Abstract
The importance of regulated necrosis in pathologies such as cerebral stroke and myocardial infarction is now fully recognized. However, the physiological relevance of regulated necrosis remains unclear. Here, we report a conserved role for p53 in regulating necrosis in Drosophila and mammalian spermatogenesis. We found that Drosophila p53 is required for the programmed necrosis that occurs spontaneously in mitotic germ cells during spermatogenesis. This form of necrosis involved an atypical function of the initiator caspase Dronc/Caspase 9, independent of its catalytic activity. Prevention of p53-dependent necrosis resulted in testicular hyperplasia, which was reversed by restoring necrosis in spermatogonia. In mouse testes, p53 was required for heat-induced germ cell necrosis, indicating that regulation of necrosis is a primordial function of p53 conserved from invertebrates to vertebrates. Drosophila and mouse spermatogenesis will thus be useful models to identify inducers of necrosis to treat cancers that are refractory to apoptosis.
Author summary
Cell death allows elimination of supernumerary cells during development or of abnormal cells throughout life. Physiological cell death is tightly regulated to prevent pathologies such as degenerative diseases or cancers, which often occur due to excessive or absent cell death, respectively. Understanding the mechanisms of cell death pathways is thus crucial for fighting various diseases. The best studied form of cell death, apoptosis, has classically been considered the sole form of cell death during development, while other forms of cell death, referred to as necrosis, were considered accidental. Here, we show that a regulated form of necrosis controls germ cell number during Drosophila spermatogenesis, thus demonstrating that necrosis can play a key role in controlling cell number in physiological conditions. This regulated form of necrosis involves p53, a protein frequently mutated in cancer. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this pathway prevents tissue hyperplasia, a condition that can lead to cancer. We also provide evidence that the same pathway is operational in mammals, as shown in the testes of mice subjected to mild heat stress. These findings expand the possible mechanisms by which cell death could be targeted to treat human pathologies.
Introduction
Cell death can occur as part of a physiological program; for example, during development and tissue homeostasis, and can also be induced in pathologies when adaptive cellular responses to adversity fail. Necrosis has long been considered an accidental process, but it has become increasingly clear that it is in fact a regulated form of cell death with great pathological relevance [1, 2, 3, 4]. However, little is known about the involvement of regulated necrosis in programmed cell death, largely because few animal models have been developed for studying physiological necrotic cell death mechanisms. Moreover, only a few markers can be used to detect necrosis in vivo, and those rely heavily on ultrastructural analysis. Necrosis is interestingly associated with cellular and organelle swelling, leading to rupture of cellular plasma and nuclear membranes. This contrasts with apoptosis, which involves cellular shrinkage and nuclear condensation but leaves organelles and cellular membranes intact. Since the loss of membrane integrity is a central feature of necrotic cell death, incorporation of the membrane-impermeant dye propidium iodide (PI) has been used to detect necrotic cells in vivo [5]. Interestingly, DNA fragmentation, most commonly visualized by the TUNEL assay, cannot discriminate between apoptosis and necrosis unless it is combined with staining of activated effector enzymes known as caspases [6]. Caspases (cysteine-dependent aspartate-directed proteases) are best known as mediators of apoptosis but they also have important non-apoptotic functions [7]. During apoptosis, initiator caspases (e.g., Caspase-8 and -9) cleave and activate effector caspases (e.g., Caspase-3 and -7), which subsequently activate or inactivate additional substrates by cleavage, leading to cell death. The initiator and effector caspases carry long and short prodomains, respectively. The long prodomain Caspase Recruitment Domain (CARD) present in Casp-9 and its Drosophila homolog Dronc allows protein–protein interactions and Casp-9/Dronc activation via the apoptosome, a multimeric structure containing the Apoptotic protease activating factor-1 (Apaf-1). In contrast, effector caspases activation requires proteolytic cleavage by initiator caspases. Recent studies indicate that initiator caspases have functions independent of their catalytic activity and some act as scaffold proteins in signaling for non-apoptotic processes such as inflammation [8] or apoptosis-induced proliferation [9].
p53, the product of the tumor suppressor gene TP53, induces canonical cellular responses such as cell cycle arrest, senescence, and apoptosis, which contribute to tumor suppression. In the past few years, there has been considerable interest in the role of non-canonical functions of p53, including the regulation of autophagy, cellular metabolism, stem cell function, and necrosis, and their potential role in tumor suppression [10]. p53 is conserved from invertebrates to mammals, and it has been proposed that its tumor-suppressive activity was co-opted from more ancient functions [11]. Thus, studying p53 in a simple organism such as Drosophila will help to identify its functions relevant to tumor suppression [12].
Recent work has shown that during adult Drosophila spermatogenesis, 20% to 30% of spermatogonial cysts are normally eliminated by a form of programmed germ cell (GC) death with morphological features reminiscent of necrosis [13]. GC death requires an atypical function of Casp-9/Dronc acting independently of the apoptosome, but the exact nature of the death mechanism remains to be elucidated. By contrast, the canonical apoptosome-dependent function of Dronc/Casp-9 is used for spermatid individualization at a later stage of spermatogenesis [14, 15] (Fig 1A). In mouse spermatogenesis, the first round of GC mitosis is accompanied by a massive and early wave of apoptosis that requires Tp53 [16], which is followed by necrotic GC death at sexual maturity [17]. Although germ cells with necrotic features had previously been observed in adult mice, the potential importance of this form of cell death in mammalian spermatogenesis was not examined at that time [18]. In vertebrates, necrosis is regulated by a number of pathways, among which the best characterized is necroptosis mediated by receptor interacting protein kinase-3 (RIPK3) and its substrate mixed lineage kinase like (MLKL) [19]. Another necrotic pathway involves activation of Tp53 in response to reactive oxygen species, possibly in a RIPK1-independent manner [20, 21, 22, 23]. Since the Drosophila genome does not encode a RIPK homolog, the fly provides a genetic model to investigate the mechanisms underlying p53 involvement in necrosis independently of RIPK.
Results
p53 mediates programmed necrosis during Drosophila spermatogenesis
During Drosophila spermatogenesis, male germ stem cells (GSCs), located at the apical tip of the testis in contact with somatic hub cells, divide to form goniablasts that undergo four rounds of mitotic divisions with incomplete cytokinesis. The resulting cysts contain 16 spermatogonia that mature into spermatocytes before entering meiosis [24, 25] (Fig 1A). GC death occurring during spermatogenesis is independent of the apoptosome and has some morphological features of necrosis [13]; therefore, we hypothesized that GC death may involve a physiological necrotic program. We first asked whether GC death culminated in cellular membrane rupture, which is a typical feature of necrosis but is not observed in apoptosis. By monitoring the incorporation of PI, a membrane-impermeable dye used to assess necrosis in vivo [5], we detected PI-positive (PI+) cells among the proliferating GCs at the apical tip of wild-type (wt) adult Drosophila testes (Fig 1B), indicating that GCs die by necrosis. To substantiate this observation, we analyzed the integrity of the nuclear and plasma membranes of dying GCs by electron microscopy and observed membrane rupture at several locations (Fig 1E–1E”). Interestingly, GC death was also detected by the TUNEL assay (Fig 1F), as previously reported [13]. This was not unexpected because earlier observations in rat liver showed that TUNEL can label fragmented DNA in both apoptotic and necrotic cells [6]. To assess whether TUNEL labels necrotic GCs, we performed PI/TUNEL double labeling in wt Drosophila testes (S1A and S1B”’ Fig). We observed GCs that were positive for both PI and TUNEL (S1A–S1A”’ Fig), confirming that DNA fragmentation occurs during necrosis and that necrotic GCs are labeled by TUNEL. We also found PI+ or TUNEL+ single-labeled dying GCs (S1B–S1B”’ Fig), suggesting that TUNEL and PI staining can occur sequentially. Next, we examined the expression of the activated apoptosis executioner Dcp-1 (effector-like caspase) in dying TUNEL+ GCs. We found that activated Dcp-1 was readily detected in terminally differentiating sperm, as previously described [15], but not in dying GCs (S1C–S1C” Fig), confirming the lack of apoptosis. These results demonstrate that programmed (spontaneous) GC death is accompanied by cellular membrane rupture and the absence of caspase activation, indicating a necrotic rather than apoptotic form of cell death.
We next asked whether GC death requires p53. At the testis apical tip, p53 expression, detected by specific antibody staining, was observed in GSCs and spermatogonia but was largely absent from somatic hub cells and spermatocytes ([26] and Fig 1H–1I’). PI and TUNEL staining revealed fewer PI+ or TUNEL+ spermatogonial cysts in the testes of p53-/- null flies (p535A-1-4 and p53E8) compared with wt flies (Fig 1C, 1D, 1G and S1D Fig), indicating a role for p53 in GC death. It was previously shown with TUNEL detection that two genes required for GC death, Debcl (fly homolog of Bax) and Dronc/Casp-9, exhibit fewer TUNEL+ GCs compared with wt [13]. We found that Debcl and Dronc/Casp-9 mutant flies not only showed drastically fewer TUNEL+ but also PI+ GC (Fig 1D and S1D Fig), suggesting that Debcl and Dronc/Casp-9 are acting together with p53 in the execution of necrosis. Although p53 has been proposed to display non-nuclear functions in some contexts [27], it is best characterized as a transcription factor. To investigate how p53 mediates GC death in spermatogonia, we monitored a nuclear GFP reporter protein expressed in the nucleus under the control of the p53 responsive element (p53RE-GFPnls) [28] in the testes of wt flies. GFP expression was induced selectively in dying spermatogonia (Fig 1J–1J”), indicating that GC death was associated with the transcriptional activity of p53. The Drosophila p53 locus encodes three isoforms: full-length Dp53/p53B, N-terminally truncated DΔNp53/p53A (corresponding to the human full-length TAp53 and N-terminally truncated TAΔNp53 forms, respectively), and p53E [29, 30, 31]. Interestingly, spermatogonia-specific silencing (with the nanos [nos] driver) of the Dp53/TAp53 isoform in wt flies reduced the level of GC death to that observed in p53-/- flies (S1E Fig), suggesting a major role for Dp53/TAp53 in male GC homeostasis. Collectively, these data demonstrate that p53 contributes to physiological GC death in the Drosophila testis, likely via its transcriptional function, and show that p53-dependent GC death exhibits hallmarks of necrosis.
Previous work has shown that the role of Dronc/Casp-9 in GC death occurs independently of the apoptosome [13]. To investigate the apparently paradoxical role of this pro-apoptotic caspase in necrotic GC death, we analyzed flies carrying a catalytically dead form of Dronc/Casp-9 (DroncC>A) to abolish the apoptotic function of Dronc/Casp-9 and performed rescue experiments with DroncWT and DroncC>A (Fig 2A). Notably, re-expression of either DroncWT or DroncC>A under the control of Dronc endogenous promoter sequences was sufficient to restore GC death in Dronc/Casp-9 mutant testes (Fig 2B). We also examined the importance of the Dronc/Casp-9 N-terminal prodomain (containing a CARD, Fig 2A), which is required for Dronc/Casp-9 interaction with Apaf-1 in the apoptosome [32]. For this, CARD-deleted Dronc/Casp-9 variants (ΔNdronc or ΔNdroncC>A) were expressed specifically in the spermatogonia of Dronc/Casp-9 mutants using the nos driver [33]. We found that expression of ΔNdronc or ΔNdroncC>A but not of the CARD domain alone (droncCARD) restored GC death in Dronc/Casp-9 mutants (Fig 2C–2I). This demonstrates that Dronc/Casp-9 does not require its catalytic activity or the CARD domain to regulate GC death and that Dronc acts independently of Dark (the fly homolog of Apaf-1) for the induction of necrosis. The latter finding is in agreement with the observation that loss of Dark/Apaf-1 function does not suppress GC death [13]. In contrast to the role of Dronc/Casp-9 in GC death, its catalytic activity is required to rescue the caspase-dependent coordinated movement of investment cones during sperm differentiation (Fig 2J–2L). Thus, these data demonstrate that Dp53/Tp53 and an atypical catalysis-independent function of Dronc/Casp-9 regulate programmed necrosis during spermatogenesis, whereas catalytically active Dronc/Casp-9 and the apoptosome regulate sperm individualization.
p53-dependent necrosis suppresses hyperplasia during Drosophila spermatogenesis
To assess the physiological role of p53-dependent necrosis, we examined the morphology of testes from wt Drosophila, flies carrying a p53-/- null mutation, or flies with spermatogonia-specific silencing of Dp53/TAp53. Compared with wt flies, flies with whole-body or spermatogonia-specific loss of p53 had testes displaying apical tip hyperplasia (Fig 3A–3C), ranging from mild (intumescence) to severe (massive outgrowth) based on morphology and size (S2A and S2B Fig). Hyperplasia is a typical precancerous condition resulting from the accumulation of cells that divide abnormally and/or escape cell death [34, 35]. Hyperplasia due to excessive proliferation is typically observed in flies lacking Bam, a factor required for maturation of spermatogonia (Fig 1A), in which the entire testes are filled with undifferentiated and stem-like GCs [36]. However, we observed no significant difference in the expression level of the proliferation marker PH3 between wt and p53-/- testes (Fig 3D–3F), indicating that hyperplasia in p53-/- flies was not due to uncontrolled proliferation. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that small variations in cell cycle duration could affect the degree of hyperplasia in p53-/- testes. Importantly, we saw no significant difference in the sizes of differentiating spermatogonia and spermatocytes in wt and p53-/- testes (Fig 3G), indicating that hyperplasia in p53-/- flies was not due to the expansion of individual cells. Rather, we observed an accumulation of maturing spermatogonia (Fig 3H and 3I) positive for the spermatogonial marker Bam (Fig 1A) as well as spermatocytes in p53-/- testes (S3A and S3B Fig). Staining for the membrane marker aPKC showed that the accumulated cells were grouped in irregularly shaped cysts, and aberrant spermatid morphology and location were observed throughout the testes (Fig 3A–3B’ and S3A and S3B Fig). These findings suggest that testicular hyperplasia in p53-/- flies results from a failure of GCs to undergo cell death, allowing them to differentiate and accumulate at the apical tip, rather than from excessive proliferation or growth. To determine whether the hyperplasia resulted from reduced necrosis of spermatogonia, we examined the testes of a number of flies defective in GC death due to loss-of-function mutations in Dronc/Casp-9, the mitochondrial factors Debcl/Bax, Pink1, Drosophila Endonuclease-G (EndoG), and Drosophila Omi/HtrA2, and the lysosomal factors Drosophila DNAse II, Drosophila Cathepsin-D, Dor (fly homolog of VPS33A), and Car (fly homolog of VPS18). We found that the Dronc/Casp-9 mutant and all of the mitochondrial mutants tested except Omi exhibited testicular hyperplasia (Fig 4A–4G and S2B and S2C Fig). In the case of EndoG mutant, the hyperplastic phenotype was revealed by genetic interaction experiments with p53 mutation (p53E8/+ background) (Fig 4G and S2C Fig). None of the lysosomal genes tested exhibited an hyperplastic phenotype to the exception of Cathepsin-D mutation, which induced hyperplasia when combined with the p53 mutation. It may be because the lysosomal effectors act downstream of the mitochondria, and alternative executioners of cell death may be activated under these conditions. Collectively, it suggests that EndoG and Cathepsin-D act in the same or parallel pathways than p53 for the execution of necrosis. Notably, expression of Dp53/TAp53 or DΔNp53/TAΔNp53 specifically in p53-/- spermatogonia restored PI and TUNEL staining and inhibited apical tip hyperplasia (Fig 4H–4O). Interestingly, while no activated caspase (Dcp-1) expression was observed in spermatogonia re-expressing Dp53/TAp53, occasional positively stained spermatogonia were seen upon DΔNp53/TAΔNp53 re-expression (Fig 4L–4M’). Collectively, these results indicate that re-expressed Dp53/TAp53 and DΔNp53/TAΔNp53 isoforms serve redundant tumor-suppressive functions and reduce tissue hyperplasia during spermatogenesis. The data also show that Dp53/TAp53 suppresses hyperplasia by inducing necrosis, whereas DΔNp53/TAΔNp53 is able to induce both necrosis and apoptosis. Similarly, re-expression of DroncWT, DroncC>A, ΔNdronc, or ΔNdroncC>A was sufficient to restore GC death and to suppress hyperplasia in Dronc/Casp-9 mutant testes (Fig 2B–2I and S4A and S4B Fig).
The p53 family member p73 has a key role in sperm differentiation and maturation but not in cell death in mouse spermatogenesis [37, 38]. Thus, we asked whether p53, which is the sole p53 family member in the fly, regulates sperm differentiation in Drosophila. For this, we compared expression of early and late spermatogenesis markers in wt and p53-/- Drosophila testes. Early differentiation steps in p53-/- testes appeared normal, as shown by expression of the somatic hub cell marker Fasciclin III, the GC marker Vasa, and the spermatogonia marker Bam (Figs 1A, 1F, 1G, 3H, 3I and S3A and S3B Fig). These data are consistent with a previous analysis of p53-mutant testes [26] and indicate that p53-/- spermatogonia and spermatocytes undergo normal differentiation. We also detected cysts containing 64 spermatids, confirming that p53-/- spermatocytes underwent meiosis (S3F Fig). Some onion-stage nebenkern spermatids showed micronuclei or had no apparent nuclei, however, suggesting a defect in chromosome segregation [39] (S3D Fig). Finally, we examined the effect of p53 loss on spermatid individualization, a process that is dependent on caspase catalytic activity and is critical for sperm maturation (Fig 1A). Sperm individualization requires non-apoptotic functions of several apoptotic factors, including Dark/Apaf-1, Dronc/Casp-9, and Dredd (fly homolog of caspase-8), as well as effector caspases, to progressively degrade cytoplasmic substrates in migrating cystic bulges [14, 40] (Fig 1A). We observed activated Caspase-3 staining in p53-/- elongated sperm similar to that of wt flies (S3I–S3I” and S3J–S3J” Fig), but cystic bulges were rarer and the few migrating individualization complexes (IC) were often morphologically abnormal in the mutant (Fig 1A and S3L Fig). This phenotype is reminiscent of Dronc/Casp-9 mutant testes in which active Drice/Casp-3 is present in elongated cysts, but cystic bulges and waste bags are largely absent and actin investment cones in the IC are uncoordinated [14] (Fig 2K). These results suggest that p53 may regulate sperm individualization in addition to its function in the regulation of necrosis in spermatogonia.
We next investigated whether the observed individualization defects in p53 or Dronc/Casp-9 mutant testes could lead to hyperplasia. We examined flies mutant for apoptotic genes whose loss of function is known to cause individualization defects, including Dark/Apaf-1, Cyt-c-d (fly homolog of Cyt-c), Dredd/Casp-8, and Dcp-1, as well as flies expressing the caspase inhibitors p35 or Diap1 (the main Drosophila IAP [Inhibitor of Apoptosis] gene). We found that none of these flies exhibited testicular hyperplasia (S5 Fig). Together with the observation that re-expression of DroncC>A under the control of endogenous promoter sequences was sufficient to suppress hyperplasia but not individualization defects in Dronc/Casp-9 mutant testes (Fig 2J–2L and S4A and S4B Fig), these results indicate that testicular hyperplasia is not due to defects in sperm individualization but to the inhibition of programmed necrosis in p53 and Dronc/Casp-9 mutants [33].
p53 is required for heat-induced necrosis during mouse spermatogenesis
The dual role of Drosophila p53 in GC death and spermatogenesis is recapitulated by p53 family proteins in mammals where TAp53 and TAp73 have been shown to regulate spermatogonial apoptosis and spermiogenesis, respectively [16, 37, 38]. To determine whether p53 has retained the ability to regulate GC necrosis in mice, we first looked for spontaneous GC death at sexual maturity in the testes of wild-type and p53-/- mice. Testes of p53-/- mutant mice appeared morphologically normal with seminiferous tubules containing mature spermatozoa anchored in the central lumens (S6A–S6B” Fig). This is consistent with previous publications showing that p53-/- mutant mice are fertile [37, 41]. TUNEL+ cells were rare in both wild-type and p53-/- mutant mice, suggesting that spontaneous GC death takes place very sporadically at this age. Therefore, we used a mild heat shock to induce a burst of cell death in 6–8-week-old wild-type mice [42]. We observed a rapid increase in the number of GCs showing hallmarks of necrosis, including the characteristic nuclear membrane rupture, granulated cytoplasm, and absence of cell shrinking (Fig 5A–5C’ and S6C and S6D Fig), with a maximum level after 6 hours and lower levels after 12 or 24 hours. This suggests that mild hyperthermia induces a rapid wave of necrosis in mouse testes, which is further supported by the lack of activated Caspase-3 induction at 6 hours (Fig 5E, 5F and 5P). TUNEL staining readily detected seminiferous tubules partially or completely filled with dying cells throughout the testes (Fig 5J–5O). At 24 hours, however, TUNEL+ GCs were co-stained with the activated Caspase-3 antibody. Although these dying GCs did not exhibit prominent chromatin condensation, as previously observed in apoptotic germ cells [43], they did show cytoplasmic and nuclear shrinkage reminiscent of apoptosis (Fig 5D, 5H and 5P), which is also in agreement with previous studies [42]. These results therefore indicate that mild hyperthermia induces rapid GC necrosis at 6 hours, followed by GC apoptosis at 24 hours.
Importantly, we observed a clear reduction in the number of TUNEL+ seminiferous tubules in the testes of p53-/- mice compared with wild-type mice at 6 hours (Fig 6A’, 6A”, 6C’, 6C” and 6D). These data demonstrate that p53 is required for heat-induced GC necrosis during mouse spermatogenesis and reveal a conserved function for p53 in regulating male GC necrosis.
Discussion
Apoptosis has long been considered the only programmed form of cell death [44]. Here, we provide cellular, genetic, and morphological evidence that programmed necrosis is required for the physiological elimination of GCs during Drosophila spermatogenesis. We demonstrate that GCs die by a p53-dependent mechanism that requires a catalytic-independent function of Dronc/Casp-9 and displays the hallmarks of necrosis, including loss of integrity plasma and nuclear membrane integrity, as measured by PI incorporation and supported by electron microscopy. Although we also observed nuclear condensation reminiscent of apoptosis, the conclusion that GC death involves necrosis and not apoptosis is further supported by the finding that inhibition of apoptosis does not suppress GC death [13]. Chromatin condensation has also been reported in necrosis, suggesting that this event cannot unambiguously distinguish between apoptosis and necrosis. Rather, breakdown of membrane integrity has been proposed to be the best hallmark of necrosis [45, 46]. Based on our current data and previous work, we propose that GC death should be classified as necrotic cell death.
We found that regulated GC necrosis requires the p53 gene as well as mitochondrial and lysosomal factors, and may be an essential process for the elimination of damaged/unfit spermatogonia during mitosis. We also showed that a wave of p53-dependent necrosis can be rapidly induced by mild hyperthermia during mouse spermatogenesis, demonstrating that this mechanism of GC homeostasis has been conserved between flies and mice. To our knowledge, physiological GC death in Drosophila is the first paradigm of programmed necrosis resulting in cell elimination during animal development, and it provides evidence that p53-dependent necrosis is among the primordial functions of p53 [12]. Based on the importance of the non-apoptotic functions of p53, Debcl/bax, and Dronc/Casp-9 in necrotic cell death (this work and [13, 22, 47]), we speculate that necrosis may actually be the primordial function of those genes and that they later evolved to be executioners of apoptosis.
The mechanisms by which p53 activates necrosis during spermatogenesis are unclear. p53-dependent transcription was selectively observed in necrotic spermatogonia, suggesting that programmed necrosis requires the expression of as yet unknown p53 transcriptional targets [48]. Of note, p53 is functional in testicular GC tumors and renders them highly sensitive to chemotherapy [49, 50]. If testicular cancer cells are also sensitive to p53-dependent necrosis, GC tumors may be useful models for testing experimental therapies for apoptosis-resistant cancers. Intriguingly, a recent study showed that necrosis/pyroptosis mediated by Gasdermin E/DNFA5, a caspase substrate, is induced by exposure of human and mouse cancer cells to chemotherapy; however, healthy mouse tissues were also affected by chemotherapy [51]. This finding supports the notion that necrotic cell death is a physiological process that suppresses tumor formation, but also it suggests that necrosis and the associated release of intracellular content may be responsible for some of the toxicity associated with cancer therapies.
We demonstrated that a protease-independent and Dark/Apaf-1-independent function of Dronc/Casp-9 is required for the execution of necrosis during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Previous studies have reported non-canonical functions of Dronc/Casp-9 in other processes, such as synaptic pruning and border cell migration [52, 53]. A recent study elegantly demonstrated that Dronc/Casp-9 catalytic activity is dispensable during apoptosis-induced proliferation, a process regulated by Dronc/Casp-9 ubiquitylation, in which proliferation is non-autonomously induced by apoptotic cells [9]. However, in that case, the catalytic-independent function of Dronc/Casp-9 did require Dark/Apaf-1. In contrast, programmed necrosis in GC cells did not require either the Dronc CARD domain or Dark/Apaf-1. The lack of requirement for Dark/Apaf-1 also contrasts with the classical protease-dependent function of Dronc/Casp-9 that is required for developmental apoptosis and for non-apoptotic activation of effector caspases in sperm individualization [33, 40, 54, 55, 56].
Earlier studies also showed that Dronc-induced cell death cannot be blocked by the inhibitor of effector caspases p35, and that Dronc controls autophagic cell death in salivary glands, suggesting that Dronc/Casp-9 regulates alternative cell death pathways [33, 57]. Activation of regulated necrosis by an atypical function of Dronc/Casp-9 is reminiscent of paraptosis, a regulated form of cell death with morphological features of necrosis, which is induced via the insulin-like growth factor receptor in human cells [58]. We thus propose that Dronc/Casp-9 is a central factor in the regulation of multiple death pathways [7, 9]. Further epistatic and molecular analyses would be required to determine if p53, Dronc/Casp-9, and other genes required for GC necrosis act in the same or parallel pathways.
It is still unclear why programmed necrosis instead of apoptosis is favored in Drosophila spermatogenesis, but it is not due to failure to express apoptotic factors. Indeed, knockdown of Diap1 or irradiation is sufficient to trigger canonical apoptosis with effector caspase activation in spermatogonia and somatic cyst cells, respectively [13, 59]. The use of programmed necrosis for elimination of spermatogonia may be favored in the testes because a non-apoptotic function of caspases is required for sperm individualization and maturation [14, 40].
A recent study showed that starvation of Drosophila leads to somatic cyst cell death, which then induces the non-autonomous death of spermatogonia, a process that is important to maintain tissue homeostasis during starvation [60]. However, the physiological spermatogonial cell death described in our study cannot be rescued by expression of Diap1 in cyst cells [59], indicating that programmed necrosis is a cell autonomous process.
Our conclusion that lack of GC necrosis leads to hyperplasia of the Drosophila testes is supported by several lines of evidence: (1) hyperplastic testes in p53 mutants exhibit reduced GC necrosis but not excessive proliferation or growth; (2) hyperplasia in p53 mutants can be suppressed by restoring GC necrosis with re-expression of Dp53/TAp53 or DΔNp53/TAΔNp53; (3) hyperplasia in Dronc/Casp-9 mutants can be suppressed by restoring GC necrosis with re-expression of wild-type Dronc/Casp-9 or DroncCA; and (4) hyperplastic testes can be induced by suppression of necrosis but not of apoptosis. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that mechanisms distinct from necrosis could contribute to suppression of the hyperplastic phenotype in mutants with defective necrosis, as suggested by the absence of significant hyperplasia in mutants with reduced cell death, such as Omi/HtrA2, DNAseII, and Car. However, we do not favor the hypothesis that hyperplasia in p53-/- mutants is due to excessive proliferation that is typically observed in Drosophila bam mutants, in which the entire testes are filled with undifferentiated and stem-like GCs [36]. Instead, GCs proceed through differentiation in p53-/- testes. In this regard, it will be important to determine if hyperplasia due to loss of necrosis could evolve to cancer in an oncogenic sensitized background. Previous work has suggested an ancient role for Drosophila p53 in gonadal tumor suppression by restricting stem cell growth induced by oncogenic stress or DNA stressors [11]. Thus, the dual function of Drosophila p53 in regulating GSC growth and necrosis may act as a double barrier to preserve genomic integrity and prevent tumorigenesis, thus safe-guarding genome transmission to the offspring.
Materials and methods
Fly strains
w1118 flies were used as wild-type controls. The following mutant and transgenic flies were used: p535A-1-] [61], p53E8 [62], p53RE-GFPnls [28], p53GD11134 (VDRC), UAS-Dp53, UAS-DΔNp53 [30], UAS-lucIR (TRiPJF01355), UAS-dronc lines (UAS-droncWT, UAS-droncC>A, UAS-ΔNdroncWT, UAS-ΔNdroncC>A, UAS-droncCARD, gift from Pascal Meier, ICRF, London, UK) [33]. UAS-darkIR [63], UAS-p35 (from Hyung Don Ryoo NYU, NY), Df(3L)H99 (from Hermann Steller, Rockefeller University, NY), debcl27, dreddF64, cyt-c-dZ21091, hsp83-gal4, droncI29, droncI24, droncL32, arkP46, ark82, dcp-1prev, strica4, cathD1, car1, DNaseIIlo, EndoGMB07150, EndoGDf(2R)BSC699, omiDF1, nos-Gal4, UAS-diap1, and pink1B9. Flies were maintained on standard corn/yeast medium at 25°C.
Generation of droncWT and droncC>A mutant flies
To generate 5'3'dronc:droncWT and 5'3'dronc:droncC>A rescue constructs, the dronc 3'UTR was PCR amplified from purified yw genomic DNA (forward primer GAATCTCGAGTTGCCGCCACTGGACATTTTATC and reverse primer CGAATCTAGACTGCGGTTTGTTGTGAAATATC with added XhoI and XbaI sites, respectively) and subcloned into the XhoI and XbaI sites of the pattB vector. The dronc 5'UTR and upstream promoter region were similarly PCR amplified (forward primer GAATAGATCTCACCATTTCCTCGCCCTTGC and reverse primer GAATGAATTCTCCGGATATGGCTTCCACGC with added BglII and EcoRI sites, respectively) and subcloned into the BamHI and EcoRI sites of the pattB vector containing the 3'UTR insert. The complete coding sequence of dronc was PCR amplified from purified genomic DNA extracted from flies carrying the uas-dronc transgene (a gift from Pascal Meier; forward primer GAATGAATTCATGCAGCCGCCGGAGCTCGAGA and reverse primer GAATGCGGCCGCCTATTCGTTGAAAAACCCGGGA with added EcoRI and NotI sites, respectively) and subcloned into the EcoRI and NotI sites between the 3'UTR and 5'UTR inserts. Similarly, the mutant droncC>A coding region (in which the catalytic cysteine in position 318 was replaced with alanine), was PCR amplified from plasmid DNA (a gift from Hyung Don Ryoo) and subcloned between the same regulatory regions as for wild-type dronc.
Whole mount propidium iodide staining of Drosophila testes
Testes were dissected in Schneider’s medium supplemented with insulin, incubated with 50 μg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma) overnight, fixed for 20 min in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at room temperature (RT), washed, and incubated in Vectashield-DAPI for 20 min at RT.
Whole mount antibody staining of Drosophila testes
Testes were dissected in PBS at 4 days post-eclosion for all genotypes except p535A-1-4 (18 days post-eclosion) and p53IR (10 days post-eclosion). Samples were fixed in 4% PFA/PBS for 30 min at RT, rinsed three times in 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS (PBT0.1) for 10 min at RT, and incubated with the appropriate primary antibody in PBT0.1 for 2 h at RT. Samples were then rinsed three times in PBT0.1 for 10 min at RT, incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody in PBT0.1 for 2 h at RT, and finally rinsed three times in PBT0.1 for 10 min at RT. Samples were mounted in DAPI Vectashield medium (AbCys) and analyzed with a Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope. F-actin was stained with phalloidin-rhodamine (1:300; Sigma). Primary antibodies were p53 (25F4, 1:500; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank [DSHB]), Vasa (rat, 1:400; DSHB), aPKC (rabbit, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), PH3 (mouse, 1:500; Millipore), Fasciclin III (mouse, 1:500; DSHB 7G10), Bam (mouse, 1:50; DSHB), cleaved caspase-3 (rabbit, 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology), GFP (rabbit, 1:200; Invitrogen), Dsp-1 (rabbit, 1:500; [64]), and cleaved Dcp-1 (rabbit, 1:100; Cell Signaling Technology) [59, 65]. Secondary antibodies were Alexa Fluor-conjugated and used at 1:400 dilution (Molecular Probes).
Histology and transmission electron microscopy
Testes were dissected in 0.1 M PIPES pH 7.4 and fixed in 0.1 M PIPES pH 7.4 containing 1.5% glutaraldehyde and 1% PFA for 16 h at 4°C. After rinsing with 0.1 M PIPES pH 7.4 at RT, specimens were impregnated with 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M PIPES pH 7.4 for 30 min at RT. Tissues were then progressively dehydrated with ethanol and then propylene oxide at RT, equilibrated in 50% epoxy resin in propylene oxide for 24 h at RT, and mounted in 100% epoxy resin into silicone-embedding molds. After resin polymerization for 48 h at 60°C, samples were sectioned into 2 μm semi-thin sections, which were stained with 1% toluidine blue, and 60 nm ultrathin sections, which were stained with lead citrate and examined with a Philips CM120 transmission electron microscope operating at 80 kV.
TUNEL staining
Testes from ice-anesthetized flies (4 days post-eclosion) were dissected in PBS, fixed in 4% PFA/PBS for 30 min at RT, rinsed three times in PBT0.1 for 10 min at RT, and stained with an In Situ Cell Death kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantification was performed as described [13].
Quantification of Drosophila testicular hyperplasia
Testes from ice-anesthetized flies were dissected in PBS at 4 days post-eclosion for all genotypes (unless indicated otherwise) and scored for hyperplasia by bright field microscopy.
Quantification of cell size
Testes from ice-anesthetized flies (4 days post-eclosion) were dissected in PBS, fixed in 4% PFA/PBS for 30 min at RT, rinsed three times in PBS, and analyzed with a Zeiss Axiovert phase contrast microscope. Cell area was measured with Fiji software.
Analysis of Drosophila testis squashes
Testes from ice-anesthetized flies (4 days post-eclosion) were squashed in PBS and analyzed with a Zeiss Axiovert phase contrast microscope.
Mouse analysis/Ethics statement
Mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free animal facility, AniCan, and handled in accordance with the French/Europa institutional guidelines and protocols approved by the animal care and use committee (Ethics committee of CLB, animal facility of ENS, PBES and P4 laboratory; CECCAP) agreement number 2014_CLB_023.
p53+/- mice (on a C57BL/6 background [66]) were interbred to generate knockout mice. Routine mouse genotyping was performed by PCR analysis of DNA purified from fingers biopsies (Red extract kit, Sigma Aldrich). Littermate male mice were euthanized at 6–8 weeks of age. Heat shock was performed on anesthetized mice by submerging the scrotal regions in a water bath at 42°C for 30 min [42]. The testes were dissected, formalin fixed, and paraffin embedded. Tissue sections (3-μm thick) were stained with hematoxylin-eosin-saffron (HES). TUNEL and caspase-3 staining was scored in a blinded fashion on both testes of each mouse. TUNEL staining of seminiferous tubules was quantified and scored as partial or completely stained and is reported as the total number of tubules for mice of each genotype. For statistical analysis, the number of testes per genotype was 26 for p53+/+, 48 for p53 +/-, and 26 for p53-/-.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank H. D. Ryoo, A. Bergmann, F. Leulier, P. Meier, the Bloomington Stock Center, DGRC Kyoto Stock Center, VDRC Stock Center, and DSHB for fly stocks and reagents. We are grateful to the ARTHRO-TOOL fly facility (UMS3444 Biosciences Lyon), PLATIM (UMS3444 Biosciences Lyon), and CTμ (UCBL) for microscopy facilities. We thank S. Kimura (UCBL) for technical advice, Nicolas Gadot and Jéromine Imbach from Anipath facilities for blind scoring of mice testes.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship to FN from the Association Française contre les Myopathies, a European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme/AIRC (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul cancro) Reintegration Grant to FN, and by Ligue Contre le Cancer (Comités de Savoie, Puy-de-Dôme and Rhône) and Foundation ARC grants to BM. EA is the incumbent of the Corinne S. Koshland Career Development Chair and is supported by grants from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement (616088) and the Israel Science Foundation (921/13). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Christofferson DE, Yuan J. Necroptosis as an alternative form of programmed cell death. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22(2):263–8. Epub 01/05. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.12.003 Epub 2010 Jan 4. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Krautwald S, Kroemer G, Linkermann A. Molecular mechanisms of regulated necrosis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014. Epub 03/04. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.02.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Linkermann A, Green DR. Necroptosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(5):455–65. Epub 01/31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1310050 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vanden Berghe T, Linkermann A, Jouan-Lanhouet S, Walczak H, Vandenabeele P. Regulated necrosis: the expanding network of non-apoptotic cell death pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(2):135–47. Epub 01/24. doi: 10.1038/nrm3737 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Unal Cevik I, Dalkara T. Intravenously administered propidium iodide labels necrotic cells in the intact mouse brain after injury. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10(8):928–9. Epub 2003/07/18. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401250 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grasl-Kraupp B, Ruttkay-Nedecky B, Koudelka H, Bukowska K, Bursch W, Schulte-Hermann R. In situ detection of fragmented DNA (TUNEL assay) fails to discriminate among apoptosis, necrosis, and autolytic cell death: a cautionary note. Hepatology. 1995;21(5):1465–8. Epub 1995/05/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.White K, Arama E, Hardwick JM. Controlling caspase activity in life and death. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(2):e1006545 Epub 2017/02/17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Henry CM, Martin SJ. Caspase-8 Acts in a Non-enzymatic Role as a Scaffold for Assembly of a Pro-inflammatory "FADDosome" Complex upon TRAIL Stimulation. Mol Cell. 2017;65(4):715–29.e5. Epub 2017/02/19. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.022 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kamber Kaya HE, Ditzel M, Meier P, Bergmann A. An inhibitory mono-ubiquitylation of the Drosophila initiator caspase Dronc functions in both apoptotic and non-apoptotic pathways. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(2):e1006438 Epub 2017/02/17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006438 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bieging KT, Mello SS, Attardi LD. Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(5):359–70. Epub 2014/04/18. doi: 10.1038/nrc3711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wylie A, Lu WJ, D'Brot A, Buszczak M, Abrams JM. p53 activity is selectively licensed in the Drosophila stem cell compartment. Elife. 2014;3:e01530 Epub 03/13. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01530 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mollereau B, Ma D. The p53 control of apoptosis and proliferation: lessons from Drosophila. Apoptosis. 2014;19(10):1421–9. Epub 09/14. doi: 10.1007/s10495-014-1035-7 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yacobi-Sharon K, Namdar Y, Arama E. Alternative Germ Cell Death Pathway in Drosophila Involves HtrA2/Omi, Lysosomes, and a Caspase-9 Counterpart. Dev Cell. 2013;25(1):29–42. Epub 03/26. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.002 Epub 2013 Mar 21. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huh JR, Vernooy SY, Yu H, Yan N, Shi Y, Guo M, et al. Multiple apoptotic caspase cascades are required in nonapoptotic roles for Drosophila spermatid individualization. PLoS Biol. 2004;2(1):E15 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020015 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arama E, Bader M, Srivastava M, Bergmann A, Steller H. The two Drosophila cytochrome C proteins can function in both respiration and caspase activation. Embo J. 2006;25(1):232–43. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600920 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Beumer TL, Roepers-Gajadien HL, Gademan IS, van Buul PP, Gil-Gomez G, Rutgers DH, et al. The role of the tumor suppressor p53 in spermatogenesis. Cell Death Differ. 1999;5(8):669–77. Epub 04/14. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400396 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rodriguez I, Ody C, Araki K, Garcia I, Vassalli P. An early and massive wave of germinal cell apoptosis is required for the development of functional spermatogenesis. Embo J. 1997;16(9):2262–70. Epub 05/01. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2262 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Allan DJ, Harmon BV, Kerr JFR. In: Potten CS Cell death in spermatogenesis ed. Perspectives on Mammalian Cell Death. London: Oxford University Press; 1987. 229–258. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pasparakis M, Vandenabeele P. Necroptosis and its role in inflammation. Nature. 2015;517(7534):311–20. Epub 01/17. doi: 10.1038/nature14191 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Montero J, Dutta C, van Bodegom D, Weinstock D, Letai A. p53 regulates a non-apoptotic death induced by ROS. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(11):1465–74. Epub 05/25. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.52 Epub 2013 May 24. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tu HC, Ren D, Wang GX, Chen DY, Westergard TD, Kim H, et al. The p53-cathepsin axis cooperates with ROS to activate programmed necrotic death upon DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(4):1093–8. Epub 01/16. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808173106 Epub 2009 Jan 14. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vaseva AV, Marchenko ND, Ji K, Tsirka SE, Holzmann S, Moll UM. p53 Opens the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore to Trigger Necrosis. Cell. 2012;149(7):1536–48. Epub 06/26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.014 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang Z, Jiang H, Chen S, Du F, Wang X. The mitochondrial phosphatase PGAM5 functions at the convergence point of multiple necrotic death pathways. Cell. 2012;148(1–2):228–43. Epub 01/24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.030 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fuller MT, editor. Spermatogenesis in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harbor (New York): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Matunis EL, Stine RR, de Cuevas M. Recent advances in Drosophila male germline stem cell biology. Spermatogenesis. 2012;2(3):137–44. Epub 10/23. doi: 10.4161/spmg.21763 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Monk AC, Abud HE, Hime GR. Dmp53 is sequestered to nuclear bodies in spermatogonia of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;350(2):385–94. Epub 09/11. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1479-4 Epub 2012 Aug 12. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Green DR, Kroemer G. Cytoplasmic functions of the tumour suppressor p53. Nature. 2009;458(7242):1127–30. doi: 10.1038/nature07986 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lu WJ, Chapo J, Roig I, Abrams JM. Meiotic recombination provokes functional activation of the p53 regulatory network. Science. 2010;328(5983):1278–81. doi: 10.1126/science.1185640 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marcel V, Dichtel-Danjoy ML, Sagne C, Hafsi H, Ma D, Ortiz-Cuaran S, et al. Biological functions of p53 isoforms through evolution: lessons from animal and cellular models. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18(12):1815–24. Epub 09/24. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.120 Epub 2011 Sep 23. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dichtel-Danjoy ML, Ma D, Dourlen P, Chatelain G, Napoletano F, Robin M, et al. Drosophila p53 isoforms differentially regulate apoptosis and apoptosis-induced proliferation. Cell Death Differ. 2012;20(1):108–16. Epub 08/18. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.100 Epub 2012 Aug 17. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang B, Rotelli M, Dixon M, Calvi BR. The function of Drosophila p53 isoforms in apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22(12):2058–67. Epub 04/18. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.40 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pang Y, Bai XC, Yan C, Hao Q, Chen Z, Wang JW, et al. Structure of the apoptosome: mechanistic insights into activation of an initiator caspase from Drosophila. Genes & development. 2015;29(3):277–87. Epub 2015/02/04. doi: 10.1101/gad.255877.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Meier P, Silke J, Leevers SJ, Evan GI. The Drosophila caspase DRONC is regulated by DIAP1. Embo J. 2000;19(4):598–611. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.4.598 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kuida K, Zheng TS, Na S, Kuan C, Yang D, Karasuyama H, et al. Decreased apoptosis in the brain and premature lethality in CPP32-deficient mice. Nature. 1996;384(6607):368–72. doi: 10.1038/384368a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Peterson C, Carney GE, Taylor BJ, White K. reaper is required for neuroblast apoptosis during Drosophila development. Development. 2002;129(6):1467–76. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gonczy P, Matunis E, DiNardo S. bag-of-marbles and benign gonial cell neoplasm act in the germline to restrict proliferation during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Development. 1997;124(21):4361–71. Epub 10/23. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Inoue S, Tomasini R, Rufini A, Elia AJ, Agostini M, Amelio I, et al. TAp73 is required for spermatogenesis and the maintenance of male fertility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. Epub 01/23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323416111 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Holembowski L, Kramer D, Riedel D, Sordella R, Nemajerova A, Dobbelstein M, et al. TAp73 is essential for germ cell adhesion and maturation in testis. J Cell Biol. 2014;204(7):1173–90. Epub 03/26. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201306066 Epub 2014 Mar 24. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wakimoto BT, Lindsley DL, Herrera C. Toward a comprehensive genetic analysis of male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2004;167(1):207–16. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Arama E, Agapite J, Steller H. Caspase activity and a specific cytochrome C are required for sperm differentiation in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2003;4(5):687–97. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hu W, Feng Z, Teresky AK, Levine AJ. p53 regulates maternal reproduction through LIF. Nature. 2007;450(7170):721–4. Epub 11/30. doi: 10.1038/nature05993 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nakai A, Suzuki M, Tanabe M. Arrest of spermatogenesis in mice expressing an active heat shock transcription factor 1. EMBO J. 2000;19(7):1545–54. Epub 04/04. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.7.1545 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brinkworth MH, Weinbauer GF, Schlatt S, Nieschlag E. Identification of male germ cells undergoing apoptosis in adult rats. Journal of reproduction and fertility. 1995;105(1):25–33. Epub 1995/09/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Galluzzi L, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Kroemer G. Ferroptosis in p53-dependent oncosuppression and organismal homeostasis. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22(8):1237–8. Epub 07/07. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.54 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Krysko DV, Vanden Berghe T, D'Herde K, Vandenabeele P. Apoptosis and necrosis: detection, discrimination and phagocytosis. Methods. 2008a;44(3):205–21. Epub 03/04. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.12.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Krysko DV, Vanden Berghe T, Parthoens E, D'Herde K, Vandenabeele P. Methods for distinguishing apoptotic from necrotic cells and measuring their clearance. Methods Enzymol. 2008b;442:307–41. Epub 07/30. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)01416-X . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Karch J, Molkentin JD. Regulated necrotic cell death: the passive aggressive side of Bax and Bak. Circ Res. 2015;116(11):1800–9. Epub 2015/05/23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jiang L, Kon N, Li T, Wang SJ, Su T, Hibshoosh H, et al. Ferroptosis as a p53-mediated activity during tumour suppression. Nature. 2015;520(7545):57–62. Epub 03/25. doi: 10.1038/nature14344 Epub 2015 Mar 18. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Einhorn LH. Curing metastatic testicular cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(7):4592–5. Epub 03/21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072067999 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gutekunst M, Oren M, Weilbacher A, Dengler MA, Markwardt C, Thomale J, et al. p53 hypersensitivity is the predominant mechanism of the unique responsiveness of testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) cells to cisplatin. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e19198 Epub 05/03. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019198 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang Y, Gao W, Shi X, Ding J, Liu W, He H, et al. Chemotherapy drugs induce pyroptosis through caspase-3 cleavage of a gasdermin. Nature. 2017;547(7661):99–103. Epub 2017/05/02. doi: 10.1038/nature22393 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ouyang Y, Petritsch C, Wen H, Jan L, Jan YN, Lu B. Dronc caspase exerts a non-apoptotic function to restrain phospho-Numb-induced ectopic neuroblast formation in Drosophila. Development. 2011;138(11):2185–96. Epub 05/12. doi: 10.1242/dev.058347 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Geisbrecht ER, Montell DJ. A role for Drosophila IAP1-mediated caspase inhibition in Rac-dependent cell migration. Cell. 2004;118(1):111–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.020 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hawkins CJ, Yoo SJ, Peterson EP, Wang SL, Vernooy SY, Hay BA. The Drosophila caspase DRONC cleaves following glutamate or aspartate and is regulated by DIAP1, HID, and GRIM. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(35):27084–93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000869200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Quinn LM, Dorstyn L, Mills K, Colussi PA, Chen P, Coombe M, et al. An essential role for the caspase dronc in developmentally programmed cell death in Drosophila. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(51):40416–24. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002935200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Xu D, Li Y, Arcaro M, Lackey M, Bergmann A. The CARD-carrying caspase Dronc is essential for most, but not all, developmental cell death in Drosophila. Development. 2005;132(9):2125–34. doi: 10.1242/dev.01790 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Daish TJ, Mills K, Kumar S. Drosophila caspase DRONC is required for specific developmental cell death pathways and stress-induced apoptosis. Dev Cell. 2004;7(6):909–15. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.09.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sperandio S, de Belle I, Bredesen DE. An alternative, nonapoptotic form of programmed cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(26):14376–81. Epub 12/20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14376 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hasan S, Hetie P, Matunis EL. Niche signaling promotes stem cell survival in the Drosophila testis via the JAK-STAT target DIAP1. Dev Biol. 2015;404(1):27–39. Epub 05/06. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.04.017 Epub 2015 May 1. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yang H, Yamashita YM. The regulated elimination of transit-amplifying cells preserves tissue homeostasis during protein starvation in Drosophila testis. Development. 2015;142(10):1756–66. Epub 2015/05/15. doi: 10.1242/dev.122663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rong YS, Titen SW, Xie HB, Golic MM, Bastiani M, Bandyopadhyay P, et al. Targeted mutagenesis by homologous recombination in D. melanogaster. Genes Dev. 2002;16(12):1568–81. doi: 10.1101/gad.986602 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lee JH, Lee E, Park J, Kim E, Kim J, Chung J. In vivo p53 function is indispensable for DNA damage-induced apoptotic signaling in Drosophila. FEBS Lett. 2003;550(1–3):5–10. Epub 08/26. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Leulier F, Ribeiro PS, Palmer E, Tenev T, Takahashi K, Robertson D, et al. Systematic in vivo RNAi analysis of putative components of the Drosophila cell death machinery. Cell Death Differ. 2006. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401868 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rappailles A, Decoville M, Locker D. DSP1, a Drosophila HMG protein, is involved in spatiotemporal expression of the homoeotic gene Sex combs reduced. Biol Cell. 2004;97(10):779–85. Epub 12/22. doi: 10.1042/bc20040508 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Querenet M, Goubard V, Chatelain G, Davoust N, Mollereau B. Spen is required for pigment cell survival during pupal development in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 2015;402(2):208–15. Epub 2015/04/15. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.03.021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jacks T, Remington L, Williams BO, Schmitt EM, Halachmi S, Bronson RT, et al. Tumor spectrum analysis in p53-mutant mice. Curr Biol. 1994;4(1):1–7. Epub 01/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Anton E. Arrested apoptosis without nuclear fragmentation produced by efferent duct ligation in round spermatids and multinucleated giant cells of rat testis. Reproduction. 2003;125(6):879–87. Epub 2003/05/30. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.