Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2017 Jun 15;5:e3422. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3422

Characterization of the transcriptome and EST-SSR development in Boea clarkeana, a desiccation-tolerant plant endemic to China

Ying Wang 1,2, Kun Liu 1,2, De Bi 1, Shoubiao Zhou 1,3,, Jianwen Shao 1,2,
Editor: Marion Röder
PMCID: PMC5474092  PMID: 28630801

Abstract

Background

Desiccation-tolerant (DT) plants can recover full metabolic competence upon rehydration after losing most of their cellular water (>95%) for extended periods of time. Functional genomic approaches such as transcriptome sequencing can help us understand how DT plants survive and respond to dehydration, which has great significance for plant biology and improving the drought tolerance of crops. Boea clarkeana Hemsl. (Gesneriaceae) is a DT dicotyledonous herb. Its genomic sequences characteristics remain unknown. Based on transcriptomic analyses, polymorphic EST-SSR (simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags) molecular primers can be designed, which will greatly facilitate further investigations of the population genetics and demographic histories of DT plants.

Methods

In the present study, we used the platform Illumina HiSeq™2000 and de novo assembly technology to obtain leaf transcriptomes of B. clarkeana and conducted a BLASTX alignment of the sequencing data and protein databases for sequence classification and annotation. Then, based on the sequence information, the EST-SSR markers were developed, and the functional annotation of ESTs containing polymorphic SSRs were obtained through BLASTX.

Results

A total of 91,449 unigenes were generated from the leaf cDNA library of B. clarkeana. Based on a sequence similarity search with a known protein database, 72,087 unigenes were annotated. Among the annotated unigenes, a total of 71,170 unigenes showed significant similarity to the known proteins of 463 popular model species in the Nr database, and 59,962 unigenes and 32,336 unigenes were assigned to Gene Ontology (GO) classifications and Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG), respectively. In addition, 44,924 unigenes were mapped in 128 KEGG pathways. Furthermore, a total of 7,610 unigenes with 8,563 microsatellites were found. Seventy-four primer pairs were selected from 436 primer pairs designed for polymorphism validation. SSRs with higher polymorphism rates were concentrated on dinucleotides, pentanucleotides and hexanucleotides. Finally, 17 pairs with stable, highly polymorphic loci were selected for polymorphism screening. There was a total of 65 alleles, with 2–6 alleles at each locus. Primarily due to the unique biological characteristics of plants, the HE (0–0.196), HO (0.082–0.14) and PIC (0–0.155) per locus were very low. The functional annotation distribution centered on ESTs containing di- and tri-nucleotide SSRs, and the ESTs containing primers BC2, BC4 and BC12 were annotated to vegetative dehydration/desiccation pathways.

Discussion

This work is the first genetic study of B. clarkeana as a new plant resource of DT genes. A substantial number of transcriptome sequences were generated in this study. These sequences are valuable resources for gene annotation and discovery as well as molecular marker development. These sequences could also provide a valuable basis for future molecular studies of Bclarkeana.

Keywords: Gene function annotation, Boea clarkeana, Transcriptome, EST-SSRs, Desiccation tolerance

Introduction

Resurrection plants are desiccation-tolerant (DT), which enables them to recover full metabolic competence upon rehydration after losing most of their cellular water (>95%) for extended periods of time (Farrant, Brandt & Lindsey, 2007). Though non-vascular plants and spores of tracheophytes are commonly DT (Rodriguez et al., 2010), this feature is rare in angiosperms (Gaff, 1971; Porembski & Barthlott, 2000; Proctor & Pence, 2002). The mechanisms of DT are different between the extant lower orders and angiosperms (Farrant, Brandt & Lindsey, 2007). Understanding how DT plants survive and respond to dehydration has great significance for plant biology and crop drought tolerance improvement, which could contribute to future water resource management decisions. Moreover, research on DT angiosperms could inform crop cultivation (Farrant, Brandt & Lindsey, 2007; Oliver et al., 2011a; Gechev et al., 2012; Xiao et al., 2015). In recent decades, research has focused on revealing the physiological and molecular mechanisms of DT in angiosperm plants and their recovery processes (Bianchi et al., 1993; Bernacchia, Salamini & Bartels, 1996; Sherwin & Farrant, 1998; Cooper & Farrant, 2002; Collett et al., 2003; Collett et al., 2004; Schneider et al., 2003; Alcazar et al., 2011; Oliver et al., 2011a; Oliver et al., 2011b; Christ et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2015). While a functional genomic approach, such as transcriptome sequencing, could be fruitful for exploring the mechanisms of DT (Xiao et al., 2015), transcriptomics could identify the metabolic processes involved in DT. Gene Ontology (GO, http://www.blast2go.com/b2ghome) and Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/) analyses can also help us understand the distribution of functional genes in plants at the macro level (Conesa et al., 2005; Ye et al., 2006). Moreover, the gene products of metabolic processes and the functions of genes related to cellular processes can be detected by BLASTX using the KEGG database (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, http://www.kegg.jp/) (Kanehisa et al., 2008). These approaches can help us study gene behaviors in biologically complex processes, such as vegetative dehydration/desiccation pathways, in DT plants (Xiao et al., 2015). However, to the best of our knowledge, only a few gene expression and EST sequencing studies have been performed in angiosperms with DT, including the dicot species Craterostigma plantagineum (Bockel, Salamini & Bartels, 1998; Rodriguez et al., 2010), Boea hygrometrica (Xiao et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2015), and Haberlea rhodopensis (Gechev et al., 2013) and the monocot species Sporobolus stapfianus (Neale et al., 2000; Le et al., 2007), Xerophyta viscosa (Mundree et al., 2000; Mowla et al., 2002; Lehner et al., 2008), and X. humilis (Collett et al., 2004; Illing et al., 2005; Mulako et al., 2008).

Boea (Gesneriaceae) is a rare group of resurrection plants within angiosperms (Liu, Hu & Zhao, 2007; Xiao et al., 2015). B. clarkeana Hemsl. is a desiccation-tolerant herb endemic to China. The whole plant, detached leaf and leaf segment all retain the DT phenotype, and the excellent drought tolerance of this plant has been of concern in the last few years (Chao et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2016). B. clarkeana is a small perennial dicotyledonous plant that is mainly distributed in eight provinces and one municipality along the middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River in China (Li, 1996; Li & Wang, 2005). It is found only on rock outcrops (such as inselbergs) among some lithophytes, where dehydration occurs frequently (Jenks & Wood, 2007). It is commonly used as a medicinal plant to treat traumatic hemorrhage and traumatic injury (Li & Wang, 2005). However, genomic sequences of B. clarkeana are scarce, and only a few nucleotide sequences are found in public databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). To fill this critical gap and obtain the first genomic resources, we used the Illumina HiSeq™2000 platform and de novo assembly to obtain leaf transcriptomes of B. clarkeana and conducted a BLASTX (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) alignment of the sequencing data and protein databases for sequence classification and annotation.

We also assessed the SSRs, or microsatellites, that are distributed universally in gene coding and non-coding regions. As the major tool of genetic research, the neutral SSR markers are widely used in botanic sciences and functional SSR markers might affect gene function by influencing recombination and chromatin organization, regulating gene expression and activity, etc. (Cavagnaro et al., 2010; Li et al., 2012a; Zalapa et al., 2012). In DT plants, identifying functional genes that contain functional SSRs could help us to understand the evolution and expression of these genes, making SSRs a valuable resource for genetic studies (Li et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2003). Therefore, based on the B. clarkeana transcriptome, 17 pairs of polymorphic EST-SSR molecular primers were developed and characterized. The results of this study will greatly facilitate further investigations of the genetics and demographic histories of populations of this DT plant.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and genomic DNA extraction

The materials of 11 natural populations were sampled from six provinces and one municipality in China that covered the vast majority of the natural habitats of B. clarkeana (Li & Wang, 2005). Young leaves were collected, rapidly dried and preserved in silica gel. DNA extraction was carried out using the QIAGEN®  DNeasy®  Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany).

RNA isolation and cDNA library construction

The young leaves of three individual B. clarkeana plants from the population of Mt. Fenghuang in Anhui Province (30°88′N, 118°02′E) were collected, mixed and frozen in liquid nitrogen; then, the sampled tissues were stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction. Total RNA was isolated using a TRIzolKit (Life Technologies, USA) and DNase I (TaKaRa, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocols. After total RNA was obtained, mRNA + poly (A) were isolated using beads with Oligo (dT), and fragmentation buffer was added to cut the mRNA into short fragments. Then, first-strand cDNA was obtained from the RNA sequence fragments using reverse transcriptase and random primers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and second-strand cDNA was synthesized using buffer, dNTPs, RNaseH and DNA polymerase I. Following the ligation of adapters, a single ‘A’ base was added to the 3’ end of these cDNA fragments to facilitate end repair. Based on the amplification of these products, the cDNAs were separated on an agarose gel, and the cDNA library was generated.

Sequencing and de novo assembly

The raw reads were produced from the cDNA library using an Illumina HiSeq™2000 genomic sequencer at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI, Shenzhen, China, http://www.genomics.cn/index). The subsequent analysis was based on the clean reads generated by filtering the raw reads. We used the filter_fq program (BGI, Shenzhen, China) to remove reads with more than 5% unknown nucleotides (N) and low-quality sequences with more than 20% low-quality bases (quality value ≤10) and adaptors to obtain clean reads. Then, we used the short read assembly program Trinity (Release-2013-02-25, http://trinityrnaseq.sourceforge.net/) for de novo transcriptome assembly by combining the clean reads into contigs with a sequence fragment length of 200 bp (±25 bp) (Grabherr et al., 2011). Two contigs were then connected into a single scaffold, and we called the resulting sequences unigenes. These unigenes were removed to prevent redundancy with TGICL (version 2.1) and further spliced to generate non-redundant unigenes that were as long as possible (Pertea et al., 2003). The raw sequencing data with accession number SRX1600046 were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), which will be released upon publication.

Functional annotation and classification of unigenes

BLASTX alignment (E-value < 10−5) between the unigenes and protein databases, such as NCBI non-redundant protein (Nr), GO, COG, and KEGG, was performed to annotate and classify the transcriptome. Based on the Nr database annotation, we used Blast2GO v2.5.0 to obtain GO terms with an E-value threshold of 10−5 (Conesa et al., 2005). With the Web Gene Ontology Annotation Plot (WEGO) (Ye et al., 2006), the distributions of GO terms were plotted to describe the categories, and the unigenes were aligned to the COG database for possible functional prediction and classification. The unigenes containing SSRs were also aligned to euKaryotic Orthologous Groups (KOGs) via BLASTX. Finally, we mapped the unigenes to each level 3 pathway graph using the KEGG database to obtain pathway annotations for the unigenes.

EST-SSR mining, primer design and polymorphism identification

SSRs from unigenes were detected and located using MIcroSAtellite (MISA, http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/misa.html) (Zalapa et al., 2012). Compound SSRs (two or more SSRs in which the interval was no more than 100 bp) were excluded, and only SSRs with flanking sequences longer than 150 bp and containing two to six repeat motifs were considered. The mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexa-nucleotide motif SSRs with a minimum of twelve, six, five, five, four and four repeats, respectively, were detected. We designed primer pairs using the online program Primer3.0 (http://www.onlinedown.net/soft/51549.htm) with the following criteria: (1) a product sequence length of 100–300 bp and no secondary structure; (2) a primer length of 18–28 bp with an optimum length of 23 bp; (3) a Tm of 55–65 °C with an optimum Tm of 60 °C and a difference between the Tm values of the forward and reverse primers of no greater than 4 °C; and (4) a guanine-cytosine (GC) content of 40–60%, with 50% as the optimum. For other parameters, the default settings were used.

Seventy-four primer pairs divided into two groups were selected for DNA amplification. The first group of 50 primer pairs was randomly selected for amplification, and the motifs that had more polymorphic alleles in the first group were used to increase the selected ratio in the second 24 primer pairs. The mixed DNA from three individuals from different populations of B. clarkeana was used to verify the amplification products, and the primers that amplified successfully were chosen for primary polymorphism identification. Using these primers, amplification was conducted using 12 individuals from 11 natural populations. Then, the DNA of 128 individuals from 11 populations were amplified using primer pairs that had more polymorphic loci for further identification of polymorphisms. The ESTs containing SSRs were aligned to GO, COG, and KEGG databases through BLASTX to help us understand the functional annotations of the sequences.

We used fluorescently-labeled (6-FAM, HEX, TAMRA or ROX) M13-tailed (5’-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3’) primers to accurately screen the variation among individuals. PCR was performed in a 15-µL reaction containing 2.5 mM MgCl2 and dNTP (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 0.5 U of Taq polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 1 × PCR buffer, and 50 ng of genomic DNA. The primers included 0.04 µM forward primers, 0.01 µM M13-tailed reverse primers, and 0.04 µM M13 primers with fluorescent tails. The annealing temperature was different for each locus. We used 54 °C as the unified annealing temperature for PCR, and the amplification conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 40 s annealing at 54 °C, and 45 s elongation at 72 °C; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. After screening on a 1.0% agarose gel, the sequence typing of successfully amplified products was performed using an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Then, we manually scored alleles using GeneMarker software (version 2.2.0).

Deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were calculated using the online tool GENEPOP (http://www.genepop.curtin.edu.au/) with Bonferroni’s correction. The number of alleles (NA) was calculated using MicroChecker (version 2.2.3). The expected (HE) and observed heterozygosity (HO) of each locus were detected by GenALEx 6 (Peakall & Smouse, 2006), and the polymorphism information content (PIC) was calculated using the PowerMarker program (version 3.25) (Liu & Muse, 2005). Then, neutral markers were detected using LOSITAN (Beaumont & Nichols, 1996; Antao et al., 2008).

Results

Illumina sequencing and de novo assembly

Sequencing success was determined by the length of the reads, as longer reads would increase the probability of SSRs being discovered (Zalapa et al., 2012). A total of 9,361,934,460 nt bases were generated in this study. After cleaning and quality checks, we obtained 104,021,494 clean reads with Q20 bases (sequences with sequencing error rates <1%) at 97.55%, and the N (ambiguous bases) and GC contents were 0 and 45.43%, respectively. De novo assembly was performed using the Trinity program; a total of 94,546 contigs were generated with an average length of 487 nt and an N50 value of 1,075 nt. Finally, a total of 91,449 unigenes with a total length of 148,176,175 nt were detected, and the average length and N50 were 1,620 nt and 2,389 nt, respectively. The final assembled transcripts of B. clarkeana were longer than those of its sibling species, i.e., the Primulina species and B. hygrometrica, which were assembled using Illumina (Ai et al., 2015) and the 454 pyrosequencing platform (Zhu et al., 2015), respectively. As 454 pyrosequencing produces longer reads than Illumina, the sequencing results were ideal in this study (Zalapa et al., 2012). A summary of the sequence assembly after Illumina sequencing is shown in Table 1. The sequence-length distribution of the unigenes is shown in Fig. 1.

Table 1. Summary of sequence assembly using Illumina sequencing.

Sequence Items Value
Reads Total raw reads 110,834,050
Total clean reads 104,021,494
Total clean nucleotides (nt) 9,361,934,460
Q20 percentage (%) 97.55
N percentage (%) 0
GC percentage (%) 45.43
Contig Total number 94,546
Total length (nt) 46,012,409
Mean length (nt) 487
Contig N50 (nt) 1,075
Unigene Total number 91,449
Total length (nt) 148,176,175
Mean length (nt) 1,620
Unigene N50 (nt) 2,389
Distinct clusters 55,888
Distinct singletons 35,561

Figure 1. The length distribution of unigenes.

Figure 1

Functional annotation and classification of unigenes

For function annotation analysis, we obtained 71,170, 59,962, 32,336 and 44,929 unigenes annotated to the Nr, GO, COG and KEGG databases, respectively. In total, 72,078 unigenes (78.82% of all assembled unigenes) were successfully annotated in the present study. This number of successful annotations was more than those reported for other DT plants, including B. hygrometrica (66.6% (Zhu et al., 2015) and 47.09% (Xiao et al., 2015)) and Syntrichia caninervis (58.7%) (Gao et al., 2014), which indicates that the functions of genes in B. clarkeana are better conserved in this study.

Nr annotation

In total, 71,170 unigenes were annotated from 463 popular model species in the Nr databases. The species distribution of Nr annotations (Fig. 2) were mainly comprised of Lycopersicon esculentum (35.11%), Vitis vinifera (27.81%), Amygdalus persica (6.66%), castor bean (Ricinus communis; 6.12%), black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera subsp. trichocarpa; 5.2%), Fragaria vesca subsp. vesca (3.18%) and Glycine max (2.82%). The most common species found in terms of this similarity were those of Solanaceae, with which six species had similar genes (26,585, 37.35%). Only a small fraction of all transcripts showed similarities to genes in other species. The structural features of the protein-coding genes were similar to those of their homologs in other previously studied DT plants, including C. plantagineum (Rodriguez et al., 2010), B. hygrometrica (Zhu et al., 2015) and H. rhodopensis (Gechev et al., 2013). The species distribution of Nr annotations primarily consisted of V. vinifera, R. communis and P. trichocarpa, which showed significant homology; however, B. clarkeana showed some differences in our study, which indicated that B. clarkeana shares a common origin with L. esculentum and V. vinifera.

Figure 2. The species distribution of Nr annotations.

Figure 2

GO and KEGG classification

Based on the Nr annotations, 59,962 unigenes (65.57% of all unigenes) were assigned to three ontologies and subdivided into 55 functional GO terms. The annotation scale in B. clarkeana was much greater than that in the related species B. hygrometrica (28.71% (Xiao et al., 2015); and 43.7% (Zhu et al., 2015)). Similarly to previous studies, the ‘Biological process’ (49.45%) was the main ontology, followed by ‘Cellular component’ and ‘Molecular function’ ontologies (37.11% and 13.43%). A high percentage of genes were classified under the GO terms ‘Cellular process’, ‘Metabolic process’, ‘Cell’, ‘Cell part’, ‘Organelle’, ‘Catalytic activity’ and ‘Binding’ (Gupta et al., 2003; Durand et al., 2010; Blanca et al., 2011; Li et al., 2012a; Xiao et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2015). The assignment of GO terms in B. clarkeana in this study focused on ‘Single-organism process’, ‘Physiological response to stimulus’, ‘Biological regulation’, ‘Localization’, ‘Macromolecular complex’, ‘Symplast’ and ‘Transporter activity’, which reflected the functional gene expression characteristics of B. clarkeana during normal growth. Compared with the related species B. hygrometrica under different DT treatments, there were more functional GO terms, more dispersed gene distributions, and different sets of GO terms, especially in the ‘Molecular function’ ontology (Fig. 3) (Xiao et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2015). This result was mainly due to selective gene expression caused by the adaptation of cells to various physiological states and environmental changes.

Figure 3. Gene ontology classification of unigenes between B. hygrometrica and B. clarkeana.

Figure 3

GO functions are shown in the X-axis. The Y-axis shows the percentage of genes annotated with the GO function. RWC, relative water content; HD, hydrated. The data of B. hygrometrica came from Xiao et al. (2015).

Based on sequence homology searches against the KEGG database, 44,924 unigenes (49.12% of all unigenes) were mapped in 128 pathways. The enrichment of the KEGG annotation in this study was much greater than that of B. hygrometrica (24.43% (Xiao et al., 2015); 15.1% (Zhu et al., 2015)). Among these pathways, ‘Metabolic pathway’ (9,232, 20.55% of KEGG unigenes) and ‘Metabolic biosynthesis of secondary metabolites’ (3,764, 8.38%) were the largest categories of ‘Metabolism’. The greatest highlight of the KEGG analysis in our study was the enrichment of the following vegetative dehydration/desiccation pathways: ‘Plant-pathogen interaction’ (1,769 unigenes, 3.94% of KEGG unigenes) in the pathogen defense system; ‘Glycerophospholipid metabolism’ (803, 1.79%) in vesicular trafficking for protein receptor interactions; ‘Plant hormone signal transduction’ (1,783, 3.97%) for abiotic stress responses; the mRNA surveillance (1,027, 2.29%) pathway for damaged transcript removal; ‘Photosynthesis’ (154, 0.34%) and ‘Nitrogen metabolism’ (154, 0.34%) for the depletion of transcripts during dehydration. In addition, some other environment-related pathways, including ‘Phosphatidylinositol signaling system’ (535, 1.19%), ‘ABC transporters’ (499, 1.11%) and ‘Circadian rhythm-plant’ (377, 0.84%) were also enriched. These results indicate that in normal metabolic processes, B. clarkeana maintains its abundant vegetative dehydration/desiccation pathways. The results of our study are consistent with those of other studies, which identified the plant genes and gene products with central roles in DT (Gechev et al., 2012; Xiao et al., 2015).

COG and KOG classification of unigenes with SSRs

In total, 56,493 functionally annotated unigenes from 32,336 (35.36% of all unigenes) COG unigenes were assigned to 25 possible functional categories in COG annotations (Fig. 4). Among the categories, the largest group was the cluster for ‘General function prediction only’ (10,438, 32.28%), followed by ‘Replication, recombination and repair’ (5,561, 17.20%) and ‘Transcription’ (5,322, 13.46%). The smallest groups were ‘Cell motility’ (228, 0.71%), ‘Extracellular structures’ (17, 0.05%) and ‘Nuclear structure’ (14, 0.04%). This pattern is similar for some angiosperms, including Camelina sativa (Liang et al., 2013), Apium graveolens (Fu, Wang & Shen, 2013) and Chrysanthemum nankingense (Wang et al., 2013). The ‘Replication, recombination and repair’ (17.20%) category has abundant genes in B. clarkeana, and this plant showed more repaired genes.

Figure 4. COG and KOG functional classification of unigenes.

Figure 4

The horizontal coordinates are functional classes of COG and KOG, and the vertical coordinates are numbers of unigenes in one class.

After SSR detection using the MIcroSAtellite (MISA) software with unigenes as references, 7,610 unigenes carrying 8,563 SSRs were found. Then, 3,267 unigenes with SSRs had hits in 24 categories of the KOG database without ‘Nuclear structure’. Among 24 categories, the largest group was ‘General function prediction’ (1,166, 35.69% of unigenes with SSRs in KOG), followed by ‘Transcription’ (797, 24.40%), ‘Replication, recombination and repair’ (737, 22.56%) and ‘Signal transduction mechanisms’ (684, 20.94%). Compared with other studies of EST-SSRs (Li et al., 2012a; Liang et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2013), ‘Replication, recombination and repair’ and ‘Signal transduction mechanisms’ (684, 20.94%) were highlighted in B. clarkeana. These 3,267 ESTs will provide a valuable repository of abundant information for future functional SSR studies.

Frequency and distribution of SSRs

All 91,449 assembled unigenes were used to mine potential SSRs in this study, and a total of 7,610 unigenes containing 8,563 SSRs were identified. Other reports have identified approximately 2,000 EST-SSRs using NGS (Next-Generation Sequencing) (Liu et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Xiang et al., 2015); the quantity of EST-SSRs in our study was significantly larger, which was probably due to the use of longer reads and the expression characteristics of the species (Zalapa et al., 2012).

Among those unigenes containing SSRs, 338 SSRs presented a compound formation, and 812 unigenes contained more than one SSR. On average, one SSR was found every 17.30 kb. Among the identified SSRs, dinucleotide motifs were the most abundant (3,991, 46.61% of all SSRs), followed by mono- (2,163, 25.26%), tri- (1,957, 22.85%), hexa- (267, 3.12%), tetra- (198, 2.3%), and penta- (36, 0.42%) nucleotide motifs. This result was similar to the findings reported for A. graveolens (Fu, Wang & Shen, 2013) and Hevea brasiliensis (Li et al., 2012a). The distributions and frequencies of different motifs are shown in Fig. 5.

Figure 5. The distribution of the most repeated nucleotide types.

Figure 5

Among all SSR loci, 109 different motifs were identified. The largest subset of mononucleotides were A/T (2,093, 24.44% of all SSRs), and there were only 70 C/G nucleotides in total. Of the dinucleotides, AT/AT (1,564, 18.26%) and AG/CT (1,391, 16.24%) were roughly equivalent, followed by AC/GT (1,035, 12.09%). Of the trinucleotides, AAG/CTT (441, 5.15%) was the most common, followed by AAT/ATT (389, 4.54%) and AGC/GCT (341, 3.98%). The ACAT/ATGT (18, 0.21%) motif comprised the most common tetranucleotide, and the most common pentanucleotides and hexanucleotides were AAAAG/CTTTT (42, 0.49%) and AAGAGC/GCTCTT (68, 0.79%), respectively. The repeat numbers of most SSRs ranged from four to twelve, and the most frequent repeat number was six (2,066, 24.13%), followed by five (1,233, 14.40%) and seven (1,113, 13.00%). Furthermore, the length of SSRs ranged from 12 to 25 bp (Fig. 6). Among the di- and trinucleotides, the most common lengths were 12 bp and 15 bp, respectively. The longest di-, tri- or tetranucleotide was 24 bp, whereas the longest pentanucleotide was 25 bp in length; all hexanucleotides were 24 bp.

Figure 6. The distribution of SSRs of different lengths.

Figure 6

Development and validation of polymorphic SSR markers

As a result, a total of 436 (only 5.73% of SSR-containing ESTs) eligible primer pairs (mononucleotide, 1; di-, 191; tri-, 205; tetra-, 5; penta-, 12; hexa-, 22) were designed. Primers could not be successfully designed for the other sequences, primarily due to their overly long sequence lengths and insufficient flank lengths, as well as the abundance of sequences containing mononucleotides. Then, 74 primer pairs (dinucleotide, 20; tri-, 38; penta-, 3; hexa-, 13) were selected to validate the amplification across a composite sample of three individuals. A total of 60 primer pairs (81.08% of 74 primer pairs) showed stable and clear amplification. Meanwhile, the 14 remaining pairs with failed PCR produced multiple bands or showed unstable amplification. After polymorphism screening across 12 individuals, 23 primer pairs were found to be monomorphic and 37 were found to be polymorphic. Among 37 polymorphic primer pairs, 17 pairs of highly polymorphic and stable loci were selected for further polymorphism screening across 128 individuals from 11 populations, which covered the majority of habitats of these plants. For the 17 polymorphic loci, there were 2–6 alleles at each locus, with a total of 65 alleles. The HE, HO and PIC per locus ranged from 0 to 0.196, 0 to 0.14 and 0.155 to 0.664, respectively. For the PIC values of the 17 polymorphic loci, eight pairs had highly informative scores (PIC > 0.50) and five pairs had weakly informative scores (0 < PIC < 0.25) (Table 2).

Table 2. Characteristics of 17 polymorphic EST-SSR markers.

