Abstract
Along with the increasing application of nanoparticles (NPs) in many walks of life, environmental exposure to NPs has raised considerable health concerns. When NPs enter a pregnant woman’s body through inhalation, venous injection, ingestion or skin permeation, maternal toxic stress reactions such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), inflammation, apoptosis and endocrine dyscrasia are induced in different organs, particularly in the reproductive organs. Recent studies have shown that NPs disturb the developing oocyte by invading the protective barrier of theca cells, granulosa cell layers and zona pellucida. NPs disrupt sex hormone levels through the hypothalamic–pituitary-gonadal axis or by direct stimulation of secretory cells, such as granule cells, follicle cells, thecal cells and the corpus luteum. Some NPs can cross the placenta into the fetus by passive diffusion or endocytosis, which can trigger fetal inflammation, apoptosis, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, low weight, reproductive deficiency, nervous damage, and immunodeficiency, among others. The toxicity of these NPs depend on their size, dosage, shape, charge, material and surface-coating. We summarize new findings on the toxic effect of various NPs on the ovary and on oogenesis and embryonic development. Meanwhile, we highlight the problems that need to be studied in the future. This manuscript will also provide valuable guidelines for protecting the female reproductive system from the toxicity of NPs and provide a certain reference value for NP application in the area of ovarian diseases.
Keywords: nanoparticles, toxicology, oogenesis, embryonic development, inflammation
INTRODUCTION
Nanoparticles (NPs) are characterized as particles with sizes between 1 to 100 nm. NPs exist in the natural environment due to biological, physical and chemical processes [1]. Moreover, due to their properties, including small particle size and a relatively high surface area, numerous applications of NPs are likely to further increase human exposure to NPs through inhalation, ingestion and dermal absorption, among other mechanisms [2, 3]. It cannot be ignored that the exposure to nanomaterials is potentially hazardous to the human body and environment. The negative impact of NPs on human health depends on individual factors, such as genetics and existing diseases as well as on the properties of NPs such as shape, size, structure, and inorganic and organic coatings [4, 5]. In recent years, many studies have reported toxic effects of NPs, mainly consisting of metal nanomaterials, nanometer oxides, carbon NPs and quantum dots [6]. Recent studies have shown that NPs can penetrate cells and subsequently disrupt their biological structures and normal functions via generation of ROS or by increasing intracellular oxidative stress [3]. The toxic effects induced by NPs include tissue inflammation and the imbalance of the cellular redox state, resulting in apoptosis or cell death [7-9]. Moreover, some NPs can penetrate the blood-testis barrier, placental barrier and blood-brain barrier and accumulate in different cells [10-12]. Reproductive toxicity caused by NPs is gradually rising in importance.
The studies on the toxicity of NPs in the female reproductive system mainly include effects on reproductive ability, teratogenic effects during embryonic development and impact on the offspring during the perinatal period [12, 13]. Recently, studies have shown that inhaled, ingested or dermally absorbed NPs are able to translocate through the circulatory system and even accumulate in different reproductive organs and in the fetus [14, 15]. Moreover, the reproductive toxicity of NPs in different germ cell lines in vitro and animal models in vivo are being increasingly reported. For example, in vitro studies showed that some NPs could be swallowed by granulosa cells, resulting in changes in the secretion of hormones and dysplasia of the ovum [16]. There are well-documented studies showing that NPs can enter both thecal cells and granule cells and affect their normal function, particularly relating to their key role in hormone secretion [16]. Before ovulation, androgens and androstenedione secreted by thecal cells diffuse into granule cells and are transformed into steroid hormones. During this process, NPs can directly affect the secretion of sex hormones by destroying these secretory cells in the ovaries [17, 18]. In vivo studies have shown that long-term (90 consecutive days) exposure to titanium dioxide NPs (TiO2 NPs) in female mice results in an imbalance of sex hormones and mineral element distribution, leading to a reduction in pregnancy rate and oxidative stress and disruption of ovarian gene expression [19, 20]. Moreover, in vivo experiments in rats showed that silver NPs of 34.9 ± 14.8 nm in size could get transferred from the mother to offspring through the placenta and breast milk [20].
Oogenesis, or ovum production, is the process of development from oogonia to a mature egg occurring in ovarian follicles [21]. Follicular atresia is a natural physiological process for follicle development, follicle maturation and ovulation in mammals. The regulated hormones of follicle atresia include estrogen, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), gonadotropic hormone, androgen and growth hormone, among others [22, 23]. A typical follicle consists of the following layers (from the outside to inside): a thecal cell layer, basement membrane, granulosa cell layer, zona pellucida and oocyte. Recent reports showed that NPs could be endocytosed by thecal cells and granulosa cells, leading to abnormal hormone secretion and termination of oocyte development in vivo [17]. In vitro experiments also suggested that the engulfment of 10 nm nanogold particles by granulosa cells could result in steroidogenesis imbalance and ovum dysplasia [16]. In other words, NPs of a particular size can accumulate in secretory cells and directly affect hormone secretion in the ovaries. However, there is no evidence showing that NPs can actually penetrate oocytes and accumulate inside them as of yet. The reason for this may be attributed to the multiple layers of follicles and the special structure of zona pellucida [24].
NPs may cross or circumvent the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and accumulate in the central nervous system (CNS) [25]. One of the potential harmful impacts from such stimulation of the nervous system by NPs is the disruption of hormone secretion. The neurohormones such as GnRH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) secreted by the hypothalamus and pituitary play crucial roles in positive and negative feedback regulation during oogenesis. NPs may indirectly affect oogenesis and ovarian health by disturbing the balance of these sex hormones [25].
As commercial uses for nanotechnology and nanomaterials continue to increase across the world, the risk for unintentional exposure or purposeful application of NPs in the workplace increases, and more and more NPs can have potential generational impacts or disrupt embryonic development [27]. For instance, exposure to gold NPs (Au NPs) was reported to alter the expression of 19 genes in human fetal lung fibroblasts [26]. In this review, we mainly focus on the toxic effect of NPs on the female reproductive system and embryonic development. This review will provide guidelines for taking care of vulnerable populations such as women working in manufacturing industries. Additionally, it will provide appropriate references for reducing the risk of nanomaterial application and support reasonable industry development.
TOXICITY OF NPS IN OOGENESIS
The toxicity of NPs vary with their size, charge, surface-coating, material, concentration, exposure time and tolerance in different cell types or animal models. Most reports on the toxicity of NPs in the female reproductive system mainly include metal, metal oxide, carbon particles and CdSe-core quantum dots (QDs) (Tables 1-4). In vivo and in vitro studies showed that certain sizes of NPs could penetrate different female germ cells and accumulate inside them, which initiate different cell responses such as oxidative stress [28], DNA damage [28], apoptosis [29], inflammation [30] and inhibition of signal transduction [21].
Table 1. Toxicity of Ag and Au NPs on ovary, oogenesis and embryonic development.
Table 4. Toxicity of other NPs on ovary, oogenesis and embryonic development.
Table 2. Toxicity of metallic oxide NPs on ovary, oogenesis and embryonic development.
Table 3. Toxicity of QDs NPs on ovary, oogenesis and embryonic development.
In vitro studies
It is known that growth and maturation of oocytes are extremely sensitive to micro-environmental changes, particularly to extracellular chemical compounds. Recent studies have demonstrated the novel phenomenon that mammalian oocytes display different toxic responses to gold, silver and gold-silver alloy NPs [31]. The results showed that both silver and gold NPs mostly accumulate in the cumulus cell layers and oocytes [31]. Additionally, studies provided evidence that the toxicity to oocytes increased with the silver molar fraction [31-33]. An in vitro model of zebrafish ovarian follicle cells surrounding an oocyte, thecal cells and granulosa cells exhibited apoptosis with phenotypes of irregular cell morphology, disorganized cytoplasm and fragmented and condensed nuclei after exposure to Ag NPs (30 mg/mL) and AgNO3 (10 mg/mL) [34]. In vitro experiments also showed that quantum dot-transferrin (QD-Tf) bioconjugates were mostly taken up by the cumulus cells, but no QDs entered the oocytes. With an increasing concentration of QD-Tf bioconjugates, antral formation was delayed and the in vitro maturation rate of oocytes displayed an obvious decrease (from 62% to 21.8%) [21]. The authors deduced that both QDs and QD-Tf bioconjugates exhibited reproductive toxicity. They concluded that the mechanism of interference with oogenesis was mediated by the disturbance of antral formation in oocytes, dysfunction of cumulus cells or disruption of signal transduction between germ cells and somatic cells [21, 35]. Fortunately, the analysis of chromosomal abnormalities demonstrated that nuclear maturation in the oocytes was unaffected by the QD-Tf bioconjugates [21]. TiO2 NPs have also been reported to cause ovarian developmental disorders in mammals. In one study, a rat preantral follicle exposed to 25 nm TiO2 at 25 μg/ml exhibited deformed follicular growth and inhibited oocyte maturation [36]. Dose-related genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of TiO2 and Al2O3 NPs have been noted in Chinese hamster ovarian cells (CHO-K1). In that study, the adverse effect of TiO2 was observed at lower concentrations and was noted to be stronger than that due to exposure of Al2O3 NPs [37]. A previous study showed that QD formulations were non-toxic to cancer cells, while more recent studies reveal that exposure to QDs can decrease the maturation rate of oocytes [35]. To detect the toxicity of CdSe-core QDs (3.5 nm) in oocytes, the oocytes collected from 21-day-old mice were treated with CdSe-core QDs (CdSe; 125, 250 or 500 nM) or ZnS-coated CdSe QDs (ZnS/CdSe; 500 nM). Some oocytes treated with CdSe-core QDs underwent apoptosis, while others exhibited reduced cell number, and oocyte development was inhibited during in vitro maturation (IVM). It is worth noting that the surface coating of ZnS could avoid these toxic effects of CdSe-core QDs on oocyte maturation and embryonic development [38]. This study indicated that the surface coating of NPs would alter their toxicity.
It was observed that CeO2 NPs had accumulated in follicular cells by endocytosis and were distributed around the zona pellucida (ZP) in oocytes [28]. At high concentrations of CeO2 NPs, follicular cell endocytosis and zona pellucida trapping were unable to protect mature oocytes from oxidative stress and DNA damage [28]. During in vitro fertilization (IVF), mouse oocytes cultured with medium containing CeO2 NPs at very low concentration (0.01 mg/l) showed a significantly lower fertilization rate compared with that of the control group [39]. The reasons of low fertilization rate may be genotoxicity and oxidative stress in gametes due to CeO2 [39]. Comet assay also showed that oocytes cultured with CeO2 showed significant DNA damage at the same low concentration [39]. At a high concentration (100 mg/l), CeO2 NPs penetrated the cumulus cells surrounding oocytes by endocytosis and were accumulated along the zona pellucida of oocytes [39]. As CeO2 engineered NPs (ENPs) have excellent biomedical properties for potential use in the treatment of endometriosis and protection of endometriosis-related adverse effects on oocytes [40], the results from the two abovementioned in vitro studies may provide evidence for the need for minimizing toxicity in the medical applications of CeO2 NPs.
In vivo studies
During the process of follicular development, theca cells, granulosa cell layers and the zona pellucida serve as protective barriers to prevent exogenous substances from entering the developing oocyte. Therefore, the layers of theca cells and granulosa cells are injured before the oocyte. Studies on female mice showed an accumulation of TiO2 NPs in the ovaries and the consequent initiation of premature oogenesis. Such abnormal processes can potentially result in malformed ova and in the induction of reproductive system dysfunction. To be specific, accumulation of NPs can cause apoptosis in the ovaries, a process potentially mediated by the activation of BCL2 modifying factor (BMF) and the mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway [19]. As mentioned previously, most of the ovarian follicles undergo atresia during development, which is a process of hormonally controlled apoptosis regulated by various factors [22, 23]. With long-term exposure to TiO2 NPs, the expression levels of 288 genes involved in hormone and cytokine pathways were found to have been changed in the mouse ovary [41]. The authors suggested that the ovarian inflammation and follicular atresia may have been due to nano-TiO2 in a dose-dependent manner, altering the expression of relevant genes in the ovary [41]. In an in vivo study, female rats exposed to Ni NPs (∼90 nm) at doses of 15 and 45 mg/kg exhibited reproductive toxicity, such as mitochondrial swelling, disappearance of mitochondrial cristae, and enlargement of the endoplasmic reticulum in ovaries [29]. Due to the signi?cantly decreased activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) and increased ROS, malondialdehyde (MDA) and NO, as well as the increased expression of pro-apoptotic proteins such as Fas, AIF, Cyt c, Bax and Bid, the possible damage mechanism may have been due to oxidative stress and apoptosis induced by the Ni NPs [29].
In summary, NP accumulation occurs in the cumulus cell layer surrounding the oocyte, but no NPs enter the oocytes due to trapping by the zona pellucida. NPs mainly accumulated in the cytoplasm and nuclei of theca cells and granule cells which resulted in ovarian cell apoptosis and antrum formation (Figure 1).
THE EFFECTS OF NPS ON STEROIDOGENESIS
In a mature female, balanced hormone levels are crucial for maintaining healthy ovaries and supporting pregnancy. Reproductive function, fertility and the process of oogenesis are ultimately regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis [42]. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), secreted by the hypothalamus, can regulate the secretion of FSH and LH by the pituitary gland. FSH and LH are then transferred to the ovary via blood circulation and subsequently regulate the secretion of estrogen and progesterone in the ovaries to maintain normal menstruation and reproduction [42]. Such hormonal regulation is sensitive to allogenic materials such as NPs. NPs have been found to be able to disrupt sex hormone levels through the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis or by direct stimulation of secretory cells, such as granule cells, follicle cells and thecal cells and the corpus luteum [43].
Neuroendocrine dysfunctions triggered by NPs
The function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis (HPOA) is to adjust and control the secretion of neurohormones, such as GnRH, LH and FSH, which regulate the reproductive system in females. Inhaled NPs have been shown to cross or circumvent the BBB via systemic circulation and subsequently accumulate in the CNS [25]. The exposure of NPs in the female may affect the functions of the HPOA, and thereby increase the risk of neurohormone imbalance. In an in vivo study, female rats exposed to Ni NPs (∼90 nm) at doses of 15 and 45 mg/kg displayed sex hormonal imbalance (increasing FSH and LH and decreasing estradiol) and ovarian damage (increasing apoptotic cells, inflammatory cell infiltration, lymphocytosis and vascular dilation and congestion) [44]. Female Wistar rats from postnatal day 4 to day 7 were daily injected intraperitoneally with poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(lactic acid) (PEG-b-PLA) NPs (20 mg/kg) [45]. The results indicated that the neonatal rats exposed to PEG-b-PLA NPs appeared to have impaired reproductive system development with disordered LH release by the pituitary, leading to reproductive dysfunctions during adulthood [45]. Female Wistar rats from postnatal days 4 to 176 were intraperitoneally injected with PEG-b-PLA at a dose of 20 or 40 mg/kg [46]. The authors observed that the hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated luteinizing hormone secretion was altered and serum progesterone levels were increased and thus speculated that the neuroendocrine disruption was due to the PEG-b-PLA NPs [46]. Ingestion of ZnO (50 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg) could alter gene and protein expression of neuronal factors in the ovary, thereby regulating the population of neuroendocrine cells in the ovary [47]. One possible reason is that the accumulation of NPs in neurosecretory cells cause inflammation or oxidative stress, or disturb signaling pathways to perturb positive and negative feedback regulations in the HPOA, as well as the normal functions of neuroendocrine cells in females [44, 47]. Hormonal imbalance in adult females results in menstrual dysfunction, infertility, or abortion. However, the mechanisms by which NPs alter the functions of HPOA ultimately resulting in female infertility have not been investigated thoroughly. Meanwhile, the amount of researches about NPs having negative effects on HPOA is relatively small. It is certain that NPs with size of 36 nm were significantly accumulated in cerebrum and cerebellum translocation via the olfactory nerve and increased with the exposure time [25]. The sizes of NPs less than 90nm could disturb the balance of GnRH, FSH and LH, such as Ni, PEG-b-PLA [29, 45-46].
Steroid hormone imbalance triggered by toxicity of NPs
In the ovaries, estrogen and progesterone are the two main types of steroid hormones. A small amount of androgen is also secreted. Superabundant steroidogenesis in the ovaries can lead to abnormal ovarian pathology, such as polycystic ovarian syndrome [48]. Conversely, reduced steroidogenesis in the ovary can also lead to abnormal follicle growth, even anovulation, resulting in infertility [17].
Exposure to TiO2 NPs can significantly alter serum levels of sex hormones, including progesterone (P4), LH, T, FSH and estradiol (E2), resulting in increased atresia of the primary and secondary follicle development and reduced fertility [19]. Ovarian granulosa cells are also involved in steroidogenesis and are important for maintaining ovarian function. In vitro studies showed that gold particles could traverse granulosa cell membranes and certain intracellular organelles, such as lipid droplets and mitochondria [16]. The gold particles could negatively affect the steroidogenic capabilities of granulose cells in culture. After 24 h, the levels of estradiol-17 beta, secreted by granulosa cells, also exhibited significant fluctuations compared to basal control levels [16]. This factor may be regulated by steroidogenic enzyme side-chain cleavage (SCC), located on the inner membrane of mitochondria [18]. This study is consistent with a later study that demonstrated that QD-Tf bioconjugates could also penetrate the first protective layer of the follicle and accumulate in the cytoplasm of theca cells and granulosa cells. This might have also altered the activity of the mitochondrial inner membrane enzyme SCC to disturb steroid biosynthetic pathways [21]. Calcium phosphate hydroxyapatite (HA) NPs are now one of the most widely used medicinal materials in the bone-repair field [49]. Due to their small size and unique properties, HA NPs can enter granulosa cells in culture and are distributed throughout the membrane compartments, including the lysosome, mitochondria and intracellular vesicles. Accumulation of calcium phosphate NPs were shown to perturb the cell cycle of cultured human ovarian granulosa cells resulting in increasing cell apoptosis [50]. To detect the effects of different NPs on steroid hormone secretion in porcine ovarian granulosa cells in vitro, metal NPs including TiO2 and Ag NPs (0.001-100 µg/ml) were used as inducers [51]. The results indicated that the two kinds of NPs induced changes in steroid hormone secretion (P4 and E2) by ovarian granulosa cells, resulting in the interference of reproductive function [51]. In vitro, exposure to Ag NPs at doses of 0.09-1.0 mg/mL interfered with pathways involved in proliferation and apoptosis of porcine ovarian granulosa cells, including the secretion of growth factor IGF-I and proliferation marker cyclin B1 and apoptosis marker caspase-3 [52].
P4 is a type of steroid hormone involved in the menstrual cycle, pregnancy and embryogenesis [53]. P4 is produced by the ovary, adrenal gland, placenta and corpus luteum. The corpus luteum is the major source of P4 during pregnancy [54]. The corpus luteum is important for steroidogenesis, which is required to maintain ovarian function and support gestation in pregnant women. However, it has been shown that the inhalation of nanoparticle-rich diesel exhaust by pregnant rats could suppress the function of the corpus luteum, resulting in a significantly decreased serum concentration of maternal P4 and subsequent increase in LH, corticosterone and estradiol-17β. This type of sex hormone imbalance was shown to increase the risk of spontaneous abortion in pregnant rats [15].
As we know, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous disease with a variety of clinical manifestations. The aetiological agent is related to inheritance, environmental nutrition, unhealthy lifestyle, among others. One of its possible mechanisms is caused by endocrine disorders. GnRH pulse frequency, LH/FSH ratio are the possible reasons result to PCOS. Although NPs can lead to secretion disorders of GnRH, LH and FSH, there is no direct evidence demonstrating the association between NPs toxicity and this disease. In other words, whether women exposed to dust with NPs is more likely to have PCOS also need more researches.
In summary, the effects of NPs on hormone secretion on the ovary and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis could be in two ways: 1. NPs pass through the blood-brain barrier into the hypothalamus and secretory cells of the pituitary altering the secretion of GnRH, LH and FSH, thus undermining the normal positive and negative feedback of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and affecting the normal secretion of ovarian estrogen and progesterone. 2. NPs enter the ovaries through circulation and accumulate in theca cells and granulosa cells, which affects steroidogenesis. This parasecretion eventually leads to dysplastic oocyte and ovarian diseases (Figure 2).
TOXICITY OF NPS TO THE PLACENTAL BARRIER AND EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT
In murine fetuses, the concentration of NPs was markedly decreased in a manner concurrent to the maturation of placental barrier (PB). This suggested that the PB prevents the penetration of NPs [55]. Nonetheless, the concern for the potential effect of NPs on fetal health remains due to the sensitivity of the fetus to many toxins. Several studies found that NPs could traverse the rodent PB and result in varying levels of fetal harm (Tables 1-4).
The PB consists of three different layers of cells, namely, the syncytiotrophoblast, cytotrophoblast and fetal capillary endothelium. The PB is an important system in the exchange of materials between the mother and fetus. Additionally, the placental barrier acts as a natural barrier, as it prevents harmful substances from invading the fetus [56]. Generally, the placental barrier is formed at approximately GD10-12 in mice and at approximately 4 months of pregnancy in humans [27]. However, some NPs may cross the placental barrier and harm the fetus. In several studies, NPs were observed to penetrate the PB, while in other studies, the NPs were seen to be trapped in the PBs. For NPs that could reach the fetal tissues, some were suspected to harm fetal development and alter gene expression in the fetus, while some had no influence on the fetus [57, 58]. These diverse results are mainly due to the different size, coatings, and types of NPs [59]. Additionally, in order to study the effects of NPs on embryonic development as well as their application in fetal treatment, in vivo and ex vivo models of the human PB have been recommended [60, 61]. Nevertheless, the molecular transport mechanisms of NP penetration across the placental barrier are still poorly understood. There could be many potential pathways such as diffusion, passive transport, active transport, or the hypothetical ‘transtrophoblastic channel’ [62-64].
Metal nanomaterials
Pregnant (20 days old) and lactating (14-16 days old) female Wistar rats were intragastrically administered with [110mAg]-labeled Ag NPs (34.9 ± 14.8 nm) at doses of 1.69-2.21 mg/kg. After labeling for the following 24 and 48 h, a low-background semiconductor gamma-ray spectrometer was used to evaluate the accumulation of Ag NPs in the offspring and nursing pups consuming their mother’s breastmilk [65]. The results showed that the average level of accumulation of NPs in the fetuses was 0.085-0.147% of the administered dose, which exceeded the accumulation of NPs in the brains of females by at least 10-100 times and was comparable to the penetration of the NPs into tissues such as the liver, blood and muscles [65]. During the 48 h period of lactation, the total accumulation of [110mAg]-labeled Ag NPs in the milk was at least 1.94 ± 0.29% of the administered dose, and the amount absorbed by the pups from the lactating mother was at least 25%, which indicated that Ag NPs could penetrated the PB and get transferred from the mother to offspring through breastmilk [65].
To evaluate the potential developmental toxicity of silver in both Ag NPs and Ag+ ionic forms, pregnant rats (7-20 days old) were orally administered both ionic Ag+ (AgNO3, 20 mg Ag/kg/day) and Ag NPs (55 nm, from 0.2 to 20 mg/kg/day). The results showed that oral administration of AgNO3 led to an increase in glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity in both the adult and offspring brains resulting in hippocampal neuronal damage. Moreover, the Ag level in both maternal and offspring blood in the AgNO3-treated group was significantly higher than that of the Ag NP-treated group, which indicated that 1. both Ag+ ions and Ag NPs could translocate across the PB and 2. The reproductive toxicity of AgNO3 was higher than that of Ag NPs [66]. In a similar study, pregnant mice (7-, 8- and 9-days old) were intravenously injected with 10 nm Ag NPs or AgNO3 at a dose of 66 mg Ag/mouse. The results showed that the accumulation of NPs in the different tissues of mice treated with 10 nm Ag NPs was more on gestation day (GD) 10 than that on GD16, and the Ag concentration in the visceral yolk sac (VYS) of AgNO3-treated group was 2-fold that in the Ag NP-treated group. The only significant reproductive parameter was that approximately 80 percent fetuses in the experimental groups appeared small for their age compared to only 9 percent fetuses in the control group, which may have been due to the accumulation in embryos. These results indicated that a large amount of Ag in maternal tissues and a small amount in embryos may impact embryonic growth, but the mechanism is unclear [67].
Exposure to Ag NPs increases the risk of damage to the nervous system of fetuses. Thirty first-time pregnant NMRI mice were subcutaneously administered with 0, 0.2 and 2 mg/kg of body weight of Ag NPs once every three days from gestation day 3 until delivery. The Morris water maze (MWM) test showed that the spatial learning and memory of the offspring were impaired, which indicated that prenatal exposure to Ag NPs might have adverse effects on the central nervous system development in the fetus [68]. Intraperitoneal injection of Ag NPs (20-50 nm, 0.427 mg/g) every two days from GD10 to GD18 in prenatal rats also demonstrated that Ag exposure in maternal rats could result in cognitive impairment in the offspring. Histological assessment showed that the hippocampal structure of the offspring was deformed compared to those in control groups, and the MWM test demonstrated impaired spatial cognition in the male offspring [69]. Sprague Dawley female rats were orally administered with Ag NPs (7.9 ± 0.95 nm) at a dosage of 250 mg/kg from 14 days before mating to the fourth day after delivery (along with synchronous lactation). The results of ICP-MS and electron microscopy showed that the Ag NPs had abundantly accumulated in the tissues of the offspring compared with the tissue in the control groups (12.3-fold in the kidneys, 7.9-fold in the liver, 5.9-fold in the lungs, and 5.4-fold in the brain), which also indicated that the possible transfer of Ag NPs from pregnant rats to offspring occurs mainly through the placenta or breastmilk [27].
The size and coating of metal NPs are important factors in determining whether they can penetrate the PB and result in developmental toxicity. Three different-sized Au NPs (3 nm (Au3), 13 nm (Au13) and 32 nm (Au32)) were administered to pregnant mice with intrauterine inflammation. The results showed that Au3 and Au13 NPs could cross the PB and accumulate in the fetuses, resulting in increasing intrauterine inflammation.
However, Au32 NPs could not cross the PB in either the mice with intrauterine inflammation or healthy mice, which indicated that particle size is an important factor in the penetration of PB [70], consistent with the results of Yang et al. (2014). The surface composition of metal NPs also showed differences in different placental damage and fetotoxicity. Pregnant mice were intravenously administered with 13 nm Au NPs with the following three types of surface modifications: Au-Ft (coated with ferritin, treatment concentration 1.1*1017/ml), Au13-PEG (coated with PEG, treatment concentration 8.3*1012/ml) and Au13-CT (coated with citrate, treatment concentration 8.3*1012/ml) at E5.5-15.5. The amount of accumulated Au-Ft and Au13-PEG NPs was significantly greater than that of Au13-CT NPs in the fetus and extraembryonic tissues; however, none of the groups showed developmental toxicity in the fetuses [55].
Nano oxide (TiO2)
Adult female rats gavaged with 100 mg/kg TiO2 NPs (10 nm) from GD2-21 exhibited effects on offspring in various aspects, such as memory impairment and decrease in hippocampal cell proliferation [71, 72], while oral treatment with the same dose during lactation on the same days resulted in a decline in spatial recognition memory and deficiency in learning of offspring [73]. Exposure to polyalcohol-coated TiO2 dust (21 nm) via inhalation for 1 h/day at a concentration of 42 mg/m3 could induce long-term lung inflammation accompanied by differential cell counts of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in pregnant mice and cause moderate neurobehavioral alterations in the offspring, while the cognitive function was unaffected [57]. Prenatal TiO2 (∼25-75 nm) exposure, via injection of 100 µl/time four times on days 6, 9, 12 and 15, could result in alteration of the olfactory bulb, cerebral cortex and regions related to the dopamine systems in the offspring. Gene expression in the offspring was also dysregulated, including genes related to the striatum, dopamine neuron system and the prefrontal lobe [74]. Pregnant mice were exposed to 42 mg of titanium dioxide (UV-Titan)/m3 via inhalation for 1 h/day from GD8 to GD18. A comet assay revealed that the pregnant mice and offspring did not have any DNA strand breaks. While transcriptional profiling of offspring livers demonstrated that the expression of genes related to the retinoic acid signaling pathway was changed in the female offspring, which indicated that the inhaled UV-Titan could cross the PB and disturb gene expression of the offspring [75]. Coincidence with the abov study that slight neurobehavioral alterations were noted in the fetus of mice treated with UV-Ti NPs (of an average size of 21 nm) via inhalation [57]. The same study also found that TiO2 NPs could affect the development of the fetal central nervous system [58].
Silica particles nSP70, nSP300 and mSP1000 and TiO2 NPs of diameters of 70 nm, 300 nm, 1000 nm and 35 nm, respectively, were intravenously injected into the placenta at a dose of 0.8 mg per mouse. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis revealed that the nSP70 NPs could accumulate in the fetus and maternal placenta, and the TiO2 NPs had also accumulated in the fetal liver and brain and placental trophoblasts. The mice treated with 70 nm silica particles and 35 nm TiO2 NPs showed 20% and 30% respective decrease in uterine weight, smaller fetuses (∼10%) and smaller amniotic sacs. A TdT-mediated dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) assay indicated that nSP70 could induce apoptotic cell death of spongiotrophoblasts resulting in variable structural abnormalities of the mouse placenta. However, the silica particles in the other groups exhibited no accumulation in the placenta, fetal liver or fetal brain and displayed no fetotoxicity or placental dysfunction. All of these results indicated that nSP70 and 35 nm TiO2 NPs might affect maternal-fetal exchange, resulting in fetal resorption and restricted fetal growth. Therefore, these detrimental effects of NPs in fetuses and placenta may be linked to the size of NPs [76].
Nano oxide (Iron oxide)
With the increase in the application of iron oxide NPs in photocatalysis, drug delivery and biomedical imaging, the risk of exposure to iron oxide NPs in humans, especially pregnant women and developmental fetuses, is of great concern. To assess the reproductive toxicity of Fe3O4 NPs, dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA)-coated Fe3O4 NPs were intraperitoneally injected into pregnant mice. At doses higher than 50 mg/kg, the weight of infants showed a significant decrease, and the male pups exhibited significant decrease in spermatogenic cells (spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatids and mature sperm) by testicular histological results, which indicated that DMSA-coated Fe3O4 NPs can disrupt embryonic development at doses higher than 50 mg/kg [77].
CD-1 mice were intraperitoneally injected with PEI-Fe2O3 NPs (∼28 nm, zeta potential: 51 mV) or PAA-Fe2O3 NPs (∼30 nm, zeta potential: -52 mV), which were coated with the hydrophilic ligands polyethyleneimine (PEI) or poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), respectively. The results indicated that both positively charged PEI-Fe2O3 NPs and negatively charged PAA-Fe2O3 NPs had the ability to cross the placenta and accumulate in the fetus, though multiple doses of positively charged PEI-Fe2O3 NPs resulted in significantly accumulation of iron in the placenta and increased fetal death over several days [78].
Whether Fe2O3 NPs can cross the human PB also depends on their diameter. In vitro analysis showed that large (50 and 78 nm) but not small (15 nm) α-Fe2O3 could increase cell death and ROS resulting in disruption of BeWo epithelial barrier functions [79].
Nano oxide (Zinc oxide)
To study the effects of ZnO NPs, pregnant rats were treated with 500 mg/kg body weight of ZnO NPs of less than 100 nm in diameter. The ZnO NPs were distributed in mammary tissues of the dams together with the liver and kidneys of pups. The accumulation of ZnO NPs could increase fetal resorption and decrease the body weight of pups [80]. Liu et al. found that ZnO NPs exposure (ZnSO4-200 mg/kg and ZnO-NP-200 mg/kg of diet) in hens could increase γ-H2AX and decrease NF-κB to decrease cell proliferation or increase apoptosis in embryos. The underlying reason was that ZnO NPs may damage DNA replication and repairmen machinery in hen oocytes, which subsequently inhibited embryonic development [81].
Nano oxide (Cadmium oxide)
To detect the toxicity of cadmium oxide (CdO) NPs in pregnant mice and offspring, pregnant CD-1 mice were exposed to CdO NPs (15.3 nm ± 1.6 nm, 230 μg/m3) via inhalation from GD4.5 through GD16.5, and the nephrotoxic indexes were examined. The results showed that mRNA expression of kidney injury molecule-1 (Kim-1) in the urinary tract was five-times higher in the pregnant mice at GD10.5 and 3.2-times higher in the neonatal offspring at PND14 than the levels in the corresponding controls, which demonstrated that inhaled CdO NPs could enter circulation and penetrate the PB resulting in their accumulation and renal injury in fetuses and mothers [82]. Similarly, a study on CdO NPs by inhalation also demonstrated that the decrease in fetal weight was due to the accumulation of NPs in the placenta [83].
Nano oxide (Cupric oxide)
To simulate the in vivo human placenta, a well-organized 3D co-culture microtissue (MT) model was developed, which consisted of placental fibroblasts surrounded by a trophoblast cell layer. The results showed that incubation with CuO NPs (4 nm) could decrease the viability of the MT and reduce the release of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) [84]. Additionally, the ex vivo human placental model provides a convenient method for studying the mechanism by which NPs cross the human PB.
Carbon nanomaterials
Exposure of prenatal mice to carbon black NPs (CB-NPs; 95 mg/kg; particle size: 14 nm; surface area: 300 m2/g) by intranasal instillation on GD9 and GD15 could increase total thymocyte and total lymphocyte counts, promote immune responses and alter gene expression associated with the induction of peripheral tolerance in male offspring. These results indicated that respiratory exposure to CB-NPs during pregnancy may result in inflammatory or allergic effects in the offspring [85]. Moreover, intranasal instillation of CB-NPs in pregnant mice on GD5 and GD9 could decrease CD3+ (T), CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the spleens of 1- to 5-day-old offspring. In addition, CB-NPs could also significantly upregulate the expression level of ll15 in the newborn male offspring as well as Ccr7 and Ccl19 in the female offspring. These results indicated that exposure of pregnant mice to CB-NPs may suppress the development of the immune system in the offspring [86].
Exposure of pregnant mice to CB-NPs (95 mg/kg; particle size: 14 nm) by intratracheal administration on GD7 and GD14 resulted in partial vacuolation of seminiferous tubules and reduction in cellular adhesion of seminiferous epithelia and in daily sperm production (DSP) in male offspring. In addition, the body, testis and epididymis weights and concentration of serum testosterone were also different between the control and CB-NP groups, which suggested that exposure to CB-NPs could affect the reproductive function of male offspring [87]. In another study, 200 μg of 14-nm carbon NPs was administered by inhalation into pregnant mice on days 7 and 14. The daily sperm production was significantly decreased in the carbon nanoparticle-exposed fetuses [87].
Quantum Dots (QDs)
Currently, quantum dots are gaining popularity in their application in both biomedical imaging and targeted therapeutics. Whether QDs are transferred from the pregnant mother to its fetus may depend on their size, dose, charge, capping material properties and inorganic components.
To evaluate the clinical safety of CdTe/CdS QDs, Chu et al. studied pregnant mice that were intravenously injected with four different doses (20, 50, 86, or 125 mg), three different sizes (MPA-coated QDs (532), MPA-coated QDs (599), MPA-coated QDs (656)), and three different coatings (MPA-coated, PEG-coated and SiO2-coated QDs (656)) of Cd-containing QDs. The results showed that abundant Cd atoms derived from the QDs were accumulated in the pups, and the amount of Cd atoms increased with increasing doses of QDs. An analysis of the size dependence of Cd-QD NPs demonstrated that smaller QDs were more efficiently transferred into the pups, which implied the presence of extracellular transport pathways across the placenta. Assessment of three different coatings of Cd-QDs showed that the average concentration of Cd in the MPA-coated QD-treated pups was higher than that of the PEG-coated and SiO2-coated QD-treated groups. The authors of this study concluded that the PB could not prevent Cd-QDs from entering the pups, and the ability of QDs to travel from the mothers to pups depend on the dosage, size and coating components [88]. Mice were intraperitoneally injected with PEG-coated CdSe QDs (4 nm) suspended in PBS at the dosage of 150 μg/kg body weight (containing 3.75 μg Cd/Te-cores) or 750 μg/kg body weight (containing 18.75 μg Cd/T-cores) every 3 days for 5 weeks. A small amount of Cd was found in the placenta of the high concentration group, which indicated that the ability of the PEG-coated CdSe QDs to cross the PB was dose-dependent [89].
Pregnant mice were injected with CdSe/ZnS QDs (∼20 nm) or CdSe QDs (∼15 nm) at a concentration of 0.5 µM, 100 µL/mice/day at GD16 and GD17. RT-PCR assay showed that in both treatment groups, the expression of symbolic genes, such as p53 and bax (related to apoptosis), IGF-1 and EGF (related to tissue development), MT-1 (related to metal transport), was significantly altered. The CdSe/ZnS QD-treated group exhibited milder toxicity compared with the CdSe QD-treated group, which could be attributed to the protection of the ZnS surface coating [90]. The results from another previous in vitro study were consistent with the finding above. To assess the cytotoxic effect of CdSe-core QDs on embryonic development, blastocysts were obtained from mouse uterine horn on the fourth day of pregnancy and treated with CdSe-core QDs (0, 25, 250 and 500 nmol/L) for 24 h. TUNEL staining analysis showed that mouse blastocysts underwent apoptosis in response to CdSe-core QD in a dose-dependent manner. Dual differential staining revealed that proliferation in blastocysts was decreased by CdSe-core QDs, resulting in the inhibition of post-implantation embryonic development. However, the ZnS coating of CdSe QDs could significantly decrease these cytotoxic effects on embryonic development [91].
Generally, the PB is formed at approximately GD10-12 in mice and at approximately 4 months of pregnancy in humans [27]. After the formation of PB, the toxic NPs with less than 50nm particles showed injury to placenta and accumulated in the fetus, which indicating that less than 50nm of NPs can penetrate the PB. While, the size of NPs penetrated the BTB is smaller than 4 nm. Compared with BTB, the penetrability of PB may be attribute to its function, which is an important system in the exchange of nutriment or excretory metabolism between the mother and fetus.
In summary, damage by the NPs to the PB and embryo is related to the following aspects: 1. the physicochemical properties of NPs (size, dosage, shape, charge, material and surface-coating). There is a negative correlation between the rate of passage through the PB and size of the nanomaterials, which may be closely related to the pore size of the placental barrier. Surface modification materials affect the penetration of NPs by changing their physicochemical properties. After NPs enter a pregnant woman’s body through inhalation, venous injection, ingestion or skin permeation, maternal toxic stress reactions such as ROS, inflammation, apoptosis and endocrine dyscrasia are induced. During pregnancy, NPs may across the placenta into the fetus by passive diffusion or endocytosis. The toxic effect of NPs can trigger fetal inflammation, apoptosis, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, low weight, reproductive deficiency, nervous damage, and immunodeficiency, among other mechanisms, which can result in abnormal embryonic development and fetal death (Figure 3). 2. the health of the uterus, NPs are more likely to pass through the PB in an inflamed uterus. Thus, more attention should be paid to avoid exposure to NPs, especially in pregnant females. These toxicity profiles of NPs in embryonic development will provide the latest information for reasonable applications of NPs.
THE POSSIBLE WAYS FOR NPS ACROSS THE PB
Passive diffusion
By TEM analysis, Kertschanska et al. (1997) demonstrated that the placental channels that begin from the basal trophoblastic plasmalemma and terminate on the maternal surface range from 15-25 nm in diameter under normal intravascular pressure [92]. Therefore, this pore size would allow the NPs of size under 25 nm to cross the PB by passive diffusion.
It was demonstrated that NPs of polystyrene beads with 50, 80 or 240 nm in diameter could cross the barrier without impairing its function. In contrast, 500-nm beads were significantly blocked. The authors suggested that the fast transport of NPs with diameters of 50 and 80 nm may occur by diffusion [64]. These results are similar to those of previous studies on rodent placenta where size was also a factor. Silicon NPs with a size of 519 nm passed the PB, while those of sizes 834 and 1000 nm were unable to penetrate it [93]. The permeability of NPs is also related to the various NP coatings. Myllynen et al. studied PEGylated gold NPs in both open and recirculating dual human placental perfusion systems. These NPs aggregated in the syncytiotrophoblast cell layer rather than crossing the PB [60].
Endocytosis
A recent study showed that the intravenous administration gold NPs (20-nm and 50-nm NPs) were transported by endocytosis into placental cells [62]. Chun et al. also showed that QDs could be internalized by endocytosis and then migrate into fetal blood through fetal capillary pores [88]. The possible mechanism of endocytosis was related to clathrin and caveolin as the placenta has increased expression of clathrin and decreased expression of caveolin [62]. Therefore, although the mechanism of NP transport through the placenta is not fully understood, according to existing results, the main pathway of NP transport seems to be that of endocytosis [62]. In addition, diffusion has also been mentioned to be related to size-dependent transport of NPs. Selective permeability and passive and active transport must also be taken into account. Another possible mechanism relating to cell structure, called the ‘transtrophoblastic channel’, has also been suggested [64]. Due to the different results in various type, coating, or diameter of NPs, several of the above mechanisms may need to be considered in combination. The toxicity of NPs in pregnancy and embryonic development is shown in Figure 3 [63, 64]. The mechanisms that are responsible for the transport of NPs across the PB should be investigated to prevent damage to the development embryos. Meanwhile, understanding of the molecular transport mechanisms is important for accelerating the development of new therapeutic tools.
However, there is some evidence suggesting that certain NPs cannot pass through the PB. CdTe QDs coated with polyethylene glycol or mercaptopropionic acid, for example, were injected into Wistar rats, and subsequent penetration through the placental barrier was observed [94]. These QDs were mostly found in the complex cell structure of the placenta [94]. PEGylated gold NPs (size: 10-30 nm) could not cross the perfused human placenta in detectable amounts into the fetal circulation within 6 h [60]. In future studies of transport of NPs across the PB, rodent placenta and placenta perfusion models may be efficient techniques to investigate the transport of NPs between the mother and fetus [61, 63, 83].
Unfortunately, recent data on the cellular mechanisms underlying the variable permeability of NPs across the PB are still unclear. Thus, there is a need to balance the application of the NPs during pregnancy to prevent impeding embryogenesis.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
With the increased application of engineered NPs in cosmetics and textiles, together with the inhalation of NPs polluting the air, understanding the reproductive toxicity and transferable adverse effects of next generation is necessary. Interestingly, NPs are a double-edged sword: on one hand, owing to their peculiar physical and chemical properties, NPs can be used in commodities (such as cosmetics and textiles), in drug delivery systems and in clinical therapy and can provide substantial advantage and effectiveness in these fields [95]; on the other hand, due to the non-degradable properties of NPs, increasing evidence from research has shown the potential of many adverse health effects relating to the use of or contact with NPs. Many of these concerns have been highlighted from both in vivo and in vitro studies. However, while the studies on the toxicity of NPs have been far fewer than those on the positive application of NPs, the small size of NPs allows them to easily enter the body, particularly via the skin, eyes, gastrointestinal tract and nasal olfactory structures, at which point many potential harmful effects may occur. Subsequently, these NPs can enter systemic circulation and traverse tissues, cells and organelles as well as the reproductive organs [96, 97].
This review has discussed the present knowledge on the influence of NPs on oogenesis, ovarian structure, hormonogenesis and embryonic development (Table 1-4). Recent studies have shown that NPs can cause genotoxicity, cytotoxicity and abnormal development of the embryo. With the application of ENPs in commercial and industrial products, the risk of environmental exposure is growing. However, it is rather difficult to compare reproductive toxicity between studies, especially because the variety and dosage of NPs are very diverse. The application of NPs in pregnant women and fetuses still needs more in-depth studies. This review also provided a reference for the application of NPs in the clinic for gynecological disease.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUNDING
We thank Miss Lian Bi and Miss Wang Qianfeng for preparation of the table. This project was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31602140), Ningbo Science and Technology Plan Project (No. 2016A610081), the Collaborative Innovation Center for Zhejiang Marine High-efficiency and Healthy Aquaculture, and the K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University.
Abbreviations
- NPs
nanoparticles
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- BBB
blood-brain barrier
- TiO2
titanium dioxide
- CNS
central nervous system
- GnRH
gonadotropin-releasing hormone
- FSH
follicle stimulating hormone
- LH
luteinizing hormone (272)
- QDs
quantum dots
- QD-Tf
quantum dot-transferrin
- IVM
in vitro maturation
- ZP
zona pellucida
- IVF
in vitro fertilization
- ENPs
engineered nanoparticles
- BMF
BCL2 modifying factor
- SOD
superoxide dismutase
- CAT
catalase
- MDA
malondialdehyde
- HPOA
hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis
- PEG-b-PLA
poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(lactic acid)
- P4
progesterone
- E2
estradiol
- SCC
side-chain cleavage
- HA
hydroxyapatite
- GPx
glutathione peroxidase
- GD
gestation day
- VYS
visceral yolk sac
- MWM
Morris water maze
- PB
placental barrier
- TEM
transmission electron microscope
- TUNEL
TdT-mediated dUTP Nick-End Labeling
- DMSA
dimercaptosuccinic acid
- PEI
polyethyleneimine
- PAA
poly(acrylic acid)
- CdO
cadmium oxide
- Kim-1
kidney injury molecule-1
- PND
postnatal days
- MT
microtissue
- hCG
human chorionic gonadotropin
- CB-NPs
carbon black NPs
- DSP
daily sperm production
Author contributions
C.-C. Hou and J.-Q. Zhu conceived of and authored the manuscript.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors confirm that this review content has no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Buzea C, Pacheco II, Robbie K. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases. 2007;2:MR17–71. doi: 10.1116/1.2815690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:823–839. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006;311:622–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1114397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hoet PH, Bruske-Hohlfeld I, Salata OV. Nanoparticles - known and unknown health risks. J Nanobiotechnology. 2004;2:12. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-2-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nohynek GJ, Dufour EK. Nano-sized cosmetic formulations or solid nanoparticles in sunscreens: a risk to human health? Arch Toxicol. 2012;86:1063–1075. doi: 10.1007/s00204-012-0831-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Weinberg H, Galyean A, Leopold M. Evaluating engineered nanoparticles in natural waters. Trend Anal Chem. 2011;30:72–83. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Foldbjerg R, Olesen P, Hougaard M, Dang DA, Hoffmann HJ, Autrup H. PVP-coated silver nanoparticles and silver ions induce reactive oxygen species, apoptosis and necrosis in THP-1 monocytes. Toxicol Lett. 2009;190:156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ahamed M, Posgai R, Gorey TJ, Nielsen M, Hussain SM, Rowe JJ. Silver nanoparticles induced heat shock protein 70, oxidative stress and apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;242:263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li PW, Kuo TH, Chang JH, Yeh JM, Chan WH. Induction of cytotoxicity and apoptosis in mouse blastocysts by silver nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett. 2010;197:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lan Z, Yang WX. Nanoparticles and spermatogenesis: how do nanoparticles affect spermatogenesis and penetrate the blood-testis barrier. Nanomedicine. 2012;7:579–596. doi: 10.2217/nnm.12.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Baghirov H, Karaman D, Viitala T, Duchanoy A, Lou YR, Mamaeva V, Pryazhnikov E, Khiroug L, de Lange Davies C, Sahlgren C, Rosenholm JM. Feasibility Study of the Permeability and Uptake of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles across the Blood-Brain Barrier. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0160705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Muoth C, Aengenheister L, Kucki M, Wick P, Buerki-Thurnherr T. Nanoparticle transport across the placental barrier: pushing the field forward! Nanomedicine. 2016;11:941–957. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2015-0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kulvietis V, Zalgeviciene V, Didziapetriene J, Rotomskis R. Transport of nanoparticles through the placental barrier. The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine. 2011;225:225–234. doi: 10.1620/tjem.225.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li C, Taneda S, Taya K, Watanabe G, Li X, Fujitani Y, Tamie N, Suzuki AK. Effects of in utero exposure to nanoparticle-rich diesel exhaust on testicular function in immature male rats. Toxicol Lett. 2009;185:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li C, Li X, Suzuki AK, Zhang Y, Fujitani Y, Nagaoka K, Watanabe G, Taya K. Effects of exposure to nanoparticle-rich diesel exhaust on pregnancy in rats. J Reprod Dev. 2013;59:145–150. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2012-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stelzer R, Hutz RJ. Gold nanoparticles enter rat ovarian granulosa cells and subcellular organelles, and alter in-vitro estrogen accumulation. J Reprod Dev. 2009;55:685–690. doi: 10.1262/jrd.20241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jamnongjit M, Gill A, Hammes SR. Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling is required for normal ovarian steroidogenesis and oocyte maturation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:16257–16262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508521102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jamnongjit M, Hammes SR. Ovarian steroids: the good, the bad, and the signals that raise them. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:1178–1183. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.11.2803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gao G, Ze Y, Li B, Zhao X, Zhang T, Sheng L, Hu R, Gui S, Sang X, Sun Q, Cheng J, Cheng Z, Wang L, et al. Ovarian dysfunction and gene-expressed characteristics of female mice caused by long-term exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater. 2012;243:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.08.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Melnik EA, Buzulukov YP, Demin VF, Demin VA, Gmoshinski IV, Tyshko NV, Tutelyan VA. Transfer of Silver Nanoparticles through the Placenta and Breast Milk during in vivo Experiments on Rats. Acta Naturae. 2013;5:107–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xu G, Lin S, Law WC, Roy I, Lin X, Mei S, Ma H, Chen S, Niu H, Wang X. The Invasion and Reproductive Toxicity of QDs-Transferrin Bioconjugates on Preantral Follicle in vitro. Theranostics. 2012;2:734–745. doi: 10.7150/thno.4290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hsueh AJ, Billig H, Tsafriri A. Ovarian follicle atresia: a hormonally controlled apoptotic process. Endocr Rev. 1994;15:707–724. doi: 10.1210/edrv-15-6-707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Manikkam M, Rajamahendran R. Progesterone-induced atresia of the proestrous dominant follicle in the bovine ovary: changes in diameter, insulin-like growth factor system, aromatase activity, steroid hormones, and apoptotic index. Biol Reprod. 1997;57:580–587. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod57.3.580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nikas G, Levkov L, Rosenlund B, Hovatta O. The three-dimensional structure of the human zona pellucida. Human Reproduction. 2001;16:165–166. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oberdorster G, Sharp Z, Atudorei V, Elder A, Gelein R, Kreyling W, Cox C. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain. Inhal Toxicol. 2004;16:437–445. doi: 10.1080/08958370490439597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ng CT, Dheen ST, Yip WC, Ong CN, Bay BH, Lanry Yung LY. The induction of epigenetic regulation of PROS1 gene in lung fibroblasts by gold nanoparticles and implications for potential lung injury. Biomaterials. 2011;32:7609–7615. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee Y, Choi J, Kim P, Choi K, Kim S, Shon W, Park K. A transfer of silver nanoparticles from pregnant rat to offspring. Toxicol Res. 2012;28:139–141. doi: 10.5487/TR.2012.28.3.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Courbiere B, Auffan M, Rollais R, Tassistro V, Bonnefoy A, Botta A, Rose J, Orsière T, Perrin J. Ultrastructural interactions and genotoxicity assay of cerium dioxide nanoparticles on mouse oocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:21613–21628. doi: 10.3390/ijms141121613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kong L, Gao X, Zhu J, Cheng K, Tang M. Mechanisms involved in reproductive toxicity caused by nickel nanoparticle in female rats. Environ Toxicol. 2016;31:1674–1683. doi: 10.1002/tox.22288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Das J, Choi YJ, Song H, Kim JH. Potential toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in mammalian germ cells and developing embryos: treatment strategies and anticipated applications of nanoparticles in gene delivery. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:588–619. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tiedemann D, Taylor U, Rehbock C, Jakobi J, Klein S, Kues WA, Barcikowski S, Rath D. Reprotoxicity of gold, silver, and gold-silver alloy nanoparticles on mammalian gametes. Analyst. 2014;139:931–942. doi: 10.1039/c3an01463k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Taylor U, Tiedemann D, Rehbock C, Kues WA, Barcikowski S, Rath D. Influence of gold, silver and gold-silver alloy nanoparticles on germ cell function and embryo development. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2014;6:651–664. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.6.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Taylor U, Barchanski A, Garrels W, Klein S, Kues W, Barcikowski S, Rath D. Toxicity of gold nanoparticles on somatic and reproductive cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;733:125–133. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2555-3_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen SX, Yang XZ, Deng Y, Huang J, Li Y, Sun Q, Yu CP, Zhu Y, Hong WS. Silver nanoparticles induce oocyte maturation in zebrafish (Danio rerio) Chemosphere. 2017;170:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Xu G, Lin X, Yong K, Roy I, Qu J, Wang X. Visualization of reproduction toxicity of QDs for in vitro oocytes maturation. Proceedings of SPIE. 2009. p. 7519.
- 36.Hou J, Wan X, Wang F, Xu G, Liu Z, Zhang T. [Effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on development and maturation of rat preantral follicle in vitro] [Article in Chinese]. Acad J Second Mil Med Univ. 2009;29:869–873. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Di Virgilio AL, Reigosa M, Arnal PM, Fernández Lorenzo de Mele M. Comparative study of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of titanium oxide and aluminium oxide nanoparticles in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells. J Hazard Mater. 2010;177:711–718. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hsieh MS, Shiao NH, Chan WH. Cytotoxic effects of CdSe quantum dots on maturation of mouse oocytes, fertilization, and fetal development. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10:2122–2135. doi: 10.3390/ijms10052122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Preaubert L, Courbiere B, Achard V, Tassistro V, Greco F, Orsiere T, Bottero JY, Rose J, Auffan M, Perrin J. Cerium dioxide nanoparticles affect in vitro fertilization in mice. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10:111–117. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2015.1030792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chaudhury K, Babu KN, Singh AK, Das S, Das S, Kumar A, Seal S. Mitigation of endometriosis using regenerative cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2013;9:439–448. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2012.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhao X, Ze Y, Gao G, Sang X, Li B, Gui S, Sheng L, Sun Q, Cheng J, Cheng Z, Hu R, Wang L, Hong F. Nanosized TiO2-induced reproductive system dysfunction and its mechanism in female mice. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 42.Dagklis T, Ravanos K, Makedou K, Kourtis A, Rousso D. Common features and differences of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in male and female. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31:14–7. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.959917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gifford RM, Reynolds RM, Greeves J, Anderson RA, Woods DR. Reproductive dysfunction and associated pathology in women undergoing military training. J R Army Med Corps. 2017 doi: 10.1136/jramc-2016-000727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kong L, Tang M, Zhang T, Wang D, Hu K, Lu W, Wei C, Liang G, Pu Y. Nickel nanoparticles exposure and reproductive toxicity in healthy adult rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:21253–21269. doi: 10.3390/ijms151121253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Scsukova S, Mlynarcikova A, Kiss A, Rollerova E. Effect of polymeric nanoparticle poly (ethylene glycol)-block-poly (lactic acid) (PEG-b-PLA) on in vitro luteinizing hormone release from anterior pituitary cells of infantile and adult female rats. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2015;36:88–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rollerova E, Jurcovicova J, Mlynarcikova A, Sadlonova I, Bilanicova D, Wsolova L, Kiss A, Kovriznych J, Kronek J, Ciampor F, Vavra I, Scsukova S. Delayed adverse effects of neonatal exposure to polymeric nanoparticle poly (ethylene glycol)-block-polylactide methyl ether on hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis development and function in Wistar rats. Reprod Toxicol. 2015;57:165–175. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.07.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liu XQ, Zhang HF, Zhang WD, Zhang PF, Hao YN, Song R, Li L, Feng YN, Hao ZH, Shen W, Min LJ, Yang HD, Zhao Y. Regulation of neuroendocrine cells and neuron factors in the ovary by zinc oxide nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett. 2016;256:19–32. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lobo RA. What are the key features of importance in polycystic ovary syndrome? Fertility and Sterility. 2003;80:259–261. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00733-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang Q, Huang W, Wang D, Darvell BW, Day DE, Rahaman MN. Preparation of hollow hydroxyapatite microspheres. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17:641–646. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-9227-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu X, Qin D, Cui Y, Chen L, Li H, Chen Z, Gao L, Li Y, Liu J. The effect of calcium phosphate nanoparticles on hormone production and apoptosis in human granulosa cells. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Scsukova S, Mlynarcikova AB, Smolikova K, Rollerova E. Effects of selected nanoparticles on in vitro steroid hormone secretion by porcine ovarian granulosa cells. Reproductive Toxicology. 2013;41:33–34. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kolesarova A, Capcarova M, Sirotkin AV, Medvedova M, Kovacik J. In vitro assessment of silver effect on porcine ovarian granulosa cells. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2011;25:166–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2011.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Taya K, Greenwald GS. In vivo and in vitro ovarian steroidogenesis in the pregnant rat. Biol Reprod. 1981;25:683–691. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod25.4.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Christenson LK, Devoto L. Cholesterol transport and steroidogenesis by the corpus luteum. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:90. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yang H, Sun C, Fan Z, Tian X, Yan L, Du Y, Chen C, Liang X, Anderson GJ, Keelan JA, Zhao Y, Nie G. Effects of gestational age and surface modification on materno-fetal transfer of nanoparticles in murine pregnancy. Sci Rep. 2012;2:847. doi: 10.1038/srep00847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sferruzzi-Perri AN, Camm EJ. The Programming Power of the Placenta. Front Physiol. 2016;7:33. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hougaard KS, Jackson P, Jensen KA, Sloth JJ, Loschner K, Larsen EH, Birkedal RK, Vibenholt A, Boisen AMZ, Wallin H, Vogel U. Effects of prenatal exposure to surface-coated nanosized titanium dioxide (UV-Titan). A study in mice. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2010;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-7-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shimizu M, Tainaka H, Oba T, Mizuo K, Umezawa M, Takeda K. Maternal exposure to nanoparticulate titanium dioxide during the prenatal period alters gene expression related to brain development in the mouse. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2009;6:20. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-6-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kulvietis V, Zalgeviciene V, Didziapetriene J, Rotomskis R. Transport of nanoparticles through the placental barrier. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2011;225:225–234. doi: 10.1620/tjem.225.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Myllynen PK, Loughran MJ, Howard CV, Sormunen R, Walsh AA, Vähäkangas KH. Kinetics of gold nanoparticles in the human placenta. Reproductive Toxicology. 2008;26:130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hutson JR, Garcia-Bournissen F, Davis A, Koren G. The Human Placental Perfusion Model: A Systematic Review and Development of a Model to Predict In vivo Transfer of Therapeutic Drugs. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2011;90:67–76. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rattanapinyopituk K, Shimada A, Morita T, Sakurai M, Asano A, Hasegawa T, Inoue K, Takano H. Demonstration of the clathrin- and caveolin-mediated endocytosis at the maternal-fetal barrier in mouse placenta after intravenous administration of gold nanoparticles. J Vet Med Sci. 2014;76:377–387. doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Keelan JA. Nanotoxicology: nanoparticles versus the placenta. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:263–264. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wick P, Malek A, Manser P, Meili D, Maeder-Althaus X, Diener L, Diener PA, Zisch A, Krug H, Mandach UV. Barrier Capacity of Human Placenta for Nanosized Materials. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2010;118:432–436. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Melnik EA, Buzulukov YP, Demin VF, Demin VA, Gmoshinski IV, Tyshko NV, Tutelyan VA. Transfer of Silver Nanoparticles through the Placenta and Breast Milk during in vivo Experiments on Rats. Acta Naturae. 2013;5:107–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Charehsaz M, Hougaard KS, Sipahi H, Ekici AI, Kaspar Ç, Culha M, Bucurgat ÜÜ, Aydin A. Effects of developmental exposure to silver in ionic and nanoparticle form: A study in rats. Daru. 2016;24:24. doi: 10.1186/s40199-016-0162-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Austin CA, Hinkley GK, Mishra AR, Zhang Q, Umbreit TH, Betz MW, E Wildt B, Casey BJ, Francke-Carroll S, Hussain SM, Roberts SM, Brown KM, Goering PL. Distribution and accumulation of 10 nm silver nanoparticles in maternal tissues and visceral yolk sac of pregnant mice, and a potential effect on embryo growth. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10:654–661. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2015.1107143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ghaderi S, Tabatabaei SR, Varzi HN, Rashno M. Induced adverse effects of prenatal exposure to silver nanoparticles on neurobehavioral development of offspring of mice. J Toxicol Sci. 2015;40:263–275. doi: 10.2131/jts.40.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wu J, Yu C, Tan Y, Hou Z, Li M, Shao F, Lu X. Effects of prenatal exposure to silver nanoparticles on spatial cognition and hippocampal neurodevelopment in rats. Environ Res. 2015;138:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tian X, Zhu M, Du L, Wang J, Fan Z, Liu J, Zhao Y, Nie G. Intrauterine inflammation increases materno-fetal transfer of gold nanoparticles in a size-dependent manner in murine pregnancy. Small. 2013;9:2432–2439. doi: 10.1002/smll.201300817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mohammadipour A, Fazel A, Haghir H, Motejaded F, Rafatpanah H, Zabihi H, Hosseini M, Bideskan AE. Maternal exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles during pregnancy; impaired memory and decreased hippocampal cell proliferation in rat offspring. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014;37:617–625. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2014.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ebrahimzadeh Bideskan A, Mohammadipour A, Fazel A, Haghir H, Rafatpanah H, Hosseini M, Rajabzadeh A. Maternal exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles during pregnancy and lactation alters offspring hippocampal mRNA BAX and Bcl-2 levels, induces apoptosis and decreases neurogenesis. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2017.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mohammadipour A, Hosseini M, Fazel A, Haghir H, Rafatpanah H, Pourganji M, Bideskan AE. The effects of exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles during lactation period on learning and memory of rat offspring. Toxicol Ind Health. 2016;32:221–228. doi: 10.1177/0748233713498440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Umezawa M, Tainaka H, Kawashima N, Shimizu M, Takeda K. Effect of fetal exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticle on brain development - brain region information. J Toxicol Sci. 2012;37:1247–1252. doi: 10.2131/jts.37.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jackson P, Halappanavar S, Hougaard KS, Williams A, Madsen AM, Lamson JS, Andersen O, Yauk C, Wallin H, Vogel U. Maternal inhalation of surface-coated nanosized titanium dioxide (UV-Titan) in C57BL/6 mice: effects in prenatally exposed offspring on hepatic DNA damage and gene expression. Nanotoxicology. 2013;7:85–96. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2011.633715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yamashita K, Yoshioka Y, Higashisaka K, Mimura K, Morishita Y, Nozaki M, Yoshida T, Ogura T, Nabeshi H, Nagano K, Abe Y, Kamada H, Monobe Y, et al. Silica and titanium dioxide nanoparticles cause pregnancy complications in mice. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:321–328. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Noori A, Amiri G. Effect of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle on pregnancy and testicular development of mice. Poster. 2011;8:769. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Di Bona KR, Xu Y, Ramirez PA, DeLaine J, Parker C, Bao Y, Rasco JF. Surface charge and dosage dependent potential developmental toxicity and biodistribution of iron oxide nanoparticles in pregnant CD-1 mice. Reprod Toxicol. 2014;50:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Faust JJ, Zhang W, Chen Y, Capco DG. Alpha-Fe2O3 elicits diameter-dependent effects during exposure to an in vitro model of the human placenta. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2014;30:31–53. doi: 10.1007/s10565-013-9267-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Jo E, Seo G, Kwon JT, Lee M, Lee B, Eom I, Kim P, Choi K. Exposure to zinc oxide nanoparticles affects reproductive development and biodistribution in offspring rats. J Toxicol Sci. 2013;38:525–530. doi: 10.2131/jts.38.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Liu J, Zhao Y, Ge W, Zhang P, Liu X, Zhang W, Hao Y, Yu S, Li L, Chu M, Min L, Zhang H, Shen W. Oocyte exposure to ZnO nanoparticles inhibits early embryonic development through the γ-H2AX and NF-κB signaling pathways. Oncotarget. 2017;8:42673–42692. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Blum JL, Edwards JR, Prozialeck WC, Xiong JQ, Zelikoff JT. Effects of Maternal Exposure to Cadmium Oxide Nanoparticles During Pregnancy on Maternal and Offspring Kidney Injury Markers Using a Murine Model. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2015;78:711–724. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2015.1026622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Blum JL, Xiong JQ, Hoffman C, Zelikoff JT. Cadmium Associated With Inhaled Cadmium Oxide Nanoparticles Impacts Fetal and Neonatal Development and Growth. Toxicological Sciences. 2012;126:478–486. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Muoth C, Wichser A, Monopoli M, Correia M, Ehrlich N, Loeschner K, Gallud A, Kucki M, Diener L, Manser P, Jochum W, Wick P, Buerki-Thurnherr T. A 3D co-culture microtissue model of the human placenta for nanotoxicity assessment. Nanoscale. 2016;8:17322–17332. doi: 10.1039/c6nr06749b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.El-Sayed YS, Shimizu R, Onoda A, Takeda K, Umezawa M. Carbon black nanoparticle exposure during middle and late fetal development induces immune activation in male offspring mice. Toxicology. 2015;327:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2014.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Shimizu R, Umezawa M, Okamoto S, Onoda A, Uchiyama M, Tachibana K, Watanabe S, Ogawa S, Abe R, Takeda K. Effect of maternal exposure to carbon black nanoparticle during early gestation on the splenic phenotype of neonatal mouse. J Toxicol Sci. 2014;39:571–578. doi: 10.2131/jts.39.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Yoshida S, Hiyoshi K, Oshio S, Takano H, Takeda K, Ichinose T. Effects of fetal exposure to carbon nanoparticles on reproductive function in male offspring. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1695–1699. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chu M, Wu Q, Yang H, Yuan R, Hou S, Yang Y, Zou Y, Xu S, Xu K, Ji A, Sheng L. Transfer of quantum dots from pregnant mice to pups across the placental barrier. Small. 2010;6:670–678. doi: 10.1002/smll.200902049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wang Z, Zhang S, Qu G, Liu S. The capability of quantum dots in crossing the placental barrier and the potential influence on erythrocytes. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2013;13:6529–6532. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2013.7743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zhang W, Yang L, Kuang H, Yang P, Aguilar ZP, Wang A, Fu F, Xu H. Acute toxicity of quantum dots on late pregnancy mice: Effects of nanoscale size and surface coating. J Hazard Mater. 2016;318:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Chan WH, Shiao NH. Cytotoxic effect of CdSe quantum dots on mouse embryonic development. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2008;29:259–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00743.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kertschanska S, Schröder H, Kaufmann P. The ultrastructure of the trophoblastic layer of the degu (Octodon degus) placenta: a re-evaluation of the ‘channel problem’. Placenta. 1997;18:219–225. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(97)90096-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Refuerzo JS, Godin B, Bishop K, Srinivasan S, Shah SK, Amra S, Ramin SM, Ferrari M. Size of the nanovectors determines the transplacental passage in pregnancy: study in rats. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;204:546–e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Zalgeviciene V, Kulvietis V, Bulotiene D, Didziapetriene J, Rotomskis R. The Effect of Nanoparticles in Rats During Critical Periods of Pregnancy. Medicina-Lithuania. 2012;48:256–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Barkalina N, Charalambous C, Jones C, Coward K. Nanotechnology in reproductive medicine: Emerging applications of nanomaterials. Nanomedicine. 2014;10:e921–938. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2014.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ema M, Kobayashi N, Naya M, Hanai S, Nakanishi J. Reproductive and developmental toxicity studies of manufactured nanomaterials. Reprod Toxicol. 2010;30:343–352. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Nemmar A, Vanbilloen H, Hoylaerts MF, Hoet PHM, Verbruggen A, Nemery B. Passage of intratracheally instilled ultrafine particles from the lung into the systemic circulation in hamster. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2001;164:1665–1668. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.9.2101036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]