Abstract
Insect cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) play critical roles in reducing water loss and chemical communication. Species-specific CHC profiles have been used increasingly as an excellent character for species classification. However, considerably less is known about their potential for population delimitation within species. The aims of this study were to develop a solid-phase microextraction (SPME)-based CHC collection method and to investigate whether CHC profiles could serve as potential chemotaxonomic tools for intraspecific delimitation in Acyrthosiphon pisum. Optimization of fibers for SPME sampling revealed that 7 μm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) demonstrated the most efficient adsorption of CHCs among five different tested fibers. SPME sampling showed good reproducibility with repeated collections of CHCs from a single aphid. Validation of SPME was performed by comparing CHC profiles with those from conventional hexane extractions. The two methods showed no qualitative differences in CHCs, although SPME appeared to extract relatively fewer short-chained CHCs. While CHC profiles of a given population differed among developmental stages, wing dimorphism types, and host plants, wingless adult aphids showed very low variance in relative proportions of individual CHC components. Reproducibility of CHC profiles was explored further to classify wingless adult morphs of A. pisum from five different geographic regions that showed no variation in mitochondrial COI gene sequences. Our results demonstrate that CHC profiles are useful in intraspecific delimitation in the field of insect chemotaxonomy.
Introduction
Insect cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) are non-polar lipids that function primarily as a barrier against desiccation, serve as species, colony, and gender-specific chemical communication cues [1,2], and are involved in insecticide resistance [3]. CHCs in a given species can be a mixture of several to more than 100 components of 21–50+ carbon alkanes, alkenes and their branched derivatives that vary in number and position of double bond and methyl branches [1,4]. Such variation makes CHC compositions highly diverse [5], leading to an assortment of mating selection types, and thus informative for reproductive isolation [6].
As a result of species specificity, CHC profiles in distinct species usually display qualitative differences, such as presence or absence of CHC components. However, subtypes of a given species generally vary in the levels of different components [6]. The nature of species specificity makes CHCs an excellent biochemical character to delimit species boundaries [7,8], reveal cryptic species [9–11], and discover new species [12]. Heritable CHCs can be extended to detect intraspecific variation in hydrocarbon phenotypes of some species [13–15]. However, the CHC profiles can be affected by many internal and external factors, such as developmental age, geographic location, and diet [6,16].
Aphids are among the most complex insect species and display multiple intraspecific phenotypic forms [17]. The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) is an important pest of many leguminous plants [18,19], and it has been used as a genomic model system for a range of biological studies [17]. Different biotypes usually show various characteristics, including facultative endosymbionts, RNAi efficiency, response to high density, and they can satisfactorily meet the needs of different experiments. As molecular classification is tedious and requires sacrificing sample individuals, there is a growing need for a simple and non-destructive method to delimit the subtypes within A. pisum species. However, few data are available to address potential CHC profiles in intraspecific delimitation of aphid species and it remains unknown whether species-specific CHC profiles can be used in chemotaxonomic delimitation of biotypes of aphids.
CHCs of A. pisum are usually extracted by immersing the whole insect into a solvent such as n-hexane or dichloromethane and analyzed with GC-MS [20–22]. This method has the risk of extracting internal body lipids and exocrine gland secretions along with the CHCs. A solvent-free and non-destructive solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method with fused-silica fiber coats [23] has been developed for collecting lipids from different matrices [24–27]. SPME seems an ideal approach to study insect CHCs [28]. SPME fibers covered by different coating materials with various polarities are commercially available; however, SPME method and the best fiber have not been developed for studying CHCs in aphids.
In the present study, we examined the efficiency of five different commercial SPME fibers for collecting the A. pisum CHCs and compared these with the CHCs obtained from hexane extracts. Using the optimized SPME sampling coupled to GC-MS analysis, we explored the polymorphism and plasticity of CHC profiles in A. pisum with respect to several factors, including developmental stage, wing dimorphism, and host plant. We further investigated the variation of CHC profiles of five different A. pisum subtypes originally collected from various geographic locations. With qualitative and quantitative analysis of CHC profiles, we conclude that the SPME-based CHC profile can be served as a viable intraspecific taxonomic tool in A. pisum.
Materials and methods
A. pisum colony
Five discrete geographic morphs of A. pisum were utilized in this study. Three of them have green body color and two are red. Details of each morph, including body color, original host, collection site, and time are shown in S1 Table. A triplet morph code was assigned for each of the five morphs (GNY, GGS, GYN, RGS or RQH), with the first letter describing body color (G = green; R = red). The five populations were separately reared on either broad bean seedlings (Vicia faba L., var. “Jin-nong”) or on clover (Trifolium repens L.) in climate chambers at 18°C, ~70% relative humidity (RH), and a 16: 8 h (light: dark) photoperiod. Unless otherwise stated, all aphids used in this study were parthenogenetic, wingless morphs.
DNA extraction, PCR, and sequencing
Total DNA was isolated from an individual adult using a conventional sodium dodecyl sulfate method [29] and was suspended in 100 μl of nuclease-free water. The purity and integrity were assessed by subjecting 2 μl and 5 μl of total DNA extracts to a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer and 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. We used the primer pair (ApCOI-F: 5’-TTTCAACTAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3’ and ApCOI-R: 5’-TAAACTTCAGGATGTCCAAAGAATCA-3’), which was modified from that designed for Lepidoptera [30], to amplify a 709 bp fragment corresponding to the 5’ region of the A. pisum mitochondrial COI (mtCOI) gene (GenBank: AB506719). Each PCR reaction mix consisted of 50 μl, containing 5 μl of 10× Ex Taq Buffer, 4 μl of dNTP mixture (2.5 mM each), 2 μl of DNA template, 2 μl of each primer (10 μM), and 0.25 μl of TaKaRa Ex Taq (5 U/μl). The thermocycling profile was set as the following: 94°C for 3 min; 5 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 45°C for 30 s and 72°C for 50 s followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 51°C for 30 s and 72°C for 50 s; and a final extension of 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were screened on 1% agarose gels and Sanger-based DNA sequencing was performed (Invitrogen, Beijing, China).
Solvent extraction of CHCs
CHCs were extracted following a 2 min n-hexane immersion with two repetitions, as previously described [22]. CHCs of aphids were extracted individually to compare with the SPME method. For quantification of the total amount of CHCs, pooled aphids (~15 mg) were used, and an aliquot of 50 μl of n-tetracosane (4 μg/ml in hexane) was added as an internal standard prior to extraction. The hexane extracts were purified by a ~300 mg silica gel (70–230 mesh, Sigma, Louis, MO, USA) mini-column, but for comparison with the SPME method, this purification was not performed. All samples were dried under a gentle nitrogen stream, re-suspended in 50 μl of hexane, and 1 μl aliquot of the solvent was subjected to gas chromatograph (GC) analysis.
Solid-phase microextraction of CHCs
CHCs of individual aphids were extracted with five different types of SPME fiber assemblies (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) housed in a manual holder from the same manufacturer. All fibers were sufficiently conditioned by heating them in the injection port of a gas chromatograph (GC) prior to their first use. The temperature and duration of conditioning varied among different stationary phases of fiber coatings, as recommended by the supplier’s instructions: 85 μm carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS) at 300°C for 30 min, 85 μm polyacrylate (PA) at 280°C for 30 min, 65 μm polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) at 250°C for 30 min, 100 μm PDMS at 250°C for 30 min, and 7 μm PDMS at 320°C for 1 h. SPME sampling was performed as per SPME guidelines [31] to ensure constant conditions for all samples. Live aphids were immobilized on the smaller end of a 1000 μl pipet tip, with which a vacuum pump was equipped to produce negative pressure (see details in S1 Fig). Then the fiber (±1 cm) was rubbed softly and rotated against the abdominal tergum for 30 s. Immediately afterwards, the loaded fibers were inserted into the GC injection port for a 5 min desorption. The fibers were conditioned for 10 min before the next sampling.
GC-MS analysis
Chemical analyses were performed with a TRACE 1310 gas chromatograph (GC), interfaced to an ISQ single quadruple mass spectrometer (MS) (GC-MS, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the system was controlled by the Xcalibur 2.2 software. The GC oven was fit with an HP-5 MS UI capillary column (30 m length × 0.32 mm inner diameter × 0.25 μm film thickness, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Sample injection was performed in splitless mode with helium as the carrier gas at a constant flow of 1 ml min−1. Hexane samples (1 μl) were injected by a TriPlus RSH autosampler (Thermo) and SPME samples were manually injected by inserting the fibers into the GC inlet. Specifically for SPME samples, a narrow-bore glass inlet liner (0.75 mm inner diameter) was used to desorb the loaded SPME fibers. The inlet temperature was maintained at 270°C for 65 μm PDMS/DVB, 280°C for 85 μm PA and 100 μm PDMS, 310°C for 85 μm CAR/PDMS, and 320°C for 7 μm PDMS and hexane samples. The GC running of the column oven was programmed from 60°C for 2 min, then ramped at 30°C min−1 to 200°C (0 min hold) and ramped at 5°C min−1 to 320°C with a 10 min hold. The transfer line was set at 280°C and the mass spectrometer was operated in EI mode with a 70 eV ionization energy. Scanning was recorded from 45 to 650 atomic mass units, at a rate of 5 scans/s.
Data analysis and statistics
Components of individual peaks were identified by comparing their retention times to those of the n-alkane standards (C7–C40, Sigma, Louis, MO, USA). They were then corroborated by their diagnostic EI ions (m/z = 352, 366, 380, 394, 408, 422, 436, 450, and 464 for C25–C33 n-alkanes, respectively). Each peak area was integrated using a single mass fragment (m/z = 71.0, one of the most intense ions) from the total ion spectrum. The relative proportion (percent area) of each component was computed by dividing individual peak area over the total peak area of all identified components. CHC components for each morph were ranked from high to low according to their relative proportions. For the hexane extracts, quantitative whole amounts of CHCs were calculated by comparing the peak area of each component with that of the internal standard (IS, n-tetracosane) of known quantity (200 ng).
Nine CHC peaks that occurred regularly were used for statistical analysis. Differences in the percent of individual CHCs found between two groups or among multi-groups were determined with the Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA, followed by the least significant difference test (LSD). CHC variation across groups was investigated with multivariate statistics. To avoid limitations inherent to the analysis of compositional data, the peak area was log-ratio transformed, based on the formula: zi, j = ln[Yi, j/g(Yj)], where Yi, j is the area of peak i for aphid j, g(Yj) is the geometric mean of all peaks for aphid j, and zi, j is the standardized area of peak i for aphid j [32]. The transformed data were then subjected to a principal components analysis (PCA) based on the correlation matrix. Extracted PCs with eigenvalues exceeding 1 were retained, and the results were visualized in score plots. The component matrix that indicates the correlations between each CHC and the PCs was plotted to interpret which CHCs are responsible for separating specific populations. Quantitative differences of CHC profiles among various intraspecific morphs also were determined statistically using multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA). All statistical analyses were implemented using IBM SPSS Statistics v. 19.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Variation of mtDNA-COI gene sequence
In order to confirm the identification of A. pisum species and investigate the genetic variation among different morphs, we sequenced and aligned of the mtCOI gene, which has been recognized as a well-known molecular marker for insect molecular taxonomy. A total of 50 DNA samples (10 for each morph) of PCR products from individual aphids were sequenced. Some of the samples (GGS (2), GYN (1), and RQH (1)) were excluded from the analysis, because of impure signals obtained during the sequencing reaction. Approximately 650 bp sequences were aligned, and a BlastN alignment to the NCBI database revealed that all of the 46 sequences showed a 100% identity to the A. pisum mtCOI gene.
Comparison of different SPME fiber coatings
To determine an optimum stationary phase of SPME fiber coating for CHC sampling, we compared the chromatograms of cuticular lipids extracted by different types of fibers with different polarities, as well as the organic solvent of n-hexane. Of the five types of fibers, the 85 μm CAR/PDMS showed little adsorption of CHCs, with no visual peaks in the chromatogram (Fig 1A). The other coatings, including the 85 μm PA, 65 μm PDMS/DVB, and 100 μm and 7 μm PDMS, resulted in qualitatively similar lipid profiles, each cotaining 12 peaks. However, we found a quantitatively visible difference in the size of CHC peaks among the four coatings (Fig 1B–1E). The signal intensity achieved from the 7 μm PDMS (Fig 1E) was much higher (2.2–10 fold) than those for the other three types of fiber coatings (Fig 1B–1D). For the coating thickness of the PDMS fiber, the 7 μm coating appeared to have a more efficient in adsorption capacity compared to the 100 μm coating. Furthermore, the former possesses a wider range of operating temperatures (220–320°C) compared to the latter (200–280°C), which indicates that the 7 μm coating is more thermostable than the 100 μm coating. Taken together, the fiber coated with 7 μm PDMS was selected as an optimal SPME fiber and was used for all the SPME sampling that followed.
Fig 1.
Representative total ions chromatogram (TIC) of cuticular lipids of A. pisum extracted by direct SPME fibers (a–e) and hexane (f), and of a C7–C40 n-alkanes standard (g). Five different SPME fibers (85 μm CAR/PDMS, 85 μm PA, 65 μm PDMS/DVB, 100 μm PDMS, and 7 μm PDMS), as well as hexane, were tested for the efficiency of CHC detection. Fig 1A–1E were achieved from 2-day old wingless GNY adults. ‘×10’ in Fig 1E indicates that peaks 1–4 are 10 times higher than their actual sizes. Peaks 1–9 in Fig 1E and 1F were tested with the same aphid and identified as C25–C33 n-alkanes, respectively [22]. Peaks 10–12 were identified as aldehydes based on the results of a NIST library (Version 2.0) MS search. Each fiber was run with at least five independent replicates.
Reproducibility and validation of SPME-GC analysis
We first investigated the reproducibility of the SPME method by taking repeated samples from the same aphid and computed the coefficient of variation for each of the nine CHC peaks. The coefficients of variation were all less than 30% for the five tested aphid individuals, with averages ranging from 4.1% for n-C31 to 18.5% for n-C33 (Table 1). These data indicate that our measurements of CHCs are highly reproducible under the present analytical conditions.
Table 1. Coefficient of variation (%) of the measurements for each of the nine CHC components.
Aphid individual | n-C25 | n-C26 | n-C27 | n-C28 | n-C29 | n-C30 | n-C31 | n-C32 | n-C33 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5.7 | 9.2 | 13.9 | 9.3 | 3.0 | 20.5 | 3.2 | 15.2 | 24.4 |
2 | 11.9 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 8.1 | 5.5 | 12.5 | 1.0 | 12.4 | 10.3 |
3 | 11.8 | 15.3 | 16.7 | 28.2 | 10.1 | 12.2 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 26.0 |
4 | 15.6 | 9.5 | 13.8 | 17.6 | 3.4 | 12.9 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 22.0 |
5 | 26.3 | 17.3 | 16.1 | 6.6 | 2.7 | 19.9 | 5.9 | 7.6 | 9.7 |
mean | 14.2 | 11.5 | 13.5 | 14.0 | 4.9 | 15.6 | 4.1 | 8.6 | 18.5 |
Wingless adults of the GNY morph were used for direct SPME (7 μm PDMS) sampling, and followed by GC-MS analysis. A coefficient of variation was computed from three sequential measurements for each of five aphid individuals.
Validation of SPME (7 μm PDMS fiber) was performed by comparing the lipid profile with that achieved from hexane extraction (Fig 2A). The two distinct sampling methods showed qualitatively similar results for all five tested morphs: all peaks present in one procedure also were found in the other (Fig 1E and 1F and S2 Fig). The CHC components (peaks 1–9 in either Fig 1E or 1F) have been identified as a series of saturated straight-chain n-alkanes (C25–C33) in previous studies [8,22], and peaks 10–12 were identified as aldehydes, based on the results of a NIST library (Version 2.0) MS search. Nevertheless, the two methods yielded quantitative differences in the relative proportions of some individual components. Compared with the hexane extraction, SPME appeared to reveal lower levels of relatively short chain (≤C29) n-alkanes (apart from n-C26) (n-C25: P < 0.001; n-C26: P = 0.067; n-C27–C29: P < 0.01), but showed no significant difference in the proportions of relatively long chain (>C29) components (apart from n-C33) (n-C30: P = 0.403; n-C31: P = 0.058; n-C32: P = 0.154; n-C33: P < 0.0001) (Fig 2B).
Fig 2. Comparison of CHC profiles of A. pisum achieved from SPME and hexane extraction.
(A) Schematic diagram of experimental procedures for CHCs extraction. CHCs were first extracted with non-destructive SPME, and the same aphid (wingless adult of the GNY morph) was used again for CHCs collection with hexane. (B) Relative proportions of nine CHCs extracted with SPME and hexane. Wingless GNY adults were used. Error bars represent s.e.m of six biological replicates. n.s denotes not significant. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 (Student’s t-test).
Effect of developmental stage, wing dimorphism and host plant on CHC profiles
We first investigated whether developmental stage and wing dimorphism contribute to CHC variation. Compared with the 3rd instar nymphs, adults showed no distinct differences in the relative abundance of C25–C29 n-alkanes, but they revealed a significant decrease in n-C31 and an increase in n-C30, n-C32, and n-C33. However, the wingless adults at different ages (2-, 10-, and 20-day old) showed no significant difference in the relative proportion of all components. In addition, winged adult showed a significant increase in the relative proportion of C25–C29 n-alkanes, but a significant decrease in C30–C33 components (Table 2). The results of MANOVA showed that quantitative CHC profiles were significantly affected by developmental stages and wing dimorphism (Wilks's λ = 0.00008, F = 20.763, P < 0.0001). A PCA clearly separated aphids by developmental stage (nymph vs. adult) and wing dimorphism (wingless vs. winged), with PC 1 and PC 2 explaining 61.1% and 27.4% of the total variance of the CHC profiles, respectively. Within the wingless adults, aphids of different ages (2-, 10-, and 20-day old) pooled with little variation (Fig 3).
Table 2. Percentage of cuticular hydrocarbons at different developmental stages of Acyrthosiphon pisum.
Wingless morph | Winged adult (2 d) | F value (df = 4, 25) | P value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHCs | 3rd instar nymph | 2 d adult | 10 d adult | 20 d adult | |||
n-C25 | 0.23 ± 0.03 b | 0.46 ± 0.03 b | 0.48 ± 0.04 b | 0.46 ± 0.06 b | 1.13 ± 0.32 a | 5.276 | < 0.01 |
n-C26 | 0.57 ± 0.08 b | 0.85 ± 0.05 b | 1.15 ± 0.15 b | 0.50 ± 0.04 b | 2.24 ± 0.41 a | 12.214 | < 0.0001 |
n-C27 | 8.45 ± 0.74 b | 6.60 ± 0.55 bc | 7.57 ± 0.75 bc | 4.82 ± 0.39 c | 20.59 ± 0.94 a | 80.634 | < 0.0001 |
n-C28 | 3.06 ± 0.30 ab | 2.59 ± 0.06 b | 2.86 ± 0.23 b | 2.45 ± 0.15 b | 4.11 ± 0.44 a | 5.936 | < 0.01 |
n-C29 | 19.71 ± 1.23 b | 22.30 ± 0.74 b | 20.84 ± 1.02 b | 21.55 ± 0.88 b | 32.48 ± 1.48 a | 22.120 | < 0.0001 |
n-C30 | 1.94 ± 0.15 b | 8.28 ± 0.48 a | 8.57 ± 0.65 a | 9.57 ± 0.50 a | 3.43 ± 0.17 b | 61.440 | < 0.0001 |
n-C31 | 60.77 ± 1.57 a | 37.44 ± 1.16 b | 37.57 ± 1.70 b | 35.20 ± 1.06 b | 27.84 ± 1.19 c | 83.471 | < 0.0001 |
n-C32 | 0.52 ± 0.05 b | 9.71 ± 1.05 a | 9.34 ± 0.98 a | 11.80 ± 0.62 a | 2.66 ± 0.12 b | 48.587 | < 0.0001 |
n-C33 | 4.77 ± 0.48 b | 11.77 ± 1.62 a | 11.63 ± 0.50 a | 13.65 ± 0.81 a | 5.52 ± 0.53 b | 20.051 | < 0.0001 |
The GNY morph was used in this experiment with direct SPME (7 μm PDMS) sampling, and followed by GC-MS analysis. The average (± SE) of six biological replicates is shown for all five groups. Values in each row followed by different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA, LSD, P < 0.05).
Fig 3. Principal components analysis (PCA) of CHC profiles of the 3rd instar nymphs, wingless and winged adults of A. pisum.
The GNY morph was used for direct SPME sampling with 7 μm PDMS fiber. Shown are score plots of PC 1 versus 2, with the percentage of total variance explained by each axis given in parentheses. Each symbol represents an aphid individual. Data points for each group are enclosed within a line.
The effect of host plant diet on CHC differentiation also was examined by translocating aphids from a well-adapted population on T. renens to V. faba for more than 50 generations. The percentages of some components varied significantly at both the 10th and 50th generation, whereas no component revealed significant differences at the first generation (Table 3). A MANOVA of CHC profiles revealed a significant difference due to host plant (Wilks's λ = 0.031, F = 3.789, P < 0.0001). The principal components plot showed apparent separation of CHC profiles from aphids on T. repens at both the 10th and 50th, but not the first generation of aphids on V. faba. The first and second PC explained 50.1% and 19.8% of the total variance of the CHC profiles, respectively (Fig 4).
Table 3. Percentage of cuticular hydrocarbons of Acyrthosiphon pisum translocated from Trifolium repens to Vicia faba.
T. repens | 1st generation on V. faba | 10th generation on V. faba | 50th generation on V. faba | F value (df = 3, 23) | P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n-C25 | 0.40 ± 0.02 a | 0.40 ± 0.07 a | 0.33 ± 0.03 a | 0.38 ± 0.01 a | 0.822 | 0.50 | ||
n-C26 | 1.51 ± 0.07 a | 1.15 ± 0.16 ab | 1.02 ± 0.06 b | 1.04 ± 0.07 b | 4.871 | < 0.01 | ||
n-C27 | 11.12 ± 0.69 a | 9.15 ± 0.90 ab | 8.40 ± 0.37 b | 7.65 ± 0.63 b | 4.732 | < 0.05 | ||
n-C28 | 7.81 ± 0.63 a | 6.69 ± 0.45 a | 6.65 ± 0.30 a | 7.06 ± 0.28 a | 1.475 | 0.25 | ||
n-C29 | 37.42 ± 0.73 ab | 38.19 ± 1.33 ab | 40.80 ± 0.75 a | 35.89 ± 0.97 b | 4.311 | < 0.05 | ||
n-C30 | 12.56 ± 0.41 ab | 13.11 ± 1.46 ab | 10.36 ± 0.25 b | 14.56 ± 1.02 a | 3.521 | < 0.05 | ||
n-C31 | 14.63 ± 0.86 b | 17.66 ± 0.81 ab | 15.73 ± 0.61 ab | 18.28 ± 1.01 a | 4.146 | < 0.05 | ||
n-C32 | 3.36 ± 0.14 b | 4.78 ± 0.68 ab | 3.64 ± 0.09 b | 6.37 ± 0.71 a | 7.698 | < 0.01 | ||
n-C33 | 11.19 ± 1.11 ab | 8.87 ± 0.57 b | 13.08 ± 1.11 a | 8.77 ± 1.81 b | 3.075 | < 0.05 |
The host switching experiment was performed by translocating aphids from T. repens to V. faba for various generations. Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles were investigated by direct SPME (7 μm PDMS) sampling and GC-MS analysis. The averages (± SE) of six or seven biological replicates are shown for all of the treatments. Different letters within the same row indicate significant differences (ANOVA, LSD, P < 0.05).
Fig 4. Principal components analysis (PCA) based on CHC composition of A. pisum during host switching from T. repens to V. faba.
Wingless adults of the RGS morph were used for SPME sampling with 7 μm PDMS fiber. Shown are score plots of PC 1 versus 2, with the percentage of total variance explained by each axis given in parentheses. Each symbol represents an aphid individual. Data points for each group are enclosed within a line.
CHC variation among various geographic morphs
The intraspecific differences of the CHC profiles among the five geographic morphs were compared based on the rank of relative proportions of the nine major CHC components. The five morphs were strikingly different in the rank numbers for most of the components. These morphs could be distinguished easily based upon one or two principal components. Specifically, n-C33 was most abundant in the GGS morph. Although n-C31 also was most abundant in the GNY and GYN morphs, they differed in the second-ranked component (n-C29 in the GNY morph but n-C33 in the GYN morph). Similarly, n-C29 was most abundant in both the RGS and RQH morphs; however, n-C31 and n-C33 were the second most abundant compounds in the RGS and RQH morph, respectively (Table 4 and Fig 5).
Table 4. Percentage of cuticular hydrocarbons in five intraspecific geographic morphs of A. pisum.
GNY morph | GGS morph | GYN morph | RGS morph | RQH morph | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHCs | % CHC (n = 6) | Rank | % CHC (n = 5) | Rank | % CHC (n = 6) | Rank | % CHC (n = 6) | Rank | % CHC (n = 7) | Rank |
n-C25 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 9 | 0.52 ± 0.09 | 9 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | 9 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 9 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 9 |
n-C26 | 0.85 ± 0.05 | 8 | 1.53 ± 0.23 | 8 | 0.80 ± 0.18 | 8 | 1.04 ± 0.07 | 8 | 0.96 ± 0.12 | 8 |
n-C27 | 6.60 ± 0.55 | 6 | 10.47 ± 1.25 | 4 | 8.05 ± 1.17 | 4 | 7.65 ± 0.63 | 5 | 7.51 ± 0.89 | 5 |
n-C28 | 2.59 ± 0.06 | 7 | 5.59 ± 0.33 | 5 | 2.81 ± 0.34 | 7 | 7.06 ± 0.28 | 6 | 6.09 ± 0.54 | 6 |
n-C29 | 22.30 ± 0.74 | 2 | 24.49 ± 2.12 | 2 | 19.36 ± 1.06 | 3 | 35.89 ± 0.97 | 1 | 34.41 ± 1.35 | 1 |
n-C30 | 8.28 ± 0.48 | 5 | 5.26 ± 1.63 | 6 | 5.54 ± 0.44 | 5 | 14.56 ± 1.02 | 3 | 11.33 ± 0.79 | 4 |
n-C31 | 37.44 ± 1.16 | 1 | 15.65 ± 1.70 | 3 | 36.75 ± 1.57 | 1 | 18.28 ± 1.01 | 2 | 16.50 ± 1.18 | 3 |
n-C32 | 9.71 ± 1.05 | 4 | 2.15 ± 0.74 | 7 | 4.42 ± 0.62 | 6 | 6.37 ± 0.71 | 7 | 4.86 ± 0.63 | 7 |
n-C33 | 11.77 ± 1.62 | 3 | 34.33 ± 4.61 | 1 | 21.90 ± 1.83 | 2 | 8.77 ± 1.81 | 4 | 18.07 ± 2.11 | 2 |
Parthenogenetic wingless adults of the five morphs were used for direct SPME (7 μm PDMS) sampling followed by GC-MS analysis.
Fig 5.
Representative TIC of cuticular lipids (A) from five geographic morphs of A. pisum (B). Wingless adults were used for SPME detection with 7 μm PDMS fiber. Colored numbers above the peaks indicate their rank of peak area for the respective morph (see quantized data in Table 4). ‘×4’ or ‘×8’ in panel (A) indicates that peaks ahead are four or eight times higher than their actual sizes. Peaks with gray shadows indicate the three main cuticular aldehydes. Scale bar in panel (B) is 1 mm.
A MANOVA showed significant differences in quantitative CHC profiles among geographic morphs (Wilks's λ = 0.002, F = 8.335, P < 0.0001). A PCA resulted in clear separation of four groups, with some overlap between the RGS and RQH morphs. The first PC accounted for 47.1% of the total variance and separated the three green color morphs (GNY, GGS and GYN) from each other. The second PC which explained 34.5% of the total variance separated the GNY and GYN morphs from the other morphs (Fig 6A). The component matrix indicated that n-C26 and n-C27 contributed primarily to group separation along PC 1, and n-C28 and n-C29 contributed primarily to separation between these groups along PC 2 (Fig 6B). In addition, the PCA showed that population variation was greater than that caused by host plant for the RGS morph (S3 Fig).
Fig 6. Principal components analysis (PCA) of CHC profiles of five geographic morphs of A. pisum.
Wingless adults of each morph reared on V. faba were used for SPME sampling (7 μm PDMS). Shown are score plots of PC 1 versus 2, with the percentage of total variance explained by each axis denoted in parentheses. Each symbol represents an aphid individual. Data points for each morph are enclosed within a line. Factor loadings of CHC components on each PC are indicated in panel (B).
Discussion
Chemotaxonomy has been recognized as an additional tool for integrated taxonomy for the study of biodiversity. In this study, we have taken advantage of the informative CHC profiles as a novel chemotaxonomy method based on a fiber optimized SPME method coupled to GC-MS analysis. As expected, CHC profiles can be used satisfactorily to classify multiple intraspecific phenotypic forms. More importantly, the five geographic morphs of A. pisum that showed no sequence variation in the 5’ region of the mtCOI gene could be separated by their CHC profiles. Our findings support the notion that heritable CHC profiles can be a useful biochemical marker for intraspecific delimitation in A. pisum.
The mtCOI gene, known as a powerful molecular marker for species identification [33], is not suitable for intraspecific taxonomy in A. pisum. As COI generally provides deeper phylogenetic information than any other mitochondrial gene (e.g., 12S, 16S rDNA, cytochrome b) [34,35], we sequenced the COI gene of the five morphs, and did not find any polymorphisms among them. Our data are consistent with a previous study on A. pisum and several other aphid species (i.e., Aphis maculatae, Hayhurstia atriplicis, Myzus persicae etc.) that exhibited no intraspecific variation of COI sequence among populations collected from various geographic origins in Canada and USA [36], but are slightly different from those in Korea, which showed low variation (average below 0.02% intraspecific pairwise divergence) [37]. Thus, mtCOI works well in molecular identification of reproductively isolated species but is not a reliable marker among populations that continue to exchange genes.
The heritable CHCs provide an excellent approach to chemotaxonomic identification among species, as well as for subtypes within a given species. It is recognized that good taxonomic characters generally fulfill some criteria that make them informative for reproductive isolation and other evolutionary events [38]. As a result of species specificity, the CHC profile shows strikingly qualitative differences among independent species, and considerable data have corroborated this assumption [6,39]. Thus, in the present study, we focused on intraspecific variation. Although CHC profiles within a given species are susceptible to various biological and environmental factors, such factors generally cause differences in CHC quantities rather than alteration in defined components [6,16]. The total amount of CHCs was less useful for discriminating the five colonies, as some of them showed similar CHC levels (S4 Fig). Therefore, we focused more attention on the relative abundance of individual CHC components, traits that were found to be informative and stable during adulthood.
SPME presents several attractive features over the conventional solvent extraction. Most of all, it is a non-destructive method (with no damage or sacrifice of samples), which permits tracking CHC dynamics for valuable specimens. It also allows the study of CHC spatial distribution by rubbing the fiber on a precise location. In addition, SPME is solvent-free, which avoids contamination from internal chemicals and is more suitable for a limited number of specimens including precious museum collections and those with only partial body parts. These advantages prompted our switching to non-lethal SPME from the well-established hexane extraction. We first compared chromatograms achieved from five commercially available SPME fibers and found major quantitative differences among them (Fig 1). As different fibers usually display discrepant polarities designed for various component classes, these differences may reflect different adsorptions of non-polar CHCs, which provided us with further guidelines for fiber selection in CHC study. Although SPME has the shortcoming that absolute quantification of CHCs is not possible, it seems an ideal approach for CHC study, as we only focused on the relative proportions of individual CHCs rather than absolute quantities. We next performed validation of SPME by comparing it to hexane extraction, but we found the two methods resulted in slight quantitative differences (Fig 2). Similarly, previous studies on Drosophila melanogaster [25], Tenebrio molitor [40], and Schistocerca gregaria [41] also revealed this difference in the relative proportions of some CHC components. Unlike quantitative differences, there occurred qualitative differences in CHC profiles of Melipona marginata and Apis mellifera with the two methods, with more or fewer components detected in one but not the other method [40]. Given that solvent extraction generally involves a whole body wash, rather than a regional investigation in SPME, these differences may be attributed to the non-uniform distribution of cuticular lipids, as recently reported in D. melanogaster [42]. Moreover, SPME detects only the CHCs present on the outermost layer of epicuticle, while solvent wash also can extract CHCs located in deeper layers of the insect cuticle [43,44]. Therefore, it is more likely that SPME-derived CHCs reflect what is really present on the cuticle surface and should be a preferential consideration for future behavior or other studies.
Several aspects were considered to guide the performance that qualify CHC profiles as a valuable character for intraspecific delimitation in aphids. First of all, adult aphids revealed very low variation in CHC profiles (Fig 3 and Table 2). This stability may be attributed to the slow turnover of CHCs during adulthood in aphids [22] and other insect species [3,45]. One benefit for using adult CHCs is that adulthood allows a broad time range for CHC detection, as it is a terminal stage longer than any nymphal instar. Secondly, the effect of wing dimorphism on the relative proportions of CHCs was also evaluated. We found the winged adults possessed fewer long-chained (>C29) CHCs (Table 2) which was positively correlated with a greater desiccation resistance [46,47]. Thus, it is possible that winged aphids may not rely on a high level of desiccation resistance, as they can easily escape from a worse-fitted habitat, such as desiccation stress. The wingless morph was recommended in the present study due to its relatively easy conduct for SPME sampling which can usually be interfered by wings. Finally, we tested whether there were differences in relative proportions of CHC components between aphids feeding on different host plants, as aphids usually involve host switching in the field [18]. Interestingly, we found host switching could lead to the complete differentiation of the aphid CHC profile in only a few generations. Such differentiation highlights the crucial role of host plants in modifying insect CHC profiles, as previously reported in two sympatric beetles, Altica fragaria and Altica viridicyanea [48]. This suggests that CHC plasticity also could be used for classification of different host biotypes. Given that A. pisum mostly displays parthenogenetic morphs, and sexual reproductive aphids that lay overwintering eggs are only present in winter [17,49], the CHC profiles of sexual aphids were not investigated here.
The overlap between the RGS and RQH morphs from our PCA was not surprising, though the two morphs could be distinguished by differences in CHC ratios. Such overlap prompts speculation that the two red color morphs may indicate a closer relationship of CHC evolution. It is possible that the two distinct morphs indeed have a similar CHC profile, which makes it difficult to investigate a difference between the groups from our multivariate analysis. Alternatively, the incomplete separation of CHC profiles might reflect on-going colony differentiation, such that the two geographic morphs might belong to an intraspecific colony complex rather than two independent colonies. Such an assumption is based on the relatively close distance (~700 kilometers) between the two respective collection sites and the involvement of colony differentiation in the introduction from one geographic origin to another [18]. Given that CHC composition can well reflect genetic variation inferred from microsatellites among intraspecific colonies of the termite Reticulitermes santonensis [15], investigation of microsatellite loci is recommended for further validation of this hypothesis.
Our findings present a novel approach for CHC intraspecific delimitation in hemipterous aphids. However, a full utilization of CHC profiling will require consideration of several aspects regarding sample preparation, SPME sampling, GC analysis, and component identification that will be critical for developing this method in different laboratories. It would be ideal for all sampling and analysis to be completed in one laboratory and by the same operator to ensure all aspects of the method are the same. Conversely, taxonomists should be aware that they may not be able to obtain identical chromatograms to those in this study. The present study merely used the hemipterous A. pisum as a demonstration of CHC in intraspecific delimitation. While the CHC profile of A. pisum is rather atypical of insects, as only nine saturated straight-chain n-alkanes were detected, the methodology likely will work equally well for other complex CHC profiles. All in all, taxonomists should be aware of the limitations listed above when taking advantage of CHC profiles for taxonomic studies in other insect species.
Development of cloud-based databases and a retrieval platform will provide universal guidelines for such concerns and thus facilitate the standard utilization of CHC-based chemotaxonomy. A promising application is the development of a database for a limited number of quarantine pests of various geographic populations, which will provide information on the imported routes of these pests. The CHC profiles reported here may provide a complementary approach to the well-established methods of insect taxonomy based on morphology and genetics. A combination of CHC profile and conventional tools should be encouraged to drive the development of integrative insect taxonomy. Clearly, the establishment of SPME-based CHC profiling is just in its infancy and more extensive studies will be necessary to supplement and optimize the utilization of CHC phenotypes in the field of insect chemotaxonomy.
Supporting information
(PDF)
(PDF)
(PDF)
(PDF)
(PDF)
(DOCX)
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We thank Yi Zhang and Xing-Xing Wang (Northwest A&F University) for collection of some geographic morphs, Zhan-Feng Zhang (Northwest A&F University) for valuable technical advice in SPME, and Huai-Jun Xue (Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Science) for assistance in statistical analysis.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents (Grant No. Chinese IPM1501 and Chinese IPM1717), the Chinese Academy of Sciences. There was no additional external funding received for this study.
References
- 1.Blomquist GJ, Bagneères AG. Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Howard RW, Blomquist GJ. Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu Rev Entomol. 2005; 50: 371–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Balabanidou V, Kampouraki A, MacLean M, Blomquist GJ, Tittiger C, Juárez MP, et al. Cytochrome P450 associated with insecticide resistance catalyzes cuticular hydrocarbon production in Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2016; 113: 9268–9273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608295113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ginzel MD, Blomquist GJ. Insect Hydrocarbons: Biochemistry and Chemical Ecology. In: Cohen E, Moussian B, editors. Extracellular Composite Matrices in Arthropods Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 221–252. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lockey KH. Lipids of the insect cuticle: origin, composition and function. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1988; 89: 595–645. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kather R, Martin S. Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles as a taxonomic tool: advantages, limitations and technical aspects. Physiol Entomol. 2012; 37: 25–32. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martin SJ, Drijfhout FP. A review of ant cuticular hydrocarbons. J Chem Ecol. 2009; 5: 1151–1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hayashi M, Nakamuta K, Nomura M. Ants learn aphid species as mutualistic partners: Is the learning behavior species-specific? J Chem Ecol. 2015; 41: 1148–1154. doi: 10.1007/s10886-015-0651-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haverty MI, Thorne BL, Page M. Surface hydrocarbon components of two species of Nasutitermes from Trinidad. J Chem Ecol. 1990; 16: 2441–2450. doi: 10.1007/BF01017467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Akino T, Terayama M, Wakamura S, Yamaoka R. Intraspecific variation of cuticular hydrocarbon composition in Formica japonica Motschoulsky (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zool Sci. 2002; 31: 1155–1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM, Moder K, Seifert B, Sanetra M, Dyreson E, et al. A multidisciplinary approach reveals cryptic diversity in Western Palearctic Tetramorium ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006; 40: 259–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Haverty MI, Nelson LJ. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Reticulitermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) from northern California indicate undescribed species. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1997; 118: 869–880. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chapman RF, Espelie KE, Sword GA. Use of cuticular lipids in grasshopper taxonomy: Variation in Schistocerca shoshone (Thomas). Biochem Syst Ecol. 1995; 23: 383–398. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Haverty MI, Woodrow RJ, Nelson LJ, Grace JK. Cuticular hydrocarbons of termites of the Hawaiian islands. J Chem Ecol. 2000; 26: 1167–1191. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dronnet S, Lohou C, Christides JP, Bagnères AG. Cuticular hydrocarbon composition reflects genetic relationship among colonies of the introduced termite Reticulitermes santonensis Feytaud. J Chem Ecol. 2006; 32: 1027–1042. doi: 10.1007/s10886-006-9043-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ingleby FC. Insect cuticular hydrocarbons as dynamic traits in sexual communication. Insects. 2015; 6: 732–742. doi: 10.3390/insects6030732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brisson JA, Stern DL. The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum: an emerging genomic model system for ecological, developmental and evolutionary studies. Bioessays. 2006; 28: 747–755. doi: 10.1002/bies.20436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Blackman RL, Eastop VF. Taxonomic Issues In: Emden H, Harrington R, editors. Aphids as crop pests. Wallingford: CAB International; 2007. pp. 7–8. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sabater-Muñoz B, Legeai F, Rispe C, Bonhomme J, Dearden P, Dossat C, et al. Large-scale gene discovery in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera). Genome Biol. 2006; 7: R21 doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-r21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stránský K, Ubik K, Holman J, Streibl M. Chemical composition of compounds produced by the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris): pentane extract of surface lipids. Collect Czechoslov Chem Commun. 1973; 38: 770–780. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Febvay G, Pageaux JF, Bonnot G. Lipid composition of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae), reared on host plant and on artificial media. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1992; 21: 103–118. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen N, Fan YL, Bai Y, Li Xd, Zhang ZF, Liu TX. Cytochrome P450 gene, CYP4G51, modulates hydrocarbon production in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2016; 76: 84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Arthur CL, Pawliszyn J. Solid phase microextraction with thermal desorption using fused silica optic fibers. Anal Chem. 1990; 62: 656. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bland J, Osbrink W, Cornelius M, Lax A, Vigo C. Solid-phase microextraction for the detection of termite cuticular hydrocarbons. J Chromatogr A. 2001; 932: 119–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Everaerts C, Farine JP, Cobb M, Ferveur JF. Drosophila cuticular hydrocarbons revisited: mating status alters cuticular profiles. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5: e9607 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pasquale DC, Guarino S, Peri E, Alonzo G. Investigation of cuticular hydrocarbons from Bagrada hilaris genders by SPME/GC-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007; 389: 1259–1265. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1503-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Turillazzi S, Sledge MF, Moneti G. Use of a simple method for sampling cuticular hydrocarbons from live social wasps. Ethol Ecol Evol. 1998; 10: 293–297. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Monnin T, Malosse C, Peeters C. Solid-phase microextraction and cuticular hydrocarbon differences related to reproductive activity in queenless ant Dinoponera quadriceps. J Chem Ecol. 1998; 24: 473–490. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang SF, Cheng JA, Yang XW. RAPD analysis of different forms of the green peach aphid. Acta Entomol Sin. 2002; 45: 764–769. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hebert PD, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2004; 101: 14812–14817. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406166101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.New SPME Guidelines. J Chem Ecol. 2009; 35: 1383. doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9733-2. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Aitchison J. The statistical analysis of compositional data: monographs in statistics and applied probability. London: Chapman and Hall; 1986. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc B. 2003; 270: 313–321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Knowlton N, Weigt LA. New dates and new rates for divergence across the Isthmus of Panama. Proc R Soc B. 1998; 265: 2257–2263. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Simmons R, Weller S. Utility and evolution of cytochrome b in insects. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2001; 20: 196–210. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.0958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Foottit R, Maw H, Dohlen C, Hebert P. Species identification of aphids (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae) through DNA barcodes. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008; 8: 1189–1201. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02297.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee W, Kim H, Lim J, Choi HR, Kim Y, Kim YS, et al. Barcoding aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) of the Korean Peninsula: updating the global data set. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011; 11: 32–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02877.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mishler BD. Cladistic analysis of molecular and morphological data. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994; 94: 143–156. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330940111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lockey KH. Insect hydrocarbon classes: Implications for chemotaxonomy. Insect Biochem. 1991; 21: 91–97. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ferreira-Caliman M, Turatti I, Lopes N, Zucchi R, Nascimento F. Analysis of insect cuticular compounds by non-lethal solid phase micro Extraction with styrene-divinylbenzene copolymers. J Chem Ecol. 2012; 38: 418–426. doi: 10.1007/s10886-012-0109-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Reitz M, Gerhardt H, Schmitt C, Betz O, Albert K, Lämmerhofer M. Analysis of chemical profiles of insect adhesion secretions by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2015; 854: 47–60. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang Y, Yu Z, Zhang J, Moussian B. Regionalization of surface lipids in insects. Proc R Soc B. 2016; 283: 20152994 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Teal P, Tumlinson J. Properties of cuticular oxidases used for sex pheromone biosynthesis by Heliothis zea. J Chem Ecol. 1988; 14: 2131–2145. doi: 10.1007/BF01014254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ginzel MD, Millar J, Hanks L. (Z)-9-Pentacosene-contact sex pheromone of the locust borer, Megacyllene robiniae. Chemoecology. 2003; 13: 135–141. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Young HP, Larabee JK, Gibbs AG, Schal C. Relationship between tissue-specific hydrocarbon profiles and lipid melting temperatures in the cockroach Blattella germanica. J Chem Ecol. 2000; 26: 1245–1263. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Foley BR, Telonis-Scott M. Quantitative genetic analysis suggests causal association between cuticular hydrocarbon composition and desiccation survival in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity. 2011; 106: 68–77. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gibbs AG, Chippindale AK, Rose MR. Physiological mechanisms of evolved desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol. 1997; 200: 1821–1832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Xue HJ, Wei JN, Magalhães S, Zhang B, Song KQ, Liu J, et al. Contact pheromones of 2 sympatric beetles are modified by the host plant and affect mate choice. Behav Ecol. 2016; 27: 895–902. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Williams IS, Dixon AFG. Life Cycles and Polymorphism. In: Emden H, Harrington R, editors. Aphids as crop pests Wallingford: CAB International; 2007. pp. 69–72. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(PDF)
(PDF)
(PDF)
(PDF)
(PDF)
(DOCX)
(XLSX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.