Abstract
The mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascades transmit extracellular stimulations to generate various cellular responses via the sequential and reversible phosphorylation of kinases. Since the strength and duration of kinase phosphorylation within the pathway determine the cellular response, both kinases and phosphatases play an essential role in the precise control of MAPK pathway activation and attenuation. Thus, the identification of pathway-specific phosphatases is critical for understanding the functional mechanisms by which the MAPK pathway is regulated. To identify phosphatases specific to the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) MAPK pathway, a synthetic screening approach was utilized in which phosphatases were individually tethered to the JNK pathway specific-JIP1 scaffold protein. Of 77 mammalian phosphatases tested, PTPN1 led to the inhibition of JNK pathway activation. Further analyses revealed that of three pathway member kinases, PTPN1 directly dephosphorylates JNK, the terminal kinase of the pathway, and negatively regulates the JNK MAPK pathway. Specifically, PTPN1 appears to regulate the overall signaling magnitude, rather than the adaptation timing, suggesting that PTPN1 might be involved in the control and maintenance of signaling noise. Finally, the negative regulation of the JNK MAPK pathway by PTPN1 was found to reduce the tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα)-dependent cell death response.
Introduction
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways are evolutionally conserved among eukaryotes, and regulate diverse cellular responses, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and death1,2. Three kinases (MAPKKK, MAPKK, and MAPK) often form a signaling complex with a scaffold protein and relay phosphorylation in response to several extracellular stimuli, and thereby modulate MAPK signaling3,4. The magnitude and duration of MAPK activation have been shown to determine the resultant cellular response5. Furthermore, dysregulation of kinase function within the MAPK pathway has been demonstrated to lead to abnormal cellular responses and disease-like states6. Proper regulation of kinase activity within the pathway requires that several kinases, phosphatases, and scaffold proteins function and undergo complex interactions correctly.
The c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway is a major signal transduction pathway in mammalian cells, and comprises three kinases, MLK3 (MAPKKK), MKK7 (MAPKK), and JNK (MAPK)7,8. As an extracellular ligand, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) is the prototype for 20 related cytokines that stimulate both the JNK and NFκB pathways, and which also induce production of ROS9,10. Stimulation by TNFα leads to the activation of JNK signaling, in which MLK3 is recruited by TRAF2 and subsequently activated, as are both MKK4 and MKK711,12. MKK7 activation induces the dual phosphorylation of JNK, and the cleavage of caspase 8 and Bid13,14. JIP1, a JNK pathway-specific scaffold protein, promotes efficient and precise JNK signal transduction by forming a signaling complex with the three kinases in response to extracellular stimuli. JNK pathway has been analyzed in various human disease states, e.g. cancer, diabetes, obesity, inflammatory diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases15–18. In most of those disease states, JNK pathway is dysregulated, often associated with upregulation of JNK activity resulting from malfunctioning of relevant phosphatases19–21. For example, when DUSP10, a negative regulator of JNK pathway, was deficient, it led to increased level of activated JNK and cytokine production22. Likewise, aging diabetic cell showed elevated JNK activity and reduced expression of DUSP1017. Proper regulation of JNK pathway by phosphatases, therefore, must be fulfilled to maintain normal physiology.
To elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of JNK MAPK signaling, it is essential to identify JNK pathway-specific phosphatases. Although there are more than 500 protein kinases identified in the human genome, only ~120 protein phosphatases have been discovered23–28. With a significant difference in the number of phosphatases compared to kinases, it is well known that phosphatases have multiple phosphoprotein targets24,29–31. This property of phosphatases may make it difficult to point out a phosphatase enzymatic activity toward a specific target among various phosphoproteins which often form complex crosstalk networks in the cell32. To clarify a specific substrate of a phosphatase within the pathway, we previously conducted a study that utilized a fusion protein model in which phosphatases were tethered to a scaffold protein (Ste5) of the mating signaling pathway in budding yeast33. In the present study, we used a synthetic approach to screen for JNK pathway-specific phosphatases. For the screen, the whole repertoire of phosphatases in cell were collected, and individual phosphatases were linked to JIP1 scaffold to increase stereophysical proximity between analyzed phosphatases and the pathway components complex with JIP1, thereby augmenting the effects of the analyzed phosphatases on JNK pathway activity. JIP1 has been previously shown to mediate TNFα-stimulation of the JNK pathway, such that TNFα treatment may be a useful means to stimulate JNK pathway for the screening that exploits JIP1-phosphatase tethers13,14. However, when expressed as a JIP1-phosphatase fusion protein, some phosphatases may inactivate the JNK pathway nonspecifically via enforced close proximity, and/or interrupt JNK signal transduction via disruption of the three-dimensional structure of JIP1 signaling complex. To exclude these potential false-negative effects, downregulation of JNK pathway by each analyzed phosphatase was confirmed by assessment of the co-expression of the corresponding phosphatase in its free form with JIP1. Together, this approach led to the identification of a novel phosphatase, non-transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase 1 (PTPN1).
PTPN1 was first discovered in isolates from human placental tissues34 and the three-dimensional structure of PTPN1 has been subsequently identified35. Previous studies have shown that PTPN1 directly dephosphorylates insulin receptor (IR) and insulin receptor substrates (IRS), which results in downregulation of insulin signaling36,37. For example, PTPN1 deficient mice show increased insulin sensitivity38,39. PTPN1 also dephosphorylates activated STAT3 and JAK2, and regulates leptin signaling40–42. PTPN1 contains a signature PTP family motif [I/V]HCXXGXXR[S/T] located beside the WPD loop, the Q loop, and the Tyr loop43. The WPD loop contains a conserved acidic residue (Asp181 in PTPN1) that plays an important role in protonation of the tyrosyl leaving group of a substrate. Mutation of Asp181 in PTPN1 results in the suppression of PTPN1 catalytic activity; however, the affinity of PTPN1 for substrates is maintained. Thus, PTPN1 D181A acts as a ‘substrate trap’ that exerts a dominant-negative effect43,44. The structural approach also provided further analysis of potential substrates of PTPN1 in vivo 44. With these studies, PTPN1 has become an attractive therapeutic target of diabetes and obesity. In the present study, PTPN1 was shown to reduce TNFα-stimulated cell death responses via direct dephosphorylation of JNK, and thus was identified as a novel negative regulator of JNK signaling pathway.
Results
PTPN1 is a novel JNK MAPK pathway phosphatase
To focus on the specific effect of a phosphatase on JNK MAPK pathway, potential negative JNK MAPK regulators were screened using JIP1 scaffold-phosphatase fusion proteins (Fig. 1A). The effects of 77 phosphatases on pathway output were tested using various JIP1-phosphatase fusion proteins (Table S2). After TNFα-stimulation, changes in the level of JNK pathway induced by a given JIP1-phosphatase fusion protein was assessed via immunoblot analysis of phosphorylated JNK. The results showed that the level of JNK phosphorylation was decreased in case of JIP1-fused DUSP4, DUSP6, DUSP7, DUSP10, DUSP16, PTPN1, PTPN2, PTPN7, PTPRO1, and PTPRO4 (Fig. S1). Of these phosphatases, DUSP4, DUSP6, DUSP7, DUSP10, and DUSP16 have been previously reported to be negative regulators of the JNK pathway45,46. The effects of the remaining phosphatases (PTPN1, PTPN2, PTPN7, PTPRO1, and PTPRO4) on JNK pathway activation are unknown (Fig. 1B).
In addition, each phosphatase was individually co-expressed with JIP1 to clarify whether the observed downregulation of JNK pathway was caused by specific activity of a given phosphatase for the member of the JNK pathway, or instead nonspecifically induced by enforced proximity between the two. DUSP10 was chosen as a negative control to compare the effect of the other phosphatases on phosphorylated JNK. PTPN1 alone was found to reduce JNK phosphorylation (Fig. 1C), and furthermore, was shown to downregulate JNK signaling in both JIP1 scaffold-fused form and its free form (Fig. 1B,C).
PTPN1 interacts with the components of the JNK MAPK pathway
For PTPN1 to dephosphorylate a particular JNK pathway protein, it must first interact with that protein. Thus, the interactions between PTPN1 and components of the JNK pathway in response to TNFα-stimulation were examined in 293 T cells. The results showed that PTPN1 bound to MLK3 in unstimulated cells, whereas this interaction between PTPN1 and MLK3 was decreased in TNFα-treated cells (Fig. 2A). In contrast, interaction between PTPN1 and either MKK7 or JNK was enhanced by TNFα stimulation (Fig. 2B,C), and PTPN1 interacted with the JIP1 scaffold protein independently of TNFα stimulation (Fig. 2D). A parallel in vitro binding analysis was performed using purified proteins and the results (Fig. S2) showed that PTPN1 can directly interact with all components of the JNK pathway including JIP1 and three kinases. JIP1 also interacted with MLK3, MKK7, and JNK regardless of TNFα stimulation in cell (Fig. S3). The fact that the pattern of interaction between JIP1 and the three kinases was notably different from that of PTPN1 and the kinases and that PTPN1 can directly bind to kinases in vitro suggests that the demonstrated interaction of PTPN1 with the three kinases (Fig. 2A–C) was not via its constitutive binding with the JIP1. Together, these data indicate that PTPN1 interacts with all three JNK pathway kinases, and that these interactions are not dependent upon the JIP1 scaffold.
JNK is dephosphorylated by PTPN1
The JNK pathway kinases transmit signals by continuous phosphorylation of their respective downstream kinase. Thus, reduced phosphorylation of JNK by PTPN1 may be the result of inhibition of the upstream kinases, MLK3 or MKK7, or of JNK itself. A PTPN1 phosphatase assay was performed in vitro to ascertain whether MLK3, MKK7, or JNK might be PTPN1 substrates. When phosphorylated MLK3 or MKK7 was incubated with PTPN1, there was no significant change in their phosphorylation status (Fig. 3A,B). Surprisingly, PTPN1 was found to reduce the tyrosine phosphorylation of JNK but the level of phosphothreonine did not change (Fig. 3C). A JNK kinase assay was also performed to investigate the effect of reduced tyrosine phosphorylation on JNK activity. After incubation of phosphorylated JNK with PTPN1, JNK failed to phosphorylate GST-cJun (Fig. 3C). This suggests that JNK is a novel PTPN1 substrate, and that PTPN1 reduces the catalytic activity of JNK by reducing tyrosine phosphorylation of JNK in vitro.
To elucidate the mechanism by which PTPN1 regulates the overall JNK signaling, we examined the level of phosphorylated JNK at regular intervals after treatment with TNFα (Fig. 3D,E). When PTPN1 was expressed, JNK phosphorylation was reduced by approximately half compared to that achieved in the absence of PTPN1 expression. However, the timing of JNK activation or deactivation was not affected by PTPN1 expression.
PTPN1 negatively regulates the JNK MAPK pathway and inhibits the cell death response
When 293 T cells were treated with TNFα, those expressing PTPN1 were shown to exhibit reduced levels of JNK phosphorylation (Fig. 3). To further evaluate the function of PTPN1, experiments using a catalytic PTPN1 mutant (PTPN1 D181A) were performed. Data showed that PTPN1 D181A bound to JNK as efficiently as wild-type (WT) PTPN1 did, but exhibited reduced catalytic activity against JNK (Figs S4 and S5). Resultantly, although the binding affinity of PTPN1 D181A for JNK was similar to that of WT PTPN1, its expression did not reduce the level of JNK phosphorylation as WT PTPN1 did (Fig. 4A). This observation was also confirmed by a luciferase reporter gene assay to monitor JNK catalytic activity (Fig. 4B). Together, WT PTPN1 decreased both JNK phosphorylation and luciferase activity, while PTPN1 D181A increased luciferase activity via prolonged JNK phosphorylation (Fig. 4A,B). These results suggest that PTPN1 promotes JNK pathway inactivation.
It is known that the JNK pathway is transiently activated when cells are stimulated with TNFα, because the NFκB pathway induces expression of MnSOD and thereby prevents not only the accumulation of ROS, but also the oxidation and inactivation of PTPs by ROS47,48. Thus, it is difficult to observe the cell death response caused by JNK pathway in 293 T cells that harbor NFκB pathway. Since the sustained JNK activation is necessary for TNFα-induced apoptosis, the cell death response was examined in p65-deficient MEF cells, in which the NFκB pathway was disrupted2,14. The results showed that PTPN1 decreased TNFα-stimulated cell death responses, whereas PTPN1 D181A increased the cell death response presumably via sustained JNK phosphorylation (Fig. 4C,D). These results demonstrate that PTPN1 reduces the cell death response via negative regulation of the JNK pathway.
Discussion
The formation of protein complexes often mediated by scaffold proteins increases the proximity between signaling components, and thereby facilitates signal transduction7,8,49. Scaffold protein-mediated MAPK pathway signals are transmitted by relayed phosphorylation of member kinases3,4. Malfunction of the signaling components or dysregulation of the signal transduction pathway have been previously investigated as putative therapeutic targets15. In this study, identification of a negative regulator of the JNK pathway was achieved via a facile synthetic screening approach using scaffold protein-tethered phosphatase fusion proteins (Fig. 1B). This was possible because when JIP1 interacts with JNK pathway kinases during the signal transduction process, a phosphatase expressed as a scaffold-fused protein is more accessible to kinases than a free form of phosphatase is. Furthermore, the effect of each phosphatase increased as a result of close proximity to the JIP1 signaling complex, and this augmented effect enabled the identification of PTPN1 as a novel negative JNK pathway regulator. PTPN1 was shown to catalyze JNK inactivation by dephosphorylating tyrosine residue in an active JNK (Fig. 3C). The utilized anti-dual phospho-JNK antibody can capture phosphorylated JNK only when both the threonine and tyrosine residues of the TPY motif in the activation loop of JNK are phosphorylated to produce a fully activated form of JNK50. Therefore, the decrease in the dual phospho-JNK and phospho-Tyr blottings by PTPN1 (Fig. 3C) suggests that PTPN1 may directly dephosphorylate the phosphotyrosine residue present in the TPY motif.
In eukaryotic cells, external cues trigger the onset of MAPK signaling and activate intracellular signaling components to generate corresponding cellular responses, and the signaling is eventually decreased to its basal level after certain amount of time, which is often called adaptation51. Precise control of the magnitude and duration of signaling is critical for cell survival. Dysregulation of these mechanisms usually leads to disease states as shown in tumorous diseases where adaptation of proliferation signaling is malfunctioning and uncontrolled proliferation is manifested14,16. Adaptation of signaling is often mediated by degradation of active signaling proteins or negative feedback regulations involving protein phosphatases. Dephosphorylation of active signaling proteins by phosphatases is a particularly important mechanism in the JNK MAPK pathway where the main signaling components are kinases. In our study, the expression of PTPN1 decreased the overall signaling magnitude, but not the duration of JNK signaling (Fig. 3D,E), suggesting that its primary function appears to control “signaling noise” during signaling process, rather than regulating the duration of JNK activation or the signal adaptation.
We also showed the catalytic mutant PTPN1 D181A could bind to JNK as efficiently as WT PTPN1 did. PTPN1 D181A failed to inhibit TNFα-stimulated JNK phosphorylation, and led to an increased cell death in p65-deficient MEF cells (Fig. 4). These results indicated that the negative regulation of TNFα-dependent JNK signaling by PTPN1 depends on its catalytic activity. Thus, elucidation of the functional mechanism of PTPN1 may help to understand the JNK-dependent cell death, which is a prominent feature in several diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, inflammatory diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases14,16.
Interestingly, PTPN1 directly binds to JIP1 scaffold and three kinases of JNK MAPK pathway in vitro (Fig. S2), while exhibiting dynamic changes in its interactions with JNK pathway components in response to TNFα stimulation (Fig. 2). This finding suggests a possibility of an additional non-catalytic role of PTPN1 in the regulation of JNK signaling, for example, sequestering of pathway members in the resting cells or acting as a co-scaffold. Previous studies have revealed non-catalytic functions of various phosphatases in the signal regulation47,48,52,53. PTPN1 has been well established for its regulatory role in insulin signaling and inflammatory signaling which involves JNK and p38 pathways in the downstream37,54,55. JNK MAPK pathway is often integrated with p38 MAPK pathway since they share multiple upstream components and stimuli which activate the both56,57, suggesting that PTPN1 may potentially regulate the phosphorylation of p3858. Thus, studying the functional mechanisms and physiological roles of PTPN1 in JNK MAPK pathway should contribute to a broader understanding of the regulation and integration of MAPK signaling.
Methods
Cell lines and transfection
HEK293 T (293 T) and MEF cells were cultured in Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (Gibco)59,60. 293 T cells were transfected with appropriate plasmids using D-fection (LugenSci) according to manufacturer’s instructions. MEF cells were transfected by electroporation using the Neon transfection system (Invitrogen). Prior to treatment with TNFα, cells were incubated in serum-free medium (2 h), and then stimulated with TNFα (BD) for the indicated time.
Plasmids for protein expression
The plasmid constructs used for protein expression are listed (Table S1). The JIP1 gene was cloned from a mouse brain cDNA library using PCR61. To construct the JIP1 scaffold-tethered phosphatase proteins, phosphatases were fused to the C-terminus of JIP1 with a linker composed of Gly and Ser residues (Ser-Gly-Gly-Gly-Ser). The phosphatases used in this study are listed (Table S2). PTPN1 D181A was generated by introducing point mutations to PTPN1 using PCR mutagenesis.
Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation
Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation were performed as previously described61. The antibodies used in this study were: anti-dual phospho-JNK (Cell Signaling), anti-Flag (Sigma), anti-HA (Boehringer Mannheim), anti-phospho-Thr (Upstate), anti-phospho-Tyr (Upstate), anti-phospho-Ser (Upstate), anti-His (Sigma), anti-GST (GE), anti-JIP1 (Santa Cruz), and anti-myc (Upstate). In all cases, before performing gel-electrophoresis, the amount of total proteins was quantified using Bradford assay and equal amounts of proteins were loaded in each lane in a gel. All immunoblot analyses were independently performed at least three times.
Kinase assay using immunoblotting
To test JNK catalytic activity, protein kinase activity was assayed using GST-cJun as a substrate. Samples were incubated (30 min) with GST-cJun in a kinase assay buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 20 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, and 20 μM ATP), and then examined via immunoblot analysis using an anti-dual phospho-cJun antibody (Cell Signaling).
Cell death assay
p65-deficient MEF cells were transfected with either p3xFLAG CMV-PTPN1 WT, PTPN1 D181A, or empty vector, and incubated for 24 h. To stimulate the cell death response, cells were treated with TNFα (50 nM) for 7 h after undergoing serum starvation. Dead cells were visualized with PI staining (7 μg/ml) in DMEM, and detected using a DE/Axiovert 200 inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss). Cells were counted from DIC and fluorescence images in triplicate, to calculate cell death percentages.
Pull down assay
An in vitro binding assay was performed with bacterially expressed proteins. Prey and bait proteins were incubated (2 h), and glutathione sepharose (GE) was incubated with protein samples (2 h). Precipitates were washed (five times) with PBS, and then examined by immunoblot analysis.
Phosphatase assay
The catalytic activity of both PTPN1 and PTPN1 D181A was measured using pNPP. To identify PTPN1 substrates, phosphatase assays were performed with bacterially expressed PTPN1. HA-MLK3 was expressed in 293 T cells, and then purified using anti HA-agarose (Sigma). To purify phospho-MKK7, GST-MKK7 was co-expressed with His-MLK3 in Escherichia coli. To generate phosphorylated JNK, GST-JNK was co-expressed with His-MKK7, (a constitutively activated mutant form of MKK7, harboring Ser-271, Thr-275, and Ser-277 mutations to Glu) in Escherichia coli. Phosphorylated proteins were incubated with purified His-PTPN1 (30 min, 37 °C). Protein phosphorylation levels were detected by immunoblot analysis.
Reporter gene assay
293 T cells were transfected with pFA2-cJun, pFR-Luc, and p3xFLAG CMV-PTPN1 (WT, PTPN1 D181A, or empty vector), and incubated for 24 h. After serum starvation (2 h), cells were treated with TNFα for the indicated time periods. Samples were prepared for, and analyzed by luciferase assay (Promega), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
Values were expressed as means ± SD. One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s t-test was used for multiple comparisons using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). The criteria for statistical significance were set at *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.005.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015R1D1A1A09057063 and NRF-2012R1A1A2009248) to SHP. We appreciate Yong-Keun Jung (Seoul National University) for providing MLK3 constructs, Jin Won Cho (Yonsei University) for providing p65-/- MEF cells, and Sayeon Cho (Chung-Ang University) for providing phosphatase expression vectors. We thank the Park lab members for helpful discussion and comments.
Author Contributions
S.-H.P. and J.M. designed the study. J.M. performed experiments, and J.M. and J.H. performed data analysis. J.H., J.M. and S.-H.P. wrote the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Jiyoung Moon and Jain Ha contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-13494-x.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Yang SH, Sharrocks AD, Whitmarsh AJ. MAP kinase signalling cascades and transcriptional regulation. Gene. 2013;513:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chang L, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase itch couples JNK activation to TNFalpha-induced cell death by inducing c-FLIP(L) turnover. Cell. 2006;124:601–613. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown MD, Sacks DB. Protein scaffolds in MAP kinase signalling. Cellular signalling. 2009;21:462–469. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Morrison DK, Davis RJ. Regulation of MAP kinase signaling modules by scaffold proteins in mammals. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2003;19:91–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111401.091942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Murphy LO, Blenis J. MAPK signal specificity: the right place at the right time. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2006;31:268–275. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ebisuya M, Kondoh K, Nishida E. The duration, magnitude and compartmentalization of ERK MAP kinase activity: mechanisms for providing signaling specificity. Journal of cell science. 2005;118:2997–3002. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Whitmarsh AJ, et al. Requirement of the JIP1 scaffold protein for stress-induced JNK activation. Genes & development. 2001;15:2421–2432. doi: 10.1101/gad.922801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Whitmarsh AJ, Cavanagh J, Tournier C, Yasuda J, Davis RJ. A mammalian scaffold complex that selectively mediates MAP kinase activation. Science. 1998;281:1671–1674. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5383.1671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Varfolomeev EE, Ashkenazi A. Tumor necrosis factor: an apoptosis JuNKie? Cell. 2004;116:491–497. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00166-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kamata H, et al. Reactive oxygen species promote TNFalpha-induced death and sustained JNK activation by inhibiting MAP kinase phosphatases. Cell. 2005;120:649–661. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sondarva G, et al. TRAF2-MLK3 interaction is essential for TNF-alpha-induced MLK3 activation. Cell research. 2010;20:89–98. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brancho D, et al. Role of MLK3 in the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascades. Molecular and cellular biology. 2005;25:3670–3681. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.9.3670-3681.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ventura JJ, Cogswell P, Flavell RA, Baldwin AS, Jr., Davis RJ. JNK potentiates TNF-stimulated necrosis by increasing the production of cytotoxic reactive oxygen species. Genes & development. 2004;18:2905–2915. doi: 10.1101/gad.1223004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Deng Y, Ren X, Yang L, Lin Y, Wu X. A JNK-dependent pathway is required for TNFalpha-induced apoptosis. Cell. 2003;115:61–70. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00757-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tonks NK. Protein tyrosine phosphatases: from genes, to function, to disease. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology. 2006;7:833–846. doi: 10.1038/nrm2039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Manning AM, Davis RJ. Targeting JNK for therapeutic benefit: from junk to gold? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:554–565. doi: 10.1038/nrd1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu J, Mei C, Vlassara H, Striker GE, Zheng F. Oxidative stress-induced JNK activation contributes to proinflammatory phenotype of aging diabetic mesangial cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;297:F1622–1631. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00078.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Borsello T, Forloni G. JNK signalling: a possible target to prevent neurodegeneration. Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13:1875–1886. doi: 10.2174/138161207780858384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chung J, et al. HSP72 protects against obesity-induced insulin resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:1739–1744. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705799105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang X, et al. Elevated expression of phosphorylated c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase in basal-like and “triple-negative” breast cancers. Hum Pathol. 2010;41:401–406. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boden G, et al. Increase in endoplasmic reticulum stress-related proteins and genes in adipose tissue of obese, insulin-resistant individuals. Diabetes. 2008;57:2438–2444. doi: 10.2337/db08-0604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang Y, et al. Regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses by MAP kinase phosphatase 5. Nature. 2004;430:793–797. doi: 10.1038/nature02764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alonso A, et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in the human genome. Cell. 2004;117:699–711. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kondoh K, Nishida E. Regulation of MAP kinases by MAP kinase phosphatases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1773:1227–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shi Y. Serine/threonine phosphatases: mechanism through structure. Cell. 2009;139:468–484. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Arena S, Benvenuti S, Bardelli A. Genetic analysis of the kinome and phosphatome in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:2092–2099. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5205-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sacco F, Perfetto L, Castagnoli L, Cesareni G. The human phosphatase interactome: An intricate family portrait. FEBS letters. 2012;586:2732–2739. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science. 2002;298:1912–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.1075762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Virshup DM, Shenolikar S. From promiscuity to precision: protein phosphatases get a makeover. Mol Cell. 2009;33:537–545. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ren L, et al. Substrate specificity of protein tyrosine phosphatases 1B, RPTPalpha, SHP-1, and SHP-2. Biochemistry. 2011;50:2339–2356. doi: 10.1021/bi1014453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jeffrey KL, Camps M, Rommel C, Mackay CR. Targeting dual-specificity phosphatases: manipulating MAP kinase signalling and immune responses. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:391–403. doi: 10.1038/nrd2289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rowland MA, Harrison B, Deeds EJ. Phosphatase specificity and pathway insulation in signaling networks. Biophys J. 2015;108:986–996. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shim E, Park SH. Identification of a novel Ser/Thr protein phosphatase Ppq1 as a negative regulator of mating MAP kinase pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2014;443:252–258. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.11.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tonks NK, Diltz CD, Fischer EH. Characterization of the major protein-tyrosine-phosphatases of human placenta. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1988;263:6731–6737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jia Z, Barford D, Flint AJ, Tonks NK. Structural basis for phosphotyrosine peptide recognition by protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. Science. 1995;268:1754–1758. doi: 10.1126/science.7540771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bandyopadhyay D, et al. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B complexes with the insulin receptor in vivo and is tyrosine-phosphorylated in the presence of insulin. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1997;272:1639–1645. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.3.1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goldstein BJ, Bittner-Kowalczyk A, White MF, Harbeck M. Tyrosine dephosphorylation and deactivation of insulin receptor substrate-1 by protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B. Possible facilitation by the formation of a ternary complex with the Grb2 adaptor protein. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275:4283–4289. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.6.4283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Elchebly M, et al. Increased insulin sensitivity and obesity resistance in mice lacking the protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B gene. Science. 1999;283:1544–1548. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5407.1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Klaman LD, et al. Increased energy expenditure, decreased adiposity, and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B-deficient mice. Molecular and cellular biology. 2000;20:5479–5489. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.15.5479-5489.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kaszubska W, et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B negatively regulates leptin signaling in a hypothalamic cell line. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002;195:109–118. doi: 10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00178-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lund IK, Hansen JA, Andersen HS, Moller NP, Billestrup N. Mechanism of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B-mediated inhibition of leptin signalling. J Mol Endocrinol. 2005;34:339–351. doi: 10.1677/jme.1.01694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Myers MP, et al. TYK2 and JAK2 are substrates of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276:47771–47774. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100583200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.J N. Andersen N. K. T. Protein phosphatases. Vol. 5 (J.Arino, D.R. Alexander, 2004).
- 44.Flint AJ, Tiganis T, Barford D, Tonks NK. Development of “substrate-trapping” mutants to identify physiological substrates of protein tyrosine phosphatases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94:1680–1685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Owens DM, Keyse SM. Differential regulation of MAP kinase signalling by dual-specificity protein phosphatases. Oncogene. 2007;26:3203–3213. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kondoh K, Nishida E. Regulation of MAP kinases by MAP kinase phosphatases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research. 2007;1773:1227–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shen Y, et al. Activation of the Jnk signaling pathway by a dual-specificity phosphatase, JSP-1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98:13613–13618. doi: 10.1073/pnas.231499098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zama T, et al. Scaffold role of a mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase, SKRP1, for the JNK signaling pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2002;277:23919–23926. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200838200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Burack WR, Shaw AS. Signal transduction: hanging on a scaffold. Current opinion in cell biology. 2000;12:211–216. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)00078-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zeke A, Misheva M, Remenyi A, Bogoyevitch MA. JNK Signaling: Regulation and Functions Based on Complex Protein-Protein Partnerships. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews: MMBR. 2016;80:793–835. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00043-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ahmed S, et al. Data-driven modeling reconciles kinetics of ERK phosphorylation, localization, and activity states. Molecular systems biology. 2014;10:718. doi: 10.1002/msb.134708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Takagaki K, et al. Characterization of a novel low-molecular-mass dual-specificity phosphatase-3 (LDP-3) that enhances activation of JNK and p38. The Biochemical journal. 2004;383:447–455. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ju A, et al. Scaffold Role of DUSP22 in ASK1-MKK7-JNK Signaling Pathway. PloS one. 2016;11:e0164259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Traves PG, et al. Pivotal role of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) in the macrophage response to pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory challenge. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1125. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tonks NK. PTP1B: from the sidelines to the front lines! FEBS letters. 2003;546:140–148. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00603-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cuevas BD, Abell AN, Johnson GL. Role of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinases in signal integration. Oncogene. 2007;26:3159–3171. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wagner EF, Nebreda AR. Signal integration by JNK and p38 MAPK pathways in cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:537–549. doi: 10.1038/nrc2694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Medgyesi D, et al. The protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B is a negative regulator of CD40 and BAFF-R signaling and controls B cell autoimmunity. J Exp Med. 2014;211:427–440. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Oh Y, et al. Regulation in the targeting of TRAIL receptor 1 to cell surface via GODZ for TRAIL sensitivity in tumor cells. Cell death and differentiation. 2012;19:1196–1207. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yang WH, et al. NFkappaB activation is associated with its O-GlcNAcylation state under hyperglycemic conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:17345–17350. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806198105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Moon J, Park SH. Reassembly of JIP1 scaffold complex in JNK MAP kinase pathway using heterologous protein interactions. PloS one. 2014;9:e96797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.