Skip to main content
BMC Cancer logoLink to BMC Cancer
. 2018 Feb 6;18:149. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4061-y

Contrasting roles of H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 in regulation of apoptosis and gemcitabine resistance in human pancreatic cancer cells

Chunwan Lu 1,2,3,, Dafeng Yang 1,2,3, Maria E Sabbatini 4, Aaron H Colby 5,6, Mark W Grinstaff 6, Nicholas H Oberlies 7, Cedric Pearce 8, Kebin Liu 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC5801751  PMID: 29409480

Abstract

Background

Pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has the most dismal prognosis among all human cancers since it is highly resistant to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy. The anticipated consequence of all therapies is induction of tumor apoptosis. The highly resistance nature of PDACs to all therapies suggests that the intrinsic tumor cell factors, likely the deregulated apoptosis pathway, are key mechanisms underlying PDAC non-response to these therapies, rather than the therapeutic agents themselves. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that epigenetic dysregulation of apoptosis mediators underlies PDAC resistance to gemcitabine, the standard chemotherapy for human PDAC.

Methods

PDAC cells were analyzed for apoptosis sensitivity in the presence of a selective epigenetic inhibitor. The epigenetic regulation of apoptosis regulators was determined by Western Blotting and quantitative PCR. The specific epigenetic modification of apoptosis regulator promoter chromatin was determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation in PDAC cells.

Results

Inhibition of histone methyltransferase (HMTase) by a selective HMTase inhibitor, verticillin A, significantly increased human PDAC cell sensitivity to gemcitabine-induced growth suppression. Verticillin A treatment decreased FLIP, Mcl-1, Bcl-x and increased Bak, Bax and Bim protein level in the tumor cells, resulting in activation of caspases, elevated cytochrome C release and increased apoptosis as determined by upregulated PARP cleavage in tumor cells. Analysis of human PDAC specimens indicated that the expression levels of anti-apoptotic mediators Bcl-x, Mcl-1, and FLIP were significantly higher, whereas the expression levels of pro-apoptotic mediators Bim, Bak and Bax were dramatically lower in human PDAC tissues as compared to normal pancreas. Verticillin A downregulated H3K4me3 levels at the BCL2L1, CFLAR and MCL-1 promoter to decrease Bcl-x, FLIP and Mcl-1 expression level, and inhibited H3K9me3 levels at the BAK1, BAX and BCL2L11 promoter to upregulate Bak, Bax and Bim expression level.

Conclusion

We determined that PDAC cells use H3K4me3 to activate Bcl-x, FLIP and Mcl-1, and H3K9me3 to silence Bak, Bax and Bim to acquire an apoptosis-resistant phenotype. Therefore, selective inhibition of H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 is potentially an effective approach to overcome PDAC cells resistance to gemcitabine.

Keywords: H3K9me3, H3K4me3, Gemcitabine, Chemoresistance, Apoptosis

Background

Pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most aggressive malignancy with the most dismal prognosis among all human cancers. The overall 5-year survival rate of PDAC patients is only 6%, and the median survival time for PDAC patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease, which accounts for over 80% of all human PDAC cases, is about 6–10 months [1]. A major cause of this poor prognosis is lack of effective therapies as PDAC is highly resistant to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy [24]. Gemcitabine has been, for years, the standard therapy for PDAC patients. However, gemcitabine only increases the survival rate of PDAC patients with advanced disease by a median duration of 5 weeks suggesting that human PDAC cells are either intrinsically resistant or acquire resistance to gemcitabine [1, 5].

The host immune system plays an important role in pancreatic cancer growth control and progression [4, 68]. Cancer immunotherapy has made clinically significant advances in the treatment of human cancers in the last few years. In addition to the first FDA-approved immune checkpoint cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor, immune checkpoint programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) blocking antibodies have been also recently approved for treatment of many types of human cancers. Since 2014, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies have been shown to induce objective responses in about 20–30% of cancer patients and many of these responses are durable [9, 10]. However, PDAC stands out as one of the few cancers that do not respond to checkpoint immunotherapy [1015].

The anticipated consequence of all therapies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy, is induction of tumor apoptosis. The highly resistance nature of PDACs to various therapies suggests that the tumor cell intrinsic factor, likely the deregulated apoptosis pathway, rather than the therapeutic agents themselves, is one of the major mechanisms for the non-responsiveness of PDAC to these therapies. Therefore, identification of the deregulated apoptosis mediators and development of a targeted therapy that acts through a different mechanism of action than the currently existing therapeutic agents will have the potential to suppress PDAC growth or overcome PDAC resistance to current therapies.

It is well-known that genetic alterations [1621] in concert with inflammatory factors in the tumor microenvironment [4, 7, 8] drive pancreatic cancer development. Recent studies, however, have shown that epigenetic changes also promote PDAC through aberrant gene expression patterns [6, 2225]. The methylation of N-terminal lysine residues in histones H3 and H4 plays a fundamental role in the regulation of gene expression through chromatin structure modulation. Histone methyltransferases (HMTase) catalyze the methylation of histones to modify chromatin structure, thereby influencing gene expression patterns during cellular differentiation and embryonic development [26]. Recent studies have shown a critical role of aberrant HMTase expression in human cancers, including PDAC [2226]. Importantly, unlike genetic defects, which are permanent and non-reversible mutations in the DNA primary sequence of the cancer genome, epigenetic alterations, including histone methylation, is a reversible process that has made HMTases attractive as molecular targets for novel cancer therapies [2630]. Furthermore, most of current chemotherapeutic agents target the genetic program of cancer cells. Targeting HMTases may be an effective alternative therapeutic approach for PDACs that are refractory to therapies that target the tumor cell genetic program [3133].

In previous studies, we have developed the novel HMTase inhibitor verticillin A, which selectively inhibits six HMTases and suppresses 5-FU-resistant colon cancer growth [34, 35]. Here, we showed that verticillin A inhibits HMTases to alter H3K9 and H3K4 methylation. Thereby, it regulates the expression of a number of apoptosis regulatory genes, including Mcl-1, FLIP, Bcl-x, Bak, Bax and Bim, effectively sensitizing human PDAC cells to gemcitabine. Our data suggest that targeting HMTase is an effective approach to alter the apoptosis-resistant phenotype of human PDAC and overcome their resistance to chemotherapy.

Methods

Human cancer cells

Human pancreatic cell lines MiaPaCa2 (Cat# CRL-1420), PANC1 (Cat# CRL-1469), CFPAC1 (Cat#CRL-1918) and SW1990 (CRL-2172) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). ATCC has characterized these cells by morphology, immunology, DNA fingerprint, and cytogenetics. De-identified human normal pancreas and pancreatic carcinoma tissues were obtained from Georgia Cancer Center tumor bank. The treatment history of these patients is not available. Normal pancreatic tissues were collected from the adjacent normal tissues of the tumor tissues. All studies with human specimens were carried out according to protocol (933148–1) approved by Augusta University Institutional Review Board.

Cell viability assays

Cell viability assays were performed using the MTT cell proliferation assay kit (ATCC, Manassas, VA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Western blotting analysis

Western blotting analysis was performed as previously described [36]. Cells were collected and lysed in cytosol buffer [10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 250 mM Sucrose, 70 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Calbiochem, Billerica, MA), and 0.01% digitonin] for 10 min. The supernatant was collected as cytosol fraction. The pellet was then resuspended in mitochondria extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10mMMgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP40, and 10% glycerol), incubated on ice for 10 min and centrifuged at 13,000 RPM for 10 min. The supernatant was collected as organelle-enriched mitochondrial fraction. Tumor tissues and normal pancreatic tissues were homogenized in total lysis buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 20 mM NaCl, 1% glycerol, and 1% Triton x-100) with a tissue homogenizer. Cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions and total tissue lysate were resolved in 4–20% SDS polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by Western blotting. Sources of antibodies are: Bax, Mcl-1, FLIP, Bcl-x and cytochrome C: BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA); Bak, Bid, Bim, cleaved Caspase 8, cleaved Caspase 3, cleaved Caspase 9, and cleaved PARP: Cell Signaling Tech (Danvers, MA); H3K9me3 (Abcam, MA); β-actin: Sigma-Aldrich (St Luis, MO). Detailed antibody information is listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Antibodies

Antibody Source Cat number Application
H3K9Me3 Abcam ab8898 WB,ChIP
H3 Cell signaling technology 4499 WB
FLIPL Cell signaling technology 3210 WB
Mcl-1 Santa Cruz sc-819 WB
Bcl-2 BD Biosciences 610539 WB
Bcl-x BD Biosciences 610747 WB
Bax Abcam ab32503 WB
Bid Cell signaling technology 2002 WB
Bak Upstate 6536 WB
Bim Cell signaling technology 2933P WB
CoxIV Cell signaling technology 4844 WB
Cleaved caspase 8 R&D system AF705 WB
Cleaved caspase 9 Cell signaling technology 9501S WB
Cleaved caspase 3 Cell signaling technology 9661S WB
Cleaved PARP Cell signaling technology 9541S WB
Cytochrome C BD Pharmingen 556433 WB
β-actin Sigma A5441 WB
H3K4me3 Cell signaling technology 9751S ChIP

Analysis of H3K9 methylation

Verticilin A was isolated, purified and characterized as previously described [37]. Cells were treated with verticillin A for 2 days and incubated in NETN buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP40, 1.5 mM PMSF, 1.7μg/ml aprotinin, 1mN NaV, 0.5 mM NaF) containing protease inhibitor cocktails (Millipore) for 30 min, centrifuged at 13,000 RPM for 5 min, resuspended the detergent-insoluble pellet in 0.1 M HCl, incubated on ice for 30 min and centrifuge at 13,000 RPM for 10 min. Add 1 M Tris pH 9.0 into the supernatant then do Western Blotting analysis. The blot was probed with antibodies specific for H3K9me3 (Abcam) and anti-H3 (Cell Signaling) which was used as the normalization control.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

ChIP assays were carried out as previously described [6]. Briefly, cells were crosslinked and fixed and the sheared chromatin fragments were immunoprecipitated using anti-H3K9me3 (Abcam) and anti-H3K4me3 antibody (Cell Signaling). The gene-specific promoter DNA was detected by qPCR using promoter DNA-specific primers as listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

PCR primer sequences

BCL-x-F GCACAGCAGCAGTTTGGATGC
BCL-x-B GAGGATGTGGTGGAGCAGAGAAG
MCL-1-F TCCCTTTTCCTTGGACTGGTATC
MCL1–1-B GATGACCTTATGGCTCTGAGATGG
FLIP-F CGAGGCAAGATAAGCAAGGA
FLIP-B CACATGGAACAATTTCCAAGAA
MIM-F TCTGAGTGTGACCGAGAAGGTAGAC
BIM-B CCGATACGCCGCAACTCTTG
BAK-F TACCGCCATCAGCAGGAACAGGAG
BAK-B AAGCCCAGAAGAGCCACCACAC
BAX-F CCCCCGAGAGGTCTTTTTCC
BAX-B ATCCAGCCCAACAGCCGCTC
BIM-ChIP-F GAGGAGGGACGGGGTATTTTG
BIM-ChIP-B TGCTGGGCTCGCAGATAACC
BAX-ChIP-F CCTGCCCGAAACTTCTAAAAATGG
BAX-ChIP-B CCAATGAGCATCTCCCGATAAG
BAK1-ChIP-F CCCCAATGCGACTACAGAACTG
BAK1-ChIP-B AGGCAGGAGAATCCCTTGAACC
MCL1-ChIP-F AACTTCCCCGTCCTCTTCCTTC
MCL-ChIP-B TTCTCGTGGCTACCTCTGTGCTTC
FLIP-ChIP-F CCGACGAGTCTCAACTAAAAGGG
FLIP-ChIP-B AAAGAAACCGAAAGCCTGGAAG
BCL-x-ChIP-F CTCTCCCGACCTGTGATACAAAAG
BCL-x-ChIP-B CACCTACATTCAAATCCGCCTTAG

Gene expression analysis

Normal human pancreas tissues and human pancreatic tumor tissues were homogenized using a tissue homogenizer in Trizol (Life Technologies) to isolate total RNA. cDNA was synthesized from total RNA and used for analysis of gene expression using gene-specific primers (Table 2) in the StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). β-actin was used as an internal control.

Results

Inhibition of HMTase suppresses human PDAC cell growth

Verticillin A selectively inhibits SUV39H1, SUV39H2, G9a, GLP, NSD2 and MLL1 [35]. These HMTases catalyze the methylation of H3K4 and H3K9 [3840] and it is known that methylated H3K4 and H3K9 regulate PDAC progression [24, 26]. We therefore reasoned that verticillin A might be effective in suppression of human PDAC cell growth. To test this hypothesis, human PDAC cell lines MiaPaCa2, CFPAC1, SW1990 and PANC-1 were cultured in the presence of various concentrations of verticillin A (0–200 nM) for up to 3 days. Tumor cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Verticillin A exhibited potent inhibitory activity to suppress all four PDAC cell lines in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the inhibitory level increased with the time of treatment with verticillin A. A three-day treatment completely killed MiaPaCa2 and PANC-1 cells in vitro (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Verticillin A inhibits PDAC cell growth alone. Human PDAC cells were cultured in the presence of various concentrations of verticillin A as indicated. Cell growth was monitored by MTT assay at days 1, 2 and 3. The cell viability of untreated cells were set at 100% and used as reference for the viability of the treated cells

Inhibition of HMTase overcomes human PDAC resistance to gemcitabine

Most human PDAC cells are intrinsically resistant to chemotherapeutic agents, such as gemcitabine. Indeed, both MiaPaCa2 and PANC-1 cells exhibit minimal sensitivity to gemcitabine at concentrations as high as 10 μg/ml in vitro (Fig. 2). Our above observations indicate that verticillin A has potent inhibitory activity against human PDAC cells (Fig. 1). However, verticillin A targets six HMTases and therefore is potentially toxic at high dose in vivo [34]. We therefore sought to test the hypothesis that a sublethal dose of verticillin A is effective in overcoming human PDAC resistance to gemcitabine. We treated human PDAC cells with verticillin A at 20 nM and various concentrations of gemcitabine and analyzed tumor cell viability. Although both MiaPaCa2 and PANC1 cells were highly resistant to gemcitabine, a sublethal concentration of verticillin A significantly increased the sensitivity of both tumor cell lines to gemcitabine (Fig. 2). We therefore conclude that a sublethal dose of verticillin A is effective in overcoming human PDAC cell resistance to gemcitabine.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Verticillin A overcomes human pancreatic cell resistance to gemcitabine. MiaPaCa2 and PANC1 cells were cultured in the presence of gemcitabine alone at the indicated concentrations, or in the presence of verticillin A (20 nM) and gemcitabine at the indicated concentrations for 1 day. Cell viability was determined by MTT assay. The cell viability of the control cells (0 μg/ml gembicine) of both the gemcitabine treatment group and the combined gemcitabine and verticillin A (20 nM) were arbitrarily set as 100%. *p < 0.1,**p < 0.01

Epigenetic regulation of apoptosis regulatory genes

HMTase-mediated methylation of H3K4 and H3K9 modulates chromatin structures to play an essential role in gene expression [26]. The above observations that verticillin A effectively suppressed human PDAC cell growth and sensitized the tumor cells to gemcitabine-induced cell growth inhibition suggest that verticillin A may act through regulating the expression of apoptosis regulatory genes. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the protein levels of the known apoptosis regulatory genes. Western blotting analysis of cytosol and mitochondrial fractions indicated that treatment with verticillin A altered the level of a number of apoptosis regulatory proteins. The pro-apoptotic proteins Bak, Bax and Bim increased, whereas the anti-apoptotic proteins FLIP, Mcl-1 and Bcl-x decreased in the treated cells (Fig. 3a & b). These observations suggested that multiple apoptosis regulatory genes are regulated by HMTase-mediated H3K4 and H3K9 methylation.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Verticillin A alters the expression levels of a panel of apoptosis regulators. a MiaPaCa2 and PANC1 cells were treated with verticillin A at the indicated concentrations for 2 days. Cytosol and mitochondrial fractions were prepared and resolved in 4–20% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and then analyzed by Western blotting analysis using antibodies for the indicated proteins. β-actin is used as normalization control for the cytosol fractions. CoxIV is used as normalization control for the mitochondrial fractions. Western blots were cropped to improve the conciseness of the results. Gels were run and blotted under the same experimental conditions. Blots from different gels are separated by white space. b The protein band intensities were quantified using NIH image J. The cytosol protein levels were normalized as the ratio over the intensity of β-actin. The mitochondria protein levels were normalized as the ratio over the intensity of CoxIV. Column: mean; Bar: SD

Verticillin A promotes human PDAC cell apoptosis through the intrinsic apoptosis pathway

To determine whether the altered apoptosis regulatory protein levels are translated into activation of apoptosis signaling pathway, we then analyzed caspase activation. Western blotting analysis of cytosol fractions indicated that treatment with verticillin A increased the activation of caspases 8, 9 and 3 as indicated by upregulated cleavage of the pro-caspases in both MiaPaCa2 and PANC1 cells. Increased caspase activation was accompanied by elevated cytochrome C release and cleaved PARP (Fig. 4a & b). Therefore, we conclude that inhibition of HMTases alters the expression levels of a set of apoptosis regulatory genes to activate the intrinsic apoptosis pathways.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Induction of intrinsic apoptosis. a MiaPaCa2 and PANC1 cells were treated with verticillin A (100 nM) for the indicated time. Cytosol fractions were analyzed by Western blotting for the indicated proteins. β-actin was used as normalization control. The protein band intensities were quantified using NIH image J and normalized as the ratio over the intensity of β-actin. Column: mean; Bar: SD. b PANC1 cells were treated with verticillin A (100 nM) for the indicated time. Cytosol fractions were analyzed by Western blotting for the indicated proteins. c-Caspase stands for cleaved-Caspase. β-actin was used as normalization control. The protein band intensities were quantified using NIH image J and normalized as the ratio over the intensity of β-actin. Column: mean; Bar: SD

Verticillin A inhibits H3K9 trimethylation

Two of verticillin A targets are SUV39H1 and SUV39H2 [35], which has redundant functions in H3K9 trimethylation [3840]. We next sought to determine whether verticillin A inhibits H3K9me3 in human PDAC cells. MiaPaCa2 and PANC1 cells were cultured in the presence of verticillin A for 2 days and analyzed for H3K9me3 level. Western blotting analysis indicated that treatment with verticillin A decreased H3K9me3 level in a dose-dependent manner in both tumor cell lines (Fig. 5a). Therefore, verticillin A functions in apoptosis regulation and PDAC cell growth suppression at least in part through inhibition of H3K9me3. Based on our previous observation, verticillin A does not alter the global level of H3K4me3 in MiaPaCa2 cells. However, it significantly reduces the H3K4me3 level on cd274 promotor region in mouse pancreatic tumor cells [6].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Dysregulation of apoptosis regulatory mediators in human PDAC. a MiaPaCa2 and PANC1 cells were treated with verticillin A at the indicated concentrations for 2 days. Acid extraction was prepared from the cells and analyzed by Western blotting with the antibodies specific for the indicated methylated histones. The protein band intensities were quantified using NIH image J and shown at the right panel. The H3K9me3 protein level was normalized as the ratio over the intensity of Η3. b RNA was extracted from human pancreatic tumor tissues and adjacent normal pancreas tissues. The mRNA levels of the indicated genes were analyzed by qPCR using gene-specific primer with β-actin as internal control. c Total protein was prepared from human pancreatic tumor tissues (patients T1 and T2) and adjacent normal pancreas tissues (N1: adjacent normal tissue from patient T1; N2: adjacent normal tissues from patient T2), and then analyzed by Western blotting analysis using antibodies for the indicated proteins. The protein band intensities were quantified using NIH image J and normalized as the ratio over the intensity of β-actin. Column: mean; Bar: SD

Apoptosis regulatory mediator profiles in human PDAC

The above data demonstrate that human PDACs are highly resistant to gemcitabine and that the HMTase inhibitor verticillin A modulates the expression of a panel of apoptosis regulatory mediators to promote PDAC apoptosis to suppress tumor cell growth. These observations suggest that dysregulation of apoptosis regulatory mediators might be a major mechanism of PDAC chemoresistance. We next analyzed the mRNA level of the six apoptosis mediators whose expression is regulated by an epigenetic mechanism. RNAs were extracted from normal human pancreas tissues and PDAC specimens and used for analysis of gene expression. qPCR analysis indicated that the expression levels of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-x, Mcl-1 and FLIP were significantly higher in PDAC tumor tissues than in the normal pancreas tissues. In contrast, the expression levels of pro-apoptotic proteins Bak, Bim and Bax were significantly lower in the PDAC tumor tissues than in the normal pancreas tissues (Fig. 5b). The Bcl-x, Mcl-1, FLIP, Bim, Bak and Bax protein levels were then analyzed by Western blotting (Fig. 5c). Bcl-xL level is significantly higher in the tumor tissues than in normal tissues. Mcl-1 and FLIP proteins were undetectable in normal pancreas tissues but detected in the pancreatic tumor tissues (Fig. 5c). Bax protein level is significantly lower in the pancreatic tumor tissues as compared to normal pancreas tissue (Fig. 5c). These observations suggested that dysregulated expression of a panel of apoptosis regulatory mediators exists in human PDACs, which leads to the block of apoptosis.

H3K9me3 directly silences Bak, Bax and Bim expression and H3K4me3 directly activates Bclx, Mcl-1 and FLIP expression

H3K9me3 is often associated with a transcriptionally repressive chromatin structure to silence gene expression. The observation that Bak, Bax and Bim expression levels are lower in PDAC cells and verticillin A increases Bak, Bax and Bim expression levels suggested that they might be silenced by H3K9me3. To test this hypothesis, we use ChIP assay to analyze the H3K9me3 level at the BAK1, BAX and BCL2L11 (gene that encodes for Bim) promoter region. Analysis of immunoprecipitated genomic DNA by H3K9me3-specific antibody indicated that verticillin A indeed decreased H3K9me3 level at BAK1, BAX and BCL2L11 promoter region in human PDAC cells (Fig. 6a). In contrast, H3K4me3 is often associated with a transcriptionally active chromatin structure to activate gene expression. The observation that Bcl-x, Mcl-1 and FLIP expression levels are higher in PDAC cells and verticillin A decreases their expression level suggested that they might be activated by H3K4me3. We again used ChIP assay to analyze the H3K4me3 level at the BCL2L1 (gene that encodes for Bcl-x), MCL-1 and CFLAR (gene that encodes for FLIP) promoter region. Analysis of immunoprecipitated genomic DNA by H3K4me3-specific antibody indicated that verticillin A indeed decreased H3K4me3 level at BCL2L1, MCL-1 and CFLAR promoter region in human PDAC cells (Fig. 6b). Taken together, our data determined that dysregulation of a panel of apoptosis regulatory genes by an epigenetic mechanism underlies PDAC chemoresistance and targeting HMTases is an effective means of overcoming human PDAC resistance to gemcitabine.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Epigenetic regulation of apoptosis regulatory genes in PDAC cells. a MiaPaCa2 cells were crosslinked and subjected to ChIP using H3K9me3-specific antibodies. The levels of H3K9me3-bound genomic DNA were then quantified by qPCR using primers within the − 1000 to + 1000 region relative to the BAK, BAX and BCL2L11 (Bim) promotor regions. The ChIP PCR-amplified DNA regions at BAK, BAX and BCL2L11 promoter are shown at the top panel. Input genomic DNA was used as internal controls. Column:mean; Bar:SD. b Miapaca2 cells were crosslinked and subjected to ChIP using H3K4me3-specific antibodies. The levels of H3K4me3-bound genomic DNA were then quantified by qPCR using primers within the − 1000 to + 1000 region relative to the BCL2L1 (Bcl-x), CFLAR (FLIP) and MCL1 promotor regions. The ChIP PCR-amplified DNA regions at BCL2L1, CFLAR and MCL1 promoter are shown at the top panel. Input genomic DNA was used as internal controls

Discussion

Gemcitabine is a nucleotide analog that is rapidly metabolized to the active triphosphate form of gemcitabine (2′, 2′-difluoro-2′-deoxycytidine triphosphate, or dFdCTP) once inside the cells. dFdCTP is then incorporated into DNA to stop DNA synthesis by a process known as masked chain termination [41, 42]. Although many cellular responses to dFdCTP incorporation are known, the downstream pathways leading to tumor cell death are largely unknown [43]. However, it has been well-documented that gemcitabine activates caspase-dependent apoptosis signaling pathways in tumor cells [5, 43]. Gemcitabine has been the standard adjuvant therapy for PDAC for the last two decades, but tumor cells are either intrinsically resistant to gemcitabine or develop acquired resistance to gemcitabine within weeks of chemotherapy initiation [1, 5, 21]. To overcome PDAC resistance to gemcitabine, nabpaclitaxel, and the folic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) have been combined with gemcitabine and this combined protocol has shown some improvement in efficacy and survival time compared to gemcitabine alone. Unfortunately, the disease still rapidly advances [1, 5, 25]. Furthermore, although targeted therapies, either alone or in combination with gemcitabine, generate responsiveness in some PDAC patients, the majority of PDAC patients do not respond to targeted therapies or rapidly acquire resistance during therapy [44]. In this study, we observed that the HMTase inhibitor verticillin A dramatically suppresses human PDAC growth. More interestingly, a sublethal dose of verticillin A effectively overcame human PDAC cell resistance to gemcitabine. Verticillin A is a selective HMTase inhibitor that inhibits SUV39H1, SUV39H2, G9a, GLP, NSD2 and MLL1 [35]. These observations suggest that human PDAC cells use deregulation of HMTase to acquire a chemoresistant phenotype.

Verticillin A inhibits PDAC growth at least in part through activating the intrinsic apoptosis pathway as it alters the levels of a panel of apoptosis regulatory genes, mainly the pro-apoptotic Bak, Bax and Bim and the anti-apoptotic Bcl-x, Mcl-1 and FLIP, in human PDAC cells. All these six apoptosis regulatory genes are known to be involved in PDAC growth and progression [4549]. Analysis of PDAC tissues from human patients revealed that Bak, Bax and Bim are significantly down-regulated, whereas Bcl-x, FLIP and Mcl-1 are notably up-regulated as compared to normal human pancreas tissues. Therefore, it seems that human PDAC cells deregulate multiple apoptosis regulators to confer an apoptosis-resistant phenotype, which may explain the potency of verticillin A in inhibition of PDAC cell growth and in sensitization of tumor cells to gemcitabine-induced growth suppression since it targets all these deregulated genes in the tumor cells. Various inhibitors that selectively target individual apoptosis regulators have been developed and tested in suppression of PDAC growth and progression and show efficacy [4549]. In light of the observations that multiple apoptosis mediators are deregulated in human PDAC and that the HMTase inhibitor verticillin A simultaneously targets these deregulated apoptosis regulators, it seems that an epigenetic HMTase inhibitors may have an advantage over these selective agents targeting a single apoptosis regulator.

SUV39H1 and SUV39H2 catalyze H3K9me3 [50]. G9a and GLP form a complex to catalyze H3K9Me1 and H3K9Me2 [51]. NSD2 mediates H3K36Me2 [52], and MLL1 catalyzes H3K4me3 [53]. H3K9me3 is often associated with a transcriptionally repressive chromatin and H3K4me3 is often linked to a transcriptionally active chromatin. Consistent with their functions in gene transcription regulation, we observed that verticillin A inhibited H3K9me3 at the BAK1, BAX and BCL2L11 promoter chromatin, and H3K4me3 at the BCL2L1, CFLAR and MCL-1 promoter chromatin in human PDAC cells. Furthermore, inhibition of H3K9me3 resulted in elevated Bak, Bax and Bim expression level and inhibition of H3K4me3 led to decreased Bcl-x, FLIP and Mcl-1 expression levels in the tumor cells. These observations suggest that PDAC cells use H3K4me3 to increase Bcl-x, FLIP and Mcl-1 expression while using H3K9me3 to silence Bak, Bax and Bim expression, which results in an overall stable apoptosis-resistant phenotype that confers PDAC cell resistance to gemcitabine.

Conclusions

We determined that a panel of apoptosis regulators was deregulated by epigenetic mechanisms in PDAC cells, suggesting that conventional approach to target individual molecular targets is unlikely to overcome PDAC chemoresistance. Therefore, epigenetic targeting of both H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 is an effective approach to overcome human PDAC resistance to gemcitabine.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Roni Bollag at Georgia Cancer Center tumor bank for providing human pancreatic tumor specimens.

Funding

Grants support from National Institutes of Health CA185909 (to KL) and CA125066 (to NHO). The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CTLA4

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4

FOLFIRINOX

Folic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin

HTMase

Histone methyltransferase

PD-1

Programmed death-1

PDAC

Pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma

PD-L1

Programmed death ligand-1

Authors’ contributions

CL, DY, performed experiments and analyzed data; MES, AHC, MWG, NHO, CP provided key reagents and participated in study design; C.L., K.L. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study used de-identified tumor specimens from human pancreatic cancer patients, and was reviewed by Augusta University Human Research Protection Institutional Review Board (#933148–1). It was determined that this study does not meet the definition of human subject research under the purview of the IRB according to federal regulations, and therefore this study was classified as non-human subject research (case #933148–1). Because only de-identified tumor specimens were used in this study, consent to participate is not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

Cedric Pearce is an employee of Mycosynthetix, Inc. No part of this study was financially supported by Mycosynthetix Inc. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Chunwan Lu, Phone: 706-721-9483, Email: Clu@augusta.edu.

Dafeng Yang, Email: Dyang@augusta.edu.

Maria E. Sabbatini, Email: MSabbatini@augusta.edu

Aaron H. Colby, Email: acolby@bu.edu

Mark W. Grinstaff, Email: mgrin@bu.edu

Nicholas H. Oberlies, Email: n_oberli@uncg.edu

Cedric Pearce, Email: cpearce@mycosynthetix.com.

Kebin Liu, Email: Kliu@augusta.edu.

References

  • 1.Muniraj T, Jamidar PA, Aslanian HR. Pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive review and update. Dis Mon. 2013;59(11):368–402. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2013.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kumar R, Herman JM, Wolfgang CL, Zheng L. Multidisciplinary management of pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2013;22(2):265–287. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2012.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rucki AA, Foley K, Zhang P, Xiao Q, Kleponis J, Wu AA, Sharma R, Mo G, Liu A, Van Eyk J, et al. Heterogeneous stromal signaling within the tumor microenvironment controls the metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2017;77(1):41–52. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Delitto D, Delitto AE, BB DV, Pham K, Han S, Hartlage ER, Newby BN, Gerber MH, Behrns KE, Moldawer LL, et al. Human pancreatic cancer cells induce a MyD88-dependent stromal response to promote a tumor-tolerant immune microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2017;77(3):672–683. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Binenbaum Y, Na’ara S, Gil Z. Gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Drug Resist Updat. 2015;23:55–68. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2015.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lu C, Paschall AV, Shi H, Savage N, Waller JL, Sabbatini ME, Oberlies NH, Pearce C, Liu K. The MLL1-H3K4me3 axis-mediated PD-L1 expression and pancreatic cancer immune evasion. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(6):djw283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Lu C, Talukder A, Savage NM, Singh N, Liu K. JAK-STAT-mediated chronic inflammation impairs cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation to decrease anti-PD-1 immunotherapy efficacy in pancreatic cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(3):e1291106. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1291106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Delitto D, Black BS, Sorenson HL, Knowlton AE, Thomas RM, Sarosi GA, Moldawer LL, Behrns KE, Liu C, George TJ, et al. The inflammatory milieu within the pancreatic cancer microenvironment correlates with clinicopathologic parameters, chemoresistance and survival. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:783. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1820-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crino L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, Antonia S, Pluzanski A, Vokes EE, Holgado E, et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(2):123–135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Villadolid J, Amin A. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice: update on management of immune-related toxicities. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4(5):560–575. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2015.06.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brahmer JR, Tykodi SS, Chow LQ, Hwu WJ, Topalian SL, Hwu P, Drake CG, Camacho LH, Kauh J, Odunsi K, et al. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(26):2455–2465. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Foley K, Kim V, Jaffee E, Zheng L. Current progress in immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016;381(1):244–251. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.12.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Herbst RS, Soria JC, Kowanetz M, Fine GD, Hamid O, Gordon MS, Sosman JA, DF MD, Powderly JD, Gettinger SN, et al. Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature. 2014;515(7528):563–567. doi: 10.1038/nature14011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cappelli LC, Shah AA, Bingham CO., 3rd Immune-related adverse effects of cancer immunotherapy-implications for rheumatology. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2017;43(1):65–78. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Friedman CF, Clark V, Raikhel AV, Barz T, Shoushtari AN, Momtaz P, Callahan MK, Wolchok JD, Chapman PB, Hellmann MD, et al. Thinking critically about classifying adverse events: incidence of pancreatitis in patients treated with Nivolumab + Ipilimumab. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Vaz AP, Deb S, Rachagani S, Dey P, Muniyan S, Lakshmanan I, Karmakar S, Smith L, Johansson S, Lele S, et al. Overexpression of PD2 leads to increased tumorigenicity and metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(3):3317–3331. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaur S, Sharma N, Krishn SR, Lakshmanan I, Rachagani S, Baine MJ, Smith LM, Lele SM, Sasson AR, Guha S, et al. MUC4-mediated regulation of acute phase protein lipocalin 2 through HER2/AKT/NF-kappaB signaling in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(3):688–700. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rajurkar M, Dang K, Fernandez-Barrena MG, Liu X, Fernandez-Zapico ME, Lewis BC, Mao J. IKBKE is required during KRAS-induced pancreatic tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2017;77(2):320–329. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sivakumar S, de Santiago I, Chlon L, Markowetz F. Master regulators of Oncogenic KRAS response in pancreatic cancer: an integrative network biology analysis. PLoS Med. 2017;14(1):e1002223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Narayanan V, Weekes CD. Molecular therapeutics in pancreas cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;8(4):366–379. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i4.366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Melisi D, Xia Q, Paradiso G, Ling J, Moccia T, Carbone C, Budillon A, Abbruzzese JL, Chiao PJ. Modulation of pancreatic cancer chemoresistance by inhibition of TAK1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(15):1190–1204. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sherman MH, Yu RT, Tseng TW, Sousa CM, Liu S, Truitt ML, He N, Ding N, Liddle C, Atkins AR, et al. Stromal cues regulate the pancreatic cancer epigenome and metabolome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(5):1129–1134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620164114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McDonald OG, Li X, Saunders T, Tryggvadottir R, Mentch SJ, Warmoes MO, Word AE, Carrer A, Salz TH, Natsume S, et al. Epigenomic reprogramming during pancreatic cancer progression links anabolic glucose metabolism to distant metastasis. Nat Genet. 2017;49:367. doi: 10.1038/ng.3753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Manuyakorn A, Paulus R, Farrell J, Dawson NA, Tze S, Cheung-Lau G, Hines OJ, Reber H, Seligson DB, Horvath S, et al. Cellular histone modification patterns predict prognosis and treatment response in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results from RTOG 9704. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(8):1358–1365. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.5639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hessmann E, Johnsen SA, Siveke JT, Ellenrieder V. Epigenetic treatment of pancreatic cancer: is there a therapeutic perspective on the horizon? Gut. 2017;66(1):168–179. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Greer EL, Shi Y. Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(5):343–357. doi: 10.1038/nrg3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Spannhoff A, Hauser AT, Heinke R, Sippl W, Jung M. The emerging therapeutic potential of histone methyltransferase and demethylase inhibitors. ChemMedChem. 2009;4(10):1568–1582. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.200900301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Crea F, Nobili S, Paolicchi E, Perrone G, Napoli C, Landini I, Danesi R, Mini E. Epigenetics and chemoresistance in colorectal cancer: an opportunity for treatment tailoring and novel therapeutic strategies. Drug Resist Updat. 2011;14(6):280–296. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2011.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nebbioso A, Carafa V, Benedetti R, Altucci L. Trials with ‘epigenetic’ drugs: an update. Mol Oncol. 2012;6(6):657–682. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Juergens RA, Wrangle J, Vendetti FP, Murphy SC, Zhao M, Coleman B, Sebree R, Rodgers K, Hooker CM, Franco N, et al. Combination epigenetic therapy has efficacy in patients with refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2011;1(7):598–607. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vedadi M, Barsyte-Lovejoy D, Liu F, Rival-Gervier S, Allali-Hassani A, Labrie V, Wigle TJ, Dimaggio PA, Wasney GA, Siarheyeva A, et al. A chemical probe selectively inhibits G9a and GLP methyltransferase activity in cells. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(8):566–574. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Daigle SR, Olhava EJ, Therkelsen CA, Majer CR, Sneeringer CJ, Song J, Johnston LD, Scott MP, Smith JJ, Xiao Y, et al. Selective killing of mixed lineage leukemia cells by a potent small-molecule DOT1L inhibitor. Cancer Cell. 2011;20(1):53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ferguson AD, Larsen NA, Howard T, Pollard H, Green I, Grande C, Cheung T, Garcia-Arenas R, Cowen S, Wu J, et al. Structural basis of substrate methylation and inhibition of SMYD2. Structure. 2011;19(9):1262–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu F, Liu Q, Yang D, Bollag WB, Robertson K, Wu P, Liu K. Verticillin A overcomes apoptosis resistance in human colon carcinoma through DNA methylation-dependent upregulation of BNIP3. Cancer Res. 2011;71(21):6807–6816. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Paschall AV, Yang D, Lu C, Choi JH, Li X, Liu F, Figueroa M, Oberlies NH, Pearce C, Bollag WB, et al. H3K9 Trimethylation silences Fas expression to confer colon carcinoma immune escape and 5-fluorouracil chemoresistance. J Immunol. 2015;195:1868. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lu C, Redd PS, Lee JR, Savage N, Liu K. The expression profiles and regulation of PD-L1 in tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells. OncoImmunology. 2016;5(12):1–13. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1247135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Figueroa M, Graf TN, Ayers S, Adcock AF, Kroll DJ, Yang J, Swanson SM, Munoz-Acuna U, Carcache de Blanco EJ, Agrawal R, et al. Cytotoxic epipolythiodioxopiperazine alkaloids from filamentous fungi of the Bionectriaceae. J Antibiot. 2012;65(11):559–564. doi: 10.1038/ja.2012.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rea S, Eisenhaber F, O'Carroll D, Strahl BD, Sun ZW, Schmid M, Opravil S, Mechtler K, Ponting CP, Allis CD, et al. Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature. 2000;406(6796):593–599. doi: 10.1038/35020506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.O'Carroll D, Scherthan H, Peters AH, Opravil S, Haynes AR, Laible G, Rea S, Schmid M, Lebersorger A, Jerratsch M, et al. Isolation and characterization of Suv39h2, a second histone H3 methyltransferase gene that displays testis-specific expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(24):9423–9433. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.24.9423-9433.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rice JC, Briggs SD, Ueberheide B, Barber CM, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Shinkai Y, Allis CD. Histone methyltransferases direct different degrees of methylation to define distinct chromatin domains. Mol Cell. 2003;12(6):1591–1598. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00479-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Huang P, Chubb S, Hertel LW, Grindey GB, Plunkett W. Action of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine on DNA synthesis. Cancer Res. 1991;51(22):6110–6117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gandhi V, Legha J, Chen F, Hertel LW, Plunkett W. Excision of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) monophosphate residues from DNA. Cancer Res. 1996;56(19):4453–4459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.de Sousa Cavalcante L, Monteiro G. Gemcitabine: metabolism and molecular mechanisms of action, sensitivity and chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;741:8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ciliberto D, Staropoli N, Chiellino S, Botta C, Tassone P, Tagliaferri P. Systematic review and meta-analysis on targeted therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2016;16(2):249–258. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tan N, Wong M, Nannini MA, Hong R, Lee LB, Price S, Williams K, Savy PP, Yue P, Sampath D, et al. Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibition increases the efficacy of MEK inhibition alone and in combination with PI3 kinase inhibition in lung and pancreatic tumor models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(6):853–864. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Huang S, Sinicrope FA. BH3 mimetic ABT-737 potentiates TRAIL-mediated apoptotic signaling by unsequestering Bim and Bak in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68(8):2944–2951. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Haag C, Stadel D, Zhou S, Bachem MG, Moller P, Debatin KM, Fulda S. Identification of c-FLIP(L) and c-FLIP(S) as critical regulators of death receptor-induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Gut. 2011;60(2):225–237. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.202325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stayrook KR, JH MK, Burke YD, Burke YA, Crowell PL. Induction of the apoptosis-promoting protein Bak by perillyl alcohol in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma relative to untransformed ductal epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18(8):1655–1658. doi: 10.1093/carcin/18.8.1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Abulwerdi F, Liao C, Liu M, Azmi AS, Aboukameel A, Mady AS, Gulappa T, Cierpicki T, Owens S, Zhang T, et al. A novel small-molecule inhibitor of mcl-1 blocks pancreatic cancer growth in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(3):565–575. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fritsch L, Robin P, Mathieu JR, Souidi M, Hinaux H, Rougeulle C, Harel-Bellan A, Ameyar-Zazoua M, Ait-Si-Ali S. A subset of the histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases Suv39h1, G9a, GLP, and SETDB1 participate in a multimeric complex. Mol Cell. 2010;37(1):46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tachibana M, Ueda J, Fukuda M, Takeda N, Ohta T, Iwanari H, Sakihama T, Kodama T, Hamakubo T, Shinkai Y. Histone methyltransferases G9a and GLP form heteromeric complexes and are both crucial for methylation of euchromatin at H3-K9. Genes Dev. 2005;19(7):815–826. doi: 10.1101/gad.1284005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kuo AJ, Cheung P, Chen K, Zee BM, Kioi M, Lauring J, Xi Y, Park BH, Shi X, Garcia BA, et al. NSD2 links dimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 to oncogenic programming. Mol Cell. 2011;44(4):609–620. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cao F, Townsend EC, Karatas H, Xu J, Li L, Lee S, Liu L, Chen Y, Ouillette P, Zhu J, et al. Targeting MLL1 H3K4 methyltransferase activity in mixed-lineage leukemia. Mol Cell. 2014;53(2):247–261. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES