Abstract
This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of infusing milk precursors into the external pudic artery on rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows. Eight multiparous Holstein cows were randomly assigned to Group A (experimental group) and Group B (control group) with 4 cows each. A 2 × 4 complex factor crossover design was used. Cows in Group A were fed corn straw as the only roughage, and cows in Group B were fed mixed roughage. The experiment was divided into two periods. In the first period, cows in Group A, received treatments: 1) a basal infusate as a control (CSC); 2) a milk fat precursor infusion including C16:0, C18:0, C18:1c9, C18:2c6, C18:3n3, acetic acid (CSF); 3) a milk protein precursor infusion including 16 amino acids (CSA); 4) the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors (CSFA). And meanwhile, cows in Group B were infused the basal infusate as a control group. In the second period, the cows in both Groups A and B were crossed over, which cows in Group A were named as Group B and the cows originally in Group B were in Group A. The experimental results showed that cows in experimental group had higher ruminal pH compared with the control, and ruminal pH in CSC, CSF, CSA were significantly higher than those in their respective control group (P < 0.05). The concentration of ammonia nitrogen (NH3–N) was significantly higher in CSA and CSFA compared with Group B (P < 0.05). We also observed that the infusion of mixed amino acids significantly increased the bacterial protein (BCP) content in rumen (P < 0.05) and influenced the rumen acetic acid concentration as well as the acetic to propionic ratio (P < 0.05). Milk fat precursors infusion significantly affected butyric acid concentration (P < 0.05). In addition, the content of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in CSA was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). It is concluded that the milk precursors infused into external pudic artery caused feedback effects on ruminal fermentation under the corn straw roughage conditions. The milk protein precursor increased the ruminal pH, the contents of BCP and acetic acid, which adjust rumen fermentation and improve milk performance.
Keywords: External pudic artery, Infusion, Milk component precursors, Rumen fermentation, Lactation dairy cows, Forage
1. Introduction
Currently, most small-scale dairy farms in China use “corn straw plus concentrate” as a ration. The result is low milk production, poor milk quality and prevalence of disease, resulting in low production efficiency. Rumen fermentation is associated with lactation performance as most of the milk precursors are derived from rumen fermentation products. Some studies proposed that supplementation with amino acids (AA) improved the yield, growth rate and synthesis efficiency of ruminal microbes in dairy cows, when the animals received sufficient carbohydrates. Meantime, fatty acids (FA) are also important for regulating rumen fermentation. For instance, the presence of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in the rumen is known to inhibit ruminal microbial activity and fermentation (Yang et al., 2009) and decrease fiber digestion. Fisher (1972) infused different quantities of methionine, histidine or lysine intravenously into lactating cows' vein, which changed feed intake and milk yield at different levels. Volatile fatty acids (VFA) and caseinate infused into the duodenum had little effect on milk composition, but increased milk yield and protein (Hurtaud et al., 1993). In contrast, histidine infused into the abomasum did not affect dry matter intake of grass silage, rumen fermentation or diet digestibility (Vanhatalo et al., 1999). Free long-chain FA infused into the abomasum of lactating dairy cows affected feed intake, reduced production and changed the composition of milk, nutrient digestibility, and metabolites in blood (Drackley et al., 1992). However, hemoperfusion with milk precursors is relatively infrequent in the research of lactating cow nutrition. The aim of this research was to further study the effects of rumen fermentation in lactating cows with external pudic artery infusion of milk composition precursors, and to provide the basis for the relationship between breast intake and rumen fermentation.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Experiment design
A 2 × 4 crossover design was used and eight cows were randomly divided into Groups A and B with 4 cows in each group. The experiment was divided into 2 periods. The first period consisted of a 14-d preliminary period followed by a 3-d adaptation period and a 9-d infusion period. The second period included a 7-d layoff period, a 3-d adaptation period and a 9-d infusion period. In the first period, cows of Group A, as the experimental group, received treatments: 1) a basal infusate as a control (CSC); 2) milk fat precursor infusion (CSF); 3) milk protein precursor infusion (CSA); 4) the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors (CSFA). And meanwhile, cows of Group B were infused the basal infusate as the control group. In the second period, the cows of Groups A and B were crossed-over. The order of infusion was the same as the first period. The experimental design is given in Table 1.
Table 1.
Item | Animal group | Forage | Preliminary period (14 d) | Adaptation period (3 d) | Infusion period |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 d | 3 d | 3 d | |||||
The first period | |||||||
Experimental group | A | CS | – | C | CSF | CSA | CSFA |
Control group | B | MF | – | C | C | C | C |
The second period | |||||||
Experimental group | B | CS | – | C | CSF | CSA | CSFA |
Control group | A | MF | – | C | C | C | C |
CS = corn straw; MF = mixed forage; C = carrier infusion; CSF = milk fat precursor infusion; CSA = milk protein precursor infusion; CSFA = the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors.
2.2. Experimental animals and feeding management
The experiment was conducted at Bing Zhou Hai Dairy Company in Hohhot in September 2013. Eight multiparous Chinese Holstein cows in mid-lactation with an average milk yield of 25 ± 3 kg and similar body weight were used. The cows were fed total mixed ration (TMR) twice daily at 06:00 and 18:00 and free drinking. Cows were milked at the time of ingestion and milk production was recorded at each milking. The intra-arterial cannula was fitted on external pudic artery at 1 wk before infusion period.
2.3. Experimental diet
The diets of experimental and control groups were corn straw (CS) and mixed forage (MF), respectively. The diet of corn straw had single corn straw and concentrate whereas the diet of the mixed forage was constituted with alfalfa, Chinese wildrye, whole corn silage and concentrate. The dietary concentrate to roughage ratio was 45:55. The composition and nutrient levels of diets are given in Table 2.
Table 2.
Item | Experimental group | Control group |
---|---|---|
Ingredient, % of DM | ||
Chinese wildrye | 3.70 | |
Whole corn silage | 26.70 | |
Imported alfalfa | 23.40 | |
Corn straw | 53.80 | |
Corn | 24.60 | 24.60 |
Soybean meal | 14.80 | 14.80 |
Whole cottonseed | 5.10 | 5.10 |
CaHPO4 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
NaCl | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Dairy premix1 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Nutrient levels, % | ||
CP | 13.61 | 18.14 |
EE | 2.84 | 3.97 |
NDF | 44.30 | 32.30 |
ADF | 29.10 | 21.30 |
Starch | 15.32 | 21.50 |
NEL, MJ/kg | 1.04 | 1.57 |
CP = crude protein; EE = ether extract; NDF = neutral detergent fiber; ADF = acid detergent fiber; NEL = net energy for lactating.
The premix provided per kg of diets:VA > 700,000 UI, VD3 > 120,000 UI, VE > 2,100 mg, Fe 1,750 mg, Cu 1,600 mg, Zn 10,000 mg, Mn 3,500 mg, Se 42 mg, I 84 mg, Co 42 mg.
2.4. Infusate preparation
The dosage of FA and AA infusate was the FA and AA intake of control group minus the intake of experimental group. Each cow received 2 L of infusate over 6 h daily after morning feeding.
Emulsions were prepared according to the methods of Stamey Lanier et al. (2013). The infusate of AA as well as the mixed infusate of milk fat and protein precursors were prepared using the method of Shi (2012). Soy lecithin was used as a sham infusate for the control group in the adaptation period and infusion period.
Soy lecithin was added to saline solution as a carrier and was heated to approximately 70°C. Different FA were then added to the solution and stirred homogeneously by an immersion blender (model EUROSTAR 60, IKA, Germany). Subsequently, the coarse emulsions were homogenized into stable emulsions with a homogenizer (model SRH 60–70, Shanghai Samro Homogenizer Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) 3 times at 17.2 MPa at the first stage and 3.5 MPa at the second stage. The emulsions were autoclaved for 10 min at 121°C and finally the solution was sealed for storage.
Different AA was added to the distilled water heated to 90°C and the mixture was blended with soy lecithin solution. The mixture was then passed twice through the homogenizer at the same stage. The methods of high pressure sterilization and storage are the same as before.
The mixed infusate had half volumes of milk fat and protein precursors following the same methods.
The infusate was continuously pumped into the external pudic artery by using peristaltic pumps (model BT100-1L, Longer Pump Co. Ltd., Baoding, China). The actual amounts of infusion were recorded each day. The placement of the infusion line was checked daily before infusion to ensure that there was no leakage.
The composition of infusate is given in Table 3.
Table 3.
Carrier | Content, g/L | Fatty acids infusate | Content, % | Amino acids infusate | Content, g/d·cow |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Soy lecithin | 6 | C16:0 | 6.50 | Asp | 0.46 |
C18:0 | 3.34 | Gly | 11.09 | ||
C18:1c9 | 7.74 | Ser | 8.94 | ||
C18:2c6 | 46.44 | Ala | 17.52 | ||
C18:3n3 | 5.57 | Cys | 2.12 | ||
Acetic acid | 30.21 | Val | 27.06 | ||
Met | 1.97 | ||||
Thr | 18.50 | ||||
Lys | 9.49 | ||||
His | 5.22 | ||||
Arg | 5.57 | ||||
Tyr | 3.68 | ||||
Glu | 16.97 | ||||
Ile | 8.42 | ||||
Leu | 9.64 | ||||
Phe | 4.73 |
2.5. Sampling and pretreatment
Rumen fluid samples were collected using the oral cavity collector at 1200 post-feeding on the last day of each infusion period from each cow. Rumen fluid was transferred into the centrifuge tube together with the enzyme for detecting lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in a germ-free environment. Rumen fluid was strained through 4 layers of Dacron mesh and pH of the filtrate was determined by a portable pH temperature meter (model P4-036, Yueqing Dacang Electronics Co. Ltd.). Ten milliliters of filtrate were centrifuged at 12,000 × g and 4°C for 10 min. A 0.5 mL supernatant was added into 9.5 mL of 0.2 N hydrochloric acid (HCl) for NH3–N and another 4 mL supernatant were added to 1 mL of metaphosphoric acid (25%) for VFA measurement. The rest of the supernatant was stored at −20°C for determining bacterial protein (BCP).
2.6. Laboratory analyses
Rumen pH of the filtrate was determined using a portable pH temperature meter. Ammonia nitrogen was measured using theindophenol blue colorimetric method as described by Wang (2011). Bacterial protein was determined using the Coomassie brilliant blue method (Cone et al., 1997). The VFA contents of rumen fluid samples were quantified using a gas chromatographic method (Filípek and Rudolf, 2009). Then Limulus reagent dynamic development process used to determine the LPS and pretreatment employed the method described by Gozho et al. (2005).
2.7. Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS 9.1(SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results are reported as least square means ± standard errors of the mean. Significance was declared at P < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. The effects of infusion of different milk composition precursors on rumen fermentation
The pH value was found to be in the normal range (Table 4). The pH in CSC, CSF and CSA of experimental group were significantly different compared with controls (P < 0.05).
Table 4.
Treatments | Experimental group | Control group | SEM | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSC | 6.81 | 6.45 | 0.078 | 0.01 |
CSF | 6.67 | 6.39 | 0.078 | 0.01 |
CSA | 6.99 | 6.72 | 0.075 | 0.02 |
CSFA | 6.90 | 6.81 | 0.09 | 0.47 |
SEM = standard errors of the mean; CSC = carrier infusion; CSF = milk fat precursor infusion; CSA = milk protein precursor infusion; CSFA = the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors.
As shown in Table 5, the concentrations of NH3–N in CSF and CSFA of experimental group were significantly higher than those of the controls (P < 0.05). But the concentration of NH3–N in CSA of experimental group was lower than that in its control group.
Table 5.
Treatments | Experimental group | Control group | SEM | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSC | 9.22 | 8.32 | 1.11 | 0.48 |
CSF | 10.46 | 7.81 | 1.10 | 0.03 |
CSA | 6.74 | 8.37 | 1.13 | 0.21 |
CSFA | 8.78 | 5.26 | 1.20 | 0.02 |
SEM = standard errors of the mean; CSC = carrier infusion; CSF = milk fat precursor infusion; CSA = milk protein precursor infusion; CSFA = the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors.
It was showed in Table 6 that the concentration of BCP in CSA of experimental group was the highest and was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The ruminal BCP content in CSF of experimental group was higher than that in the control group.
Table 6.
Treatments | Experimental group | Control group | SEM | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSC | 23.77 | 19.98 | 3.40 | 0.49 |
CSF | 23.46 | 13.66 | 3.20 | 0.07 |
CSA | 33.06 | 20.99 | 3.40 | 0.04 |
CSFA | 22.89 | 21.92 | 3.60 | 0.88 |
SEM = standard errors of the mean; CSC = carrier infusion; CSF = milk fat precursor infusion; CSA = milk protein precursor infusion; CSFA = the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors.
3.2. The effects of infusion of different milk composition precursors on ruminal VFA
The concentration of acetic acid was significantly higher than that in the control group when cows were infused with a milk protein precursor (P < 0.05) and tended to be higher when they were infused with a milk fat precursor (Table 7).
Table 7.
Treatments | Experimental group | Control group | SEM | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSC | 67.00 | 67.65 | 0.45 | 0.53 |
CSF | 67.22 | 65.94 | 0.45 | 0.12 |
CSA | 68.60 | 65.39 | 0.50 | 0.01 |
CSFA | 67.85 | 67.62 | 0.55 | 0.85 |
SEM = standard errors of the mean; CSC = carrier infusion; CSF = milk fat precursor infusion; CSA = milk protein precursor infusion; CSFA = the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors.
Table 8 shows that the concentration of propionic acid was lower than that in controls except for CSC, which tended to have decreased CSA compared with the control group.
Table 8.
Treatments | Experimental group | Control group | SEM | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSC | 19.51 | 18.93 | 0.39 | 0.31 |
CSF | 18.60 | 18.64 | 0.39 | 0.95 |
CSA | 18.25 | 19.43 | 0.43 | 0.06 |
CSFA | 18.02 | 18.09 | 0.45 | 0.91 |
SEM = standard errors of the mean; CSC = carrier infusion; CSF = milk fat precursor infusion; CSA = milk protein precursor infusion; CSFA = the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors.
The variation tendency of the concentration of butyric acid was the same as propionic acid. But the concentration of butyric acid in CSF of experimental group was significantly lower than that in control group (P < 0.05) (Table 9).
Table 9.
Treatments | Experimental group | Control group | SEM | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSC | 9.93 | 9.87 | 0.56 | 0.94 |
CSF | 10.22 | 11.81 | 0.56 | 0.04 |
CSA | 9.66 | 11.09 | 0.61 | 0.09 |
CSFA | 10.27 | 10.46 | 0.65 | 0.83 |
SEM = standard errors of the mean; CSC = carrier infusion; CSF = milk fat precursor infusion; CSA = milk protein precursor infusion; CSFA = the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors.
From Table 10 it can be seen that the concentration of VFA in CSA of experimental group tended to be higher than that in the control group, and other groups had no significant differences.
Table 10.
Treatments | Experimental group | Control group | SEM | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSC | 96.42 | 96.41 | 0.23 | 0.99 |
CSF | 96.04 | 96.39 | 0.23 | 0.28 |
CSA | 96.51 | 95.50 | 0.25 | 0.08 |
CSFA | 96.13 | 96.17 | 0.25 | 0.90 |
SEM = standard errors of the mean; CSC = carrier infusion; CSF = milk fat precursor infusion; CSA = milk protein precursor infusion; CSFA = the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors.
The acetic acid to propionic acid ratio was significant higher than that in the control group when cows were infused with AA (P < 0.05) (Table 11).
Table 11.
Treatments | Experimental group | Control group | SEM | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSC | 3.44 | 3.58 | 0.09 | 0.31 |
CSF | 3.62 | 3.54 | 0.09 | 0.59 |
CSA | 3.76 | 3.39 | 0.10 | 0.01 |
CSFA | 3.76 | 3.74 | 0.10 | 0.90 |
SEM = standard errors of the mean; CSC = carrier infusion; CSF = milk fat precursor infusion; CSA = milk protein precursor infusion; CSFA = the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors.
3.3. The effects of infusion of different milk composition precursors on ruminal LPS
The LPS concentration in CSA of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05) (Table 12).
Table 12.
Treatments | Experimental group | Control group | SEM | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSC | 19,291 | 14,688 | 2,530 | 0.19 |
CSF | 21,547 | 16,841 | 2,525 | 0.18 |
CSA | 19,127 | 10,212 | 2,610 | 0.02 |
CSFA | 19,964 | 13,758 | 2,930 | 0.14 |
SEM = standard errors of the mean; CSC = carrier infusion; CSF = milk fat precursor infusion; CSA = milk protein precursor infusion; CSFA = the mixed infusion of milk fat and protein precursors.
4. Discussion
4.1. The effects of infusion of different milk composition precursors on rumen pH
The ruminal pH depends upon the HN3-N and total VFA concentration resulting from rumen fermentation (Wang et al., 2013). Though the pH was affected by infusion, these data were still within the normal range of 6 to 7, indicating that rumen fermentation was normal. Shen et al. (2012) considered that the pH of rumen fluid collected directly from the mouth of a cow was higher than the value in the rumen itself.
The dietary concentrate to roughage ratio was 46 :54. Volatile fatty acid production per unit of mass decreased correspondingly because of a lower ratio of concentrate. At the same time, corn straw has a high content of crude fiber, thus it may have made cows to chew and ruminatte longer and secrete more saliva than usual. The phosphate and bicarbonate in the saliva could neutralize acidic material to increase pH value. The pH value changed slightly compared with other infusion treatments, which did not affect pH through infusion. Vanhatalo et al. (1999) found the ruminal pH was higher than that in the control group without a significant difference with abomasal infusion of histidine and methionine. However, pH value throughout the gut fluctuates depending on the nutrient level and composition of diets.
4.2. The effects of infusion of different milk composition precursors on rumen NH3–N
The concentration of NH3–N in the ruminal liquid is associated with dietary protein degradation in rumen, which is then utilized by the rumen microbes. In the present study, corn straw had a low content of nonprotein nitrogen and soluble protein. In addition, the degradation rate is low, contributing less to ruminal ammonia concentrations.
Ivan et al. (2001) suggested that oilseeds increase the efficiency of dietary protein utilization, and release NH3–N into the rumen which is in an undulation state (Atasoglu et al., 1998). Indeed, in the current study, diets supplemented with FA yielded a high concentration of NH3–N. However, high levels of unsaturated fatty acids in the rumen led to adverse effects on ruminal fermentation, and hence total tract fiber digestion (Doreau and Chilliard, 1997). This resulted in NH3 accumulation due to decreased efficiency of protein synthesis.
In the current study, the concentration of NH3–N was the lowest with cows infused with AA presumably because there was sufficient nitrogen for urea synthesis. Therefore, more ammonia enters into the rumen with saliva, which is enough to satisfy the synthesis demand of protein and improve the activity of microbes to produce BCP, which was present at the highest concentration in CSA group. Another possibility is the absorption of ammonia from deaminated AA and the nitrogen lost from urinary purines could be counterbalanced by utilization and recycling of urea and other nitrogen compounds transported from blood to the rumen (Reynolds and Kristensen, 2008). The ruminant digestive system can adjust dietary nitrogen intake based on the amount of recycled nitrogen to the rumen and replace dietary nitrogen with recycled nitrogen (Kristensen et al., 2010). Wickersham et al. (2008) reported that cattle decreased their dietary nitrogen intake by changing the proportion of endogenous urea recycled into the gut when compared with the proportion excreted in urine.
4.3. The effects of infusion of different milk composition precursors on rumen BCP concentration
The available energy and appropriate protein content in the rumen are beneficial to the growth and reproduction of rumen microbes, which capture and use nitrogen to produce microbial protein. The concentration of ammonia nitrogen is the major nitrogen source for BCP synthesis.
Lipid inhibits the activity of microorganisms (Wanapat et al., 2011). Demeyer and Henderickx (1967) found C18 fatty acid, especially PUFA, is toxic to ciliates that are believed to be more sensitive than bacteria. High levels of fat infused into blood may decrease microbial activity, resulting in decreased synthesis of BCP. However, Pantoja et al. (1994) reported that hydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids could protect microbes. The BCP yield increased with adding FA into the rumen and with increased unsaturation of fat (Denman and McSweeney, 2006).
The concentration of BCP is the highest after infusing milk protein precursors in our study. The highest TVFA concentration with infusing mixed AA provided more energy and carbon-skeleton. The energy and carbon-skeleton were beneficial for large scale synthesis of BCP. Amino acids were needed by most microbe growth. When there are plenty of degradable carbohydrates in the rumen, supplying AA could increase microbial growth and synthesis ratio. Kajikawa et al. (2002) thought that mixed AA had better domino effect to improve microbial growth. Socha et al. (2005) reported that 25% of the effective nitrogen content was from AA, thus the growth of microbes was at the best level. Methionine and methionine hydroxy analogue (MHA) could accelerate microbial growth and reproduction, and therefore improve synthesis BCP.
4.4. The effects of infusion of different milk composition precursors on rumen VFA concentration
Volatile fatty acids are important products of carbohydrate fermentation by the rumen (Wang et al., 2013). Volatile fatty acids are produced in the rumen account for about two-thirds of carbon flow into body metabolism, which supplies 70% to 80% of the energy to ruminants (Van Houtert, 1996). This is also vital for the synthesis of milk fat and protein.
In the current study, FA infusion had no effect on the content of VFA. This agrees with the findings of Polviset et al. (2014) who reported that the molar proportions of acetic, propionic and butyric acid were not affected by the source of fat. A similar result was reported by Dayani et al. (2007) and Wongnen et al. (2009). On the contrary, VFA production was decreased by long-chain fatty acids which were unsaturated and contained less than 18 carbon atoms; however, stearic acid did not affect VFA production or acetate to propionate ratio in vitro (Chalupa et al., 1984).
Rumen bacteria require an adequate supply of AA from rumen fermentation to achieve optimal growth. The growth of bacteria that can degrade structural carbohydrates rely on HN3 whereas that of organisms can degrade nonstructural carbohydrates depend on available AA. Argyle and Baldwin (1989) reported the amount of AA has a linear relationship with the growth of bacteria, but linear relationship was reduced with the increasing AA quantity. Branched chain-AA modulate protein metabolism and isoacids, the degradation products of branched chain-AA, influence the growth of cellulolytic bacteria and improve the digestion of fiber. The results showed that the concentration of TVFA was significantly higher than that in the control group after infusing AA, which illustrated that the activity of cellulolytic bacteria enhanced obviously. Different proportions of AA affect the yield of VFA, may be due to the antagonism and anxoaction effect of AA on the degradation of microbes, or due to microbes have different mechanisms of absorption and utilization to each AA. Thus, there were different ratios of acid production.
4.5. The effects of infusion of different milk composition precursors on rumen LPS yield
Endoxin is a kind of LPS and trace protein complexes on the outer membrane of cell walls of gram-negative bacteria. Lipopolysaccharide has a broad range of biological activity when released after bacterial death or disassembly (Wang, 2006).
The LPS yield did not exceed 30,000 EU/mL in the infusion groups as well as the control group according to some studies (Khafipour et al., 2008, Zebeli and Ameta, 2009, Li et al., 2011, Zhou et al., 2014). In the current study, the amounts of LPS in each infusion treatment were higher than that in the control group. The LPS content in CSA group was significantly higher than that in the control group, but there was no difference among infusion treatments. The death of gram-negative bacteria leads to the release of LPS. When cows have good metabolic balance and enough energy supply, they have enhanced rumen digestion performance, which hastens microbial life cycle (Tajima et al., 2001). This may, in turn, increases the rate of LPS entering the intestinal tract without accumulating in the rumen, because of faster chyme circulation. Amino acids play essential nutritional roles in rumen microbial metabolism and hence level of AA in the rumen has a linear relationship with the growth of bacteria (Argyle and Baldwin, 1989).
5. Conclusion
Infusing milk precursors into external pudic artery of cows fed diets with corn straw as roughage has feedback effects on rumen fermentation. Infusing with AA – the milk protein precursor, increased pH, elevated the concentrations of BCP, and lifted the content of acetic acid, and regulated rumen fermentation. The end result was improved milk production in lactating dairy cows.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine.
References
- Argyle J.L., Baldwin R.L. Effects of amino acids and peptides on rumen microbial growth yields. J Dairy Sci. 1989;72:2017–2027. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79325-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atasoglu C., Valdes C., Walker N.D., Newbold C.J., Wallace R.J. De novo synthesis of amino acids by the ruminal bacteria Prevotella bryantii B14, Selenomonas ruminantium HD4, and Streptococcus bovis ES1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:2836–2843. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.8.2836-2843.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalupa W., Rickabaugh B., Kronfeld D.S., Sklan D. Rumen fermentation in vitro as influenced by long chain fatty acids. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67:1439–1444. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(84)81459-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cone J.W., Gelder A.H.V., Driehuis F. Description of gas production profiles with a three-phasic model. Animal Feed Sci And Technol. 1997;66:31–45. [Google Scholar]
- Dayani O., Ghorbani G.R., Alikhani M., Rahmani H.R., Mir P.S. Effects of dietary whole cottonseed and crude protein level on rumen protozoa population and fermentation parameters. Small Rumin Res. 2007;69:36–45. [Google Scholar]
- Demeyer D.I., Henderickx H.K. The effect of C18 unsaturated fatty acids of methane production in vitro by mixed rumen bacteria. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1967;137:484–497. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(67)90130-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denman S.E., McSweeney C.S. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006;58:572–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doreau M., Chilliard Y. Effects of ruminal or postruminal fish oil supplementation on intake and digestion in dairy cows. Rep Nutr Dev. 1997;37:113–124. doi: 10.1051/rnd:19970112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drackley J.K., Klusmeyer T.H., Trusk A.M., Clark J.H. Infusion of long-chain fatty acids varying in saturation and chain length into the abomasum of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1992;75:1517–1526. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77908-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Filípek Jaroslav, Rudolf Dvořák. Determination of the volatile fatty acid content in the rumen liquid: comparison of Gas chromatography and capillary isotachophoresis. Acta Vet Brno. 2009;78:627–633. [Google Scholar]
- Fisher L.J. Response of lactating cows to the intravenous infusion of amino acids. J Anim Sci. 1972;52:377–384. [Google Scholar]
- Gozho G.N., Plaizier J.C., Krause D.O., Kennedy A.D., Wittenberg K.M. Subacute ruminal acidosis induces ruminal lipopolysaccharide endotoxin release and triggers an inflammatory response. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88:1399–1403. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72807-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hurtaud C., Rulquin H., Verit R. Effect of infused volatile fatty acids and caseinate on milk composition and coagulation in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1993;76:3011–3020. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77640-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ivan M., Mir P.S., Koenig K.M., Rode L.M., Neill L., Entz T. Effects of dietary sunflower seed oil on rumen protozoa population and tissue concentration of conjugated linoleicacid in sheep. Small Rum Res. 2001;41:215–227. [Google Scholar]
- Kajikawa H., Mitsumori M., Ohmomo S. Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of protein amino acids on growth rate and efficiency of mixed ruminal bacteria. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:2015–2022. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74278-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khafipour E., Krause D.O., Plaizier J.C. A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation. J Dairy Sci. 2008;92:1060–1070. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kristensen N.B., Storm A.C., Larsen M. Effect of dietary nitrogen content and intravenous urea infusion on ruminal and portal-drained visceral extraction of arterial urea in lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93:2670–2683. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lanier J.S., Suagee J.K., Becvar O., Corl B.A. Mammary uptake of fatty acids supplied by intravenous triacylglycerol infusion to lactating dairy cows. Lipids. 2013;48:469–479. doi: 10.1007/s11745-013-3782-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li S., Khafipour E., Krause D.O., Kroeker A., Rodriguez-Lecompte J.C., Gozho G.N. Effects of subacute ruminal acidosis challenges on fermentation and endotoxins in the rumen and hindgut of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2011;95:294–303. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pantoja J., Firkins J.L., Eastridge M.L., Hull B.L. Effects of fat saturation and source of fiber on site of nutrient digestion and milk production by lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1994;77:2341–2356. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77177-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polviset W., Wachiraprakorn C., Yuangklang C. Effect of fat sources on digestibility and rumen fermentation in crossbred Thai native x Brahman bulls. Indian J Anim Res. 2014;48:14–20. [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds C.K., Kristensen N.B. Nitrogen recycling through the gut and the nitrogen economy of ruminants—An asynchronous symbiosis. J Anim Sci. 2008;86:E293–E305. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen J.S., Chai Z., Song L.J., Liu J.X., Wu Y.M. Insertion depth of oral stomach tubes may affect the fermentation parameters of ruminal fluid collected in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:5978–5984. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi X.L. Shan Dong University; 2012. Production process optimization of compound amino acid injection (18AA-II) (not PVC) [Google Scholar]
- Socha M.T., Putnam D.E., Garthwaite B.D., Whitehouse N.L., Kierstead N.A., Schwab C.G. Improving intestinal amino acid supply of pre- and postpartum dairy cows with rumen protected methionine and lysine. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88:1113–1126. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72778-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tajima K., Aminov R.I., Nagamine T., Matsui H., Nakamura M., Benno Y. Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:2766–2774. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2766-2774.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Houtert Martin. Challenging the retinal for altering VFA ratios in growing ruminates. Feed Mix. 1996;41:514–525. [Google Scholar]
- Vanhatalo A., Huhtanen P., Toivonen V., Varvikko T. Response of dairy cows fed grass silage diets to abomasal infusions of histidine alone or in combinations with methionine and lysine. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82:2674–2685. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75524-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wanapat M., Mapato C., Pilajun R., Toburan W. Effects of vegetable oil supplementation on feed intake,rumen fermentation, growth performance, and carcass characteristic of growing swamp buffaloes. Live Sci. 2011;135:32–37. [Google Scholar]
- Wang J.C. The role of endoxemia concentration on the pathogenesis of severe hepatitis. Parasitoses Infect Dis. 2006;4:40–41. [Google Scholar]
- Wang J.Q. 2011. Ruminant nutrition research methods. [Google Scholar]
- Wang R.L., Liang J.G., Lu L., Zhang L.Y. Effect of zinc source on performance, zinc status, immune response, and rumen fermentation of lactating cows. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013;152:16–24. doi: 10.1007/s12011-012-9585-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wickersham T.A., Titgemeyer E.C., Cochran R.C., Wickersham E.E., Gnad D.P. Effect of rumen-degradable intake protein supplementation on urea kinetics and microbial use of recycled urea in steers consuming low-quality forage. J Anim Sci. 2008;86:3079–3088. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wongnen C., Wachirapakorn C., Patipan C., Panpong D., Kongweha K., Namsaen N. Effects of fermented total mixed ration and cracked cottonseed on milk yield and milk composition in dairy cows. Asian-Aust. J Anim Sci. 2009;12:1625–1632. [Google Scholar]
- Yang S.L., Bu D.P., Wang J.Q., Hu Z.Y., Li D., Wei H.Y. Soybean oil and linseed oil supplementation affect profiles of ruminal microorganisms in dairy cows. Animal. 2009;3:1562–1569. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109990462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zebeli Q., Ameta B.N. Relationships between rumen lipopolysaccharide and mediators of inflammatory response with milk fat production and efficiency in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:3800–3809. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou J., Dong G.Z., Ao C.J. Feeding a high-concentrate corn straw diet increased the release of endotoxin in the rumen and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the mammary gland of dairy cows. BMC Veterinary Res. 2014;10:172. doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0172-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]