Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 13;27(11):749–751.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.10.003

Self-reported Bacterial Vaginosis and Risk of Ultrasound Diagnosed Incident Uterine Fibroid Cases in a Prospective Cohort Study of Young African-American Women

Kristen R Moore 1, Donna D Baird 1
PMCID: PMC5705442  NIHMSID: NIHMS912725  PMID: 29066031

BACKGROUND

Uterine fibroids, benign smooth muscle cell tumors, are a very common gynecological condition 1 and the leading indication for hysterectomy in the US 2. Though hormonally dependent, the causes of fibroids are unknown. For decades it has been hypothesized that reproductive tract infections (RTIs) play a role in fibroid development 3. However, few studies have been conducted, even for the leading cause of symptomatic vaginal discharge, bacterial vaginosis (BV). BV is characterized by a shift from the dominant flora of Lactobacillus spp. to a mixed vaginal flora with large numbers of anaerobic bacteria 4,5. BV also may increase the risk of RTIs, human immunodeficiency virus, pelvic inflammatory disease, spontaneous abortion and preterm birth 611.

Two studies investigated BV and fibroids using cross-sectional data 12,13. One was the Uterine Fibroid Study which found suggestions of a positive association between “other” infections (mainly BV) and fibroids among ~600 African-American women 12. The other was our recent study which found that African-American women self-reporting a BV diagnosis had elevated odds of multiple fibroids (≥2) and larger total fibroid volume (≥2 cm3) 13. In this current study in the same population, a group at high risk of BV 14, we prospectively followed women for incident fibroids. This is the first study to investigate the relationship between BV and fibroids prospectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used transvaginal ultrasound results and self-reported questionnaire data from participants in the ongoing National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Study of Environment, Lifestyle & Fibroids (SELF) described previously 15. In brief, starting in 2010, the study enrolled a volunteer sample of 1,695 African-American women ages 23–34 living in the Detroit, Michigan area. Follow-up visits continue approximately every 20 months for 5 years. Women were ineligible if they had previously been diagnosed with fibroids; had a hysterectomy; had ever taken medication to treat lupus, Grave’s disease, Sjogren’s scleroderma, or multiple sclerosis; or ever had any type of cancer treated with radiation or chemotherapy. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of NIEHS and Henry Ford Health System.

At enrollment ultrasound screening, 22% of participants had fibroids. This follow-up analysis was among women who did not have a fibroid detected at enrollment and completed both baseline and follow-up 1 data collection. The median interval between baseline and follow-up 1 was 19 months (interquartile range (IQR): 18–20 months). We excluded women who had a birth during the interval because birth has been shown to be protective of fibroids, most likely due to postpartum uterine remodeling 16,17.

Self-reported history of doctor-diagnosed BV (yes/no) at baseline was the exposure of interest. Fibroid status measured by ultrasound at follow-up 1 was the outcome. Fibroids were assessed by study sonographers as described previously 18 using transvaginal ultrasound, the standard procedure for the detection and diagnosis of fibroids 19. Participants with ≥1 fibroid ≥0.5 cm at the follow-up 1 visit ultrasound were considered to have incident fibroids.

Binomial regression models were used to compute risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the risk of incident fibroids for women with a history of BV compared to women without a history of BV. Time since first BV diagnosis was also examined. Among women with incident fibroids, we examined the risk of having multiple fibroids by BV status. Potential covariates were determined based on a review of the literature and their association with BV and the risk of fibroids (among unexposed, i.e., women without BV) in our data. The following baseline covariates were included in the full model: age in years (continuous), parity (nulliparous/parous), and alcohol (drinking level at the age when drinking the most: low, moderate, heavy). In addition, we conducted a sensitivity analysis excluding women who reported a new BV diagnosis at the first follow-up visit among those who had not previously reported a diagnosis (n=35) to make sure they were not influencing the results.

RESULTS

Of the 1,695 women enrolled, 660 were excluded (384 had a fibroid at enrollment, 1 was missing baseline BV data, 179 did not attend the follow-up visit, and 96 had a birth during the interval) leaving 1,035 eligible participants (characterized in Suppl. Table 1). Thirty-seven percent (n=385) reported a history of BV at baseline. The median time since first BV diagnosis was 6 years (IQR: 3–9 years). Ten percent (n=103) of women had fibroids discovered at ultrasound screening, 78% of whom had a single fibroid.

