Abstract
While unilateral nephrectomy (UNx) is suggested to protect against ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in the remaining kidney, the mechanisms underlying this protection remain to be elucidated. In this study, functional MRI was employed in a renal IRI rat model to reveal global and regional changes in renal filtration, perfusion, oxygenation and sodium handling, and microarray and pathway analyses were conducted to identify protective molecular mechanisms. Wistar rats were randomized to either UNx or sham UNx immediately prior to 37 minutes of unilateral renal artery clamping or sham operation under sevoflurane anesthesia. MRI was performed 24 hours after reperfusion. Blood and renal tissue were harvested. RNA was isolated for microarray analysis and QPCR validation of gene expression results. The perfusion (T1 value) was significantly enhanced in the medulla of the post-ischemic kidney following UNx. UNx decreased the expression of fibrogenic genes, i.a. Col1a1, Fn1 and Tgfb1 in the post-ischemic kidney. This was associated with a marked decrease in markers of activated myofibroblasts (Acta2/α-Sma and Cdh11) and macrophages (Ccr2). This was most likely facilitated by down-regulation of Pdgfra, thus inhibiting pericyte-myofibroblast differentiation, chemokine production (Ccl2/Mcp1) and macrophage infiltration. UNx reduced ischemic histopathologic injury. UNx may exert renoprotective effects against IRI through increased perfusion in the renal medulla and alleviation of the acute pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic responses possibly through decreased myofibroblast activation. The identified pathways involved may serve as potential therapeutic targets and should be taken into account in experimental models of IRI.
Introduction
Renal hypoperfusion and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) are leading causes of acute kidney injury [1]. Ischemic tolerance is enhanced, when unilateral nephrectomy (UNx) is performed prior to ischemia, creating a preconditioning stimulus, which diminishes both functional impairment and structural injury [2,3]. The elicited recovery stimulus is independent of compensatory renal growth, since it can be generated by UNx performed immediately prior to sustained ischemia [3]. Few published studies have addressed the mechanisms underlying the renoprotective effects, although such information may provide valuable insights into fundamental IRI mechanisms and novel repair/regenerative mechanisms.
UNx triggers both acute hemodynamic and neurohormonal/humoral changes [4–8], alters renal sodium and water handling [9] and mediates transcriptional changes, occurring within hours, in the remaining non-ischemic kidney [10]. There is subsequent cell proliferation and hypertrophy followed by nephron hypertrophy and compensatory kidney growth [11]. Studies have reported that UNx increases blood flow in the remaining post-ischemic kidney, reduces intrarenal levels of vasoconstrictors, such as thromboxane A2, and lowers plasma renin activity. These changes might potentially reduce medullary circulatory dysfunction and hypoxia following IRI [12–14]. It has further been suggested that altered regional blood flow rather than maintenance of total renal blood flow (RBF), in the remaining kidney, is fundamental to the effect of UNx [12,13].
Research into the molecular mechanisms triggered by UNx in the remaining post-ischemic kidney has focused primarily on vasoactive substances [2,12–14]. This is in spite of several reports on the molecular response induced by UNx without superimposed IRI. Hence, UNx has been shown to down-regulate growth inhibitors and alters the balance between growth control suppressor and inducer elements, leading to proliferation and hypertrophy [10,11]. Proliferation of tubular epithelial cells is crucial for renal recovery following IRI [15]. UNx stimulates a wide range of growth factors such as IGF-1 [16,17], GH [18,19], HGF [20], VEGF [21] and EGF [22,23] with beneficial pleiotropic effects (e.g. proliferative, anti-apoptotic and tubulogenic as well as vasodilatory properties) [24–26].
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of UNx on global and regional changes in renal filtration, perfusion and oxygenation as well as extracellular sodium regulation using non-invasive MRI technique both in the non-ischemic kidney and 24 hours after IRI, where persistent IRI-induced regional differences may be evident [27,28]. At this time point, repair and regenerative processes are active and may be further promoted by UNx. Using microarray technique, we aimed to identify differentially regulated genes following UNx, both in the non-ischemic and the ischemic setting. Our study revealed significant differences in regional perfusion as well as potentially renoprotective molecular mechanisms regulated by UNx. The myofibroblast may have a more prominent role in the very early inflammatory and fibrogenic response following renal IRI than earlier recognised.
Material and methods
Experimental animals
The national animal experiments inspectorate approved the study (number 2013−15−2934−00810). Standard housing conditions and husbandry practices were identical across the control and experimental groups. Adult male rats, Rattus norvegicus, Wistar (250–350 g) were supplied by Janiver Labs (Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) and housed pairwise in cages, an artificial 12 h:12 h light-dark cycle and controlled temperature and humidity (21 ± 2°C and 55 ± 2%). The rats had free access to tap water and standard rodent chow (Altromin, Lage, Germany). The rats were cared for daily and monitored for pain and distress between and after the procedures in accordance to the general distress scoring sheet from Wolfensohn et al [29]. The rats were allowed to acclimate at least 1 week prior to the surgical procedures.
Study design
Each animal underwent either right UNx or sham UNx, and was subjected to either 37 minutes of unilateral renal ischemia by left renal artery clamping or sham operation [30]. All operations were of similar total length. A total of 32 animals were randomized to the 4 groups as follows; sham (2 non-ischemic kidneys, n = 8), UNx (1 non-ischemic kidney, n = 8), IR (1 non-ischemic kidney, 1 post-ischemic kidney, n = 8) and IR+UNx (1 post-ischemic kidney, n = 8). One rat had to be replaced during surgery due to a renal cyst. Following 24 hours of reperfusion, the rat was anesthetized with sevoflurane and positioned in a MRI system, followed by harvesting of kidneys. The rats were terminated by cervical dislocation. Histopathologic assessment of renal tissue was performed in a blinded fashion. No further measures of blinding or randomization were taken. The study was designed and conducted according to international guidelines (S1 Text).
Surgical procedures
Anesthesia was induced and maintained by inhalation of sevoflurane (2.5–5%) in O2. An injection of buprenorphine (Temgesic ®; RB Pharmaceuticals Limited, Berkshire, UK) 0.05 mg/kg was given s.c. in order to minimize postoperative pain. Buprenorphine administration was repeated every 8–12 hours until study end. Four mL of isotonic saline was administered s.c. at two different abdominal sites to avoid dehydration. The rat was placed on a heating pad, and a rectal probe was used to monitor and keep core temperature at 36.5–37.0°C. Prior to renal ischemia or sham ischemia, core temperature was allowed to stabilize at the target temperature.
The abdominal wall was opened using a median incision. First, the right-sided nephrectomy or sham procedure was performed. Next, the left renal artery was carefully dissected, and a non-traumatic microvascular clamp was used to occlude the artery to induce 37 minutes of warm ischemia [30]. The sham ischemia procedure involved visual identification of the left renal hilus. In all rats, a single droplet of lidocaine (10 mg/mL) was applied to the surgical area prior to renal artery dissection and 2 minutes prior to microvascular clamp removal. All post-ischemic kidneys resumed normal surface color within a preset limit of 3 minutes. Finally, the abdominal wall was closed in two layers using 4–0 absorbable sutures.
MRI
MRI was performed 24 hours after induction of IRI using a 9.4 T preclinical MRI system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a dual tuned 1H/23NA volume rat coil (Doety Scientific, Columbia, SC). A tail vein catheter was inserted for contrast medium administration. During the MRI, the animal was kept under anesthesia with sevoflurane (3% sevoflurane, flow rate: 2 L/min). The body temperature was kept stable at 35–36°C, and respiration and capillary oxygen saturation were monitored. The MRI protocol included the following sequences: 1H T2‐weighted fast-spin-echo sequence, coronal and axial (repletion time (TR): 3 s, echo time (TE): 4 ms, flip angles: 90°/180°, echo train length (ETL): 4, echo spacing (ESP): 10 ms, FOV: 70 × 70 mm2, matrix: 128 × 128) for anatomical images. Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) sequence (R2*-weighted) was performed using an axial 1H-multi-echo gradient-echo sequence, covering the entire abdomen with 32 slices. The sequence parameters were: TR: 800 ms, ΔTE: 2 ms, slice thickness: 2 mm, flip angle: 90°, matrix: 128 × 128, FOV: 80 × 80 mm2. A single-slice segmented Look–Locker sequence with a gradient-echo readout was used to acquire T1-weighted data, using the sequence parameters: TR: 3 ms, TE: 2 ms, inversion times (TI): 150, 250, 400, 600, 900, 1200, 2500, 4000 ms, flip angle: 8°, slice thickness: 2 mm, matrix: 128 × 128, FOV: 80 × 80 mm2. A dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T2*-weighted sequence was performed using an axial 1H gradient-echo sequence, covering both kidneys in 1 slice, using the parameters: TR: 13.7 ms, TE: 1.85 ms, flip angle: 15°, slice thickness: 2 mm, matrix: 128 × 128, FOV: 60 × 60 mm2 with a single bolus of 0.05 mL of Gadoteric acid (Dotarem; 279.3 mg/mL; Guerbet, Villepinte, France) in isotonic saline (total injection volume of 1 mL and administered over 10 s).
Next, a sodium MRI was performed using 23Na gradient echo-sequence (TR: 60 ms, TE = 0.65 ms, flip angle: 90°, spectral width: 8 kHz, matrix: 32 x 32 x 8, FOV: 70 x 70 x 70 mm3.
Data were imported and processed offline, where parametric maps of the relaxation times T2* and T1 were calculated. These maps and the 23Na image were converted to the file format Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). Regions of interests (ROIs) were drawn and analyzed using OsiriX (Pixmeo SARL, Bernex, Switzerland) (Fig 1). DCE images were processed and analyzed using Mistar software (Apollo Medical Imaging Technology, Melbourne, Australia), in which measures of RBF and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were calculated based on a two-compartmental kinetic model.
Renal functional measurements
Plasma creatinine (Pcr) and urea (Purea) were measured using the Roche Cobas 6000 analyser (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).
Tissue handling
Kidneys were kept on ice and cut into two equal pieces along the short axis. One half was fixed in phosphate buffered 4% paraformaldehyde for 2–4 hours, washed and stored in phosphate buffered saline-Tween (PBS-Tween) at 4°C until further tissue preparation. The other half was divided into three parts: 1) cortex, 2) cortex and outer medulla, and 3) inner medulla, and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3000 × g. Kidney and plasma samples were stored at -80°C until further processing.
Histological examination
Fixed kidney tissue (all zones represented, including the renal papilla) was dehydrated, paraffin-embedded and cut in slices of 2-μm on a rotary microtome (Leica, Microsystems A/S, Herlev, Denmark). Then tissue was stained with the periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain. The histopathologic damage in cortex and outer medulla was evaluated by a board certified pathologist, SK using conventional light microscopy.
RNA isolation
The kidney tissue was homogenised in lysis buffer (Macherey Nagel, Düren, Germany) on a TissueLyser LT (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) for 30 seconds at 1250 rpm and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Total RNA was obtained using an RNA Isolation Kit (Macherey Nagel) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA concentration and purity were determined spectrophotometrically. The same batch of total RNA, containing both renal cortex and outer medulla, was used both for microarray analysis and confirmatory QPCR.
Microarray analysis
Samples from three animals from each group were randomly selected for microarray analysis performed by a commercial transcriptomics provider (Aros Applied Biotechnology, Eurofins, Aarhus, Denmark) using the Affymetrix Clariom D array cartridge (Thermo Fischer, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to standard procedures. cDNA was synthesized from 150 ng RNA, transcribed in vitro, and labelled utilizing the WT PLUS reagent kit. The generated target RNA was loaded onto the array cartridge and hybridized for 16 hours at 45°C. After washing and staining in the GeneChip Fluidics Station, the array was scanned in the GeneChip Scanner 7G. The image files were imported into the Affymetrix Expression Console software. Background correction and quantile normalization were performed after quality control of the data. The experimental data have been deposited in the NBCI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under series entry GSE100540.
Gene expression analysis
The Affymetrix Clariom D array detects all known, coding rat genes. Normalized gene expression data was analysed in the open source software Multiexperiment Viewer version 4.9.0, which is part of the TM4 microarray software suite [32]. The statistical analysis was done by employing the Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM)-method [33]. The number of permutations was set to 200, S0 (the exchangeability factor, which was set to the Tusher et al method [33]), and the k-nearest neighbours method for imputation of missing data with k = 10 was used. Unpaired two-class analysis was performed. A false discovery rate (FDR) of 10% was selected in the functional enrichment and specific pathway analysis. Functional enrichment analysis was done by using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 [34]. The following criteria defined the threshold of an enriched category: a modified Fischer Exact p-value of < 0.05 (> 1.3 after -log10 transformation), and n ≥ 2 genes represented in a category. For further pathway analysis the Ingenuity ® Pathway Analysis (IPA) software (Qiagen Bioinformatics, Hilden, Germany) was used.
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
cDNA was synthesised using a RevertAid First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples were made using Maxima SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A standard curve was generated by mixing an equal amount of cDNA from each experimental group, diluting the mixture successively and applying it into separate wells. The QPCR protocol consisted of 40 cycles of denaturation (30 seconds at 90°C), annealing and synthesis (60 seconds at 60°C). The primers are shown in supplementary files (S1 Table). Gapdh was used for normalisation of the target gene.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Normality was checked by a quantile plot and histogram. Equality of standard deviations was checked by Bartlett’s test. Data were ln-transformed, when necessary. Comparison of means between groups was performed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni's multiple comparisons post-test or the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test. Comparison of means within a group (MRI-data) was performed by paired one-way ANOVA or Friedman's test with Bonferroni’s or Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-tests. The comparison of the means of right and left kidney weights in the IR group was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test since these data did not meet the assumption of normal distribution. Post-hoc analysis of differences in histopathologic injury between the two ischemic groups was performed using Student’s t-test. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were analysed using STATA version IC/13.1 for Windows (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 6.05 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Sample size calculation was based on a pilot study, where UNx attenuated the IRI-induced increase in Tnf mRNA.
Results
All animals survived until planned termination at the study end. IRI significantly increased kidney weight in both the IR and the IR+UNx group compared with the sham group (Table 1). As expected the IR+UNx group demonstrated a marked rise in Pcr and Purea compared with the IR group. UNx significantly reduced renal histopathologic injury, e.g. epithelial necrosis and outer medullary casts, after IRI (Table 2).
Table 1. Physical parameters, plasma and arterial gas analysis parameters.
Sham | UNx | IR | IR+UNx | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BW [g] (baseline) | 295 ± 11.5 | 305 ± 10.5 | 296 ± 8.4 | 305 ± 12.2 |
Δ BW [g] | -4.0 ± 6.1 | 1.9 ± 4.3 | 3.8 ± 2.8 | 5.7 ± 2.9 |
KW [g/100 g BW] | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.43 ± 0.014 (LK) *** 0.38 ± 0.012 (RK) $ |
0.40 ± 0.01 * |
Pcr [μmol/L] | 26 ± 1.9 | 41 ± 1.6 * | 39 ± 1.7 | 198 ± 42.6 ****, # |
Purea [mmol/L] | 6 ± 0.2 | 8 ± 0.3 | 8 ± 0.3 | 25 ± 4.1 **** |
PO2 [kPa] | 8.4 ± 0.6 | 9.2 ± 0.9 | 9.5 ± 0.6 | 11.0 ± 0.9 |
Hb [mmol/L] | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 7.7 ± 0.1 | 8,2 ± 0.3 | 7.6 ± 0.1 |
Hct [%] | 36 ± 1.4 | 38 ± 0.6 | 40 ± 1.6 | 37 ± 0.6 |
SO2 [%] | 78 ± 4 | 80 ± 5 | 83 ± 3 | 88 ± 1 |
Values are presented as means ± SEM. Measurements are from the day of termination unless otherwise stated. Comparison of unpaired group means was performed using either two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons post-test or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons post-test.
*, P < 0.05
***, P < 0.005
****, P < 0.0001 vs. sham
#, P < 0.05 vs. IR. Comparison of paired group means was performed by Wilcoxon signed rank test.
$, P < 0.01 vs. left kidney (LK).
BW, body weight; KW, kidney weight; Pcr, plasma creatinine; Purea, plasma urea; PO2, partial pressure of oxygen; Hb, hemoglobin; Hct: hematocrit; SO2, oxygen saturation; UNx, unilateral nephrectomy; IR, ischemia-reperfusion. Number of animals: sham, UNx and IR groups (n = 8), IR+UNx (n = 6).
Table 2. Effect of unilateral nephrectomy on renal histologic damage after ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Sham | UNx | IR | IR+UNx | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cortical casts | 0 | 0 | 1.2 ± 0.17 | 1.6 ± 0.18 |
Epithelial necrosis | 0 | 0 | 3.6 ± 0.18 | 2.7 ± 0.42 * |
Tubular dilatation | 0 | 0 | 1.5 ± 0.19 | 1.0 ± 0.26 |
Epithelial cell detachment | 0 | 0 | 3.3 ± 0.25 | 2.3 ± 0.42 |
Edema | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Inflammation | 0 | 0 | 0.13 ± 0.13 | 0.17 ± 0.17 |
Outer medullary casts | 0 | 0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 2.8 ± 0.48 * |
Values are presented as means ± SEM. Histopathologic scores for each item ranged from 0–4 depending on the size of the affected area: 0: < 1%, 1: 1–5%, 2: 5–25%, 3: 25–50% and 4: 50–100%. Evaluation was done by co-author SK, who is a board certified pathologist. Comparison of IR and IR+UNx group means was performed as a post-hoc analysis using Student's t-test.
*, P < 0.05 compared with IR.
UNx, unilateral nephrectomy; IR, ischemia-reperfusion. Number of animals: sham, UNx and IR groups (n = 8), IR+UNx (n = 6).
Two animals from the IR+UNx group were excluded from all analyses due to a hemorrhagic infarction in the kidney.
Unilateral nephrectomy enhances perfusion in the inner medulla
DCE-MRI was applied to assess kidney perfusion and filtration. The DCE-MRI estimates of RBF and GFR are shown in Fig 2A and 2B. IRI reduced GFR in the IR+UNx and IR groups compared with the sham group (IR+UNx, P < 0.05; IR, P = NS). Neither IRI nor UNx decreased RBF compared with sham. However, RBF was increased in the IR group compared with the IR+UNx group (P < 0.001). To examine regional perfusion and oxygenation in the kidney, slice-selective T1- and BOLD-weighted sequences with parametric mapping were used. Fig 2C shows calculated T1 values in the different zones of the kidney. The T1 was 66% (P = 0.14) and 83% (P < 0.01) greater in the outer and inner medulla, respectively, in the UNx group compared with the sham group. The T1 value was significantly higher in outer medulla compared with cortex within the UNx group (Fig 2D). The inner medulla T1 was significantly higher (82%) in the IR+UNx group compared with the IR group. The T2*(BOLD)-weighted MRI is sensitive to changes in the amount of deoxygenated Hb per voxel, and R2* (1/T2*) is generally regarded to relate linearly to the Hb concentration. In the sham group, the R2* value was significantly lower in inner medulla compared with cortex (Fig 2F). The cortical R2* value was significantly decreased by IRI, indicating a higher oxygenation in cortex after IRI. We used a 23Na-MRI sequence to investigate possible changes in the renal cortico-medullary sodium gradient following UNx. As shown in Fig 2G, the 23Na signal intensity increased gradually from cortex to inner medulla in all groups. In Fig 2H, the inner medullary 23Na signal intensity normalized to cortex is presented. IRI significantly reduced this gradient. We have summarized main results in Table 3.
Table 3. Changes in outcome measures.
UNx vs sham | IR vs sham | IR+UNx vs sham | IR+UNx vs IR | |
---|---|---|---|---|
DCE-MRI, GFR [mL/s] | ↔ | ↔ | ↓ | ↔ |
DCE-MRI, RBF [mL/s] | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↓ |
Slice-selective T1-weighted-MRI, T1 [ms] | ↑ | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ |
BOLD-MRI, R2* [s-1] | ↔ | ↓ | ↓ | ↔ |
23Na-MRI, CM sodium gradient | ↔ | ↓ | ↓ | ↔ |
Morphologic injury | ↔ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ |
Pro-inflammatory gene expression | ↔ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ |
Pro-fibrotic gene expression | ↔ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ |
Unilateral nephrectomy mainly up-regulates genes in the remaining non-ischemic kidney, whereas it mainly down-regulates genes in the remaining post-ischemic kidney
S1 Fig displays the total number of differentially regulated genes identified by unpaired two-class SAM analysis. The 56 genes differentially regulated by UNx were exclusively up-regulated compared with the sham treatment. Gene enrichment analysis showed that the most highly enriched biofunctional categories were mitotic cytokinesis, chromosome segregation and mitotic cell cycle (Fig 3A).
UNx significantly down-regulated the expression of 47 genes in the setting of IRI. Gene enrichment analysis showed that UNx significantly down-regulated genes involved in wound healing, ECM organization and cell adhesion as well as positive regulation of fibroblast proliferation and immune response (Fig 3B and S2 Table). UNx was associated with suppression of genes encoding different types of collagen (Col1a2 and Col12a1), collagen triple helix repeat containing 1 (Cthrc1), tenascin C (Tnc), fibulin- 1 (Fbln1) and fibronectin-1 (Fn1). In addition, Acta2 (also known as α-Sma, actin, alpha 2, smooth muscle, aorta), which is expressed by differentiated myofibroblasts, was down-regulated. The above mentioned genes were all significantly induced by IRI. The top differentially regulated genes are presented in supplementary files (S3 Table).
UNx down-regulates the expression of pro-fibrotic genes in the remaining post-ischemic kidney
Pathway analysis was performed to investigate the possible underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the observed suppression of fibrogenic genes.
S2A Fig shows the most highly enriched canonical pathways. UNx down-regulated the genes in the pathway hepatic fibrosis/hepatic stellate cell activation such as platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha (Pdgfra). UNx also suppressed genes associated with the inflammatory response (complement system, agranulocyte adhesion and diapedesis and granulocyte adhesion and diapedesis, dendritic cell maturation). Pathway analysis identified the most significantly regulated network of molecules (S2B Fig). Next, we aimed at exploring differentially regulated genes associated with fibrosis and inflammation and the possible interactions with the diseases and biofunctions application in IPA. UNx significantly suppressed genes in the biofunctions: fibrosis and inflammation of organ (Fig 4, 4A, 4B and 4C).
QPCR confirms that UNx significantly suppresses fibrosis and inflammation-associated genes
We validated microarray results by QPCR in relation to the expression of genes associated with fibrosis, macrophages and immune mediators. IRI was associated with a significant increase in the expression of Col1a1 and Fn1 compared with the sham treated animals (Fig 5, 5A and 5B), while UNx abolished this increase. IRI was associated with a significant increase in the expression of α-Sma compared with the sham group, and UNx decreased this expression significantly compared with the IR group (Fig 5C). Cadherin-11 (Cdh11) was significantly up-regulated in the IR group, but not in the IR+UNx group (Fig 5D). The expression of Pdgfra was also significantly increased in the IR group (Fig 5E), and this was attenuated by prior UNx (P < 0.0001). The Pdgfrb gene demonstrated a similar expression pattern (Fig 5F)
The transcript level of the C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (Ccr2) gene expressed by monocyte/macrophages [35] was attenuated by prior UNx (P < 0.005) (Fig 6A). Transcript levels of both Mpeg1 (macrophage expressed-1, also known as Perforin-2) and Csf1r (colony stimulating factor 1 receptor) [36] were significantly down-regulated in the IR+UNx group compared with the IR group (Fig 6, 6B and 6C). Expression level of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (Mcp1) was significantly increased in the IR group compared with sham, and attenuated by UNx (Fig 7A). UNx blocked the up-regulation of the vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (Vcam1) (P < 0.0001, Fig 7B) observed in relation to IRI. Interestingly, Tgfb1 was significantly increased by IRI in the non-UNx group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by UNx (Fig 7C). UNx down-regulated thrombospondin-1 (Thbs1) compared with the sham group both in the non-ischemic kidney (P < 0.005) and the post-ischemic, contralateral kidney (P < 0.0001, Fig 7D). Thbs1 was also suppressed by IRI in the non-UNx group (P < 0.01). The mRNA level of Cd36 was suppressed in the UNx group and the IR group compared with sham (P = 0.47, P < 0.01), but was further down-regulated by the combination of UNx and IR (P < 0.0001, Fig 6D).
Discussion
The main findings of our study are that 1) UNx reduced ischemic histopathologic injury both in cortex and outer medulla of the remaining, contralateral kidney, 2) this could be attributed to UNx-mediated increase in medullary perfusion and 3) a decreased pro-inflammatory response. It may be speculated that UNx reduces post-ischemic tissue injury and expression of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic genes by improving medullary perfusion. On the other hand, it is also possible that UNx facilitates vasodilatation and improved perfusion by reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as Tnf.
Alterations in hemodynamics, oxygenation and sodium handling following UNx with and without IRI
This study demonstrated that UNx increases perfusion in the inner medulla in both the remaining non-ischemic and post-ischemic kidney. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the changes in regional perfusion following UNx with superimposed IRI. A number of experimental IRI studies have found that blood flow to the outer medulla is persistently and disproportionately (relative to RBF reduction) reduced in the reperfusion phase, aggravating tissue injury in this area [37,38]. Previous experimental studies have found that UNx reduces renal dysfunction and tissue injury 24–48 hours to 2 weeks after IRI [2,3,12–14,39–41] In general, the improved GFR is associated with an increased RBF (recovery or absolute) [12–14,39–41], but it is not always the case [3,12,13]. Furthermore, UNx does not always promote increased GFR in the post-ischemic kidney, even when RBF is maintained (at 160 min into reperfusion) [41]. Improved renal function may be caused by diminished structural injury instead, which we did detect. Interestingly, it has been speculated that altered regional blood flow rather than maintenance of total RBF is fundamental to the effect of UNx [12,13]. Our main finding is that UNx increases medullary perfusion. It is possible that intrarenal redistribution of blood flow is a prerequisite for the observed increase in inner medullary perfusion. Such mechanism is supported by Moskowitz et al. [42], demonstrating that blood flow is redistributed from renal cortex to renal medulla within 1 hour after UNx. This seems possible since we also noted that UNx increased perfusion in both inner and outer medulla in the non-ischemic kidney compared with cortex. However, we did not detect a concomitant drop in cortical perfusion in the UNx groups, implying that the increase in medullary perfusion theoretically would need to be dependent on an increase in total RBF. Nevertheless, our data showed that the RBF was unaffected 24 hours after UNx compared with the sham group, albeit lower than the IR group. Previous studies have shown that RBF increased in the remaining non-ischemic kidney following UNx [12,13,43,44] (30 minutes to 6 weeks post-nephrectomy) or the remaining ischemic kidney [12–14,39–41] (2 hours to 2 weeks after IRI). This discrepancy between studies may relate to differences in assessment method, since neither of the reported studies used MRI, model-specific factors (ischemia time, species/strain differences, etc.) and/or differences in the time point of measurements. In our study, UNx did not cause an increase in the MRI-based GFR estimate in the remaining non-ischemic kidney at 24 hours of reperfusion. This finding is in contrast to the majority of previous experimental studies and clinical reports from living kidney donors [12,13,45]. IRI only lead to a statistical significant reduction in GFR in the IR+UNx group in which large increases in Pcr and Purea were also observed. However, we previously showed that even 60 minutes of unilateral ischemia, normally giving rise to severe AKI, only gives rise to minor increases in Pcr and Purea 24 hours after ischemia, when a normal contrateral kidney is left in situ [46]. In addition, both DCE-MRI and the slice-selective T1-sequence are known to have limitations, which could explain the inconsistencies in our data [47]. The slice-selective T1-sequence has the advantage of having a high spatial resolution that enables the detection of signal intensity differences in the renal compartments, but the calculated value is obviously influenced by many factors, including perfusion, tissue composition and water content.
Sodium reabsorption in the remaining kidney will decrease acutely following UNx in order to maintain sodium homeostasis, potentially lowering oxygen demand. We did not find any significant effect of UNx on sodium signal intensity in any of the renal zones. We did, however, as expected, observe IRI-induced attenuation of the cortico-medullary sodium gradient. Similar results have been reported in the early phase of reperfusion (10–60 minutes after index ischemia) and 6 hours after induction of AKI by nephrotoxic chemicals [48,49]. Tubular transport and the countercurrent exchange system are compromised during IRI, decreasing osmolarity in the medulla. Our data extends the findings in showing that the sodium signal intensity gradient is also disrupted 24 hours after reperfusion. In addition, our data show that the diminished sodium gradient seems to be a result of lower sodium signal intensity in inner medulla as well as a higher level in cortex. Atthe et al. found that relaxation rates in cortex and medulla were equally affected by IRI. This supports the use of sodium signal intensity as a proxy for sodium concentration in evaluating cortico-medullary gradient differences between non-ischemic and ischemic kidneys [48]. It can be speculated that the increased sodium signal intensity in cortex and the decreased level in the inner medulla could be a compensatory shift in reabsorption of sodium to cortical proximal convoluted tubules, compensating for impaired tubular reabsorption in the more damaged medullary straight portion of the proximal tubules and thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle that compromises the countercurrent mechanism in the first place [49]. However, we cannot rule out that it is caused by changed relaxation rates in out setup, morphologic injury and edema [50], since tubular sodium reabsorption is in general compromised by IRI through a reduction in tubular sodium transporters [51]. We observed a concomitant decrease in the R2* in the cortex of the post-ischemic kidney compared with non-ischemic kidneys. This could be explained by the volume effect of edema on the R2* parameter. In line with our results, Oostendorp et al. also found a lower R2* value in cortex of ischemic kidneys 24 hours after reperfusion suggesting a higher oxygenation [28]. In inner medulla, the R2* value was not significantly different comparing the UNx groups to non-UNx groups, even though we observed an increased T1 value. It may be possible that oxygen consumption is correspondingly increased in the UNx groups, thus tending to increase the R2*. Outer medullary hypoxia has been demonstrated after IRI, by BOLD-MRI, in both the immediate reperfusion phase (up to 100 min) and 24 hours after reperfusion [28,52]. Our results could not confirm this. However, we did detect a low R2* in inner medulla in the sham group. This finding is similar to other studies and probably caused by increased water content, lower vascular volume and Hct per tissue volume [53].
In summary, we showed that UNx enhanced perfusion in the inner medulla of the kidney. This finding may play a role in the overall protection afforded by UNx against IR-induced kidney injury. However, UNx did not significantly change the renal oxygenation or the cortico-medullary sodium gradient as assessed by BOLD and 23Na-MRI. In contrast to previous investigations, UNx did not increase GFR or RBF.
The transcriptional response to UNx with and without IRI
Under normophysiologic states, UNx induced the expression of genes associated with cell proliferation, whereas UNx suppressed several genes encoding structural ECM components in the post-ischemic kidney.
The transcriptional response to UNx without superimposed IRI
The gene enrichment analysis showed that UNx induced genes that serve important functions during cell cycle progression and mitosis. The most highly enriched biofunctional categories were mitotic cytokinesis, chromosome segregation and mitotic cell cycle. These functions are part of the processes exclusively taking place in the M phase of cell cycle. For instance, UNx induced Plk-1 (polo-like kinase 1), Cdk-1 (cyclin-dependent kinase 1) and Ki-67 (marker of proliferation Ki-67). This highly indicates that UNx induces cell proliferation in the remaining kidney at 24 hours after UNx. Compensatory kidney growth was observed in 79.3% of the cases 6–12 months after human kidney donation [54]. Our study supports the results of other studies showing that the gene transcription pattern is altered acutely (at 1 hour) following UNx [10]. In contrast to our data, compensatory kidney growth was promoted by down-regulation of growth inhibition elements at 24 hours in the study by Hauser et al. [11]. We found no changes in the expression of various growth factors previously implicated in compensatory kidney growth after UNx [17–21,23]. The proliferative response induced by UNx could be beneficial for the repair and regeneration of injured tubules.
The transcriptional response to UNx with superimposed IRI
The most abundantly suppressed genes by UNx belonged to the biological group of structural ECM components such as different types of collagen (1a2, 8a1, 1a1, 12a1 and 6a3), Fn1, Fbln1 and fibrillin-1. An interesting finding is that UNx also reduced the expression of α-Sma and Cdh11 expressed by (activated) myofibroblasts [55]. We validated the microarray data and explored the underlying molecular mechanisms. We demonstrate that UNx diminished the IRI-induced increase in expression of representative genes encoding structural ECM components Col1a1 and Fn1 at 24 hours of reperfusion. Chronically activated and highly α-Sma expressing myofibroblasts are the dominant cell type expressing Col1a1 and Fn1 in the late fibrotic stage of ischemic kidney injury. Pericyte to myofibroblast differentiation has been implicated as an important source of myofibroblasts in the injured kidney [56]. Their role in the renal repair process, starting within 24 hours after the ischemic insult, is less well described. The elevated Cdh11 supports that myofibroblasts are the primary cells expressing α-Sma in our study. Cdh11 is a cell-cell adherens junction, highly expressed by activated (α-Sma-positive) myofibroblasts in the skin [55]. Interestingly, Cdh11 was recently found to be increased in both renal tissue and urine in CKD animal models (including IRI) and in patients with CKD [57,58]. We document that IRI indeed induces α-Sma and Cdh11 simultaneously, suggesting that myofibroblast proliferation and activation is triggered by IRI already at 24 hours of reperfusion. This finding suggests that myofibroblasts may also play a role in the early injury phase after renal IRI. IRI induced the expression of monocyte/macrophage genes such as Ccr2, Mpeg1 and Csfr1r, which indicates the presence of activated macrophages recruited into the injured kidney. Our results showed that UNx is associated with reduced expression of these genes, indicating reduced infiltration of macrophages. In addition, UNx reduced the expression of Pdgfra. Most importantly this is in line with a previous report by Hauser et al. [11]. Nakagawa et al. noted that Pdgfra and -b transcript levels were up-regulated acutely after 50 minutes of bilateral renal artery clamping [59]. We observed induction of the Pdgfra and -b in the post-ischemic kidney, but only in the IR group. Interestingly, Chen et al. showed that both Pdgfr-subunit transcripts were up-regulated in the kidney from 1–14 days after unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO), the α-subunit exclusively being expressed by pericytes [60]. Both specific and dual blockade of the Pdgfrs inhibited pericyte proliferation and differentiation into myofibroblasts, Mcp1 transcript level, macrophage infiltration and Tgfb1 expression at 4 days and fibrosis at 14 days following UUO. This highlights the pericyte/myofibroblast as a central mediator of inflammation and fibrogenesis. Our data, though only assessed on the transcriptional level, suggested that UNx may diminish the IRI-induced proliferation of pericytes and myofibroblasts, in turn reducing the expression of ECM components. This may have additional immunomodulatory effects due to lowering of the pericyte/myofibroblast contribution to Mcp1 (protein) production.
Reduced myofibroblast and ECM-gene expression could also be related to the observed attenuated Tgfb1 levels. Tgfb1 (protein) induces proliferation and activation of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts [61]. Tgfb1 (protein) is produced by a variety of cells during IRI, including pro-fibrotic subtypes of macrophages, e.g. the Cd36 positive macrophages [62–65]. In our model, the decrease in myofibroblast markers and particularly in attenuated ECM gene expression could partially be explained by diminished macrophage infiltration in the kidney, including Cd36 positives. LPS depletion of macrophages attenuated persistent inflammation and fibrosis 4–8 weeks after IRI [66] UNx was associated with a significant reduction in Thbs1 expression. Inhibition of Thbs1 (protein) has been shown to be renoprotective against IRI-induced tubular damage and inflammation [67,68], potentially mediated by less activation of the latent Tgfb1 (protein) [69]. Interestingly, our microarray results also revealed that UNx attenuated the rise in connective tissue growth factor (Cnn2), a matricellular protein (non-structural ECM protein) with multiple pro-fibrotic functions. Cnn2 (protein) is secreted by fibroblasts and is both a potent activator of myofibroblasts, but also a co-factor for Tgfb1 (protein) binding to its receptor [55,70]. UNx was associated with the down-regulation of additional matricellular protein genes following IRI such as Sparc (Osteonectin) and Tnc, playing essential roles in inflammation and fibrogenesis in other organs such as the heart [71,72]. Recently, Tnc (protein) was also found to be important in kidney fibrosis in promoting fibroblast proliferation [73]. IR+UNx was also associated with the down-regulation of complement factor and receptor genes as well as the Vcam1 gene, consistent with earlier findings, and probably contributing to the reduced infiltration of immune cells in our model [11,74,75].
Taken together, our results show that 1) UNx changed the transcriptional profile in the remaining non-ischemic and post-ischemic kidney, 2) only a relatively small number of genes were differentially expressed after UNx; however, in the remaining post-ischemic kidney these genes were functionally related. 3) UNx was associated with diminished structural ECM gene expression. 4) This may be mediated by inhibition of pericyte/myofibroblast activation (through reduced expression of Pdgfra, Cdh11, Tgfb1, and matricellular genes), and reduced macrophage infiltration in the post-ischemic kidney. Our data points to the pericyte/myofibroblast as a potential target for modulating the inflammatory response both in the early injury phase, but also later in persistent chronic inflammation and fibrogenesis. Our study is limited by having only data from one time point. Hence, we cannot firmly conclude what happens in later stages of the injury phase, the recovery phase or long-term, on the occurrence of tissue injury, inflammation and fibrosis in this model.
Conclusion
This study provides new insights into the potential renoprotective mechanisms triggered by UNx against renal IRI. UNx reduced ischemic histopathologic injury and this could be attributed to enhanced perfusion in the inner parts of the post-ischemic kidney, and a marked attenuation of the post-ischemic pro-inflammatory and fibrogenic response by targeting the pericyte/myofibroblast. These findings could be either linked or independently occurring events, potentially protecting the kidney. The myofibroblast may have a more prominent role in the very early inflammatory and fibrogenic response following renal IRI than earlier recognised.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Gitte Kall and Gitte Schou for their expert technical assistance.
Data Availability
Data are available at Figshare.com under the following DOIs: Physical parameters and plasma measurements: https://figshare.com/s/af9573a72310d601c448 Results of MRI experiments: https://figshare.com/s/5fd18f27eef9358ef758 Results of QPCR: https://figshare.com/s/d499e8754c7a4854f6f1 Results of histopathologic evaluation: https://figshare.com/s/400c506e96d97b254621 The experimental microarray data have been deposited in the NBCI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under series entry GSE100540.
Funding Statement
The work was supported by the following: The Danish Society of Nephrology Research Foundation, no grant number (http://nephrology.dk); The A.P. Møller Medical Science Promotion Foundation, no grant number (www.apmollerfonde.dk); The Helen and Ejnar Bjørnow's Foundation, no grant number (www.bjoernowsfond.dk); and The P.A. Messerschmidt and Wife's Foundation, no grant number (www.bechbruun.com/da/Mennesker/JHW). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Sharfuddin AA, Weisbord SD, Palevsky PM, Molitoris BA. Acute Kidney Injury In: Skorecki K, Chertow GM, Marsden PA, Taal MW, Yu ASL, editors. Brenner and Rector's The Kidney. E-Book. 10th ed.: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016. p. 958–1011. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nakajima T, Miyaji T, Kato A, Ikegaya N, Yamamoto T, Hishida A. Uninephrectomy reduces apoptotic cell death and enhances renal tubular cell regeneration in ischemic ARF in rats. Am J Physiol 1996. October;271(4 Pt 2):F846–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fried TA, Hishida A, Barnes JL, Stein JH. Ischemic acute renal failure in the rat: protective effect of uninephrectomy. Am J Physiol 1984. October;247(4 Pt 2):F568–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lin SY, Humphreys MH. Centrally administered naloxone blocks reflex natriuresis after acute unilateral nephrectomy. Am J Physiol 1985. September;249(3 Pt 2):F390–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Krohn AG, Peng BB, Antell HI, Stein S, Waterhouse K. Compensatory renal hypertrophy: the role of immediate vascular changes in its production. J Urol 1970. May;103(5):564–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Young LS, Regan MC, Sweeney P, Barry KM, Ryan MP, Fitzpatrick JM. Changes in regional renal blood flow after unilateral nephrectomy using the techniques of autoradiography and microautoradiography. J Urol 1998. September;160(3 Pt 1):926–931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Humphreys MH, Lin SY, Wiedemann E. Renal nerves and the natriuresis following unilateral renal exclusion in the rat. Kidney Int 1991. January;39(1):63–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Humphreys MH, Lin SY, Ribstein J, Wiedemann E. Reflex responses to reductions in functioning renal mass. Fed Proc 1985. October;44(13):2840–2845. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fong D, Denton KM, Moritz KM, Evans R, Singh RR. Compensatory responses to nephron deficiency: adaptive or maladaptive? Nephrology (Carlton) 2014. March;19(3):119–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moskowitz DW, Liu W. Gene expression after uninephrectomy in the rat: simultaneous expression of positive and negative growth control elements. J Urol 1995. October;154(4):1560–1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hauser P, Kainz A, Perco P, Bergmeister H, Mitterbauer C, Schwarz C, et al. Transcriptional response in the unaffected kidney after contralateral hydronephrosis or nephrectomy. Kidney Int 2005. December;68(6):2497–2507. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00725.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kato A, Hishida A, Tanaka I, Komatsu K. Uninephrectomy prevents the ischemia-induced increase in renin activity. Nephron 1997;75(1):72–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kato A, Hishida A, Nakajima T. Role of thromboxane A2 and prostacyclin in uninephrectomy-induced attenuation of ischemic renal injury. Kidney Int 1995. November;48(5):1577–1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kato A, Hishida A. Amelioration of post-ischaemic renal injury by contralateral uninephrectomy: a role of endothelin-1. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001. August;16(8):1570–1576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bonventre JV, Yang L. Cellular pathophysiology of ischemic acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest 2011. November;121(11):4210–4221. doi: 10.1172/JCI45161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shohat J, Davidowitz M, Erman A, Silbergeld A, Boner G. Serum and renal IGF-I levels after uninephrectomy in the rat. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1997. April;57(2):167–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fagin JA, Melmed S. Relative increase in insulin-like growth factor I messenger ribonucleic acid levels in compensatory renal hypertrophy. Endocrinology 1987. February;120(2):718–724. doi: 10.1210/endo-120-2-718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cingel-Ristic V, Flyvbjerg A, Drop SL. The physiological and pathophysiological roles of the GH/IGF-axis in the kidney: lessons from experimental rodent models. Growth Horm IGF Res 2004. December;14(6):418–430. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2004.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Flyvbjerg A, Bennett WF, Rasch R, van Neck JW, Groffen CA, Kopchick JJ, et al. Compensatory renal growth in uninephrectomized adult mice is growth hormone dependent. Kidney Int 1999. December;56(6):2048–2054. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00776.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nagaike M, Hirao S, Tajima H, Noji S, Taniguchi S, Matsumoto K, et al. Renotropic functions of hepatocyte growth factor in renal regeneration after unilateral nephrectomy. J Biol Chem 1991. December 5;266(34):22781–22784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Flyvbjerg A, Schrijvers BF, De Vriese AS, Tilton RG, Rasch R. Compensatory glomerular growth after unilateral nephrectomy is VEGF dependent. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2002. August;283(2):E362–6. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00007.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kanda S, Saha PK, Nomata K, Taide M, Nishimura N, Igawa T, et al. Transient increase in renal epidermal growth factor content after unilateral nephrectomy in the mouse. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1991. February;124(2):188–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kanda S, Igawa T, Sakai H, Nomata K, Kanetake H, Saito Y. Anti-epidermal growth factor antibody inhibits compensatory renal hyperplasia but not hypertrophy after unilateral nephrectomy in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992. September 16;187(2):1015–1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hirschberg R, Ding H. Mechanisms of insulin-like growth factor-I-induced accelerated recovery in experimental ischemic acute renal failure. Miner Electrolyte Metab 1998;24(4):211–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dai C, Yang J, Liu Y. Single injection of naked plasmid encoding hepatocyte growth factor prevents cell death and ameliorates acute renal failure in mice. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002. February;13(2):411–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen J, Chen JK, Harris RC. Deletion of the epidermal growth factor receptor in renal proximal tubule epithelial cells delays recovery from acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2012. July;82(1):45–52. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Molitoris BA. Therapeutic translation in acute kidney injury: the epithelial/endothelial axis. J Clin Invest 2014. June;124(6):2355–2363. doi: 10.1172/JCI72269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Oostendorp M, de Vries EE, Slenter JM, Peutz-Kootstra CJ, Snoeijs MG, Post MJ, et al. MRI of renal oxygenation and function after normothermic ischemia-reperfusion injury. NMR Biomed 2011. February;24(2):194–200. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wolfensohn S, Lloyd M. Pain, Stress and Humane End Points Handbook of Laboratory Animal Management and Welfare: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2003. p. 59–73. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kierulf-Lassen C, Kristensen ML, Birn H, Jespersen B, Norregaard R. No Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning Strategies on Recovery from Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Protective Molecular Mediators. PLoS One 2015. Dec 31;10(12):e0146109 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Oudar O, Elger M, Bankir L, Ganten D, Ganten U, Kriz W. Differences in rat kidney morphology between males, females and testosterone-treated females. Ren Physiol Biochem 1991. May-Jun;14(3):92–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Saeed AI, Bhagabati NK, Braisted JC, Liang W, Sharov V, Howe EA, et al. TM4 microarray software suite. Methods Enzymol 2006;411:134–193. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)11009-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001. April 24;98(9):5116–5121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091062498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009;4(1):44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yadav A, Saini V, Arora S. MCP-1: chemoattractant with a role beyond immunity: a review. Clin Chim Acta 2010. November 11;411(21–22):1570–1579. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol 2011. October 14;11(11):723–737. doi: 10.1038/nri3073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Karlberg L, Norlen BJ, Ojteg G, Wolgast M. Impaired medullary circulation in postischemic acute renal failure. Acta Physiol Scand 1983. May;118(1):11–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1983.tb07234.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mason J, Torhorst J, Welsch J. Role of the medullary perfusion defect in the pathogenesis of ischemic renal failure. Kidney Int 1984. September;26(3):283–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Finn WF. Enhanced recovery from postischemic acute renal failure. Micropuncture studies in the rat. Circ Res 1980. March;46(3):440–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Finn WF, Fernandez-Repollet E, Goldfarb D, Iaina A, Eliahou HE. Attenuation of injury due to unilateral renal ischemia: delayed effects of contralateral nephrectomy. J Lab Clin Med 1984. February;103(2):193–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zager RA, Baltes LA. Progressive renal insufficiency induces increasing protection against ischemic acute renal failure. J Lab Clin Med 1984. April;103(4):511–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Moskowitz DW, Gillespie KN, Sutera SP, Druce HM, Merli CA, Simon EE. Evidence for acute renal cortical vasoconstriction after uninephrectomy. Ren Fail 1996. November;18(6):833–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Helle F, Skogstrand T, Schwartz IF, Schwartz D, Iversen BM, Palm F, et al. Nitric oxide in afferent arterioles after uninephrectomy depends on extracellular L-arginine. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2013. April 15;304(8):F1088–98. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00665.2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chevalier RL, Kaiser DL. Autoregulation of renal blood flow in the rat: effects of growth and uninephrectomy. Am J Physiol 1983. May;244(5):F483–7. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1983.244.5.F483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Delanaye P, Weekers L, Dubois BE, Cavalier E, Detry O, Squifflet JP, et al. Outcome of the living kidney donor. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012. January;27(1):41–50. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nielsen PM, Szocska Hansen ES, Norlinger TS, Norregaard R, Bonde Bertelsen L, Stodkilde Jorgensen H, et al. Renal ischemia and reperfusion assessment with three-dimensional hyperpolarized 13 C,15 N2-urea. Magn Reson Med 2016. November;76(5):1524–1530. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mendichovszky I, Pedersen M, Frokiaer J, Dissing T, Grenier N, Anderson P, et al. How accurate is dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the assessment of renal glomerular filtration rate? A critical appraisal. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008. April;27(4):925–931. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Atthe BK, Babsky AM, Hopewell PN, Phillips CL, Molitoris BA, Bansal N. Early monitoring of acute tubular necrosis in the rat kidney by 23Na-MRI. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2009. November;297(5):F1288–98. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00388.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Maril N, Margalit R, Rosen S, Heyman SN, Degani H. Detection of evolving acute tubular necrosis with renal 23Na MRI: studies in rats. Kidney Int 2006. February;69(4):765–768. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aguor EN, van de Kolk CW, Arslan F, Nederhoff MG, Doevendans PA, Pasterkamp G, et al. 23Na chemical shift imaging and Gd enhancement of myocardial edema. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013. February;29(2):343–354. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0093-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kwon TH, Frokiaer J, Han JS, Knepper MA, Nielsen S. Decreased abundance of major Na(+) transporters in kidneys of rats with ischemia-induced acute renal failure. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2000. June;278(6):F925–39. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2000.278.6.F925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pohlmann A, Arakelyan K, Hentschel J, Cantow K, Flemming B, Ladwig M, et al. Detailing the relation between renal T2* and renal tissue pO2 using an integrated approach of parametric magnetic resonance imaging and invasive physiological measurements. Invest Radiol 2014. August;49(8):547–560. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Niendorf T, Pohlmann A, Arakelyan K, Flemming B, Cantow K, Hentschel J, et al. How bold is blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney? Opportunities, challenges and future directions. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2015. January;213(1):19–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chen KW, Wu MW, Chen Z, Tai BC, Goh YS, Lata R, et al. Compensatory Hypertrophy After Living Donor Nephrectomy. Transplant Proc 2016. April;48(3):716–719. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hinz B. Myofibroblasts. Exp Eye Res 2016. January;142:56–70. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lin SL, Kisseleva T, Brenner DA, Duffield JS. Pericytes and perivascular fibroblasts are the primary source of collagen-producing cells in obstructive fibrosis of the kidney. Am J Pathol 2008. December;173(6):1617–1627. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Craciun FL, Bijol V, Ajay AK, Rao P, Kumar RK, Hutchinson J, et al. RNA Sequencing Identifies Novel Translational Biomarkers of Kidney Fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016. June;27(6):1702–1713. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015020225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schneider DJ, Wu M, Le TT, Cho SH, Brenner MB, Blackburn MR, et al. Cadherin-11 contributes to pulmonary fibrosis: potential role in TGF-beta production and epithelial to mesenchymal transition. FASEB J 2012. February;26(2):503–512. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-186098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nakagawa T, Sasahara M, Haneda M, Kataoka H, Nakagawa H, Yagi M, et al. Role of PDGF B-chain and PDGF receptors in rat tubular regeneration after acute injury. Am J Pathol 1999. November;155(5):1689–1699. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65484-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen YT, Chang FC, Wu CF, Chou YH, Hsu HL, Chiang WC, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor signaling activates pericyte-myofibroblast transition in obstructive and post-ischemic kidney fibrosis. Kidney Int 2011. December;80(11):1170–1181. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sureshbabu A, Muhsin SA, Choi ME. TGF-beta Signaling in the Kidney: Pro-fibrotic and Protective Effects. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2016. January 6:ajprenal.00365.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pennathur S, Pasichnyk K, Bahrami NM, Zeng L, Febbraio M, Yamaguchi I, et al. The macrophage phagocytic receptor CD36 promotes fibrogenic pathways on removal of apoptotic cells during chronic kidney injury. Am J Pathol 2015. August;185(8):2232–2245. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.04.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lin SL, Castano AP, Nowlin BT, Lupher ML Jr, Duffield JS. Bone marrow Ly6Chigh monocytes are selectively recruited to injured kidney and differentiate into functionally distinct populations. J Immunol 2009. November 15;183(10):6733–6743. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Desmouliere A, Geinoz A, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 induces alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1993. July;122(1):103–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Vyalov S, Desmouliere A, Gabbiani G. GM-CSF-induced granulation tissue formation: relationships between macrophage and myofibroblast accumulation. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol 1993;63(4):231–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ko GJ, Boo CS, Jo SK, Cho WY, Kim HK. Macrophages contribute to the development of renal fibrosis following ischaemia/reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008. March;23(3):842–852. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rogers NM, Yao M, Novelli EM, Thomson AW, Roberts DD, Isenberg JS. Activated CD47 regulates multiple vascular and stress responses: implications for acute kidney injury and its management. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2012. October 15;303(8):F1117–25. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00359.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rogers NM, Thomson AW, Isenberg JS. Activation of parenchymal CD47 promotes renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012. September;23(9):1538–1550. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012020137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lu A, Miao M, Schoeb TR, Agarwal A, Murphy-Ullrich JE. Blockade of TSP1-dependent TGF-beta activity reduces renal injury and proteinuria in a murine model of diabetic nephropathy. Am J Pathol 2011. June;178(6):2573–2586. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.02.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shi-Wen X, Leask A, Abraham D. Regulation and function of connective tissue growth factor/CCN2 in tissue repair, scarring and fibrosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2008. April;19(2):133–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bradshaw AD. The role of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) in cardiac repair and fibrosis: Does expression of SPARC by macrophages influence outcomes? J Mol Cell Cardiol 2016. April;93:156–161. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.11.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Imanaka-Yoshida K. Tenascin-C in cardiovascular tissue remodeling: from development to inflammation and repair. Circ J 2012;76(11):2513–2520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fu H, Tian Y, Zhou L, Zhou D, Tan RJ, Stolz DB, et al. Tenascin-C Is a Major Component of the Fibrogenic Niche in Kidney Fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017. March;28(3):785–801. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016020165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Peng Q, Li K, Smyth LA, Xing G, Wang N, Meader L, et al. C3a and C5a promote renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012. September;23(9):1474–1485. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011111072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Burne MJ, Elghandour A, Haq M, Saba SR, Norman J, Condon T, et al. IL-1 and TNF independent pathways mediate ICAM-1/VCAM-1 up-regulation in ischemia reperfusion injury. J Leukoc Biol 2001. August;70(2):192–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are available at Figshare.com under the following DOIs: Physical parameters and plasma measurements: https://figshare.com/s/af9573a72310d601c448 Results of MRI experiments: https://figshare.com/s/5fd18f27eef9358ef758 Results of QPCR: https://figshare.com/s/d499e8754c7a4854f6f1 Results of histopathologic evaluation: https://figshare.com/s/400c506e96d97b254621 The experimental microarray data have been deposited in the NBCI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under series entry GSE100540.