The diversity and impact of hookworm infections in wildlife

Abstract

Hookworms are blood-feeding nematodes that parasitize the alimentary system of mammals. Despite their high pathogenic potential, little is known about their diversity and impact in wildlife populations. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on hookworm infections of wildlife and analyzed 218 studies qualitative and quantitatively. At least 68 hookworm species have been described in 9 orders, 24 families, and 111 species of wild mammals. Black bears, red foxes, and bobcats harbored the highest diversity of hookworm species and Ancylostoma pluridentatum, A. tubaeforme, Uncinaria stenocephala and Necator americanus were the hookworm species with the highest host diversity index. Hookworm infections cause anemia, retarded growth, tissue damage, inflammation and significant mortality in several wildlife species. Anemia has been documented more commonly in canids, felids and otariids, and retarded growth only in otariids. Population- level mortality has been documented through controlled studies only in canines and eared seals although sporadic mortality has been noticed in felines, bears and elephants. The main driver of hookworm pathogenic effects was the hookworm biomass in a population, measured as prevalence, mean burden and hookworm size (length). Many studies recorded significant differences in prevalence and mean intensity among regions related to contrasts in local humidity, temperature, and host population density. These findings, plus the ability of hookworms to perpetuate in different host species, create a dynamic scenario where changes in climate and the domestic animal-human-wildlife interface will potentially affect the dynamics and consequences of hookworm infections in wildlife.

Graphical abstract

Highlights

• •At least 68 hookworm species have been described in 111 species of wild mammals.
• •Wildlife are permanent hosts of important hookworms of humans and domestic animals.
• •Hookworms cause anemia, retarded growth and mortality in canids, felids and otariids.
• •Hookworm biomass is a key driver of pathogenic effects in a host population.

1. Introduction

Hookworms (Nematoda: Strongylida: Ancylostomatoidae) are blood-feeding nematodes that parasitize the mammalian alimentary system (Popova, 1964). Regardless of the large diversity within this parasitic group, all Ancylostomatoidae species share basic morphologic, physiologic and life history traits that translate into similar consequences for their host. In humans and domestic animals, the deleterious effects of hookworms are well documented at the individual and population level, being one of the most significant neglected tropical diseases of humans (Bartsch et al., 2016), and an important cause or contributory factor of anemia and neonatal mortality in domestic dogs and cats (Traversa, 2012). Despite the potential deleterious impact in their hosts, there is no currently available summary on the number of hookworm species described and the significance of hookworm infection in free-ranging wild mammals.

The modification of landscapes and climate change create additional challenges for wildlife disease study, and it is predicted that these phenomena will modify the dynamics of nematode infections (Weaver et al., 2010, Weinstein and Lafferty, 2015). Therefore, improved description, analysis, and understanding of hookworm infections in wildlife are necessary to direct future research efforts and understand host-parasite relationships in a regional and global scale.

In this context, the objectives of this review are to i) provide a systematic summary of the literature available on hookworm infections of wildlife, ii) evaluate the reported hookworm diversity in wildlife corrected for sampling effort, iii) identify significant pathologic features of these infections and the potential drivers of the deleterious effects of hookworms on wildlife hosts.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Searching methods and inclusion criteria

A systematic literature review of Ancylostomatoidae nematodes of wildlife was performed using Google scholar, Web of Science and Biosis search engines on April 27th, 2016; following recommended practices for systematic reviews in the field of parasitology (Haddaway and Watson, 2016). The initial term searched was “hookworm(s)” AND “wildlife”. The abstracts of the papers retrieved were reviewed and included in the study if they met the following criteria: i) The parasitic nematode found belonged to a genus within the Ancylostomatoidae family. (Studies describing the presence of eggs or nematodes as “hookworms” or “strongyles” without genus identification were excluded). ii) The host species was any free-ranging non-domesticated (wild) animal. Captive wild animals were only included if they were taken from the wild soon before the study, and therefore, transmission of parasites was assumed to occur in the wild. In the case of domestic animal-wildlife hybrids, these were included if they were free-ranging. Additional searches were performed using the preliminary list of genera identified in the initial search plus the word “wildlife” (e.g. “Ancylostoma wildlife”). The studies selected based on abstract screening (N = 216) were fully reviewed and the most significant findings summarized into a master spreadsheet (supplementary material).

2.2. Data analyses

To identify host species with high hookworm diversity, an index penalized for sampling effort was calculated based on previously published methods (Nunn et al., 2003, Ezenwa et al., 2006). Briefly; the citations for each host species were extracted from the databases and after factor analyses condensed into one variable, citation-principal component (citation-PC). Additional sampling effort measures included the number of animals sampled in the reviewed studies and the number of studies in our review for each host species. Negative binomial regression models were fitted for each measure of sampling effort and the residuals were used as a penalized index of hookworm diversity. To assess which hookworm species parasitized higher number of wildlife species a similar approach was used with the difference that citation-PC was not used because of “too high” penalization for highly studied hookworm species infecting humans or domestic animals (e.g. Necator americanus). We used instead, the total number of mammalian species screened in the studies where that hookworm species was found, since in many studies several host species were assessed. The penalized measurements of host diversity were calculated as previously described.

To assess which factors influenced the likelihood of finding a mammalian-hookworm species relationship that had detrimental effects for the host, the paired mammalian-hookworm species were categorized as 1 if there was at least one study describing adverse health effects at the individual or population level and as 0 if there were no studies registering such effect. Evidence of adverse health effect included mortality, anemia, retarded growth, and significant degrees of macroscopic or histologic tissue damage (e.g. fibrosis, inflammatory infiltrate). Generalized linear models were fitted using these two categories (no pathologic effect vs. pathologic effect) as binomial response and the number of studies for each mammalian-hookworm species relationship, number of animals sampled, Citation-PC for the animals and hookworm species, hookworm host diversity index, average prevalence in the studies reporting pathology or no effect, mean infection intensity in studies reporting pathology or no effect, average host weight (in kilograms), average hookworm length (in millimeters), host weight-hookworm size ratio, geographic location (continent) and study methodology were used as predictors in the general model. We used a stepwise algorithm and calculated Akaike's information criteria (AIC) to determine which set of independent variables (including potential interactions between covariates) provided the best fit to the data.

3. Characterization of studies describing hookworm infections in wild animals

The initial search yielded 3710 abstracts in Google scholar, 38 in Web of Science and 42 in Biosis. Out of these, 180 papers met the inclusion criteria and later searches by hookworm genera produced additional 38 papers, totaling 218 studies. Most of the studies were conducted in North America (n = 66) followed by Eastern Asia (n = 35) and Europe (n = 35) (Fig. 1a), and the most commonly used methodology of data collection was through necropsies of culled or incidentally found dead animals (n = 153). Studies using experimental or molecular approaches for data collection corresponded to a minority of the papers (n = 10 and n = 8 respectively) (Fig. 1b). Most of the studies described hookworm infections in the order Carnivora (n = 125), particularly within the Canidae (n = 73) Felidae (n = 28) and Otariidae (n = 25) families. Regarding host species, most studies were performed in red fox (n = 26), coyote (n = 16), raccoons (n = 11) and Northern fur seals (n = 10). After penalizing by sampling effort (number of studies and number of animals), the host species harboring the larger number of hookworm species were black bear (Ursus americanus), bob cat (Lynx rufus), and red fox (Vulpes vulpes) (Fig. 2a and b).

Fig. 1.

Percentage of studies describing hookworm infections in wildlife hosts divided by continent (a) and the main methodology used to collect the data (b).

Fig. 2.

Hookworm diversity index penalized by the citation principal component (citation-PC) of the host species (a) and the number of sampled animals of each host species (b). Bar colors indicate represented mammalian orders. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

At least 68 hookworm species have been described in 9 orders, 22 families, and 108 species of wild mammals. Before penalizing for sampling effort the hookworm species with the largest host range were Uncinaria stenocephala (n = 11), Ancylostoma caninum (n = 10), Ancylostoma tubaeforme (n = 10), Ancylostoma pluridentatum (n = 6) and Necator americanus (n = 6); however, after penalizing for the number of sampled animals (Fig. 3a) or the number of species assessed in the studies of a particular hookworm species (Fig. 3b), U. stenocephala and A. caninum became less generalists, but the feline hookworms A. tubaeforme, A. pluridentatum, A. braziliencis and the human nematode N. americanus remained as more generalist parasites, affecting several host species.

Fig. 3.

Host species diversity index for represented hookworm species, penalized by number of animals sampled (a) and the number of animal species sampled in each study (b).

Thirty-five studies reported detrimental effects of hookworms at the individual or population level. All these studies were conducted on carnivores with the exception of a few reports on elephants and giraffes (n = 5). The final model to assess the likelihood of finding a detrimental host-hookworm relationship included the level of study of the particular hookworm species (citation-PC), the mean prevalence and infection intensity in the studies and the average hookworm length as predictors (binomial GLM, p value = 0.0003, df = 79); however, only the mean prevalence was statistically significant (p-value = 0.0008).

4. Mammalian orders and families infected with hookworms

4.1. Carnivora

4.1.1. Canidae

Nine hookworm species have been described in canids, all of them members of the Ancylostoma, Uncinaria and Arthrostoma genera (Table 1). Among canids, the best studied species are the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and coyotes (Canis latrans), probably related to their widespread distribution and because they are commonly hunted/culled.

Table 1.

Canine hosts infected with hookworms with the corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Coyote (Canis latrans)	Ancylostoma caninum	Erickson, 1944, Ameel, 1955, Mitchell and Beasom, 1974, Thornton and Reardon, 1974, Schitoskey, 1980, Conti, 1984, Pence et al., 1988, Radomsky, 1989, Guberti et al., 1993, Henke et al., 2002, Foster et al., 2003, Manning, 2007, Liccioli et al., 2012
	Uncinaria stenocephala	Schitoskey, 1980, Gompper et al., 2003, Bridger et al., 2009, Manning, 2007, Liccioli et al., 2012, Huffman et al., 2013
Red fox (Vulpes vulpes)	Ancylostoma caninum	Smith, 1943, Ryan and Sc, 1976, Conti, 1984, Dalimi et al., 2006, Alagaili et al., 2011, Ubelaker et al., 2013
	Ancylostoma tubaeformae	Conti 1984
	Ancylostoma kusimaense	Kamiya and Ohbayashi, 1975, Sato et al., 1999
	Arthrostoma miyazakiense	Noda and Kuji, 1980, Sato et al., 1999
	Uncinaria stenocephala	Erickson, 1944, Miller and Harkema, 1968, Kamiya and Ohbayashi, 1975, Ryan and Sc, 1976, Hackett and Walters, 1980, Loos-Frank and Zeyhle, 1982, Willingham et al., 1996, Criado-Fornelio et al., 2000, Reperant et al., 2007, Cerbo et al., 2008, Al-Sabi et al., 2013, Dybing et al., 2013, Huffman et al., 2013, Stuart et al., 2013, Lahmar et al., 2014, Razmjoo et al., 2014
	Uncinaria sp.	Borecka et al., 2013
Wolf (Canis lupus)	Ancylostoma caninum	Kazacos and Dougherty, 1979, Kreeger et al., 1990, Guberti et al., 1993, Torres et al., 1997
	Ancylostoma spp	Borecka et al., 2013
	Uncinaria stenocephala	Erickson, 1944, Guberti et al., 1993, Torres et al., 1997, Craig and Craig, 2005
Crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous)	Ancylostoma buckleyi	Dos Santos et al., 2003
	Uncinaria carinii	Duarte 2016
Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus)	Uncinaria stenocephala	Aguirre et al., 2000
Darwin's fox (Pseudalopex fulvipes)	Uncinaria stenocephala	Jiménez et al., 2012
Dingo (Canis lupus dingo)	Ancylostoma caninum	Smout et al., 2013
	Ancylostoma ceylanicum	Smout et al., 2013
	Ancylostoma braziliense	Smout et al., 2013
Golden jackal (Canis aureus)	Ancylostoma caninum	Sadighian, 1969, Takács et al., 2014, Lahmar et al., 2014
	Uncinaria stenocephala	Sadighian, 1969, Takács et al., 2014, Lahmar et al., 2014
Grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus)	Ancylostoma caninum	Miller and Harkema, 1968, Conti, 1984, Buechner, 1944
	Ancylostoma braziliense	Conti, 1984, Buechner, 1944
	Ancylostoma tubaeformae	Conti 1984
Pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus)	Ancylostoma buckleyi	Scioscia et al., 2016
	Uncinaria sp.	Fiorello et al., 2006
Raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides)	Uncinaria stenocephala	Al-Sabi et al., 2013
	Ancylostoma kusimaense	Noda and Kuji, 1980, Sato et al., 1999, Sato et al., 2006
	Arthrostoma miyazakiense	Noda and Kuji, 1980, Sato et al., 1999, Sato et al., 2006, Shin et al., 2007
Red Wolf (Canis rufus)	Ancylostoma caninum	Custer and Pence, 1981, Phillips and Scheck, 1991
Short-eared fox (Atelocynus microtis)	Ancylostoma buckleyi	Thatcher 1971
South American grey fox (Lycalopex griseus)	Uncinaria stenocephala	Alarcón, 2005
Swift fox (Vulpes velox)	Uncinaria stenocephala	Miller et al., 1998

In Asia, the native hookworms Arthrostoma miyazakiense and Ancylostoma kusimaense are the most common gastrointestinal nematodes of native (raccoon dogs, Nyctereutes procyonoides) and introduced canids (red foxes) (Sato et al., 2006, Shin et al., 2007). Interestingly, introduced raccoon dogs in Denmark lack their native Asian hookworms but are infected with U. stenocephala (48.5% prevalence), a very common parasite of red foxes in that region (Al-Sabi et al., 2013), highlighting the potential of canine hookworms to infect multiple species (see Table 1).

Many common canine hookworms such U. stenocephala, A. caninum and A. ceylanicum are important zoonotic pathogens, especially in Australia and Southeast Asia (Smout et al., 2013).

4.1.2. Felidae

Twelve species of hookworms within the Ancylostoma, Uncinaria, Galoncus and Arthrostoma genera have been described in wild felids (Table 2). Despite the significant diversity of hookworm species within felines, and the vulnerable conservation status of many of them, considerably less research has been performed on hookworm parasites in felids compared to canids, and many aspects of their hookworms' biology are unknown.

Table 2.

Feline hosts infected with hookworms and corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Bobcat (Lynx rufus)	Ancylostoma caninum	Miller and Harkema, 1968, Little et al., 1971, Mitchell and Beasom, 1974, Schitoskey and Linder, 1981, Mclaughlin et al., 1993, Hiestand et al., 2014
	Ancylostoma braziliense	Miller and Harkema, 1968, Mclaughlin et al., 1993
	Ancylostoma tubaeformae	Tiekotter, 1985, Mclaughlin et al., 1993
	Ancylostoma pluridentatum	Mclaughlin et al., 1993
Iriomote cats (Prionailurus iriomotensis)	Uncinaria maya	Hasegawa, 1989, Yasuda et al., 1994
Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris)	Galoncus perniciosus	Kalaivanan et al., 2015
Leopard (Panthera pardus)	Galoncus tridentatus	Khalil, 1922a, Pythal et al., 1993
Canadian lynx (Lynx canadensis)	Ancylostoma caninum	Smith et al., 1986
	Uncinaria stenocephala	Smith et al., 1986
Cougar (Puma concolor)	Ancylostoma tubaeformae	Waid and Pence 1988
	Ancylostoma pluridentatum	Forrester et al., 1985, Dunbar et al., 1994
	Ancylostoma buckleyi	Thatcher 1971
Geoffroy's cat (Leopardus geoffroyi)	Ancylostoma tubaeformae	Beldomenico et al., 2005, Fiorello et al., 2006
Iberian Lynx (Lynx pardinus)	Ancylostoma spp	Vicente et al., 2004
	Ancylostoma tubaeformae	Millán and Blasco-Costa, 2012
Jaguar (Felis onca)	Ancylostoma pluridentatum	Thatcher 1971
Jaguarondi (Puma yagouaroundi)	Ancylostoma tubaeformae	Thatcher 1971
	Ancylostoma pluridentatum	Thatcher 1971
Leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis)	Ancylostoma tubaeformae	Yasuda et al., 1993
	Arthrostoma hunanensis	Yasuda et al., 1993
	Uncinaria felidis	Yasuda et al., 1993, Yasuda et al., 1994, Shimono et al., 2012
Lion (Panthera leo)	Uncinaria stenocephala	Smith and Kok 2006
	Ancylostoma braziliense	Smith and Kok 2006
	Ancylostoma paraduodenale	Bjork et al., 2000
	Ancylostoma spp	Muller-Graf, 1995, Bjork et al., 2000
Margay cat (Leopardus wiedii)	Ancylostoma pluridentatum	Thatcher 1971
Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis)	Ancylostoma tubaeformae	Pence et al., 2003, Fiorello et al., 2006
	Ancylostoma pluridentatum	Thatcher 1971
	Uncinaria sp.	Fiorello et al., 2006

The dog hookworm A. caninum infects felids in many areas where wild cats are sympatric with domestic or wild canids, such as the southeastern United States (Miller and Harkema, 1968, Little et al., 1971, Mitchell and Beasom, 1974). In other areas, however, the domestic cat hookworms, A. tubaeforme and A. braziliense, are the predominant species in wild felids (Waid and Pence, 1988, Pence et al., 2003, Smith and Kok, 2006), and in some occasions these wildlife infections are most likely because of spillover from feral domestic cats (Millán and Basco-Costa, 2012).

In Asia, Uncinaria felidis and Uncinaria maya are the most common hookworms of native felids such as the leopard (Prionailurus bengalensis) and Iriomote cats (Prionailurus iriomotensis) (Hasegawa, 1989, Yasuda et al., 1993, Shimono et al., 2012). Although apparently rare, the nematode Arthrostoma hunanensis infects the bile duct of leopard cats in some areas (Yasuda et al., 1993).

4.1.3. Otariidae

Four Uncinaria species have been described in eared seals (otariids); however, molecular analyses suggest that there are at least 5 additional undescribed Uncinaria species (Nadler et al., 2013; Seguel et al., 2017) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Eared seals (otariids) infected with hookworms and corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Australian fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus)	Uncinaria hamiltoni	Ramos et al., 2013
Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea)	Uncinaria sanguinis	Haynes et al., 2014, Marcus et al., 2014a, Marcus et al., 2014b, Marcus et al., 2015a, Marcus et al., 2015b
California Sea Lion (Zalophus californianus)	Uncinaria lyonsi	Lyons et al., 2000, Lyons et al., 2001, Lyons et al., 2005, Acevedo-Whitehouse et al., 2006, Spraker et al., 2007, Lyons et al., 2011b, Kuzmina and Kuzmin, 2015
Galapagos sea lion (Zalophus wollebaeki)	Uncinaria sp	Herbert 2014
Juan Fernandez fur seal (Arctocephalus phillippii)	Uncinaria sp	Sepulveda, 1998
New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri)	Uncinaria sp	Ramos et al., 2013
New Zealand sea lion (Phocarctos hookeri)	Uncinaria sp	Castinel et al., 2006, Castinel et al., 2007a, Castinel et al., 2007b, Acevedo-Whitehouse et al., 2009, Chilvers et al., 2009, Michael et al., 2015
Northern fur seal (Callorrhinus ursinus)	Uncinaria lucasi	Olsen and Lyons, 1965, Lyons et al., 1978, Lyons et al., 1997, Lyons et al., 2000, Lyons et al., 2001, Lyons et al., 2003, Delong et al., 2009, Lyons et al., 2011a, Lyons et al., 2011b, Lyons et al., 2014
South American fur seal (Arctocephalus australis)	Uncinaria hamiltoni	Katz et al., 2012, Nadler et al., 2013
	Uncinaria sp	Seguel et al., 2011, Seguel et al., 2013, Seguel et al., 2017
South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens)	Uncinaria hamiltoni	Berón-vera et al., 2004
Steller sea lion (Eumatopias jubatus)	Uncinaria lucasi	Lyons et al., 2003, Nadler et al., 2013

4.1.4. Procyonidae

Six species of hookworms within the Necator, Arthrocephalus, Ancylostoma, Arthrostoma and Uncinaria genera have been described in procyonids (Table 4). Most studies in procyonids have been conducted in raccoons (Procyon lotor), which in their native North America are infected with Arthrocephalus lotoris; however, in Japan, where they have been introduced, raccoons are infected with the native raccoon dog hookworms Ancylostoma kusimaense and Arthrostoma miyazakiense (Matoba et al., 2006, Sato and Suzuki, 2006).

Table 4.

Procyonids infected with hookworms and corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Crab-eating raccoon (Procyon cancrivorus)	Necator urichi	Cameron 1936
	Uncinaria maxillaris	Vicente et al., 1997
	Uncinaria bidens	Vicente et al., 1997
Coati (Nasua nasua)	Uncinaria bidens	Duarte 2016
Raccoon (Procyon lotor)	Arthrocephalus lotoris	Dikmans and Goldberg, 1949, Jordan and Hayes, 1959, Gupta, 1961, Balasingam, 1964, Snyder and Fitzgerald, 1985, Cole and Shoop, 1987, Yabsley and Noblet, 1999, Ching et al., 2000, Kresta et al., 2009
	Ancylostoma spp	Popiołek et al., 2011
	Ancylostoma kusimaense	Matoba et al., 2006, Sato and Suzuki, 2006
	Arthrostoma miyazakiense	Sato and Suzuki 2006

4.1.5. Mustelidae

Four species of hookworms within the Uncinaria and Tetragomphius genera and at least one unknown species within the Ancylostoma genus have been described in mustelids (Table 5). The most studied host species is the European badger (Meles meles), which is usually infected with Uncinaria criniformis, and in Korea Tetragomphius procyonis has been described in the Asian badger (Meles leucurus) (Son et al., 2009).

Table 5.

Mustelids infected with hookworms and corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Badger (Meles meles)	Uncinaria criniformis	Loos-Frank and Zeyhle, 1982, Magi et al., 1999, Torres et al., 2001, Millán et al., 2004, Rosalino et al., 2006, Cerbo et al., 2008, Stuart et al., 2013
	Tetragomphius procyonis	Son et al., 2009
Hog badger (Arctonyx collaris)	Tetragomphius arctonycis	Jansen 1968
Japanese badger (Meles anakuma)	Tetragomphius melis	Ohbayashi et al., 1974, Ashizawa et al., 1976, Marcus et al., 2015a, Marcus et al., 2015b
Pine martens (Martes martes)	Uncinaria criniformis	Segovia et al., 2007
	Uncinaria sp.	Borecka et al., 2013
	Ancylostoma spp	Borecka et al., 2013

In Europe, pine martens (Martes martes) are infected with Uncinaria sp., U. criniformis and an Ancylostoma sp. (Segovia et al., 2007, Borecka et al., 2013).

4.1.6. Ursidae

Six species of hookworms within the Ancylostoma, Arthrocephalus and Uncinaria genera have been described in bears (Table 6). The most important hookworm species in black bears is Uncinaria rauschi, which can reach up to 72% prevalence in some areas of Canada (Catalano et al., 2015a, Catalano et al., 2015b). Uncinaria yukonenesis is more common in brown bears in North America, while in Japan brown bears are infected with Ancylostoma malayanum (Catalano et al., 2015a, Catalano et al., 2015b, Asakawa et al., 2006). The canine hookworm, A. caninum, and the raccoon hookworm, A. lotoris, infect black bears in the southeastern United States; however, the mean intensities are usually low (<15 nematodes per animal) (Crum et al., 1978, Foster et al., 2011).

Table 6.

Bear species (ursids) infected with hookworms and corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Black Bear (Ursus americanus)	Ancylostoma caninum	Foster et al., 2011, Crum et al., 1978
	Ancylostoma tubaeformae	Foster et al., 2011
	Arthrocephalus lotoris	Crum et al., 1978
	Uncinaria rauschi	Olsen, 1968, Catalano et al., 2015a, Catalano et al., 2015b
	Uncinaria yukonensis	Frechette and Rau 1977
	Uncinaria sp.	Worley et al., 1976
Brown bear (Ursus arctos)	Ancylostoma malayanum	Asakawa et al., 2006
	Uncinaria rauschi	Olsen 1968
	Uncinaria yukonensis	Choquette et al., 1969, Rausch et al., 1979, Catalano et al., 2015a, Catalano et al., 2015b
	Uncinaria sp.	Greer, 1972, Worley et al., 1976, Kilinc et al., 2015

4.1.7. Mephtididae, Herpestidae, Phocidae, Hyenidae and Viverridae

There are few studies reporting hookworm infections in the Mephitidae (skunks), Herpestidae (mongoose), Phocidae (true seals), Hyenidae (hyenas) and Viverridae (civets) families (Table 7). Skunks can be infected with the raccoon hookworm A. lotoris in North America (Dikmans and Goldberg, 1949), while in South America the native skunk, Conepatus chinga, harbor its own hookworm, Ancylostoma conepati (Ibáñez, 1968). In Taiwan a few individuals of Arthrostoma vampire were found in the Palawan stink badger (Mydaus marchei) (Schmidt and Kuntz, 1968). Arthrocephalus gambiensi has been described in herpestids inhabiting Gambia and Taiwan (Ortlepp, 1925, Myers and Kuntz, 1964). Compared to their otariid relatives, hookworms have been rarely described in phocids; however, the description of Uncinaria sp. in Southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) from Antarctica (Ramos et al., 2013) highlights the extreme adaptability of some hookworm species. The human hookworm, Ancylostoma duodenale, has been found in low numbers (n = 7) in spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) in Ethiopia (Graber and Blanc, 1979), and in other study in Kenya up to 90% of hyenas harbored an Ancylostoma sp. (Engh et al., 2003). The Malay civet (Viverra tangalunga) in Borneo harbors the zoonotic hookworm, Ancylostoma ceylanicum, in low prevalence (3%); however, they are more commonly infected (33% prevalence) with a different Ancylostoma sp. (Colon and Patton, 2012).

Table 7.

Members of the Mephtididae, Herpestidae, Phocidae, Hyenidae and Viverridae families on which hookworms have been described and the corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Palawan stink badger (Mydaus marchei)	Arthrostoma vampira	Schmidt and Kuntz, 1968
Andean hog-nosed skunk (Conepatus chinga)	Ancylostoma conepati	Ibáñez, 1968
Skunk (Mephitis nigra)	Arthrocephalus lotoris	Dikmans and Goldberg 1949
Gambian mongoose (Mungos gambianus)	Arthrocephalus gambiensi	Ortlepp 1925
Crab-eating mongoose (Herpestes urva)	Arthrocephalus gambiensi	Myers and Kuntz 1964
Small Asian mongoose (Herpestes javanicus)	Uncinaria sp.	Ishibashi et al., 2010
Southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina)	Uncinaria sp	Ramos et al., 2013
Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus)	Uncinaria sp	Nadler et al., 2013
Malay civet (Viverra tangalunga)	Ancylostoma ceylanicum	Colon and Patton 2012
	Ancylostoma sp.	Colon and Patton 2012
Spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta)	Ancylostoma duodenale	Graber and Blanc 1979
	Ancylostoma spp	Engh et al., 2003

4.2. Arctiodactyla

4.2.1. Bovidae

Hookworm infections of bovines are dominated by the genera Agriostomum, Bunostomum and Gaigeria (Table 8). All Agriostomum species have been described in South African bovids such as blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) and kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) (Van Wyk and Boomker, 2011). The cattle hookworm Bunostomum phlebotomum has been described in endangered European bison (Bison bonasus) in Poland (Karbowiak et al., 2014); however, numerous African bovines, including the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) harbor hookworms of the Bunostomum genus although the definitive species have not been fully described (Ocaido et al., 2004, Phiri et al., 2011). Sheep hookworms also affect wild ruminants; Bunostomum trigonocephalum infects European wild bovids (Pérez et al., 1996, Karbowiak et al., 2014) and Gaigeria pachyscelis infects the cecum and colon of several South African bovines (Anderson, 1978, Horak et al., 1983).

Table 8.

Hookworm species described in members of the Bovidae family with corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros)	Agriostomum gorgonis	Boomker et al., 1989a, Boomker et al., 1989b, Van Wyk and Boomker, 2011
African buffalo (Syncerus caffer)	Bunostomum sp.	Ocaido et al., 2004, Senyael et al., 2013
Blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus)	Agriostomum gorgonis	Van Wyk and Boomker 2011
	Gaigeria pachyscelis	Horak et al., 1983
Common tsessebe (Damaliscus lunatus)	Agriostomum cursoni	Mönnig 1932
Common reedbuck (Redunca arundinum)	Gaigeria sp.	Boomker et al., 1989a, Boomker et al., 1989b
Gemsbok (Oryx gazella)	Agriostomum monnigi	Ogden 1965
	Agriostomum equidentatus	Fourie et al., 1991
European bison (Bison bonasus)	Bunostomum phlebotomum	Karbowiak et al., 2014
	Bunostomum trigonocephalum	Karbowiak et al., 2014
Nyala (Tragelaphus angasii)	Gaigeria pachyscelis	Boomker et al., 1991
Impala (Aepyceros melampus)	Gaigeria pachyscelis	Anderson 1978
	Bunostomum sp.	Ocaido et al., 2004
Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica)	Bunostomum trigonocephalum	Pérez et al., 1996
Springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis)	Agriostomum equidentatus	Young et al., 1973, Horak et al., 1982, De Villiers et al., 1985
Lechwe (Kobus leche)	Bunostomum sp.	Phiri et al., 2011
Waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus)	Bunostomum sp.	Ocaido et al., 2004

4.2.2. Suidae and Tayassuidae

The domestic pig hookworm, Globocephalus urosubulatus, has been described in wild boars, feral domestic pigs-wild boar hybrids (Sus scrofa) and the central America wild pig, pecari (Pecari tajacu) (Table 9) (Coombs and Springer, 1974, Romero-castañón et al., 2008, Senlik et al., 2011). G. urosubulatus dominates in the Americas and Europe, and has been sporadically reported in eastern Asia; however, in Japan and Korea wild boars are usually infected with G. samoensis and G. longimucronatus (Kagei et al., 1984, Sato et al., 2008). In Africa, the bushpig (Potamochoerus porcus) harbors a different species of hookworm, G. versteri (Van Wyk and Boomker, 2011).

Table 9.

Hookworm species described in members of the Bovidae family with corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Wild Boar (Sus scrofa)	Globocephalus urosubulatus	Coombs and Springer, 1974, Eslami and Farsad-Hamdi, 1992, Rajković-Janje et al., 2002, Fernandez-De-Mera et al., 2004, Foata et al., 2005, Foata et al., 2006, Nanev et al., 2007, Senlik et al., 2011, Gasso et al., 2015
	Globocephalus samoensis	Kagei et al., 1984, Sato et al., 2008, Ahn et al., 2015
	Globocephalus longimucronatus	Kagei et al., 1984, Sato et al., 2008
Bushpig (Potamochoerus porcus)	Globocephalus versteri	Van Wyk and Boomker 2011
Pecari (Pecari tajacu)	Globocephalus urosubulatus	Romero-castañón et al., 2008

4.2.3. Cervidae and Giraffidae

The cattle and sheep hookworms B. phlebotomum, B. trigonocephalum are the most common Ancylostomids of deer in Europe and Asia (Table 10). In North America, however, Monodontus lousianensis has been found in the intestines of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) (Chitwood and Jordan, 1965). Monodontella giraffae has been found in the bile duct of a captive giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) (Ming et al., 2010) and in all (n = 7) necropsied giraffes in one study in Namibia (Bertelsen et al., 2009).

Table 10.

Hookworm species described in members of the Cervidae and Giraffidae families with corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Fallow deer (Dama dama)	Bunostomum phlebotomum	Omeragić et al., 2011
	Bunostomum trigonocephalum	Páv et al., 1975
Red deer (Cervus elaphus)	Bunostomum trigonocephalum	Zalewska-Schönthaler and Szpakiewicz 1986
Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)	Bunostomum trigonocephalum	Demiaszkiewicz et al., 2002
White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)	Monodontus lousianensis	Chitwood and Jordan 1965
Reeves's muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi)	Bunostomum phlebotomum	Myers and Kuntz 1964
Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis)	Monodontella giraffae	Bertelsen et al., 2009, Ming et al., 2010

4.3. Primates

Primates within the Cercopithecidae, Hominidae and Loricidae families are affected by hookworms, and, as in people, Necator and Ancylostoma are the most important genera in non-human primates (Table 11). Necator gorillae has been described in western mountain gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in the democratic Republic of Congo (Noda and Yamada, 1964), and in humans in close contact with gorillas in the Central African Republic (Kalousová et al., 2016). Additionally, the human hookworm Necator americanus, has been found in gorillas and chimpanzees in areas where this parasite is common among people (Hasegawa et al., 2014). In Cameroon, Ancylostoma sp. nematodes were common in endemic cercopithecids sold as bushmeat in a local market (Pourrut et al., 2011). In the endangered lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus), groups close to human populations have 40–70% prevalence of Ancylostoma sp while groups in areas with no human settlements had 0% prevalence (Hussain et al., 2013).

Table 11.

Primate species infected with hookworms with corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus)	Ancylostoma spp	Hussain et al., 2013
	Bunostomum sp.	Hussain et al., 2013
Moustached guenon (Cercopithecus cephus)	Ancylostoma spp	Pourrut et al., 2011
Mona monkey (Cercopithecus mona)	Ancylostoma spp	Pourrut et al., 2011
De Brazza's monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus)	Ancylostoma spp	Pourrut et al., 2011
Greater spot-nosed monkey (Cercopithecus nictitans)	Ancylostoma spp	Pourrut et al., 2011
Crested mona monkey (Cercopithecus pogonias)	Ancylostoma spp	Pourrut et al., 2011
Agile mangabey (Cercocebus agilis)	Ancylostoma spp	Pourrut et al., 2011
Mantled guereza (Colobus guereza)	Ancylostoma spp	Pourrut et al., 2011
Gabon talapoin (Miopithecus ogoouensis)	Ancylostoma spp	Pourrut et al., 2011
Brown woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha)	Ancylostoma sp	Michaud et al., 2003
Vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)	Necator sp.	Gillespie et al., 2004
Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla)	Necator americanus	Hasegawa et al., 2014
	Necator gorillae	Noda and Yamada 1964
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)	Necator americanus	Hasegawa et al., 2014
	Ancylostoma spp	Pourrut et al., 2011
Bald uakari (Cacajao calvus)	Necator americanus	Michaud et al., 2003
Baboons (Papio hamadryas)	Necator sp	Howells et al., 2011
Javan slow loris (Nycticebus javanicus)	Necator sp	Albers, 2014, Rode-Margono et al., 2015

Occasional grey literature (technical reports), describe hookworms as common in non-human primates; however, they do not report the genus or species, and therefore could not be incorporated into this review.

4.4. Rodentia

Hookworms have been sporadically described in rodents. Most studies have focused in the nematode species description and little is known about the prevalence and patterns of hookworm infection in this animal group. Monodontus is one of the most common hookworm genera in rodents in the Americas (Table 12). In Australia, the native water rat (Hydromys chrysogaster) harbors Uncinaria hydromydis (Smales and Cribb, 1997), and in Malaysia Cyclodontostomum purvisi infects several native murid species (Balasingam, 1963). In Africa, the greater cane rat (Thryonomys swinderianus) is infected by two species of the Acheilostoma genus, of which A. simpsoni is found in the gallbladder and bile ducts of 60% of animals (Kankam et al., 2009).

Table 12.

Rodent species infected with hookworms with corresponding references.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
Australian water rat (Hydromys chrysogaster)	Uncinaria hydromyidis	Beveridge, 1980, Smales and Cribb, 1997
Long-tailed giant rat (Leopoldamys sabanus)	Cyclodontostomum purvisi	Balasingam 1963
Müller's giant Sunda rat (Sundamys muelleri)	Cyclodontostomum purvisi	Balasingam 1963
Bower's white-toothed rat (Berylmys bowersi)	Cyclodontostomum purvisi	Balasingam 1963
Greater cane rat (Thryonomys swinderianus)	Acheilostoma simpsoni	Kankam et al., 2009
	Acheilostoma moucheti	Popova 1964
Cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus)	Monodontus floridanus	McIntosh 1935
Round-tailed muskrat (Neofiber alleni)	Monodontus floridanus	Forrester et al., 1987
Red-rumped agouti (Dasyprocta leporina)	Monodontus aguiari	Travassos 1937
Brazilian spiny rat (Mesomys sp)	Monodontus rarus	Travassos 1929

4.5. Perissodactyla

The knowledge of hookworm infections in this order is limited to parasite descriptions usually based on a few nematodes recovered from a single animal (Khalil, 1922b). Within the perissodactyla, hookworms have been found in tapirs (Tapitus sp.) (Travassos, 1937), and the black Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros bicornis) (Table 13) (Neveu-Lemaire, 1924).

Table 13.

Mammalian species in the Perissodactyla, Proboscidea, Pholidota, Afrosoricida and Scandentia orders affected by hookworms.

Host Species	Hookworm species	References
South American tapir (Tapirus terrestris)	Monodontus nefastus	Travassos 1937
Malayan tapir (Tapirus indicus)	Brachyclonus indicus	Khalil 1922b
Black Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros bicornis)	Grammocephalus intermedius	Neveu-Lemaire, 1924
African elephant (Loxodonta africana)	Bunostomum brevispiculum	Monnig 1925
	Bunostomum hamatum	Monnig 1925
	Grammocephalus clathratus	Allen et al., 1974, Obanda et al., 2011
	Grammocephalus sp	Debbie and Clausen 1975
Asian elephant (Elephas maximus)	Grammocephalus hybridatus	Romboli et al., 1975
Asian elephant (Elephas maximus)	Grammocephalus varedatus	Van Der Westhuysen, 1938
Asian elephant (Elephas maximus)	Bathmostomum sangeri	Setasuban 1976
Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla)	Necator americanus	Cameron and Myers, 1960, Myers and Kuntz, 1964
Indian pangolin (Manis crassicaudata)	Necator americanus	Mohapatra et al., 2015
Greater hedgehog tenrec (Setifer setosus)	Uncinaria bauchoti	Chabaud et al., 1964
Treeshrew (Tupaia sp)	Uncinaria olseni	Chabaud and Durette-Desset, 1974

4.6. Proboscidea

Elephants are the only living family within the proboscidea order. In this group, despite the low number of studies conducted, at least 3 species of hookworms have been described in the African elephant (Loxodonta Africana) and another 3 in the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) (Table 13). In these animals, hookworms in the Grammocephalus genus inhabit the bile duct while those in the Bunostomum and Bathmostomum genera inhabit the small and large intestines (Monnig, 1925, Debbie and Clausen, 1975, Setasuban, 1976).

4.7. Pholidota

In Asia, pangolins (Manis sp) are infected with low intensities (less than 16 nematodes per host) of the human hookworm N. americanus (Table 13) (Cameron and Myers, 1960, Mohapatra et al., 2015).

4.8. Afrosoricida and Scandentia

In the Afrosoricida order the greater hedgehog tenrec (Setifer setosus) is the only species in which hookworms have been described (Uncinaria bauchoti) (Table 13) (Chabaud et al., 1964). In the Scandentia order the hookworm Uncinaria olseni was described in a treeshrew (Tupaia sp) (Table 13) (Chabaud and Durette-Desset, 1974).

5. The impact of hookworm infections on wildlife

All members of the Ancylostomatoidae family are hematophagous and have developed efficient systems to extract and digest their host blood (Hotez et al., 2016). Most hookworm species use their well-developed buccal capsules to attach to mucosal surfaces and cut-out pieces of the tissue to produce “wounds” that bleed, in part because of the secretion of several anticoagulant proteins (Periago and Bethony, 2012, Hotez et al., 2016). Since most hookworms live in the small intestine, this process creates a perfect environment for chronic blood loss, secondary bacterial infections and significant inflammation in the mucosae, impairing digestion and absorption (Seguel et al., 2017). Therefore, the main adverse effects of hookworms recorded in humans, domestic animals and wildlife species are anemia, retarded growth, secondary bacteremia and mortality (Traversa, 2012, Hotez et al., 2016, Seguel et al., 2017). The following section summarizes available evidence of such effects on wildlife hosts and explores potential drivers of those effects on wildlife populations.

5.1. Pathologic effects

5.1.1. Anemia

Anemia is rarely documented in wildlife species infected with hookworms, because few studies include assessment of blood values. In wolves, A. caninum infection has been associated with iron deficiency anemia in pups (Kazacos and Dougherty, 1979). In Florida, USA, a young cougar was found markedly anemic due to A. pluridentatum infection (Dunbar et al., 1994). In Michigan, USA, the reintroduced American martens (Martes americana) infected with hookworms (not species specified), were more likely to have anemia (Spriggs et al., 2016). The pups of Northern fur seals, California sea lions (Acevedo-Whitehouse et al., 2006), New Zealand sea lions (Acevedo-Whitehouse et al., 2009), Australian sea lions (Marcus et al., 2015b) and South American fur seals (Seguel et al., 2017), present with mild to severe anemia related to Uncinaria sp. infection. Hookworm-induced anemia is markedly regenerative in Australian sea lions (Marcus et al., 2015b). In New Zealand and California sea lions, a single nuclear polymorphism (SNP) is linked with the degree of hookworm-associated anemia (Acevedo-Whitehouse et al., 2006, Acevedo-Whitehouse et al., 2009).

5.1.2. Retarded growth

The only hookworm-infected wildlife species in which retarded growth has been accurately measured are Northern fur seals (Delong et al., 2009), New Zealand sea lions (Chilvers et al., 2009) and South American fur seals (Seguel et al., 2017). In Australian sea lions, although pups from rookeries with lower hookworm prevalence had higher body mass index (Marcus et al., 2014a, Marcus et al., 2014b), controlled deworming experiments did not find significant difference between treated and hookworm-infected animals (Marcus et al., 2015a). The scarce literature on the effect of hookworms on wildlife host growth rates is probably related to logistic limitations to perform experimental studies in most free-ranging populations, an approach that facilitates measurement and comparison of growth rates in infected and uninfected animals. Additionally, hookworm infection is a primarily neonatal disease in pinnipeds, because infective stage 3 larvae only develop into adults when ingested by a pup with its mother's milk (Lyons et al., 2011a, Lyons et al., 2011b Seguel et al., 2017), therefore, retarded growth is a significant component of hookworm disease in these mammalian species (Chilvers et al., 2009, Delong et al., 2009 Seguel et al., 2017).

5.1.3. Tissue damage and inflammation

Probably most hookworm species cause some level of tissue damage as an unavoidable consequence of parasite feeding. This effect, however, along with inflammation, has been rarely documented in wildlife species, probably because most studies only assess these changes through gross examination of carcasses, where subtle lesions can be easily missed (Seguel et al., 2017).

When hookworms feed on the intestinal mucosa they leave small 1–2 mm erosions on the mucosal surface that sometimes can be observed grossly, as is the case of Coyote pups infected with low numbers of A. caninum (Pence et al., 1988), California sea lions, South American fur seals, New Zealand sea lions, and Northern fur seals infected with Uncinaria sp hookworms (Spraker et al., 2007, Lyons et al., 2011a, Lyons et al., 2011b, Seguel et al., 2017). The chronic bleeding of these intestinal wounds and accompanying inflammation elicited by the disruption of the mucosal barrier lead to different degrees of hemorrhagic enteritis, a common consequence of A. caninum infections in coyotes (Radomsky, 1989), A. pluridentatum in young cougars, Uncinaria sp. in otariids and A. lotoris in raccoons. However, in raccoons these lesions have only been documented with experimental infections leading to burdens not observed in the wild (∼1500 nematodes) (Balasingam, 1964).

The mentioned patterns of lesions in wildlife are similar to that reported in domestic animal and human hookworm infections (Periago and Bethony, 2012, Traversa, 2012). However, among the high diversity of hookworm species infecting wildlife, there are particular lesion patterns only described in wild host species. These are the cases of peritoneal penetration by Uncinaria sp. in pinnipeds, hookworm submucosal infections in large cats, and bile and pancreatic duct hookworm infections of badgers, giraffes and elephants. Complete intestinal penetration by adult hookworms (Uncinaria sp.), has been observed in a significant proportion (from 12.5 to 60% of pups found dead) of California sea lions (Spraker et al., 2007), Northern fur seals (Lyons et al., 2011b) and South American fur seals (Seguel et al., 2017), leading to peritonitis, septicemia and death. In large felines, the hookworms Galoncus trudentatus and Galoncus perniciosus, which infect leopards (Panthera pardus) and tigers (Pant hera tigris), respectively (Khalil, 1922a, Kalaivanan et al., 2015) have the particularity of feeding in the intestinal submucosa and muscularis where they form hemorrhagic nodules, which, once infected with enteric bacteria, can lead to sepsis and death (Khalil, 1922a, Kalaivanan et al., 2015). Tetragomphius melis and Tetragomphius arctonycis, which infect the Japanese (Meles anakuma) and Hog (Arctonyx collaris) badgers respectively, cause significant inflammation, fibrosis, and “mass-like” lesions in the pancreatic duct (Jansen, 1968, Ashizawa et al., 1976, Matsuda and Yamamoto, 2015). Despite significant tissue alterations caused by these mustelid parasites, mortality due to severe infection has not been reported, and the effect of these hookworms at the population level is unknown. Monodontella giraffae causes cholangitis and peribiliary fibrosis in giraffes (Bertelsen et al., 2009), and in elephants Grammocephalus spp cause severe eosinophilic cholangitis (Allen et al., 1974, Debbie and Clausen, 1975, Obanda et al., 2011).

5.1.4. Mortality

Mortality of wild animals due to hookworm infection is in most cases the final outcome of chronic anemia, retarded growth, tissue damage, and secondary bacterial infections. Mortality has been recorded most commonly in canids, felids, and otariids. In southern Texas coyote populations, the effect of A. caninum has been tested by experimental infection, where infective doses of over 300 stage 3 larvae/Kg of A. caninum were lethal in pups (Radomsky, 1989), and resulted in parasitic loads similar to those reported in naturally infected juvenile coyotes (range 50–150 nematodes) (Thornton and Reardon, 1974), suggesting a potential role of A. caninum in pup mortality and limiting the expansion of coyote populations. Similarly, in the same region, grey foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) were infected with high burdens of A. caninum, suggesting some level of population mortality ((Miller and Harkema, 1968). In wolves, A. caninum and U. stenocephala have been associated with pup mortality; however, detailed assessment of parasite effects on mortality through controlled studies have not been performed (Kazacos and Dougherty, 1979, Kreeger et al., 1990, Guberti et al., 1993). In Europe, some level of population mortality has been assumed in peri-urban red foxes infected with high burdens of Uncinaria stenocephala (Willingham et al., 1996). In Asia, Arthrostoma miyazakiense can cause sporadic mortality in raccoon dogs (Sato et al., 2006, Shin et al., 2007). In felines, beside the highly pathogenic Galoncus spp. affecting tigers and leopards, probably A. caninum and A. pluridentatum cause some level of mortality in bobcats and cougars in the southeastern United States (Mitchell and Beasom, 1974, Forrester et al., 1985, Dunbar et al., 1994). In otariids, Uncinaria spp. can cause up to 70% mortality in some colonies of California sea lions (Spraker et al., 2007). In other species, such as New Zealand sea lions, northern fur seal, Australian sea lions and South American fur seals, hookworms cause between 15 and 50% of total pup mortality (Castinel et al., 2007a, Lyons et al., 2011a, Seguel et al., 2013, Marcus et al., 2014a). In other mammalian groups, reports of hookworms causing mortality are sporadic, as in the case of Uncinaria sp nematodes causing the death of a brown bear pup in Turkey (Kilinc et al., 2015), and the role of Grammocephalus hybridatus in the death of several young Asian elephants transported to a zoo (Romboli et al., 1975). Hookworms were suspected to be the cause of death of a maroon langur (Presbytis rubicunda) in Asia, but the hookworm genus or species causing death was unknown (Hilser et al., 2014).

5.2. Drivers of hookworm pathologic effects

According to the data retrieved from the reviewed literature and the regression models performed, population level hookworm prevalence is the most significant predictor of the pathogenic effect of hookworms. The role of infection intensity on the severity of hookworm disease is reported in several studies; however, it was not a significant predictor in regression models. This could be due to natural study bias, reporting pathologic effects, as many of them provide good descriptions of mean infection intensity but little or no assessment of tissue damage and other pathologic effects.

There is a wide range of variation in prevalence and mean intensity of hookworm infections among wildlife populations; however, a common pattern of regional and local differences in prevalence is noted, usually attributable to contrasts in local temperature and soil humidity, which are critical factors for survival of hookworm infective larvae in the soil (Ryan and Sc, 1976, Yabsley and Noblet, 1999, Criado-Fornelio et al., 2000, Gompper et al., 2003, Dybing et al., 2013). Additionally, hookworm species can differ in their resistance to environmental conditions, creating regional patterns of infection. Such is the case of canine hookworms since A. caninum is found in higher mean intensities in areas with mild climate like southeastern United States (Miller and Harkema, 1968, Mitchell and Beasom, 1974, Thornton and Reardon, 1974, Schitoskey, 1980, Custer and Pence, 1981) while U. stenocephala is usually reported in higher prevalence and intensity in canids inhabiting temperate or circumboreal areas (Willingham et al., 1996, Craig and Craig, 2005, Reperant et al., 2007, Stuart et al., 2013). An additional factor associated with changes in prevalence and mean intensities is the spatial density of host animals. Higher population density is usually associated with higher prevalence, as this increases the number of infective larvae in the soil (Henke et al., 2002, Lyons et al., 2011a Seguel et al., 2017). Beside environmental contrasts, intra-host dynamics of hookworm infection are probably important in explaining patterns of prevalence and burden. For instance, canid, felid, ursid and procyonid hookworms establish chronic infections, where significant immunity apparently does not occur, indicating that older animals have higher chances to be in contact with infective stages through their life and harbor higher numbers of parasites (Worley et al., 1976, Yabsley and Noblet, 1999, Kresta et al., 2009, Liccioli et al., 2012). In some canine populations, however, young animals are the most severely affected with Ancylostoma species, probably reflecting the role of lactogenic transmission in the disease dynamics (Custer and Pence, 1981). In the case of pinnipeds, infective larvae reach pups only through their mothers' milk and adult hookworms are cleared from the pup's intestine 2–6 months after initial infection. This results on a short life span for adult hookworms in pinnipeds and markedly seasonal prevalence (Lyons et al., 2011a, Marcus et al., 2014a, Seguel et al., 2017).

An additional element incorporated in the final model to explain pathologic effect was hookworm length, although the effect was not significant. There is evidence across the reviewed literature suggesting that larger hookworms are potentially more pathogenic, as the case of Grammocephalus spp in elephants, which are approximately 35 mm long (Obanda et al., 2011). Something similar occurs with pinniped Uncinaria spp., which are larger than their terrestrial relatives (Ramos et al., 2013, Nadler et al., 2013). For other groups of large hookworms, however, such as those within the Bunostominae subfamily, there is little evidence of pathologic effects in their wild ruminant host, although some of those species, such as Bunostomum phlebotomum, Bunostomum trigonocephalum and Gaigeria pachyscelis, are known to cause anemia, hemorrhagic enteritis and death in domestic ruminants (Hart and Wagner, 1971).

The three discussed drivers of hookworm pathogenic effects; prevalence, burden and hookworm length can be considered indicators of hookworm biomass within a population. Since the pathogenic effects described are related to the extraction of host resources by the parasite, it can be inferred that any factor that increases the hookworm biomass within a population will also increase the detrimental effect of these parasites in this group.

6. Discussion and conclusions

There are numerous hookworm species described in a wide range of wild mammals. Carnivores are over represented in the literature, and therefore most of the negative effects of hookworm infection have been described in this group. This does not necessarily imply that hookworms are important pathogens only in carnivores; for instance, there is enough evidence to infer that hookworm infections are significant disease agents in ruminants and primates. These groups, however, are less represented and probably neglected regarding the study of hookworms. This could be in part due to the fact that most wild ruminants and primates live in areas of the planet traditionally underrepresented in terms of parasitology research (Falagas et al., 2006).

Several studies have highlighted the potential of carnivore hookworms to infect multiple species, including humans (Reviewed in Travesa, 2012). The literature in wildlife species support these observations, as several human and domestic animal hookworms infect more than 10 different wildlife hosts in a wide range of taxonomic groups. In most cases, these hookworm species are capable of establishing complete life cycles and harm in their “non-native” hosts. This highlights the significance of domestic animal-human-wildlife interface for this disease and the potential for spillover and spillback processes playing an important role in the maintenance of high hookworm burdens in some areas.

A comprehensive understanding of the drivers of hookworm deleterious effects on wildlife hosts is complicated, given the likely strong bias towards the reporting only positive findings. In this sense, the literature available describes in which species and locations hookworms have an effect, but is insufficient to understand why these effects are observed in some species or populations and not in others. Evidence in the literature, however, indicates that hookworm biomass in a population and the host and environmental factors affecting biomass (e.g. environmental temperature, host density), are important in determining the outcome of hookworm infections. It is, however, likely that the importance of these elements change across populations. The role in disease dynamics of other hookworm-related traits, such as genetic variation and virulence factors, is less clear, and studies addressing these aspects are necessary to fully understand drivers of hookworm disease in wildlife.

The hookworms' effects on some populations of canines, felines and eared seals are of special concern, as several species in these families are endangered. Additionally, in all these groups, the dynamics of hookworm infections, and therefore the pathogenic effects, are linked to the density of susceptible animals and environmental variables such as humidity and temperature. These characteristics of wildlife hookworm infections, plus the generalist nature of these nematodes, creates a dynamic scenario where human-related disturbances of wildlife populations and climate change may potentially affect the dynamics and effects of hookworm infections in wildlife.

In the era of molecular pathogenesis, the study of hookworm disease is still very rudimentary in wildlife hosts, despite the fact that these pathogens impact wildlife, domestic animal, and human, health and wildlife conservation. The use of approaches other than opportunistic collection of carcasses, especially experimental and molecular when possible, could substantially improve our understanding of the impact and drivers of hookworm disease in wildlife populations.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the supplementary data related to this article: