Abstract
Fifty-eight cadherin-related protocadherin (Pcdh) genes are tandemly arrayed in three clusters (α, β, and γ) on mouse chromosome 18. The large number of clustered Pcdh family members, their presence at synapses, and the known binding specificities of other cadherin superfamily members all suggest that these Pcdhs play roles in specifying synaptic connectivity. Consistent with this idea, mice lacking all 22 genes of the Pcdh-γ cluster have decreased numbers of spinal cord synapses and are nearly immobile. Interpretation of this phenotype was complicated, however, by the fact that Pcdh-γ loss also led to apoptosis of many spinal interneurons. Here, we used two methods to circumvent apoptosis and neurodegeneration in Pcdh-γ mutant mice. First, we analyzed mutants lacking both Pcdh-γ proteins and the proapoptotic protein Bax. Second, we generated a hypomorphic allele of Pcdh-γ in which apoptosis was minimal. In both cases, spinal interneurons were preserved but the mice bore dramatically decreased numbers of spinal cord synapses and exhibited profound neurological defects. Moreover, synaptic function was compromised in neurons cultured from the hypomorphs. These results provide evidence for a direct role of γ-Pcdhs in synaptic development and establish genetic tools for elucidating their contribution to synaptic specificity.
Keywords: synaptogenesis, Bax, interneuron
As synapses form, their presynaptic and postsynaptic elements become linked by transmembrane adhesion molecules, including members of the Ig and cadherin superfamilies. Some of these adhesion molecules, such as SynCAM, neuroligin, and neurexin, might function primarily to coordinate presynaptic and postsynaptic differentiation, whereas others might contribute to the selectivity with which synaptic connections form between appropriate partners (reviewed in refs. 1–4). The diversity of the Ig and cadherin families and the binding specificities of individual members suggests that they might be involved in both aspects of synaptogenesis. Support for roles in synaptic specificity has recently been obtained for at least five Ig superfamily members, Sidekick-1 and-2 in vertebrates (5), Syg-1 and -2 in worms (6, 7), and DS-CAM in flies (8, 9).
Additional attractive candidate synaptic recognition molecules are the nearly 60 cadherin-related protocadherin (Pcdh) genes tandemly arrayed in three clusters on a single chromosome in mammals (10, 11). These clusters, termed Pcdh-α, -β, and -γ, each contain multiple “variable” exons encoding the extracellular, transmembrane, and proximal cytoplasmic domains of individual isoforms. Within the Pcdh-α and -γ clusters, each variable exon is transcribed from its own promoter and spliced to “constant” exons that encode a shared C-terminal domain (12–15). Many neuronal populations express multiple Pcdh genes, and the α- and γ-Pcdh proteins are concentrated at, although not exclusively localized to, synapses (16–19). Together, these features have led to the hypothesis that combinatorial patterns of Pcdh expression promote specific interactions between presynaptic and postsynaptic partners (20–22).
In an attempt to test this hypothesis, we generated and analyzed mice from which the entire Pcdh-γ locus had been deleted (Pcdh-γdel/del; ref. 17). The number of synapses in the gray matter of the spinal cord was decreased in these mice, consistent with the idea that γ-Pcdhs are required for synaptic development. However, the interpretation was complicated because Pcdh-γ deletion also led to apoptosis of spinal interneurons. Thus, the reduction in synapse number might have been either a direct consequence of Pcdh-γ deletion or an indirect consequence of neurodegeneration.
We have now used two methods to distinguish these alternatives. First, we prevented apoptosis in Pcdh-γdel/del mice by removal of the proapoptotic Bcl-2 family member Bax. Bax-/- mice are outwardly normal and live to adulthood (23). However, naturally occurring apoptosis of many neuronal populations is greatly decreased in these mutants (24–26), making them useful for examining characteristics of neurons that would otherwise die (27, 28). Second, we generated a hypomorphic allele of the Pcdh-γ locus (Pcdh-γtr). Pcdh-γtr/tr mice, like Pcdh-γdel/del mice, die shortly after birth. Unexpectedly, however, neuronal apoptosis was not substantially elevated in Pcdh-γtr/tr mice. Thus, we were able to use both Pcdh-γdel/del;Bax-/- and Pcdh-γtr/tr mutants to examine spinal neuron synapses in the absence of neurodegeneration. Our morphological and electrophysiological results support a direct role for γ-Pcdhs in synaptic development.
Materials and Methods
Mouse Strains. Mice lacking the entire 22-gene Pcdh-γ locus (Pcdh-γdel/del; ref. 17) and mice lacking Bax (23, 24) have been described. Both were maintained on a C57/B6 background. The targeting vector for the C-terminal truncation allele (Pcdh-γtr) consisted of a NotI/SalI-digested, 6.4-kb 5′ homology arm generated by PCR, an internal ribosome entry site (IRES), a GFP-β-galactosidase (LacZ) fusion gene, a loxP-flanked neomycin resistance gene for positive selection, an NheI/EcoRI-digested, 1.6-kb 3′ homology arm amplified by PCR, and a thymidine kinase-negative selection marker. Homologous recombination led to the insertion of the IRES-GFP-LacZ cassette into constant exon 3, resulting in truncation of γ-Pcdh proteins 57 aa from the C terminus. Targeted ES clones were identified by PCR, and the selection marker was excised by transient expression of Cre recombinase in ES cells before blastocyst injection.
Immunofluorescence. Tissues were frozen unfixed or after immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde and cryoprotection in 30% sucrose. Cryostat sections were cut at 10–15 μm, and sections from unfixed blocks were fixed in 100% methanol for 10 min at -20°C. Sections were blocked in 2.5% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h, followed by incubation with primary antibody at 4°C overnight in the same solution. Sections were washed in PBS and secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488- or 568-conjugated) applied in PBS for 1 h. Nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole added to the final wash.
Antibodies used (and their sources) were: anti-NeuN (Chemicon); anti-gephyrin and anti-glycine receptor (Alexis, San Diego); anti-microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2, Sigma); anti-class III β-tubulin (TuJ1, Covance, Princeton, NJ); anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA); anti-vesicular glutamate transporter (VGlut) 1 and 2 (mixed 1:1 and used together, Chemicon); anti-postsynaptic density (PSD)-95 (Affinity Bioreagents, Golden, CO); anti-synaptophysin (Zymed); anti-cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA); anti-neurofilaments (Sternberger–Meyer, Jarrettsville, MD); rabbit anti-GFP (Chemicon); and a rabbit antiserum to the common Pcdh-γ C-terminal exons (17). Neuro Trace 435 (Molecular Probes) was used as a fluorescent Nissl stain.
For quantification of synapse and neuron number, digital micrographs of control and mutant spinal cord sections or neuronal cultures were taken at equivalent locations and camera exposures by using ×63 or ×100 oil objectives on a Zeiss Axioplan microscope. These digital images were adjusted and thresholded similarly in metamorph (Universal Imaging, Downingtown, PA), and synaptic puncta were counted by using automated analysis functions. NeuN+ neurons were counted manually. Statistical significance was determined by using multifactorial ANOVA and Fisher's probable least-squares difference post hoc tests calculated with statview software (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA).
Spinal Neuron Cultures. Spinal neurons were cultured by methods modified from ref. 29. Spinal cords were removed from embryonic day 13 control and Pcdh-γtr/tr embryos in 135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 75 mM Na2HPO4, 0.2 mM KH2PO4, 20 mM glucose, 44 mM sucrose, and 10 mM Hepes. Extra-neural tissue was taken from each embryo for genotyping. Each spinal cord was transferred to a well of a 12-well tissue-culture dish (Nunc) containing 1 ml of trypsin-EDTA (0.05% trypsin), cut into small pieces with spring scissors, incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 30 min, diluted with 2 ml of plating medium (DMEM plus 10% FCS, 10% horse serum, and penicillin/streptomycin) to inhibit trypsin, transferred to 1 ml fresh medium, and triturated 10–20 times with a fire-polished Pasteur pipet. Cells were then plated on 13-mm glass coverslips that had been coated sequentially with poly-l-lysine and laminin-1 (400,000–500,000 cells per well) and placed at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 24 h, the medium was changed to growth medium [DMEM plus 10% FCS and N2 supplements (Gibco)] without antibiotics. Growth medium was changed every 2–3 days. Cultures were used for electrophysiological recordings at 8–11 days in vitro (DIV) or fixed for immunofluorescence at 9 DIV. Cultures consisted of a “lawn” of glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive astrocytes on which clusters of interneurons grew. Motor neurons did not survive the plating procedure and were completely absent. A few dorsal root ganglia sensory neurons were present in some cultures, but they were easily distinguishable from interneurons by their large somata and expression of neurofilaments and were excluded from histological and electrophysiological analyses.
Western Blotting. We generated full-length or C-terminally truncated Pcdh-γ-EGFP fusion proteins by PCR from a cDNA clone encoding the full-length Pcdh-γ C4 isoform. PCR products were cloned into an EGFP-containing vector to generate in-frame fusions, which were then transferred to the expression vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). The full-length fusion protein corresponds to that produced by the Pcdh-γfusg allele reported previously (17), and the truncated protein corresponds to that generated in the Pcdh-γtr allele. Both the full-length and truncated constructs were transfected into COS-7 cells, and the recombinant proteins were analyzed by Western blotting using standard methods.
Electrophysiological Recordings. Current- and voltage-clamp recordings were performed as described (30). Data files obtained with axoscope 9.0 were analyzed offline with minianalysis 5.0 software to obtain peak amplitudes, frequencies, and decay time constants. The decay phases of inhibitory and excitatory postsynaptic currents were best-fitted with a single exponential curve. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed by using Student's t test, ANOVA, or the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
Results
Synaptic Defects in Pcdh-γ/BAX Double Mutants. As reported previously, spinal cords of Pcdh-γdel/del mice were hypoplastic and exhibited high levels of interneuronal apoptosis and neurogeneration (ref. 17 and Fig. 1 A and B). These defects made it impossible to determine whether decreased synapse number in the Pcdh-γdel/del spinal cord reflected a role for γ-Pcdhs in synaptogenesis or a consequence of neurodegeneration. To distinguish these alternatives, we attempted to block neuronal apoptosis by mating Pcdh-γdel mice to mice harboring a null allele of the proapoptotic gene Bax (23). Because Pcdh-γdel/del mice die at birth (17) and Bax-/- mice are infertile (23), we first generated compound heterozygotes, which were then mated to obtain Pcdh-γdel/del;Bax-/- double mutants at the expected frequency of ≈1/16.
Double mutant spinal cords were grossly normal in size, shape, and organization (Fig. 1C), had a normal density of neuronal somata (stained with antibodies to NeuN; Fig. 1 D and F) and fiber tracts (stained with antibodies to neurofilaments; Fig. 1C), and exhibited few, if any, apoptotic cells (stained with antibodies to activated caspase-3; Fig. 1E). Thus, deletion of Bax effectively prevented the apoptosis, neurodegeneration, and spinal cord hypoplasia caused by Pcdh-γ deletion. Nonetheless, Pcdh-γdel/del;Bax-/- double mutants, like Pcdh-γdel/del single mutants, died within hours of birth. They displayed a tremor and decrements in reflex action and voluntary movement and did not feed or right themselves. Their neurological defects were similar to, but less severe than, those in Pcdh-γdel/del mice.
To assess synapse number and composition, we labeled spinal cords of the double mutants with antibodies to the synaptic vesicle proteins, synaptophysin and SV2, which label all presynaptic terminals; to PSD-95, which stains glutamatergic postsynaptic sites; and to gephyrin and glycine receptors, which stain inhibitory postsynaptic sites. In all cases, synapses were present, but their density was lower in Pcdh-γdel/del;Bax-/- mice than in Bax-/- or Bax+/- controls (Fig. 2 and data not shown). Postsynaptic markers were used for quantitative analysis, because their appearance was more punctate than that of the presynaptic markers. The density of excitatory (PSD-95-positive) and inhibitory (glycine receptor- or gephyrin-positive) synapses did not differ significantly between control and Bax-/- mice, but was decreased 30–50% in double mutants (Fig. 2B). This decrease was similar to, although not quite as severe as, that seen in Pcdh-γdel/del single mutants (Fig. 2B). Thus, even when the deleterious effect of Pcdh-γ deletion on neuronal survival is abrogated, synaptic defects persist.
