Skip to main content
AIMS Public Health logoLink to AIMS Public Health
. 2014 Nov 4;1(4):226–240. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2014.4.226

The Association between Non-Medical Prescription Drug Use and Suicidal Behavior among United States Adolescents

Amanda L Divin 1,*, Keith J Zullig 2
PMCID: PMC5690255  PMID: 29546088

Abstract

Adolescence represents a vulnerable time for the development of both drug use/abuse and mental illness. Although previous research has substantiated a relationship between drug use and suicidal behavior, little research has examined this relationship with non-medical prescription drug use. Given the growing prevalence of non-medical prescription drug use (NMPDU) among adolescents, this study explored the association between NMPDU and suicidal behavior. Nationally representative data were derived from 16, 410 adolescents who completed the 2009 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Approximately 19.8% of participants reported lifetime NMPDU. NMPDU was associated with significantly increased odds of suicidal behavior (P < 0.01), with seriously considering attempting suicide and making a plan about attempting suicide representing the strongest correlates for males and females. Results suggest the importance of 1) continued reinforcement of drug education programs in high school begun at earlier ages and 2) mental health care and screenings among adolescents.

Keywords: prescription drug use, adolescents, suicide, drug use, suicidal ideation

1. Introduction

Nonmedical prescription drug use (NMPDU) has reached epidemic proportions in the United States (US). Currently, it ranks second only to marijuana as the most prevalent drug problem in the US [1]. Frequently defined as intentional use of a prescription medication without a valid doctor's prescription [2],[3], NMPDU has been on the rise since the early 1990s [4], and appears to be disproportionately affecting adolescents. For example, according to the 2012 Partnership Attitude Tracking Study (PATS), NMPDU in adolescents has increased 33% since 2008, with one in four adolescents reporting NMPDU in their lifetime [5].

NMPDU among adolescents is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. According to the 2009 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), there were approximately 66,000 emergency department visits due to nonmedical use of pharmaceuticals among 12–17 year olds [6], with 95.4% of visits for drug-related suicide attempts involving pharmaceuticals [7]. Moreover, unintentional poisoning, partially driven by prescription drug overdose, was the second leading cause of accidental death among 15–19 year olds in the US [8], while suicide was the overall third leading cause of death in this group [9].

NMPDU has also been associated with a variety of psychopathologies including depression [6],[10][14] and suicidal behavior [10],[15],[16]. Although NMPDU, depression, and suicidal behavior (e.g., suicide ideation, plans, and attempts) occur frequently during adolescence, little research has examined the relationship these variables may share among adolescents. What is known, however, is that among adolescents, both prescription medication use [17],[18] and suicide [19] increase with age. In addition, females are more likely to use prescription medications [18], suffer from depression [20],[21], and attempt suicide [22],[23]. Nevertheless, the comorbidity of substance use and psychiatric disorders is considered the norm, not the exception [24], and adolescents who suffer from depression and engage in drug use are significantly more likely to attempt suicide [25].

While depression is one of the most treatable psychiatric illnesses [26], many adolescents may ignore or not recognize the symptoms, instead relying on drug use to self-medicate [27]. Thus, self-treatment of such psychological distress may be one of the factors which contributes to the increasing prevalence in substance use. Individuals with higher levels of depressive symptoms comprise a special group of nonmedical prescription drug users at higher risk for other psychopathology [28]. Given the propensity for both depression [29] and experimentation with substance use [30] to begin early and increase with age, as well as the known comorbidity of depression and substance use in adolescence [31],[32] more research exploring the relationship between NMPDU, depression, and suicidal behavior in adolescents is necessary. The purpose of this study was to further explore the relationship between NMPDU, depression, and suicidal behavior in a large, nationally representative sample of adolescents. It was hypothesized that NMPDU would be related to depression; and suicide ideation, plans, and attempts.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Sampling Procedure

The 2009 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance (YRBS) National High School Questionnaire was utilized (N = 16,410) for this study. The YRBS focuses on six major areas of adolescent behaviors: those that lead to intentional and unintentional injuries; tobacco, alcohol and other drug use; sexual behaviors, dietary behaviors; and physical inactivity [3].

The YRBS uses a three-stage cluster sample design to produce a representative sample of 9th through 12th grade students in the US. The sampling frame for the 2009 YRBS consisted of all regular and private schools in at least one of the 9–12 grades in all 50 US states and the District of Columbia (See [33] for a full review). In the first stage, 1,276 primary sampling units (counties, subareas or large counties, or groups of smaller adjacent counties) were grouped into 16 strata based on 1) their metropolitan statistical area, and 2) the percentage of Hispanic and black student represented in the primary sampling units [33]. Fifty-seven primary sampling units were sampled from the 1,276 in 2009.

In the second stage, 196 schools with any grades of 9–12 were sampled with probability proportional to school enrollment size, followed by randomly sampling each of the grades 9–12 in the selected schools in the third stage [33]. A weighting factor was applied to each student record to adjust for non-response and the oversampling of black and Hispanic students in the sample. The final, overall weights were scaled so the weighted count of students was equal to the total sample size, and the weighted proportions of students in each grade matched population projections.

Survey protocols allow for anonymous and voluntary participation to protect the privacy of participating students. Before survey administration, local parental permission procedures were followed. Letters describing the survey were sent to the homes of all targeted participants prior to data collection; parents electing to prevent their child from participating were instructed to return an enclosed form. Trained data collectors who emphasized anonymity, confidentiality, and privacy administered the surveys to the participants in large groups. Students completed the self-administered survey during one class period and recorded their responses directly on a computer-scannable booklet or answer sheet. These procedures were approved by CDC's Institutional Review Board approved for the national YRBS [33].

In 2009, the school response rate was 81% (158 of the 196 sampled schools participated) and the student response rate was 88% (16,460 of the 18,573 sampled students submitted questionnaires). However, 16,410 questionnaires were usable after data editing yielding a 71% overall response rate (81% * 88%) [3].

2.2. Measures

The study's independent variable was the YRBS question, “During your life, how many times have you taken a prescription drug (such as OxyContin, Percocet, Vicodin, Adderall, Ritalin, or Xanax) without a doctor's prescription?” Response options for this item were “0 times”, “1–2 times”, “3–9 times”, “10–19 times”, “20 to 39 times”, or “40 or more times”. Age was also included as an independent study variable: “How old are you?” Response options for this question were “12 years old or younger”, “13 years old”, “14 years old”, “15 years old”, “16 years old”, “17 years old”, and “18 years old or older”.

The study's dependent variables were the YRBS questions concerned with suicidal behavior and were “During the past 12 months, did you ever seriously consider attempting suicide? (yes/no)”, and “During the past 12 months, did you make a plan about how you would attempt suicide? (yes/no)”. Two additional questions also served as dependent variables, but had additional response options. For example, the question “During the past 12 months, how many times did you actually attempt suicide?” had “0 times”, “1 time”, “2 or 3 times”, “4 or 5 times”, or “6 or more times” as response options while the question “If you attempted suicide during the past 12 months, did any attempt result in an injury, poisoning, or overdose that had to be treated by a doctor or nurse?” had the response options of “Did not attempt suicide”, “Yes”, or “No”.

The current study's covariates included grade, cigarette smoking, alcohol use, grades, and self-reported feelings of depression. Specifically, self-reported grade was assessed with the question “In what grade are you?” with response options of “9th grade”, “10th grade”, “11th grade”, “12th grade”, and “Ungraded or other grade”. Cigarette smoking was assessed with the question “How old were you when you smoked a whole cigarette for the first time?” with response options of “I have never smoked a whole cigarette”, “8 years older or younger”, “9 or 10 years old”, “11 or 12 years old”, “13 or 14 years old”, “15 or 16 years old”, and “17 years old or older”. Alcohol use was assessed with the question “How old were you when you had your first drink of alcohol other than a few sips?” with the response options of ‘I have never had a drink of alcohol other than a few sips’ with all other response options identical to the cigarette smoking variable. Grade point average was assessed with the question “During the past 12 months, how would you describe your grades in school?” with the response options of “Mostly A's”, “Mostly B's”, “Mostly C's”, “Mostly D's”, “Mostly F's”, “None of these grades”, and “Not sure”. Depression was assessed with the question “During the past 12 months, did you ever feel so sad or hopeless almost every day for two weeks or more in a row that you stopped doing some usual activities? (yes/no)”.

These covariates were chosen because of their consistent independent associations with both NMPDU and suicidal behaviors. For example, increasing age through adolescence, as measured by self-reported grade, has consistently been identified as a correlate to NMPDU [1],[4],[34][36] and suicidal behaviors [19],[29]. In addition, both cigarette smoking and alcohol use have been independently associated with illicit drug use [1], NMPDU [13],[37], and suicidal behaviors [38],[52]. Lower grades have also been associated with higher rates of NMPDU [13],[36]. Finally, depression has been found to not only be a predictor of NMPDU [13],[34] and a major risk factor for suicidal behaviors [39],[40],[63], but when combined with substance use is known to have a synergistic influence on suicidal behaviors [25].

2.3. Data Analysis

This study sought to determine if NMPDU was related to depression, suicide ideation, plans, and attempts. To investigate this aim, three separate logistic regression models were employed using Proc Surveylogistic in SAS version 9.3 to adjust for the complex YRBS sampling methodology. The first model examined lifetime NMPDU, followed by two additional regressions separated by sex. Models were estimated before and after control for key covariates (age, self-reported grade in school, cigarette smoking, alcohol use, depression, and grade point average).

For these analyses, lifetime NMPDU was dichotomized into those who reported no lifetime NMPDU and compared against those were reported lifetime NMPDU 1+ times in life categories. Since two of the suicidal behavior questions were already dichotomized into “yes” and “no” categories, they did not require any re-coding. However, suicide attempts (last 12 months) was re-coded into those who reported 0 attempts and compared to those who reported 1+ attempts, while the response options of “no” and “did not attempt suicide during the past 12 months” were combined and compared to those who reported requiring medical treatment for their suicide attempt. In all cases, the referent group was the “no use” or “no suicide ideation, or attempts”. None of the covariates were re-coded for analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Participants

Table 1 details the sample demographic data. The sample was evenly split between males (N = 8,065, 49.3%) and females (N = 8,280, 50.7%) and grade, but those 14 years old and younger and 18 years or older were underrepresented. As anticipated, fewer students reported fewer suicide attempts (6.4%) and injuries resulting from a suicide attempt (2.0%) than either planning a suicide attempt (11.5%) or seriously considering suicide (14.4%). In addition, approximately 19.8% of the overall sample reported NMPDU in their lifetime (20.6% males, 19.1% females).

Table 1. Sample characteristics.

Variable n %
Sex
Male 8,065 49.3
Female 8,280 50.7
Age
≤13 Years 45 0.3
14 Years 1,634 10.0
15 Years 3,701 22.7
16 Years 4,135 25.3
17 Years 4,230 25.9
≥ 18 Years 2,595 15.8
Grade
9th 4,153 25.4
10th 3,926 24.2
11th 4,092 25.2
12th 4,137 25.2
GPA
Mostly As 4,162 26.8
Mostly Bs 5,845 38.9
Mostly Cs 3,318 22.2
Mostly Ds 726 4.9
Mostly Fs 311 2.3
None of These 87 0.7
Not Sure 616 4.2
Suicidal Behaviors
Considered 2,349 14.4
Planned an attempt 1,873 11.5
Attempted 1,053 6.4
Injured by attempt 332 2.0

Rates of self-reported suicidal behavior were also compared between nonmedical prescription drug users and non-users (not tabled) using a series of chi-square analyses. These analyses revealed significant differences between having considered suicide (27.4% users; 11.2% non-users, χ2 = 394.82, P < 0.0001), planning a suicide attempt (22.7% users; 8.7% non-users, χ2 = 391.74, P < 0.0001), suicide attempts (15.0% users; 4.3% non-users, χ2 = 406.62, P < 0.0001), and an injury needing treatment as a result of a suicide attempt (6.2% users; 1.1% non-users, χ2 = 355.15, P < 0.0001).

3.2. Logistic Regression Findings

Table 2 presents the results from the unadjusted and adjusted regressions. In the unadjusted model, lifetime NMPDU was significantly (P < 0.0001) related to all of the suicidal behavior variables with those who reported lifetime NMPDU being between 2.74 and 7.81 times more likely to report suicidal behavior. After covariate adjustment, lifetime NMPDU continued to be significantly (P < 0.001) associated with each of the suicidal behaviors with those who reported lifetime NMPDU being between 1.61 and 2.22 times more likely to report suicidal behavior. In both the unadjusted and adjusted models, lifetime NMPDU was most strongly associated with a suicide attempt resulting in an injury that needed treatment.

Table 2. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for reporting suicidal behavior in the past 12 months with covariates included. Nonusers serve as the referent group.

Variable Unadjusted modelOR (CI) Adjusted modelOR (CI)
Seriously considered attempting suicide 2.74***(2.39–3.13) 1.61***(1.34–1.94)
Made a plan about attempting suicide 2.90***(2.51–3.35) 1.74***(1.43–2.12)
Attempted suicide 3.77***(3.17–4.49) 1.70***(1.33–2.17)
Suicide attempt resulted in an injury that needed treatment 7.81***(5.64–10.83) 2.22**(1.39–3.54)
Covariates
Age 0.97(0.89–1.07)
Grade 0.92(0.83–1.01)
GPA 1.08***(1.04–1.13)
Depression 1.46***(1.29–1.65)
Alcohol use 1.54***(1.47–1.60)
Cigarette smoking 1.42***(1.38–1.47)

***P < 0.0001, **P < 0.001.

When the analyses are separated by sex and adjusted for covariates (Table 3), males who reported lifetime NMPDU were 1.61 times more likely to report seriously considering attempting suicide and 1.80 times more likely to report having made a plan to attempt suicide (P < 0.01). Lifetime NMPDU continued to be significantly associated with each of the suicide variables for females in the adjusted models. Females who reported lifetime NMPDU were between 1.63 times and 2.32 more likely to report suicidal behavior (P < 0.01).

Table 3. Adjusted odds ratios (OR)† and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for reporting suicidal behavior in the past 12 months. nonusers serve as the referent group. Results are provided for females and males separately.

Variable FemalesOR (CI) MalesOR (CI)
Seriously considered attempting suicide 1.63***(1.29–2.05) 1.62*(1.20–2.20)
Made a plan about attempting suicide 1.74***(1.34–2.26) 1.80**(1.33–2.44)
Attempted suicide 1.82***(1.36–2.46) 1.52(0.97–2.39)
Suicide attempt resulted in an injury that needed treatment 2.32*(1.34–4.03) 2.18(0.87–5.48)

†adjusted for age, self-reported grade in school, grade point average, depression, alcohol use, and cigarette smoking. ***P < 0.0001; **P < 0.001; * P < 0.01.

4. Discussion

Consistent with a growing body of research [10],[15],[16],[34],[41][44], this preliminary study suggests there is a relationship between NMPDU, suicide ideation, plans, and attempts. Furthermore, this study adds significantly to the literature by exploring this relationship among a large, representative sample of adolescents.

Approximately 19.8% of the overall sample reported any NMPDU in their lifetime (20.6% males, 19.1% females). These estimates are consistent with some previous studies examining any NMPDU in adolescent samples (e.g. 20.9% [45]; 22% [46]), lower than results found in recent national samples (24% [5]), and higher than results found in other adolescent samples (10.9% [47]; 10%–13% [48]). These numbers appear to be consistent with results from the 2009 Monitoring the Future (MTF) [4] and the 2009 NSDUH [49], although due to sampling and measurement differences [e.g. definition of NMPDU, time period inquired about (past month, past year, lifetime), year data was collected] a true comparison is difficult to make. The YRBS data generally shows higher prevalence rates than MTF and NSDUH, although long-term trends are similar [1]. Thus, we believe the prevalence rates found in the current study are accurate measures of NMPDU and highlight the significance of NMPDU in this population. Additionally, our age-specific prevalence rates are a particular cause for concern, as adolescents who initiate drug use at younger ages are more likely to struggle with substance abuse than those who initiate at older ages [5].

Findings suggest that after the adjustment for key covariates, including depression, adolescents reporting lifetime NMPDU were significantly more likely to report considering suicide, making a suicide plan, attempting suicide, and injury associated with a suicide attempt. These relationships are important because although the comorbidity of depression and illicit drug use and their association with suicide has been examined in adolescents (e.g. [25],[50],[51]), this relationship has not been examined with prescription drugs. Moreover, the current study makes a unique contribution to the literature by controlling for depression, thus helping to disentangle the complicated issue of comorbidity. Given that those who engage in drug use are at increased odds for suicidal behavior [52] and the high rates of NMPDU in adolescents, study findings emphasize the potential gravity of this relationship.

When separated by sex, males who reported lifetime NMPDU were significantly more likely to report seriously considering attempting suicide and making a suicide plan, while lifetime NMPDU among females continued to be significantly associated with all four suicidal behaviors. These findings are in slight contrast to previous research examining gender differences in suicide behavior(s) in that suicide ideation is typically greater in adolescent females [53], but similar to previous research in that suicide attempts are more likely to occur in adolescent females [54]. The findings, however, are important because not only does suicide ideation predict suicide attempts [55], but both suicide ideation and suicide attempts put adolescents at greater risk for future suicide attempts and completions [53],[55],[56].

Results may also suggest there is something different about females who engage in NMPDU when compared to those who do not, as males typically commit suicide at significantly greater rates than females [53]. Females are more likely to use prescription drugs [1],[56][58] and engage in NMPDU for self-treatment [59]. Although speculative, NMPDU may serve as trigger which motivates females to progress from self-treatment use to suicide risk [60].

Although lifetime NMPDU was significantly associated with making a suicide plan for both males and females, the finding for males is a novel finding which we speculate may be indicative of several possible theories. First, males who make a suicide plan may turn to NMPDU because they have no outlet for their psychological distress. Thus, like females they may use prescription drugs to quell their negative affect (e.g. self-medication; see [61]), but unlike females they may be more serious about suicide attempts. Although only 34% of those thinking about suicide develop a suicide plan, approximately 72% of suicidal ideators progress from having a suicide plan to a suicide attempt [62] and those with a plan are over five times more likely to attempt suicide [63]. Second, contrary to the self-medication hypothesis, NMPDU may precede and actually cause or worsen pre-existing psychological issues such as depression and/or suicidal behavior [64] in males. Thus, making a suicide plan may be artifact of NMPDU. Third, NMPDU and suicidal behavior share characteristics such as impulsivity, risk-taking, and sensation seeking. For example, impulse control disorders (e.g. substance use disorders) predict which individuals with suicide ideation go on to make a suicide plan or attempt [65]. And finally, since males tend to choose more lethal methods of suicide such as firearms or hanging [66],[67], perhaps males who make a suicide plan may be under such mental duress that they engage in NMPDU to make the suicide attempt easier. Because the questionnaire asked about lifetime NMPDU, but suicidal behavior in the past year, we are only able to speculate about this finding. Nevertheless, future research should explore this relationship.

Study results also highlight the importance of mental health care and screenings in the adolescent population. For example, recent research suggests that for each year depression was delayed, the odds of lifetime NMPDU decreased by 2.3% [34]. In other words, the earlier the age of major depressive disorder, the greater the odds of lifetime NMPDU. Results do beg the question that if adolescents are treating themselves for psychological distress, why is it that they are not seeking assistance from healthcare providers or other forms of assistance? One explanation may be the lack of access to healthcare often encountered by adolescents. Because adolescents are often under the care and/or coverage of their parents health insurance policy, barriers such as cost, lack of insurance or insurance coverage for certain services, lack of knowledge, and transportation [68], combined with the perceived lack of confidentiality [69],[70], pose a substantial deterrent to seeking and receiving mental health care services. In addition, although school-based health centers are increasingly seen as an entry point to healthcare for adolescents and the vast majority of them do offer some type of mental health services [71], adolescents with depressive disorders are less likely to receive such services than those with disruptive disorders [72]. Stigma and fear of stigma associated with mental illness offer additional barriers to seeking treatment among adolescents [73].

An alternative explanation for the self-treatment of psychological distress may be the ease of access to prescription drugs. The most common sources of prescription drugs are friends or family [74][76]. Thus, the barriers associated with seeking treatment may seem insurmountable or excessively arduous when compared to a short walk to the family medicine cabinet or friend's house. In fact, 74% of those borrowing medication from friends or family do so in lieu of seeing a health care provider [77]. Early identification and intervention for treatment of mood disorders may help reduce the severity and/or the persistence of the initial or primary disorder, and prevent theorized related disorders.

Limitations of the current study should be noted. First, we utilized a secondary source of data from the 2009 YRBS Questionnaire. Consequently, our analysis was limited to the questions asked and information collected by this instrument. This may have affected the depressive symptoms and suicidal behavior indicators, as well as the temporal relationship between such variables and NMPDU from these cross-sectional data, including potentially important statistical controls such as stress and/or socioeconomic status. Second, the self-reported nature of the data used in this study could introduce various forms of bias including recall bias, non-response bias, pressure to give desirable answers, and misreporting or inaccurate reporting of variables measured. However, self-reported data on risky behaviors and substance use are generally considered valid [78]. Third, the results cannot be generalized to all adolescents because this sample only included adolescents in grades 9–12 enrolled in public or private schools, and did not include individuals who had dropped out of school or were not present in school on the day of YRBS administration. Fourth, true prevalence of NMPDU and mental health variables measured cannot be determined because questions ask how many times drugs have been used for non-medical reasons over the lifetime and if an individual suffered from mental health issues in the past 12 months. More accurate prevalence estimates would be derived from past 12 month usage. Fifth, because our dependent variable does not distinguish between various types of prescription drugs (e.g., opioid pain killers, stimulants, depressants, sedatives, etc.), it is unknown whether results may be stronger or weaker for any of these differing drug classes. Sixth, we are also unable to identify if other motives were responsible for NMPDU seen in this sample. Despite these limitations, this current study corroborates other studies documenting the prevalence of NMPDU among adolescents, and is among the first to document the association between NMPDU, depression, and suicide ideation, plans, and attempts.

5. Conclusion

Controlled medications are important in the treatment of pediatric psychological disorders such as depression and suicidal behavior. Nonetheless, research suggests that an unintended side effect of their greater use and availability may be an increase in NMPDU [46]. Results from the current study suggest that approximately one out of five adolescents have engaged in NMPDU in their lifetime, and that NMPDU is significantly associated with suicidal behavior. Specifically, results suggest that adolescents who report lifetime NMPDU are also at significantly increased odds to engage in suicide ideation even after controlling for key covariates including depression. Moreover, females who reported lifetime NMPDU were also at significantly increased odds to report a suicide attempt and to be injured as a result of their suicide attempt. These results suggest the importance and necessity of continued reinforcement of drug education programs in high school begun in late elementary or middle school. Results also highlight the significance mental health screening and access to healthcare in the adolescent population.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Volume I. Summary of National Findings. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2010. (NSDUH Series H-38A, HHS Publication No. SMA 10-4856 Findings). Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2k9NSDUH/2k9Results.htm#2.2. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hernandez SH, Nelson LS. Prescription drug abuse: Insight into the epidemic. Clin Pharmacol Therap. 2010;88:307–317. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Division of Adolescent and School Health 2009 National YRBS data users manual Available from: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/data/yrbs/2009/YRBS_2009_National_User_Guide.pdf2009.
  • 4.Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, et al. Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2011: volume i, secondary school students. 2012 Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan Available from: http://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/docs/20898-Monitoring_the_Future-Secondary-2011.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.The Partnership at Drugfree.org. 2012 Partnership attitude tracking study. 2013. Available from: http://www.drugfree.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/PATS-2012-FULL-REPORT2.pdf.
  • 6.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Drug abuse warning network, 2009: national estimates of drug-related emergency department visits. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies; 2011. (HHS Publication No. (SMA) 11-4659, DAWN Series D-35). Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/2k11/DAWN/2k9DAWNED/HTML/DAWN2k9ED.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. The DAWN Report: Emergency Department Visits for Drug-related Suicide Attempts by Adolescents: 2008. Rockville: Office of Applied Studies; 2010. Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/2k10/DAWN001/SuicideAttempts.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in the prevalence of suicide-related behaviors National YRBS: 1991–2011. 2012. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/yrbs/pdf/us_suicide_trend_yrbs.pdf.
  • 9.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Child health USA 2011. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011 doi: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530. Available from: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/chusa11/hstat/hsa/pages/229am.html. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zullig KJ, Divin AL. The association between non-medical prescription drug use, depressive symptoms, and suicidality among college students. Addict Behav. 2012;37(8):890–899. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2009 national survey on drug use and health: mental health detailed tables- adult mental health tables 1.1 to 1.53 (prevalence estimates) 2010. Available from: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2K9NSDUH/MH/tabs/LOTSect1pe.htm#TopOfPage.
  • 12.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. The NSDUH report: Nonmedical stimulant use, other drug use, delinquent behaviors, and depression among adolescents. Rockville: Substance abuse and mental health services administration, office of applied studies. 2008. Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/2k8/stimulants/depression.htm.
  • 13.Schepis TS, Krishnan-Sarin S. Characterizing adolescent prescription misusers: A population-based study. J Am Acad Child Adol Psychiat. 2008;47(7):745–754. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318172ef0ld. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Conway KP, Compton W, Stinson FS, et al. Lifetime comorbidity of DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders and specific drug use disorders: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. J Clin Psychiat. 2006;67:247–257. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim HM, Smith EG, Ganoczy D, et al. Predictors of suicide in patient charts among patients with depression in the Veterans Health Administration health system: Importance of prescription drug and alcohol abuse. J Clin Psychiat. 2012;73(10):e1269–75. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.United States Army. Army health promotion risk reduction suicide prevention: Report 2010. 2010 Available from: http://usarmy.vo.llnwd.net/e1/HPRRSP/HP-RR-SPReport2010_v00.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Neutel CI, Walop W. Drug utilization by men and women: Why the difference? Drug Inform J. 2005;39:299–310. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roe CM, McNamara AM, Motheral BR. Gender-and age-related prescription drug use patterns. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:30–39. doi: 10.1345/aph.1A113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pelkonen M, Marttunen M. Child and adolescent suicide: epidemiology, Risk factors, and approaches to prevention. Pediat Drugs. 2003;5(4):243–265. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200305040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Essau CA, Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, et al. Gender differences in the developmental course of depression. J Affect Disord. 2010;127(1-3):185–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marttunen M, Henriksson M, Aro H, et al. Suicide among female adolescents: characteristics and comparison with males in the age group 13 to 22 years. J Am Acad Child Adol Psychiat. 1995;34:1297–307. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199510000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zosel A, Bartelson BB, Bailey E, et al. Characterization of adolescent prescription drug abuse and misuse using the researched abuse diversion and addiction-related surveillance (RADARS®) system. J Am Acad Child Adol Psychiat. 2013;52(2):196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nrugham L, Holen A, Sund AM. Suicide attempters and repeaters: Depression and coping: A prospective study of early adolescents followed up as young adults. J Nerv Ment Disord. 2012;200:197–203. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318247c914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sanchez-Samper X, Knight JR. Drug abuse by adolescents: General considerations. Pediat Rev. 2009;30(3):83–93. doi: 10.1542/pir.30-3-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Effinger JM, Stewert DG. Classification of co-occurring depression and substance abuse symptoms predicts suicide attempts in adolescents. Suicide Life-Threat Behav. 2012;42(4):353–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Eisenberg D, Golberstein E, Gollust SE. Help-seeking and access to mental health care in a university student population. Med Care. 2007;45:594–601. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31803bb4c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Reichert E. Reducing stigma barriers to help-seeking behaviors among college students. Psychology. 2012;3(10):892–898. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hall MT, Howard MO, McCabe SE. Subtypes of adolescent sedative/anxiolytic misusers: A latent profile analysis. Addictive Behaviors. 2010;35:882–889. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kessler RC, Amminger GP, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, et al. Age of onset of mental disorders: A review of recent literature. Curr Opin Psychiat. 2007;20:359–364. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32816ebc8c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McGorry PD, Purcell R, Goldstone S, et al. Age of onset and timing of treatment for mental and substance use disorders: implications for preventive intervention strategies and models of care. Curr Opin Psychiat. 2011;24:301–306. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283477a09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Volkow ND. The reality of comorbidity: Depression and drug abuse. Biol Psychiat. 2004;56(10):714–717. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Armstrong TD, Costello EJ. Community studies on adolescent substance use, abuse, or dependence and psychiatric comorbidity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(6):1224–1239. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.6.1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States 2009. MMWR. 2002;59(SS-5):1–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schepis TS, McCabe SE. Exploring age of onset as a causal link between major depression and nonmedical use of prescription medications. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;120(1-3):99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Young AM, Glover N, Havens JR. Nonmedical use of prescription medications among adolescents in the United States: A systematic review. J Adol Health. 2012;51:6–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Meier EA, Troost JP, Anthony JC. Extramedical use of prescription pain relievers by youth aged 12 to 21 years in the United States. Arch Pediat Adol Med. 2012;166(9):803–807. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nakawaki B, Crano WD. Predicting adolescents' persistence, non-persistence, and recent onset of nonmedical use of opioids and stimulants. Addict Behav. 2012;37(6):716–721. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miller M, Borges G, Orozco R, et al. Exposure to alcohol, drugs and tobacco and the risk of subsequent suicidality: Findings from the Mexican Adolescent Mental Health Survey. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;113:110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.American Association of Suicidology. Depression and suicide risk. 2014. Retrieved September 42, 2014, from http://www.suicidology.org/Portals/14/docs/Resources/FactSheets/2011/DepressionSuicide2014.pdf.
  • 40.Institute of Medicine. Reducing suicide: a national imperative. 2002. Retrieved September 24, 2014 Available from: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309083214. [PubMed]
  • 41.McCauley JL, Amstadter AB, Macdonald A, et al. Non-medical use of prescription drugs in a national sample of college women. Addict Behav. 2011;36:690–695. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Teter CJ, Falone AE, Cranford JA, et al. Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants and depressed mood among college students: Frequency and routes of administration. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010;38(3):292–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vidourek RA, King KA, Knopf EE. Non-medical prescription drug use among university students. Am J Health Educ. 2010;41:345–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wu LT, Pilowsky DJ, Patkar AA. Non-prescribed use of pain relievers among adolescents in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;94(1-3):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.09.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.McCabe SE, Boyd CJ, Young A. Medical and nonmedical use of prescription drugs among secondary school students. J Adol Health. 2007;40(1):76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McCabe SE, West BT, Cranford JA, et al. Medical misuse of controlled medications among adolescents. Arch Pediat Adol Med. 2011;165(8):729–735. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Boyd CJ, Young A, Grey M, et al. Adolescents' nonmedical use of prescription medications and other problem behaviors. J Adol Health. 2009;45(6):543–550. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Havens JR, Young AM, Havens CE. Nonmedical prescription drug use in a nationally representative sample of adolescents: Evidence of greater use among rural adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adol Med. 2011;165(3):250–255. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2009 national survey on drug use and health: detailed tables. 2010. Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2k10ResultsTables/NSDUHTables2009R/HTM/Sect1peTabs1to46.htm#Tab1.17B. [PubMed]
  • 50.Kelly TM, Cornelius JR, Lynch KG. Psychiatric and substance use disorders as risk factors for attempted suicide among adolescents: A case control study. Suicide Life-Threat Behav. 2002;32(3):301–312. doi: 10.1521/suli.32.3.301.22168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Minkoff K. An integrated model for the management of co-occurring psychiatric and substance disorders in managed-care systems. Dis Manag Health Outcomes. 2000;8:251–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hallfors DD, Waller MW, Ford CA, et al. Adolescent depression and suicide risk: association with sex and drug behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(3):224–231. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Brezo J, Paris J, Barker ED, et al. Natural history of suicidal behaviors in a population-based sample of young adults. Psychol Med. 2007;37:1563–1574. doi: 10.1017/S003329170700058X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wichstrom L. Predictors of adolescent suicide attempts: a nationally representative longitudinal study of Norwegian adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adol Psychiat. 2000;39:603–610. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200005000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR. Adolescent suicidal ideation and attempts: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications. Clin Psychol Sci Prac. 1996;3:25–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Colliver JD, Kroutil LA, Dai L, et al. Misuse of prescription drugs: data from the 2002, 2003, and 2004 national surveys on drug use and health. Rockville: DHHS Publication; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Simoni-Wastila L, Ritter G, Strickler G. Gender and other factors associated with the nonmedical use of abusable prescription drugs. Subst Use Misuse. 2004;39(1):1–23. doi: 10.1081/ja-120027764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Simoni-Wastila L. The use of abusable prescription drugs: The role of gender. J Womens Health & Gender-Based Medicine. 2000;9(3):289–297. doi: 10.1089/152460900318470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.McCabe SE, Boyd CJ, Teter CJ. Subtypes of nonmedical prescription drug misuse. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;102:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.National Institute on Drug Abuse. Drugs, brains, and behavior: the science of addiction. NIH Pub No. 10-5605. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2010. Available from: http://www.drugabuse.gov/sites/default/files/sciofaddiction.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Khantzian EJ. The self-medication hypothesis of substance use disorders: A reconsideration and recent applications. Harvard Rev Psychiat. 1997;4(5):231–244. doi: 10.3109/10673229709030550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kessler RC, Borges G, Walters EE. Prevalence of and risk factors for lifetime suicide attempts in National Comorbidity Survey. Arch General Psychiat. 1999;56:617–626. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.7.617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nock MK, Green JG, Hwang I, et al. Prevalence, correlates, and treatment of lifetime suicidal behavior among adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. JAMA Psychiat. 2013;70(3):300–310. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.National Institute on Drug Abuse. Comorbidity: addiction and other mental illnesses.NIH Publication Number 10-5771. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2010. Available from: http://www.drugabuse.gov/sites/default/files/rrcomorbidity.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nock MK, Hwang I, Sampson NA, et al. Mental disorders, comorbidity and suicidal behavior: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Molec Psychiat. 2010;15(8):868–876. doi: 10.1038/mp.2009.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Elnour AA, Harrison J. Lethality of suicide methods. Injury Prev. 2008;14:39–45. doi: 10.1136/ip.2007.016246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Beautrais AL. Suicide and serious suicide attempts in youth: A multiple-group comparison study. Am J Psychiat. 2003;160:1093–1099. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Elliott BA, Larson JT. Adolescents in mid-sized and rural communities: Foregone care, perceived barriers, and risk factors. J Adol Health. 20032004;35(4):303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.National Institute for Health Care Management. Protecting confidential health services for adolescents & young adults: strategies & considerations for health plans. 2011. Available from: http://www.cicatelli.org/ipp/downloadable/NIHCM-Confidentiality-Final.pdf.
  • 70.Ford C, English A, Sigman G. Confidential health care for adolescents: Position paper for the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adol Health. 2004;35:160–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Teich JL, Robinson G, Weist MD. What kinds of mental health services do public schools in the United States provide? Adv School Ment Health Prom. 2008;1(S1):13–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wu P, Hoven CW, Cohen P, et al. Factors associated with use of mental health services for depression by children and adolescents. Psychiat Serv. 2001;52(2):189–195. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.2.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chandra A, Minkovitz CS. Stigma starts early: Gender differences in teen willingness to use mental health services. J Adol Health. 2006;38:754.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2011 national survey on drug use and health: summary of national findings, NSDUH Series H-44, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 12-4713. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2012. Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2k11Results/NSDUHresults2011.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Boyd CJ, McCabe SE, Teter CJ. Medical and nonmedical use of prescription pain medication by youth in a Detroit-area public school district. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;81:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.McCabe SE, Boyd CJ. Sources of prescription drugs for illicit use. Addict Behav. 2005;30:1342–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Goldsworthy RC, Mayhorn CB. Prescription medication sharing among adolescents: Prevalence, risks, and outcomes. J Adol Health. 2009;45:634–637. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ford JA. Nonmedical prescription drug use among college students: a comparison between athletes and nonathletes. J Am College Health. 2008;57(2):211–219. doi: 10.3200/JACH.57.2.211-220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AIMS public health are provided here courtesy of AIMS Press

RESOURCES