In this work, we have removed some of the confusion surrounding the use of the name “USA500,” placed USA500 strains in the context of the CC8 group, and developed a strategy for assignment to subclades based on genome sequence. Our new phylogeny of USA300/USA500 will be a reference point for understanding the genetic adaptations that have allowed multiple highly virulent clonal strains to emerge from within CC8 over the past 50 years.
KEYWORDS: evolution, IS256, MRSA, USA300, adenosine, drug resistance
ABSTRACT
USA500 isolates are clonal complex 8 (CC8) Staphylococcus aureus strains closely related to the prominent community- and hospital-associated USA300 group. Despite being relatively understudied, USA500 strains cause a significant burden of disease and are the third most common methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains identified in the U.S. Emerging Infections Program (EIP) invasive S. aureus surveillance. To better understand the genetic relationships of the strains, we sequenced the genomes of 539 USA500 MRSA isolates from sterile site infections collected through the EIP between 2005 and 2013 in the United States. USA500 isolates fell into three major clades principally separated by their distribution across different U.S. regions. Clade C1 strains, found principally in the Northeast, were associated with multiple IS256 insertion elements in their genomes and higher levels of antibiotic resistance. C2 was associated with Southern states, and E1 was associated with Western states. C1 and C2 strains all shared a frameshift in the gene encoding AdsA surface-attached surface protein. We propose that the term “USA500” should be used for CC8 strains sharing a recent common ancestor with the C1, C2, and E1 strains but not in the USA300 group.
IMPORTANCE In this work, we have removed some of the confusion surrounding the use of the name “USA500,” placed USA500 strains in the context of the CC8 group, and developed a strategy for assignment to subclades based on genome sequence. Our new phylogeny of USA300/USA500 will be a reference point for understanding the genetic adaptations that have allowed multiple highly virulent clonal strains to emerge from within CC8 over the past 50 years.
INTRODUCTION
The name “USA500” is used to describe a group of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones that have emerged over the past 20 years as frequent causes of community-associated (CA) and health-care-associated infections in North America. USA500 was first defined as a distinct pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) type (1). Like the better known USA300 PFGE type, which has caused an epidemic of community-acquired infections in the United States (2, 3), USA500 strains mostly have the multilocus sequence type (MLST) ST8 genotype and are part of the CC8 clonal complex (4). Both USA300 and USA500 carry the type IV SCCmec cassette conferring resistance to β-lactam antibiotics and have conserved mutations in their capsule locus (5). USA300 strains are distinguished from USA500 by having Panton-Valentin leukocidin (PVL) toxin genes within a prophage of the phiSA2 family (6). Isolates of the North American epidemic (NAE) USA300 lineage have an arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) cassette next to SCCmec, whereas those of the South American epidemic (SAE) lineage have a copper and mercury resistance (COMER) element at same locus (7). USA300 strains also have a SaPI5 pathogenicity island containing sek and seq enterotoxin genes (8). The arginine deiminase (arc) and polyamine resistance (speG) genes on the ACME cassette and the PVL toxin have been proposed as key determinants of the enhanced ability to cause skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and transmissibility of USA300 (3, 9), although strains with deletions in these genes have been frequently reported (2, 10, 11).
It has been postulated that USA300 evolved as a clonal lineage from within a background of USA500 strains (2, 12). However, genome sequencing studies suggested the relationship was more complex, with USA500 strains assigned to different clades within CC8 (2, 3, 5, 13). Nomenclature for USA500 strains is also complicated. USA500 strains collected at the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) were subdivided into two groups based on closely related PFGE types: true “USA500” and “Iberian.” Before 2012, the assignment was based largely on PFGE. From 2012 onward, an algorithm for inferring USA500 and Iberian was implemented (https://www.cdc.gov/HAI/settings/lab/CCalgorithm.html), which combined PFGE, spa, MLST, and PCR amplicon-based detection of key horizontally acquired staphylococcal enterotoxin A (sea) and B (seb) genes (12). Confusingly, the term “Iberian” was also earlier used to describe a PFGE type from an MRSA epidemic in Spain and other countries between 1990 and 1995 that was found to be ST247 (CC8) with SCCmec type Ia (14–16).
The CDC’s Emerging Infections Program (EIP) conducts active, laboratory- and population-based surveillance for invasive MRSA infections (17). Strains typed as USA500/Iberian have represented a significant proportion of EIP MRSA isolates. In 2013 (the final year in which we drew collected strains for sequencing in this study), they constituted 13.5% of health care-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) strains collected at 5 surveillance sites (https://www.cdc.gov/abcs/reports-findings/surv-reports.html). Notably, in Georgia the incidence was higher than other sites, with USA500/Iberian representing 20% of all HA-MRSA infections over the period from 2012 through 2015 (R. Overton, personal communication). While numerous projects have investigated USA300 evolution through comparative genomics (2, 3, 10, 11, 13), fewer genomic studies have been performed on USA500. Here we aimed to investigate the diversity of USA500 isolates causing invasive infections in the United States through analysis of a large set of strains collected through EIP surveillance. The goal of this work was to arrive at a genetic definition of USA500 that can be used for future typing efforts and to understand its relationship to USA300.
RESULTS
CC8 strains typed as “USA500/Iberian” fall into three major clades.
De novo-assembled contigs of the 539 strains typed as MRSA USA500, along with data from 24 published CC8 strains (listed with citations in Table S1 in the supplemental material), were aligned against the reference genome of strain 2395 (2,995,646 bp with a large plasmid [pUSA500] of 32,406 bp) (18). The 2395 strain, recovered from a wound infection in New York (18, 19), was originally assigned to the “Iberian” subgroup of USA500 based on the presence of the sea and seb genes. The whole-genome alignment of all 539 CC8 strains sequenced in this study plus 24 published genomes had a core region of 1,995 kbp (67.5% of the 2,956-kbp chromosome). Regions not part of the core alignment on the chromosome included prophages, pathogenicity islands, transposons, and other repeat sequences. Plasmid content was variable between strains and therefore excluded from consideration in the phylogenetic reconstruction. After recombinant regions were identified and removed, the final alignment consisting of 13,765 chromosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was used to estimate a maximum likelihood tree (Fig. 1). We labeled the CC8 sublineages A to F using a scheme developed recently (20) (Fig. 1).
The phylogeny revealed that the majority of USA500/Iberian strains were in three major and discrete clades within CC8. Two of the USA500 clades were in the C sublineage and were designated C1 and C2. The other was in the E sublineage and was designated E1. Nineteen strains were placed outside these three clades: in USA300 (sublineage F), sublineage B, or deep-branching sublineages E and C (Fig. 1).
Metadata for each strain included patient age, epidemiological classification of infection (community-associated [CA], health care onset [HO], health care-associated community onset [HACO], or unknown), culture source (blood, cerebrospinal fluid [CSF], bone, etc.), outcome (lived, died, or unknown), and U.S. state of isolation. Using a permutation test, the three major USA500 clades defined here (C1, C2, and E1) were found to have a significantly nonrandom distribution in only the U.S. state of isolation metadata variable (P value of 9.7e−12), reflecting the geographical structuring of the USA500 clades.
The C1 clade (64 strains from this study) contained the strain 2395 USA500 isolate that was used as the reference genome sequence for this study (18). The majority (52/64 [81%]) of samples were from Maryland, Connecticut, or New York. Most C1 strains were ST8, with minority populations of ST609 and ST1508. The C2 clade corresponded to the group labeled as “USA500-like” by Jamrozy et al. (13). These strains were predominantly from Georgia and Tennessee (351/378). One strain was typed as ST476, and the rest were ST8. E1 clade strains were predominantly isolated in California, Colorado, Minnesota, and Oregon (63/78 [81%]). This clade contained the BD02-25 strain originally used as the USA500 reference isolate (12). Of these, 36/78 (46%) were ST2253 and the rest were ST8. Two strains closely related to USA300 contained the S. aureus pathogenicity island (SaPI5) with USA300-like seq and sek genes but lacked the typical USA300 mobile elements ACME and PVL (Fig. 2).
Seventy-six percent (39/51) of E1 strains were typed as “USA500” by the CDC algorithm, whereas 83% (304/368) of strains in C1 and C2 were typed as “Iberian” (Table 1). If we assume that E1 corresponded to the “USA500” inferred PFGE type and that the C1 and C2 strains were “Iberian” (because the majority of strains from each respective clade had these types), the number of correctly typed strains was 343 out of 419 (82% accuracy). The major reason for the relatively low accuracy was the frequent turnover of pathogenicity islands and prophages in USA500 genomes. The seb gene used in the CDC algorithm (in addition to sek and seq) was on the SaPI5 pathogenicity island in USA300; an analogous island in COL and USA500 (SaPI3) carried sek and seq (Fig. 2) (21). The SaPI was common in C1 and C2, but most E1 strains did not contain either SaPI3 or SaPI5, although a subclade of 8 strains was found to have a previously undescribed variant of SaPI3 at the same chromosomal locus (called here SaPI3-E1), with low sequence identity to the other islands and lacking sek/seq homologs (Fig. 2). Families of S. aureus prophages inserted into different conserved sites in the genome and varied in frequency of occurrence between strain groups (22). The sea gene used for typing, as well as sak, was usually found on the phiSA3 prophage. This element was inserted at a site in the hlb hemolysin B gene in C1/C2, but in the E1 strains the DNA sequence of the element was missing the sea/sak genes (Fig. 2). Most C1 and C2 strains carried the phiSA2 prophages, which were rare in E1. Conversely, phiSA1 and phiSA6 were more common in E1 (75% and 45%, respectively) than other clades (Fig. 3).
TABLE 1 .
Clade | No. of strains sequenced |
||
---|---|---|---|
Sequenced | Inferred “USA500” | Inferred “Iberian” | |
C1 | 64 | 3 | 57 |
C2 | 378 | 61 | 247 |
E1 | 78 | 39 | 12 |
Other | 19 | 8 | 7 |
Total | 539 | 111 | 323 |
The strains sequenced in this study were placed in clades by their position on the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). The third and fourth columns are the inferred PFGE type to which the strains were assigned using methods described in https://www.cdc.gov/abcs/reports-findings/survreports/mrsa13.html. (Note that not all strains sequenced in this study were tested by the algorithm.)
Emergence of the USA500 clades.
Initial analysis suggested that there was a clock-like structure to the phylogeny, with strains sampled in earlier years nearer the root than those from later years. Therefore, we attempted to estimate the dates of diversification of the USA500 clades using a Bayesian molecular clock method implemented by the BEAST2 software package (23) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Key parameter predictions that could be cross-referenced against other studies were consistent with our estimates. For instance, our estimate of the substitution rate parameter (1.158e−6 mutations per nucleotide site per year) was similar to those of previous S. aureus studies: e.g., 1.3e−6 (24), 1.53e−6 (11), 1.25e−6 (10), and 1.34e−6 (2) (with the caveats that some of these studies had partially overlapping data sets and each used slightly different evolutionary models). Furthermore, the estimate of 1989 as the time to the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) of the NAE group USA300 strain was within the ranges of other recent publications (3, 10, 11). The C1, C2, E1, and F clades all appeared to have emerged at time points toward the middle of the 20th century. We noted that the C2 clade tMRCA estimation was likely significantly retarded by the three deeply branching isolates. When these were removed, the tMRCA was 1972 (1945 to 1992, 95% high posterior density intervals). Each of the major clades’ Tajima’s D statistics was negative (Table 2), consistent with a recent population size expansion scenario.
TABLE 2 .
Clade | Median estimated tMRCAa | Tajima’s D |
---|---|---|
C1 | 1937 (1873−1973) | −2.32 |
C2 | 1945 (1890–1978) | −2.63 |
E1 | 1950 (1899–1980) | −2.42 |
F | 1951 (1901–1981)b | −1.90 |
F (NAE) | 1989 (1976–1999) | −0.98 |
F (SAE) | 1994 (1983–2001) | −0.85 |
USA300/USA500 (C–F) | 1892 (1820–1952) | −2.33 |
In parentheses are the 95% highest posterior density intervals.
See reference 11 for details.
USA500 clades differ in proportion of strains resistant to antibiotics.
The phenotypic antibiotic resistance profile was determined for most strains sequenced in this study using the reference broth microdilution (rBMD) method with CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute)-recommended interpretive criteria (25) (Fig. 4). There was no trend toward increased resistance to greater numbers of drugs per strain over the time period 2005 through 2013 (see Fig. S2a in the supplemental material). However, it was notable that C1 strains were resistant to a greater number of antibiotics than C2 and E1 strains (Fig. S2b). Almost all C1 strains were resistant to tetracycline (60/64) and gentamicin (54/64) (Fig. 4). Most C1 (55/64) and C2 (324/325) strains tested were also resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, a drug often used in treating community-acquired S. aureus SSTIs, but resistance was uncommon among E1 strains (3/72). These and other more sporadic resistance phenotypes were associated with the presence of horizontally acquired plasmids, the Tn916 conjugative transposon (which conferred tetracycline resistance), or a 3.3-kb insertion element containing the trimethoprim resistance gene dfrG (13, 26–28).
Most isolates tested (435/464 [94%]) were resistant to the fluoroquinolone (FQ) levofloxacin. We observed that FQ-susceptible strains tended to be on early branching lineages of the C2 and E1 clades. This mirrored the pattern seen in USA300, where a subgroup of strains that branched after an estimated point in 1994 were found to be FQ resistant (10, 11). These results suggested that resistance to FQ independently evolved in multiple emergent CC8 lineages.
Conserved IS256 insertion sites in C1 strains suggest expansion from an ancestor with multiple transposon insertions.
Insertion sequence IS256 was previously shown to play a significant role in the hypertoxicity of strain 2395 and other isolates from the C1 clade (18). The genome was notable for the presence of 18 identical copies of the insertion sequence IS256 (16 on the chromosome, 2 on the plasmid). Two IS256 elements in inverted orientation flank gentamicin and trimethoprim resistance genes to form transposon Tn4001, which is part of the pUSA500 plasmid. One IS256 element in the promoter of the rot (repression of toxin) gene, a master positive transcriptional regulator of toxin expression, was found to be responsible for increased cytotoxin production. The 73 USA500 isolates that contained at least one copy of IS256 included all 64 in C1. Benson et al. speculated that the pUSA500 plasmid spread IS256 to the USA500 chromosome (18). We found that 40 strains contained sequences similar to the pUSA500 plasmid, judged as having a BLAST match of more than 97% sequence identity over >13 kb of the 32-kb plasmid (accession no. CP007500.1). Only one strain carrying a pUSA500-like plasmid was outside the C1 clade (in C2). Meanwhile, seven strains outside C1 without a USA500-like plasmid had an IS256. Thus, there was not an absolute correlation of the presence of the plasmid with the transposon. Possibly the plasmid originally introduced the transposon in these strains and was cured after a time sufficient for IS256 to transpose into the chromosome.
We determined the chromosomal locations of IS256 insertions in our sequenced strains relative to the 2395 reference (18) in using the ISMapper tool (29). Within the C1 clade, the number of IS256 chromosomal insertion locations ranged from 9 to 42, while outside C1, the range was 1 to 3 locations. There was no trend toward increase in number of insertions per isolate during the period of collection (2005 to 2013) (see Fig. S3a in the supplemental material). Eleven insertion sites were common among almost all C1 strains (Fig. S3b), suggesting that these were present in the last common ancestor of the clade. These 11 sites included one upstream of the rot gene (18).
USA500 C clade strains have a frameshift mutation in the adsA adenosine synthase gene
We noted that many USA500 strains had a premature stop in adsA, encoding adenosine synthase (previously called sasH [30]). The cell-wall-anchored protein encoded by adsA had been shown to aid in evasion of phagocytic clearance in blood, by catalyzing the production of adenosine, an anti-inflammatory signal molecule, from AMP (31). The wild-type AdsA protein has an LPXTG motif necessary for sortase-mediated anchoring to peptidoglycan on the cell surface (32) in the C terminus of the 773-amino-acid preprotein. The most important residues for 5′-nucleotidase activity are toward the N terminus: aspartic acid 127 and histidine 196 (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). All isolates in the C clade had a duplication of the “TCAA” quadruplet at nucleotide positions 340 to 343 of the wild type (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material). The frameshift resulted in a truncated protein of 131 amino acids (as well as a predicted C-terminal stub of 636 amino acids) instead of the full-length 773-amino-acid sequence. The C-terminal stub was not predicted to have a signal sequence necessary for translocation out of the cytoplasm. Therefore, the truncated proteins, if they were stably expressed, would be predicted to be diminished in activity as surface-exposed adenosine synthases. This mutation clearly did not abolish the potential to cause human systemic illness, as might have been predicted from the result of earlier mouse bacteremia model studies (31), since all isolates were associated with invasive disease.
DISCUSSION
It is important to establish a consistent use of the name “USA500” that can be used for future epidemiological studies and comparisons. The terms “USA500” and “USA300” are derived from a PFGE typing scheme established in early 2000s (33) and represent different lineages within a single clonal complex (CC8) that acquired SCCmec type IV cassettes and increased in incidence in the human population. In essence, three definitions of the USA500 strain have been used in the literature, as described below: (i) USA500 PFGE type, (ii) USA500 sensu stricto as a single clade within CC8, and (iii) USA500 sensu lato as the genetic background to USA300 (e.g., as proposed by Glaser et al. [2]).
(i) USA500 PFGE type.
USA500 is the original designation associated with MRSA strain types in the United States, based on PFGE (1). However, PFGE will be performed less frequently on future isolates as clinical genome sequencing becomes more routine (34). We also showed that PFGE (before 2012) and the algorithm (after 2012) for inferring USA500 from “Iberian” PFGE using MLST or spa and sea/seb PCR was only 82% accurate in distinguishing USA500 and Iberian USA500 pulse types (Fig. 1; Table 1).
(ii) USA500 sensu stricto as a single clade within CC8.
If USA500 was represented a single clade, the primary candidates would be C1 and C2 or E1. Strain 2395 (C1) has been the reference genome for USA500 since the publication by Benson et al. (15). This strain was assumed to be representative of a unitary USA500 clade in the recent genomic analysis of CC8 by Strauß et al. (34), which led the authors to conclude that USA500 was not a direct ancestor of USA300. Alternatively, the marker-based typing scheme proposed by Li et al. designated the E1 clade as USA500 (11) (Fig. 1; Table 1). Designation of one or the other of these clades as the sole USA500 clade would have the advantage of casting USA500 as a true monophyletic clade. The problem is that any sensu stricto definition excludes many other strains that are commonly referred to in the literature as USA500.
(iii) USA500 sensu lato as the genetic background to USA300.
As proposed by Glaser et al. (2), USA500 sensu lato could be considered the genetic background to USA300. All CC8 non-USA300 strains that derive from an ancestor that contained a signature cap5D A nucleotide insertion at position 994 in the gene (5) could be considered USA500. Based on this definition, the CC8 sublineages C, D, and E (20) would all be considered USA500 (Fig. 1). We believe the “sensu lato” definition has the advantages of being simple and inclusive. One consequence of using this definition is that it would sequester some strains not previously considered USA500, including the recently described epidemic Russian clone OC8 (35) (Fig. 1). The clade containing all descendants of the common ancestor of USA300 and USA500 isolates (subgroups C to F) would be called USA300/USA500 (sensu lato).
The whole-genome phylogeny and molecular clock analysis revealed that the three major USA500 clades collected by the EIP had undergone population expansions in the United States from around the middle of the 20th century. USA300 emerged from the F sublineage and spread within the United States and internationally (36) rather than remaining regionally concentrated, as the USA500 clades did. Including the recent Russian OC8 strain (35), we now know there have been at least five significant expansions of virulent strains carrying SCCmec type IV cassettes from within the CC8 clonal complex (USA300, OC8, and the 3 USA500 clades). CC8 was also the origin of the first MRSA strains with the type I SCCmec cassette (ST250) in the early 1960s (37, 38). It has been suggested that the CC8 background in general and USA500/USA300 in particular have intrinsic high virulence potential (39, 40). Li et al. showed that USA300 strains and USA500 (clade E1) strain BD02-25 had greater virulence in a bacteremic mouse model than other CC8 strains and enhanced resistance to human antimicrobial peptides (12). Benson et al. also demonstrated the unusually high toxin levels of the C1 strain 2395 (18).
Each of the five expansions within CC8 (USA300, OC8, C1, C2, and E1) may have been the result of either specific genetic adaptations or chance events or a combination of both. Interestingly, there are parallels in the types of genetic changes acquired by each strain expansion and also unique differences. Antibiotic resistance may have played a role in the expansion of the C1 clade in particular (Fig. 4). Fluoroquinolone resistance, as an example, likely evolved in parallel on at least 4 occasions by the strains that form part of the study. There must have been particular selection pressure for survival of the effects of this class of antibiotics (possibly administered to treat other infections), and the mutations probably have low fitness cost, allowing them to persist in the population even in the absence of an antibiotic selective pressure. It has been suggested that the propensity for secretion of fluoroquinolones onto the skin through sweat may lead to high enough drug concentrations to effect selection (41).
In the case of OC8 and C1, parallel acquisition of IS256 seemed to be associated with expansion (18, 35). An IS256 element in strain 2395 (clade C1) disrupted the rot (repressor of toxicity) locus and increased toxin production (18). C1 strains containing IS256 were found to be more cytotoxic for human neutrophils (18, 42) and also exhibited greater virulence for mice in a systemic infection model (43). The OC8 strain had 19 IS256 copies, two of which, in inverted orientation, facilitated a 1-Mb genomic inversion in the main chromosome (35). IS256 is a catalyst for expansion in diverse S. aureus lineages and may affect numerous other phenotypes—for example, vancomycin resistance (44). IS256 transposition activity is enhanced by antibiotic concentration, which may be a clue in understanding the recent spread of the element in S. aureus and other pathogens (45–47). We surveyed a database of 3,755 published S. aureus Illumina genome assemblies for the IS256 transposase, finding identical or nearly identical (a maximum 2-nucleotide [nt] difference) sequences in a number of recent clonally expanding genotypes. These included 41/41 ST772 strains, an emerging Indian strain, CA-MRSA (48), and 50/50 ST239, a worldwide HA-MRSA clone contained IS256. IS256 was common (37/262 strains) in ST398, associated with human/livestock transmission (49). No USA300 strain contained IS256. The fact that very similar IS256 elements can move between S. aureus clonal complexes is fascinating given the known genetic barriers to transfer (50, 51). Genes with 100% nucleotide identity to the USA500 IS256 transposase gene were also found by BLAST in other bacterial species. These species included Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Staphylococcus warneri, Staphylococcus capitis, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus durans, Clostridiales bacterium, Clostridium difficile, Mycoplasma mycoides, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. This suggested IS256 is part of a recent genetic exchange community (26) that encompassed diverse genetic groups within S. aureus as well as several other pathogen species.
For USA300, the mobile ACME (or COMER) elements, speG, and PVL toxins were likely important for its success in community-associated infection (40). The E1 USA500 clade is most closely related to USA300 and may share some of its yet not fully understood adaptations that promote enhanced expression of extracellular toxins and increased transmission rate. The C subgroup had a synapomorphic frameshift mutation in the adsA gene encoding the core (52) surface protein. Previous studies have shown that AdsA is required for full virulence in mouse bacteremia models. A possible explanation invoking pathoadaptation is that the adsA functions to reduce inflammation when S. aureus is on the skin by promoting production of adenosine, a purine nucleotide and antagonist (53). Inflammation may contribute to more frequent transmission and spread of the bacteria by causing rashes and skin damage. The finding that the disrupted adsA gene is common in clinical USA500 MRSA isolates from the United States may also be significant in the future given that the encoded surface protein is a potential vaccine target (54).
In conclusion, whole-genome sequencing has resolved the conundrum of USA500 nomenclature and unveiled possibly important genetic changes (SNPs and horizontal acquisition of genes) that played a role in evolution of pathogenic CC8 MRSA by promoting virulence and/or transmission. These mutations can be used for subtyping CC8 strains using PCR or genome-based types. Functional studies are needed now to disentangle which mutations enhance the success of community and hospital pathogens and which are just random evolutionary noise.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains.
Invasive MRSA isolates were collected from California (CA), Colorado (CO), Connecticut (CT), Georgia (GA), Maryland (MD), Minnesota (MN), New York (NY), Oregon (OR), and Tennessee (TN) as part of the Emerging Infections Program (EIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as previously described (55). All isolates were characterized at the CDC by SCCmec typing, detection of staphylococcal toxins, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing, and PCR typing as previously described (1, 55). PFGE was only performed from 2005 to 2008; from 2009 to 2011, an algorithm (https://www.cdc.gov/HAI/settings/lab/inferred-PFGE-algorithm.html) was used to infer PFGE type, and then between 2012 and 2013, a second algorithm incorporating spa typing was used (https://www.cdc.gov/HAI/settings/lab/CCalgorithm.html). From 758 strains classified as USA500/Iberian, 549 strains were chosen for whole-genome sequencing based on maximizing geographic and genetic diversity, based on metadata collected at the time of isolation. We used all the isolates from states other than Georgia, which had the majority of isolates. Strains from Georgia were randomly down-sampled using the criterion that all sampling years, hospitals, and unique PFGE patterns would be represented in the set selected for sequencing. The number of isolates chosen from each year varied between a high of 74 (2005) to a low of 49 (2013) (see Fig. S6 in the supplemental material).
DNA isolation.
MRSA was grown overnight at 35°C on Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep’s blood (BAP) (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD). Bacterial colonies from the third and fourth quadrants of the BAP were transferred into 1.5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 0.02% Tween (PBST) and centrifuged at 13,200 × g for 2 min at room temperature. Cells were resuspended in 1.5 ml of PBST and centrifuged at 13,200 × g for 2 min at room temperature two more times and resuspended in 1.5 ml PBST. Nine hundred microliters of each sample was transferred into a Lysing Matrix E tube (MP Biochemicals), vortexed for 3 min, and then centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 1 min, and 200 µl was transferred into an SEV cartridge (MP Biochemicals) and processed per the manufacturer’s instructions on the Maxwell 16 or Maxwell 16 MDx instrument (Promega).
Whole-genome shotgun sequencing.
Libraries constructed using whole-genome DNA preparations were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument. Raw read data were deposited in the NCBI Short Read Archive under project accession no. PRJNA316461. The median sequence coverage for each genome was 89-fold with a median per base Q score of 37. One strain was excluded due to library failure.
Genome assembly and annotation.
Strains were assembled de novo using SPAdes v3.7.1 (56) and annotated using PROKKA v1.11 (57). FASTQ sequencing output files from strains with more than 100× coverage were down-sampled using a custom script (https://gist.github.com/rpetit3/9c623454758c9885bf81d269e3453b76) based on the seqtk toolkit (https://github.com/lh3/seqtk). Antibiotic resistance phenotypes were predicted for each strain based on the methods of Gordon et al. (58). Roary (59) was used to estimate a pan-genome from de novo-assembled contigs of the strains sequenced in the study. The MLST was ascertained using SRST2 (60). Two strains were excluded because pangenome content suggested they were not S. aureus, and 8 strains fell outside CC8 based on MLST patterns.
BLAST comparisons to assembled genome sequences.
Blast+ v2.2.28 was used for alignments. For short nucleotide sequences (<31 nt), we used the blastn with the “blastn-short” task and called matches with a greater than 90% identity and an alignment length of at least 15. For alignment of protein sequences, we used the tblastn program and called matches with at least 97% identity. For most larger nucleotide alignments, we used blastn with the megablast task and called matches with greater than 97% identity. For antibiotic resistance genes, we followed the guidelines of Gordin et al. (58) and used blastn with a word size parameter of 17, gapopen of 5, and gapextend of 2 and saved matches where the identity multiple by the ratio of the hit to the total length of the gene was greater than 0.8 (or 0.3 in the case of the blaZ, fusB, and far genes).
IS256 insertion sites.
All strains found to contain IS256 were processed using ISMapper v1.2 (29) to determine the transposon insertion sites. ISMapper used the paired-end FASTQ files of reads for each genome, the reference genome assembly (USA500-2395; accession no. CP007499.1) (18) and an IS256 query sequence (accession no. NC_013321.1) (33).
Phylogenetic tree estimation.
A whole-genome alignment of de novo-assembled contigs from 539 CC8 strains from this study and 24 CC8 strains described in other papers was processed using Parsnp (61). The alignment length was 2,361,133 bp. Potential recombination sites were identified using ClonalFrameML (24) based on a maximum likelihood (ML) guide tree constructed by PhyML (62, 63), removed using a custom R script, leaving a final alignment of 2,359,393 bp with 18,755 variable sites (SNPs). The alignment file, R script, and ClonalFrameML output listing recombinant sites have been made publicly available on FigShare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5915257.v1). We performed ML tree estimation on the 2,359,393-bp alignment with 1,000 bootstraps using RAxML version 8.2.11 (63) with a GTRGAMMA model and one partition. The resulting phylogenetic trees were visualized with the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) web service (64). We chose ST250 COL (accession no. CP000046.1 [13]) as the outgroup, as it was the earliest branching strain in subgroups A to F when we included a more divergent ST630 in a pilot phylogeny. One strain in group F, CT-172, was pruned from the final tree because of a long branch. Visual inspection using the gingr tool (61) revealed the presence of a likely large recombinant region in this strain between 2.47 and 2.59 Mbp on the USA500-2395 reference coordinates that had not been detected by ClonalFrameML.
Statistical tests of metadata.
Seven metadata categories for each sample were provided: state, hospital identification, year of collection, culture source, patient age, in-hospital patient mortality (deceased, alive, and unknown) and sample class (HACO, CO, HA, and CA). A case was classified as HO if the MRSA culture was obtained on or after the fourth calendar day of hospitalization (where admission was hospital day 1). A case was classified as HACO if the culture was obtained in an outpatient setting or before the fourth calendar day of hospitalization and had one or more of the following: (i) a history of hospitalization, surgery, dialysis, or residence in a long-term-care facility in the previous year, or (ii) the presence of a central vascular catheter (CVC) within 2 days prior to MRSA culture. Finally, a case was classified as community-associated (CA) if none of the previously mentioned criteria were met. To test the significance of these categories on which clade the sample belongs to, we ran a permutation test on each category, and adjusted the output P values with a Bonferroni correction. Tests were implemented using the Independence Test from the coin R package (65) and p.adjust from the base statistics R package.
Molecular dating analysis.
We used BEAST 2.4.5 (23) to conduct the molecular dating analysis, incorporating a coalescent Bayesian skyline demographic model with 5 groups. We picked up to 5 isolates from each sampling year for each of the clades C1, C2, and E1. Where there were more than 5 strains in a clade for a given year, we randomly selected 5 using the R sample function. We picked all dated samples from sublineage F in Fig. 1 and representatives of ST247, ST250, and sublineages B and D as outgroups. COL (ST250) was set as the root of the tree as in the phylogenetic analysis described above. In total, 151 samples were used. We experimented with different subsampling strategies before selecting 130,000 randomly picked sites. We found larger data configurations (more isolates and/or more sites) did not reach effective sample sizes (ESSs) of >200 for many parameters even after 300,000,000 generations. We used a GTR+R substitution model with the correction for among-site variation. We obtained good estimates of the posterior distribution of the parameters in this analysis, as these parameters reached over 200 ESSs. We set an uncorrelated log-normal relaxed clock and calibrated the clock using the dates of collection of the isolates. The final analysis was run for 200,000,000 generations, sampling every 20,000 generations and discarding the first 20,000,000 generations as burn-in. We evaluated the convergence of the analysis by checking that all the parameters reached ESS values of >200 and by analyzing the trace plots of the likelihood scores. Furthermore, we ran the final analysis twice so as to check that the analysis was converging and the two runs reached very similar results (see Table S2 and Fig. S7 in the supplemental material). To test whether the subsampling strategy accurately reproduced variation in the data, given that we only used a subset of the sites, we created another 3 replicates (randomly subsampling the same number of sites), and molecular dating analyses were run on each replicate. We obtained similar results across all the replicates (see Fig. S8 in the supplemental material). Tajima’s D values for clades were calculated using VariScan (66).
Clade attribution.
We used the VCF format output of the whole-genome alignment to identify 31-mers unique to each major USA500 clade and USA300. Using Jellyfish (67), samples were queried for a nonzero count of each 31-mer from this list. Assignment of a strain to a clade was based on the presence of a strain-specific 31-mer from only one clade and the absence of 31-mers from other clades. We also extracted 31-mers associated with canonical SNPs defined by Bowers et al. (20) and used these to assign strains to sublineages A to F.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
M.M.F., T.D.R., and M.B.F. were supported by CDC-RFA-CK12-120903PPHF14 “Emerging Infections Program (EIP) PPHF/ACA: Enhancing Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity” funding from the Emory Public Health Bioinformatics Fellowship. We thank Linda McDougal, Kamile Rasheed, Maria Karlsson, Shelley Magill, and Clifford McDonald for reading and commenting on the draft manuscript and Jolene Bowers for help with fitting CC8 strain sublineages. We also thank the EIP site staff and clinical laboratories at sites for providing the MRSA isolates and metadata.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Footnotes
For a companion article on this topic, see https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00464-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.McDougal LK, Steward CD, Killgore GE, Chaitram JM, McAllister SK, Tenover FC. 2003. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol 41:5113–5120. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5113-5120.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Glaser P, Martins-Simões P, Villain A, Barbier M, Tristan A, Bouchier C, Ma L, Bes M, Laurent F, Guillemot D, Wirth T, Vandenesch F. 2016. Demography and intercontinental spread of the USA300 community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage. mBio 7:e02183-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02183-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Planet PJ, Larussa SJ, Dana A, Smith H, Xu A, Ryan C, Uhlemann AC, Boundy S, Goldberg J, Narechania A, Kulkarni R, Ratner AJ, Geoghegan JA, Kolokotronis SO, Prince A. 2013. Emergence of the epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300 coincides with horizontal transfer of the arginine catabolic mobile element and speG-mediated adaptations for survival on skin. mBio 4:e00889-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00889-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feil EJ, Cooper JE, Grundmann H, Robinson DA, Enright MC, Berendt T, Peacock SJ, Smith JM, Murphy M, Spratt BG, Moore CE, Day NPJ. 2003. How clonal is Staphylococcus aureus? J Bacteriol 185:3307–3316. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.11.3307-3316.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boyle-Vavra S, Li X, Alam MT, Read TD, Sieth J, Cywes-Bentley C, Dobbins G, David MZ, Kumar N, Eells SJ, Miller LG, Boxrud DJ, Chambers HF, Lynfield R, Lee JC, Daum RS. 2015. USA300 and USA500 clonal lineages of Staphylococcus aureus do not produce a capsular polysaccharide due to conserved mutations in the cap5 locus. mBio 6:e02585-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02585-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tenover FC, McDougal LK, Goering RV, Killgore G, Projan SJ, Patel JB, Dunman PM. 2006. Characterization of a strain of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus widely disseminated in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 44:108–118. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.1.108-118.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Planet PJ, Diaz L, Kolokotronis SO, Narechania A, Reyes J, Xing G, Rincon S, Smith H, Panesso D, Ryan C, Smith DP, Guzman M, Zurita J, Sebra R, Deikus G, Nolan RL, Tenover FC, Weinstock GM, Robinson DA, Arias CA. 2015. Parallel epidemics of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 infection in North and South America. J Infect Dis 212:1874–1882. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, Lin F, Lin J, Carleton HA, Mongodin EF, Sensabaugh GF, Perdreau-Remington F. 2006. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 367:731–739. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68231-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thurlow LR, Joshi GS, Clark JR, Spontak JS, Neely CJ, Maile R, Richardson AR. 2013. Functional modularity of the arginine catabolic mobile element contributes to the success of USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Host Microbe 13:100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alam MT, Read TD, Petit RA, Boyle-Vavra S, Miller LG, Eells SJ, Daum RS, David MZ. 2015. Transmission and microevolution of USA300 MRSA in U.S. households: evidence from whole-genome sequencing. mBio 6:e00054-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00054-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Uhlemann AC, Dordel J, Knox JR, Raven KE, Parkhill J, Holden MTG, Peacock SJ, Lowy FD. 2014. Molecular tracing of the emergence, diversification, and transmission of S. aureus sequence type 8 in a New York community. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:6738–6743. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401006111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li M, Diep BA, Villaruz AE, Braughton KR, Jiang X, DeLeo FR, Chambers HF, Lu Y, Otto M. 2009. Evolution of virulence in epidemic community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:5883–5888. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900743106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jamrozy DM, Harris SR, Mohamed N, Peacock SJ, Tan CY, Parkhill J, Anderson AS, Holden MTG. 2016. Pan-genomic perspective on the evolution of the Staphylococcus aureus USA300 epidemic. Microb Genom 2:e000058. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sanches IS, Ramirez M, Troni H, Abecassis M, Padua M, Tomasz A, de Lencastre H. 1995. Evidence for the geographic spread of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone between Portugal and Spain. J Clin Microbiol 33:1243–1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Lencastre H, Chung M, Westh H. 2000. Archaic strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular and microbiological properties of isolates from the 1960s in Denmark. Microb Drug Resist 6:1–10. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Campanile F, Bongiorno D, Borbone S, Stefani S. 2009. Hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) in Italy. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 8:22. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-8-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray S, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Craig AS, Zell ER, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, Fridkin SK, Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) MRSA Investigators . 2007. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 298:1763–1771. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.15.1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Benson MA, Ohneck EA, Ryan C, Alonzo F III, Smith H, Narechania A, Kolokotronis SO, Satola SW, Uhlemann AC, Sebra R, Deikus G, Shopsin B, Planet PJ, Torres VJ. 2014. Evolution of hypervirulence by a MRSA clone through acquisition of a transposable element. Mol Microbiol 93:664–681. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Roberts RB, de Lencastre A, Eisner W, Severina EP, Shopsin B, Kreiswirth BN, Tomasz A. 1998. Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 12 New York hospitals. J Infect Dis 178:164–171. doi: 10.1086/515610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bowers JR, Driebe EM, Albrecht V, McDougal LK, Granade M, Roe CC, Lemmer D, Rasheed JK, Engelthaler DM, Keim P, Limbago BM. 2018. Improved subtyping of Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 8 strains based on whole-genome phylogenetic analysis. mSphere 3:e00464-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00464-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Novick RP, Christie GE, Penadés JR. 2010. The phage-related chromosomal islands of Gram-positive bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:541–551. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goerke C, Pantucek R, Holtfreter S, Schulte B, Zink M, Grumann D, Bröker BM, Doskar J, Wolz C. 2009. Diversity of prophages in dominant Staphylococcus aureus clonal lineages. J Bacteriol 191:3462–3468. doi: 10.1128/JB.01804-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu CH, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2014. BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Holden MTG, Hsu LY, Kurt K, Weinert LA, Mather AE, Harris SR, Strommenger B, Layer F, Witte W, de Lencastre H, Skov R, Westh H, Zemlicková H, Coombs G, Kearns AM, Hill RLR, Edgeworth J, Gould I, Gant V, Cooke J, Edwards GF, McAdam PR, Templeton KE, McCann A, Zhou Z, Castillo-Ramírez S, Feil EJ, Hudson LO, Enright MC, Balloux F, Aanensen DM, Spratt BG, Fitzgerald JR, Parkhill J, Achtman M, Bentley SD, Nübel U. 2013. A genomic portrait of the emergence, evolution, and global spread of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pandemic. Genome Res 23:653–664. doi: 10.1101/gr.147710.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2017. M100: performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 27th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Skippington E, Ragan MA. 2011. Lateral genetic transfer and the construction of genetic exchange communities. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:707–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ramsay JP, Kwong SM, Murphy RJT, Yui Eto K, Price KJ, Nguyen QT, O’Brien FG, Grubb WB, Coombs GW, Firth N. 2016. An updated view of plasmid conjugation and mobilization in Staphylococcus. Mob Genet Elem 6:e1208317. doi: 10.1080/2159256X.2016.1208317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Roberts AP, Mullany P. 2011. Tn916-like genetic elements: a diverse group of modular mobile elements conferring antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:856–871. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00283.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hawkey J, Hamidian M, Wick RR, Edwards DJ, Billman-Jacobe H, Hall RM, Holt KE. 2015. ISMapper: identifying transposase insertion sites in bacterial genomes from short read sequence data. BMC Genomics 16:667. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1860-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Roche FM, Massey R, Peacock SJ, Day NPJ, Visai L, Speziale P, Lam A, Pallen M, Foster TJ. 2003. Characterization of novel LPXTG-containing proteins of Staphylococcus aureus identified from genome sequences. Microbiology 149:643–654. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.25996-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thammavongsa V, Kern JW, Missiakas DM, Schneewind O. 2009. Staphylococcus aureus synthesizes adenosine to escape host immune responses. J Exp Med 206:2417–2427. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mazmanian SK, Ton-That H, Schneewind O. 2001. Sortase-catalysed anchoring of surface proteins to the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 40:1049–1057. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02411.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.McDougal LK, Fosheim GE, Nicholson A, Bulens SN, Limbago BM, Shearer JES, Summers AO, Patel JB. 2010. Emergence of resistance among USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates causing invasive disease in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3804–3811. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00351-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Roach DJ, Burton JN, Lee C, Stackhouse B, Butler-Wu SM, Cookson BT, Shendure J, Salipante SJ. 2015. A year of infection in the intensive care unit: prospective whole genome sequencing of bacterial clinical isolates reveals cryptic transmissions and novel microbiota. PLoS Genet 11:e1005413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wan TW, Khokhlova OE, Iwao Y, Higuchi W, Hung WC, Reva IV, Singur OA, Gostev VV, Sidorenko SV, Peryanova OV, Salmina AB, Reva GV, Teng LJ, Yamamoto T. 2016. Complete circular genome sequence of successful ST8/SCCmecIV community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (OC8) in Russia: one-megabase genomic inversion, IS256’s spread, and evolution of Russia ST8-IV. PLoS One 11:e0164168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Strauß L, Stegger M, Akpaka PE, Alabi A, Breurec S, Coombs G, Egyir B, Larsen AR, Laurent F, Monecke S, Peters G, Skov R, Strommenger B, Vandenesch F, Schaumburg F, Mellmann A. 2017. Origin, evolution, and global transmission of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus ST8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E10596–E10604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702472114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jevons MP. 1961. ‘Celbenin’—resistant staphylococci. Br Med J 1:124–125. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chambers HF, Deleo FR. 2009. Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:629–641. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Thurlow LR, Joshi GS, Richardson AR. 2012. Virulence strategies of the dominant USA300 lineage of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 65:5–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00937.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Otto M. 2010. Basis of virulence in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:143–162. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Høiby N, Jarløv JO, Kemp M, Tvede M, Bangsborg JM, Kjerulf A, Pers C, Hansen H. 1997. Excretion of ciprofloxacin in sweat and multiresistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Lancet 349:167–169. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)09229-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dumont AL, Nygaard TK, Watkins RL, Smith A, Kozhaya L, Kreiswirth BN, Shopsin B, Unutmaz D, Voyich JM, Torres VJ. 2011. Characterization of a new cytotoxin that contributes to Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol 79:814–825. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07490.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Alonzo F III, Benson MA, Chen J, Novick RP, Shopsin B, Torres VJ. 2012. Staphylococcus aureus leucocidin ED contributes to systemic infection by targeting neutrophils and promoting bacterial growth in vivo. Mol Microbiol 83:423–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07942.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.McEvoy CRE, Tsuji B, Gao W, Seemann T, Porter JL, Doig K, Ngo D, Howden BP, Stinear TP. 2013. Decreased vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus caused by IS256 tempering of WalKR expression. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3240–3249. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00279-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Di Gregorio S, Fernandez S, Perazzi B, Bello N, Famiglietti A, Mollerach M. 2016. Increase in IS256 transposition in invasive vancomycin heteroresistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate belonging to ST100 and its derived VISA mutants. Infect Genet Evol 43:197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nagel M, Reuter T, Jansen A, Szekat C, Bierbaum G. 2011. Influence of ciprofloxacin and vancomycin on mutation rate and transposition of IS256 in Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Med Microbiol 301:229–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schreiber F, Szekat C, Josten M, Sahl HG, Bierbaum G. 2013. Antibiotic-induced autoactivation of IS256 in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:6381–6384. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01585-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Prabhakara S, Khedkar S, Shambat SM, Srinivasan R, Basu A, Norrby-Teglund A, Seshasayee ASN, Arakere G. 2013. Genome sequencing unveils a novel sea enterotoxin-carrying PVL phage in Staphylococcus aureus ST772 from India. PLoS One 8:e60013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Uhlemann AC, McAdam PR, Sullivan SB, Knox JR, Khiabanian H, Rabadan R, Davies PR, Fitzgerald JR, Lowy FD. 2017. Evolutionary dynamics of pandemic methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus ST398 and its international spread via routes of human migration. mBio 8:e01375-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01375-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McCarthy AJ, Lindsay JA. 2012. The distribution of plasmids that carry virulence and resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus is lineage associated. BMC Microbiol 12:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lindsay JA. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus genomics and the impact of horizontal gene transfer. Int J Med Microbiol 304:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.McCarthy AJ, Lindsay JA. 2010. Genetic variation in Staphylococcus aureus surface and immune evasion genes is lineage associated: implications for vaccine design and host-pathogen interactions. BMC Microbiol 10:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cronstein BN. 1999. Adenosine and its receptors during inflammation, p 259–274. In Serhan CN, Ward PA (ed), Molecular and cellular basis of inflammation. Humana Press, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang BZ, Cai J, Yu B, Xiong L, Lin Q, Yang XY, Xu C, Zheng S, Kao RY, Sze K, Yuen KY, Huang JD. 2017. Immunotherapy targeting adenosine synthase A decreases severity of Staphylococcus aureus infection in mouse model. J Infect Dis 216:245–253. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Limbago B, Fosheim GE, Schoonover V, Crane CE, Nadle J, Petit S, Heltzel D, Ray SM, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Schaffner W, Mu Y, Fridkin SK, Active Bacterial Core Surveillance MRSA Investigators . 2009. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in 2005 and 2006 from patients with invasive disease: a population-based analysis. J Clin Microbiol 47:1344–1351. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02264-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gordon NC, Price JR, Cole K, Everitt R, Morgan M, Finney J, Kearns AM, Pichon B, Young B, Wilson DJ, Llewelyn MJ, Paul J, Peto TEA, Crook DW, Walker AS, Golubchik T. 2014. Prediction of Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial resistance by whole-genome sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 52:1182–1191. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03117-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Inouye M, Dashnow H, Raven LA, Schultz MB, Pope BJ, Tomita T, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2014. SRST2: rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs. Genome Med 6:90. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0090-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2014. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 15:524. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0524-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Letunic I, Bork P. 2016. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W242–W245. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hothorn T, Hornik K, van de Wiel MA, Zeileis A 13 November 2008. Implementing a class of permutation tests: the coin package. J Stat Soft doi: 10.18637/jss.v028.i08. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hutter S, Vilella AJ, Rozas J. 2006. Genome-wide DNA polymorphism analyses using VariScan. BMC Bioinformatics 7:409. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Marçais G, Kingsford C. 2011. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27:764–770. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gill SR, Fouts DE, Archer GL, Mongodin EF, Deboy RT, Ravel J, Paulsen IT, Kolonay JF, Brinkac L, Beanan M, Dodson RJ, Daugherty SC, Madupu R, Angiuoli SV, Durkin AS, Haft DH, Vamathevan J, Khouri H, Utterback T, Lee C, Dimitrov G, Jiang L, Qin H, Weidman J, Tran K, Kang K, Hance IR, Nelson KE, Fraser CM. 2005. Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain. J Bacteriol 187:2426–2438. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.7.2426-2438.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Guy L, Kultima JR, Andersson SGE. 2010. genoPlotR: comparative gene and genome visualization in R. Bioinformatics 26:2334–2335. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.