Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2018 Mar 28;6:e4565. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4565

Limb-use by foraging marine turtles, an evolutionary perspective

Jessica A Fujii 1,, Don McLeish 2, Andrew J Brooks 3, John Gaskell 4, Kyle S Van Houtan 1,5
Editor: Jose Maria Cardoso da Silva
PMCID: PMC5878658  PMID: 29610708

Abstract

The use of limbs for foraging is documented in both marine and terrestrial tetrapods. These behaviors were once believed to be less likely in marine tetrapods due to the physical constraints of body plans adapted to locomotion in a fluid environment. Despite these obstacles, ten distinct types of limb-use while foraging have been previously reported in nine marine tetrapod families. Here, we expand the types of limb-use documented in marine turtles and put it in context with the diversity of marine tetrapods currently known to use limbs for foraging. Additionally, we suggest that such behaviors could have occurred in ancestral turtles, and thus, possibly extend the evolutionary timeline of limb-use behavior in marine tetrapods back approximately 70 million years. Through direct observation in situ and crowd-sourcing, we document the range of behaviors across habitats and prey types, suggesting its widespread occurrence. We argue the presence of these behaviors among marine tetrapods may be limited by limb mobility and evolutionary history, rather than foraging ecology or social learning. These behaviors may also be remnant of ancestral forelimb-use that have been maintained due to a semi-aquatic life history.

Keywords: Foraging, Limb use, Behavioral ecology, Evolution

Introduction

Marine turtles (Chelonioidea Oppel, 1811) and most other marine tetrapods, have evolved body forms that are best suited to move, orient, and minimize drag in a fluid environment rather than using their articulating limbs to directly aid in prey capture or processing (Fish, 2016). Due to the limitation of these evolved body plans and the constraints of the aquatic environment, Taylor (1987) predicted mouth-based filter, suction, or ram foraging to be the primary foraging mechanisms for all marine tetrapods. Although the evolution of foraging mechanisms generally coincides with associated morphological traits, such as filter feeding and baleen in Mysticete whales (Deméré et al., 2008), many species have been observed using innovative strategies counter to what their evolved body plans would predict. Following Gould & Vrba (1982) and Lloyd & Gould (2017), these traits could be considered exaptations; “traits that were adapted for one evolutionary function, but were later co-opted (but not selected) to serve a different role”. Such exaptations can provide insight into an organism’s current ecological dynamics (Gould & Vrba, 1982) as well as the evolutionary conditions influencing these novel behaviors.

Despite the predictions of Taylor (1987), a number of marine tetrapods have been documented to use their limbs to directly aid in prey capture, manipulation, and processing (Iwaniuk & Whishaw, 2000). Rudimentary limb-use for foraging is observed in a range of terrestrial and aquatic taxa, therefore, this behavior could have evolved in ancestral tetrapods and was subsequently developed, maintained, or lost in different lineages over time (Iwaniuk & Whishaw, 2000). For those lineages that lost the ability, the use of limbs to aid in foraging may be an exaptation—wherein limbs evolved for locomotion have been co-opted to be used in food handling (Gould & Vrba, 1982). These behaviors (hereafter “limb-use”) may improve foraging efficiency, expand ecological niches, and perhaps confer greater resiliency in dynamic or altered environments. Limb-use could also have developed as a result of co-evolution or are secondary adaptations (Lloyd & Gould, 2017), but as suggested by Hocking et al. (2017b), the evolution of forelimbs dedicated to locomotion may have consequently made said limbs unsuitable for feeding purposes. Thus, it seems unlikely that these behaviors would have been selected for under various evolutionary processes.

Why limb-use develops in some marine tetrapods, but not others, is not well understood. Hocking et al. (2017b) showed that less-specialized, semi-aquatic marine mammals (Mustelidae, Odobenidae, Otariidae, Phocidae) might retain the use of forelimbs to manipulate prey, but older taxa and taxa more specialized for the aquatic environment (e.g., cetaceans) might rely solely on suction, filter, or ram foraging. Whether this pattern extends to marine turtles has not been previously explored.

Marine turtles are the oldest extant line of marine tetrapods but some still maintain a semi-aquatic lifestyle for thermoregulation and breeding (Kelley & Pyenson, 2015). Like many other marine tetrapods, marine turtles predominantly use suction or bite-and-tear foraging strategies to capture and process food (Moreno et al., 2016). To date, however, direct observations of marine turtle foraging mechanisms are somewhat limited, or the methods used (such as critter-cams) limit the ability to assess limb-use due to a narrow field of view (but see: Schofield et al., 2006; Seminoff, Jones & Marshall, 2006; Patel et al., 2016). While knowledge of marine turtle diets has significantly improved in recent years with technological innovations (Arthur et al., 2007; Patel et al., 2016; Van Houtan et al., 2016) without direct observations, many aspects of feeding behavior remain overlooked.

Here, we describe three marine turtle species—green (Chelonia mydas), hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata), and loggerhead (Caretta caretta)—using limbs in the wild to aid in foraging in ways which have not been previously assessed in detail. We set these observations in context with other marine tetrapods known to use their flippers, forelimbs, or tails as direct aids in obtaining or processing food and discuss the role of behavioral, morphological and ecological factors that may limit or promote this behavior.

Materials & Methods

While viewing a fixed-station underwater video from a coral reef in Moorea, French Polynesia we opportunistically observed a hawksbill sea turtle use its limbs while foraging, prompting discussion with experts in the field, and a broader survey for the occurrence and context of this behavior. We documented marine turtle foraging behavior from underwater surveys, web image and video searches (e.g., Google, YouTube, Vimeo, Flickr, Shutterstock), and the published literature.

For this study, limb-use for feeding was defined as the intentional use of flippers, paws, tails, or feet to directly aid in the capture, processing, or transport of the animal’s food while in the marine environment. If we did not find limb-use feeding described in the published literature (e.g., searching Google Scholar and Web of Science), we conducted broader internet searches for video and images using the species’ common name or group (“green turtle” or “sea turtle”) combined with feeding terms (e.g., “feeding”, “foraging”, “eating”). Once an initial record was found, we conducted more in-depth searches for that species or group to determine the ecological context of the behaviors. Feeding strategies were grouped into broad behavioral categories and feeding stages based on previous study definitions (Hocking et al., 2017b), Table 1.

Table 1. Functional definitions of observed types of limb use by feeding marine tetrapods.

Behavior Feeding stagea Definition
Digging Capture Using one or both flippers or paws to remove benthic sediment in order to access benthic food.
Striking Capture Using one or both flippers, or tail, to forcibly hit prey, usually to stun.
Tossing Capture Using flipper or tail to project prey into the air, usually used to stun prey.
Kerplunking Capture Slapping water surface with tail to cause a startle response in prey to aid in capture.
Leveraging Processing Placing one or both flippers against benthic substrate to create tension while pulling food from substrate with mouth.
Swiping Processing Moving one flipper against food to create tension while tearing food into smaller pieces with mouth.
Holding Processing Using both flippers to keep food in place, either by squeezing flippers or gripping with claws while pulling food apart with mouth.
Pounding Processing Using both flippers or paws to hold food while rapidly hitting against another object.
Corralling Transport Using one or both flippers to guide loose food in a directed manner toward mouth.
Lobtailing Transport Slapping water surface with tail during bubble-net feeding to corral prey together.

Notes.

a

Feeding behaviors fell in one of three categories of feeding stages: capture, processing, and transport based on Hocking et al. (2017b).

We defined marine tetrapods similar to previous studies (Kelley & Motani, 2015; Kelley & Pyenson, 2015). We excluded the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) as there is significant genetic admixture with a fully terrestrial species (Miller et al., 2012), and we excluded marine snakes as they lack external limbs. We initially included sea birds, yet limited observations to feeding occurring entirely in the marine environment. Foot-paddling, for example, is observed in a number of Laridae gulls, yet it occurs in terrestrial or mudflat habitats (Tinbergen, 1962) and so was not included.

Due the difficulty of observing wild foraging behaviors for many marine tetrapods, the absence of documented limb-use while feeding here does not indicate the behavior does not or cannot occur. In light of this, our intent was to be descriptive, not exhaustive, in comparing the occurrence of these behaviors. Due to the relative rarity of this behavior, we grouped marine tetrapods into taxonomic families for comparisons. We broadly compared evolutionary, morphological, ecological, and behavioral factors to qualitatively determine if the presence of limb-use behaviors followed patterns across marine tetrapod families. Evolutionary relationships and divergence times are from Timetree.org (Hedges, Dudley & Kumar, 2006).

Results & Discussion

Carr (1967) described hatch-year green turtles using the sharp claw on their foreflippers to swipe and tear food in tanks in captivity. Davenport & Clough (1985) similarly observed these behaviors in captive juvenile loggerhead turtles. Both studies suggested these behaviors would be limited to juveniles due to undeveloped, weak jaws. Since then, adult loggerhead turtles have been recorded holding mollusks between their foreflippers (Houghton, Woolmer & Hays, 2000), and digging (using forelimbs to remove benthic sediment) has been opportunistically documented in adult green turtles (Christianen et al., 2014) and loggerhead turtles (Limpus, Couper & Read, 2001; Preen, 1996). In our surveys, we found additional forms of limb-use not previously described, and add hawksbill turtles to the species of marine turtles documented to use these feeding strategies.

We found four novel types of limb-use by hawksbill, loggerhead, and green turtles. Hawksbill and green turtles were observed using corralling, leveraging, holding, and swiping movements to capture, process, or transport a variety of sponges, cnidarians, macroalgae, and fishes (Figs. 1A1D, 1F, Fig. S1, Table 1). We also documented loggerhead sea turtles swiping to process benthic mollusks, which is likely a continuation of the holding behaviors described above (Fig. 1E). Given the apparent rarity of these feeding strategies, it seems unlikely that they are required to consume any of these prey items, but they may aid feeding efficiency and expand foraging or habitat niches.

Figure 1. Limb use in marine turtle foraging.

Figure 1

(A) A hawksbill sea turtle holding a lobe coral (Porites lobata) to eat the black-brown protein sponge (Chondrosia chucalla) clinging to its surface in Kahekili, Maui USA, taken March 2010. (B) A green turtle holding a mosaic jellyfish (Thysanostoma thysanura) in the water column near the ocean surface in the Similan Islands, Thailand, taken June 2017 (© Rich Carey/Shutterstock.com). (C) A hawksbill sea turtle leveraging against the reef substrate to pry away a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica). This was a frame grab from a video in Cook’s Bay, Moorea, French Polynesia from June 2013. (D) A green turtle leveraging against the reef substrate to pry away bites of red macroalgae (Amansia glomerata) in Kahekili, Maui, taken October 2016. (E) A loggerhead sea turtle swiping the shell of an Atlantic deep-sea scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) while it consumes the edible tissue. This is a frame grab from a video in the mid-Atlantic Bight USA taken on July 2009 and available courtesy of the Coonamessett Farm Foundation (Patel et al., 2016). (F) A green turtle swiping the stinging jellyfish (Cyanea barkeri) in the water column at Hook Island, Queensland, Australia, taken June 2017. Image credits by the authors, save (B) © Rich Carey/Shutterstock.com and (E) Coonamessett Farm Foundation.

Limb-use while feeding has been previously reported in eight additional families of marine tetrapods including Balaenopteridae, Delphinidae, Trichechidae, Dugongidae, Mustelidae, Odobenidae, Otariidae, and Phocidae (Fig. 2, Table S1). Within these families, ten types of limb-use for foraging have been observed: digging, striking, tossing, kerplunking, leveraging, swiping, holding, pounding, lobtailling, and corralling (Table 1). Holding and digging were the most common behaviors seen across families (Kastelein & Mosterd, 1989; Bowen et al., 2002; Marshall et al., 2003; Van Neer, Jensen & Siebert, 2015; Hocking et al., 2017a). Stunning prey included directly striking or tossing as well as indirect so-called “kerplunking” (slapping the water surface with tail to cause a startle response in prey) and was seen only in Delphinids (Domenici et al., 2000; Gonzalez & Lopez, 2000). Lobtail feeding (slapping water surface with tail during bubble-net feeding to corral prey together) is currently exclusive to humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae, (Weinrich, Schilling & Belt, 1992)). Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) demonstrated the most diverse and complex forms of limb-use for foraging, including pounding prey against tools (Fujii, Ralls & Tinker, 2014). To our knowledge, limb-use has not been documented in any other marine tetrapods, but future studies may reveal currently undescribed behaviors. Although publicly-available media have increased over time (Kousha, Thelwall & Abdoli, 2012), uploading images and videos on public platforms is not a universal practice. As a result, there may be other examples of limb-use that our surveys missed. However, the number of behaviors observed suggests it is still an effective method of documenting natural behavior.

Figure 2. Evolutionary links between marine tetrapods known to use limbs while feeding and the diversity of body plans and types of limb use.

Figure 2

Silhouettes show a representative body plan for each family. Specific feeding behaviors are listed for each family.

We compared the prey type, relative prey size, and habitat across the marine tetrapods listed above to determine if distinct ecological factors promoted the development of limb-use (Table S1). However, limb-use behaviors were observed in a wide variety of conditions. Benthic feeders consumed bivalves, grasses, macroalgae, sponges, anemones, and hard corals. Epipelagic feeders consumed fish, jellyfish, and small marine mammals. Prey size often exceeded gape size (precluding whole consumption) but relatively smaller prey were also consumed, and included both mobile and sessile species. These factors may still be important factors at the species level, but did not remain constant across marine tetrapod families. Given the disparity of body forms and ecological niches observed across marine tetrapods, the range of ecological conditions in which limb-use is present is perhaps unsurprising. However, this diversity shows that a variety of conditions can lead to the expression of these behaviors, and provides additional support that many more species may use limb-use strategies that have not yet been documented in the literature.

The regular use of limbs for tasks beyond swimming may also promote the development of limb-use. As noted in Hocking et al. (2017b), limb-use was more common in semi-aquatic mammals who may also use forelimbs for locomotion on land. In marine turtles, although predominately aquatic, females must return to land for nesting and use both fore- and hind-limbs to dig body pits and nesting sites (Carr & Ogren, 1959). Additionally, terrestrial basking by marine turtles is female-biased (Van Houtan, Halley & Marks, 2015). The wider range of flipper-use by female marine turtles may also result in a female sex-bias in limb-use for feeding. From our observations, all hawksbills we were able to age and sex were putatively determined to be females, but were unable to determine the sex of the other turtles due to limitations in the media. However, Schofield et al. (2006) observed digging by both sexes of loggerheads.

Limb mobility may play the largest role in the development of limb-use across marine tetrapods. Foreflipper mobility varies across marine tetrapods due to trade-offs for maneuverability, stability, and propulsion (Fish, 2004). Taylor (1987) suggested that the constant need of foreflippers for locomotion and stability in the marine environment would limit their availability for other uses, including foraging. Although foreflippers used in propulsion have greater mobility compared to the foreflippers of taxa that use hindlimbs as the primary source of propulsion (Fish, 2004; Kelley & Pyenson, 2015), we found limb-use by species that used both forms of propulsion (Table S1). The limited mobility of foreflippers may prompt the use of tails in Delphinidae and Balaenopteridae cases, and may also explain the lack of limb-use by penguins and other cetacean families. Of the marine turtle foraging observations we report, all save one (Fig. 1B) involved foreflipper pronation movements. Figure 1B instead shows foreflipper supination while holding prey. Foreflipper pronations are the dominant mechanism marine turtles employ for swimming, crawling on land, excavating body pits for nesting, and aiding thermoregulation while basking (Van Houtan, Halley & Marks, 2015).

The origin of limb-use in marine turtles is currently unknown. Unlike other foraging strategies (such as lunge feeding), that can be analyzed via skull structure in extinct and extant species (Motani et al., 2015), it is currently unknown if there are any detectible physical predictors of limb-use that could be used for studying the origin of this behavior. Given the possible role of forelimb mobility on the presence of limb-use, muscular comparisons may be a future avenue of study as precedence for correlations between limb shape and ecological niche in turtles has been previously shown by Joyce & Gauthier (2004). If limb-use is an (unselected) exaptation rather than an evolved trait, however, distinct morphological correlations may be more difficult to identify. Several species of terrestrial or semi-aquatic turtles have also been documented using their forelimbs to assist in processing food (Davenport, Munks & Oxford, 1984; Lutz, Musick & Wyneken, 2002), but the limbs of these species are not as specialized in shape as marine turtle foreflippers are for swimming (Joyce & Gauthier, 2004) and so this limb-use is similar to that seen in other terrestrial tetrapods (Iwaniuk & Whishaw, 2000). As marine turtles do not have opportunities for social learning, these behaviors either developed via independent trial and error, or are maintained as an innate behavior (Lutz, Musick & Wyneken, 2002). If these behaviors are innate, their presence in terrestrial turtles may support the hypothesis that this behavior was present in an ancestral turtle (Joyce & Gauthier, 2004). If this behavior was present when marine turtles evolved, approximately 120 million years ago, then limb-use may have been present in the marine environment almost 70 million years before all other extant marine tetrapods (Bowen, Nelson & Avise, 1993; Cadena & Parham, 2015; Kelley & Pyenson, 2015).

Although flipper morphology and foraging ecologies likely evolved via convergent evolution across marine tetrapods (Kelley & Motani, 2015; Kelley & Pyenson, 2015) it is unknown if limb-use evolved under the same processes. Iwaniuk & Whishaw (2000) showed that rudimentary limb-use likely first evolved in ancestral tetrapods but was subsequently maintained, developed, or lost in various lineages over time. It is, therefore, possible that the predisposition for this ancestral behavior was maintained as tetrapods returned to the marine environment and only manifests under appropriate modern conditions.

Conclusions

The use of limbs to directly aid in foraging, while still relatively rare, is a strategy used by a variety of marine tetrapods. Despite being the oldest extant line of marine tetrapods, this is the first time such a wide range of limb-use has been described in marine turtles. We argue that these limb-use behaviors across marine tetrapods are limited by limb mobility and that the frequent use of forelimbs for other behaviors may promote the development of these feeding strategies. These observations provide additional insight into the diversity and possible evolution of limb-use behaviors.

Supplemental Information

Table S1. List of marine tetrapods known to use limbs for feeding, prey type consumed and feeding habitat when behaviors were observed, limbs typically used for propulsion, and links to videos with examples of behaviors.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4565/supp-1
Figure S1. Hawksbill sea turtle holding live fish.

A series of frame grabs from a video recorded at night in Maldives shows a Hawksbill sea turtle using its foreflippers to capture and hold a red-toothed triggerfish (Odonus niger). Video shot by Simon Enderby, ©http://www.Scubazoocom and provided with permission from Dr. Nicolas Pilcher.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4565/supp-2

Acknowledgments

J Seminoff, N Pilcher, A Gentry, J Goldbogen, J Moxley, M Staedler, T Nicholson, M Murray, A Johnson, L Henkel and several anonymous reviewers improved earlier versions of this manuscript. The Coonamessett Farm Foundation provided underwater video.

Funding Statement

The authors received no funding for this work.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests. Jessica Fujii and Kyle Van Houtan are employees of Monterey Bay Aquarium, Don McLeish is an employee of Hawaiian Hawksbill Conservation, and John Gaskell is an employee of Living Reef - Daydream Island.

Author Contributions

Jessica A. Fujii and Kyle S. Van Houtan conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Don McLeish, Andrew J. Brooks and John Gaskell performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Fujii JA, Mcleish D, Brooks A, Gaskell J, Van Houtan KS. (2018). Limb-use by foraging marine turtles, an evolutionary perspective. Available at https://osf.io/b3dtq/.

References

  • Arthur et al. (2007).Arthur KE, O’Neil JM, Limpus CJ, Abernathy K, Marshall G. Using animal-borne imaging to assess green turtle (Chelonia mydas) foraging ecology in Moreton Bay, Australia. Marine Technology Society Journal. 2007;41:9–13. doi: 10.4031/002533207787441953. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bowen, Nelson & Avise (1993).Bowen BW, Nelson WS, Avise JC. A molecular phylogeny for marine turtles: trait mapping, rate assessment, and conservation relevance. Proceedings of the National Acadeny of Sciences of the United States of America. 1993;90:5574–5577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.12.5574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bowen et al. (2002).Bowen W, Tully D, Boness D, Bulheier B, Marshall G. Prey-dependent foraging tactics and prey profitability in a marine mammal. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2002;244:235–245. doi: 10.3354/meps244235. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Cadena & Parham (2015).Cadena EA, Parham JF. Oldest known marine turtle? A new protostegid from the Lower Cretaceous of Colombia. PaleoBios. 2015;32:1–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Carr (1967).Carr A. The sea turtle: so excellent a fishe. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967. pp. 94–97. [Google Scholar]
  • Carr & Ogren (1959).Carr A, Ogren LH. The ecology and migrations of sea turtles, 3: Dermochelys in Costa Rica. American Museum Novitates. 1959;1958:1–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Christianen et al. (2014).Christianen MJ, Herman PM, Bouma TJ, Lamers LP, Van Katwijk MM, Van der Heide T, Mumby PJ, Silliman BR, Engelhard SL, Van de Kerk M. Habitat collapse due to overgrazing threatens turtle conservation in marine protected areas. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014;281 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2890. Article 20132890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Davenport & Clough (1985).Davenport J, Clough W. The use of limbscales of “pseudoclaws” in food handling by young loggerhead turtles. Copeia. 1985;1985:786–788. doi: 10.2307/1444774. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Davenport, Munks & Oxford (1984).Davenport J, Munks SA, Oxford PJ. A comparison of the swimming of marine and freshwater turtles. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1984;220:447–475. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1984.0013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Deméré et al. (2008).Deméré TA, McGowen MR, Berta A, Gatesy J. Morphological and molecular evidence for a stepwise evolutionary transition from teeth to baleen in mysticete whales. Systematic Biology. 2008;57:15–37. doi: 10.1080/10635150701884632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Domenici et al. (2000).Domenici P, Batty RS, Simila T, Ogam E. Killer whales (Orcinus orca) feeding on schooling herring (Clupea harengus) using underwater tail-slaps: kinematic analyses of field observations. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2000;203:283–294. doi: 10.1242/jeb.203.2.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fish (2004).Fish FE. Structure and mechanics of nonpiscine control surfaces. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering. 2004;29:605–621. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2004.833213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Fish (2016).Fish FE. Secondary evolution of aquatic propulsion in higher vertebrates: validation and prospect. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2016;56:1285–1297. doi: 10.1093/icb/icw123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fujii, Ralls & Tinker (2014).Fujii JA, Ralls K, Tinker MT. Ecological drivers of variation in tool-use frequency across sea otter populations. Behavioral Ecology. 2014;26:519–526. doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gonzalez & Lopez (2000).Gonzalez AF, Lopez A. ‘Kerplunking’: surface fluke-splashes during shallow-water bottom foraging by bottlenose dolphins. Marine Mammal Science. 2000;16:646–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2000.tb00959.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gould & Vrba (1982).Gould SJ, Vrba ES. Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology. 1982;8:4–15. doi: 10.1017/S0094837300004310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hedges, Dudley & Kumar (2006).Hedges SB, Dudley J, Kumar S. TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2971–2972. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hocking et al. (2017a).Hocking DP, Ladds MA, Slip DJ, Fitzgerald EMG, Evans AR. Chew, shake, and tear: prey processing in Australian sea lions (Neophoca cinerea) Marine Mammal Science. 2017a;33:541–557. doi: 10.1111/mms.12384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hocking et al. (2017b).Hocking DP, Marx FG, Park T, Fitzgerald EMG, Evans AR. A behavioural framework for the evolution of feeding in predatory aquatic mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2017b;284 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2750. Article rspb.2016.2750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Houghton, Woolmer & Hays (2000).Houghton JDR, Woolmer A, Hays GC. Sea turtle diving and foraging behaviour around the Greek Island of Kefalonia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 2000;80:761–762. doi: 10.1017/S002531540000271X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Iwaniuk & Whishaw (2000).Iwaniuk AN, Whishaw IQ. On the origin of skilled forelimb movements. Trends in Neurosciences. 2000;23:372–376. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01618-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Joyce & Gauthier (2004).Joyce WG, Gauthier JA. Palaeoecology of Triassic stem turtles sheds new light on turtle origins. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2004;271:1–5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kastelein & Mosterd (1989).Kastelein RA, Mosterd P. The excavation technique for molluscs of Pacific Walruses (Odobenus rosmarus divergens) under controlled conditions. Aquatic Mammals. 1989;15.1:3–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelley & Motani (2015).Kelley NP, Motani R. Trophic convergence drives morphological convergence in marine tetrapods. Biology Letters. 2015;11 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0709. Article 20140709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelley & Pyenson (2015).Kelley NP, Pyenson ND. Evolutionary innovation and ecology in marine tetrapods from the Triassic to the Anthropocene. Science. 2015;348 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3716. Article aaa3716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kousha, Thelwall & Abdoli (2012).Kousha K, Thelwall M, Abdoli M. The role of online videos in research communication: a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2012;63:1710–1727. doi: 10.1002/asi.22717. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Limpus, Couper & Read (2001).Limpus CJ, Couper P, Read M. The loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta, in Queensland: population structure in a warm temperature feeding area. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum. 2001;46(2):631–645. [Google Scholar]
  • Lloyd & Gould (2017).Lloyd EA, Gould SJ. Exaptation revisited: changes imposed by evolutionary psychologists and behavioral biologists. Biological Theory. 2017;12:50–65. doi: 10.1007/s13752-016-0258-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Lutz, Musick & Wyneken (2002).Lutz PL, Musick JA, Wyneken J. The biology of sea turtles. CRC press; New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • Marshall et al. (2003).Marshall CD, Maeda H, Iwata M, Furuta M, Asano S, Rosas F, Reep RL. Orofacial morphology and feeding behaviour of the dugong, Amazonian, West African and Antillean manatees (Mammalia: Sirenia): functional morphology of the muscular-vibrissal complex. Journal of Zoology. 2003;259:245–260. doi: 10.1017/S0952836902003205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Miller et al. (2012).Miller W, Schuster SC, Welch AJ, Ratan A, Bedoya-Reina OC, Zhao F, Kim HL, Burhans RC, Drautz DI, Wittekindt NE, Tomsho LP, Ibarra-Laclette E, Herrera-Estrella L, Peacock E, Farley S, Sage GK, Rode K, Obbard M, Montiel R, Bachmann L, Ingólfsson Ó, Aars J, Mailund T, Wiig Ø, Talbot SL, Lindqvist C. Polar and brown bear genomes reveal ancient admixture and demographic footprints of past climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:E2382–E2390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210506109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moreno et al. (2016).Moreno AF, Escalona VHC, Rguez-Baron JM, Ruiz MG, Hart CE. Functional morphology in marine turtle skulls. In: Rquez-Baron JM, Lara-Uc M, Rodriguez RR, editors. Advances in research techniques for the study of sea turtles. Nova Publishers; New York: 2016. pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Motani et al. (2015).Motani R, Chen X-h, Jiang D-y, Cheng L, Tintori A, Rieppel O. Lunge feeding in early marine reptiles and fast evolution of marine tetrapod feeding guilds. Scientific Reports. 2015;5 doi: 10.1038/srep08900. Article srep08900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Patel et al. (2016).Patel SH, Dodge KL, Haas HL, Smolowitz RJ. Videography reveals in-water behavior of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) at a foraging ground. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2016;3 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00254. Article 254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Preen (1996).Preen AR. Infaunal mining: a novel foraging method of loggerhead turtles. Journal of Herpetology. 1996;30:94–96. doi: 10.2307/1564718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Schofield et al. (2006).Schofield G, Katselidis KA, Dimopoulos P, Pantis JD, Hays GC. Behaviour analysis of the loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta from direct in-water observation. Endangered Species Research. 2006;2:71–79. doi: 10.3354/esr002071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Seminoff, Jones & Marshall (2006).Seminoff JA, Jones TT, Marshall GJ. Underwater behaviour of green turtles monitored with video-time-depth recorders: what’s missing from dive profiles? Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2006;322:269–280. doi: 10.3354/meps322269. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor (1987).Taylor MA. How tetrapods feed in water: a functional analysis by paradigm. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1987;91:171–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1987.tb01727.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Tinbergen (1962).Tinbergen N. Foot-paddling in gulls. British Birds. 1962;55:117–120. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Houtan et al. (2016).Van Houtan KS, Andrews AH, Jones TT, Murakawa SKK, Hagemann ME. Time in tortoiseshell: a bomb radiocarbon-validated chronology in sea turtle scutes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2016;283 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2220. Article 20152220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Houtan, Halley & Marks (2015).Van Houtan KS, Halley JM, Marks W. Terrestrial basking sea turtles are responding to spatio-temporal sea surface temperature patterns. Biology Letters. 2015;11 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0744. Article 20140744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Neer, Jensen & Siebert (2015).Van Neer A, Jensen LF, Siebert U. Grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) predation on harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) on the island of Helgoland, Germany. Journal of Sea Research. 2015;97:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2014.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Weinrich, Schilling & Belt (1992).Weinrich MT, Schilling MR, Belt CR. Evidence for acquisition of a novel feeding behaviour: lobtail feeding in humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae. Animal Behaviour. 1992;44:1059–1072. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80318-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. List of marine tetrapods known to use limbs for feeding, prey type consumed and feeding habitat when behaviors were observed, limbs typically used for propulsion, and links to videos with examples of behaviors.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4565/supp-1
Figure S1. Hawksbill sea turtle holding live fish.

A series of frame grabs from a video recorded at night in Maldives shows a Hawksbill sea turtle using its foreflippers to capture and hold a red-toothed triggerfish (Odonus niger). Video shot by Simon Enderby, ©http://www.Scubazoocom and provided with permission from Dr. Nicolas Pilcher.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4565/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Fujii JA, Mcleish D, Brooks A, Gaskell J, Van Houtan KS. (2018). Limb-use by foraging marine turtles, an evolutionary perspective. Available at https://osf.io/b3dtq/.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES