Abstract
Exocytosis involves fusion of secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane, thereby delivering membrane proteins to the cell surface and releasing material into the extracellular space. The tethering of the secretory vesicles before membrane fusion is mediated by the exocyst, an essential phylogenetically conserved octameric protein complex. Exocyst biogenesis is regulated by several processes, but the mechanisms by which the exocyst is degraded are unknown. Here, to unravel the components of the exocyst degradation pathway, we screened for extragenic suppressors of a temperature-sensitive fission yeast strain mutated in the exocyst subunit Sec3 (sec3-913). One of the suppressing DNAs encoded a truncated dominant-negative variant of the 26S proteasome subunit, Rpt2, indicating that exocyst degradation is controlled by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The temperature-dependent growth defect of the sec3-913 strain was gene dosage-dependent and suppressed by blocking the proteasome, Hsp70-type molecular chaperones, the Pib1 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase, and the deubiquitylating enzyme Ubp3. Moreover, defects in cell septation, exocytosis, and endocytosis in sec3 mutant strains were similarly alleviated by mutation of components in this pathway. We also found that, particularly under stress conditions, wild-type Sec3 degradation is regulated by Pib1 and the 26S proteasome. In conclusion, our results suggest that a cytosolic protein quality control pathway monitors folding and proteasome-dependent turnover of an exocyst subunit and, thereby, controls exocytosis in fission yeast.
Keywords: chaperone, exocytosis, proteasome, protein folding, ubiquitin
Introduction
During exocytosis, secretory vesicles fuse with the plasma membrane, thereby delivering membrane proteins to the cell surface and releasing material into the extracellular space. Importantly, exocytosis also provides lipids for membrane extension, which is required for growth, cell polarity, and division and is therefore critical for cell function and tissue development. In yeasts, exocytosis of hydrolytic enzymes is necessary to dissolve the cell wall (septum) between two daughter cells to complete cytokinesis (1). In general, cargoes derived from organelles are transported by motor proteins along cytoskeletal tracks toward specific areas of the plasma membrane. The initial contact between the secretory vesicles and the target membrane is mediated by tethering factors that are thought to bridge SNARE complexes on opposing membranes to allow vesicle docking and fusion with the plasma membrane (2, 3). The tethering of the secretory vesicles prior to docking and fusion with the plasma membrane is mediated by the exocyst, a phylogenetically conserved and stable octameric protein complex (4, 5). The two exocyst members Sec3 and Exo70 interact with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate at the plasma membrane and assemble the rest of the exocyst complex, which is trafficked to the cell surface on vesicles in an actin-dependent manner (6–10). The importance of the exocyst complex is exemplified by the fact that it is linked to a number of developmental and infectious diseases in animals, plants, and fungi (4). In simple organisms, such as the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, most exocyst subunits are essential for viability, and conditional exocyst mutants display reduced secretion of hydrolytic enzymes, incomplete cytokinesis, and retarded cell growth (11–14). Not surprisingly, given its pivotal role, the function, localization, and assembly of the exocyst are modulated by posttranslational modifications, interaction with molecular switches such as GTPases, or alternative splicing (15, 16). There is, however, no information about the mechanisms by which the degradation of the exocyst occurs.
As a result of stress conditions or mutations, proteins may lose their native conformation and misfold. Because misfolded proteins tend to form toxic aggregates with other cell proteins, the accumulation of misfolded proteins represents a considerable danger to cells. To cope with such harmful protein variants, cells have evolved efficient protein quality control (PQC)3 mechanisms that function to clear the cell of misfolded proteins (17–19). Typically, these rely on molecular chaperones that capture misfolded proteins and either refold them or guide them to degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). How cells discern misfolded from native proteins remains incompletely understood but is likely to involve recognition of exposed hydrophobic regions in misfolded proteins. A number of proteins involved in targeting the misfolded proteins for degradation have been identified, particularly in yeast cells, where mutants in UPS components were identified as extragenic suppressors of point mutants in essential genes (20, 21). These observations suggest that PQC is highly diligent and thus prone to target proteins that are only slightly structurally perturbed and still functional. Similarly, some cystic fibrosis patients carry mutations in the CFTR gene (22, 23) that result in a full-length protein that retains biochemical function. This protein variant fails to conduct its function not because it is inactive but because it is discarded by the protein quality control system, prompting disease.
PQC is compartmentalized in the cell, and in recent years a great deal has been learned about endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation (24, 25) and nuclear quality control (20, 26, 27). In contrast, cytosolic quality control is less well defined, although recent studies in budding yeast have shown that misfolded cytosolic proteins are often transported to the nucleus prior to degradation (28) or targeted directly in the cytosol by the E3s Ltn1, Rsp5, and Doa10 (29–31). Here we show that degradation of the exocyst subunit Sec3 depends on the proteasome, Hsp70-type molecular chaperones, the Pib1 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase, and the deubiquitylating enzyme Ubp3.
Results
The Sec3-913 protein is a proteasome target
The fission yeast sec3-913 strain carries a point mutation in the sec3 gene that renders the cell temperature-sensitive (11). To further our understanding of the exocyst, we performed a screen for extragenic suppressors of the sec3-913 temperature-sensitive growth defect at 35 °C. One of the suppressing plasmids contained a genomic DNA fragment of chromosome II encoding the first 658 bp (219 amino acids) of the proteasome subunit Mts2/Rpt2 (Fig. 1A).
Because full-length Rpt2 is a 361-residue essential ATPase subunit of the 26S proteasome (32), we predicted this truncated Rpt2 version to function in a dominant-negative manner, as has been shown before (21). To test the effect of proteasome mutations further, we combined the sec3-913 mutant with a deletion in the proteasome assembly factor nas6+. In agreement with the sec3-913 temperature-sensitive phenotype being suppressed by reducing proteasome activity, we observed a strong restoration of growth at the restrictive temperature in the sec3-913nas6Δ double mutant (Fig. 1B).
In budding yeast, deletion of the gene encoding the proteasome subunit Sem1 (Dss1 in fission yeast) was found to suppress various exocyst mutations (33). To test whether this was also the case for fission yeast Dss1, a sec3-913dss1Δ double mutant was constructed and analyzed for growth at the restrictive temperature. In S. pombe, deletion of the dss1+ gene results in a temperature-sensitive growth defect (34). Unlike the situation in budding yeast, we did not observe any effect of Dss1 on the growth defect of the sec3-913 mutant in fission yeast (Fig. 1C). However, because Dss1/Sem1 is also linked to non-proteasomal functions (35), including transcription and mRNA maturation, this is likely to obscure a positive genetic interaction between dss1 and sec3 in S. pombe cells. However, as a further control, we also analyzed the growth of wild-type and sec3-913 cells on medium containing sublethal amounts of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (BZ). In agreement with the genetic interaction data, addition of bortezomib suppressed the growth defect in a temperature- and dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1D). We therefore conclude that the sec3-913 temperature-dependent growth defect is suppressed by blocking the proteasome.
This phenotype suppression suggests that Sec3-913 is a substrate of the UPS. To test this, we followed the degradation of V5-tagged wild-type Sec3 and Sec3-913 in cultures treated with the translation inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX). Both at the permissive and restrictive temperature, the wild-type Sec3 protein appeared to be fairly stable during the experiment. In contrast, degradation of the Sec3-913 protein occurred rapidly at the permissive temperature and was even more pronounced at the restrictive temperature (Fig. 1E). By densitometry of Western blots, we estimated the half-life of Sec3-913 at 36 °C to be <2 h (Fig. 1F), whereas wild-type Sec3 under the same conditions displayed a half-life of ∼8 h (Fig. 1F). The observed degradation was proteasome-dependent because addition of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib blocked the degradation (Fig. 1, E and F). Accordingly, addition of bortezomib and deletion of nas6 increased the steady-state level of the Sec3-913 protein (Fig. 1, G and H). Addition of bortezomib did not lead to a general stress response because we did not observe any induction of Hsp70 (Fig. 1G). We conclude from these experiments that the Sec3-913 protein is a target of the UPS.
The Sec3-913 protein is partially functional at the restrictive temperature when proteasome activity is blocked
Our observation that the sec3-913 temperature-sensitive growth defect is suppressed by deletion of nas6+ or addition of bortezomib suggests that the Sec3-913 protein at least partly retains function at the restrictive temperature. To test this prediction, we generated strains in which the endogenous sec3 promoter was replaced with the strong nmt1 promoter, leading to enhanced synthesis of Sec3 and Sec3-913. When sec3-913 was overexpressed, we no longer observed any temperature-sensitive growth defect (Fig. 2A), suggesting that Sec3-913 is functional at the restrictive temperature. Thus, the temperature-sensitive growth defect is likely a consequence of a meticulous PQC pathway, leading to an insufficient cellular quantity of the Sec3-913 protein.
In S. pombe, Sec3 is required for the exocytosis of hydrolytic enzymes to dissolve the septum between two daughter cells during cytokinesis but also for actin patch localization and endocytosis (11). To test whether these functions of Sec3-913 were restored when protein degradation was inhibited, we first monitored cell septation by calcofluor staining. The septation defect of the sec3-913 strain appeared gradually upon shifting the cells to the restrictive temperature. After the cells were incubated for 4 h at 36 °C, we observed about 60% septated sec3-913 cells, of which several displayed multiple septa. Addition of bortezomib led to a strong reduction in the number of septated and multiseptated cells (Fig. 2B). In addition, bortezomib treatment also reduced the thickness of the septa (Fig. 2C). To rule out that these results were caused by an off-target effect of bortezomib, we also analyzed septation in untreated sec3-913nas6Δ double mutant cells. We observed full restoration of the sec3-913 septation defect upon deletion of nas6 (Fig. 3A).
A defect in exocytosis can also be observed by transmission electron microscopy and quantified as the proportion of secretory vesicles per unit of cytoplasm. In wild-type and nas6Δ cells, the vesicle/cytoplasm ratio was very low, presumably because secretory vesicles efficiently fuse with the plasma membrane. In sec3-913 cells, secretory vesicles accumulated in the cytoplasm, whereas this increase was not as extensive in the sec3-913nas6Δ double mutant (Fig. 3, B and C). Thus, the secretory defects observed in sec3-913 cells are at least partially caused by the degradation of Sec3-913.
To monitor whether the reported endocytosis defect of the sec3-913 strain (11) could be restored by deletion of nas6, we followed the uptake of the dye FM4-64 over time. As described previously (36), added FM4-64 first associates with the plasma membrane in zones of active growth and is then incorporated into endosomes, which later fuse with the vacuolar membranes. Clearly, FM4-64 incorporation in sec3-913 endosomes was delayed compared with the situation in the nas6Δ and sec3-913nas6Δ double mutant (Fig. 3D, arrowheads). Hence, after 1 h, FM4-64 began to accumulate in endosomes in the sec3-913 single mutant strain, whereas this occurred already after 30 min in the sec3-913nas6Δ double mutant (Fig. 3D). This reveals that inhibiting degradation also restores the endocytic function of the Sec3-913 protein.
Sec3-913 degradation depends on molecular chaperones
Our observations so far suggest that the UPS targets the Sec3-913 protein. Because Sec3-913 is encoded by a mutant gene, is unstable, and interacts less efficiently with its binding partner Sec8 (11), we speculated that Sec3-913 is targeted for the UPS by a protein quality control mechanism, although Sec3-913 is still partly functional and, therefore, probably only slightly misfolded. Molecular chaperones are key players in PQC, where they catalyze folding and/or target misfolded proteins for degradation. To test whether molecular chaperones were involved in the folding or degradation of Sec3-913, we first crossed the sec3-913 strain to different chaperone mutants to obtain double mutants. The growth of the double mutants was then compared with the single mutants at various temperatures. Deletion of the Hsp70-type chaperones sks2, ssa1, and ssa2 led to partial suppression of the temperature-sensitive growth defect (Fig. 4A), indicating that these chaperones are not very active in folding Sec3-913 (because this would lead to a phenotype enhancement) but, rather, may play a role in targeting Sec3-913 for degradation. In case of ssa2Δ, we observed that the cells displayed a general growth defect that, surprisingly, appeared to be somewhat stronger at 29 °C than at higher temperatures (Fig. 4A). Mutation of the cdc48 segregase did not affect the growth of the sec3-913 strain, whereas deletion of the hsp104 chaperone led to a slight but reproducible synthetic growth defect at 33 °C. In agreement with deletion of sks2 and ssa1 only partially suppressing the sec3-913 growth defect, we only observed a modest suppression of the septation defect in the sec3-913sks2Δ and sec3-913ssa1Δ double mutants (Fig. 4B), and we were unable to detect any change in Sec3-913 protein levels (Fig. 4C).
The sec3-913 temperature sensitivity is partially suppressed by deletion of pub1
To identify E3s involved in targeting Sec3-913 for degradation, we took an approach similar to the one for the molecular chaperones. In yeast, the principal nuclear quality control E3 is San1 (37), whereas Doa10, Hul5, and Ltn1 have been implicated in cytosolic quality control (29, 38–41). However, in all cases, double mutants displayed a similar growth pattern as the sec3-913 single mutant (Fig. 5), which strongly indicates that, on their own, none of these E3s contribute significantly to Sec3-913 degradation. More recently, the budding yeast E3, Rsp5 (human NEDD4), has been connected to degradation of misfolded proteins following heat stress (30, 42). The S. pombe genome encodes three genes, pub1+, pub2+, and pub3+, which display high similarity to Saccharomyces cerevisiae RSP5. When we tested these, only deletion of pub1 led to partial rescue of the sec3-913 temperature-sensitive growth defect (Fig. 5). This suggests that Pub1 contributes to the degradation of Sec3-913. Because double deletion mutants of pub1, pub2, and pub3 display synthetically sick/lethal phenotypes (43, 44), we did not construct pub double mutants in the sec3-913 background.
The Pib1 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase targets Sec3-913 for degradation
Because none of the typical PQC E3s appeared to target Sec3-913 for degradation, we searched the S. pombe database for other candidate E3s and noticed the uncharacterized SPBC36B7.05c orthologue of the budding yeast E3 Pib1 and human ZNRF2. Budding yeast Pib1 has been reported to bind phosphatidylinositol phosphate and localize to endosomal membranes (45, 46). In addition, PIB1 expression is regulated by the heat shock transcription factor Hsf1 (47).
In agreement with Pib1 playing a role in Sec3-913 turnover, deletion of pib1 efficiently suppressed the temperature-sensitive growth defect of the sec3-913 strain (Fig. 6A). With cells on minimal medium, we observed that the temperature-sensitive growth defect of the sec3-913 strain was less dramatic. However, overexpression of pib1+ did not affect the growth of wild-type cells but reversed temperature-sensitive phenotype suppression of the sec3-913pib1Δ double mutant (Fig. 6B). Similar to the situation with the proteasome and chaperone mutants, deletion of pib1 also significantly suppressed the sec3-913 septation defect (Fig. 6C). In addition, the steady-state level of Sec3-913 protein was increased in a pib1-null background (Fig. 6D). Accordingly, when following the degradation of Sec3-913 in cultures treated with cycloheximide, we observed decreased degradation in pib1Δ cells at the restrictive temperature (Fig. 6, E and F). However, the degradation was not entirely blocked, suggesting that Pib1 is likely functionally redundant with other PQC E3s.
Finally, to test the ubiquitylation of Sec3-913, we transformed the sec3-913 and sec3-913pib1Δ strains with a plasmid overproducing His6-tagged ubiquitin. After blocking protein degradation with bortezomib, ubiquitin and ubiquitin-protein conjugates were isolated by precipitation using an Ni2+ resin under denaturing conditions. Indeed, we observed that Sec3-913 was ubiquitylated and that the ubiquitylation was reduced in the pib1Δ background (Fig. 6G). In agreement with Pib1 being functionally redundant with other E3s, ubiquitylation of Sec3-913 was also still evident in the pib1-null strain. Also, because we did not observe any growth defect in a pib1Δpub1Δ double mutant (supplemental Fig. S1), Pib1 and Pub1 are unlikely to generally overlap in their function.
Sec3-913 degradation requires deubiquitylating enzymes
When a ubiquitylated substrate reaches the 26S proteasome, various proteasome-associated deubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs) cleave the ubiquitin chain and thus regulate degradation. For instance, the proteasome-associated DUB Ubp6 has been shown to rescue substrates from degradation by trimming ubiquitin chains (48, 49). In contrast, the proteasome-associated DUBs Ubp3 and Uch2 (UCH37 in humans) have been shown to stimulate degradation (50, 51), presumably because ubiquitylated proteins are less efficiently translocated into the proteasome lumen. In addition, the budding yeast DUBs Ubp2 and Ubp3 were recently shown to be required for degradation of misfolded proteins targeted by Rsp5 (Pub1, Pub2, and Pub3 in fission yeast) (42).
To test whether any of these DUBs regulate Sec3-913 turnover, we crossed the sec3-913 strain to different DUB mutants to obtain double mutants. The growth of the double mutants was then compared with the single mutants at various temperatures. We did not observe any genetic interaction between sec3-913 and ubp2Δ (Fig. 7A). Deletion of ubp6 led to a slightly synthetic sick phenotype (Fig. 7A), indicating that Ubp6 may deubiquitylate Sec3-913 and thus antagonize its degradation. However, for both uch2Δ (the UCH37/UCHL5 orthologue in fission yeast) and ubp3Δ, we observed a suppression of the sec3-913 temperature-sensitive growth defect (Fig. 7A). This phenotype suppression was more pronounced for ubp3 than for uch2, indicating that Ubp3 plays a more prominent role than Uch2 for regulation of Sec3-913 degradation. The septation defects of the sec3-913 strain were also strongly alleviated in the sec3-913ubp3Δ double mutant (Fig. 7B), and, accordingly, deletion of ubp3 led to an increase in the steady-state level of Sec3-913 protein, in particular at the restrictive temperature (Fig. 7C). We therefore conclude that Ubp3 and Uch2 stimulate Sec3-913 degradation. However, because we did not observe any growth defect in ubp3Δuch2Δ double mutants (supplemental Fig. S1), either these DUBs do not generally overlap in their function or they are functionally redundant with other cellular DUBs.
Wild-type Sec3 is also a UPS target
When the molecular chaperones and components of the UPS are blocked, the Sec3-913 protein appears functional at the restrictive temperature; therefore, we reasoned that, structurally, the Sec3-913 protein is most likely near native or least not highly misfolded. Accordingly, it is possible that the components involved in degradation of Sec3-913 may also, to a lesser extent, target wild-type Sec3 for degradation. In our degradation assays, the wild-type Sec3 protein appeared to be fairly stable during the experiment (Fig. 1F, t½, ∼8 h). The steady-state level of wild-type Sec3 was clearly increased after 16 h with bortezomib (Fig. 8A) and, at the restrictive temperature, also significantly increased in the pib1Δ strain (Fig. 8B), indicating that wild-type Sec3 levels are also regulated by Pib1 and the UPS. Importantly, these differences were even more pronounced after subjecting cells to a 45-min heat shock at 40 °C (Fig. 8C). We therefore conclude that wild-type Sec3 is likely to be regulated by a similar mechanism as we observed for Sec3-913.
Discussion
The exocyst is an evolutionarily conserved protein complex that tethers post-Golgi vesicles, transported along cytoskeletal tracks, to the plasma membrane. As an exocyst subunit, Sec3 plays an important role in mediating interaction of the complex with the plasma membrane (6, 9). Here we show that the exocyst subunit Sec3 is regulated by a protein quality control pathway (Fig. 9). Our data suggest that this PQC pathway operates on wild-type Sec3 under stress conditions that may cause misfolding but is exacerbated in the Sec3-913 missense protein variant. This is in agreement with the previously observed depletion of Sec3 in response to heat shock and damage of the cell membrane in budding yeast (52). This also indicates that the structural stability of the Sec3-913 protein is compromised, and, accordingly, the Sec3-913 protein displays impaired interaction with the exocyst subunit Sec8 (11); as we show here, Sec3-913 is regulated by molecular chaperones. However, because exocyst function is restored upon blocking the PQC pathway, the Sec3-913 protein is probably only slightly misfolded at the restrictive temperature, which suggests that mutations that only cause subtle misfolding may still trigger rapid protein turnover. Because previous studies have shown that depletion of one exocyst subunit does not affect the level of the other subunits (5), it is unlikely that the other exocyst subunits become unstable in sec3-913 cells at the restrictive temperature.
Early studies showed that certain missense protein variants are more rapidly degraded than wild-type proteins (53). Since then, a number of proteins involved in targeting the misfolded proteins for degradation have been identified in a manner similar to our approach, in which mutants in UPS components were identified as extragenic suppressors of point mutants in essential genes (20, 21). For instance, the nuclear PQC E3 San1 was first connected to protein quality control of the mutant proteins Sir4-9 and Cdc68-1 because loss of San1 alleviates the sir4-9 and cdc68-1 phenotypes (20). These observations are important because they link proteasomal substrates to E3s, which is otherwise highly complicated, in particular because of the vast number of genes encoding E3s (the human genome encodes more than 600 different E3s, whereas the fission yeast genome encodes roughly 100 different E3s). However, these genetic interactions also suggest that the PQC network is highly diligent and prone to target proteins that are only slightly structurally perturbed and still functional. This has important consequences for protein evolution (54) because mutations in proteins that allow functional innovation may slightly destabilize the structure and trigger degradation via the UPS. This severely limits the functional space available for a protein variant, and, accordingly, molecular chaperones are important for evolution because they may help destabilized mutants to fold, allowing access to new activities (55–57). However, chaperones have also been shown to actively direct their substrates for degradation (58).
This seemingly overactive PQC also has direct consequences for disease. For instance, missense variants in the mismatch repair protein MSH2 have been linked to the hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome, known as Lynch syndrome. Although several of the disease-linked MSH2 mutations result in functional proteins with only minor folding defects, the proteins are targeted for degradation, leading to depletion of the MSH2 protein, which, in turn, triggers the disease (59, 60). As mentioned, similar observations have been made for cystic fibrosis and disease-linked variants of the CFTR protein (23), suggesting that this highly sensitive PQC system may be a common etiological mechanism for disease-linked loss-of-function missense mutations.
In general, the nuclear and endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation pathways for degradation of misfolded proteins are well characterized (20, 24, 26, 27). However, PQC in the cytosol is less well defined. Recent studies in budding yeast have shown that smaller misfolded cytosolic proteins are transported to the nucleus, where they are ubiquitylated by the E3 San1 and degraded (26, 28, 61). Other misfolded cytosolic proteins appear to be targeted during translation on the ribosome (62–64) or directly in the cytosol by the E3s Ltn1, Rps5, and Doa10 (29, 42). We found that the degradation of Sec3-913 occurred independent of San1, Ltn1, and Doa10 but relied on the membrane-associated Pib1 enzyme. However, we note that some Sec3-913 is still degraded when pib1 is deleted, suggesting that Sec3-913 can also be targeted for degradation via other pathways. This observation is in line with studies in budding yeast that have shown that multiple E3s display overlapping substrate specificity for misfolded proteins (65). Indeed, we observed that the sec3-913 temperature-sensitive growth defect is partially suppressed by deletion of pub1, suggesting that Pub1 also contributes to Sec3-913 degradation. In addition, the strong suppressing effect we observed for ubp3Δ and the link between Rsp5 and Ubp3, recently established in budding yeast (42), lend additional support for a role of Pub1 in Sec3-913 degradation. The fission yeast pub1+, pub2+, and pub3+ genes are highly similar and unessential orthologues of the essential RSP5 gene in S. cerevisiae (43). Accordingly, pub1+, pub2+, and pub3+ display overlapping functions and pairwise synthetic deletion phenotypes (43, 66), indicating that they may all contribute to Sec3-913 turnover. However, because Rsp5 and the fission yeast Pub E3s have also been linked to other functions, including transcription, ribosome stability, and endocytosis (66–71), they may also indirectly contribute to the sec3-913 phenotype.
As for how the cellular PQC system is able to discriminate between misfolded proteins and their native counterparts, this has been shown, in the case of San1, to involve direct recognition of exposed hydrophobic regions in the substrate (20). However, other PQC E3s seem to associate with molecular chaperones and ubiquitylate the chaperone-bound substrates (58). Because we found that the Hsp70-type chaperones Sks2 and Ssa1 both affect Sec3-913, Pib1 presumably operates through molecular chaperones. Sec3-913 is probably only slightly misfolded because, in our assays, it appears to be functional at the restrictive temperature when overproduced or when degradation is inhibited. Accordingly, the proteasome and Pib1 also play a role in regulating wild-type Sec3. In conclusion, our data corroborate previous findings showing that missense proteins are targeted for degradation and reveal a so far unreported chaperone-assisted degradation pathway (Fig. 9).
Experimental procedures
Yeast strains and techniques
The fission yeast strains used in this study (supplemental Table S1) are derivatives of the wild-type heterothallic strains 972h− and 975h+. Some strains were purchased from Bioneer (72). Standard genetic methods and media were used, and S. pombe transformations were performed using lithium acetate (73). The PCR mutagenesis and marker switch were performed as described previously (74, 75).
Plasmids
The pib1+ (SPBC36B7.05c) cDNAs were purchased from GeneArt in the pENTR221 vector and transferred to the pDUAL vector (76) for expression in S. pombe using the Gateway cloning system (Invitrogen).
Growth assays
Growth assays on solid medium were performed essentially as described previously (77). Briefly, the S. pombe strains to be assayed were grown to an A600 nm of 0.4–0.8. The cells were then diluted in medium to an A600 nm of exactly 0.40. Serial 5-fold dilutions of this culture were prepared before 5 μl of each dilution was spotted onto solid medium plates (Edinburgh minimal medium 2 (EMM2) (Biomol) for plasmid selection, otherwise yeast extract with supplements (YES; 30 g/l glucose, 5 g/l yeast extract, 225 mg/l adenine, 225 mg/l leucine, 225 mg/l uracil)) and incubated at the indicated temperature until colonies formed.
Electrophoresis and blotting
Proteins were separated on 7 cm × 8 cm 12% acrylamide gels and subsequently transferred to 0.2-μm pore size nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked in PBS (133 mm NaCl, 2.7 mm KCl, 6.5 mm Na2HPO4, and 1.5 mm KH2PO4 (pH 7.4)) containing 5% fat-free milk powder and 0.01% Tween 20. Membranes were then probed with the indicated antibodies overnight. The antisera, used in Western blots diluted 1:1000, were as follows: anti-GFP (clone 3H9, Chromotek), anti-V5 (clone SV5, Serotec), anti-His6 (catalog no. 34660, Qiagen), anti-Hsp70 (clone 5A5, Abcam), and anti-α-tubulin (clone TAT1, Abcam). Secondary antibodies were purchased HRP-conjugated from Dako Cytomation.
Cell imaging and fluorescence microscopy
Cell septation was monitored by staining with calcofluor white (Sigma) as described previously (11). Endocytosis was monitored by following FM4-64 uptake over time as described previously (11). Cells were imaged on 2% agarose pads using an Olympus IX71 wide-field inverted epifluorescence microscope. An Olympus ×63 numerical aperture 1.4 oil immersion objective was used, and images were captured with a Coolsnap-HQ2 charge-coupled device camera. Counts, measurements, and image presentations were made using Metamorph (Molecular Devices) and downloaded to Microsoft Excel or GraphPad for analyses.
Transmission electron microscopy
For electron microscopy studies, 106 cells in YES were fixed in 2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and 2% (v/v) formaldehyde in PBS, washed with buffer, and sedimented for 10 min at 17,000 × g. The cells were then post-fixed using 2% potassium permanganate, washed with water, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (50% to 100% ethanol), and embedded in Durcupan resin (Sigma). Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were collected on pioloform-coated EM copper grids (Agar Scientific) and contrasted using lead citrate. Sections were analyzed using a JEOL JEM 1400 transmission electron microscope operated at 120 kV, and images were obtained at a nominal magnification of 12,000 with a digital camera (ES1000 W, Gatan).
For estimating the fractional volume of vesicles inside the cytoplasm, sections were sampled systematic uniform random in three independent experiments (n > 202 cells in total) (78). The sampled micrographs were then overlaid with a randomly placed square grid lattice in Metamorph (Molecular Devices) and the areas (A) of interest estimated by point counting (point spacing 50 pixels and 350 pixels for vesicles and cytoplasm, respectively). The mean volume density of vesicles in the cytoplasm is then given by ΣAvesicle/ΣAcytoplasm. Vesicles were identified by the presence of a single membrane, a round to oval profile shape, and a dark and homogenously contrasted matrix. Results were downloaded to GraphPad for analyses.
Protein degradation assays
The degradation of the V5-tagged Sec3 and Sec3-913 proteins was followed in cycloheximide-treated cultures by electrophoresis and blotting as described previously (79). Protein was extracted in TCA using glass beads. Briefly, harvested cells were resuspended in 20% TCA. Then glass beads were added, and the samples were subjected to three rounds of 15 s in a FastPrep machine (Thermo). The glass beads and unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation (1000 × g, 5 min.). The supernatant was further centrifuged (10,000 × g, 5 min), and the resulting pellet was extensively washed with ice-cold acetone. Finally, the pellet was resuspended in SDS-PAGE loading buffer (50 mm Tris/HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, and 0.2 mg/ml bromphenol blue). Antibodies to α-tubulin (Abcam) were used as the loading control. Quantification was performed by densitometry using the Un-Scan-It Gel v6.1 software (Silk Scientific Corp.). Bortezomib was purchased from LC Laboratories.
Ubiquitylation of Sec3-913
The ubiquitylation of Sec3-913-V5 was determined by precipitating His6-ubiquitin under denaturing conditions (in 8 m urea), followed by electrophoresis and blotting for the V5 tag on Sec3-913 as described previously (80).
Author contributions
C. K., A. K., A. B. A., A. M. L., S. M. S., and I. J. conducted the experiments. I. J. and R. H. P. conceived the project. C. K., I. J., and R. H. P. designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Christian Hacker (Bioimaging Centre, University of Exeter) for technical assistance with the EM experiments. We also thank Dr. Olaf Nielsen, Dr. Colin Gordon, Dr. Klavs B. Hendil, Dr. Michael Seeger, and Dr. Franziska Kriegenburg for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation (to R. H. P.), the Danish Cancer Society (to R. H. P.), the Novo Nordisk Foundation (to R. H. P.), the A. P. Møller Foundation (to R. H. P.), the Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation (to R. H. P.), the Danish Rheumatism Association (to R. H. P.), and the Danish Council for Independent Research (Natural Sciences) (to R. H. P.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
This article contains supplemental Fig. S1 and Table S1.
- PQC
- protein quality control
- UPS
- ubiquitin-proteasome system
- BZ
- bortezomib
- CHX
- cycloheximide
- DUB
- deubiquitylating enzyme.
References
- 1. Martín-Cuadrado A. B., Dueñas E., Sipiczki M., Vázquez de Aldana C. R., and del Rey F. (2003) The endo-β-1,3-glucanase eng1p is required for dissolution of the primary septum during cell separation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 116, 1689–1698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cai H., Reinisch K., and Ferro-Novick S. (2007) Coats, tethers, Rabs, and SNAREs work together to mediate the intracellular destination of a transport vesicle. Dev. Cell 12, 671–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. He B., and Guo W. (2009) The exocyst complex in polarized exocytosis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 537–542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Martin-Urdiroz M., Deeks M. J., Horton C. G., Dawe H. R., and Jourdain I. (2016) The exocyst complex in health and disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 4, 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Heider M. R., Gu M., Duffy C. M., Mirza A. M., Marcotte L. L., Walls A. C., Farrall N., Hakhverdyan Z., Field M. C., Rout M. P., Frost A., and Munson M. (2016) Subunit connectivity, assembly determinants and architecture of the yeast exocyst complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 59–66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Boyd C., Hughes T., Pypaert M., and Novick P. (2004) Vesicles carry most exocyst subunits to exocytic sites marked by the remaining two subunits, Sec3p and Exo70p. J. Cell Biol. 167, 889–901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. He B., Xi F., Zhang X., Zhang J., and Guo W. (2007) Exo70 interacts with phospholipids and mediates the targeting of the exocyst to the plasma membrane. EMBO J. 26, 4053–4065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Liu J., Zuo X., Yue P., and Guo W. (2007) Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate mediates the targeting of the exocyst to the plasma membrane for exocytosis in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 4483–4492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Pleskot R., Cwiklik L., Jungwirth P., Žárský V., and Potocký M. (2015) Membrane targeting of the yeast exocyst complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1848, 1481–1489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jin Y., Sultana A., Gandhi P., Franklin E., Hamamoto S., Khan A. R., Munson M., Schekman R., and Weisman L. S. (2011) Myosin V transports secretory vesicles via a Rab GTPase cascade and interaction with the exocyst complex. Dev. Cell 21, 1156–1170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Jourdain I., Dooley H. C., and Toda T. (2012) Fission yeast sec3 bridges the exocyst complex to the actin cytoskeleton. Traffic 13, 1481–1495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wang H., Tang X., Liu J., Trautmann S., Balasundaram D., McCollum D., and Balasubramanian M. K. (2002) The multiprotein exocyst complex is essential for cell separation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 515–529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Martín-Cuadrado A. B., Morrell J. L., Konomi M., An H., Petit C., Osumi M., Balasubramanian M., Gould K. L., Del Rey F., de Aldana C. R. (2005) Role of septins and the exocyst complex in the function of hydrolytic enzymes responsible for fission yeast cell separation. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 4867–4881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bendezú F. O., Vincenzetti V., and Martin S. G. (2012) Fission yeast Sec3 and Exo70 are transported on actin cables and localize the exocyst complex to cell poles. PLoS ONE 7, e40248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wu H., Rossi G., and Brennwald P. (2008) The ghost in the machine: small GTPases as spatial regulators of exocytosis. Trends Cell Biol. 18, 397–404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wu B., and Guo W. (2015) The exocyst at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 128, 2957–2964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hartl F. U., Bracher A., and Hayer-Hartl M. (2011) Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475, 324–332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kriegenburg F., Ellgaard L., and Hartmann-Petersen R. (2012) Molecular chaperones in targeting misfolded proteins for ubiquitin-dependent degradation. FEBS J. 279, 532–542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Le Goff X., Chesnel F., Delalande O., Couturier A., Dréano S., Le Goff C., Vigneau C., and Arlot-Bonnemains Y. (2016) Aggregation dynamics and identification of aggregation-prone mutants of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein. J. Cell Sci. 129, 2638–2650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gardner R. G., Nelson Z. W., and Gottschling D. E. (2005) Degradation-mediated protein quality control in the nucleus. Cell 120, 803–815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kriegenburg F., Jakopec V., Poulsen E. G., Nielsen S. V., Roguev A., Krogan N., Gordon C., Fleig U., and Hartmann-Petersen R. (2014) A chaperone-assisted degradation pathway targets kinetochore proteins to ensure genome stability. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Meacham G. C., Patterson C., Zhang W., Younger J. M., and Cyr D. M. (2001) The Hsc70 co-chaperone CHIP targets immature CFTR for proteasomal degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 100–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ahner A., Nakatsukasa K., Zhang H., Frizzell R. A., and Brodsky J. L. (2007) Small heat-shock proteins select δF508-CFTR for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 806–814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Amm I., Sommer T., and Wolf D. H. (2014) Protein quality control and elimination of protein waste: the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 182–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Christianson J. C., and Ye Y. (2014) Cleaning up in the endoplasmic reticulum: ubiquitin in charge. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 325–335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Guerriero C. J., Weiberth K. F., and Brodsky J. L. (2013) Hsp70 targets a cytoplasmic quality control substrate to the San1p ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 18506–18520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Nielsen S. V., Poulsen E. G., Rebula C. A., and Hartmann-Petersen R. (2014) Protein quality control in the nucleus. Biomolecules 4, 646–661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Park S. H., Kukushkin Y., Gupta R., Chen T., Konagai A., Hipp M. S., Hayer-Hartl M., and Hartl F. U. (2013) PolyQ proteins interfere with nuclear degradation of cytosolic proteins by sequestering the Sis1p chaperone. Cell 154, 134–145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Maurer M. J., Spear E. D., Yu A. T., Lee E. J., Shahzad S., and Michaelis S. (2016) Degradation signals for ubiquitin-proteasome dependent cytosolic protein quality control (CytoQC) in yeast. G3 6, 1853–1866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Fang N. N., Chan G. T., Zhu M., Comyn S. A., Persaud A., Deshaies R. J., Rotin D., Gsponer J., and Mayor T. (2014) Rsp5/Nedd4 is the main ubiquitin ligase that targets cytosolic misfolded proteins following heat stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 1227–1237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Geffen Y., Appleboim A., Gardner R. G., Friedman N., Sadeh R., and Ravid T. (2016) Mapping the landscape of a eukaryotic degronome. Mol. Cell 63, 1055–1065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Gordon C., McGurk G., Dillon P., Rosen C., and Hastie N. D. (1993) Defective mitosis due to a mutation in the gene for a fission yeast 26S protease subunit. Nature 366, 355–357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Jäntti J., Lahdenranta J., Olkkonen V. M., Söderlund H., and Keränen S. (1999) SEM1, a homologue of the split hand/split foot malformation candidate gene Dss1, regulates exocytosis and pseudohyphal differentiation in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 909–914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Paraskevopoulos K., Kriegenburg F., Tatham M. H., Rösner H. I., Medina B., Larsen I. B., Brandstrup R., Hardwick K. G., Hay R. T., Kragelund B. B., Hartmann-Petersen R., and Gordon C. (2014) Dss1 is a 26S proteasome ubiquitin receptor. Mol. Cell 56, 453–461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kragelund B. B., Schenstrøm S. M., Rebula C. A., Panse V. G., and Hartmann-Petersen R. (2016) DSS1/Sem1, a multifunctional and intrinsically disordered protein. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 446–459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Gachet Y., and Hyams J. S. (2005) Endocytosis in fission yeast is spatially associated with the actin cytoskeleton during polarised cell growth and cytokinesis. J. Cell Sci. 118, 4231–4242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Rosenbaum J. C., Fredrickson E. K., Oeser M. L., Garrett-Engele C. M., Locke M. N., Richardson L. A., Nelson Z. W., Hetrick E. D., Milac T. I., Gottschling D. E., and Gardner R. G. (2011) Disorder targets misorder in nuclear quality control degradation: a disordered ubiquitin ligase directly recognizes its misfolded substrates. Mol. Cell 41, 93–106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Finley D. (2011) Misfolded proteins driven to destruction by Hul5. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1290–1292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bays N. W., Gardner R. G., Seelig L. P., Joazeiro C. A., and Hampton R. Y. (2001) Hrd1p/Der3p is a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase required for ER-associated degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 24–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Mathiassen S. G., Larsen I. B., Poulsen E. G., Madsen C. T., Papaleo E., Lindorff-Larsen K., Kragelund B. B., Nielsen M. L., Kriegenburg F., and Hartmann-Petersen R. (2015) A two-step protein quality control pathway for a misfolded DJ-1 variant in fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 21141–21153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Fang N. N., Ng A. H., Measday V., and Mayor T. (2011) Hul5 HECT ubiquitin ligase plays a major role in the ubiquitylation and turnover of cytosolic misfolded proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1344–1352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Fang N. N., Zhu M., Rose A., Wu K. P., and Mayor T. (2016) Deubiquitinase activity is required for the proteasomal degradation of misfolded cytosolic proteins upon heat-stress. Nat. Commun. 7, 12907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tamai K. K., and Shimoda C. (2002) The novel HECT-type ubiquitin-protein ligase Pub2p shares partially overlapping function with Pub1p in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 115, 1847–1857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Liu X. M., Sun L. L., Hu W., Ding Y. H., Dong M. Q., and Du L. L. (2015) ESCRTs cooperate with a selective autophagy receptor to mediate vacuolar targeting of soluble cargos. Mol. Cell 59, 1035–1042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Burd C. G., and Emr S. D. (1998) Phosphatidylinositol(3)-phosphate signaling mediated by specific binding to RING FYVE domains. Mol. Cell 2, 157–162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Shin M. E., Ogburn K. D., Varban O. A., Gilbert P. M., and Burd C. G. (2001) FYVE domain targets Pib1p ubiquitin ligase to endosome and vacuolar membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 41388–41393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Yamamoto A., Mizukami Y., and Sakurai H. (2005) Identification of a novel class of target genes and a novel type of binding sequence of heat shock transcription factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 11911–11919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Crosas B., Hanna J., Kirkpatrick D. S., Zhang D. P., Tone Y., Hathaway N. A., Buecker C., Leggett D. S., Schmidt M., King R. W., Gygi S. P., and Finley D. (2006) Ubiquitin chains are remodeled at the proteasome by opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinating activities. Cell 127, 1401–1413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Lee B. H., Lee M. J., Park S., Oh D. C., Elsasser S., Chen P. C., Gartner C., Dimova N., Hanna J., Gygi S. P., Wilson S. M., King R. W., and Finley D. (2010) Enhancement of proteasome activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of USP14. Nature 467, 179–184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Mazumdar T., Gorgun F. M., Sha Y., Tyryshkin A., Zeng S., Hartmann-Petersen R., Jørgensen J. P., Hendil K. B., and Eissa N. T. (2010) Regulation of NF-κB activity and inducible nitric oxide synthase by regulatory particle non-ATPase subunit 13 (Rpn13). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 13854–13859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Mao P., and Smerdon M. J. (2010) Yeast deubiquitinase Ubp3 interacts with the 26S proteasome to facilitate Rad4 degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 37542–37550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kono K., Saeki Y., Yoshida S., Tanaka K., and Pellman D. (2012) Proteasomal degradation resolves competition between cell polarization and cellular wound healing. Cell 150, 151–164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Capecchi M. R., Capecchi N. E., Hughes S. H., and Wahl G. M. (1974) Selective degradation of abnormal proteins in mammalian tissue culture cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 4732–4736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Drummond D. A. (2009) Protein evolution: innovative chaps. Curr. Biol. 19, R740–R742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Van Dyk T. K., Gatenby A. A., and LaRossa R. A. (1989) Demonstration by genetic suppression of interaction of GroE products with many proteins. Nature 342, 451–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Queitsch C., Sangster T. A., and Lindquist S. (2002) Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature 417, 618–624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Sangster T. A., Salathia N., Undurraga S., Milo R., Schellenberg K., Lindquist S., and Queitsch C. (2008) HSP90 affects the expression of genetic variation and developmental stability in quantitative traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 2963–2968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Arndt V., Rogon C., and Höhfeld J. (2007) To be, or not to be: molecular chaperones in protein degradation. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 64, 2525–2541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Arlow T., Scott K., Wagenseller A., and Gammie A. (2013) Proteasome inhibition rescues clinically significant unstable variants of the mismatch repair protein Msh2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 246–251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Nielsen S. V., Stein A., Dinitzen A. B., Papaleo E., Tatham M. H., Poulsen E. G., Kassem M. M., Rasmussen L. J., Lindorff-Larsen K., and Hartmann-Petersen R. (2017) Predicting the impact of Lynch syndrome-causing missense mutations from structural calculations. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Amm I., and Wolf D. H. (2016) Molecular mass as a determinant for nuclear San1-dependent targeting of misfolded cytosolic proteins to proteasomal degradation. FEBS Lett. 590, 1765–1775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Bengtson M. H., and Joazeiro C. A. (2010) Role of a ribosome-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase in protein quality control. Nature 467, 470–473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Brandman O., Stewart-Ornstein J., Wong D., Larson A., Williams C. C., Li G. W., Zhou S., King D., Shen P. S., Weibezahn J., Dunn J. G., Rouskin S., Inada T., Frost A., and Weissman J. S. (2012) A ribosome-bound quality control complex triggers degradation of nascent peptides and signals translation stress. Cell 151, 1042–1054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Duttler S., Pechmann S., and Frydman J. (2013) Principles of cotranslational ubiquitination and quality control at the ribosome. Mol. Cell 50, 379–393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Theodoraki M. A., Nillegoda N. B., Saini J., and Caplan A. J. (2012) A network of ubiquitin ligases is important for the dynamics of misfolded protein aggregates in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 23911–23922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Fang Y., Jaiseng W., Ma Y., Hu L., Yamazaki S., Zhang X., Hayafuji T., Shi L., and Kuno T. (2014) E3 ubiquitin ligase Pub1 is implicated in endocytosis of a GPI-anchored protein Ecm33 in fission yeast. PLoS ONE 9, e85238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Huibregtse J. M., Yang J. C., and Beaudenon S. L. (1997) The large subunit of RNA polymerase II is a substrate of the Rsp5 ubiquitin-protein ligase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 3656–3661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Dunn R., and Hicke L. (2001) Domains of the Rsp5 ubiquitin-protein ligase required for receptor-mediated and fluid-phase endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 421–435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Shcherbik N., and Pestov D. G. (2011) The ubiquitin ligase Rsp5 is required for ribosome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 17, 1422–1428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Nishino K., Kushima M., Matsuo Y., Matsuo Y., and Kawamukai M. (2015) Cell lysis in S. pombe ura4 mutants is suppressed by loss of functional Pub1, which regulates the uracil transporter Fur4. PLoS ONE 10, e0141796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Nakashima A., Kamada S., Tamanoi F., and Kikkawa U. (2014) Fission yeast arrestin-related trafficking adaptor, Arn1/Any1, is ubiquitinated by Pub1 E3 ligase and regulates endocytosis of Cat1 amino acid transporter. Biol. Open 3, 542–552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Kim D. U., Hayles J., Kim D., Wood V., Park H. O., Won M., Yoo H. S., Duhig T., Nam M., Palmer G., Han S., Jeffery L., Baek S. T., Lee H., Shim Y. S., et al. (2010) Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 617–623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Moreno S., Klar A., and Nurse P. (1991) Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 194, 795–823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Bähler J., Wu J. Q., Longtine M. S., Shah N. G., McKenzie A. 3rd, Steever A. B., Wach A., Philippsen P., and Pringle J. R. (1998) Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 14, 943–951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Sato M., Dhut S., and Toda T. (2005) New drug-resistant cassettes for gene disruption and epitope tagging in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 22, 583–591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Matsuyama A., Shirai A., Yashiroda Y., Kamata A., Horinouchi S., and Yoshida M. (2004) pDUAL, a multipurpose, multicopy vector capable of chromosomal integration in fission yeast. Yeast 21, 1289–1305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Andersen K. M., Jensen C., Kriegenburg F., Lauridsen A. M., Gordon C., and Hartmann-Petersen R. (2011) Txl1 and Txc1 are co-factors of the 26S proteasome in fission yeast. Antioxid. Redox. Signal 14, 1601–1608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Lucocq J. M., and Hacker C. (2013) Cutting a fine figure: on the use of thin sections in electron microscopy to quantify autophagy. Autophagy 9, 1443–1448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Hartmann-Petersen R., Wallace M., Hofmann K., Koch G., Johnsen A. H., Hendil K. B., and Gordon C. (2004) The Ubx2 and Ubx3 cofactors direct Cdc48 activity to proteolytic and nonproteolytic ubiquitin-dependent processes. Curr. Biol. 14, 824–828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Penney M., Samejima I., Wilkinson C. R., McInerny C. J., Mathiassen S. G., Wallace M., Toda T., Hartmann-Petersen R., and Gordon C. (2012) Fission yeast 26S proteasome mutants are multi-drug resistant because of stabilization of the Pap1 transcription factor. PLoS ONE 7, e50796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.