Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1974 Feb;53(2):258–260. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.2.258

Rapid Estimates of Relative Water Content

Richard E Smart a,1, Gail E Bingham b,2
PMCID: PMC541374  PMID: 16658686

Abstract

Relative water content may be accurately estimated using the ratio of tissue fresh weight to tissue turgid weight, termed here relative tissue weight. That relative water content and relative tissue weight are linearly related is demonstrated algebraically. The mean value of r2 for grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz) leaf tissue over eight separate sampling occasions was 0.993. Similarly high values were obtained for maize (Zea mays cv. Cornell M-3) (0.998) and apple (Malus sylvestris cv. Northern Spy) (0.997) using a range of leaf ages. The proposal by Downey and Miller (1971. Rapid measurements of relative turgidity in maize (Zea mays L.). New Phytol. 70: 555-560) that relative water content in maize may be estimated from water uptake was also investigated for grapevine leaves; this was found to be a less reliable estimate than that obtained with relative tissue weight. With either method, there is a need for calibration, although this could be achieved for relative tissue weight at least with only a few subsamples.

Full text

PDF
259

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bacalzo L. V., Jr, Cary A. L., Miller L. D., Parkins W. M. Methods and critical uptake volume for hemorrhagic shock in rats. Surgery. 1971 Oct;70(4):555–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gardner W. R., Ehlig C. F. Physical Aspects of the Internal Water Relations of Plant Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1965 Jul;40(4):705–710. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.4.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES