Abstract
With about 5,000 species worldwide, the Heteroptera or true bugs are the most diverse taxon among the hemimetabolous insects in aquatic and semi-aquatic ecosystems. Species may be found in almost every freshwater environment and have very specific habitat requirements, making them excellent bioindicator organisms for water quality. However, a correct determination by morphology is challenging in many species groups due to high morphological variability and polymorphisms within, but low variability between species. Furthermore, it is very difficult or even impossible to identify the immature life stages or females of some species, e.g., of the corixid genus Sigara. In this study we tested the effectiveness of a DNA barcode library to discriminate species of the Gerromorpha and Nepomorpha of Germany. We analyzed about 700 specimens of 67 species, with 63 species sampled in Germany, covering more than 90% of all recorded species. Our library included various morphological similar taxa, e.g., species within the genera Sigara and Notonecta as well as water striders of the genus Gerris. Fifty-five species (82%) were unambiguously assigned to a single Barcode Index Number (BIN) by their barcode sequences, whereas BIN sharing was observed for 10 species. Furthermore, we found monophyletic lineages for 52 analyzed species. Our data revealed interspecific K2P distances with below 2.2% for 18 species. Intraspecific distances above 2.2% were shown for 11 species. We found evidence for hybridization between various corixid species (Sigara, Callicorixa), but our molecular data also revealed exceptionally high intraspecific distances as a consequence of distinct mitochondrial lineages for Cymatia coleoptrata and the pygmy backswimmer Plea minutissima. Our study clearly demonstrates the usefulness of DNA barcodes for the identification of the aquatic Heteroptera of Germany and adjacent regions. In this context, our data set represents an essential baseline for a reference library for bioassessment studies of freshwater habitats using modern high-throughput technologies in the near future. The existing data also opens new questions regarding the causes of observed low inter- and high intraspecific genetic variation and furthermore highlight the necessity of taxonomic revisions for various taxa, combining both molecular and morphological data.
Keywords: Aquatic insects, Cymatia, Mitochondrial DNA, Corixidae, Plea, Taxonomy, Freshwater, Sigara, GBOL, Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I
Introduction
Aquatic insects are the dominant invertebrate fauna element in most freshwater ecosystems and are enormously variable in morphology, development, physiology, and ecology (Lancaster & Downes, 2013; Dijkstra, Monaghan & Pauls, 2014). Among the hemimetabolous insects, the Heteroptera or true bugs comprise a significant and diverse component of the world’s aquatic insect biota (Polhemus & Polhemus, 2008). They are unique as a group because they comprise both aquatic and terrestrial species, whereas other taxa include only species that are aquatic during some life stage, e.g., mayflies, stoneflies, or dragonflies (Wesenberg-Lund, 1943; Lancaster & Downes, 2013; Gullan & Cranston, 2014). Two infraorders, the Gerromorpha and Nepomorpha, are considered as primarily aquatic (Polhemus & Polhemus, 2008; Lancaster & Downes, 2013; Gullan & Cranston, 2014; Henry, 2017). With more than 4,400 described species worldwide (Henry, 2017), aquatic Heteroptera are well-known for utilizing an exceptionally broad range of habitats, ranging from the marine and intertidal to the arctic and high alpine (Polhemus & Polhemus, 2008). They may be found in almost every freshwater biotope. Approximately 120 species of the Gerromorpha and 230 species of the Nepomorpha are known from the Palearctic region (Polhemus & Polhemus, 2008). For Germany, 47 species of the Nepomorpha and 22 species belonging to the Gerromorpha have been recorded so far (Wachmann, Melber & Deckert, 2006; Strauss & Niedringhaus, 2014).
Species of the Nepo- and Gerromorpha exhibit numerous morphological and ecological adaptations to their aquatic environment. For instance, nepomorphan true bugs have a streamlined body, natatorial legs and short antennas, whereas gerromorphan species are well-known for their long slender legs which operate as motive (middle leg) and rudder (hind legs), allowing them to operate on the water surface (Wesenberg-Lund, 1943; Andersen, 1982; Lancaster & Downes, 2013; Gullan & Cranston, 2014) (Fig. 1). Furthermore, a reduction, loss, and/or polymorphism of wings can be observed in many taxa, which is controlled by environmental conditions and genetic factors (Zera, Innes & Saks, 1983; Muraji, Miura & Nakasuji, 1989; Spence & Andersen, 1994). With the exception of the omnivorous Corixidae, all aquatic true bugs are predators, feeding on any organism that can be subdued by the injection of a venom cocktail consisting of various toxins and proteolytic enzymes (Polhemus & Polhemus, 2008). On the other hand they serve as important prey for numerous fish and other organisms at higher trophic levels (McCafferty, 1981; Peckarsky, 1982; Zimmermann & Spence, 1989; Hutchinson, 1993; Klecka, 2014; Boda et al., 2015).
Figure 1. Representative images of analyzed aquatic bug species.
(A) Nepa cinerea Linnaeus, 1758 (Nepidae), (B) Corixa affinis Leach, 1817 (Corixidae), (C) Sigara (Subsigara) scotti (Douglas & Scott, 1868) (Corixidae), (D) Ilyocoris cimicoides (Linnaeus, 1758) (Naucoridae), (E) Aphelocheirus aestivalis (Fabricius, 1794) (Aphelocheiridae), (F) Notonecta viridis Delcourt, 1909 (Notonectidae), (G) Plea minutissima Leach, 1817 (Pleidae), (H) Mesovelia furcata Mulsant & Rey, 1852 (Mesovelidae), (I) Hydrometra gracilenta Horváth, 1899 (Hydrometridae), (J) Hebrus ruficeps Thomson, 1871 (Hebridae), (K) Velia caprai Tamanini, 1947 (Velidae), (L) Gerris costae (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1840–1853) (Gerridae). Scale bars = 1 mm. All images were obtained from http://www.corisa.de.
Due to their general high abundance in many freshwater systems, their great value as bioindicators of water quality and their unique morphological and ecological specializations for exploiting specialized microhabitats, these groups has been in the focus of entomological and ecological research for a long time (Hufnagel, Bakonyi & Vásárhelyi, 1999; Polhemus & Polhemus, 2008; Whiteman & Sites, 2008; Skern, Zweimüller & Schiemer, 2010). Nevertheless, as a result of their highly similar morphology, the determination of various species is quite difficult and requires the help of experienced taxonomists. Furthermore, it is very challenging or even impossible to identify nymphal stages or females of some species, e.g., some species of the genus Sigara Fabricius, 1775. In term of males of the Corixidae, typical diagnostic traits include the shape and size of the tarsus of the first leg (pala), the arrangement of pala pegs, and the morphology of the genitalia (Jansson, 1986; Savage, 1989). Because aquatic Heteroptera are of high importance for ecological and conservational studies, however, the correct species identification is essential (Hufnagel, Bakonyi & Vásárhelyi, 1999; Whiteman & Sites, 2008; Skern, Zweimüller & Schiemer, 2010). This is especially true for juveniles and females which can, depending on the life history of a species, dominate within a population over a given period of a year (Barahona, Millan & Velasco, 2005; Pfenning & Poethke, 2006; Wachmann, Melber & Deckert, 2006).
In the last few years, new molecular and genomic approaches have become more and more popular to overcome possible drawbacks of this traditional and morphology-based way of species assessment. Given the recent technological advancement of DNA-based methods, in particular in the field of modern high-throughput technologies (Heather & Chain, 2016), it is expected that such techniques will gradually replace traditional field and lab procedures in bioassessment studies over the coming 10–15 years (Leese et al., 2016). For example, the EU COST Action CA15219 on “Developing new genetic tools for bioassessment of aquatic ecosystems in Europe”—or DNAqua-Net (http://dnaqua.net/)—aims to accelerate the use of DNA-based approaches for the monitoring and assessment of aquatic habitats (Leese et al., 2016). Following these considerations, the analysis of single specimens, bulk samples or environmental DNA will be performed routinely as part of modern species diversity assessment studies (Yu et al., 2012; Scheffers et al., 2012; Cristescu, 2014; Shackleton & Rees, 2015; Kress et al., 2015; Creer et al., 2016). However, the effectiveness of all these approaches relies highly on comprehensive sequence libraries that act as valid references (Brandon-Mong et al., 2015; Creer et al., 2016; Morinière et al., 2016). In this context, DNA barcoding represents undoubtedly the most prominent and popular approach using sequence data for valid species identification (Hajibabaei et al., 2007; Miller et al., 2016). The concept of DNA barcoding relies on the postulate that the interspecific genetic variation is higher than the intraspecific variation of the selected marker (Hebert, Ratnasingham & de Waard, 2003; Hebert et al., 2003). As a consequence, every species is characterized by a unique DNA barcode cluster. For animals, an approximately 650 base pair (bp) fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was proposed as the global standard for the identification of unknown specimens in terms of a given classification (sensu Hebert, Ratnasingham & de Waard, 2003; Hebert et al., 2003). However, it should be noted that various problems may affect the use of mitochondrial DNA, e.g., recent speciation events (Balvín et al., 2012; Raupach et al., 2014), heteroplasmy (Boyce, Zwick & Aquadro, 1989; Kavar et al., 2006; Kmiec, Woloszynska & Janska, 2006), incomplete lineage sorting (Petit & Excoffier, 2009), (introgressive) hybridization (Jansson, 1979a, 1979b; Calabrese, 1982; Spence & Wilcox, 1986; Wilcox & Spence, 1986; Savage & Parkin, 1998; Raupach et al., 2014), the presence of alpha-proteobacteria as Wolbachia within terrestrial arthropods (Werren, Zhang & Guo, 1995; Xiao et al., 2011; Werren, Baldo & Clark, 2008), and the existence of mitochondrial pseudogenes (Leite, 2012; Song, Moulton & Whiting, 2014). Nevertheless, a vast number of studies across a broad range of different animals demonstrate the efficiency of DNA barcoding (Spelda et al., 2011; Hausmann et al., 2013; Hendrich et al., 2015; Lin, Stur & Ekrem, 2015; Raupach et al., 2015; Barco et al., 2016; Coddington et al., 2016; Morinière et al., 2017).
Despite the fact that more than 45,000 species of true bugs have been described worldwide until now (Henry, 2017), the number of studies analyzing the usefulness of DNA barcodes to discriminate species of this highly diverse insect taxon is still low. Some studies focus on selected species (Rebijith et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2012; Lis, Lis & Ziaja, 2013), other on specific families (Grebennikov & Heiss, 2014; Kaur & Sharma, 2017), whereas four publications provide a larger representation of various families (Park et al., 2011; Jung, Duwal & Lee, 2011; Raupach et al., 2014; Tembe, Shouche & Ghate, 2014). However, all these studies focused primarily on terrestrial species, analyzing just small number of species belonging to the Gerromorpha and/or Nepomorpha (Park et al., 2011; Jung, Duwal & Lee, 2011; Raupach et al., 2014). To our knowledge, only two publications analyzed aquatic true bugs specifically until now: Castanhole et al. (2013) investigated the variability of 17 barcode sequences of a few species from Brazil, whereas Ebong et al. (2016) successfully tested the usefulness of DNA barcodes to discriminate various species from Cameroon.
The aim of this study was to build-up a baseline for a comprehensive library of DNA barcodes for aquatic Heteroptera (Gerromorpha, Nepomorpha) of Central Europe with a focus on the German fauna and to test the efficiency of DNA barcodes to discriminate the analyzed species. Moreover, our study provides the first thorough molecular study of the aquatic Heteroptera of Germany. In doing so, we analyzed more than 700 DNA barcodes representing more than 60 species. Our library included various morphological similar taxa, e.g., species of the genera Sigara Fabricius, 1775 and Notonecta Linnaeus, 1758 as well as water striders of the genus Gerris Fabricius, 1794 from different localities in Germany. In addition to this we added various specimens from other European countries for comparison, e.g., specimens of the expansive small-bodied backswimmer Anisops sardeus Herrich-Schaeffer, 1849 (Soós et al., 2010; Berchi, 2011; Klementová & Svitok, 2014).
Materials and Methods
Species collection and identification
All analyzed Gerromorpha and Nepomorpha were collected between the years 2003 and 2017. Most of them were adults (n = 584; 96.8%). Specimens were stored in ethanol (96%) immediately after collection and identified by some of the authors (NH, MMG, MJR, PS, RN) using various keys (Nieser, 1982; Jansson, 1986; Savage, 1989; Stoffelen et al., 2013; Strauss & Niedringhaus, 2014) based on the most recent taxonomic classification (Aukema & Rieger, 1995). All specimens were carefully checked multiple times by some of the authors in order to prevent a misidentification. For our analysis we also included 109 DNA barcodes of aquatic bugs that were part of a previous barcoding study of true bugs of Central Europe and in which species identification was verified by the authors for comparison (Raupach et al., 2014). Most of the analyzed bug specimens were collected in Germany (n = 616: 86.5%), but various individuals were sampled in Austria (37; 5.2%), Greece (20; 2.8%), Spain (16; 2.3%), Switzerland (8; 1.1%), Italy (7; 1.0%), Poland (6; 0.8%), and Portugal (2; 0.3%) for comparison (Fig. 2). In this context we also included specimens of four species that are not recorded for Germany: I. Anisops sardeus Herrich-Schaeffer, 1849 (n = 5) from Greece, II. Mesovelia vittigera Horváth, 1895 (n = 4) from Greece, III. Sigara dorsalis (Leach, 1817–1818) (n = 1) from Switzerland, and IV. Velia currens (Fabricius, 1794) (n = 3) from Switzerland. The total data set consisted of 712 DNA barcodes with 63 species that are documented for Germany. Furthermore, the number of analyzed specimens per species ranged from one (eight species) to a maximum of 41 for Notonecta glauca Linnaeus, 1758.
Figure 2. Sampling sites of the studied aquatic true bugs (Gerromorpha, Nepomorpha) across Europe.
DNA barcode amplification, sequencing, and data depository
The DNA barcode amplification was either performed at the German Centre of Biodiversity Research (Senckenberg am Meer) in Wilhelmshaven, the Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, or the Bavarian State Collection of Zoology in Munich (SNSB-ZSM). Following the guidelines of DNA barcoding studies (Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2007), all species were documented by photographs before molecular work started. In the majority of the studied animals, all legs of one side of the body were dissected and used for DNA extraction. In case of larger specimens of the genera Notonecta Linneaus, 1758, Ilyocoris Stål, 1861, Ranatra Fabricius, 1790, Nepa Linnaeus, 1758, and Aphelocheirus Westwood, 1833, however, only one leg was used. For some very small specimens with a body length <3 mm, e.g., species of the genus Microvelia Westwood, 1834, complete specimens were used for DNA extraction. All voucher specimens as well as DNA extracts are stored in a local collection at the Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg.
The DNA extraction was performed using the NucleoSpin Tissue Kit by Macherey and Nagel (Düren, Germany), following the extraction protocol. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used for amplifying the COI barcode fragment by using the established primer pairs LCO1490/HCO2198 (Folmer et al., 1994), LCO1490/NANCY (Simon et al., 1994), jgLCO1490/jgHCO2198 (Geller et al., 2013), or LepF1/LepR1 (Hebert et al., 2004) for most specimens. For various specimens of the Gerromorpha, however, a new specific forward primer HETF1 (5′-ATG AAT TAT TCG AAT TGA AAT AGG-3′) was designed and used in combination with HCO2198 for amplification, resulting in a somewhat smaller fragment with a length of 579 bp of the barcode region. All primers were modified with M13 forward and reverse tails to provide defined base sequences for sequencing (see Ivanova et al., 2007; Khalaji-Pirbalouty & Raupach, 2014).
Barcode amplicons were amplified using illustra™ puReTaq Ready-To-Go PCR Beads (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) in a total volume of 20 μl, containing 17.5 μl sterile molecular grade H2O, 2 μl DNA template with an DNA amount between 2 and 150 ng/μl and 0.25 μl of each primer (20 pmol/μl). The PCR thermal conditions included an initial denaturation at 94 °C (5 min), followed by 38 cycles at 94 °C (denaturation, 45 s), 48 °C (annealing, 45 s), 72 °C (extension, 80 s), and a final extension step at 72 °C (7 min). All PCR amplification reactions were conducted using an Eppendorf Mastercycler Pro system (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Negative and positive controls were included with each round of reactions. Two microliter of the amplified products were verified for size conformity by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel with GelRed or SYBR Green using commercial DNA size standards, whereas the remaining PCR product was purified with the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Purified PCR products were cycle-sequenced and sequenced in both directions at a contract sequencing facility (GATC, Konstanz, Germany) using the given M13 tail sequences. Double stranded sequences became assembled and checked for mitochondrial pseudogenes (numts) analyzing the presence of stop codons, frameshifts as well as double peaks in chromatograms with the Geneious program package version 7.0.4 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand) (Kearse et al., 2012). Ambiguous parts at the 5′-end or 3′-end of the sequences were removed. For verification, BLAST (nBLAST, search set: others, program selection: megablast) and/or BOLD (identification engine; species level barcode records) searches were performed to confirm the identity of all new sequences as bug sequences based on already published sequences.
Detailed voucher information, taxonomic classifications, photos, DNA barcode sequences, used primer pairs and trace files (including their quality) are publicly accessible through the public data set “DS-BAHCE Barcoding Aquatic Heteroptera of Central Europe” (Dataset ID: DOI 10.5883/DS-BAHCE) on the Barcode of Life Data Systems workbench (BOLD; www.boldsystems.org) (Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2007). All new barcode data were also deposited in GenBank (MG665389–MG665993).
DNA barcode analysis
We analyzed intra- and interspecific distances of the studied aquatic Heteroptera using the provided analytical tools of the BOLD workbench (align sequences: BOLD aligner; ambiguous base/gap handling: pairwise deletion) based on the Kimura 2-parameter model of sequence evolution (K2P; Kimura, 1980). Furthermore, all analyzed COI sequences became subject to the barcode index number (BIN) system implemented in BOLD which clusters DNA barcodes in order to generate operational taxonomic units that closely correspond to species (Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2013). We used a recommended threshold of 2.2% for a rough differentiation of intraspecific as well as interspecific K2P distances (Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2013).
A neighbour-joining cluster analysis (NJ; Saitou & Nei, 1987) was performed for all studied species for a graphical representation of the genetic differences between sequences and clusters of sequences using MEGA v7.0.18 (Kumar, Stecher & Tamura, 2016). The K2P model was chosen as the model for sequence evolution for comparison purposes with previous studies. For validation, non-parametric bootstrap support values were obtained by resampling and analyzing 1,000 replicates (Felsenstein, 1985). All analysis were based on an alignment that was generated using MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004) implemented in MEGA v7.0.18 for all studied barcode sequences. Additionally, statistical maximum parsimony networks were constructed exemplarily for species with interspecific distances ranging from zero to 1% (see Table 1) by using TCS networks (Clement, Posada & Crandall, 2000) as part of the software package of PopArt v.1.7 (Leigh & Bryant, 2015). Such networks allow the identification of haplotype sharing between species as a consequence of recent speciation and/or on-going hybridization processes (Raupach et al., 2010, 2014).
Table 1. BOLD distance analysis of the studied Gerromorpha and Nepomorpha.
Family | Species | n | PC | BIN | MID | DNN | NNS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aphelocheiridae | Aphelocheirus aestivalis | 2 | Mono | ABX0398 | 0 | 11.86 | Notonecta maculata |
Corixidae | Arctocorisa carinata | 5 | Para | AAJ7903, ACY1261 | 2.36 | 1.03 | Arctocorisa germari |
Arctocorisa germari | 1 | n. a. | – | 0 | 1.03 | Arctocorisa carinata | |
Callicorixa praeusta | 23 | Para | AAK1938 | 0.31 | 0 | Callicorixa producta | |
Callicorixa producta | 1 | n. a. | AAK1938 | 0 | 0 | Callicorixa praeusta | |
Corixa affinis | 13 | Mono | ACY0615 | 1.92 | 5.92 | Corixa panzeri | |
Corixa dentipes | 1 | n. a. | – | 0 | 6.08 | Corixa punctata | |
Corixa panzeri | 2 | Mono | ACX9506 | 0 | 5.92 | Corixa affinis | |
Corixa punctata | 21 | Mono | ACB1799 | 0.77 | 6.08 | Corixa dentipes | |
Cymatia bonsdorffii | 4 | Mono | ABX0396 | 0.62 | 12.34 | Cymatia coleoptrata | |
Cymatia coleoptrata | 24 | Mono | ACB1796, ADD1561 | 9.44 | 12.4 | Cymatia bonsdorffii | |
Cymatia rogenhoferi | 1 | n. a. | ACB2132 | 0 | 12.7 | Cymatia coleoptrata | |
Glaenocorisa propinqua | 8 | Mono | ABX4248 | 1.55 | 9.96 | Sigara semistriata | |
Hesperocorixa castanea | 14 | Mono | ABX0447 | 0.32 | 13.22 | Paracorixa concinna | |
Hesperocorixa linnaei | 8 | Mono | ABX0448 | 0 | 11.89 | Sigara venusta | |
Hesperocorixa sahlbergi | 39 | Mono | AAN0795 | 1.7 | 11.34 | Corixa panzeri | |
Micronecta griseola | 2 | Mono | AAK6480 | 0 | 10.63 | Micronecta poweri | |
Micronecta poweri | 2 | Mono | ACB1970 | 2.39 | 10.63 | Micronecta griseola | |
Micronecta scholtzi | 6 | Mono | AAK6479 | 0.16 | 18.58 | Sigara semistriata | |
Paracorixa concinna | 11 | Mono | ABV3365, ADG5371 | 1.71 | 7.03 | Sigara semistriata | |
Sigara distincta | 7 | Poly | ABY7152, ABV4484 | 5.77 | 0.37 | Sigara falleni | |
Sigara dorsalis* | 1 | n. a. | AAJ6688 | 0 | 1.71 | Sigara striata | |
Sigara falleni | 12 | Poly | AAH9524, ABY7152 | 3.37 | 0 | Sigara iactans | |
Sigara fossarum | 3 | Mono | AAJ6707, ADD1512 | 2.82 | 2.72 | Sigara scotti | |
Sigara hellensii | 2 | Mono | ADH9592, ACT7694 | 4.41 | 9.09 | Sigara distincta | |
Sigara iactans | 12 | Poly | ABY7152, AAH9524 | 2.67 | 0 | Sigara falleni | |
Sigara lateralis | 14 | Mono | AAJ6697 | 0.81 | 9.84 | Sigara striata | |
Sigara limitata | 2 | Para | ACM1221 | 0.48 | 0.15 | Sigara semistriata | |
Sigara nigrolineata | 16 | Mono | ACB1978 | 0.46 | 10.12 | Sigara semistriata | |
Sigara scotti | 12 | Mono | ACY0807 | 1.08 | 2.72 | Sigara fossarum | |
Sigara semistriata | 5 | Poly | ACM1221 | 0 | 0.15 | Sigara limitata | |
Sigara stagnalis | 6 | Mono | ACY0713 | 0.55 | 11.45 | Paracorixa concinna | |
Sigara striata | 10 | Mono | AAJ6688 | 0.93 | 1.71 | Sigara dorsalis | |
Sigara venusta | 2 | Mono | ABA5309 | 0 | 2.11 | Sigara semistriata | |
Naucoridae | Ilyocoris cimicoides | 17 | Mono | AAF2590 | 1.03 | 15.06 | Hesperocorixa sahlbergi |
Nepidae | Nepa cinerea | 10 | Mono | AAK8359 | 0.34 | 17.06 | Notonecta maculata |
Ranatra linearis | 16 | Mono | AAL1328 | 0.84 | 15.03 | Notonecta lutea | |
Notonectidae | Anisops sardeus* | 5 | Mono | ABV0079 | 1.24 | 12.84 | Notonecta maculata |
Notonecta glauca | 41 | Mono | AAK4442 | 1.71 | 1.08 | Notonecta obliqua | |
Notonecta lutea | 19 | Mono | AAN1701 | 0.68 | 1.24 | Notonecta reuteri | |
Notonecta maculata | 10 | Mono | AAN1703 | 2.43 | 6.56 | Notonecta glauca | |
Notonecta obliqua | 9 | Mono | AAK4442 | 0.64 | 1.08 | Notonecta glauca | |
Notonecta reuteri | 5 | Mono | ACE8526 | 0.46 | 1.24 | Notonecta lutea | |
Notonecta viridis | 10 | Mono | ABV0133 | 1.18 | 5.03 | Notonecta glauca | |
Pleidae | Plea minutissima | 17 | Mono | ACY0868, AAF3832 | 8.3 | 10.92 | Notonecta lutea |
Gerridae | Aquarius najas | 7 | Mono | AAN1521 | 2.14 | 11.75 | Gerris thoracicus |
Aquarius paludum | 19 | Mono | AAI7450 | 1.24 | 12.61 | Gerris argentatus | |
Gerris argentatus | 32 | Mono | ADD1846 | 0.72 | 6.55 | Gerris odontogaster | |
Gerris asper | 1 | n. a. | ABA3327 | 0 | 0.34 | Gerris lateralis | |
Gerris costae | 11 | Mono | ACI6181 | 0 | 7.48 | Gerris thoracicus | |
Gerris gibbifer | 11 | Mono | ACB1756 | 0.88 | 8.91 | Gerris lacustris | |
Gerris lacustris | 38 | Mono | ACT3584 | 1.05 | 8.91 | Gerris gibbifer | |
Gerris lateralis | 2 | Mono | ABA3327 | 0.17 | 0.34 | Gerris asper | |
Gerris odontogaster | 19 | Mono | ABU6679, ADD1838 | 1.59 | 6.55 | Gerris argentatus | |
Gerris thoracicus | 6 | Mono | ACB1745 | 0.35 | 7.48 | Gerris costae | |
Limnoporus rufoscutellatus | 3 | Mono | AAV0261 | 0.88 | 11.86 | Gerris asper | |
Hebridae | Hebrus pusillus | 2 | Mono | AAN0981 | 0.15 | 14.32 | Hebrus ruficeps |
Hebrus ruficeps | 7 | Mono | AAI6967 | 0.15 | 14.32 | Hebrus pusillus | |
Hydrometridae | Hydrometra gracilenta | 9 | Mono | AAN0857 | 0.46 | 13.06 | Hydrometra stagnorum |
Hydrometra stagnorum | 21 | Mono | AAK5632 | 0.62 | 13.06 | Hydrometra gracilenta | |
Mesoveliidae | Mesovelia furcata | 17 | Mono | AAN2451 | 1.39 | 16.24 | Mesovelia vittigera |
Mesovelia vittigera* | 4 | Mono | ACD4048 | 2.32 | 16.24 | Mesovelia furcata | |
Veliidae | Microvelia buenoi | 1 | n. a. | ACY1789 | 0 | 15.06 | Gerris costae |
Microvelia reticulata | 27 | Mono | AAG4341 | 0.77 | 15.04 | Gerris asper | |
Velia caprai | 20 | Mono | AAN0455 | 1.1 | 4.94 | Velia saulii | |
Velia currens* | 3 | Mono | ADI1962 | 0 | 2.82 | Velia saulii | |
Velia saulii | 1 | n. a. | ABX0836 | 0 | 2.82 | Velia currens |
Notes:
With the number of analyzed specimens (n), phylogenetic categories (PC), barcode index number (BIN), maximum intraspecific pairwise K2P distances (MID), minimum interspecific pairwise K2P distances to the nearest neighbour species (DNN), and the nearest neighbour species (NNS). Maximum intraspecific distances >2.2% and minimum interspecific distances <2.2% are marked in bold. At least one specimen of the compared species showed a distance value above or below this threshold in terms of a pairwise comparison. Asterisks (*) indicate species not recorded for Germany.
Results
Our analyzed DNA barcode library comprised 63 species that are documented for Germany, representing 91% of the known aquatic bug species diversity of this country (Nepomorpha: n = 43 (92%); Gerromorpha: n = 20 (91%)), and additional four species that were collected in other countries and not recorded for Germany. In total, we generated 603 new barcodes of 64 species. The complete alignment of all analyzed sequences (n = 712) had a length of 658 bp, with fragments lengths ranging from a minimum of 366 bp to the full barcode fragment size of 658 bp. For some studied specimens of Cymatia coleoptrata (Fabricius, 1777) (n = 22), our analysis revealed two characteristic deletions of 39 (alignment position: 110–148) (Fig. S1) and nine nucleotides (629–637) for all studied specimens. Average base frequencies were A = 32%, C = 17%, G = 16%, and T = 35%. For eight species only one barcode sequence was generated (Table 1). Intraspecific distances ranged from zero to maximum values of 8.3% (Plea minutissima Leach, 1817) and 9.44% (C. coleoptrata) (Table 1). Maximum intraspecific pairwise distances with values >2.2% were found for 11 species (Table 1). In terms of interspecific divergence, values ranged from zero to 18.58%, with 18 species pairs having values <2.2% (Table 1). We found interspecific distances below 1% for nine species. Unique BINs were recorded for 55 species, whereas two BINs were identified for 10 species (Table 1). For two species that were represented only by one specimen, namely Arctocorisa germari (Fieber, 1848) and Corixa dentipes Thomson, 1869, our sequences did not have he required fragment length of at least 400 bp to fulfill the criteria for BIN assignment. As consequence, no BINs were available for these two species.
Our NJ analysis based on K2P distances revealed two large and distinct clusters, separating all analyzed Gerromorpha and all Nepomorpha specimens from each other (Fig. S2). For a better presentation, the topology has been split on this basis and shown in two figures (Gerromorpha: Fig. 3, Nepomorpha: Fig. 4). We found non-overlapping clusters with bootstrap values >90% for 57 species (85%) (Figs. 3 and 4). Of the analyzed 59 species with more than one specimen, 52 (88%) were monophyletic, three (5%) paraphyletic, and four (7%) polyphyletic (Table 1; Fig. S2).
Figure 3. Neighbour-joining (NJ) topology of the analyzed species of the Gerromorpha based on Kimura 2-parameter distance.
Triangles indicate the relative number of individual’s sampled (height) and sequence divergence (width). Blue triangles indicate species with intraspecific maximum pairwise distances >2.2%, red triangles species pairs with interspecific distances <2.2%. Numbers next to nodes represent non-parametric bootstrap values >80% (1,000 replicates). Asterisks indicate species not recorded in Germany. All images were obtained from http://www.corisa.de.
Figure 4. Neighbour-joining (NJ) topology of the analyzed species of the Nepomorpha based on Kimura 2-parameter distance.
Triangles indicate the relative number of individual’s sampled (height) and sequence divergence (width). Blue triangles indicate species with intraspecific maximum pairwise distances >2.2%, red triangles species with interspecific distances <2.2%. Numbers next to nodes represent non-parametric bootstrap values ≥80% (1,000 replicates). Asterisks indicate species not recorded in Germany. All images were obtained from http://www.corisa.de.
The statistical maximum parsimony network analysis of species with interspecific distances below 1% revealed a close relationship between Gerris asper (Fieber, 1860) (n = 1) and Gerris lateralis Schummel, 1832 (n = 2) (Fig. 5). We found three haplotypes with a frequency of one (singletons) that were separated by only one or two mutational steps, with haplotype h1 (G. asper) connected with h2 (G. lateralis), which was in turn connected with haplotype h3 (G. lateralis). A similar situation was observed for Sigara limitata (Fieber, 1848) (n = 2) and Sigara semistriata (Fieber, 1848) (n = 5) (Fig. 5). Three different haplotypes were identified, with h1 representing all studied specimens of S. semistriata. Both unique haplotypes of S. limitata (h2, h3) were directly connected to this haplotype by two or three mutational steps. In the case of Callicorixa praeusta (Fieber, 1848) (n = 23) and Callicorixa producta (Reuter, 1880) (n = 1) we found five different haplotypes (Fig. 5), with h1 representing the dominant haplotype which includes 19 specimens of C. praeusta and the only specimen of C. producta. All other four haplotypes (h2–h5) were only scored in one specimen and connected with h1 by one or two mutational steps. A much more complex network was revealed for Sigara distincta (Fieber, 1848) (n = 7), Sigara falleni (Fieber, 1848) (n = 12), and Sigara iactans Jansson, 1983 (n = 12) (Fig. 6). We identified 16 different haplotypes in total, with six haplotypes (h1–h6) shared by more than one specimen. Three of these haplotypes (h2, h3, h5) were shared by specimens of S. falleni and S. iactans. Furthermore, haplotypes of both previously mentioned species were randomly distributed within the network. In many cases, haplotypes of S. falleni were separated merely by two mutational steps from haplotypes of S. iactans (e.g., h6 and h13) and vice versa. We found four singletons for S. falleni and five for S. iactans. In contrast to these two species, we identified only two haplotypes (h1, h8) for the seven analyzed specimens of S. distincta. Moreover, most specimens (n = 6) were identical (h1) and located at the periphery of the network. The other haplotype (h8), a singleton collected among others at Apen (Lower Saxony), was separated by more than 25 mutational steps from the network and represents the most isolated haplotype in this network by far. Therefore, S. distincta shared no haplotypes with other species.
Figure 5. Maximum statistical parsimony network of various species of the Gerromorpha and Nepomorpha with interspecific K2P-based distances of COI sequences <1%.
(A) Gerris asper (Fieber, 1860) (n = 1) and Gerris lateralis Schummel, 1832 (n = 2); (B) Sigara limitata (Fieber, 1848) (n = 2) and Sigara semistriata (Fieber, 1848) (n = 5); (C) Callicorixa praeusta (Fieber, 1848) (n = 23) and Callicorixa producta (Reuter, 1880) (n = 1). Used settings included default settings for connection steps whereas gaps were treated as fifth state. Each line represents a single mutational change whereas small black dots and small black lines indicate missing haplotypes. The diameter of the circles is proportional to the number of haplotypes sampled (see open half circles with numbers). Color codes were given for each species. Scale bars = 1 mm. Aquatic bug images were obtained from http://www.corisa.de.
Figure 6. Maximum statistical parsimony network of three Sigara species with interspecific K2P-based distances of COI sequences <1%.
Used settings included default settings for connection steps whereas gaps were treated as fifth state. Each line represents a single mutational change whereas small black dots and small black lines indicate missing haplotypes. The diameter of the circles is proportional to the number of haplotypes sampled (see open half circles with numbers). Color codes were given for each species. Scale bars = 1 mm. Aquatic bug images were obtained from http://www.corisa.de.
Discussion
Our comprehensive DNA barcode library represents an important step for the molecular characterization of the freshwater fauna in Central Europe and adjacent regions. As COI sequences are used routinely in phylogeographic, phylogenetic, and evolutionary studies as well, our data can be also implemented in projects analyzing the genetic variation of species in relation to historical, geographical, and ecological factors (Galacatos, Cognato & Sperling, 2002; Damgaard, 2005, 2008b; Gagnon & Turgeon, 2010; Ye et al., 2016). Unique BINs were found for 55 species, allowing a valid identification of 82% of the analyzed 67 species. Distinct and monophyletic lineages were revealed for 52 species (78%). Our study also indicates the need of further detailed taxonomic revisions, using state-of-the-art methods for a fine-scaled characterization (Raupach et al., 2016). This is especially true for the species-rich family Corixidae. In the following we will discuss noticeable species with high intraspecific and/or low interspecific distances more in detail.
Interspecific K2P distances with values below 2.2%
The efficiency of DNA barcoding highly depends on distinct mitochondrial lineages, ideally coupled with moderate to high genetic interspecific distances. If sister species, however, have low interspecific distances and haplotype sharing as a result of a recent ancestry and/or ongoing gene flow, DNA barcoding will fail (Tautz et al., 2003; Frezal & Leblois, 2008; Raupach & Radulovici, 2015). For the analyzed species of the Gerromorpha and Nepomorpha, minimum interspecific K2P distances with values below 2.2% were found for 18 species (Table 1). Distance values ranged from 0% (four species: C. praeusta (Fieber, 1848), C. producta (Reuter, 1880), S. falleni (Fieber, 1848), Sigara iactans Jansson, 1983) to 2.11% (Sigara venusta (Douglas & Scott, 1869)). Distinct monophyletic clusters, however, were revealed for Notonecta obliqua Thunberg, 1787 and Notonecta glauca Linnaeus, 1758 (1.08%), Notonecta lutea Müller, 1776 and Notonecta reuteri Hungerford, 1928 (1.24%), Sigara dorsalis (Leach, 1817) and Sigara striata (Linnaeus, 1758) (1.71%) (but see Savage & Parkin, 1998), and S. venusta (Douglas & Scott, 1869) and S. limitata (Fieber, 1848)/S. semistriata (Fieber, 1848) (2.11%), indicating a close relationship of these species pairs with distinct lineages (Table 1). Furthermore, the analyzed specimen of A. germari (Fieber, 1848) was nested in the paraphyletic cluster of Arctocorisa carinata (Sahlberg, 1819) (1.03%) (Fig. S1). In this context it should be noted that experimental crosses gave viable hybrids between both Arctocorisa species with intermediate characters (Jansson, 1979a). These examples show that recent speciation events as well as hybridization may represent important processes in these groups. Future studies including more specimens and other genetic markers should be conducted to resolve the eco-evolutionary events leading to the low interspecific variation. Species pairs with interspecific K2P distances <1% will be discussed more in detail below.
Species pairs with interspecific distances below 1%
Gerris asper (Fieber, 1860) and Gerris lateralis Schummel, 1832
From a morphological perspective, both species are very similar (Wagner & Zimmermann, 1955; Schuster, 1983; Wachmann, Melber & Deckert, 2006). Not surprisingly, G. asper is suggested as a south-eastern vicariant of its boreo-montane sister species G. lateralis (Jeziorski et al., 2012). Whereas G. lateralis has a distribution ranging from Europe to the Far East of Russia, G. asper is found in Southern and Central Europe, extending to Afghanistan (Jeziorski et al., 2012). In spite of the fact that our sample sizes were very small (G. asper: n = 1, G. lateralis: n = 2), our molecular data set clearly support the proposed close relationship of both water striders species (Fig. 5; Table 1). Future studies including more specimens covering a larger geographic range are needed to test whether both taxa represent distinct lineages or hybridization still takes place as it is known from other species of this genus (Calabrese, 1982).
Sigara limitata (Fieber, 1848) and Sigara semistriata (Fieber, 1848)
Both species belong to the subgenus Retrocorixa Walton, 1940 and have a similar distribution, ranging from Europe eastwards to Siberia (Jansson, 1986; Wachmann, Melber & Deckert, 2006; Coulianos, Økland & Økland, 2008). A close relationship as it has been indicated by our data has not been proposed yet. In contrast to our results, morphological characters suggest S. venusta (Douglas & Scott, 1869) as sister species of S. semistriata (see Jansson, 1986). As part of our study, S. venusta represents the sister species of S. limitata and S. semistriata with a distance of 2.11% (Fig. 5; Table 1). Due to the fact that neither S. limitata nor S. semistriata were monophyletic and the observed interspecific distances were very low (0.15%) (Table 1), we suggest a recent ancestry of both species. Hybrids are currently not known. Future studies are needed to verify this hypothesis.
Callicorixa praeusta (Fieber, 1848) and Callicorixa producta (Reuter, 1880)
The genus Callicorixa White, 1873 includes five medium sized species (6–8 mm) that are recorded for Europe, with two species documented in Central Europe. Specimens of C. praeusta can be found throughout most Europe except the Mediterranean region reaching to the Far East of Russia, whereas the distribution of C. producta ranges from the Northern parts of Central Europe to Fennoscandia, Northern Russia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and Siberia (Jansson, 1986; Wachmann, Melber & Deckert, 2006; Coulianos, Økland & Økland, 2008). Most identification keys for this genus rely largely on the shape and intensity of dark areas of the hind tarsus 1 (Jansson, 1986; Savage, 1989; Strauss & Niedringhaus, 2014). While this morphological trait is fairly good for the determination of most typical specimens, existing variation is rather wide, making it unreliable in many cases (Jansson, 1986). Similar to other species, our DNA barcode data give evidence for a recent ancestry or ongoing gene flow between C. praeusta and C. producta (Fig. 5). However, only one (female) specimen of C. producta was available, demonstrating the need for more detailed studies to clarify the underlying processes.
Sigara distincta (Fieber, 1848), Sigara falleni (Fieber, 1848), and Sigara iactans Jansson, 1983
Some decades ago, a comprehensive revision revealed that the well-known species S. falleni of the subgenus Subsigara Stichel, 1935 was actually a mixture of four closely related and highly similar species, including S. iactans (see Jansson, 1983). Whereas the identification of females is not always reliable, males of both species can be recognized by the shape of their pala: specimens of S. falleni are characterized by triangular pala, whereas trapezoidal pala are found for S. iactans (Jansson, 1983, 1986). Intermediate specimens, however, have been also documented and indicate on-going hybridization between both species (Jansson, 1983, 1986).
Water bugs of S. distincta are found from the British Isles through North and Central Europe to Asia as far as East Siberia and Mongolia (Jansson, 1986; Savage, 1989; Coulianos, Økland & Økland, 2008). A similar distribution is known for S. falleni, ranging throughout most of Europe eastwards to Siberia and China (Jansson, 1986; Savage, 1989; Coulianos, Økland & Økland, 2008). In contrast to both previous species, S. iactans is found in two disjunct areas, one in North and Central Europe, and the other in Southeastern Europe (Jansson, 1986; Wachmann, Melber & Deckert, 2006). Our DNA barcode data revealed multiple haplotype sharing between S. falleni and S. iactans, supporting the close relationship and on-going hybridization between both species (Fig. 6). Beside this, our results revealed a close relationship of Sigara (Subsigara) distincta with S. falleni and S. iactans, as it has been discussed in the past also (Jansson, 1986). However, we found no shared haplotypes yet. Additional studies involving more specimens of a larger geographic region are needed to validate the species status within this subgenus.
Intraspecific K2P distances with values >2.2%
Various phenomena can generate distinct lineages within DNA barcode data, e.g., phylogeographic processes (Andersen et al., 2000; Damgaard, 2005, 2008b; Ye et al., 2016), the presence of maternally inherited endosymbionts as Wolbachia (Lis, Maryańska-Nadachowska & Kajtoch, 2015), or the existence of cryptic species (Paterson et al., 2016; Jiu et al., 2017). In this context we found 11 species with intraspecific K2P distances >2.2%, ranging from 2.32% (Mesovelia vittigera Horváth, 1895) to a maximum of 9.44 (C. coleoptrata (Fabricius, 1777)). For most species, excluding S. iactans (2.67%), S. falleni (3.37%), and S. distincta (5.77%) (see Discussion above), we are currently unable to clarify the background of the observed high nucleotide distances and distinct lineages based on the given data set. However, exceptionally high intraspecific distances with values >8% were found within the pygmy backswimmer Plea minutissima Leach, 1817 (8.3%) and C. coleoptrata (Fabricius, 1777) (9.44%) (Table 1). Both will be discussed more in detail.
Small and cryptic: two highly distinct DNA barcode clusters within Plea minutissima Leach, 1817
Pygmy backswimmers are small bugs, usually less than 3.5 mm in length and confine themselves to the vegetation in which they hide and where they prey on mosquito larvae and other small arthropods (Schuh & Slater, 1995). For Europe, only one species of the Pleidae is recorded, namely P. minutissima. As part of our study we found two distinct lineages within the 16 analyzed specimens with high distances ranging from 8.1% to 8.3%. Both lineages were supported by high bootstrap values (99%) (Fig. 7). Most specimens of lineage A (n = 8) were found in Brandenburg and Bavaria, but also two specimens were collected in Lower Saxony (Jaderberg). In contrast to this, all specimens of lineage B (n = 8) were collected in Lower Saxony (Jaderberg, Lingen, Norderney). Whether this surprisingly high molecular diversity is a result of effects as incomplete lineage sorting (Damgaard, 2008a) or whether we found evidence for the existence of two sibling species (Damgaard, 2005), is not within the scope of this study but clearly needs further investigation.
Figure 7. Subtree of the neighbour-joining topology of the analyzed specimens of Plea minutissima Leach, 1817. Branches with specimen ID-Number from BOLD and species names.
Numbers next to internal branches are non-parametric bootstrap values (in %). Scale bar = 1 mm. Image obtained from http://www.corisa.de.
A currently unknown species of the genus Cymatia Flor, 1860?
For the genus Cymatia, three European species are documented so far: C. coleoptrata (Fabricius, 1777), C. bonsdorffii (Sahlberg, 1819), and C. rogenhoferi (Fieber, 1864). In terms of a morphological identification, all species can be identified according to their size and hemelytral patterns without doubt (Jansson, 1986, Stoffelen et al., 2013). Our study revealed two distinct lineages within the analyzed specimens of C. coleoptrata (lineage A and B), with a K2P distances ranging from 9.13% to 9.42% and bootstrap support values of 99% (Fig. 8). Whereas lineage A includes 22 specimens from Lower Saxony (n = 21, Lingen) and Baden-Württemberg (n = 1, Wolperstwende), lineage B contains two specimens that were collected in Brandenburg (Voßberg). Both specimens of lineage B were small adult males with a body size between 4.3 and 4.5 mm and were identified using morphological traits as C. coleoptrata at first sight. Interestingly, their barcode sequences did not have the characteristic nucleotide deletions of this species (Fig. S1). Furthermore, we found no other similar sequences using the BOLD identification engine (Best ID: C. coleoptrata) (date of request: 2017-11-20). Unfortunately, both Cymatia vouchers were lost, preventing a closer reanalysis of the specimens. Nevertheless, our results should motivate heteropterologists to study more specimens of this genus, in particular from the Eastern parts of Germany, in order to verify the presence of this putative new species.
Figure 8. Subtree of the neighbour-joining topology of the analyzed species of the genus Cymatia Flor, 1860.
Numbers next to internal branches are non-parametric bootstrap values (in %). Images obtained from http://www.corisa.de.
Conclusion
In our study we lay the foundations for a comprehensive DNA barcode data set for the aquatic Heteroptera in Central Europe and adjacent regions, which will act as useful reference library for freshwater bioassessment studies using modern high-throughput sequencing technologies. Unique BINs were revealed for 55 species, representing 82% of the analyzed 67 species. Furthermore, monophyletic lineages were found for 52 species (78%). Nevertheless, our molecular data highlights discordance between the generally accepted but exclusively morphologically based taxonomy and observed molecular diversity within some species of the Gerromorpha and Nepomorpha. The analysis of additional specimens from other localities and of other molecular markers, e.g., microsatellites or SNPs, will give us more insights into the taxonomic status of these species as well as in the eco-evolutionary processes underlying the observed genetic patterns. However, it should be kept in mind that the traditional aims of taxonomy are unchanged and include various aspects, e.g., detailed high-quality descriptions and delimitation of species, a classification that reflects evolution, a dynamic nomenclature, and fast and reliable identification tools. Therefore, our DNA barcode library may be considered as a promoter for such studies.
Supplemental Information
Accession numbers are requested and will be added in proof.
Amino acid classification accords to the IUPAC-IUB single-letter amino acid codes. Visualization was performed using the Geneious program package version 7.0.4.
Specimens are classified using ID numbers from BOLD and species name. Numbers next to nodes represent non-parametric boot-strap values (1,000 replicates, in %).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Jana Deppermann and Babett Günther (both DZMB, Wilhelmshaven) for their laboratory assistance. Three anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on the manuscript. We also thank Torsten Berger (Potsdam) and Reinhard Müller (Berlin) for providing further specimens. Furthermore we are very grateful to Gerhard Strauss for giving his permission to use the excellent photos of aquatic true bugs from http://www.corisa.de. We are also grateful to the team of Paul Hebert in Guelph (Ontario, Canada) for their great support and help and in particularly to Sujeevan Ratnasingham for developing the BOLD database infrastructure and the BIN management tools.
Funding Statement
This publication was financed by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ03F0664A, GBOL2: 01LI1101B), the Land Niedersachsen and the Bavarian State Ministry of Education and Culture (BFB). Sequencing work was partly supported by funding from the Government of Canada to Genome Canada through the Ontario Genomics Institute, whereas the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation and NSERC supported development of the BOLD informatics platform. There was no additional external funding received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Nadine Havemann conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Martin M. Gossner conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Lars Hendrich conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Jèrôme Morinière conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Rolf Niedringhaus conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, identification of specimens, providing specimens.
Peter Schäfer conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, identification of specimens, providing specimens.
Michael J. Raupach conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
DNA Deposition
The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:
Detailed information are publicly accessible and can be found via the dataset ID of BOLD: DOI 10.5883/DS-BAHCE.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The aligned DNA barcodes of the analyzed data set DS-BAHCE Barcoding Aquatic Heteroptera of Central Europe are provided in Supplemental Dataset File.
References
- Andersen (1982).Andersen NM. The Semiaquatic Bugs (Hemiptera, Gerromorpha). Phylogeny, Adaptations, Biogeography and Classification. Klampenborg: Scandinavian Science Press Ltd; 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Andersen et al. (2000).Andersen NM, Cheng L, Damgaard J, Sperling FAH. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation and phylogeography of oceanic insects (Hemiptera: Gerridae: Halobates spp.) Marine Biology. 2000;136(3):421–430. doi: 10.1007/s002270050701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aukema & Rieger (1995).Aukema B, Rieger C. Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region Vol. 1: Enicocephalomorpha, Dipsocoromorpha, Nepomorpha, Gerromorpha and Leptopodomorpha. Amsterdam: Netherlands Entomological Society; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Balvín et al. (2012).Balvín O, Munclinger P, Kratochvíl L, Vilímová J. Mitochondrial DNA and morphology show independent evolutionary histories of bedbug Cimex lectularius (Heteroptera: Cimicidae) on bats and humans. Parasitology Research. 2012;111(1):457–469. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-2862-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barahona, Millan & Velasco (2005).Barahona J, Millan A, Velasco J. Population dynamics, growth and production of Sigara selecta (Fieber, 1848) (Hemiptera, Corixidae) in a Mediterranean hypersaline stream. Freshwater Biology. 2005;50(12):2101–2113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01463.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Barco et al. (2016).Barco A, Raupach MJ, Laakmann S, Neumann H, Knebelsberger T. Identification of North Sea molluscs with DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2016;16(1):288–297. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berchi (2011).Berchi GM. First record of Anisops sardeus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Notonectidae) in Romania. North-Western Journal of Zoology. 2011;7:339–341. [Google Scholar]
- Boda et al. (2015).Boda P, Bozóki T, Vásárhelyi T, Bakonyi G, Várbíró G. Revised and annotated checklist of aquatic and semi-aquatic Heteroptera of Hungary with comments on biodiversity patterns. ZooKeys. 2015;501:89–108. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.501.8964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boyce, Zwick & Aquadro (1989).Boyce TM, Zwick ME, Aquadro CF. Mitochondrial DNA in the bark weevils size, structure and heteroplasmy. Genetics. 1989;123:825–836. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brandon-Mong et al. (2015).Brandon-Mong GJ, Gan HM, Sing KW, Lee PS, Lim PE, Wilson JJ. DNA metabarcoding of insects and allies: an evaluation of primers and pipelines. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 2015;105(6):717–727. doi: 10.1017/S0007485315000681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calabrese (1982).Calabrese DM. Hybridization between Gerris alacris Hussey and Gerris comatus Drake and Hottes (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerridae) in nature. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington. 1982;84:209–210. [Google Scholar]
- Castanhole et al. (2013).Castanhole MMU, Marchesin SRC, Pereira LLV, Moreira FFF, Barbosa JF, Valério JR, Itoyama MM. The first assess of the haplotypes from COI gene sequences in species of spittlebugs (Cicadomorpha: Hemiptera) and aquatic true bugs (Gerromorpha and Nepomorpha: Hemiptera) in Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2013;12(4):5372–5381. doi: 10.4238/2013.November.7.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clement, Posada & Crandall (2000).Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. TCS: estimating gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology. 2000;9(10):1657–1659. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coddington et al. (2016).Coddington JA, Agnarsson I, Cheng R-C, Candek K, Driskell A, Frick H, Gregorič M, Kostanjšek R, Kropf C, Kweskin M, Lokovšek T, Pipan M, Vidergar N, Kuntner M. DNA barcode data accurately assign higher spider taxa. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2201. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coulianos, Økland & Økland (2008).Coulianos C-C, Økland J, Økland KA. Norwegian water bugs. Distribution and ecology (Hemiptera-Heteroptera: Gerromorpha and Nepomorpha) Norwegian Journal of Entomology. 2008;55:179–222. [Google Scholar]
- Creer et al. (2016).Creer S, Deiner K, Frey S, Porazinska D, Taberlet P, Thomas WK, Potter C, Bik HM. The ecologist’s field guide to sequence-based identification of biodiversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2016;7(9):1008–1018. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12574. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cristescu (2014).Cristescu ME. From barcoding single individuals to metabarcoding biological communities: towards an integrative approach to the study of global biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2014;29(10):566–571. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Damgaard (2005).Damgaard J. Genetic diversity, taxonomy, and phylogeography of the western Palaearctic water strider Aquarius najas (DeGeer) (Heteroptera: Gerridae) Insect Systematics & Evolution. 2005;36(4):395–406. doi: 10.1163/187631205788838537. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Damgaard (2008a).Damgaard J. MtDNA diversity and species phylogeny of western Palaearctic members of the Gerris lacustris group (Hemiptera-Heteroptera: Gerridae) with implications for “DNA barcoding” of water striders. Insect Systematics & Evolution. 2008a;39(1):107–120. doi: 10.1163/187631208788784156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Damgaard (2008b).Damgaard J. MtDNA diversity and phylogeography of five Palaearctic water striders (Hemiptera-Heteroptera: Gerridae) In: Grozewa S, Simov N, editors. Advances in Heteroptera Research. Sofia, Moscow: Pensoft Publishers; 2008b. pp. 17–30. [Google Scholar]
- Dijkstra, Monaghan & Pauls (2014).Dijkstra K-DB, Monaghan MT, Pauls SU. Freshwater biodiversity and aquatic insect diversification. Annual Review of Entomology. 2014;59(1):153–163. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-161958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Douglas & Scott (1869).Douglas JW, Scott J. British Hemiptera: Additions and corrections. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine. 1869;5:259–268. 293–297. [Google Scholar]
- Douglas & Scott (1868).Douglas JW, Scott J. British Hemiptera: Additions and corrections. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine. 1868;4:265–271. [Google Scholar]
- Ebong et al. (2016).Ebong SMA, Petit E, Le gall P, Chen P-P, Nieser N, Guilbert E, Njiokou F, Marsollier L, Guégan J-F, Pluot-Sigwalt D, Eyangoh S, Harry M. Molecular species delimitation and morphology of aquatic and sub-aquatic bugs (Heteroptera) in Cameroon. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0154905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar (2004).Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;5:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fabricius (1777).Fabricius JC. Genera Insectorum. Chilonii: Bartsch; 1777. [in Latin] [Google Scholar]
- Fabricius (1794).Fabricius JC. Entomologia systematica emendate et aucta, secudum classes, ordines, genera, species adjectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Hafniae: Proft; 1794. [in Latin] [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein (1985).Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39(4):783–791. doi: 10.2307/2408678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fieber (1848).Fieber FX. Synopsis aller bisher in Europa entdeckten Arten der Gattung Corisa. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou. 1848;21:505–593. [in German] [Google Scholar]
- Fieber (1860).Fieber FX. Die europäischen Hemiptera. Halbflügler. (Rhynchota Heteroptera) Wien: Gerold’s Sohn; 1860. [in German] [Google Scholar]
- Fieber (1864).Fieber FX. Neuere Entdeckungen in europäischen Hemipteren. B. Neue Arten. Wiener Entomologische Monatsschrift. 1864;8:65–86. 205–234, 321–335. [Google Scholar]
- Folmer et al. (1994).Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology. 1994;3:294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frezal & Leblois (2008).Frezal L, Leblois R. Four years of DNA barcoding: current advances and prospects. Infection Genetics and Evolution. 2008;8(5):727–736. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagnon & Turgeon (2010).Gagnon M-C, Turgeon J. Disjunct distributions in Gerris species (Insecta: Hemiptera: Gerridae): an analysis based on spatial and taxonomic patterns of genetic diversity. Journal of Biogeography. 2010;37(1):170–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02195.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Galacatos, Cognato & Sperling (2002).Galacatos K, Cognato AI, Sperling FAH. Population genetic structure of two water strider species in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Freshwater Biology. 2002;47(3):391–399. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00811.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Geller et al. (2013).Geller J, Meyer C, Parker M, Hawk H. Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2013;13(5):851–861. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grebennikov & Heiss (2014).Grebennikov VV, Heiss E. DNA barcoding of flat bugs (Hemiptera: Aradidae) with phylogenetic implications. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny. 2014;72:213–219. [Google Scholar]
- Gullan & Cranston (2014).Gullan PA, Cranston PS. The Insects—An outline of Entomology. Fifth edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Hajibabaei et al. (2007).Hajibabaei M, Singer GAC, Hebert PDN, Hickey DA. DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends in Genetics. 2007;23(4):167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hausmann et al. (2013).Hausmann A, Godfray HCJ, Huemer P, Mutanen M, Rougerie R, van Nieukerken EJ, Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. Genetic patterns in European Geometrid moths revealed by the barcode index number (BIN) system. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(12):e84518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heather & Chain (2016).Heather JM, Chain B. The sequence of sequencers: The history of sequencing DNA. Genomics. 2016;107(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hebert et al. (2003).Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, de Waard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2003;270(1512):313–321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hebert et al. (2004).Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(41):14812–14817. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406166101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hebert, Ratnasingham & de Waard (2003).Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, de Waard JR. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2003;270(Suppl_1):96–99. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hendrich et al. (2015).Hendrich L, Morinière J, Haszprunar G, Hebert PD, Hausmann A, Köhler F, Balke M. A comprehensive DNA barcode database for Central European beetles with a focus on Germany: adding more than 3500 identified species to BOLD. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2015;15(4):795–818. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henry (2017).Henry TJ. Biodiversity of Heteroptera. In: Foottit RG, Adler PH, editors. Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Hoboken: Wiley; 2017. pp. 279–335. [Google Scholar]
- Herrich-Schaeffer (1840–1853).Herrich-Schaeffer GAW. Die Wanzenartigen Insecten – Getreu nach der Natur abgebildet und beschrieben. Nürnberg: Zehns̀che Buchhandlung; 1840–1853. [in German] [Google Scholar]
- Hufnagel, Bakonyi & Vásárhelyi (1999).Hufnagel L, Bakonyi G, Vásárhelyi T. New approach for habitat characterization based on species lists of aquatic and semiaquatic bugs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 1999;58:305–316. doi: 10.1023/A:1006047130545. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hutchinson (1993).Hutchinson G. A Treatise on Limnology, Vol. 4, The Zoobenthos. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Ivanova et al. (2007).Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2007;7(4):544–548. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01748.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jansson (1979a).Jansson A. Reproductive isolation and experimental hybridization between Arctocorisa carinata and A. germari (Heteroptera, Corixidae) Annales Zoologici Fennici. 1979a;16(2):89–104. [Google Scholar]
- Jansson (1979b).Jansson A. Experimental hybridization of Sigara striata and S. dorsalis (Heteroptera, Corixidae) Annales Zoologici Fennici. 1979b;16(2):105–114. [Google Scholar]
- Jansson (1983).Jansson A. Three new palaearctic species of Sigara (Subsigara) (Heteroptera, Corixidae) Annales Entomologici Fennici. 1983;49:65–70. [Google Scholar]
- Jansson (1986).Jansson A. The Corixidae (Heteroptera) of Europe and some adjacent regions. Acta Entomologica Fennica. 1986;47:1–94. [Google Scholar]
- Jeziorski et al. (2012).Jeziorski P, Kment P, Ditrich T, Straka M, Sychra J, Dvořák L. Distribution of Gerris asper and G. lateralis (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerridae) in the Czech Republic. Klapalekiana. 2012;48:191–202. [Google Scholar]
- Jiu et al. (2017).Jiu M, Hu J, Wang L-J, Dong J-F, Song Y-Q, Sun H-Z. Cryptic species identification and composition of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) complex in Henan province, China. Journal of Insect Science. 2017;17(3):78. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iex048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jung, Duwal & Lee (2011).Jung S, Duwal RK, Lee S. COI barcoding of true bugs (Insecta, Heteroptera) Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11(2):266–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02945.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaur & Sharma (2017).Kaur H, Sharma K. COI-based DNA barcoding of some species of Pentatomidae from North India (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2017;28(5):756–761. doi: 10.1080/24701394.2016.1180513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kavar et al. (2006).Kavar T, Pavlovčič P, Sušnik S, Meglič V, Virant-Doberlet M. Genetic differentiation of geographically separated populations of the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Bulletin of Entomological Research. 2006;96(2):117–128. doi: 10.1079/BER2005406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kearse et al. (2012).Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;15(12):1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khalaji-Pirbalouty & Raupach (2014).Khalaji-Pirbalouty V, Raupach MJ. A new species of Cymodoce Leach, 1814 (Crustacea: Isopoda: Sphaeromatidae) from the Persian Gulf based on morphological and molecular characteristics, with a redescription of Cymodoce tribullis from Queensland. Zootaxa. 2014;3826:230–254. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3826.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura (1980).Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 1980;16(2):111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klecka (2014).Klecka J. The role of a water bug, Sigara striata, in freshwater food webs. PeerJ. 2014;2:e389. doi: 10.7717/peerj.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klementová & Svitok (2014).Klementová BR, Svitok M. Anisops sardeus (Heteroptera): a new expansive species in Central Europe. Biologia. 2014;69(5):676–680. doi: 10.2478/s11756-014-0354-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kmiec, Woloszynska & Janska (2006).Kmiec B, Woloszynska M, Janska H. Heteroplasmy as a common state of mitochondrial genetic information in plants and animals. Current Genetics. 2006;50(3):149–159. doi: 10.1007/s00294-006-0082-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kress et al. (2015).Kress WJ, García-Robledo C, Uriarte M, Erickson DL. DNA barcodes for ecology, evolution, and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2015;30(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, Stecher & Tamura (2016).Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2016;33(7):1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lancaster & Downes (2013).Lancaster J, Downes BJ. Aquatic Entomology. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Leach (1817–1818).Leach WE. On the classification of the natural tribe of insects Notonectides with descriptions of British species. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London. 1817–1818;12:10–18. [Google Scholar]
- Leese et al. (2016).Leese F, Altermatt F, Bouchez A, Ekrem T, Hering D, Meissner K, Mergen P, Pawlowski J, Piggott J, Rimet F, Steinke D, Taberlet P, Weigand A, Abarenkov K, Beja P, Bervoets L, Björnsdóttir S, Boets P, Boggero A, Bones A, Borja Á, Bruce K, Bursić V, Carlsson J, Čiampor F, Čiamporová-Zatovičová Z, Coissac E, Costa F, Costache M, Creer S, Csabai Z, Deiner K, Delvalls Á, Drakare S, Duarte S, Eleršek T, Fazi S, Fišer C, Flot J, Fonseca V, Fontaneto D, Grabowski M, Graf W, Guðbrandsson J, Hellström M, Hershkovitz Y, Hollingsworth P, Japoshvili B, Jones J, Kahlert M, Kalamujic Stroil B, Kasapidis P, Kelly M, Kelly-Quinn M, Keskin E, Kõljalg U, Ljubešić Z, Maček I, Mächler E, Mahon A, Marečková M, Mejdandzic M, Mircheva G, Montagna M, Moritz C, Mulk V, Naumoski A, Navodaru I, Padisák J, Pálsson S, Panksep K, Penev L, Petrusek A, Pfannkuchen M, Primmer C, Rinkevich B, Rotter A, Schmidt-Kloiber A, Segurado P, Speksnijder A, Stoev P, Strand M, Šulčius S, Sundberg P, Traugott M, Tsigenopoulos C, Turon X, Valentini A, van der Hoorn B, Várbíró G, Vasquez Hadjilyra M, Viguri J, Vitonytė I, Vogler A, Vrålstad T, Wägele JW, Wenne R, Winding A, Woodward G, Zegura B, Zimmermann J. DNAqua-Net: developing new genetic tools for bioassessment and monitoring of aquatic ecosystems in Europe. Research Ideas and Outcomes. 2016;2:e11321. doi: 10.3897/rio.2.e11321. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Leigh & Bryant (2015).Leigh JW, Bryant D. POPART: fullfeature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2015;6(9):1110–1116. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Leite (2012).Leite LAR. Mitochondrial pseudogenes in insect DNA barcoding: differing points of view on the same issue. Biota Neotropica. 2012;12(3):301–308. [Google Scholar]
- Linnaeus (1758).Linnaeus C. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Holmiae: Salvii; 1758. [in Latin] [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Stur & Ekrem (2015).Lin X, Stur E, Ekrem T. Exploring genetic divergence in a species-rich insect genus using 2790 DNA barcodes. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0138993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lis, Lis & Ziaja (2013).Lis B, Lis JA, Ziaja DJ. Identification of the nymphal stages of two European seed bugs, L. equestris and L. simulans (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Lygaeidae), using DNA barcodes. Zootaxa. 2013;3608(2):147–150. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3608.2.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lis, Maryańska-Nadachowska & Kajtoch (2015).Lis A, Maryańska-Nadachowska A, Kajtoch Ł. Relations of Wolbachia infection with phylogeography of Philaenus spumarius (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) populations within and beyond the Carpathian contact zone. Microbial Ecology. 2015;70(2):509–521. doi: 10.1007/s00248-015-0570-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCafferty (1981).McCafferty W. Aquatic Entomology. Boston: Science Books International; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Miller et al. (2016).Miller SE, Hausmann A, Hallwachs W, Janzen DH. Advancing taxonomy and bioinventories with DNA barcodes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2016;371(1702):20150339. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morinière et al. (2017).Morinière J, Hendrich L, Balke M, Beermann AJ, König T, Hess M, Koch S, Müller R, Leese F, Hebert PDN, Hausmann A, Schubart CD, Haszprunar G. A DNA barcode library for Germany’s mayflies, stoneflies and caddisflies (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) Molecular Ecology Resources. 2017;17(6):1293–1307. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morinière et al. (2016).Morinière J, Cancian de Araujo B, Lam AW, Hausmann A, Balke M, Schmidt S, Hendrich L, Doczkal D, Fartmann B, Arvidsson S, Haszprunar G. Species identification in Malaise trap samples by DNA barcoding based on NGS technologies and a scoring matrix. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0155497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muraji, Miura & Nakasuji (1989).Muraji M, Miura T, Nakasuji F. Phenological studies on the wing dimorphism of a semi-aquatic bug, Microvelia douglasi (Heteroptera: Veliidae) Researches on Population Ecology. 1989;31(1):129–138. doi: 10.1007/BF02515811. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nieser (1982).Nieser N. De Nederlandse water-en oppervlakte wantsen (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha en Gerromorpha) Wetenschappelijke mededelingen van de koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging. 1982;155:1–103. [in Dutch] [Google Scholar]
- Park et al. (2011).Park DS, Foottit R, Maw E, Hebert PDN. Barcoding bugs: DNA-based identification of the true bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) PLOS ONE. 2011;6(4):e18749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paterson et al. (2016).Paterson ID, Mangan R, Downie DA, Coetzee JA, Hill MP, Burke AM, Downey PO, Henry TJ, Compton SG. Two in one: cryptic species discovered in biological control agent populations using molecular data and crossbreeding experiments. Ecology and Evolution. 2016;6(17):6139–6150. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peckarsky (1982).Peckarsky BL. Aquatic insect predator-prey relations. Bioscience. 1982;32(4):261–266. doi: 10.2307/1308532. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Petit & Excoffier (2009).Petit RJ, Excoffier L. Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2009;24(7):386–393. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfenning & Poethke (2006).Pfenning B, Poethke HJ. Variability in the life history of the water strider Gerris lacustris (Heteroptera: Gerridae) across small spatial scales. Ecological Entomology. 2006;31(2):123–130. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2006.00763.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Polhemus & Polhemus (2008).Polhemus JT, Polhemus DA. Global diversity of true bugs (Heteroptera; Insecta) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia. 2008;595(1):379–391. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-9033-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ratnasingham & Hebert (2007).Ratnasingham S, Hebert PD. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (www.barcodinglife.org. ) Molecular Ecology Notes. 2007;7(3):355–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ratnasingham & Hebert (2013).Ratnasingham S, Hebert PD. A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the barcode index number (BIN) system. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(7):e66213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raupach et al. (2016).Raupach MJ, Amann R, Wheeler QD, Roos C. The application of “-omics” technologies for the classification and identification of animals. Organisms Diversity & Evolution. 2016;16(1):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s13127-015-0234-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Raupach et al. (2010).Raupach MJ, Astrin JJ, Hannig K, Peters MK, Stoeckle MY, Wägele JW. Molecular species identification of Central European ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) using nuclear rDNA expansion segments and DNA barcodes. Frontiers in Zoology. 2010;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raupach et al. (2015).Raupach MJ, Barco A, Steinke D, Beermann J, Laakmann S, Mohrbeck I, Neumann H, Kihara TC, Pointner K, Radulovici A, Segelken-Voigt A, Wesse C, Knebelsberger T. The application of DNA barcodes for the identification of marine crustaceans from the North Sea and adjacent regions. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0139421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raupach et al. (2014).Raupach MJ, Hendrich L, Küchler SM, Deister F, Morinière J, Gossner MM. Building-up of a DNA barcode library for true bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Germany reveals taxonomic uncertainties and surprises. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(9):e106940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raupach & Radulovici (2015).Raupach MJ, Radulovici AE. Looking back on a decade of barcoding crustaceans. ZooKeys. 2015;539:53–81. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.539.6530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rebijith et al. (2012).Rebijith KB, Asokan R, Kumar NKK, Srikumar KK, Ramamurthy VV, Bhat PS. DNA barcoding and development of species-specific markers for the identification of tea mosquito bugs (Miridae: Heteroptera) in India. Environmental Entomology. 2012;41(5):1239–1245. doi: 10.1603/EN12096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reuter (1880).Reuter OM. Nya bidrag till Åbo och Ålands skärgårds Hemipter-fauna. Meddelanden af Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica. 1880;5:160–236. [in Swedish] [Google Scholar]
- Saitou & Nei (1987).Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sahlberg (1819).Sahlberg CR. Dissertatio academica, observationes quasdam historiam notonectidum imprimis Fennicarum, illustrantes propositura. Aboae. 1819;15 [in Latin] [Google Scholar]
- Savage (1989).Savage AA. Adults of British aquatic Hemiptera Heteroptera: a key with ecological notes. Biological Conservation. 1989;50(4):1–173. [Google Scholar]
- Savage & Parkin (1998).Savage A, Parkin E. The diagnostic features of British Sigara striata, S. dorsalis and intermediate specimens (Corixidae), with a new key for identification of adult males. Freshwater Forum. 1998;10:35–48. [Google Scholar]
- Scheffers et al. (2012).Scheffers BR, Joppa LN, Pimm SL, Laurance WF. What we know and don’t know about Earth’s missing biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2012;27(9):501–510. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuh & Slater (1995).Schuh RT, Slater JA. True Bugs of the World (Hemiptera: Heteroptera): Classification and Natural History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Schuster (1983).Schuster G. Zur Trennung von Gerris lateralis Schumm. und Gerris asper Fieb. Bericht der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Augsburg. 1983;38:3–6. [in German] [Google Scholar]
- Shackleton & Rees (2015).Shackleton M, Rees GN. DNA barcoding Australian macroinvertebrates for monitoring programs: benefits and current short comings. Marine and Freshwater Research. 2015;67:380–390. doi: 10.1071/MF14331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Simon et al. (1994).Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 1994;87(6):651–701. doi: 10.1093/aesa/87.6.651. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Skern, Zweimüller & Schiemer (2010).Skern M, Zweimüller I, Schiemer F. Aquatic Heteroptera as indicators for terrestrialisation of floodplain habitats. Limnologica—Ecology and Management of Inland Waters. 2010;40(3):241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2009.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Song, Moulton & Whiting (2014).Song H, Moulton MJ, Whiting MF. Rampant nuclear insertion of mtDNA across diverse lineages within Orthoptera (Insecta) PLOS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soós et al. (2010).Soós N, Petri A, Nagy-László Z, Csabai Z. Anisops sardeus Herrich-Schaeffer, 1849: first records from Hungary (Heteroptera: Notonectidae) Folia Entomologica Hungarica. 2010;71:15–18. [Google Scholar]
- Spelda et al. (2011).Spelda J, Reip HS, Oliveira-Biener U, Melzer RR. Barcoding Fauna Bavarica: Myriapoda. ZooKeys. 2011;156:123–139. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.156.2176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spence & Andersen (1994).Spence JR, Andersen NM. Biology of water striders: interactions between systematics and ecology. Annual Review of Entomology. 1994;39(1):101–128. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.000533. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Spence & Wilcox (1986).Spence JR, Wilcox RS. The mating system of two hybridizing species of water striders (Gerridae). II. Alternative tactics of males and females. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1986;19(2):87–95. doi: 10.1007/BF00299943. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stoffelen et al. (2013).Stoffelen E, Henderickx H, Vercauteren T, Lock K, Bosmans R. De water- en oppervlaktewantsen van België. Brussel: Koninklich Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen; 2013. [in Dutch] [Google Scholar]
- Strauss & Niedringhaus (2014).Strauss G, Niedringhaus R. Die Wasserwanzen Deutschlands-Bestimmungsschlüssel für alle Nepo- und Gerromorpha. Scheeßel: WABV; 2014. [in German] [Google Scholar]
- Tautz et al. (2003).Tautz D, Arctander P, Minelli A, Thomas RH, Vogler AP. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2003;18(2):70–74. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00041-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tembe, Shouche & Ghate (2014).Tembe S, Shouche Y, Ghate HV. DNA barcoding of Pentatomorpha bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Western Ghats of India. Meta Gene. 2014;2:737–745. doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wachmann, Melber & Deckert (2006).Wachmann E, Melber A, Deckert J. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands 77. Teil. Wanzen Band 1. Dipsocoromorpha, Nepomorpha, Gerromorpha, Leptopodomorpha, Cimicomorpha (Teil 1) Keltern: Goecke & Evers; 2006. [in German] [Google Scholar]
- Wagner & Zimmermann (1955).Wagner E, Zimmermann S. Beitrag zur Systematik der Gattung Gerris F. (Hemiptera-Heteroptera, Gerridae) Zoologischer Anzeiger. 1955;155:177–190. [in German] [Google Scholar]
- Werren, Baldo & Clark (2008).Werren JH, Baldo L, Clark ME. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2008;6(10):741–751. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werren, Zhang & Guo (1995).Werren JH, Zhang W, Guo LR. Evolution and phylogeny of Wolbachia: reproductive parasites of arthropods. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1995;261(1360):55–71. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wesenberg-Lund (1943).Wesenberg-Lund C. Biologie der Süßwasserinsekten (Reprint) Luxenburg: Springer; 1943. [in German] [Google Scholar]
- Whiteman & Sites (2008).Whiteman NK, Sites RW. Aquatic insects as umbrella species for ecosystem protection in Death Valley National Park. Journal of Insect Conservation. 2008;12(5):499–509. doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9090-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wilcox & Spence (1986).Wilcox RS, Spence JR. The mating system of two hybridizing species of water striders (Gerridae). I. Ripple signal functions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1986;19:79–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00299942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao et al. (2011).Xiao J-H, Wang N-X, Murphy RW, Cook J, Jia L-Y, Huang D-W. Wolbachia infection and dramatic intraspecific mitochondrial DNA divergence in a fig wasp. Evolution. 2011;66(6):1907–1916. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01561.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ye et al. (2016).Ye Z, Zhu G, Damgaard J, Chen X, Chen P, Bu W. Phylogeography of a semi-aquatic bug, Microvelia horvathi (Hemiptera: Veliidae): an evaluation of historical, geographical and ecological factors. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):21932. doi: 10.1038/srep21932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu et al. (2012).Yu DW, Ji Y, Emerson BC, Wang X, Ye C, Yang C, Ding Z. Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2012;3(4):613–623. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00198.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zera, Innes & Saks (1983).Zera AJ, Innes DJ, Saks ME. Genetic and environmental determinants of wing polymorphism in the waterstrider Limnoporus canaliculatus. Evolution. 1983;31(3):513–522. doi: 10.2307/2408264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou et al. (2012).Zhou C, Kandemir I, Walsh DB, Zalom FG, Lavine LC. Identification of Lygus hesperus by DNA barcoding reveals insignificant levels of genetic structure among distant and habitat diverse populations. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(3):e34528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimmermann & Spence (1989).Zimmermann M, Spence JR. Prey use of the fishing spider Dolomedes triton (Pisauridae, Araneae): an important predator of the neuston community. Oecologia. 1989;80:187–194. doi: 10.1007/BF00380149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Accession numbers are requested and will be added in proof.
Amino acid classification accords to the IUPAC-IUB single-letter amino acid codes. Visualization was performed using the Geneious program package version 7.0.4.
Specimens are classified using ID numbers from BOLD and species name. Numbers next to nodes represent non-parametric boot-strap values (1,000 replicates, in %).
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The aligned DNA barcodes of the analyzed data set DS-BAHCE Barcoding Aquatic Heteroptera of Central Europe are provided in Supplemental Dataset File.