Abstract
The net amounts of carotenoids accumulating in plant tissues are determined by the rates of biosynthesis and degradation. While biosynthesis is rate-limited by the activity of PHYTOENE SYNTHASE (PSY), carotenoid losses are caused by catabolic enzymatic and non-enzymatic degradation. We established a system based on non-green Arabidopsis callus which allowed investigating major determinants for high steady-state levels of β-carotene. Wild-type callus development was characterized by strong carotenoid degradation which was only marginally caused by the activity of carotenoid cleavage oxygenases. In contrast, carotenoid degradation occurred mostly non-enzymatically and selectively affected carotenoids in a molecule-dependent manner. Using carotenogenic pathway mutants, we found that linear carotenes such as phytoene, phytofluene and pro-lycopene resisted degradation and accumulated while β-carotene was highly susceptible towards degradation. Moderately increased pathway activity through PSY overexpression was compensated by degradation revealing no net increase in β-carotene. However, higher pathway activities outcompeted carotenoid degradation and efficiently increased steady-state β-carotene amounts to up to 500 μg g-1 dry mass. Furthermore, we identified oxidative β-carotene degradation products which correlated with pathway activities, yielding β-apocarotenals of different chain length and various apocarotene-dialdehydes. The latter included methylglyoxal and glyoxal as putative oxidative end products suggesting a potential recovery of carotenoid-derived carbon for primary metabolic pathways. Moreover, we investigated the site of β-carotene sequestration by co-localization experiments which revealed that β-carotene accumulated as intra-plastid crystals which was confirmed by electron microscopy with carotenoid-accumulating roots. The results are discussed in the context of using the non-green calli carotenoid assay system for approaches targeting high steady-state β-carotene levels prior to their application in crops.
Introduction
Carotenoids are plastid-synthesized lipophilic isoprenoids which serve as precursors for pharmacologically relevant metabolites, such as crocetin or β-cryptoxanthin [1–3]. Moreover, animals including humans rely on carotenoid uptake through their diet to exploit their function as radical scavenger and provitamin A [4]. Accordingly, there are numerous approaches to increase the carotenoid content of various crops to fight vitamin A deficiencies [5]. Most provitamin A-rich edible tissues, such as fruits and seeds, are non-green, which restricts the use of Arabidopsis as a model system for basic research. In this study we established an Arabidopsis-derived, non-green callus assay to develop strategies for increasing and stabilizing β-carotene which can also be applied for carotenoid-derived phytochemicals. Serving as a model, the cell culture system allows evaluating suitable gene combinations to be tested prior to engineering biofortified crops.
Plant tissue cultures are frequently used as a scalable alternative to whole plants as a source for plant secondary metabolites for pharmaceuticals, flavours, colours and food additives. Preferably, cell suspension cultures are exploited to produce phytochemicals, including phenylpropanoids, alkaloids, steroids, quinines and terpenoids [6–8]. Product specificity and yield is often limited by weak expression of relevant pathway genes in undifferentiated callus cells and by intracellular degradation of desired compounds. While biotechnological approaches are frequently used to specifically adopt pathway fluxes, stability issues can only be overcome by in situ product removal requiring solubility and secretion [8,9]. While this applies for some compounds like resveratrol, it is unsuitable for lipophilic metabolites that are synthesized and stored within plant cells.
In non-photosynthetic tissues, coloured carotenoids are sequestered in diverse sub-organellar structures of chromoplasts. Depending on the sequestration mode, chromoplasts are classified as globular, crystalline, membranous, fibrillar and tubular [10,11]. Tissue type, developmental and environmental conditions determine carotenoid losses by enzymatic and non-enzymatic processes. Thus, carotenoid accumulation is determined by the relative rates of synthesis and degradation [12,13]. In leaf chloroplasts carotenoids are indispensable constituents of photosynthesis [14,15]. In some plastid types carotenoids are precursors for signalling molecules and hormones that affect gene regulatory, physiological and developmental processes [16].
The rate of carotenoid biosynthesis is mainly determined by the first committed enzyme of the pathway, phytoene synthase (PSY; Fig 1) [17,18]. Phytoene is desaturated to ζ-carotene and pro-lycopene by phytoene desaturase (PDS) and ζ-carotene desaturase (ZDS), respectively. Two cis-trans carotenoid isomerases are required to isomerize the central 15-cis double bond in phytoene and the cis-configured double bonds in pro-lycopene to form all-trans-lycopene. These reactions are catalyzed by Z-ISO and CRTISO, respectively, but substitutable by photoisomerization in association with a functional photosynthetic apparatus [19–23]. Therefore, cis-configured intermediates accumulate predominantly in etiolated tissues of crtISO mutants (tangerine, tomato; ccr2, Arabidopsis) and Z-ISO mutants (y9, maize; zic, Arabidopsis).
Two cyclases introduce terminal ε- or β-ionone rings into all-trans-lycopene, resulting in α-(ε,β-) or β-(β,β)-carotene, respectively. Hydroxylations yields the xanthophylls lutein from α-carotene and zeaxanthin from β-carotene [24] catalyzed by five carotene hydroxylases in Arabidopsis including the three cytochrome p450 enzymes CYP97A3/LUT5, CYP97C1/LUT1 and CYP97B3 which was identified only recently [25,26]. Zeaxanthin mono- and diepoxidation catalyzed by zeaxanthin epoxidase yields antheraxanthin and violaxanthin, respectively. The reverse reaction catalyzed by violaxanthin deepoxidase represents an inducible photoprotective mechanism, the xanthophyll cycle. Finally, neoxanthin synthase catalyzes the conversion of violaxanthin into an allenic carotenoid.
The carotenoid backbone can be cleaved by enzymatic and non-enzymatic processes. The former is catalyzed by carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase/nine-cis-epoxy-carotenoid dioxygenases (CCD/NCED) [16,27]. In Arabidopsis, this gene family comprises nine members, five of which are assumed to be involved in abscisic acid synthesis (ABA; AtNCED2,3,5,6 and 9) [28,29]. Two CCDs are committed to strigolactone biosynthesis (CCD7/MAX3 and CCD8/MAX4) [30]. The two remaining CCD1 and CCD4 contribute to carotenoid degradation and cleave their substrates into volatile apocarotenoids, producing scents [31–33]. Arabidopsis seed carotenoid content is mainly determined by CCD4 with only minor contribution of CCD1, while CCD4 determines petal colour in Chrysanthemum and norisoprenoid formation in peaches [34–36].
Non-enzymatic carotenoid destruction is related to their antioxidant properties. Their highly unsaturated hydrocarbon backbone is oxidized to form epoxy- and peroxyl derivatives, decompose into apocarotenoids and finally form a plethora of products which are partially identical to those formed enzymatically [37,38]. In chloroplasts, photooxidation seemingly predominates and consumes carotenoids [12,13,39]. A variety of signalling apocarotenoids protect against high-light stress by regulating gene expression [40–42].
Although the instability of carotenoids is well known, data correlating carotenoid turnover rates with degradation products in living cells are sparse. Aiming at unravelling these mechanisms, we used Arabidopsis lines with enhanced carotenoid pathway activity obtained by overexpressing PSY which provoked pathway flux imbalances. We determined a concurrent high carotenoid degradation activity present in wild-type (WT) calli selectively affecting carotenoid molecules. Our results reveal that a constantly high pathway activity is required to counteract carotenoid degradation and to maintain high steady-state β-carotene levels. Furthermore, we identified β-carotene-derived turnover metabolites revealing a possible recovery route for carotenoid-derived carbon to feed back into primary metabolic pathways.
Results
Carotenoid degradation during Arabidopsis callus development
Callus cells form upon exposure of plant tissues on auxin/kinetin containing medium (callus inducing medium, CIM) and are considered pluripotent resembling meristematic root cells [43]. Carotenoid content in callus induced from Arabidopsis leaves incubated on CIM decreases dramatically to only trace amounts within four weeks incubation in darkness. Specifically, Arabidopsis WT leaves with about 2300 μg g-1 carotenoids (expressed per dry mass, DM) retain about 1% after four weeks of callus generation with only 40.8 μg g-1 residual carotenoid content remaining (Fig 2A; for detailed carotenoid data, see S1 Table).
In order to identify factors determining carotenoid breakdown, we applied a protocol which allowed developing calli directly from Arabidopsis seedlings. This protocol eliminates contamination-prone tissue subculturing and allows producing several grams of callus for analyses within 3 weeks. Seeds were germinated on CIM for 5 days under long-day conditions and thereafter incubated for 7 and 14 days in darkness [44]. During the initial illumination, seedlings developed green cotyledons and accumulated carotenoid and chlorophyll amounts only slightly lower than those in rosette leaves (Fig 2A). Calli developed for two weeks showed a considerable reduction in carotenoid levels with only about 11% remaining compared to initial carotenoid amounts, and with comparable carotenoid patterns like leaf-derived calli. Carotenoid losses after callus etiolation uniformly affected all major carotenoids present after 5 days illumination (violaxanthin and neoxanthin: 94.4%; lutein 90.2%, α-/β-carotene, 88.4%). Moreover, with the exception of xanthophyll esters consisting mainly of esterified antheraxanthin, we did not detect additional carotenoid species that were not present in leaves (see S1 Fig).
The contribution of enzyme-mediated carotenoid turnover was determined with Arabidopsis lines deficient in carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases. We generated calli from all Arabidopsis CCD null mutants, as well as from a ccd1 ccd4 double mutant line [36]. Carotenoid levels were similar to WT calli in all lines albeit about two-fold increases in the ccd1, ccd4 and ccd1 ccd4 mutants were observed. Compared with carotenoids prior to etiolation, this corresponds to residual 20% while carotenoids in WT calli are reduced to only 11% (Fig 2B; see S2 Fig for mutant calli images). As carotenoid losses during callus development occurred largely without involvement of CCDs, we considered non-enzymatic carotenoid breakdown which is often counteracted by high abundance of antioxidants in vitro [45,46] and in vivo [47,48]. In fact, callus etiolation in presence of the water-soluble vitamin E analog trolox resulted in about 300 μg g-1 carotenoids, thus about 50% higher than in untreated controls, indicating a retarded carotenoid degradation (Fig 2B).
Accumulation of pathway intermediates in carotenoid biosynthesis mutants
We questioned whether oxidation equally affects carotenoid species which normally do not accumulate in WT calli and analyzed calli from Arabidopsis mutants exhibiting different leaf carotenoid patterns. We focussed on characterized cytochrome p450 carotene hydroxylase mutants: lut1 which is devoid of lutein but still accumulates the mono-hydroxylated α-carotene precursor zeinoxanthin and lut5 which accumulates α-carotene [24,49,50]. Moreover, we included the crtISO mutant, which accumulates cis-carotene intermediates in the absence of light [20,51].
Lut1 calli accumulated about 15% zeinoxanthin while lutein was absent matching with the carotenoid profile of lut1 leaves [49]. Calli from lut5 had slightly more α-carotene than the WT, mirroring the α-carotene abundance in lut5 leaves (Fig 3A) [24]. However, surprisingly, crtISO calli accumulated almost two-fold higher total carotenoid amounts compared to WT calli. Although crtISO calli had less lutein than WT calli as previously reported for leaves, the increase was mostly due to about 250 μg g-1 of carotene desaturation intermediates. This included pro-lycopene and similar proportions of phytoene, phytofluene and ζ-carotene. The accumulation of these intermediates in (dark-grown) calli resembles their abundance in etiolated crtISO seedlings and corroborates that CRTISO is indispensable for carotene cis-trans isomerization in the dark [19,20]. Therefore, cis-carotene biosynthesis in etiolated calli persists and the large accumulation of cis-carotene intermediates indicates their reduced susceptibility towards carotenoid degradation in contrast to the downstream carotenoids.
Carotenoid synthesis during Arabidopsis callus development
High carotene levels in crtISO calli might be caused by feed-forward increased PSY activity caused by apocarotenoid signals which are assumed to originate from cis-configured carotenes [16,52,53]. To determine the pathway flux in calli, we took advantage of the PDS inhibitor norflurazon (NFZ). NFZ-mediated phytoene accumulation is frequently correlated with PSY activity, in both etioplasts and chloroplasts [13,54,55]. For NFZ-treatment of calli, WT seedlings were light-germinated on CIM and thereafter transferred onto CIM supplemented with NFZ and maintained in the dark. Carotenoid patterns were determined after 7 and 14 days.
The accumulation of coloured carotenoids was decreased as expected, but was not significantly different in NFZ-treated versus non-treated WT calli (Fig 3B). However, NFZ treatment caused 100 and 470 μg g-1 of phytoene to accumulate after 7 and 14 days in the dark, respectively (S2 and S3 Figs). The equivalent experiment with crtISO calli led to approximately 400 μg g-1 phytoene after 14 days etiolation thus almost matching the amounts in WT calli. This argues against feed-forward induced pathway activation in crtISO calli and indicates similar pathway activities in both WT and crtISO during callus etiolation.
Given its continuous accumulation during callus etiolation, phytoene appears to be unaffected by degradation. As CCD1 is reported to cleave phytoene in vitro [56], we determined possible enzyme-mediated phytoene losses by quantification of phytoene amounts in calli from ccd1, ccd4 and the ccd1 ccd4 double mutant grown on NFZ (Fig 3C). Partial PDS inhibition by NFZ caused low amounts of phytofluene to accumulate in addition to phytoene which slightly increased only in ccd1 calli compared to the WT. In contrast, phytoene levels in all ccd mutants were not significantly different from that of WT calli, thus excluding that phytoene is an in vivo substrate for CCD1 and CCD4-catalyzed cleavage.
Moreover, we included calli from an Arabidopsis pds mutant, thus representing a genetic equivalent to NFZ-inhibition [57]. As homozygous pds mutants develop only bleached cotyledons, but then cease further development, we generated calli from cotyledons. In agreement with a constant pathway activity during callus development, pds calli accumulated similar phytoene levels like NFZ-treated WT calli (Fig 3C). These interrelations were further confirmed with calli from Arabidopsis lines expressing the bacterial phytoene desaturase CrtI which bypasses PDS-mediated phytoene desaturation thus conferring insensitivity to NFZ [58,59]. As expected, 35S::CrtI calli accumulated carotenoid amounts similar to WT and did not accumulate phytoene in presence of NFZ.
High phytoene synthesis rates exceed carotenoid breakdown and result in β-carotene accumulation
Clearly, phytoene is not subjected to degradation in calli and there does not appear to be a feed-forward effect of phytoene accumulation on carotenoid biosynthesis. Thus, phytoene levels accumulating upon NFZ treatment can be used as a measure for monitoring carotenoid pathway activity during callus etiolation undiminished by enzymatic and non-enzymatic degradation. In addition to those carotenoids present in light-grown callus prior to etiolation (1.5 mg g-1), most of the carotenoids synthesized during callus etiolation (0.5 mg g-1, as phytoene) are promptly degraded. Quantitatively, a total amount of 2 mg g-1 carotenoids are degraded within 14 days of etiolated callus development.
The pronounced carotenoid degradation capacity conflicts with high carotenoid amounts usually achieved through PSY overexpression in various tissues, including Arabidopsis calli as previously demonstrated [44,60]. In calli from two selected AtPSY-overexpressing lines (At12 and At22), there was a significant increase in xanthophylls especially lutein (2-3-fold) and α/β-carotene (20-30-fold) and a substantial accumulation of phytoene (240–280 μg g-1) as well as phytofluene (73–137 μg g-1) (Fig 4; S4 Fig for calli images). Given the strong resistance of phytoene and phytofluene against degradation as described above (Fig 3), the accumulation of these carotenes is not surprising. However, high amounts of β-carotene are unexpected as β-carotene is reduced by 90% during WT callus development (Fig 2A). High levels of β-carotene together with colourless intermediates is a widespread pattern for PSY-overexpressing tissues, and is similarly observed for PSY-overexpressing maize and rice calli [61,62].
Interestingly, in a screen of calli from about 50 additional AtPSY-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines, we noticed that calli either turned orange or remained as pale as WT calli while intermediate colour intensities were not observed. This was confirmed by HPLC analysis of calli from two selected pale lines (At13, AtU16) which revealed carotenoid levels and patterns just like the WT, while colourless pathway intermediates were also absent (Fig 4A). Compared with the two 35S::AtPSY lines forming orange calli (At12, At22), the paler lines had much lower PSY protein levels suggesting that the carotenogenic pathway activity determines whether β-carotene over-accumulates or not (Fig 4A).
To corroborate this, we determined pathway activity using PSY overexpression lines by NFZ inhibition (Fig 4A). Pale calli from lines At13 and AtU16 accumulated about 1500 μg g-1 phytoene—thus about three-fold more than WT calli. However, NFZ-treated calli from orange lines (At12, At22) further exceeded these levels by accumulating almost 1900 μg g-1 phytoene. These different pathway capacities were confirmed by in vitro PSY activity assay using callus plastid membrane fractions (Fig 4B). Upon incubation with DMAPP, [14C]-IPP and a recombinant Arabidopsis GGPP synthase, plastids from the pale-callus line At13 formed about 75% higher [14C]-phytoene levels than WT, while orange-callus lines formed about 300% higher [14C]-phytoene levels.
In conclusion, a moderately-enhanced carotenoid pathway activity through PSY overexpression does not necessarily result in carotenoid over-accumulation in dark-grown calli. Considering our findings on carotenoid degradation, moderately increased carotenoid activity appears to be promptly compensated by degradation as in weaker PSY-overexpression lines At13 and AtU16. However, stronger pathway activity by stronger PSY overexpression (At12, At22) produces carotenoid levels which exceed the breakdown rate and result in increased steady-state levels of β-carotene and upstream intermediates. The upstream carotene intermediates like phytoene and phytofluene most probably accumulate as a consequence from the oversaturation of desaturation capacities (see Discussion).
Carotenoid degradation products in Arabidopsis calli
Despite increased phytoene synthesis the pale/weaker AtPSY-overexpressing calli did not accumulate coloured carotenoids which may indicate the prevalence of increased carotenoid breakdown. In leaves, increased pathway activity is compensated by higher levels of glycosylated xanthophyll-derived apocarotenoids, as we showed recently [13]. In contrast, roots were shown to accumulate β-apocarotenals instead of apocarotenoid glucosides. Given the similarity of calli to meristematic root cells, we only found increased levels of β-apocarotenals but no glucosides, as expected (Fig 5A). We identified β-apocarotenals of various chain lengths at low levels in WT calli, including retinal, β-apo-14’-carotenal, β-apo-12’-carotenal, β-apo-10’-carotenal, β-apo-8’-carotenal, β-apo-13-carotenone and β-ionylidene acetaldehyde. All β-apocarotenals were more abundant in β-carotene over-accumulating calli, while they remained similar to the WT in pale calli from the weaker AtPSY-overexpression lines. Therefore, β-apocarotenal levels correlated well with increased β-carotene levels, but not necessarily with increased pathway activity. Moreover, we identified the volatiles β-cyclocitral, β-ionone and 5,6-epoxy-β-ionone, which similarly showed higher abundances exclusively in lines over-accumulating β-carotene (Fig 5B–5D). These results were further confirmed using calli from one ZmPSY1-expressing line, which over-accumulates β-carotene just like AtPSY-overexpressing lines [60] and showed similar increases in apocarotenoid levels (Fig 5). Moreover, we determined about 50-fold increased amounts of geronic acid, which is liberated from carotenoid-oxygen copolymers and corroborates the non-enzymatic degradation of β-carotene in calli (S5 Fig) [38,63].
Kinetics of β-carotene formation and decomposition in calli
Taking advantage of the possibility to arrest β-carotene synthesis, we investigated β-carotene stability after treatment with NFZ. For this purpose calli from WT and the ZmPSY1-expressing line were etiolated for 14 days and thereafter transferred onto CIM supplemented with 1 μM NFZ and carotenoids quantified after 5, 10, 15 and 20 days continued etiolation. In addition, prior to inhibitor treatment and after 10 and 20 days inhibition, β-apocarotenoids were quantified. Non-treated control calli were grown accordingly and transferred onto fresh CIM medium without NFZ (Fig 6).
In non-inhibited control calli, carotenes and xanthophylls remained relatively constant over time in the WT and increased only slightly in the ZmPSY1-expressing line. Upon NFZ inhibition phytoene levels increased constantly in both WT and ZmPSY1-expressing calli, while visible carotenoids decreased concurrently due to ongoing oxidative degradation (Fig 6A). The decrease in visible carotenoids occurred almost linearly within the initial 15 days following pathway inhibition and then remained almost constant possibly due to nutrient shortage. While most β-apocarotenal levels remained constant with prolonged development in NFZ-treated WT calli, β-apo-13-carotenone, retinal, β-apo-14’-carotenal and β-apo-12’-carotenal in NFZ-inhibited ZmPSY1-expressing calli were reduced by approximately 30% after 10 days etiolation and remained constant after 20 days etiolation (Fig 6B).
Quantitative comparisons of carotenoid synthesis and degradation rates allowed calculating the pathway flux required for the net accumulation of β-carotene. In ZmPSY1-expressing calli the phytoene increases in presence of NFZ reflects an average daily synthesis of about 180 nmol (100 μg g-1). In non-inhibited calli, β-carotene increased with only about 50 nmol (27 μg g-1) per day, while xanthophylls remained relatively constant. Therefore, about 130 nmol (70 μg g-1) β-carotene per day was either converted into xanthophylls (and immediately subjected to further degradation) or oxidatively degraded. Accordingly, this suggests that synthesis rates exceeding 130 nmol (70 μg g-1) β-carotene per day are required to overcome the turnover rate and to over-accumulate β-carotene. Interestingly, this matches with the different effect on carotenoid over-accumulation observed with AtPSY-overexpressing calli from above (Fig 4). Pale lines (At13 and AtU16) had an average daily synthesis of 100 to 123 nmol respectively, which correspond with the pathway activity compensated by degradation as described above. In contrast, carotenoid over-accumulating lines synthesized approximately 190 nmol of carotenoids per day, which exceeds the degradation rate and thus explains the net over-accumulation of carotenoids.
In order to correlate β-apocarotenal levels with β-carotene losses on a molar basis, we accounted for the fact that β-carotene forms cleavage product pairs (β-apo-14’-carotenal / β-apo-13-carotenone; retinal / retinal etc.). β-Apocarotenal levels in ZmPSY1-expressing calli correspond to 41 nmol β-carotene degraded prior to prolonged callus incubation and dropped to 30 nmol after 10 days of pathway inhibition. However, since 50 nmol β-carotene is degraded per day, β-apocarotenals are evidently in steady state and are also likely to be continuously degraded into further yet unknown metabolites.
Secondary β-apocarotenal oxidation products
The presence of β-apocarotenals with various chain lengths suggests non-selective oxidation at any double bond present in β-carotene. Continued oxidative cleavage of long-chain β-apocarotenals might yield short-chain β-apocarotenals (β-cyclocitral, β-ionone) plus dialdehydes of various chain lengths (Fig 7). We analyzed calli from AtPSY-overexpressing lines with different pathway activities for corresponding apocarotene-dialdehydes by LC-MS (Fig 8A). In fact, we identified apocarotene-dialdehydes with variable chain lengths ranging from C10 to C5 while other apocarotene-dialdehydes were below detection limit. Relative quantification of these apocarotene-dialdehydes revealed increased levels compared to WT calli only in correlation with high β-carotene and β-apocarotenal levels as in orange-coloured calli from AtPSY-overexpressing lines. Moreover, continued subsequent oxidative truncations of apocarotene-dialdehydes might result in glyoxal and methylglyoxal as shortest possible dialdehydes (Fig 7). Confirmatory, we found about 50% increased levels of both dialdehydes in calli of AtPSY-overexpressing line At12, compared to WT calli (Fig 8B).
Subcellular localization of carotenoid crystals
We previously demonstrated that β-carotene in PSY-overexpressing lines over-accumulates as crystals in Arabidopsis calli, similar to carrot roots [44]. The plastid-localization of carotenoid biosynthesis indicates that these crystals are present within these organelles. However, this would imply drastic changes in plastid morphology, as crystals observed are much larger compared to plastids present in control cells and are needle- or rhombus-shaped. Moreover, Cao et al. observed carotenoid crystals in Citrus calli in amyloplasts as well as within vacuoles [64].
To address these questions we sought for non-invasive localization of crystals in orange AtPSY-overexpressing Arabidopsis calli. We crossed line At22 with an Arabidopsis line expressing a plastid-marker protein fused to cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) [65]. Protoplasts were isolated from calli and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Carotenoid crystals were visualized with a (polarized) laser beam while plastids were identified through CFP fluorescence (Fig 9A to 9H). The spatial match of both signals unequivocally confirmed the intra-plastidic localization of crystals. Moreover, we analyzed plastid structures from a crystal-forming AtPSY-overexpressing line by transmission electron microscopy. For this, we used roots which were recently shown to accumulate similarly high carotenoid levels like callus [44]. This revealed plastid-localized membrane remnants exclusively in the carotenoid-accumulating line, while these structures were absent in WT roots (Fig 9I to 9N). As most lipophilic carotenoids are extracted during sample dehydration, undulating membranes which formerly surrounded carotenoids are indicative for crystals and are similarly found in tomato and carrot chromoplasts [66,67].
Discussion
Arabidopsis callus as model system for quantifying carotenoid pathway flux
Nutritionally important carotenoids often accumulate in non-green tissues of crops, such as fruits, seeds and storage roots [10] with carotenoid-sequestering protein complexes and structures contributing essentially to carotenoid stability. While chromoplasts form specialized storage structures, chloroplasts sequester carotenoids mainly within membranes and protein-bound in light-harvesting complex proteins [68]. Although Arabidopsis serves as model for multifaceted plant research, unravelling the fundamental processes governing carotenoid stability and deposition has been hampered due to the absence of chromoplasts. The establishment of the non-green callus system allows carotenoid biosynthesis and degradation to be mechanistically investigated in Arabidopsis. This assay system can likely assist in developing strategies to develop improved provitamin A-biofortified crops.
We here demonstrate large differences of carotenoid species regarding their degradation. Carotenes bearing cyclic end groups like α- and β-carotene were degradation-sensitive and decreased rapidly upon callus etiolation or when biosynthesis was blocked using NFZ (Figs 2 and 6). However, carotenes with cyclic end-groups were maintained at higher steady-state levels when carotenoid pathway activity was increased through overexpression of PSY. Various crop tissues show chemotypic similarities with Arabidopsis calli, sharing similar carotenoid patterns. The tomato ghost mutant for instance over-accumulates phytoene due to an impaired phytoene desaturation [69–71]. Interestingly, total carotenoid amounts in ghost fruits are almost doubled compared to red-ripe WT tomatoes. This suggests significant carotenoid losses when the pathway is unrestricted, like in WT tomatoes, i.e. when phytoene is further metabolized into downstream carotenoids. These losses are partially due to enzymatic cleavage of downstream carotenoids into aromatic volatiles, but a large fraction is expected to be degraded non-enzymatically [32,72,73]. In line with this, we observed high phytoene amounts in NFZ-treated WT calli which—in absence of pathway inhibition–would be carried into carotenoids with cyclic end-groups and subsequently degraded resulting in much lower total carotenoid levels.
While phytoene is the predominant carotene accumulating upon NFZ inhibition, downstream carotenes like phytofluene, ζ-carotene and pro-lycopene are similarly degradation-resistant. These carotenes accumulated stably during callus etiolation when the pathway was blocked chemically or by the loss of key pathway enzymes such as PDS or CRTISO (Fig 3). Equivalently, crtISO mutants of tomato (tangerine) and melon (yofi) accumulate pro-lycopene and upstream carotenes to larger amounts compared to total carotenoids in corresponding WT fruits with unrestricted pathway flux [19,74,75].
Finally, the seed-derived callus assay allowed us to enhance pathway activity through the overexpression of PSY, which revealed carotenoid patterns matching those observed in carotenoid-rich, orange-coloured crop tissues (Fig 4). For instance, β- and α-carotene are the main carotenes followed by colourless intermediates in carrot roots, sweet potatoes and squash [44,50,76,77]. The specific accumulation of β-carotene upon high pathway activities reflects a limited β-carotene hydroxylation capacity while additional phytoene and phytofluene accumulation is caused by limited desaturation capacity and maintained by their resistance to oxidative cleavage. These interrelations are convincingly evident from successful approaches to increase β-carotene levels through down-regulation of hydroxylases [78–80]. Overall, our seed-derived callus assay system appears useful for an exploration of carotenoid homeostasis involving biosynthesis and degradation.
Different susceptibilities of carotenoid species to non-enzymatic degradation
Enzyme-mediated carotenoid cleavage generates various aroma compounds and is mediated by CCD enzymes [72,81]. With the exception of mutants deficient in CCD1 and CCD4, other carotenoid cleavage enzymes did not contribute to major carotenoid turnover as corresponding mutants showed unaltered carotenoid breakdown in calli (Fig 2). Increased carotenoid levels in ccd1 and ccd4 calli are in accordance with higher carotenoid levels reported for dark-incubated ccd1 and ccd4 Arabidopsis leaves and corroborates the contribution of these CCDs to carotenoid turnover [36]. However, carotenoid cleavage enzymes are probably not involved in β-apocarotenal formation generated upon β-carotene over-accumulation in PSY-overexpressing calli. While β-apocarotenals of all possible chain lengths were detected, CCD1 and CCD4 are known to selectively cleave C7-C8 and C9-C10 double bonds (Fig 5) [82,83]. Moreover, callus generation in presence of a vitamin E analog retarded carotenoid losses suggesting that carotenoids are primarily degraded non-enzymatically, thus through oxidation.
The conjugated polyene is the site of oxidation. While β-carotene has 11 conjugated double bonds, even those species with small chromophores, like phytoene and phytofluene with three and five conjugated double bonds, respectively, would be expected to be prone to oxidative attack. In contrast to prominent carotenoids like lycopene and β-carotene, the antioxidative capacity of phytoene and phytofluene was assessed only recently [84–86]. In fact, purified phytoene and phytofluene in solution were susceptible to autoxidation [87,88] and recent analyses confirmed their antioxidant activities, although weaker compared with lycopene and β-carotene [89]. Furthermore, lycopene isomers including pro-lycopene had the same antioxidant capacity like all-trans-lycopene and α-tocopherol [90].
However, these results disagree with our observations. Linear carotenes from phytoene to pro-lycopene were highly resistant against oxidative destruction as they accumulate in calli (Fig 3). Possibly, these carotenes are less accessible for oxygen in vivo, which might be caused by different sequestration modes compared to β-carotene. This agrees with fractionation experiments carried out with tomato chromoplasts equipped with different carotenoid patterns [91]. While phytoene was sequestered within plastoglobules all-trans-lycopene and β-carotene were found in thylakoid-like membranes and formed crystals, apparently due to a limited membrane capacity to harbour these carotenes. Moreover, the sequestration modes of lycopene isomers differ dramatically: while pro-lycopene formed liquid-crystalline structures in CRTISO-deficient tangerine tomatoes, all-trans-lycopene in WT fruits formed crystals [92]. Given the crucial impact of food matrix on bioaccessibility, the liquid-crystalline sequestration of phytoene, phytofluene and pro-lycopene might account for their higher bio-accessibility compared with other carotenoids [10,86,92]. Nonetheless, our seed-derived callus assay corroborates that cis-carotenes are less susceptible to oxidative cleavage, highlighting them as rather stable intermediates which might also favour them as substrates for several proposed apocarotenoid signals [16].
Oxidative cleavage of carotenoids during callus development
In photosynthetic complexes, carotenoids are bound to light-harvesting complex proteins. Calli developed from light-grown tissues lose most of their carotenoids during etiolation. The decomposition of photosynthetic apparatus most probably releases carotenoids increasing oxidative susceptibility, resembling senescence-mediated catabolism in chloroplasts. In fact, decomposition of thylakoid membranes during leaf senescence is accompanied by carotenoid degradation which is thought to involve plastoglobuli [93]. Interestingly, etiolated calli accumulated xanthophyll esters, which are formed during leaf senescence or fruit ripening and might thus represent carotenoid degradation intermediates [93,94]. This suggests that carotenoid breakdown in calli follows senescence-related pathways [95].
Carotenoids are known to be oxidized rapidly in presence of singlet oxygen present at high concentrations in photosynthetically active leaves. Confirmatory, high levels of β-apocarotenals are formed in green vegetables and also Arabidopsis leaves, initiated by non-enzymatic quenching of singlet oxygen [13,38,40,96]. Therefore, carotenoid degradation during early callus etiolation might be caused by triplet-excited chlorophylls. However, carotenoid degradation continues even in absence of chlorophylls. Interestingly, singlet oxygen is not only generated during photosynthesis—it also forms through various types of stresses and accordingly is present in low amounts in chlorophyll-free tissues. These levels might be sufficient to initiate continuous carotenoid oxidation in etiolating calli [97].
In addition to the direct oxidation of carotenoids, there is also an indirect route via lipid peroxidation products. Lipid hydroperoxides are generated non-enzymatically via reactions with singlet oxygen and radials or enzymatically by incorporation of molecular oxygen catalyzed by lipoxygenases (LOX, [98]). Secondary reactions of lipid hydroperoxides generate various radicals which attack carotenoids–especially if in close proximity which applies for membrane-embedded carotenoids. Several findings support an inverse correlation between LOX activity and carotenoid retention. For instance, a deletion at a LOX locus was associated with improved pasta color in durum wheat [99]. Moreover, the r9-LOX1 gene in rice was found to be responsible for rice seed quality deterioration and r9-LOX RNAi Golden Rice 1 lines showed significantly increased endosperm carotenoid stability during storage [100,101].
Antioxidants like tocopherols are capable to quench both singlet oxygen as well as lipid peroxyl radicals and apparently reduce the oxidative degradation of carotenoids. This is concluded from increased callus carotenoid levels in presence of a tocopherol analogue and corroborated by other observations. For instance, α-tocopherol is positively correlated with α- and β-carotene in carrots and higher α-tocopherol levels protect lycopene and β-carotene against LOX-catalyzed co-oxidation in vitro [47,102]. Furthermore, elevated vitamin E levels extend β-carotene half-life during storage in sorghum [48].
The fate of β-carotene upon oxidation
The antioxidative function of carotenoids primarily generates β-apocarotenoids which maintain their antioxidative properties [103]. Continued oxidation yields shorter apocarotene-dialdehydes of various chain lengths among which the shortest dialdehydes methylglyoxal and glyoxal cannot be oxidized further and represent possible terminal products of carotenoid oxidation (Fig 7). Confirmatory, β-apocarotenals, apocarotene-dialdehydes, glyoxal and methylglyoxal are oxidatively generated from β-carotene after treatment with ozone in vitro [104]. Interestingly, we found increased levels of these metabolites in correlation with high β-carotene amounts which confirms that oxidative β-carotene decomposition occurs also in vivo and suggests short dialdehydes as putative end-product (Fig 8).
Methylglyoxal and glyoxal represent ubiquitous highly reactive compounds formed both enzymatically and non-enzymatically [105,106]. For instance, the majority of methylglyoxal is generated as a glycolytic by-product. Cellular detoxification systems effectively convert methylglyoxal/glyoxal into less-toxic metabolites and thus are capable to maintain tolerable steady-state levels. Intriguingly, methylglyoxal is detoxified into pyruvate, which can enter the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Accordingly, it might be possible that carotenoid oxidation allows recycling of carotenoid-derived carbon for primary metabolism upon truncation into C2 and C3 metabolites. This process might not be restricted to calli with an artificially high pathway activity through PSY overexpression. It is conceivable that this process represents a ubiquitous recycling mechanism for carotenoid-derived carbon as observed in WT calli as well as leaves and fruits. This would be similar to the vitamin E recycling process in which oxidized α-tocopherol is re-generated upon its oxidation to tocopherolquinone [107]. Further research is required to confirm whether carotenoids undergo carbon recycling.
Conditions for carotenoid crystallization in plastids
In contrast to orange calli with strongly increased pathway activity (At12 and At22), PSY-overexpressing lines with only about two-fold increased pathway activity (At13 and AtU16) did not over-accumulate β-carotene and β-apocarotenal and carotene-dialdehyde levels were unchanged. We cannot fully rule out that increased pathway activity in weak expressors is compensated by increased turnover of xanthophylls. Xanthophyll turnover remains enigmatic since glycosylated xanthophyll-derived cleavage products which are known degradation routes in leaves, are absent in calli [13]. Thus, given the correlation between β-carotene over-accumulation and β-apocarotenals/apocarotene-dialdehyde formation, oxidative β-carotene destruction might be capable of keeping pace with higher β-carotene formation induced by slightly enhanced pathway activity. This maintains low steady-state levels similar to those in WT. Further increased pathway activity apparently outcompetes degradation and upon exceeding a critical concentration β-carotene over-accumulates and crystallizes in an autonomous process (Fig 9).
Upon biosynthetic arrest by NFZ, crystalline β-carotene decays with an average daily rate of 13 μg g-1. This disagrees with the high stability of carotenoid crystals concluded from their prevalence in fruits and vegetables. Differences in oxygen accessibility as well as concentrations of alternative antioxidants, as discussed above, might be capable in stabilizing carotenoid crystals. However, importantly, carotenoid crystals are observed in vital tissues with an active metabolism; thus high steady-state carotenoid levels might require an active carotenoid biosynthesis to compensate degradation.
In conclusion, the Arabidopsis callus system unravelled that biosynthesis and non-enzymatic degradation are critical pathway steps towards maintaining high steady-state β-carotene levels. Future investigations can consider the introduction of alternative antioxidants and/or the optimization of pathway enzymes in addition to PSY to further increase β-carotene synthesis above the rate of degradation. For instance, endosperm carotenoid content in Golden Rice lines differed dramatically only by using an array of PSY enzymes from different plant origins [61]. A systematic approach determining or even engineering PSY variants with highest performance in planta using the Arabidopsis callus system prior to their application could accelerate developing crops with further increased carotenoid contents. Moreover, combinatorial approaches of PSY overexpression with variants of the OR protein, MEP pathway enzymes or carotene hydroxylases would allow conclusions on promising gene editing applications in crops. Thus, the observed similarities of carotenoid properties in Arabidopsis calli with those in other carotenoid-rich crop tissues opens new doors towards improving provitamin A biofortification in crops.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
Arabidopsis AGI numbers and mutant alleles used are as follows: NCED2 (At4g18350, SALK_090937, nced2-3); NCED3 (At3g14440, N3KO-6620); NCED5 (At1g30100, N5KO-4250); NCED6 (At3g24220, WISC.DSLox471G6); NCED9 (At1g78390, SALK_051969); CCD1 (At3g63520, SAIL_390_C01, ccd1-1); CCD4 (At4g19170, SALK_097984, ccd4-1); CCD7 (At2g44990, max3-11); CCD8 (At4g32810, max4-6); CYP97C1 (At3g53130, SALK_129724C, lut1); CYP97A3 (At1g31800, lut5-1); PDS (At4g14210, ZHJ070204); CRTISO (At1g06820, ccr2-1). For 35S::CrtI lines, see [58]; for 35S::AtPSY and 35S::ZmPSY1 lines, see [60].
qPCR
RNA extraction, qPCR analysis and Arabidopsis PSY immunoblotting was performed as described in [44].
Callus generation
Leaves from plants grown aseptically on MS agar were cut into pieces and incubated on CIM (4.33 g L-1 MS basal salts/KOH, pH 5.8, 3% [w/v] sucrose, 0.1% [v/v] Gamborg B5 vitamins, 0.5 mg L-1 2,4-D, 2 mg L-1 indole-3-acetic acid, 0.5 mg L-1 2-isopentenyladenine, 0.4% [w/v] phytagel) for four weeks. For seed-derived calli, ten milligrams of surface-sterilized seeds were plated onto petri dishes (145 mm diameter) containing CIM, germinated under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark, 26°C) for five days and incubated for 14 days in darkness. For NFZ and trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid) treatments, seeds were germinated on a filter paper on CIM medium, germinated as above and transferred to CIM medium supplemented with 1 μM NFZ or 500 μM trolox prior to etiolation.
Carotenoid analysis
Callus carotenoids were extracted and analyzed as described in [108]. For saponification, extracts were mixed with 4 ml of ethanol and 120 μl KOH (1 g ml-1), heated for 10 min at 85°C and cooled. 6 ml 1% (w/v) NaCl solution was added and carotenoids were extracted as above.
Apocarotenoid analysis
Analysis of retinal, β-apo-14’-carotenal, β-apo-12’-carotenal, β-apo-10’-carotenal, β-apo-8’-carotenal, β-apo-13-carotenone and β-ionylidene acetaldehyde was performed by LC-MS as described [38]. Extracts were spiked with an internal standard mix (75 pmol of each D3-β-apocarotenoid; Buchem, Netherlands) and with 50 μg α-tocopheryl-acetate. Apocarotenoids were subjected to atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and analyzed in the positive mode. For quantification, the respective D3-labelled compounds served as internal standards. Standard curves were obtained with each unlabelled apocarotenoid (BASF, Germany) in a range of 0.5 − 15 pmol on-column containing a constant amount of 3 pmol of the respective D3-labelled compound. The TraceFinder 3.2 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for quantification based on the MS1 signal, the MS2 spectra serving as a qualifier. Peak areas of the photometric signals at 285 nm were integrated for α-tocopheryl-acetate and used to correct for unspecific losses during sample processing. Geronic acid was analyzed as described [38].
Upon β-apocarotenoid analysis, extracts were processed as follows for subsequent analysis of β-cyclocitral, β-ionone, 5,6-epoxy-β-ionone and apocarotene-dialdehydes. Samples were dissolved in 300 μl dichlormethane and derivatized by adding 15 μl of 200 μM 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine phosphoric acid solution (DNPH; Sigma-Aldrich) and incubating for 3 h at 37°C. After washing with 1 ml of water, the organic phase was recovered, dried under vacuum, redissolved in 50 μl dichlormethane:methanol (1:1, v/v) and 2 μl were subjected to LC-MS analysis. LC-MS parameters were identical as above except that APCI ionization was performed in negative mode. Derivatization efficiency was monitored by measuring underivatized D3-labelled apocarotenoids. D3-β-apo-14’-carotenal-DNPH was used as internal standard for normalization of apocarotene-dialdehyde signals. For analytical specificities of dinitrophenylhydrazone derivatives of β-ionone, β-cyclocitral, 5,6-epoxy-β-ionone and apocarotene-dialdehydes, see S2 Table. Methylglyoxal and glyoxal identity was confirmed by authentic standards (Sigma-Aldrich).
In vitro phytoene synthase activity
Plastid were isolated from calli etiolated for two weeks according to [109]. Following lysis and centrifugation (21000*g for 10 min), the membranes were resuspended in lysis buffer and protein concentration was determined (Bio-Rad Protein Assay; Bio-Rad, Munich). For in vitro phytoene synthesis, 200 μg protein was incubated with 10 μM [14C]-isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP, 50 mCi mmol-1; ARC), 20 μM IPP (Isoprenoids), 40 μM dimethylallyl diphosphate, 4 mM ATP and 10 μg of recombinant, purified geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase [110] for 30 min. Incubation conditions, product analysis and quantification was performed by thin layer chromatography and scintillation counting as described [17].
Microscopy
Genetic crosses were made between a AtPSY-overexpressing line [44] and a line carrying a cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) labelled plastid-localized protein (pt-ck; CS16265) [65]. Callus protoplasts were prepared according to [111]. Fluorescence was imaged using a laser scanning microscope (LSM; Zeiss LSM 510 META). CFP fluorescence was excited with 458 nm, and emission was recorded at 475/525 nm. Carotenoid crystals were visualized using a 543 nm laser.
For TEM Arabidopsis roots from WT and line At12 were generated [60], cut in approximately 1 mm long pieces, processed and analyzed using microtubule-stabilizing buffer and applying vacuum infiltration during fixation [112].
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Prof. Peter Beyer for his suggestions to improve the manuscript. We thank Jamie van Norman for nced and max mutants, Li-Jia Qu for the pds mutant, Dean DellaPenna for lut1, lut5 and ccd1-4 mutants and Barry Pogson for ccr2.1. We gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical supports from Roland Nitschke, Carmen Schubert and Rosula Hinnenberg. The article processing charge was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg in the funding program Open Access Publishing.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by funds from the HarvestPlus (http://www.harvestplus.org/) research consortium (grant 2014H6320.FRE) to PS, FW and RW. The article processing charge was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg in the funding program Open Access Publishing. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Ahrazem O, Rubio-Moraga A, Nebauer SG, Molina RV, Gómez-Gómez L. Saffron: Its Phytochemistry, Developmental Processes, and Biotechnological Prospects. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63: 8751–8764. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Iskandar AR, Miao B, Li X, Hu K-Q, Liu C, Wang X-D. β-Cryptoxanthin Reduced Lung Tumor Multiplicity and Inhibited Lung Cancer Cell Motility by Downregulating Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor α7 Signaling. Cancer Prev Res. 2016;9 doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-16-0161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Granchi C, Fortunato S, Meini S, Rizzolio F, Caligiuri I, Tuccinardi T, et al. Characterization of the Saffron Derivative Crocetin as an Inhibitor of Human Lactate Dehydrogenase 5 in the Antiglycolytic Approach against Cancer. J Agric Food Chem. American Chemical Society; 2017; acs.jafc.7b01668. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.von Lintig J. Provitamin A metabolism and functions in mammalian biology. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96: 1234S–44S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.034629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Giuliano G. Provitamin A biofortification of crop plants: a gold rush with many miners. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017;44: 169–180. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ramachandra Rao S, Ravishankar G. Plant cell cultures: Chemical factories of secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv. 2002;20: 101–153. doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(02)00007-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Karuppusamy S. A review on trends in production of secondary metabolites from higher plants by in vitro tissue, organ and cell cultures [Internet]. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. Academic Journals; 2009. pp. 1222–1239. Available: http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/JMPR/article-abstract/EEE689215753 [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yue W, Ming Q-L, Lin B, Rahman K, Zheng C-J, Han T, et al. Medicinal plant cell suspension cultures: pharmaceutical applications and high-yielding strategies for the desired secondary metabolites. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36: 215–32. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2014.923986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rischer H, Häkkinen ST, Ritala A, Seppänen-Laakso T, Miralpeix B, Capell T, et al. Plant cells as pharmaceutical factories. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19: 5640–60. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23394561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schweiggert RM, Carle R. Carotenoid Deposition in Plant And Animal Foods and Its Impact on Bioavailability. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;57: 1807–1830. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1012756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sitte P, Falk H, Liedvogel B. Chromoplasts In: Czygan F-C, editor. Pigments in plants. 2nd ed Stuttgart: Fischer; 1980. pp. 117–148. Available: https://katalog.ub.uni-freiburg.de/opac/RDSIndex/Results?lookfor=343730299X&source=homepage [Google Scholar]
- 12.Simkin AJ, Zhu C, Kuntz M, Sandmann G. Light-dark regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in pepper (Capsicum annuum) leaves. J Plant Physiol. 2003;160: 439–43. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12806770 doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-00871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lätari K, Wüst F, Hübner M, Schaub P, Beisel, Kim G, Matsubara S, et al. Tissue-specific Apocarotenoid Glycosylation Contributes to Carotenoid Homeostasis in Arabidopsis Leaves. Plant Physiol. 2015;168: 1550–1562. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Niyogi KK. PHOTOPROTECTION REVISITED: Genetic and Molecular Approaches. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999;50: 333–359. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW. Antioxidants in photosynthesis and human nutrition. Science. 2002;298: 2149–53. doi: 10.1126/science.1078002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hou X, Rivers J, León P, McQuinn RP, Pogson BJ. Synthesis and Function of Apocarotenoid Signals in Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21: 792–803. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Welsch R, Beyer P, Hugueney P, Kleinig H, von LJ, von Lintig J. Regulation and activation of phytoene synthase, a key enzyme in carotenoid biosynthesis, during photomorphogenesis. Planta. 2000;211: 846–54. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11144270 doi: 10.1007/s004250000352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Baranski R, Cazzonelli CI. Carotenoid Biosynthesis and Regulation in Plants Carotenoids. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2016. pp. 159–189. doi: 10.1002/9781118622223.ch10 [Google Scholar]
- 19.Isaacson T, Ronen G, Zamir D, Hirschberg J. Cloning of tangerine from Tomato Reveals a Carotenoid Isomerase Essential for the Production of beta-Carotene and Xanthophylls in Plants. Plant Cell. 2002;14: 333–342. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Park H, Kreunen SS, Cuttriss AJ, DellaPenna D, Pogson BJ. Identification of the carotenoid isomerase provides insight into carotenoid biosynthesis, prolamellar body formation, and photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell. 2002;14: 321–32. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11884677 doi: 10.1105/tpc.010302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Giuliano G, Giliberto L, Rosati C. Carotenoid isomerase: a tale of light and isomers. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7: 427–9. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12399171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cazzonelli C, Roberts AC, Carmody ME, Pogson BJ. Transcriptional Control of SET DOMAIN GROUP 8 and CAROTENOID ISOMERASE during Arabidopsis Development. Mol Plant. 2010;3: 174–91. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssp092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen Y, Li F, Wurtzel ET. Isolation and characterization of the Z-ISO gene encoding a missing component of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 2010;153: 66–79. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.153916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim J, Smith JJ, Tian L, DellaPenna D. The evolution and function of carotenoid hydroxylases in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50: 463–79. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kim J-E, Cheng KM, Craft NE, Hamberger B, Douglas CJ. Over-expression of Arabidopsis thaliana carotenoid hydroxylases individually and in combination with a beta-carotene ketolase provides insight into in vivo functions. Phytochemistry. 2010;71: 168–78. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fiore A, Dall’Osto L, Fraser PD, Bassi R, Giuliano G. Elucidation of the β-carotene hydroxylation pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 2006;580: 4718–4722. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.07.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Auldridge ME, McCarty DR, Klee HJ. Plant carotenoid cleavage oxygenases and their apocarotenoid products. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9: 315–21. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Iuchi S, Kobayashi M, Taji T, Naramoto M, Seki M, Kato T, et al. Regulation of drought tolerance by gene manipulation of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme in abscisic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2001;27: 325–333. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01096.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tan B-C, Joseph LM, Deng W-T, Liu L, Li Q-B, Cline K, et al. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis 9 -cis epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene family. Plant J. 2003;35: 44–56. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01786.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alder A, Jamil M, Marzorati M, Bruno M, Vermathen M, Bigler P, et al. The Path from b-Carotene to Carlactone, a Strigolactone-Like Plant Hormone. Science (80-). 2012;335: 1348–1351. doi: 10.1126/science.1218094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rubio A, Rambla JL, Santaella M, Gómez MD, Orzaez D, Granell A, et al. Cytosolic and plastoglobule-targeted carotenoid dioxygenases from Crocus sativus are both involved in beta-ionone release. J Biol Chem. 2008;283: 24816–25. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804000200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ilg A, Bruno M, Beyer P, Al-Babili S. Tomato carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases 1A and 1B: Relaxed double bond specificity leads to a plenitude of dialdehydes, mono-apocarotenoids and isoprenoid volatiles. FEBS Open Bio. 2014;4: 584–93. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2014.06.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Simkin AJ, Underwood BA, Auldridge ME, Loucas HM, Shibuya K, Schmelz E, et al. Circadian Regulation of the PhCCD1 Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase Controls Emission of β-Ionone, a Fragrance Volatile of Petunia Flowers. Plant Physiol. 2004;136: 3504–3514. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4356704 doi: 10.1104/pp.104.049718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ohmiya A, Kishimoto S, Aida R, Yoshioka S, Sumitomo K. Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CmCCD4a) contributes to white color formation in chrysanthemum petals. Plant Physiol. 2006;142: 1193–201. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.087130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brandi F, Bar E, Mourgues F, Horváth G, Turcsi E, Giuliano G, et al. Study of “Redhaven” peach and its white-fleshed mutant suggests a key role of CCD4 carotenoid dioxygenase in carotenoid and norisoprenoid volatile metabolism. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11: 24 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gonzalez-Jorge S, Ha S-H, Magallanes-Lundback M, Gilliland LU, Zhou A, Lipka AE, et al. CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE4 Is a Negative Regulator of β-Carotene Content in Arabidopsis Seeds. Plant Cell. 2013; tpc.113.119677-. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.119677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Britton G. Structure and properties of carotenoids in relation to function. FASEB J. 1995;9: 1551–8. Available: http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/content/abstract/9/15/1551 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schaub P, Wuest F, Koschmieder J, Yu Q, Virk P, Tohme J, et al. Non-Enzymatic β-Carotene Degradation in (Provitamin A-Biofortified) Crop Plants. J Agric Food Chem. American Chemical Society; 2017; acs.jafc.7b01693. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Beisel KG, Jahnke S, Hofmann D, Koppchen S, Schurr U, Matsubara S. Continuous turnover of carotenes and chlorophyll a in mature leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana revealed by 14CO2 pulse-chase labeling. Plant Physiol. 2010;152: 2188–2199. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.151647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ramel F, Mialoundama AS, Havaux M. Nonenzymic Carotenoid Oxidation and Photooxidative Stress Signalling in Plants. J Exp Bot. 2012;64: 799–805. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bradbury LMT, Shumskaya M, Tzfadia O, Wu S-B, Kennelly EJ, Wurtzel ET. Lycopene cyclase paralog CruP protects against reactive oxygen species in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109: E1888–97. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206002109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Havaux M. Carotenoid oxidation products as stress signals in plants. Plant J. 2013;79: 597–606. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sugimoto K, Jiao Y, Meyerowitz EM. Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway. Dev Cell. 2010;18: 463–71. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Maass D, Arango J, Wüst F, Beyer P, Welsch R. Carotenoid crystal formation in Arabidopsis and carrot roots caused by increased phytoene synthase protein levels. PLoS One. 2009;4: e6373 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Palozza P. Prooxidant actions of carotenoids in biologic systems. Nutr Rev. 1998;56: 257–65. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9763875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Boon CS, McClements DJ, Weiss J, Decker EA. Factors influencing the chemical stability of carotenoids in foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50: 515–32. doi: 10.1080/10408390802565889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Koch TC, Goldman IL. Relationship of carotenoids and tocopherols in a sample of carrot root-color accessions and carrot germplasm carrying Rp and rp alleles. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53: 325–31. doi: 10.1021/jf048272z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Che P, Zhao Z-Y, Glassman K, Dolde D, Hu TX, Jones TJ, et al. Elevated vitamin E content improves all-trans β-carotene accumulation and stability in biofortified sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. National Academy of Sciences; 2016;113 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618558114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pogson BJ, McDonald KA, Truong M, Britton G, DellaPenna D. Arabidopsis carotenoid mutants demonstrate that lutein is not essential for photosynthesis in higher plants. Plant Cell. 1996;8: 1627–39. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.9.1627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Arango J, Jourdan M, Geoffriau E, Beyer P, Welsch R. Carotene Hydroxylase Activity Determines the Levels of Both -Carotene and Total Carotenoids in Orange Carrots. Plant Cell. 2014;26: 2223–2233. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.122127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cazzonelli C, Cuttriss AJ, Cossetto SB, Pye W, Crisp P, Whelan J, et al. Regulation of carotenoid composition and shoot branching in Arabidopsis by a chromatin modifying histone methyltransferase, SDG8. Plant Cell. 2009;21: 39–53. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.063131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kachanovsky DE, Filler S, Isaacson T, Hirschberg J. Epistasis in tomato color mutations involves regulation of phytoene synthase 1 expression by cis-carotenoids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109: 19021–19026. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214808109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Avendaño-Vázquez A-O, Cordoba E, Llamas E, San Román C, Nisar N, De la Torre S, et al. An Uncharacterized Apocarotenoid-Derived Signal Generated in ζ-Carotene Desaturase Mutants Regulates Leaf Development and the Expression of Chloroplast and Nuclear Genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26: 2524–2537. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.123349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rodríguez-Villalón A, Gas E, Rodríguez-Concepción M, Rodriguez-Villalon A. Colors in the dark: a model for the regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in etioplasts. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4: 965–7. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhou X, Welsch R, Yang Y, Álvarez D, Riediger M, Yuan H, et al. Arabidopsis OR proteins are the major posttranscriptional regulators of phytoene synthase in controlling carotenoid biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112: 3558–3563. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420831112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Huang F-C, Horváth G, Molnár P, Turcsi E, Deli J, Schrader J, et al. Substrate promiscuity of RdCCD1, a carotenoid cleavage oxygenase from Rosa damascena. Phytochemistry. 2009;70: 457–64. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.01.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Qin G, Gu H, Ma L, Peng Y, Deng XW, Chen Z, et al. Disruption of phytoene desaturase gene results in albino and dwarf phenotypes in Arabidopsis by impairing chlorophyll, carotenoid, and gibberellin biosynthesis. Cell Res. 2007;17: 471–82. doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schaub P, Al-Babili S, Drake R, Beyer P. Why is golden rice golden (yellow) instead of red? Plant Physiol. 2005;138: 441–50. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.057927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Schaub P, Yu Q, Gemmecker S, Poussin-Courmontagne P, Mailliot J, McEwen AG, et al. On the Structure and Function of the Phytoene Desaturase CRTI from Pantoea ananatis, a Membrane-Peripheral and FAD-Dependent Oxidase/Isomerase. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2012;7: e39550 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Álvarez D, Voß B, Maass D, Wüst F, Schaub P, Beyer P, et al. Carotenogenesis Is Regulated by 5′UTR-Mediated Translation of Phytoene Synthase Splice Variants. Plant Physiol. 2016;172: 2314–2326. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Paine JA, Shipton CA, Chaggar S, Howells RM, Kennedy MJ, Vernon G, et al. Improving the nutritional value of Golden Rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23: 482–7. doi: 10.1038/nbt1082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bai C, Rivera SM, Medina V, Alves R, Vilaprinyo E, Sorribas A, et al. An in vitro system for the rapid functional characterization of genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulation. Plant J. 2014;77: 464–475. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Burton GW, Daroszewski J, Mogg TJ, Nikiforov GB, Nickerson JG. Discovery and Characterization of Carotenoid-Oxygen Copolymers in Fruits and Vegetables with Potential Health Benefits. J Agric Food Chem. American Chemical Society; 2016;64: 3767–77. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cao H, Zhang J, Xu JJ, Ye J, Yun Z, Xu Q, et al. Comprehending crystalline β-carotene accumulation by comparing engineered cell models and the natural carotenoid-rich system of citrus. J Exp Bot. 2012;63: 4403–4417. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nelson BK, Cai X, Nebenführ A. A multicolored set of in vivo organelle markers for co-localization studies in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant J. 2007;51: 1126–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03212.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Harris WM, Spurr AR. Chromoplasts of tomato fruits. II. The red tomato. Am J Bot. 1969;56: 380–389. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jeffery J, Holzenburg A, King S. Physical barriers to carotenoid bioaccessibility. Ultrastructure survey of chromoplast and cell wall morphology in nine carotenoid-containing fruits and vegetables. J Sci Food Agric. 2012;92: 2594–602. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Li L, Yuan H. Chromoplast biogenesis and carotenoid accumulation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2013;539: 102–9. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Barr J, White WS, Chen L, Bae H, Rodermel S. The GHOST terminal oxidase regulates developmental programming in tomato fruit. Plant, Cell Environ. 2004;27: 840–852. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01190.x [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gemmecker S, Schaub P, Koschmieder J, Brausemann A, Drepper F, Rodriguez-Franco M, et al. Phytoene Desaturase from Oryza sativa: Oligomeric Assembly, Membrane Association and Preliminary 3D-Analysis. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2015;10: e0131717 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Brausemann A, Gemmecker S, Koschmieder J, Ghisla S, Beyer P, Einsle O. Structure of Phytoene Desaturase Provides Insights into Herbicide Binding and Reaction Mechanisms Involved in Carotene Desaturation. Structure. 2017; doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schwartz SH, Simkin AJ, Auldridge ME, Taylor MG, Klee HJ. The tomato carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 1 genes contribute to the formation of the flavor volatiles beta-ionone, pseudoionone, and geranylacetone. Plant J. 2004;40: 882–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02263.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lewinsohn E, Sitrit Y, Bar E, Azulay Y, Meir A, Zamir D, et al. Carotenoid pigmentation affects the volatile composition of tomato and watermelon fruits, as revealed by comparative genetic analyses. J Agric Food Chem. American Chemical Society; 2005;53: 3142–8. doi: 10.1021/jf047927t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Galpaz N, Burger Y, Lavee T, Tzuri G, Sherman A, Melamed T, et al. Genetic and chemical characterization of an EMS induced mutation in Cucumis melo CRTISO gene. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2013;539: 117–25. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chayut N, Yuan H, Ohali S, Meir A, Saar U, Tzuri G, et al. Distinct Mechanisms of the ORANGE Protein in Controlling Carotenoid Flux. Plant Physiol. American Society of Plant Biologists; 2016; pp.012562016. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhang MK, Zhang MP, Mazourek M, Tadmor Y, Li L. Regulatory control of carotenoid accumulation in winter squash during storage. Planta. 2014;240: 1063–1074. doi: 10.1007/s00425-014-2147-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Park S-Y, Lee SY, Yang JW, Lee J-S, Oh S-D, Oh S, et al. Comparative analysis of phytochemicals and polar metabolites from colored sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) tubers. Food Sci Biotechnol. The Korean Society of Food Science and Technology; 2016;25: 283–291. doi: 10.1007/s10068-016-0041-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Diretto G, Welsch R, Tavazza R, Mourgues F, Pizzichini D, Beyer P, et al. Silencing of beta-carotene hydroxylase increases total carotenoid and beta-carotene levels in potato tubers. BMC Plant Biol. 2007;7: 11 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yan J, Kandianis CB, Harjes CE, Bai L, Kim E-H, Yang X, et al. Rare genetic variation at Zea mays crtRB1 increases beta-carotene in maize grain. Nat Genet. Nature Publishing Group; 2010;42: 322–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kang L, Ji CY, Kim SH, Ke Q, Park S-C, Kim HS, et al. Suppression of the β-carotene hydroxylase gene increases β-carotene content and tolerance to abiotic stress in transgenic sweetpotato plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;117: 24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.05.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ibdah M, Azulay Y, Portnoy V, Wasserman B, Bar E, Meir A, et al. Functional characterization of CmCCD1, a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase from melon. Phytochemistry. 2006;67: 1579–89. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rodrigo MJ, Alquézar B, Alós E, Medina V, Carmona L, Bruno M, et al. A novel carotenoid cleavage activity involved in the biosynthesis of Citrus fruit-specific apocarotenoid pigments. J Exp Bot. 2013;64: 4461–78. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Bruno M, Koschmieder J, Wuest F, Schaub P, Fehling-Kaschek M, Timmer J, et al. Enzymatic study on AtCCD4 and AtCCD7 and their potential to form acyclic regulatory metabolites. J Exp Bot. Oxford University Press; 2016;67: 5993–6005. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Engelmann NJ, Clinton SK, Erdman JW. Nutritional aspects of phytoene and phytofluene, carotenoid precursors to lycopene. Adv Nutr. American Society for Nutrition; 2011;2: 51–61. doi: 10.3945/an.110.000075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Meléndez-Martínez AJ, Mapelli-Brahm P, Benítez-González A, Stinco CM. A comprehensive review on the colorless carotenoids phytoene and phytofluene. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mapelli-Brahm P, Corte-Real J, Meléndez-Martínez AJ, Bohn T. Bioaccessibility of phytoene and phytofluene is superior to other carotenoids from selected fruit and vegetable juices. Food Chem. 2017;229: 304–311. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Rabourn WJ, Quackenbush FW, Porter JW. Isolation and properties of phytoene. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1954;48: 267–274. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(54)90341-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Britton G, Liaaen-Jensen S, Pfander H. Carotenoids Handbook. Basel: Birkhäuser-Verlag; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Stinco CM, Heredia FJ, Vicario IM, Meléndez-Martínez AJ. In vitro antioxidant capacity of tomato products: Relationships with their lycopene, phytoene, phytofluene and alpha-tocopherol contents, evaluation of interactions and correlation with reflectance measurements. LWT—Food Sci Technol. 2016;65: 718–724. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.08.068 [Google Scholar]
- 90.Müller L, Goupy P, Fröhlich K, Dangles O, Caris-Veyrat C, Böhm V. Comparative Study on Antioxidant Activity of Lycopene (Z) -Isomers in Different Assays. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59: 4504–4511. doi: 10.1021/jf1045969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Nogueira M, Mora L, Enfissi EMA, Bramley PM, Fraser PD. Subchromoplast Sequestration of Carotenoids Affects Regulatory Mechanisms in Tomato Lines Expressing Different Carotenoid Gene Combinations. Plant Cell. 2013; tpc.113.116210-. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.116210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Cooperstone JL, Ralston RA, Riedl KM, Haufe TC, Schweiggert RM, King SA, et al. Enhanced bioavailability of lycopene when consumed as cis -isomers from tangerine compared to red tomato juice, a randomized, cross-over clinical trial. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015;59: 658–669. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Biswal B. Carotenoid catabolism during leaf senescence and its control by light. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 1995;30: 3–13. doi: 10.1016/1011-1344(95)07197-A [Google Scholar]
- 94.Tevini M, Steinmüller D. Composition and function of plastoglobuli: II. Lipid composition of leaves and plastoglobuli during beech leaf senescence. Planta. 1985;163: 91–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00395902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Rottet S, Besagni C, Kessler F. The role of plastoglobules in thylakoid lipid remodeling during plant development. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1847: 889–899. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ramel F, Birtic S, Cuiné S, Triantaphylidès C, Ravanat J-L, Havaux M. Chemical quenching of singlet oxygen by carotenoids in plants. Plant Physiol. 2012;158: 1267–78. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.182394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Mor A, Koh E, Weiner L, Rosenwasser S, Sibony-Benyamini H, Fluhr R. Singlet Oxygen Signatures Are Detected Independent of Light or Chloroplasts in Response to Multiple Stresses. Plant Physiol. 2014;165 Available: http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/165/1/249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Farmer EE, Mueller MJ. ROS-Mediated Lipid Peroxidation and RES-Activated Signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way, PO Box 10139, Palo Alto, California 94303–0139, USA; 2013;64: 429–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Carrera A, Echenique V, Zhang W, Helguera M, Manthey F, Schrager A, et al. A deletion at the Lpx-B1 locus is associated with low lipoxygenase activity and improved pasta color in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum). J Cereal Sci. 2007;45: 67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2006.07.001 [Google Scholar]
- 100.Gayen D, Ali N, Sarkar SN, Datta SK, Datta K. Down-regulation of lipoxygenase gene reduces degradation of carotenoids of golden rice during storage. Planta. 2015; doi: 10.1007/s00425-015-2314-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Gayen D, Ali N, Ganguly M, Paul S, Datta K, Datta SK. RNAi mediated silencing of lipoxygenase gene to maintain rice grain quality and viability during storage. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult. Springer Netherlands; 2014;118: 229–243. doi: 10.1007/s11240-014-0476-6 [Google Scholar]
- 102.Biacs PA, Daood HG. Lipoxygenase-catalysed degradation of carotenoids from tomato in the presence of antioxidant vitamins. Biochem Soc Trans. 2000;28: 839–45. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11171227 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Mueller L, Boehm V. Antioxidant Activity of? -Carotene Compounds in Different in Vitro Assays. Molecules. 2011;16: 1055–1069. doi: 10.3390/molecules16021055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Benevides CM de J, Veloso MC da C, de Paula Pereira PA, Andrade JB de. A chemical study of β-carotene oxidation by ozone in an organic model system and the identification of the resulting products. Food Chem. 2011;126: 927–934. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.11.082 [Google Scholar]
- 105.Yadav SK, Singla-Pareek SL, Sopory SK. An overview on the role of methylglyoxal and glyoxalases in plants. Drug Metabol Drug Interact. 2008;23: 51–68. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18533364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Hoque TS, Hossain MA, Mostofa MG, Burritt DJ, Fujita M, Tran L-SP. Methylglyoxal: An Emerging Signaling Molecule in Plant Abiotic Stress Responses and Tolerance. Front Plant Sci. Frontiers Media SA; 2016;7: 1341 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Kobayashi N, DellaPenna D. Tocopherol metabolism, oxidation and recycling under high light stress in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008;55: 607–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03539.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Welsch R, Wüst F, Bär C, Al-Babili S, Beyer P. A third phytoene synthase is devoted to abiotic stress-induced abscisic acid formation in rice and defines functional diversification of phytoene synthase genes. Plant Physiol. 2008;147: 367–80. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.117028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Fraser PD, Kiano JW, Truesdale MR, Schuch W, Bramley PM. Phytoene synthase-2 enzyme activity in tomato does not contribute to carotenoid synthesis in ripening fruit. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;40: 687–98. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10480392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Kloer DP, Welsch R, Beyer P, Schulz GE. Structure and reaction geometry of geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase from Sinapis alba. Biochemistry. 2006;45: 15197–204. doi: 10.1021/bi061572k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Yoo S-D, Cho Y-H, Sheen J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc. 2007;2: 1565–72. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Schuessele C, Hoernstein SNW, Mueller SJ, Rodriguez-Franco M, Lorenz T, Lang D, et al. Spatio-temporal patterning of arginyl-tRNA protein transferase (ATE) contributes to gametophytic development in a moss. New Phytol. 2016;209: 1014–1027. doi: 10.1111/nph.13656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.