Synaptic Defects in γ-Pcdh Hypomorphs. A potential problem in using Bax-/- mice to rescue neurons is that some steps in apoptotic pathways proceed in the absence of Bax (31), so the rescued neurons could be abnormally susceptible to loss of γ-Pcdhs. A way to circumvent this limitation was provided by an allele initially generated for another purpose. In this allele, a cassette containing an internal ribosome entry site and a reporter gene was inserted into the last coding exon of the Pcdh-γ locus, resulting in the deletion of 57 aa at the carboxyl terminus of all Pcdh-γ isoforms (Fig. 3A). Northern analysis of tissue from the resulting truncation (Pcdh-γtr/tr) mutants confirmed that the 3′ end of the Pcdh-γ mRNA had been replaced by sequences in the inserted cassette (Fig. 3B), although expression of the reporter protein was only barely detectable in embryos and neonates (data not shown).
To characterize the protein product of the Pcdh-γtr/tr allele, we immunoblotted brain lysates with a polyclonal antiserum to peptides encoded by the Pcdh-γ common exons. Pcdh-γtr/tr and control brains both contained immunoreactive proteins of appropriate mass as judged by using recombinant Pcdh-γ as a standard (Fig. 3C). Heterogeneity in mass is likely to reflect differences in glycosylation among isoforms. Antibody specificity was demonstrated by the absence of immunoreactive material in Pcdh-γdel/del brain (Fig. 3C).
Levels of Pcdh-γ protein were several-fold lower in Pcdh-γtr/tr brains than in controls. One possible confound was that the antiserum we used may have recognized epitopes in the carboxyl-terminal segment that is deleted in this mutant, in which case decreased immunoreactivity would reflect loss of epitopes rather than decreased protein levels. To test this possibility, we transiently transfected COS cells with constructs encoding a full-length or a C-terminally truncated Pcdh-γ isoform fused to GFP (see Materials and Methods). Proteins from these transfectants were blotted and probed with anti-GFP and anti-Pcdh-γ antisera. The ratio of GFP-to-Pcdh-γ immunoreactivity was similar for the two recombinant proteins (Fig. 3D), showing that predominant epitopes recognized by the anti-Pcdh-γ antiserum were retained in the truncated proteins. We conclude that the Pcdh-γtr allele produces Pcdh-γ protein that is reduced both in size and amount compared with that in WT mice. The reduced levels might reflect defects in production or stability of mRNA or protein.
Pcdh-γtr/tr mice, like Pcdh-γdel/del;Bax-/- and Pcdh-γdel/del mice, died within several hours of birth, with movement defects more similar in severity to those in Pcdh-γdel/del;Bax-/- double mutants than to those in Pcdh-γdel/del single mutants. The histological organization of the spinal cord in Pcdh-γtr/tr mice also resembled that in Pcdh-γdel/del;Bax-/- mice in that its size, shape, and neuronal density were normal (Fig. 4 A, B, and D) and levels of apoptosis were low (Fig. 4C). However, the density of excitatory and inhibitory synapses was decreased by ≈40–50% compared to controls (Fig. 4 E and F and data not shown). Thus, the Pcdh-γ protein that persists in the Pcdh-γtr/tr mice is sufficient for neuronal survival, but insufficient to support normal synaptic development.
Synaptic Defects in Neurons Cultured from Pcdh-γtr/tr Mice. As a third approach to analyzing the role of Pcdh-γ in synaptic development, we cultured spinal neurons from Pcdh-γtr/tr mice (see Materials and Methods). Immunofluoresence confirmed a reduction in Pcdh-γ protein levels in Pcdh-γtr/tr cultures, similar to that observed in intact brain tissue (data not shown). In both Pcdh-γtr/tr and control cultures, neurons differentiated (expressed NeuN), extended tubulin-rich processes (TuJ1-positive), some of which differentiated into dendrites (MAP2-positive), and exhibited little apoptosis (as assayed with anti-activated caspase 3) (Fig. 5 A–C). In the serum-containing medium we used, many neurons survived for at least 12 days.
Quantitative analysis revealed no significant differences between Pcdh-γtr/tr and control cultures in neuron number or dendritic area (Fig. 5D). However, the number of synapses was reduced in Pcdh-γtr/tr cultures (Fig. 5 E–I), as assayed with antibodies against a panel of presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins: synaptophysin, present at all terminals; VGlut, a marker of excitatory nerve terminals; GAD, a marker of inhibitory nerve terminals; and PSD-95 and gephyrin, markers of excitatory and inhibitory PSDs, respectively. Both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic populations were significantly affected. Synaptic puncta were decreased in average size as well as in number in the mutant cultures, although the difference in size was statistically significant only for excitatory synapses (Fig. 5I). Thus, in vitro as in vivo, synaptic development is perturbed in Pcdh-γtr/tr neurons, despite seemingly normal neuronal differentiation and survival.
To assess the physiological consequences of Pcdh-γ deficiency, we recorded spontaneous synaptic currents from neurons in Pcdh-γtr/tr and control cultures. Depolarization elicited action potentials from both mutant and control neurons (Fig. 6A Upper). Neither membrane potential (VM) nor action potential threshold differed significantly between genotypes (VM -54 ± 2 mV and -57 ± 3 mV in Pcdh-γtr/tr and controls, respectively; threshold -43 ± 6 mV and -40 ± 3 mV in Pcdh-γtr/tr and controls, respectively; n = 4 cells per genotype). Moreover, recordings in voltage clamp mode revealed spontaneous synaptic currents in both mutant and control neurons (Fig. 6A Lower). Their frequency was lower in mutant than in control neurons, but this difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 6B Right). However, the mean amplitude of the synaptic currents recorded from mutant neurons was ∼50% lower than those in controls (Fig. 6B Left). This result suggests that γ-Pcdhs are required for the development and/or function of synapses.
To ask whether Pcdh-γ affects excitatory or inhibitory synapses, we took account of the fact that decay times of excitatory (glutamatergic) currents recorded from cultured mammalian central neurons are considerably faster than those of inhibitory (GABAergic and glycinergic) currents (32, 33). Pharmacological tests confirmed this distinction in our cultures: excitatory currents, isolated by addition of GABAergic and glycinergic blockers (200 nM strychnine and 2 μM bicuculline), had decay times of 0.5–4 ms, whereas inhibitory currents, isolated by addition of glutamatergic blockers (2 mM 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione and 20 μM 2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid), had decay times of 7–100 ms (Fig. 6C). Using decay time as a criterion, we found that both excitatory synaptic currents (<8 ms decay time; Fig. 6D) and inhibitory synaptic currents (>10 ms decay time; Fig. 6E) were significantly smaller in mutants than in controls. Thus, truncation and/or reduced expression of γ-Pcdhs leads both to fewer synapses and reduced synaptic activity at those synapses that are present.
Discussion
Our initial studies of mice lacking γ-Pcdhs established the importance of these molecules for the development of the nervous system, but we could not tell whether the observed synaptic deficits were a direct effect of Pcdh-γ mutation or secondary to interneuron loss (17). Here, we used two additional mutants, Bax-/- and Pcdh-γtr/tr, to test the role of γ-Pcdhs in synaptic development.
Neurodegeneration was minimal but synaptic defects were dramatic in spinal cords of both Pcdh-γdel/del;Bax-/- double mutants and Pcdh-γtr/tr hypomorphs. Similarly, Pcdh-γtr/tr interneurons survived and differentiated in vitro but exhibited fewer and weaker synapses than did control interneurons. The fact that both the double mutants and the hypomorphs exhibit sensori-motor defects and die at birth suggests that the synaptic defects are biologically as well as statistically significant.
