Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Apr 23;8:6404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24759-4

High fat diet induces airway hyperresponsiveness in mice

Kathrin Fricke 1,3,#, Marcela Vieira 1,#, Haris Younas 1,#, Mi-Kyung Shin 1, Shannon Bevans-Fonti 1, Slava Berger 1, Rachel Lee 1, Franco R D’Alessio 1, Qiong Zhong 1, Andrew Nelson 2, Jeff Loube 2, Ian Sanchez 2, Nadia N Hansel 1, Wayne Mitzner 2, Vsevolod Y Polotsky 1,
PMCID: PMC5913253  PMID: 29686414

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to examine the effect of a high fat diet (HFD) on airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in mice. Twenty-three adult male C57BL/6 J mice were fed with HFD or regular chow diet for two weeks. The total respiratory resistance was measured by forced oscillation technique at baseline and after methacholine aerosol challenge at 1, 3, 10 and 30 mg/mL. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed. Lipid levels and lipid peroxidation in lung tissue were measured along with gene expression of multiple cytokines. Lungs were digested, and IL-1β secretion by pulmonary macrophages was determined. HFD feeding resulted in 11% higher body weight compared to chow. HFD did not affect respiratory resistance at baseline, but significantly augmented airway responses to methacholine compared to chow diet (40.5 ± 17.7% increase at 30 mg/ml methacholine, p < 0.05). HFD induced a 3.2 ± 0.6 fold increase in IL-1β gene expression (p < 0.001) and a 38 fold increase in IL-1β secretion in the lungs. There was no change in BAL and no change in any other cytokines, lipid levels or lipid peroxidation. Hence, HFD induced AHR in mice prior to the development of significant obesity which was associated with up-regulation of pulmonary IL-1β.

Introduction

Asthma is one of the most common diseases and the prevalence of asthma continues to increase, which has been attributed to the epidemics of obesity13. Asthma in obesity appears to be different from typical TH2 driven allergic asthma demonstrating a poor response to inhaled corticosteroids4. Possible mechanisms include breathing at lower lung volumes, altered airway structure, increased airway oxidative stress, and greater systemic inflammation5. Up-regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β has been implicated in asthma in high fat diet (HFD) induced obesity6. HFD is pro-inflammatory due to direct effects of free fatty acids7. However, the effect of high fat diet per se on airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) has not been investigated. We hypothesize that high fat diet induces inflammation which can affect AHR independent of obesity.

Methods

Experimental animals

Twenty-three adult male C57BL/6 J mice, 10 weeks of age (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, MA) were fed with HFD (TD 03584, Teklad WI, 5.4 kcal/g, 35.2% fat, 58.4% kcal from fat, n = 10) or chow diet (3.0 kcal/g, 4.4% fat, 13% kcal from fat, n = 13) for 14 days. Details on HFD composition are provided in Supplemental Table 1. HFD was refrigerated at 4–8 °C before it was added to the cages. Food and water was provided ad libitum. Mice were housed in a standard laboratory environment at 22 °C in the 12 h light/dark cycle (9 am–9 pm lights on/9 pm–9 am lights off). In order to assure reproducibility of the measurements, mice were separated in two batches (Batch 1, HFD, n = 5, chow diet, n = 6; Batch 2, HFD, n = 5, chow diet, n = 7), which were studied six months apart using different batches of HFD. The study was approved by the Johns Hopkins University Animal Use and Care Committee (Protocol # MO15M257) and complied with the American Physiological Society Guidelines for Animal Studies.

Physiological measurements and Histology

On day 14 mice were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine i.p., tracheostomized and the total respiratory resistance (Rrs) was measured by forced oscillation technique (Flexivent) at baseline and after methacholine aerosol challenge at 1, 3, 10 and 30 mg/mL as described8,9. Blood was collected from the aorta, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed with 2 × 0.8 mL of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) through a tracheal cannula. The thorax was opened, and the right lung was tied off, dissected free and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. The remaining left lung was inflated with formalin at 26 cmH2O pressure for 20 min, tied off and placed inflated in formalin for 2 days. Left lung volumes were measured by water replacement.

For histology the left lung was dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in paraffin. For morphometry, 5-μm-thick sections were cut from transverse blocks and stained with Masson trichrome.

Blood, Plasma and Lung Tissue Analysis

Complete blood counts (CBC) were determined. Triglycerides and free fatty acids (FFA) were measured in lung homogenates and plasma with kits from Wako Inc (Richmond, VA). Plasma insulin and leptin were measured with kits from Alpco Diagnostics (Salem, NH) and Abcam (Cambridge, MA), respectively. Blood glucose levels were measured with a glucometer (ACCU-CHECK Aviva Plus, Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Total RNA was extracted from lung tissue with a Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD). cDNA was produced from total RNA using Advantage RT for PCR kit from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA). Real time PCR was performed for the cytokine panel, including interleukins (IL) 1β, 4, 5, 6, 10, 13, 17, TNF-α, IL-21, IL-23, adiponectin, leptin, fork head box protein P3 (FOXP3), matrix metallopeptidase (MMP 9), as well as toll-like receptors (TLR)−2 and 4 with premade primers from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA), and Taqman probes from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) using 18 S as a housekeeping gene (Supplemental Table 2).

Custom made 18 S primers were forward 5′-CTCTTTCGAGGCCCTGTAATTGT-3′, reverse, 5′-AACTGCAGCAACTTTAATATACGCTATT-3′ and the probe 6FAM-AGTCCACTTTAAATCCTT. Target mRNA level was normalized to 18 s rRNA, using the formula: Target/18 s = 2Ct(18s)–Ct(target). Activity of nuclear factor κB (NF- κB) was derived from the of phosphorylated to total IκBα protein with a kit from Abcam. Lipid peroxidation in lungs was measured by malondialdehyde level with a kit from Abcam.

Cytokine Secretion and Flow Cytometry

In a subset of mice left lungs were harvested, minced and placed in gentle MACS Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec), and digested using Collagenase type 1 (Worthington) and DNase I (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 10 minutes at 37 °C. The lung digests were passed through a 70-μm nylon cell strainer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and erythrocytes were subsequently lysed using RBC Lysis Buffer (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). The cells were counted and cells viability was assessed by Trypan Blue staining. Then, 2 × 106 of viable cells were seeded in 96 well plates in the presence of DMEM + 10% FBS + Pen/Strep 1:100 medium. Two hours later, non-adherent cells were removed and 100 ul of the medium were added to the attached cells. The cells were incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C, the media was collected, centrifuged to remove cells and debris, and IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 secretion was measured with an ELISA kit (R&D systems). For flow cytometry, cells were washed with FACS buffer (PBS + 0.5% BSA) and incubated with PE-Cy CD64 Ab. Then, non-specific staining of Fcγ III/II receptors was blocked with Fc Block-2.4G2 (BD Biosciences — Pharmingen) Ab. The following Abs (BD Biosciences — Pharmingen) were used for cell phenotyping: PerCp Cy 5.5-conjugated anti-CD11c, PE-CF594-conjugated anti-CD11b, APC-Cy7-conjugated anti-MHCII, BV421-conjugated anti-SigF, BV605-conjugated anti-Ly6c, BV510-conjugated anti-Ly6g, BV395-conjugated anti-CD4 and BV737-conjugated anti-8 and respective isotype Abs. Lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, alveolar and interstitial macrophages were gated with characteristic low forward scatter/side scatter, using a FACSAria instrument and FACSDiva for data acquisition (Becton Dickinson) and Flowjo for analysis (Tree Star Inc.) as previously described10.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Statistical analysis

All values are reported as means ± SEM. All the data in the study were checked for normality with a chi-square goodness of fit test. Statistical comparisons on non-normally distributed values were performed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance for normally distributed values was determined by student’s t-test or two-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) with the Bonferroni correction when appropriate. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using PRISM 7 and Stata.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the experimental animals are described in Table 1. HFD feeding for 2 weeks resulted in 11% higher body weight than in chow-fed mice doubling the size of epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pads. Of note, inguinal fat pads were not increased. HFD feeding induced hyperglycemia and increases in plasma insulin and leptin levels, whereas plasma triglyceride were unchanged (Table 1). There was no difference in CBC (Supplemental Table 3). Diet did not affect left lung volumes which were 0.16 ml ± 0.03 on a chow diet and 0.18 ± 0.03 on HFD.

Table 1.

Basic characteristics, and plasma metabolic parameters in regular chow and high fat diet mice.

Chow diet
(n = 13)
High Fat Diet
(n = 10)
Initial Body weight (g) 26.09 ± 0.74 25.67 ± 0.74
Final Body weight (g) 26.65 ± 0.59 29.21 ± 0.77*
Daily food intake (KJ/mouse) 47.9 ± 12.42 70.9 ± 6.32
Glucose levels (mg/dL) 140.1 ± 4.15 188.8 ± 8.48***
Plasma triglycerides (mg/dL) 119.79 ± 34.17 123.04 ± 71.61
Plasma free fatty acids (mmol/L) 0.44 ± 0.02 0.51 ± 0.03
Plasma insulin (ng/mL) 0.111 ± 0.007 0.167 ± 0.029*
Plasma leptin (ng/mL) 5.6 ± 0.5 18.2 ± 1.8**
Epidydimal fat pads weight (g) Right 0.223 ± 0.05 0.481 ± 0.16***
Left 0.213 ± 0.04 0.455 ± 0.167***
Retroperitoneal fat pads weight(g) Right 0.054 ± 0.01 0.093 ± 0.03**
Left 0.051 ± 0.015 0.127 ± 0.064**
Inguinal fat pads weight (g) Right 0.117 ± 0.011 0.115 ± 0.044
Left 0.123 ± 0.023 0.109 ± 0.04

*,**, and ***denote p < 0.05, <0.01 and <0.001, respectively, compared to chow diet; denotes p < 0.05 for the weight gain during the experiment in the high fat diet group.

Pulmonary function testing revealed no difference in total lung resistance at baseline between mice fed chow and HFD (Rrs of 0.69 ± 0.04 cm H2O*s/ml and 0.63 ± 0.03 cm H2O*s/ml, respectively). HFD significantly augmented airway responses to methacholine compared to chow diet (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

High fat diet (HFD) increased total resistance of the respiratory system (Rrs) in response to methacholine. The Rrs values were normalized to baseline (no significant difference between groups at baseline).

Compared to chow diet, HFD did not affect lung lipid content, lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde), BAL cell count and differential, TNF-α and IL-6 lung mRNA expression and secreted protein levels (Fig. 2) and adiponectin mRNA levels (Table 2). Histological examination show no evidence of inflammation or fibrosis in HFD mice (Supplemental Fig. 1). Mice on both diets showed no detectable pulmonary expression of pro-inflammatory or pro-allergic IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-17, IL-21, IL-23, leptin, MMP 9, TLR 2, TLR 4 and anti-inflammatory IL-10 and FOXP3. There was no indication of upregulation of NF-κB by HFD, because the IκB subunit showed similar levels of phosphorylation in both dietary groups. In contrast, HFD induced a significant 3.2 ± 0.6 fold increase in total lung IL-1β mRNA compared to chow diet (p = 0.001), and this difference remained significant after the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (Fig. 2A). Most remarkably, HFD induced a 38-fold increase in IL-1β secretion by adherent cells isolated from the lungs, presumably monocytes and macrophages (Fig. 2B). The flow cytometry of total lung digest showed that HFD induced a 1.3-fold increase in the percentage of interstitial macrophages and 1.7-fold increase in the percentage of alveolar macrophages in lung tissue (Fig. 3A). Moreover, HFD mice had a 1.4-fold increase in the percentage of adherent alveolar macrophages compared to mice on a chow diet (Fig. 3B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The effect of high fat diet (HFD) feeding for 14 days on (A) interleukin 1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) mRNA levels in lung tissue; (B) IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 protein secretion to the media by adherent cells isolated from the lung single cell suspension. *p < 0.05 for the difference with a regular chow diet.

Table 2.

Lung metabolic parameters and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) data in regular chow and high fat diet mice.

Chow diet
(n = 13)
High Fat Diet
(n = 10)
Triglycerides in lung tissue (µg/mg) 12.96 ± 1.08 14.55 ± 2.20
Free fatty acids in lung tissue (µmol/mg) 0.039 ± 0.003 0.038 ± 0.001
Lung malondialdehyde (uM/mg) 36.08 ± 3.83 30.73 ± 4.28
Phosphorylation of IκBα (% of total) 2.7 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 0.9
Lung adiponectin mRNA (fold change) 1.00 ± 0.19 0.63 ± 0.18
BAL cell count (cells/mL) 36212 ± 6775 31666 ± 2317
BAL differential (% of total) Epithelial cells 10.08 ± 1.39 12.58 ± 1.92
Macrophages 89.28 ± 1.43 86.88 ± 1.91
Eosinophils 0 0
Basophils 0 0
Neutrophils 0.05 ± 0.02 0.02 ± 0.02
Lymphocytes 0.59 ± 0.14 0.52 ± 0.2

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The effect of high fat diet (HFD) feeding on the leukocyte population in the mouse lungs. CD4, CD8 lymphocytes, interstitial macrophages, monocytes, and alveolar macrophages were identified by flow cytometry according to protocol described by Misharin et al. (ref.10) in (A) total lung leukocyte suspension and (B) the adherent cell population as described in methods.

Discussion

To our knowledge this is the first study demonstrating that high fat diet induces airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) early in the time course, only after two weeks of feeding. Another novel finding of the study is that HFD feeding induces IL-1β expression in lung tissue and increases IL-1β secretion in the lungs prior to the development of significant obesity.

Numerous factors may account for increased AHR in obesity. Several phenotypes of obesity associated asthma have been identified, including obesity-induced structural changes in lung volumes and airways; pre-existing allergic asthma complicated by obesity; neutrophilic asthma and asthma induced by obesity-related environmental factors (e.g. high fat diet)11. The latter phenotype has been associated with increased IL-1β inflammatory response11. However, it has been previously unknown whether HFD can lead to AHR early in time course. Our data in a non-allergy prone strain of mice showed that HFD activates the IL-1β pathway specifically in the lungs, prior to the development of significant obesity. Previous data showed that IL-1β knockout or receptor blockade abolished an increase of AHR in mice with severe diet-induced obesity6. Furthermore, IL-1β may directly potentiate cholinergic bronchoconstriction12. There was no signs of eosinophilic or neutrophilic inflammation in BAL associated with obese asthma13,14 and there was no increase in TH2 cytokines like IL-4. We observed an increase in the percentage of pulmonary macrophages in mice fed with a HFD. However, this increase was small compared to a striking increase in IL-1 β levels. Thus, our data suggest that up-regulation of IL-1β in the lungs is implicated in causality of HFD-induced asthma.

What would be a potential mechanism by which dietary fat induces IL-1β in the lungs? In patients with asthma, a high fat diet meal increases airway inflammation and decreases the airway response to bronchodilators15. The pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells are responsible for triglyceride uptake and triglyceride clearance16. FFA may activate the NF-κB pathway followed by IL-1β up-regulation17. Another possible mechanism would be a high fat diet induced activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome through fatty acids or cholesterol crystals in pulmonary macrophages resulting in IL-1β production. However, we did not find an increase in FFA or activation of the NF- κB pathway. Also, the lack of an effect of HFD on IL-17, an indispensable component of the inflammasome may argues against this mechanism6.

Up-regulation of IL-1β is not the only possible mechanism by HFD-induced bronchial reactivity. HFD induced a 3-fold increase in plasma leptin. In patients with asthma, high leptin have been independently associated with the disease severity18. In a mouse model leptin treatment induced the TH2 response and allergic inflammation of the airways18. Of note, leptin may also increase IL-1β19,20, which would be consistent with current findings. Finally, our data suggest that HFD feeding for 2 weeks induced early manifestations of the metabolic syndrome including visceral fat deposition with an increased size of visceral fat pads (epidydimal and retroperitoneal), but not subcutaneous fat pads (inguinal), hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia (Table 1). Coexistence of metabolic syndrome and asthma is well documented in the literature21. Low grade systemic inflammation observed in the metabolic syndrome may contribute to the development of obese asthma via IL-1β and other pathways. Furthermore, treatment of insulin resistance, a hallmark manifestation of the metabolic syndrome, may have a beneficial effect in obese asthma22.

Limitations

The main limitation of our study is that the role of IL-1β in HFD-induced asthma is not confirmed in mechanistic experiments using IL-1β knock out mice or IL-1β receptor blockers. However, this causal relationship has been shown previously by other investigators in mice with diet-induced obesity6. Future experiments using IL-1β receptor blockers are needed.

Conclusion and implications

Our data suggests that HFD may rapidly induce airway hyperresponsiveness prior to the development of significant obesity with early involvement of IL-1β. Given that IL-1β production is not responsive to steroids in severe asthma23,24, our data imply that dietary fat restriction may be an important adjunct to other therapies used in obese asthma.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information (260.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

NNH and VYP are supported by NIEHS grant P50 ES018176 and EPA Agreements 83615201 & 83451001. VYP is also supported by NHLBI grants R01 HL128970, HL133100, and HL138932. This publication has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of Fricke and colleagues and do not necessarily reflect those of the Agency. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication.

Author Contributions

K.F., M.V., H.Y., S.B., F.R.D., A.N., I.S., N.N.H., W.M., V.Y.P. conceived and carried out experiments. M.-K.S., and S.B.-F. carried out experiments. H.Y. carried out experiments and performed statistical analysis. All authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted and published versions.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Kathrin Fricke, Marcela Vieira and Haris Younas contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-24759-4.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Akinbami, L. J. & Fryar, C. D. Current Asthma Prevalence by Weight Status Among Adults: United States, 2001–2014. NCHS data brief, 1–8 (2016). [PubMed]
  • 2.Mosen DM, Schatz M, Magid DJ, Camargo CA., Jr. The relationship between obesity and asthma severity and control in adults. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2008;122:507–511.e506. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Taylor B, et al. Body mass index and asthma severity in the National Asthma Survey. Thorax. 2008;63:14–20. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.082784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Peters-Golden M, et al. Influence of body mass index on the response to asthma controller agents. The European respiratory journal. 2006;27:495–503. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00077205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shore SA, Johnston RA. Obesity and asthma. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 2006;110:83–102. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim HY, et al. Interleukin-17-producing innate lymphoid cells and the NLRP3 inflammasome facilitate obesity-associated airway hyperreactivity. Nature medicine. 2014;20:54–61. doi: 10.1038/nm.3423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kanneganti TD, Dixit VD. Immunological complications of obesity. Nature immunology. 2012;13:707–712. doi: 10.1038/ni.2343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bishai JM, Mitzner W. Effect of severe calorie restriction on the lung in two strains of mice. American Journal of Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 2008;295:L356–L362. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00514.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Soutiere SE, Mitzner W. On defining total lung capacity in the mouse. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985) 2004;96:1658–1664. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01098.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Misharin AV, Morales-Nebreda L, Mutlu GM, Budinger GRS, Perlman H. Flow Cytometric Analysis of Macrophages and Dendritic Cell Subsets in the Mouse Lung. American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology. 2013;49:503–510. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0086MA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dixon AE, Poynter ME. Mechanisms of Asthma in Obesity. Pleiotropic Aspects of Obesity Produce Distinct Asthma Phenotypes. American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology. 2016;54:601–608. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0017PS. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ansell TK, Mitchell HW, McFawn PK, Noble PB. TNF and IL-1β exposure increases airway narrowing but does not alter the bronchodilatory response to deep inspiration in airway segments. Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) 2016;21:1041–1048. doi: 10.1111/resp.12800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Scott HA, Gibson PG, Garg ML, Wood LG. Airway inflammation is augmented by obesity and fatty acids in asthma. The European respiratory journal. 2011;38:594–602. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00139810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Telenga ED, et al. Obesity in asthma: more neutrophilic inflammation as a possible explanation for a reduced treatment response. Allergy. 2012;67:1060–1068. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02855.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wood LG, Garg ML, Gibson PG. A high-fat challenge increases airway inflammation and impairs bronchodilator recovery in asthma. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2011;127:1133–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yao Q, et al. Effect of chronic intermittent hypoxia on triglyceride uptake in different tissues. Journal of Lipid Research. 2013;54:1058–1065. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M034272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang W, et al. Alternate-day fasting protects the livers of mice against high-fat diet-induced inflammation associated with the suppression of Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor kappaB signaling. Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) 2016;36:586–593. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2016.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zheng H, et al. Leptin Enhances TH2 and ILC2 Responses in Allergic Airway Disease. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2016;291:22043–22052. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.743187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boyd CA. Placental transport studied by means of isolated plasma membrane vesicles. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 1991;50:337–343. doi: 10.1079/PNS19910043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Luheshi GN, Gardner JD, Rushforth DA, Loudon AS, Rothwell NJ. Leptin actions on food intake and body temperature are mediated by IL-1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96:7047–7052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.12.7047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baffi CW, et al. Metabolic Syndrome and the Lung. Chest. 2016;149:1525–1534. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Carpaij OA, van den Berge M. The asthma-obesity relationship: underlying mechanisms and treatment implications. Current opinion in pulmonary medicine. 2018;24:42–49. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hew M, et al. Relative corticosteroid insensitivity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in severe asthma. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2006;174:134–141. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200512-1930OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim RY, et al. Role for NLRP3 Inflammasome-mediated, IL-1beta-Dependent Responses in Severe, Steroid-Resistant Asthma. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2017;196:283–297. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201609-1830OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (260.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES