Skip to main content
PMC home page
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2017 Jan 23;6:69. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10631.1

In silico gene expression profiling in Cannabis sativa

Luca Massimino 1,a
PMCID: PMC5414814  PMID: 28529696

Abstract

The cannabis plant and its active ingredients (i.e., cannabinoids and terpenoids) have been socially stigmatized for half a century. Luckily, with more than 430,000 published scientific papers and about 600 ongoing and completed clinical trials, nowadays cannabis is employed for the treatment of many different medical conditions. Nevertheless, even if a large amount of high-throughput functional genomic data exists, most researchers feature a strong background in molecular biology but lack advanced bioinformatics skills. In this work, publicly available gene expression datasets have been analyzed giving rise to a total of 40,224 gene expression profiles taken from cannabis plant tissue at different developmental stages. The resource presented here will provide researchers with a starting point for future investigations with Cannabis sativa.

Keywords: Cannabis sativa, gene expression, cannabinoid pathway

Introduction

The cannabis plant has been used for medical purposes for centuries, before being socially stigmatized for the last half century 1. Nevertheless, more than 430,000 published scientific papers exist, with about 25,600 works published in 2016 ( https://scholar.google.com/). In addition, there are about 600 ongoing and completed clinical trials involving cannabis ( https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/).

The endocannabinoid system is involved in virtually every biological function 2, so it is not surprising that cannabis is being used to treat neurological 3, psychiatric 4, immunological 5, cardiovascular 6, gastrointestinal 7, and oncological 8 conditions.

Today, a large amount of high-throughput functional genomic data exists. Nonetheless, even in the era of ‘omics, the great majority of researchers feature a strong background in molecular biology but lack advanced bioinformatics skills 9.

In the present work, publicly available gene expression data taken from cannabis plant tissue at different developmental stages (shoot, root, stem, young and mature leaf, early-, mid- and mature-stage flower) have been analyzed, giving rise to 40,224 gene expression profiles. Moreover, the expression patterns of 23 cannabinoid pathway related genes are described. The data note provided here will aid future studies by providing researchers with a powerful resource for future investigations.

Material and methods

Gene expression analysis

Gene expression datasets were downloaded from the NCBI SRA directory 10 ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) with accession numbers SRP006678 and SRP008673. Raw sequences were mapped to the canSat3 reference genome 11 with TopHat2 v2.1.0 12. Gene counts and relative transcript levels were obtained with Cufflinks v2.2.1.0 13, and submitted to NCBI GEO ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) with accession number GSE93201. Cannabinoid related genes were found within the canSat3 transcripts with the Cannabis genome browser BLAT web tool 11 ( http://genome.ccbr.utoronto.ca/cgi-bin/hgBlat?command=start). Gene expression heatmaps and unsupervised hierarchical clustering were carried out with GENE-E 14.

Results

The Cannabis sativa reference genome and transcriptome have been published, although data analysis is still at the preliminary stages 11. In other words, we know what the presumptive genes are, but we do not know the chromosomes they are located in, nor their molecular functions. Given that this high-throughput gene expression data is publicly available, expression analysis of these yet unidentified genes can be performed. To this end, public repositories have been surveyed for transcriptional profiling datasets derived from Cannabis sativa. In total, 31 RNA-seq datasets derived from one hemp and two different psychoactive strains (NCBI SRA accession numbers: SRP006678 and SRP008673) of Cannabis sativa shoot, root, stem, young and mature leaf, early-, mid- and mature-stage flower have been analyzed. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of gene expression values revealed six clusters of genes with specific tissue/stage expression ( Figure 1). Cluster 1 genes display high expression levels in shoots, mature leaves, and flowers; cluster 2 genes in leaves and flowers; cluster 3 genes in roots and stems; cluster 4 genes in roots, stems, and flowers; cluster 5 genes in hemp flowers and cluster 6 genes in shoots, roots, stems, and flowers.

Figure 1. Gene expression profiles taken from cannabis plant tissue at different developmental stages.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Heatmap showing relative expression values (log2 RPKM) of the highest expressed genes. Six gene clusters were defined in accordance with the unsupervised hierarchical clustering.

Genes involved in the biosynthesis of cannabinoids and their precursors have been shown to be overexpressed in flowers 15. To validate gene expression profiling, cannabinoid, hexanoate, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate ( MEP) and geranyl diphosphate ( GPP) pathway genes 11, 16, together with the olivetol synthase ( OLS) gene 17, 18, the (-)-limonene terpene synthase ( TPS) gene 19 and the polyketide synthase ( PKS) gene 20, have been analyzed. As expected, most of these genes were overexpressed in flowers, although many of the genes also displayed high expression in other tissues ( Figure 2; Supplementary table 1). Interestingly, virtually all of them were highly expressed in the shoot.

Figure 2. Gene expression analysis of the cannabinoid pathway.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Heatmap showing relative expression values (log2 RPKM) of genes belonging to cannabinoid and precursor (hexanoate, GPP, MEP, olivetolic acid) pathways, together with terpene synthase (TPS) and polyketide synthase (PKS).

Discussion

Today, cannabis and its derivatives are successfully employed for treatment of a large number of different pathological conditions 3, 5– 8. Each year, more articles related to cannabis are published, with about 25,600 studies published in 2016 ( https://scholar.google.com/). Remarkably, only 3% of these papers (13,300 out of 432,000) also take genomics into consideration, with very few of them directly relating to the genomics of cannabis. This could be due to the fact that, for obvious reasons, most researchers still lack advanced bioinformatics skills and are therefore limited in their research 9.

To this end, a total of 40,224 gene expression profiles taken from cannabis plant tissue at different developmental stages were obtained by exploiting common bioinformatics pipelines 13. Moreover, expression profiles of the genes belonging to the cannabinoid pathway 11, 16– 20 are provided.

Even if these data are preliminary, some observations can already be made. For instance, virtually all genes found to be highly expressed in flowers ( Figure 1, cluster 1 and Figure 2) also displayed high expression in the shoot. Having had only one sample at this specific developmental stage, these results could be derived from technical issues rather than differences in gene expression. However, not all transcripts (57%) were found to be overexpressed in the shoot, thus pointing toward the possible specificity of these changes. If this is confirmed, it may provide researchers with the possibility to study the molecular function of flower specific genes directly in sprouting plants, without having to wait for the plant to fully bloom.

Cannabis sativa is a versatile plant - it is being used for medical as well as for industrial purposes 21, 22. For this reason, cutting-edge genomics technology is currently being applied either to ameliorate specific phenotypes, or for breeding purposes 22– 27. Cluster 5 genes ( Figure 1) seem of great interest in this regard, as they are visibly overexpressed specifically in non-psychoactive cannabis flowers. These genes could be downregulated in hemp in order to create new strains high in cannabidiol (CBD), but with the proper entourage effect commonly found in the psychoactive counterparts 28. On the other hand, hemp specific genes could be upregulated in marijuana to produce high fiber/oil containing crops harboring therapeutically valuable active principles within their flowers. One potential candidate is the Csfad2a gene which was recently found to be highly expressed only in some hemp strains. Here, high Csfad2a expression was correlated with both higher oil content and lower oxidation tendency, eventually leading to the production of a significantly better commercial product 26.

Perhaps the major pitfall of this kind of analysis comes from the fact that although the current cannabis reference genome and transcriptome have been published, data analysis is still at the preliminary stages 11. Like in other plants, the cannabis genome is highly redundant and difficult to resolve 29. It is very likely that false negatives have caused important transcripts to still be missing. Nevertheless, these 40,224 gene expression profiles will provide researchers with a valuable resource and important genomic insights for future investigations with Cannabis sativa.

Data availability

The data referenced by this article are under copyright with the following copyright statement: Copyright: © 2017 Massimino L

Raw expression data can be found in the NCBI SRA directory ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) with accession numbers SRP006678 and SRP008673.

Processed data can be found in the NCBI GEO repository ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) with accession number GSE93201.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 1; referees: 2 approved]

Supplementary material

Supplementary table 1. Cannabinoid metabolism related gene profiling in different tissues and developmental stages. Gene expression matrix of cannabinoid pathway genes. Expression values are expressed in RPKM.

Click here for additional data file. (17KB, tgz)

.

References

  • 1. Pain S: A potted history. Nature. 2015;525(7570):S10–S11. 10.1038/525S10a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Di Marzo V, Bifulco M, De Petrocellis L: The endocannabinoid system and its therapeutic exploitation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(9):771–84. 10.1038/nrd1495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hosking R, Zajicek J: Pharmacology: Cannabis in neurology--a potted review. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(8):429–30. 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Curran HV, Freeman TP, Mokrysz C, et al. : Keep off the grass? Cannabis, cognition and addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17(5):293–306. 10.1038/nrn.2016.28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Klein TW: Cannabinoid-based drugs as anti-inflammatory therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5(5):400–11. 10.1038/nri1602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Di Marzo V, Després JP: CB1 antagonists for obesity--what lessons have we learned from rimonabant? Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009;5(11):633–8. 10.1038/nrendo.2009.197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gerich ME, Isfort RW, Brimhall B, et al. : Medical marijuana for digestive disorders: high time to prescribe? Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(2):208–14. 10.1038/ajg.2014.245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Swami M: Cannabis and cancer link. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2009;9:148 10.1038/nrc2617 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chang J: Core services: Reward bioinformaticians. Nature. 2015;520(7546):151–152. 10.1038/520151a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Barrett T, Clark K, Gevorgyan R, et al. : BioProject and BioSample databases at NCBI: Facilitating capture and organization of metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D57–63. 10.1093/nar/gkr1163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. van Bakel H, Stout JM, Cote AG, et al. : The draft genome and transcriptome of Cannabis sativa. Genome Biol. 2011;12(10):R102. 10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, et al. : TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14(4):R36. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, et al. : Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–78. 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. GENE-E. Cambridge (MA): The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sirikantaramas S, Taura F, Tanaka Y, et al. : Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid synthase, the enzyme controlling marijuana psychoactivity, is secreted into the storage cavity of the glandular trichomes. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46(9):1578–82. 10.1093/pcp/pci166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Stout JM, Boubakir Z, Ambrose SJ, et al. : The hexanoyl-CoA precursor for cannabinoid biosynthesis is formed by an acyl-activating enzyme in Cannabis sativa trichomes. Plant J. 2012;71(3):353–365. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04949.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Taura F, Tanaka S, Taguchi C, et al. : Characterization of olivetol synthase, a polyketide synthase putatively involved in cannabinoid biosynthetic pathway. FEBS Lett. 2009;583(12):2061–2066. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Gagne SJ, Stout JM, Liu E, et al. : Identification of olivetolic acid cyclase from Cannabis sativa reveals a unique catalytic route to plant polyketides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(31):12811–6. 10.1073/pnas.1200330109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Günnewich N, Page JE, Köllner TG, et al. : Functional expression and characterization of trichome- specific (-)-limonene synthase and (+)-α-pinene synthase from Cannabis sativa. Nat Prod Commun. 2007;2(3):223–232. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Flores-Sanchez IJ, Linthorst HJ, Verpoorte R: In silicio expression analysis of PKS genes isolated from Cannabis sativa L. Genet Mol Biol. 2010;33(4):703–13. 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. de Meijer EP, Hammond KM, Sutton A: The inheritance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. (IV): cannabinoid-free plants. Euphytica. 2009;168(1):95–112. 10.1007/s10681-009-9894-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Salentijn EM, Zhang Q, Amaducci S, et al. : New developments in fiber hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) breeding. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;68:32–41. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.08.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Mandolino G, Carboni A: Potential of marker-assisted selection in hemp genetic improvement. Euphytica. 2004;140(1):107–120. 10.1007/s10681-004-4759-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. van den Broeck HC, Maliepaard C, Ebskamp MJM, et al. : Differential expression of genes involved in C 1 metabolism and lignin biosynthesis in wooden core and bast tissues of fibre hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.). Plant Sci. 2008;174(2):205–220. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.11.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Guerriero G, Sergeant K, Hausman JF: Integrated -omics: A powerful approach to understanding the heterogeneous lignification of fibre crops. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(6):10958–10978. 10.3390/ijms140610958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Bielecka M, Kaminski F, Adams I, et al. : Targeted mutation of Δ12 and Δ15 desaturase genes in hemp produce major alterations in seed fatty acid composition including a high oleic hemp oil. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12(5):613–23. 10.1111/pbi.12167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Massimino L: Cannabis growing meets genomics. F1000Research. 2017;6:15. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Russo EB, Taming TH: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163(7):1344–1364. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01238.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Türktaş M, Kurtoğlu KY, Dorado G, et al. : Sequencing of plant genomes - A review. Turkish J Agric For. 2015;39:361–376. 10.3906/tar-1409-93 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2017 May 2. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.11455.r20301

Referee response for version 1

Sergio Esposito 1

The bioinformatic approach presented in this study is potentially highly interesting, providing to scientists a useful data set to investigate the different pathways activated in Cannabis sativa at different developmental stages, and in different organs.

I would only ask to the Author if some of the gene sets identified could be further divided into sub-clusters: e.g. there is a “green” area in Fig.1 – cluster 4 in leaves and flower buds (about in the second quarter from above). On the opposite, this area is "red" in cluster 5 – first quarter. Could be these results interpreted under the light of the considerations exposed in the discussion?

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2017 Feb 20. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.11455.r20299

Referee response for version 1

Gea Guerriero 1

The present study suits the Data Note format and can be a useful resource for future studies centered on Cannabis sativa. I find the bioinformatics approach sound.  I have one suggestion for the author. How about enriching Figure 1 with a representation of GO/pathway enrichment analysis for each cluster (for example with ClueGO in Cytoscape; Bindea et al., 2009 1)?

The interest around this multi-purpose crop is increasing and recently transcriptomics data have been published for a fiber variety too (see for example Behr et al., 2016 2). The approach described in this note can be applied also to other varieties in the future and/or to other tissue types.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

References

  • 1. Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Hackl H, Charoentong P, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Fridman WH, Pagès F, Trajanoski Z, Galon J: ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics.2009;25(8) : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101 1091-3 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Behr M, Legay S, Žižková E, Motyka V, Dobrev PI, Hausman JF, Lutts S, Guerriero G: Studying Secondary Growth and Bast Fiber Development: The Hemp Hypocotyl Peeks behind the Wall. Front Plant Sci.2016;7: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01733 1733 10.3389/fpls.2016.01733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Click here for additional data file. (17KB, tgz)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data referenced by this article are under copyright with the following copyright statement: Copyright: © 2017 Massimino L

    Raw expression data can be found in the NCBI SRA directory ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) with accession numbers SRP006678 and SRP008673.

    Processed data can be found in the NCBI GEO repository ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) with accession number GSE93201.

    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES