Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2017 Oct 18;85(11):e00541-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00541-17

Spontaneous Loss of Virulence in Natural Populations of Listeria monocytogenes

Mylène M Maury a,b, Viviane Chenal-Francisque a,b,*, Hélène Bracq-Dieye a,b, Lei Han c, Alexandre Leclercq a,b, Guillaume Vales a,b, Alexandra Moura b,d, Edith Gouin f, Mariela Scortti c,e, Olivier Disson b,d, José A Vázquez-Boland c,e,, Marc Lecuit a,b,d,g,
Editor: Nancy E Freitagh
PMCID: PMC5649026  PMID: 28827366

ABSTRACT

The pathogenesis of Listeria monocytogenes depends on the ability of this bacterium to escape from the phagosome of the host cells via the action of the pore-forming toxin listeriolysin O (LLO). Expression of the LLO-encoding gene (hly) requires the transcriptional activator PrfA, and both hly and prfA genes are essential for L. monocytogenes virulence. Here, we used the hemolytic activity of LLO as a phenotypic marker to screen for spontaneous virulence-attenuating mutations in L. monocytogenes. Sixty nonhemolytic isolates were identified among a collection of 57,820 confirmed L. monocytogenes strains isolated from a variety of sources (0.1%). In most cases (56/60; 93.3%), the nonhemolytic phenotype resulted from nonsense, missense, or frameshift mutations in prfA. Five strains carried hly mutations leading to a single amino acid substitution (G299V) or a premature stop codon causing strong virulence attenuation in mice. In one strain, both hly and gshF (encoding a glutathione synthase required for full PrfA activity) were missing due to genomic rearrangements likely caused by a transposable element. The PrfA/LLO loss-of-function (PrfA/LLO) mutants belonged to phylogenetically diverse clades of L. monocytogenes, and most were identified among nonclinical strains (57/60). Consistent with the rare occurrence of loss-of-virulence mutations, we show that prfA and hly are under purifying selection. Although occurring at a low frequency, PrfA/LLO mutational events in L. monocytogenes lead to niche restriction and open an evolutionary path for obligate saprophytism in this facultative intracellular pathogen.

KEYWORDS: Listeria monocytogenes, virulence, hemolysis, genomics, spontaneous mutations

INTRODUCTION

Listeria monocytogenes is a foodborne pathogen that can cause a severe invasive disease, called listeriosis, in people and animals. As a facultative intracellular bacterium, L. monocytogenes has evolved a range of virulence determinants allowing intracellular survival (1, 2). One key virulence factor is listeriolysin O (LLO), a pore-forming toxin responsible for the characteristic β-hemolytic phenotype of L. monocytogenes that allows the bacterium to escape from the phagosome of host cells and replicate intracellularly (3, 4). LLO is encoded by hly, located in Listeria pathogenicity island 1 (LIPI-1) (5). Expression of the genes within this central pathogenicity locus, including hly, is under the control of the transcriptional activator PrfA, the master regulator of L. monocytogenes virulence genes (6, 7). The hemolytic activity conferred by LLO is considered a cardinal marker for L. monocytogenes detection and/or identification in clinical and food microbiology. L. monocytogenes is divided into four phylogenetic lineages (810), 13 serotypes (11) that can be approximated by PCR serogrouping (12), and more than 100 clonal complexes (CCs, as defined by multilocus sequence typing [MLST]) (13), which are unevenly virulent (14). Weakly or nonhemolytic L. monocytogenes strains have been reported (1519), but the frequency and phylogenetic diversity of the strains displaying an altered hemolysis phenotype are unknown, as well as their underlying genetic and microbiological features.

This study aimed at (i) estimating the frequency of naturally occurring nonhemolytic L. monocytogenes isolates and their distribution among L. monocytogenes lineages and MLST clonal complexes, (ii) understanding the molecular bases of the nonhemolytic phenotype, and (iii) assessing its impact on virulence. By using phenotypic and genomic approaches, mutagenesis, and in vivo assays, we show that mutations leading to loss of hemolytic activity in L. monocytogenes, although rare, affect a wide range of clonal complexes of the major lineages I and II and lead to a decreased virulence.

RESULTS

Identification and characterization of nonhemolytic L. monocytogenes strains.

We examined the prevalence of nonhemolytic L. monocytogenes strains among the 57,820 L. monocytogenes isolates collected between 1987 and 2008 at the French National Reference Centre for Listeria (NRCL) and the WHO Collaborating Centre for Listeria (WHOCCL). Sixty L. monocytogenes isolates (0.1%) were identified as nonhemolytic on horse blood agar plates. These were isolated from food (n = 33), food production environments (n = 2), nonhuman unknown sources (n = 22), and human clinical cases (n = 3). Phenotypic characterization using the API Listeria system confirmed all 60 nonhemolytic isolates as L. monocytogenes. These belonged to lineages I (n = 23, 38.3%) and II (n = 37, 61.7%) and were grouped within serogroups IIa (n = 36), IVb (n = 13), IIb (n = 10), and IIc (n = 1) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). MLST showed that the 60 nonhemolytic isolates belonged to 15 different clonal complexes, including the hypovirulent CC9 (n = 1), CC121 (n = 3), CC31 (n = 20), and sequence type 13 (ST13) (n = 3) (14, 20) as well as the hypervirulent CC1 (n = 3), CC2 (n = 7), CC4 (n = 1), and CC6 (n = 1) (14) (Fig. 1 and Table S1). Core genome MLST (cgMLST) typing identified 39 different cgMLST types (CTs) (21). Nine CTs comprised more than one strain, suggesting a possible epidemiological link between them (21) (Table S1). In particular, among the 20 nonhemolytic CC31 strains, 10 belonged to CT878, and 2 belonged to CT2659, suggesting that the overrepresentation of CC31 could be in part due to multiple sampling of the same source in the context of an epidemiological investigation. These results show that nonhemolytic strains are phylogenetically very diverse and that the loss of hemolytic activity is caused by independent events across the L. monocytogenes population.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Phylogenetic tree summarizing all the genetic features causing the loss of hemolytic activity among the 60 nonhemolytic L. monocytogenes strains. Single-linkage-based clustering was obtained based on the cgMLST allelic profiles, as described previously (21). The scale bar indicates the percentage of cgMLST similarity. Strain names have been simplified to avoid redundancy and should be preceded by CLIP (Collection of the Institut Pasteur). PrfA activities and mutations (first and second columns, respectively), gshF presence/absence profile (third column), and LLO mutations and presence/absence profile (fourth column) are mapped on the phylogeny. The position and the nature of amino acid substitutions are indicated in gray zones. Positions of premature stop codons are indicated next to black asterisks in light pink zones. The absence of gshF and hly in the CLIP 1998/76801 strain is indicated in black. MLST clonal complexes are shown on the right. The black star highlights the CLIP 1998/76801 strain that contains multiple copies of a transposable element that induced huge genomic rearrangements. ND, not determined (unknown and nonhuman origin).

To investigate the impact of the loss of hemolytic activity on L. monocytogenes fitness, we analyzed the growth of all nonhemolytic strains in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth at 22°C and 37°C, using strain EGDe as control (Fig. S1). At 22°C, in a large majority of cases, the growth of nonhemolytic strains was within the same range as that of EGDe, as revealed by the areas under the growth curves (AUCs). In contrast, at 37°C, the temperature at which prfA is known to be maximally expressed (22), most of the nonhemolytic strains showed lower growth (lower AUCs) than EGDe. Some of the nonhemolytic strains showed particularly decreased fitness at one or both temperatures: CLIP 2000/86467 (PrfAT170*, at 22°C, where the asterisk indicates a truncation at residue T170 of PrfA), CLIP 1998/75799 (PrfAI51*-LLON261*, at 37°C), and, at both temperatures, strains CLIP 1998/76801 (ΔhlygshF), CLIP 1996/70991 (PrfAQ21*), CLIP 1994/58618 (PrfAA129P), and CLIP 1996/71614 (PrfAY207*) (Fig. S1).

Molecular basis of the nonhemolytic phenotype: PrfA variants and activity.

The central regulator of Listeria virulence, PrfA, is required for the expression of a set of key virulence determinants, known as the PrfA regulon, including the hly gene (6, 7, 23). Consequently, mutations altering the function of either PrfA or LLO could lead to a nonhemolytic phenotype. Sequence analyses identified frameshifts and missense and nonsense mutations in prfA in 56 nonhemolytic strains, leading to amino acid substitutions or protein truncations in PrfA (Fig. 1; Table S1). Phenotypic analysis under PrfA-activating and -nonactivating conditions using the PrfA-dependent virulence factors PlcB (phospholipase C) and Hpt as reporters (see Materials and Methods) (24) confirmed the complete loss of function of the central virulence gene regulator in all of these strains (Fig. 1; Fig. S2).

Forty-three out of the 56 PrfA strains, distributed in lineages I and II, expressed a truncated PrfA at 14 distinct positions distributed along the entire PrfA protein (Table S1). All analyzed strains of CC59 and CC31 exhibited a truncation at positions 59 and 185, respectively, suggesting a common ancestor for each of these groups of strains. Seven PrfA strains presented a single amino acid substitution in PrfA compared to the sequence of the reference strain EGDe (GenBank accession number: NC_003210). Among them, one occurred in the β-roll region of PrfA (G72D in strain CLIP 1997/75561, CC9). Mutations located in this region are known to affect PrfA activation or the ability of PrfA to form a stable complex with the RNA polymerase and initiate transcription of the target virulence genes (2527). One PrfA mutation occurred in the DNA-binding helix-turn-helix (HTH) domain of PrfA (G175C in strain CLIP 2006/01642, CC6), and two others occurred in its C-terminal part (K220T in strains CLIP 1994/60344, CLIP 2000/80770, and CLIP 2001/87255, all ST13; and L221F in strain CLIP 1994/56373, CC1). These regions are known to be important for the binding of PrfA to PrfA-binding sites of target DNAs (25, 26). In addition, the A129P substitution, located between the β-roll and the hinge αD regions, occurred in a CC224 strain (CLIP 1994/58618). Finally, six of the PrfA strains, all belonging to CC155, showed a reversion of the prfA stop codon due to the insertion of 5 nucleotides at position 712 in the prfA sequence, leading to a longer PrfA protein (238 amino acids in EGDe versus 293 amino acids in the CC155 strains of this study).

One of the four nonhemolytic mutants (CC1 strain CLIP 1998/76801) exhibited a wild-type (WT) PrfA sequence compared to that of EGDe but showed a PrfA phenotype. This observation suggested that a mechanism interfering upstream of PrfA function was affected. Glutathione, synthetized by L. monocytogenes through the glutathione synthase encoded by gshF (lmo2770), is critical for PrfA activation (28). Interestingly, although it is part of the L. monocytogenes core genome (14, 21), gshF was absent in the genome of the CLIP 1998/76801 strain (Fig. 1) (see below), which could explain the absence of PrfA activity in this strain.

Analysis of spontaneous LLO mutants.

Analysis of hly sequences in the 60 nonhemolytic strains identified multiple mutations leading to amino acid substitutions in LLO (Table S1). Several substitutions (N31H, S35L, V438I, and K523S) were identified in at least 48 hemolytic L. monocytogenes strains of our database (∼4,100 genomes), suggesting that they do not cause LLO loss of function. However, an S250N substitution was found only in three nonhemolytic strains of this study (CLIP 2008/01432, 2008/01433, and 2008/01435, all CC77) and could therefore result in LLO loss of function. Since these strains also expressed a truncated and nonactive PrfA, which is sufficient to explain the nonhemolytic phenotype of these strains, we did not pursue this further.

Two out of the three nonhemolytic strains showing a WT PrfA sequence and a PrfA+ phenotype (CC121 strains CLIP 2007/01406 and CLIP 2007/01014) exhibited a single amino acid substitution in LLO (the G299V substitution encoded by hly [hlyG299V], or LLOG299V), which was not present in any of the other strains. The third strain (CC2, CLIP 1989/13656) harbored a premature stop codon at position 484 in LLO (hlyC484*, or LLOC484*). The absence of any other specific feature in these three strains that could be linked to the loss of hemolytic activity suggested that the G299V mutation and the truncation at position 484 in LLO could be the cause of the loss of hemolytic activity in these strains. In addition, two CC7 strains expressing a truncated PrfA (CLIP 1998/75799 and CLIP 1989/14490) also showed a premature stop codon in LLO at position 261 (hlyN261*) due to the insertion of one nucleotide.

In the CLIP 1998/76801 strain mentioned above, hly could not be detected by PCR, and the hly region could not be assembled from Illumina reads. In order to resolve this region, we sequenced this strain using single-molecule, real-time (SMRT) sequencing technology (Pacific Biosciences, CA, USA). The CLIP 1998/76801 complete genome (CC1; 2.84 Mb) was compared to the closely related F2365 complete genome (CC1; NCBI accession number NC_002973) as a reference. This showed that the LIPI-1 region had undergone an inversion of more than 40 kb (Fig. 2A). This large rearrangement split LIPI-1 into two parts with a concomitant loss of hly and partial truncation of the 5′ region of the adjacent mpl gene. Six open reading frames (ORFs) were inserted upstream of mpl in CLIP 1998/76801 compared to the sequence of F2365 and comprised genes encoding a transposition protein (tnsB) and a DNA invertase (hin), which are likely the cause of the rearrangement, as well as cadmium resistance genes (cadA and cadC) (Fig. 2A).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Comparison of the CLIP 1998/76801 and F2365 genomes. (A) Gene content of the LIPI-1 region in F2365 (GenBank accession number NC_002973) in comparison to the corresponding region in the nonhemolytic CLIP 1998/76801 strain, as indicated. LIPI-1 genes are highlighted in red. mpl is composed of 1,532 bp in F2365 but 1,133 bp in CLIP 1998/76801. (B) Gene content of the gshF region in F2365 in comparison to the corresponding region in CLIP 1998/76801. In panels A and B, genes that are present in CLIP 1998/76801 but absent in F2365 are indicated in orange. Genes encoding the transposition protein (tnsB), the DNA invertase (hin), and cadmium resistance (cadA and cadC) are indicated. (C) Global comparison of the F2365 and the CLIP 1998/76801 genomes. Positions of the eight copies of the transposable element are indicated in dark blue. Identity percentages (indicated by gray zones of variable intensities) between sequences were determined by nucleotide BLAST (55). Genome comparisons were performed using Easyfig, version 2.1 (56).

We confirmed that gshF is absent in CLIP 1998/76801, together with 12 other upstream and downstream genes related to sugar metabolism (Fig. 2B). These genes were replaced by 11 ORFs encoding a transposition protein (tnsB), a DNA invertase (hin), and cadmium resistance (cadA and cadC), similar to the genes inserted in the LIPI-1 region. In total, eight similar copies of this transposable element were found in the CLIP 1998/76801 genome, as well as many other large rearrangements and deletions (Fig. 2C). Similar transposable elements were detected in one Listeria ivanovii strain in the NCBI database (GenBank accession number KR780025.1; 99% nucleotide identity) and in 128 L. monocytogenes strains (>99.87% nucleotide similarity) of the 4,091 genome sequences available at the NRCL at the time of the study. These strains comprised 14.1% of all the CC1 strains (90/638, representing two distinct monophyletic groups within the phylogeny of CC1 [data not shown]) and all the CC59 strains (n = 38). No significant link of this element with food or clinical origins was found within CC1.

Assessment of hly and prfA transcription.

In order to test the effect of the identified mutations on hly and prfA transcription, quantitative reverse transcription-PCRs (qRT-PCRs) were performed for a representative set of nonhemolytic strains (one strain per type of loss-of-hemolysis mutation) (Table S1). All nonhemolytic strains showed prfA transcription levels equivalent to or higher than those of EGDe, except for strains CLIP 1998/75799 (PrfAI51*-LLON261* mutations) and CLIP 1998/77604 (PrfAT76* mutation), which showed no amplification, likely due to poor primer annealing (eight mismatches with the prfA-R primer) (Fig. S3). As expected, strains with an altered PrfA (amino acid substitution or truncation) showed no or extremely reduced hly transcription levels. These results show that for these strains the loss of hemolytic activity is due to prfA posttranscriptional events leading to the absence of PrfA activity. In the strain CLIP 2007/01406 (LLOG299V), hly was transcribed at a level similar to that in EGDe, whereas in CLIP 1989/13656 (LLOC484*), hly transcription was weaker.

In vitro characterization of the hlyG299V and hlyC484* mutations.

In order to characterize the functional impact of the G299V substitution (CLIP 2007/01406 and CLIP 2007/01014) and of the truncation at position 484 in LLO (CLIP 1989/13656), we introduced a plasmid containing either a wild-type hly gene (hlyWT) or a mutated version of this gene (hlyG299V or hlyC484*, encoding LLOG299V and LLOC484*, respectively) in an EGDΔhly strain. While EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT was hemolytic, EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V or EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* remained nonhemolytic, as assessed on Columbia horse blood agar plates. These results demonstrate that the hlyG299V and hlyC484* mutations are responsible for the absence of hemolytic activity in the strains CLIP 2007/01406, CLIP 2007/01014, and CLIP 1989/13656.

Western blot analyses of culture supernatants detected smaller amounts of LLO produced by EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V and EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* bacteria than by the WT EGD and EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT strains (Fig. 3A). qRT-PCR analyses showed that the hly transcription levels in both the EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V and EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* strains are comparable to the level observed in EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT although the level is slightly weaker in EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, the EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* mutant produced a shorter LLO protein than strains harboring the hlyWT, confirming that the premature stop codon identified in hly in the CLIP 1989/13656 strain leads to the production of a truncated LLO. The hlyN261* mutation (Fig. 1; Table S1) was not tested in vitro as this premature stop codon is upstream of the hlyC484* mutation, leading to an even shorter LLO.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Characterization of the G299V substitution in LLO and the truncated LLO at position 484. (A) Western blotting of the culture supernatants of EGD and EGDΔhly complemented or not with the pPL2 plasmid alone or containing the hlyWT, hlyG299V, or hlyC484* gene. LLO detection was performed by using LLO-specific antibodies, and InlC-specific antibodies were used as loading controls. (B) qRT-PCR quantification of hly transcripts produced in BHI broth at 37°C by the EGDΔhly strain complemented with the pPL2 plasmid alone or containing the hlyWT, hlyG299V, or hlyC484* gene. Each strain was tested at least three times using independent precultures. gyrB was used as a stable reference gene for normalization. Results are shown as fold change of hly expression relative to that in EGD (RQ, relative quantities). Each central bar represents the mean of at least three replications. Error bars indicate standard deviations from the means. (C) In vivo characterization of the hlyG299V and hlyC484* mutant strains compared to the hlyWT strain. Each BALB/c mouse was infected intravenously with 1 × 104 CFU. Animals were sacrificed 72 h after infection. Numbers of CFU per organ are shown for all tested strains. No bacteria could be recovered from the liver of mice infected with the EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V and EGDΔhly::pPL2 strains or from the spleen of mice infected with EGDΔhly::pPL2. Statistical analyses were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test, by comparing results with those of EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

Virulence of hlyG299V and hlyC484* mutants.

We finally assessed the virulence of the EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V and EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* complemented strains relative to that of the EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT and EGDΔhly::pPL2 strains upon intravenous injection in mice. The EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V and EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* strains were four orders of magnitude less abundant than the EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT strain in the liver and the spleen (Fig. 3C). This demonstrates that the virulence of L. monocytogenes expressing either LLOG299V or LLOC484* is strongly attenuated in vivo.

DISCUSSION

Virulence gene polymorphisms leading to L. monocytogenes attenuation have been previously described and have been associated with strains of lower pathogenic potential. The best characterized are those affecting the invasion-associated inlA gene, found in a large proportion (>25 to 30%) of lineage II food isolates but extremely rare among lineage I strains, which are more frequently associated with clinical cases (13, 21, 29, 30). Mutations leading to more radical L. monocytogenes virulence attenuation have also been characterized, particularly those affecting the prfA gene (3133), but their frequency and distribution across the L. monocytogenes population remained undetermined. Here, we examined the occurrence of loss-of-virulence mutations in L. monocytogenes by screening a wide and diverse panel of strains for hemolytic activity. Our data show that nonhemolytic L. monocytogenes mutants occur at low frequency (0.1%) and are phylogenetically diverse, including strains belonging to hypovirulent and hypervirulent clonal complexes (14). This indicates that the underlying mutational events are not linked to the genetic background of the strains.

The L. monocytogenes hemolytic phenotype depends on two essential virulence determinants, the central virulence regulator PrfA and LLO, encoded by prfA and hly, respectively. Indeed, all nonhemolytic strains identified in this study carried mutations in at least one of these genes. The large majority of nonhemolytic strains (56/60; 93.3%) carried prfA mutations (frameshifts, missense or nonsense nucleotide changes, or reversion of the stop codon into a glutamine codon). Although no PrfA activity could be detected and hly was not transcribed in these strains, prfA was transcribed at levels similar to the level in strain EGDe. This suggests that the loss of PrfA activity in these strains likely results from PrfA misfolding, instability, and/or inactivating amino acid substitution. Some inactivating amino acid substitutions in PrfA occurred in the β-roll, HTH motif, or C-terminal domain, in line with the critical role of these regions in PrfA activity (2527, 31). As PrfA is the major transcriptional regulator of the virulence genes of L. monocytogenes and is essential for its pathogenicity (23, 34), the virulence of PrfA strains is expected to be highly attenuated, as previously described (3133). The first L. monocytogenes strain naturally producing a C-terminally extended PrfA polypeptide (55 residues longer) was identified in this study and showed no PrfA activity and no hly transcription.

Nonhemolytic hly mutants with affected LLO activity were less frequent (5/60; 8.3%) in our study than strains with loss-of-hemolysis mutations in prfA. Our analysis identified for the first time a spontaneous amino acid substitution in LLO (hlyG299V) and premature stop codons in hly (hlyN261* and hlyC484*) leading to the loss of LLO activity. Lower quantities of LLO were detected in the culture supernatants of the EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V and EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* constructs than in the EGD and EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT strains. The quantities of hly transcripts were similar in the EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V and the EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT control strain, indicating that LLOG299V is likely less stable than WT LLO. In contrast, EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* showed a lower hly transcription level than that of WT hly, suggesting an impaired stability of the hlyC484* transcript. In vivo experiments confirmed that the nonhemolytic strains harboring the hlyG299V or hlyC484* mutation have strongly attenuated virulence in mice. In line with these results, only three nonhemolytic strains were isolated from human samples. Although we did not have access to the detailed clinical data of these patients (dating back to the 1980s and 1990s), one possibility would be that they were heavily immunocompromised, mirroring previous reports on isolation of the nonpathogenic L. monocytogenes relative Listeria innocua from immunosuppressed individuals (35).

One of the LLO-negative (LLO) strains (CLIP 1998/76801) underwent huge genomic rearrangements that likely caused the loss of hly and gshF, encoding a glutathione synthase reported as being required for PrfA activity (28). CLIP 1998/76801 is the only strain in our entire genome database (∼4,100 entries) that lacks gshF. Interestingly, each copy of the transposable element that likely caused the genomic rearrangements observed in this strain carried putative cadmium resistance determinants that could be advantageous in environments in which virulence determinants are not needed. Similar transposable elements were detected in monophyletic groups of CC1 and CC59 strains, suggesting that they have been horizontally transmitted in the L. monocytogenes population.

The predominance of PrfA mutants among the nonhemolytic strains could reflect the fact that prfA is a pleiotropic regulatory gene that controls the expression of a number of virulence determinants, the expression of which is known to entail a significant fitness cost under nonhost conditions (24). Our results show that, at 22°C, the majority of PrfA strains have a fitness level similar to that of EGDe, suggesting that the absence of PrfA activity does not impact L. monocytogenes fitness under nonpathogenic conditions. Nevertheless, reduced fitness was observed at 37°C (mammalian host temperature) compared to that of EGDeΔprfA. This result suggests that nonhemolytic strains are more adapted to a nonpathogenic lifestyle, independently of PrfA. Consistent with this, most of the nonhemolytic L. monocytogenes isolates were from nonclinical origins. The ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) estimated for prfA (dN/dS = 0.08892) and hly (dN/dS = 0.03674) using a data set of 100 genomes representative of L. monocytogenes phylogenetic diversity (14) confirmed that, similar to L. monocytogenes core genes (dN/dS = 0.05353, on average [21]), these genes are under purifying selection. Thus, any deleterious mutations affecting these genes tend to be eliminated from the L. monocytogenes population. The relatively low frequency of deleterious mutations in prfA and hly indicates that there might be a strong selection for L. monocytogenes to retain its virulence capacity (36). Our results also suggest that once strains lose their virulence capacity (e.g., due to a prfA mutation), other virulence genes may become irrelevant and prone to accumulate mutations, as observed in our PrfA/LLO and PrfA/GshF strains. Previous studies have already identified strains with multiple mutations occurring in several major virulence genes (20). Strains with virulence-attenuating mutations are therefore prone to enter into an evolutionary path toward obligate saprophytism. The L. monocytogenes phylogenomic clade comprises another pathogenic species, Listeria ivanovii, which contains a set of PrfA-regulated genes, as well as nonpathogenic species, some of which contain remnants thereof (e.g., Listeria seeligeri or L. innocua) (37, 38). While infrequent, spontaneous virulence-disabling mutations such as those described here could have been key initial events in the emergence and evolution of the L. monocytogenes-related nonpathogenic Listeria species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth media.

The 60 nonhemolytic L. monocytogenes isolates included in this study were identified among a collection of 57,820 L. monocytogenes strains collected between 1987 and 2008 by the French National Reference Centre for Listeria (NRCL) and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Listeria (WHOCCL) in the context of the epidemiological surveillance of listeriosis. This global collection included isolates of food (n = 36,630), clinical (n = 5,980), environmental (n = 3,647), veterinary (n = 1,713), and unknown (n = 9,850) origins. Isolates were revived by plating them onto Columbia agar, and single colonies were grown on Columbia agar slants. L. monocytogenes strains were routinely grown in BHI broth at 37°C, and Escherichia coli strains were grown at 37°C in LB broth or agar plates.

Phenotypic characterization of Listeria isolates.

Miniaturized enzymatic and sugar fermentation tests (API-Listeria identification microgallery; bioMérieux, France), in combination with the hemolytic activity assessment of strains, were used for phenotypic identification of Listeria species (39). Hemolytic activity was tested on Columbia horse blood agar plates (bioMérieux, France). L. monocytogenes CLIP 74910 and Listeria innocua CLIP 74915 were used as positive and negative controls of hemolysis, respectively.

Genome sequencing and analyses.

Genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Extraction kit (Qiagen, Denmark) and used for whole-genome sequencing on an Illumina NextSeq 500 (2 × 150 bp) platform (Illumina, CA, USA). Reads were trimmed with AlienTrimmer (40) to eliminate adapter sequences and discard reads with Phred scores of ≤20. De novo assembly of Illumina reads was performed using SPAdes Genome Assembler, version 3.1 (41). The complete genome of the CLIP 1998/76801 strain was obtained by PacBio RS II sequencing (Pacific Biosciences, CA, USA) using DNA purified with a Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, WI, USA). Genome annotation was performed using Prokka, version 1.11 (42).

PCR serogroups (12, 43), MLST profiles (13), and cgMLST profiles (21) were deduced from genome assemblies using the BIGSdb-L. monocytogenes platform (http://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/listeria) (21). Genome assemblies were made publicly available in the BIGSdb-L. monocytogenes platform (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

Assessment of prfA and hly evolutionary trends.

prfA and hly sequences were extracted from 100 genomes that were selected to represent the species diversity based on MLST and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing (14) and aligned using Muscle, version 3.8 (44). This data set included genomes from 13 food isolates, 45 human clinical isolates, 19 animal isolates, 1 environmental isolate, and 22 isolates of unknown origin. They comprised 41 genomes of lineage I, 53 of lineage II, 5 of lineage III, and 1 of lineage IV and represented 5 singletons and 34 clonal complexes based on MLST. No nonhemolytic strain was included in this analysis. Alignments were used to estimate the ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) in prfA and hly using the codeml program included in the PAML package, version 4.4 (45).

Assessment of PrfA activity.

PrfA activity was assessed by measuring the activity of PrfA-regulated plcB and hpt gene products as previously described (46, 47). For PlcB, lecithinase tests were performed in egg yolk BHI agar, and for Hpt, glucose-1-phosphate acidification tests were carried out in phenol red broth, in both cases with and without 0.5% (wt/vol) activated charcoal (Merck, NJ, USA). Medium supplementation with charcoal leads to the partial activation of PrfA, presumably due to sequestration of repressor substances from the culture medium. Three L. monocytogenes genotypes from strain P14 were used as controls: (i) a prfAWT strain characterized by an activatable PrfA phenotype (lack of PlcB and Hpt activity in normal medium and strong activity in charcoal-supplemented medium), (ii) a ΔprfA strain which remains negative for PlcB and Hpt activity in the presence of charcoal, and (iii) a constitutively activated prfA (prfA*) strain with strong PlcB and Hpt activity independent of charcoal supplementation (24, 46, 48).

RNA extractions.

Nonhemolytic strains and EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT, EGDΔhly::pPL2, EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V, and EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* constructs were cultured overnight on BHI agar at 37°C. One colony was used to inoculate 5 ml of BHI broth. After overnight growth at 37°C, 500 μl of culture was added to 10 ml of BHI broth, and the whole exponential-phase culture (at 37°C) was centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 5 min. The pellet was suspended with 400 μl of resuspension buffer (10% glucose, 12.5 mM Tris, 10 mM EDTA in nuclease-free water) and transferred to a lysing tube (containing 0.1 mm of ceramic breads, 500 μl of acid phenol, and 60 μl of 0.5 M EDTA). A Precellys 24 homogenizer (Bertin Instruments, France) was used at 6,500 rpm for 23 s two times (10-s break), and the resulting mixture was centrifuged at 14,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min. The upper aqueous phase was transferred into a tube containing 1 ml of TRIzol and 100 μl of chloroform, mixed by inversions, and centrifuged. The upper aqueous phase was transferred into a tube containing 200 μl of chloroform, mixed by inversions, and centrifuged. The upper aqueous phase was transferred into a storage tube (containing 650 μl of isopropanol and 65 μl of 3 M sodium acetate), mixed by inversions, precipitated for 20 min at −20°C, and centrifuged for 20 min. The supernatant was rinsed twice with 75% ethanol. The air-dried pellet was dissolved in 300 μl of nuclease-free water. RNA concentrations were measured with a DeNovix DS-11 spectrophotometer (DeNovix, DE, USA) and diluted to obtain 500 ng of RNA in 12.5 μl of nuclease-free water.

Quantification of hly and prfA transcripts by qRT-PCR.

For the qRT-PCRs, cDNAs were generated prior to quantitative PCRs (qPCRs). DNase treatment was performed with RNase-free DNase I (New England BioLabs, MA, USA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Briefly, 0.5 μl of RNAseOUT, 0.5 μl of DNase I, and 1.5 μl of 10× buffer were added to the 12.5 μl of diluted RNAs, followed by a final addition of 1.5 μl of 0.05 M EDTA. cDNAs were generated by reverse transcription using Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, CA, USA) and random hexamers for priming according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Briefly, 2 μl of 10 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), 2 μl of 2.5 μM random primers, and 3.5 μl of nuclease-free water were added to the 16.5 μl of the previously DNase-treated sample, and then 8 μl of 5× first-strand buffer, 4 μl of 0.1 M dithiothreitol (DTT), and 2 μl of nuclease-free water were added, followed by 0.5 μl of MMLV reverse transcriptase.

All quantitative PCRs were prepared using SYBR green real-time PCR master mixes and a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Each primer pair was used for separate reactions using PCR mixtures containing 1 μl of a 9 μM concentration of each primer (Table S2), 5 μl of SYBR mix, 1 μl of cDNA diluted at 1:5, and 3 μl of nuclease-free water. Real-time PCRs were carried out in MicroAmp Fast Optical 96-well reaction plates (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) using the following protocol: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s and primer annealing/elongation at 60°C for 1 min. Each strain was tested at least three times using independent precultures. gyrB was used as a stable reference gene for normalization. Results are shown as fold change of the target gene expression level relative to that of EGDe or EGD (relative quantities [RQ]), which was deduced from the cycle threshold (CT) values using the 2−ΔΔCT methodology.

Fitness studies.

The microbial growth of nonhemolytic strains, EGDe, EGD, and EGDeΔprfA was monitored over time in BHI broth at 22°C and 37°C using absorbance measurements (optical density at 600 nm [OD600]) through a Bioscreen C system (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd., Helsinki, Finland). Bacteria were first cultured overnight on BHI agar at 22°C or 37°C, and one colony was used to inoculate 5 ml of BHI broth. After overnight growth, the stationary-phase cultures were diluted to reach an OD600 of 0.1 and transferred into Bioscreen C 96-well plates. The OD600 values of noninoculated wells (blanks) were subtracted from those of inoculated ones to delete the background noise. Each strain was tested three times. Mean OD600 values per strain were used to calculate the areas under the curves over time. For this, data were fitted to parametric models (Gompertz, modified Gompertz, logistic, and Richards laws) using the gcFit function of the grofit R package, version 1.1.1-1 (49). The model that best fitted the data was selected by means of an Akaike information criterion (AIC) (50) and used to derive areas under the growth curves.

DNA manipulations and cloning.

We used a two-step cloning strategy to introduce the wild-type hly (hlyWT), hlyG299V, or hlyC484* genes in the L. monocytogenes strain EGDΔhly. First, we cloned separately the hlyWT, hlyG299V, and hlyC484* gene sequences into the Listeria integrative vector pPL2 (51). Primers used are listed in Table S2. To deliver plasmids into L. monocytogenes, Escherichia coli S17.1 (colistin and nalidixic acid sensitive) was transformed with the plasmids, followed by conjugation with L. monocytogenes EGDΔhly (colistin and nalidixic acid resistant). L. monocytogenes EGDΔhly bacteria were selected on 7 μg/ml chloramphenicol (bacteria containing the pPL2 derivatives), 10 μg/ml colicin, and 50 μg/ml nalidixic acid (selection of resistant L. monocytogenes versus sensitive E. coli bacteria). Since all our constructs were made on a similar EGD background, the PrfA* phenotype of EGD was not expected to have any impact on our results and conclusions.

Western blotting.

Protein extracts were obtained from EGD, EGDΔhly, EGDΔhly::pPL2, EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT, EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V, and EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484* as follows. Bacteria were grown overnight in BHI broth at 37°C. After centrifugation of bacterial cultures (30 min at 2,151 × g), all proteins of the supernatant were precipitated by using trichloroacetic acid (20%) and washed using acetone. Proteins were then separated by SDS-PAGE (8% acrylamide gel and 3.9% stacking gel) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride transfer membrane (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). The membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C with a blocking buffer containing dried milk (5%), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 1%), and Tween (0.1%) and washed with PBS (1%) and Tween (0.1%). The membrane was then incubated first with a polyclonal anti-LLO (52, 53) or anti-InlC antibody (54) (1/20,000; 1 h at room temperature) and second with an anti-rabbit antibody (1/3,000; 1 h at room temperature). The membrane was washed with PBS (1%) and Tween (0.1%) between each incubation step with antibodies. Antibody-antigen interactions were revealed using a SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fischer Scientific, MA, USA).

Animal studies.

The virulence of L. monocytogenes strains EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT, EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyG299V, EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyC484*, and EGDΔhly::pPL2 was assessed in vivo. BALB/c mice were infected via the intravenous route with 1 × 104 CFU per animal. At 72 h postinfection, mice were sacrificed for spleen and liver dissection. CFU were enumerated by plating dilutions of the whole homogenized organs onto BHI plates. Statistical analyses were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test, by comparing the results with those of EGDΔhly::pPL2-hlyWT. All procedures were in agreement with the guidelines of the European Commission for the handling of laboratory animals, directive 86/609/EEC, and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institut Pasteur, as well as by the ethical committee of Paris Centre et Sud under the number 2010-0020.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge Anne Morvan, Thomas Cantinelli, Nathalie Tessaud-Rita and Laetitia Bellon for their help in strain collection and isolation at the National Reference Centre for Listeria. We thank Pascale Cossart for providing antibodies against LLO and the Institut Pasteur P2M platform for genome sequencing.

Work in M.L.'s laboratory was supported by Institut Pasteur, Inserm, LabEx IBEID, the European Research Council, and Santé Publique France. Work in J.A.V.-B.'s laboratory was supported by the Wellcome Trust (program grant WT074020MA) and partially by core Roslin Institute funding from BBSRC (BB/J004227/1).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00541-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Freitag NE, Port GC, Miner MD. 2009. Listeria monocytogenes—from saprophyte to intracellular pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:623–628. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cossart P. 2011. Illuminating the landscape of host-pathogen interactions with the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:19484–19491. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112371108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Portnoy DA, Jacks PS, Hinrichs DJ. 1988. Role of hemolysin for the intracellular growth of Listeria monocytogenes. J Exp Med 167:1459–1471. doi: 10.1084/jem.167.4.1459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hamon MA, Ribet D, Stavru F, Cossart P. 2012. Listeriolysin O: the Swiss army knife of Listeria. Trends Microbiol 20:360–368. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vazquez-Boland JA, Dominguez-Bernal G, Gonzalez-Zorn B, Kreft J, Goebel W. 2001. Pathogenicity islands and virulence evolution in Listeria. Microbes Infect 3:571–584. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01413-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leimeister-Wachter M, Haffner C, Domann E, Goebel W, Chakraborty T. 1990. Identification of a gene that positively regulates expression of listeriolysin, the major virulence factor of Listeria monocytogenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:8336–8340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chakraborty T, Leimeister-Wachter M, Domann E, Hartl M, Goebel W, Nichterlein T, Notermans S. 1992. Coordinate regulation of virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes requires the product of the prfA gene. J Bacteriol 174:568–574. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.2.568-574.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Piffaretti JC, Kressebuch H, Aeschbacher M, Bille J, Bannerman E, Musser JM, Selander RK, Rocourt J. 1989. Genetic characterization of clones of the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes causing epidemic disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:3818–3822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wiedmann M, Bruce JL, Keating C, Johnson AE, McDonough PL, Batt CA. 1997. Ribotypes and virulence gene polymorphisms suggest three distinct Listeria monocytogenes lineages with differences in pathogenic potential. Infect Immun 65:2707–2716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Orsi RH, den Bakker HC, Wiedmann M. 2011. Listeria monocytogenes lineages: Genomics, evolution, ecology, and phenotypic characteristics. Int J Med Microbiol 301:79–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seeliger HPR, Jones D. 1986. Genus Listeria, p 1235–1245. In Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG (ed), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 2. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Doumith M, Buchrieser C, Glaser P, Jacquet C, Martin P. 2004. Differentiation of the major Listeria monocytogenes serovars by multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol 42:3819–3822. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3819-3822.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ragon M, Wirth T, Hollandt F, Lavenir R, Lecuit M, Le Monnier A, Brisse S. 2008. A new perspective on Listeria monocytogenes evolution. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000146. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maury MM, Tsai YH, Charlier C, Touchon M, Chenal-Francisque V, Leclercq A, Criscuolo A, Gaultier C, Roussel S, Brisabois A, Disson O, Rocha EP, Brisse S, Lecuit M. 2016. Uncovering Listeria monocytogenes hypervirulence by harnessing its biodiversity. Nat Genet 48:308–313. doi: 10.1038/ng.3501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tabouret M, De Rycke J, Audurier A, Poutrel B. 1991. Pathogenicity of Listeria monocytogenes isolates in immunocompromised mice in relation to listeriolysin production. J Med Microbiol 34:13–18. doi: 10.1099/00222615-34-1-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Allerberger F, Dierich M, Petranyi G, Lalic M, Bubert A. 1997. Nonhemolytic strains of Listeria monocytogenes detected in milk products using VIDAS immunoassay kit. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 200:189–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moreno LZ, Paixao R, de Gobbi DD, Raimundo DC, Porfida Ferreira TS, Micke Moreno A, Hofer E, dos Reis CM, Matte GR, Matte MH. 2014. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of atypical Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua isolated from swine slaughterhouses and meat markets. Biomed Res Int 2014:742032. doi: 10.1155/2014/742032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Palerme JS, Pan PC, Parsons CT, Kathariou S, Ward TJ, Jacob ME. 2016. Isolation and characterization of atypical Listeria monocytogenes associated with a canine urinary tract infection. J Vet Diagn Invest 28:604–607. doi: 10.1177/1040638716661381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Burall LS, Grim C, Gopinath G, Laksanalamai P, Datta AR. 2014. Whole-genome sequencing identifies an atypical Listeria monocytogenes strain isolated from pet foods. Genome Announc 2:e01243-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01243-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Roche SM, Grepinet O, Kerouanton A, Ragon M, Leclercq A, Temoin S, Schaeffer B, Skorski G, Mereghetti L, Le Monnier A, Velge P. 2012. Polyphasic characterization and genetic relatedness of low-virulence and virulent Listeria monocytogenes isolates. BMC Microbiol 12:304. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moura A, Criscuolo A, Pouseele H, Maury MM, Leclercq A, Tarr C, Bjorkman JT, Dallman T, Reimer A, Enouf V, Larsonneur E, Carleton H, Bracq-Dieye H, Katz LS, Jones L, Touchon M, Tourdjman M, Walker M, Stroika S, Cantinelli T, Chenal-Francisque V, Kucerova Z, Rocha EP, Nadon C, Grant K, Nielsen EM, Pot B, Gerner-Smidt P, Lecuit M, Brisse S. 2016. Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes. Nat Microbiol 2:16185. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Johansson J, Mandin P, Renzoni A, Chiaruttini C, Springer M, Cossart P. 2002. An RNA thermosensor controls expression of virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes. Cell 110:551–561. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00905-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Scortti M, Monzo HJ, Lacharme-Lora L, Lewis DA, Vazquez-Boland JA. 2007. The PrfA virulence regulon. Microbes Infect 9:1196–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vasanthakrishnan RB, de Las Heras A, Scortti M, Deshayes C, Colegrave N, Vazquez-Boland JA. 2015. PrfA regulation offsets the cost of Listeria virulence outside the host. Environ Microbiol 17:4566–4579. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vega Y, Rauch M, Banfield MJ, Ermolaeva S, Scortti M, Goebel W, Vazquez-Boland JA. 2004. New Listeria monocytogenes prfA* mutants, transcriptional properties of PrfA* proteins and structure-function of the virulence regulator PrfA. Mol Microbiol 52:1553–1565. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04052.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Herler M, Bubert A, Goetz M, Vega Y, Vazquez-Boland JA, Goebel W. 2001. Positive selection of mutations leading to loss or reduction of transcriptional activity of PrfA, the central regulator of Listeria monocytogenes virulence. J Bacteriol 183:5562–5570. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.19.5562-5570.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Deshayes C, Bielecka MK, Cain RJ, Scortti M, de las Heras A, Pietras Z, Luisi BF, Nunez Miguel R, Vazquez-Boland JA. 2012. Allosteric mutants show that PrfA activation is dispensable for vacuole escape but required for efficient spread and Listeria survival in vivo. Mol Microbiol 85:461–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08121.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reniere ML, Whiteley AT, Hamilton KL, John SM, Lauer P, Brennan RG, Portnoy DA. 2015. Glutathione activates virulence gene expression of an intracellular pathogen. Nature 517:170–173. doi: 10.1038/nature14029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jacquet C, Doumith M, Gordon JI, Martin PM, Cossart P, Lecuit M. 2004. A molecular marker for evaluating the pathogenic potential of foodborne Listeria monocytogenes. J Infect Dis 189:2094–2100. doi: 10.1086/420853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nightingale KK, Windham K, Martin KE, Yeung M, Wiedmann M. 2005. Select Listeria monocytogenes subtypes commonly found in foods carry distinct nonsense mutations in inlA, leading to expression of truncated and secreted internalin A, and are associated with a reduced invasion phenotype for human intestinal epithelial cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8764–8772. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8764-8772.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Velge P, Herler M, Johansson J, Roche SM, Temoin S, Fedorov AA, Gracieux P, Almo SC, Goebel W, Cossart P. 2007. A naturally occurring mutation K220T in the pleiotropic activator PrfA of Listeria monocytogenes results in a loss of virulence due to decreasing DNA-binding affinity. Microbiology 153:995–1005. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/002238-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Miner MD, Port GC, Bouwer HG, Chang JC, Freitag NE. 2008. A novel prfA mutation that promotes Listeria monocytogenes cytosol entry but reduces bacterial spread and cytotoxicity. Microb Pathog 45:273–281. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2008.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rupp S, Aguilar-Bultet L, Jagannathan V, Guldimann C, Drogemuller C, Pfarrer C, Vidondo B, Seuberlich T, Frey J, Oevermann A. 2015. A naturally occurring prfA truncation in a Listeria monocytogenes field strain contributes to reduced replication and cell-to-cell spread. Vet Microbiol 179:91–101. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.de las Heras A, Cain RJ, Bielecka MK, Vazquez-Boland JA. 2011. Regulation of Listeria virulence: PrfA master and commander. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Perrin M, Bemer M, Delamare C. 2003. Fatal case of Listeria innocua bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 41:5308–5309. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5308-5309.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bruno JC Jr, Freitag NE. 2011. Listeria monocytogenes adapts to long-term stationary phase survival without compromising bacterial virulence. FEMS Microbiol Lett 323:171–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02373.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.den Bakker HC, Cummings CA, Ferreira V, Vatta P, Orsi RH, Degoricija L, Barker M, Petrauskene O, Furtado MR, Wiedmann M. 2010. Comparative genomics of the bacterial genus Listeria: genome evolution is characterized by limited gene acquisition and limited gene loss. BMC Genomics 11:688. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Orsi RH, Wiedmann M. 2016. Characteristics and distribution of Listeria spp., including Listeria species newly described since 2009. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5273–5287. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7552-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fujisawa T, Mori M. 1994. Evaluation of media for determining hemolytic activity and that of API Listeria system for identifying strains of Listeria monocytogenes. J Clin Microbiol 32:1127–1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Criscuolo A, Brisse S. 2013. AlienTrimmer: a tool to quickly and accurately trim off multiple short contaminant sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. Genomics 102:500–506. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Leclercq A, Chenal-Francisque V, Dieye H, Cantinelli T, Drali R, Brisse S, Lecuit M. 2011. Characterization of the novel Listeria monocytogenes PCR serogrouping profile IVb-v1. Int J Food Microbiol 147:74–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24:1586–1591. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ermolaeva S, Karpova T, Novella S, Wagner M, Scortti M, Tartakovskii I, Vazquez-Boland JA. 2003. A simple method for the differentiation of Listeria monocytogenes based on induction of lecithinase activity by charcoal. Int J Food Microbiol 82:87–94. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00399-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chico-Calero I, Suarez M, Gonzalez-Zorn B, Scortti M, Slaghuis J, Goebel W, European Listeria Genome Consortium, Vazquez-Boland JA. 2002. Hpt, a bacterial homolog of the microsomal glucose-6-phosphate translocase, mediates rapid intracellular proliferation in Listeria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:431–436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012363899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ermolaeva S, Novella S, Vega Y, Ripio MT, Scortti M, Vazquez-Boland JA. 2004. Negative control of Listeria monocytogenes virulence genes by a diffusible autorepressor. Mol Microbiol 52:601–611. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kahm M, Hasenbrink G, Lichtenberg-Frate H, Ludwig J, Kschischo M. 2010. grofit: fitting biological growth curves with R. J Stat Softw 33:1–21. doi: 10.18637/jss.v033.i07.20808728 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19:716–723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lauer P, Chow MY, Loessner MJ, Portnoy DA, Calendar R. 2002. Construction, characterization, and use of two Listeria monocytogenes site-specific phage integration vectors. J Bacteriol 184:4177–4186. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.15.4177-4186.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gouin E, Dehoux P, Mengaud J, Kocks C, Cossart P. 1995. iactA of Listeria ivanovii, although distantly related to Listeria monocytogenes actA, restores actin tail formation in an L. monocytogenes actA mutant. Infect Immun 63:2729–2737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ribet D, Hamon M, Gouin E, Nahori MA, Impens F, Neyret-Kahn H, Gevaert K, Vandekerckhove J, Dejean A, Cossart P. 2010. Listeria monocytogenes impairs SUMOylation for efficient infection. Nature 464:1192–1195. doi: 10.1038/nature08963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Archambaud C, Gouin E, Pizarro-Cerda J, Cossart P, Dussurget O. 2005. Translation elongation factor EF-Tu is a target for Stp, a serine-threonine phosphatase involved in virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol Microbiol 56:383–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04551.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES