Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: Rheol Acta. 1993 Jul;32(4):422–426. doi: 10.1007/bf00435088

An analytical solution for steady flow of a Quemada fluid in a circular tube

A S Popel 1, G Enden 1
PMCID: PMC5512721  NIHMSID: NIHMS878401  PMID: 28725091

Abstract

An analytical solution is obtained for steady flow of Quemada-type fluids in a circular tube driven by a constant pressure gradient. Expressions are derived for velocity distribution and for volumetric flow rate as a function of pressure gradient or wall shear stress.

Keywords: Concentrated suspension, Quemada's model, tube flow, steady shear flow

Introduction

Rheology of concentrated suspensions has been an active area of research for several decades. Numerous models have been formulated for fluids with internal structure; some of the models derived from first physical principles, while others formulated as empirical fits to experimental data. Quemada (1978 a, b) formulated a rheological model for concentrated suspensions based on physical arguments. The model introduces an intrinsic viscosity that, generally, is governed by a kinetic equation. In case of simple shear flow, the intrinsic viscosity becomes a function of local shear rate and concentration of suspended particles. Quemada's model is an extension of the well-known Casson's rheological model (Casson, 1959) with one additional rheological parameter; thus, it contains three rheological parameters. The principal difference between the two models is that Casson's model is characterized by a yield shear stress and, hence, the viscosity approaches infinity as shear rate approaches zero, whereas in Quemada's model viscosity assumes a large, but finite, value as shear rate goes to zero.

The Quemada model has been used extensively in recent years in applications to flow of blood (Quemada, 1978b, 1983; Lerche and Oelke, 1990; Cokelet and Goldsmith, 1991), microemulsions (Langevin, 1986), food pastes (Doublier et al., 1987), and coal slurries (Lapasin and Pricl, 1992), to name a few. It has been shown to be one of the most accurate hemorheological models; the model is in excellent agreement with experimental data (Easthope and Brooks, 1980). However, the practical applications of the model are significantly hampered by the lack of analytical expressions for velocity profiles and volumetric flow rate versus pressure gradient for simple “viscometric” flows. Of particular importance is the problem of steady fully developed flow in a circular tube driven by a constant pressure gradient. Solutions of this problem have been obtained numerically (Cokelet and Goldsmith, 1991).

This paper presents an exact analytical solution for steady fully developed flow of Quemada-type fluid in a circular tube. Closed-form expressions are derived for velocity profile and for volumetric flow rate as a function of pressure gradient or wall shear stress.

Formulation of the problem

A cylindrical coordinate system (r, θ, z) is chosen with the z-axis along the axis of the tube. Quemada's model (Quemada, 1978 a, b) for non-Newtonian shear viscosity can be formulated as follows. If H is the local concentration of suspended particles, and ηp is the viscosity of the suspending fluid, then the absolute value of the shear stress, τ = |τrz|, for a steady fully developed flow can be expressed in terms of the non-Newtonian shear viscosity, η, and the shear rate, γ̇ = |z/dr|:

τ=ηγ˙, (1)

where

η=η(k,H)=ηp(112kH)2 (2)

and k is an intrinsic viscosity. The intrinsic viscosity is expressed in terms of three Quemada parameters, k0, k, and γc:

k=k0+kγ˙/γc1+γ˙/γc. (3)

Parameters k0, k, and γc are, generally, functions of particle concentration, H.

Equations (13) can be recast as

τ=(η+τ0λ+γ˙)γ˙, (4)

where the new parameters τ0, η, and λ are expressed in terms of the Quemada parameters:

τ0=ηpγc[12H(k0k)]2(112kH)4 (5)
η=ηp(112kH)2 (6)
λ=γc[112k0H112kH]2. (7)

When written in this form, the Quemada model reduces to the Casson model as λ → 0. In the Casson model, τ0 is the yield shear stress and η is the asymptotic viscosity at large shear rates. At very small shear rates, γ̇λ, Eq. (4) describes a Newtonian fluid with a viscosity

η0=ηp(112k0H)2. (8)

In the following analysis it would be convenient to use Eq. (4) as a representation of the Quemada model; note that Eqs. (1) – (3) and Eq. (4) are equivalent for steady shear flow. We consider steady fully developed flow of the Quemada fluid in a circular tube of radius R driven by a constant pressure gradient P = (pinpout)/L, where pin and pout are the inlet and outlet pressures, respectively, and L is the tube length. Because the problem is axisymmetric and the flow is fully developed, only the axial velocity component, νz(r), is considered; the other two components are equal to zero. In the following section, expressions for shear rate, γ̇(r), velocity, νz(r), and volumetric flow rate, Q(P), are derived.

Solution

Writing the momentum equation in the z direction and integrating it, we find that shear stress is a linear function of r

τ=Pr/2. (9)

Thus, shear stress at the wall is τw = PR/2. It is convenient to introduce dimensionless variables and parameters:

ξ=rR;α=τ0+ηλτw,q=τ0ηλτ0+ηλ. (10)

Note that 0 ≤ ξ ≤ 1, α ≥ 0, and −1 ≤ q ≤ 1. The extreme values of q correspond to Newtonian (q = −1) and Casson (q = 1) fluids, respectively.

Solving Eq. (4) to express γ̇ in terms of τ, and using Eq. (9), after simple algebraic transformations we express shear rate γ̇ in terms of dimensionless radial coordinate, ξ,

γ˙=PR4η[ξα(1+q)ξ+α2+(ξα)ξ2αqξ+α2]. (11)

Substituting (11) into the equation z/dr = −γ̇, and integrating this equation together with boundary condition νz(R) = 0, we obtain velocity profile; in dimensionless form

ν=νz(PR2/4η)=12[(1αq)4(ξαq)4]+23α(2q1)[(1αq)3(ξαq)3]+α2(q1)2[(1αq)2(ξαq)2]2α3q(q1)(1ξ)+12{[1+13α(5q4)](12αq+α2)3/2[ξ+13α(5q4)](ξ2αqξ+α2)3/2}+14α2(q1)(5q+1)[(1αq)(12αq+α2)1/2(ξαq)(ξ2αqξ+α2)1/2]14α4(q1)2(q+1)(5q=1)ln(12αq+α2)1/2+1αq(ξ2αqξ+α2)1/2+ξαq. (12)

The normalizing factor, PR2/4η, represents the maximum velocity of a Newtonian fluid with viscosity η. When q → 1 (e.g., when λ → 0), Eq. (12) reduces to Casson's velocity profile. For q – 1 or α → 0, Eq. (12) reduces to parabolic velocity profile. Figure 1 shows a family of velocity profiles for different values of parameters α and q. Note the parabolic profiles ν = 1 – ξ2 for q = −1 and α = 0; the Casson profile corresponding to q = 1 has a flat core of radius ξc = α2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Normalized velocity profiles, ν = νz/(PR2/4η), for steady fully-developed flow in a tube as a function of normalized radius, ξ = r/R, for a) α = 0.4 and different values of q, and b) q = 0.6 and different values of α. Cases α = 0 and q = −1 correspond to Poiseuille flow of a Newtonian fluid, case q = 1 corresponds to Casson flow

To express the volumetric flow rate, Q, in terms of the pressure gradient, P, we will use the relationship

Q=2π0Rrνzdr=πR3τw30τwτ2f(τ)dτ, (13)

where γ̇ = f(τ). Combining Eqs. (9) and (11) with Eq. (13) and integrating, we obtain, after somewhat lengthy transformations,

Q=πPR48ηF(α,q) (14)
F=12[187α(1+q)+43α2α8P7+(1+n=17αnPn)12αq+α2α8P8ln1αq+12αq+α2α(1q)]. (15)

Here, P1, P2, …, P8 are polynomials in powers of q:

P1=17(q+8)P2=142(13q28q7)P3=1210(143q388q2113q+48)P4=1840(1287q4792q31342q2+632q+175)P5=1840(3003q51848q43894q3+1944q2+1011q256)P6=11680(15015q69240q523331q4+12096q3+9081q23179q525)P7=11680(45045q727720q282005q5+43680q4+42819q317304q25619q+1024)P8=116(1q)2(1+q)(429q5+165q4330q390q2+45q+5). (16)

When q→ 1, Eq. (14) reduces to Casson's equation

Q=πPR48η[1167α+43α2121α8], (17)

in which α = (τ0/τw)1/2, 0 ≤ α < 1; for α ≥ 1 there is no flow. Figure 2 shows F as a function of α and q. Note the monotonic decrease of F with increasing q and increasing α. This behavior for large values of α is not evident from Eq. (15) that contains positive powers of α. However, when the square root and the logarithmic terms are expanded in inverse powers of α, all positive powers of α cancel out; an asymptotic expression for function F for large α is

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Function F(α, q), given by Eq. (15); a) versus α for several values of q; b) versus q for several values of α. F = 1 for α = 0 and for q = −1 (Newtonian fluid); F = 0 for q = 1 and α ≥ 1 (Casson fluid, ττ0)

F=14(1q)2+29(1q)2(1+q)1α+O(1α2). (18)

From (10) we have q = 1 – 2(η/η0)1/2, thus F→ (1 – q)2/4 = η/η0, as α → ∞; here, viscosity η0 is expressed by Eq. (8).

The ratio of maximum velocity, νmax = νz|r = 0, and mean velocity, νmean = Q/πR2, characterizes the shape of velocity profile; the ratio can be expressed in terms of dimensionless variables νmax/νmean = 2ν|ξ = 0/F. This ratio is equal to 2 in the case of flow of a Newtonian fluid, and approaches 1 for flow of a Casson fluid when shear rate at the wall approaches zero (i.e., τwτ0 or α → 1). Note that in the latter case both the maximum velocity and mean velocity approach zero. Figure 3 depicts the velocity ratio as a function of α for different values of q. To better understand the asymptotic behavior of the velocity ratio as q → 1, we introduce a parameter ε = 1 – q, and using Eqs. (12) and (15), calculate the leading terms in the corresponding asymptotic expansions for small ε.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Maximum-to-mean velocity ratio, νmax/νmean = 2ν|ξ = 0/F, as a function of α for −1 ≤ q ≤ 1. Note the sensitive dependence of the function on q when q → 1. The limiting curves for q → 1 are obtained from Eqs. (19) for α ≤ 1 and Eqs. (20) for α > 1

For α ≤ 1

ν|ξ=0=183α+2α213α4+O(ε)=13(1α)3(3+α)+O(ε)F=1167α+43α2121α8+O(ε)=121(1α)3(21+15α+10α2+6α3+3α4+α5)+O(ε). (19)

These leading terms correspond to a Casson fluid.

For α > 1

ν|ξ=0=ε22[α2(13α+6α2)α16α4lnαα1]+o(ε2)F=ε22[α2(1014α21α232α370α4210α5+420α6)15(α1)28α8lnαα1]+o(ε2). (20)

For α ≫ 1, expanding ν and F in (20) in powers of 1/α, we obtain

ν|ξ=0=ε24(1+851α+)F=ε24(1+1691α+) (21)

in accordance with Eq. (18). In Fig. 3 the limiting curve corresponding to q → 1, α > 1 does not represent a physical solution, whereas the curve corresponding to q → 1, α ≤ 1 represents Casson's fluid.

Equations (12) and (15) can be extended to the case of two-phase flow with a core of suspension with a constant concentration of particles, described as a Quemada fluid, and a concentric layer of a Newtonian fluid adjacent to the walls.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. A. Dutta for reading the manuscript and making critical comments. This work was supported by NIH grants HL 17421 and HL 18292. Mathematica 2.0 software was used in some of the calculations.

References

  1. Casson N. A flow equation for pigment oil suspensions of the printing ink type. In: Mill CC, editor. Rheology of Disperse Systems. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1959. pp. 84–102. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cokelet GR, Goldsmith HL. Decreased hydrodynamic resistance in the two-phase flow of blood through small vertical tubes at low flow rates. Circ Res. 1991;68:1–17. doi: 10.1161/01.res.68.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doublier JL, Llamas G, Paton D. A rheological investigation of oat starch pastes. Cereal Chemistry. 1987;64:21–26. [Google Scholar]
  4. Easthope PL, Brooks DE. A comparison of rheological constitutive functions for whole human blood. Biorheology. 1980;17:235–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lapasin R, Pricl S. Continuous and oscillatory flow of concentrated coal water suspensions. Can J Chem Eng. 1992;70:20–27. [Google Scholar]
  6. Langevin D. Recent advances in the physics of microemulsions. Physica Scripta. 1986:T13, 252–258. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lerche D, Oelke R. Theoretical model of blood flow through hollow fibers considering hematocrit-dependent, non-Newtonian blood properties. Int J Artif Organs and Tissues. 1990;13:742–746. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Quemada D. Rheology of concentrated dispersed systems: II. A model for non-Newtonian shear viscosity in shear flows. Rheol Acta. 1978a;17:632–642. [Google Scholar]
  9. Quemada D. Rheology of concentrated dispersed systems: III. General features of proposed non-Newtonian model: comparison with experimental data. Rheol Acta. 1978b;17:643–653. [Google Scholar]
  10. Quemada D. Blood rheology and its implications in flow of blood. In: Rodkiewicz CM, editor. Arteries and arterial blood flow Biological and physiological aspects. Springer Verlag; New York: 1983. pp. 1–127. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES