Abstract
Adaptive immune responses are tailored to different types of pathogens through differentiation of naïve CD4 T cells into functionally distinct subsets of effector T cells (TH1, TH2, and TH17) defined by expression of key transcription factors (TFs)1. Regulatory T (Treg) cells comprise a distinct anti-inflammatory lineage specified by the X-linked TF Foxp32, 3. Paradoxically, some activated Treg cells express the aforementioned effector CD4 T cell TFs, which have been suggested to endow Treg cells with enhanced suppressive capacity4, 5, 6. Whether expression of these factors in Treg cells—akin to effector T cells—is indicative of heterogeneity of functionally discrete and stable differentiation states, or conversely may be readily reversible, is unknown. Here, we demonstrate that in Treg cells expression of the TH1-associated TF T-bet, induced at steady state and following infection, gradually becomes highly stable even under non-permissive conditions. Loss-of-function or elimination of T-bet-expressing Treg cells—but not of T-bet in Treg cells—resulted in severe TH1 autoimmunity. Conversely, following depletion of T-bet-negative Treg cells, remaining T-bet+ cells specifically inhibited TH1 and CD8 T cell activation in agreement with their co-localization with T-bet+ effector T cells. These results suggest an essential immunosuppressive function for T-bet+ Treg cells and indicate that Treg cell functional heterogeneity is a critical feature of immune tolerance.
Whether Treg cells expressing the TH1-associated TF T-bet represent a stable sub-lineage of cells with unique function, or rather a transient activation state, remains unknown. To address this question, we assessed stability of T-bet expression in Treg cells using a novel Tbx21tdTomato-T2A-CreERT2 knock-in allele combined with the R26Y recombination and Foxp3Thy1.1 reporters. The resulting Tbx21RFP-CreERT2 mice showed a range of RFP expression and CreERT2 activity faithfully reflecting endogenous T-bet protein levels in major lymphocyte subsets (Fig. 1a; Extended Data Fig. 1a–b). RFP+ Treg cells comprised between 30–70% of CD44hiCD62Llo effector Treg cells in lymphoid organs and non-lymphoid tissues; interestingly, intestinal Treg cells exhibited prevalent co-expression of T-bet and RORγt, but not T-bet and GATA3 (Extended Data Fig. 1d–i).
Three weeks post tamoxifen administration we found—in contrast to a previous report7—the vast majority of both YFP-labeled Treg and effector CD4 T cells continued to express RFP (Fig. 1b,c; Extended Data Fig. 1j). The percent YFP+ cells expressing RFP was similarly high at three and seven months, although percentages of YFP+ cells themselves declined, indicating that continual Treg cell recruitment into the T-bet+ subset balances out cell turnover over time (Fig. 1b,c; Extended Data Fig. 1j). Indicative of intrinsic stability of T-bet+ Treg cells typical of a differentiated cell state, treatment of Tbx21RFP-CreERT2 mice with tamoxifen 3 wk prior to infection with the helminth Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nb) did not result in loss of RFP expression among YFP+ Treg (or effector CD4) T cells despite robust TH2 activation and cytokine production in spleens and lungs of infected mice (Fig. 1d; Extended Data Fig. 3a; data not shown).
The presence of small percentages of YFP+RFP− cells 3 wk post gavage (Fig. 1b,c) suggested that some Treg cells might have experienced a transient unstable T-bet expression at the time of tamoxifen administration. Such a scenario would reconcile the above result with an earlier study7. Indeed, in Tbx21RFP-CreERT2 mice we observed RFPlo Treg cells that lacked the T-bet-dependent chemokine receptor CXCR3, in addition to RFPhiCXCR3+ cells ( Extended Data Fig. 2a). The former exhibited slightly lower CD44 and slightly higher CD62L expression than the latter and RNA-seq analysis suggested CD44hiRFPloCXCR3− Treg cells to be differentiation intermediates between CD44hiRFP− cells and CD44hiRFPhiCXCR3+ cells (Extended Data Fig. 2b–d). ~40% of FACS-sorted RFPloCXCR3− (but not RFPhiCXCR3+) Treg cells lost RFP expression following transfer into lymphoreplete hosts, whereas some became RFPhiCXCR3+ ( Extended Data Fig. 2e,f). Notably, populations of RFPloCXCR3− and YFP+RFP− cells were also observed within the CD4 non-Treg cell population (Extended Data Fig. 2a). Thus, the observed instability of a low level of T-bet expression is not unique to Treg cells but is indicative of the gradual process of peripheral T cell effector differentiation8, 9.
In addition to steady state cues, TH1-polarizing infection can drive increases in T-bet+ Treg cells10. To determine whether infection expands T-bet+ Treg cells present at steady state, or rather induces T-bet expression in T-bet− cells, we administered tamoxifen to Tbx21RFP-CreERT2 mice 3 wk prior to challenge with the intracellular bacteria Listeria monocytogenes (Lm). Upon Lm challenge, RFP+ Treg and effector CD4 T cell subsets increased markedly; however, YFP+ subsets did not (yielding a decreased YFP+/RFP+ ratio.) (Fig. 2a,b; Extended Data Fig. 3b). This pattern was indicative of de novo differentiation of T-bet+ cells from T-bet− Treg precursors in parallel with differentiation of TH1 cells. Following transfer, both CD44loCD62Lhi RFP− and CD44hiRFP− Treg cells upregulated RFP in response to Lm infection ( Extended Data Fig. 3c). Notably, upon Lm infection YFP-labeled T-bet+ Treg cells did increase expression of T-bet and CXCR3, but not IL-10, an important suppressor molecule11, as similar fate mapping experiments in Tbx21RFP-CreERT2IL-10eGFP/WT mice revealed no increase in IL-10(eGFP)+ among YFP+ Treg cells even as bulk RFP+eGFP+ cells increased ~3-fold (Extended Data Fig. 3d–g). Similar results were obtained during LCMV infection (data not shown).
We next assessed the persistence and recall response of Lm-induced T-bet+ Treg cells. To preferentially label infection-induced T-bet+ cells, tamoxifen was administered at the peak of the primary Lm response (d7 and 9). Mice were assessed 8 wk later, at which time the percent of splenic and liver Treg cells that were RFP+ had returned to roughly pre-infection levels (Fig 2c,d). Given the turnover rate of T-bet+ cells (Fig. 1c) we reasoned that by d60 post-infection YFP+ cells would be relatively enriched for infection-induced Treg cells compared to the bulk RFP+ cell pool. Reinfection increased bulk RFP+ Treg and effector CD4 T cells and even more prominently increased the corresponding cell subsets tagged with YFP (Fig. 2d; Extended Data Fig. 3h–j). On day 65 following primary infection, >90% of YFP+ Treg cells continued to express T-bet as they did in uninfected controls (Fig. 2e). Furthermore, mice infected with Lm that were administered tamoxifen on d37 and 39 following resolution of the primary response and re-infected on d60 exhibited a parallel increase in bulk RFP+ and YFP+ Treg cell subsets on d65, suggesting cells that acquired T-bet expression during primary infection remained T-bet+ and expanded upon reinfection (Fig. 2f). Together, these studies demonstrate that bacterial infection caused de novo differentiation of T-bet− Treg cells into stable T-bet+ cells uniquely suited for reactivation under conditions that drove their initial acquisition of T-bet.
Although the stability of T-bet+ Treg cells suggested a particular function presumably imparted by T-bet itself, we found that 12 wk-old Foxp3YFP-CreTbx21FL/FL mice were clinically indistinguishable from littermate controls, consistent with previous studies7, 12, 13. Foxp3YFP-CreTbx21FL/FL mice did exhibit mild TH1 (but not CD8 T cell) activation, indicating that T-bet expression in Treg cells moderately potentiated suppression of TH1 autoimmunity (Extended Data Fig. 4a). We considered the possibility that T-bet deficiency might not fully impair the function of T-bet+ Treg cells. Since Treg cell suppressor function requires continuous expression of the Foxp3 gene14 we ablated Foxp3 in T-bet+ Treg cells using a novel Tbx21tdTomato-T2A-Cre allele (Extended Data Fig. 5a). Loss of Foxp3 expression in T-bet+ Treg cells in 8 wk-old Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL mice resulted in deceased weight gain, lymphadenopathy, T cell activation, and marked immune infiltration in the lung; with age, loss of hair pigmentation and rectal prolapse were evident (Fig. 3a–d; Extended Data Fig. 5).
Indicative of TH1-type inflammation, the majority of expanded effector CD4 and CD8 T cells in Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL mice expressed RFP (Fig. 3e–g; Extended Data Fig. 5). Additionally, IFNγ and IL-2 but neither IL-4 nor IL-17 production by T cells were increased compared to controls (Fig. 3g,h; Extended Data Fig. 5). Antibiotic treatment did not mitigate autoimmunity in Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL mice, excluding microbial antigens as the drivers of TH1 inflammation (Fig. 3b; data not shown). We considered whether induction of a robust non-TH1 immune response in Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL mice might reveal potential function for T-bet+ Treg cells in its control. However, the TH2 response to Nb infection was not increased in Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL compared to control mice, in contrast to the exacerbated TH2 response observed upon pan-Treg cell depletion during helminth infection (Extended Data Fig. 6)15, 16. Importantly, while CXCR3+ Treg cells were significantly depleted neither total nor effector Treg cell numbers were diminished, and analysis of Tbx21RFP-CreR26Y mice confirmed that a significant proportion of effector Treg cells had not undergone Cre-mediated recombination (Fig. 3d; Extended Data Fig. 5c,f). These results suggested that immune activation could not be attributed to non-specific loss of effector Treg cells.
Cells likely to represent ex-Treg cells lacking Foxp3 but expressing high CD25, CD39, CTLA4, and GITR levels2, 17, 18 were readily found in male Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL and, to a lesser extent, female Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL/WT mice (Fig. 3e; Extended Data Fig. 5g,h). The lack of autoimmunity in Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL/WT females—in which only half of T-bet+ Treg cells lose Foxp3 due to X-inactivation—indicated that ex-Treg cells were efficiently controlled by remaining T-bet+ Treg cells (Fig. 3). Moreover, upon adoptive transfer into T cell-deficient hosts, ex-Treg cells induced no more pathology and expanded less than CD4 effector T cells (Extended Data Fig. 7a–c). These results indicate that ex-Treg cells were unlikely drivers of (although it is possible that they may play some role in) the observed autoimmunity.
To determine whether punctual ablation of T-bet+ Treg cells would similarly unleash TH1 inflammation, we generated bone marrow chimeric mice with a 1:1 mix of either CD45.1+ Foxp3WT or Foxp3KO with CD45.2+ Tbx21RFP-Cre/WTR26iDTR cells (Fig. 4). Prior to DT treatment, both sets of mixed chimeras were healthy with similar basal levels of T cell activation (data not shown). DT administration over 2 wk resulted in weight loss, profound T cell activation, and a selective increase in IFNγ production by CD4 and CD8 T cells in Foxp3KO:Tbx21RFP-Cre/WTR26iDTR chimeric mice ablated of T-bet+ Treg cells compared to Foxp3WT:Tbx21RFP-Cre/WTR26iDTR controls (Fig. 4). Treg cell percentages in experimental mice were only very modestly decreased (from 13±0.53 to 11±0.82, p=0.022) and, as in Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL mice, percentages of CD44hiCD62Llo Treg cells were undiminished compared to controls (Fig. 4b,c). This experimental model is not confounded by generation of ex-Treg cells, providing additional evidence that the latter were not the sole drivers of pathology in the absence of T-bet+ Treg cells. Finally, weight loss was not observed in TcrbKO:Tbx21RFP-Cre/WTR26iDTR mixed chimeras, in which T-bet+ Treg and effector T-bet+ TCRαβ+ cells were simultaneously ablated, implicating the latter in driving disease (Extended Data Fig. 7d,e).
RNA-seq analysis revealed that 561 genes, including Tbx21, CXCR3, Gzmb, Ebi3, Fgl2, and Il10 were more highly expressed in CD44hi RFP+ compared to CD44hiRFP− Treg cells (Extended Data Fig. 2c). Expression of this gene set was further increased upon loss of Foxp3 in ex-Treg cells, suggesting that Foxp3 opposes the transcriptional signature of T-bet+ Treg cells to prevent full TH1 differentiation (Extended Data Fig. 4b)10. Notably, the TH1-associated chemokine receptor CCR5 and adhesion molecule β1-integrin (CD29) were expressed in T-bet+ Treg cells independently of T-bet (Extended Data Fig. 4c,d) indicating that some functional redundancy of homing molecules may in part explain the mild phenotype of Foxp3YFP-CreTbx21FL/FL mice. Moreover, we found that the TCR repertoires of CD44hiCXCR3(T-bet)+ and CD44hiCXCR3(T-bet)− Treg subsets in DO11.10 TCRβ+ Tcra+/− mice were distinct, suggesting that antigenic specificity of T-bet+ Treg cells may also contribute to distinct localization and suppressor capacity, as recent studies revealed TCR-dependent spatial proximity of Treg and IL-2 producing self-reactive T cells (Extended Data Fig. 4e)19.
Therefore, we sought to determine the relative spatial positioning of T-bet+ and T-bet− Treg and effector T cells in secondary lymphoid organs of Tbx21RFP-Cre mice. Immunofluorescence imaging revealed pronounced preferential proximity of CD44hiT-bet+ vs. CD44hiT-bet− Treg cells to CD44hiT-bet+ TH1 and CD8 T cells (Fig. 3i–k; Extended Data Fig. 8a–d). In contrast, CD44hiT-bet+ Treg cells were no nearer to T-bet− CD4 effectors than were CD44hiT-bet− Treg cells (Fig. 3j; Extended Data Fig. 8c). Notably, the CD44hiT-bet− Treg cells remaining in Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL mice were no nearer to TH1 or CD8 T cells than were CD44hiRFP− Treg cells in healthy Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3WT mice (Extended Data Fig. 8e,f). This result suggests that failure of non-T-bet+ Treg cells to approximate TH1 cells may at least in part account for their inability to suppress TH1 inflammation.
Lastly, to complement T-bet+ Treg cell ‘loss-of-function’ experiments we sought to selectively eliminate T-bet− Treg cells. We generated a Foxp3fl-DTReGFP allele by inserting a loxP flanked IRES-DTReGFP DNA sequence into the 3′UTR of the Foxp3 gene (Extended Data Fig. 9a) and generated Foxp3fl-DTReGFPTbx21RFP-CreERT2 mice (Fig. 5a). Following 9 days of DT treatment, Treg cells in tamoxifen-pre-treated (d-5 and -3) mice were present in undiminished percentages and were exclusively T-bet and CXCR3 positive (Fig. 5a–c). Compared to vehicle (oil)-treated mice, tamoxifen-treated Foxp3fl-DTReGFPTbx21RFP-CreERT2 mice displayed robustly suppressed CD8 T cell activation and selective suppression of IFNγ production by CD4 and CD8 T cells, but unrestrained TH2 and TH17 cytokine production (Fig. 5d–f). T-bet+ Treg cells similarly suppressed pre-established TH1, but not TH2 or TH17, activation induced by depletion of Treg cells prior to tamoxifen treatment (Extended Data Fig. 9b–g). Selective TH1 suppression was not simply a feature of activated Treg cells rebounding post-depletion, as partial depletion and recovery of Treg cells in Foxp3DTR mice resulted in prominently inhibited TH2 responses (Extended Data Fig. 9h–l; Extended Data Fig. 10).
Our studies suggest that T-bet expression in Treg cells denotes a differentiated cell state with unique T-bet-dependent and -independent gene expression and TCR specificity, capable of driving potent immunosuppression limited to circumstances of TH1 and CD8 T cell activation. It is possible that GATA3- and RORγt-expressing Treg cells may play analogous roles in suppression of TH2 and TH17 responses. Such division of anti-inflammatory labor amongst Treg cells, arising at steady state and during infection, may enable focused regulation of specific TH responses without incurring undesired bystander suppression.
Experimental Procedures
Animals
Tbx21tdTomato-T2A-CreERT2 mice were generated by insertion of a targeting construct into the Tbx21 locus by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) on the C57BL/6 background; the targeting construct was generated by inserting sequence containing exons 2–5 of the Tbx21 gene from BAC RP23-237M14 (BACPAC Resources Center) into a plasmid backbone containing a PGK promoter driving expression of diphtheria toxin A subunit (DTA) followed by BGHpA sequence (modified PL452 plasmid). A SalI restriction enzyme site was simultaneously engineered into the Tbx21 3′UTR between the stop codon and the polyadenylation site. The Clontech Infusion HD Cloning system was used to generate in the pUC19 plasmid backbone sequence containing (in order from 5′ to 3′) encephalomyocarditis virus IRES; tandem dimer (td) Tomato; T2A self-cleaving peptide from Thoseaasigna virus; Cre recombinase fused to the estrogen receptor ligand binding domain (ER); followed by a frt site-flanked PGK-Neomycin resistance gene (NEO)-BGHpA cassette. The IRES-tdTomato-T2A-CreERT2-frt-NEO-BGHpA-frt sequence was PCR-amplified and inserted into the SalI site in the Tbx21 3′UTR in the modified PL452 backbone. The resulting plasmid was linearized with the restriction enzyme NotI prior to electroporation into ESCs. Tbx21tdTomato-T2A-Cre mice were generated similarly, with Cre recombinase containing a nuclear localization sequence replacing the CreERT2 sequence. Tbx21tdTomato-T2A-CreERT2 and Tbx21tdTomato-T2A-Cre mice were bred to FLPeR mice to excise the NEO cassette and backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice to remove the FLPeR allele.
Foxp3fl-DTReGFP mice were similarly generated by insertion of a targeting construct into the Foxp3 locus by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) on the C57BL/6 background; the targeting construct was generated by inserting sequence containing exons 8–13 of the Foxp3 gene from a 30.8-kb cosmid containing the complete Foxp3 gene into the plasmid backbone containing a PGK promoter driving expression of diphtheria toxin A subunit (DTA) followed by BGHpA sequence (modified PL452 plasmid). The Clontech Infusion HD Cloning system was used to generate in the pUC19 plasmid backbone sequence containing (in order from 5′ to 3′) a loxP site; encephalomyocarditis virus IRES; Diptheria toxin receptor (DTR) enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) fusion protein; a triple SV40 polyA (STOP); a second loxP site; encephalomyocarditis virus IRES; Thy1.1; followed by a frt site-flanked PGK-Neomycin resistance gene (NEO)-BGHpA cassette. The loxP-IRES-DTReGFP-STOP-loxP-IRES-Thy1.1-frt-NEO-BGHpA-frt sequence was PCR-amplified and inserted into the BaeI site in the Foxp3 3′UTR in the modified PL452 backbone. The resulting plasmid was linearized with the restriction enzyme NotI prior to electroporation into ESCs. Foxp3fl-DTReGFP mice were bred to FLPeR mice to excise the NEO cassette and backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice to remove the FLPeR allele.
Foxp3Thy1.1, R26Y, Foxp3FL, Foxp3KO, RorcGFP, Foxp3YFP-Cre, IL-10eGFP, and Tbx21FL mice have been previously described 2, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. CD45.1, R26iDTR, and TcrbKO mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories26. Foxp3Thy1.1Tbx21CreERT2R26Y (called Tbx21CreERT2 mice in the text) mice are homozygous at each locus. Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3WT, Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL, Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3WT, Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3WTWT, and Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3WT/FL mice described in the text are homozygous for the Tbx21 knock-in allele. Foxp3fl-DTReGFPTbx21RFP-CreERT2 mice described in the text are homozygous at each locus. Generation and treatments of mice were performed under protocol 08-10-023 approved by the Sloan Kettering Institute (SKI) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All mouse strains were maintained in the SKI animal facility in specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions in accordance with institutional guidelines and ethical regulations.
For tamoxifen administration, 40 mg tamoxifen dissolved in 100 μL olive oil (Sigma-Aldrich) were sonicated 4 × 30 seconds in a Bioruptor Twin (Diagenode). Mice were orally gavaged with 200μl tamoxifen emulsion per treatment. For diphtheria toxin (DT) injections, DT (Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in PBS and 200 μl of indicated doses (1μg/mouse unless otherwise indicated) were injected i.p per mouse. For antibiotic treatment, mice were weaned onto filtered antibiotic-treated water containing ampicillin, kanamycin, vancomycin, and metronidazole (0.1% w/v each.)
All mice analyzed were sex and aged matched (8–12 wk old) with the exception of some Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3WT and Tbx21RFP-CreFoxp3FL mice used for immunofluorescence imaging that were up to 10 months of age (results were similar to in 8–12 wk old mice).
Isolation of cells
For analysis of YFP-labeled CD4 T cells in Tbx21RFP-CreERT2 mice, CD4 T cells in spleens and lymph nodes were enriched using the Dynabeads CD4 Positive Isolation Kit (Invitrogen). To isolate lymphocytes from tissues, mice were euthanized and immediately perfused with 20 mL PBS. Small and large intestines were removed, flushed with PBS and Peyer’s patches were removed. 0.5 cm-long fragments of intestines were washed in PBS and incubated in PBS supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum, 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 mM EDTA for 15 minutes. Samples were washed and incubated in digest solution (RPMI supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum, 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mg/mL collagenase, and 1 U/mL DNase I) for 10 minutes twice. After filtering through a 100-μm strainer, cells were resuspended in 35% Percoll to eliminate debis. Lymphocytes from livers and lungs were isolated by 50–60 min incubation in digest solution, filtered through 100-μm strainers, and after debris removal in 35% Percoll, purified by centrifugation (1000×g, 7.5 min) over a step-wise 44%/67% Percoll gradient at room temperature.
Nippostrongylus brasiliensis and Listeria monocytogenes infections
Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nb) was maintained by passage in 9 to 10 week-old male Wistar rats as previously described 27. Briefly, rats were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) with 7000 L3 Nb and stool was collected on days 6–9 post infection. Fecal pellets were mixed with 5×8 bone charcoal and incubated on moisten filter paper in Petri dishes at 26°C for 7 days. L3 larvae were recovered from the edge of the filter paper and the perimeter of the plates and extensively washed with PBS to eliminate contaminants before infection. Mice infections were carried out using a 23G needle at a concentration of 500 L3 Nb in 200 μL. For Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) infections, frozen stocks were thawed, resuspended in Brain-Heart Infusion media, and grown at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.1. For primary infections, mice were injected via lateral tail vein with 5–10×103 colony-forming units (cfu) of Lm diluted in 200 μL PBS. For secondary infection, mice were injected via lateral tail vein with 105 cfu of Lm in 200 μL PBS.
Treatments of rats were performed under protocol 08-10-023 approved by the Sloan Kettering Institute (SKI) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Rats were maintained in the SKI animal facility in Biosafety Level 2 conditions in accordance with institutional guidelines and ethical regulations.
Cell transfer experiments
For cell transfer experiments, pooled spleens and lymph nodes were enriched for CD4 T cells using the Dynabeads CD4 Positive Isolation Kit. Cells were FACS-sorted on an Aria II cell sorter (BD Bioscience), washed 3 times in PBS, resuspended in 200 μL PBS, and transferred into recipients via retro-orbital injection.
Generation of bone marrow chimeric mice
Tcrb−/−Tcrd−/− recipient mice were lethally irradiated with 650 Gy. The following day, bone marrow was isolated from femurs of donor mice and depleted of T cells and RBCs via staining with biotinylated anti-Thy1.2 and anti-Ter119 antibodies followed by magnetic bead negative selection. 5×106 total T cell-depleted bone marrow cells were transferred into recipient mice via retro-orbital injection.
Flow cytometric analysis
Cells were stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Yellow Dead Cell Stain (Molecular Probes) and the following antibodies purchased from eBioscience, BioLegend, BD Biosciences, Tonbo, or obtained from the NIH tetramer core facility: anti-CD4 (RM4-5, Biolegend 100548), anti-CD8a (5H10, BD Biosciences 564297), anti-TCRβ (H57-597, eBioscience 47-5961-82), PBS-57-loaded mCD1d tetramer (NIH 26181), anti-Thy1.1 (HIS51, eBioscience 17-0900-82), anti-CD44 (IM7, BioLegend 103026), anti-CD62L (MEL-14, eBioscience 25-0621-82), anti-CXCR3 (CXCR3-173, eBioscience 17-1831-173), anti-CD25 (PC61.5, eBioscience 17-0251), anti-CTLA-4 (UC10-4B9, eBioscience 17-1522-82), anti-GITR (DTA-1, eBioscience 48-5874-82), anti-CD39 (24-DMS1, eBioscience 25-0391-82), anti-CD11b (M1/70, Tonbo Bioscience 25-01120U100), anti-SiglecF (E50-2440, BD Pharmingen 562681), anti-CCR5 (HM-CCR5(7A4) (eBioscience 12-1951-82) and C34-3448 (BD Biosciences 559921), anti-CD29 (eBioHMb1-1, eBioscience 48-0291-80), anti-Foxp3 (FJK-16s, Tonbo Bioscience 35-5773-U100), anti-T-bet (4B10, BioLegend 644816), anti-RORγt (B2D, eBioscience 12-6981-82), anti-Gata-3 (TWAJ, eBioscience 46-9966-41), anti-DsRed (Living Colors® DsRed Polyclonal Antibody, Clontech 632496), anti-IFNγ (XMG1.2, eBioscience 48-7311-80), anti-IL-4 (11B11, eBioscience 51-7041-82), anti-IL-17A (17B7, eBioscience 61-7177-82), anti-IL-13 (eBio13A, eBioscience 12-7133-82), anti-IL-5 (BD Pharmingen, 554396), and anti-IL-2 (JES6-5H4, eBioscience 25-7021-82). Flow cytometric analysis was performed using an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) and FlowJo software (Tree Star). Intracellular staining was performed using eBioscience Fixation Permeabilization buffers. For cytokine staining lymphocytes were stimulated with soluble anti-CD3 clone 2C11 (5μg/ml) and anti-CD28 clone 37.51 (5μg/ml) in the presence of 1μg/mL brefeldin A for 5 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. Unless otherwise stated, CD4 T cells were pre-gated as TCRβ+ PBS-57-CD1d tetramer− cells.
RNA-seq analysis
Pooled spleens and lymph nodes were enriched for CD4 T cells using the Dynabeads CD4 Positive Isolation Kit. CD4+Thy1.1+ cells were FACS-sorted on an Aria II cell sorter (BD Bioscience) into 4 populations (CD62LhiCD44loRFP−, CD44hiRFP−, CD44hiRFPloCXCR3−, and CD44hiRFPhiCXCR3+ cells) and resuspended in Trizol. Three replicates of each cell subset were generated. RNA-sequencing reads were aligned to the reference mouse genome GRCm38 using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) 28 and local realignment was performed using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) 29. For each sample, raw count of reads per gene was measured using R, and DESeq2 R package 30 was used to perform differential gene expression among different conditions. A cutoff of 0.05 was set on the obtained p values (that were adjusted using Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction) to get the significant genes of each comparison.
TCR sequencing and data analysis
Briefly, following isolation of CD4+ T cells from spleens and lymph nodes of DO11.10 TCRβ transgenic Tcra+/− Foxp3DTReGFP mice using the Dynabeads CD4 Positive Isolation Kit (Invitrogen), CD44hiCXCR3− and CD44hiCXCR3+ eGFP(Foxp3)+ Treg and eGFP− effector CD4 T cells were FACS sorted and stored in Trizol. TCR sequencing and data analysis were performed as previously described 31. Pearson correlation of clonotype frequencies for the shared TCR clones was used for the generation of the dendrogram.
Microscopy
Confocal imaging was done using standard conditions. In brief, micer were perfused in PLP buffer. Lymph nodes and spleens were excised, fixed for 1 hour at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde, and dehydrated at 4°C in sucrose (30% in PBS). Tissues were snap frozen in OCT compound (Sakura Tissue-Tek). 10 μm tissue sections were cut and fixed with Acetone for 20 minutes at −20°C, rehydrated in PBS and blocked with 10% normal donkey serum, in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100, followed by over night antibody staining at 4°C in a humidified chamber. After antibody staining nuclei were stained with 5μM Draq7 (Abcam) for 20 minutes at room temperature. Sections were imaged in Prolong Diamond mounting media (Life Technologies). All images were acquired using a confocal microscope (LSM880; Carl Zeiss) with a 40X oil immersion objective. Images were processed and analyzed using ImageJ software (version 2.0.0-rc-54/1.51h; National Institutes of Health). Nearest neighboranalysis was performed using MATLAB (version R2016b, MathWorks).
Code availability
The colocalization program (ImageJ software, 2.0.0-rc-54/1.51h, National Institutes of Health) used to find cell positions and the MATLAB program (software R2016b, MathWorks) to calculate nearest cell distance are provided as Supplementary Text.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses (excluding RNA-seq and TCR sequence analyses, described above) were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 software. Differences between individual groups were analyzed for statistical significance using the unpaired or paired two-tailed t-test. *, p ≥ 0.05; **, p ≥ 0.01; ***, p ≥ 0.001; ns, not significant. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is used to determine the significance between the distributions of signature genes and the rest of expressed genes. One-way ANOVA is used to compare the means of 3 or more samples. No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size. The number of mice used in each experiment to reach statistical significance was determined on the basis of preliminary data. No animals were excluded from the analyses. No methods of randomization were used to allocate animals into experimental groups. No blinding was used. Data met assumptions of statistical methods used and variance was similar between groups that were statistically compared.
Data availability
The RNA-seq data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the NIH SRA database with the accession code SRP102941.
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank N. Arpaia, I. Leiner, and members of the Rudensky lab for discussions; J. Sun for providing Lm stocks; and A.H. Bravo, S.E. Lee, and M.B. Faire for experimental support. This work was supported by an NIH Medical Scientist Training Program grant T32GM07739 to the Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program (A.G.L); the Frank Lappin Horsfall Jr. Student Fellowship (A.G.L); NIH grant R37AI034206 (A.Y.R.), the Ludwig Center at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Hilton-Ludwig Cancer Prevention Initiative (Conrad N. Hilton Foundation and Ludwig Cancer Research) (A.Y.R.); the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748; the Russian Science Foundation project 14-14-00533 (E.V.P. and D.M.C) and the RFBR fellowship grant 16-34-60178 (E.V.P). A.Y.R. is an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Footnotes
Author contributions: A.G.L. and A.Y.R. conceived the study, designed experiments, and wrote the manuscript. A.G.L generated mice, performed experiments, and analyzed data. A.M. designed and performed immunofluorescence experiments and A.M. and S.F. analyzed the data. S.H. assisted with some experiments. B.M. performed TCR sequencing studies. E.V.P. and D.M.C performed TCR sequencing analysis. A.G.L and R.E.N. analyzed and R.E.N., A.C., and S.D. bred Foxp3YFP-CreTbx21FL/FL mice. M.S. performed RNA-seq data analysis. B.E.H. prepared Nb larvae. P.M.T. performed histological analyses.
The authors declare no completing financial interests.
References
- 1.Zhu J, Yamane H, Paul WE. Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations (*) Annual review of immunology. 2010;28:445–489. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nature immunology. 2003;4:330–336. doi: 10.1038/ni904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003;299:1057–1061. doi: 10.1126/science.1079490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Koch MA, et al. The transcription factor T-bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation. Nature immunology. 2009;10:595–602. doi: 10.1038/ni.1731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ohnmacht C, et al. MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY. The microbiota regulates type 2 immunity through RORgammat(+) T cells. Science. 2015;349:989–993. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sefik E, et al. MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY. Individual intestinal symbionts induce a distinct population of RORgamma(+) regulatory T cells. Science. 2015;349:993–997. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yu F, Sharma S, Edwards J, Feigenbaum L, Zhu J. Dynamic expression of transcription factors T-bet and GATA-3 by regulatory T cells maintains immunotolerance. Nature immunology. 2015;16:197–206. doi: 10.1038/ni.3053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhou L, et al. TGF-beta-induced Foxp3 inhibits T(H)17 cell differentiation by antagonizing RORgammat function. Nature. 2008;453:236–240. doi: 10.1038/nature06878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hwang ES, Szabo SJ, Schwartzberg PL, Glimcher LH. T helper cell fate specified by kinase-mediated interaction of T-bet with GATA-3. Science. 2005;307:430–433. doi: 10.1126/science.1103336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Koch MA, et al. T-bet(+) Treg cells undergo abortive Th1 cell differentiation due to impaired expression of IL-12 receptor beta2. Immunity. 2012;37:501–510. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Laidlaw BJ, et al. Production of IL-10 by CD4(+) regulatory T cells during the resolution of infection promotes the maturation of memory CD8(+) T cells. Nature immunology. 2015;16:871–879. doi: 10.1038/ni.3224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Colbeck EJ, et al. Eliminating roles for T-bet and IL-2 but revealing superior activation and proliferation as mechanisms underpinning dominance of regulatory T cells in tumors. Oncotarget. 2015;6:24649–24659. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McPherson RC, Turner DG, Mair I, O’Connor RA, Anderton SM. T-bet Expression by Foxp3(+) T Regulatory Cells is Not Essential for Their Suppressive Function in CNS Autoimmune Disease or Colitis. Frontiers in immunology. 2015;6:69. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Williams LM, Rudensky AY. Maintenance of the Foxp3-dependent developmental program in mature regulatory T cells requires continued expression of Foxp3. Nature immunology. 2007;8:277–284. doi: 10.1038/ni1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Smith KA, et al. Low-level regulatory T-cell activity is essential for functional type-2 effector immunity to expel gastrointestinal helminths. Mucosal immunology. 2016;9:428–443. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sawant DV, et al. Regulatory T cells limit induction of protective immunity and promote immune pathology following intestinal helminth infection. Journal of immunology. 2014;192:2904–2912. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lahl K, et al. Nonfunctional regulatory T cells and defective control of Th2 cytokine production in natural scurfy mutant mice. Journal of immunology. 2009;183:5662–5672. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lin W, et al. Regulatory T cell development in the absence of functional Foxp3. Nature immunology. 2007;8:359–368. doi: 10.1038/ni1445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu Z, et al. Immune homeostasis enforced by co-localized effector and regulatory T cells. Nature. 2015;528:225–230. doi: 10.1038/nature16169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Intlekofer AM, et al. Anomalous type 17 response to viral infection by CD8+ T cells lacking T-bet and eomesodermin. Science. 2008;321:408–411. doi: 10.1126/science.1159806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liston A, et al. Differentiation of regulatory Foxp3+ T cells in the thymic cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:11903–11908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801506105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rubtsov YP, et al. Regulatory T cell-derived interleukin-10 limits inflammation at environmental interfaces. Immunity. 2008;28:546–558. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Srinivas S, et al. Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC developmental biology. 2001;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-1-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eberl G, et al. An essential function for the nuclear receptor RORgamma(t) in the generation of fetal lymphoid tissue inducer cells. Nature immunology. 2004;5:64–73. doi: 10.1038/ni1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kamanaka M, et al. Expression of interleukin-10 in intestinal lymphocytes detected by an interleukin-10 reporter knockin tiger mouse. Immunity. 2006;25:941–952. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Buch T, et al. A Cre-inducible diphtheria toxin receptor mediates cell lineage ablation after toxin administration. Nature methods. 2005;2:419–426. doi: 10.1038/nmeth762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Camberis M, Le Gros G, Urban J., Jr Animal model of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis and Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Current protocols in immunology/edited by John E. Coligan … [et al.] 2003;Chapter 19(Unit 19):12. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1912s55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McKenna A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome research. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome biology. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Feng Y, et al. A mechanism for expansion of regulatory T-cell repertoire and its role in self-tolerance. Nature. 2015;528:132–136. doi: 10.1038/nature16141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-seq data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the NIH SRA database with the accession code SRP102941.