It remains to be determined which stages of synaptic development are regulated by γ-Pcdhs. Possibilities include the initial formation of synaptic contacts, their maturation into fully functional synapses, and the maintenance of their structural or physiological integrity. One hint comes from our observations that synaptic puncta are decreased in size as well as number in mutant neurons in vitro, and that mutant synaptic currents are reduced in amplitude rather than frequency. These results suggest that γ-Pcdhs affect synaptic maturation or maintenance. The decreased number of synaptic puncta in mutants in vivo and in vitro suggests an additional effect on the initial steps of synaptogenesis, but could also reflect an inability to detect the smallest, presumably least mature, synapses. That is, small synaptic puncta are difficult to distinguish from background fluorescence, so that a decrease in average size would be conflated with a decrease in number.
Whatever the stage at which they act, γ-Pcdhs might be required either for generic synaptic functions or synaptic specificity, as suggested by the diversity of their extracellular domains. Either role could result in decreased synapse number or size, if one imagines that synapses formed between “inappropriate” partners are smaller, weaker, or less stable than those found in “appropriate” circuits. Indeed, such defects have been observed in several cases in which neurons formed synapses on inappropriate targets either transiently during development or because of experimental manipulations (34–37). One way to distinguish these possibilities would be to ask whether misexpression of one or a few Pcdh-γ isoforms affects patterns of connectivity. The demonstration that Pcdhs play separate roles in neuronal survival and synaptic development makes these issues important to address, and our genetic methods for separating trophic from synaptic effects of Pcdhs make the appropriate experiments possible.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Andreas Burkhalter (Washington University) for use of his patch-clamping rig and Dr. Monica Carrasco for helpful advice on spinal neuron cultures. This work was supported by a National Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health postdoctoral fellowship (to J.A.W.) and grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/National Institutes of Health (to J.R.S.).
Author contributions: J.A.W., X.W., and J.R.S. designed research; J.A.W., X.W., and J.C.T. performed research; X.W. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.A.W., J.C.T., and J.R.S. analyzed data; and J.A.W. and J.R.S. wrote the paper.
This contribution is part of the special series of Inaugural Articles by members of the National Academy of Sciences elected on April 30, 2002.
Abbreviations: Pcdh, protocadherin; MAP2, microtubule-associated protein 2; GAD, glutamic acid decarboxylase; VGlut, vesicular glutamate transporter; PSD, postsynaptic density.
See accompanying Biography on page 5.
References
- 1.Yamagata, M., Sanes, J. R. & Weiner, J. A. (2003) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 621-632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scheiffele, P. (2003) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 26, 486-508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Washbourne, P., Ditayetev, A., Scheiffele, P., Biederer, T., Weiner, J. A., Christopherson, K. S. & El-Husseini, A. (2004) J. Neurosci. 24, 9244-9249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Takai, Y., Shimuzu, K. & Ohtsuka, T. (2003) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 520-526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yamagata, M., Weiner, J. A. & Sanes, J. R. (2002) Cell 110, 649-660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shen, K. & Bargmann, C. I. (2003) Cell 112, 619-630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shen, K., Fetter, R. D. & Bargmann, C. I. (2004) Cell 116, 869-881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wojtowicz, W. M., Flanagan, J. J., Millard, S. S., Zipursky, S. L. & Clemens, J. C. (2004) Cell 118, 619-633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhan, X. L., Clemens, J. C., Neves, G., Hattori, D., Flanagan, J. J., Hummel, T., Vasconcelos, M. L., Chess, A. & Zipursky, S. L. (2004) Neuron 43, 673-686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wu, Q. & Maniatis, T. (1999) Cell 97, 779-790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu, Q., Zhang, T., Cheng, J. F., Kim, Y., Grimwood, J., Schmutz, J., Dickson, M., Noonan, J. P., Zhang, M. Q., Myers, R. M. & Maniatis, T. (2001) Genome Res. 11, 389-404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Obata, S., Sago, H., Mori, N., Davidson, M., St. John, T. & Suzuki, S. T. (1998) Cell Adhes. Commun. 