Abstract
XtalFluor-E® has been extensively used in a broad range of reactions in the past few years. Here we report its use with protic nucleophiles in a catalytic manner for the in situ generation of protons that lead to the proteo functionalization of activated olefins. Utilizing the latter protocol, proteo etherification of enamides gives rise to N,O-acetals in nearly quantitative yields.
Graphical abstract

Within the family of organic reactions, functionalization of olefins is one of the most well studied and important transformations. Some of the milestone reactions in this realm are epoxidation,1 dihydroxylation,2 aminohydroxylation,3 dihalogenation,4 and halofuntionalization5 to name a few. Proteo-functionalization of olefins i.e., activation of a double bond with a proton and interception of the resulting carbocation with a nucleophile, is one of the early discovered reactions. These generally require the application of strong acids and relatively harsh reaction conditions,6 not compatible with molecules bearing sensitive functionalities. There are milder conditions, although not with Brønsted acid sources.7 In this vein, introduction of approaches that catalyze the reaction by in situ generation of proton under mild conditions are of interest.8 Here we report such a system and utilize this mild condition towards proteo functionalization of enamides to access N,O-acetals.
To date, several strategies have been devised that give rise to N,O-acetals (Scheme 1a). These include condensation of aldehydes with amides in the presence of titanium ethoxide,9 benzotriazole10, 11 or sodium benzenesulfinate,12 as well as the reduction of nitriles with Schwartz reagent followed by the reaction of the resulting intermediate with acyl chloride and alcohol.13 Szymura and coworkers used the Hofer-Moest reaction for the electrochemical decarboxylative methoxylation of N-acteyl-α-amino acids to generate N-(α-methoxyalklyl)-amides.14 Our approach takes advantage of the high reactivity of enamides. Reaction of XtalFluor-E® with alcohols leads to a mild method for generation of protons that promote the described transformation. Noteworthy, is Toste and coworkers’ development of an enantioselective oxyfluorination of enamides using chiral phosphoric acid and selectfluor.15
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of N,O-acetals, previous and current strategies in employing XtalFluor-E®
XtalFluor-E® is best known as a reagent for deoxyfluorination of carbonyl compounds and alcohols (Scheme 1b).16–23 This reagent can activate oxygenated organic compounds towards substitution reactions.16, 21–23 In this manner, deoxyfluorination20, 24 and halogenation16, 19 as well as formation of 2-oxazolin from β-hydroxyamide25, 26 and activation of benzyl alcohols for Friedel-Crafts benzylation23 are realized. The commonality of these transformations is the activation of the hydroxyl group with XtalFluor-E® into a good leaving group for the subsequent displacement reaction. Moreover, XtalFuor-E® has been extensively used to activate carboxylic acids for the synthesis of amides and nitriles,13, 27, 28 and the fluoride opening of aziridines.21, 29 Recently the synthesis of perfluorinated esters using XtalFluor-E® as the activating agent of carboxylic acid was reported, in which fluorinated alcohols are utilized as the nucleophile.27 XtalFluor-E® consists of a sulfur nitrogen double bond with a highly electron deficient sulfur atom, bearing two electronegative fluorine atoms. Indeed, this polarized bond is the key feature for its reactivity. It is the activation of the carbonyl or hydroxyl groups with XtalFluor-E® that initiates the reaction. Based on these observations, we envisioned that catalytic XtalFluor-E® with a protic nucleophile (alcohol, thiol, acid, etc.) will function as a source for in situ generation of protons, which in turn can initiate activation of olefins toward proteo functionalization reactions.
We began our investigations with the addition of stoichiometric amount of XtalFluor-E® to enamide 1a in presence of methanol as the solvent and nucleophile source (entry 1, Table 1). Reaction at room temperature resulted in the quantitative formation of the N,O-acetal after 36 h. Next we pursued the application of catalytic amount of XtalFluor-E®. Gratifyingly, we realized that 10 mol% of the catalyst can lead to the expected N,O-acetal product, although not as efficiently (entry 2, Table 1), requiring longer reaction time. We surmised this to be due to the attenuated activity of the in situ generated proton in methanol, thus we resorted to aprotic solvents.
Table 1.
Optimization results for the XtalFluor-E® mediated N,O-acetal formation of enamide
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Entry | Solvent | Time (h) | Conversion (yield)a |
| 1b | MeOH | 36 | 99% (>98%) |
| 2 | MeOH | 48 | 88% (57%) |
| 3 | Toluene | 22 | 74% (66%) |
| 4 | CH2Cl2 | 10 | 95% (89%) |
| 5 | CHCl3 | 10 | 93% (83%) |
| 6 | Nitromethane | 10 | 95% (85%) |
| 7 | ClCH2CH2Cl | 10 | 95% (85%) |
| 8 | Acetonitrile | 22 | 85% (68%) |
| 9c | CH2Cl2 | 36 | 97% (86%) |
| 10d | CH2Cl2 | 8 | 100% (>98%) |
Yields were estimated by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
One equivalent of XtalFluor-E® was used
XtalFluor-M® (10 mol%) was used instead of XtalFluor-E®.
MeOH:DCM (1:1 v:v, 0.1 M) was used.
The screening of a variety of solvents revealed higher efficiency of the reaction in less polar solvents and in the presence of excess methanol as the nucleophile. Ultimately, dichloromethane was chosen as the optimal solvent (entry 4, Table 1). The reaction is not limited to XtalFluor-E®, as XtalFluor-M® (Scheme 1c) showed similar efficiency for N,O-acetal formation (entry 9, Table 1). The amount of methanol proved to have a profound effect on the rate of the reaction (with excess methanol increasing the rate of the reaction). A 1:1 (v:v) DCM:MeOH solvent ratio led to the optimal reaction condition (entry 10, Table 1). In case of alcohols with low molecular weight, the excess amount is not an issue since the remainder can be evaporated. However, for less volatile alcohols, stoichiometric amounts (1.1 equiv) of the protic nucleophile can be used, yielding the desired product, albeit with longer reaction time (see entry 7, Table 2 for an example).
Table 2.
Scope of XtalFluor-E® catalyzed synthesis of N,O-acetals.a
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Entry | Enamide | N,O-acetal | Yield (%) |
| 1 |
|
|
95 |
| 2 | 98 | ||
| 3 |
|
|
98 |
| 4 | 95 | ||
| 5 | 80 | ||
| 6 | 40 | ||
| 7 | 98b | ||
| 8 | 85 | ||
| 9 |
|
|
85c |
| 10 |
|
|
98 |
| 11 |
|
|
91 |
| 12 | 72 | ||
| 13 |
|
|
60 |
| 14 |
|
|
98 |
| 15 |
|
|
71 |
| 98d | |||
| 16 |
|
|
83 |
| 17 |
|
|
86 |
| 18 |
|
|
98 |
| 19 |
|
|
98e |
| 21 |
|
|
94 |
| 21 | 98d | ||
Reactions were performed at room temperature (0.1 mmol), reported yields are isolated unless otherwise indicated;
1.1 equivalents of nucleophile was used, requiring 48 h for reaction completion, resulting in the same yield;
Reaction was performed at 1.0 mmol scale;
Yield was determined by 1H-NMR with methyl t-butyl ether as internal standard;
HFIP:methanol (9:1 v:v) was used as solvent.
To demonstrate the generality of the reaction, a handful of enamide substrates were synthesized and subjected to the reaction condition (Table 2). Gratifyingly, the reaction resulted in the corresponding N,O or N,S-acetals with nearly quantitative yield for most of the substrates. The electronic and steric influence of the aryl group on the reactivity of the enamide was screened, with minimal effect on the yield and efficiency of the reaction. Nevertheless, the p-methoxy benzoyl group generally gave better results. The transformation was equally effective with aliphatic enamides, delivering high yield of the N,O-acetal products. The reaction is not limited to secondary enamides, as cyclic-tertiary enamides resulted in products with excellent yield. Furthermore, the cyclic nature of the enamide did not diminish the reaction outcome. With regard to the nature of the protic nucleophile, light alcohols can be used to successfully give the corresponding N,O-acetal products. Thiols also yield N,S-acetals with excellent yields (2f, 2g). The thiol mediated reactions typically proceed faster as compared to alcohols as nucleophiles. The reaction can also be performed on a large scale without deterioration in efficiency (2b, entry 9, Table 2). The stereoisomerism of the starting enamide (cis or trans) had minimal effect on the reaction. Of note is the incompatibility of the methodology with bulky nucleophiles. As illustrated in Table 2, hydroalkoxylation of enamide with n-propyl alcohol results in high yield of 2d, however the reaction is less efficient with iso-propyl alcohol (2e, Table 2). The reaction of 1b with tert-butyl alcohol failed to give any product.
To propose a reasonable mechanism, we conducted a few control experiments. As reported by Paquin and coworkers, alcohols can react with XtalFluor-E® to give a non-reversible adduct.19, 22 In our optimized reaction condition, catalytic XtalFluor-E® is exposed to protic nucleophiles in large excess. As a result, the formation of the putative adduct and its implication on the reaction progress is obscured by the presence of excess nucleophile. To circumvent this issue, the reaction of 1j was conducted in presence of only one equivalent of methanol and the loading of XtalFluor-E® was varied. As illustrated in Scheme 2a the yield of N,O-acetal product 2o decreases as XtalFluor-E® loading increases. At a 1:1 ratio of methanol:XtalFluor-E®, no product was detected based on1H NMR analysis. Of note is the complete disappearance of the enamide 1j in the reaction with methanol and XtalFluor-E® (1 equiv each) illustrative of the fact that the protonation of the enamaide most likely is taking place under this condition, however in the absence of free methanol the protonated enamide undergoes deleterious side reactions. This set of experiments does suggest the formation of an adduct such as I, depicted in Scheme 3 (dashed box).
Scheme 2.
Control experiments and mechanistic insights.
Scheme 3.
Proposed mechanism of XtalFluor-E® mediated proteo functionalization of enamides.
Since the nucleophile acts as the proton source in this reaction, we designed experiments to investigate the contribution of nucleophilicity as well as the acidity of the protic nucleophiles on the course of the reaction. As illustrated in Scheme 2b, comparing reactions of the enamide 1a revealed that the reaction with sulfur-based nucleophiles is faster than oxygen-based nucleophiles (compare entries 1 and 2, Scheme 2b). On the other hand, the acidity of the protic nucleophile proved to have minimal effect on the reaction progress i.e., benzoic acid, despite its higher acidity, was an incompetent reagent (Scheme 2b). This can be interpreted by the weaker nucleophilicity of benzoic acid that prevents adduct formation with XtalFluor-E®. This hypothesis is in accordance with the reported data that adduct formation of carboxylic acids with XtalFluor-E® requires the presence of a base. The increased nucleophilicity of thiobenzoic acid in comparison resulted in the fast consumption of 1a and formation of the corresponding product 2t was observed.
Upon addition of methanol to a solution of XtalFluor-E® in d3-acetonitrile, substantial changes in the 19F NMR of the mixture were observed. XtalFluor-E® has two peaks in the 19F NMR that correspond to the fluorine atoms on the sulfur (12.9 ppm) and the tetrafluoroborate anion (−151.6 ppm). Addition of one equivalent of methanol resulted in the disappearance of the peak at 12 ppm concomitant with the appearance of multiple peaks in the 50–60 ppm range. Addition of two equivalents of methanol simplified the spectrum into a single peak at 54 ppm (see Figure S1 for NMR traces). This newly emerged peak did not undergo any further changes upon increasing the equivalents of methanol (up to 10 equivalents). These results further suggest the formation of the putative adduct I.
Our experimental and NMR data, along with observations and mechanistic suggestions that have appeared in the literature, lead us to the mechanistic proposal depicted in Scheme 3. We surmised addition of an alcohol to XtalFluor-E® provides a catalytic proton source as the initial step of the reaction. The protonated enamide can be intercepted by the excess nucleophile to yield the protonated N,O-acetal product. This protonated N,O-acetal product can act as proton source to activate another enamide. Putative complexes (shown in the dashed box, Scheme 3) can potentially collapse to generate tetrafluoroboric acid (HBF4) and subsequently this acid can protonate the enamide. This suggest that HBF4 itself should be able to catalyze this reaction. Indeed, we find the latter statement is true (Table S1).
Conclusions
We report a mild method for the generation of protons from the reaction of XtalFluor-E® with a protic solvent. Reaction of enamides under the prescribed conditions lead to the proteo functionalization of olefins, yielding N,O-acetals when alcohols are used as the nucleophilic proton source. The N,O-acetal products can be accessed in nearly quantitative yield in most cases, often without the need for further purification. XtalFluor-E® is commercially available and the water-soluble side product can be easily removed.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Generous support was provided by the NIH (GM110525).
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [Experimental procedures for all reactions and characterization Data for all new compounds]. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
- 1.Grigoropoulou G, Clark JH, Elings JA. Green Chem. 2003;5:1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kolb HC, VanNieuwenhze MS, Sharpless KB. Chem. Rev. 1994;94:2483–2547. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bodkin JA, McLeod MD. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1. 2002:2733–2746. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cresswell AJ, Eey STC, Denmark SE. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:15642–15682. doi: 10.1002/anie.201507152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Denmark SE, Kuester WE, Burk MT. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:10938–10953. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.a Coulombel L, Dunach E. Green Chem. 2004;6:499–501. [Google Scholar]; b Rosenfeld DC, Shekhar S, Takemiya A, Utsunomiya M, Hartwig JF. Org. Lett. 2006;8:4179–4182. doi: 10.1021/ol061174+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Coulombel L, Favier I, Dunach E. Chem. Commun. 2005:2286–2288. doi: 10.1039/b501601k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Harayama Y, Yoshida M, Kamimura D, Kita Y. Chem. Commun. 2005:1764–1766. doi: 10.1039/b418212j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li M, Luo B, Liu Q, Hu Y, Ganesan A, Huang P, Wen S. Org. Lett. 2014;16:10–13. doi: 10.1021/ol4031155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Katritzky AR, Pernak J, Fan WQ, Saczewski F. J. Org. Chem. 1991;56:4439–4443. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Katritzky AR, Fan WQ, Black M, Pernak J. J. Org. Chem. 1992;57:547–549. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gizecki P, Ait Youcef R, Poulard C, Dhal R, Dujardin G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:9589–9592. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wan S, Green ME, Park J-H, Floreancig PE. Org. Lett. 2007;9:5385–5388. doi: 10.1021/ol702184n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mazurkiewicz R, Adamek J, Pazdzierniok-Holewa A, Zielinska K, Simka W, Gajos A, Szymura K. J. Org. Chem. 2012;77:1952–1960. doi: 10.1021/jo202534u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Honjo T, Phipps RJ, Rauniyar V, Toste FD. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:9684–9688. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pouliot M-F, Mahé O, Hamel J-D, Desroches J, Paquin J-F. Org. Lett. 2012;14:5428–5431. doi: 10.1021/ol302496q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nielsen MK, Ugaz CR, Li W, Doyle AG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:9571–9574. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b06307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ni C, Hu M, Hu J. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:765–825. doi: 10.1021/cr5002386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.L’Heureux A, Beaulieu F, Bennett C, Bill DR, Clayton S, LaFlamme F, Mirmehrabi M, Tadayon S, Tovell D, Couturier M. J. Org. Chem. 2010;75:3401–3411. doi: 10.1021/jo100504x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Beaulieu F, Beauregard L-P, Courchesne G, Couturier M, LaFlamme F, L’Heureux A. Org. Lett. 2009;11:5050–5053. doi: 10.1021/ol902039q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nonn M, Kiss L, Haukka M, Fustero S, Fülöp F. Org. Lett. 2015;17:1074–1077. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lebleu T, Paquin J-F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017;58:442–444. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Desroches J, Champagne PA, Benhassine Y, Paquin J-F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015;13:2243–2246. doi: 10.1039/c4ob02655a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vandamme M, Paquin J-F. Org. Lett. 2017;19:3604–3607. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pouliot M-F, Angers L, Hamel J-D, Paquin J-F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:4121–4123. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brandstätter M, Roth F, Luedtke NW. J. Org. Chem. 2015;80:40–51. doi: 10.1021/jo5016695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vandamme M, Bouchard L, Gilbert A, Keita M, Paquin J-F. Org. Lett. 2016;18:6468–6471. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Orliac A, Gomez Pardo D, Bombrun A, Cossy J. Org. Lett. 2013;15:902–905. doi: 10.1021/ol400045d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cochi A, Gomez Pardo D, Cossy J. Org. Lett. 2011;13:4442–4445. doi: 10.1021/ol201769b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



