Abstract
Indocyanine green (ICG) is the only near-infrared dye approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for clinical use. When injected in blood, ICG binds primarily to plasma proteins and lipoproteins, resulting in enhanced fluorescence. Recently, the optofluidic laser has emerged as a novel tool in bio-analysis. Laser emission has advantages over fluorescence in signal amplification, narrow linewidth, and strong intensity, leading to orders of magnitude increase in detection sensitivity and imaging contrast. Here we successfully demonstrate, to the best of our knowledge, the first ICG lasing in human serum and whole blood with the clinical ICG concentrations and the pump intensity far below the clinically permissible level. Furthermore, we systematically study ICG laser emission within each major serological component (albumins, globulins, and lipoproteins) and reveal the critical elements and conditions responsible for lasing. Our work marks a critical step toward eventual clinical and biomedical applications of optofluidic lasers using FDA approved fluorophores, which may complement or even supersede conventional fluorescence-based sensing and imaging.
OCIS codes: (140.2050) Dye lasers, (140.4780) Optical resonators, (170.6280) Spectroscopy, fluorescence and luminescence, (170.0170) Medical optics and biotechnology, (170.1610) Clinical applications, (170.1470) Blood or tissue constituent monitoring
1. INTRODUCTION
Indocyanine green (ICG) is the only near-infrared dye approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use [1,2], such as hepatobiliary surgery [3], sentinel lymph node biopsy [4], and assessment of surgical tumor resection margins [1,5]. ICG has low toxicity and exhibits absorption and emission maxima around 730 and 800 nm (Fig. S1)—both wavelengths are within the ideal spectral window of human tissues for clinical imaging. When injected in blood, ICG binds primarily to plasma proteins and lipoproteins [Fig. 1(a)], resulting in enhanced fluorescence [1,6–9]. In practice, ICG is injected in the blood circulation within the normal clinical dosage range to locate the tumor site and its margin by the higher fluorescence above the background since more blood vessels are grown within/around the tumor site [10,11]. In addition, ICG has been extensively used in in vitro preclinical studies of cell lines or animal tissues [8,11–13] with an aim to develop innovative technologies and methodologies for potential clinical applications. In cancer surgery, one of the main prognostic factors for survival rate is complete tumor resection and imaging modalities that allow the specific differentiation and identification of vital structures, which would be of huge benefit during image guided surgery. However, in clinical applications, due to background fluorescence and omnipresent tissue scattering, it remains challenging to obtain high contrast in ICG emission between the tumor and normal tissue for precise tumor detection and margins of excision [12,14–16]. In in vitro applications, ICG emission is often not sensitive enough to detect or monitor subtle changes in concentrations or structures in biomolecules, cells, and tissues. Therefore, ICG emission with a superior signal-to-background ratio (SBR) is highly desirable.
Recently, the optofluidic laser has been explored in bioanalysis at the molecular [17–23] and cellular level [21,24–26], in which laser emission, rather than spontaneous emission (i.e., fluorescence), is used as the sensing signal. Laser emission has distinct advantages over fluorescence. First, it is significantly more sensitive to biomolecular and cellular changes than fluorescence [18,19,21,22,27], thanks to the optical feedback in lasing. Second, the laser signal is orders of magnitude stronger and has much narrower linewidth (so that the broadband background can be spectrally filtered out). Finally, due to the threshold behavior in lasing emission, a large contrast (102–103 fold) can be obtained between before and after lasing [17,28]. All of those result in unprecedented SBR in imaging for tumor localization and sensitivity in in vitro biosensing. Therefore, using ICG laser emission could lead to a paradigm change in clinical practice and theranostics. However, while a plethora of previous work has shown the great promise of optofluidic lasers in in vitro biomolecular and cellular analysis [17,18,21,22,24,25,27–29], no research has been conducted on the feasibility of laser emission from an FDA approved dye in whole human blood (which is tissue), particularly at the clinically acceptable dye concentration and external pump intensity.
In this article, we carried out for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, a systematic investigation on ICG lasing. We started with each major serological component (albumins, globulins, and lipoproteins) to elucidate the critical elements and conditions responsible for ICG lasing. Then, we demonstrated ICG lasing in human serum. Finally, we studied ICG lasing in human whole blood. All the ICG concentrations in serological component studies were well below the commonly used level in in vitro biological studies (∼1 mM) [29–31] with the lasing threshold on the order of 1 μJ/mm2. More significantly, lasing could be achieved in human serum and whole blood using ICG within the normal range of clinical dosage (0.01–0.07 mM in human blood [32,33]). The threshold of laser emission in whole blood was 10 μJ/mm2, 20 times lower than the laser exposure limit for tissues (∼200 μJ/mm2) [34]. At the end of the article, we will present a few possible clinical, preclinical, and biomedical opportunities where the ICG laser may help improve the existing practices and also discuss the challenges that it faces, in particular for in vivo clinical applications where the current high-Q cavities may not be applicable.
2. ICG LASING WITH SEROLOGICAL COMPONENTS
Throughout the experiments, we used the optofluidic ring resonator (OFRR) based on a thin-walled fused silica capillary, as illustrated in Fig. 1(b). The circular cross section of the capillary forms the ring resonator that supports the high-Q (>107) whispering gallery modes (WGMs). The liquid was injected into the OFRR, in which the evanescent field of the WGM present inside the capillary interacts with the gain medium in the liquid and provides the optical feedback for lasing. See Section 5.
First, as a control experiment, Curves 1 and 2 in Fig. 1(c) show no laser emission from ICG (0.4 mM) alone in either phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or deionized (DI) water at the excitation of 4.8 μJ/mm2. In fact, no laser emission was observed even when the excitation was as high as 25 μJ/mm2. This is due to the extremely low quantum yield (0.48%) of ICG in PBS or water. In contrast, in the presence of proteins, rapid binding to ICG results in a significant increase in quantum yield (∼4.0%, Fig. S2). Although such a quantum yield is still quite low in comparison with that for many other dyes (such as Rhodamine 6G, Cy3, and Cy5), it is sufficient to support laser emission. In turn, since laser emission is stimulated emission, which is much faster than many nonradiative recombination processes, the quantum yield becomes significantly enhanced once the lasing threshold is achieved. Curve 3 in Fig. 1(c) displays, to the best of our knowledge, the first demonstration of ICG lasing with bovine serum albumin (BSA, 1.2 mM) in PBS under the same excitation as Curves 1 and 2. Strong laser emission peaks emerge on the red side of the ICG fluorescence spectrum (900–935 nm). The linewidth of each peak is approximately 0.18 nm, limited by the resolution of the spectrometer. Those lasing peaks exhibit an SBR as high as 800, nearly 20-fold improvement over that obtained with the fluorescence-based measurement with the same BSA–ICG mixture under the same excitation (Fig. S2 shows a SBR of 40 for ICG–BSA fluorescence versus background), attesting to the advantage of using laser emission in accurate determination of tumor boundaries and sensitive measurement of analyte concentration changes [22].
In order to comprehensively understand the ICG lasing for prospective clinical and preclinical applications, we first studied the ICG lasing behavior of albumin, globulin, and lipoprotein [Fig. 1(a)] with the ICG concentration well below the commonly used level in in vitro biological studies [30].
A. Albumins
As presented in Fig. 2, we investigated the ICG laser under different albumin/ICG molar ratios [Figs. 2(a)–2(c)] and various ICG concentrations [Figs. 2(d)–2(g)]. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS was used as our model albumin, since it is the most abundant protein in blood plasma. We used five solutions with the molar ratio of BSA:ICG ranging from 2∶1 to 3.3∶1 while fixing the ICG concentration (0.4 mM). Figure 2(a) presents the lasing spectra for different BSA/ICG molar ratios under the same excitation. Detailed studies reveal that different BSA/ICG ratios resulted in different lasing thresholds, as shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c), with a minimal lasing threshold of 0.38 μJ/mm2 for a molar ratio around 3∶1. This phenomenon suggests that the ICG binding efficiency (or activation efficiency) plays an important role in ICG lasing. Indeed, in Fig. S3 we carried out regular fluorescence measurement with various BSA/ICG ratios. At a low BSA/ICG ratio, the fluorescence is relatively weak, suggesting that not all ICG molecules are activated (i.e., bound to BSA molecule). When BSA/ICG = 3, nearly all ICG molecules are bound to BSA and fluorescence starts to saturate. Our fluorescence results not only correlate well with our laser experiments, but also are consistent with a recent finding that a BSA molecule can bind at most one ICG molecule at a time [35,36]. Note that the slight reduction in fluorescence (and hence increase in the ICG lasing threshold) when an excessive amount of BSA was added may be attributed to the additional absorption and scattering loss from BSA.
To study the concentration dependency of the ICG lasing, Figs. 2(d)–2(f) show the lasing spectra of three ICG concentrations at 0.04, 0.2, and 0.4 mM, respectively, when the BSA/ICG ratio was fixed at 3∶1. The corresponding lasing threshold curves are plotted in Fig. 2(g), showing the decreased threshold with the increased ICG concentration, which is typical for an optofluidic laser [37]. Even with the lowest ICG concentration (0.04 mM), the lasing threshold was only 5.3 μJ/mm2. To mimic human plasma, we replaced BSA with human serum albumin (HSA) (fluorescence spectrum in Fig. S2). Once again, a low lasing threshold of 1.68 μJ/mm2 was obtained when ICG (0.2 mM) binds to HSA (0.6 mM) (Fig. S4). The slightly lower lasing threshold for HSA than for the BSA counterpart (2.3 μJ/mm2) is due to the relatively high binding affinity of ICG to HSA [35] (hence the ICG quantum yield) as well as the red-shifted fluorescence (and the gain) spectrum (see Fig. S2).
B. Globulins
Next, we studied globulins (GLBs), which take up nearly 35% of the plasma proteins. We used three different concentrations (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mM in saline) of γ-GLB (one type of GLBs in blood) to cover the clinically relevant globulin concentration (∼0.25 mM). The ICG concentration was fixed at 0.2 mM. However, no lasing emission could be observed even at a high excitation of 25 μJ/mm2 (Fig. 3). Given that globulins have been reported to bind ICG molecules in previous papers [6,38–40], our result is surprising in that GLB is unable to produce lasing. In Fig. S5, we investigated the cause of such negative results and discovered that the quantum yield of ICG when bound to GLB (∼0.56%) is not as high as generally thought. It is actually about seven times lower than that of ICG bound to BSA.
C. Lipoproteins
Besides plasma proteins, lipoproteins are another major serological component. Lipoproteins are complex particles that carry lipids such as triglycerides and cholesterol through the bloodstream. They are simply classified into high-density (HDL) and low-density (LDL) lipoproteins, in which the LDL level is regarded as a critical criterion for cardiovascular diseases. To determine whether ICG binds to lipoproteins and generates lasing emission, we investigated LDL in PBS with a concentration matching that in human blood (∼0.01 mM). The ICG concentration was fixed at 0.2 mM. In Fig. 4(a) we present the lasing emission spectra for LDL pumped under various pump energy densities. Compared to ICG lasing for albumins (center around 920 nm), lasing peaks for LDL emerged at longer wavelengths (around 930 nm) due to the red shift of the ICG–LDL fluorescence (hence the gain) profile (see Fig. S6). Further pump energy density dependent experiments in Fig. 4(b) show a remarkably low threshold of only 0.17 μJ/mm2, which is more than 10 × lower than the corresponding ICG–BSA lasing [threshold = 2.3 μJ/mm2 given in Fig. 2(g)] and ICG–HSA lasing (threshold = 1.68 μJ/mm2 given in Fig. S4), which have the same ICG concentration (0.2 mM). Such a low threshold can be accounted for by the higher gain (proportional to the quantum yield, which is 12.8% for ICG–LDL) of ICG–LDL than that of ICG–BSA and ICG–HSA (see Supplement 1 for discussion).
The above result becomes even more significant when we consider that the LDL concentration (0.01 mM) used was 60 times lower than BSA and HSA (0.6 mM). Previously it was thought that albumins are responsible for enhanced fluorescence in blood [8,38,41]. However, recent studies revealed that ICG might bind mainly to lipoproteins [2,8,36,42,43]. Indeed, our fluorescence measurement shows that lipoproteins bind more ICG and produce approximately three times stronger emission than albumins (Fig. S6), despite a 60 times difference in lipoprotein and albumin concentrations. Our lasing experiment offers another evidence to support the above finding. Furthermore, this suggests that we can obtain ICG lasing for lipoproteins well before for albumins, thus providing a unique means to sensitively monitor lipid levels in blood. In fact, due to the threshold behavior, the signal difference between ICG–lipoprotein (lasing emission) and ICG–albumin (fluorescence) can be as high as 100–1000 times [17,22,28], orders of magnitude larger than the three times difference in the conventional fluorescence measurement.
D. Serum
Moving a step forward, we explored the ICG lasing possibility in human serum, which contains an abundance of plasma proteins, lipoproteins, antibodies, hormones, and antigens. As a control experiment (Fig. S7), no lasing emission was observed from serum itself. In contrast, as we added ICG (0.2 mM) into serum, lasing emission could easily be observed [Fig. 5(a)]. The lasing threshold is 0.45 μJ/mm2, falling between that of HSA and LDL, as ICG molecules bind to both plasma proteins and lipoproteins. We also measured serum by using ICG with a concentration as low as 0.04 mM; lasing was obtained with a threshold of 3.4 μJ/mm2.
3. LASING IN HUMAN WHOLE BLOOD
Our work culminated in achieving direct lasing from “whole blood.” As a control experiment, we first flowed human whole blood (2 × diluted in PBS to avoid clogging) through the OFRR as illustrated in Fig. 6(a). Upon excitation, no lasing emission was observed even at a high excitation of 25 μJ/mm2 (Fig. S8). In contrast, when ICG (0.04 mM) mixed with human whole blood (2 × diluted in PBS to avoid clogging), the lasing band emerged at 915 nm [Fig. 6(b)]. The spectrally integrated laser emission versus pump energy density for blood with ICG is presented in Fig. 6(c), in which the lasing threshold is derived to be approximately 10 μJ/mm2. The relatively high lasing threshold results from the relatively low concentration of plasma proteins and lipoproteins in whole blood as compared to that in the serum in our previous studies. Moreover, blood cells and other serological components cause disturbance in the gain media, which could significantly degrade the OFRR Q-factor. Nevertheless, this lasing threshold is still >20 × lower than the current standard for clinical surgery [34], which is considered to be bio-safe and noninvasive.
Figure 6(d) presents the ICG concentration dependent study of the “blood lasing” under the same pump intensity of 20 μJ/mm2. The ICG concentration ranged from 0.01 to 0.06 mM, which is within the normal ICG clinical dosage allowed in the circulation system of a human body. Again the blood sample was 2 × diluted. As shown in the black curve of Fig. 6(d), only featureless emission was observed for 0.01 mM ICG. The most prominent blood lasing was achieved when the ICG concentration was around 0.035 to 0.04 mM. However, the laser intensity began to drop dramatically when ICG was higher than 0.06 mM, and no laser emission was observed beyond.
Our concentration dependent laser emission results are consistent with the previous studies on fluorescence, which show that strong fluorescence is observed when the ICG concentration is 0.04 to 0.08 mM [44]. The maximum intensity around 0.065 mM indicates a critical point at which nearly all binding sites in whole blood are occupied by ICG molecules. As such, the fluorescence begins to decrease as the ICG concentration increases beyond 0.065 mM, which can be attributable to two possible factors, i.e., the increased absorption from excessive unbound ICG molecules and the self-quenching effect of ICG molecules [45]. Note that the two times difference in the optimal ICG concentration between lasing (0.035–0.04 mM) and regular fluorescence (0.065 mM) is due to the 2 × dilution in blood samples used in our experiment.
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
In this work, we demonstrated, to the best of our knowledge, the first “blood laser” using the only FDA approved near-infrared dye, ICG, in human whole blood with the dye concentration within the clinically acceptable range. In addition, we also investigated the ICG lasing behavior in three major serological components (albumins, globulins, and lipoproteins) using the ICG concentration lower than the typical concentration used in in vitro studies on cells and excised tumor tissues. In all studies, the pump intensity is orders of magnitude lower than the exposure level that may cause damage to cells or tissues (see Table S1 for summary). Furthermore, we found that it is albumins and lipoproteins that are responsible for ICG lasing and that lipoproteins are far more effective than albumins in achieving ICG lasing.
Our work opens a door to a broad range of clinical and biomedical applications in vivo and in vitro that provide superior sensitivity and imaging quality to their fluorescence counterparts, such as in vitro examination of excised tumor tissues, in vitro diagnostics in whole blood (cancer cell detection and monitoring of lipid in blood), in vivo tumor margin determination during surgery, preclinical research applications, and single cellular bioanalysis, just to name a few. Together with the recent advancement in optofluidic cellular lasers [21,24–26], lasing in whole blood (which is tissue and generally considered to be closer to actual complex biological samples than cells) represents a critical step toward eventual clinical applications of optofluidic lasers.
As an outlook, below we present a few clinical, preclinical, and biomedical scenarios where the ICG laser may be implemented, and discuss the challenges it faces. (1) Image guided surgery and screening. In this scenario, the ICG is first administered to patients, and then the suspected tumor is removed and examined under a fluorescence microscope. As discussed previously, ICG lasing may help improve differentiation and identification of vital structures in tissues. To implement, a high-Q Fabry–Perot cavity (the Q-factor is as high as 6 × 105 [46], close to that of the OFRR used in the current work) can be employed for in vitro biological imaging and spectroscopy due to its planar format. (2) In vivo characterization and differentiation of tissues. In this scenario, macroscopic laser cavities such as the Fabry–Perot cavities and ring resonators discussed above may not be applicable. In contrast, the random laser [47,48] and plasmonic laser [49] offer a possible tool to realize lasing at the microscopic and nanoscopic scales. However, it should be noted that those types of laser cavities usually have much lower Q-factors, which may require higher ICG concentrations and pump intensities. Therefore, more work needs to be carried out in the future to develop cavities that are compatible with in vivo tissues and have relatively high Q-factors. Meanwhile, new methods that can deliver a higher concentration of ICG, which helps lower the pump intensities required for lasing, while maintaining clinical safety, should also be investigated. One example in this regard is high concentrations of ICG encapsulated in clinically compatible nanoparticle applications recently demonstrated [50,51]. (3) Hyperspectral imaging. It has shown great potential by combining laser spectroscopy with imaging, thereby providing both higher spectral/spatial information and image contrast [15,16,52]. The ICG lasing presented in this article will also lead to the development of novel hyperspectral imaging technologies that complement conventional fluorescence techniques.
5. METHODS
A. Materials
The ICG used in this work was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Product #C5753). Other components including HSA (P8119), LDL (L8292), γ-globulins (G4386), and human serum (H4522) were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. BSA and PBS were purchased from R&D systems (Product# 841380, #896009). Human whole blood was purchased from ZenBio Inc. (Product# SER-WB10ML), which was collected from healthy volunteers (one male and one female) through Interstate Blood Bank, USA. First, ICG powder was dissolved in DI water to form 2 mM solution, and then it was diluted with DI water to lower concentrations (1 and 0.2 mM). LDL, BSA, HSA, and human serum were originally ordered in solution form, whereas γ-globulins powder was prepared by dissolving it in 0.9% saline. The measured concentrations of LDL, BSA, and HSA in this work were diluted by mixing with 2, 1, or 0.2 mM ICG solutions to obtain the desired compound solutions. For the serum experiments, 200 μL of pure serum was mixed with 50 μL of ICG (1 mM, 0.2 mM) to obtain ICG (0.2 mM, 0.04 mM) compound solutions, respectively. Regarding the whole blood experiments, fresh human blood was first diluted two times with PBS, and then it was added with 0.2 mM ICG to form 0.04 mM compound solution. Other concentrations of ICG used in experiments were prepared similarly. All the prepared samples were allowed to stand for 20 min under room temperature before measuring to ensure the completion of binding reactions of ICG.
B. Fabrication of Optofluidic Ring Resonator
The fabrication of the OFRR has been well documented elsewhere [53]. Briefly, a fused silica capillary preform (Polymicro Technologies TSP700850) was first etched with diluted hydrofluoric acid and then rapidly stretched under CO2 laser irradiation. The resulting OFRR capillary was slightly bulged with a diameter of 80 μm at the center and of a few micrometers smaller at the two necking points approximately 1 mm apart. The wall thickness of the OFRR was approximately 2–4 μm, and the Q-factor was approximately 107 [37,53]. Due to the thin wall, the WGM has a sufficient evanescent field in the core and provides optical feedback for the gain medium flowing inside the capillary to lase.
C. Optical Setup
A typical confocal setup was used to excite the sample and collect emission light from the OFRR (Fig. S9). In this work, a pulsed OPO laser (pulsewidth, 5 ns; repetition rate, 20 Hz) with 660 nm was used as the excitation source to excite a 1 mm portion of the OFRR capillary. The pump intensity was adjusted by a continuously variable neutral density filter. The emission light was collected through the same lens and sent to a spectrometer (Horiba iHR550, spectral resolution ∼0.2 nm) for analysis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (NIBIB-1R21EB016783); National Science Foundation (NSF) (ECCS-1607250).
Footnotes
See Supplement 1 for supporting content.
References
- 1.Schaafsma BE, Mieog JSD, Hutteman M, Van der Vorst JR, Kuppen PJ, Löwik CW, Frangioni JV, Van de Velde CJ, Vahrmeijer AL. The clinical use of indocyanine green as a near-infrared fluorescent contrast agent for image-guided oncologic surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:323–332. doi: 10.1002/jso.21943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alander JT, Kaartinen I, Laakso A, Pätilä T, Spillmann T, Tuchin VV, Venermo M, Välisuo P. A review of indocyanine green fluorescent imaging in surgery. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012;2012:940585. doi: 10.1155/2012/940585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kokudo N, Ishizawa T. Clinical application of fluorescence imaging of liver cancer using indocyanine green. Liver Cancer. 2012;1:15–21. doi: 10.1159/000339017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Troyan SL, Kianzad V, Gibbs-Strauss SL, Gioux S, Matsui A, Oketokoun R, Ngo L, Khamene A, Azar F, Frangioni JV. The FLARE intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging system: a first-in-human clinical trial in breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2943–2952. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0594-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boni L, David G, Mangano A, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Spampatti S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A. Clinical applications of indocyanine green (ICG) enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2046–2055. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3895-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Woitzik J, Horn P, Vajkoczy P, Schmiedek P. Intraoperative control of extracranial-intracranial bypass patency by near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:692–698. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.4.0692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kraft JC, Ho RJ. Interactions of indocyanine green and lipid in enhancing near-infrared fluorescence properties: the basis for near-infrared imaging in vivo. Biochemistry. 2014;53:1275–1283. doi: 10.1021/bi500021j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vinegoni C, Botnaru I, Aikawa E, Calfon MA, Iwamoto Y, Folco EJ, Ntziachristos V, Weissleder R, Libby P, Jaffer FA. Indocyanine green enables near-infrared fluorescence imaging of lipid-rich, inflamed atherosclerotic plaques. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:84ra45. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yoneya S, Saito T, Komatsu Y, Koyama I, Takahashi K, Duvoll-Young J. Binding properties of indocyanine green in human blood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:1286–1290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zheng C, Zheng M, Gong P, Jia D, Zhang P, Shi B, Sheng Z, Ma Y, Cai L. Indocyanine green-loaded biodegradable tumor targeting nanoprobes for in vitro and in vivo imaging. Biomaterials. 2012;33:5603–5609. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ogawa M, Kosaka N, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. In vivo molecular imaging of cancer with a quenching near-infrared fluorescent probe using conjugates of monoclonal antibodies and indocyanine green. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1268–1272. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fang C, Wang K, Zeng C, Chi C, Shang W, Ye J, Mao Y, Fan Y, Yang J, Xiang N. Illuminating necrosis: from mechanistic exploration to preclinical application using fluorescence molecular imaging with indocyanine green. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21013. doi: 10.1038/srep21013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang K, Sun W, Richie CT, Harvey BK, Betzig E, Ji N. Direct wavefront sensing for high-resolution in vivo imaging in scattering tissue. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7276. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lu G, Fei B. Medical hyperspectral imaging: a review. J Biomed Opt. 2014;19:010901. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.010901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Judy RP, Keating JJ, DeJesus EM, Jiang JX, Okusanya OT, Nie S, Holt DE, Arlauckas SP, Low PS, Delikatny EJ. Quantification of tumor fluorescence during intraoperative optical cancer imaging. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16208. doi: 10.1038/srep16208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lue N, Kang JW, Yu C-C, Barman I, Dingari NC, Feld MS, Dasari RR, Fitzmaurice M. Portable optical fiber probe-based spectroscopic scanner for rapid cancer diagnosis: a new tool for intraoperative margin assessment. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sun Y, Fan X. Distinguishing DNA by analog-to-digital-like conversion by using optofluidic lasers. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:1236–1239. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang X, Lee W, Fan X. Bio-switchable optofluidic lasers based on DNA Holliday junctions. Lab Chip. 2012;12:3673–3675. doi: 10.1039/c2lc40183e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen Q, Zhang X, Sun Y, Ritt M, Sivaramakrishnan S, Fan X. Highly sensitive fluorescent protein FRET detection using optofluidic lasers. Lab Chip. 2013;13:2679–2681. doi: 10.1039/c3lc50207d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu X, Khaing Oo MK, Reddy K, Chen Q, Sun Y, Fan X. Optofluidic laser for dual-mode sensitive biomolecular detection with a large dynamic range. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3779. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fan X, Yun S-H. The potential of optofluidic biolasers. Nat Methods. 2014;11:141–147. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Aas M, Chen Q, Jonáš A, Kiraz A, Fan X. Optofluidic FRET lasers and their applications in novel photonic devices and biochemical sensing. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2016;22:1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen Y-C, Chen Q, Fan X. Optofluidic chlorophyll lasers. Lab Chip. 2016;16:2228–2235. doi: 10.1039/c6lc00512h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gather MC, Yun SH. Single-cell biological lasers. Nat Photonics. 2011;5:406–410. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Humar M, Yun SH. Intracellular microlasers. Nat Photonics. 2015;9:572–576. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen Q, Kiraz A, Fan X. Optofluidic FRET lasers using aqueous quantum dots as donors. Lab Chip. 2016;16:353–359. doi: 10.1039/c5lc01004g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen Q, Ritt M, Sivaramakrishnan S, Sun Y, Fan X. Optofluidic lasers with a single molecular layer of gain. Lab Chip. 2014;14:4590–4595. doi: 10.1039/c4lc00872c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee W, Fan X. Intracavity DNA melting analysis with optofluidic lasers. Anal Chem. 2012;84:9558–9563. doi: 10.1021/ac302416g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sabapathy V, Mentam J, Jacob PM, Kumar S. Noninvasive optical imaging and in vivo cell tracking of indocyanine green labeled human stem cells transplanted at superficial or in-depth tissue of SCID mice. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:606415. doi: 10.1155/2015/606415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Balaiya S, Brar VS, Murthy RK, Chalam K. Effects of indocyanine green on cultured retinal ganglion cells in-vitro. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:236. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yamada T, Yoshikawa M, Kanda S, Kato Y, Nakajima Y, Ishizaka S, Tsunoda Y. In vitro differentiation of embryonic stem cells into hepatocyte-like cells identified by cellular uptake of indocyanine green. Stem Cells. 2002;20:146–154. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.20-2-146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Abels C, Karrer S, Bäumler W, Goetz AE, Landthaler M, Szeimies RM. Indocyanine green and laser light for the treatment of AIDS-associated cutaneous Kaposi’s sarcoma. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:1021–1024. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Holt D, Parthasarathy AB, Okusanya O, Keating J, Venegas O, Deshpande C, Karakousis G, Madajewski B, Durham A, Nie S. Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging and spectroscopy identifies residual tumor cells in wounds. J Biomed Opt. 2015;20:076002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.7.076002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Matthes R, Cain CP, Courant D, Freund DA, Grossman BA, Kennedy PA, Lund DJ, Mainster MA, Manenkov AA, Marshall WJ, McCally R, Rockwell BA, Sliney DH, Smith PA, Stuc BE, Tell SA, Wolbarsht ML, Zheltov GI. Revision of guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation of wavelengths between 400 nm and 1.4 μm. Health Phys. 2000;79:431–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Berezin MY, Guo K, Akers W, Livingston J, Solomon M, Lee H, Liang K, Agee A, Achilefu S. Rational approach to select small peptide molecular probes labeled with fluorescent cyanine dyes for in vivo optical imaging. Biochemistry. 2011;50:2691–2700. doi: 10.1021/bi2000966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Desmettre T, Devoisselle J, Mordon S. Fluorescence properties and metabolic features of indocyanine green (ICG) as related to angiography. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45:15–27. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00123-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lacey S, White IM, Sun Y, Shopova SI, Cupps JM, Zhang P, Fan X. Versatile microfluidic lasers based on opto-fluidic ring resonators. Opt Express. 2007;15:15523–15530. doi: 10.1364/oe.15.015523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jung B, Vullev VI, Anvari B. Revisiting indocyanine green: effects of serum and physiological temperature on absorption and fluorescence characteristics. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2014;20:149–157. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mihara M, Kisu I, Hara H, Iida T, Yamamoto T, Araki J, Hayashi Y, Moriguchi H, Narushima M, Banno K. Uterus autotransplantation in cynomolgus macaques: intraoperative evaluation of uterine blood flow using indocyanine green. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:3019–3027. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Unno N, Suzuki M, Yamamoto N, Inuzuka K, Sagara D, Nishiyama M, Tanaka H, Konno H. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for intraoperative assessment of blood flow: a feasibility study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35:205–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cherrick GR, Stein SW, Leevy CM, Davidson CS. Indocyanine green: observations on its physical properties, plasma decay, and hepatic extraction. J Clin Invest. 1960;39:592–600. doi: 10.1172/JCI104072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Agarwal A. Fundus Fluorescein and Indocyanine Green Angiography: A Textbook and Atlas (SLACK Incorporated) 2007 [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lee S, Lee MW, Cho HS, Song JW, Nam HS, Oh DJ, Park K, Oh W-Y, Yoo H, Kim JW. Fully integrated high-speed intravascular optical coherence tomography/near-infrared fluorescence structural/molecular imaging in vivo using a clinically available near-infrared fluorescence-emitting indocyanine green to detect inflamed lipid-rich atheromata in coronary-sized vessels. Circulation. 2014;7:560–569. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.van den Biesen PR, Jongsma FH, Tangelder GJ, Slaaf DW. Yield of fluorescence from indocyanine green in plasma and flowing blood. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995;23:475–481. doi: 10.1007/BF02584447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mordon S, Devoisselle JM, Soulie-Begu S, Desmettre T. Indocyanine green: physicochemical factors affecting its fluorescence in vivo. Microvasc Res. 1998;55:146–152. doi: 10.1006/mvre.1998.2068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang W, Zhou C, Zhang T, Chen J, Liu S, Fan X. Optofluidic laser array based on stable high-Q Fabry–Pérot microcavities. Lab Chip. 2015;15:3862–3869. doi: 10.1039/c5lc00847f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Polson RC, Vardeny ZV. Random lasing in human tissues. Appl Phys Lett. 2004;85:1289–1291. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ziegler J, Djiango M, Vidal C, Hrelescu C, Klar TA. Gold nano-stars for random lasing enhancement. Opt Express. 2015;23:15152–15159. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.015152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Noginov MA, Zhu G, Belgrave AM, Bakker R, Shalaev VM, Narimanov EE, Stout S, Herz E, Suteewong T, Wiesner U. Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser. Nature. 2009;460:1110–1112. doi: 10.1038/nature08318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu P, Yue C, Shi B, Gao G, Li M, Wang B, Ma Y, Cai L. Dextran based sensitive theranostic nanoparticles for near-infrared imaging and photothermal therapy in vitro. Chem Commun. 2013;49:6143–6145. doi: 10.1039/c3cc43633k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zheng J, Muhanna N, Souza RD, Wada H, Chan H, Akens MK, Anayama T, Yasufuku K, Serra S, Irish J, Allen C, Jaffray D. A multimodal nano agent for image-guided cancer surgery. Biomaterials. 2015;67:160–168. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mordant D, Al-Abboud I, Muyo G, Gorman A, Sallam A, Ritchie P, Harvey A, McNaught A. Spectral imaging of the retina. Eye. 2011;25:309–320. doi: 10.1038/eye.2010.222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shopova SI, Zhu H, Fan X, Zhang P. Optofluidic ring resonator based dye laser. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;90:221101. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.