In multivariable analysis (Table 1), those with a self-reported BV diagnosis had a 35% increased risk of fibroids [aRR: 1.35 95% CI (0.93–1.95)]. Results were similar for the sensitivity analysis (data not shown). Among the 103 women with incident fibroids, those with a previous BV diagnosis were twice as likely to have ≥2 fibroids compared to 1 fibroid [aRR: 2.21 95% CI (1.01–4.81)]. Women whose first BV diagnosis was 3–5 years before baseline were the group that had a statistically significant increased risk of developing fibroids compared to those with no BV [aRR: 2.42 95% CI (1.42–4.11)].

Table 1.

Self-Reported Bacterial Vaginosis and Time Since Bacterial Vaginosis Diagnosis and Risk of Incident Uterine Fibroids and Multiple Fibroids among 23–34-Year-Old African-American Women in the Study of Environment, Lifestyle and Fibroids (SELF), Detroit, MI Metropolitan Area: Risk Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals

Incident Fibroids Age- adjusted RR 95% CI Multivariable- adjusted RRa 95% CI
No Yes
n% n%
History of Bacterial Vaginosis at Baseline
No 591 (91) 59 (9) 1.00 ref 1.00 ref
Yes 341 (89) 44 (11) 1.25 0.87, 1.81 1.35 0.93, 1.95
Time Since 1st Bacterial Vaginosis Diagnosisb
No Bacterial Vaginosis 591 (91) 59 (9) 1.00 ref 1.00 ref
0–2 years 78 (92) 7 (8) 1.02 0.48, 2.16 1.05 0.49, 2.23
3–5 years 87 (84) 16 (16) 2.02 1.20, 3.41 2.42 1.42, 4.11
≥ 6 years 179 (90) 20 (10) 1.02 0.63, 1.67 1.12 0.69, 1.82
Among women with Incident Fibroids
Number of Fibroids
1 ≥2
n% n%
History of Bacterial Vaginosis at Baseline
No 49 (83) 10 (17) 1.00 ref 1.00 ref
Yes 31 (70) 13 (30) 1.73 0.84, 3.58 2.21 1.01, 4.81

CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio

a

Adjusted for age, parity and alcohol at age when drinking most

b

1 participant was missing data on time since 1st bacterial vaginosis diagnosis

DISUCUSSION

We observed a positive association between BV and the risk of developing fibroids, but timing of BV may be important. BV was also associated with developing more than a single fibroid, consistent with our previous cross-sectional analysis of this same population 13.

BV can be chronic and recurring 20 with adverse upper-tract sequela 9. This could plausibly increase the risk of fibroids through a hypothesized injury/abnormal wound-healing process 21, but our findings need further replication.

Self-reported doctor-diagnosed BV may be subject to recall error and may under-estimate the relevant bacterial changes. Vaginal bacterial shifts may be non-symptomatic in as many as 40% of BV-positive cases based on Nugent scoring 22,23. This likely accounts for our relatively low BV prevalence (37%) compared to the prevalence of BV for African-American women in the National Health and Examination Survey by Nugent score (51%) 14. Furthermore, we had small numbers and limited power to detect an association for time since BV diagnosis. However, our study has unique strengths. We used prospective data on incident fibroids with a standardized measure based on systematic ultrasound screening. We also had extensive data to assess confounding and minimal missing data. Studies using Nugent scoring or polymerase chain reaction for BV detection are needed to investigate the association of BV bacterial changes with fibroid development.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Lauren Wilson and Katie O’Brien for review of a draft of the manuscript. We also thank our collaborators and study staff at Social and Scientific Systems in Research Triangle Park, NC and Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, MI.

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [grant number 10-E-N044]. Funding also came from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds designated for National Institute of Health research.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Abbreviations

BV

bacterial vaginosis

CI

confidence interval

NIEHS

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RR

risk ratio

RTI

reproductive tract infection

SELF

the Study of Environment, Lifestyle and Fibroids

US

United States

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2003;188(1):100–7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids. Lancet. 2001;357(9252):293–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03622-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Witherspoon JT, Butler VW. The etiology of uterine fibroids with special reference to the frequency of their occurrence in the Negro: a hypothesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1934;58:57–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sobel JD. Vaginitis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(26):1896–903. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199712253372607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Forsum U, Holst E, Larsson PG, Vasquez A, Jakobsson T, Mattsby-Baltzer I. Bacterial vaginosis--a microbiological and immunological enigma. APMIS. 2005;113(2):81–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm1130201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Atashili J, Poole C, Ndumbe PM, Adimora AA, Smith JS. Bacterial vaginosis and HIV acquisition: a meta-analysis of published studies. AIDS. 2008;22(12):1493–501. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283021a37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brotman RM, Klebanoff MA, Nansel TR, Yu KF, Andrews WW, Zhang J, Schwebke JR. Bacterial vaginosis assessed by gram stain and diminished colonization resistance to incident gonococcal, chlamydial, and trichomonal genital infection. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(12):1907–15. doi: 10.1086/657320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cherpes TL, Meyn LA, Krohn MA, Lurie JG, Hillier SL. Association between acquisition of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women and bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(3):319–25. doi: 10.1086/375819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haggerty CL, Totten PA, Tang G, Astete SG, Ferris MJ, Norori J, Bass DC, Martin DH, Taylor BD, Ness RB. Identification of novel microbes associated with pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. Sex Transm Infect. 2016;92(6):441–6. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Klebanoff MA, Hillier SL, Nugent RP, MacPherson CA, Hauth JC, Carey JC, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Trout W, Moawad A, Leveno KJ, Miodovnik M, Sibai BM, Vandorsten JP, Dombrowski MP, O’Sullivan MJ, Varner M, Langer O. Is bacterial vaginosis a stronger risk factor for preterm birth when it is diagnosed earlier in gestation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):470–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nelson DB, Hanlon AL, Wu G, Liu C, Fredricks DN. First Trimester Levels of BV-Associated Bacteria and Risk of Miscarriage Among Women Early in Pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(12):2682–7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1790-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Laughlin SK, Schroeder JC, Baird DD. New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Seminars in reproductive medicine. 2010;28(3):204–17. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1251477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moore KR, Cole SR, Dittmer DP, Schoenbach VJ, Smith JS, Baird DD. Self-Reported Reproductive Tract Infections and Ultrasound Diagnosed Uterine Fibroids in African-American Women. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2015;24(6):489–95. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koumans EH, Sternberg M, Bruce C, McQuillan G, Kendrick J, Sutton M, Markowitz LE. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001–2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(11):864–9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318074e565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Baird DD, Harmon QE, Upson K, Moore KR, Barker-Cummings C, Baker S, Cooper T, Wegienka G. A Prospective, Ultrasound-Based Study to Evaluate Risk Factors for Uterine Fibroid Incidence and Growth: Methods and Results of Recruitment. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2015;24(11):907–15. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baird DD, Dunson DB. Why is parity protective for uterine fibroids? Epidemiology. 2003;14(2):247–50. doi: 10.1097/01.EDE.0000054360.61254.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Laughlin SK, Herring AH, Savitz DA, Olshan AF, Fielding JR, Hartmann KE, Baird DD. Pregnancy-related fibroid reduction. Fertility and sterility. 2010;94(6):2421–3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moshesh M, Peddada SD, Cooper T, Baird D. Intraobserver Variability in Fibroid Size Measurements: Estimated Effects on Assessing Fibroid Growth. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2014;33(7):1217–1224. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.7.1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186(3):409–15. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Hocking J, Garland SM, Morris MB, Moss LM, Horvath LB, Kuzevska I, Fairley CK. High recurrence rates of bacterial vaginosis over the course of 12 months after oral metronidazole therapy and factors associated with recurrence. J Infect Dis. 2006;193(11):1478–86. doi: 10.1086/503780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wegienka G. Are uterine leiomyoma a consequence of a chronically inflammatory immune system? Medical hypotheses. 2012;79(2):226–31. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Klebanoff MA, Schwebke JR, Zhang J, Nansel TR, Yu KF, Andrews WW. Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(2):267–72. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000134783.98382.b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nelson DB, Bellamy S, Odibo A, Nachamkin I, Ness RB, Allen-Taylor L. Vaginal symptoms and bacterial vaginosis (BV): how useful is self-report? Development of a screening tool for predicting BV status. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135(8):1369–75. doi: 10.1017/S095026880700787X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES