:2343-60; PMID:11562345; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.927301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tschiersch B, Hofmann A, Krauss V, Dorn R, Korge G, Reuter G. The protein encoded by the Drosophila position-effect variegation suppressor gene Su(var)3-9 combines domains of antagonistic regulators of homeotic gene complexes. EMBO J 1994; 13:3822-31; PMID:7915232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jenuwein T, Laible G, Dorn R, Reuter G. SET domain proteins modulate chromatin domains in eu- and heterochromatin. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 1998; 54:80-93; PMID:9487389; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s000180050127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang X, Wen H, Shi X. Lysine methylation: beyond histones. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 2012; 44:14-27; PMID:22194010; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/abbs/gmr100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dillon SC, Zhang X, Trievel RC, Cheng X. The SET-domain protein superfamily: protein lysine methyltransferases. Genome Biol 2005; 6:227; PMID:16086857; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/gb-2005-6-8-227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mozzetta C, Boyarchuk E, Pontis J, Ait-Si-Ali S. Sound of silence: the properties and functions of repressive Lys methyltransferases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015; 16:499-513; PMID:26204160; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm4029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rea S, Eisenhaber F, O'Carroll D, Strahl BD, Sun ZW, Schmid M, Opravil S, Mechtler K, Ponting CP, Allis CD, et al.. Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature 2000; 406:593-9; PMID:10949293; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/35020506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.O'Carroll D, Scherthan H, Peters AH, Opravil S, Haynes AR, Laible G, Rea S, Schmid M, Lebersorger A, Jerratsch M, et al.. Isolation and characterization of Suv39h2, a second histone H3 methyltransferase gene that displays testis-specific expression. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:9423-33; PMID:11094092; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.20.24.9423-9433.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tachibana M, Sugimoto K, Nozaki M, Ueda J, Ohta T, Ohki M, Fukuda M, Takeda N, Niida H, Kato H, et al.. G9a histone methyltransferase plays a dominant role in euchromatic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and is essential for early embryogenesis. Genes Dev 2002; 16:1779-91; PMID:12130538; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.989402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tachibana M, Ueda J, Fukuda M, Takeda N, Ohta T, Iwanari H, Sakihama T, Kodama T, Hamakubo T, Shinkai Y. Histone methyltransferases G9a and GLP form heteromeric complexes and are both crucial for methylation of euchromatin at H3-K9. Genes Dev 2005; 19:815-26; PMID:15774718; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.1284005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schultz DC, Ayyanathan K, Negorev D, Maul GG, Rauscher FJ. SETDB1: a novel KAP-1-associated histone H3, lysine 9-specific methyltransferase that contributes to HP1-mediated silencing of euchromatic genes by KRAB zinc-finger proteins. Genes Dev 2002; 16:919-32; PMID:11959841; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.973302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Falandry C, Fourel G, Galy V, Ristriani T, Horard B, Bensimon E, Salles G, Gilson E, Magdinier F. CLLD8/KMT1F is a lysine methyltransferase that is important for chromosome segregation. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:20234-41; PMID:20404330; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M109.052399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rice JC, Briggs SD, Ueberheide B, Barber CM, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Shinkai Y, Allis CD. Histone methyltransferases direct different degrees of methylation to define distinct chromatin domains. Mol Cell 2003; 12:1591-8; PMID:14690610; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00479-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Loyola A, Bonaldi T, Roche D, Imhof A, Almouzni G. PTMs on H3 Variants before Chromatin Assembly Potentiate Their Final Epigenetic State. Mol Cell 2006; 24:309-16; PMID:17052464; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang H, An W, Cao R, Xia L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Chatton B, Tempst P, Roeder RG, Zhang Y. mAM facilitates conversion by ESET of dimethyl to trimethyl lysine 9 of histone H3 to cause transcriptional repression. Mol Cell 2003; 12:475-87; PMID:14536086; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2003.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang T, Xu C, Liu Y, Fan K, Li Z, Sun X, Ouyang H, Zhang X, Zhang J, Li Y, et al.. Crystal structure of the human SUV39H1 chromodomain and its recognition of histone H3K9me2/3. PloS One 2012; 7:e52977; PMID:23285239; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0052977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Collins RE, Northrop JP, Horton JR, Lee DY, Zhang X, Stallcup MR, Cheng X. The ankyrin repeats of G9a and GLP histone methyltransferases are mono- and dimethyllysine binding modules. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2008; 15:245-50; PMID:18264113; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nsmb.1384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Harte PJ, Wu W, Carrasquillo MM, Matera AG. Assignment of a novel bifurcated SET domain gene, SETDB1, to human chromosome band 1q21 by in situ hybridization and radiation hybrids. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1999; 84:83-6; PMID:10343109; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1159/000015220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Clouaire T, Stancheva I. Methyl-CpG binding proteins: specialized transcriptional repressors or structural components of chromatin Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 2008; 65:1509-22; PMID:18322651; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00018-008-7324-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen C, Nott TJ, Jin J, Pawson T. Deciphering arginine methylation: Tudor tells the tale. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011; 12:629-42; PMID:21915143; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm3185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fritsch L, Robin P, Mathieu JRR, Souidi M, Hinaux H, Rougeulle C, Harel-Bellan A, Ameyar-Zazoua M, Ait-Si-Ali S. A subset of the histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases Suv39h1, G9a, GLP, and SETDB1 participate in a multimeric complex. Mol Cell 2010; 37:46-56; PMID:20129054; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aagaard L, Schmid M, Warburton P, Jenuwein T. Mitotic phosphorylation of SUV39H1, a novel component of active centromeres, coincides with transient accumulation at mammalian centromeres. J Cell Sci 2000; 113( Pt 5):817-29; PMID:10671371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Park SH, Yu SE, Chai YG, Jang YK. CDK2-dependent phosphorylation of Suv39H1 is involved in control of heterochromatin replication during cell cycle progression. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:6196-207; PMID:24728993; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gku263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tachibana M, Matsumura Y, Fukuda M, Kimura H, Shinkai Y. G9a/GLP complexes independently mediate H3K9 and DNA methylation to silence transcription. EMBO J 2008; 27:2681-90; PMID:18818694; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/emboj.2008.192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rao VK, Ow JR, Shankar SR, Bharathy N, Manikandan J, Wang Y, Taneja R. G9a promotes proliferation and inhibits cell cycle exit during myogenic differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res 2016. 44(17):8129-43; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gkw483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Estève P-O, Chin HG, Smallwood A, Feehery GR, Gangisetty O, Karpf AR, Carey MF, Pradhan S. Direct interaction between DNMT1 and G9a coordinates DNA and histone methylation during replication. Genes Dev 2006; 20:3089-103; PMID:17085482; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.1463706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yu Y, Song C, Zhang Q, DiMaggio PA, Garcia BA, York A, Carey MF, Grunstein M. Histone H3 lysine 56 methylation regulates DNA replication through its interaction with PCNA. Mol Cell 2012; 46:7-17; PMID:22387026; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Groth A, Rocha W, Verreault A, Almouzni G. Chromatin challenges during DNA replication and repair. Cell 2007; 128:721-33; PMID:17320509; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cho S, Park JS, Kang Y-K. Dual functions of histone-lysine N-methyltransferase Setdb1 protein at promyelocytic leukemia-nuclear body (PML-NB): maintaining PML-NB structure and regulating the expression of its associated genes. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:41115-24; PMID:21921037; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M111.248534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tachibana K, Gotoh E, Kawamata N, Ishimoto K, Uchihara Y, Iwanari H, Sugiyama A, Kawamura T, Mochizuki Y, Tanaka T, et al.. Analysis of the subcellular localization of the human histone methyltransferase SETDB1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2015; 465:725-31; PMID:26296461; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.08.065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Beyer S, Pontis J, Schirwis E, Battisti V, Rudolf A, Le Grand F, Ait-Si-Ali S. Canonical Wnt signalling regulates nuclear export of Setdb1 during skeletal muscle terminal differentiation. Cell Discov 2016; 2:16037; PMID:27790377; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/celldisc.2016.37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Loyola A, Tagami H, Bonaldi T, Roche D, Quivy JP, Imhof A, Nakatani Y, Dent SYR, Almouzni G. The HP1α–CAF1–SetDB1-containing complex provides H3K9me1 for Suv39-mediated K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin. EMBO Rep 2009; 10:769-75; PMID:19498464; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/embor.2009.90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Peters AH, O'Carroll D, Scherthan H, Mechtler K, Sauer S, Schöfer C, Weipoltshammer K, Pagani M, Lachner M, Kohlmaier A, et al.. Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell 2001; 107:323-37; PMID:11701123; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00542-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Brown SE, Campbell RD, Sanderson CM. Novel NG36/G9a gene products encoded within the human and mouse MHC class III regions. Mamm Genome Off J Int Mamm Genome Soc 2001; 12:916-24; PMID:11707778; http://dx.doi.org/23087213 10.1007/s00335-001-3029-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ling BMT, Gopinadhan S, Kok WK, Shankar SR, Gopal P, Bharathy N, Wang Y, Taneja R. G9a mediates Sharp-1-dependent inhibition of skeletal muscle differentiation. Mol Biol Cell 2012; 23:4778-85; PMID:23087213; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1091/mbc.E12-04-0311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tachibana M, Nozaki M, Takeda N, Shinkai Y. Functional dynamics of H3K9 methylation during meiotic prophase progression. EMBO J 2007; 26:3346-59; PMID:17599069; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Huang X-J, Ma X, Wang X, Zhou X, Li J, Sun S-C, Liu H. Involvement of G9A-like protein (GLP) in the development of mouse preimplantation embryos in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev 2015; 28(11):1733-1740; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1071/RD14341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schaefer A, Sampath SC, Intrator A, Min A, Gertler TS, Surmeier DJ, Tarakhovsky A, Greengard P. Control of cognition and adaptive behavior by the GLP/G9a epigenetic suppressor complex. Neuron 2009; 64:678-91; PMID:20005824; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kleefstra T, Kramer JM, Neveling K, Willemsen MH, Koemans TS, Vissers LELM, Wissink-Lindhout W, Fenckova M, van den Akker WMR, Kasri NN, et al.. Disruption of an EHMT1-associated chromatin-modification module causes intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet 2012; 91:73-82; PMID:22726846; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Balemans MCM, Ansar M, Oudakker AR, van Caam APM, Bakker B, Vitters EL, van der Kraan PM, de Bruijn DRH, Janssen SM, Kuipers AJ, et al.. Reduced Euchromatin histone methyltransferase 1 causes developmental delay, hypotonia, and cranial abnormalities associated with increased bone gene expression in Kleefstra syndrome mice. Dev Biol 2014; 386:395-407; PMID:24362066; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Northcott PA, Nakahara Y, Wu X, Feuk L, Ellison DW, Croul S, Mack S, Kongkham PN, Peacock J, Dubuc A, et al.. Multiple recurrent genetic events converge on control of histone lysine methylation in medulloblastoma. Nat Genet 2009; 41:465-72; PMID:19270706; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ng.336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cho S, Park JS, Kwon S, Kang Y-K. Dynamics of Setdb1 expression in early mouse development. Gene Expr Patterns GEP 2012; 12:213-8; PMID:22504302; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.gep.2012.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dodge JE, Kang Y-K, Beppu H, Lei H, Li E. Histone H3-K9 methyltransferase ESET is essential for early development. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:2478-86; PMID:14993285; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.24.6.2478-2486.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Eymery A, Liu Z, Ozonov EA, Stadler MB, Peters AHFM. The methyltransferase Setdb1 is essential for meiosis and mitosis in mouse oocytes and early embryos. Development 2016; 143:2767-79; PMID:27317807; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/dev.132746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jiang Y, Jakovcevski M, Bharadwaj R, Connor C, Schroeder FA, Lin CL, Straubhaar J, Martin G, Akbarian S. Setdb1 histone methyltransferase regulates mood-related behaviors and expression of the NMDA receptor subunit NR2B. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 2010; 30:7152-67; PMID:20505083; http://dx.doi.org/23815974 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1314-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chase KA, Gavin DP, Guidotti A, Sharma RP. Histone Methylation at H3K9; Evidence for a Restrictive Epigenome in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2013; 149:15-20; PMID:23815974; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.schres.2013.06.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vandel L, Nicolas E, Vaute O, Ferreira R, Ait-Si-Ali S, Trouche D. Transcriptional repression by the retinoblastoma protein through the recruitment of a histone methyltransferase. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:6484-94; PMID:11533237; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.21.19.6484-6494.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dick FA, Rubin SM. Molecular mechanisms underlying RB protein function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013; 14:297-306; PMID:23594950; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm3567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nielsen SJ, Schneider R, Bauer UM, Bannister AJ, Morrison A, O'Carroll D, Firestein R, Cleary M, Jenuwein T, Herrera RE, et al.. Rb targets histone H3 methylation and HP1 to promoters. Nature 2001; 412:561-5; PMID:11484059; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/35087620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hossain M, Stillman B. Opposing roles for DNA replication initiator proteins ORC1 and CDC6 in control of Cyclin E gene transcription. eLife 2016; 5e12785; PMID:27458800; http://dx.doi.org/12588981 10.7554/eLife.12785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nicolas E, Roumillac C, Trouche D. Balance between acetylation and methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 on the E2F-responsive dihydrofolate reductase promoter. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:1614-22; PMID:12588981; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.23.5.1614-1622.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Czvitkovich S, Sauer S, Peters AHFM, Deiner E, Wolf A, Laible G, Opravil S, Beug H, Jenuwein T. Over-expression of the SUV39H1 histone methyltransferase induces altered proliferation and differentiation in transgenic mice. Mech Dev 2001; 107:141-53; PMID:11520670; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00464-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shankar SR, Bahirvani AG, Rao VK, Bharathy N, Ow JR, Taneja R. G9a, a multipotent regulator of gene expression. Epigenetics Off J DNA Methylation Soc 2013; 8:16-22; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/epi.23331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zylicz JJ, Dietmann S, Günesdogan U, Hackett JA, Cougot D, Lee C, Surani MA. Chromatin dynamics and the role of G9a in gene regulation and enhancer silencing during early mouse development. eLife 2015; 4e09571; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7554/eLife.09571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kim K-B, Son H-J, Choi S, Hahm JY, Jung H, Baek HJ, Kook H, Hahn Y, Kook H, Seo S-B. H3K9 methyltransferase G9a negatively regulates UHRF1 transcription during leukemia cell differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:3509-23; PMID:25765655; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gkv183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nishio H, Walsh MJ. CCAAT displacement protein/cut homolog recruits G9a histone lysine methyltransferase to repress transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:11257-62; PMID:15269344; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0401343101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Duan Z, Zarebski A, Montoya-Durango D, Grimes HL, Horwitz M. Gfi1 coordinates epigenetic repression of p21Cip/WAF1 by recruitment of histone lysine methyltransferase G9a and histone deacetylase 1. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:10338-51; PMID:16287849; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.25.23.10338-10351.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kim JK, Estève P-O, Jacobsen SE, Pradhan S. UHRF1 binds G9a and participates in p21 transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:493-505; PMID:19056828; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gkn961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Battisti V, Pontis J, Boyarchuk E, Fritsch L, Robin P, Ait-Si-Ali S, Joliot V. Unexpected Distinct Roles of the Related Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methyltransferases G9a and G9a-Like Protein in Myoblasts. J Mol Biol 2016; 428:2329-43; PMID:27056598; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rada M, Vasileva E, Lezina L, Marouco D, Antonov AV, Macip S, Melino G, Barlev NA. Human EHMT2/G9a activates p53 through methylation-independent mechanism. Oncogene 2016; PMID:27452519; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/onc.2016.258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Huang J, Dorsey J, Chuikov S, Pérez-Burgos L, Zhang X, Jenuwein T, Reinberg D, Berger SL. G9a and Glp methylate lysine 373 in the tumor suppressor p53. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:9636-41; PMID:20118233; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M109.062588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Song YJ, Choi JH, Lee H. Setdb1 is required for myogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblast cells via maintenance of MyoD expression. Mol Cells 2015; 38:362-72; PMID:25715926; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.14348/molcells.2015.2291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hong W, Li J, Wang B, Chen L, Niu W, Yao Z, Baniahmad A. Epigenetic involvement of Alien/ESET complex in thyroid hormone-mediated repression of E2F1 gene expression and cell proliferation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011; 415:650-5; PMID:22079090; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.10.130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ait-Si-Ali S, Guasconi V, Fritsch L, Yahi H, Sekhri R, Naguibneva I, Robin P, Cabon F, Polesskaya A, Harel-Bellan A. A Suv39h-dependent mechanism for silencing S-phase genes in differentiating but not in cycling cells. EMBO J 2004; 23:605-15; PMID:14765126; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Guasconi V, Pritchard L-L, Fritsch L, Mesner LD, Francastel C, Harel-Bellan A, Ait-Si-Ali S. Preferential association of irreversibly silenced E2F-target genes with pericentromeric heterochromatin in differentiated muscle cells. Epigenetics 2010; 5:704-9; PMID:20716953; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/epi.5.8.13025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mal AK. Histone methyltransferase Suv39h1 represses MyoD-stimulated myogenic differentiation. EMBO J 2006; 25:3323-34; PMID:16858404; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhang Z-C, Liu Y, Li S-F, Guo L, Zhao Y, Qian S-W, Wen B, Tang Q-Q, Li X. Suv39h1 mediates AP-2α-dependent inhibition of C/EBPα expression during adipogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 2014; 34:2330-8; PMID:24732798; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.00070-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ling BMT, Bharathy N, Chung T-K, Kok WK, Li S, Tan YH, Rao VK, Gopinadhan S, Sartorelli V, Walsh MJ, et al.. Lysine methyltransferase G9a methylates the transcription factor MyoD and regulates skeletal muscle differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:841-6; PMID:22215600; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1111628109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Jung E-S, Sim Y-J, Jeong H-S, Kim S-J, Yun Y-J, Song J-H, Jeon S-H, Choe C, Park K-T, Kim C-H, et al.. Jmjd2C increases MyoD transcriptional activity through inhibiting G9a-dependent MyoD degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015; 1849:1081-94; PMID:26149774; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2015.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wang J, Abate-Shen C. The MSX1 homeoprotein recruits G9a methyltransferase to repressed target genes in myoblast cells. PloS One 2012; 7:e37647; PMID:22629437; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0037647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 73.Choi J, Jang H, Kim H, Lee J-H, Kim S-T, Cho E-J, Youn H-D. Modulation of lysine methylation in myocyte enhancer factor 2 during skeletal muscle cell differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:224-34; PMID:24078251; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gkt873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ow JR, Palanichamy Kala M, Rao VK, Choi MH, Bharathy N, Taneja R. G9a inhibits MEF2C activity to control sarcomere assembly. Sci Rep 2016; 26(6):34163; PMID:27667720; http://dx.doi.org/27239264 10.1038/srep34163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhang R-H, Judson RN, Liu DY, Kast J, Rossi FMV. The lysine methyltransferase Ehmt2/G9a is dispensable for skeletal muscle development and regeneration. Skelet Muscle 2016; 6:22; PMID:27239264; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/s13395-016-0093-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gulbagci NT, Li L, Ling B, Gopinadhan S, Walsh M, Rossner M, Nave K-A, Taneja R. SHARP1/DEC2 inhibits adipogenic differentiation by regulating the activity of C/EBP. EMBO Rep 2009; 10:79-86; PMID:19029947; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/embor.2008.207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wang L, Xu S, Lee J-E, Baldridge A, Grullon S, Peng W, Ge K. Histone H3K9 methyltransferase G9a represses PPARγ expression and adipogenesis. EMBO J 2013; 32:45-59; PMID:23178591; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/emboj.2012.306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Li S-F, Guo L, Qian S-W, Liu Y, Zhang Y-Y, Zhang Z-C, Zhao Y, Shou J-Y, Tang Q-Q, Li X. G9a is transactivated by C/EBPβ to facilitate mitotic clonal expansion during 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2013; 304:E990-998; PMID:23512806; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1152/ajpendo.00608.2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Musri MM, Carmona MC, Hanzu FA, Kaliman P, Gomis R, Párrizas M. Histone demethylase LSD1 regulates adipogenesis. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:30034-41; PMID:20656681; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M110.151209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Funayama R, Ishikawa F. Cellular senescence and chromatin structure. Chromosoma 2007; 116:431-40; PMID:17579878; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00412-007-0115-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Narita M, Nũ nez S, Heard E, Narita M, Lin AW, Hearn SA, Spector DL, Hannon GJ, Lowe SW. Rb-mediated heterochromatin formation and silencing of E2F target genes during cellular senescence. Cell 2003; 113:703-16; PMID:12809602; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00401-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rastogi S, Joshi B, Dasgupta P, Morris M, Wright K, Chellappan S. Prohibitin facilitates cellular senescence by recruiting specific corepressors to inhibit E2F target genes. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:4161-71; PMID:16705168; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.02142-05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Braig M, Lee S, Loddenkemper C, Rudolph C, Peters AHFM, Schlegelberger B, Stein H, Dörken B, Jenuwein T, Schmitt CA. Oncogene-induced senescence as an initial barrier in lymphoma development. Nature 2005; 436:660-5; PMID:16079837; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature03841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Reimann M, Lee S, Loddenkemper C, Dörr JR, Tabor V, Aichele P, Stein H, Dörken B, Jenuwein T, Schmitt CA. Tumor stroma-derived TGF-beta limits myc-driven lymphomagenesis via Suv39h1-dependent senescence. Cancer Cell 2010; 17:262-72; PMID:20227040; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Takahashi A, Imai Y, Yamakoshi K, Kuninaka S, Ohtani N, Yoshimoto S, Hori S, Tachibana M, Anderton E, Takeuchi T, et al.. DNA damage signaling triggers degradation of histone methyltransferases through APC/C(Cdh1) in senescent cells. Mol Cell 2012; 45:123-31; PMID:22178396; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Ogawa H, Ishiguro K-I, Gaubatz S, Livingston DM, Nakatani Y. A complex with chromatin modifiers that occupies E2F- and Myc-responsive genes in G0 cells. Science 2002; 296:1132-6; PMID:12004135; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1069861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Imai K, Togami H, Okamoto T. Involvement of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methyltransferase G9a in the maintenance of HIV-1 latency and its reactivation by BIX01294. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:16538-45; PMID:20335163; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M110.103531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Albacker CE, Storer NY, Langdon EM, Dibiase A, Zhou Y, Langenau DM, Zon LI. The histone methyltransferase SUV39H1 suppresses embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma formation in zebrafish. PloS One 2013; 8:e64969; PMID:23705022; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0064969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Khanal P, Kim G, Lim S-C, Yun H-J, Lee KY, Choi H-K, Choi HS. Prolyl isomerase Pin1 negatively regulates the stability of SUV39H1 to promote tumorigenesis in breast cancer. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 2013; 27:4606-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Bosch-Presegué L, Raurell-Vila H, Marazuela-Duque A, Kane-Goldsmith N, Valle A, Oliver J, Serrano L, Vaquero A. Stabilization of Suv39H1 by SirT1 is part of oxidative stress response and ensures genome protection. Mol Cell 2011; 42:210-23; PMID:21504832; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang D, Zhou J, Liu X, Lu D, Shen C, Du Y, Wei F-Z, Song B, Lu X, Yu Y, et al.. Methylation of SUV39H1 by SET7/9 results in heterochromatin relaxation and genome instability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:5516-21; PMID:23509280; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1216596110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Vaquero A, Scher M, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Serrano L, Reinberg D. SIRT1 regulates the histone methyl-transferase SUV39H1 during heterochromatin formation. Nature 2007; 450:440-4; PMID:18004385; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature06268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Dong C, Wu Y, Yao J, Wang Y, Yu Y, Rychahou PG, Evers BM, Zhou BP. G9a interacts with Snail and is critical for Snail-mediated E-cadherin repression in human breast cancer. J Clin Invest 2012; 122:1469-86; PMID:22406531; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1172/JCI57349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Chen M-W, Hua K-T, Kao H-J, Chi C-C, Wei L-H, Johansson G, Shiah S-G, Chen P-S, Jeng Y-M, Cheng T-Y, et al.. H3K9 histone methyltransferase G9a promotes lung cancer invasion and metastasis by silencing the cell adhesion molecule Ep-CAM. Cancer Res 2010; 70:7830-40; PMID:20940408; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hua K-T, Wang M-Y, Chen M-W, Wei L-H, Chen C-K, Ko C-H, Jeng Y-M, Sung P-L, Jan Y-H, Hsiao M, et al.. The H3K9 methyltransferase G9a is a marker of aggressive ovarian cancer that promotes peritoneal metastasis. Mol Cancer 2014; 13:189; PMID:25115793; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1476-4598-13-189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Casciello F, Windloch K, Gannon F, Lee JS. Functional Role of G9a Histone Methyltransferase in Cancer. Front Immunol 2015; 6:487; PMID:26441991; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ke X-X, Zhang D, Zhu S, Xia Q, Xiang Z, Cui H. Inhibition of H3K9 methyltransferase G9a repressed cell proliferation and induced autophagy in neuroblastoma cells. PloS One 2014; 9:e106962; PMID:25198515; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0106962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Zhang J, He P, Xi Y, Geng M, Chen Y, Ding J. Down-regulation of G9a triggers DNA damage response and inhibits colorectal cancer cells proliferation. Oncotarget 2015; 6:2917-27; PMID:25595900; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.18632/oncotarget.2784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Lehnertz B, Pabst C, Su L, Miller M, Liu F, Yi L, Zhang R, Krosl J, Yung E, Kirschner J, et al.. The methyltransferase G9a regulates HoxA9-dependent transcription in AML. Genes Dev 2014; 28:317-27; PMID:24532712; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.236794.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Sun Y, Wei M, Ren S-C, Chen R, Xu W-D, Wang F-B, Lu J, Shen J, Yu Y-W, Hou J-G, et al.. Histone methyltransferase SETDB1 is required for prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Asian J Androl 2014; 16:319-24; PMID:24556744; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4103/1008-682X.122812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wong C-M, Wei L, Law C-T, Ho DW-H, Tsang FHC, Au SL-K, Sze KM-F, Lee JM-F, Wong CCL. Ng IO-L. Up-regulation of histone methyltransferase SETDB1 by multiple mechanisms in hepatocellular carcinoma promotes cancer metastasis. Hepatol Baltim Md 2016; 63:474-87; PMID:26481868; http://dx.doi.org/26471002 10.1002/hep.28304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Fei Q, Shang K, Zhang J, Chuai S, Kong D, Zhou T, Fu S, Liang Y, Li C, Chen Z, et al.. Histone methyltransferase SETDB1 regulates liver cancer cell growth through methylation of p53. Nat Commun 2015; 6:8651; PMID:26471002; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms9651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Noh H-J, Kim K-A, Kim K-C. p53 down-regulates SETDB1 gene expression during paclitaxel induced-cell death. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014; 446:43-8; PMID:24565839; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.02.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Spyropoulou A, Gargalionis A, Dalagiorgou G, Adamopoulos C, Papavassiliou KA, Lea RW, Piperi C, Papavassiliou AG. Role of histone lysine methyltransferases SUV39H1 and SETDB1 in gliomagenesis: modulation of cell proliferation, migration, and colony formation. Neuromolecular Med 2014; 16:70-82; PMID:23943221; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s12017-013-8254-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Black JC, Whetstine JR. Tipping the lysine methylation balance in disease. Biopolymers 2013; 99:127-35; PMID:23175387; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/bip.22136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Black JC, Van Rechem C, Whetstine JR. Histone lysine methylation dynamics: establishment, regulation, and biological impact. Mol Cell 2012; 48:491-507; PMID:23200123; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Morera L, Lübbert M, Jung M. Targeting histone methyltransferases and demethylases in clinical trials for cancer therapy. Clin Epigenetics 2016; 8:57; PMID:27222667; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/s13148-016-0223-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Bittencourt D, Wu D-Y, Jeong KW, Gerke DS, Herviou L, Ianculescu I, Chodankar R, Siegmund KD, Stallcup MR. G9a functions as a molecular scaffold for assembly of transcriptional coactivators on a subset of glucocorticoid receptor target genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:19673-8; PMID:23151507; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1211803109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Black JC, Whetstine JR. Chromatin landscape: methylation beyond transcription. Epigenetics 2011; 6:9-15; PMID:20855937; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/epi.6.1.13331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Ceol CJ, Houvras Y, Jane-Valbuena J, Bilodeau S, Orlando DA, Battisti V, Fritsch L, Lin WM, Hollmann TJ, Ferré F, et al.. The histone methyltransferase SETDB1 is recurrently amplified in melanoma and accelerates its onset. Nature 2011; 471:513-7; PMID:21430779; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature09806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]