Abstract
Hydrostatic lung compression in diving marine mammals, with collapsing alveoli blocking gas exchange at depth, has been the main theoretical basis for limiting N2 uptake and avoiding gas emboli (GE) as they ascend. However, studies of beached and bycaught cetaceans and sea turtles imply that air-breathing marine vertebrates may, under unusual circumstances, develop GE that result in decompression sickness (DCS) symptoms. Theoretical modelling of tissue and blood gas dynamics of breath-hold divers suggests that changes in perfusion and blood flow distribution may also play a significant role. The results from the modelling work suggest that our current understanding of diving physiology in many species is poor, as the models predict blood and tissue N2 levels that would result in severe DCS symptoms (chokes, paralysis and death) in a large fraction of natural dive profiles. In this review, we combine published results from marine mammals and turtles to propose alternative mechanisms for how marine vertebrates control gas exchange in the lung, through management of the pulmonary distribution of alveolar ventilation (
) and cardiac output/lung perfusion (
), varying the level of
in different regions of the lung. Man-made disturbances, causing stress, could alter the
mismatch level in the lung, resulting in an abnormally elevated uptake of N2, increasing the risk for GE. Our hypothesis provides avenues for new areas of research, offers an explanation for how sonar exposure may alter physiology causing GE and provides a new mechanism for how air-breathing marine vertebrates usually avoid the diving-related problems observed in human divers.
Keywords: diving physiology, cardiorespiratory physiology, whale stranding, noise pollution, climate change
1. General overview on respiratory anatomy and physiology in marine mammals
While exposure to high pressure is a common challenge among breath-hold divers, there is large variation in respiratory anatomy, function and capacity between genera and even species [1–3]. The ultra-deep-diving feats of some marine mammals go beyond our current understanding of respiratory physiology and lung mechanics. Many diving adaptations relate to behaviour, intermittent ventilation and physiological functions that support simultaneous activities, including gas exchange, aerobic metabolism, buoyancy control and air storage for echolocation, social vocalization and foraging [1,2,4]. As a generalization, deep divers tend to have greater overall O2 stores, with a greater proportion of muscle mass, higher myoglobin content, a greater blood volume and higher haematocrit [5–8]. Lungs of deep-diving whales have a smaller mass-specific total lung capacity, are typically smaller, occupy a smaller percentage of thoracic volume and are associated with more vascular retia than the lungs of shallower divers such as nearshore bottlenose dolphins [9,10]. Increased lung volume while diving could increase the amount of N2 taken up during dives, and thereby increase the risk of decompression sickness (DCS) [11,12]. Thus in deep-diving species, available O2 is mainly augmented by increased haemoglobin and blood volume as well as muscle myoglobin [8,9,13].
In cetaceans, the cartilaginous reinforcements that maintain patency of the airways during diving serve different goals, including facilitation of high respiratory flow and short breath durations at the surface. Furthermore, the airway reinforcement associated with a greater lung compliance [1] facilitates alveolar collapse, limiting N2 absorption during dives. The reinforcements also help to maintain airway permeability (no gas trapping) during compression, and provide an air storage site in a non-gas-exchange compartment when lung parenchyma collapses at depth [1,2]. At least in some pinnipeds the airways compress to some extent during a dive [14], but no study has measured airway compression in a live cetacean. In 1969, Ridgway et al. [15] showed in bottlenose dolphins that O2 content in the first breath after a 300 m dive was greater than after an equivalent amount of horizontal swimming at 20 m. This finding supports the theory that alveolar collapse and air displacement into the reinforced trachea and primary bronchi [10], or terminal bronchi [5,14,16], help reduce exchange of gases across the alveolar–capillary barrier during diving. McDonald & Ponganis [17] provided direct evidence of alveolar collapse during descent and alveolar recruitment during ascent in freely diving sea lions. However, the extent of compression of the tracheobronchial tree on different species is still debated [10,11,18].
Besides airway reinforcement, recent studies on cetaceans have demonstrated the presence of vascular plexuses (mainly venous) along the airways (well extended into the terminal bronchus in deep-diving whales) [4,16,19–22]. It has been hypothesized that engorgement of the plexus during dives would help to reinforce the airways during dives [3,4]. They could also help warm the air, serve as an oxygen store, reduce the internal volume of the airway and prevent extreme intraluminal negative pressures minimizing deformity of the tracheal wall [19–21]. This mechanism could also assure that reduced air volume at great depths is displaced into the sound-producing areas, structures not typically covered with venous plexuses.
2. Present perspective: passive alveolar collapse as the main driving force to minimize nitrogen uptake
In an early study, Scholander [10] argued that passive compression of the highly compliant alveolus and rigid conducting airways would result in cessation of gas exchange, which would prevent N2 uptake and reduce the risk of gas emboli (GE). Until recently, this lung compression/alveolar collapse model has been the main hypothesis as to how marine mammals prevent excessive uptake of N2 and avoid diving-related complications, such as DCS and N2 narcosis. However, it is not known how they prevent excessive N2 uptake during dives shallower than the estimated alveolar collapse depth. In addition, it was proposed that changes in cardiac output (
) would alter N2 exchange [23], and theoretical modelling studies agree that variation on perfusion and blood flow distribution will have a marked effect on blood and tissue N2 levels [11,24–26]. Here, we aim to summarize past studies that have attempted to assess how lung compression and atelectasis alter gas dynamics. From this synthesis, we provide an alternative perspective as to how cetaceans, and possibly other marine mammals, and sea turtles, may manage a pulmonary shunt through alteration in alveolar ventilation (
) and perfusion (
) that allows selective gas exchange during natural dives. This may help explain how stressful disturbances could cause failure of these evolved mechanisms, leading to GE and even DCS.
Research to establish the alveolar collapse depth in cetaceans has been used to predict how these animals avoid DCS, and has been studied in various ways. In the bottlenose dolphin, muscle N2 washout following more than 20 repeated dives to 100 m was used to estimate the alveolar collapse depth at 70 m [27]. A recent analysis of these data provide an alternative conclusion suggesting that the actual alveolar collapse depth is highly variable and is probably considerably deeper [24]. Another study imaged marine mammal cadavers in a fibreglass pressure chamber at different pressures. The lung volumes at different pressures were estimated from three-dimensional reconstruction of the images, allowing the depth of alveolar collapse to be estimated [28]. While it was admitted that post-mortem changes could bias the results, the estimated alveolar collapse depth was deeper when compared with estimates from other investigations [27,29]. Houser et al. [30] measured venous blood N2 levels in bottlenose dolphins during the post-dive period after a series of 10–12 dives to 100 m and did not find any elevation of the blood N2 tension (PN2). These results do not necessarily contradict the findings by Ridgway & Howard [27] as a different compartment was sampled and the dive series was shorter in the more recent study.
The actual degree of pulmonary shunt has been determined for some pinniped species [12], but not in cetaceans. In the harbour seal and California sea lion, the pulmonary shunt at the surface was 8% and 13%, respectively. The shunt progressively increased to 70% at 10 ATA in the seal, and was 57% in the sea lion at 7.8 ATA. Based on these data, complete alveolar collapse was estimated at 170 m for the harbour seal and at 160 m for the sea lion [12]. Further evidence for alveolar collapse and pulmonary shunt has been demonstrated through measurement of arterial O2 tension (PO2) in free-diving California sea lions [17]. During deep dives (300–400 m) the arterial PO2 abruptly declined at approximately 200 m during descent, and increased at the same depth on ascent. A rise in arterial PO2 during ascent associated with an increase in heart rate, most probably reflecting an increase in
, contributed to a second rise in arterial PO2 during the last portion of the dive.
The alveolar collapse depth is affected by the structural properties of the respiratory system, and the ratio between alveolar and airway dead space volume and therefore the diving lung volume [10,11,18]. Deep divers are reported to have comparatively smaller lung volumes when compared with shallow-diving species, which is thought to reduce N2 uptake and the risk for GE [2,5]. Voluntary adjustment of the initial diving lung volume could adjust O2 stores or minimize N2 uptake, and hence the risk of GE [11,17,31]. Individual variation in such adjustments would mean that alveolar collapse depth and thus the potential risk of DCS in case of altered behaviour would change [1]. The degree of pulmonary shunt, through lung compression, probably increases with depth as demonstrated experimentally [12] and predicted theoretically [11,18,32]. Modelling studies have shown how theoretical estimations may provide useful insights into complex physiological systems, where a number of studies with seemingly varying results can be explained on the basis of a unifying theory [10,15,17,27,29,33–35]. However, it is important to realize that results from these theoretical constructs, such as estimating blood and tissue gas distribution during diving, are limited by available information about basic cardiorespiratory physiology (e.g. pulmonary and cardiac shunt fractions, gas diffusion coefficient through alveolar membranes under compression and total inspired air volume before submersion), the structural properties of the various portions of the respiratory system (e.g. respiratory compliance) [35], and the link between ventilation (alveolar ventilation,
) and
in live animals [11,18]. Considering all present knowledge and assuming passive compression of the respiratory system to achieve complete alveolar collapse, complex theoretical lung compression models are still unable to explain how marine mammals avoid the bends [26,36]. The estimated N2 tensions at the end of routine dives in a number of marine vertebrates from the current models suggest that the probability of experiencing severe DCS is 50% or more (figure 1). Thus, these models highlight that (1) the physiological responses during diving are not very well understood and (2) there are likely mechanisms that help reduce these unlikely levels of blood and tissue N2 levels. Based on past studies, and recent work in the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) [40], we propose that a combination of a variety of cardiorespiratory traits permit active control on
matching, allowing selective gas exchange at almost any depth. We will first discuss evidence of GE in marine mammals and then the case of the sea turtle. Finally, we will provide additional data to make a general case as to how volitional
regulation could be a common trait to manage gas exchange in cetaceans in particular, but also as a general mechanism in other breath-hold divers.
Figure 1.
The median N2 saturation/mixed venous inert gas tension (PvN2) pressure (ED50) causing in 50% severe decompression sickness (DCS) in a range of terrestrial mammals following rapid decompression [37,38]. Also included are the estimated end-dive PvN2 for a range of breath-hold divers using present gas dynamics models [11,24–26,39]. Black circles are PvN2 for terrestrial animals. The solid line indicates the best-fit regression logED50 = 0.730–0.205 logMb. Figure reproduced from Hooker et al. [26]. Open and grey symbols are average PvN2 for Blainville's beaked whale, Cuvier's beaked whale and northern bottlenose whale at shallow (greater than 5 m ≤ 50 m), intermediate (greater than 50 m ≤ 200 m) and deep (greater than 200 m) depths [26]. Blue circle is the estimated PvN2 for the king penguin [25], and red is that for the bottlenose dolphin (Fahlman et al. 2018, unpublished observation). Note how estimated PvN2 at the end of each dive are high enough to lead these animals to suffer DCS in 50% of their dives or even more, which implies that some other mechanisms should exist to help minimize N2 uptake.
3. Evidence for gas embolism and decompression sickness in breath-hold divers
Cases of excessive GE associated with lesions have been reported in stranded cetaceans, particularly in beaked whales adjacent to naval exercises where mid-frequency sonar was used [41,42]. Pathologic findings consistent with dysbaric osteonecrosis in sperm whales also raised the question of potential GE [43,44]. How marine mammals manage gas exchange during diving is critical to understand how they avoid diving-related problems such as hypoxia, N2 narcosis and DCS, and this information is vital to understand how anthropogenic disturbances and environmental change will affect breath-hold diving vertebrates and provide important guidance for conservation efforts. Sonar-related mass strandings have increased research efforts looking for evidence of gas bubbles, as well as theoretical modelling of N2 uptake and distribution in an attempt to understand potential risk factors [45]. Recently, a study found two Risso's dolphins with systemic GE most probably caused by intense stress at depth associated with large prey capture causing alteration in diving behaviour and physiology [46]. Interestingly, a similar case of asphyxiation was reported in a dolphin [47], but the paper did not mention whether the necropsy included checking for gas bubbles. However, the author confirmed that no GE was detected (N. Stephens 2018, personal communication). Decompression gas bubbles were also detected in 65% of carcasses of seals and dolphins drowned at depth in gill nets [48,49], and also observed in 55% of bycaught sea turtles entrapped in gill nets or trawlers [50,51]. In marine mammals, these results have been considered evidence of blood N2 supersaturation during dives [48], similar to results observed by Kooyman in his pressure chamber 37 years earlier [2,33]. However, at least in turtles, the situation of entrapment in fishing gear does not necessarily reflect what occurs during a routine dive [51]. Bycaught sea turtles can show signs of DCS after entrapment even at shallower depths, during shorter immersion times and slower ascent rates than the normal limits that could take place during natural dives [50]. Trying to elucidate the potential mechanism, we investigated the functional characteristics of the pulmonary arterial vessels (particularly pulmonary sphincters at the pulmonary arteries), and lung parenchyma that could clarify the pathophysiology of GE in the sea turtle. Our results, and those from our ongoing work on marine mammal lung function, have resulted in a new hypothesis that we believe may explain how marine mammals manage gases during diving, and how failure of this mechanism due to man-made or even some natural disturbances could alter gas exchange and increase the risk of DCS.
4. Sea turtles as an animal model to show how ventilation and perfusion matching can be used to minimize nitrogen uptake in breath-hold divers
In a recent study, it was reported that bycaught loggerhead sea turtles experienced varying degrees of GE after being hauled to the surface [50,51]. In the 2014 study, where DCS was diagnosed by reversal of clinical signs by recompression, it was proposed that the muscular section of the pulmonary artery, the pulmonary sphincter, could play a role in the mechanism of how turtles manage gases. We therefore investigated the vasoactive properties of the arterial vessels (pulmonary and systemic), and the lung parenchyma in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) and also in the red-eared slider fresh water turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans) [40]. During diving there is elevated parasympathetic tone that helps reduce the heart rate. When the arterial vessels and lung parenchyma were exposed to carbachol, a parasympathetic agonist, the tissues contracted in both species (see electronic supplementary material, S1). When the vessels and tissues were exposed to epinephrine (sympathetic response), all vessels contracted in the red-eared slider turtle, but pulmonary arteries and especially at the region of the pulmonary sphincters relaxed in the sea turtle. From these results, we propose that the parasympathetic tone that prevails during diving strongly constricts the pulmonary arterial sphincter, causing a pulmonary shunt that limits pulmonary perfusion and gas exchange. The sphincter relaxes by sympathetic stimulation, which could happen when submerged sea turtles become entrapped in fishing gear at depth and start fighting against the gear [50]. This finding provides a mechanism for how disruption of the normal dive response may increase N2 uptake through increased lung perfusion, resulting in the formation of blood and tissue GE in turtles. Consequently, we hypothesize that the development of GE in this species is caused by failure of the protective physiological mechanism that creates a shunt as the turtle tries to escape from the fishing gear. We propose that a similar mechanism may also exist in cetaceans where stress may cause failure to manage the
mismatch that controls exchange of gases. In contrast with the studies of sonar-exposed cetaceans, bycaught marine mammals [48] or cases of live stranded dolphins [52], bubbles in healthy Tursiops were not detectable on ultrasound in the portal vein of animals trained to do serial dives at 100 m depth during Houser's studies [30], nor in any of the dolphins examined after capture for health exams [53], nor in Steller sea lions trained to perform serial dives to 50 m [52], because in all cases the animals were most probably diving within their physiological range/control. In some pinnipeds such as the elephant seal, the hepatic sinus and caval sphincter may provide a similar mechanism to limit venous return to the right atrium, subsequently restricting pulmonary cardiac output although through a different anatomical structure [54,55].
5. The new hypothesis: possible traits to induce a complete pulmonary functional shunt (full ventilation perfusion mismatch) in cetaceans through differential distribution of alveolar collapse and precise control of cardiac output
The present knowledge of physiological and anatomical adaptations in cetaceans includes the following factors: (1) volitional control and extreme flexibility of
(heart rate and stroke volume) [56–59]; (2) highly compliant lung parenchyma in association with collateral ventilation allowing air to escape from alveoli to alveoli to uppermost areas, creating a differential parenchymal collapse at depth as evidenced by CT images of seal and dolphin specimens in a hyperbaric chamber (figure 2); (3) the presence of reinforced airways favouring parenchymal collapse and air accumulation in respiratory dead space [1]; (4) the absence of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction response in studied marine mammals [60]; (5) the presence of myoelastic sphincters located between the exchange and non-exchange portions of the respiratory tract and/or the presence of parenchymal/pleural smooth muscular bundles/cells [2,3,16,61]; and (6) evidence of intrapulmonary arteriovenous shunts/anastomoses in some deep-diving species [3]. Based on these factors, we hypothesize that cetaceans may be able to create a full respiratory shunt even at shallow depths not fully dependent on hydrostatic compression.
Figure 2.

Computed tomographic image of (a) pig, (b) grey seal and (c) common dolphin pressurized in a hyperbaric chamber at 4–4.5 ATA. Note the difference of pulmonary gas distribution and location in terrestrial versus marine species. In the seal and dolphin, air predominates at the upper portion of the lung in the uppermost side of the body. In the pig, it remains uniformly distributed despite being under similar pressure and axial rotation. Data published here generated during the Moore et al. [28] study. Image slices are selected to show the anatomy at the mid-thoracic level behind tracheal bifurcation and all include the heart.
Trans-alveolar–septal pulmonary venous–arterial anastomoses have been described in several cetaceans at the level of the alveoli [3,62], and a similar structure is also present in Baird's beaked whales, where an arterialvenous plexus is referenced in the interlobular stroma around the alveoli [16], although clear anatomical or histological description or evidence of real direct shunting capability have never been demonstrated. In any case, based on the previous mechanisms described, direct arterialvenous anastomosis would not be needed to create an extreme VA/
mismatch in the lung. Ventilated areas would be towards the region closest to the surface (lowest pressure), which would receive minimal perfusion due to the effect of gravity and higher vascular resistance due to distended alveoli. Blood flow would be favoured to non-ventilated areas (atelectasic) regions where the vascular resistance would be minimal due to lack of capillary stretching induced by alveolar distension and the hypoxic vasodilation [60].
Avoidance of direct pulmonary arteriovenous shunts and operating with a functional bypass could be a wise alternative for diving species that could be at risk of bubble formation in the blood. In fact intra-cardiac communications or arteriovenous shunting of lung circulation has been directly associated with increased risk of suffering DCS after diving due to elimination of the bubble-filtering capability of the human lung [63].
Extremely high collateral ventilation has been measured in excised lungs of two different cetacean species, (a white-sided dolphin and a pilot whale) [1,64], as well as in vivo in a bottlenose dolphin using a Chartis System (PulmonX Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) through bronchoscopy (figure 3). The lack of lung lobulation in cetaceans would minimize air trapping and facilitate separation of a ventilated (upper region) and non-ventilated (lower region) region that would be differentially perfused [1]. Such dramatic separation of a recruited and collapsed region is apparent during hyperbaric CT studies in the compressed lung of both pinnipeds and cetaceans, but not in a terrestrial mammal model (pig) (figure 2).
Figure 3.
The Chartis System (PulmonX Inc.) is a medical tool to assess the level of collateral ventilation in human patients. By bronchoscopically occluding a conducting airway, and only allowing one-way flow out of the section of the lung that has been occluded, the level of collateral ventilation can be assessed. The orange pattern shows the expired flow (ml min−1) out of the occluded region. (a) In a human lung with collateral ventilation, there should be some level of flow through that section of the lung. (b) In a human lung without collateral ventilation, there is a decrease in the flow with each breath as the lung section collapses. In humans, flow is generally approximately 600–1000 ml min−1 for collateral ventilation, but in the dolphin (c) the collateral ventilation was greater than the machine could measure. The continuous flow out of the occluded region without any evident progressive decline indicated a high level of collateral ventilation. The blue pattern shows the negative intrapleural pressure (cmH2O) during each breath and indicates the quality of the occlusion by the balloon (reproduced from fig. 1a,b of Shah & Herth [65]).
A functional shunt provides a possibility to selectively manage
by varying
. Limited perfusion of the uppermost ventilated areas of the lung could occur at depth by an increase of
. This mechanism would allow exchange of O2 and CO2 with minimal exchange of N2 provided the
ratio is kept elevated [66]. This selective exchange of different gas species is caused by differences in gas solubility, which alters whether a gas is perfusion or diffusion limited. For example, a high
would favour O2 and CO2 exchange, while reducing, or possibly even reversing N2 exchange (figure 4). In the erect human, the effect of gravity has shown to result in a
mismatch, which results in preferential gas exchange for O2 and CO2 in regions where
is high and for N2 in regions where
is low [68]. In cetaceans, enhanced collateral ventilation would cause pulmonary gas to remain in the upper portions of the lung (figure 2), and a hypoxia-induced vasodilatation of the lower compressed/collapsed regions and effect of gravity would create two distinct\regions of either high or low
(see electronic supplementary material, S2). Consequently, cetaceans at depth may have the ability to alter the
ratio to reduce inert gas uptake while still exchanging some O2 and CO2 (figure 4) [66–68]. This mechanism may help explain why cetaceans alter heart rate and lung perfusion at depth, in order to access pulmonary O2 during prolonged dives or increased exercise demands [69–71], with minimal uptake of N2. In some cases, these periods of elevated cardiac frequency have been referred to as cardiac arrhythmias [70]. In fact the elevation of heart rate is commonly observed from the beginning of the ascent phase in studied marine mammals [8,33,56,70–72]. In this context, the myoelastic pulmonary sphincters observed in cetaceans may help to retain the air in the conducting airways which limits alveolar recruitment during ascent, especially in the lower parts of the lung, thereby maintaining the
ratio to prevent N2 uptake during ascent. Recruitment could then occur more gradually through collateral ventilation from uppermost, highly ventilated/poorly perfused areas (alveolar dead space) progressively into lower areas with re-expansion. Increased systemic perfusion during ascent would also serve to distribute any dissolved N2 over a greater body volume to reduce the risk of supersaturation. Closer to the surface, the myoelastic sphincters would open, causing full alveolar recruitment through the tracheobronchial tree with a simultaneous increase of
towards increasing
and
matching, maximizing gas exchange.
Figure 4.
Variation in
changes the relative alveolar (PA) and end-capillary pulmonary venous (PV) tension for each gas. Thus, PA × PV−1 represents the level of exchange, with 1 being perfect matching and 0 being no gas exchange (i.e. full pulmonary shunt). Reproduced from Farhi [67] and modified by the authors. Note how O2 and CO2 exchange is favoured in areas of high
ratios, while N2 is exchanged in regions with lower
. Thus, matching
would allow O2 and CO2 exchange with minimal or no N2 exchange.
This mechanism would also explain the presence of GE in stranded/bycaught cetaceans. Any disruption leading to abnormally high
through non-collapsed regions (e.g. through prolonged elevation of sympathetic tone and a cessation of diving bradycardia and increase of
) could lead to an increased N2 uptake at depth, resulting in bubble formation and DCS during or after ascent (depending on the amount of gas dissolved), similar to that described for sea turtles. While both
and
are essential for gas exchange, their relative importance for a certain gas varies with the
ratio. In terrestrial mammals
is in fact one of the most relevant factors when predicting DCS risk [37], but in marine mammals the interaction between
and
and variation in the
ratios may be critical. This could be an additional reason for why heart rate and
seem to be under volitional control in these species [56–58].
In the case of beaked whales exposed to sonar, a highly evasive species that appear to dive at the very limit of a breath-hold diver (and so, being even more sensitive to acoustic stress compared to other marine mammal species), a strong evasive response may result in increased activity, resulting in hypercapnia and elevated lung perfusion. Both increased
and elevated CO2 have been suggested to increase the risk of GE [37,73–76]. In addition, increased stress may result in failure of normal physiological mechanisms that help reduce gas exchange similar to that proposed in the pulmonary arterial system in sea turtles [50]. Variation in dive behaviour has already been considered as a possible cause for the stranding in these species [77]. In a more recent study, the physiological aspects were considered, and the study concluded that changes in dive behaviour and physiology were the most probably reasons for GE and sonar-associated mass strandings [45]. In summary, gas bubble formation, hypoxia, acidosis and arrhythmias (especially those leading to an increase of cardiac output) were considered to result from extended dive duration and time at depth, changes in ascent or descent rates, or increased duration of surface intervals. We consider that even a strong evasive response, resulting in elevated activity, could lead to significant hypercapnia and increased lung perfusion even through ventilated areas. This would reduce the
ratio at this level, resulting in increased N2 uptake. Increased PCO2 and PN2 may both increase the risk of GE and DCS symptoms. Indeed, bycaught cetaceans and seals were shown to have elevated PCO2 and PN2 [49].
While the evidence for the proposed mechanism is from a range of species, it has been used to propose how cetaceans manage pulmonary ventilation–perfusion to regulate pulmonary exchange of gases. A similar mechanism may be present in other diving animals, and the general mechanism would be that passive lung collapse is not required to avoid N2 uptake. If the lung is ventilated but not perfused, there will not be any gas exchange. Consequently, the ventilation–perfusion matching (distribution) is the critical component in our proposed mechanism, while the total volume of air in the alveolar space or the total volume of blood reaching the lung is less important. For example, diving sea turtles appear to use a specific mechanism which includes a muscular sphincter that regulates pulmonary blood flow [40], and birds may use different anatomical or functional mechanisms to manage the ventilation–perfusion to avoid DCS.
Most recent physiological work has been focused on the potential for N2 supersaturation, and how changes in dive behaviour could lead to bubble formation and increased risk of DCS. Alternative routes for inducing pulmonary shunt at a shallower depth should be considered for cetaceans, requiring future work to fully understand how these animals dive to such great depths and why they occasionally can suffer from GE whenever their anatomical, physiological and behavioural compensatory mechanisms are disrupted. In vitro studies measuring the response in live tissues, improved anatomical details, development of novel biologging capacities for obtaining measurements on free-ranging animals and medical imaging studies using trained animals under voluntary control will provide exciting avenues to investigate the cardiopulmonary adaptations hypothesized in the current perspective.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all collaborators who have enabled us to perform some of the studies used as references in this review, to the colleagues who have commented on numerous discussions of these ideas, and to the many people we have had the pleasure and opportunity to work with throughout the years.
Data accessibility
This article has no additional data.
Authors' contributions
D.G.P., M.M. and A.F. contributed equally to the development of the ideas of this paper.
Competing interests
We have no competing interests.
Funding
Funding to support a portion of this work was obtained by the Fundación Oceanogràfic and by the Office of Naval Research (ONR YIP Award no. N000141410563 and Award no. N000140811220).
References
- 1.Fahlman A, Moore MJ, Garcia-Parraga D. 2017. Respiratory function and mechanics in pinnipeds and cetaceans. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 1761–1763. ( 10.1242/jeb.126870) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kooyman GL. 1973. Respiratory adaptations in marine mammals. Am. Zool. 13, 457–468. ( 10.1093/icb/13.2.457) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Piscitelli MA, Raverty SA, Lillie MA, Shadwick RE. 2013. A review of cetacean lung morphology and mechanics. J. Morphol. 274, 1425–1440. ( 10.1002/jmor.20192) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Leith DE. 1989. Adaptations to deep breath-hold diving: respiratory and circulatory mechanics. Undersea. Hyperbar. Med. 16, 345–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kooyman GL. 1989. Diverse divers: physiology and behavior. Berlin, Germany: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pabst DA, McLellan WA, Rommel SA. 2016. How to build a deep diver: the extreme morphology of mesoplodonts. Integr. Comp. Biol. 56, 1337–1348. ( 10.1093/icb/icw126) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ponganis PJ. 2011. Diving mammals. Comp. Physiol. 1, 517–535. ( 10.1002/cphy.c091003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ponganis PJ. 2015. Diving physiology of marine mammals and seabirds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Piscitelli MA, McLellan WA, Rommel SA, Blum JE, Barco SG, Pabst DA. 2010. Lung size and thoracic morphology in shallow- and deep-diving cetaceans. J. Morphol. 271, 654–673. ( 10.1002/jmor.10823) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scholander PF. 1940. Experimental investigations on the respiratory function in diving mammals and birds. Hvalrådets Skrifter 22, 1–131. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fahlman A, Hooker SK, Olszowka A, Bostrom BL, Jones DR. 2009. Estimating the effect of lung collapse and pulmonary shunt on gas exchange during breath-hold diving: the Scholander and Kooyman legacy Resp . Physiol. Neurobiol. 165, 28–39. ( 10.1016/j.resp.2008.09.013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kooyman GL, Sinnett EE. 1982. Pulmonary shunts in Harbor seals and sea lions during simulated dives to depth. Physiol. Zool. 55, 105–111. ( 10.1086/physzool.55.1.30158447) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ridgway SH, Harrison RJ. 1986. Diving dolphins. In Research on dolphins (eds Bryden MM, Harrison RH), pp. 33–58. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kooyman GL, Hammond DD, Schroede JP. 1970. Bronchograms and tracheograms of seals under pressure. Science 169, 82–84. ( 10.1126/science.169.3940.82) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ridgway SH, Scronce BL, Kanwisher JW. 1969. Respiration and deep diving in the bottlenose porpoise. Science 166, 1651–1654. ( 10.1126/science.166.3913.1651) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ninomiya H, Inomata T, Shirouzu H, Katsumata E. 2005. Microanatomy of the terminal air spaces in Baird's beaked whale (Berardius bairdii) lungs. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 67, 473–479. ( 10.1292/jvms.67.473) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McDonald BI, Ponganis PJ. 2012. Lung collapse in the diving sea lion: hold the nitrogen and save the oxygen. Biol. Lett. 8, 1047–1049. ( 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0743) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bostrom BL, Fahlman A, Jones DR. 2008. Tracheal compression delays alveolar collapse during deep diving in marine mammals. Resp. Physiol. Neurobiol. 161, 298–305. ( 10.1016/j.resp.2008.03.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bagnoli P, Cozzi B, Zaffora A, Acocella F, Fumero R, Costantino ML. 2011. Experimantal and computational biomechanical characterization of the tracheo-bronchial tree of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). J. Biomech. 44, 1040–1045. ( 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Costidis AM. 2012. The morphology of the venous system in the head and neck of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris). PhD thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cozzi B, Bagnoli P, Acocella F, Constantino ML. 2005. Structure and biomechanical properties of the trachea of the striped dolphin Stenella coeruleoalba: evidence for evolutionary adaptations to diving. Anat. Rec. A. 284A, 500–510. ( 10.1002/ar.a.20182) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Costidis AM, Rommel SA. 2016. The extracranial venous system in the heads of beaked whales, with implications on diving physiology and pathogenesis. J. Morphol. 277, 34–64. ( 10.1002/jmor.20437) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ponganis PJ, Kooyman GL, Van Dam R, Le Maho Y. 1999. Physiological responses of king penguins during simulated diving to 136 m depth. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 2819–2822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fahlman A, Olszowka A, Bostrom B, Jones DR. 2006. Deep diving mammals: dive behavior and circulatory adjustments contribute to bends avoidance. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 153, 66–77. ( 10.1016/j.resp.2005.09.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fahlman A, Schmidt A, Jones DR, Bostrom BL, Handrich Y. 2007. To what extent does N2 limit dive performance in king penguins? J. Exp. Biol. 210, 3344–3355. ( 10.1242/jeb.008730) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hooker SK, Baird RW, Fahlman A. 2009. Could beaked whales get the bends? Effect of diving behaviour and physiology on modelled gas exchange for three species: Ziphius cavirostris, Mesoplodon densirostris and Hyperoodon ampullatus. Resp. Physiol. Neurobiol. 167, 235–246. ( 10.1016/j.resp.2009.04.023) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ridgway SH, Howard R. 1979. Dolphin lung collapse and intramuscular circulation during free diving: evidence from nitrogen washout. Science 206, 1182–1183. ( 10.1126/science.505001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moore MJ, Hammar T, Arruda J, Cramer S, Dennison S, Montie E, Fahlman A. 2011. Hyperbaric computed tomographic measurement of lung compression in seals and dolphins. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 2390–2397. ( 10.1242/jeb.055020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Falke KJ, Hill RD, Qvist J, Schneider RC, Guppy M, Liggins GC, Hochachka PW, Elliot RE, Zapol WM. 1985. Seal lung collapse during free diving: evidence from arterial nitrogen tensions. Science 229, 556–557. ( 10.1126/science.4023700) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Houser DS, Dankiewicz-Talmadge LA, Stockard TK, Ponganis PJ. 2010. Investigation of the potential for vascular bubble formation in a repetitively diving dolphin. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 52–62. ( 10.1242/jeb.028365) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hooker SK, Miller P, Johnson MP, Cox OP, Boyd IL. 2005. Ascent exhalations of Antarctic fur seals: a behavioural adaptation for breath-hold diving? Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 355–363. ( 10.1098/rspb.2004.2964) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fahlman A, et al. 2006. Accounting for body condition improves allometric estimates of resting metabolic rates in fasting king penguins, Aptenodytes patagonicus. Polar Biol. 29, 609–614. ( 10.1007/s00300-005-0096-z) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kooyman GL, Schroeder JP, Denison DM, Hammond DD, Wright JJ, Bergman WP. 1972. Blood nitrogen tensions of seals during simulated deep dives. Am. J. Physiol. 223, 1016–1020. ( 10.1152/ajplegacy.1972.223.5.1016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hooker SK, Fahlman A. 2015. Pressure regulation. In Marine mammal physiology: requisites for ocean living (eds Castellini M, Mellish J), pp. 69–92. Baco Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hodanbosi M, Sterba-Boatwright B, Fahlman A. 2016. Updating a gas dynamics model using estimates for California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). Resp. Physiol. Neurobiol. 234, 1–8. ( 10.1016/j.resp.2016.08.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zimmer WMX, Tyack PL. 2007. Repetitive shallow dives pose decompression risk in deep-diving beaked whales. Mar. Mam. Sci. 23, 888–925. ( 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00152.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fahlman A. 2017. Allometric scaling of decompression sickness risk in terrestrial mammals; cardiac output explains risk of decompression sickness. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9. ( 10.1038/srep40918) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Berghage TE, David TD, Dyson CV. 1979. Species differences in decompression. Undersea. Biomed. Res. 6, 1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kvadsheim PH, Miller PJO, Tyack PL, Sivle LLD, Lam F-PA, Fahlman A. 2012. Estimated tissue and blood N2 levels and risk of in vivo bubble formation in deep-, intermediate- and shallow-diving toothed whales during exposure to naval sonar. Front. Physiol. 3, 1–14. ( 10.3389/fphys.2012.00125) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.García-Párraga D, Lorenzo T, Ortiz J-L, Ortega J, Crespo-Picazo J-L, Cortijo J, Fahlman A. Submitted. Deciphering function of the pulmonary arterial sphincters in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). J. Exp. Biol. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fernandez A, Edwards JF, Rodruiquez F, de los Monteros AE, Herraez MP, Castro P, Jaber JR, Martin V, Arbelo M. 2005. ‘Gas and fat embolic syndrome’ involving a mass stranding of beaked whales (Family Ziphiidae) exposed to anthropogenic sonar signals. Vet. Pathol. 42, 446–457. ( 10.1354/vp.42-4-446) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jepson PD, et al. 2003. Gas-bubble lesions in stranded cetaceans. Nature 425, 575–576. ( 10.1038/nature02528,2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Moore MJ, Early GA. 2004. Cumulative sperm whale bone damage and the bends. Science 306, 2215 ( 10.1126/science.1105452) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rothschild BM. 2005. What causes lesions in sperm whale bones? Science 308, 631–632. ( 10.1126/science.308.5722.631c) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hooker SK, et al. 2012. Deadly diving? Physiological and behavioural management of decompression stress in diving mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 1041–1050. ( 10.1098/rspb.2011.2088) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fernández A, Sierra E, Díaz-Delgado J, Sacchini S, Sánchez-Paz Y, Suárez-Santana C, Arregui M, Arbelo M, Bernaldo de Quirós Y. 2017. Deadly acute decompression sickness in Risso's dolphins. Sci. Rep. 7, 13621 ( 10.1038/s41598-017-14038-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stephens N, Duignan P, Symons J, Holyoake C, Bejder L, Warren K. 2017. Death by octopus (Macroctopus maorum): laryngeal luxation and asphyxiation in an Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus). Mar. Mam. Sci. 33, 1204–1213. ( 10.1111/mms.12420) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Moore MJ, Bogomolni AL, Dennison SE, Early G, Garner MM, Hayward BA, Lentell BJ, Rotstein DS. 2009. Gas bubbles in seals, dolphins, and porpoises entangled and drowned at depth in gillnets. Vet. Pathol. 46, 536–547. ( 10.1354/vp.08-VP-0065-M-FL) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.de Quirós YB, Seewald JS, Sylva SP, Greer B, Niemeyer M, Bogomolni AL, Moore MJ. 2013. Compositional discrimination of decompression and decomposition gas bubbles in bycaught seals and dolphins. PLoS ONE 8, e83994 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0083994) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.García-Párraga D, et al. 2014. Decompression sickness (the bends) in Sea Turtles. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 111, 191–205. ( 10.3354/dao02790) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fahlman A, Crespo Picazo J-L, Sterba-Boatwright B, Stacy BA, Garcia-Parraga D. 2017. Defining risk variables causing gas embolism in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) caught in trawls and gillnets. Sci. Rep. 7, 2739 ( 10.1038/s41598-017-02819-5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dennison S, Fahlman A, Moore MJ. 2012. The use of diagnostic imaging for identifying abnormal gas accumulations in cetaceans and pinnipeds. Front. Physiol. 3, 1–8. ( 10.3389/fphys.2012.00181) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dennison S, et al. 2012. Bubbles in live-stranded dolphins. Proc. R. Soc. B 79, 1396–1404. ( 10.1098/rspb.2011.1754) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Thornton SJ, Spielman DM, Pelc NJ, Block WF, Crocker DE, Costa DP, LeBoeuf BJ, Hochachka PW. 2001. Effects of forced diving on the spleen and hepatic sinus in northern elephant seal pups. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9413–9418. ( 10.1073/pnas.151192098) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Meir JU, Champagne CD, Costa DP, Williams CL, Ponganis PJ. 2009. Extreme hypoxemic tolerance and blood oxygen depletion in diving elephant seals. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 297, R927–R939. ( 10.1152/ajpregu.00247.2009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Elsner RW, Franklin DL, Van Critters RL. 1964. Cardiac output during diving in an unrestrained sea lion. Nature 202, 809–810. ( 10.1038/202809a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Elmegaard SL, Johnson M, Madsen PT, McDonald BI. 2016. Cognitive control of heart rate in diving harbor porpoises. Curr. Biol. 26, R1167–R1176. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Miedler S, Fahlman A, Valls Torres M, Álvaro Álvarez T, Garcia-Parraga D. 2015. Evaluating cardiac physiology through echocardiography in bottlenose dolphins: using stroke volume and cardiac output to estimate systolic left ventricular function during rest and following exercise. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 3604–3610. ( 10.1242/jeb.131532) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.McDonald BI, Johnson M, Madsen PT. 2018. Dive heart rate in harbour porpoises is influenced by exercise and expectations. J. Exp. Biol. 221, 168740 ( 10.1242/jeb.168740) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Olson KR, Whitfield NL, Bearden SE, St. Leger J, Nilson E, Gao Y, Madden JA. 2010. Hypoxic pulmonary vasodilation: a paradigm shift with a hydrogen sulfide mechanism. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 298, R51–R60. ( 10.1152/ajpregu.00576.2009) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ridgway SH. 1972. Homeostasis in the Aquatic Environment. In Mammals of the sea: biology and medicine (ed. SH Ridgway.), pp. 590–748. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fanning JC, Harrison RJ. 1974. The structure of the trachea and lungs of the South Australian bottle-nose dolphin. In Functional anatomy of marine mammals (ed. Harrison RJ.), pp. 231–252. London, UK: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Vann RD, Butler FK, Mitchell SJ, Moon RE. 2011. Decompression illness. Lancet 377, 153–164. ( 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61085-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Fahlman A, et al. 2011. Static inflation and deflation pressure-volume curves from excised lungs of marine mammals. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 3822–3828. ( 10.1242/jeb.056366) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shah PL, Herth FJF. 2014. Dynamic expiratory airway collapse and evaluation of collateral ventilation with Chartis. Thorax 69, 290–291. ( 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204875) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Farhi LE, Yokoyama T. 1967. Effects of ventilation-perfusion inequality on elimination of inert gases. Resp. Physiol. 3, 12–20. ( 10.1016/0034-5687(67)90019-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Farhi LE. 1967. Elimination of inert gas by the lung. Resp. Physiol. 3, 1–11. ( 10.1016/0034-5687(67)90018-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.West JB. 1962. Regional differences in gas exchange in the lung of erect man. J. Appl. Physiol. 17, 893–898. ( 10.1152/jappl.1962.17.6.893) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Guyton GP, Stanek KS, Schneider RC, Hochachka PW, Hurford WE, Zapol DG, Liggins GC, Zapol WM. 1995. Myoglobin saturation in free-diving Weddell seals. J. Appl. Physiol. 79, 1148–1155. ( 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.4.1148) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Williams TM, et al. 2015. Exercise at depth alters bradycardia and incidence of cardiac anomalies in deep-diving marine mammals. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–9. ( 10.1038/ncomms7055) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ponganis PJ, McDonald BI, Tift MS, Williams CL. 2017. Heart rate regulation in diving sea lions: the vagus nerve rules. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 1372–1381. ( 10.1242/jeb.146779) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Williams TM, Blackwell SB, Richter B, Sinding M-HS, Heide-Jørgensen MP. 2017. Paradoxical escape responses by narwhals (Monodon monoceros). Science 358, 1328–1331. ( 10.1126/science.aao2740) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bernaldo de Quirós Y, Gonzales-Diaz O, Arbelo M, Sierra E, Sacchini S, Fernández A. 2012. Decompression versus decomposition: distribution, quantity and gas composition of bubbles in stranded marine mammals. Front. Physiol. 3, 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Behnke AR. 1951. Decompression sickness following exposure to high pressures. In Decompression sickness (ed. Fulton JF.), pp. 53–89. Philadephia, PA: Saunders. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Harris M, Berg WE, Whitaker DM, Twitty VC, Blinks LR. 1945. Carbondioxide as a facilitating agent in the initiation and growth of bubbles in animals decompressed to simulated altitudes. J. Gen. Physiol. 28, 225–240. ( 10.1085/jgp.28.3.225) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Harvey EN. 1945. Decompression sickness and bubble formation in blood and tissues. Bull. NewYork Acad. Med. 21, 505–536. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Cox TM, et al. 2006. Understanding the impacts of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 7, 177–187. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
This article has no additional data.



