Gut Microbiota Dysfunction as Reliable Non-invasive Early Diagnostic Biomarkers in the Pathophysiology of Parkinson’s Disease: A Critical Review

Abstract

Recent investigations suggest that gut microbiota affects the brain activity through the microbiota-gut-brain axis under both physiological and pathological disease conditions like Parkinson’s disease. Further dopamine synthesis in the brain is induced by dopamine producing enzymes that are controlled by gut microbiota via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Also alpha synuclein deposition and the associated neurodegeneration in the enteric nervous system that increase intestinal permeability, oxidative stress, and local inflammation, accounts for constipation in Parkinson’s disease patients. The trigger that causes blood brain barrier leakage, immune cell activation and inflammation, and ultimately neuroinflammation in the central nervous system is believed to be due to the chronic low-grade inflammation in the gut. The non-motor symptoms that appear years before motor symptoms could be reliable early biomarkers, if they could be correlated with the established and reliable neuroimaging techniques or behavioral indices. The future directions should therefore, focus on the exploration of newer investigational techniques to identify these reliable early biomarkers and define the specific gut microbes that contribute to the development of Parkinson’s disease. This ultimately should pave the way to safer and novel therapeutic approaches that avoid the complications of the drugs delivered today to the brain of Parkinson’s disease patients.

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is considered today as the most common movement disorder, which affects 1–2 per 1000 of the population worldwide.¹ It has been estimated that 7–10 million people in the world have PD.² This is expected to double in the next 2 decades in proportion with the increase in the aging population.³ Complexity of the etiology of this disease along with clinical challenges, including difficulty to make definite early stage diagnosis and management of symptoms in the later stage, make treatment of PD difficult.⁴ Even though motor symptoms are still considered to be the hallmarks of PD, early non-motor symptoms (NMS) have been given considerable attention during the last 2 decades.⁵ These NMS could definitely be considered as either an indicator of risk factors that lead to PD or an early biomarker that stand as an objective measure to identify PD pathogenesis.³ In the present review, we explore the diagnostic potential of NMS associated with gut micro-biota dysfunction. These early symptoms that are believed to appear during the preclinical stage of the disease have to be correlated with the established investigational techniques to discover reliable early non-invasive PD biomarkers. It is hoped that the present review will lead to further intensive research leading to successful detection of early stage biomarkers for the safe and effective treatment of PD.

Parkinson’s Disease

Worldwide non-communicable diseases play a major role for mortality compared to communicable diseases.⁶ Neurodegenerative diseases, the main culprit of disability, are increasing globally at a fast pace.^7–10 PD is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor symptoms like dyskinesia, muscular rigidity, tremor, slowness of movement, and gait disorder. Apart from these motor symptoms, NMS like depression, dementia, autonomic and sensory dysfunction also accompany PD. In addition to the widely known dopaminergic loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta, PD is also characterized by synucleinopathy, the accumulation of insoluble polymers of denatured alpha-synuclein (α-synuclein) along with toxic parkin substrates called lewy bodies in the neurons. Lewy bodies are considered to be responsible for neurodegeneration and neuronal death.^11,12

Conventional Diagnosis, Treatments, and Their Shortcomings

The conventional diagnosis of PD relies on the patient’s clinical symptoms and neurological examination. Specialized brain scanning techniques that measure dopamine system and brain metabolism are among the best options available today to diagnose PD.¹³ The currently employed treatment for PD using drugs like levodopa, dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase (MAO) B inhibitors, anti-cholinergic agents, amantadine, and catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors have limitations with regard to both efficacy and safety.¹⁴ Prolonged use of levodopa is associated with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia while dopamine agonists are associated with an increased risk of impulse control disorders. The MAO B inhibitors have only a modest symptomatic benefit as monotherapy. The use of anti-cholinergic drugs is limited due to their side effects. The use for older or demented individuals and those without tremor is strongly discouraged. Amantadine is a relatively weak antiparkinsonian drug and its toxic side effects are more likely in older patients. The main drawback of the conventional treatment is that it cannot stop the progress of disease or reverse the symptoms. Furthermore, the conventional diagnosis of PD relies mainly on the motor symptoms of the patient. By the time motor symptoms emerge, however, a significant amount of neurological damage and destruction of structural changes might have already taken place. In addition, the neuroimaging tests employed are quite expensive and can be performed only in specialized imaging centers. What is more, today there is no standard diagnostic test for PD.

Importance of Early Diagnosis Through Biomarkers

Early diagnosis should enable immediate treatment and help protect the neuronal functions, slow disease progression, improve patient’s quality of life and ultimately reduce the overall cost of PD treatment.¹⁵ Recent investigations that use diverse techniques to recognize NMS that precede years before the motor symptom should help in earlier diagnosis of PD and determine appropriate treatment strategy and alter the diagnostic concept of PD.¹⁶ Currently there are no reliable biomarkers available that can predict the onset of PD, diagnosis, progression of the disease, and evaluation of the response to disease modifying treatments (DMT).¹⁷ Development of early diagnostic biomarkers at the very beginning is therefore crucial for therapeutic interventions. Biomarkers for PD are classified generally into three types, namely prodromal, preclinical or premotor stage, risk or susceptibility stage, and motor stage.^18,19 The prodromal biomarkers which could predict the onset of PD years in advance are, no doubt, very crucial. These biomarkers can again be classified mainly into 3 types, namely clinical biomarkers, biochemical biomarkers and imaging biomarkers (Table 1). The clinical NMS appear years before the appearance of motor symptoms.¹⁷ The most common clinical NMS that occur ten years before motor symptoms are constipation, dream enacting behavior, and frequent nightmares (with rapid eye movement, sleep behavior disorder), excessive day time sleepiness, and post prandial fullness. Additionally, the more frequent NMS that are believed to occur 2–10 years before motor symptoms are smell loss and mood disturbances, taste loss, excessive sweating, fatigue, and pain. It is therefore worth considering these clinical NMS for developing early diagnostic bio-markers.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Presymptomatic Stage Biomarkers in Parkinson’s Disease (Adapted From Picillo et al¹⁷)

Presymptomatic biomarker type	Subtype	Identifiable characteristics.
Clinical biomarkers	NMS (appear10 years before motor symptoms)	Constipation, dream enacting behavior, frequent nightmares, excessive daytime sleepiness, post prandial fullness, tremor
	NMS (appear between 2–10 years before motor symptoms)	Smell loss, mood disturbances, excessive sweating, fatigue, pain, constipation, hypotension, urinary dysfunction, erectile dysfunction
Biochemical biomarkers	Metabolic factors	Cholesterol level
	Neurotrophic factors	High IGF-1
		Low vitamin D
	Oxidative stress	High uric acid level
Imaging biomarkers	Nuclear imaging	Nigrostriatal degeneration
	Transcranial sonography	Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity
	Magnetic resonance imaging	Reorganization of corticostriatal circuits in mutations

NMS, non-motor symptoms; IGF, immunoglobulin F.

The appearance of NMS during the prodromal stage indicates the widespread neuroanatomical and neurochemical changes which occur throughout PD. It involves not only the dopaminergic nigrostriatal system but also serotonergic, noradrenergic and cholinergic frontal and brain stem regions.²⁰ Development of prodromal biomarkers could be achieved by determining the relationship between risk factors, hyperechogenicity of the substantia nigra, and positive family history.²¹ The most promising potential clinical prodromal PD biomarkers include bowel dysfunction, RBD, olfactory deficits, and mood disorders. Identification of the potent clinical premotor biomarkers that could support to confirm the sensitivity and specificity of other early phase biomarkers of PD is therefore very crucial.

Communications Between the Brain and the Gastrointestinal Tract

The microbiota-gut-brain axis is a bidirectional communication between the central nervous system (CNS) and the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.^22,23 This axis is responsible for the modulation of digestive process, immune function, perception and emotional response to visceral stimuli under physiological conditions.²⁴ Various diseases like anxiety and depressive disorders, liver diseases, gut inflammation, disorders of GI motility, and chronic abdominal pain syndrome, etc, are believed to occur due to dysregulation in the microbiota-gut-brain axis.^22,25–31 This axis incorporates the CNS, autonomic nervous system, and enteric nervous system in addition to the neuroendocrine and the neuroimmune systems.²⁹ Afferent fibers from the gut to cortical centers, cerebral, anterior and posterior cingulate, insular and amygdala cortices, as well as effector fibers projecting to the smooth muscles of the gut, stand as the major route for bidirectional communication along the axis.³² This network plays a major role and impacts both GI and brain function.^31,33 Further, dopamine synthesis in the brain is induced by dopamine producing enzymes whose synthesis or inhibition is controlled by gut microbiota via the microbiota-gut-brain axis.³⁴

Gut Microbiome Imbalance Affects Brain Through Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis

The human microbiome is believed to constitute 100 trillion microorganisms⁷ and the vast majority live in the gut microbiota.³⁵ The main chunk of these microbiomes is inherited maternally through the microbiota enriched vaginal fluid of the mother at the time of birth and becomes a vital part of our immunity.^36–41 These microbiomes act as a barrier between humans and the external environment and plays a major role in the protection against various external hazards.^6,42–46 Although the microbiome is inherited from the mother, eventually the microbiome changes to one’s own unique signature.^39,47,48 The gut microbiota changes constantly according to our food habits and the environment.^49,50 The stool and the intestinal mucosal microbiome compositions may differ from each other and between different individuals. Recent investigations suggest that gut microbiota affects the brain activity through microbiota-gut-brain axis under both physiological and pathological disease conditions like PD^25,51–53 through a prion like transmission via the molecular mimicry pathway.⁵⁴

Recent Perspectives of Parkinson’s Disease and Gastrointestinal Tract Dysfunction

Enteric α-Synuclein Triggers Early Gut Symptoms

Recent reports claim that the origin of PD does not take place in the substantia nigra alone and its pathology involves extranigral regions as well. Initially lewy bodies begin to appear in the non-dopaminergic neurons outside the basal ganglia in the olfactory pathways, namely the gigantocellular reticular nucleus, caudal raphe nuclei, coeruleus-subcoeruleus complex and glosso-pharyngeal vagal complex.⁵⁵ A recent perspective is that the onus of PD is shared by the extra neurological region along with the brain. Comorbid GI dysfunctions characterized by constipation accompany almost 80% of the PD patients.⁵⁶ Also α-synuclein deposition and the associated neurodegeneration in the enteric nervous system, characterized by increased intestinal permeability, oxidative stress and local inflammation, accounts for the constipation in PD patients.^57–59 These pathophysiological symptoms could be observed in the initial stages of PD, years before the important motor symptoms appear, giving support to the hypothesis that PD pathogenesis might have primary connections with the gut.^60–64

Gut Dysfunction Impacts Brain

The clinical manifestations of PD in the gut, their symptoms and etiology are shown in Table 2. The table reveals that the majority of symptoms that are of GI origin appear to be early diagnostic tools in neurodegenerative diseases. It is, therefore, important that these symptoms are investigated in detail to understand the exact pathophysiology of PD. Several studies have been carried out in recent years to understand the role of gut microbiota in PD. The concept of linking PD with the low-grade inflammation of the gut has been around for quite some time. In colonic biopsies of PD patients, increased mRNA expressions of proinflammatory cytokines have been observed compared to normal patients.²⁷ It is possible that the trigger that causes blood brain barrier leakage, immune cell activation and inflammation, and ultimately neuroinflammation in the CNS may possibly be due to the chronic low-grade inflammation in the gut.

Table 2.

Early Clinical Manifestations of Parkinson’s Disease in Gut, Symptoms, and Etiology (Adapted From Mukherjee et al⁶⁵,¹⁰⁴)

PD associated clinical manifestation in the gut	Symptoms	Etiology and test for evaluation
Malnutrition	Weight alteration, increased disease severity or duration, depression or anxiety, fatigue, osteoporosis	Loss of appetite, dysphagia, constipation, early satiety, increased dose of levodopa, vitamin D deficiency, impaired insulin signaling, mitochondrial dysfunction
Oral and dental disorders	Lesser teeth number, teeth caries, gingival recession, increased tooth mobility, burning mouth syndrome, bruxism, temporomandibular disorder, taste impairment	Low frequency tooth brushing, motor or impairment, apathy, depression, cognitive impairment
Sialorrhea	Drooling, dementia, hallucination, orthostatic hypotension, silent aspiration, laryngeal penetration of saliva	Dysphagia with less efficient swallowing, abnormal head posture, unintentional mouth opening due to hypomimia
Dysphagia	Aspiration pneumonia, dementia, depression, severe motor symptoms	Dysfunction of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal swallowing, central cholinergic dysfunction Test: Bed side screening, cough reflex testing, video fluoroscopy, manometry
Gastric dysfunction	Nausea, vomiting, early satiety, postprandial fullness	Response fluctuation with levodopa Test: gastric emptying scintigraphy, 13C sodium octanoate breath test, electrogastrography
H. pylori infection and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth	Motor severity worsening in PD	Serology, urea breath test, serum antigen test
Constipation and defecatory dysfunction	Infrequent bowel movements, failed defecation attempts, sense of incomplete rectal emptying at defecation	Slow transit constipation, dyssynergic defecation. Test: radioopaque marker study for colonic transit, wireless motility capsule, anorectal manometry, rectal balloon expulsion, defecography

PD, Parkinson’s disease; H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori.

Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis

The most extensively studied example of microbial association of PD is Helicobacter pylori. The prevalence of H. pylori is high and causes motor impairments by hindering the absorption of levodopa, a primary drug used for PD management.⁶⁵ Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), a disorder of excessive bacterial growth in the small intestine, has also been associated with PD. SIBO affects almost one quarter of PD patients with motor impairments and its eradication results in the improvement of motor fluctuations.^66,67

Fecal microbiota collected from 72 patients with PD and age-matched controls has shown higher levels of enterobacteriacea and lower counts for prevotellacea. Prevotella helps in breaking down complex carbohydrates to provide short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) along with thiamine and folate which are by products that promote a healthy intestinal environment.⁶⁸ Decrease in prevotella count is linked to decreased production of these important micro nutrients. Gut microbes like bacillus spp. are known to produce dopamine and gut microbiota accounts for almost half of the dopamine production in the body.^69,70

Cyanobacteria, present in minute quantities in the GI tract, is believed to produce β-N-methyl amino-L-alanine (BMAA) which has been found to be increased in the brain of PD, Alzheimer’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. BMAA is an excitotoxin which activates metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 that causes reduction in the levels of glutathione, a major antioxidant. It is believed that neurons and glial cells cannot control reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) effectively in the brain. The BMAA protein also has implications over protein misfolding and aggregation particularly in PD, Alzheimer’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.⁷¹

Gut Inflammation

Figure shows an algorithm that represents the gut inflammation driven GI dysfunction mediated PD pathogenesis model. It shows that neurodegeneration in the brain of PD patients is the ultimate result of a cascade of events that starts from the gut. The initial trigger caused by the environmental pollutants and pesticides in the gut are crucial. The involvement of gut should therefore be taken into consideration for designing early and reliable diagnostic tools in PD.

Figure.

Gut inflammation driven gastrointestinal dysfunction mediated Parkinson’s disease (PD) pathogenesis model. BBB, blood brain barrier. Adapted from Yarandi et al¹⁴⁷ and Houser and Tansey.¹⁴⁸

Identifying Reliable Early Non-motor Biomarkers

PD patients exhibit GI dysfunction that precedes almost 2 decades to motor dysfunction. Symptoms like constipation, dysbiosis, altered intestinal permeability and enteric accumulation of α-synuclein co-exist with the inflammation in the GI tract.^72–75 Persistant inflammation in the gut leads to systemic inflammation and ultimately neuroinflammation. Recent studies have reported that gut inflammation and oxidative stress do exist in patients with PD.^76,77

Constipation

Constipation is the second most common NMS next to hyposmia in PD.^78,79 Constipation occurs mainly due to delayed intestinal transit time and its effects are displayed in the small intestine and colon.^78,79 It is believed that constipation appears as a prodromal symptom years before the motor symptoms appear.⁸⁰ It has been reported that men, in their middle age, with less than one bowel movement per day had 4 times the risk of PD diagnosis for the next 20–25 years compared to men who had normal bowel movements.⁸¹ Constipated men (bowel movements less than 3 in a week) had 5 times more chance and women with constipation have 3 times more chance of being diagnosed with PD in the next 6 years compared with individuals with normal bowel movement.⁸² Meta-analyses reveal that constipation is more than 2 times common in people who develop PD compared to normal people,⁸³ and individuals with constipation have 2 times the chance to have PD within 10 years of their evaluation.⁸⁴ The time duration over which constipation indicates the development of PD is remarkable. After prospective and retrospective studies, it has been found that constipation becomes apparent at an average of 15.6–24.0 years before PD is diagnosed.^33,64,81,85 Constipation should, therefore, be considered as one of the earliest and important symptoms of pathological events that lead to PD.

Enteric α-Synuclein Deposition

Alpha synuclein associated enteric abnormality is another intestinal characteristic that has been generally recorded. PD patients have been detected with more frequent and higher levels of intestinal α-synuclein compared to the same age matched healthy controls.^{58,61,62,86–88} This has significance as the over-expression of α-synuclein causes α-synuclein aggregation in the intestine and brain of mice and humans.^76,89,90 Studies have reported detection of phosphorylated α-synuclein in 61.6% of PD samples and lewy bodies/lewy neutrites in 72.4–100.0% of PD samples compared to the detection of 0.0–33.0% of α-synuclein in healthy population,^91–95 suggesting that intestinal synucleinopathy is a relatively sensitive and reliable indicator of PD pathology. Recently it has been reported that distinctive α-synuclein immunoreactivity observed in biopsies of intestines of healthy individuals who would develop PD in the later stage,^61,62,87 give rise to the presumption that abnormal enteric α-synuclein appears before neurodegeneration in CNS advances to develop motor symptoms.

Altered Intestinal Barrier Function

Studies have indicated that patients with PD have increased intestinal permeability compared to healthy controls.^{76,85,96–98} Several studies have also indicated abnormalities in the tight junctions of intestine without complete damage in the mucosa, but characterized by a decrease in the barrier promoting protein levels and disruptions of tight junction networks,^76,92,93 thus showing a phenotype consistent with low-grade inflammation.⁷² The penetration of E. coli into the intestinal mucosa seems to be expressed more frequently in PD patients as compared to controls, and correlate with increased intestinal permeability and oxidative stress and increased enteric α-synuclein levels.⁵⁸ Newly diagnosed PD patients have been detected with increased intestinal permeability and this seems to be present since the earliest clinical stages of the disease.⁵⁸

Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth

The incidence of SIBO, bacterial density, and dysbiosis is greater in the small intestine of PD patients compared to healthy controls.^66,67,99,100 The prevalence of SIBO is 25.0–54.5% in PD patients compared to 8.3–20.0% in normal controls. The presence of SIBO has been associated with a greater degree of impairment in motor control in PD with fluctuation in levodopa response.⁶⁷

Due to the immediate vicinity of the enteric nervous system (ENS) with fecal products, gut microbiota and its metabolic products are the major candidates that could start the process leading to lewy body formation in the ENS. Two recent studies claim a link between abundance of gut microbiota and PD.^68,101 According to these studies, bacteria which has the potential to produce SCFAs are reported to be low in PD. SCFAs alter the activity of ENS and increases GI motility.¹⁰² A shift in gut microbiota may, therefore, have an association with the shift in metabolic products like SCFA.¹⁰³

The difference in fecal gut microbiota composition in PD patients vs the age matched control has been analysed by real-time quantitative PCR and the data is given in Table 3. The data reveal that bacteria family from phylum bacteroidetes and furmicutes decrease significantly in the fecal samples of PD patients in comparison to age matched controls, whereas the bacteria from phylum verrocomicrobia, actinobacteria, archaea, and proteobacteria increase compared to controls.

Table 3.

Difference in Fecal Gut Microbiota Composition in Parkinson’s Disease Patients Versus Age Matched Control (Adapted From Unger et al¹⁰³)

Bacterial family	Phylum	Change in microbial concentration in PD group compared to control
Prevotellacea	Bacteroidetes	Decrease
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii	Firmicutes	Decrease
Lactobacilli/Enterococci	Firmicutes	Decrease
Akkarmansia muciniphila	Verrucomicrobia	Increase
Bifidobacterium	Actinobacteria	Increase
Methanobrevibacter smithii	Archaea	Increase
Enterobacteriaceae	Proteobacteria	Increase

PD, Parkinson’s disease.

The difference in fecal SCFAs of PD patients in comparison to age matched controls has been analysed by gas chromatography and data obtained is given in Table 4. The data reveal a considerable reduction in the absolute concentrations of acetate, propionate, and butyrate compared to age matched controls thus indicating that gut is the origin of pathological process that causes PD.¹⁰⁴ Gut microbiota and its metabolic products may therefore be considered as potential factors that could eventually lead to the formation of lewy bodies in the ENS.^68,101

Table 4.

Difference in Fecal Short Chain Fatty Acid Composition in Parkinson’s Disease Patients Compared to Age Matched Control (Adapted From Unger et al¹⁰³)

SCFA	Change in SCFA concentration in PD group compared to control
Acetate	Decrease
Butyrate	Decrease
Propionate	Decrease

SCFA, short chain fatty acid; PD, Parkinson’s disease.

Gastrointestinal Inflammation

Prolonged intestinal inflammatory conditions can lead to systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation. The GI inflammation is associated with symptoms like constipation, intestinal permeability, dysbiosis, and higher levels of pathogenic enteric α-synuclein (together characterized as GI dysfunction) that appear more than two decades before the onset of motor symptoms.^72–75 Also, studies have reported that PD patients show inflammation and oxidative stress in the gut.^58,59

Current Biomarkers and Investigational Techniques Used

Individuals with PD have been reported to exhibit increased urinary indoxyl sulfate indicating gut dysbiosis.¹⁰⁰ Gut microflora is analyzed by the state of the art high-throughput technique.⁷⁷ Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and next generation sequencing using high-throughput microbial identification are used to identify different microbial community in PD. Occludins, the tight junction proteins, are important components of tissue barriers and are essential for structural maintenance.¹⁰⁵ Microbiota changes are linked with alterations in intestinal barrier in GI diseases like irritable bowel syndrome.²⁴ Also colonic specimens of PD patients show down-regulation of occluding.⁹⁵

Objective measures of PD include leukocyte subset counts,¹⁰⁶ serum cortisol, TNF-α,^107,108 in addition to global motor scores in the peripheral blood mononuclear cell production of cytokines, and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) expression.¹⁰⁹ An increase IL-6 concentration in blood collected four years earlier predicts PD in patients.¹¹⁰ Normal concentration of plasma 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) regulates emotion. Gut microbiota may regulate 5-HT.¹¹¹ Gut microbiota dysfunction can be linked to decrease in 5-HT and depression in PD patients.^112,113 Leaky gut, which enables lipopolysaccharide translocation, is involved in inflammation associated with major depression.¹¹⁴

Metagenomics technology like proton nuclear magnetic resonance and targeted analysis are used as non-invasive techniques for diagnosing dysbiosis associated with bacteria by profiling biofluids like urine, serum, and plasma.¹¹⁵ Selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry is another technique used to detect bacterial dysbiosis by measuring volatile compounds (ethane, methane, pentane, ammonia, dimethyl sulfide) in the breath, stool or urine of PD patients.¹¹⁶ A recent study has shown that patients who suffer from depression have increased concentration of isovaleric acid (volatile fatty acid) in their stool.¹¹⁷

Correlating Gastrointestinal Mediated Non-motor Symptoms With Established Techniques to Discover Reliable Early Non-invasive Biomarkers

Correlating Enteric Nervous System Mediated Non-motor Symptoms With Neuro Imaging Techniques

The NMS in PD include GI symptoms like constipation, enteric α-synuclein deposition, altered intestinal barrier function, SIBO, and inflammation in the gut. The presence of these symptoms in the majority of PD patients possibly suggests that these could be considered as preclinical or prodromal biomarkers of PD. It would be more reliable, therefore, if these could be related to the already established investigational techniques.

The established investigational techniques meant for correlation with the NMS of ENS have to be ideal in terms of sensitivity, reproducibility, technical feasiblity, and also cost effective, non-invasive and ultimately they should be thoroughly validated.¹¹⁸ Types of the investigational neuroimaging techniques that include single photon emission tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and transcranial sonography (TCS), will give vital clues about the structure and function of the brain in PD patients. These could be used to confirm the extent of accuracy in predicting PD from early preclinical or prodromal biomarkers of GI origin.¹¹⁹

The above-mentioned neuroimaging techniques are non-invasive and can be regularly used to check the integrity of the dopamine system to provide anatomical figures (eg, imbalance in uptake). They give data about the time span of neuronal loss and can be correlated with the disease severity as well.^120–123

TCS could be used as an ideal imaging technique to correlate with the NMS of the ENS at early stages. TCS can identify echoes of higher density in the midbrain with greater efficiency in hospital as well as community settings. The hyperechogenicity of the midbrain could figure out the increment in the concentration of iron in the substantia nigra of PD patients very early. TCS is thus a promising candidate for discovering early biomarkers. Another state-of-the-art technique called voxel based morphometry that can tell similarities in the structure and differences in the volume, help in identifying PD from other motor disorders in the initial stages of the disease.^124,125

Correlating Enteric Nervous System Mediated Non-motor Symptoms With Functional or Behavioral Indices

It is believed that early NMS that reflect degeneration in extranigral regions before the loss of dopamine in the substantia nigra, include altered functions in sleep, olfaction, visuospatial abilities that affect cognition by diminished executive function as well as behavioral change.¹²⁶ The tests which are meant to evaluate these symptoms of PD are non-invasive, cost effective, easy to perform even at home and/or online by the participants. These functional or behavioral tests include olfaction acuity test (eg, the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test- the UPSIT), RBD screening questionnaire, key board tapping test, the bradykinesia akinesia incoordination test, and accelerometer based examinations. These tests have the potential to correlate with the ENS associated NMS to discover early reliable biomarkers for the consequent improvement of PD screening in various settings.^127–129

Future Directions for Reliable Early Non-invasive Biomarkers

Recent studies suggest that biopsies of the GI tract and sub-mandibular gland could be used as potential early biomarkers of PD. These are promising approaches to detect α-synuclein neuropathology in the autonomic nervous system of PD cases.^130–135 In addition, the presence of α-synuclein in ENS and submandibular gland is likely to occur at a very early stage in the course of the disease.^126,136 As of now, the abnormal α-synuclein accumulation has been identified in the biopsies within the salivary glands,^8,45,56 stomach, duodenum,^55,57 colon and rectum of PD patients.^{122,130,132,134}

Analysis of surgical specimens obtained during intervention of diverse pathological conditions demonstrates in vivo α-synuclein pathology outside the CNS in PD patients. A recent study has shown the presence of lewy pathology in GI and biliary surgical specimens taken by surgical interventions performed years before the onset of neurological symptoms. This emphasizes the potential utility of surgical specimens for the confirmation of α-synuclein pathology for the prediction of PD in patients.¹²⁷

Newer investigational techniques use broader net and more global non-targeted strategies, like genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics for identifying multiple biomarkers in tissues from normal and disease affected individuals.^137–141 Metabolomic evaluations of plasma generated set of metabolites (indicators) are capable of differentiating between PD patients and controls irrespective of medication status.¹⁴²

Recently a study using cerebrospinal fluid and serum of PD affected patients using thorough pathological assessments has shown that these cell free peripheral fluid profiles provide an accurate picture of the cell level pathological events in the deceased tissue of PD patients.¹⁴³ Greater care and attention to standardize clinical assessment and to properly classify different patients, as well as the standardization and proper collection and storage of bio-samples, are vital for these newer approaches to get fruitful results.

There should be a greater focus in future, on studying the current data sets from large population based investigations and also analyzing the archived fluid and tissue samples from large prospective population-based cohort studies.^127,144 Ultimately the main effort should be made to thoroughly evaluate these results using current bio-informatics and technological approaches.

Conclusion

Discovering reliable early biomarkers for PD has become the need of the hour for the ailing patients all over the world. Early diagnostic biomarkers are vital for 2 reasons, namely to intervene right at the onset of the disease and to monitor the progress of therapeutic interventions that may slow or stop the course of the disease. Even though loss of dopamine neurons may occur early, clinical motor symptoms of PD like muscular rigidity, body tremors, drooping body posture, difficulty in walking and other symptoms associated with autonomic nervous system show at a later stage in the disease progression, much after the majority of dopamine neurons have degenerated. It is important, therefore, to discover reliable, early, sensitive and specific biomarkers that would enable differential diagnosis, prognosis and effective treatment of PD. Discovery of novel biomarkers no doubt play a major role in the effective treatment of PD with minimum or no side effects. Recent studies have suggested that PD originates in the gut and not in the brain.¹⁴⁵ It has been shown that a biological link exists between the gut microbiome and PD.¹⁴⁶ The hypothetical basis for this theory is that the gut bacteria may be responsible for chemicals which are over activating parts of the brain,¹⁴⁷ leading to α-synuclein damage and its deposition which ultimately causes neurodegeneration in the brain resulting in PD.¹⁴⁸ It is important, therefore, to have a forward step to define the specific gut microbes that may contribute to the development of PD, as this could translate into novel biomarkers to identify at-risk patients at a very early stage in the disease progression. These findings may possibly lead to novel therapeutic approaches that avoid the existing complications of drugs delivered to the brain and may also become safer and more effective to the ailing patients.