Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the main causes of cancer-associated mortality in females with gynecological malignancies. Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) has previously been reported to be involved in tumor growth and the inhibition of tumor metastasis. However, the association between DARC and EOC remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of DARC in the SKOV3 human epithelial ovarian cancer cell line with the establishment of a subcutaneous model in nude mice. To investigate the effects of DARC on the tumorigenesis of human epithelial ovarian cancer cells, GV287-DARC-L.V lentiviral vectors containing a DARC overexpression construct were transfected into SKOV3 cells. The present study revealed that transfection with DARC reduced the viability of SKOV3 cells in vitro by performing an MTT assay. SKOV3-DARC and SKOV3-negative control (NC) cells cultured in vitro were injected into nude mice to establish a subcutaneous model. The ovarian tumor volumes and the tumor weights were observed. Immunohistochemistry to detect CD31 expression was used to determine the microvessel density (MVD) in SKOV3-DARC and SKOV3-NC tumors. The results of the present study revealed that DARC-induced inhibition of tumor growth was associated with MVD in xenograft tumors. This suggested that DARC was a negative regulator of tumor growth in EOC, primarily via the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis.
Keywords: Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines, ovarian cancer, animal model, nude mice, microvessel density
Introduction
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) affects females worldwide, and is the fifth highest cause of mortality from malignancy in females (1). The majority of patients with EOC are diagnosed at an advanced clinical stage, since they are asymptomatic until the tumor has metastasized on the surface of the peritoneum (2). Surgery combined with chemotherapy is the main strategy for treatment, but this has a poor outcome. Furthermore, 75% of patients with advanced stage EOC develop recurrences and succumb to mortality within 5 years from the point of diagnosis (3,4). The histological subtypes of EOC include mucinous, serous, endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma (5). The pathogenesis of EOC is a complex process that involves interactions among chemokines, chemokine receptors, environmental influences, inflammatory cells, hereditary factors and cancer suppression and progression mechanisms (6).
Chemokines and chemokine receptors have previously been studied due to their involvement in cancer progression, including proliferation, migration, invasion and angiogenesis (7,8). C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8), C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL)2 and CCL5 have previously been reported to be associated with cancer progression (9,10). Chemokines may be mediated by transcriptional activity and posttranslational regulation (10). Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) is an atypical chemokine binder, incapable of transmitting signals via the classic G-protein-mediated signaling pathways. DARC is able to efficiently internalize its cognate chemokine ligands and act as a scavenger. Multiple previous studies have demonstrated that DARC serves an inhibitory function in breast cancer growth and progression by sequestration of pro-malignancy chemokines (11–13). However, the association between DARC and EOC remains unknown.
Chemokines promote angiogenesis by interaction with EOC cells. In EOC, tumor derived vascular endothelial growth factor promotes tumor angiogenesis (14). Angiogenesis is essential for tumor growth (15). DARC is widely expressed on vascular endothelial cells and erythrocytes (16). DARC is also present on blood vessels and serves as a systemic barrier to tumor metastasis (16). Given the broad distribution of DARC within the body and its inhibitory effect on tumor progression and metastasis, the present study hypothesized that DARC may inhibit ovarian cancer growth and progression by angiogenesis. In order to investigate this hypothesis, the present study established a nude mouse model with subcutaneous primary ovarian cancer. The biological mechanism of DARC was subsequently analyzed.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The SKOV3 human ovarian cancer cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The SKOV3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; HyClone; GE Healthcare Lifesciences, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 5% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The SKOV3 cells were transfected with the lentiviral vector GV287-DARC-L.V-GFP (LVKL7847-2; Genechem Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) containing a DARC overexpression construct, with the sequence: 5′ GAG GAT CCC CGG GTA CCG GTC GCC ACC ATG GGG AAC TGT CTG CAC AGG 3′, and an empty vector negative control (NC) GV287-NC-L.V-GFP (KL3120-1; Genechem Co., Ltd.) in the presence of 5 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and ENi.S (Genechem Co., Ltd.) for 16 h, following which the medium was replaced by DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. The infection efficiency of lentivirus was determined under a Zeiss LSM 510 laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscope (Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany) 72 h following infection (Fig. 1). The cells were counted manually in 5 fields of view. The DARC-transfected SKOV3 cells and mock-transfected SKOV3 cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2.
MTT assay
For the MTT assay, the SKOV3-DARC and SKOV3-NC cells were seeded at a density of 2,000 cells/well in 96-well plates 72 h following transfection. Subsequently, MTT reagent (20 µl, 5 mg/ml, cat. no., ab211091; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) was added to each well and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The remaining crystals were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. The absorbance was evaluated at 492 nm. The assays were performed in triplicate.
Murine model of ovarian cancer
A total of 10 female athymic nude mice (4–6 weeks old) weighing 15–18 g were purchased from Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine (Shanghai, China) and housed at 18–20°C and a constant humidity of 60–70%, with ad libitum feeding schedules and as 12/12 h light/dark cycle. The nude mice were bred under specific pathogen free conditions. Protocols for the treatment of nude mice were approved by the committee of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine (Shanghai, China). The nude mice were randomly separated into two groups as follows: The DRAC group (DARC-transfected SKOV3 cells) and NC group (mock-transfected SKOV3 cells). To establish a subcutaneous model, nude mice from each group were injected with 0.10 ml DMEM containing 1×106 SKOV3-DARC or SKOV3-NC cells. Mice were observed every week for tumor growth and appearance, and tumors were harvested 4 weeks following injection. Tumor diameter and tumor weights were recorded. The volume (V) of ovarian tumors was evaluated by the following formula: V = 1/ 2 × length × width2. Tumor tissues were fixed in paraformaldehyde for frozen slide preparation.
Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor sections, tumor samples were collected 4 weeks following injection and processed for frozen section analysis. Sections (8 µm thick) were prepared as follows: Tumor tissues isolated from nude mice were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, sectioned and mounted on slides. The slides were fixed in cold acetone for 15 min without antigen retrieval. Following washing with PBS, endogenous peroxide was blocked with 3% H2O2 in PBS for 15 min at 20–22°C. Slides were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and 10% normal goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) in PBS for 50 min at room temperature, followed by incubation with primary antibody (mouse monoclonal CD31; cat. no., Ab28364; dilution, 1:80; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) in PBS overnight at 20°C. Secondary antibody (Biotin-SP-conjugated Affinipure goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G; cat. no., A8275; dilution, 1:350; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) in PBS was added for 45 min at 37°C and horseradish peroxidase (HRP; dilution, 1:500; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was added for 35 min at 37°C. Subsequently, HRP was detected using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) as a substrate with a 100 sec incubation period at 20–22°C, followed by washing and counter-staining with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Microvessel density (MVD) was determined from five random high power fields using light microscopy. Vessels with a well-defined lumen or linear vessel shape were observed for blood microvessel analysis. The negative control was prepared by replacing CD31 with PBS under the same conditions as the primary antibody.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 software (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. An unpaired Student's t-test was used to determine P-values. Levene's test was used to assess the homogeneity of variance. Continuous variables in the figures were presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Overexpression of the DARC molecule in SKOV3 cell line
To investigate the anti-malignant functional significance of DARC in ovarian cancer, a DARC-overexpressing SKOV3 cell line was generated in vitro (Fig. 1, at ×200 magnification). The infection efficiency of SKOV3 cells was evaluated by observing concomitant green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression. There was no significant difference between GFP expression of SKOV3-DARC and SKOV3-NC cells observed (P>0.05).
DARC inhibited EOC viability in vitro
To determine whether DARC expression affected the viability of SKOV3 cells in vitro, an MTT assay was performed. DARC overexpression demonstrated a significant effect on cell viability when compared with SKOV3-NC cells. The number of SKOV3-DARC cells was significantly decreased (1.19×104±21.01) compared with SKOV3-NC cells (1.38×104±366.09; P=0.001; Fig. 2).
DARC inhibited EOC development in vivo
To investigate the inhibitory function of DARC on tumor development, the present study established a subcutaneous model to observe ovarian cancer growth in nude mice (n=5). Nude mice were injected with 0.10 ml DMEM containing 1×106 SKOV3-DARC or SKOV3-NC cells. The experimental group demonstrated decreased tumor volume (mm3) on day 21 and 28 post-injection (Fig. 3). The tumor volume of the SKOV3-DARC group (21.24±4.75 mm3) was significantly lower at day 21 compared with the SKOV3-NC group (67.48±36.13 mm3; P=0.045). At day 28, the tumor volume of the SKOV3-DARC group (36.30±16.38 mm3) was also lower compared with that of the SKOV3-NC group (158.43±108.66 mm3; P=0.038). Furthermore, the present study compared the tumor weight between the SKOV3-DARC and SKOV3-NC groups at the time of sacrifice (Fig. 4). The tumor weight of the SKOV3-DARC group (0.55±0.13 g) was lower compared with the SKOV3-NC group (1.40±0.72 g) on day 28 (P=0.032; Fig. 4). The tumors of the SKOV3-DARC group were, in general, smaller compared with those of the SKOV3-NC group (Fig. 5). Therefore, it was revealed that DARC expression regulated ovarian cancer cell proliferation in vivo.
DARC inhibited EOC progression by anti-angiogenesis in vivo
Tumor growth and progression depend on angiogenesis. To determine whether DARC expression-induced inhibition of cancer growth was associated with tumor angiogenesis, CD31 staining in tumor sections was performed. MVD was analyzed at ×200 magnification. The expression of CD31 was confined to the cytomembrane of vascular endothelial cells (Fig. 6). MVD in the DARC group (11.04±1.76) was lower compared with the NC group (17.32±3.55) in tumor sections of nude mice (P=0.008; Fig. 6). These results revealed that DARC expression inhibited ovarian cancer growth by decreasing tumor angiogenesis.
Discussion
Chemokines are multifunctional secreted peptides that are involved in regulating leukocyte migration, malignancy progression and metastasis. Chemokines may facilitate tumorigenesis by providing an inflammation microenvironment for tumor cells. The functions of chemokines include directly influencing tumor growth, transformation and metastasis, and indirect functions affecting tumor-leukocyte interactions and tumor angiogenesis. Solid tumors contain various types of stromal cells, including endothelial cells and fibroblast cells. In addition, tumors are infiltrated with inflammatory cells, including macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes. These all contribute to the microenvironment for the growth and metastasis of tumor cells. Chemokines may attract macrophages, which affect tumor progression (17). C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 and C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 have been demonstrated to be involved in peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer and gastric cancer (18). However, the mechanism of these chemokine factors remains unknown.
Atypical chemokine receptors, which include DARC, C-C chemokine receptor type 11 and D6, may act as scavengers and internalize their cognate chemokine ligands. DARC is not only a receptor for the malaria parasites, plasmodium knowlesi and plasmodium vivax, but is also known to be a typical decoy receptor that binds with CC chemokines and CXC chemokines (19). DARC lacks the Asp-Arg-Tyr motif to enable G protein coupling in the second intracellular loop (20,21). When a ligand binds to DARC, it doesn't induce G protein-coupled signal transduction and Ca2+-flux (22). DARC, which is specialized for chemokine sequestration, may regulate chemokine bioavailability by binding its chemoattractant ligands without activating its signal transduction cascades for tumor cell migration (23,24). DARC is unable to induce signaling responses by binding to a ligand so that it appears to be a scavenger of multiple chemokines (25). Thus, it is also proposed to limit tumorigenesis, tumor growth and metastasis. Certain previous studies have demonstrated that DARC is a negative regulator of lung caner and prostate cancer (26,27). The present study hypothesized that DARC may inhibit the proliferation and growth of human ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo, which indicated that the intratumor chemokine network may be partially modulated by DARC.
Angiogenic chemokines have been reported to involved in tumor angiogenesis. Certain chemokines may promote an inflammatory microenvironment for tumor initiation, growth, angiogenesis, progression and metastasis, whereas others may suppress tumor proliferation by promoting antitumor immunity (28–30). The capture and clearance of angiogenic chemokines may induce inhibition of tumor growth and proliferation. The present study hypothesized that DARC, as a silent chemokine receptor, is able to selectively bind to angiogenic chemokines and inhibit tumor angiogenesis. MVD, as an indicator of angiogenesis, has been used for the evaluation of tumor angiogenesis in multiple types of human tumors. A previous study revealed that DARC induced tumor neovascularity inhibition in breast cancer (13). The present study demonstrated that the inhibition effect of DARC on tumor progression was associated with MVD.
The present study observed that DARC decreased SKOV3 cell proliferation in vitro. It was also revealed that DARC inhibited SKOV3 cell growth in vivo, and that the SKOV3-DARC tumor volumes were smaller compared with SKOV3-NC tumor volumes. The present study demonstrated that the SKOV3-DARC tumor weights were lower compared with the SKOV3-NC tumor weights. Furthermore, the MVD was confirmed to be positively associated with DARC expression. The present study suggested that DARC may inhibit EOC growth and metastasis via an anti-angiogenesis effect. This result is partially consistent with certain previous studies in other types of cancer, including non-small-cell lung cancer (26), breast cancer (13,31,32), thyroid cancer (20) and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (33). The inhibitory effect of DARC on ovarian cancer growth and metastasis is mainly due to its ability to sequester pro-malignant chemokines. Furthermore, the anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenesis functions of DARC were reported to be derived from the interaction between the tumor suppressor gene kangai 1 and DARC on vascular endothelial cells (34).
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that overexpression of DARC was associated with inhibited tumor growth, proliferation and tumor angiogenesis of ovarian cancer. Further experiments investigating DARC and chemokines are required in the future for exploring their potential as neo-therapeutic targets in EOC.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81372787 and 81072136), the Top 100 Medical Elite in Shanghai (grant no. XBR 2011065) and the Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Health (grant no. 20164Y0024).
References
- 1.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Weidle UH, Birzele F, Kollmorgen G, Rueger R. Mechanisms and targets involved in dissemination of ovarian cancer. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2016;13:407–423. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lavoué V, Thédrez A, Levêque J, Foucher F, Henno S, Jauffret V, Belaud-Rotureau MA, Catros V, Cabillic F. Immunity of human epithelial ovarian carcinoma: The paradigm of immune suppression in cancer. J Transl Med. 2013;11:147. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mei L, Chen H, Wei DM, Fang F, Liu GJ, Xie HY, Wang X, Zou J, Han X, Feng D. Maintenance chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD007414. 2013 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007414.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tan DS, Kaye S. Ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: A continuing enigma. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:355–360. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.040030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Barbolina MV, Kim M, Liu Y, Shepard J, Belmadani A, Miller RJ, Shea LD, Stack MS. Microenvironmental regulation of chemokine (C-X-C-motif) receptor 4 in ovarian carcinoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2010;8:653–664. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zlotnik A. Chemokines and cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2026–2029. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Balakin KV, Ivanenkov YA, Tkachenko SE, Kiselyov AS, Ivachtchenko AV. Regulators of chemokine receptor activity as promising anticancer therapeutics. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2008;8:299–340. doi: 10.2174/156800908784533490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Soria G, Yaal-Hahoshen N, Azenshtein E, Shina S, Leider-Trejo L, Ryvo L, Cohen-Hillel E, Shtabsky A, Ehrlich M, Meshel T, et al. Concomitant expression of the chemokines RANTES and MCP-1 in human breast cancer: A basis for tumor-promoting interactions. Cytokine. 2008;44:191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Soria G, Ben-Baruch A. The inflammatory chemokines CCL2 and CCL5 in breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2008;267:271–285. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Feng LY, Ou ZL, Wu FY, Shen ZZ, Shao ZM. Involvement of a novel chemokine decoy receptor CCX-CKR in breast cancer growth, metastasis and patient survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2962–2970. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu FY, Ou ZL, Feng LY, Luo JM, Wang LP, Shen ZZ, Shao ZM. Chemokine decoy receptor d6 plays a negative role in human breast cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:1276–1288. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-2108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang J, Ou ZL, Hou YF, Luo JM, Shen ZZ, Ding J, Shao ZM. Enhanced expression of Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines by breast cancer cells attenuates growth and metastasis potential. Oncogene. 2006;25:7201–7211. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang L, Yang N, Park JW, Katsaros D, Fracchioli S, Cao G, O'Brien-Jenkins A, Randall TC, Rubin SC, Coukos G. Tumor-derived vascular endothelial growth factor up-regulates angiopoietin-2 in host endothelium and destabilizes host vasculature, supporting angiogenesis in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3403–3412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:1182–1186. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197111182852108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rot A. Contribution of Duffy antigen to chemokine function. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16:687–694. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Balkwill F. Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:540–550. doi: 10.1038/nrc1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhao HB, Tang CL, Hou YL, Xue LR, Li MQ, Du MR, Li DJ. CXCL12/CXCR4 axis triggers the activation of EGF receptor and ERK signaling pathway in CsA-induced proliferation of human trophoblast cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Szabo MC, Soo KS, Zlotnik A, Schall TJ. Chemokine class differences in binding to the Duffy antigen-erythrocyte chemokine receptor. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:25348–25351. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Latini FR, Bastos AU, Arnoni CP, Muniz JG, Person RM, Baleotti W, Jr, Barreto JA, Castilho L, Cerutti JM. DARC (Duffy) and BCAM (Lutheran) reduced expression in thyroid cancer. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2013;50:161–165. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2012.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Horne K, Woolley IJ. Shedding light on DARC: The role of the Duffy antigen/receptor for chemokines in inflammation, infection and malignancy. Inflamm Res. 2009;58:431–435. doi: 10.1007/s00011-009-0023-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Neote K, Mak JY, Kolakowski LF, Jr, Schall TJ. Functional and biochemical analysis of the cloned Duffy antigen: Identity with the red blood cell chemokine receptor. Blood. 1994;84:44–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Graham GJ, Locati M, Mantovani A, Rot A, Thelen M. The biochemistry and biology of the atypical chemokine receptors. Immunol Lett. 2012;145:30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2012.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ulvmar MH, Hub E, Rot A. Atypical chemokine receptors. Exp Cell Res. 2011;317:556–568. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang D, Dubois RN, Richmond A. The role of chemokines in intestinal inflammation and cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009;9:688–696. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Addison CL, Belperio JA, Burdick MD, Strieter RM. Overexpression of the duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) by NSCLC tumor cells results in increased tumor necrosis. BMC Cancer. 2004;4:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-4-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lentsch AB. The Duffy antigen/receptor for chemokines (DARC) and prostate cancer. A role as clear as black and white? FASEB J. 2002;16:1093–1095. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0066hyp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McClellan JL, Davis JM, Steiner JL, Enos RT, Jung SH, Carson JA, Pena MM, Carnevale KA, Berger FG, Murphy EA. Linking tumor-associated macrophages, inflammation, and intestinal tumorigenesis: Role of MCP-1. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;303:G1087–G1095. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00252.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Doll D, Keller L, Maak M, Boulesteix AL, Siewert JR, Holzmann B, Janssen KP. Differential expression of the chemokines GRO-2, GRO-3, and interleukin-8 in colon cancer and their impact on metastatic disease and survival. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25:573–581. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-0901-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ning Y, Manegold PC, Hong YK, Zhang W, Pohl A, Lurje G, Winder T, Yang D, LaBonte MJ, Wilson PM, et al. Interleukin-8 is associated with proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and chemosensitivity in vitro and in vivo in colon cancer cell line models. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:2038–2049. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang J, Ou ZL, Hou YF, Luo JM, Chen Y, Zhou J, Shen ZZ, Ding J, Shao ZM. Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines attenuates breast cancer growth and metastasis: An experiment with nude mice. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005;85:2033–2037. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zeng XH, Ou ZL, Yu KD, Feng LY, Yin WJ, Li J, Shen ZZ, Shao ZM. Coexpression of atypical chemokine binders (ACBs) in breast cancer predicts better outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;125:715–727. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0875-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sun G, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Huang C, Ji Q. Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma as a negative regulator. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131:197–203. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2010.516012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bandyopadhyay S, Zhan R, Chaudhuri A, Watabe M, Pai SK, Hirota S, Hosobe S, Tsukada T, Miura K, Takano Y, et al. Interaction of KAI1 on tumor cells with DARC on vascular endothelium leads to metastasis suppression. Nat Med. 2006;12:933–938. doi: 10.1038/nm1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]