Locus Primer sequence 5’–3’ Repeat motif NA Size range (bp) HE HO HWEa PIC GenBank accession no.
BC1 F:GCAGTTCTGTGCAGTACCATACAT (TA)6 4 172–182 0.065 0.038 0.036* 0.193 Pr032805680
R:GGCTTCTGATCAGGTTTCTGAAT
BC2 F:GAGATCCCAGATCCAGATCTTCT (TC)6 3 160–164 0.038 0.023 0.192 n.s 0.423 Pr032805689
R:AACATTAATGGAAACACGTCGTC
BC3 F:ATTCGCTCTCTTGGTATGACTGT (TA)6 5 170–184 0.054 0.045 0.380n.s 0.664 Pr032805690
R:CCCAATTTGAAGTGTTGCTTTAC
BC4 F:TATCAGCGTGTGTGAATAGTTGC (TA)7 4 157–163 0.097 0.045 0.004** 0.491 Pr032805691
R:TAACCTAAATTCGAATCCATCCA
BC5 F:CAAACTTGGCTTAATACCATTCG (TG)9 3 119–125 0.079 0.083 0.713 n.s 0.469 Pr032805692
R:CCATGATCATCTCTATTTCAGGC
BC6 F:CCTTAAGGAGATGCATTGTGAAT (TC)9 3 159–169 0.000 0.000 - n.c. 0.299 Pr032805693
R:GTATGAAGGGCATCAACAATAGG
BC7 F:GCTGAAAGTTGGTGATTGCTAGT (AT)9 4 166–178 0.120 0.125 0.087 n.s 0.526 Pr032805694
R:AGTTATGTCTTCGCTTGCTTCAG
BC8 F:AACGTGAGAGTGCTAGTTCGGTA (TGA)5 3 167–173 0.014 0.000 0.041* 0.17 Pr032805695
R:TCTTCCTCACTTTATCATCCACG
BC9 F:AGAAGAGGTACGACAGTTTGCTG (GCG)5 2 156–159 0.059 0.064 1.000 n.s 0.195 Pr032805696
R:TTCACGTCCGAATTCTTAGTCTC
BC10 F:CACTGCACATAGAAGGAGGAGTT (GCG)6 5 108–129 0.081 0.076 0.146 n.s 0.581 Pr032805681
R:GTAATCGCCTACATGATTCATCC
BC11 F:CAGCAGTATGTCGGGATTATTTC (TTTCT)4 2 123–133 0.000 0.000 -n.c. 0.155 Pr032805682
R:CCTCTGGTCATATTGCTGTTACC
BC12 F:AACAAGAGGGTCAGCTACAACAG (CAGCAA)4 4 160–178 0.104 0.095 0.184 n.s 0.549 Pr032805683
R:CAGCAATGGTATTAGCAGAGGAC
BC13 F:ACCTTGACGATCCTTCATCTTCT (GGTGCG)4 6 132–174 0.124 0.095 0.161 n.s 0.701 Pr032805684
R:TTATGTTCTCCATATCCGTCAGC
BC14 F:GGCAGCAATATAGCTCAAATACG (GACAAG)4 4 170–188 0.196 0.083 0.000*** 0.516 Pr032805685
R:ACCTGATCGTTCACAACTTCATC
BC15 F:TCTTATTCAACACAACAGCCTGA (ATGATA)4 5 151–175 0.157 0.140 0.228 n.s 0.528 Pr032805686
R:GCTGCAGTTGATAATGAGAAGGA
BC16 F:ACCAATGGTCTATATTTCAACGG (ATTACT)4 6 149–179 0.132 0.125 0.174 n.s 0.643 Pr032805687
R:GTGCCCCACATAGCTTCTATCTA
BC17 F:TGACGAGGCTTCTACAGAATGAG (CATCCT)4 2 137–143 0.034 0.045 1.000 n.s 0.186 Pr032805688
R:ACAAACAACAAGATGGGAATCAT

Notes.

NA
number of alleles per locus across all populations
HE
expected heterozygosity (mean value)
HO
observed heterozygosity (mean value)
PIC
polymorphic information content
HWE
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
a

After Bonferroni correction, significant departures from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium are indicated by P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001. n.s., not significant; n.c., not calculated (Clarke & Gorley, 2001).

Functional annotation of SSR-containing ESTs

The functional annotation distribution of SSR-containing ESTs centered on ESTs containing di- and tri-nucleotide SSRs (BC1–BC10). With the exception of one EST (BC12), the ESTs containing penta- and hexa- nucleotide SSRs (BC11 to BC17) had almost no functional annotations. However, the ESTs containing BC2, BC4 and BC12 were annotated by the KEGG analysis to vegetative dehydration/desiccation pathways (Table 3 and Table S1). Thus, these ESTs may contain the SSRs involved in regulating the function of DT-related genes. Although the SSR variation of the functional markers did not agree with the neutral theory, the neutrality test conducted using LOSITAN showed that all 17 primer pairs agreed with the neutral theory (Fig. 7). These 17 primer pairs may have contained exactly neutral markers, or perhaps the sample size and randomness of sampling in this study was deficient. Therefore, increasing the sample size in future studies will provide us with more accurate results. It should be noted that compared with previous reports that identified EST-SSRs using NGS, the hexa- nucleotide SSR-containing ESTs, which comprised a relatively larger number of sequences with more polymorphic markers and fewer annotations, were unique to B. clarkeana (Liu et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Xiang et  al., 2015).

Table 3. GO, COG and KEGG annotation of 17 SSR-containing ESTs.

Unigenea Annotation
GOb COG KEGG
b. p. c. c. m. f.
BC1 6 Function unknown
BC2 1 Plant hormone signal transduction
BC3
BC4 7 3 General function prediction only Plant hormone signal transduction
Signal transduction mechanisms Plant-pathogen interaction
Transcription
Replication, recombination, and repair
BC5
BC6 General function prediction only
BC7 2 2 General function prediction only Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites
Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism
BC8 12 4 4 General function prediction only
Signal transduction mechanisms
Transcription
Replication, recombination and repair
BC9 2 Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites
Flavonoid biosynthesis
Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesis
Isoflavonoid biosynthesis
BC10 2 4 1 Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning Metabolic pathways
Endocytosis
Ether lipid metabolism
BC11
BC12 10 3 2 General function prediction only Plant hormone signal transduction
Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
BC13 Transcription
BC14
BC15 9 5 2
BC16
BC17

Notes.

b. p.
biological_process
c. c.
cellular_component
m. f.
molecular_function
a

The name of each unigene is replaced with the name of the EST-SSR maker it contains.

b

This table shows only the number of the GO terms in the ontology for unigenes. The details of the GO classification in three ontologies are shown in Table S1.

Figure 7. The neutral test results for 17 primer pairs using FST and HE from 11 populations using LOSITAN.

Figure 7

Discussion

Gene expression characteristics and comparison of B. clarkeana with B. hygrometrica

This work is the first genetic study of B. clarkeana as a new plant resource of DT genes. Notably, a large amount of EST data were available, enabling a better understanding of gene expression in this species. B. clarkeana was compared with the related species B. hygrometrica, and both plants showed KEGG enrichment of vegetative dehydration/desiccation pathways; these results showed the common characteristics of metabolic pathways in DT plants. However, there were some differences between the transcriptome data of these two species. First, the GC content (45.43%) of B. clarkeana was higher than that of B. hygrometrica, which was close to the distribution centered value of coding sequences (Matassi et al., 1989). Likely due to the lack of dehydration stress, the annotated unigene percentage (78.82% of all assembled unigenes) and the enrichment of GO (65.57% of all unigenes) and KEGG (49.12%) annotations in this study were much greater than those of B. hygrometrica (Nr, 47.09%; GO, 28.71%; KEGG, 24.43% (Xiao et al., 2015) and Nr, 66.6%; GO, 43.7%; KEGG, 15.1% (Zhu et al., 2015)). Second, due to different sequencing depths or selective gene expression at various physiological stages, the structural features of gene expression in B. hygrometrica was quite different under various environmental pressures. Zhu et al. (2015) found that B. hygrometrica matched in the Nr database with V. vinifera, R. communis and P. trichocarpa, whereas Xiao et al. (2015) found shared genes in the genomes of B. hygrometrica, Solanum tuberosum and Solanum lycopersicum (Solanales). Thus, Solanales and V. vinifera could both contain the main components of the protein-coding genes of B. hygrometrica, which would be similar to the structural features of gene expression in B. clarkeana in the present study.

