Skip to main content
Studies in Mycology logoLink to Studies in Mycology
. 2018 Mar 7;90:161–189. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.03.001

Resolving the Lophiostoma bipolare complex: Generic delimitations within Lophiostomataceae

A Hashimoto 1,2, K Hirayama 3, H Takahashi 1, M Matsumura 1,4, G Okada 5, CY Chen 6, JW Huang 7, M Kakishima 8,9, T Ono 10, K Tanaka 1,4,
PMCID: PMC5889712  PMID: 29632417

Abstract

Lophiostoma bipolare was taxonomically revised based on the morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses of molecular data from nuclear rDNA SSU-ITS-LSU, TUB, tef1, and rpb2 genes. Twenty-nine strains were morphologically similar to Lo. bipolare. A total of 174 sequences were generated from the Lo. bipolare complex. Phylogenetic analyses based on TUB sequence revealed 11 distinct species within the Lo. bipolare complex. Morphological features of the ascospores and the anatomical structure of the ascomata from both field collections as well as axenic culture, which have been reported previously as variable features at intraspecific levels, were compared to evaluate the taxonomic reliability of these features. To clarify the generic position of the 11 species, phylogenetic analyses were done on SSU-ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 gene sequences. The Lo. bipolare complex shared phylogenetic relationships with Pseudolophiostoma and Vaginatispora, and formed an additional five distinct clades from other members of Lophiostomataceae. According to its phylogenetic position, Lo. bipolare sensu stricto was distantly related to Lophiostoma s. str., and formed an independent clade within Lophiostomataceae. Lophiostoma bipolare s. str. could be distinguished from the other lophiostomataceous genera by the clypeus around the ostiolar neck and by the thin and uniformly thick peridium. A novel genus described as Lentistoma was established to accommodate this species, and the epitypification of Lentistoma bipolare (basionym: Massarina bipolaris) was proposed. Other lineages of the Lo. bipolare complex could not be separated on the basis of the ascospore size and sheath variations, but were distinguished based on ascomatal features, such as the existence of the clypeus, brown hyphae surrounding the peridium, and the contexture of the peridium, which were stable indicators of generic boundaries in Lophiostomataceae. Four additional new genera with five new species were recognised based on these morphological differences: Crassiclypeus (C. aquaticus), Flabellascoma (F. cycadicola and F. minimum), Leptoparies (Lep. palmarum), and Pseudopaucispora (Pseudop. brunneospora). Three new species were added to Pseudolophiostoma (Pseudol. cornisporum, Pseudol. obtusisporum, and Pseudol. tropicum) and two new species were added to Vaginatispora (V. amygdali and V. scabrispora). The re-evaluation of the validity of several previously recognised genera resulted in the introduction of two new genera with new combinations for Lophiostoma pseudoarmatisporum as Parapaucispora pseudoarmatispora and Vaginatispora fuckelii as Neovaginatispora fuckelii.

Key words: Freshwater fungi, Pleosporales, Species complex, Systematics, Taxonomy, 21 new taxa, 1 new typification

Taxonomic novelties: New genera: Crassiclypeus A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Flabellascoma A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Lentistoma A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Lentistoma A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Leptoparies A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Neovaginatispora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Parapaucispora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Pseudopaucispora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka

New species: Crassiclypeus aquaticus A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Flabellascoma cycadicola A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Flabellascoma minimum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Leptoparies palmarum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Pseudolophiostoma cornisporum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Pseudolophiostoma obtusisporum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Pseudolophiostoma tropicum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Pseudopaucispora brunneospora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Vaginatispora amygdali A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Vaginatispora scabrispora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka

New combinations: Lentistoma bipolare (K.D. Hyde) A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Parapaucispora pseudoarmatispora (Hay. Takah. et al.) A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka; Neovaginatispora fuckelii (Sacc.) A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka

Typification: Epitypification (Basionym): Massarina bipolaris K.D. Hyde

Introduction

Lophiostomataceae was established by Saccardo (1883) based on the subfamily Lophiostomeae. Members of the family are readily recognised by their carbonaceous ascomata with the slit-like ostiolar neck. They are saprophytes that grow on herbaceous and woody plants from terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments (Chesters and Bell, 1970, Holm and Holm, 1988, Barr, 1987, Barr, 1992). The slit-like ostiolar neck and peridium of the ascomata are regarded as variable structures within a single specimen. Chesters & Bell (1970) adapted ascospore features including colour and longitudinal or transverse septation for generic circumscription. However, Holm & Holm (1988) considered ascospore septation as an unimportant characteristic at the generic level, but useful at the species level, and therefore used broad generic concepts for Lophiostomataceae. These broad generic concepts of Lophiostoma have been used by several authors (Barr, 1987, Barr, 1992, Yuan and Zhao, 1994, Checa, 1997, Kirk et al., 2008, Mugambi and Huhndorf, 2009). A recent generic re-evaluation of Lophiostomataceae (Thambugala et al. 2015) segregated Lophiostoma s. lat. into 16 genera according to the multi-locus phylogenies using small subunit nrDNA (18S; SSU), large subunit nrDNA (28S; LSU), and translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1).

Lophiostoma bipolare is recognised by its striking features of the slit-like ostiolar neck surrounded by a well-developed clypeus, an ascus with a broad ocular chamber, and ascospores bearing an appendage-like sheath (hereafter referred to as the bipolar sheath) (Hyde 1995a). Lophiostoma bipolare has been reported in freshwater (Shearer & Raja 2010) and marine habitats (Hyde et al. 2002). The species was originally described as a member of Massarina (Hyde 1995a). Although Lo. bipolare slightly differs in morphology from the generic type Lo. macrostomum – which is characterised by a well-developed carbonaceous ascoma, a slit-like ostiolar neck lacking the clypeus, and an ascus with a small ocular chamber (Zhang et al. 2009) – this species was transferred to the genus Lophiostoma based on the results of the phylogenetic analyses using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences (Liew et al. 2002). Lophiostoma bipolare was not included in the recent comprehensive study on Lophiostomataceae by Thambugala et al. (2015). Thus, its generic placement remains unresolved.

During our studies of ascomycetous fungi in Japan (Hirayama and Tanaka, 2011, Tanaka et al., 2015, Hashimoto et al., 2017a, Hashimoto et al., 2017b), we obtained strains that were morphologically similar to Lo. bipolare. The main objectives of the present study were to clarify the generic placement of the Lo. bipolare complex and to establish a taxonomic framework of genera in Lophiostomataceae based on the morphological observations and molecular phylogenetic analyses of the sequences of SSU, ITS, LSU, tef1, and rpb2 (the second largest subunit of the DNA-directed RNA polymerase II).

Materials and methods

DNA isolation and amplification

DNA extraction was carried out with an ISOPLANT II kit (Nippon Gene, Japan) based on the manufacturer's protocol. Sequences of SSU, ITS, LSU, TUB, tef1, and rpb2 were amplified by PCR with the following primer pairs: SSU = NS1/NS4, ITS = ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990), LSU = LR0R/LR7 (Rehner and Samuels, 1994, Vilgalys and Hester, 1990), TUB = T1/Bt2b (Glass and Donaldson, 1995, O'Donnell and Cigelnik, 1997), tef1 = EF1-983F/EF1-2218R (Rehner & Buckley 2005), and rpb2 = fRPB2-5F/fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999), respectively. Amplifications were performed in 25 μL volumes consisting of 2 μL DNA, 2.5 μL of 10× TEMPase Buffer I, 10 mM dNTP mix, 1 μL of each primer (20 pM), 25 mM MgCl2, 14.5 μL MilliQ water, and 0.5 μL TEMPase Hot Start DNA polymerase (Ampliqon, Denmark). PCR was carried out on a PC 320 thermocycler (ASTEC, Japan) as follows: 95 °C for 15 min, 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at the designated annealing temperature (42.2 °C for SSU, 61.5 °C for ITS, 46 °C for LSU, 50 °C for TUB, 60 °C for tef1, and 58 °C for rpb2), and 1 min at 72 °C, with a final denaturation step of 7 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were sequenced directly at SolGent (South Korea).

Phylogenetic analyses

Newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). The primary analyses of TUB sequences were applied to 29 strains of Lo. bipolare complex to assess species diversity (Table 1). Secondary analyses were conducted on SSU-ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 sequences from 73 taxa of Lophiostomataceae to clarify the generic placement (Table 1, Table 2). Vaginatispora armatispora was excluded from the analyses because the sequences were limited to ITS data only. All sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm as implemented in MEGA v. 5 (Tamura et al. 2011). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian methods. The optimum substitution models for each dataset were estimated using the Kakusan4 program (Tanabe 2011) based on the Akaike information Criterion (AIC; Akaike 1974) for the ML analysis, and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC; Schwarz 1978) for the Bayesian analysis. The ML analysis was performed using the TreeFinder Mar 2011 program (Jobb 2011) based on the models selected with the AICc4 parameter (a proportional model among genes and codons). TN93+G was used for TUB in the first dataset. The second dataset used HKY85+G for SSU, TN93+G for LSU, J2ef+G for ITS, F81+G for tef1 first codon position, J1ef+G for tef1 second codon position, J2+G for tef1 third codon position, J2+G for rpb2 first codon position, F81+G for rpb2 second codon position, and J2+G for rpb2 third codon position. Bootstrap proportions (BPs) were obtained via 1 000 bootstrap replicates. Bayesian analysis was performed with MrBayes v. 3.2.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) using substitution models containing the BIC4 parameter (i.e., proportional model among loci and among codons). HKY85+G was used for TUB in the first dataset. The second dataset used K80+G for SSU, K80+G for LSU, SYM+G for ITS, F81+G for tef1 first codon position, GTR+G for tef1 second codon position, GTR+G for tef1 third codon position, GTR+G for rpb2 first codon position, F81+G for rpb2 second codon position, and HKY85+G for rpb2 third codon position. Two simultaneous and independent Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs were performed for 1 M and 2 M generations with the trees sampled every 1 000 generations for the first and second analyses, respectively. Convergence of the MCMC procedure was assessed from the average standard deviation of split frequencies (< 0.01) and effective sample size scores (all > 100) using MrBayes and Tracer v. 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2014), respectively. The first 25 % of the trees were discarded as burn-in, and the remainder were used to calculate the 50 % majority rule trees and to determine the posterior probabilities (PPs) for individual branches. Teichospora rubriostiolata and T. trabicola (Teichosporaceae; Jaklitsch et al. 2016) were used as outgroups in the secondary analyses. The alignments were submitted to TreeBASE under study number S21190.

Table 1.

Specimens, isolates and new sequence accessions used in this study.

Species
Original no. Specimen no.1 Strain no. Habitat2 GenBank accession no.
Old name New name SSU ITS LSU tef1 rpb2 TUB
Lo. bipolare -1 Crassiclypeus aquaticus KH 56 HHUF 30566 CBS 143639 F LC312468 LC312497 LC312526 LC312555 LC312584 LC312613
KH 91 HHUF 30567 CBS 143640 F LC312469 LC312498 LC312527 LC312556 LC312585 LC312614
KH 104 HHUF 30568 CBS 143641 F LC312470 LC312499 LC312528 LC312557 LC312586 LC312615
KH 185 HHUF 30569 CBS 143642 F LC312471 LC312500 LC312529 LC312558 LC312587 LC312616
KT 970 HHUF 27985H CBS 143643
=JCM 13087
=MAFF 239597
F LC312472 LC312501 LC312530 LC312559 LC312588 LC312617
Lo. bipolare -2 Flabellascoma cycadicola KT 2034 HHUF 30570H BCRC FU30901
=CBS 143644
T LC312473 LC312502 LC312531 LC312560 LC312589 LC312618
Lo. bipolare -3 F.minimum KT 2013 HHUF 30571 BCRC FU30900
=CBS 143645
T LC312474 LC312503 LC312532 LC312561 LC312590 LC312619
KT 2040 HHUF 30572H BCRC FU30902
=CBS 143646
T LC312475 LC312504 LC312533 LC312562 LC312591 LC312620
Lo. bipolare -4 Lentistoma bipolare HKUCC 10069 HHUF 30576 CBS 115370 U LC312476 LC312505 LC312534 LC312563 LC312592 LC312621
HKUCC 10110 HHUF 30577E CBS 115375 U LC312477 LC312506 LC312535 LC312564 LC312593 LC312622
HKUCC 8277 HHUF 30575 JCM 14139
=CBS 110448
F LC312478 LC312507 LC312536 LC312565 LC312594 LC312623
KH 214 HHUF 30578 CBS 143647 F LC312479 LC312508 LC312537 LC312566 LC312595 LC312624
KH 216 HHUF 30579 CBS 143648 T LC312480 LC312509 LC312538 LC312567 LC312596 LC312625
KH 222 HHUF 30580 CBS 143649 F LC312481 LC312510 LC312539 LC312568 LC312597 LC312626
KH 311 HHUF 30581 CBS 143650 F LC312482 LC312511 LC312540 LC312569 LC312598 LC312627
KT 2415 HHUF 30573 CBS 143651 T LC312483 LC312512 LC312541 LC312570 LC312599 LC312628
KT 3056 HHUF 30574 CBS 143652 T LC312484 LC312513 LC312542 LC312571 LC312600 LC312629
Lo. bipolare -5 Leptoparies palmarum KT 1653 HHUF 28983H CBS 143653
=JCM 13089
=MAFF 239599
T LC312485 LC312514 LC312543 LC312572 LC312601 LC312630
Lo. bipolare -6 Pseudolophiostoma cornisporum KH 322 HHUF 30582H CBS 143654
=JCM 32348
T LC312486 LC312515 LC312544 LC312573 LC312602 LC312631
Lo. bipolare -7 P. obtusisporum KH 228 HHUF 30584 CBS 143655 T LC312487 LC312516 LC312545 LC312574 LC312603 LC312632
KH 336 HHUF 30585 CBS 143656 T LC312488 LC312517 LC312546 LC312575 LC312604 LC312633
KT 2838 HHUF 30583H CBS 143657
=JCM 32349
T LC312489 LC312518 LC312547 LC312576 LC312605 LC312634
KT 3098 HHUF 30171 CBS 143941
=MAFF 243969
T LC312490 LC312519 LC312548 LC312577 LC312606 LC312635
KT 3119 HHUF 30189 CBS 143658
=MAFF 243983
T LC312491 LC312520 LC312549 LC312578 LC312607 LC312636
Lo. bipolare -8 P. tropicum KH 352 HHUF 30586 CBS 143659 T LC312492 LC312521 LC312550 LC312579 LC312608 LC312637
KT 3134 HHUF 30202H CBS 143660
=MAFF 243989
T LC312493 LC312522 LC312551 LC312580 LC312609 LC312638
Lo. bipolare -9 Pseudopaucispora brunneospora KH 227 HHUF 30587H CBS 143661
=JCM 32350
T LC312494 LC312523 LC312552 LC312581 LC312610 LC312639
Lo. bipolare -10 Vaginatispora amygdali KT 2248 HHUF 30588H CBS 143662
=JCM 32351
T LC312495 LC312524 LC312553 LC312582 LC312611 LC312640
Lo. bipolare -11 V. scabrispora KT 2443 HHUF 30589H CBS 143663
=JCM 32352
M LC312496 LC312525 LC312554 LC312583 LC312612 LC312641
1

“E”: epitype, “H”: holotype.

2

“F”: freshwater, “M”: marine, “T”: terrestrial, “U”: unknown.

Table 2.

Isolates and GenBank accession numbers of species used in the phylogenetic study.

Species Strain no. GenBank Accession no.1
SSU ITS LSU tef1 rpb2
Alpestrisphaeria terricola SC-12H JX985749 JN662930 JX985750
Biappendiculispora japonica KT 573H AB618686 LC001728 AB619005 LC001744
KT 686-1P AB618687 LC001729 AB619006 LC001745
Capulatispora sagittiformis KT 1934H AB618693 AB369268 AB369267 LC001756
Coelodictyosporium muriforme MFLUCC 13-0351H KP899127 KP899136 KP888641 KR075163
C. pseudodictyosporium MFLUCC 13-0451H KR025858 KR025862
Dimorphiopsis brachystegiae CPC 22679H KF777160 KF777213
Guttulispora crataegi MFLUCC 13-0442H KP899125 KP899134 KP888639 KR075161
MFLUCC 14-0993P KP899126 KP899135 KP888640 KR075162
Lophiohelichrysum helichrysi MFLUCC 15-0701H KT333437 KT333435 KT333436 KT427535
Lophiopoacea paramacrostoma MFLUCC 11-0463H KP899122 KP888636
L. winteri KT 740 AB618699 JN942969 AB619017 LC001763 JN993487
KT 764 AB618700 JN942968 AB619018 LC001764 JN993488
Lophiostoma alpigenum GKM 1091b GU385193 GU327758
L. caulium CBS 623.86 GU296163 GU301833 GU371791
L. crenatum CBS 629.86 DQ678017 DQ678069 DQ677912 DQ677965
L. heterosporum CBS 644.86 AY016354 GQ203795 AY016369 DQ497609 DQ497615
L. macrostomoides CBS 123097 FJ795482 FJ795439 GU456277 FJ795458
L. macrostomum KT 635 AB521731 AB433275 AB433273 LC001752 JN993484
L. quadrinucleatum GKM 1233 GU385184 GU327760
L. semiliberum KT 828 AB618696 JN942970 AB619014 LC001759 JN993489
Neotrematosphaeria biappendiculata KT 1124H GU205256 GU205227
KT 975P GU205254 GU205228
Neovaginatispora fuckelii CBS 101952 FJ795496 DQ399531 FJ795472
KH 161 AB618689 LC001731 AB619008 LC001749
KT 634 AB618690 LC001732 AB619009 LC001750
Parapaucispora pseudoarmatispora KT 2237H LC100018 LC100021 LC100026 LC100030
Paucispora quadrispora KH 448P LC001720 LC001733 LC001722 LC001754
P. quadrispora KT 843H AB618692 LC001734 AB619011 LC001755
P. versicolor KH 110H LC001721 AB918731 AB918732 LC001760
Platystomum actinidiae KT 521H JN941375 JN942963 JN941380 LC001747 JN993490
P. compressum MFLUCC 13-0343 KP899129 KP888643 KR075165
P. crataegi MFLUCC 14-0925H KT026113 KT026117 KT026109 KT026121
P. salicicola MFLUCC 15-0632H KT026114 KT026118 KT026110
Pseudolophiostoma
 vitigenum
HH 26930 H AB618697 LC001735 AB619015 LC001761
HH 26931I AB618698 LC001736 AB619016 LC001762
Pseudoplatystomum scabridisporum BCC 22835 GQ925831 GQ925844 GU479857 GU479830
BCC 22836 GQ925832 GQ925845 GU479856 GU479829
Sigarispora arundinis KT 651 AB618680 JN942965 AB618999 LC001738 JN993486
S. caudata KT 530 AB618681 LC001723 AB619000 LC001739
S. ononidis MFLUCC 15-2667H KU243126 KU243128 KU243125 KU243127
S. ravennica MFLUCC 14-0005H KP698415 KP698413 KP698414
Teichospora rubriostiolata TR 7H KU601590 KU601590 KU601609 KU601599
T. trabicola C 134E KU601591 KU601591 KU601601 KU601600
Vaginatispora appendiculata MFLUCC 16-0314H KU743219 KU743217 KU743218 KU743220
V. aquatica MFLUCC 11-0083 KJ591575 KJ591577 KJ591576
1

“E”: ex-epitype, “H”: ex-holotype, “I”: ex-isotype, “P”: ex-paratype.

Morphology and isolation

All fungal structures were observed in preparations mounted in distilled water. Morphological characters were observed by differential interference and phase contrast microscopy (Olympus BX53) using images captured with an Olympus digital camera (DP21). A total of 29 single-spore isolates were used for morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses (Table 1). The colony characteristics of the cultures grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco) were observed after 3 wk of growth at 20 °C in the dark. Colours were noted as described by Rayner (1970). To induce sexual or asexual fructification in culture, 5 mm squares of mycelial agar were placed on water agar containing sterilised natural substrates including rice straw and banana leaves. The plates were incubated at 20 °C for 2 wk in the dark. When the substrate was colonised, the plates were incubated at 20 °C under black light blue illumination for 2 mo to observe for sporulation. Cultures were deposited in the Bioresource Collection and Research Center of Food Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan (BCRC); the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM); the Genebank Project NARO, Japan (MAFF); and the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (CBS). Specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Hirosaki University, Fungi (HHUF).

Results

Phylogeny

Alignment of the first analyses was based on TUB, and consisted of 29 strains with 628 nucleotide positions. Of these positions, 256 were variable and 357 were conserved. Both ML and Bayesian analyses showed 11 distinct operational taxonomic units for the Lo. bipolare complex (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree of the Lophiostoma bipolare complex based on TUB sequences. An ML bootstrap proportion (BP) greater than 90 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) above 0.95 are presented at the nodes as ML BS/Bayesian PP. The scale bars represent nucleotide substitutions per site and ascospore size (5 μm).

SSU-LSU phylogenies displayed low resolution at the generic and species levels. SSU-LSU phylogeny also failed to distinguish between Guttulispora, Sigarispora, and Platystomum (Fig. S1A). ITS phylogeny was able to distinguish at the generic and species levels with good resolution, except for Platystomum (Fig. S1B). tef1 phylogeny showed highly supported clades at the species level, while the monophyletic status of genera Lophiostoma, Platystomum, and Vaginatispora were weakly supported (< 70 % ML BS/ < 0.95 Bayesian PP) and Pseudolophiostoma was not reconstructed (Fig. S1C). rpb2 phylogeny was able to distinguish all 12 genera in both analyses, although the dataset included several missing taxa (Fig. S1D).

For the second analyses, ML and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were conducted using an aligned sequence dataset comprising 935 nucleotide positions from SSU, 1 243 from LSU, 900 from ITS, 885 from tef1, and 1 017 from rpb2. The alignment contained a total of 75 taxa, which consisted of 69 taxa (92 %) in SSU, 75 (100 %) in LSU, 63 (84 %) in ITS, 64 (85.3 %) in tef1, and 44 (58.7 %) in rpb2 (Table 1, Table 2). This combined dataset provided higher confidence values for the generic and species levels than those of the individual gene trees, and a total of 23 genera were reconstructed (Fig. 2, S1). Of the 4 980 characters included in the alignment, 1 387 were variable and 3 524 were conserved. The ML tree with the highest log likelihood (–26083.925) is shown in Fig. 2. The Bayesian likelihood score was –26185.401. The topology recovered by the Bayesian analysis was almost identical to that of the ML tree, except for the positions of Alpestrisphaeria, Coelodictyosporium, and Lophiohelichrysum.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree of Lophiostomataceae based on the SSU-ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 sequences. An ML bootstrap proportion (BP) greater than 60 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) above 0.95 are presented at the nodes as ML BS/Bayesian PP. The circle (●) indicates nodes with 100 % ML BS/ 1.00 Bayesian PP. A hyphen (“-”) indicates values lower than 60 % BP or 0.95 PP. Ex-holotype, isotype, paratype, and epitype strains are indicated with superscripts H, I, P, and E, respectively. The newly obtained sequences are shown in bold and red. The scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per site.

The phylogenetic analyses showed that 11 of the Lo. bipolare complex appeared polyphyletic (Fig. 1), and were scattered within Lophiostomataceae (Figs 2, S1). The phylogenetic positions of Lo. bipolare (Lo. bipolare-4), including an ex-epitype strain (CBS 115375), was distantly related to Lophiostoma s. str. and was located in a clade separate from other members of Lophiostomataceae (Fig. 2). The results of the phylogenetic analyses suggested that the species should be excluded from Lophiostoma s. str. Lophiostoma bipolare was transferred to a novel, individual genus Lentistoma, and a new combination Lentistoma bipolare was proposed. Other members of the Lo. bipolare complex were scattered to Pseudolophiostoma, Vaginatispora, and four separate clades from known lophiostomataceous genera. Lophiostoma bipolare-1 was resolved as a strongly supported clade (100 % ML BS/ 1.00 Bayesian PP, Fig. 2) and a new generic name Crassiclypeus was proposed for a single novel species, C. aquaticus. Lophiostoma bipolare-2, 3 formed a robust clade (100 % ML BS/ 1.00 Bayesian PP, Fig. 2). A new genus Flabellascoma was introduced for these two species (F. cycadicola and F. minimum). The monotypic genus Leptoparies was introduced for Lep. palmarum (formerly treated as Lo. bipolare-5), which separated from the other lophiostomataceous genera in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2). Pseudolophiostoma comprised four species – its type species Pseudol. vitigenum (Thambugala et al. 2015), as well as Lo. bipolare-6, 7, and 8 (Pseudol. cornisporum, Pseudol. obtusisporum, and Pseudol. tropicum) – forming a strongly supported clade (98 % ML BS/ 1.00 Bayesian PP, Fig. 2). Lophiostoma bipolare-9 represented a basal clade among Lophiostomataceae, for which a new genus and species Pseudopaucispora brunneospora was introduced. A clade containing V. appendiculata, V. aquatica, and Lo. bipolare-10, 11 received strong support (98 % ML BS/ 1.00 Bayesian PP, Fig. 2). Vaginatispora amygdali and V. scabrispora were proposed for Lo. bipolare-10, 11, respectively.

Taxonomy

Our phylogenetic analyses resolved 11 species that were classified in the Lo. bipolare complex (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). These 11 species could not be distinguished solely based on the ascospore morphology due to their close resemblance (Fig. 1). Detailed morphological observations of the ascospores as well as other morphological features (Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 11, Fig. 12, Fig. 13), culture characteristics (Fig. 14) and multi-locus phylogeny differentiated the complex. Seven genera (including five new genera), 11 species (including 10 new species), and one new combination are proposed below. An epitype is designated for Lo. bipolare s. str. (basionym: Massarina bipolaris). Additionally, two new genera and two new combinations are introduced for Lophiostoma pseudoarmatisporum and Vaginatispora fuckelii (See Discussion and Appendix B).



Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Crassiclypeus aquaticus.A–C. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. D–F. Ascomata in longitudinal section. G. Peridium of ascoma. H. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. I. Ascus apex. J. Ascus stipe. K, L. Asci. M. Pseudoparaphyses. N–S. Ascospores (arrowheads indicate an internal chamber in S). T–V. Conidiomata in culture. W. Conidioma in longitudinal section. X. Peridium of conidioma. Y–AA. Conidiogenous cells. AB, AC. Conidia. A, G–L, O–S from HHUF 30569. B–F from HHUF 27985 (holotype); M, N from HHUF 30567; T–AC from culture CBS 143640. Scale bars: A, T = 1 mm; B = 300 μm; C, U, V = 100 μm; D–F = 50 μm; K–M, W = 10 μm; G–J, N–S, X–AC = 5 μm.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Flabellascoma cycadicola. A–C. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. D. Ascoma in longitudinal section. E. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. F. Pseudoparaphyses. G. Peridium of ascoma. H. Ascus apex. I, J. Asci. K–P. Ascospores (arrowheads indicate an internal chamber in P). Q–S. Conidiomata in culture. T, U. Conidiomata in longitudinal section. V. Peridium of conidioma. W, X. Conidiogenous cells. Y, Z. Conidia. A–P from HHUF 30570 (holotype). Q–Z from culture BCRC FU30901 = CBS 143644 (ex-holotype). Scale bars: B = 500 μm; C, S = 100 μm; D, T, U = 20 μm; G, I, J = 10 μm; E, F, H, K–P, V–Z = 5 μm; Q, R = 1 mm.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Flabellascoma minimum.A–C. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. D, E. Ascomata in longitudinal section. F. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. G, H. Peridium of ascoma. I. Pseudoparaphyses. J, K. Asci. L. Ascus apex. M. Ascus stipe. N–T. Ascospores (arrowheads indicate an internal chamber in T). U–W. Conidiomata in culture. X. Conidioma in longitudinal section. Y. Peridium of conidioma. Z–AB. Conidiogenous cells. AC, AD. Conidia. A, B, D, F, H–K, N, O from HHUF 30572 (holotype); C, E, G, L, M, P–T from HHUF 30571; U–AD from culture BCRC FU30902 = CBS 143646 (ex-holotype). Scale bars: B, U, V = 1 mm; C, W = 100 μm; D, E, X = 20 μm; F–K = 10 μm; L–T, Y–AD = 5 μm.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Lentistoma bipolare.A–F. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. G. Ascomata in culture. H–J. Ascomata in longitudinal section. K. Peridium. L. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. M. Pseudoparaphyses. N, O. Asci. P–U. Ascospores (arrowheads indicate an internal chamber in U). V. Senescent ascospore. A, E, I, T, U from HHUF 30578; B from HHUF 30574; C, D, O from HHUF 30573; F, M, N, P from BRIP 21489 (holotype); G from culture CBS 115370; H, K, L, S, V from HHUF 30579; J, R from culture CBS 115375 (ex-epitype); Q from culture CBS 143652. Scale bars: A–C, G = 1 mm; D–F = 100 μm; H–J = 50 μm; K–O = 10 μm; P–V = 5 μm.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Leptoparies palmarum.A–C. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. D–F. Ascomata in culture. G, H. Ascomata in longitudinal section. I. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. J. Peridium of ascoma. K. Ascus apex. L, M. Asci. N. Pseudoparaphyses. O–U. Ascospores (arrowheads indicate an internal chamber in U). A–C, G, I–L, N–Q from HHUF 28983 (holotype); D–F, H, M, R–U from culture CBS 143653 = JCM 13089 = MAFF 239599 (ex-holotype). Scale bars: B, F = 300 μm; C = 100 μm; D, E = 1 mm; G, H = 50 μm; I–N = 10 μm; O–U = 5 μm.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Pseudolophiostoma cornisporum.A–C. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. D–F. Ascomata in culture. G, H. Ascomata in longitudinal section. I. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. J, K. Peridium of ascoma. L, M. Asci. N. Pseudoparaphyses. O–T. Ascospores. A–C, G, I, J, P, T from HHUF 30582 (holotype). D–F, H, K–O, Q–S from culture CBS 143654 = JCM 32348 (ex-holotype). Scale bars: A, D = 1000 μm; B, E = 200 μm; C, F = 100 μm; G, H = 50 μm; I–N = 10 μm; O–T = 5 μm.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Pseudolophiostoma obtusisporum.A–D. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. E, F. Ascomata in culture. G–I. Ascomata in longitudinal section. J. Peridium of ascoma. K. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. L, M. Asci. N. Ascus apex. O. Pseudoparaphyses. P–T. Ascospores. A, M, R from HHUF 30189; B, G, J–L from HHUF 30583 (holotype); C, D, H, N from HHUF 30171; E, F, I, O, S from culture CBS 143658 = MAFF 243983; P, T from culture CBS 143941 = MAFF 243969; Q from HHUF 30584. Scale bars: A, E, F = 1 mm; B, C = 200 μm; D = 100 μm; G–I = 50 μm; J–M, O = 10 μm; N, P–T = 5 μm.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Pseudolophiostoma tropicum.A–E. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. F. Ascomata in culture. G–I. Ascomata in longitudinal section. J. Peridium of ascoma. K. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. L, M. Asci. N. Ascus apex. O. Pseudoparaphyses. P–U. Ascospores. A, B, H, K, Q from HHUF 30586; C–E, G, J, M, N, R–U from HHUF 30202 (holotype); F, I, L, O, P from culture CBS 143659. Scale bars: A, F = 1 mm; B, C = 200 μm; D, E = 100 μm; G–I = 50 μm; J–M, O = 10 μm; N, P–U = 5 μm.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Pseudopaucispora brunneospora.A–C. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. D. Ascoma in longitudinal section. E. Peridium of ascoma. F. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. G. Pseudoparaphyses. H. Ascus apex. I. Ascus. J–O. Ascospores (arrowheads indicate an internal chamber in O). P–R. Conidiomata in culture. S, T. Conidiomata in longitudinal section (confluent conidioma in T). U. Peridium of conidioma. V, W. Conidiogenous cells. X. Conidia. Y. Germinating conidium. A–F, H–O from HHUF 30587 (holotype); G, P–Y from culture CBS 143661 = JCM 32350 (ex-holotype). Scale bars: A, P, Q = 1 mm; B = 200 μm; C, R = 100 μm; D, S, T = 50 μm; E, F, H, I, U, Y = 10 μm; G, J–O, V–X = 5 μm.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Vaginatispora amygdali.A–C. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. D, E. Ascomata in culture. F. Ascoma in longitudinal section. G. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. H. Pseudoparaphyses. I. Peridium of ascoma. J. Ascus apex. K, L. Asci. M–R. Ascospores (arrowheads indicate an internal chamber in R). A–C, F–J, L–N, P–R from HHUF 30588 (holotype); D, E, K, O from culture CBS 143662 = JCM 32351 (ex-holotype). Scale bars: B, D = 200 μm; C, E = 100 μm; F = 50 μm; K, L = 10 μm; G–J, M–R = 5 μm.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Vaginatispora scabrispora.A–C. Appearance of ascomata on substrate. D. Ascomata in culture. E, F. Ascomata in longitudinal section. G. Ostiolar neck of ascoma. H, I. Peridium of ascomata. J. Ascus. K. Ascus apex. L. Ascus stipe. M. Pseudoparaphyses. N–S. Ascospores (arrowheads indicate an internal chamber in S). A–C, E, G, H, K–M, O, P, S from HHUF 30589 (holotype); D, F, I, J, N, Q, R from culture CBS 143663 = JCM 32352 (ex-holotype). Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B–D = 100 μm; E, F = 50 μm; G–J, M = 10 μm; K, L, NS = 5 μm.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14

Colony characters of Lophiostoma bipolare complex used in this study on PDA within 3 wk at 20 °C in the dark (left: upper, right: reverse). A.Crassiclypeus aquaticus (CBS 143643 = JCM 13087 = MAFF 239597, ex-holotype). B.Flabellascoma cycadicola (BCRC FU30901 = CBS 143644, ex-holotype). C.F. minimum (BCRC FU30902 = CBS 143646, ex-holotype). D, E.Lentistoma bipolare (D. CBS 115375, ex-epitype, E. CBS 143647). F.Leptoparies palmarum (CBS 143653 = JCM 13089 = MAFF 239599, ex-holotype). G.Pseudolophiostoma cornisporum (CBS 143654 = JCM 32348, ex-holotype). H.Pseudol. obtusisporum (CBS 143657 = JCM 32349, ex-holotype). I.Pseudol. tropicum (CBS 143659, ex-paratype). J.Pseudopaucispora brunneospora (CBS 143661 = JCM 32350, ex-holotype). K.Vaginatispora amygdali (CBS 143662 = JCM 32351, ex-holotype). L.V. scabrispora (CBS 143663 = JCM 32352, ex-holotype). Scale bar: A–L = 1 cm.

Crassiclypeus A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. MycoBank MB823131.



Etymology: Refers to its well-developed clypeus.



Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered to gregarious, immersed, subglobose. Ostiolar neck elongated, laterally compressed, surrounded by a well-developed clypeus. Peridium composed of elongated, brown cells, surrounded by brown hyphae. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, clavate, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, with a narrow bipolar sheath. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, superficial to immersed. Peridium composed of subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, ampliform, hyaline, smooth. Conidia subglobose with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, aseptate.



Type species: Crassiclypeus aquaticus A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka.



Notes: Crassiclypeus is established to accommodate C. aquaticus, which is characterised by a crest-like, elongated, and laterally compressed ostiolar neck, well-developed peridium surrounded by brown hyphae (Fig. 3D–F), and an ascus with a long stipe (up to 50 μm, Fig. 3K, L).

The genus is superficially similar to Flabellascoma, but differs from the latter by having an ascomatal wall with 1 zone (Fig. 3D–F) and phialidic conidiogenous cells in the conidiomata (Fig. 3Y–AA) (vs. an ascomatal peridium composed of 2 zones and holoblastic conidiogenous cells in the conidiomata; Fig. 4D, W, X). It is also similar to Neotrematosphaeria, but the latter genus has a poorly developed peridium at the base and lacks the clypeated ostiolar neck of the ascomata (Thambugala et al. 2015). Crassiclypeus has similar morphological features of Lentistoma, such as the clypeated ostiolar neck, but can be distinguished from Lentistoma by the well-developed peridium of the ascomata (up to 70 μm in thickness). Lentistoma is characterised by ascomata with less-developed peridium (up to 45 μm in thickness).



Crassiclypeus aquaticus A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. MycoBank MB823132. Fig. 3, Fig. 14.



Etymology: Refers to its aquatic habitat.



Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose, 3–5 grouped, immersed, dark brown to black, 400–780 μm high, 600–1 000 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated and laterally compressed, 80–100 μm high, 160–300 μm wide, composed of 2.5–7 μm diam, globose, thick-walled, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses, surrounded by a well-developed clypeus (up to 390 μm wide). Peridium uniform, (30–)45–70 μm thick at side, composed of 8–9(–15) layers of elongated, thin-walled, 5–18 × 2.5–5 μm, brown cells, surrounded by brown hyphae. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1.5–2 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, clavate, 85–125 × 11–17.5 μm (x¯ = 102.5 × 12.9 μm, n = 96), with a stipe (14–50 μm long, x¯ = 26.3 μm, n = 24), apically rounded with a broad ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with obtuse ends, 20–32.5 × 5–8 μm (x¯ = 25.3 × 6.7 μm, n = 190), l/w 2.9–4.8 (x¯ = 3.8, n = 190), hyaline, with a septum nearly median ((0.42–)0.45–0.55, x¯ = 0.49, n = 167), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 2–5 μm long at both ends, with an internal chamber at both ends of ascospores. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 165 μm high, 135–180 μm diam, scattered to 3–6 grouped, superficial to immersed. Peridium 11.5–18.5 μm thick, composed of 2–4 layers of 8–13.5 × 3–4 μm, subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, 6–12 × 2.5–4 μm, ampliform, hyaline, smooth. Conidia subglobose with rounded ends, 2–3(–4) × 1.2–1.8 μm (x¯ = 2.4 × 1.5 μm, n = 60), l/w 1.2–2.2 (x¯ = 1.6, n = 60), hyaline, smooth, aseptate, guttulate when young.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 19 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, centrally raised, greenish grey (110; Rayner 1970); reverse dull green (70) (Fig. 14A); red pigment produced in water agar media (Fig. 3T); asexual morph formed.



Materials examined (all on submerged dead twigs of woody plant): Japan, Aomori, Hirosaki, Aoki, near Mohei-pond, 7 Dec. 2002, K. Tanaka & N. Asama, KT 970 (HHUF 27985 holotype designated here; ex-holotype culture CBS 143643 = JCM 13087 = MAFF 239597); ibid., 21 Jul. 2007, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 56 (HHUF 30566; ex-paratype culture CBS 143639); ibid., 23 Sep. 2007, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 91 (HHUF 30567; ex-paratype culture CBS 143640); ibid., 29 Oct. 2007, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 104 (HHUF 30568; ex-paratype culture CBS 143641); ibid., 30 Aug. 2008, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 185 (HHUF 30569; ex-paratype culture CBS 143642).



Notes: Crassiclypeus aquaticus was collected from submerged dead twigs of woody plants during summer, fall, and winter. Crassiclypeus aquaticus strains produced a red pigment in water agar medium.



Flabellascoma A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. MycoBank MB823133.



Etymology: Refers to its ostiolar neck, which resembles a Japanese fan.



Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered, immersed, subglobose to ellipsoidal. Ostiolar neck elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium composed of elongated, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, with a narrow bipolar sheath. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose. Peridium composed of subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, cylindrical or ampliform, hyaline, smooth. Conidia subglobose with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, aseptate.



Type species: Flabellascoma minimum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka.



Notes: The genus Flabellascoma is proposed to include F. cycadicola and F. minimum. These two species have well-developed, crest-like ostiolar necks (Fig. 4, Fig. 5) and a uniformly thickened ascomatal wall composed of 2 zones (Fig. 4, Fig. 5), and asci with a short stipe. Flabellascoma is morphologically similar to Pseudolophiostoma in having ascomata with a well-developed, crest-like ostiolar neck, and a peridium of uniform thickness. However, the ascomatal peridium in Pseudolophiostoma is composed of 1 zone (Thambugala et al. 2015, this study Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10) rather than the 2 zones in Flabellascoma.



Flabellascoma cycadicola A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. MycoBank MB823134. Fig. 4, Fig. 14.



Etymology: Refers to the generic name of the host plant.



Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose, scattered, immersed, dark brown to black, 490–530 μm high, 600–620 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, 190–210 μm high, 320–380 μm wide, composed of 3–6 μm diam, globose, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses. Peridium uniform, 45–50 μm thick at side, composed of 2 zones; outer zone 28–38 μm thick, composed of 5–8 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 10–17 × 3–4 μm, brown cells; inner zone 12–25 μm thick, composed of globose, 1.5–2.5 μm diam, hyaline cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–3 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, 67.5–88 × 9–12 μm (x¯ = 77.2 × 10.2 μm, n = 20), with a short stipe, apically rounded with a broad ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with obtuse ends, 17–23 × 4.5–7 μm (x¯ = 20.4 × 5.4 μm, n = 70), l/w 3.0–4.5 (x¯ = 3.8, n = 70), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.47–0.55, x¯ = 0.50, n = 70), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 7–10 μm long at both ends, with a lateral pad-like structure within the sheath, with an internal chamber at both ends of ascospores. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 90 μm high, 50–85 μm diam, 4–10 grouped, superficial. Peridium 7–13 μm thick, composed of 2–4 layers of 6.5–10.5 × 3.5–4 μm, subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 6–8 × 1.5–2.5 μm, ampliform, hyaline, smooth. Conidia subglobose with rounded ends, 1.5–2.5 × 1.1–2 μm (x¯ = 2.0 × 1.4 μm, n = 60), l/w 1.0–1.8 (x¯ = 1.4, n = 60), hyaline, smooth, aseptate, guttulate when young.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 20 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, centrally raised, greenish grey (110); reverse grey olivaceous (107) (Fig. 14B); asexual morph formed.



Material examined: Taiwan, Taipei, Wulai, on petiole of Cycas revoluta, 28 Nov. 2005, K. Tanaka, H.S. Chang & G. Okada, KT 2034 (HHUF 30570 holotype designated here; ex-holotype culture BCRC FU30901 = CBS 143644).



Notes: Flabellascoma cycadicola superficially resembles F. minimum, but can be distinguished from the latter by its larger ascospores (17–23 × 4.5–7 μm vs. 12–17.5 × 3.5–5 μm). The two species differ at 15 positions with one gap in their ITS regions.



Flabellascoma minimum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. MycoBank MB823135. Fig. 5, Fig. 14.



Etymology: Refers to its small-sized ascospore.



Sexual morph: Ascomata ellipsoidal to lageniform, scattered, immersed, dark brown to black, 250–320 μm high, 350–500 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, 160–310 μm high, 210–280 μm wide, composed of 3–5 μm diam, globose, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses. Peridium uniform, 43–50(–62) μm thick at side, composed of 2 zones; outer zone 18–27(–42) μm thick, composed of 3–5 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 5–18 × 5–8 μm, brown cells; inner layer 20–25 μm thick, composed of globose, 1–2 μm diam, hyaline cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1.5–3 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, 45–77.5 × 7.5–12 μm (x¯ = 61.9 × 9.3 μm, n = 123), with a stipe, apically rounded with a broad ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with obtuse ends, 12–17.5 × 3.5–5 μm (x¯ = 14.8 × 4.3 μm, n = 17), l/w 2.6–4.3 (x¯ = 3.4, n = 170), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.46–0.54, x¯ = 0.50, n = 170), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 5.5–8 μm long at both ends, with a lateral pad-like structure within the sheath, up to 1.5 μm wide at side, with an internal chamber at both ends of ascospores. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to subglobose, up to 125 μm high, 85–110 μm diam, 3–5 grouped, superficial. Peridium 12–17 μm thick, composed of 2–4 layers of 6.5–10 × 3.5–5 μm, subglobose to rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 7.5–9 × 2.5–4 μm, cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia subglobose with rounded ends, 1.9–2.4(–3.2) × 1.3–1.8 μm (x¯ = 2.1 × 1.5 μm, n = 50), l/w 1.1–1.6(–2.1) (x¯ = 1.3, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, aseptate, guttulate when young.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 17 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, centrally raised, smoke grey (105); reverse sienna (8) (Fig. 14C); asexual morph formed.



Materials examined: Taiwan, Nantou Hsien, Hui Sun Forest Area, Kuan-Dau river, on petioles of Arenga engleri, 26 Nov. 2005, K. Tanaka, C.Y. Chen & G. Okada, KT 2013 (HHUF 30571; ex-paratype culture BCRC FU30900 = CBS 143645); Taipei, Wulai, on pods of Bauhinia purpurea, 28 Nov. 2005, K. Tanaka, H.S. Chang & G. Okada, KT 2040 (HHUF 30572 holotype designated here; ex-holotype culture BCRC FU30902 = CBS 143646).



Notes: ITS sequences of ex-holotype and ex-paratype cultures of F. minima isolated from Arecaceae (Arecales) and Fabaceae (Fabales), respectively, were identical. Although the ascomatal shape was slightly different between the holotype (lageniform, Fig. 5D) and paratype (ellipsoidal, Fig. 5E) of F. minima, the peridial structure of their ascomata and the ascospore size were almost identical. The differences in the ascomatal shape appeared to vary depending on the condition of the substrates. We, therefore, regard these specimens as conspecific.



Lentistoma A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. MycoBank MB823136.



Etymology: Refers to its lenticular ascomata.



Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered, immersed, subglobose. Ostiolar neck elongated, laterally compressed, surrounded by a well-developed clypeus. Peridium composed of globose, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, with a narrow bipolar sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Type species: Lentistoma bipolare (K.D. Hyde) A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka



Notes: Lophiostoma bipolare was originally described as a species of Massarina (Hyde 1995a). Liew et al. (2002) transferred the species to Lophiostoma based on phylogenetic analyses of ITS sequences. This classification was corroborated by subsequent studies (Tanaka and Hosoya, 2008, Hirayama and Tanaka, 2011). Thambugala et al. (2015) conducted comprehensive taxonomic revisions in Lophiostomataceae, but Lo. bipolare was not included. Thus, its generic placement remained unresolved. Our phylogenetic study revealed the distant relationship of this species to Lophiostoma s. str. (Fig. 2). Lentistoma is well-characterised and is differentiated from Lophiostoma by its clypeus around the ostiolar neck and by its thinner and uniformly thickened peridium (up to 45 μm in thickness, Fig. 6H–J).



Lentistoma bipolare (K.D. Hyde) A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, comb. nov. MycoBank MB823137. Fig. 6, Fig. 14.

Basionym: Massarina bipolaris K.D. Hyde, Nova Hedwigia 61: 131. 1995.

Synonym: Lophiostoma bipolare (K.D. Hyde) E.C.Y. Liew et al., Mycologia 94: 812. 2002.



Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose, scattered, immersed, dark brown to black, 160–200 μm high, 470–540 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, 100–125 μm high, 210–225 μm wide, composed of globose, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses, surrounded by a well-developed clypeus (up to 500 μm wide). Peridium uniform, 25–45 μm thick at side, composed of 5–7 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 12.5–15 × 5 μm, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–2 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, (82–)105–140 × 8–15 μm (x¯ = 119.9 × 10.9 μm, n = 30), with a stipe (7.5–18.5 μm long, x¯ = 11.7 μm, n = 11), apically rounded with a broad ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with obtuse ends, 20–33 × 5.5–9(–11) μm (x¯ = 27.0 × 7.2 μm, n = 216), l/w 2.5–4.8 (x¯ = 3.8, n = 216), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.46–0.55, x¯ = 0.50, n = 216), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 5–10 μm long at both ends, with a cap-like structure at tips of the sheath, with an internal chamber at both ends of ascospores. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 16 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, plane, dull green (110); reverse grey olivaceous (107) (Fig. 14D, E); asexual morph formed.



Materials examined. Australia, Queensland, Kauri Creek, on woody plant, 23 May 2003 (HHUF 30576, dried culture specimen made from culture CBS 115370). China, Hong Kong, Tai Po Country Park, on submerged wood, Aug. 1993, K.D. Hyde (BRIP 21489, holotype); Sai Kung, Highland Reservoir, on submerged wood, 3 May 2003 (HHUF 30575, dried culture specimen made from culture JCM 14139 = CBS 110448); Mt. Nicholson, on woody plant, 9 Sep. 2003 (HHUF 30577, dried culture specimen made from culture CBS 115375, epitype designated here; MBT379010). Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Iriomote, near Kampire waterfall, on dead herbaceous plant, 27 Sep. 2007, K. Tanaka & H. Yonezawa, KT 2415 (HHUF 30573; culture CBS 143651); ibid., on dead twigs of woody plant, 5 Aug. 2012, K. Tanaka, KT 3056 (HHUF 30574; culture CBS 143652); Oomijya river, on submerged dead twigs of woody plant, 22 Nov. 2008, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 214 (HHUF 30578; culture CBS 143647); ibid., on submerged dead twigs of woody plant, 12 Jul. 2011, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 311 (HHUF 30581; culture CBS 143650); near Maryudu water falls, on herbaceous plant, 21 Nov. 2008, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 216 (HHUF 30579; culture CBS 143648); ibid., on submerged dead twigs of woody plant, 21 Nov. 2008, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 222 (HHUF 30580; culture CBS 143649).



Notes: Our phylogenetic and morphological studies revealed 11 species scattered among Lophiostomataceae (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). They were originally misidentified as Lo. bipolare based on the morphological resemblance of their ascospores, but a precise morphological observation of the Lo. bipolare complex including its holotype (BRIP 21489) distinguished the Lo. bipolare s. str. from other species of the Lo. bipolare complex on the basis of a clypeus around the ostiolar neck (Fig. 6H–J); an internal chamber at both ends of the ascospores (Fig. 6U); and a bipolar sheath with a cap-like structure at the tips (Fig. 6T). Here, we designated an epitype specimen (HHUF 30577) that was collected from the same country as the holotype specimen. Although the species was previously reported to have been collected from either freshwater or marine habitats (Hyde et al., 2002, Shearer and Raja, 2010), this is the first report of the species from a terrestrial habitat.



Leptoparies A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. MycoBank MB823138.



Etymology: Refers to the thin peridium of the ascomata.



Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered, immersed, subglobose. Ostiolar neck elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium relatively thin, composed rectangular, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, with a narrow bipolar sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Type species: Leptoparies palmarum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka.



Notes: Leptoparies is a new monotypic genus characterised by a relatively thinner and non-carbonised peridium, which represents an atypical character for Lophiostomataceae. Leptoparies can be easily distinguished from other genera by the thin peridium composed of rectangular cells and the absence of the surrounding brown hyphae (Fig. 7J). The genus is similar to Capulatispora due to the thin peridium and the ascospores with the drawn-out sheaths; however, Capulatispora differs from Leptoparies due to its short ascus stipe (Tanaka and Hosoya, 2008, Thambugala et al., 2015).



Leptoparies palmarum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. MycoBank MB823139. Fig. 7, Fig. 14.



Etymology: Refers to the host plant.



Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose, scattered, immersed, dark brown to black, 210–320 μm high, 490–650 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, 90–140 μm high, 200–300 μm wide, composed of 6–8 × 3–4 μm diam, globose, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses. Peridium uniform, 25–32 μm thick at side, composed of 3–5 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 8–10 × 3–7 μm, brown cells, surrounded by brown hyphae. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1.5–2 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, (67–)77–118 × 10–14 μm (x¯ = 93.9 × 11.9 μm, n = 20), with a stipe (8.5–18.5 μm long, x¯ = 13.5 μm, n = 20), apically rounded with a broad ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with obtuse ends, 20–25 × 5–7 μm (x¯ = 23.1 × 6.1 μm, n = 100), l/w 2.8–4.4 (x¯ = 3.5, n = 100), hyaline, with a septum mostly supramedian (0.47–0.55, x¯ = 0.49, n = 100), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 6–8 μm long at both ends, with a lateral pad, up to 1.5 μm wide at side. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 21 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, centrally raised, smoke grey (105); reverse grey olivaceous (107) (Fig. 14F); sexual morph formed.



Material examined: Japan, Kanagawa, Yokohama, Nakaku, near Sankei-garden, on petioles of Trachycarpus fortunei, 9 Mar. 2004, K. Tanaka & Y. Harada, KT 1653 (HHUF 28983 holotype designated here; ex-holotype culture CBS 143653 = JCM 13089 = MAFF 239599).



Notes: Leptoparies palmarum and Flabellascoma minimum can be found on the petioles of palms. The former species is characterised by the larger ascospores (20–25 × 5–7 μm) distinguishing it from the latter species, which has smaller ascospores (12–17.5 × 3.5–5 μm).



Pseudolophiostoma Thambug. et al., Fungal Diversity 74: 235. 2015.



Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered, immersed, globose to subglobose. Ostiolar neck elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium composed of rectangular, dark brown to black cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, with a narrow bipolar sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Type species: Pseudolophiostoma vitigenum (Kaz. Tanaka & Y. Harada) Thambug. et al.



Notes: Thambugala et al. (2015) established the monotypic genus Pseudolophiostoma to accommodate its generic type Pseudol. vitigenum, which was found on Vitis coignetiae (Vitaceae), and was collected from a boreal region in Japan. Although this species was considered a member of Lophiotrema (Tanaka & Harada 2003), phylogenetic analyses based on SSU and LSU sequences revealed that this species belonged to Lophiostoma (Hirayama & Tanaka 2011). Later, a monotypic genus Pseudolophiostoma was introduced to segregate L. vitigenum from Lophiostoma s. str. based on phylogenetic analyses (Thambugala et al. 2015). In our study, three new species (Pseudol. cornisporum, Pseudol. obtusisporum, and Pseudol. tropicum), collected from a subtropical region in Japan, were introduced. These species are also characterised by an ascomatal wall having uniform thickness (Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10) and asci with a relatively long stipe (up to 18.5 μm) (Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10L, M). Although Pseudolophiostoma possess morphologically similar ascospores to those of Lentistoma, the latter genus is easily differentiated from Pseudolophiostoma by having a clypeated ostiolar neck.



Pseudolophiostoma cornisporum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. MycoBank MB823140. Fig. 8, Fig. 14G.



Etymology: Refers to the ascospores with acute ends.



Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose, scattered, immersed, dark brown to black, 650–700 μm high, 580–650 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, 100–190 μm high, 120–140 μm wide, composed of 2–3 μm diam, globose, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses. Peridium uniform, 12–17 μm thick at side, composed of 4–5 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 8–12 × 3–4 μm, brown cells, surrounded by dark brown hyphae. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1.5–2 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, 80–92 × 11–15(–18) μm (x¯ = 86.4 × 13.6 μm, n = 5), with a long stipe (8–15 μm long, x¯ = 11.6 μm, n = 7), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, 21–32 × 4.5–6 μm (x¯ = 26.6 × 5.3 μm, n = 60), l/w (3.9–)4.1–6.3 (x¯ = 5.0, n = 60), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.47–0.56, x¯ = 0.51, n = 60), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 2–11 μm long at both ends, with a lateral pad-like structure within the sheath, up 2.5 μm wide at side. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 14–18 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, centrally raised, olivaceous buff (89); reverse olivaceous (48) (Fig. 14G); sexual morph formed.



Material examined: Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Iriomote, near Sonai trail, on dead stem of herbaceous plant, 13 Jul. 2011, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 322 (HHUF 30582 holotype designated here; ex-holotype culture CBS 143654 = JCM 32348).



Notes: This species resembles Pseudol. vitigenum by having ascospores with acute ends. Ascospores of the new species are smaller (21–32 × 4.5–6 μm), while those of Pseudol. vitigenum are larger ((30.5–)34–44(–51) × (8–)9–11.5(–13) μm; Thambugala et al. 2015).



Pseudolophiostoma obtusisporum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. MycoBank MB823141. Fig. 9, Fig. 14.



Etymology: Refers to the ascospores with obtuse ends.



Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose, scattered, immersed, dark brown to black, 350–400 μm high, 250–350 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, 110–200 μm high, 150–250 μm wide, composed of 2–4 μm diam, globose, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses. Peridium uniform, 10–17 μm thick at side and base, composed of 3–4 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 8–13 × 3–4 μm, brown cells, surrounded by dark brown hyphae. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1.5–2 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, (81–)103–140 × 8–15 μm (x¯ = 119.9 × 10.9 μm, n = 30), with a long stipe (7.5–18.5 μm long, x¯ = 11.7 μm, n = 11), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with obtuse ends, (20–)23.5–31.5 × 4–7 μm (x¯ = 27.3 × 5.5 μm, n = 90), l/w 3.5–6.9 (x¯ = 5.0, n = 90), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.47–0.55, x¯ = 0.51, n = 90), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 5–11 μm long at both ends, with a lateral pad-like structure within the sheath, up to 3 μm wide at side. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 22–29 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, centrally raised, lavender grey (125); reverse smoke grey (105) (Fig. 14H); sexual morph formed.



Materials examined: Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Iriomote, near Midara river, on dead stem of herbaceous plant, 22 Nov. 2008, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 228 (HHUF 30584; ex-paratype culture CBS 143655); Isl. Ishigaki, Mt. Banna, near small stream, on dead stem of herbaceous plant, 14 Jul. 2011, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 336 (HHUF 30585; ex-paratype culture CBS 143656); ibid., on dead stem of herbaceous plant, 14 Jul. 2011, K. Tanaka & K. Hirayama, KT 2838 (HHUF 30583 holotype designated here; ex-holotype culture CBS 143657 = JCM 32349); Tokyo, Ogasawara Islands, Isl. Hahajima, Shizukasawa, on dead stem of Livistona boninensis, 14 Sep. 2012, K. Tanaka, A. Hashimoto, T. Ono & T. Sato, KT 3098 (HHUF 30171; ex-paratype culture CBS 143941 = MAFF 243969); Isl. Chichijima, near Mt. Yoake, on dead stem of Stachytarpheta jamaicensis, 9 Sep. 2012, K. Tanaka, A. Hashimoto, T. Ono & T. Sato, KT 3119 (HHUF 30189; ex-paratype culture CBS 143658 = MAFF 243983).



Notes: Pseudolophiostoma obtusisporum is commonly distributed among subtropical islands in Japan and is found on various herbaceous plants or palm trees. The wall of the ascomata is composed of equal thickness among specimens on herbaceous plants (Fig. 9G) and palm trees (Fig. 9H). Other morphological features, such as the ascospore size, were identical and ITS sequences among these isolates also completely matched. Thus, we regard these isolates as conspecific. Pseudolophiostoma obtusisporum can be distinguished from other Pseudolophiostoma species by its obtuse-ended ascospores (Fig. 9P–T).



Pseudolophiostoma tropicum A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. MycoBank MB823142. Fig. 10, Fig. 14.



Etymology: Refers to the species occurring in the tropical regions.



Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose, scattered, immersed, dark brown to black, 530–880 μm high, 550–840 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, 100–160 μm high, 100–200 μm wide, composed of 2–4(–7) μm diam, globose, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses. Peridium uniform, 15–22 μm thick at side and base, composed of 3–4 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 9–13(–18) × 3–5 μm, brown cells, surrounded by dark brown hyphae. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, (75–)85–120 × 10–15 μm (x¯ = 104.4 × 12.3 μm, n = 14), with a long stipe (8–18.5 μm long, x¯ = 11.7 μm, n = 10), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with acute ends, 23.5–29.5 × 4–6 μm (x¯ = 26.3 × 5.4 μm, n = 70), l/w 4.0–6.3 (x¯ = 4.9, n = 70), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.46–0.56, x¯ = 0.51, n = 70), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 6–9 μm long at both ends, with a lateral pad-like structure within the sheath, up 2 μm wide at side. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 24–27 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, centrally raised, greyish blue (97); reverse grey olivaceous (107) (Fig. 14I); sexual morph formed.



Materials examined: Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Iriomote, Takana, on dead stem of herbaceous plant, 13 Jul. 2011, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 352 (HHUF 30586 ex-paratype culture CBS 143659); Tokyo, Ogasawara Islands, Isl. Chichijima, Buta coast, on dead stem of Bidens pilosa var. radiata, 15 Sep. 2012, K. Tanaka, A. Hashimoto & T. Sato, KT 3134 (HHUF 30202 holotype designated here; ex-holotype culture CBS 143660 = MAFF 243989).



Notes: In culture, Pseudol. tropicum produced ascomata that were slightly different from those on natural substrates, with a slightly thicker peridium and a well-developed ostiolar neck (Fig. 10F, H, I). Although these differences were observed, the anatomical structure of the ascomatal wall formed in culture were identical to those on natural specimens.

Both Pseudol. tropicum and Pseudol. obtusisporum have ascospores overlapping in size, but can be distinguished by the ascospore shape. Obtuse-ended ascospores were identified as Pseudol. obtusisporum (Fig. 9P–T) and acute-ended ascospores as Pseudol. tropicum (Fig. 10P–U). ITS sequences between these species differed in nine nucleotide positions with three gaps.



Pseudopaucispora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. MycoBank MB823143.



Etymology: Refers to its morphological resemblance to Paucispora.



Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered, immersed, subglobose. Ostiolar neck elongated, laterally compressed. Peridium composed of rectangular, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical to clavate, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, brown, 1-septate, smooth, with a narrow bipolar sheath. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pseudopycnidial, globose to cylindrical, sometimes deformed, confluent, multiloculate, scattered, semi-immersed, black. Ostiolar neck papillate. Peridium composed of rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores absent. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia cylindrical with rounded ends, hyaline, smooth, aseptate, guttulate when young.



Type species: Pseudopaucispora brunneospora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka.



Notes: Pseudopaucispora is introduced to accommodate Pseudop. brunneospora, which is characterised by small brown ascospores and pseudopycnidial conidiomata. Pseudopaucispora is superficially similar to Paucispora (Thambugala et al. 2015). However, Pseudopaucispora has an ascomatal peridium composed of 1 zone and an ascus with a short stipe, while Paucispora is characterised by a peridium composed of 2 zones and an ascus with a relatively long stipe (up to 34 μm in length; Thambugala et al. 2015).



Pseudopaucispora brunneospora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. MycoBank MB823144. Fig. 11, Fig. 14.



Etymology: Refers to its brown ascospores.



Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose, scattered, immersed, dark brown to black, 210–300 μm high, 215–355 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, 145–175 μm high, 95–190 μm wide, composed of 2–4 μm diam, globose, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses. Peridium uniform, 15–18 μm thick at side and base, composed of rectangular, thin-walled, 6–16 × 3–4 μm, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1–1.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, 67–89 × 7–10.5 μm (x¯ = 75.0 × 8.7 μm, n = 20), with a short stipe (6.5–15 μm long, x¯ = 11.9 μm, n = 20), apically rounded with an ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with obtuse ends, 14–17 × 3.5–4.5 μm (x¯ = 15.3 × 4.0 μm, n = 50), l/w 3.0–4.7 (x¯ = 3.8, n = 50), brown, with a septum usually supramedian (0.44–0.56, x¯ = 0.48, n = 50), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 6–10 μm long at both ends. Asexual morph: Conidiomata pseudopycnidial, globose to cylindrical, up to 230 μm high, 150–190 μm diam, sometimes deformed, confluent, multiloculate, scattered, semi-immersed, black. Ostiolar neck mainly single, occasionally three, papillate. Peridium 10–18 μm wide, composed of 7.5–16.5 × 3–4 μm, rectangular, brown cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, 10–15 × 2.5–4.5 μm, ampliform to cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidia cylindrical with rounded ends, 2–3(–3.5) × 1–1.3 μm (x¯ = 2.8 × 1.1 μm, n = 50), l/w 1.8–3.1 (x¯ = 2.6, n = 50), hyaline, smooth, aseptate, guttulate when young.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 9–15 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, centrally raised, pale luteous (11); reverse sienna (8) (Fig. 14J); asexual and sexual morph formed.



Material examined: Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Yonaguni, near Kubura pond, on dead stem of Asteraceae sp., 23 Nov. 2008, K. Hirayama & K. Tanaka, KH 227 (HHUF 30587 holotype designated here; ex-holotype culture CBS 143661 = JCM 32350).



Note: Pseudopaucispora can be easily distinguished from the other Lo. bipolare complex by the brown ascospores, which possesses a sheath without a lateral pad-like structure (Fig. 11J–O).



Vaginatispora K.D. Hyde, Nova Hedwigia 61: 234. 1995.



Sexual morph: Ascomata scattered, immersed, subglobose. Ostiolar neck elongated, laterally compressed, with hyaline periphyses. Peridium composed of rectangular, brown cells, surrounded by dark brown hyphae. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, with a bipolar or entire sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Type species: Vaginatispora aquatica K.D. Hyde.



Notes: The genus Vaginatispora was established to accommodate V. aquatica, which was found on submerged twigs of woody plants and was originally characterised by Massarina-like ascomata with much longer ostiolar necks and ascospores bearing an entire sheath (Hyde 1995b). Liew et al. (2002) suggested that this genus was related to Lophiostoma, according to the phylogenetic analyses using ITS sequences. However, the authors could not determine the fundamental differences between these two genera. Thus, no taxonomic conclusion regarding whether Vaginatispora was synonymous with Lophiostoma was drawn. Subsequently, the genus was considered to be synonymous with Lophiostoma due to its phylogenetic affinities to the latter genus (Zhang et al. 2014). Thambugala et al. (2015) recently retained Vaginatispora, emphasising the structures of the peridium and asci, as well as based on results of their multi-locus phylogenetic analyses. They accepted V. fuckelii (formerly Lo. fuckelii) as a member of the genus. Although this species was morphologically atypical in the genus because of the 2 zoned peridium, this proposal was accepted by subsequent studies (Wanasinghe et al., 2016, Tibpromma et al., 2017). Our phylogenetic analyses showed a paraphyletic nature of Vaginatispora sensu Thambugala et al. (2015) (Fig. 2). We re-circumscribed the genus to include five species with well-developed ascomatal peridium at the sides, while poorly-developed at the base, with numerous brown hyphae around the ascomata, and asci with a broad ocular chamber. Vaginatispora fuckelii is excluded from Vaginatispora and transferred to its own new genus, Neovaginatispora (see Appendix B).



Vaginatispora amygdali A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. MycoBank MB823145. Fig. 12, Fig. 14.



Etymology: Refers to the generic name of the host plant.



Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose, scattered, immersed, dark brown to black, 330–360 μm high, 480–500 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, 150–225 μm high, 275–445 μm wide, composed of 3–7 μm diam, globose to elongated, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses. Peridium 37.5–62.5 μm thick at side, composed of 9–15 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 11–13 × 4–5 μm, brown cells, surrounded by dark brown hyphae; 10–17.5 μm thick at base, composed of globose, 6–10 μm diam, pale brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1.5–2.5 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, (81–)100–140 × (11.5–)16.5–22.5 μm (x¯ = 115.0 × 18.5 μm, n = 53), with a short stipe (8.5–16 μm long, x¯ = 12.0 μm, n = 10), apically rounded with a broad ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with obtuse ends, 25–34(–37) × 7–10.5 μm (x¯ = 30.6 × 8.8 μm, n = 120), l/w 2.6–4.6 (x¯ = 3.5, n = 120), hyaline, with a septum nearly median (0.45–0.58, x¯ = 0.51, n = 120), slightly constricted at the septum, smooth, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 6–8 μm long at both ends, with a lateral pad-like structure within the sheath, with an internal chamber at both ends of ascospores. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 18 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, centrally raised, greenish grey (110); reverse dull green (70) (Fig. 14K); sexual morph formed.



Material examined: Japan, Wakayama, Kinokawa, Kishigawa, Kita, on endocarp of Amygdalus persica, 9 May 2007, S. Hatakeyama, KT 2248 (HHUF 30588 holotype designated here; ex-holotype culture CBS 143662 = JCM 32351).



Notes: Vaginatispora amygdali is morphologically similar to V. armatispora, but ascospores of the latter species are slightly larger (28–39.2 × 7–9.8 μm; Hyde et al. 1992). ITS sequences of V. amygdali and V. armatispora (AF383955), which were derived from an authentic specimen of the species, differed in 17 positions with five gaps.

This species is difficult to distinguish from other Lo. bipolare complexes based on ascospore features, but detailed features of the ascomata and asci are well-matched to the characteristics present in Vaginatispora.



Vaginatispora scabrispora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, sp. nov. MycoBank MB823146. Fig. 13, Fig. 14.



Etymology: Refers to its verruciform ascospores.



Sexual morph: Ascomata subglobose, scattered, immersed, dark brown to black, 220–340 μm high, 340–360 μm diam. Ostiolar neck crest-like, elongated, laterally compressed, 88–120 μm high, 175–225 μm wide, composed of 3–5 μm diam, globose, brown to black cells, with hyaline periphyses. Peridium 18–28 μm thick at side, composed of 3–5 layers of rectangular, thin-walled, 10–11 × 3–5 μm, brown cells, surrounded by dark brown hyphae (1–1.5 μm wide); 10–17.5 μm thick at base, composed of globose, brown cells. Pseudoparaphyses numerous, 1.5–2 μm wide, septate, branched and anastomosed. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, (77.5–)95–115 × 15–20 μm (x¯ = 102.3 × 16.5 μm, n = 10), with a short stipe (7.5–17.5 μm long, x¯ = 13.0 μm, n = 10), apically rounded with a broad ocular chamber, 8-spored. Ascospores fusiform with obtuse ends, 20–23 × 5–6 μm (x¯ = 21.9 × 5.9 μm, n = 50), l/w 2.9–3.5 (x¯ = 3.3, n = 50), hyaline, with a septum supramedian (0.42–0.49, x¯ = 0.47, n = 50), slightly constricted at the septum, verrucous, with a narrow sheath. Sheath drawn out 5–7 μm long at both ends, with a lateral pad-like structure within the sheath, with an internal chamber at both ends of ascospores. Asexual morph: Undetermined.



Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA attaining 19 mm diam within 21 d at 20 °C in the dark, velvety, centrally raised, smoke grey (105); reverse smoke grey (105) (Fig. 14L); sexual morph formed.



Material examined: Japan, Okinawa, Isl. Iriomote, near Shiira river (intertidal region), on submerged dead twigs of Rhizophora mucronata, 25 Sep. 2007, K. Tanaka & H. Yonezawa, KT 2443 (HHUF 30589 holotype designated here; ex-holotype culture CBS 143663 = JCM 32352).



Notes: Vaginatispora scabrispora is easily distinguished from other species of Vaginatispora due to its verrucous ascospores (Fig. 13R) and mangrove habitat. This species is phylogenetically related to V. amygdali, but differs from the latter by the smaller sized ascospores (vs. 25–34(–37) × 7–10.5 μm in the latter species).

Discussion

Generic delimitation in Lophiostomataceae

Lophiostoma bipolare has a worldwide distribution in freshwater and marine habitats, and is characterised by ascomata with a slit-like ostiolar neck surrounded by a clypeus and ascospores with a bipolar sheath (e.g. Hyde, 1995a, Hyde et al., 2002, Liew et al., 2002). This species was originally treated as a member of Massarina (Hyde 1995a). Later, Liew et al. (2002) transferred this species to Lophiostoma based on the results of molecular phylogenetic analyses using ITS region. The genus Lophiostoma was taxonomically revised on the basis of the phylogenetic analyses of multi-locus genes (Thambugala et al. 2015). Lophiostoma bipolare was not included in the analyses and thus the taxonomic position of this species has remained unclear. Our phylogenetic analyses, which included 29 strains provisionally identified as Lo. bipolare, indicate that the species is not monophyletic (Fig. 1) and is scattered into seven genera and 11 species within Lophiostomataceae (Fig. 2). The present data also indicate that Lo. bipolare s. str. is phylogenetically distinct from Lophiostoma s. str. and should be separately placed in the novel genus Lentistoma (Fig. 2). Lentistoma is clearly different from other lophiostomataceous genera owing to its well-developed clypeus around the ostiolar neck (Fig. 6H–J). Other Lo. bipolare complexes are scattered among six distinct genera that are morphologically defined and whose monophyly is strongly supported (Fig. 2). As mentioned in previous studies (Chesters and Bell, 1970, Holm and Holm, 1988, Hyde, 1995b), the length of the ostiolar neck and the peridium thickness varies both on natural substrate and in culture (Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 13). The differences in the ascomatal shape are used to differentiate between several lophiostomataceous genera (Thambugala et al. 2015). However, our results suggest that it may also vary depending on the condition of the substrates (herbaceous or woody plants) within the same species. For example, the ascomata of F. minimum and Len. bipolare found on woody plants were flattened at the base, while those on herbaceous plants were ellipsoidal (Fig. 5, Fig. 6). Although the length of the ostiolar neck, peridium thickness, and ascomatal forms were unstable characteristics depending on different conditions, their peridial features, such as the existence of the clypeus (Crassiclypeus, Lentistoma; Fig. 3, Fig. 6), the brown hyphae surrounding the peridium (Crassiclypeus, Vaginatispora; Fig. 3, Fig. 12, Fig. 13), the contexture of the peridium with 1 zone (Crassiclypeus, Lentistoma, Leptoparies, Pseudolophiostoma, Pseudopaucispora, Vaginatispora; Fig. 3, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 11, Fig. 12, Fig. 13) or with 2 zones (Flabellascoma; Fig. 4, Fig. 5), were always stable even on different hosts or culture conditions (Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 13). These anatomical differences could be useful for generic circumscriptions. Thus, we treated these seven genera as distinct, their monophyly being strongly supported (Fig. 2). Additionally, clear morphological differences were observed in the asexual morphs of Crassiclypeus, Flabellascoma, and Pseudopaucispora; pycnidial conidiomata and phialidic conidiogenous cells (Crassiclypeus; Fig. 3W, Y–AA); pycnidial conidiomata and holoblastic conidiogenous cells (Flabellascoma; Fig. 4, Fig. 5); and pseudopycnidial conidiomata and holoblastic conidiogenous cells (Pseudopaucispora; Fig. 11S, T, V, W).

Resolution of the Lo. bipolare complex led us to reconsider the generic placement of unresolved species and the generic delimitations of the broadly defined genera from previous studies. Thambugala et al. (2015) retained Vaginatispora as a natural genus and subsequent studies accepted four species in this genus according to the results of phylogenetic analyses (Wanasinghe et al., 2016, Tibpromma et al., 2017). On the other hand, multi-locus phylogenetic analyses revealed the paraphyletic nature of this genus in the present study (Fig. 2). The morphological observations suggested that the genus was restricted to V. amygdali, V. appendiculata, V. armatispora, V. aquatica, and V. scabrispora, although V. armatispora was not included in our phylogenetic analyses due to the limited availability of the sequence data. Vaginatispora fuckelii is atypical for this genus, because this species possesses a thinner peridium (up to 25 μm in thickness) that is uniformly thick and composed of 2 zones (Thambugala et al. 2015). Therefore, we propose a new genus, Neovaginatispora, to accommodate this species (see Appendix B). Lophiostoma pseudoarmatisporum was introduced as a species of Lophiostoma s. lat. Lophiostoma pseudoarmatisporum is characterised by fusiform, hyaline ascospores with thin mucilaginous appendages (Li et al. 2016). The authors did not resolve the generic placement of the species (Hyde et al. 2016). The species is phylogenetically related to Crassiclypeus, Flabellascoma, Leptoparies, and Paucispora in our phylogenetic trees (Figs 1, S1A–C), but can be distinguished from these genera by the peridium that is composed of 1 zone and an ostiolar neck without the clypeus. Thus, a new monotypic genus, Parapaucispora, is proposed for Par. pseudoarmatispora (see Appendix B). The validity of the genera Alpestrisphaeria, Coelodictyosporium, Guttulispora, Lophiohelichrysum, Platystomum, and Sigarispora remain questionable. Most of these genera were originally divided from Lophiostoma based on insufficient features, such as the form of the ascomata and the ascospore colour and septation, and comprised single species and strain (Thambugala et al. 2015). Further discovery of more specimens along with additional morphological and molecular data will help to fully elucidate the taxonomic validity of these problematic genera in Lophiostomataceae.

Form and function of the ascospore sheath

Ascospores of the Lo. bipolare complex possess a gelatinous sheath that may help these organisms to attach to plant substrates in aquatic or marine habitats (Shearer, 1993, Hyde and Goh, 2003, Jones, 2006). Several terrestrial ascomycetes with appendaged ascospores have been reported from moist environments near a waterfall (Wanasinghe et al. 2016), a humid subtropical mountain (Tanaka & Hosoya 2008), and bamboo (Hashimoto et al. 2017b). It is interesting to note that most of the Lo. bipolare complexes were also collected from terrestrial habitats (Table 1). Jones (2006) suggested that these appendaged ascospores adapt to small watery environments in terrestrial habitats.

Ascospore characteristics are particularly useful in species identification of freshwater or marine fungi. Several morphological variations of the ascospore sheath were observed in Lophiostomataceae (Read et al., 1994, Read et al., 1997, Tsui et al., 1999, Au et al., 1999, Hyde et al., 2002). Capulatispora sagittiforme and Lentistoma bipolare have ascospores with bipolar sheaths, providing cap-like structures at the tips (Tanaka and Hosoya, 2008, Thambugala et al., 2015, this study Fig. 6T). Tanaka & Hosoya (2008) indicated that the bipolar appendages with the cap-like structures of the ascospores may contribute to the settlement of the discharged ascospore on the substrate. The lateral, gelatinous, pad-like structure was observed in most Lo. bipolare complexes (Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 12, Fig. 13), which is suspected to contribute to their attachment to plant substrates in aquatic or marine habitats, as evident in other freshwater fungi (Jones, 2006, Shearer et al., 2009). The presence of the internal chamber or inner spine structure at both ends of the ascospore sheath was observed in Capulatispora, Crassiclypeus, Flabellascoma, Lentistoma, Leptoparies, Pseudopaucispora, and Vaginatispora (Read et al., 1997, Hyde et al., 2002, Tanaka and Hosoya, 2008, this study, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 11, Fig. 12, Fig. 13). Ultrastructural examination of Len. bipolare ascospores suggested that the chamber is comprised of concentrated fibrillar material (Read et al., 1997, Hyde et al., 2002). Although these morphological variations are considered a result of the adaptation to their habitats, their taxonomic importance remains unclear (Hyde et al. 2002). Our phylogeny showed that these structures may have evolved several times within Lophiostomataceae (Fig. 2). From these results, it appears that the ascospore sheath has less importance to the understanding of the phylogenetic relationships as already reported (Shearer et al. 2009). Identification with an emphasis on these ascospore features alone may lead to misidentification of morphologically similar genera. A typical example of morphological convergence was reported in the study of “Massarinaingoldiana s. lat. (Hirayama et al. 2010), in which the unrelated species complex was comprised of two distinct lineages at the familial level. Precise re-identification of the Lo. bipolare complex based on detailed morphological characteristics (not only ascospores, but also ascomatal features) and molecular evidences will be needed to reveal their generic placements, accurate geographical distributions, ecological traits, and species diversity.

Intraspecific variability of morphological features has traditionally been reported in lophiostomataceous species, even within a single specimen. This complicates their generic and species delimitations (Chesters and Bell, 1970, Holm and Holm, 1988). Although recent studies on Lophiostomataceae using multiple genes revealed new lineages (Thambugala et al., 2015, Li et al., 2016, Wanasinghe et al., 2016, Tibpromma et al., 2017), 16 genera were separated from Lophiostoma based on insufficient morphological features or unclear generic circumscriptions that relied mainly on the molecular phylogenetic topologies. The present data provide insight into the complicated delimitations within the Lophiostomataceae genera and revealed the taxonomic importance of anatomical characteristics of the ascomata, which were previously unclear. To build a stable and comprehensive taxonomic framework, detailed morphological observations based on multiple specimens and comparisons of morphological variability both on natural substrate and in culture, as well as molecular data with high resolution, such as rpb2, will be needed. The data will be helpful to resolve the taxonomic placement of genera within this family and to validate the various problematic genera that currently exist in Lophiostomataceae.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funds obtained from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS 14255004, 26291084, 15H04491, 16J07243, and 16K07474) and the National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences' Genebank Project for conserving, managing and distributing microorganism genetic resources commissioned projects (2012, 2013) “Exploration, collection and diversity survey of dothideomycetous fungi in Ogasawara Islands”. The authors gratefully acknowledge the curator of BRIP for the loan of the specimens. We thank N. Asama, H.S. Chang, Y. Harada, S. Hatakeyama, T. Sato, and H. Yonezawa for their help with the collection of fungal specimens.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute.

Appendix A

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2018.03.001.

Appendix B. Other nomenclatural proposals

While resolving the Lo. bipolare complex, two new genera and two new combinations for Lophiostoma pseudoarmatisporum and Vaginatispora fuckelii were required. They are introduced as follows:

Neovaginatispora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. MycoBank MB823147.

Etymology: Refers to its morphological similarity to Vaginatispora.

Diagnosis: Differs from Vaginatispora via the thinner peridium (composed of 2 zones) having uniform thickness.

Type species: Neovaginatispora fuckelii (Sacc.) A. Hashim. et al.

Neovaginatispora fuckelii (Sacc.) A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, comb. nov. MycoBank MB823148.

Basionym: Lophiostoma fuckelii Sacc., Michelia 1: 336. 1878.

Synonym: Vaginatispora fuckelii (Sacc.) Thambug. et al., Fungal Diversity 74: 243. 2015.

For other synonyms, see Holm and Holm, 1988, Barr, 1992, and Tanaka & Harada (2003).

Parapaucispora A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, gen. nov. MycoBank MB815297.

Etymology: Refers to its morphological similarity to Paucispora.

Diagnosis: This genus can be distinguished from other lophiostomataceous genera by the single-zoned peridium that is wider at the sides and thinner at the base in the ascomata without a clypeus near the ostiolar neck.

Type species: Parapaucispora pseudoarmatispora (Hay. Takah. et al.) A. Hashim. et al.

Parapaucispora pseudoarmatispora (Hay. Takah. et al.) A. Hashim., K. Hiray. & Kaz. Tanaka, comb. nov. MycoBank MB824639.

Basionym: Lophiostoma pseudoarmatisporum Hay. Takah. et al., Fungal Diversity 78: 35. 2016.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the supplementary data related to this article:

Fig. S1

Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree of Lophiostomataceae based on (A) SSU-LSU, (B) ITS, (C) tef1, and (D) rpb2 individual sequences. An ML bootstrap proportion (BP) greater than 60 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) above 0.95 are presented at the nodes as ML BS/Bayesian PP. The circle (●) indicates nodes with 100 % ML BS/ 1.00 Bayesian PP. A hyphen (“-”) indicates values lower than 60 % BP or 0.95 PP. Ex-holotype, isotype, paratype, and epitype strains are indicated with superscripts H, I, P, and E, respectively. The newly obtained sequences are shown in bold and red. The scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per site.

mmc1.zip (7.3MB, zip)

References

  1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19:716–723. [Google Scholar]
  2. Au D.W.T., Jones E.B.G., Vrijmoed L.L.P. Observations on the biology and ultrastructure of the asci and ascospores of Julella avicenniae from Malaysia. Mycological Research. 1999;103:865–872. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barr M.E. Published by the author; 1987. Prodromus to class Loculoascomycetes. Massachusetts, USA. [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr M.E. Notes on the Lophiostomataceae (Pleosporales) Mycotaxon. 1992;45:191–221. [Google Scholar]
  5. Checa J. Annotated list of the Lophiostomataceae and Mytilinidiaceae (Dothideales, Ascomycotina) reported from the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Mycotaxon. 1997;63:467–491. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chesters C.G.C., Bell A. Studies in the Lophiostomataceae Sacc. Mycological Papers. 1970;120:1–55. [Google Scholar]
  7. Glass N.L., Donaldson G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1995;61:1323–1330. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hashimoto A., Matsumura M., Hirayama Pseudodidymellaceae fam. nov.: phylogenetic affiliations of mycopappus-like genera in Dothideomycetes. Studies in Mycology. 2017;87:187–206. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hashimoto A., Matsumura M., Hirayama K. Revision of Lophiotremataceae sensu lato (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes): establishment of Aquasubmersaceae, Cryptocoryneaceae, Hermatomycetaceae fam. nov. Persoonia. 2017;39:51–73. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirayama K., Tanaka K. Taxonomic revision of Lophiostoma and Lophiotrema based on reevaluation of morphological characters and molecular analyses. Mycoscience. 2011;52:401–412. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hirayama K., Tanaka K., Raja H.A. A molecular phylogenetic assessment of Massarina ingoldiana sensu lato. Mycologia. 2010;102:729–746. doi: 10.3852/09-230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Holm L., Holm K. Studies in the Lophiostomataceae with emphasis on the Swedish species. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses. 1988;28(2):1–50. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hyde K.D. Tropical Australian freshwater fungi. VII. New genera and species of Ascomycetes. Nova Hedwigia. 1995;61:119–140. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hyde K.D. Tropical Australasian fungi. IX. Vaginatispora aquatica gen. et sp. nov. Nova Hedwigia. 1995;61:233–241. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyde K.D., Goh T.K. Adaptations for dispersal in filamentous freshwater fungi. In: Tsui K.M., Hyde K.D., editors. Freshwater mycology. Fungal Diversity Press; Hong Kong: 2003. pp. 231–258. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hyde K.D., Hongsanan S., Jeewon R. Fungal diversity notes 367–490: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity. 2016;80:1–270. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hyde K.D., Vrijmoed L.L.P., Chinnaraj S. Massarina armatispora sp. nov., a new intertidal ascomycete from mangroves. Botanica Marina. 1992;35:325–328. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hyde K.D., Wong W.S.W., Aptroot A. Marine and estuarine species of Lophiostoma and Massarina. In: Hyde K.D., editor. Fungi in Marine Enironments. Fungal Diversity Press; Hong Kong: 2002. pp. 93–109. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kirk P.M., Cannon P.F., Minter D.W. 10th edn. CAB International; Wallingford, UK: 2008. Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jaklitsch W.M., Olariaga I., Voglmayr H. Teichospora and the Teichosporaceae. Mycological Progress. 2016;15:31. doi: 10.1007/s11557-016-1171-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jobb G. 2011. Treefinder Mar 2011.http://www.treefinder.de Available at: [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones E.B.G. Form and function of fungal spore appendages. Mycoscience. 2006;47:167–183. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li G.J., Hyde K.D., Zhao R.L. Fungal diversity notes 253–366: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity. 2016;78:1–237. [Google Scholar]
  24. Liew E.C.Y., Aptroot A., Hyde K.D. An evaluation of the monophyly of Massarina based on ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia. 2002;94:803–813. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu Y.J., Whelen S., Hall B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1999;16:1799–1808. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mugambi G.K., Huhndorf S.M. Molecular phylogenetics of Pleosporales: Melanommataceae and Lophiostomataceae re-circumscribed (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) Studies in Mycology. 2009;64:103–121. doi: 10.3114/sim.2009.64.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. O'Donnell K., Cigelnik E. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 1997;7:103–116. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rambaut A., Suchard M.A., Xie D. 2014. Tracer 1.6.http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer Available at: [Google Scholar]
  29. Rayner R.W. Commonwealth Mycological Institute and British Mycological Society; UK: 1970. A mycological colour chart. [Google Scholar]
  30. Read S.J., Jones E.B.G., Moss S.T. Ultrastructural observations of asci, ascospores and appendages of Massarina armatispora (Ascomycota) Mycoscience. 1997;38:141–146. [Google Scholar]
  31. Read S.J., Moss S.T., Jones E.B.G. Ultrastructure of asci and ascospore sheath of Massarina thalassiae (Loculoascomycetes, Ascomycotina) Botanica Marina. 1994;37:547–553. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rehner S.A., Buckley E. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia. 2005;97:84–98. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rehner S.A., Samuels G.J. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycological Research. 1994;98:625–634. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Saccardo P.A. Volume 2. 1883. (Sylloge Fungorum Omnium hucusque cognitorum). Padova, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  36. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics. 1978;6:461–464. [Google Scholar]
  37. Shearer C.A. The freshwater Ascomycetes. Nova Hedwigia. 1993;56:1–33. [Google Scholar]
  38. Shearer C.A., Raja H.A. 2010. Freshwater ascomycetes database.http://fungi.life.illinois.edu/ [Google Scholar]
  39. Shearer C.A., Raja H.A., Miller A.N. The molecular phylogeny of freshwater Dothideomycetes. Studies in Mycology. 2009;64:145–153. doi: 10.3114/sim.2009.64.08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tanabe A.S. Kakusan4 and Aminosan: two programs for comparing nonpartitioned, proportional and separate models for combined molecular phylogenetic analyses of multilocus sequence data. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:914–921. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tanaka K., Harada Y. Pleosporales in Japan (1): The genus Lophiostoma. Mycoscience. 2003;44:85–96. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tanaka K., Hirayama K., Yonezawa H. Revision of the Massarineae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) Studies in Mycology. 2015;82:75–136. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2015.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tanaka K., Hosoya T. Lophiostoma sagittiforme sp. nov., a new ascomycete (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) from Island Yakushima in Japan. Sydowia. 2008;60:131–145. [Google Scholar]
  45. Thambugala K.M., Hyde K.D., Tanaka K. Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Lophiostomataceae, Floricolaceae, and Amorosiaceae fam. nov. Fungal Diversity. 2015;74:199–266. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tibpromma S., Hyde K.D., Jeewon R. Fungal diversity notes 491–602: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity. 2017;83:1–261. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsui K.M., Wong S.W., Hyde K.D. Ultrastructural Studies of Massarina ingoldiana and M. purpurascens. Mycologia. 1999;91:721–726. [Google Scholar]
  48. Vilgalys R., Hester M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology. 1990;172:4238–4246. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wanasinghe D.N., Jones E.B.G., Dissanayake A.J. Saprobic Dothideomycetes in Thailand: Vaginatispora appendiculata sp. nov. (Lophiostomataceae) introduced based on morphological and molecular data. Studies in Fungi. 2016;1:56–68. [Google Scholar]
  50. White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J.J., editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press; San Diego, USA: 1990. pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yuan Z., Zhao Z. Studies on lophiostomataceous fungi from Xinjiang, China. Sydowia. 1994;46:162–184. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang Y., Wang H.K., Fournier J. Towards a phylogenetic clarification of Lophiostoma / Massarina and morphologically similar genera in the Pleosporales. Fungal Diversity. 2009;38:225–251. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang H., Hyde K.D., Zhao Y.C. Freshwater ascomycetes: Lophiostoma vaginatispora comb. nov. (Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Lophiostomataceae) based on morphological and molecular data. Phytotaxa. 2014;176:184–191. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1

Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree of Lophiostomataceae based on (A) SSU-LSU, (B) ITS, (C) tef1, and (D) rpb2 individual sequences. An ML bootstrap proportion (BP) greater than 60 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) above 0.95 are presented at the nodes as ML BS/Bayesian PP. The circle (●) indicates nodes with 100 % ML BS/ 1.00 Bayesian PP. A hyphen (“-”) indicates values lower than 60 % BP or 0.95 PP. Ex-holotype, isotype, paratype, and epitype strains are indicated with superscripts H, I, P, and E, respectively. The newly obtained sequences are shown in bold and red. The scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per site.

mmc1.zip (7.3MB, zip)

Articles from Studies in Mycology are provided here courtesy of Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute

RESOURCES