Abstract
Resistance to the intestinal parasitic helminth Trichuris muris requires T-helper 2 (TH2) cellular and associated IgG1 responses, with expulsion typically taking up to 4 weeks in mice. Here, we show that the time-of-day of the initial infection affects efficiency of worm expulsion, with strong TH2 bias and early expulsion in morning-infected mice. Conversely, mice infected at the start of the night show delayed resistance to infection, and this is associated with feeding-driven metabolic cues, such that feeding restriction to the day-time in normally nocturnal-feeding mice disrupts parasitic expulsion kinetics. We deleted the circadian regulator BMAL1 in antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs) in vivo and found a loss of time-of-day dependency of helminth expulsion. RNAseq analyses revealed that IL-12 responses to worm antigen by circadian-synchronised DCs were dependent on BMAL1. Therefore, we find that circadian machinery in DCs contributes to the TH1/TH2 balance, and that environmental, or genetic perturbation of the DC clock results in altered parasite expulsion kinetics.
Introduction
Parasitic helminthic infection afflicts approximately one third of the world’s population, with the bulk of infection occurring within the gastrointestinal tract1. Parasite recognition is mediated by pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs), the triggering of which results in activation of antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs), which stimulate and polarise antigen-specific T-cells. The PRRs important in the recognition of Trichuris antigens remain undefined. Typically, effective responses to gastrointestinal helminth parasites are mediated by TH2-polarised immune responses, which confer protection, but also promote pathologic responses associated with allergic inflammation. Multiple factors are capable of promoting polarised TH cell responses in vivo, including cytokine signals, antigen dose, antigen affinity and epigenetic changes2, and the nature and relative importance of each may differ according to the infectious agent3,4. Trichuris muris (T. muris) is a caecal dwelling parasitic helminth of mice. Expulsion of this parasite has been rigorously characterised and critically requires a dominant TH2 immune response. Thus, murine T. muris infection provides a useful model system for identifying the drivers of TH2 responses5, with changes in the TH1/TH2 balance easily monitored via changes in the kinetics of worm expulsion and levels of TH2-controlled parasite-specific IgG1 versus TH1-controlled IgG2c levels. DC-derived IL-12 is critical for promotion of TH1 polarization6. However, although IL-4 is a master cytokine in driving TH2 immunity, the early cellular sources of IL-4 in helminth infection are less well defined and may involve accessory cells7–11. Thus, despite the unequivocal importance of dominant TH2 immune responses in immunity to T. muris infection, the underlying interplay between the DC and T cell remains incomplete.
The circadian clock plays a central role in the regulation of physiological pathways12. Cellular oscillations are driven by a complex interplay of cell-intrinsic clock genes, which are linked, to output pathways in a tissue-specific manner13. A significant proportion of the expressed transcriptome within tissues is circadian-regulated with reports of up to 43% of protein-coding gene transcripts oscillating in at least one organ14. Circadian rhythms play an important role in the regulation of immune function15. Both monocytes of the innate immune system and cells of the adaptive immune system such as T and B cells possess components of the circadian clock machinery, which generate autonomous oscillations in vivo16–24. Further, trafficking and migration of immune cells is also circadian regulated, with daily oscillations in lymphocytes in blood19,25–27, T-helper-17 (TH-17) cell differentiation28, and lymphocyte trafficking through the lymph node29,30. Further, in the context of intracellular protozoan parasite infection, circadian regulation of the magnitude of Leishmania infection has recently been described with an underpinning mechanism, thought to involve circadian control of chemokine expression by macrophages and thus rhythmic infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages to the site of infection31.
It is not known whether the circadian clock plays a role in immunity to large, extracellular, multicellular parasites such as gastrointestinal helminths. Here, we show that mice infected with T. muris demonstrate different TH cell responses and consequently different levels of effective parasite expulsion several weeks later, dependent of time-of-day of infection. We show that antigen-presenting DCs are key components; with disruption of time-of-day responses observed in mice with a DC-conditional knock-out of the circadian regulating Bmal1 gene. Circadian-synchronised DCs in vitro showed strongly polarised responses at peak and trough of the circadian cycle, and these were disrupted in Bmal1-deficient cells. Collectively our data reveal that a DC circadian clock regulates efficient expulsion of the parasitic nematode T. muris.
Results
T. muris expulsion kinetics depends on time-of-day of infection
Different inbred strains of mice vary in their ability to expel a T. muris infection32 with some strains expelling the parasite within three weeks of infection, while others require more than four weeks, and yet further strains are completely unable to clear the infection. We used the C57BL/6 mouse strain which mounts an immune response characterised by both TH1 and TH2 cytokines, typically leading to expulsion of parasites approximately three to four weeks later. As in all mouse strains, C57BL/6 mice become infected by the parasite with no expulsion before day 13 post infection (Schematic Fig. 1A; Establishment). Subsequently the developing adaptive immune response, characterised by both TH1 and TH2 cytokines, leads to expulsion of parasites approximately three to four weeks later (Resolution). If C57BL/6 mice become more biased towards a TH1 immune response, this results in delayed-expulsion kinetics, with an elevated worm burden, as indicated by the red line, Schematic Fig. 1A; Expulsion).
The impact of time-of-day of infection on long-term parasite expulsion dynamics was measured using a dose of 200 T. muris eggs. Mice were maintained on a 12 L:12 D light-dark cycle, and eggs administered via oral gavage at lights on (ZT0; Zeitgeber Time 0) or 12 h later at lights off (ZT12). Animals were sacrificed at Day 21 or 28 post-infection, when mice would normally have started to expel or almost completely expelled their worm burden respectively32,33. Mice infected at ZT12 had a significantly higher T. muris worm burden at Day 21, but both groups had largely cleared worms by Day 28 (Fig. 1B). Infection of any mouse strain with T. muris eggs results in the establishment of larval stage parasites around two weeks post infection, with this infection subsequently expelled if a dominant TH2 immune response is generated32,34. It is possible therefore, that the differences in expulsion kinetics observed were simply attributable to time-of-day differences in the initial extent of establishment of infection. To assess this, we quantified worm numbers in mice infected at Day 13, a time-point prior to the normal onset of expulsion. We observed no significant differences between ZT0 and ZT12 infected mice (Fig. S1A). Thus collectively this suggests that long-term programming of the adaptive immune response to parasitic worm infection is determined by the time-of-day of infection, but with manifestation of the effect occurring several weeks after infection.
IgG1 and IL-13, typical markers of the TH2 response associated with effective worm clearance, were significantly higher following a ZT0 infection (Fig. 1C,G). Total IgE and mucosal mast cell protease-1 (MCPT-1), which also correlate with the TH2 response associated with Trichuris infection were significantly elevated in ZT0-infected mice (Fig. 1E,F). In contrast, IgG2c and IFN-γ, markers of a worm-susceptible TH1 immune response, were significantly raised following a ZT12 infection (Fig. 1D,H). Here, IgG2c was measured at day 28 post-infection as the optimal time point post-infection to detect differences in this antibody isotype, At day 21 post infection parasite specific IgG2c levels are usually too low in sera to use as a surrogate marker of delayed expulsion. In subsequent experiments we focussed our final autopsy on day 21 in order to monitor the delayed worm expulsion phenotype as our main readout of clock regulation. Leukocyte populations infiltrate the intestine after a T. muris infection, with DCs then migrating to the local draining lymph nodes where they initiate T cell polarisation35. To assess the early leukocyte recruitment to the gut we quantified two key sentinel cells, the macrophage (MHC II+, F4/80+ CD11b+) and the DC (MHCII+, CD11c+, CD103+ Dec205+), in the large intestinal lamina propria by flow cytometry (Fig. 1I, on Days 0, 1, 2 and 3 post infection) and immunohistochemistry (Fig. 1J,K, on Day 0 and Day 1 post infection). These data revealed no significant differences in numbers, which might underlie the observed time-of-day of infection phenotype despite a non-significant trend for fewer macrophages in the lamina propria prior to infection at ZT12. Therefore, the early local intestinal immune response to post worm infection was not affected by time of exposure.
To establish the range of time-of-day influences over worm expulsion we further infected mice at the two intermediate time points (ZT6 and ZT18; Fig. S1B) and assessed worm burdens at day 21 post-infection. These did not differ significantly suggesting that the difference in time-of-day of worm expulsion is at its greatest when comparing ZT0 to ZT12. Analyses of antibodies and cytokines revealed a significant increase in IgG1 after a ZT6 infection and a significantly elevated IFNγ response after a ZT18 infection (Fig. S1C,F) suggesting that the circadian influence over the immune response is still apparent at these two circadian times, but insufficiently polarised to result in a delayed worm expulsion. Thus all subsequent analyses focussed on ZT0 and ZT12. Collectively these data reveal a powerful effect of time-of-day of infection on the kinetics of worm expulsion, with the maximal effect observed at the transitions between light and dark.
The role of metabolic cues and DC subsets in parasite expulsion
We next assessed whether metabolic feeding-associated cues might be involved in directing circadian regulation of worm expulsion. Feeding cues are now widely recognised as a powerful Zeitgeber for peripheral oscillators36. To address this we adopted a restricted feeding regime (RFR37;), whereby mice (which usually feed mainly at night) have restricted access to food in a 6 h window centred either at mid-light or mid-dark phase. This RFR was imposed for two weeks prior to, and one week post-infection at ZT0 (Fig. 2A). Analysis of core circadian genes (per2, bmal1, dbp) in the intestine at the time of infection revealed that restricting feeding to the daytime reversed the pattern of expression of local clock genes (Fig. 2B). Analysis of the same circadian genes in the liver demonstrated similar outcomes (Fig. S2).
Mice restricted to feeding in the daytime two weeks prior to a ZT0 infection harboured significantly more worms at Day 21 post-infection compared to night-fed mice (Fig. 2C). Surprisingly unlike the time-of-day infection experiments, the effect of food reversal on expulsion kinetics was not associated with alteration in the IgG1/IgG2c balance, with the IgG1 antibody isotype raised following daytime feeding in addition to IgG2c (Fig. 2D,E). The expression of TH2 (il-13, Retnlb, ccl2)-associated genes in the local intestinal tissue likewise was elevated following daytime feeding (Fig. S3). The data thus suggests that a transient period of food reversal prior to and early in the infection process is sufficient to regulate the circadian machinery in the gut to impair worm expulsion even after returning to ad libitum feeding, but without perturbing the TH balance.
Infection occurs on ingestion of embryonated parasite eggs, which hatch approximately 90 minutes later upon reaching the caecum38. Hatching releases the first stage larva (L1), which burrows into intestinal epithelial cells, and triggers the immune system35. Antigen-bearing DCs leave the gut mucosa via the lymphatics, arriving in the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and promote T cell activation from approximately Day 7 post-infection35. Thus we investigated the cellular composition of the MLN at Day 11 post-infection, (a time point prior to the onset of worm expulsion) in the more susceptible day-fed versus the more resistant night-fed animals. Flow cytometric analysis (Fig. 3A) revealed no significant differences in total cell numbers or in the relative percentages of B cells, NK cells, neutrophils and conventional dendritic cells (cDC) between day-fed and night-fed mice (Fig. 3B and Table S1). However the relative percentage of T cells (both CD4+ and CD8+) was significantly elevated in day-fed animals (Fig. 3B, Table S1).
In order to investigate changes in cDC subsets, total cDCs were broken down into CD11bhi/CD103−, CD11b+/CD103+ and CD11b−/CD103+ populations. This separation revealed significant increases in the CD11bhi/CD103− and CD11b+/CD103+ populations in day-fed mice (Fig. 3C). Overall, these data suggest that the gut circadian machinery influences the cellular composition of the mesenteric lymph nodes, in particular the proportions of DC subtypes.
Chronic infection influences body temperature and activity rhythms, but independently of time of infection
Parasitic infection can lead to widespread systemic disruption of circadian-regulated physiology39,40. To assess whether infection with T. muris leads to a widespread systemic perturbation of circadian organisation and behaviour we used whole body telemetry. Mice display strong diurnal oscillations in both body temperature and activity, which continued following infection (Fig. 4A,B). Comparison of mice infected at ZT0 and ZT12 showed no significant difference in daytime body temperature or activity (Fig. S4). However, a significant increase in the mean amplitude of body temperature was recorded after infection that was independent of time-of-day of infection (Fig. 4C). Infected mice showed a significant reduction in overall activity, likely a sickness response (Fig. 4D, Fig. S4). Further, mice in light-dark cycles typically exhibit a short period of “anticipatory behaviour” to dark-onset with an increase in activity in late light phase, but by late stages of infection this did not occur (Fig. 4B). These data indicate that although infection slightly altered the phasing of activity onsets, robust rhythmic behaviour was maintained and was not significantly modified by infection.
DCs drive circadian responses
We next addressed how the DC circadian clock may be involved, by deleting the core circadian clock gene Bmal1. Mice homozygous for a floxed Bmal1 allele (Bmal1fl/fl) were bred with mice expressing Cre-recombinase driven by a CD11c transgene, which is expressed in DCs (CD11c-Bmal1−/−). All mice were maintained on a background strain carrying the PER2::Luciferase circadian reporter construct41. Cultured bone marrow derived DCs from Bmal1fl/fl mice exhibited robust PER2 bioluminescent circadian oscillations (Fig. 5A). Strikingly, DCs derived from CD11c-Bmal1−/− mice showed significantly dampened oscillations. Next, we infected CD11c-Bmal1−/− and “floxed” (Bmalfl/fl) littermates with T. muris at either ZT0 or ZT12. As predicted from earlier studies, ZT12-infected Bmal1fl/fl mice harboured significantly more worms at Day 21 post-infection compared to ZT0 (Fig. 5B). In contrast, worm burdens of ZT0 and ZT12-infected, CD11c-Bmal1−/− mice were not significantly different, suggesting a loss of circadian control over expulsion kinetics (Fig. 5B). Levels of the TH1 marker IgG2c were low in all groups of mice at Day 21 post-infection and showed no significant differences between groups (Fig. 5C). However, in keeping with the increased worm burden in ZT12-infected Bmal1fl/fl mice the signature TH2 marker IgG1 was significantly reduced only in Bmal1fl/fl mice infected at ZT12, all other groups exhibited IgG1 levels typically associated with a more efficient worm expulsion (Fig. 5D). Thus, these data suggest that Bmal1 plays a crucial role in the regulation of resistance to T. muris infection, and that loss of Bmal1 in DCs results in loss of the time-of-day variation in worm expulsion, favouring development of a protective immune response across the day.
The loss of bmal1−/− in DCs reduces expression of TH1 promoting cytokines
To investigate the role of Bmal1 in DCs, gene expression profiles were compared using bone marrow derived DCs as a surrogate for the tissue DC. Bone marrow derived DCs from Bmal1fl/fl and CD11c-Bmal1−/− mice were isolated and cultured to high purity (>94%; Fig. 6A). Following synchronisation with temperature cycles42 cells were treated with T. muris ES antigen or vehicle at either the peak or trough of PER2::luc bioluminescence activity in Bmalfl/fl PER2::luc cells. Identical time-points were used for the non-cycling CD11c-Bmal1−/− PER2::luc derived DCs which exhibited markedly dampened bioluminescence rhythms, as shown previously (Fig. 5A). Cells were collected for RNA-SEQ analysis 3 h post antigen challenge.
In unchallenged (naïve) Bmalfl/fl DCs 70 genes were significantly different between peak and trough. Whereas in Bmal1−/− DCs only 3 genes exhibited significant differences between peak and trough (Fig. 6B). In ES-stimulated DCs we saw an increase in the number of genes differing at peak versus trough in the Bmalfl/fl and bmal1−/− DCs. However, the number of genes differing in the Bmalfl/fl DC was considerably higher (Fig. 6C). Following ES-stimulation we saw differences between peak and trough in Bmal1fl/fl DCs in the expression of genes associated with TH1 polarisation (Table S2). This included il-12b and Tnfsf15 which were significantly down-regulated at peak (Table S2). Further, pathway analyses of the differentially expressed genes in ES stimulated Bmal1fl/fl DCs at peak versus trough revealed major differences in pro-inflammatory and TH1 associated pathways. These pathways include the IL-12 and IL-27-mediated signalling pathways, which were down-regulated at peak (Fig. 6D). In addition, changes in metabolic pathways were evident, with increases in, for example, amino acid metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation pathways in Bmalfl/fl DC at peak. Using String analysis43 we assessed the interconnectivity of genes that differed at peak versus trough in Bmalfl/fl DC (Fig. S5A). Within this gene-set significantly more genes were seen to be interacting than would be expected by chance (P < 10−14).
There were few differences between Bmal1fl/fl and Bmal1−/− DCs at the peak PER2 bioluminescence following antigen challenge (Fig. 6F). In marked contrast, comparison of Bmal1fl/fl and Bmal1−/− DCs at the trough of PER2 bioluminescence revealed differences (Fig. 6F) with significant down-regulation of TH1 genes in the Bmal1−/− DCs (Table S3). Both the IL-12 and IL-27 pathways were also down-regulated in cells lacking Bmal1 (Fig. 6E). In addition, loss of Bmal1 from DCs was associated with an up-regulation in metabolic pathways including amino acid metabolism and the TCA cycle. We also assessed the interconnectivity of genes that differed between genotype from cells sampled at the trough of the PER2::Luc cycle by String analysis (Fig. S5A). In this analysis, Bmal1-regulated genes emerged as a tightly connected cluster (P < 10−14).
Collectively these data from cultured circadian-synchronised DCs stimulated with parasite antigen reveal that TH1-associated genes are circadian regulated. Cytokine and signalling pathways associated with the development of TH1 immune responses were down-regulated in the absence of Bmal1. Thus, the clock regulator BMAL1 may be critical for the establishment of DC-derived TH1 promoting cytokines (Fig. 6H).
Discussion
The circadian clock is recognised as a key regulator of immune cell function, with molecular clock control of inflammation, sepsis and immunity to bacterial and protozoan parasite infection described15,26,31,44. More recently, remarkable time-of-day differences in lymphocyte trafficking and adaptive immune responses have emerged29,30. However, the role of the circadian clock in regulation of immunological responses to large multi-cellular parasites, that are eliminated by TH2 immune responses, remain unexplored. To address this question, we took advantage of a gastro-intestinal nematode parasite infection model where expulsion of the pathogen is exquisitely dependent on the TH1/TH2 cell balance, thus enabling changes in this balance to be evidenced by altered worm expulsion kinetics and the balance of parasite-specific IgG1/IgG2c.
We now show that time of infection is a key component in tuning the efficiency of worm expulsion. Our data show that mice infected in the early light-phase were more efficient in expelling their worm burden than mice infected at the onset of the dark-phase, with cytokine signatures (increased IL-13, reduced IFN-γ), and parasite-specific antibody profiles (increased IgG1; reduced IgG2c) consistent with an immune response polarised towards TH2. These effects were not immediate, but become manifest over several weeks, and were not associated with the altered worm establishment. Food reversal studies also strongly implicated an important role for metabolic cues during the initial stages of infection. Thus inversion of the local gut clock, by restricting feeding to the daytime, impaired parasitic immune responses. Interestingly, unlike time-of–day of infection, food reversal impaired worm expulsion in the presence of TH2 immune responses. This was accompanied by increases in CD11bhi/CD103− and CD11b+/CD103+ cDC with CD11b+ cDC thought to be the main drivers of TH2 immune responses in vivo45. One possible implication of this is that reversed-feeding leads to a state of internal de-synchrony between central and peripheral signals46. Thus, central signals (TH2) defining efficient worm expulsion after a ZT0 infection may be unable to coordinate the innate TH2-controlled effector mechanisms in intestinal tissue subjected to a reversed feeding regime. To our knowledge, this represents the first demonstration that cellular immune responses underlying worm expulsion are sensitive, either directly or indirectly, to feeding-associated metabolic cues. Interestingly, in keeping, tissue innate lymphoid cells (ILC) 2s have previously been shown to influence tissue eosinophilia via a mechanism sensitive to nutrient intake47. The alterations in the relative percentages of DC subsets and T-cells in the MLN observed when feeding was restricted to day-time are in keeping with the recent reports29,30 showing strong diurnal effects on leukocyte migration and concurrent accumulation of T cells at night compared to day under steady state conditions. Our data from RFR studies, suggests, at least for the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), metabolic cues may contribute to this effect. We currently do not know if the RFR regime has ablated oscillations or shifted oscillations and this warrants further investigation. Further, we suggest that populations of cDC within the MLN may also be under circadian control.
Our data identify the DC as a key cell type underpinning the BMAL1 regulated resistance to T. muris in vivo. Thus, mice with Bmal1-deficient DCs no longer showed a time-of-day dependent effect on worm expulsion, with both ZT0 and ZT12-infected mice harbouring equivalent worm burdens to ZT0-infected Bmalfl/fl littermate controls. Although our current studies cannot definitively show that the circadian clock regulates resistance to T. muris infection in vivo, we can conclude that loss of BMAL1 in DCs results in loss of the time-of-day variation in worm expulsion. To begin to explore further how BMAL1 in DCs regulates the time-of-day dependency of worm expulsion we used circadian-synchronised purified bone marrow derived DCs stimulated with T. muris antigen. These data revealed BMAL1 as an important component in determining the ability of the DC to promote polarised T cell responses with a down-regulation in TH1-promoting cytokines and pathways in BMAL1-deficient cells. Furthermore, we also show that these differences are both DC-intrinsic and circadian-regulated. This supports a mechanism that involves dynamic changes over the day in the promotion of TH1-promoting cytokines (e.g. IL-12) and TH1-pathways in non-targeted (Bmal1fl/fl) DCs, which are circadian-regulated. Interestingly, two of the major signalling pathways down-regulated in BMAL1 deficient DCs were the IL-12 and IL-27-mediated signalling pathways, both known to be critical in enabling TH1-mediated immune responses, and failure to expel T. muris6,48. Further studies are warranted to translate our in vitro driven hypothesis to in vivo, exploring the early post infection cellular events underpinning the time of day effects on worm expulsion which emerge three weeks post infection.
Our study adds the DC to the repertoire of circadian-regulated immune cells in which components of the core molecular clock-work have been targeted, with impact on either innate and/or adaptive responses18,30,49,50. We selected Bmal1 for genetic targeting, as uniquely loss of this transcription factor leads to suppression of rhythmic activity of the core mammalian clockwork51,52. Given that Bmal1 is the critical regulator of the other clock genes which comprise the molecular clock, it remains to be defined whether the effects of Bmal1 deficiency are through effects on downstream clock proteins, such as REV-ERB or CRYPTOCHROME, or are directly BMAL1-regulated.
In summary, we show that expulsion of T. muris is influenced by time-of-day of infection and involves entrainment by metabolic feeding cues. BMAL1 and clock-control of DC function now emerge as important components in the efficient expulsion of helminth parasites.
Methods
Mice
All experimental procedures and protocols were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986 and subject to local ethical approval by the University of Manchester Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board. Male C57BL/6J mice (6–8 weeks) were purchased from Harlan. Unless otherwise stated, mice were maintained at a temperature of 20–22 °C in a 12 h light, 12 h dark lightening schedule, in sterile, individually ventilated cages with food and water ad lib. A CD11ccre line53 was bred with a bmal1fl/flPER2::luc line18 to generate CD11c-bmal−/− mice and Bmal1fl/fl, on a C57BL/6J background, which were used as littermate controls. Radiotelemetry probes (Data Sciences International) were implanted in the peritoneal cavity under isoflurane-induced anaesthesia 3 days prior to infection. During the restricted feeding regime (RFR) access to food was provided either mid-light phase (ZT4 – ZT9; Day fed) or mid-dark phase (ZT16 – ZT21; night fed).
Infection
The parasite was maintained as previously described38. 200 eggs were given per oral gavage to each mouse. For worm counts, caecum and colon were harvested, opened and the gut mucosa scraped to remove epithelia prior to screening for T. muris worms.
Culture of bone marrow derived dendritic cells
Bone marrow cells were seeded on Day 0 at 2 × 105/ml on 10 cm dishes in RPMI (2% Pen Strep, 10% fetal calf serum and 1% L-glutamine) containing 20 ng/ml GM-CSF. Fresh media containing 20 ng/ml GM-CSF was added on day 3, day 6 and day 8, and cells used on day 10. For photonmultiplier tube (PMT) experiments, DCs were plated on 36 mm dishes in a recording media containing luciferin54 synchronised using two full temperature cycles of 12 h 35 °C/12 h 37 °C and placed under the PMTs.
Mesenteric lymph node (MLN) cell re-stimulation and cytokine bead array
MLN cells were brought to cell suspension and 1 × 106 cells were cultured for 48 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2, with E/S antigen (50 µg/ml). Supernatants were analysed by Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) Mouse/Rat soluble protein flex set system (BD Bioscience, Oxford, UK). Results were measured by Flow cytometry. For analysis, FCAP Array v1.0.1 software (BD Cytometric Bead Array) was used.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed on frozen colon sections. CD11c (clone N418) antibody (eBioscience, Hatfield, UK) was used to identify dendritic cells, F4/80 (clone Cl-A3-1, AbD Serotec) antibodies were used to identify macrophages. Slides were counterstained using Mayer´s haematoxylin (Sigma Aldrich Company Ltd, Dorset, UK).
IgG ELISA
Serum was assayed for parasite specific IgG1 and IgG2c. 96 well plates were coated with 5 μg/ml T. muris E/S antigen overnight, incubated with serum (2 fold dilutions, 1:20–1:2560). Parasite specific antibody was measured using biotinylated IgG1 or IgG2c (BD Biosciences). The plates were read at 405 nm, with reference of 490 nm.
IgE ELISA
Serum was assayed for total IgE antibody production. 96 well plates were coated with purified anti-mouse IgE (2 ug/ml, Biolegend, Clone: RME-1) in 0.05 M carbonate/bicarbonate buffer and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Following coating, plates were washed in PBS-Tween and non-specific binding blocked with 3% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Plates were washed and diluted serum (1:10) added to the plate and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. After washing HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgE (1 ug/ml; BioRad) was added to the plates for 1 h. Finally, plates were washed and developed with TMB substrate kit (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reaction was stopped using 0.18 M H2SO4, when sufficient colour had developed. The plates were read by a MRX II microplate reader (DynexTechnologies, VA, USA) at 450 nm, with reference of 570 nm subtracted.
MCPT-1 ELISA
Serum MCPT-1 levels were assayed at a 1:100 dilution utilising a mouse MCPT-1 ELISA kit (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Lamina propria lymphocyte (LPL) isolation
Lymphocytes were isolated from the lamina propria of caecum and colon using an enzyme cocktail. containing 1.25 mg/ml collagenase D (Roche, West Sussex, UK), 0.85 mg/ml collagenase V (Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd; Dorset, UK), 1 mg/ml dispase (Gibco, Life Technologies Ltd; Paisley, UK) and 30 µg/ml DNase (Roche, West Sussex, UK) dissolved in complete RPMI media. 2 × 106 cells were used for FACS staining. FC receptors were blocked using anti CD16/CD32 antibody (1:100, BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK), stained with PE-anti mouse CD103 (clone M290, 1:200, BD Pharmigen, BD Biosciences, Ozford, UK), Alexaflor 700- anti mouse CD45 (clone 30-F11, 1:200, BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK) FITC- anti mouse CD11b (clone M1/70 1:200), PE-Cy7-anti mouse CD11c (clone N418 1:200), Pacific Blue-anti mouse IA-IE (clone M5/114.15.2, 1:400), APC-anti mouse F4/80 (clone BM8,1:200, all eBioscience, Hatfield, UK) and Biotin- anti mouse Dec205 (NLDC-145,1:200 Biolegend, Cambridge, UK) prior to addition of SAv-QDot 605 (Invitrogen, Life Technologies Ltd; Paisley, UK) with Biotin-anti mouse Dec205. 7AAD (10 µL, BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK) was added to 200 µl FACS Buffer remaining in each tube and about 1 × 106 cells were acquired using LSR II Flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK).
For the analysis of MLN cells 1 × 106 cells were re-suspended in 1:2000 Live/Dead Zombie UV (Biolegend). Fc receptors were then blocked prior to staining with: FITC-anti mouse MHC-II (1:600), PerCP/Cy5.5-anti mouse Ly6G (1:600), PerCP/cy5. 5-anti mouse CD8 (1:600), APC -anti mouse CD4 (1:200), APC-anti mouse CD138 (1:200), AF700-anti mouse Ly6C (1:200), APC/Cy7 -anti mouse TCR-beta (1:200), BV421 -anti mouse CD103 (1:200), BV510-anti mouse XCR1 (1:500), BV605-anti mouse CD11c (1:400), BV650-anti mouse PDCA-1 (1:200) BV711-anti mouse CD11b (1:500), BV785-anti mouse B220 (1:150), PE -anti mouse CD64 (1:100), PE/CF594 -anti mouse CD19 (1:200), PE/Cy5 -anti mouse NK1.1 (1:200) and PE/Cy7 -anti mouse F4/80 (1:200). Cells were washed in FACS buffer and were fixed in 1% PFA (Sigma Aldrich) for 10 minutes are RT before a final wash in FACS buffer. 1 × 106 cells were then acquired on a BD Fortessa. All antibodies were purchased from Biolegend apart from TCRbeta APC-Cy7 (eBioScience) and CD19 PE CF594 (BD).
qPCR
RNA was extracted after homogenising gut tissue in Trizol using a FastPrep machine with Lysing matrix D (MP Biomedicals). After genomic DNA elimination, 2 μg RNA was converted to cDNA (RNA to cDNA, Applied biosystems). qPCR was performed on a StepOne plus machine using Taqman probes and primers and qPCR MasterMix (Eurogentec). Beta actin was used as a housekeeping gene.
RNA-Seq analysis
Strand-specific RNA-Seq libraries were prepared using the Illumina workflow. Paired-end reads were generated and 40 to 85 M of total reads obtained from each sample. The fastq files generated by Illumina HiSeq4000 platform were analysed with FastQC and any low quality reads and contaminated barcodes were trimmed with Trimmomatic55. All libraries were aligned to GRCm38.p2 (mm10) assembly of mouse genome using Tophat-2.1.056 and only matches with the best score were reported for each read. The mapped reads were counted by genes with HTSeq57 against gencode.vM2.annotation.gtf. Differentially expressed (DE) genes were identified by comparing between the treatment groups with DESeq258. The functional analysis was carried out with a R package topGO59 and RontoTools.
Statistics
Where statistics are quoted, Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-parametric data comparing two groups. Kruskal-Wallis test, with Dunn’s multiple comparison post hoc was used to compare three or more groups. Parametric data were assessed using unpaired T tests for pairwise comparisons or one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey. A p-value of < 0.05 was classed as significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism for windows, version 6.
Data availability
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
AL and DR are Wellcome Investigators (107849/Z/15/Z and 107851/Z/15/Z. SH was supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Case (BBSRC) PhD studentship. RF is supported by Medical Research Council (MRC) grant MR/N022661/1 awarded to KJE. ML and RMH were supported by Wellcome Trust Grant No: 091815. EAM and TH were supported by a BBSRC PhD studentship. JEG is an Arthritis Research UK Career Development Fellow (Ref 20629). This work was supported by the Flow cytometry (Gareth Howell), Histology and the Genomic Technologies Core Facilities at the University of Manchester.
Author Contributions
Conceptualisation: A.L. and K.E. Methodology: K.J.E., A.M. and A.L. Formal analysis: T.H., S.H., A.B., D.B. and J.G. Investigation: T.H., S.H., N.B., R.F., S.B., R.V., B.S., M.L., E.M., R.H., D.B. and J.G. Resources: A.L., K.E. and D.R. Writing – original draft: J.G., A.L. and K.E. Writing – review and editing: D.R., A.M., J.G., A.L. and K.E. Visualisation: T.H., D.B., J.G., A.L. and K.E. Supervision: J.G., A.L. and K.E. Project Administration: K.E. and A.L. Funding Acquisition: K.E. and A.L.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Thomas W. Hopwood and Sarah Hall contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-22021-5.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Julie E. Gibbs, Email: julie.gibbs@manchester.ac.uk
Andrew S. Loudon, Email: Andrew.loudon@manchester.ac.uk
Kathryn J. Else, Email: Kathryn.j.else@manchester.ac.uk
References
- 1.Hotez PJ, et al. Helminth infections: the great neglected tropical diseases. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1311–1321. doi: 10.1172/JCI34261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pulendran B, Artis D. New paradigms in type 2 immunity. Science. 2012;337:431–435. doi: 10.1126/science.1221064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tumes DJ, et al. Epigenetic regulation of T-helper cell differentiation, memory, and plasticity in allergic asthma. Immunol Rev. 2017;278:8–19. doi: 10.1111/imr.12560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Oliphant CJ, Barlow JL, McKenzie AN. Insights into the initiation of type 2 immune responses. Immunology. 2011;134:378–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03499.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Klementowicz JE, Travis MA, Grencis RK. Trichuris muris: a model of gastrointestinal parasite infection. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34:815–828. doi: 10.1007/s00281-012-0348-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bancroft AJ, Else KJ, Sypek JP, Grencis RK. Interleukin-12 promotes a chronic intestinal nematode infection. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27:866–870. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830270410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Oliphant CJ, et al. MHCII-mediated dialog between group 2 innate lymphoid cells and CD4( + ) T cells potentiates type 2 immunity and promotes parasitic helminth expulsion. Immunity. 2014;41:283–295. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pelly VS, et al. IL-4-producing ILC2s are required for the differentiation of TH2 cells following Heligmosomoides polygyrus infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9:1407–1417. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Perrigoue JG, et al. MHC class II-dependent basophil-CD4+ T cell interactions promote T(H)2 cytokine-dependent immunity. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:697–705. doi: 10.1038/ni.1740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Padigel UM, et al. Eosinophils act as antigen-presenting cells to induce immunity to Strongyloides stercoralis in mice. J Infect Dis. 2007;196:1844–1851. doi: 10.1086/522968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van Panhuys N, et al. Basophils are the major producers of IL-4 during primary helminth infection. J Immunol. 2011;186:2719–2728. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Richards J, Gumz ML. Mechanism of the circadian clock in physiology. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013;304:R1053–1064. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00066.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mohawk JA, Green CB, Takahashi JS. Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:445–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang R, Lahens NF, Ballance HI, Hughes ME, Hogenesch JB. A circadian gene expression atlas in mammals: implications for biology and medicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:16219–16224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408886111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Man K, Loudon A, Chawla A. Immunity around the clock. Science. 2016;354:999–1003. doi: 10.1126/science.aah4966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nguyen KD, et al. Circadian gene Bmal1 regulates diurnal oscillations of Ly6C(hi) inflammatory monocytes. Science. 2013;341:1483–1488. doi: 10.1126/science.1240636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Keller M, et al. A circadian clock in macrophages controls inflammatory immune responses. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2009;106:21407–21412. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906361106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gibbs JE, et al. The nuclear receptor REV-ERBalpha mediates circadian regulation of innate immunity through selective regulation of inflammatory cytokines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:582–587. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106750109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Scheiermann C, et al. Adrenergic nerves govern circadian leukocyte recruitment to tissues. Immunity. 2012;37:290–301. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bollinger T, et al. Circadian clocks in mouse and human CD4+ T cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e29801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Silver AC, Arjona A, Walker WE, Fikrig E. The circadian clock controls toll-like receptor 9-mediated innate and adaptive immunity. Immunity. 2012;36:251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Silver AC, Arjona A, Hughes ME, Nitabach MN, Fikrig E. Circadian expression of clock genes in mouse macrophages, dendritic cells, and B cells. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26:407–413. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fortier EE, et al. Circadian variation of the response of T cells to antigen. J Immunol. 2011;187:6291–6300. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1004030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hemmers S, Rudensky AY. The Cell-Intrinsic Circadian Clock Is Dispensable for Lymphocyte Differentiation and Function. Cell Rep. 2015;11:1339–1349. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Labrecque N, Cermakian N. Circadian Clocks in the Immune System. J Biol Rhythms. 2015;30:277–290. doi: 10.1177/0748730415577723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Curtis AM, Bellet MM, Sassone-Corsi P, O’Neill LA. Circadian clock proteins and immunity. Immunity. 2014;40:178–186. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Arjona A, Silver AC, Walker WE, Fikrig E. Immunity’s fourth dimension: approaching the circadian-immune connection. Trends Immunol. 2012;33:607–612. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yu X, et al. TH17 cell differentiation is regulated by the circadian clock. Science. 2013;342:727–730. doi: 10.1126/science.1243884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Suzuki K, Hayano Y, Nakai A, Furuta F, Noda M. Adrenergic control of the adaptive immune response by diurnal lymphocyte recirculation through lymph nodes. J Exp Med. 2016;213:2567–2574. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Druzd D, et al. Lymphocyte Circadian Clocks Control Lymph Node Trafficking and Adaptive Immune Responses. Immunity. 2017;46:120–132. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kiessling S, et al. The circadian clock in immune cells controls the magnitude of Leishmania parasite infection. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11297-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Else K, Wakelin D. The effects of H-2 and non-H-2 genes on the expulsion of the nematode Trichuris muris from inbred and congenic mice. Parasitology. 1988;96(Pt 3):543–550. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000080173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Else KJ, Wakelin D, Wassom DL, Hauda KM. The influence of genes mapping within the major histocompatibility complex on resistance to Trichuris muris infections in mice. Parasitology. 1990;101(Pt 1):61–67. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000079762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Else KJ, Finkelman FD, Maliszewski CR, Grencis RK. Cytokine-mediated regulation of chronic intestinal helminth infection. J Exp Med. 1994;179:347–351. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.1.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cruickshank SM, et al. Rapid dendritic cell mobilization to the large intestinal epithelium is associated with resistance to Trichuris muris infection. J Immunol. 2009;182:3055–3062. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bass J, Lazar MA. Circadian time signatures of fitness and disease. Science. 2016;354:994–999. doi: 10.1126/science.aah4965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Panda S. Circadian physiology of metabolism. Science. 2016;354:1008–1015. doi: 10.1126/science.aah4967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wakelin D. Acquired immunity to Trichuris muris in the albino laboratory mouse. Parasitology. 1967;57:515–524. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000072395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Palomba M, et al. Alterations of orexinergic and melanin-concentrating hormone neurons in experimental sleeping sickness. Neuroscience. 2015;290:185–195. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.12.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Darsaud A, et al. Twenty-four-hour disruption of the sleep-wake cycle and sleep-onset REM-like episodes in a rat model of African trypanosomiasis. Sleep. 2004;27:42–46. doi: 10.1093/sleep/27.1.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yoo SH, et al. PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:5339–5346. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308709101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brown SA, Zumbrunn G, Fleury-Olela F, Preitner N, Schibler U. Rhythms of mammalian body temperature can sustain peripheral circadian clocks. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1574–1583. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01145-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Szklarczyk D, et al. The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D362–D368. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bellet MM, et al. Circadian clock regulates the host response to Salmonella. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:9897–9902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120636110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mayer JU, et al. Different populations of CD11b+ dendritic cells drive Th2 responses in the small intestine and colon. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15820. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Izumo, M. et al. Differential effects of light and feeding on circadian organization of peripheral clocks in a forebrain Bmal1 mutant. Elife3 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Nussbaum JC, et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells control eosinophil homeostasis. Nature. 2013;502:245–248. doi: 10.1038/nature12526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bancroft AJ, Humphreys NE, Worthington JJ, Yoshida H, Grencis RK. WSX-1: a key role in induction of chronic intestinal nematode infection. J Immunol. 2004;172:7635–7641. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.12.7635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gibbs JE, et al. An epithelial circadian clock controls pulmonary inflammation, and glucocorticoid action. Nature Medicine. 2014;20:919–926. doi: 10.1038/nm.3599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hand LE, et al. The circadian clock regulates inflammatory arthritis. FASEB J. 2016;30:3759–3770. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600353R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kornmann B, Schaad O, Bujard H, Takahashi JS, Schibler U. System-driven and oscillator-dependent circadian transcription in mice with a conditionally active liver clock. PLoS. Biol. 2007;5:e34. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Preitner N, et al. The orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBalpha controls circadian transcription within the positive limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Cell. 2002;110:251–260. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00825-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Travis, M. A. et al. Loss of integrin alpha(v)beta8 on dendritic cells causes autoimmunity and colitis in mice. Nature449, 361-365 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Yamazaki S, Takahashi JS. Real-time luminescence reporting of circadian gene expression in mammals. Methods Enzymol. 2005;393:288–301. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)93012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kim D, et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq. 2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J, Lengauer T. Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1600–1607. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.