6, 323-333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sugino, H., Hamada, S., Yasuda, R., Tuji, A., Matsuda, Y., Fujita, M. & Yagi, T. (2000) Genomics 63, 75-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang, X., Su, H. & Bradley, A. (2002) Genes Dev. 16, 1890-1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tasic, B., Nabholz, C. E., Baldwin, K. K., Kim, Y., Rueckert, E. H., Ribich, S. A., Cramer, P., Wu, Q., Axel, R. & Maniatis, T. (2002) Mol. Cell 10, 21-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kohmura, N., Senzaki, K., Hamada, S., Kai, N., Yasuda, R., Watanabe, M., Ishii, H., Yasuda, M., Mishina, M. & Yagi, T. (1998) Neuron 20, 1137-1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang, X., Weiner, J. A., Levi, S., Craig, A. M., Bradley, A. & Sanes, J. R. (2002) Neuron 36, 843-854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Phillips, G. R., Tanaka, H., Frank, M., Elste, A., Fidler, L., Benson, D. L. & Colman, D. R. (2003) J. Neurosci. 23, 5096-5104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Blank, M., Triana-Baltzer, G. B., Richards, C. S. & Berg, D. K. (2004) Mol. Cell Neurosci. 26, 530-543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shapiro, L. & Colman, D. R. (1999) Neuron 23, 427-430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hamada, S. & Yagi, T. (2001) Neurosci. Res. 41, 207-215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Benson, D. L., Colman, D. R. & Huntley, G. W. (2001) Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 899-909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Knudson, C. M., Tung, K. S., Tourtellotte, W. G., Brown, G. A. & Korsmeyer, S. J. (1995) Science 270, 96-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Deckwerth, T. L., Elliott, J. L., Knudson, C. M., Johnson, E. M., Jr., Snider, W. D. & Korsmeyer, S. J. (1996) Neuron 17, 401-411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.White, F. A., Keller-Peck, C. R., Knudson, C. M., Korsmeyer, S. J. & Snider, W. D. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 1428-1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pequignot, M. O., Provost, A. C., Salle, S., Taupin, P., Sainton, K. M., Marchant, D., Martinou, J. C., Ameisen, J. C., Jais, J. P. & Abitbol, M. (2003) Dev. Dyn. 228, 231-238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Patel, T. D., Jackman, A., Rice, F. L., Kucera, J. & Snider, W. D. (2000) Neuron 25, 345-357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Misgeld, T., Burgess, R. W., Lewis, R. M., Cunningham, J. M., Lichtman, J. W. & Sanes, J. R. (2002) Neuron 36, 635-648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ransom, B. R., Neale, E., Henkart, M., Bullock, P. N. & Nelson, P. G. (1977) J. Neurophysiol. 40, 1132-1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Van Zundert, B., Alvarez, F. J., Tapia, J. C., Yeh, H. H., Diaz, E. & Aguayo, L. G. (2004) J. Neurophysiol. 91, 1036-1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Miller, T. M., Moulder, K. L., Knudson, C. M., Creedon, D. J., Deshmukh, M., Korsmeyer, S. J. & Johnson, E. M., Jr. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 205-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gao, B. X., Cheng, G. & Ziskind-Conhaim, L. (1998) J. Neurophysiol. 79, 2277-2287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Galante, M., Nistri, A. & Ballerini, L. (2000) J. Physiol. (London) 523, 639-651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Purves, D., Thompson, W. & Yip, J. W. (1981) J. Physiol. (London) 313, 49-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wigston, D. J. & Sanes, J. R. (1982) Nature 299, 464-467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Butler, J., Cauwenbergs, P. & Cosmos, E. (1986) J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 95, 147-168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Seebach, B. S. & Ziskind-Conhaim, L. (1994) J. Neurosci. 14, 4520-4528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]