EST-SSR characteristics of B. clarkeana

A significant number of SSRs were identified in the present study. A higher number of SSRs indicated stronger environmental adaptation capabilities (Zalapa et al., 2012); therefore, B. clarkeana should be highly adaptable to different environments due to the large number of SSRs contained in its ESTs. Moreover, the ‘Transcription’, ‘Replication, recombination and repair’ and ‘Signal transduction mechanisms’ reflect the strong ability of B. clarkeana to undergo environmental adaptation.

Intrinsic features (such as repeat number, motif size, and length) could influence the rate and probability of slippage. These features were the strongest predictors of microsatellite mutability (Kelkar et al., 2008). The increased probability of slippage and mutation rates may be due to, for example, a greater number of repeats (Ellegren, 2004; Kelkar et al., 2008), a greater length irrespective of the repeat numbers (Webster, Smith & Ellegren, 2002), and lengths that were inversely proportional to their motif sizes (Chakraborty et al., 1997). Additionally, the mutation rates might vary among SSRs with different motif compositions due to the dissimilarities of secondary DNA structures (Baldi & Baisnee, 2000). In this study, 37 pairs (dinucleotide, 13; tri-, 13; penta-, 2; hexa-, 9) of the 74 primer pairs (dinucleotide, 20; tri-, 38; penta-, 3; hexa-, 13) that were selected to validate the amplification results were polymorphic. The percentage of polymorphism was 65% in dinucleotides (13 of the 20 selected were polymorphic), 34.21% (13 of 38) in trinucleotides, 66.67% (2 of 3) in pentanucleotides and 69.23% (9 of 13) in hexanucleotides. As a result, in our study, SSRs with higher polymorphism rates were concentrated on shorter motifs with a higher number of repeats (dinucleotides, 65%) and longer motifs with fewer repeats (hexanucleotides, 69.23%; pentanucleotides, 66.67%). Our analysis confirmed that mutability might increase with both increased repeat number and greater length, as reported by Baldi & Baisnee (2000).

Compared with other SSR and EST-SSR reports (Choudhary et al., 2009; Li et al., 2012a; Li et al., 2012b; Yuan et al., 2012; Fu, Wang & Shen, 2013), the observed number of polymorphic primers was actually higher, but the polymorphism level of the markers and the HO, HE, HWE and PIC values of the B. clarkeana population were still much lower in our study and were similar to those of B. hygrometrica (Xiao et al., 2015).These results could be attributed to two main reasons: first, the number of SSRs and polymorphisms of the DNA protein-coding sequence was expected to be lower than that in non-coding sequences, and the mutation rate within these regions was lower than that in other DNA sequences (Blanca et al., 2011; Zalapa et al., 2012). Second, B. clarkeana is a plant with a short stature that requires scattered light. As this plant grows on the north side of rock outcrops (mostly limestone) and in the shadow of trees and shrubs (Chao et al., 2013), the long-distance dispersal potential of windborne seeds might be significantly reduced. Furthermore, the occurrence of biparental inbreeding could be universal in plants with high self-compatibility (Li & Wang, 2005), which would cause lower genetic variability within populations of B. clarkeana.

Conclusions

In this study, 91,449 unigenes were detected by NGS transcriptomics. A total of 8,563 SSRs were identified from 7,610 unigenes, 72,087 unigenes were successfully annotated to protein databases, and polymorphic primer pairs of EST-SSRs were also developed. These results indicated that transcriptome sequencing is a highly efficient method of EST-SSR identification in non-model species that lack a reference genome and associations with functional genes. Therefore, by characterizing phenotypic features, these species can be identified (Li et al., 2002). These data will accelerate our identification of functional genes and genetic variation in DT plants, including B. clarkeana. In addition, polymorphic primer pairs can continue to be developed from the remaining primers of EST-SSRs. The large-scale transcriptome dataset is a powerful resource for functional gene marker-assisted selection and DT exploration in Boea plants.

Supplemental Information

Table S1. GO classification of 17 SSR-containing ESTs.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3422/supp-1

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Cunhai Li and Fei Tan (Guanshan National Nature Reserve, JiangXi, China) for their assistance with the sampling.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Cultivation Foundation for Young Talents at Basic Research of Anhui Normal University (No. 2015rcpy35, awarded to Ying Wang) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31400291, awarded to Kun Liu). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Shoubiao Zhou, Email: zhoushoubiao@vip.163.com.

Jianwen Shao, Email: 545491044@qq.com.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Ying Wang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kun Liu and De Bi contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Shoubiao Zhou conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jianwen Shao conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The raw reads squences and primer pairs described here are accessible via GenBank accession numbers SRX1600046 and Pr032805680Pr032805696.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Wang, Ying (2017): Datas of the transcriptome and EST-SSR development in Boea clarkeana. figshare.

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4197987.v1.

References

  • Ai et al. (2015).Ai B, Gao Y, Zhang XL, Tao JJ, Kang M, Huang HW. Comparative transcriptome resources of eleven Primulina species, a group of ‘stone plants’ from a biodiversity hot spot. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2015;15:619–632. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Alcazar et al. (2011).Alcazar R, Bitrian M, Bartels D, Koncz C, Altabella T, Tiburcio AF. Polyamine metabolic canalization in response to drought stress in Arabidopsis and the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2011;6(2):243–250. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.2.14317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Antao et al. (2008).Antao T, Lopes A, Lopes RJ, Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G. LOSITAN: a workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Baldi & Baisnee (2000).Baldi P, Baisnee PF. Sequence analysis by additive scales: DNA structure for sequences and repeats of all lengths. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:865–889. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beaumont & Nichols (1996).Beaumont MA, Nichols RA. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences. 1996;263:1619–1626. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernacchia, Salamini & Bartels (1996).Bernacchia G, Salamini F, Bartels D. Molecular characterization of the rehydration process in the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. Plant Physiology. 1996;111(4):1043–1050. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.4.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bianchi et al. (1993).Bianchi G, Gamba A, Limiroli R, Pozzi N, Elster R, Salamini F, Bartels D. The unusual sugar composition in leaves of the resurrection plant Myrothamnus flabellifolia. Physiologia Plantarum. 1993;87:223–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb00146.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Blanca et al. (2011).Blanca J, Cañizares J, Roig C, Ziarsolo P, Nuez F, Picó B. Transcriptome characterization and high throughput SSRs and SNPs discovery in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) BMC Genomics. 2011;12(3):1–15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bockel, Salamini & Bartels (1998).Bockel C, Salamini F, Bartels D. Isolation and characterization of genes expressed during early events of the dehydration process in the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. Journal of Plant Physiology. 1998;152:158–166. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(98)80127-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Cavagnaro et al. (2010).Cavagnaro PF, Senalik DA, Yang L, Simon PW, Harkins TT, Kodira CD, Huang S, Weng Y. Genome-wide characterization of simple sequence repeats in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):1–18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chakraborty et al. (1997).Chakraborty R, Kimmel M, Stivers DN, Davison LJ, Deka R. Relative mutation rates at di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide microsatellite loci. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94:1041–1046. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chao et al. (2013).Chao TC, Zhou SB, Chang LL, Chen YS, Xu HJ, Zhou QK. Effects of light intensity on the leaf morphology and physiological parameters of Boea clarkeana. Chinese Journal of Ecology. 2013;32:1161–1167. [Google Scholar]
  • Choudhary et al. (2009).Choudhary S, Sethy NK, Shokeen B, Bhatia S. Development of chickpea EST-SSR markers and analysis of allelic variation across related species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2009;118(3):591–608. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0923-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Christ et al. (2014).Christ B, Egert A, Suessenbacher I, Kraeutler B, Bartels D, Peters S, Hoertensteiner S. Water deficit induces chlorophyll degradation via the ‘PAO/phyllobilin’ pathway in leaves of homoio-(Craterostigma pumilum) and poikilochlorophyllous (Xerophyta viscosa) resurrection plants. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2014;37(11):2521–2531. doi: 10.1111/pce.12308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke & Gorley (2001).Clarke K, Gorley R. PRIMER v5: user manual/tutorial. Primer-E Ltd; Plymouth: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • Collett et al. (2003).Collett H, Butowt R, Smith J, Farrant J, Illing N. Photosynthetic genes are differentially transcribed during the dehydration-rehydration cycle in the resurrection plant, Xerophyta humilis. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2003;54(392):2593–2595. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Collett et al. (2004).Collett H, Shen A, Gardner M, Farrant JM, Denby KJ, Illing N. Towards transcript profiling of desiccation tolerance in Xerophyta humilis: construction of a normalized 11 k X. humilis cDNA set and microarray expression analysis of 424 cDNAs in response to dehydration. Physiologia Plantarum. 2004;122:39–53. doi: 10.1111/j.13993054.2004.00381.x.. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Conesa et al. (2005).Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(18):3674–3676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper & Farrant (2002).Cooper K, Farrant JM. Recovery of the resurrection plant Craterostigma wilmsii from desiccation: protection versus repair. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2002;53(375):1805–1813. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Durand et al. (2010).Durand J, Bodénès C, Chancerel E, Frigerio J-M, Vendramin G, Sebastiani F, Buonamici A, Gailing O, Koelewijn H-P, Villani F. A fast and cost-effective approach to develop and map EST-SSR markers: oak as a case study. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):570. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellegren (2004).Ellegren H. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2004;5(6):435–445. doi: 10.1038/nrg1348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Farrant, Brandt & Lindsey (2007).Farrant JM, Brandt W, Lindsey GG. An overview of mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in selected angiosperm resurrection plants. Plant Stress. 2007;1:72–84. [Google Scholar]
  • Fu, Wang & Shen (2013).Fu N, Wang Q, Shen H-L. De novo assembly, gene annotation and marker development using Illumina paired-end transcriptome sequences in celery (Apium graveolens L) PLOS ONE. 2013;8(2):e57686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaff (1971).Gaff DF. Desiccation-tolerant flowering plants in Southern Africa. Science. 1971;174(4013):1033–1034. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4013.1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gao et al. (2014).Gao B, Zhang D, Li X, Yang H, Wood AJ. De novo assembly and characterization of the transcriptome in the desiccation-tolerant moss Syntrichia caninervis. BMC Research Notes. 2014;7:490. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gechev et al. (2013).Gechev TS, Benina M, Obata T, Tohge T, Sujeeth N, Minkov I, Hille J, Temanni MR, Marriott AS, Bergstrom E, Thomas-Oates J, Antonio C, Mueller-Roeber B, Schippers JH, Fernie AR, Toneva V. Molecular mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in the resurrection glacial relic Haberlea rhodopensis. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2013;70(4):689–709. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1155-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gechev et al. (2012).Gechev TS, Dinakar C, Benina M, Toneva V, Bartels D. Molecular mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in resurrection plants. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2012;69(19):3175–3186. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1088-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grabherr et al. (2011).Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology. 2011;29:644–652. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta et al. (2003).Gupta PK, Rustgi S, Sharma S, Singh R, Kumar N, Balyan HS. Transferable EST-SSR markers for the study of polymorphism and genetic diversity in bread wheat. Molecular Genetics & Genomics. 2003;270(4):315–323. doi: 10.1007/s00438-003-0921-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Illing et al. (2005).Illing N, Denby KJ, Collett H, Shen A, Farrant JM. The signature of seeds in resurrection plants: a molecular and physiological comparison of desiccation tolerance in seeds and vegetative tissues. Integrative & Comparative Biology. 2005;45(5):771–787. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.5.771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jenks & Wood (2007).Jenks MA, Wood AJ, editors. Plant desiccation tolerance. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; Oxford: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • Kanehisa et al. (2008).Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M, Katayama T, Kawashima S, Okuda S, Tokimatsu T, Yamanishi Y. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Research. 2008;36(suppl. 1):D480–D484. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelkar et al. (2008).Kelkar YD, Tyekucheva S, Chiaromonte F, Makova KD. The genome-wide determinants of human and chimpanzee microsatellite evolution. Genome Research. 2008;18(1):30–38. doi: 10.1101/gr.7113408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Le et al. (2007).Le TN, Blomstedt CK, Kuang J, Tenlen J, Gaff DF, Hamill JD, Neale AD. Desiccation-tolerance specific gene expression in leaf tissue of the resurrection plant Sporobolus stapfianus. Functional Plant Biology. 2007;34:589–600. doi: 10.1071/FP06231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lehner et al. (2008).Lehner A, Chopera DR, Peters SW, Keller F, Mundree SG, Thomson JA, Farrant JM. Protection mechanisms in the resurrection plant Xerophyta viscosa: cloning, expression, characterisation and role of XvINO1, a gene coding for a myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase. Functional Plant Biology. 2008;35:26–39. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2012a).Li DJ, Deng Z, Qin B, Liu XH, Men ZH. De novo assembly and characterization of bark transcriptome using Illumina sequencing and development of EST-SSR markers in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell Arg.) BMC Genomics. 2012a;13:192. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2012b).Li M, Zhu L, Zhou CY, Lin L, Fan YJ, Zhuang ZM. Development and characterization of EST-SSR markers from Scapharca broughtonii and their transferability in Scapharca subcrenata and Tegillarca granosa. Molecules. 2012b;17:10716–10723. doi: 10.3390/molecules170910716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2002).Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, Nevo E. Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Molecular Ecology. 2002;11(12):2453–2465. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01643.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li (1996).Li ZY. The georaphical distribution of the subfamily Cyrtandroideae Endl. emend. Burtt (Gesneriaceae) Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. 1996;34:341–360. [Google Scholar]
  • Li & Wang (2005).Li ZY, Wang YZ. Plants of gesneriaceae in China. Henan Science and Technology Publishing House; Henan: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • Liang et al. (2013).Liang C, Liu X, Yiu SM, Lim BL. De novo assembly and characterization of Camelina sativa transcriptome by paired-end sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu, Hu & Zhao (2007).Liu G, Hu Y, Zhao F. Molecular cloning of BcWRKY1 transcriptional factor gene from Boea crassifolia Hemsl and its preliminary functional analysis. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium-Universitatis Pekinensis. 2007;43:446–452. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu & Muse (2005).Liu K, Muse SV. PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(9):2128–2129. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu et al. (2013).Liu ZP, Chen TL, Ma LC, Zhao ZG, Zhao PX, Nan ZB, Wang YR. Global transcriptome sequencing using the Illumina platform and the development of EST-SSR markers in Autotetraploid alfalfa. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(12):e83549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Matassi et al. (1989).Matassi G, Montero LM, Salinas J, Bernardi G. The isochore organization and the compositional distribution of homologous coding sequences in the nuclear genome of plants. Nucleic Acids Research. 1989;17(13):5273–5290. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.13.5273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mowla et al. (2002).Mowla SB, Thomson JA, Farrant JM, Mundree SG. A novel stress-inducible antioxidant enzyme identified from the resurrection plant Xerophyta viscosa Baker. Planta. 2002;215(5):716–726. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0819-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mulako et al. (2008).Mulako I, Farrant JM, Collett H, Illing N. Expression of Xhdsi-1VOC, a novel member of the vicinal oxygen chelate (VOC) metalloenzyme superfamily, is up-regulated in leaves and roots during desiccation in the resurrection plant Xerophyta humilis (Bak) Dur and Schinz. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2008;59:3885–3901. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mundree et al. (2000).Mundree SG, Whittaker A, Thomson JA, Farrant JM. An aldose reductase homolog from the resurrection plant Xerophyta viscosa Baker. Planta. 2000;211(5):693–700. doi: 10.1007/s004250000331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Neale et al. (2000).Neale AD, Blomstedt CK, Bronson P, Le TN, Guthridge K, Evans J, Gaff DF, Hamill JD. The isolation of genes from the resurrection grass Sporobolus stapfianus which are induced during severe drought stress. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2000;23:265–277. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00548.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Oliver et al. (2011a).Oliver MJ, Guo LN, Alexander DC, Ryals JA, Wone BWM, Cushman JC. A sister group contrast using untargeted global metabolomic analysis delineates the biochemical regulation underlying desiccation tolerance in Sporobolus stapfianus. Plant Cell. 2011a;23:1231–1248. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.082800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oliver et al. (2011b).Oliver MJ, Jain R, Balbuena TS, Agrawal G, Gasulla F, Thelen JJ. Proteome analysis of leaves of the desiccation-tolerant grass, Sporobolus stapfianus, in response to dehydration. Phytochemistry. 2011b;72(10):3–1284. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Peakall & Smouse (2006).Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Moleculary Ecology Notes. 2006;6:288–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pertea et al. (2003).Pertea G, Huang X, Liang F, Antonescu V, Sultana R, Karamycheva S, Lee Y, White J, Cheung F, Parvizi B, Tsai J, Quackenbush J. TIGR Gene Indices clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(5):651–652. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Porembski & Barthlott (2000).Porembski S, Barthlott W. Granitic and gneissic outcrops (inselbergs) as centers of diversity for desiccation-tolerant vascular plants. Plant Ecology. 2000;151:19–28. doi: 10.1023/A:1026565817218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Proctor & Pence (2002).Proctor MCF, Pence VC. Vegetative tissues: bryophytes, vascular resurrection plants and vegetative propagules. In: Black M, Pritchard HW, editors. Desiccation and survival in plants: drying without dying. CABI Publishing; New York: 2002. pp. 207–237. [Google Scholar]
  • Rodriguez et al. (2010).Rodriguez MC, Edsgard D, Hussain SS, Alquezar D, Rasmussen M, Gilbert T, Nielsen BH, Bartels D, Mundy J. Transcriptomes of the desiccation-tolerant resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. Plant Journal. 2010;63(2):212–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04243.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider et al. (2003).Schneider H, Manz B, Westhoff M, Mimietz S, Szimtenings M, Neuberger T, Faber C, Krohne G, Haase A, Volke F. The impact of lipid distribution, composition and mobility on xylem water refilling of the resurrection plant Myrothamnus flabellifolia. New Phytologist. 2003;159:487–505. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00814.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sherwin & Farrant (1998).Sherwin HW, Farrant JM. Protection mechanisms against excess light in the resurrection plants Craterostigma wilmsii and Xerophyta viscosa. Plant Growth Regulation. 1998;24:203–210. doi: 10.1023/A:1005801610891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2013).Wang HB, Jiang JF, Chen SM, Qi XY, Peng H, Li PR, Song AP, Guan ZY, Fang WM, Liao Y, Chen FD. Next-generation sequencing of the Chrysanthemum nankingense (Asteraceae) transcriptome permits large-scale unigene assembly and SSR marker discovery. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(4):e62293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Webster, Smith & Ellegren (2002).Webster MT, Smith NG, Ellegren H. Microsatellite evolution inferred from human-chimpanzee genomic sequence alignments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99(13):8748–8753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122067599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xiang et al. (2015).Xiang XY, Zhang ZX, Wang ZG, Zhang XP, Wu GL. Transcriptome sequencing and development of EST-SSR markers in Pinus dabeshanensis, an endangered conifer endemic to China. Molecular Breeding. 2015;35:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0351-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Xiao et al. (2015).Xiao LH, Yang G, Zhang LC, Yang XH, Zhao S, Ji ZZ, Zhou Q, Hu M, Wang Y, Chen M. The resurrection genome of Boea hygrometrica: a blueprint for survival of dehydration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112:5833–5837. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505811112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ye et al. (2006).Ye J, Fang L, Zheng HK, Zhang Y, Chen J, Zhang ZJ, Wang J, Li ST, Li RQ, Bolund L. WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Research. 2006;34(Web Server issue):W293–W297. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yuan et al. (2012).Yuan N, Sun Y, Nakamura K, Qiu YX. Development of microsatellite markers in heterostylous Hedyotis chrysotricha (Rubiaceae) American Journal of Botany. 2012;99(2):e43–e45. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zalapa et al. (2012).Zalapa JE, Cuevas H, Zhu HY, Steffan S, Senalik D, Zeldin E, McCown B, Harbut R, Simon P. Using next-generation sequencing approaches to isolate simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci in the plant sciences. American Journal of Botany. 2012;99(2):193–208. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2016).Zhang DD, Zhou SB, Zhou H, Liu F, Yang SY, Ma ZH. Physiological response of Boea clarkeana to dehydration and rehydration. Chinese Journal of Ecology. 2016;35:72–78. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu et al. (2015).Zhu Y, Wang B, Phillips J, Zhang ZN, Du H, Xu T, Huang LC, Zhang XF, Xu GH, Li WL. Global transcriptome analysis reveals acclimation-primed processes involved in the acquisition of desiccation tolerance in Boea hygrometrica. Plant & Cell Physiology. 2015;56:1429–1441. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. GO classification of 17 SSR-containing ESTs.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3422/supp-1

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Wang, Ying (2017): Datas of the transcriptome and EST-SSR development in Boea clarkeana. figshare.

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4197987.v1.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES