Spores of Clostridium difficile carry a chitinase enzyme whose function is to bind to mucin, leading to its degradation. We show in vivo that this is potentially an important element of colonization and virulence.
Keywords: Clostridium difficile, spores, colonization, chitinase, virulence, mucus
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is an important hospital-acquired infection resulting from the germination of spores in the intestine as a consequence of antibiotic-mediated dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. Key to this is CotE, a protein displayed on the spore surface and carrying 2 functional elements, an N-terminal peroxiredoxin and a C-terminal chitinase domain. Using isogenic mutants, we show in vitro and ex vivo that CotE enables binding of spores to mucus by direct interaction with mucin and contributes to its degradation. In animal models of CDI, we show that when CotE is absent, both colonization and virulence were markedly reduced. We demonstrate here that the attachment of spores to the intestine is essential in the development of CDI. Spores are usually regarded as biochemically dormant, but our findings demonstrate that rather than being simply agents of transmission and dissemination, spores directly contribute to the establishment and promotion of disease.
Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, spore-forming human and animal pathogen and one of the leading causes of nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in developed countries [1]. The disease results from antibiotic-induced dysbiosis of the gut microflora that allows spores of C. difficile to germinate, proliferate, and produce at least 2 inflammatory cytotoxins (toxins A and B), resulting in tissue damage [2, 3]. It has been demonstrated that vegetative cell adherence is important and a number of adhesins have been found, including SlpA [4], flagellin [5], and Cwp84 [6]. However, whether it is necessary for the spore to attach to the intestine prior to germination is unknown.
During the acute stage of infection, there is transient production of enormous numbers of spores (approximately 6 logs higher than the infective dose) in the intestine [7]. However, the number of spores produced can vary significantly for different strains. A number of clues suggest that the spore may contribute to C. difficile infection (CDI). First, hamsters challenged with spores of a non-toxigenic strain of C. difficile (CD1342) experienced cell damage in the cecum as well as an inflammatory response [8]. Second, Kansau et al [9] found that in a mouse model, the sporulation process of hypervirulent strain R20291 was initiated earlier compared to non-hypervirulent strains. Finally, a C. difficile spo0A mutant that cannot produce spores was shown to be unable to persist within, and effectively transmit disease between mice [10].
Other than being an agent of transmission, an intriguing question that has not been addressed is whether the spore per se plays a role in the development of disease. The outermost layer of the spore carries a number of enzymes, but the CotE protein is particularly interesting [11]. It is an 81-kDa bifunctional protein that carries 2 distinct domains, an N-terminal peroxiredoxin domain and a C-terminal chitinase domain [11, 12]. The peroxiredoxin domain resembles a 1-Cys peroxiredoxin, suggesting it may be involved in reducing hydrogen peroxide arising as a by-product of SodA-mediated cross-linking of spore coat proteins [11]. The chitinase domain, belonging to the glycohydrolase family 18, might prima facie play a nutritional role in the turnover of macromolecules such as chitin. Intriguingly, CotE may have a more sophisticated function and contribute directly to pathogenesis.
In this article, we show in vitro that CotE enables spore adhesion to mucus via direct binding to the mucin glycoproteins GlcNAc and GalNAc. Our in vivo data demonstrate that spore attachment is important for developing CDI and that CotE is required for efficient intestinal colonization. Surprisingly, CotE increased the severity of CDI in a hamster model; animals dosed with spores lacking CotE exhibited significantly delayed symptoms of CDI. Taken together we suggest that CotE, and thus the spore, plays an integral role in attachment to the gut mucosa to initiate the infection and the ensuing virulence of CDI, a finding that is both important and hitherto unnoticed.
METHODS
Strains, Reagents, and General Methods
Two wild-type strains of C. difficile were used in this work: 630Δerm and 630. The 630Δerm strain is a spontaneously cured derivative of 630 (tcdA+tcdB+) that is erythromycin sensitive [13]; 630 (erythromycin resistant) was isolated from a patient with pseudomembranous colitis during an outbreak of CDI [14]. The 630 strain is used in animal experiments as the 630Δerm strain is sensitive to clindamycin. Two previously described [12] cotE ClosTron mutants, isogenic to 630Δerm, were used: ET46 (cotE::CT220s) and ET24 (cotE::CT1203s). A sigK ClosTron mutant JP051 (sigK::CT266s) carrying an insertion after codon 87 of the coding open reading frame was constructed in this laboratory and will be described elsewhere. The CotE mutants were complemented with wild-type copies of the respective genes using pRPF185 as described previously [12]. All spores used were purified through a 20%–50% Histodenz gradient. Expression of CotE on the spore surface was verified by Western blotting (Supplementary Figure 1C). Antibodies (mouse) recognizing the N-terminus of CotE (M1-K234) have been described previously [12] while antibodies to the C-terminus of CotE were raised in mice by 3 intraperitoneal injections of rCotEC (P381-F712) (Supplementary Figure 1). Methods for growth and sporulation of C. difficile and previously described methods are shown in the Supplementary Methods.
Adhesion of Spores to HT29-MTX Cells
The method was performed as described previously [15]. In brief, cells were seeded at 4 × 104 cells/well in 24-well plates for 14 days at 37°C with 7.5% carbon dioxide. On the day of experimentation, cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Spores were added to the wells and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C. Non-adherent spores were removed by washing with PBS 5-times and cells lysed with Triton X-100 (0.1% w/v) in PBS for 10 minutes before enumeration of adherent spores by plating on brain heart infusion broth supplemented with yeast extract, cysteine and sodium taurocholate (BHISS) plates. Percentage adhesion was calculated using the formula [% adhesion = (colony-forming units [CFU] count / initial number of spores added) × 100]. Data were presented as the percentage proportion of binding demonstrated by strain 630 spores. For antibody-blocking adhesion experiments; the same procedure as described above was used, but spores were preincubated with anti-CotEC antibody (1/10) for 30 minutes at 37°C before adding to the wells.
Ligand Binding
High binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates were coated with ligands conjugated to human serum albumin (Dextra, Reading, United Kingdom) at a concentration of 10 µg/mL overnight at 4°C. For mucin, porcine stomach type III (M1778, Sigma), a solution was made fresh in PBS (pH 7.4) and used to coat plates at 1 µg/mL (overnight at 4°C). After blocking the plate with 2% (v/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS (1 hour at 30°C), recombinant proteins (rCotEN or rCotEC) were diluted in 1% (v/v) BSA at a concentration of 0.5 μM and incubated for 2.5 hours at 30°C. rCotEN (mouse) and rCotEC (mouse) were used as primary antibodies and anti-mouse immunoglobulin G–horseradish peroxidase (DAKO P0447) was used as the secondary antibody.
Mucin Degradation
Three milliliters of sterile molten 0.5% (w/v) agarose containing 0.5% (w/v) of mucin (porcine type III, Sigma M1778) was overlaid onto sterile microscope slides (76 × 26 mm) rapidly. The sterile slide was placed into a petri dish and the agarose left to solidify, after which 3-mm-diameter holes were punched out of the medium. Ten microliters of spores (1 × 1010/mL) was added to the wells. The petri dished was closed and sealed with parafilm and incubated for 48 hours at 37°C. Before staining with amido black solution for 30 minutes (Sigma A8181), the agarose was compressed to a thin layer using a 500-g weight (30 minutes with Whatman No. 3 between agarose and weight). The slide was then de-stained several times with 7% (v/v) acetic acid.
Animal Experiments
All animal procedures were performed under the UK Home Office project license PPL 70/8276. For animal experiments, we followed methods from those described previously [15, 16].
Hamsters
Female Golden Syrian Hamsters were 16–18 weeks old (Harlan UK Ltd). For the hamster challenge, animals were dosed by intragastric gavage (i.g.) with clindamycin (clindamycin-2-phosphate, Sigma) 30 mg/kg body weight. After 16 hours, they were dosed i.g. with spores or vegetative cells of wild-type or mutant strains. Animals were monitored for symptoms of disease progression and culled upon reaching the clinical endpoint. The symptoms of CDI were scored as severe/clinical endpoint (wet tail >2 cm, high lethargy), mild (wet tail <2 cm), or healthy. Feces were sampled daily and ceca taken from culled animals.
Mice
The 50% infectious dose (ID50) was determined in mice (6–8 weeks old, female, Harlan UK Ltd) as described previously [17]. Animals were dosed i.g. with clindamycin (30 mg/kg) and challenged with spores (101, 102, and 103 CFU) of strain 630 or cotE mutants. Ceca were removed 24 hours post-infection and colonization was defined by the presence of toxins and spore CFU counts 2 logs higher than the initial dose.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was calculated and significance determined (P < .05) using the Welch t test for unequal variance. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software.
RESULTS
Generation of CotE Mutants and Their Complements
Two mutants of cotE and their complements have been described previously [12]. cotE::CT220s carries an insertion (cotE::CT220s) at the N-terminus preceding both the peroxiredoxin and chitinase domains, while the insertion in cotE::CT1203s is centrally positioned and precedes the C-terminal chitinase domain (Supplementary Figure 1A). For simplicity, these mutants will be described here as CotE– (cotE::CT220s) and CotEC– (cotE::CT1203s). To demonstrate the integrity of both mutants, we showed that each carried 2 copies of the erm gene, whereas the isogenic 630Δerm parent strain carried 1 copy (Supplementary Figure 1B). This confirmed the presence of 1 ClosTron insertion on the chromosome, which we further verified using DNA sequencing. Therefore, the phenotypes we observe for the 2 cotE mutants can be directly assigned to the absence of CotE or of course due to a pleiotropic effect (eg, disruption or missassembly of the spore coat resulting from the absence of an intact CotE). Using polyclonal antisera raised in mice to the N-terminal (residues 1–234) and C-terminal (residues 381–712) domains of CotE, we confirmed that neither mutant produced CotE (Supplementary Figure 1C). In previous work, we have reported a pRPF185-CotE complementation plasmid that carried full-length cotE [12]. The cotE mutant cells carrying this plasmid produced spores that expressed CotE (Supplementary Figure 1D). Functional complementation of the CotE mutant phenotype was demonstrated in this work and is described in more detail below.
CotE Enables Binding of Spores to Mucus
Adhesion of mutant and wild-type spores to mucus was evaluated using the HT29-MTX human cell line that secretes MUC2 mucins typically found in the small and large intestine and therefore more physiologically relevant for studies of pathogen–mucus interactions [18]. Wild-type 630Δerm spores exhibited higher levels of adhesion (15%–20%) to HT29-MTX cells compared to both cotE mutants, which showed significantly (P < .001) lower levels of adhesion (Figure 1A). In cotE mutant strains carrying the pRPF185-CotE plasmid, levels of adhesion were equivalent to wild type demonstrating functional, in trans, complementation of the CotE phenotype. Image analysis of antibody-labeled spores adhering to HT29-MTX cell lines (day 14) was also used to confirm that wild-type spores were more abundant on mucus-producing HT29-MTX monolayers (Supplementary Figure 2). In a second, ex vivo, approach we measured adhesion of wild-type and mutant spores to ileum and cecum biopsies obtained from a piglet (Supplementary Figure 3). For both cotE mutants, spore adhesion to ileum and cecum explants was significantly reduced compared with adhesion of wild-type spores at both incubation times. A further experiment, confirming that cotE is involved in binding of spores to mucus, was performed using wild-type spores preincubated with antibodies recognizing the C-terminal domain of cotE before being added to HT29-MTX cells. The data showed that adhesion of wild-type spores could be significantly reduced by preadsorption with CotE antibodies (Figure 1B).
CotE Mediates Spore Binding to Mucin and Enhances Colonization
To dissect CotE’s affinity for mucus, we used an ELISA-based method to examine binding of recombinant CotE protein fragments to mucin, the main component of mucus, as well as GlcNAc and GalNAc. GlcNAc is the repeating unit in chitin and is also present in mucin glycoproteins [19] and glycosylated proteins present on intestinal epithelial cells [20]. GalNAc is the C4 epimer of GlcNAc and is found (together with GlcNAc) in mucin. We observed significantly more binding of rCotEC, comprising the C-terminal chitinase domain, to mucin, GlcNAc, and GalNAc compared to rCotEN that carried the N-terminal peroxiredoxin domain (Figure 2).
In many pathogenic bacteria, binding to mucus and mucin is a mechanism for attachment to the intestinal epithelium and host colonization [19, 21]. We hypothesize that CotE enables C. difficile spores to accomplish the same. To address this, we determined the ID50 of mutants in a murine model (Table 1) as previously described by Phetcharaburanin et al [17]. In this model, animals do not show symptoms of disease, and colonization is measured by the presence of toxin and CFU (2–3 logs higher CFU than initial dose) in the cecum. Wild-type 630 spores had an ID50 of 101 whereas values for the cotE– (103) and cotEC– (102.3) mutants were 1–2 logs higher, demonstrating that CotE had a role in the ability of spores to infect and colonize the host.
Table 1.
Strain | 50% Infectious Dose |
---|---|
CotE+ | 101 |
CotE– | 103 |
CotEC– | 102.3 |
aMice are considered positive for Clostridium difficile infection when cecum tests positive for toxin and colony-forming units 2 logs higher than initial dose.
CotE Facilitates Degradation of Mucin
Chitin-binding proteins in bacteria can also function as mucolytic enzymes and therefore we investigated CotE for this trait [22, 23]. Using a modified mucin degradation assay [24], we showed mucin degradation mediated by CotE. After 48 hours of incubation, a zone or halo of mucin degradation was observed in amido black–stained mucin agarose wells containing wild-type spores (Figure 3). By contrast, very limited degradation was apparent in wells containing an identical number of spores for either of the cotE mutants. This phenotype, however, was restored in cotE mutant spores carrying pRPF185-CotE. Vegetative cells of C. difficile have been shown previously to be unable to degrade mucin [25], and we have confirmed this also with our wild-type and mutant strains (data not shown). Degradation of mucin by CotE was confirmed using fluorescently labeled mucin and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography analysis (Supplementary Figure 4).
CotE Enhances Virulence of CDI in Hamsters
Degradation of mucin by intestinal pathogenic bacteria has been shown to contribute to virulence [19]. Accordingly, we investigated the effect of CotE on virulence using the hamster model of infection [26]. In this model, the colonization of the host can be observed from specific symptoms, or the presence of toxins and/or spore CFU in the cecum or feces. Virulence is reflected by survival rate and/or by the time from colonization to clinical endpoint (severe symptoms). In both mutants, 17% of hamsters were not colonized and survived until the end of the experiment (10 days) whereas with wild type, 100% of hamsters were colonized and eventually succumbed to infection (Figure 4A). While the time from colonization to clinical endpoint for 630 was approximately 6 hours, with CotE– and CotEC– the time was 28 and 27 hours, respectively (Figure 4B). Interestingly, among colonized hamsters (5/6), there was 1 hamster from each of the mutant groups which was positive for toxin in feces but developed no symptoms and only reached clinical endpoint after approximately 90 hours (Figure 4B). At 82 hours post-inoculation, 100% of hamsters infected with strain 630 spores had reached clinical endpoint, whereas with cotE– and cotEC– only 34% and 50%, respectively, had become moribund (Figure 5A–C). Once hamsters reached clinical endpoint, ceca were checked to confirm the presence of toxins and C. difficile spores at roughly equivalent levels between groups (Supplementary Figure 5). To rule out the possibility that the delay in symptoms and morbidity of hamsters could be due to a difference in toxin production, we checked the kinetics of toxin production both in vitro and in vivo and confirmed that they were of essentially equivalent levels between all 3 strains (Supplementary Figure 6). The germination rate of the mutant and wild-type spores has also been checked and confirmed to be the same (Supplementary Figure 7). The reduced virulence of cotE mutant spores observed here in hamsters has been independently repeated (Supplementary Figure 8).
To investigate whether sporulation affects virulence, we used vegetative cells of wild type and a sporulation defective sigK– mutant to infect hamsters following the same dosing regime as that used above with spores. Mutation of sigK (encoding a sporulation-specific sigma factor controlling spore coat biosynthesis [27]) will affect the terminal stages of sporulation-specific gene expression in the mother cell chamber and, unlike spoOA, is less likely to exert pleiotropic effects on expression of additional virulence genes. While it took 72 hours for all strain 630–infected hamsters to reach clinical endpoint, 168 hours was required for all sigK– infected animals to succumb (Figure 6). Since hamsters dosed with sigK– cells exhibited delayed mortality, we ruled out the possibility of differential toxin production in vivo by measuring toxin kinetics in mice (Supplementary Figure 9). Note that in cecum samples, a low spore CFU count was found as the sigK– mutant being oligosporogenous is presumably able to produce a very low level (approximately 4 logs less than 630 per gram of feces) of functional spores (Figure 6) [28]. These results suggest that (i) spores contribute to the virulence of CDI, and (ii) CotE, and potentially additional spore-associated proteins, are involved in colonization.
DISCUSSION
Our study provides important insights into the role of the spore in CDI: first, that the spore is responsible for initial colonization by targeting and binding mucus enabling the establishment of infection and, second, that the spore is an active agent in the acute stage of infection. Although an interaction of the spore with mucus might not be unexpected, we can now attribute this to at least 1 spore-associated protein, CotE, a bifunctional peroxiredoxin/chitinase that is embedded in the outermost layers of the spore. What is surprising is that this spore enzyme is functionally active and able to bind directly to mucin monomers (the glycoproteins GlcNAc and GalNAc) and directly or indirectly facilitate mucin degradation. Some chitinases are thought to degrade mucus [22], and chitin binding proteins are considered colonization factors that have been found in several other important pathogens including Listeria monocytogenes [29], Legionella pneumophila [30], and Escherichia coli [31]. In each case, the proteins are secreted and have a direct role in virulence, colonization, and infection. Vibrio cholerae is a well-studied example where 2 proteins, GbpA and ChiA2 (1 of 2 chitinases in V. cholerae), act synergistically to bind and degrade both chitin and mucin. GbpA is a chitin-binding protein that is able to recognize GlcNAc present in chitin as well as on the surface of epithelial cells, enabling colonization of host cells by V. cholerae [21].
The adhesion of intestinal pathogenic bacteria to the gastrointestinal tract is a crucial aspect of host colonization as it prevents them being mechanically cleared [32]. In the case of C. difficile, the spore is the transmissible entity and here we show that for the successful establishment of infection, the spore must also adhere to the host. Interestingly, Theriot et al demonstrated that, within the small intestine, spores are able to germinate regardless of antibiotic perturbation [33]. It is therefore possible that spores are able to initiate colonization in the small bowel in the absence of microbiota disruption and that an intact microbiota is required to suppress vegetative C. difficile outgrowth to prevent clinical disease. Hong et al recently found that mucosal antibodies against the C-terminal of toxin A also recognize the spore and vegetative cells of C. difficile and prevents CDI in hamsters by blocking colonization [15]. We demonstrate that the spore binds to the gastrointestinal tract prior to germination to initiate CDI via interactions mediated by CotE. In our study, animals (both mice and hamsters) infected with spores lacking CotE show a marked reduction in colonization. It is important to consider that several adhesins may be responsible for initial spore attachment. In support of this, Phetcharaburanin et al identified hair-like appendages comprised of the BclA1 protein that make “first contact” with the host mucosa [17]. However, this study saw no differences between the severity of CDI caused by mutant BclA1 and wild-type 630 in hamsters.
In our study, spores appear able to enhance the severity of disease once initial colonization has been established. This is clear from hamster studies showing that the time required to develop symptoms in colonized animals was markedly delayed in animals dosed with spores devoid of CotE. To explain this, we can envisage several scenarios. One possible explanation could be that by degrading mucus, CotE facilitates transit of toxins to the underlying epithelial cells and so mucin degradation is an integral step in pathogenesis. Another possibility is that the severity of disease is due to the combined action of toxins and spores interacting with the large number of macrophages and neutrophils produced during the acute stages of infection leading to the production of inflammatory cytokines [3]. In support of this we have shown, in vitro, that spores are inflammatory and that this response is significantly reduced in the absence of CotE (Supplementary Figure 10). The spore acting as a virulence factor has been shown in Bacillus anthracis where a spore surface superoxide dismutase enhances virulence by as much as 40-fold in a mouse model of anthrax [34].
Over the past decade, a multitude of studies have been conducted to understand the severity of epidemic and hypervirulent 027/B1/NAP1 strains, but precise causative mechanisms have yet to be found and links between high sporulation rates and hypervirulence remain inconclusive [35, 36]. A direct role for the spore in acute infection has implications for the concept of hypervirulence, a phenomenon that so far lacks clarity. Most compelling are recent in vivo studies showing (i) increased persistence of hypervirulent 027 strains (R20291) in the gastrointestinal tract [17] and (ii) increased levels of intestinal sporulation that correlated with increased severity of disease [9]. Using isogenic strains, we show that administration of cells of a sigK mutant that exhibits very low levels of spores results in an extended period of infection, post-colonization. One straightforward explanation is that increased spore numbers together with greater intestinal persistence exacerbate symptoms of CDI by CotE-mediated mucin degradation and/or inflammation.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at The Journal of Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
Supplementary Material
Notes
Acknowledgments. We thank Dr Ian Teo (Imperial College, United Kingdom) for advice on the quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assays.
Financial support. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (grant number MR/K015354/1 to S. M. C.) and EU Era-Net (grant number ANIHWA 031A357 to S. M. C. and J. Z.).
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
- 1. Smits WK, Lyras D, Lacy DB, Wilcox MH, Kuijper EJ. Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2:16020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Shen A. Clostridium difficile toxins: mediators of inflammation. J Innate Immun 2012; 4:149–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rupnik M, Wilcox MH, Gerding DN. Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009; 7:526–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Merrigan MM, Venugopal A, Roxas JL et al. . Surface-layer protein A (SlpA) is a major contributor to host-cell adherence of Clostridium difficile. PLoS One 2013; 8:e78404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Baban ST, Kuehne SA, Barketi-Klai A et al. . The role of flagella in Clostridium difficile pathogenesis: comparison between a non-epidemic and an epidemic strain. PLoS One 2013; 8:e73026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Janoir C, Péchiné S, Grosdidier C, Collignon A. Cwp84, a surface-associated protein of Clostridium difficile, is a cysteine protease with degrading activity on extracellular matrix proteins. J Bacteriol 2007; 189:7174–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lawley TD, Clare S, Walker AW et al. . Antibiotic treatment of Clostridium difficile carrier mice triggers a supershedder state, spore-mediated transmission, and severe disease in immunocompromised hosts. Infect Immun 2009; 77:3661–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Buckley AM, Spencer J, Maclellan LM, Candlish D, Irvine JJ, Douce GR. Susceptibility of hamsters to Clostridium difficile isolates of differing toxinotype. PLoS One 2013; 8:e64121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kansau I, Barketi-Klai A, Monot M et al. . Deciphering adaptation strategies of the epidemic Clostridium difficile 027 strain during infection through in vivo transcriptional analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0158204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Deakin LJ, Clare S, Fagan RP et al. . The Clostridium difficile spo0A gene is a persistence and transmission factor. Infect Immun 2012; 80:2704–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Permpoonpattana P, Tolls EH, Nadem R, Tan S, Brisson A, Cutting SM. Surface layers of Clostridium difficile endospores. J Bacteriol 2011; 193:6461–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Permpoonpattana P, Phetcharaburanin J, Mikelsone A et al. . Functional characterization of Clostridium difficile spore coat proteins. J Bacteriol 2013; 195:1492–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hussain HA, Roberts AP, Mullany P. Generation of an erythromycin-sensitive derivative of Clostridium difficile strain 630 (630Deltaerm) and demonstration that the conjugative transposon Tn916DeltaE enters the genome of this strain at multiple sites. J Med Microbiol 2005; 54:137–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wüst J, Sullivan NM, Hardegger U, Wilkins TD. Investigation of an outbreak of antibiotic-associated colitis by various typing methods. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16:1096–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hong HA, Hitri K, Hosseini S et al. . Mucosal antibodies to the C-terminus of toxin A prevent colonization of Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun 2017; 85. doi:10.1128/IAI.01060-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Permpoonpattana P, Hong HA, Phetcharaburanin J et al. . Immunization with Bacillus spores expressing toxin A peptide repeats protects against infection with Clostridium difficile strains producing toxins A and B. Infect Immun 2011; 79:2295–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Phetcharaburanin J, Hong HA, Colenutt C et al. . The spore-associated protein BclA1 affects the susceptibility of animals to colonization and infection by Clostridium difficile. Mol Microbiol 2014; 92:1025–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gagnon M, Zihler Berner A, Chervet N, Chassard C, Lacroix C. Comparison of the Caco-2, HT-29 and the mucus-secreting HT29-MTX intestinal cell models to investigate Salmonella adhesion and invasion. J Microbiol Methods 2013; 94:274–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. McGuckin MA, Lindén SK, Sutton P, Florin TH. Mucin dynamics and enteric pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011; 9:265–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Finne J, Breimer ME, Hansson GC et al. . Novel polyfucosylated N-linked glycopeptides with blood group A, H, X, and Y determinants from human small intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 1989; 264:5720–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kirn TJ, Jude BA, Taylor RK. A colonization factor links Vibrio cholerae environmental survival and human infection. Nature 2005; 438:863–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sanders NN, Eijsink VG, van den Pangaart PS et al. . Mucolytic activity of bacterial and human chitinases. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007; 1770:839–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mondal M, Nag D, Koley H, Saha DR, Chatterjee NS. The Vibrio cholerae extracellular chitinase ChiA2 is important for survival and pathogenesis in the host intestine. PLoS One 2014; 9:e103119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhou JS, Gopal PK, Gill HS. Potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus rhamnosus (HN001), Lactobacillus acidophilus (HN017) and Bifidobacterium lactis (HN019) do not degrade gastric mucin in vitro. Int J Food Microbiol 2001; 63:81–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Wilson KH, Perini F. Role of competition for nutrients in suppression of Clostridium difficile by the colonic microflora. Infect Immun 1988; 56:2610–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Goulding D, Thompson H, Emerson J, Fairweather NF, Dougan G, Douce GR. Distinctive profiles of infection and pathology in hamsters infected with Clostridium difficile strains 630 and B1. Infect Immun 2009; 77:5478–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Haraldsen JD, Sonenshein AL. Efficient sporulation in Clostridium difficile requires disruption of the sigmaK gene. Mol Microbiol 2003; 48:811–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Pereira FC, Saujet L, Tomé AR et al. . The spore differentiation pathway in the enteric pathogen Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chaudhuri S, Bruno JC, Alonzo F 3rd, Xayarath B, Cianciotto NP, Freitag NE. Contribution of chitinases to Listeria monocytogenes pathogenesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76:7302–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. DebRoy S, Dao J, Söderberg M, Rossier O, Cianciotto NP. Legionella pneumophila type II secretome reveals unique exoproteins and a chitinase that promotes bacterial persistence in the lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:19146–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Low D, Tran HT, Lee IA et al. . Chitin-binding domains of Escherichia coli ChiA mediate interactions with intestinal epithelial cells in mice with colitis. Gastroenterology 2013; 145:602–12.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ribet D, Cossart P. How bacterial pathogens colonize their hosts and invade deeper tissues. Microbes Infect 2015; 17:173–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Theriot CM, Bowman AA, Young VB, Ellermeier CD. Antibiotic-induced alterations of the gut microbiota alter secondary bile acid production and allow for Clostridium difficile spore germination and outgrowth in the large intestine. mSphere 2016; 1. doi:10.1128/mSphere.00045-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Cybulski RJ Jr, Sanz P, Alem F, Stibitz S, Bull RL, O’Brien AD. Four superoxide dismutases contribute to Bacillus anthracis virulence and provide spores with redundant protection from oxidative stress. Infect Immun 2009; 77:274–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Burns DA, Heeg D, Cartman ST, Minton NP. Reconsidering the sporulation characteristics of hypervirulent Clostridium difficile BI/NAP1/027. PLoS One 2011; 6:e24894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Akerlund T, Svenungsson B, Lagergren A, Burman LG. Correlation of disease severity with fecal toxin levels in patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and distribution of PCR ribotypes and toxin yields in vitro of corresponding isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44:353–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.