Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Equine Vet J. 2017 Sep 6;50(2):241–248. doi: 10.1111/evj.12734

Advanced Three-Dimensional Culture of Equine Intestinal Epithelial Stem Cells

A Stieler Stewart 1, J M Freund 1, L M Gonzalez 1,*
PMCID: PMC5796842  NIHMSID: NIHMS898200  PMID: 28792626

Summary

Background

Intestinal epithelial stem cells are critical to epithelial repair following gastrointestinal injury. The culture of intestinal stem cells has quickly become a cornerstone of a vast number of new research endeavours that range from determining tissue viability to testing drug efficacy for humans. This study aims to describe the methods of equine stem cell culture and highlights the future benefits of these techniques for the advancement of equine medicine.

Objectives

To describe the isolation and culture of small intestinal stem cells into three-dimensional (3D) enteroids in horses without clinical gastrointestinal abnormalities.

Study design

Descriptive study.

Methods

Intestinal samples were collected by sharp dissection immediately after euthanasia. Intestinal crypts containing intestinal stem cells were dissociated from the underlying tissue layers, plated in a 3D matrix and supplemented with growth factors. After several days, resultant 3D enteroids were prepared for immunofluorescent imaging and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis to detect and characterise specific cell types present. Intestinal crypts were cryopreserved immediately following collection and viability assessed.

Results

Intestinal crypts were successfully cultured and matured into 3D enteroids containing a lumen and budding structures. Immunofluorescence and PCR were used to confirm the existence of stem cells and all post-mitotic, mature cell types, described to exist in the horse intestinal epithelium. Previously frozen crypts were successfully cultured following a freeze-thaw cycle.

Main limitations

Tissues were all derived from normal horses. Application of this technique for the study of specific disease was not performed at this time.

Conclusions

The successful culture of equine intestinal crypts into 3D “mini-guts” allows for ex vivo studies of the equine intestine. Additionally, these results have relevance to future development of novel therapies that harness the regenerative potential of equine intestine in horses with gastrointestinal disease (colic).

Keywords: horse, stem cell, 3D culture, intestine, enteroid, organoid

Introduction

Colic remains a major cause of morbidity and death in horses. Previous reports concluded that colic seconds old age as the leading cause of death in horses [1]. Death of these patients often results from breakdown of the intestinal mucosal barrier. This barrier is lined by a single layer of columnar cells, responsible for transporting nutrients, protecting the underlying tissues and self-renewal [2]. The small intestinal epithelium is composed of villi that extend into the lumen and are lined by differentiated, post-mitotic cell types, and the crypts of Lieberkühn that contain undifferentiated stem cells interspersed with Paneth cells and partially-differentiated transit amplifying cells [3]. Current literature proposes two populations of intestinal stem cells that co-exist in the crypt base including (1) active crypt base columnar cells and (2) reserve/quiescent stem cells that are activated upon injury and preferentially reside at a position four cells above the crypt base [4,5]. The intestinal stem cells are responsible for creating a new epithelial mucosal lining every 5–7 days and only differentiate into cells of intestinal epithelial lineage, unlike mesenchymal stem cells that can give rise to multiple tissue types [4,6].

Recent discoveries in the field of stem cell biology have demonstrated the growth potential and differentiation of stem cells in culture from murine, porcine and human intestinal epithelium [7,8,9]. These culture systems have been used as models of tissue morphogenesis, stem cell lineage selection, tissue plasticity and bidirectional signaling of stem cells and their niche [10]. Studies utilising these cultures to determine the impact of injury and regenerative response of stem cells remain limited. Understanding stem cell dynamics as well as inter- and intra- cellular interactions is critical in order to harness the regenerative potential of these resident stem cells as novel therapeutic targets to improve outcome in cases of severe colic [11,12,13].

At this time, limited work has been done in the field of equine intestinal stem cell culture [14,15]. The capacity of intestinal stem cells to contribute to mucosal repair make them a key target for researchers.

The objective of the study reported here was to describe the isolation, culture and differentiation of intestinal crypts into 3D enteroids from horses without clinical gastrointestinal abnormalities. Our aim was to successfully grow enteroids in culture and identify and distinguish stem cells, partially differentiated cells, and postmitotic epithelial cells by means of histologic evaluation, immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Materials and Methods

Animals and Sample Collection

Tissues were obtained from 5 healthy horses of various breeds (3 geldings, 2 mares) that were euthanised for reasons unrelated to this study. Horses ranged from 5–14 years of age. Immediately following euthanasia, several 20 cm sections of mid-jejunum were removed through a celiotomy incision and immediately processed as described.

Crypt Isolation, Enteroid Culture and Analysis

The excised jejunum was washed in cold phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS) and opened longitudinally. The intestine was sectioned into smaller squares measuring 1–2 cm in diameter. The layers of the intestine were not separated prior to incubation. Several small pieces of tissue were incubated for 30 min in a 50 ml-conical tube with PBS containing 30 mM Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 10 mM Y-27632a and 1 mM DTTb. The conical tube, in addition to vigorous shaking every 5 min, was kept on ice and on an orbital shaking platform moving at 60 rpm. Tissue pieces were transferred into a 37˚C pre-warmed PBS solution containing 30 mM EDTA and 10 mM Y-27632. The tissue was incubated in this solution at 37˚C for 10 min and shaken vigorously to help mobilise the crypt/villi units. Following this incubation, the tissues were placed in an ice-cold PBS wash containing 1X antibiotic-antimycoticc for 5 min. Tissue was then transferred into additional washes and shaken until crypt/villi units were seen with minimal background debris. Following the final wash, the remnant intestine was removed from the solution and the solution filtered using a 100-micron sterile cell strainerd to remove the villi. A desired crypt yield of approximately 50 crypts/50 μL was determined by examining several 50 μL aliquots at 10X. The crypts were then pelleted in preparation of plating.

The pelleted crypts were re-suspended directly into growth factor reduced Matrigele supplemented with 100 ng/mL recombinant human Nogginf, 500 ng/mL recombinant human R-Sponding, 50 ng/mL recombinant human EGFc, 100 ng/mL recombinant human Wnt3ag, 10 mM Y-27632, 10 mM SB202190b, 500 nM LY2157299a and 2.5 μM glycogen synthase kinase 3 inhibitor (GSK3i, CHIR99021). Between 25–50 crypts were plated in 50 μL of matrigel on a 24 well plated. After allowing the matrix to polymerise for 30 min at 37˚C, each well was overlaid with 500 mL of Advanced DMEM/F12 containing the supplements 1X N-2 supplementc, 1X B-27 supplement minus vitamin Ac, 1X Glutamaxc, 100 mg/mL penicillin/streptomycin and 1 mM Hepes bufferc. Growth factors were added to the media 48 h after plating and subsequent 48 h intervals. The entire volume of media was changed 96 h following plating and every subsequent 96 h interval.

Enteroid plating efficiency was calculated by counting the number of enterospheres or enteroids formed every 24 hours divided by the starting number of crypts plated in each matrigel matrix.

Subculture technique

Passage of enteroids was attempted once the enteroids demonstrated significant budding and growth between 7–10 days post plating. To passage enteroids, the matrigel matrix was first depolymerised nonenzymatically following a PBS rinse in cell recovery solutiond on ice for 30 min. The resultant enteroids and recovery solution were collected and centrifuged at 200–300 G for 5 min. The supernatant was removed, the pellet resuspended in PBS, passed through a 27-gauge needleh and spun down at 200–300 G for 5 min. The pellet was then resuspended in Matrigel and plated as above.

Cryo-preservation of Equine Crypts

To assess freezing as an option for long-term storage, freshly isolated equine jejunal crypts were suspended in 1 ml freeze- preservation medium consisting of 10% dimethylsulfoxide in 1X DMEM/F12 culture medium with no growth factors and were frozen slowly over 12–18 hours using a cryo freezing containeri placed in a −80˚C freezer. This method is designed to achieve a rate of cooling close to −1°C/minute, the optimal rate for cell preservation. Following removal from the −80˚C freezer, the tubes were stored in liquid nitrogen. To thaw, cryopreservation tubes were obtained from liquid nitrogen storage and warmed in a 37˚C water bath. The tubes were centrifuged to pellet the crypts at 200–300 G for 5 minutes. The freezing media was removed and the crypt pellet was resuspended in cooled matrigel and plated as above on a 24 well plate.

Enteroid Immunofluorescence Analyses

Fixed sections

Crypts were plated onto a polystyrene plate with transwell insertd and removed from the incubator at 7 days of development. Enteroids were fixed overnight in formalin. The transwell filter and matrigel plug were removed from the plate insert, covered in agarose, embedded in paraffin and sectioned (~5–8 μm thickness). Deparaffinisation was performed using a modified protocol with xylene, ethanol and peroxidase. Heat induced epitope retrieval was performed when necessary by heating in reveal decloaker solutionj to 120°C for 30 s and then 90°C for 10 s inside a pressure cookerk. Slides were allowed to cool to room temperature for 20 min prior to staining. Enteroids were permeabilised in a 0.3% Triton X-100 PBS solution for 20 min and then blocked in protein block solutionk for 30 min. Primary antibodies labeling individual cell types were applied at concentrations previously published [16], and incubated overnight at 4°C. Additional primary antibodies included anti-Lysozyme and anti-Ki67 for Paneth cells and proliferating cell populations, respectively. All secondary staining was performed with Cy3, Alexa488 and Alexa 647 conjugated antibodies diluted 1:500 in antibody diluentk incubated at room temperature for 45 min. Nuclei were marked with bisbenzamide Hoechst 33258 nuclear stainb diluted 1:1000 in PBS and applied for 5 min at room temperature.

Background staining was negligible as determined by nonspecific IgG staining. Images were captured on an inverted fluorescence microscopel fitted with a monochrome digital cameram and colour cameran. The objective lenses used were X10, X20 and X40 with numerical apertures of 0.3, 0.45 and 0.6, respectively.

Whole Mount Staining

After culturing, the enteroids were removed from the incubator at 5–7 days of development. The enteroids were whole mounted and stained using a modified protocol from StemCell Technologiesp. Briefly, the stem cell media was gently aspirated. Following a wash in room temperature PBS, enteroids were fixed in the Matrigel using room temperature 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Following two washes in PBS, 0.1% Triton X-100 was applied. The enteroids were blocked using 5% BSA. Primary antibody was added and left overnight at 4°C. Dilutions for functional antibodies were increased compared to those previously published and are provided (Table 1). All secondary staining was performed with Cy3 and Alexa488 conjugated antibodiesi diluted 1:250 in antibody diluent incubated for 45 minutes at approximately 21°C. Mounts were counterstained with bisbenzamide Hoechst 33258b nuclear stain (diluted 1:500 in PBS solution).

Table 1.

Functional Antibodies Used

Cell Type Antibody Fixation Dilution

Epithelial EpCAM WM 1:250
B-catenin
Proliferative cell Mouse anti-human Ki67 WM 1:100
PE 1:250
Intestinal epithelial stem cell Rabbit anti-human SOX9 WM 1:500
PE 1:1000
Enteroendocrine cell Rabbit anti-porcine chromogranin A WM 1:500
PE 1:1000
Goblet cell Rabbit anti-human MUC2 PE 1:1000
Paneth cell Rabbit anti-human lysozyme PE 1:500

PE = Paraffin embedded; WM = Whole mount

PCR

The jejunal mucosa was physically separated from seromuscular layers by scraping with a glass slide and was placed in RNAse free microcentrifuge tubes and immediately placed in liquid nitrogen. Enteroids grown in matrigel were collected using Cell Recovery solution. Enteroids were collected into an RNAse free microtube and placed in liquid nitrogen. Jejunal scrapings and enteroids were then stored at −80°C until use. Total RNA from jejunal tissue and enteroids was extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy Minikitq. Yield and quality of the extracts were determined by measuring absorbance at 260 and 280 nmr. The ratio of absorbance at 260:280 was between 2.02 and 2.09. 1 μg of RNA was converted to cDNA using the iScript cDNA synthesis kits and pooled. The cycle conditions were 5 min at 25°C, cDNA synthesis at 42°C for 30 min, denaturation at 85°C for 5 min and held at 4°C. Primers were designed based on published sequences of horse target genes either manually or using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) online primer design toolt. Specific target sequences, cell type and expected product sizes are provided (Table 2). The specificity of the primers was checked using the NCBI online Blast toolv. RT-PCR was performed utilising the iTaq Universal SYBR green Supermixs. The StepOnePlus real time PCR systemc was used. Cycle parameters included polymerase activation and DNA denaturation at 95°C for 30 s. Forty cycles of amplification were performed with a 15 s denaturation at 95°C and annealing/extension and plate read for 60 s at 60°C. The melting curve analysis was performed at 65°C –95°C at 0.5°C increments, 5 s per step. Melting curves were checked to ensure consistent amplification of a single PCR product. Primer efficiency was calculated using the equation, Efficiency = 10^ (−1/slope) –1. Only primers with greater than 92% efficiency were considered acceptable. All primers were first validated using cDNA derived from normal equine jejunal samples.

Table 2.

PCR Primer Sequences.

Target Forward (5′-3′) Reverse (5′-3′) Product Size (bp)
Active Stem Cell
SOX9 AACAAGCCTCACGTCAAGCG TCCGCCTCCTCCACGAAA 176
LGR5 AGCCTGGTGGTTCTGCATCT AACGCTTTCTCGGGGATCAG 200
Reserve Stem Cell
HOPX AGTGGCGGCGGTCGGAA ACAGTGGCACATACAACACT 167
LRIG GGCTGACACAACTGGACCTC TGGTGCCCGAAATGTCGTTA 477
Epithelial Cell
EPCAM TGACCACAAACTGCTCTGTGA AGCCCGTCGTTATTCTGGAT 180
Absorptive Enterocytes
SIM GCAATACTGGGGGAAGCAGT CAGATCCAGCAAAAGTTGACC 137
Goblet Cell
MUC2 AGGACCTGAAGAAGTGCGTC AGTTGAGAATCTTTCCTTCCTC 165
Enteroendocrine Cell
CGA CTGCGAGGAGATGAACGGAT AGAACCTCTGCGAGTTCGTC 143
Paneth cells
LYZ CCTGGTCAGCCTAGAGGTCT TGGCCAAACAGACCCAGTTT 186
Proliferating cells
PCNA CATGGACTCGTCCCACGTC CTTCAGCCCTTAGGGTAATG 164
Housekeeping Gene
B-ACTIN CTGTGGCATCCACGAAACTA GACAATGAGGCCAGAATGGA 237

Target Validation by Sequencing

RT-PCR amplicons were analysed on a 1.5% Agarose TE gel to assess size. Samples were sequencedu and the sequences were aligned to the gene target using the NCBI online Blast toolt and MacVector alignment programv for validation.

Results

In vitro culture of equine crypts

Using a modified 3D culture environment similar to the culture conditions that support growth of porcine and mouse enteroids [7,9,17], within 24 hours of plating, equine crypts isolated from jejunal tissue formed enterospheres, a spherical structure with a clearly defined basement membrane and lumen and with an average diameter of 97.85 ± 18.43 μm (Fig 1A and B). Following two days of culture these structures began to bud. These structures persist, enlarge and by day 3 begin to convert into enteroids, more complex three dimensional structures with a clearly defined lumen, columnar epithelial cells and primitive crypt buds, and measure an average of 199.3 ± 49.68 μm in diameter (Fig 1C). Within 5 days, enteroids appear as large complex structures with multiple well defined crypt buds and an average diameter of 340.1 ± 122.2 μm (Fig 1D; Supplementary Item 1). Mean plating efficiency was 59.08 ± 25.07% (Supplementary Item 2).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

In vitro culture of equine crypts. The in vitro isolation, growth and maintenance of enteroids derived from equine intestinal crypts are shown. On day of collection (Day 0, panel A), crypts maintain their morphological appearance. Enterospheres first develop (Day 1, panel B) and progressively enlarge to form complex structures with a pseudolumen and crypt like structures (Day 3, panel C; Day 5, panel D). Scale Bar 100 μm.

Subculture of equine crypts

Enteroids were successfully passaged using a 27-gauge needle, replated and formed large budding structures by culture day 5. However, despite effectively disrupting and re-plating the enteroids into single cells and small buds, expansion of the original population was minimal. A modification of the technique was therefore attempted without passage through a needle. Following centrifugation and removal of the cell recovery solution, the pellet was alternatively resuspended aggressively in the matrigel prior to re-plating. This modification resulted in an effective expansion of the original cell population with larger spheroid structures and budding noted in addition to small, single spheroids.

Cryo-preservation of equine crypts

Equine crypts that were frozen in liquid nitrogen for a range of 3 weeks to 4 months were successfully thawed and cultured as above in enteroid medium. Accurate enteroid counts were difficult to obtain as many of the plated crypts were fragmented at the time of plating resulting in increased background debris. Enterosphere formation was delayed 24–48 hours after a freeze-thaw cycle compared with untreated control crypt cultures but large budding enteroid structures were observed by culture day 7 (not shown).

Detection of intestinal stem cells, cellular proliferation and specific epithelial cell types by immunofluorescence

Assessment of cellular proliferation is essential for monitoring normal regenerative responses as well as those following injury. The protein Ki67 is a cellular marker for proliferation and is present in all stages of the cell cycle except rest (G0) [18]. Within the enteroids, intestinal stem cells and a sub-population of transit amplifying cells were identified using antibodies against sex-determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9) [19,20] and KI67, respectively (Fig 2). Cells positive for both SOX9 and KI67 were found (colocalisation) indicating cells in a state of active proliferation or early stages of differentiation. Immunostaining for homeobox protein (HOPX), a marker for reserve stem cell populations in other species [9,21] was not detected. Additionally, antibodies for the stem cell biomarkers leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains 1 (LRIG1) [22] and leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 5 (LGR5) [23] did not cross react with the equine proteins and were not detected (data not shown).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Markers to identify proliferating cell populations. Identification of intestinal stem and transit amplifying cells in equine enteroids are shown. Immunostaining for SOX9 (red, panel A and C), a transcription factor that is primarily expressed in active intestinal stem cells and transit-amplifying progenitor cells is localised to the nuclei of cells along the primitive enteroid buds. Colocalisation with a general marker of proliferation (Ki67+, green, panel B and C) is also seen. Digital magnification demonstrating colocalisation (yellow) of SOX9 (red) and Ki67 (green) is provided. Nuclei, blue (panel D). Insert scale bar 20 μm.

Epithelial cells and post-mitotic cell types were also identified through immunofluorescent antibody staining. The baso-lateral borders of all epithelial cells were positive for β-catenin expression (Fig 3B). Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), a pan-epithelial transmembrane protein [24], demonstrated expression along the membrane of epithelial cells (Fig 3A). Secretory enteroendocrine cells were identified by immunofluorescence labeling of chromogranin A (CgA) [25] within the cytoplasm of a small number of cells distributed throughout the enteroid sections (Fig 4A). Expression of cytoplasmic mucin (MUC2) [26] was detected within goblet cells and the lumen of the developing enteroid (Fig 4B) and positive immunostaining for lysozyme (Lyz) was observed, indicating the presence of Paneth cells [27] (Fig 4C).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Detection of epithelial cells. Immunostaining for EpCAM, a pan-epithelial transmembrane protein marker is seen within the centre of an equine enteroid that was whole mounted (panel A). Immunostaining for β-catenin, a membrane-bound protein, is evident on the cellular border of a sectioned enteroid (panel B). Nuclei, blue. Scale bar 20 μm.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Markers to identify cell lineages within in vitro cultures. The existence of differentiated, post-mitotic cell lineages was confirmed using biomarkers for identification: anti-CgA (enteroendocrine, panel A), anti-MUC2 (goblet, panel B) and anti-lysozyme (paneth, panel C) antibodies. All specific markers shown in red. Digital magnification of each image provided in the insert. Nuclei, blue. Scale bar 20 μm unless noted.

Detection of specific epithelial cell types by PCR

PCR confirmed the expression of intestinal stem cell target genes SOX9, HOPX, LRIG and LGR5, and post-mitotic cell target genes CGA, sucrase isomaltase (SIM, a biomarker of absorptive enterocytes) [28], LYZ and MUC2 within 7-day enteroids (sequences provided in Table 2).

Discussion

In the present study, intestinal crypts containing intestinal stem cells from subjectively normal horse jejunum were successfully cultured, developing into mature, 3D enteroids containing post-mitotic cell types. This is the first report describing the development of equine crypts into complex intestinal “mini-guts” containing stem cells and differentiated, post-mitotic cell types. Mini-gut enteroids or organoids recapitulate the intestinal epithelium seen in vivo with a central lumen and outwardly budding crypt-like structures [29]. A preliminary abstract described successful isolation and plating of equine crypts from small intestine and large colon [14], while recent work confirmed successful growth of equine enteroids from the ileum [15]. Unlike these prior studies, we were able to demonstrate the successful development and maturation of isolated crypts into 3D enteroids along with the cellular characterisation, maintenance, and frozen storage of these cultures.

The results of this study confirmed the existence of intestinal stem cells, partially-differentiated transit-amplifying cells, and post-mitotic cell types within developing enteroids. In normal intestine, intestinal stem cells are localised to the crypt base and differentiate as they move towards the intestinal lumen resulting in progressive loss of SOX9 expression. This was appreciated by immunofluorescent co-localisation results that demonstrated the co-localisation of a general marker of cellular proliferation (Ki67) with SOX9 indicating a cell type of minimal to no differentiation whereas Ki67 staining alone indicates a cell type that is proliferating but has lost its stemness. Several approaches to identify equine epithelial cell types were pursued because of the innate advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Similar to other studies, antibody-based assays alone failed to positively identify all intestinal epithelial cell types [9,16]. The antibodies that were used were commercially derived and raised against proteins in species other than horses. Many cellular biomarkers were conserved between species, as indicated by cross-reactivity of several antibodies with equine proteins in this study. A previous study helped to establish the existence and normal distribution of cell types within the equine small and large intestinal mucosa and the reagents and tools currently available [16]. Successful amplification of known gene cellular biomarkers was further used to characterise and confirm the existence of all known cell types that exist in the equine intestinal epithelium.

The methods described in this paper provide the foundation for future equine in vitro studies focusing on the gastrointestinal tract. Limited work has been performed utilising these techniques in veterinary patients. Successful intestinal organoid growth has been demonstrated in pigs [9,17] and dogs [15,30,31]. There are many benefits to ex vivo intestinal organoid culture in the research setting. These organoids may serve as a model for stem cell behaviour and biology, and can be used as a screening tool to investigate the effects of different drugs, hormones and pathogenic organisms on normal and diseased patient samples [5,32]. Furthermore, the lumen of intestinal organoids is intact, which allows for microinjection and the study of pathogen-epithelial cell interaction [33,34]. Our study was limited in that we did not investigate the functional capacity of the cultured enteroids. Functional assays including the study of tight junction proteins and measurement of transport function, have been described in other species. Future work should focus on these techniques in equine intestinal stem cell culture [35,36,37].

As techniques become more advanced and our understanding of these mini-gut cultures continues to grow, the potential remains for the utilisation of these cells in tissue healing and tissue transplantation. In research conditions, colonic organoids were successfully engrafted into superficially damaged mouse colon following transplant [38]. More recently, human intestinal organoids were successfully transplanted and matured in the kidney capsule of a mouse [39]. Transplanted tissues demonstrated digestive function and responded to circulating humoral factors following ileocecal resection. Three-dimensional organoid cultures have also been successfully grown from a variety of other tissues in the mouse and human including the stomach, liver, pancreas [29] and brain [40]. These advances in the field of stem cell biology demonstrate the range of techniques that can be performed and the future potential of these culture systems to develop novel therapeutic interventions. To date, none of these advances have been investigated in an equine culture model. However, the translational techniques demonstrated in other species will aid in the advancement of equine 3D cell culture. This study provides the first major step toward utilising this technology to advance the field specific to equine medicine as well as provides the foundation for using the horse as a model to study stem-cell driven intestinal regeneration.

Supplementary Material

Supp ItemS1. Supplementary Item 1.

Image of 7 day equine enteroid.

Supp ItemS2. Supplementary Item 2.

Horse information and overall enteroid efficiency.

Acknowledgments

Sources of funding

This work was funded by an NIH Special Emphasis Research Career Award (SERCA, K01OD0199, LMG) as well as the Comparative Medicine and Translational Research Training Program (NIH Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA, 4T32OD011130-09, ASS). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

The authors gratefully acknowledge Shelby Grillo, Madison Voigt and Cecilia Kucera for their assistance in primer design and method validation. We also wish to thank Leandi Kruger for her assistance with sample fixation.

Abbreviations Used

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

HIER

Heat induced epitope retrieval

MUC2

Mucin 2

PCNA

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen

SOX9

Sex determining region Y-box 9

EpCAM

Epithelial adhesion molecule

CGA

Chromogranin A

SIM

Sucrase isomaltase

LYZ

Lysozyme

HOPX

Homeobox protein

LGR5

Leucine rich repeat containing G-protein coupled receptor 5

LRIG1

Leucine rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains 1

EPCAM

Epithelial cell adhesion molecule

Footnotes

a

Selleck Chemicals, Houston, Texas, USA.

b

Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

c

Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, California, USA.

d

Corning Incorporated, Corning, New York, USA.

e

BD Bioscience, San Jose, California, USA.

f

PeproTech, Rocky Hill, New Jersey, USA.

g

R&D Systems Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

h

BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA.

i

Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

j

Biocare Medical, Concord, California, USA.

k

Dako, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA.

l

Olympus IX83, Tokyo, Japan.

m

ORCA-flash 4.0, Hamamatsu, Japan.

n

DP26, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan.

o

LUC Plan FLN, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan.

p

StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

q

Qiagen Inc, Valencia, California, USA.

r

Nanodrop, Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.

s

Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA.

t

PrimerBlast, NCBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

u

GENEWIZ, South Plainfield, New Jersey, USA.

v

Macvector Inc., Apex, North Carolina, USA.

Authors’ declarations of interest

No competing interests have been declared.

Ethical animal research

Procedures were approved by the North Carolina State University Institutional Care and Use Committee. Intestinal samples were obtained with the consent of the owners.

Authorship

L. Gonzalez contributed to the study design, study execution, data analysis and interpretation, preparation of the manuscript and final approval of the manuscript. A. Stewart contributed to the study design, study execution, data analysis and interpretation, preparation of the manuscript and final approval of the manuscript. J. Freund contributed to the study design, execution and final approval of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.USDA APHIS Veterinary Services Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health. Part I: Baseline reference of equine health and management. CO, Fort Collins: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kararli TT. Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1995;16:351–380. doi: 10.1002/bdd.2510160502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cheng H, Leblond CP. Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. V Unitarian Theory of the origin of the four epithelial cell types. Am J Anat. 1974;141:537–561. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001410407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gonzalez LM. The mother of a gut cell: Intestinal epithelial stem cells. Equine Vet Educ. 2015;27:559–560. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leushacke M, Barker N. Ex vivo culture of the intestinal epithelium: strategies and applications. Gut. 2014;63:1345–1354. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sancho E, Batlle E, Clevers H. Live and let die in the intestinal epithelium. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003;15:763–770. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, van de Wetering M, Barker N, Stange DE, van Es JH, Abo A, Kujala P, Peters PJ, Clevers H. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459:262–265. doi: 10.1038/nature07935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sato T, Stange DE, Ferrante M, Vries RG, Van Es JH, Van den Brink S, Van Houdt WJ, Pronk A, Van Gorp J, Siersema PD, Clevers H. Long-term expansion of epithelial organoids from human colon, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and Barrett’s epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1762–1772. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gonzalez LM, Williamson I, Piedrahita JA, Blikslager AT, Magness ST. Cell lineage identification and stem cell culture in a porcine model for the study of intestinal epithelial regeneration. PLoS One. 2013:8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kretzschmar K, Clevers H. Organoids: Modeling Development and the Stem Cell Niche in a Dish. Dev Cell. 2016;38:590–600. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Markel TA, Crisostomo PR, Lahm T, Novotny NM, Rescoria FJ, Tector AJ, Meldrum DR. Stem cells as a potential future treatment of pediatric intestinal disorders. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:1953–1963. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Neal MD, Richardson WM, Sodhi CP, Russo AM, Hackam DJ. Intestinal stem cells and their roles during mucosal injury and repair. J Surg Res. 2011;167:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.04.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Quante M, Wang TC. Stem cells in gastroenterology and hepatology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:724–737. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jacobs CC, Southwood LL, Lindborg S. Development of an in-vitro three-dimensional culture system for equine gastrointestinal crypts. Vet Surg. 2013;42:E13. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Powell RH, Behnke MS. WRN conditioned media is sufficient for in vitro propagation of intestinal organoids from large farm and small companion animals. Biol Open. 2017;6:698–705. doi: 10.1242/bio.021717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gonzalez LM, Kinnin LA, Blikslager AT. Characterization of discrete equine intestinal epithelial cell lineages. Am J Vet Res. 2015;76:358–366. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.76.4.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Khalil HA, Lei NY, Brinkley G, Scott A, Wang J, Kar UK, Jabaji ZB, Lewis M, Martin MG, Dunn JC, Stelzner MG. A novel culture system for adult porcine intestinal crypts. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;365:123–134. doi: 10.1007/s00441-016-2367-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol. 2000;182:311–322. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200003)182:3<311::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gracz AD, Ramalingam S, Magness ST. Sox9 expression marks a subset of CD24-expressing small intestine epithelial stem cells that form organoids in vitro. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;298:G590–600. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00470.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Formeister EJ, Sionas AL, Lorance DK, Barkley CL, Lee GH, Magness ST. Distinct SOX9 levels differentially mark stem/progenitor populations and enteroendocrine cells of the small intestine epithelium. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;296:G1108–1118. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00004.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Takeda N, Jain R, LeBoeuf MR, Wang Q, Lu MM, Epstein JA. Interconversion between intestinal stem cell populations in distinct niches. Science. 2011;334:1420–1424. doi: 10.1126/science.1213214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Powell AE, Wang Y, Li Y, Pouline EJ, Means AL, Washington MK, Higginbotham JN, Juchheim A, Prasad N, Levy SE, Guo Y, Shyr Y, Aronow BJ, Haigis KM, Franklin JL, Coffey RJ. The pan-ErbB negative regulator Lrig1 is an intestinal stem cell marker that functions as a tumor suppressor. Cell. 2012;149:146–158. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Barker N, van Es JH, Kuipers J, Kujala P, van den Born M, Cozijnsen M, Haegebarth A, Korving J, Begthel H, Peters PJ, Clevers H. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature. 2007;449:1003–1007. doi: 10.1038/nature06196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Trzpis M, McLaughlin PM, de Leij LM, Harmsen MC. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule: more than a carcinoma marker and adhesion molecule. Am J Pathol. 2007;171:386–395. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Portela-Gomes GM, Stridsberg M, Johansson H, Grimelius L. Complex co-localization of chromogranins and neurohormones in the human gastrointestinal tract. J Histochem Cytochem. 1997;45:815–822. doi: 10.1177/002215549704500606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Johansson ME, Sjovall H, Hansson GC. The gastrointestinal mucus system in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:352–361. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Farin HF, Van Es JH, Clevers H. Redundant sources of Wnt regulate intestinal stem cells and promote formation of Paneth cells. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:1518–1529. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rodriguez IR, Taravel FR, Whelan WJ. Characterization and function of pig intestinal sucrase-isomaltase and its separate subunits. Eur J Biochem. 1984;143:575–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1984.tb08408.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Date S, Sato T. Mini-gut organoids: reconstitution of the stem cell niche. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2015;31:269–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Agopian VG, Chen DC, Avansino JR, Stelzner M. Intestinal stem cell organoid transplantation generates neomucosa in dogs. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:971–982. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0806-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meneses AMC, Schneeberger K, Kruitwagen HS, Penning L, van Steenbeek F, Burgener I, Spee B. Intestinal Organoids—Current and Future Applications. Veterinary Sciences. 2016:3. doi: 10.3390/vetsci3040031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dedhia PH, Bertaux-Skeirik N, Zavros Y, Spence JR. Organoid Models of Human Gastrointestinal Development and Disease. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1098–1112. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.12.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wilson SS, Tocchi A, Holly MK, Parks WC, Smith JG. A small intestinal organoid model of non-invasive enteric pathogen-epithelial cell interactions. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8:352–361. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nigro G, Hanson M, Fevre C, Lecuit M, Sansonetti PJ. Intestinal Organoids as a Novel Tool to Study Microbes-Epithelium Interactions. Methods Mol Biol. 2016 doi: 10.1007/7651_2016_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang YG, Wu S, Xia Y, Sun J. Salmonella-infected crypt-derived intestinal organoid culture system for host-bacterial interactions. Physiol Rep. 2014:2. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zachos NC, Kovbasnjuk O, Foulke-Abel J, In J, Blutt SE, de Jonge HR, Estes MK, Donowitz M. Human Enteroids/Colonoids and Intestinal Organoids Functionally Recapitulate Normal Intestinal Physiology and Pathophysiology. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:3759–3766. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R114.635995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kovbasnjuk O, Zachos NC, In J, Blutt SE, de Jonge HR, Estes MK, Donowitz M. Human enteroids: preclinical models of non-inflammatory diarrhea. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013;4(Suppl 1):S3. doi: 10.1186/scrt364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yui S, Nakamura T, Sato T, Nemoto Y, Mizutani T, Zheng X, Ichinose S, Nagaishi T, Okamoto R, Tsuchiya K, Clevers H, Watanabe M. Functional engraftment of colon epithelium expanded in vitro from a single adult Lgr5(+) stem cell. Nat Med. 2012;18:618–623. doi: 10.1038/nm.2695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Watson CL, Mahe MM, Munera J, Howell JC, Sundaram N, Poling HM, Schwitzer JI, Vallance JE, Mayhew CN, Sun Y, Grabowski G, Finkbeiner SR, Spence JR, Shroyer NF, Wells JM, Helmrath MA. An in vivo model of human small intestine using pluripotent stem cells. Nat Med. 2014;20:1310–1314. doi: 10.1038/nm.3737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yin X, Mead BE, Safaee H, Langer R, Karp JM, Levy O. Engineering Stem Cell Organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp ItemS1. Supplementary Item 1.

Image of 7 day equine enteroid.

Supp ItemS2. Supplementary Item 2.

Horse information and overall enteroid efficiency.

RESOURCES