Skip to main content
Cell Death and Differentiation logoLink to Cell Death and Differentiation
letter
. 2017 Jan 20;24(7):1303–1304. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.120

PTEN deficiency permits the formation of pancreatic cancer in the absence of autophagy

Mathias T Rosenfeldt 1,2,3,*, Jim O'Prey 1, Lucia Flossbach 3, Colin Nixon 1, Jennifer P Morton 1, Owen J Sansom 1,4, Kevin M Ryan 1,4,*
PMCID: PMC5520160  PMID: 28106883

Dear Editor,

Macroautophagy (hereafter, autophagy) is a membrane-trafficking process that delivers cargos to lysosomes for degradation.1 The process preserves cellular integrity by facilitating removal of damaged proteins and organelles, thereby protecting against various forms of disease. The involvement of autophagy in cancer, however, is context-specific.2 For example, work by ourselves and others has shown that progression of certain KRAS-driven cancers, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), requires autophagy for full development of disease.3, 4, 5 However, in tumors driven by oncogenic KRAS and deletion of p53, loss of autophagy does not block pancreatic tumor development and even accelerates the disease.5

This caused us to question if autophagy’s contribution to PDAC development is specifically controlled by p53 or if other genetic lesions can also modulate autophagy’s role in this disease. To test this hypothesis, we examined the impact of autophagy loss in a different model of PDAC driven by oncogenic KRAS (G12D) combined with deficiency of the tumor suppressor, Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN)—a factor lost in PDAC, albeit with a relatively low frequency.6 Four cohorts of mice were generated with the following genotypes: (1) Pdx1-Cre KRasG12D/wt Ptenwt/− Atg7wt/wt; (2) Pdx1-Cre KRasG12D/wt Ptenwt/− Atg7−/−; (3) Pdx1-Cre KRasG12D/wt Pten−/− Atg7wt/wt; and (4) Pdx1-Cre KRasG12D/wt Pten−/− Atg7−/− (Supplementary Figure 1a).

Consistent with previous studies, tumors formed in Pdx1-Cre KRasG12D/wt Ptenwt/− Atg7wt/wt mice (Supplementary Figure 1b).6 However, in contrast to what we and others have observed in tumors containing mutant KRas as the only genetic lesion,3, 4, 5 deletion of the critical autophagy regulator Atg7 did not block formation of PDAC in animals that were also hemizygous for Pten in their pancreas (Supplementary Figure 1b). In fact, Pten hemizygosity not only permitted tumor formation in the absence of Atg7, but loss of autophagy in this context caused earlier death associated with pancreatic tumor formation when compared with autophagy-competent animals (Supplementary Figure 1b). Importantly, as is routinely undertaken to diagnose PDAC,7 we performed histological analysis of tissue morphology, which showed that both autophagy-competent and -deficient animals developed PDAC and that tumors from Pdx1-Cre KRasG12D/wt Ptenwt/− Atg7−/− mice lacked ATG7 expression, were deficient in LC3 puncta formation, had a strong diffuse LC3 stain indicative of accumulation of the LC3-I form of the protein,5 and had high levels of the adapter protein p62/SQSTM1—all signs that these tumors were indeed autophagy-deficient. In line with previous studies,8 these tumors were also negative for PTEN (Supplementary Figure 1b) and importantly were also wild-type for p53 (data not shown).

We also examined the impact of deleting both alleles of Pten on pancreatic tumor formation driven by oncogenic KRAS in either the absence or presence of Atg7. This revealed that autophagy-deficient tumors (which lack LC3 puncta and accumulate p62) can also form in the total absence of PTEN (Supplementary Figure 1c), but loss of Atg7 did not accelerate tumor onset in this context. It is possible, however, that the extremely rapid onset of tumor formation caused by oncogenic KRAS and loss of PTEN (median=13 days) does not permit the detection of further accelerating events.

When taken together, our findings show that autophagy’s contribution to tumor development can be determined by the status of either Pten, p53 or other as yet unidentified factors. In these contexts, loss of autophagy can then promote tumor development probably through changes in metabolism, accumulation of oxidative stress, DNA damage and increased inflammation.2 It should be stated, however, that our findings give no indication that the genetic status of p53 or Pten would determine the response of an established tumor to a modulator of autophagy. This is a completely different context when compared with loss of autophagy during tumor development and is undoubtedly an area worthy of further investigation.

Acknowledgments

We are extremely grateful to Masaaki Komatsu for providing the Atg7 floxed mice that were used in this study. This work was supported by Cancer Research UK.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Cell Death and Differentiation website (http://www.nature.com/cdd)

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 1
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Mizushima N et al. Nature 2008; 451: 1069–1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Galluzzi L et al. EMBO J 2015; 34: 856–880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Yang S et al. Genes Dev 2011; 25: 717–729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Guo JY et al. Genes Dev 2013; 27: 1447–1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Rosenfeldt MT et al. Nature 2013; 504: 296–300. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Hill R et al. Cancer Res 2010; 70: 7114–7124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Hruban RH et al. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 95–106. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Kennedy AL et al. Mol Cell 2011; 42: 36–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1
Supplementary Information

Articles from Cell Death and Differentiation are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES