Abstract
The innate immune system plays a central role in the immune-mediated pathology of multiple sclerosis, and is a therapeutic target for progressive disease. Recently, it has been demonstrated that MIS416, a novel immunomodulatory microparticle that activates NOD-2 and TLR-9-signaling, has disease-modifying activity in multiple sclerosis models. This activity is dependent on innate IFN-γ; however, the precise immune regulatory mechanisms amplified by MIS416 have not previously been determined. Using the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model, MIS416 treatment was associated with IFN-γ–dependant expansion of Treg number and increased suppressive function; however, these cells did not account for disease reduction. Additionally, MIS416 treatment stimulated increased nitric oxide production that was IFN-γ–dependant but dispensable for protection. Finally, MIS416-mediated protection was shown to correlate with IFN-γ–dependant expansion of PDL-1-expressing peripheral myeloid cells, a subset of which was found to be selectively recruited to the brain. This central nervous system trafficking was independent of neuro-inflammatory signals as it occurred in MIS416-treated healthy mice. Together, these findings provide insight into regulatory myeloid cell activities amplified by MIS416-mediated NOD-2 and TLR-9 signalling and highlight the potential importance of these cells in accessing the brain where they may act locally and contribute to the control of neuroinflammation.
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory disease with an autoimmune component that is characterised by activation of self-reactive lymphocytes, which enter the central nervous system (CNS) and cause destruction of myelin producing cells and neurons leading to the formation of inflammatory lesions. A number of immune-modifying therapies are now available to treat the relapsing-remitting form of MS, most of which target the peripheral immune system. Unfortunately, such treatments are largely ineffective in patients with the secondary progressive form of MS (SPMS), supporting the hypothesis that CNS-compartmentalised, innate inflammation is the key driver of SPMS pathogenesis, which appears to be independent of peripheral adaptive immunity. Therefore, to treat progressive MS, new therapeutic strategies are required that have direct anti-inflammatory activity within the CNS and restore CNS homeostasis.
Modification of the innate immune system with MIS416, a TLR9 and NOD2 agonist derived from Propionibacterium acnes 1, is currently under investigation as a treatment for SPMS. Previous studies have shown that MIS416 has a good safety profile in SPMS patients and works effectively as an immunomodulator2,3. Using the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS, it has been shown that treatment with MIS416 significantly reduced disease burden in EAE mice when treated prophylactically or therapeutically4. MIS416 treatment induced rapid production of high levels of IFN-γ in the serum of treated mice and SPMS patients4, and IFN-γ was found to be essential for disease protection in EAE4. Whilst IFN-γ is typically considered to be a pro-inflammatory product of effector T cells, it has been also been demonstrated that IFN-γ−/− mice develop more severe EAE than wild type (WT) controls5, highlighting alternate, IFN-γ–dependant negative feedback mechanisms that can constrain EAE disease activity. This study aimed to determine the mechanisms by which MIS416-induced IFN-γ reduces disease severity in EAE and investigate the IFN-γ-dependent effects on disease-inducing auto-reactive CD4 T cells as well as the peripheral and CNS resident myeloid cells that are directly targeted by MIS416.
Methods
Animals
Female C57BL/6, B6.SJL-ptprca, 2D2 (MOG35-55 TCR transgenic)6, and IFN-γ-deficient mice between the ages of 8–12 weeks old were obtained from the Malaghan Institute of Medical Research. All experimental procedures in this study were approved by the Victoria University of Wellington Animal Ethics Committee (protocol 2011-R21 and 2014-R23), and all experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
EAE induction and treatments
Mice were immunized by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection in each hind flank with an emulsion consisting of 50 μg MOG35-55 peptide (Genscript, Piscataway, NJ) and 500 μg heat-inactivated Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, USA) in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). In addition, mice received 200 ng pertussis toxin (Sapphire Bioscience, Redfern, NSW, Australia) intraperitoneally (i.p.) on days 0 and 2 post-immunization (p.i.) as previously described7. Mice were weighed and monitored for signs of disease daily. EAE disease was scored 0-5 as follows: 0 = unaffected, 0.5 = loss of tonicity in distal region of tail, 1 = half-tail paralysis; 2 = full tail paralysis; 3 = one hind limb paralysis or severe weakness in both hind limbs; 4 = full hind limb paralysis; and 5 = moribund8,9. MIS416 was provided by Innate Immunotherapeutics (Auckland, New Zealand) and was administered (100 μg/mouse) weekly via the tail vein. Aminoguanidine hemisulfate (Sigma) was administered to mice (100 mM in drinking water) to inhibit inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in vivo 9.
