Abstract
Structural arrangement and dimension play vital roles in wave transport and amplification as they can restrict the volume explored by the waves. However, it is challenging to systematically investigate the interplay among structural, optical, and mechanical properties, in part because of limited experimental platforms that modulate the structural arrangement in a continuous manner. We present light amplification action in Rhodamine B doped silk fibroin (SF) nanofibrous scaffolds and its modulation via the control of the alignment or directionality of SF nanofibers through an electrospinning procedure. Random lasing features of such scaffolds are examined as a function of structural arrangement of the SF nanofibers, and optical-structural-mechanical relationships of the SF-based structures are examined. As SF nanofibers are aligned parallel undergoing a transition from three to quasi-two dimension, light amplification features (e.g., lasing threshold and output power) enhanced, which also strongly correlated with mechanical characteristics (i.e., Young’s moduli) of the scaffolds. We confirm such optical characteristics using quasi-mode analyses based on the finite element method. We further demonstrate non-contact, in situ measurement of alternations in lasing features of the scaffolds while the specimens are under tensile loads. These results may highlight potential utility of the scaffolds as a flexible and biocompatible sensor.
Introduction
Amplified spontaneous emission or stimulated emission can be obtained through multiple light scattering by disordered scattering structures1, 2. Disordered arrangement of the cavity in a conventional laser has been thought as deteriorating the lasing performance, but it has been realized that multiple scattering from disordered structures can serve as feedback for light amplification and lasing. Since the theoretical studies3, 4 and experimental observations5–8, significant efforts have been focused on understanding the underlying physics of disordered cavities and implementing random lasing systems in many types of material systems9–11. Some interesting applications of random lasing have been reported, which include speckle-free optical imaging12, remote temperature sensing13, self-formed lasing from polymer-dispersed liquid crystal14, paper-based self-formed lasing15, and biosensors16–18.
One of the interesting avenues toward the realization of random lasers involves the implementation with biocompatible or biodegradable materials. Many random structures can be found in nature, which for example, provide mechanisms for body temperature regulation19, camouflage20, and structural coloring21. In these respects, researchers have measured light amplification effects in butterfly wings22, cicada wings23, human tissues24, and bone tissue25. Random lasing in biological tissue has also been exploited to detect cancerous tissue24 and monitor the changes in micro-structures under various mechanical conditions, observing that the optical characteristics are extremely sensitive to the micro- or nanoscale local perturbation of structures26.
Silk fibroin (SF), recently highlighted biocompatible material, has been extensively studied because of the tunability of its mechanical and optical properties. Diverse optical components such as waveguides27, microlens arrays28, and photonic crystals29, 30 have been fabricated, and lasing from SF nanograting structures31 has been demonstrated. Random lasing in SF-based photonic glasses has also been demonstrated, which are composed of bulk silk fibroin structured with pores of sizes comparable with the wavelength of light32. For applications in regenerative tissue engineering and drug delivery, SF has been structured in the forms of sutures, films33, 34, porous scaffolds35, 36, electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds37, 38, and micro- or nano-patterned structures39, 40.
Among these engineered structures, three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds composed of SF nanofibers are particularly attractive because of their large surface-to-volume ratio. These structures, for example, have been utilized as the scaffolds for cell proliferation and differentiation37, and its utility as artificial implants was also assessed. The measurements of the mechanical properties of such scaffolds revealed that the structural arrangement of the SF nanofibers greatly affected their mechanical properties41. On the other hand, random arrangement of SF nanofibers may provide a platform for light amplification. Incorporation of active dopants such as fluorescent dye molecules into the SF nanofibrous scaffolds could realize a unique photonic device that functions as a biocompatible scaffold, while providing optical signatures sensitive to local mechanical and structural features. The device is also flexible and readily adapted to biological host systems. Yet, its experimental demonstration and the relationship of its lasing characteristics with structural and mechanical properties have not been demonstrated, to our best knowledge.
Here, we demonstrate biocompatible random lasers based on SF nanofibers and the modulation of its lasing behaviors through the control of SF nanofiber arrangement. The measured lasing properties are compared against the structural and mechanical properties to understand the interplay among structural, optical, and mechanical properties in the scaffolds. The experimental results are further validated by numerical calculations of lasing modes with the finite element method (FEM). In situ measurement of changes of lasing features of the SF nanofibers is also presented, as the scaffolds are under tensile loads, suggesting potential application of the SF nanofibrous random lasers.
