Abstract
We characterized influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 isolates from large‐scale outbreaks that occurred in Nepal and India in early 2015. Although no specific viral features, which may have caused the outbreaks, were identified, an S84N substitution in hemagglutinin was frequently observed. Chronological phylogenetic analysis revealed that these Nepalese and Indian viruses possessing the S84N substitution constitute potential ancestors of the novel genetic subclade 6B.1 virus that spread globally in the following (2015/16) influenza season. Thus, active surveillance of circulating influenza viruses in the Southern Asia region, including Nepal and India, would be beneficial for detecting novel variant viruses prior to their worldwide spread.
Keywords: India, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus, Nepal, outbreak
Despite the worldwide predominance of the A(H3N2) virus in the 2014/15 season, India reported a huge outbreak of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus (H1N1pdm) infection with severe clinical outcomes at the beginning of 2015; over 30 000 cases were reported with over 2000 deaths, compared with 5044, 5250 and <1000 reported cases in 2012, 2103, and 2014, respectively.1, 2, 3 Subsequently, Nepal also experienced a regional outbreak with an increased number of patients infected with H1N1pdm (personal communication).4 Although a number of Indian case reports have proposed several possible causes for the outbreak and characterized viruses isolated from the patients,2, 5, 6 the viral properties of isolates from outbreak patients remain largely unknown. Thus, in this study, the antigenicity, genetic properties, and antiviral susceptibility of 43 Nepalese isolates from 50 clinical specimens of Nepalese outbreak patients (patient information is summarized in Table S1) and 10 Indian isolates were characterized to identify particular features related to outbreaks with severe and fatal cases.
The antigenicity of these Nepalese and Indian isolates was characterized using the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. The hemagglutination activity of all isolates tested was inhibited by ferret antisera raised against several reference viruses including the 2014/15 season vaccine strain, egg‐propagated A/California/07/2009, the high‐growth reassortant strain, A/California/07/2009 (X‐179A), representative field isolates, cell‐propagated A/Narita/1/2009, and A/Wakayama/153/2013 or A/Yokohama/50/2015. The HI titers of these antisera against the Nepalese and Indian isolates were equivalent to or within a fourfold reduction compared to the homologous titer of each reference virus (data not shown), indicating that all Nepalese and Indian isolates tested were antigenically similar to the contemporary circulating H1N1pdm.
The susceptibility of the isolates to four neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors, oseltamivir, peramivir, zanamivir, and laninamivir, was determined using a fluorescent NA inhibition assay with the NA‐Fluor influenza neuraminidase assay kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), as previously described.7 The results showed that the Nepalese and Indian isolates were susceptible to all four inhibitors (data not shown), suggesting that no antiviral‐resistant viruses had spread in these outbreaks.
Taken together, our viral antigenicity and antiviral susceptibility analyses did not identify any unusual features in the Nepalese and Indian outbreak isolates.
Genetic sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were conducted for all Nepalese and Indian isolates. As shown in Figure 1, the isolates contain a hemagglutinin (HA) gene belonging to genetic clade 6B represented by globally circulating H1N1pdm.8 Interestingly, 70% of the Nepalese viruses and all Indian viruses, except for one (A/India/P1510025/2015), formed a subclade branch with a high bootstrap value (92/100) due to an S84N amino acid substitution in their HA (designated as subclade 1 in Figure 1). Of the remaining viruses analyzed (15 Nepalese viruses and one Indian virus), nine Nepalese viruses and one Indian virus formed a small cluster (94/100 bootstrap value). Within this small cluster, five Nepalese viruses formed a subcluster with an E506D amino acid substitution (88/100 bootstrap value; designated as subclade 2 in Figure 1). The other six Nepalese viruses belonged to a different cluster possessing an E491G substitution; within this cluster, five viruses formed a subcluster exhibiting an N129D substitution (87/100 of bootstrap value; designated as subclade 3 in Figure 1). Analysis of the NA gene showed that the Nepalese and Indian viruses possessing an S84N substitution in HA formed a subclade exhibiting V13I and I314M substitutions in NA (designated as subclade 1 in Fig. S1). The remaining viruses formed NA subclades related to the HA subclades (designated as subclade 2 and subclade 3, respectively, in Fig. S1). Although the biological significance of these amino acid substitutions in HA and NA has yet to be precisely elucidated, they seem to be correlated with a certain extent in terms of phylogenetic tree (sub)clade structure, suggesting the coevolution of HA and NA with viral fitness.9 The Indian isolate, A/India/P152122/2015, possessed a D222G/N amino acid substitution in its HA. This polymorphism in HA has been occasionally associated with viral pathogenesis.10 However, because this is the only isolate analyzed in this study that had this substitution, it is unlikely that this substitution was solely responsible for the outbreaks. The nucleotide sequences of the internal genes (PA, PB1, PB2, NP, M, and NS) of all Indian and seven randomly selected Nepalese isolates were determined using next‐generation sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq system (Illumina K. K., Tokyo, Japan). Genetic and phylogenetic analysis of these genes revealed that most of the Nepalese and Indian isolates were clustered into a genetic subclade separated from other subclades formed by globally circulating H1N1pdm (Fig. S2). The amino acid substitutions identified in the internal genes analyzed are summarized in Table S2. Although several amino acid substitutions accumulated in these isolates compared to the globally circulating H1N1pdm, no known amino acid substitutions related to viral pathogenicity were identified. In addition, there were no characteristic differences in the genetic features of the internal genes between the patients with severe and mild outcomes (Table S2). Sequence data determined in this study were deposited with the GISAID database under accession numbers EPI610408 to EPI610535, EPI630406 to EPI630425, and EPI635481 to EPI635540.
In the following influenza season (2015/16), H1N1pdm infections were more prevalent than A/H3N2 and type B virus infections in the Northern Hemisphere temperate regions, as reported by GISRS.11 Most of these H1N1pdm isolates reacted well with the ferret antisera described above (data not shown), indicating that no apparent antigenic change had occurred in the circulating H1N1pdm strains. To determine the genetic correlation between these predominate 2015/16 season H1N1pdm strains and the Nepalese and Indian isolates, further phylogenic analysis with a large number of H1N1pdm strains was conducted (Figure 2). The vast majority of the 2015/16 season H1N1pdm strains (designated by a blue vertical line in Figure 2) formed part of a large cluster possessing an S84N substitution in HA (isolates colored in light blue in Figure 2). These isolates were descended from the Nepalese and Indian isolates described above (designated by a green vertical line in Figure 2). Most of these 2015/16 season isolates contained S162N (on the Sa antigenic site of HA resulting in a potential glycosylation site) and I216T amino acid substitutions in addition to the S84N substitution and formed a subclade subsequently designated as 6B.1.12 Intriguingly, this set of S84N variants was preceded by the emergence of isolates possessing an S84N substitution in Nepal in March and April 2014 (designated by a red rectangle in Figure 2 and enlarged in Fig. S3). Although isolates with an S84N substitution were occasionally observed earlier than 2014 in other parts of the world (colored in light blue from 2009 to 2013 in Figure 2), they disappeared shortly thereafter for unknown reasons. The 2014/15 season Nepalese and Indian isolates possessing an S84N substitution originated from isolates with S84N that emerged in Nepal in early 2014 and contributed to further worldwide spread (2015/16 season), suggesting the importance of these areas as a source for the evolution and global spread of novel variant viruses.
Although no viral features related to expanded infection with severe and fatal outcomes, including antigenicity, genetic properties, or susceptibility to antivirals, were identified in this study, it is important to note that many Nepalese and Indian H1N1pdm isolates possessing a novel genetic feature (S84N substitution in HA) preceded strains with additional substitutions observed in the subsequent annual influenza season (2015/16 season) in the Northern Hemisphere temperate regions. These novel H1N1pdm variants have also caused widespread outbreaks with severe or fatal outcomes.11 The phylogenetic analyses in our current study suggest that South Asian countries, such as Nepal and India, might serve as an important source of variant viruses, and improve our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of circulating influenza viruses. Thus, the future establishment of systematic measures for monitoring circulating influenza viruses in these countries would be of great importance.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank H. Sugawara, A. Sato, R. Ogawa, H. Miura, and M. Akimoto for technical assistance with this study; D. T. Mourya (National Institute of Virology, Pune) for providing support throughout the experiments; and P. Koul (Sher‐i‐Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Sri Nagar), L. Dar (All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi), and M. Chawla Sarkar (National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata) for submitting influenza isolates/clinical samples to the National Institute of Virology, NIC India. In addition, we wish to thank the various laboratories that compiled and submitted (GISAID EpiFlu database) the sequences used in this study and the Influenza Virus Surveillance Group of Japan for providing Japanese isolates. Moreover, we wish to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing. This work was supported, in part, by a Grant‐in‐Aid for Emerging and Re‐emerging Infectious Diseases from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan, as well as by JSPS KAKENHI grant JP26460816. DFB and DJS wish to acknowledge the support received from the Center for Research on Influenza Pathogenesis (CRIP) funded by the NIAID and BARDA contracts HHSN272201400008C and HHSO100201500033C, respectively.
Nakamura K., Shirakura M., Fujisaki S., et al. (2017), Characterization of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses isolated from Nepalese and Indian outbreak patients in early 2015. Influenza Other Respi Viruses 11, 399‐403. https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12469
REFERENCES
- 1. Bagchi S. India tackles H1N1 influenza outbreak. Lancet. 2015;385:e21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Mishra B. 2015 resurgence of influenza A (H1N1) 09: smoldering pandemic in India? J Glob Infect Dis. 2015;7:56‐59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. D'Silva J. Swine flu: how well did India respond? BMJ. 2015;350:h2286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. World Health Organization . Influenza surveillance report. https://extranet.who.int/sree/Reports?op=vs&path=/WHO_HQ_Reports/G5/PROD/EXT/Influenza%20Surveillance+Report+by+Country. Accessed December 10, 2015.
- 5. Tharakaraman K, Sasisekharan R. Influenza surveillance: 2014‐2015 H1N1 “swine”‐derived influenza viruses from India. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:279‐282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Takashita E, Fujisaki S, Shirakura M, et al. Characterization of an A(H1N1)pdm09 virus imported from India in March 2015. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2016;69:83‐86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Takashita E, Kiso M, Fujisaki S, et al. Characterization of a large cluster of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses cross‐resistant to oseltamivir and peramivir during the 2013–2014 influenza season in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:2607‐2617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. World Health Organization . Recommended composition of influenza virus vaccines for use in the 2015–2016 northern hemisphere influenza season. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2015;90:97‐108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wagner R, Matrosovich M, Klenk H‐D. Functional balance between haemagglutinin and neuraminidase in influenza virus infections. Rev Med Virol. 2002;12:159‐166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Resende PC, Motta FC, Oliveira M, et al. Polymorphisms at residue 222 of the hemagglutinin of pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09: association of quasi‐species to morbidity and mortality in different risk categories. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e92789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. World Health Organization . Risk assessment ‐ seasonal influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. http://www.who.int/influenza/publications/riskassessment_AH1N1pdm09_201602/en/. Accessed May 1, 2016.
- 12. Broberg E, Melidou A, Prosenc K, Bragstad K, Hungnes O, WHO European Region and the European Influenza Surveillance Network members of the reporting countries . Predominance of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus genetic subclade 6B.1 and influenza B/Victoria lineage viruses at the start of the 2015/16 influenza season in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:pii=30184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post‐analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312‐1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.