Isolation and in vitro culture of cells
A single cell suspension was prepared from spleen and lymph nodes as previously described10, and the number of viable cells were counted based on trypan blue dye exclusion. CD4 T cells were isolated using Dynabeads Untouched mouse CD4 Kit (Life Technologies, USA) and Treg were isolated using MACs CD4+ CD25+ mouse regulatory T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Cologne, Germany) as per manufacturer’s instructions.
Splenocytes (1 × 106 cells/well) and CD4 T cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were cultured in culture media containing Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium, 10% FCS, 10 mM Hepes, 100 U/ml penicillin plus 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (all from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). In addition, cells were cultured with MOG peptide (27 μg/ml), MIS416 (20 μg/ml), concanavalin A (ConA, 1 μg/ml) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 200 ng/ml) in the absence or presence of the iNOS inhibitor, aminoguanidine (200 mM)) for 48-72 hours. Previously published dose-response curves identified that these doses give reliable and reproducible results1,11. For proliferation assays, isolated CD4 T cells and splenocytes were stained with 5 μM CFSE as previously described12. CD4 T cells were stimulated with 2.5 × 104 anti-CD3/CD28 T cell activator beads (Life Technologies, USA) for 72 hours.
Cytokine analysis
Murine IFN-γ and IL-10 in culture supernatants were analyzed using a sandwich ELISA. All reagents were purchased from Becton Dickinson Biosciences and used as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Nitric oxide (NO) was measured in culture supernatants using the Griess reaction as previously described13 and NO levels in the serum were detected using a Nitric Oxide Detection kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, New York) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Flow cytometry
Cells isolated from spleen, lymph nodes, brain, and spinal cord were analysed using a FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) as described14. The following antibodies were used for phenotypic analysis: mouse anti-NK1.1 IgG2a, hamster anti-CD11c IgG, rat anti-Ly6C IgG2c, rat anti-Ly6G IgG2a, mouse anti-FoxP3 IgG1, mouse anti-CX3CR1 IgG2a, and mouse anti-CD45.1 IgG2a from Biolegend (San Diego, CA) and rat anti-CD4 IgG2a, rat anti-CD8α IgG2a, rat anti-CD25 IgG1, rat anti-I-Ab (MHC-II) IgG2a, rat anti-CD11b IgG2b, mouse anti-CD45.2 IgG2 and rat anti-Gr1 IgG2b from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA) and rat anti-PD-L1 IgG2a and rat anti-F4/80 IgG2a from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA). Fcγ receptors were blocked by the addition of purified anti-CD16/32 antibodies (Fc Block; 1 μg/106 cells; BD Biosciences) 15 minutes prior to surface staining. For intracellular cytokine staining, GolgiStop (1 μg/106 cells; BD Biosciences), ionomycin (500 ng/ml; Sigma) and PMA (50 ng/ml) were added to the Con A-stimulated splenocyte cultures 5 hours prior to surface antibody staining. After extracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using Transcription Factor Buffer (BD Biosciences, USA) and stained with rat anti-IFN-γ IgG1 (BD Biosciences) following the manufacturer’s instructions and analyzed using BD FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
In vivo proliferation
Single cell suspensions were prepared from the spleen and lymph nodes of 2D2 mice and CFSE-labelled as indicated previously7. CFSE-labelled 2D2 cells (10 × 106) were injected i.v. into B6.SJL-ptprca mice, and the following day mice were immunized for EAE and treated with MIS416 as previously described4. Mice were culled 5 days later and the spleen, blood and draining lymph nodes were processed and analyzed by flow cytometry to assess 2D2 CD4 T cell proliferation, using rat anti-CD45.2 and rat anti-CD4 antibodies to clearly identify donor CD4 T cells.
Statistical analyses
All data were graphed and analysed using GraphPad Prism version 7 (La Jolla, CA, USA). In general, for two group comparisons, unpaired or paired Student’s t test was used for parametric data, and Mann-Whitney for non-parametric data. For >2 groups, one-way or two-way ANOVA was used with the recommended multiple comparison tests as indicated in the figure legend and as recommended by GraphPad Prism. Differences of p < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
MIS416 reduced disease severity of EAE model and led to an increase in splenic T cell populations
As shown in previous studies4, weekly treatment with 100 μg MIS416 i.v. starting on the day of immunization effectively reduced disease severity in the EAE model (Fig. 1a). Analysis of T cell subsets in secondary lymphoid tissue (spleen) on day 22 after disease induction showed a significant increase in the total number of splenocytes in MIS416-treated mice (Fig. 1b). A similar increased was found in healthy MI416-treated mice 15 days after treatment initiation (Fig. 1b). This increase in splenocyte numbers in both EAE and healthy MIS-treated mice was in part due to increased numbers of CD4 and CD8 T cells, as well as Tregs, whilst numbers of NK cells were not significantly altered (Fig. 1c and Suppl Fig. 1).
CD4 T cell proliferation was reduced by MIS416 and was dependant on accessory cells
Although MIS416 has been shown to reduce antigen-specific cytokine production during EAE4, it is not known how MIS416 affects CD4 T cell proliferation in vitro or in vivo. To determine the in vitro effect of MIS416 on CD4 T cell proliferation, MIS416 was added to MOG-stimulated splenocyte cultures from EAE immunized mice, and was shown to suppress MOG antigen-induced CD4 T cell proliferation (Fig. 2a). MIS416 added to cultures in the absence of antigen showed that MIS416 on its own did not support CD4 T cell proliferation (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, splenocyte cultures from healthy mice treated with MIS416 demonstrated reduced T cell proliferation as well as a decreased number of IFN-γ+ CD4 T cells in response to antigen-independent stimulation by mitogen (ConA), when compared to untreated, healthy mice (Fig. 2b,c). Paradoxically, the number of IFN-γ+ CD4 T cells was significantly enhanced in unstimulated cultures (Fig. 2c) suggesting an in vivo enhancement.
To determine if MIS416 reduced the proliferative capacity of CD4 T cells in vivo, CFSE-labelled CD4 T cells from 2D2 mice, the majority of which express a MOG-specific T cell receptor15 were injected into congenic (CD45.1) mice prior to EAE immunization. Five days post-immunization, during the period of peak lymphocyte proliferation, we found that MIS416 treatment significantly reduced the number of proliferative events in the lymph nodes and spleens of immunized mice (Fig. 2d,e and Suppl Fig. 2). In contrast, purified CD4 T cells from MIS416-treated and untreated mice showed similar proliferative responses to anti-CD3/CD28 stimulator beads (Fig. 2f,g). A decreased proliferative index was observed at bead ratios of 1:2 and 1:4 but this decrease was not reflected in the division index suggesting that MIS416 treatment was not directly inducing T cell anergy in the absence of other immune cells. Together, these results indicate that MIS416-mediated suppression of CD4 T cell proliferation is dependent on MIS416-associated alterations in the immune environment of the lymphoid tissue.
MIS416 administration enhanced Treg function in an IFN-γ-independent manner
Given the significant increase in Treg number by MIS416 treatment (Fig. 1c) and the known capacity of Treg to suppress T cell proliferation, we investigated whether MIS416 treatment also enhanced Treg function. We found that purified splenic Treg from MIS416-treated healthy mice were more effective at suppressing CD4 T cell proliferation in vitro than those purified from untreated mice (Fig. 3a) indicating that MIS416 enhanced Treg function. Since IFN-γ is essential for MIS416-mediated suppression of EAE4, we assessed whether the enhancement in Treg number occurred in MIS416-treated IFN-γ−/− mice and found that MIS416 was still able to enhance Treg numbers in the absence IFN-γ (Fig. 3b). Although the expansion was not as dramatic as that seen in WT mice, we believe this reduced expansion may, in part, be due to increased numbers of Treg in the spleens of untreated IFN-γ−/− mice. Furthermore, in vitro CD4 T cell proliferation was not suppressed in splenocyte cultures from MIS416-treated IFN-γ−/− mice (Fig. 3c) suggesting that despite the increased presence of Treg, these cells are not the major contributors to the effects of MIS416. Together this data suggests MIS416 suppression of CD4 T cell proliferation is dependent on IFN-γ but Treg are not major contributors.
MIS416 specifically expanded the red pulp macrophage population and upregulated myeloid PDL-1expression in an IFN-γ-dependent manner
In addition to increasing lymphocyte numbers, MIS416 has also been reported to expand splenic myeloid subsets4. To further define these populations and determine whether any changes correlated with disease protection in EAE, we quantified the major splenic myeloid populations as follows: neutrophils (Gr-1high, Ly6G+, CD11b+, SSChigh), white pulp macrophages (Gr-1−, CD11b+, F4/80−), red pulp macrophages (Gr-1−, CD11b−, F4/80+), splenic CD11c dendritic cells (Gr-1−, CD11c+, CD11b+/−, F4/80+/−), and infiltrating monocytes (Gr-1low, Ly6C+, CD11b+). Using the gating strategy in Supplementary Figure 3a, it is evident that MIS416 administration significantly increased the number of red pulp macrophages in healthy and EAE immunized mice (Fig. 4a). While neutrophil numbers were increased by MIS416 treatment in healthy mice, these did not increase further during EAE (Fig. 4a). Although only red pulp macrophage numbers increased, MIS416 treatment upregulated PDL-1 and MHC class II expression on all splenic myeloid subsets analysed in unimmunized and immunized mice (Fig. 4b and Suppl Fig. 3b). Moreover, the absence of IFN-γ abolished red pulp macrophage expansion as well as the upregulation of PDL-1 and MHC class II (Fig. 4c,d and Suppl Fig. 3b) indicating that these changes are correlates of IFN-γ induced by MIS416. In contrast, although PDL-1 expression was modestly upregulated on lymphocytes, this upregulation was not abolished by IFN-γ-deficiency (Suppl Fig. 4) further supporting the myeloid-specificity of MIS416-mediated effects.
MIS416-stimulated NO was responsible for the suppression of CD4 T cell proliferation but not disease protection
In light of MIS416-mediated expansion of splenic macrophages, we investigated their functional status by determining responsiveness to ex vivo innate stimulation with both MIS416 as well as the TLR4 ligand, LPS. Stimulation of splenocytes from MIS416-treated mice with MIS416 or LPS resulted in significantly higher levels of NO, IFN-γ and IL-10 in culture supernatants compared to those from healthy animals (Fig. 5a–c). Consistent with this, serum levels of NO were significantly elevated after MIS416 treatment in EAE as well as healthy mice (Fig. 5d). Additionally, the MIS416-associated increased NO production in vitro and in vivo was abolished in the absence of IFN-γ (Fig. 5e,f) whilst in vitro IL-10 production was not affected (Fig. 5g).
NO plays a role in both EAE disease development and disease pathogenesis; the timing of NO induction being a determinant for whether this molecule acts to enhance or suppress EAE disease16–19. Since NO can act to suppress T cell proliferation18, we determined whether MIS416-induced NO was involved in the suppression of EAE. Inhibition of iNOS, the enzyme responsible for NO synthesis, by addition of aminoguanidine to splenocyte cultures from MIS416-treated mice reduced the suppression of CD4 T cell proliferation but did not fully rescue T cell proliferation indicating that MIS416 may exert additional effects on T cells (Fig. 6a). To understand the effect of MIS416-induced NO in vivo, aminoguanidine was administered in the drinking water from the onset of EAE (day 12), but was not found to alter the disease-protective effects of MIS416 (Fig. 6b,c) despite reducing serum NO levels (Fig. 6d). Interestingly, inhibition of NO in vivo did not affect the expansion of red pulp macrophages nor the upregulation of PDL-1 on splenic myeloid cells in MIS416-treated immunized (Fig. 6d–f) or healthy mice (Fig. 6g–i). Taken together, these results indicate that while NO may contribute to the observed suppression of T cell proliferation by MIS416, it is likely that the disease protective effects in EAE are due to other IFN-γ-mediated effects.
MIS416 reduced CNS invasion by immune cells during EAE while promoting the homeostatic trafficking of PDL-1-expressing myeloid populations in an IFN-γ-dependent manner
Recent work has shown that IFN-γ promotes trafficking of regulatory immune cells20 into the CNS through the choroid plexus21, a point of entry that is predominantly associated with innate immune surveillance and the maintenance of CNS homeostasis. Thus, we assessed the extent to which MIS416 altered CNS leukocyte trafficking during EAE-associated inflammation and also determined whether MIS416 promoted IFN-γ-dependant homeostatic trafficking to the CNS of healthy mice. As expected, MIS416-mediated attenuation of EAE was associated with a significant reduction in the number of CD45high cells in the spinal cords during EAE (Fig. 7a and Suppl Figs 5 and 6), including a significant reduction in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations (Suppl Fig. 5b). In contrast, MIS416 treatment of healthy mice led to an increase in these cells in the spinal cord (Fig. 7a; see inset) and brain (Fig. 7b–f). The increase in CD45high cells in the brains of MIS416-treated healthy animals consisted primarily of CD4 T cells, macrophages and a Ly6C+CD11blow monocytic myeloid population (Fig. 7b,d,e and Suppl Figs 5 and 7). Significantly, this recruitment was IFN-γ-dependent (Fig. 7b,d, and e), and leukocyte subset specific as MIS416 treatment did not lead to an increase in Treg, neutrophils, or microglia (Fig. 7b,c,f). Lastly, the expression of PDL-1 that was shown to be significantly upregulated on peripheral myeloid cells was also highly expressed on the peripheral myeloid subset (CD11b+CD45high) that were recruited to the brain by MIS416 treatment. Analysis of markers that discriminate non-inflammatory/non-classical blood monocytes from their pro-inflammatory/classical counterparts demonstrated these cells had the restricted phenotype of non-inflammatory monocytes cells with upregulation of markers associated with myeloid activation/macrophage maturation (CX3CR1+, CD11c+, and IA-IE+; Fig. 7g–k) similar to their CD11b−CD45high peripheral blood counterpart (Fig. 7l,m). Overall, these results suggest that MIS416 may provide protection from EAE by driving innate IFN-γ production, which enhances homeostatic recruitment of PDL-1-expressing myeloid cells to the CNS, where they may establish a more immune regulatory environment that restricts neuroinflammation.
Discussion
The innate immune system is thought to play a pivotal role in MS pathogenesis, particularly in progressive disease; therefore, targeting innate cell receptors has recently been recognised as a potential therapeutic strategy22. Treatment with a NOD-2 and TLR9 agonist, MIS416, has shown success for reducing disease burden in the EAE model when given prophylactically and therapeutically. This protection depended on IFN-γ, a cytokine that was also significantly increased in MIS416-treated secondary progressive MS patients4. The dose of MIS416 that effectively reduced EAE disease also induced a number of immunological changes within the innate and adaptive immune compartments which may contribute to its disease-modifying activity. The current study aimed to determine which of these immune alterations were orchestrated by IFN-γ and evaluate their contribution to the mechanism of action of MIS416 in EAE.
It was determined that MIS416 treatment significantly reduced antigen-specific and non-specific T cell responses in vitro and in vivo, however in the absence of IFN-γ this capability of MIS416 to suppress T cells was lost. Additionally, the absence of MIS416-induced IFN-γ abrogated myeloid cell expansion and expression of NO and PDL-1, both of which are likely to contribute to suppressed T cell responses and ultimately, reduced EAE disease18,23. While NO was found to have an important function in suppressing T cell proliferation in vitro, depleting NO in vivo did not affect MIS416 disease protection. This result indicates that other factors such as myeloid expression of PDL-1 are likely to have a more central role in the mechanism underpinning suppressed T cell responses in vivo.
Central to immune homeostasis, the ligand PDL-1 is expressed by many different cell types, including both hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells, whereas expression of PDL-2 is limited to activated antigen presenting cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells. The engagement of PDL-1/PDL-2 with its receptor, PD-1, on T cells maintains homeostasis by limiting T cell responses during infection and preventing autoimmunity24. The PD-1/PDL-1 pathway has been extensively studied recently in the context of cancer immunology as the expression of PDL-1 in the tumour microenvironment is thought to be one of the mechanisms by which cancer cells suppress anti-tumour T cell responses and evade recognition by the host immune system. More recently, clinical trials have shown that treatment with antibodies that block T cell PD-1 signalling, such as Nivolumab, successfully initiate anti-cancer immune responses and increase patient survival25. Increased PDL-1 expression has been shown to be important in naturally limiting EAE disease, as work by Latchman et al. showed that PD-L1−/− mice have enhanced T cell responses in vitro and develop more severe EAE than wild type mice26. In addition, PDL-1 expression was increased during the acute phase of disease indicating its role in limiting disease severity27. Other studies investigating EAE in PD-1−/− and PDL-1−/− mice have identified that the absence of PD-1 signalling Th1 and Th17-type cytokines were increased23. Such studies provide strong evidence that the PDL-1/PD1 axis is a pivotal check point that determines T cell fate and support the hypothesis that MIS416-mediated upregulation of the PDL-1 pathway is a key mechanism by which MIS416 reduces the severity of EAE. Notably, enhanced myeloid cell expression of PDL-1 is also associated with recombinant IFN-β treatment, an approved therapy for treating relapse remitting MS28,29. The activation of the Type I/II interferon axis by both recombinant IFN-β and MIS416, further highlights the significance of the PDL-1-Type I/II interferon axis to the proposed mechanism of action of MIS416.
In addition to its effects on T cell anergy and apoptosis, PDL-1 expression may be protective in EAE through the induction of Treg. Several studies have shown that the expression of PDL-1 on myeloid cells induces the formation of Treg as well as maintains the suppressive nature of the Treg population30,31. In agreement with these findings, we found MIS416-treated mice had increased Treg number and suppressive function in conjunction with increased PDL-1 expression. However, in the absence of IFN-γ while there was very little myeloid PDL-1 expression, Treg expansion still occurred, albeit to a lesser extent, suggesting that Treg expansion alone was not responsible for disease protection.
In addition to suppressed peripheral T cell responses and reduced inflammatory cell trafficking to the CNS, MIS416 was demonstrated to induce IFN-γ-dependent recruitment of regulatory PDL-1+ myeloid cells into the CNS in the absence of neuroinflammation - another mechanism by which MIS416 may exert its effects in vivo. The concept that IFN-γ can enhance CNS-trafficking20 of non-inflammatory myeloid cells through the choroid plexus is well supported21,32,33. Such PDL-1 expressing myeloid cells may be able to suppress T cell activity within the CNS, directly reducing CNS inflammation and recruitment of pathogenic leukocytes from the periphery.
In summary, this work has uncovered a unique mechanism by which an innate-myeloid targeted therapeutic can selectively modulate CNS-trafficking and reduce neuroinflammation. We have found that this mechanism is dependent upon IFN-γ, which appears to mediate its protective actions through myeloid cell expansion and PDL-1 upregulation. This finding is particularly significant as MIS416 has been shown to induce elevated serum IFN-γ in secondary progressive MS patients treated with MIS4164. Having shown clinical promise during preliminary trials2,3, MIS416 is currently completing a phase 2b exploratory trial in secondary progressive MS. This work provides critical insight into how this novel MS therapeutic may reduce compartmentalized neuroinflammation that occurs in progressive MS. MIS416 has the capacity to favour CNS recruitment of myeloid cells associated with anti-inflammatory/tissue repair activity in the presence of an intact blood barrier and represents the first example of an MS therapeutic that can amplify peripheral, regulatory myeloid cells and licence their trafficking to the CNS34,35.
Electronic supplementary material
Author Contributions
M.W. performed the experiments, analysed the results, and contributed to the manuscript writing. G.W. provided guidance on the experimental design, analysed the results, and edited the manuscript. F.L. contributed to the experimental work and data analysis. A.C.L. supervised the experimental design, data analysis and wrote the manuscript.
Competing Interests
G.W. and F.L. are employees of Innate Immunotherapeutics, which is commercialising MIS416 as an immune modulator.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-18543-z.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Girvan RC, et al. MIS416, a non-toxic microparticle adjuvant derived from Propionibacterium acnes comprising immunostimulatory muramyl dipeptide and bacterial DNA promotes cross-priming and Th1 immunity. Vaccine. 2011;29:545–557. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Luckey A, Anderson TJ, Silverman MH. A phase II, open-label, dose escalation of intravenous (IV) MIS416 in progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2012;18:516–516. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Luckey AM, Anderson T, Silverman MH, Webster G. Safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of a novel immunomodulator, MIS416, in patients with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical. 2015;1:1–12. doi: 10.1177/2055217315583385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.White M, Webster G, O’Sullivan D, Stone S, La Flamme AC. Targeting innate receptors with MIS416 reshapes Th responses and suppresses CNS disease in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ferber IA, et al. Mice with a disrupted IFN-gamma gene are susceptible to the induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) The Journal of Immunology. 1996;156:5–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bettelli E, et al. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-specific T cell receptor transgenic mice develop spontaneous autoimmune optic neuritis. J Exp Med. 2003;197:1073–1081. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Crume KP, O’Sullivan D, Miller JH, Northcote PT, La Flamme AC. Delaying the onset of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with the microtubule-stabilizing compounds, paclitaxel and Peloruside A. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86:949–958. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0908541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tierney JB, Kharkrang M, La Flamme AC. Type II-activated macrophages suppress the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Immunol Cell Biol. 2009;87:235–240. doi: 10.1038/icb.2008.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Keating P, et al. Protection from EAE by IL-4Ralpha(−/−) macrophages depends upon T regulatory cell involvement. Immunol Cell Biol. 2009;87:534–545. doi: 10.1038/icb.2009.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tierney JB, Kharkrang M, La Flamme AC. Type II-activated macrophages suppress the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Immunol Cell Biol. 2009;87:235–240. doi: 10.1038/icb.2008.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.La Flamme AC, et al. Fcgamma receptor-ligating complexes improve the course of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by enhancing basal Th2 responses. Immunol Cell Biol. 2006;84:522–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2006.01464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Quah, B. J. C. & Parish, C. R. The Use of Carboxyfluorescein Diacetate Succinimidyl Ester (CFSE) to Monitor Lymphocyte Proliferation. e2259 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Green LC, et al. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N]nitrate in biological fluids. Analytical biochemistry. 1982;126:131–138. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(82)90118-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.O’Sullivan D, et al. Treatment with the antipsychotic agent, risperidone, reduces disease severity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e104430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bettelli E, et al. Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein–specific T Cell Receptor Transgenic Mice Develop Spontaneous Autoimmune Optic Neuritis. J Exp Med. 2003;197:1073–1081. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cross AH, et al. Aminoguanidine, an inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase, ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in SJL mice. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:2684–2690. doi: 10.1172/JCI117282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hooper DC, et al. Prevention of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by targeting nitric oxide and peroxynitrite: implications for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:2528–2533. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van der Veen RC, Dietlin TA, Dixon Gray J, Gilmore W. Macrophage-derived nitric oxide inhibits the proliferation of activated T helper cells and is induced during antigenic stimulation of resting T cells. Cell Immunol. 2000;199:43–49. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1999.1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.van der Veen RC, et al. Superoxide prevents nitric oxide-mediated suppression of helper T lymphocytes: decreased autoimmune encephalomyelitis in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase knockout mice. J Immunol. 2000;164:5177–5183. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.10.5177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sonar SA, Shaikh S, Joshi N, Atre AN, Lal G. IFN-gamma promotes transendothelial migration of CD4(+) T cells across the blood-brain barrier. Immunol Cell Biol. 2017;95:843–853. doi: 10.1038/icb.2017.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kunis G, et al. IFN-gamma-dependent activation of the brain’s choroid plexus for CNS immune surveillance and repair. Brain. 2013;136:3427–3440. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mayo L, Quintana FJ, Weiner HL. The Innate Immune System in Demyelinating Disease. Immunological reviews. 2012;248:170–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01135.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Carter LL, et al. PD-1/PD-L1, but not PD-1/PD-L2, interactions regulate the severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;182:124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Francisco LM, Sage PT, Sharpe AH. The PD-1 pathway in tolerance and autoimmunity. Immunological reviews. 2010;236:219–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00923.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Philips GK, Atkins M. Therapeutic uses of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies. International Immunology. 2015;27:39–46. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxu095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Latchman YE, et al. PD-L1-deficient mice show that PD-L1 on T cells, antigen-presenting cells, and host tissues negatively regulates T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:10691–10696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307252101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Latchman YE, et al. PD-L1-deficient mice show that PD-L1 on T cells, antigen-presenting cells, and host tissues negatively regulates T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:10691–10696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307252101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yong VW. Differential mechanisms of action of interferon-beta and glatiramer aetate in MS. Neurology. 2002;59:802–808. doi: 10.1212/WNL.59.6.802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schreiner B, et al. Interferon-beta enhances monocyte and dendritic cell expression of B7-H1 (PD-L1), a strong inhibitor of autologous T-cell activation: relevance for the immune modulatory effect in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;155:172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Francisco LM, et al. PD-L1 regulates the development, maintenance, and function of induced regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2009;206:3015–3029. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shi L, Chen S, Yang L, Li Y. The role of PD-1 and PD-L1 in T-cell immune suppression in patients with hematological malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2013;6:74. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Prinz M, Priller J. Tickets to the brain: role of CCR2 and CX3CR1 in myeloid cell entry in the CNS. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;224:80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Szmydynger-Chodobska J, et al. Posttraumatic invasion of monocytes across the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:93–104. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Palmer AM. Multiple sclerosis and the blood-central nervous system barrier. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol. 2013;2013:530356. doi: 10.1155/2013/530356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pardridge WM. The blood-brain barrier: bottleneck in brain drug development. NeuroRx. 2005;2:3–14. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.2.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.