Results
Structurally-modulated SF nanofibrous scaffolds
Figure 1a–c shows representative scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the SF nanofibrous scaffolds. The fabrication protocol of the SF nanofibrous random laser is illustrated in Methods and Fig. S1. As a gain medium, fluorescent dye molecules, Rhodamine B (RhB), are employed, and scattering structures are formed via electrospinning to control the nanofiber orientation in a continuous manner. It is evident that operating the electrospinning system at various rotational speeds of the collection drum (ω) enables production of the scaffolds with different SF nanofiber arrangements. As the rotational speed of the collection drum increases, the SF nanofibers tend to be well aligned along a certain direction. This behavior may be partly attributed to adhesion and stretching of the fibers on the collection drum during the operation. In other words, at higher ω, the fibers adhered to the surface of the collection drum are stretched, forming aligned arrangement of SF nanofibers. Image analysis using the NIH ImageJ program indicates that the fiber angles from the vertical axis of each SEM image vary from ~±70° at 500 rpm to <±15° at 2,500 rpm. Mean diameter of the SF nanofibers is measured to be 92 ± 20 nm. Shown in the bottom of Fig. 1a–c are the amplitude maps of two-dimensional (2D) Fourier transform of the SEM images. Random nanofiber orientation, or an isotropic distribution in spatial frequency, can be found at small ω, while alignment of SF nanofibers, represented by anisotropic distribution in spatial frequency, can be obtained at larger ω. To represent the SF nanofiber orientation, the aspect ratio of the spatial frequency distribution is evaluated as AR = a/b, where a and b denote the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) lengths of the spatial frequency distributions along the x and y axes, respectively. Figure 1d shows the ARs of the SF scaffolds as a function of collection drum speeds, which suggests a linear relationship of the ARs with the rotational speed of collection drum.
Young’s moduli of SF nanofibrous scaffolds
The mechanical properties of the scaffolds were then measured to obtain their dependence on the structural arrangement SF nanofibers (Fig. 2 and Methods). The SF scaffolds were mounted in a Universal Testing Machine (OTT-001, Oriental TM, Republic of Korea), and the tensile tests were performed based on the ASTM D882 standard test method (Fig. 2a). Figure 2b shows the measured Young’s moduli of the SF scaffolds as a function of ARs. A linear behavior of Young’s moduli of the scaffolds with ARs can be observed. The SF scaffolds with aligned nanofibers exhibit higher Young’s moduli. This response can be accounted for as follows: Under a tensile load, individual nanofibers are initially stretched and subsequently carry the tensile load. Therefore, at the same strain, the scaffolds with randomly distributed SF nanofibers are expected to exhibit smaller resistance than those of aligned SF fibers. This is reflected by the larger Young’s moduli of the scaffolds with aligned SF nanofibers.
Lasing characteristics of SF nanofibrous scaffolds
We now demonstrate light amplification actions from RhB-doped SF nanofibrous scaffolds (Fig. 3). Details of the photoluminescence (PL) experiment are provided in Methods. Figure 3a presents representative intensities and linewidths of the output emission from a scaffold assembled at the drum speed of 1,000 rpm. The RhB concentration was 0.001 M. The transition of emission regime is marked by both a spectral narrowing and increase of emission power. The threshold is measured to be 11.46 nJ/mm2 of pump energy, which compares favorably to similar systems in other materials42, 43. Figure 3b shows normalized emission spectra below the threshold at 8.75 nJ/mm2 and above the threshold at 14.32 nJ/mm2. The lasing emission spectra beyond the threshold exhibits a rather broad single emission peak with a FWHM linewidth of ~8 nm, which are typically observed in diffusive random lasing systems with non-resonant feedback. The lasing thresholds of the scaffold as a function of RhB concentrations are also examined (Fig. 3c). It can be noted that the threshold decreases monotonically, as the RhB concentration increases up to 0.004 M. This behavior may be explained by a larger number of gain molecules at higher RhB concentrations, and is consistent with the experimental results in other publications44, 45. Comparisons of the measured lasing thresholds against the degrees of SF nanofiber alignment (i.e., AR) and Young’s moduli are shown in Fig. 3d. For this experiment, the RhB concentration in the scaffolds was set to 0.001 M. The lasing threshold decreases, as the nanofibers are aligned into parallel arrays normal to the pump beam direction. It can also be seen that the lasing thresholds vary inversely with the Young’s modulus of the scaffolds. This result may be of significance in some applications, as it implies that alteration in the structural arrangement and mechanical properties of the scaffolds can be probed by measuring the lasing signatures (e.g., lasing threshold).
Numerical validation
To further validate the observed lasing behaviors in the SF scaffolds of diverse nanofiber arrangements, the quasi-modes in the scaffolds are examined through the FEM analysis in COMSOL (Fig. 4). Note that lasing modes could be different from the quasi-modes for a weakly scattering regime, but are still associated with individual quasi-modes of the passive system. Figure 4a–c shows the spatial distribution of SF nanofibers, along with the histograms of their angular distributions that have been used in the analysis. Quality (Q) factors for the quasi modes are obtained (grey circles in Fig. 4d–f), and the average Q factors are also evaluated as a representative parameter for the lasing characteristics in each case (solid lines in Fig. 4d–f). The average Q factors are defined as , where κ represents the complex eigenvalue of eigenmode in the lasing system, m is the mode number, and M is the total number of modes. As the SF nanofibers are aligned reducing the structural dimensionality, the Q factors become larger, which corresponds to smaller loss in the lasing system. These results are consistent with the experimental observations in Fig. 3d, where smaller lasing thresholds are measured in the aligned SF nanofibers. Figure 4g–i shows the spatial distribution of the three representative electric fields with the highest Q factors for each SF scaffold (colored circles in Fig. 4d–f). In large angular variations (Fig. 4i), the waves scatter into all different directions, but in small angular variations of nanofibers (Fig. 4g), the volume explored by the waves is restricted to the direction perpendicular to the fiber direction. These results explain the measured lasing characteristics in the SF nanofibers of different arrangements.
Measurement of lasing signatures from SF nanofibers under tensile loading
The measured interrelationships among optical-mechanical-structural properties of the SF scaffolds (Fig. 3d) can be utilized as a transduction mechanism for non-contact in-situ optical sensor of mechanical and structural properties. In order to demonstrate its utility, we performed measurement of lasing features from a SF nanofibrous scaffold, while the scaffold is under tensional loads. The two opposite sides of the scaffold assembled at 500 rpm were clamped to separate translational stages to stretch the scaffold. (Fig. 5a and Methods). The scaffold was then incrementally stretched, and its lasing properties were measured. Shown as empty black circles in Fig. 5b are the measured lasing thresholds at increasing tensile loads. As the scaffold is stretched, the lasing thresholds were found to decrease. This behavior can be explained by the observation made in Fig. 3d. As the scaffold is stretched, the SF nanofibers are likely to be more aligned, making a transition from small to larger ARs. As the AR increases, the scaffolds are expected to exhibit smaller lasing thresholds. The full orange circles in Fig. 5b denote the optical power of output emission measured at a pump energy beyond the lasing threshold (12 nJ/mm2). The optical power of the output emission from the scaffold increased as the SF nanofibers are stretched further with higher loads. This can also be accounted for by the measured smaller lasing threshold for the aligned SF nanofibers. Interestingly, the emission wavelength from the scaffold did not vary under various tensile loads (data not shown). This experimental result suggests a potential utility of this lasing system for monitoring alteration of local mechanical arrangement and properties.
Discussion
Our experimental and calculation results can be adequately described by diffusive models46. Under the illumination of a pump laser, the excited molecules emit photons through spontaneous emission after a given time. The emitted photons travel along random paths, and either generate stimulated emission if they encounter excited molecules, or are absorbed. The initial spontaneous emission will be amplified so long as it travels in the excited region. For the pumping beam normal to the direction of the fiber alignment, the highly forward and backward scattering redirect the emitted photons to the excited volume with high probability. Therefore, an enhanced population inversion and a smaller lasing threshold could be obtained in the SF scaffold with aligned fibers. For the scaffolds with randomly distributed SF fibers, random light scattering results in less confinement of the emitted photons in the excited region. This explains the smaller Q factors and larger lasing threshold in the random SF scaffolds, as demonstrated in our FEM analysis. In order to validate the enhanced directional scattering and emission in the aligned SF nanofibrous scaffolds, we measured angular distributions of output emissions from the scaffolds assembled at various collection drum speeds (Methods and Fig. S2). It is clearly seen from Fig. S2 that the output emissions from the aligned SF nanofibers exhibit directional emission normal to the direction of the SF nanofiber alignment, while the emission from the random SF nanofibers is characterized by a broad angular distribution. This observation clearly accounts for the enhanced directional scattering and emission processes in the aligned SF nanofibers. We then examined operating regime of SF nanofibrous random lasers by measuring transport mean free path-lengths (l t) of the fabricated SF scaffolds via a coherent back-scattering setup (Fig. S3 and Methods). The measured l t of the scaffolds were in the range 12 ~ 15.4 μm, which corresponds to 20 times the emission wavelength. Dimensionless parameter kl t were found to be in the range of 119 ~ 153, where k is the wave number of light. It implies that the scaffolds are scattering materials well described by diffusive models46.
SF nanofibrous structure has previously been explored as the scaffolds for cell proliferation and drug delivery47, 48. It exhibits high surface to volume ratio, and can therefore interact with host biological systems or external environments with high contact areas. On the other hand, random arrangement of the SF nanofibers provides a great platform for light amplification, but lasing from these structures and its dependence on structural and mechanical features have not been studied thus far. Random lasing from other fibrous structures has been reported49, 50, but its features were examined in other perspectives, for example, in the context of plasmonic enhancement and formation of random resonators42, 43, 51. To demonstrate light amplification in SF nanofibers, we incorporated rhodamine B dyes into the silk fibroin and assembled random structures as modulating directionality and dimensionality through an electrospinning method. Our results demonstrate that light amplification or random lasing can be engineered through the control of structural arrangement or dimensionality via electrospinning. Lasing features, structures and mechanical properties of the fabricated SF scaffolds were then examined to obtain their interrelationships.
We envision that the SF nanofibrous random laser is promising for sensing applications, as it is flexible, largely insensitive to external shape and versatile to host diverse gain materials. The scaffold can also be readily tuned to have certain mechanical properties through the controlled arrangement of SF nanofibers. Integration of such device in biological tissues and measurement of its lasing features based on the observed interconnects with structural and mechanical properties may allow non-contact measurement of the structural modifications of the scaffolds in the host systems. SF nanofibers have been structured to form composites with controlled mechanical strengths by incorporating various nanoparticles52, 53. For instances, hydroxyapatite54, 55 and chitosan56, 57 nanoparticles have been employed to tune the mechanical properties of the SF-based composites. Once the composite materials are integrated to biological systems, it then becomes critical to measure degradation or alteration of their mechanical properties in the host tissues in continuous and non-destructive manner. Measuring lasing features in the composites could be a feasible means to non-destructive, non-contact monitoring of their mechanical properties. SF-based nanofibrous scaffolds have also been explored in tissue engineering58–61. In particular, scaffolds made of aligned nanofibers have been regarded as favorable ones for nerve regeneration and directed cell growth due to their superior cell attachment and proliferation62–64. The structural modification of the SF-based scaffolds due to the cell infiltration, growth and proliferation may be associated with changes in their mechanical and optical properties, and so could be monitored by examining their lasing features. We also note that the spatial resolution of the sensor can be varied depending on the optical beam size. Therefore, two-dimensional mapping of structural and mechanical alterations can be potentially achieved by scanning the optical beam across the SF scaffolds. The incorporation of clinically viable dyes (e.g., indocyanine green and methylene blue) into the SF scaffolds may also open up novel directions towards its applications to in vivo studies.
In summary, we have demonstrated light amplification in RhB-doped SF nanofibers. By operating the electrospinning system at various rotational speeds of collection drum, we have controlled the alignment of SF nanofibers in structuring the scaffolds. The PL results indicate that the scaffolds act as a diffusive random lasing system with its lasing features strongly related to structural and mechanical properties of the scaffolds. These lasers may therefore represent opportunities in the context of sensor devices since the local perturbation of mechanical properties could lead to alterations in the lasing features. The random lasing systems based on SF nanofibers are compatible with living tissues due to biocompatible constituents, and may also be intact with biological systems with high surface to volume ratios. All these features suggest its potential as a biocompatible tool to sense or image local mechanical and structural properties with high sensitivity.
Methods
Fabrication of silk fibroin scaffolds
Bombyx mori cocoon was prepared for a SF solution based on the protocols described65. In brief, Bombyx mori cocoon was degummed to remove sericin. The degummed silk was then dissolved in a 9.3 M LiBr (SAMCHUN Chemical, South Korea, L1106) solution and dialyzed against deionized (DI) water for 3 days. After dialysis, the SF/DI solution was freeze-dried and dissolved in 98% formic acid (JUNSEI Chemical Co, Japan, 25010-0350) at a concentration of 10% (w/v). SF scaffolds were then fabricated via electrospinning, which provides rapid and low-cost strategy to control the SF nanofiber alignment in a continuous manner. As a gain medium, rhodamine B (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, 1001405226) was added to the SF solution. Concentration of the rhodamine B was 0.001 M, unless specified otherwise. The electrospinning system (NanoNC, South Korea, ESR200RD) consisted of a high-voltage power supply, syringe pump, metal nozzle, and rotating collection drum. The alignment of the SF nanofibers was achieved by controlling the rotational speed of the collection drum. The rotational speed of the drum was varied from 500 to 2,500 rpm. The SF solution was continuously fed to the tip of the charged metal nozzle via the syringe pump at a constant speed. An electric field of 1.2 ~ 2.0 kV/cm was applied between the nozzle and the collection drum.
Tensile test setup
The experiment was performed with a Universal Testing Machine (OTT-001, Oriental TM, Republic of Korea), based on the ASTM D882 standard test method. Tensile testing was performed at a speed of 50 mm/min at room temperature with a load cell capacity of 1 N. The SF specimen had a width of 30 mm and a length of 30 mm.
PL experiment
A 532 nm Q-switched mode-locked Nd:YAG laser (LOTIS TII Inc., LS-2131) was employed as a pumping light source. The repetition rate and width of the laser pulse were 10 Hz and 10 ns, respectively. The output beam from the pump laser was delivered to the SF scaffold with a diameter of ~4 mm. The optical energy of the pumping laser was controlled by a polarizer (Thorlabs Inc., LPVISE100-A), and increased from 90 to 190 nJ in steps of 10 nJ for each PL measurement. The output emission from the scaffold was collected via a lens with a focal length of 30 mm (Thorlabs Inc., AC254-030-A-ML) and directed to a spectrometer with a spectral resolution of ~0.1 nm (Ocean Optics Inc., customized HR4000). The integration time of the spectrometer was set to ~95 ms.
Once the output emission from a SF nanofibrous scaffold is measured as a function of optical pump energy, the lasing threshold was determined at the intersection of the linear fits performed in the regions of the spontaneous and stimulated emissions in the light input–output plot. We repeated the threshold measurements of a SF scaffold assembled at 1000 rpm over 5 times, and found that the measurement precision was found to be 0.26 nJ/mm2 in standard deviation. For all of the experiments, the scaffold thickness was >300 μm.
FEM calculation
The diameters and angular orientations of SF nanofibers were obtained from the representative SEM images (Fig. 1a–c); three SF scaffolds with different orientations of nanofibers (θ fiber) were considered. The refractive indices of the nanofibers and air were set at 1.54 and 1, respectively. The geometrical distributions were applied to the computational domain of the FEM of 40 µm × 40 µm, which made it possible to obtain a numerical solution of the two-dimensional Helmholtz equation. 2D Helmholtz equation was discretized and formulated into the generalized eigenvalue problem, and E z, H x, and H y components of the transverse magnetic (TM) mode are considered, in which the electric field is along the cylindrical axis, in a manner similar to a previous report66. For the boundary conditions, a layer perfectly matched to the surrounding medium of the scattering structures was employed. By the integrating boundary conditions, the numerical solutions of the generalized eigenvalue problem were obtained by an unsymmetric-pattern multifrontal method for sparse lower and upper triangular matrices (LU) factorization. Instead of the field intensity, the norm of E z was visualized for a better display of the small values of the field. We performed FEM analysis with the RF Module of COMSOL Multiphysics (version 4.3a), and examined 20 leaky modes around λ = 600 nm. For simplicity, the effect of the magnetic field on the scaffolds was considered to be negligible (i.e., magnetic permeability = 0).
PL measurement with SF nanofibers under tensile loads
A 30 mm × 30 mm SF scaffold assembled at a collection drum speed of 500 rpm (AR = 1.01) was used. The two opposite sides of the specimen were clamped by holders (Edmund Optics inc., #54-994), that were mounted onto mechanical translation stages (Newport Co., Ltd., M-423-MIC). The specimen was stretched from 0 μm to 700 μm. PL measurements were performed as described above for each displacement of the stages.
Angular distribution of output emissions from SF nanofibers
The experimental PL setup is illustrated in Fig. S2a. The setup is similar to the PL setup as described above, except that the spectrometer was mounted on a rotational arm (Thorlabs Inc., LC1A) to measure output emissions from SF scaffolds at various detection angles. The spectrometer was elevated by 30 degrees in order not to block the beam path of the pump laser. For measurement, detection angle (θ) was varied from −85 to 85 degrees in steps of 10 degrees, and the pumping energy was set to 13.84 nJ/mm2, which was above the measured threshold (11.04~11.92 nJ/mm2). The distance from the scaffolds to the spectrometer was set to 70 mm. The SF scaffolds were assembled at a drum speed of 500, 1000, 1500, and 2500 rpm, producing the nanofiber arrangements with the aspect ratios (ARs) of 1.01, 1.18, 1.40 and 1.88. The concentration of rhodamine B in the scaffolds was 0.001 M.
Coherence backscattering (CBS)
To quantify the bulk (passive) optical properties of the fabricated SF scaffolds, we employed a coherent backscattering (CBS) method to measure the l t of light. The CBS setup was similar to that of ref. 67, except that the experiment was performed with a 633 nm laser (Edmund Optics Inc., Model 1135 P). Its wavelength is close to the emission wavelength of RhB dye (~592 nm). Dye-free scaffolds were utilized for the experiment to avoid light absorption. The frame rate of the employed image sensor (IO Industries Inc., 4M180MCL) was 10 fps. The measurement was performed for 10 s, while the specimen was jittered continuously during the measurements, which removed strong speckle patterns in the angular signals. The measured CBS cone was fitted with θ ≈ λ/(3πl t), and l t of each sample was extracted from the fit68. Here, θ is a full width at half-maximum of the CBS cone and λ is the wavelength of light.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the research program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (NRF-2015R1A5A1037668). S.H.C and Y.L.K also thank the support (FA2386-16-1-4114) of Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development from Air Force Office of Scientific Research, USA.
Author Contributions
S.K. performed the experiment of coherence backscattering; S.Y.Y. performed the fabrication of silk fibroin scaffolds and experiment of tensile test; S.K. and S.Y.Y. performed the experiment of random lasing; S.H.C. contributed to FEM analysis; Y.L.K., W.H.R., and C.J. wrote the manuscript; All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Soocheol Kim and SungYeun Yang contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04881-5
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
WonHyoung Ryu, Email: whryu@yonsei.ac.kr.
Chulmin Joo, Email: cjoo@yonsei.ac.kr.
References
- 1.Cao H. Review on latest developments in random lasers with coherent feedback. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 2005;38:10497. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/38/49/004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wiersma DS. The physics and applications of random lasers. Nature Physics. 2008;4:359–367. doi: 10.1038/nphys971. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Letokhov V. Generation of light by a scattering medium with negative resonance absorption. Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 1968;26:835. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pradhan P, Kumar N. Localization of light in coherently amplifying random media. Physical Review B. 1994;50:9644. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.9644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lawandy NM, Balachandran R, Gomes A, Sauvain E. Laser action in strongly scattering media. Nature. 1994;368:436–438. doi: 10.1038/368436a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Noginov M, Caulfield H, Noginova N, Venkateswarlu P. Line narrowing in the dye solution with scattering centers. Optics Communications. 1995;118:430–437. doi: 10.1016/0030-4018(95)00177-A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sha W, Liu C-H, Liu F, Alfano R. Competition between two lasing modes of Sulforhodamine 640 in highly scattering media. Optics Letters. 1996;21:1277–1279. doi: 10.1364/OL.21.001277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cao H, et al. Random laser action in semiconductor powder. Physical Review Letters. 1999;82:2278. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2278. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gottardo S, et al. Resonance-driven random lasing. Nature Photonics. 2008;2:429–432. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2008.102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.García-Revilla S, et al. Ultrafast random laser emission in a dye-doped silica gel powder. Optics Express. 2008;16:12251–12263. doi: 10.1364/OE.16.012251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yu S, Yuen C, Lau S, Park WI, Yi G-C. Random laser action in ZnO nanorod arrays embedded in ZnO epilayers. Applied Physics Letters. 2004;84:3241–3243. doi: 10.1063/1.1734681. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Redding B, Choma MA, Cao H. Speckle-free laser imaging using random laser illumination. Nature Photonics. 2012;6:355–359. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wiersma DS, Cavalieri S. Light emission: A temperature-tunable random laser. Nature. 2001;414:708–709. doi: 10.1038/414708a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gottardo S, Cavalieri S, Yaroshchuk O, Wiersma DS. Quasi-two-dimensional diffusive random laser action. Physical Review Letters. 2004;93:263901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.263901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Viola I, et al. Random laser emission from a paper-based device. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2013;1:8128–8133. doi: 10.1039/c3tc31860e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Choi SH, Kim YL. The potential of naturally occurring lasing for biological and chemical sensors. Biomedical Engineering Letters. 2014;4:201–212. doi: 10.1007/s13534-014-0155-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.dos Santos MV, et al. Random laser action from flexible biocellulose-based device. Journal of Applied Physics. 2014;115:083108. doi: 10.1063/1.4866686. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Frolov S, Vardeny ZV, Yoshino K, Zakhidov A, Baughman R. Stimulated emission in high-gain organic media. Physical Review B. 1999;59:R5284. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.R5284. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Somero GN. Temperature adaptation of enzymes: biological optimization through structure-function compromises. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1978;9:1–29. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.000245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shohet A, Baddeley R, Anderson J, Osorio D. Cuttlefish camouflage: a quantitative study of patterning. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2007;92:335–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00842.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kinoshita S, Yoshioka S, Miyazaki J. Physics of structural colors. Reports on Progress in Physics. 2008;71:076401. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/71/7/076401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang C-S, Chang T-Y, Lin T-Y, Chen Y-F. Biologically inspired flexible quasi-single-mode random laser: An integration of Pieris canidia butterfly wing and semiconductors. Scientific Reports. 2014;4:6736. doi: 10.1038/srep06736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang D, Kostovski G, Karnutsch C, Mitchell A. Random lasing from dye doped polymer within biological source scatters: the pomponia imperatorial cicada wing random nanostructures. Organic Electronics. 2012;13:2342–2345. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.06.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Polson RC, Vardeny ZV. Random lasing in human tissues. Applied Physics Letters. 2004;85:1289–1291. doi: 10.1063/1.1782259. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Song Q, et al. Random lasing in bone tissue. Optics Letters. 2010;35:1425–1427. doi: 10.1364/OL.35.001425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Briones-Herrera J, Cuando-Espitia N, Sánchez-Arévalo F, Hernández-Cordero J. Evaluation of mechanical behavior of soft tissue by means of random laser emission. Review of Scientific Instruments. 2013;84:104301. doi: 10.1063/1.4823783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Parker ST, et al. Biocompatible silk printed optical waveguides. Advanced Materials. 2009;21:2411–2415. doi: 10.1002/adma.200801580. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lawrence BD, Cronin-Golomb M, Georgakoudi I, Kaplan DL, Omenetto FG. Bioactive silk protein biomaterial systems for optical devices. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:1214–1220. doi: 10.1021/bm701235f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Diao YY, Liu XY, Toh GW, Shi L, Zi J. Multiple structural coloring of silk‐fibroin photonic crystals and humidity‐responsive color sensing. Advanced Functional Materials. 2013;23:5373–5380. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201203672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim S, et al. Silk inverse opals. Nature Photonics. 2012;6:818–823. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.264. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Toffanin S, et al. Low-threshold blue lasing from silk fibroin thin films. Applied Physics Letters. 2012;101:091110. doi: 10.1063/1.4748120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Caixeiro, S., Gaio, M., Marelli, B., Omenetto, F. G. & Sapienza, R. Silk‐Based Biocompatible Random Lasing. Advanced Optical Materials (2016).
- 33.Karageorgiou V, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein‐2 decorated silk fibroin films induce osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2004;71:528–537. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Madden PW, et al. Human corneal endothelial cell growth on a silk fibroin membrane. Biomaterials. 2011;32:4076–4084. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nazarov R, Jin H-J, Kaplan DL. Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:718–726. doi: 10.1021/bm034327e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yan L-P, et al. Macro/microporous silk fibroin scaffolds with potential for articular cartilage and meniscus tissue engineering applications. Acta biomaterialia. 2012;8:289–301. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jin H-J, Chen J, Karageorgiou V, Altman GH, Kaplan DL. Human bone marrow stromal cell responses on electrospun silk fibroin mats. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1039–1047. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00609-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li C, Vepari C, Jin H-J, Kim HJ, Kaplan DL. Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3115–3124. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Perry H, Gopinath A, Kaplan DL, Dal Negro L, Omenetto FG. Nano‐and micropatterning of optically transparent, mechanically robust, biocompatible silk fibroin films. Advanced Materials. 2008;20:3070–3072. doi: 10.1002/adma.200800011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Amsden JJ, et al. Rapid nanoimprinting of silk fibroin films for biophotonic applications. Advanced Materials. 2010;22:1746–1749. doi: 10.1002/adma.200903166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mathew G, Hong J, Rhee J, Leo D, Nah C. Preparation and anisotropic mechanical behavior of highly‐oriented electrospun poly (butylene terephthalate) fibers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2006;101:2017–2021. doi: 10.1002/app.23762. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Camposeo A, et al. Laser emission from electrospun polymer nanofibers. Small. 2009;5:562–566. doi: 10.1002/smll.200801165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang R, et al. Plasmon-enhanced random lasing in bio-compatible networks of cellulose nanofibers. Applied Physics Letters. 2016;108:011103. doi: 10.1063/1.4939263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kitur J, Zhu G, Bahoura M, Noginov M. Dependence of the random laser behavior on the concentrations of dye and scatterers. Journal of Optics. 2010;12:024009. doi: 10.1088/2040-8978/12/2/024009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang L, et al. Effective random laser action in Rhodamine 6G solution with Al nanoparticles. Applied Optics. 2011;50:1816–1821. doi: 10.1364/AO.50.001816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wiersma DS, Lagendijk A. Light diffusion with gain and random lasers. Physical Review E. 1996;54:4256. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.4256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang X, Baughman CB, Kaplan DL. In vitro evaluation of electrospun silk fibroin scaffolds for vascular cell growth. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2217–2227. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li L, et al. Electrospun poly (ɛ-caprolactone)/silk fibroin core-sheath nanofibers and their potential applications in tissue engineering and drug release. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2011;49:223–232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Quochi F, et al. Random laser action in self-organized para-sexiphenyl nanofibers grown by hot-wall epitaxy. Applied Physics Letters. 2004;84:4454–4456. doi: 10.1063/1.1759384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Quochi F. Random lasers based on organic epitaxial nanofibers. Journal of Optics. 2010;12:024003. doi: 10.1088/2040-8978/12/2/024003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Krämmer S, et al. Random‐Cavity Lasing from Electrospun Polymer Fiber Networks. Advanced Materials. 2014;26:8096–8100. doi: 10.1002/adma.201402995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cohen-Karni T, et al. Nanocomposite gold-silk nanofibers. Nano Letters. 2012;12:5403. doi: 10.1021/nl302810c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Panzavolta S, et al. Fast Coprecipitation of Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles inside Gelatin Nanofibers by Tricoaxial Electrospinning. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2016;2016:15. doi: 10.1155/2016/4235235. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ming J, Zuo B. A novel electrospun silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite hybrid nanofibers. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2012;137:421–427. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kim H, Che L, Ha Y, Ryu W. Mechanically-reinforced electrospun composite silk fibroin nanofibers containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2014;40:324–335. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cai Z-x, et al. Fabrication of chitosan/silk fibroin composite nanofibers for wound-dressing applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2010;11:3529–3539. doi: 10.3390/ijms11093529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang K, et al. Genipin‐crosslinked silk fibroin/hydroxybutyl chitosan nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue‐engineering application. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2010;95:870–881. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Altman GH, et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2003;24:401–416. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00353-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Petrini, P. et al. in Molecular, Cellular and Tissue Engineering, 2002. Proceedings of the IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on. 43–45 (IEEE).
- 60.Altman GH, et al. Silk matrix for tissue engineered anterior cruciate ligaments. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4131–4141. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00156-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kim U-J, Park J, Kim HJ, Wada M, Kaplan DL. Three-dimensional aqueous-derived biomaterial scaffolds from silk fibroin. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2775–2785. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim, J. I., Hwang, T. I., Aguilar, L. E., Park, C. H. & Kim, C. S. A Controlled Design of Aligned and Random Nanofibers for 3D Bi-functionalized Nerve Conduits Fabricated via a Novel Electrospinning Set-up. Scientific Reports6 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 63.Beachley V, Hepfer RG, Katsanevakis E, Zhang N, Wen X. Precisely assembled nanofiber arrays as a platform to engineer aligned cell sheets for biofabrication. Bioengineering. 2014;1:114–133. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering1030114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S, Ramakrishna S. Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly (L-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2603–2610. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yang SY, et al. Membrane-reinforced three-dimensional electrospun silk fibroin scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomedical Materials. 2015;10:035011. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/10/3/035011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Andreasen J, et al. Modes of random lasers. Advances in Optics and Photonics. 2011;3:88–127. doi: 10.1364/AOP.3.000088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Verma, M., Singh, D. K., Senthilkumaran, P., Joseph, J. & Kandpal, H. Ultrasensitive and fast detection of denaturation of milk by Coherent backscattering of light. Scientific Reports4 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68.Kim YL, et al. Coherent backscattering spectroscopy. Optics Letters. 2004;29:1906–1908. doi: 10.1364/OL.29.001906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.