Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Sep 12;7:11277. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11842-5

Oleic acid induces apoptosis and autophagy in the treatment of Tongue Squamous cell carcinomas

Lin Jiang 1,2,3,#, Wei Wang 1,2,#, Qianting He 1, Yuan Wu 2, Zhiyuan Lu 1, Jingjing Sun 1, Zhonghua Liu 1, Yisen Shao 2,3,, Anxun Wang 1,
PMCID: PMC5595908  PMID: 28900281

Abstract

Oleic acid (OA), a main ingredient of Brucea javanica oil (BJO), is widely known to have anticancer effects in many tumors. In this study, we investigated the anticancer effect of OA and its mechanism in tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). We found that OA effectively inhibited TSCC cell proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner. OA treatment in TSCC significantly induced cell cycle G0/G1 arrest, increased the proportion of apoptotic cells, decreased the expression of CyclinD1 and Bcl-2, and increased the expression of p53 and cleaved caspase-3. OA also obviously induced the formation of autolysosomes and decreased the expression of p62 and the ratio of LC3 I/LC3 II. The expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR, p-S6K, p-4E-BP1 and p-ERK1/2 was significantly decreased in TSCC cells after treatment with OA. Moreover, tumor growth was significantly inhibited after OA treatment in a xenograft mouse model. The above results indicate that OA has a potent anticancer effect in TSCC by inducing apoptosis and autophagy via blocking the Akt/mTOR pathway. Thus, OA is a potential TSCC drug that is worthy of further research and development.

Introduction

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been proven to have anti-tumor effects on many types of cancer. TCM herbal treatment has also been shown to increase chemotherapy efficiency, reduce toxicity, prolong survival time, and improve immune functions15. Brucea javanica oil (BJO) is extracted from the seeds of the herb medicine Brucea javanica, and its main active component is oleic acid (OA)6. OA has also attracted much attention in the “Mediterranean diet”, characterized by a high olive oil (rich in OA) consumption7. BJO or OA has shown anticancer effects in many types of cancers, such as prostate, breast and colorectal cancer, and OA is commonly administered in combination with chemotherapy6, 811.

Several mechanisms have been proposed for the antiproliferative effect of OA. Moon et al. illustrated that OA could cross-regulate the AMPK/S6 axis and up-regulate tumor suppressor genes (p53, p21, and p27) in esophageal cancer cells12. Fu et al. also found that OA led to a production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and up-regulation of NOX4 protein13. In short, the effects of OA on cancer cells include effects on the cell membrane, apoptosis, autophagy, mitochondria, proteasome inhibition, cell adhesion and glycolysis14, 15.

Despite advances in surgical techniques, chemotherapy and radiation treatments, approximately 50% of patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) do not survive for more than 5 years after diagnosis as a result of local recurrence or metastasis of the primary tumor16. Recently, numerous studies have indicated that natural remedies or TCM have therapeutic effects on neoplastic diseases15. Although, both epidemiological and animal studies have reported a protective role of OA in several cancers, the beneficial effects of OA in TSCC remain unknown. Moreover, the mechanisms behind the antitumor effect of OA are not well understood. Askari et al. found that the levels of OA in oral squamous cancer cell (OSCC) tissue were lower than those in the adjacent normal-appearing squamous tissue17. Thus, lower levels of OA may be related to the development and progression of OSCC. To investigate the anticancer effect of OA on TSCC and the mechanism behind its anticancer effect, we first investigated the anticancer effect of OA on TSCC in vitro and in vivo, and the cell cycle, apoptosis, autophagy and the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway were further analyzed. We found that OA had significant anticancer effects on TSCC both in vitro and vivo. OA induced cell cycle G0/G1 arrest, apoptosis, and autophagy by modulation of the Akt/mTOR pathway in the treatment of TSCC.

Results

OA inhibits the proliferation of TSCC cells in vitro

First, we performed a CCK8 assay to examine the effect of OA on the proliferation of TSCC cells (CAL27, UM1 cells). As shown in Fig. 1a-b, OA significantly inhibited the proliferation of TSCC cells. The anti-proliferation effect of OA on TSCC cells was portrayed in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The IC50 values of OA were 291~228 μM and 159~78 μM for CAL27 and UM1 cells, respectively (Table 1). The population doubling times of TSCC cell lines were prolonged after treatment with OA, from 69.1 h to 126.8 h for CAL27 cells and from 67 h to 90.7 h for UM1 cells (Table 2). Based on these results, we chose four concentrations (0, 50, 100, and 150 μM) that were below the IC50 at 24 h treatment for further experiments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

OA inhibits TSCC cells proliferation. (a,b) TSCC cells (CAL27 and UM1) were treated with OA (0–400 μM) for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h or 96 h, and the inhibition rate of cell proliferation was detected using a Cell Counting kit-8 assay. (ce) The capacity of cell proliferation was also tested using an Edu assay after treatment with different concentrations of OA for 24 h. Arrows indicate the proliferating cells. Data are the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

Table 1.

The IC50 of OA in the treatment of TSCC.

Time (h) IC50 (μM)
CAL27 UM1
24 291 159
48 266 112
72 253 89
96 228 78

Table 2.

The population doubling time of TSCC cells with OA treatment.

OA (μM) Population doubling time (h)
CAL27 UM1
0 69.1 67
50 100.8 90.7
100 116.1
150 124.2
200 126.8
>250

Moreover, the proliferation abilities of TSCC cells were also investigated using an Edu assay. As shown in Fig. 1c-e, the proliferation of TSCC cells was significantly inhibited at the concentrations of 100 and 150 μM. These results indicated that OA can inhibit the proliferation of TSCC cells.

OA induces cell cycle G0/G1 arrest in TSCC cells

As shown in Fig. 2a-c, TSCC cells were significantly arrested in the G0/G1 phase in a concentration-dependent manner after treatment with OA. Compared to the controls, the percentage of cells in the G0/G1 phase was significantly increased from 50.28 ± 0.78% to 62.21 ± 3.38% in CAL27 cells and from 45.36 ± 1.50% to 62.88 ± 0.59% in UM1 cells. The percentage of cells in the G2/M phase was correspondingly decreased from 17.87 ± 1.57% to 5.41 ± 0.56% in CAL27 cells and from 9.43 ± 0.95% to 2.26 ± 0.30% in UM1 cells after OA treatment. The percentage of cells in the S phase was not obviously changed (Fig. 2b-c)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

OA induces cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase in TSCC cells. The TSCC cells were treated with different concentrations of OA (0, 50, 100, or 150 μM) for 24 h. (a) The flow cytometric histograms show the cell cycle arresting effect of OA in CAL27 and UM1 cells. (b,c) Cell cycle arrest during the G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases was found after treatment with OA. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation for three independent experiments. (d,e) The G0/G1 cell cycle regulator CyclinD1 was detected by Western blot. GAPDH was used as the internal control.

Moreover, we detected the expression of the key G0/G1 cell cycle regulator CyclinD1 and found that the protein levels of CyclinD1 were markedly decreased after OA treatment in TSCC cells (Fig. 2d-e). These results indicated that OA induced cell cycle G0/G1 arrest in TSCC cells.

OA induces apoptosis in TSCC cells

To further investigate how OA inhibits cell proliferation in TSCC cells, CAL27 and UM1 cells were treated with OA (0, 50, 100, or 150 μM) for 24 h. As shown in Fig. 3a, the percentages of TSCC cells undergoing early apoptosis were significantly increased in a concentration-dependent manner after treatment with OA. The proportion of apoptotic cells was up to 12.2 ± 1.05% for CAL27 cells and up to 31.2 ± 3.1% for UM1 cells after treatment with OA. Apoptosis was also investigated with TUNEL staining. As shown in Fig. 3c, OA obviously increased apoptosis in TSCC cells. Moreover, we discovered that OA treatment obviously inhibited the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and enhanced the expression of the pro-apoptotic proteins cleaved caspase-3 and p53 in CAL27 and UM1 cells (Fig. 3d).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

OA induces apoptosis in TSCC cells. The TSCC cells were treated with different concentrations of OA (0, 50, 100, or 150 μM) for 24 h. (a) Flow cytometric plots showing OA-induced apoptosis in CAL27 and UM1 cells. The cells in the lower right corner represent early apoptosis, and the top right corner shows the dead cells. (b) Bar graphs showing that 24 h OA treatment induced a marked apoptotic cell death in CAL27 and UM1 cells. Data are the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). (c) TUNEL assay showing OA-induced apoptosis of CAL27 and UM1 cells after treatment with OA. Arrows indicate apoptotic cells. (d) The expression of apoptosis-related proteins (Bcl-2, caspase-3, cleaved-caspase-3 and p53) was detected by Western blot. GAPDH was used as the internal control.

OA induces autophagy in TSCC cells

To investigate whether OA induced autophagy in the TSCC cells, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to observe autolysosomes after treatment with OA (0 or 150 μM). As shown in Fig. 4a, OA treatment obviously increased the presence of autolysosome formation in CAL27 and UM1 cells. Autophagy-specific proteins including LC3 and p62 were also detected to evaluate autophagy activity (Fig. 4b-c). After treatment with OA, the expression ratio of LC3-I/ LC3-II was significantly decreased, which means that LC3-I was converted into LC3-II (Fig. 4d-e). The expression of p62 was also obviously decreased after treatment with OA (Fig. 4b-c). These data indicated that OA induced autophagy in CAL27 and UM1 cells.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

OA induces autophagy in TSCC cells. (a) OA-induced autolysosome formation in CAL27 and UM1 cells was observed under a TEM after the TSCC cells were treated with different concentrations of OA (0 or 150 μM) for 24 h. Arrows indicate autolysosomes. (b,c) Western blot displaying the expression levels of LC3, p62 in TSCC cells after treatment with OA for 24 h. GAPDH was used as the internal control. (d,e) LC3 protein levels from the above Western blot were quantitated, and the ratio between LC3 I (16 kDa) and LC3 II (14 kDa) was calculated. OA induced conversion of the LC3 protein from LC3 I to LC3 II. Bar graphs showing the LC3 I/LC3 II ratio was significantly decreased after treatment with OA. Data are the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

OA inhibits the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway

To further confirm the possible mechanism of OA-mediated antitumor activity in TSCC, Akt/mTOR pathway-related proteins were detected by Western blot. We found that the expression levels of p-Akt, p-mTOR, p-S6K, p-4E-BP1 and p-ERK1/2 were significantly inhibited by OA in a dose-dependent manner in CAL27 and UM1 cells (Fig. 5a and Fig. S1). Moreover, the protein level of PTEN was increased with the increasing concentrations of OA. The expression of Akt, mTOR, and ERK1/2 was not obviously changed in CAL27 or UM1 cells after treatment with OA (Fig. 5a and Fig. S1).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

OA inhibits the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. (a) Western blot displaying the expression levels of Akt, p-Akt, mTOR, p-mTOR, PTEN, p-S6K, p-4E-BP1, p-ERK1/2, and ERK1/2 in CAL27 and UM1 cells after treatment with OA for 24 h. GAPDH was used as the internal control. (b–e) The protein expression levels from the above Western blot were quantitated. Bar graphs showed that the p-Akt/Akt ratio and p-mTOR/mTOR ratio were significantly decreased after treatment with OA. OA induced a decreased in p-Akt protein expression from 2.1-fold to 0.9-fold and from 3.2-fold to 1.2-fold in CAL27 and UM1 cells, respectively. p-mTOR expression was decreased from 0.78-fold to 0.59-fold in CAL27 cells and from 0.6-fold to 0.2-fold in UM1 cells. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation for three independent experiments (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

OA inhibits the growth of TSCC xenograft tumors in vivo

To investigate whether OA inhibited tumor growth in vivo, we chose the CAL27 cell line to establish xenograft tumors in nude mice. The mice were randomly assigned into three groups (0, 2 mg, and 4 mg) when the tumor volume was 12.7 ± 1.7 mm3. As shown in Fig. 6, the group treated with OA showed a marked inhibitory action on tumor growth compared with the control group. The tumor inhibition rates on day 40 were 33.3% for the 2-mg group and 58.2% for the 4-mg group, according to the tumor volume (Fig. 6b). The doubling time of the xenograft tumors treated with 0 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg OA were 7, 9, and 11 days, respectively. The mean weights of the excised tumors decreased by approximately 40% for the 2-mg group and by 56.7% for the 4-mg group (Fig. 6c). Immunohistochemical analyses also showed that OA strongly inhibited the expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR, and p-S6K and induced cleaved-caspase-3 expression in the xenograft tumors (Fig. 6d).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

OA inhibited the growth of CAL27 xenograft tumors in nude mice. CAL27 xenograft tumors were treated with OA (2 or 4 mg/kg, i.p, every two days) or (0.2 ml saline as control) for 14 times, and the animals were euthanized on day 40. (a) Representative photographs of the gross tumors from nude mice. (b) Graphs represent the average tumor volumes of CAL27 xenografts in mice from the control and OA-treated groups. (c) Graphs represent the average weights of tumors from the control and OA-treated groups (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). (d) The expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR, p-S6K, and the cleavage of caspase-3 was detected by immunohistochemical staining and the expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR, and p-S6K was decreased and cleaved-caspase-3 expression was induced after OA treatment.

Discussion

Although most studies have revealed that OA has strong anticancer effects18, 19, some studies found that OA could promote the proliferation, migration, invasion of cancer20, 21. For example, Fernanda et al. confirmed that 100 μM OA decreased the viability of cells18, whereas Navarro et al. found that OA promoted migration of breast cancer in a dose-dependent manner (0–400 μM)21. Here, we investigated the effects of OA on TSCC cells and found that OA had a strong antiproliferation effect and prolonged the cell population doubling time in vitro and had a significant anticancer effect in the TSCC xenograft mouse model. Most chemotherapeutic agents induce cell cycle arrest to control cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis22. The progression of cells through the cell cycle is under positive control by a series of specific cyclin/CDK complexes and is negatively controlled by specific CKIs (CDK inhibitors)16. Many studies have found that G1/S progression is highly regulated by CyclinD1, and the loss of CyclinD1 can induce G1 phase arrest2325. Similarly, we found that the treatment of TSCC cells with OA resulted in a dose-dependent cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase. OA induced CyclinD1 downregulation in TSCC cells. These results indicate that OA suppresses TSCC cell proliferation by G0/G1 phase arrest.

G1-phase cell cycle arrest creates an opportunity for cells to either undergo repair or enter the programmed cell death pathway. There are three forms of programmed cell death (PCD), including apoptosis (type I PCD), autophagy (type II PCD), and programmed necrosis. Many studies have demonstrated that these types of cell death may be triggered by common upstream signals and thus affect cancer development and therapy26, 27. Recently, OA was found to trigger autophagic or apoptotic tumor cell death in cancer treatment2831. We showed that OA not only induces autophagy in TSCC cells but also induces apoptosis. During autophagy, the cytoplasm components or organelles that are determined for degradation are conveyed to double-membrane vesicles, known as autophagosomes, which then progress to autolysosomes through the fusion of acidic lysosomes with autophagosomes32. In the present study, autolysosomes were observed after treatment with OA, and we also found that LC3-I was converted to LC3-II. LC3 is important for autophagosome formation and function, and LC3 is processed from LC3-I to LC3-II during autophagy33, 34. p62, another marker of autophagy, can be incorporated into completed autophagosomes and degraded in autolysosomes2 and was also decreased after OA treatment. These data indicate that OA induces autophagy in TSCC. In our study, we also found that OA treatment induces cleavage of caspase-3 in vitro and in vivo and decreases the expression level of Bcl-2; both are markers of apoptosis35. Moreover, the increase of p53 expression was also found after OA treatment; p53 is an important pro-apoptotic factor and can promote apoptosis by activating a number of positive regulators of apoptosis36. All these results indicate that OA effectively induces TSCC cell apoptosis. Thus, OA treatment induces TSCC cell G0/G1 arrest and subsequently leads to autophagy and apoptosis.

Apoptosis and autophagy share several common transcriptional regulators and kinase signaling pathways that mediate cell fate37. Akt/mTOR is one of them and is well known as the key regulator in a series of cell processes, including metabolism, cell proliferation, and survival33. Many reports had revealed that extracts from Chinese medicine have anticancer effects by inducing autophagy, apoptosis, and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest by suppressing the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway38, 39. In our study, we also found that OA induced G0/G1 arrest, autophagy and apoptosis and significantly decreased the expression of p-Akt and p-mTOR, p-S6K, p-4E-BP1 in TSCC cells, which means that OA may block the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Moreover, OA inhibited the expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-S6K in vivo. According to Qi’s research, Akt is known to increase CyclinD1 through inactivation of GSK-3β24. Thus, the decreased expression of CyclinD1 and the G0/G1 arrest in TSCC cells after OA treatment may be related to the decreased expression of p-Akt. Mester et al. found that the increase in PTEN expression inhibited the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, leading to cell death and growth regulation40. Therefore, in this study, the increased expression of PTEN after treatment with OA in TSCC cells may lead to a decrease in phosphorylation of Akt and mTOR. Moreover, Liu et al. found that p53 exert its effect through negative regulation of mTOR to induce apoptosis and autophagy in response to DNA damaging agents36. In the present study, we found that p53 expression was induced after treatment with OA in TSCC cells; this may also lead to subsequent autophagy, apoptosis and a decrease in p-Akt and p-mTOR expression. Many recent reports regarding the interaction of the MEK/ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways have suggested that blocking one pathway may also block the other41. In our study, we also found that p-ERK1/2 expression was inhibited after OA treatment.

In summary, our results show that OA has valuable anticancer effects on TSCC in vitro and in vivo through cell cycle G0/G1 arrest and induction of cell death via autophagy and apoptosis. Based on these findings, we conclude that OA may potentially serve as a therapeutic agent for TSCC.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and materials

OA was purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) and dissolved in 0.1% NaOH and 10% delipidated bovine serum albumin (d-BSA). OA was prepared as a 10-mM stock solution and stored at −20 °C. BSA was used as a vehicle control. The final concentration of BSA was <0.5%.

TSCC cells (UM1 and CAL27) were cultured in DMEM/F12 medium (UM1) and DMEM medium (CAL27) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS. Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2/95% air humidified incubator. According to most studies, TSCC cells treated with OA were cultured in serum-free medium.

Cell proliferation detected by CCK8 assay

Cell proliferation was evaluated using a modified Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay (Fanbo, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions42. In brief, cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 3 × 103 cells per well, and after incubation for 24 h, cells were treated with different concentrations of OA for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h or 96 h. Then, 10 µl of the CCK-8 solution was added to each well of the plate, and the plate was incubated for 2 h in an incubator. The absorbance (optical density, OD) value at 450 nm was determined using a plate reader, and the cell inhibition rate was calculated as follows: [1 − (Atreated  − Ablank)/(Acontrol − Ablank)] × 100%. The population doubling times were calculated as Td = Δt × lg2/(lgNt − lgN0), where Nt = the OD value at 96 h and N0 = the OD value at 24 h.

Cell proliferation detected by Edu assay

The TSCC cells were treated with different concentrations of OA (0, 50, 100, or 150 μM) for 24 h. After being washed with PBS, cells were incubated in serum-free DMEM containing 10 μmol/L Edu (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) for 2 h. Then, cells were fixed and stained with Apollo (red) and Hoechst (blue) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were examined with a fluorescence microscope. The positive cells were identified by red staining, and the numbers of proliferating cells in ten different fields were counted.

Cell cycle distribution analysis

The effect of OA on cell cycle distribution was determined by flow cytometry as previously described16. Briefly, TSCC cells were treated with OA at a concentration of 0, 50, 100, or 150 μM for 24 h. After treatment with OA, cells were washed with D-PBS, centrifuged, and fixed in 70% ethanol at 4 °C overnight. Then, following two washes in PBS, cells were resuspended in 1 ml of PBS containing 20 μg/mL RNase A and 50 μg/mL PI. After 30 min of incubation in the dark at room temperature, a total of 10,000 cells were subject to cell cycle analysis using a flow cytometer. The experiment was performed at least three times with consistent results and analyzed using ModFit software.

Cellular apoptosis was detected by Flow cytometry and TUNEL assay

The effect of OA on cell apoptosis was evaluated using the Annexin V: PE apoptosis detection kit. Briefly, the cells were collected after 24 h of OA treatment and resuspended in 1 × binding buffer with 5 μL Annexin V: PE and 5 μL 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) at 1 × 105 cells/mL in a total volume of 150 μL. The cells were incubated in the dark for 15 min at room temperature. An aliquot of 1 × binding buffer (100 μL) was then added to each tube, and the number of apoptotic cells was quantified using a flow cytometer, which collected 10,000 events for analysis. The cells in the lower right corner represent early apoptosis, and the top right corner shows the dead cells.

TUNEL assay was also used to detect apoptosis according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). Briefly, cells were plated in 6-well plates and cultured to 80% confluence and then incubated with OA (150 μM) for 24 h. Apoptotic cells were labeled (1 h, 37 °C) with 20 μl TUNEL reaction mixture in the dark after fixation (4% paraformaldehyde) and permeabilization (Triton X-100 0.1% in PBS). Then, cells were stained with DAPI solution in the dark and images were captured under a light microscope.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis

TEM was used to detect autolysosomes (autophagy) after treatment with OA (0 or 150 μM) for 24 h. Treated TSCC cells were collected and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma Co., Ltd., USA) for 24 h, washed with 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4), post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Polyscience Co., Ltd., USA), and subsequently dehydrated in increasing concentrations of alcohol. The samples were then impregnated with propylene oxide (Merck-Schuchardt Inc., Hohenbrunn, Germany) and embedded in epoxy resin embedding media. After light microscopy examination of semi-thin sections and staining with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate and 1% (w/v) lead citrate, samples were observed with a JEM-1200EX II (Jeol, Japan) transmission electron microscope. TEM images at 18500x magnification are shown.

Western blot analysis

Western blot analysis was performed as described previously43 to detect the expression levels of CyclinD1, p53, Bcl-2, caspase-3, cleaved-caspase-3, ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, LC3, p62, PTEN, Akt, p-Akt, mTOR, p-mTOR, p-S6K, p-4E-BP1 and GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) in TSCC cells. GAPDH was used as the internal control. The intensity of each band was quantified using the image analyzing computer software Quantity One (Bio-Rad software).

TSCC xenografts in Nude mice

To investigate the anticancer effect of OA in vivo, CAL27 cells (1 × 107/0.2 ml) were subcutaneously injected into the right flanks of 4-wk-old male BALB/c nude mice (purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd)44. Ten days later, each xenograft was identifiable as a mass of more than 3 mm in maximal diameter in all groups. Then, mice were randomly assigned into 3 groups (control, 2-mg treated group, 4-mg treated group, n = 6/group). The OA-treated groups were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) at different concentrations (2 or 4 mg/kg body weight) every two days for 14 times, whereas the control group received saline (0.2 ml) as vehicle. In addition, the animals were euthanized on the 40th day. During this period, all mice were examined every 3 days to assess their health and any evidence of drug toxicity. All the mice appeared to be healthy and there were no obvious signs or symptoms of drug toxicity or loss of body weight during the experimental period. Tumors were measured every 3 days with a standard caliper and the tumor volumes were calculated as ½length × width2, and a tumor growth curve (y = Aekday) and the tumor doubling time (ln2/k) were obtained as previously described44. At the end of the experiments, tumors were weighed after being separated from the surrounding muscles and dermis.

Tumor samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin wax. Sample sections were dewaxed, rehydrated and stained using Mayer’s hematoxylin and eosin Y solution. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to detect the expression of p-Akt, p-mTOR, p-S6K and cleaved-caspase-3 in xenograft sections.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital at Sun Yat-Sen University (2016047). All the methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Statistical analysis

The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation for three independent experiments. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Chicago, IL), Version 19.0. The data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance to calculate significance. The value P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Electronic supplementary material

Original data of blots (802.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC81672659, NSFC81472523, NSFC81272953), the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2015A030313017), the Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (Collaborative Innovation Major Projects, 201605131226218), the Jiangxi Province Health Department of Science and Technology Plan (20091067), and the Science and Technology Research Project from the Jiangxi Province Department of Education (GJJ11330).

Author Contributions

L.J. and W.W. performed the experiments; L.J., Q.H., W.Y. and J.S. analyzed the data; Y.S., W.W. and Z.L. prepared the figures; J.L. and A.X. wrote the main manuscript; Y.S. and A.W. designed the experiments. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Lin Jiang and Wei Wang contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11842-5

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Yisen Shao, Email: yshshao@163.com.

Anxun Wang, Email: wang_anxun@aliyun.com.

References

  • 1.Wang, X. et al. Melittin Inhibits Tumor Growth and Decreases Resistance to Gemcitabine by Downregulating Cholesterol Pathway Gene CLU in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Lett. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2017.04.012 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Gao S, Li X, Ding X, Qi W, Yang Q. Cepharanthine Induces Autophagy, Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest in Breast Cancer Cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;41:1633–1648. doi: 10.1159/000471234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fan, J. et al. Mechanism of Modulation through PI3K-AKT Pathway About Nepeta Cataria L.‘S Extract in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Oncotarget. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.15608 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Wu, C. Y. et al. Anti-Cancer Effect of Danshen and Dihydroisotanshinone I On Prostate Cancer: Targeting the Crosstalk Between Macrophages and Cancer Cells Via Inhibition of the STAT3/CCL2 Signaling Pathway. Oncotarget. doi:18632/oncotarget, 14958 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Mi, C. et al. Imperatorin Suppresses Proliferation and Angiogenesis of Human Colon Cancer Cell by Targeting HIF-1alpha Via the mTOR/p70S6K/4E-BP1 and MAPK Pathways. J Ethnopharmacol. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2017.03.033 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Cui Y, et al. Preparation, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Liposomes Containing Brucea javanica Oil. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:878–884. doi: 10.1208/s12249-010-9454-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carrillo C, Cavia MM, Alonso-Torre SR. Antitumor Effect of Oleic Acid; Mechanisms of Action: A Review. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27:1860–1865. doi: 10.3305/nh.2012.27.6.6010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ma S, et al. Intravenous Microemulsion of Docetaxel Containing an Anti-Tumor Synergistic Ingredient (Brucea Javanica Oil): Formulation and Pharmacokinetics. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:4045–4052. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S47956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang H, et al. Seed Oil of Brucea javanica Induces Apoptotic Death of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells via Both the Death Receptors and the Mitochondrial-Related Pathways. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:965016. doi: 10.1155/2011/965016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Khan AA. Pro-Apoptotic Activity of Nano-Escheriosome Based Oleic Acid Conjugate Against 7,12-Dimethylbenz(A)anthracene (DMBA) Induced Cutaneous Carcinogenesis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;90:295–302. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.03.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shaikh IA, Brown I, Wahle KW, Heys SD. Enhancing Cytotoxic Therapies for Breast and Prostate Cancers with Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids. Nutr Cancer. 2010;62:284–296. doi: 10.1080/01635580903407189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Moon HS, Batirel S, Mantzoros CS. Alpha Linolenic Acid and Oleic Acid Additively Down-Regulate Malignant Potential and Positively Cross-Regulate AMPK/S6 Axis in OE19 and OE33 Esophageal Cancer Cells. Metabolism. 2014;63:1447–1454. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fu D, Lu J, Yang S. Oleic/Palmitate Induces Apoptosis in Human Articular Chondrocytes via Upregullation of NOX4 Expression and ROS Production. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2016;46:353–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fontana A, Spolaore B, Polverino De Laureto P. The Biological Activities of Protein/Oleic Acid Complexes Reside in the Fatty Acid. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics. 2013;1834:1125–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.02.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Menendez JA, Vellon L, Colomer R, Lupu R. Oleic Acid, the Main Monounsaturated Fatty Acid of Olive Oil, Suppresses Her-2/neu (erbB-2) Expression and Synergistically Enhances the Growth Inhibitory Effects of Trastuzumab (Herceptin) in Breast Cancer Cells with Her-2/neu Oncogene Amplification. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:359–371. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang A, Zeng R, Huang H. Retinoic Acid and Sodium Butyrate as Cell Cycle Regulators in the Treatment of Oral Squamous Carcinoma Cells. Oncol Res. 2008;17:175–182. doi: 10.3727/096504008785114129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Askari M, et al. Tissue Fatty Acid Composition and Secretory phospholipase-A2 Activity in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol. 2015;17:378–383. doi: 10.1007/s12094-014-1242-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fernanda CM, Cristine KC, Gorjao R, Martins DLT, Curi R. Mechanisms Involved in Jurkat Cell Death Induced by Oleic and Linoleic Acids. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:1004–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martinez J, et al. The Repression of E2F-1 is Critical for the Activity of Minerval Against Cancer. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;315:466–474. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.088716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Soto-Guzman A, Navarro-Tito N, Castro-Sanchez L, Martinez-Orozco R, Salazar EP. Oleic Acid Promotes MMP-9 Secretion and Invasion in Breast Cancer Cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2010;27:505–515. doi: 10.1007/s10585-010-9340-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Navarro-Tito N, Soto-Guzman A, Castro-Sanchez L, Martinez-Orozco R, Salazar EP. Oleic Acid Promotes Migration On MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells through an Arachidonic Acid-Dependent Pathway. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2010;42:306–317. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kohrman AQ, Matus DQ. Divide Or Conquer: Cell Cycle Regulation of Invasive Behavior. Trends Cell Biol. 2017;27:12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yu CC, et al. AZD2014 Radiosensitizes Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inhibiting AKT/mTOR Axis and Inducing G1/G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest. PLoS One. 2016;11:e151942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Qi W, et al. Huaier Extract Synergizes with Tamoxifen to Induce Autophagy and Apoptosis in ER-positive Breast Cancer Cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:26003–26015. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang R, et al. Stellettin B Induces G1 Arrest, Apoptosis and Autophagy in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer A549 Cells via Blocking PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27071. doi: 10.1038/srep27071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ge J, et al. Resveratrol Induces Apoptosis and Autophagy in T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells by Inhibiting Akt/mTOR and Activating p38-MAPK. Biomed Environ Sci. 2013;26:902–911. doi: 10.3967/bes2013.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hou LL, Gao C, Chen L, Hu GQ, Xie SQ. Essential Role of Autophagy in Fucoxanthin-Induced Cytotoxicity to Human Epithelial Cervical Cancer HeLa Cells. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2013;34:1403–1410. doi: 10.1038/aps.2013.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aits S, et al. HAMLET (Human Alpha-Lactalbumin Made Lethal to Tumor Cells) Triggers Autophagic Tumor Cell Death. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:1008–1019. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Niso-Santano M, et al. Novel Inducers of BECN1-independent Autophagy: Cis-Unsaturated Fatty Acids. Autophagy. 2015;11:575–577. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1017222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Niso-Santano M, et al. Unsaturated Fatty Acids Induce Non-Canonical Autophagy. EMBO J. 2015;34:1025–1041. doi: 10.15252/embj.201489363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Llado V, et al. Minerval Induces Apoptosis in Jurkat and Other Cancer Cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:659–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00625.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chow SE, Chen YW, Liang CA, Huang YK, Wang JS. Wogonin Induces Cross-Regulation Between Autophagy and Apoptosis Via a Variety of Akt Pathway in Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113:3476–3485. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wu Z, et al. Autophagy Blockade Sensitizes Prostate Cancer Cells towards Src Family Kinase Inhibitors. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:40–49. doi: 10.1177/1947601909358324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tsai, J. H. et al. 1-(2-Hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)-3-phenyl-1,3-propanedione Induces G1 Cell Cycle Arrest and Autophagy in HeLa Cervical Cancer Cells. INT J MOL SCI. 17, doi:10.3390/ijms17081274 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Ashkenazi A, Fairbrother WJ, Leverson JD, Souers AJ. From Basic Apoptosis Discoveries to Advanced Selective BCL-2 Family Inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:273–284. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu K, et al. Depending On the Stage of Hepatosteatosis, P53 Causes Apoptosis Primarily through Either DRAM-induced Autophagy Or BAX. LIVER INT. 2013;33:1566–1574. doi: 10.1111/liv.12034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Platini F, Perez-Tomas R, Ambrosio S, Tessitore L. Understanding Autophagy in Cell Death Control. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16:101–113. doi: 10.2174/138161210789941810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lee HW, et al. Celastrol Inhibits Gastric Cancer Growth by Induction of Apoptosis and Autophagy. BMB Rep. 2014;47:697–702. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2014.47.12.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang Y, et al. Schisandrin B Inhibits Cell Growth and Induces Cellular Apoptosis and Autophagy in Mouse Hepatocytes and Macrophages: Implications for its Hepatotoxicity. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9:2001–2027. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S77071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mester J, Eng C. When Overgrowth Bumps Into Cancer: The PTEN-opathies. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013;163C:114–121. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bi Y, Wang G, Liu X, Wei M, Zhang Q. Low-After-High Glucose Down-Regulated Cx43 in H9c2 Cells by Autophagy Activation Via Cross-Regulation by the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and MEK/ERK1/2 Signal Pathways. Endocrine. 2017;56:336–345. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1251-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chang B, et al. Deregulation of Bmi-1 is Associated with Enhanced Migration, Invasion and Poor Prognosis in Salivary Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840:3285–3291. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu Z, et al. Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Induces Migration and Invasion of Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Via H2O2-dependent Snail Signaling. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhao L, et al. Deregulation of the miR-222-ABCG2 Regulatory Module in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Contributes to Chemoresistance and Enhanced Migratory/Invasive Potential. Oncotarget. 2015;6:44538–44550. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Original data of blots (802.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES