Skip to main content
mSphere logoLink to mSphere
. 2017 Nov 1;2(6):e00370-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00370-17

Imaging the Antistaphylococcal Activity of CATH-2: Mechanism of Attack and Regulation of Inflammatory Response

Viktoria A F Schneider a, Maarten Coorens a, Johanna L M Tjeerdsma-van Bokhoven a, George Posthuma b, Albert van Dijk a, Edwin J A Veldhuizen a, Henk P Haagsman a,
Editor: Paul D Feyc
PMCID: PMC5663982  PMID: 29104934

Due to the high use of antibiotics in both human and veterinary settings, many bacteria have become resistant to those antibiotics that we so heavily rely on. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is one of these difficult-to-treat resistant pathogens for which novel antimicrobial therapies will be required in the near future. One novel approach could be the utilization of naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides, such as chicken CATH-2, which have been show to act against a wide variety of bacteria. However, before these peptides can be used clinically, more knowledge of their functions and mechanisms of action is required. In this study, we used live imaging and electron microscopy to visualize in detail how CATH-2 kills S. aureus, and we investigated how CATH-2 affects immune activation by S. aureus. Together, these results give a better understanding of how CATH-2 kills S. aureus and what the potential immunological consequences of this killing can be.

KEYWORDS: Staphylococcus aureus, antimicrobial peptides, cathelicidins, electron microscopy, host defense peptides, inflammation, live imaging, macrophages

ABSTRACT

Chicken cathelicidin-2 (CATH-2) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial host defense peptide (HDP) that may serve as a paradigm for the development of new antimicrobial agents. While previous studies have elucidated the mechanism by which CATH-2 kills Escherichia coli, its mode of action against Gram-positive bacteria remains to be determined. In this study, we explored the underlying antibacterial mechanism of CATH-2 against a methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus and the effect of CATH-2-mediated S. aureus killing on immune activation. Visualization of the antimicrobial activity of CATH-2 against S. aureus with live-imaging confocal microscopy demonstrated that CATH-2 directly binds the bacteria, which is followed by membrane permeabilization and cell shrinkage. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies further showed that CATH-2 initiated pronounced morphological changes of the membrane (mesosome formation) and ribosomal structures (clustering) in a dose-dependent manner. Immunolabeling of these sections demonstrated that CATH-2 binds and passes the bacterial membrane at subminimal bactericidal concentrations (sub-MBCs). Furthermore, competition assays and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) analysis provided evidence that CATH-2 directly interacts with lipoteichoic acid and cardiolipin. Finally, stimulation of macrophages with S. aureus and CATH-2 showed that CATH-2 not only kills S. aureus but also has the potential to limit S. aureus-induced inflammation at or above the MBC. Taken together, it is concluded that at sub-MBCs, CATH-2 perturbs the bacterial membrane and subsequently enters the cell and binds intracellular S. aureus components, while at or above the MBC, CATH-2 causes disruption of membrane integrity and inhibits S. aureus-induced macrophage activation.

IMPORTANCE Due to the high use of antibiotics in both human and veterinary settings, many bacteria have become resistant to those antibiotics that we so heavily rely on. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is one of these difficult-to-treat resistant pathogens for which novel antimicrobial therapies will be required in the near future. One novel approach could be the utilization of naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides, such as chicken CATH-2, which have been show to act against a wide variety of bacteria. However, before these peptides can be used clinically, more knowledge of their functions and mechanisms of action is required. In this study, we used live imaging and electron microscopy to visualize in detail how CATH-2 kills S. aureus, and we investigated how CATH-2 affects immune activation by S. aureus. Together, these results give a better understanding of how CATH-2 kills S. aureus and what the potential immunological consequences of this killing can be.

INTRODUCTION

The extensive use of antibiotics over past years has led to an increase in the number of difficult-to-treat antibiotic-resistant pathogens (13). In the search for novel anti-infective therapies against these pathogens, host defense peptides (HDPs) have been suggested as potential candidates (4). HDPs are small effector molecules of the innate host defense system and have been shown to be crucial in the protection against various infections (57). Their described functions range from broad-spectrum direct antimicrobial activity (8) to immunomodulatory activities, such as neutralization of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (9) and enhancement of DNA-induced Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation (10, 11).

Chicken cathelicidin-2 (CATH-2) is an HDP with strong antimicrobial potential (12). This 26-amino-acid peptide is highly cationic and amphipathic, with salt-insensitive antibacterial activity against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (13, 14). In addition, CATH-2 has a proline-induced kink that was demonstrated to play an important role in the biological activity of the peptide (12, 15). Furthermore, CATH-2 exhibits several immunomodulatory properties, such as the neutralization of LPS and enhancement of DNA-induced macrophage activation (10, 16).

So far, various different antimicrobial mechanisms have been described for different HDPs, including membrane disruption or killing by inhibition of important cell functions (protein folding and nucleic acid and protein synthesis) (8, 17, 18). Recently, we visualized and characterized the bactericidal effects of CATH-2 on Escherichia coli and demonstrated that CATH-2 has distinctive effects on Gram-negative bacterial membranes and intracellular contents at concentrations that do not immediately kill the bacteria (19). In addition, the killing of E. coli by CATH-2 was shown to be immunologically silent, preventing the inflammatory response against neutralized bacteria (20). However, the mechanism of action of CATH-2 against Gram-positive bacteria has not been studied yet. This study focuses on the antibacterial activity of CATH-2 against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). By using different imaging techniques, such as live-imaging confocal microscopy and (immuno-)transmission electron microscopy [(immuno-)TEM], the antibacterial actions of CATH-2 were visualized and characterized. With these techniques, we observed that at subminimal bactericidal concentrations (sub-MBCs), CATH-2 already enters the bacteria and induces membrane ruffling and intracellular morphological changes, including ribosomal structural changes, while at or above the MBC, CATH-2 binds and permeabilizes the S. aureus membrane. Furthermore, lipoteichoic acid (LTA) and cardiolipin were found to directly interact with CATH-2 through ionic interaction, suggesting these could be the initial targets of the peptide on the bacterial surface. Finally, analysis of macrophage activation showed that CATH-2 not only kills S. aureus but also dampens S. aureus-induced macrophage activation at or above the MBC compared to its effects at sub-MBCs.

RESULTS

CATH-2 rapidly kills S. aureus.

The bactericidal activity of CATH-2 against S. aureus was assessed by colony-counting assays. The MBC of CATH-2 against S. aureus (at 2 × 106 CFU/ml) was 5 µM (data not shown). Additional killing kinetics demonstrated that the peptide rapidly kills S. aureus, with 10 µM CATH-2 killing all bacteria within 10 min (Fig. 1). Due to the different experimental setup compared to a conventional colony-counting assay, the MBC was 1.25 µM, showing complete bacterial killing at 60 min. While lower peptide concentrations were able to hamper bacterial growth, bacteria recovered and started to regrow after 60 min.

FIG 1 .

FIG 1 

CATH-2 rapidly kills S. aureus. S. aureus was incubated at 37°C with CATH-2 at the indicated concentrations, and aliquots were serially diluted and spread plated at 1, 5, 10, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min. After 16 h at 37°C, viable bacteria were counted. Data represent three independent measurements (mean values ± standard errors of the means [SEM]).

CATH-2 targets the septum and permeabilizes the bacterial membrane.

To visualize the interaction between CATH-2 and S. aureus, live imaging with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled CATH-2 was performed. This showed that the peptide preferentially binds to the septum, as indicated by higher local fluorescence intensities (Fig. 2A; Movie S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). This was followed by permeabilization of the bacteria, as observed by propidium iodide (PI) staining of the bacterial DNA. Simultaneously with the permeabilization, bacterial shrinkage occurred. Compared to the size of the cells at the start of the experiment (0 s), peptide treatment caused 0.15-µm shrinkage of the cells at 807 s (Fig. 2A). Single-cell analysis was carried out to determine fluorescence intensity levels and showed first CATH-2 binding, followed after a few minutes by intracellular PI staining (Fig. 2B). In addition, heat intensity plots confirmed the preferential binding of the peptide at the bacterial septum (Fig. 2C).

FIG 2 .

FIG 2 

Time-lapse imaging demonstrates binding of CATH-2 to S. aureus and permeabilization of membranes. (A) Peptide binding (green), entry of PI (red), and cell shrinkage (differential inference contrast [DIC]) are shown at various time points. Bars = 1 µm. (B) Fluorescence intensities of FITC–CATH-2 (0.5 µM) and PI (2.5 µM) were measured in a dividing cell (shown as left and right cell). (C) Heat intensity plots demonstrate localization of FITC–CATH-2 and PI.

MOVIE S1 

CATH-2 instantly binds to the bacterial septum and permeabilizes the membrane. S. aureus live imaging was performed using 0.5 µM FITC–CATH-2 and 2.5 µM PI. DIC, FITC-labeled CATH-2 (green fluorescence), PI (red fluorescence), and merged channels are shown. One representative cell is shown. Bars = 500 nm. Download MOVIE S1, MOV file, 4 MB (4.1MB, mov) .

Copyright © 2017 Schneider et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

MOVIE S2 

CATH-2 permeabilizes multiple S. aureus cells. Live imaging with 0.5 μM FITC-labeled CATH-2 (green) and 2.5 μM PI (red). Bars = 1 µm. Download MOVIE S2, MOV file, 2.9 MB (2.9MB, mov) .

Copyright © 2017 Schneider et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

CATH-2 causes membrane ruffling and ribosome clustering.

The concentration-dependent effects of CATH-2 were determined by performing TEM studies. Representative pictures of the observed morphological changes at each CATH-2 concentration are shown in Fig. 3A to F, while quantification of the morphological changes is shown in Fig. 3G to J. At the lowest concentration used (2.5 µM), the peptidoglycan layers became fuzzy and the membrane started to ruffle. Furthermore, structural changes of the ribosomes were observed compared to the ribosome structure of the untreated control cells (Fig. 3B and G to J). At 5 µM and 10 µM, 20% and 40% of the bacteria showed major membrane ruffling, respectively, as well as minor ribosome clustering (Fig. 3C, D, H, and I). Additionally, at 10 µM, CATH-2 induced the dissociation of small bacterial fragments, which became larger and thicker at higher concentrations (Fig. 3J). At and above the MBC (≥40 µM), pronounced effects on the cell wall were observed, with major invaginations of the membrane (Fig. 3H), while intracellular ribosomal clustering also became more dense (Fig. 3I). Taken together, these results suggest that CATH-2 both attacks the membrane and alters intracellular morphology.

FIG 3 .

FIG 3 

TEM imaging shows CATH-2-induced morphological changes of S. aureus. (A to F) Two representative images each are shown for results at concentrations of 0 µM (A), 2.5 µM (B), 5 µM (C), 10 µM (D), 40 µM (E), and 80 µM (F). (G to J) Categorization of morphological changes for peptidoglycan layer (G), membrane ruffling (H), ribosomal changes (I), and dissociated fragments (J). Bars = 100 nm.

CATH-2 binds the bacterial membrane and enters S. aureus at sub-MBCs.

To obtain more insights on the mechanism of action of CATH-2 against S. aureus, immunogold labeling of the TEM sections with a CATH-2-specific antibody was performed (Fig. 4A to F). Interestingly, at a concentration as low as 2.5 µM, considerable numbers of gold particles were detected intracellularly, and this accumulation increased significantly at higher peptide concentrations. In addition, at 2.5 μM, binding of CATH-2 to the peptidoglycan layer and the membrane was observed (Fig. 4A and F). With increasing CATH-2 concentrations, increased binding of the peptide to the membrane was observed, with a higher number of gold particles on the membranes than on the peptidoglycan layer (Fig. 4F). At 10 µM, the number of intracellular gold particles peaked (19.1 gold particles/µm2), with slightly lower intracellular numbers observed at higher CATH-2 concentrations (11.8 and 13.6 gold particles/µm2 for 40 and 80 µM, respectively) (Fig. 4C to F). At and above the MBC (≥40 µM), high numbers of gold particles were also detectable on dissociated fragments, which were present throughout the section (Fig. 4D and E, third images). These fragments are most likely cytosolic remnants released upon membrane disruption, which could explain why lower numbers of intracellular gold particles were observed at 40 µM and 80 µM than at 10 µM. Taken together, these electron microscopy studies demonstrated that already at sub-MBCs, CATH-2 binds to the bacterial membrane and localizes intracellularly, where it induces ribosomal changes and lamellar mesosome-like structures.

FIG 4 .

FIG 4 

Localization of CATH-2 determined with immunogold labeling and quantification of gold particles (black arrows). (A to E) For each peptide concentration, two representative TEM images of S. aureus cells are shown. Peptide concentrations were 2.5 µM (A), 5 µM (B), 10 µM (C), 40 µM (D), and 80 µM (E). (D and E) The third images show gold particles on dissociated fragments when peptide concentrations at and above the MBC (≥40 µM) were used. Bars = 100 nm. (F) The number of gold particles per µm2 is categorized as intracellular or associated with either the membrane or the peptidoglycan layer. The data are mean values ± SEM. *, significant difference from the result for 2.5 µM (P < 0.001); #, significant difference from the result for 5 µM (P < 0.001). All peptide-treated samples were corrected for background staining.

CATH-2 interacts with LTA and cardiolipin.

To determine the potential interaction partners of CATH-2 on the bacterial cell wall, competition assays were performed in combination with different purified cell wall components. Peptidoglycan, LTA, and cardiolipin were preincubated in different ratios with CATH-2, after which the antibacterial activity of CATH-2 against S. aureus was tested. LTA and cardiolipin both strongly inhibited CATH-2-mediated S. aureus killing, with inhibition occurring at a ratio as low as 0.5:1 (Fig. 5A and B). In contrast, prior incubation of CATH-2 with peptidoglycan only showed a weak reduction in the killing activity of the peptide (Fig. 5C), which corresponds with our previous findings in TEM experiments, where relatively little binding of CATH-2 to the peptidoglycan layer was observed. To confirm that CATH-2 directly interacts with LTA and cardiolipin, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) analysis was performed. This showed that indeed CATH-2 directly bound LTA and cardiolipin. LTA was bound with an initial dissociation constant (Kd) of 2.15 ± 1.15 nM (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]) (Fig. 6A; Table 1), and cardiolipin was bound with an initial Kd of 72.1 ± 57.1 nM (Fig. 6B; Table 1). Both interactions were enthalpy driven and showed reductions in entropy, which suggests that binding is caused by ionic interaction between the cationic CATH-2 and negative charges on LTA and cardiolipin.

FIG 5 .

FIG 5 

LTA and cardiolipin inhibit CATH-2-induced killing of S. aureus. CATH-2 was preincubated with various ratios of lipoteichoic acid from S. aureus (LTA-SA) (A), cardiolipin (B), and peptidoglycan from S. aureus (PG-SA) (C) for 1 h at 37°C. Then, mixtures were incubated with S. aureus for 3 h at 37°C, after which bacteria were serially diluted and spread plated on TSA plates. Viable colonies were counted after 16 h. One representative value per compound is demonstrated (n = 3).

FIG 6 .

FIG 6 

CATH-2 binds LTA and cardiolipin. Analysis of ITC titration of CATH-2 into S. aureus LTA (A) or cardiolipin (B) solution. Images depict representative titrations for n = 2 experiments. Kd values are the mean values ± SEM for n = 2 experiments.

TABLE 1 .

Affinity, enthalpy changes, and entropy changes for the interaction between CATH-2 and LTA or cardiolipin as determined by ITC

Parametera Mean value ± SEM for:
Cardiolipin LTA
Kd (nM) 72.1 ± 57.1 2.15 ± 1.15
ΔH (kJ/mol) −51.2 ± 3.3 −106 ± 46.4
ΔS (J/mol × K) −33.7 ± 2.1 −193 ± 163
a

Kd, dissociation constant, measure of affinity; ΔH, change in enthalpy; ΔS, change in entropy.

CATH-2 inhibits S. aureus-induced macrophage activation at and above the MBC.

Recently, it was shown that CATH-2 “silently kills” E. coli; i.e., when CATH-2 kills E. coli, it also inhibits macrophage activation against the killed E. coli (20). To determine whether a similar effect also occurs upon killing of S. aureus, macrophages were stimulated for 2 h with live or heat-killed S. aureus in the presence or absence of various concentrations of CATH-2, after which tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) release was determined. Stimulation of macrophages with live S. aureus and low CATH-2 concentrations (0.02 to 0.04 μM) resulted in an increase in TNF-α release (Fig. 7A). However, when the concentration of CATH-2 was further increased, the TNF-α release was reduced back to initial (0 μM CATH-2) levels. Stimulation of macrophages with heat-killed S. aureus resulted in a gradual reduction of TNF-α release at higher peptide concentrations, with significant inhibition between 0.31 and 2.5 μM (Fig. 7B). In addition, as these experiments were performed in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) plus 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), the antimicrobial activity of CATH-2 was assessed under the same conditions, which showed a dose-dependent killing pattern with an MBC of 1.25 μM, which corresponds to the concentration at which CATH-2 is able to inhibit the macrophage activation by live S. aureus cells back to control levels (Fig. 7C). Together, these experiments demonstrate the potential of CATH-2 to dampen S. aureus-induced macrophage activation when the bacteria are killed.

FIG 7 .

FIG 7 

Macrophage activation by CATH-2-treated S. aureus. (A and B) J774.A1 macrophages were stimulated with 3 × 107 CFU/ml S. aureus, either live (A) or heat killed (B), for 2 h in the presence or absence of indicated CATH-2 concentrations in DMEM + 10% FCS at 37°C, after which TNF-α release was determined by ELISA. (C) Colony count assay to determine S. aureus viability. Incubation of 3 × 107 CFU/ml S. aureus for 2 h in DMEM + 10% FCS at 37°C in the presence or absence of indicated CATH-2 concentrations, after which bacteria were spread plated to determine viability after overnight incubation. Mean values ± SEM for n ≥ 3 experiments are shown. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; <<, lower than detection limit.

DISCUSSION

Previously, we demonstrated the antibacterial mode of action of CATH-2 on E. coli (19). However, in order to develop new broad-spectrum cathelicidin-based antibacterial compounds, both bacterial classes should be studied, as the mode of action against Gram-negative bacteria might not resemble the mode of action against Gram-positive bacteria. The present study demonstrates for the first time the antibacterial mode of action of chicken CATH-2 against Gram-positive bacteria. On the basis of various imaging methods, our data indicated that CATH-2 binds to and perturbs the membrane, with sub-MBCs of CATH-2 already leading to cytosolic peptide localization and morphological changes of ribosomes.

CATH-2 is an important host defense peptide of the avian immune system and was shown to exhibit antibacterial activity against different bacterial pathogens (e.g., Salmonella, extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL]-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Bacillus, and Campylobacter) (12, 2123). Furthermore, earlier studies demonstrated that CATH-2 rapidly kills Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and E. coli (12). These results are in line with the current findings of CATH-2 killing S. aureus within 10 min. Additionally, this study demonstrated that bacteria incubated with low peptide concentrations were initially suppressed in their survival but recovered after 60 min and efficiently replicated again.

To elucidate the mechanism of action of CATH-2 against S. aureus, live-cell imaging was performed. Our data demonstrated the real-time binding of CATH-2 to the bacteria, in particular the bacterial septa, which was followed by cell shrinkage and membrane permeabilization. The preferred binding of HDPs to the bacterial septa has been observed previously (2426) and could be the result of a higher local concentration of cardiolipin, which we observed was a direct interaction partner for CATH-2. To date only one Gram-positive bacterium has been used to study the real-time attack of an antimicrobial HDP. In that study, Barns and Weisshaar demonstrated that LL-37, the only human cathelicidin, causes cell shrinking and membrane permeabilization of Bacillus subtilis (27). Bacterial shrinkage was suggested to occur due to a disorder of turgor pressure and membrane potential, induced by membrane permeabilization. These results are in line with our current findings and similar to those of other experiments by our group showing the permeabilization and shrinkage of Bacillus globigii and Bacillus subtilis during CATH-2 exposure (unpublished data).

Our TEM studies showed that at a low sub-MBC (2.5 µM) of CATH-2, numerous morphological changes took place, which became more pronounced with increasing concentrations. Two main effects of CATH-2 on the bacteria were the ruffling of the membrane and the structural changes of the ribosomes. These membrane alterations are similar to the previously described effects of CATH-2 on the membrane of Candida albicans (28), where CATH-2 treatment triggered plasma membrane detachment from the fungal cell wall and the formation of pockets. The membrane of Gram-positive bacteria has been shown to play a distinctive role in the antibacterial mechanism of action of antimicrobial peptides. Several studies have revealed the formation of mesosomes (membrane inclusions and folding) due to peptide exposure (2933). Studies on rat defensins and human neutrophil defensin-1 (HNP-1) showed that these peptides (600 µg/ml) target the membranes of S. aureus and induce lamellar mesosome formation. Interestingly, the exposure to higher defensin concentrations (3.2 mg/ml, close to MBCs) did not enhance the formation of these mesosomal structures in S. aureus (33). These results are in contrast with our findings, which show a CATH-2 concentration-dependent effect on the formation of mesosomes. At low peptide concentrations, punctuated invaginations were observed, whereas incubating bacteria with MBCs resulted in major lamellar mesosome formation. These differences most likely reflect different modes of action between HNP-1-mediated killing of S. aureus and the CATH-2-mediated killing visualized in this study.

The observation of morphological changes in S. aureus cells correlated with the observed intracellular localization and membrane binding of CATH-2 at sub-MBCs. Comparable findings with small (~15-amino-acid) alpha-helical peptides (MAw-1) were obtained by Azad and colleagues (34). These peptides were shown to cause deformation of the membrane, the peptidoglycan layer, and the outer acidic surfaces. Based on immunolabeling of the TEM sections, it was observed that the peptides are localized next to the induced membrane folds, suggesting that these membrane folds are aggregates of toroid-like pores produced earlier (34). This might also occur in the presence of CATH-2, as with lower peptide concentrations, similar binding of peptides near folds was detected. Our TEM studies also demonstrated that at 2.5 µM, the peptides induced a fuzzy peptidoglycan layer. However, competition assays and immuno-TEM studies demonstrated that peptidoglycan interacts only poorly with the CATH-2 peptide, suggesting that direct interaction between CATH-2 and peptidoglycan plays only a minor role in the antibacterial mode of action of CATH-2. In contrast, competition assays with LTA and cardiolipin showed that the antibacterial activity of CATH-2 was strongly inhibited by preincubation of the peptide with either compound. ITC analysis further confirmed the direct interaction of CATH-2 with LTA and cardiolipin, indicating that these negatively charged molecules most likely play a role in the initial interaction between S. aureus and CATH-2. Similarly, other antimicrobial peptides have also been shown to possess similar LTA and cardiolipin binding properties (25, 35, 36).

Besides its antimicrobial activity, CATH-2 has been shown to limit macrophage activation against E. coli and S. Enteritidis at MBCs (20). This means that once these Gram-negative bacteria are killed, CATH-2 can neutralize immune activation against these bacteria to prevent unnecessary inflammation. Here, we show that CATH-2 can have a similar effect on S. aureus, where a reduction of TNF-α release was observed at and above the MBC of CATH-2 compared to the levels of TNF-α released at sub-MBCs. Furthermore, CATH-2 was able to reduce TNF-α release when bacteria were heat killed prior to the addition of CATH-2, suggesting a potential inhibitory role for CATH-2 on immune activation by killed S. aureus. The observed inhibition could be the result of the neutralization of the S. aureus-derived LTA, as CATH-2 and other HDPs have previously been shown to prevent LTA-induced macrophage activation (9, 14, 35, 37). Interestingly, at low CATH-2 concentrations, where only limited killing was observed, CATH-2 increased TNF-α release. As S. aureus is a notorious evader of the immune system (3840), it is possible that in the absence of CATH-2, the evasion strategies of S. aureus prevent full macrophage activation. The presence of CATH-2 might obstruct this evasion, as the bacteria require an acute defense against the peptide, which could come at the expense of immune evasion. From a host point of view, increased inflammation at sub-MBCs could also be beneficial to better detect S. aureus, as well as to strengthen the immune response until S. aureus is completely neutralized.

In conclusion, our findings provide important insights on the mechanism of action of CATH-2 against S. aureus. By using a unique combination of time-lapse imaging and (immuno-)TEM imaging, CATH-2 was found to cause membrane perturbation, possibly due to the interaction with negatively charged surface molecules, such as LTA and cardiolipin, which resulted in the formation of lamellar mesosomes and membrane permeabilization. However, the targeting of intracellular components at sub-MBCs that results, inter alia, in ribosome clustering may contribute to killing of the bacteria. Finally, we demonstrate that CATH-2-mediated killing of S. aureus can limit macrophage activation, which could be an important function in the regulation of inflammation during the host’s antimicrobial response against S. aureus. Taken together, these results provide insight into the antimicrobial mechanisms of CATH-2 against Gram-positive bacteria and contribute to a better understanding of HDP functions during infections and the development of effective HDP-based anti-infectives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peptide.

CATH-2 (H2N-RFGRFLRKIRRFRPKVTITIQGSARF-NH2) was synthesized by 9-fluorenylmethoxy carbonyl (Fmoc) chemistry at CPC Scientific (Sunnyvale, CA). N-terminally labeled FITC–CATH-2 was synthesized by Fmoc chemistry at the Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (Amsterdam, the Netherlands).

Colony-counting assays.

The antibacterial activity of CATH-2 was assessed by performing colony-counting assays. A methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain (WKZ-2, human isolate) was grown to mid-logarithmic phase in tryptone soy broth (TSB; Oxoid Limited, Hampshire, United Kingdom), washed in TSB, and diluted to 2 × 106 CFU/ml. Bacteria were exposed to different CATH-2 concentrations (0 to 40 µM) for 3 h at 37°C. Subsequently, mixtures were serially diluted and spread plated on tryptone soy agar (TSA; Oxoid Limited) petri dishes as described previously (41). Surviving bacteria were counted after 16 h of incubation at 37°C.

Killing kinetics.

The killing kinetics of CATH-2 against S. aureus was assessed by incubating 550 µl peptide (0.07 to 10 µM) with an equal volume of bacteria (2 × 106 CFU/ml) at 37°C for several time intervals: 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min. At each time point, 100 µl was immediately spread plated on TSA plates, while 20 µl was serially diluted in minimum TSB medium (1:1,000 TSB in water) and 100 µl of each dilution was spread plated on TSA plates. After 16 h at 37°C, surviving bacteria were counted.

Live imaging.

S. aureus was grown to mid-logarithmic stage, washed, and resuspended in 1 ml 5 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4 (Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, the Netherlands). A drop (30 µl) of 1% low-melting agarose (type I, low electroendosmosis [EEO]; Sigma-Aldrich) each was placed in the middle of silanized coverslips (Gerhard Menzel GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany), which were previously prepared with 2% (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (SAA; Sigma-Aldrich) in acetone. Next, 30 μl of S. aureus suspension was resuspended in the agarose drop. A sandwich was made by adding a second silanized coverslip on top of the first one. After 2 min, the second coverslip was removed, and a homogenous agarose-bacterium layer was formed. Coverslips were fixed in an Attofluor cell chamber and covered in 450 µl HEPES buffer containing propidium iodide (PI; 2.5 µM final concentration). When cells were in focus, the recording was started and FITC–CATH-2 (0.5 µM final concentration) was added. Time-lapse imaging was performed using Nikon A1R and Leica SPE-II confocal microscopes at the Center for Cell Imaging (CCI) at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Utrecht. Nikon NIS-Elements software was used for data analysis.

TEM.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to study the CATH-2-induced morphological changes of S. aureus in detail. For TEM experiments, 5 × 108 CFU/ml S. aureus WKZ-2 was incubated with various concentrations of CATH-2 (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 40, and 80 µM). Due to the higher bacterial concentration required for TEM experiments, a higher MBC of 40 μM was observed. After 30 min of incubation at 37°C, the reaction was stopped by adding fixation buffer containing 2% glutaraldehyde (Polysciences, Eppelheim, Germany), 5 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MgCl2 (both from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Sigma-Aldrich), pH 7.4. After overnight fixation at 4°C, samples were washed 3 times for 10 min each time in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, embedded in 4% low-melting-point agarose (Sigma-Aldrich), and subsequently post-fixed with 4% osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA), 1.5% K4Fe(CN)6 ⋅ 3H2O (Merck) in distilled water for 2 h at 4°C. Samples were again rinsed 3 times for 10 min and then stained with uranyl acetate for 1 h at 4°C. Subsequently, samples were extensively washed (5 times for 10 min) and embedded in Epon resin. Sections of 50 nm were mounted on 100-mesh formvar–carbon-coated copper grids and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate based on a Leica AC20 system (Leica, Vienna, Austria). Cells were visualized on an FEI Tecnai 12 electron microscope (FEI, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) at 80 kV.

Immuno-TEM.

In order to determine the localization of CATH-2 on/in bacteria, the same Epon blocks previously used for the morphology determination were used. Sections (50 nm) mounted on formvar-coated copper grids were incubated with PBS containing 0.5% fish skin gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.1% BSA-c (chemically modified bovine serum albumin; Aurion, Wageningen, the Netherlands) and immunolabeled as described previously (42). Subsequently, each section was incubated with CATH-2 antibody (43) for 1 h at room temperature (RT). After rinsing (5 times for 2 min each) with PBS, specimens were exposed to protein-A–gold particles (10 nm; Department of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands) for 20 min at RT. Finally, sections were stained with 2% uranyl oxalic acetate (pH 7) (SPI, West Chester, PA, USA) for 5 min at RT and incubated with methylcellulose-uranyl acetate (pH 4, 2% methylcellulose [Sigma-Aldrich] and 4% uranyl acetate [SPI] in distilled water). Morphological changes and peptide localization were determined using a total of 60 randomly selected cells from two independent experiments. Gold particle localization was classified in three different positions—intracellular, membrane, and peptidoglycan layer—according to the methodology of Griffiths (44), and corrected for background staining using the results from control non-peptide-treated cells.

Competition assays.

To determine potential binding targets of CATH-2 on the S. aureus surface, competition assays were performed. For this, concentrations of 20 to 400 µM cardiolipin (Sigma-Aldrich), lipoteichoic acid from S. aureus (InvivoGen, Toulouse, France), and peptidoglycan from S. aureus (InvivoGen) were preincubated with 40 µM CATH-2 (resulting in binding target/CATH-2 ratios of 0.5:1 to 10:1) for 1 h at 37°C. Subsequently, 2-fold dilutions of the mixtures were exposed to bacterial cultures, as described in “Colony-counting assays.” The following day, bacterial survival was assessed.

ITC.

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) was performed with the low-volume nano ITC calorimeter (TA Instruments-Waters LLC, New Castle, DE, USA). The 50-μl syringe was filled with 200 μM CATH-2 in PBS for titration into 190 μl 100 μM S. aureus LTA (InvivoGen) in PBS. Alternatively, the 50-μl syringe was filled with 400 μM CATH-2 in PBS, 1.5% ethyl alcohol (EtOH) for titration into 190 μl 200 μM cardiolipin (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS, 1.5% EtOH. Titrations were incremental, with 2-μl injections at 300-s intervals. Experiments were performed at 20°C. Data were analyzed with the NanoAnalyze software (TA Instruments-Waters LLC).

Macrophage stimulation.

For macrophage stimulation, 7.5 × 104 cells/well of J774.A1 murine macrophages (45) (a kind gift of Jos van Putten, Utrecht University) were seeded in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% FCS (Bodinco B.V., Alkmaar, the Netherlands) at 37°C, 5.0% CO2. After overnight adherence, cells were stimulated with live or heat-killed (1 h at 80°C) S. aureus (multiplicity of infection [MOI] of 20:1) in the presence or absence of CATH-2 (0.01 to 2.5 µM) for 2 h at 37°C in DMEM plus 10% FCS, after which supernatants were collected to determine TNF-α levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; R&D Systems Minneapolis, MN). TNF-α ELISAs were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were measured with a FLUOstar omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech GmbH, Ortenberg, Germany) and analyzed with MARS data analysis software (BMG Labtech GmbH). Measurements of optical density at 450 nm (OD450) were corrected by subtracting OD570 measurements. In addition to macrophage stimulation, mixtures of S. aureus and CATH-2 in DMEM plus 10% FCS were incubated for 2 h at 37°C, followed by serial dilution and spread plating on tryptone soy agar petri dishes to determine bacterial viability after overnight incubation.

Statistical analysis.

For statistical analysis, SPSS 22 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used. Analysis of immunogold-labeling distribution was performed with the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Analysis of differences in TNF-α release was determined by repeated one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc correction.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was financially supported by the Immuno Valley ALTANT ASIA2 program of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Martin MJ, Thottathil SE, Newman TB. 2015. Antibiotics overuse in animal agriculture: a call to action for health care providers. Am J Publ Health 105:2409–2410. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cully M. 2014. Public health: the politics of antibiotics. Nature 509:S16–S17. doi: 10.1038/509S16a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown ED, Wright GD. 2016. Antibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era. Nature 529:336–343. doi: 10.1038/nature17042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hancock REW, Sahl HG. 2006. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat Biotechnol 24:1551–1557. doi: 10.1038/nbt1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chromek M, Arvidsson I, Karpman D. 2012. The antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin protects mice from Escherichia coli O157:H7-mediated disease. PLoS One 7:e46476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chromek M, Slamová Z, Bergman P, Kovács L, Podracká L, Ehrén I, Hökfelt T, Gudmundsson GH, Gallo RL, Agerberth B, Brauner A. 2006. The antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin protects the urinary tract against invasive bacterial infection. Nat Med 12:636–641. doi: 10.1038/nm1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nizet V, Ohtake T, Lauth X, Trowbridge J, Rudisill J, Dorschner RA, Pestonjamasp V, Piraino J, Huttner K, Gallo RL. 2001. Innate antimicrobial peptide protects the skin from invasive bacterial infection. Nature 414:454–457. doi: 10.1038/35106587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brogden KA. 2005. Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat Rev Microbiol 3:238–250. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scott MG, Davidson DJ, Gold MR, Bowdish D, Hancock REW. 2002. The human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 is a multifunctional modulator of innate immune responses. J Immunol 169:3883–3891. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coorens M, Van Dijk A, Bikker F, Veldhuizen EJA, Haagsman HP. 2015. Importance of endosomal cathelicidin degradation to enhance DNA-induced chicken macrophage activation. J Immunol 195:3970–3977. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lande R, Gregorio J, Facchinetti V, Chatterjee B, Wang YH, Homey B, Cao W, Wang YH, Su B, Nestle FO, Zal T, Mellman I, Schröder JM, Liu YJ, Gilliet M. 2007. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells sense self-DNA coupled with antimicrobial peptide. Nature 449:564–569. doi: 10.1038/nature06116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.van Dijk A, Molhoek EM, Veldhuizen EJA, van Bokhoven JLMT, Wagendorp E, Bikker F, Haagsman HP. 2009. Identification of chicken cathelicidin-2 core elements involved in antibacterial and immunomodulatory activities. Mol Immunol 46:2465–2473. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xiao Y, Cai Y, Bommineni YR, Fernando SC, Prakash O, Gilliland SE, Zhang G. 2006. Identification and functional characterization of three chicken cathelicidins with potent antimicrobial activity. J Biol Chem 281:2858–2867. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M507180200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Coorens M, Scheenstra MR, Veldhuizen EJA, Haagsman HP. 2017. Interspecies cathelicidin comparison reveals divergence in antimicrobial activity, TLR modulation, chemokine induction and regulation of phagocytosis. Sci Rep 7:40874. doi: 10.1038/srep40874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xiao Y, Herrera AI, Bommineni YR, Soulages JL, Prakash O, Zhang G. 2009. The central kink region of fowlicidin-2, an alpha-helical host defense peptide, is critically involved in bacterial killing and endotoxin neutralization. J Innate Immun 1:268–280. doi: 10.1159/000174822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Van Dijk A, Van Eldik M, Veldhuizen EJA, Tjeerdsma-Van Bokhoven HLM, De Zoete MR, Bikker FJ, Haagsman HP. 2016. Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activities of chicken cathelicidin-2 derived peptides. PLoS One 11:e0147919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jenssen H, Hamill P, Hancock REW. 2006. Peptide antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 19:491–511. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00056-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nguyen LT, Haney EF, Vogel HJ. 2011. The expanding scope of antimicrobial peptide structures and their modes of action. Trends Biotechnol 29:464–472. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schneider VAF, Coorens M, Ordonez SR, Tjeerdsma-van Bokhoven JLM, Posthuma G, van Dijk A, Haagsman HP, Veldhuizen EJA. 2016. Imaging the antimicrobial mechanism(s) of cathelicidin-2. Sci Rep 6:32948. doi: 10.1038/srep32948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Coorens M, Schneider VAF, de Groot AM, van Dijk A, Meijerink M, Wells JM, Scheenstra MR, Veldhuizen EJA, Haagsman HP. 2017. Cathelicidins inhibit Escherichia coli-induced TLR2 and TLR4 activation in a viability-dependent manner. J Immunol 199:1418–1428. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1602164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.van Dijk A, Herrebout M, Tersteeg-Zijderveld MHG, Tjeerdsma-van Bokhoven JLM, Bleumink-Pluym N, Jansman AJM, Veldhuizen EJA, Haagsman HP. 2012. Campylobacter jejuni is highly susceptible to killing by chicken host defense peptide cathelicidin-2 and suppresses intestinal cathelicidin-2 expression in young broilers. Vet Microbiol 160:347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Molhoek EM, van Dijk A, Veldhuizen EJA, Dijk-Knijnenburg H, Mars-Groenendijk RH, Boele LCL, Kaman-van Zanten WE, Haagsman HP, Bikker FJ. 2010. Chicken cathelicidin-2-derived peptides with enhanced immunomodulatory and antibacterial activities against biological warfare agents. Int J Antimicrob Agents 36:271–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Veldhuizen EJA, Brouwer EC, Schneider VAF, Fluit AC. 2013. Chicken cathelicidins display antimicrobial activity against multiresistant bacteria without inducing strong resistance. PLoS One 8:e61964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Malanovic N, Lohner K. 2016. Antimicrobial peptides targeting gram-positive bacteria. Pharmaceuticals 9:59. doi: 10.3390/ph9030059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Scheinpflug K, Krylova O, Nikolenko H, Thurm C, Dathe M. 2015. Evidence for a novel mechanism of antimicrobial action of a cyclic R-,W-rich hexapeptide. PLoS One 10:e0125056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sochacki KA, Barns KJ, Bucki R, Weisshaar JC. 2011. Real-time attack on single Escherichia coli cells by the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:E77–E81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101130108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barns KJ, Weisshaar JC. 2013. Real-time attack of LL-37 on single Bacillus subtilis cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1828:1511–1520. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ordonez SR, Amarullah IH, Wubbolts RW, Veldhuizen EJA, Haagsman HP. 2014. Fungicidal mechanisms of cathelicidins LL-37 and CATH-2 revealed by live-cell imaging. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:2240–2248. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01670-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Friedrich CL, Moyles D, Beveridge TJ, Hancock RE. 2000. Antibacterial action of structurally diverse cationic peptides on gram-positive bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:2086–2092. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.8.2086-2092.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Friedrich CL, Rozek A, Patrzykat A, Hancock RE. 2001. Structure and mechanism of action of an indolicidin peptide derivative with improved activity against Gram-positive bacteria. J Biol Chem 276:24015–24022. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009691200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hartmann M, Berditsch M, Hawecker J, Ardakani MF, Gerthsen D, Ulrich AS. 2010. Damage of the bacterial cell envelope by antimicrobial peptides gramicidin S and PGLa as revealed by transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3132–3142. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00124-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rabanal F, Grau-Campistany A, Vila-Farrés X, Gonzalez-Linares J, Borràs M, Vila J, Manresa A, Cajal Y. 2015. A bioinspired peptide scaffold with high antibiotic activity and low in vivo toxicity. Sci Rep 5:10558. doi: 10.1038/srep10558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shimoda M, Ohki K, Shimamoto Y, Kohashi O. 1995. Morphology of defensin-treated Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 63:2886–2891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Azad MA, Huttunen-Hennelly HEK, Ross Friedman C. 2011. Bioactivity and the first transmission electron microscopy immunogold studies of short de novo-designed antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2137–2145. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01148-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Scott MG, Gold MR, Hancock RE. 1999. Interaction of cationic peptides with lipoteichoic acid and gram-positive bacteria. Infect Immun 67:6445–6453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang L, Rozek A, Hancock RE. 2001. Interaction of cationic antimicrobial peptides with model membranes. J Biol Chem 276:35714–35722. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104925200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nell MJ, Tjabringa GS, Wafelman AR, Verrijk R, Hiemstra PS, Drijfhout JW, Grote JJ. 2006. Development of novel LL-37 derived antimicrobial peptides with LPS and LTA neutralizing and antimicrobial activities for therapeutic application. Peptides 27:649–660. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2005.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reyes-Robles T, Alonzo F III, Kozhaya L, Lacy DB, Unutmaz D, Torres VJ. 2013. Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin ED targets the chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 to kill leukocytes and promote infection. Cell Host Microbe 14:453–459. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Koymans KJ, Feitsma LJ, Brondijk THC, Aerts PC, Lukkien E, Lössl P, van Kessel KPM, de Haas CJC, van Strijp JAG, Huizinga EG. 2015. Structural basis for inhibition of TLR2 by staphylococcal superantigen-like protein 3 (SSL3). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:11018–11023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502026112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thammavongsa V, Kim HK, Missiakas D, Schneewind O. 2015. Staphylococcal manipulation of host immune responses. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:529–543. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.van Dijk A, Veldhuizen EJA, Kalkhove SIC, Tjeerdsma-van Bokhoven JLM, Romijn RA, Haagsman HP. 2007. The beta-defensin gallinacin-6 is expressed in the chicken digestive tract and has antimicrobial activity against food-borne pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:912–922. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00568-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Slot JW, Geuze HJ. 2007. Cryosectioning and immunolabeling. Nat Protoc 2:2480–2491. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.van Dijk A, Tersteeg-Zijderveld MHG, Tjeerdsma-van Bokhoven JLM, Jansman AJM, Veldhuizen EJA, Haagsman HP. 2009. Chicken heterophils are recruited to the site of Salmonella infection and release antibacterial mature cathelicidin-2 upon stimulation with LPS. Mol Immunol 46:1517–1526. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Griffiths G. 1993. Fine structure immunocytochemistry. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ralph P, Prichard J, Cohn M. 1975. Reticulum cell sarcoma: an effector cell in antibody-dependent cell-mediated immunity. J Immunol 114:898–905. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

MOVIE S1 

CATH-2 instantly binds to the bacterial septum and permeabilizes the membrane. S. aureus live imaging was performed using 0.5 µM FITC–CATH-2 and 2.5 µM PI. DIC, FITC-labeled CATH-2 (green fluorescence), PI (red fluorescence), and merged channels are shown. One representative cell is shown. Bars = 500 nm. Download MOVIE S1, MOV file, 4 MB (4.1MB, mov) .

Copyright © 2017 Schneider et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

MOVIE S2 

CATH-2 permeabilizes multiple S. aureus cells. Live imaging with 0.5 μM FITC-labeled CATH-2 (green) and 2.5 μM PI (red). Bars = 1 µm. Download MOVIE S2, MOV file, 2.9 MB (2.9MB, mov) .

Copyright © 2017 Schneider et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.


Articles from mSphere are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES