Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2017 Aug 30;284(1861):20171383. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1383

Effects of early-life competition and maternal nutrition on telomere lengths in wild meerkats

Dominic L Cram 1,2,, Pat Monaghan 3, Robert Gillespie 3, Tim Clutton-Brock 1,2
PMCID: PMC5577495  PMID: 28855370

Abstract

Early-life adversity can affect health, survival and fitness later in life, and recent evidence suggests that telomere attrition may link early conditions with their delayed consequences. Here, we investigate the link between early-life competition and telomere length in wild meerkats. Our results show that, when multiple females breed concurrently, increases in the number of pups in the group are associated with shorter telomeres in pups. Given that pups from different litters compete for access to milk, we tested whether this effect is due to nutritional constraints on maternal milk production, by experimentally supplementing females' diets during gestation and lactation. While control pups facing high competition had shorter telomeres, the negative effects of pup number on telomere lengths were absent when maternal nutrition was experimentally improved. Shortened pup telomeres were associated with reduced survival to adulthood, suggesting that early-life competition for nutrition has detrimental fitness consequences that are reflected in telomere lengths. Dominant females commonly kill pups born to subordinates, thereby reducing competition and increasing growth rates of their own pups. Our work suggests that an additional benefit of infanticide may be that it also reduces telomere shortening caused by competition for resources, with associated benefits for offspring ageing profiles and longevity.

Keywords: telomeres, early-life adversity, early-life stress, Suricata suricatta, meerkats, infanticide

1. Introduction

The early period of an animal's life can have a disproportionately influential role in determining health, survival and reproductive success later in life, even though it accounts for a relatively minor proportion of total lifespan [1]. Despite the importance of the early-life environment, our understanding of the physiological mechanisms underpinning its lasting and delayed consequences remains poor [2].

Telomere loss has recently been proposed as a potential molecular mechanism linking early-life adversity with later-life performance and ageing [3]. Telomeres are non-coding sequences at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes that play a critical role in protecting genome integrity [4]. Telomeres shorten with each cell division, and this shortening is accelerated during early development and by stressors including oxidative damage and stress hormone exposure ([57], but see [8]). When telomeres shorten beyond a critical point, the cell enters replicative senescence, and accumulation of senescent cells can impair tissue function in later life when cell renewal capacity is reduced [9]. A number of studies have shown that telomere length or rate of loss predicts survival and longevity in vertebrates [1012] including humans (reviewed in [13]), and short telomeres are associated with the systemic loss of function frequently observed in ageing individuals [14]. Accelerated telomere loss early in life may therefore advance the onset of senescence, thereby linking early-life conditions with later-life health and survival.

Early-life adversity promotes telomere shortening in a range of species, including salmon, humans and several birds [1519]. In birds, offspring competing with more rivals, or rivals higher in the competitive hierarchy, exhibit accelerated telomere loss [2025]. Studies of the consequences of offspring competition on telomere dynamics have thus far focused almost exclusively on biparental species; the importance of early-life competition in species with other social systems therefore remains unclear.

In animal societies where multiple females breed the effects of early-life competition on telomere lengths are likely to be particularly pronounced, because the number of competing offspring is expected to be higher and competition therefore more intense. Where females breed asynchronously, greater age asymmetries between offspring will likely further exacerbate telomere loss for offspring that are younger or lower in the competitive hierarchy [23,25]. Alternatively, sharing offspring care between multiple females may buffer offspring against unpredictable environments [26] and improve growth and health [27], thus relaxing competition and slowing telomere attrition. Whether the effects of early-life competition on the rate of telomere attrition in animal societies are exacerbated by increased offspring number, or mitigated by cooperative care of young, remains unknown.

Where early-life adversity promotes the accumulation of ageing-related damage and poor telomere integrity, we would predict that selection would favour parental strategies that protect offspring, either by improving the environment or by enhancing offspring resilience to adversity. Despite extensive evidence that early-life adversity is reflected in enduring deleterious effects on telomere lengths [1520], and that short telomeres are linked with poor health and curtailed survival [12,14,28,29], little is known about parental strategies associated with slowed offspring telomere attrition, and how effective they are [30].

Here, we investigate whether early-life adversity, in the form of intense pup competition, is associated with shortened telomeres in wild Kalahari meerkat pups at emergence from the natal burrow. Meerkats (Suricata suricatta) live in stable cooperatively breeding groups of up to 50 individuals. Reproduction is largely monopolized by a single dominant female, but older subordinate females also attempt to breed at a lower frequency [31]. Mean litter size is 4.1 pups (range 1–8) [32]. Mixed litters are suckled indiscriminately by all lactating females [32], and pups therefore compete both with their littermates and with pups from other litters. Previous research suggests that pups compete for access to milk before emerging from the natal burrow, as experimental contraception of subordinate females leads to increased growth of the dominant's pups at emergence from the birth burrow [33]. Pups are also frequently observed aggressively competing for access to provisioning helpers after emergence [34]. After investigating whether variation in the number of competing pups affects their telomere lengths, we test whether supplementing the mother's food intake during gestation and lactation mitigates the effects of competition on pup telomeres. We then investigate whether early-life telomere lengths predict survival into adulthood. Finally, we explore the extent to which mothers reduce pup competition by killing litters born to other females and discuss how this strategy might impact telomere dynamics in their own pups. Such infanticide is common in meerkat groups and is almost always perpetrated by heavily pregnant females [35].

2. Material and methods

(a). Study population

Data collection was conducted in the context of a long-term study, monitoring a naturally regulated population of wild meerkats at the Kuruman River Reserve, South Africa (26°58′ S, 21°49′ E), between 1994 and 2015. All meerkats were habituated to close observation (less than 1 m) and individually recognizable using small dye-marks (approx. 2 cm2, for adults and older pups) or trimming small patches of fur (approx. 0.5 cm2, for newly emerged pups) [36]. Virtually all (greater than 95%) meerkats could be voluntarily weighed on electronic scales (±0.1 g, Durascale, UK) before they commenced foraging in the morning, at midday and after sunset. Groups were visited two to three times per week to collect behavioural, life-history and bodyweight data. Observations of pregnancy, birth, infanticide, dominance, group size and rainfall were made using protocols detailed elsewhere [36,37]. Mother and father identity were assigned genetically [38,39].

(b). Pup tail tip sampling

Meerkats are born in an underground burrow, emerging for the first time at age 3–4 weeks. Shortly after the litter's first emergence, a small biopsy of skin from the tail tip was collected from each pup (age 28.3 ± 3.4 days) for the determination of telomere length and parentage [39]. Skin samples were immediately transferred to 96% ethanol and stored at −20°C until DNA extraction.

(c). Supplementary feeding experiment

To investigate the effects of early nutritional environment on telomere lengths, we fed pregnant females during gestation and lactation. To minimize inter-individual differences in body condition, our experimental procedure was limited to dominant females. The supplementary feeding protocol consisted of one hard-boiled egg per day (divided equally between the morning and afternoon observation sessions) commencing 6 weeks after the end of a dominant female's pregnancy, and continuing until the next parturition [40]. Thereafter, fed dominant females received four eggs per week until the pups were weaned. This feeding protocol occurred between August and November in 2011 and 2012. Control females were pregnant during the same period and did not receive supplemental food.

(d). Observations of infanticide

We investigated how infanticide by dominant females affects the number of competing pups and the likely consequences for telomere lengths in her own litter. While previous analyses of the distribution of infanticide have focused on consequences for the victim mother (i.e. whether her litter survives or is killed [35,37]), we quantified the benefits of infanticide for the perpetrator (i.e. how many competitor pups she removes). We identified periods when the dominant female is most likely to kill pups born to other females (the 30 days prior to her own parturition, hereafter termed ‘high infanticide period’) and least likely (the 30 days immediately after giving birth, hereafter termed ‘low infanticide period’) [27]. We then assessed subordinate litter survival probabilities and the total number of subordinate pups surviving to emergence during these two periods. Parturition for all females could be identified by sudden weight loss and change in body shape [36], and pup production for each period was measured as the number of pups born that survived to emergence from the birth burrow.

(e). Quantitative PCR determination of telomere lengths

We used quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis to measure telomere length in skin samples, based on published protocols with some modifications [41,42]. This measure represents the average telomere length across cells in a sample and is reported as the level of telomeric sequence abundance relative to a reference non-variable copy number gene (T/S ratio). Further details of DNA extraction and qPCR analysis can be found in the electronic supplementary methods.

(f). Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out in R v. 3.2.3, using a stepwise model simplification approach [43,44]. Initially all fixed terms of interest were fitted, followed by the stepwise removal of terms whose removal from the model resulted in a non-significant change in deviance (using maximum log-likelihood estimation), until the minimal adequate model (MAM) was obtained, in which only significant terms remained. Dropped terms were then added back in to the MAM to confirm their non-significance. The homoscedasticity and normality of residuals were confirmed by visual inspection, and all continuous predictors were scaled to a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1. The significance of all terms was tested either by removing the terms from the MAM (if the term was in the MAM) or by adding the terms to the MAM (if the term was not included in the MAM). Analysis using Akaike's information criterion correcting for small sample size (AICc) and inspection of the top model set (for which AICc differed by less than 2) yielded qualitatively identical results [45]. We ran four sets of statistical models: first to investigate the determinants of pup telomere lengths in the large correlative dataset, second to investigate how experimental supplementary feeding of mothers impacted pup telomere lengths, third to investigate whether early-life telomere lengths predict survival into adulthood and fourth to investigate the consequences of infanticide for pup competition.

(i). What are the determinants of pup telomere lengths?

Our primary interest was the effect of the number of competing pups on telomere lengths at emergence from the natal burrow. For each sampled pup, we assessed the number of rival pups (aged under 90 days) present in the group, every day between the focal pup's birth and day of sampling for telomere length. The average of these daily rival counts represents our measure of overall competition experienced by the focal pup prior to sampling, hereafter termed ‘pup number’. This estimate of pup competition includes littermates and pups from older and younger litters born to the dominant female and subordinate females.

We controlled for maternal factors that may influence offspring quality, including weight at conception, age (mean 4.9 years, range 1.2–8.0) and dominance status (dominant or subordinate) [46]. Social group size (average number of adult group members calculated as above for pup number) and rainfall (mm) in the month before birth can also both influence offspring quality [47]. Pup sex (male, female or unknown) and age at capture were also controlled for. We included these individual, maternal, environmental and social predictors, with our estimate of pup number, in a general linear mixed-effects model (GLMM), with pup telomere length as the response. Cohort year, group identity (ID), mother ID and litter ID were included as random terms, to account for the non-independence of pups within years, groups, mothers and litters. Telomere lengths were available for 230 pups from 63 litters in 13 groups, born between 2009 and 2012. We also tested the effect of paternal age (mean 4.1 years, range 1.4–6.1) on pup telomere lengths in a reduced dataset for which the father's date of birth could be accurately determined (78 pups from 23 litters in seven groups).

(ii). Does an experimentally improved nutritional environment mitigate the effects of pup number?

To test the effect of supplementary feeding of the pregnant and lactating mother on pup telomere lengths, we included experimental treatment (fed/control) as a two-level factor in a GLMM, with pup telomere length as the response and litter ID as the random term. Given our smaller sample size for the experimental dataset, only terms found to be significant in the larger correlative model were included, and two-way interactions between these and treatment. Telomere lengths were available for 25 pups from eight litters in each treatment.

(iii). Do pup telomere lengths predict survival to adulthood?

We investigated whether pup telomere lengths predicted survival to adulthood (1 year old). Sub-adult meerkats do not disperse [31,48], and any disappearance from the group before reaching adulthood is therefore likely to reflect mortality. We removed any individuals dying before reaching nutritional independence (90 days) as death at this early stage typically occurs due to starvation, predation or becoming separated from the group, these sources of mortality are unlikely to reflect variation in telomere lengths. We used a binary term for survival to adulthood as the response in a binomial mixed-effects model. We included pup telomere length as a predictor. We also controlled for other predictors known to influence telomere lengths and survival in young meerkats: sex, group size, rainfall, maternal dominance status and maternal age [47]. We controlled for the effects of pup body-weight on survival, by including their bodyweight at age 40 days in the model. Group ID, mother ID and litter ID were included as random terms. This model was fitted to a dataset of 178 individuals: 161 pups from 51 litters born to dominant females and 17 pups from seven litters born to subordinates. The maximum confirmed lifespan for meerkats in our population is 12.2 and 12.4 years, for males and females, respectively.

(iv). How does infanticide affect the number of competing pups?

We contrasted the fates of subordinate litters born in periods of high and low dominant female infanticides. First, for each dominant female parturition (n = 158), we counted subordinate parturitions during the two periods (30 days before and after dominant parturition). Infanticide typically takes places shortly after birth, so we classed each subordinate parturition as a ‘success’ or ‘infanticide’ according to whether the litter survived its first 2 days (litter loss after this point is more likely to be due to starvation or predation [35,37]). Although newborn litters remained in the burrow for up to 4 weeks, their survival could be recorded daily by observing whether the group continued to leave babysitters during foraging trips [35]. The number of successes and infanticides were then used as the response term in a binomial mixed-effects model, with the high/low infanticide period fitted as a two-level predictor. The random terms were dominant female pregnancy ID, dominant female ID and group ID. Second, for each dominant female parturition, we calculated the total number of emerging subordinate pups born during the two infanticide periods, and fitted this as the response term in a GLMM with a Poisson distribution. The main predictor of interest was the two-level high/low dominant female infanticide period, and we controlled for the number of subordinate females giving birth.

3. Results

(a). What are the determinants of pup telomere lengths?

Male and female pups had similar telomere lengths at 4 weeks (Inline graphic, p = 0.47; electronic supplementary material, table S1). Pup telomere lengths were not associated with their mother's dominance status, the number of helpers in the group, the pup's age or the amount of rainfall in the month before their birth (all Inline graphic, p > 0.23). Older mothers produced pups with significantly longer telomeres (Inline graphic, p = 0.002; figure 1a). There was a trend for lighter mothers to produce pups with slightly longer telomeres, but this was not statistically significant (Inline graphic, p = 0.06). In contrast to the positive effect of maternal age, in a reduced dataset for which father age was known, older fathers tended to produce pups with shorter telomeres, although this association was not significant (Inline graphic, p = 0.07).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) The positive association between maternal age and pup telomere length at emergence from the natal burrow. The line represents the model predictions from a GLMM, with a mean pup number of 5.43. (b) The negative association between the number of competitors a pup encounters in the first weeks of life and its telomere length at emergence from the natal burrow. The line represents the model predictions from a GLMM, with an average maternal age of 4.86 years. In both figures, the points represent raw data, which are translucent for clarity. Shaded areas represent the 95% confidence intervals of each model prediction.

Controlling for the effect of mother's age, pup telomeres were significantly shorter when the number of competing pups was high (Inline graphic, p = 0.018; figure 1b): telomeres were 13.3% longer when pup number was lowest compared with highest.

(b). Does an experimental feeding of mothers mitigate the effects of pup number?

The effect of maternal supplementary feeding on pup telomere lengths was evident as a significant interaction between experimental treatment and pup number (Inline graphic, p < 0.001; figure 2 and electronic supplementary material, table S2). While control pups had shorter telomeres under greater pup competition, no similar pattern was observed in pups from fed mothers. In contrast to our larger, correlative dataset, in our restricted experimental dataset, pup telomere lengths were not significantly affected by maternal age, either as a single term or in the interaction with treatment (both χ2 < 2.23, p > 0.14). Retention of the non-significant maternal age in the model did not qualitatively change the results.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The effect of experimental maternal feeding (during gestation and lactation) on pup telomere lengths is dependent on the number of competitor pups. In control litters (filled points and solid line), there is a negative relationship between the number of pups and telomere lengths, while in litters from mothers receiving supplementary feeding (open triangles and dashed line), this negative association disappears. Lines represent model predictions for a mean maternal age of 4.5 years, from a GLMM with telomere length as the response, and maternal age, experimental treatment and the interaction between treatment and number of pups. Shaded areas represent the model's 95% confidence intervals for each model prediction line. Points represent raw data and are jittered on the x-axis for clarity.

(c). Do pup telomere lengths predict survival to adulthood?

A pup's probability of survival to adulthood was positively predicted by its weight (Inline graphic, p < 0.001; electronic supplementary material, table S3) and its mother's age (Inline graphic, p = 0.027). In this dataset, pups born to dominant females were less likely to survive to adulthood compared with those born to subordinates (Inline graphic, p < 0.001); however, this may be driven by poor data availability for subordinates: only 17 pups (9% of this dataset) were born to subordinates. Pups were less likely to survive in larger groups (Inline graphic, p = 0.042). Controlling for these significant effects, pups with longer telomeres were significantly more likely to survive to adulthood (Inline graphic, p < 0.001; figure 3). Survival to adulthood was not significantly predicted by pup sex or rainfall (both Inline graphic, p > 0.36).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The positive association between pup telomere length and survival to adulthood. The line represents the model predictions from a GLMM, for a pup with a dominant mother and all other significant predictors at their mean (pup weight: 230 g; maternal age: 4.8 years and group size: 19.2). The points represent raw data (jittered on the y-axis for clarity) and the shaded areas are 95% confidence intervals of the model predictions.

(d). How does infanticide affect pup competition?

Pregnant dominant females commonly kill pups born to subordinate females shortly after they are born [35]. The probability of a subordinate litter surviving its first 2 days was 9.4% if it was born during the high dominant female infanticide period (the 30 days before dominant female parturition), compared with 71.6% during the low dominant female infanticide period (the 30 days after dominant female parturition; Inline graphic, p < 0.001; figure 4a and electronic supplementary material, table S4i).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(a) The effect of dominant female infanticidal behaviour on the probability of subordinate litters surviving their first 2 days of life. Points represent predicted means and standard errors from a binomial mixed model with dominant female infanticide risk as the only predictor. (b) The effect of infanticide by dominant females on the total number of surviving pups produced by all subordinate females in their group.

After controlling for the number of subordinate females giving birth (Inline graphic, p < 0.0001; electronic supplementary material, table S4ii), infanticide by the pregnant dominant female significantly reduced the total number of subordinate pups surviving to emergence (Inline graphic, p < 0.0001; figure 4b), and the number of surviving non-littermates that pups born to the dominant female had to compete with fell from a median value of 4 to 0. This suggests that the infanticidal behaviour of dominant females leads to a substantial reduction in pup competition for her own litter. From our analysis of the effects of pup number on telomere lengths, we estimate that the removal of four rival pups is likely to be associated with a 7.3% increase in telomere lengths for the dominant female's pups.

4. Discussion

Our results show that early-life competition is associated with shortened telomeres in wild meerkats, and that this effect is evident by the time pups leave the natal burrow at approximately 28 days old. The detrimental effect of competition on pup telomere lengths disappears when mothers are given supplementary food during gestation and lactation, suggesting that the reduction in telomere lengths in pups facing more rivals is a consequence of competition for food. Pups with short telomeres show a lower probability of survival to adulthood. Dominant females can reduce pup competition through killing other pups born in their group at times while they are pregnant, with likely benefits for their own pups' telomere lengths and survival.

Our findings from a wild, social mammal extend evidence that in several biparental bird species, offspring competing with more rivals, or rivals higher in the competitive hierarchy, exhibit accelerated telomere loss [2025]. There are several non-mutually exclusive explanations for the association between high numbers of competing offspring and shortened telomeres in meerkats. Under greater competition, offspring typically expend more energy gaining access to food (either through elevated begging or competing to access food, [4951]). Early-life adversity can also trigger physiological stress mechanisms, which confer short-term benefits, but are costly in the long term, as they allocate resources to immediate survival at the expense of somatic maintenance [52]. Greater competition can also promote accelerated growth profiles, whereby offspring grow faster than their optimal developmental rate in order to out-compete rivals [53]. Aggressively competing to access food, physiological stress cascades and accelerated growth can all lead to elevated oxidative damage and accelerated telomere attrition ([5458], but see [8]).

Our experimental results show that high numbers of competing pups are no longer associated with reduced telomere lengths when maternal food intake is increased during gestation and lactation. Previous evidence suggests that experimental food supplementation of weaned meerkat pups reduces aggressive pup competition [59], and that a relaxed early-life competitive environment slows telomere shortening in other species [23]. Increased maternal weight during gestation is positively associated with meerkat pup weight at weaning [46], suggesting that heavier females are better able to provision their young, leading to reduced early-life competition. Pups from experimentally fed mothers may therefore exhibit longer telomeres owing to a relaxed early competitive environment, arising from improved pup quality at birth (thus enhancing pup competitive ability), or elevated maternal milk yield or micronutrient content (thus reducing the pups’ need to compete for food) [60].

Our finding that variation in offspring telomere lengths is associated with maternal and paternal age should be interpreted with caution. Pups born to older mothers had longer telomeres, and while a female could provide better care for offspring as she grows older, it is equally possible that early mortality of poor-quality females leads to disproportionate numbers of high-quality females in older cohorts [61,62]. The positive effect of maternal age on pup telomere lengths may therefore be due to selective disappearance, rather than within-female change. Furthermore, maternal age at conception is unrelated to offspring telomere length in other mammals [63]; whether subsequent litters of pups have longer telomeres as the mother grows older is therefore unclear. We also find that paternal age has a weak negative effect on pup telomere lengths. This result is surprising, given that paternal age at conception is typically positively associated with offspring telomeres (e.g. in humans [63] and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) [64]). It is possible that older male meerkats lose condition faster than humans or chimpanzees, with concomitant decreases in sperm and pup telomere lengths, but further work would be needed to clarify the role of paternal age at conception in meerkat telomere dynamics.

Shortened pup telomeres following early-life competition may be associated with significant fitness costs, given our finding that reduced telomere lengths predicted low survival to adulthood. Short telomeres and rapid telomere attrition are associated with reduced survival and curtailed longevity in a number of species, both in captivity and in the wild [1012,28]. Given that we found short telomeres were linked to reduced survival during meerkats' first year of life, this likely does not reflect accelerated senescence, as senescence is typically only manifest after meerkats reach 3 years old [65]. Similarly, early-life telomere dynamics are linked with survival during the first years of life in other wild mammals [29], suggesting that telomeres are not only linked to ageing-related mortality, but provide an integrative biomarker of somatic damage which can be associated with mortality at any age [66]. Whether telomere dynamics in adult meerkats are predictive of age-related mortality requires further investigation.

Our results suggest that infanticide by dominant females leads to marked reductions in the number of competitors faced by their own litters. Previous evidence suggests that experimental reductions of pup number, either by temporary pup removal or by contraception of subordinate females, leads to increased weight gain in the remaining pups [33,67]. Heavier pups are subsequently more likely to survive to adulthood and acquire dominance [67,68], suggesting that this accelerated growth does not exceed the optimal growth rate and therefore confers little costs. By eliminating rival offspring, dominant females are therefore likely to improve the condition, survival and probability of dominance acquisition of their own litters.

Our findings highlight a further potential benefit of infanticide: the removal of competitor pups may be associated with a significant increase in pup telomere lengths. Longer telomeres are associated with improved early-life survival in meerkats and later-life benefits including delayed senescence and improved longevity in a number of other species [1012,14]. Such later-life benefits may be particularly important in meerkats: in dominants (who monopolize reproduction), the primary determinant of lifetime reproductive success is dominance tenure length [69]. Dominants of both sexes exhibit senescence and their tenure typically ends when they are unable to repel same-sex challengers [36,39,65,70]. In addition to the above benefits for offspring condition and dominance acquisition, infanticide may therefore allow dominant females to improve pup telomere lengths, thus delaying their onset of senescence, extending their dominance tenures and increasing their lifetime reproductive success. While the level and type of parental care has been shown to influence offspring telomere lengths in humans and captive rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) [30,71,72], to our knowledge this is the first evidence that a specific maternal strategy (killing competitor pups) has associated benefits for offspring telomere lengths.

5. Conclusion

Our results suggest that in a social species, where offspring competition may be particularly pronounced, an unfavourable early-life competitive environment accelerates telomere loss under natural conditions, with potentially lifelong consequences [12]. Despite the observed enduring detrimental effects of early-life adversity on telomere dynamics [2025,28,58], and the clear selection pressure this places on parents, few studies have investigated whether parents are able to protect offspring telomeres by improving the early environment. In meerkats, dominant females kill rival litters to reduce competition for their own pups, resulting in improved pup condition and likely benefits for telomere lengths and longevity. Overall, our results highlight that both the early environment and protective parental strategies may affect offspring telomere lengths, and without detailed consideration of both, we are likely to underestimate the role of telomere dynamics in shaping life-histories, ageing profiles and fitness.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary methods
rspb20171383supp1.pdf (110.3KB, pdf)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary results
rspb20171383supp2.pdf (107.7KB, pdf)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data 01 - correlative
rspb20171383supp3.csv (16.7KB, csv)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data 02 - experimental
rspb20171383supp4.csv (1.5KB, csv)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data 03 - survival
rspb20171383supp5.csv (12.9KB, csv)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data 04 - infanticide
rspb20171383supp6.csv (7.1KB, csv)

Acknowledgements

We thank the Kalahari Research Trust for permission to work at the Kuruman River Reserve and the neighbouring farmers for the use of their land. Many thanks to Marta Manser, Dave Gaynor and Tim Vink for the organization of the field site and database. We are grateful to all the volunteers, students and researchers who have assisted with data collection, especially Ben Dantzer, Sinead English, Stuart Sharp, Helen Spence-Jones, Chris Duncan and Nathan Thavarajah. Three anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments that improved an earlier draft of this work. We thank Iain Stevenson and Penny Roth for support and Markus Zöttl and Raff Mares for many useful discussions. We are especially grateful to Jenny York for advice throughout this work. Finally, we thank the Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation for permission to conduct the research.

Ethics

Our work was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Pretoria, South Africa (no. EC010-13) and by the Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation, South Africa (FAUNA 1020/2016).

Data accessibility

All data used in analyses and figures are included in the electronic supplementary material.

Authors' contributions

This study was designed by D.L.C. and T.C.-B.; P.M. and R.G. planned and implemented the laboratory analyses and advised on interpretation of telomere data. D.L.C. planned and implemented the statistical analyses; D.L.C. and T.C.-B. wrote the paper, with extensive advice from P.M. and R.G. All authors contributed to the manuscript, approved the final version and are accountable for the work.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

The Kalahari Meerkat Project is supported by the Universities of Cambridge, Zurich and Pretoria. Components of this research were supported by grants to T.C.-B. from the Natural Environment Research Council (grant no. NE/G006822/1) and the European Research Council (grant no. 294494). P.M. was supported by the European Research Council (grant no. 268926).

References

  • 1.Lindström J. 1999. Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 343–348. ( 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01639-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tarry-Adkins JL, Ozanne SE. 2011. Mechanisms of early life programming: current knowledge and future directions. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 94(Suppl. 6), 1765S-1771S. ( 10.3945/ajcn.110.000620) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nussey DH, et al. 2014. Measuring telomere length and telomere dynamics in evolutionary biology and ecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 299–310. ( 10.1111/2041-210X.12161) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blackburn EH. 1991. Structure and function of telomeres. Nature 350, 569–573. ( 10.1038/350569a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Epel ES, Blackburn EH, Lin J, Dhabhar FS, Adler NE, Morrow JD, Cawthon RM. 2004. Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17 312–17 315. ( 10.1073/pnas.0407162101) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Badás EP, Martínez J, Rivero de Aguilar Cachafeiro J, Miranda F, Figuerola J, Merino S. 2015. Ageing and reproduction: antioxidant supplementation alleviates telomere loss in wild birds. J. Evol. Biol. 28, 896–905. ( 10.1111/jeb.12615) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Salomons HM, Mulder GA, van de Zande L, Haussmann MF, Linskens MHK, Verhulst S. 2009. Telomere shortening and survival in free-living corvids. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 3157–3165. ( 10.1098/rspb.2009.0517) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boonekamp JJ, Bauch C, Mulder E, Verhulst S. 2017. Does oxidative stress shorten telomeres? Biol. Lett. 13, 20170164 ( 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0164) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aubert G, Lansdorp PM. 2008. Telomeres and aging. Physiol. Rev. 88, 557–579. ( 10.1152/physrev.00026.2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barrett ELB, Burke TA, Hammers M, Komdeur J, Richardson DS. 2013. Telomere length and dynamics predict mortality in a wild longitudinal study. Mol. Ecol. 22, 249–259. ( 10.1111/mec.12110) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bize P, Criscuolo F, Metcalfe NB, Nasir L, Monaghan P. 2009. Telomere dynamics rather than age predict life expectancy in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1679–1683. ( 10.1098/rspb.2008.1817) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heidinger BJ, Blount JD, Boner W, Griffiths K, Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P. 2012. Telomere length in early life predicts lifespan. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1743–1748. ( 10.1073/pnas.1113306109) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boonekamp JJ, Simons MJP, Hemerik L, Verhulst S. 2013. Telomere length behaves as biomarker of somatic redundancy rather than biological age. Aging Cell 12, 330–332. ( 10.1111/acel.12050) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Armanios M, Blackburn EH. 2012. The telomere syndromes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 693–704. ( 10.1038/nrg3246) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ridout KK, Levandowski M, Ridout SJ, Gantz L, Goonan K, Palermo D, Price LH, Tyrka AR. In press Early life adversity and telomere length: a meta-analysis. Mol. Psychiatry ( 10.1038/mp.2017.26) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Herborn KA, Heidinger BJ, Boner W, Noguera JC, Adam A, Daunt F, Monaghan P. 2014. Stress exposure in early post-natal life reduces telomere length: an experimental demonstration in a long-lived seabird. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20133151 ( 10.1098/rspb.2013.3151) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McLennan D, Armstrong JD, Stewart DC, McKelvey S, Boner W, Monaghan P, Metcalfe NB. 2016. Interactions between parental traits, environmental harshness and growth rate in determining telomere length in wild juvenile salmon. Mol. Ecol. 25, 5425–5438. ( 10.1111/mec.13857) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Meillère A, Brischoux F, Ribout C, Angelier F. 2015. Traffic noise exposure affects telomere length in nestling house sparrows. Biol. Lett. 11, 20150559 ( 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0559) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Watson H, Bolton M, Monaghan P. 2015. Variation in early-life telomere dynamics in a long-lived bird: links to environmental conditions and survival. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 668–674. ( 10.1242/jeb.104265) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boonekamp JJ, Mulder GA, Salomons HM, Dijkstra C, Verhulst S. 2014. Nestling telomere shortening, but not telomere length, reflects developmental stress and predicts survival in wild birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20133287 ( 10.1098/rspb.2013.3287) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mizutani Y, Niizuma Y, Yoda K. 2016. How do growth and sibling competition affect telomere dynamics in the first month of life of long-lived seabird? PLoS ONE 11, e0167261 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0167261) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nettle D, Monaghan P, Boner W, Gillespie R, Bateson M. 2013. Bottom of the heap: having heavier competitors accelerates early-life telomere loss in the European starling, Sturnus vulgaris. PLoS ONE 8, e83617 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0083617) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nettle D, Monaghan P, Gillespie R, Brilot B, Bedford T, Bateson M. 2015. An experimental demonstration that early-life competitive disadvantage accelerates telomere loss. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20141610 ( 10.1098/rspb.2014.1610) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reichert S, Criscuolo F, Zahn S, Arrivé M, Bize P, Massemin S. 2015. Immediate and delayed effects of growth conditions on ageing parameters in nestling zebra finches. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 491–499. ( 10.1242/jeb.109942) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stier A, Massemin S, Zahn S, Tissier ML, Criscuolo F. 2015. Starting with a handicap: effects of asynchronous hatching on growth rate, oxidative stress and telomere dynamics in free-living great tits. Oecologia 179, 999–1010. ( 10.1007/s00442-015-3429-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lukas D, Clutton-Brock T.. 2017. Climate and the distribution of cooperative breeding in mammals. R. Soc. open sci. 4, 160897 ( 10.1098/rsos.160897) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Clutton-Brock TH, et al. 2001. Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups. Science 291, 478–481. ( 10.1126/science.291.5503.478) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Needham BL, Rehkopf D, Adler N, Gregorich S, Lin J, Blackburn EH, Epel ES. 2015. Leukocyte telomere length and mortality in the national health and nutrition examination survey, 1999–2002. Epidemiology 26, 528–535. ( 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000299) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fairlie J, Holland R, Pilkington JG, Pemberton JM, Harrington L, Nussey DH. 2016. Lifelong leukocyte telomere dynamics and survival in a free-living mammal. Aging Cell 15, 140–148. ( 10.1111/acel.12417) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Asok A, Bernard K, Roth TL, Rosen JB, Dozier M. 2013. Parental responsiveness moderates the association between early-life stress and reduced telomere length. Dev. Psychopathol. 25, 577–585. ( 10.1017/S0954579413000011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Clutton-Brock TH, Hodge SJ, Flower TP, Spong GF, Young AJ. 2010. Adaptive suppression of subordinate reproduction in cooperative mammals. Am. Nat. 176, 664–673. ( 10.1086/656492) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Clutton-Brock TH, Maccoll A, Chadwick P, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Skinner JD. 1999. Reproduction and survival of suricates (Suricata suricatta) in the southern Kalahari. Afr. J. Ecol. 37, 69–80. ( 10.1046/j.1365-2028.1999.00160.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bell MBV, Cant MA, Borgeaud C, Thavarajah N, Samson J, Clutton-Brock TH. 2014. Suppressing subordinate reproduction provides benefits to dominants in cooperative societies of meerkats. Nat. Commun. 5, 4499 ( 10.1038/ncomms5499) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hodge SJ, Flower TP, Clutton-Brock TH. 2007. Offspring competition and helper associations in cooperative meerkats. Anim. Behav. 74, 957–964. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.029) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, Smith R, McIlrath GM, Kansky R, Gaynor D, Riain MJ, Skinner JD.. 1998. Infanticide and expulsion of females in a cooperative mammal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2291–2295. ( 10.1098/rspb.1998.0573) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hodge SJ, Manica A, Flower TP, Clutton-Brock TH. 2008. Determinants of reproductive success in dominant female meerkats. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 92–102. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01318.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Young AJ, Clutton-Brock T. 2006. Infanticide by subordinates influences reproductive sharing in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Biol. Lett. 2, 385 ( 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0463) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Griffin AS, Pemberton JM, Brotherton PNM, McIlrath G, Gaynor D, Kansky R, O'Riain J, Clutton-Brock TH. 2003. A genetic analysis of breeding success in the cooperative meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Behav. Ecol. 14, 472–480. ( 10.1093/beheco/arg040) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Spong GF, Hodge SJ, Young AJ, Clutton-Brock TH. 2008. Factors affecting the reproductive success of dominant male meerkats. Mol. Ecol. 17, 2287–2299. ( 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03734.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dubuc C, English S, Thavarajah N, Dantzer B, Sharp SP, Spence-Jones HC, Gaynor D, Clutton-Brock TH.. 2017. Increased food availability raises eviction rate in a cooperative breeding mammal. Biol. Lett. 13, 20160961 ( 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0961) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cawthon RM, Smith KR, O'Brien E, Sivatchenko A, Kerber RA. 2003. Association between telomere length in blood and mortality in people aged 60 years or older. Lancet 361, 393–395. ( 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12384-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Criscuolo F, Bize P, Nasir L, Metcalfe NB, Foote CG, Griffiths K, Gault EA, Monaghan P. 2009. Real-time quantitative PCR assay for measurement of avian telomeres. J. Avian Biol. 40, 342–347. ( 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2008.04623.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Crawley M. 2007. The R book, pp. 527–528. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.R Development Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Burnham KP, Anderson DR.. 2003. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York, NY: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Russell AF, Brotherton PNM, McIlrath GM, Sharpe LL, Clutton-Brock TH. 2003. Breeding success in cooperative meerkats: effects of helper number and maternal state. Behav. Ecol. 14, 486–492. ( 10.1093/beheco/arg022) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Russell AF, Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, Sharpe LL, McIlrath GM, Dalerum FD, Cameron EZ, Barnard JA. 2002. Factors affecting pup growth and survival in co-operatively breeding meerkats Suricata suricatta. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 700–709. ( 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00636.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mares R, Bateman AW, English S, Clutton-Brock TH, Young AJ. 2014. Timing of predispersal prospecting is influenced by environmental, social and state-dependent factors in meerkats. Anim. Behav. 88, 185–193. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.025) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Drake A, Fraser D, Weary DM. 2008. Parent–offspring resource allocation in domestic pigs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 309–319. ( 10.1007/s00265-007-0418-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Madden JR, Kunc HP, English S, Manser MB, Clutton-Brock TH. 2009. Calling in the gap: competition or cooperation in littermates’ begging behaviour? Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1255–1262. ( 10.1098/rspb.2008.1660) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kilner RM. 2001. A growth cost of begging in captive canary chicks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11 394–11 398. ( 10.1073/pnas.191221798) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Monaghan P. 2013. Organismal stress, telomeres and life histories. J. Exp. Biol. 217, 57–66. ( 10.1242/jeb.090043) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huchard E, English S, Bell MBV, Thavarajah N, Clutton-Brock T. 2016. Competitive growth in a cooperative mammal. Nature 533, 532–534. ( 10.1038/nature17986) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Costantini D, Marasco V, Møller AP. 2011. A meta-analysis of glucocorticoids as modulators of oxidative stress in vertebrates. J. Comp. Physiol. B 181, 447–456. ( 10.1007/s00360-011-0566-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.De Block M, Stoks R. 2008. Compensatory growth and oxidative stress in a damselfly. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 781–785. ( 10.1098/rspb.2007.1515) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Haussmann MF, Longenecker AS, Marchetto NM, Juliano SA, Bowden RM. 2012. Embryonic exposure to corticosterone modifies the juvenile stress response, oxidative stress and telomere length. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 1447–1456. ( 10.1098/rspb.2011.1913) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Moreno-Rueda G, Redondo T, Trenzado CE, Sanz A, Zúñiga JM.. 2012. Oxidative stress mediates physiological costs of begging in magpie (Pica pica) nestlings. PLoS ONE 7, e40367 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0040367) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nettle D, Andrews C, Reichert S, Bedford T, Kolenda C, Parker C, Martin-Ruiz C, Monaghan P, Bateson M. 2017. Early-life adversity accelerates cellular ageing and affects adult inflammation: experimental evidence from the European starling. Sci. Rep. 7, 40794 ( 10.1038/srep40794) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hodge SJ, Thornton A, Flower TP, Clutton-Brock TH. 2009. Food limitation increases aggression in juvenile meerkats. Behav. Ecol. 20, 930–935. ( 10.1093/beheco/arp071) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Landete-Castillejos T, García A, López-Serrano FR, Gallego L. 2005. Maternal quality and differences in milk production and composition for male and female Iberian red deer calves (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57, 267–274. ( 10.1007/s00265-004-0848-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sanz-Aguilar A, Cortés-Avizanda A, Serrano D, Blanco G, Ceballos O, Grande JM, Tella JL, Donázar JA. 2017. Sex- and age-dependent patterns of survival and breeding success in a long-lived endangered avian scavenger. Sci. Rep. 7, 40204 ( 10.1038/srep40204) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Vaupel JW, Yashin AI. 1985. Heterogeneity's ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. Am. Stat. 39, 176–185. ( 10.1080/00031305.1985.10479424) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Broer L, et al. 2013. Meta-analysis of telomere length in 19713 subjects reveals high heritability, stronger maternal inheritance and a paternal age effect. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 21, 1163–1168. ( 10.1038/ejhg.2012.303) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Eisenberg DTA, Tackney J, Cawthon RM, Cloutier CT, Hawkes K. 2017. Paternal and grandpaternal ages at conception and descendant telomere lengths in chimpanzees and humans. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 162, 201–207. ( 10.1002/ajpa.23109) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sharp SP, Clutton-Brock TH. 2010. Reproductive senescence in a cooperatively breeding mammal. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 176–183. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01616.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Simons MJP. 2015. Questioning causal involvement of telomeres in aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 24, 191–196. ( 10.1016/j.arr.2015.08.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Clutton-Brock T, Russell A, Sharpe L, Brotherton P, McIlrath G, White S, Cameron E. 2001. Effects of helpers on juvenile development and survival in meerkats. Science 293, 2446–2449. ( 10.1126/science.1061274) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.English S, Huchard E, Nielsen JF, Clutton-Brock TH. 2013. Early growth, dominance acquisition and lifetime reproductive success in male and female cooperative meerkats. Ecol. Evol. 3, 4401–4407. ( 10.1002/ece3.820) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Clutton-Brock TH, Hodge SJ, Spong G, Russell AF, Jordan NR, Bennett NC, Sharpe LL, Manser MB. 2006. Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals. Nature 444, 1065–1068. ( 10.1038/nature05386) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sharp SP, Clutton-Brock TH. 2011. Competition, breeding success and ageing rates in female meerkats. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 1756–1762. ( 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02304.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Enokido M, Suzuki A, Sadahiro R, Matsumoto Y, Kuwahata F, Takahashi N, Goto K, Otani K.. 2014. Parental care influences leukocyte telomere length with gender specificity in parents and offsprings. BMC Psychiatry 14, 277 ( 10.1186/s12888-014-0277-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Schneper LM, Brooks-Gunn J, Notterman DA, Suomi SJ. 2016. Early-life experiences and telomere length in adult rhesus monkeys: an exploratory study. Psychosom. Med. 78, 1066–1071. ( 10.1097/psy.0000000000000402) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary methods
rspb20171383supp1.pdf (110.3KB, pdf)
Supplementary results
rspb20171383supp2.pdf (107.7KB, pdf)
Supplementary data 01 - correlative
rspb20171383supp3.csv (16.7KB, csv)
Supplementary data 02 - experimental
rspb20171383supp4.csv (1.5KB, csv)
Supplementary data 03 - survival
rspb20171383supp5.csv (12.9KB, csv)
Supplementary data 04 - infanticide
rspb20171383supp6.csv (7.1KB, csv)

Data Availability Statement

All data used in analyses and figures are included in the electronic supplementary material.


Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES