Abstract
This work analyzes the involvement of arginines in copper/H2O2-induced DNA breakage. Copper is a highly redox active metal which has been demonstrated to form compounds with arginines. For this aim we used mixtures of pGEM3 DNA plasmid and two types of H1 histones which differ only in their arginine content. The sperm H1 histone from the annelid worm Chaetopterus variopedatus (arginine content 12.6 mol% K/R ratio 2) and the somatic H1 histone from calf thymus (arginine content 1.8 mol% and K/R ratio 15). Copper/H2O2-induced DNA breakage was observed only in presence of sperm H1 histones, but it was more relevant for the native molecule than for the deguanidinated derivative (K/R ratio 14), in which 80% of arginine residues were converted to ornithine. Further, copper induced proteinase K resistance and increase of DNA binding affinity on native sperm H1 histones. These observations are consistent with a copper induced reorganization of the side-chains of arginine residues. Copper, instead, did not affect DNA binding affinity of somatic and deguanidinated H1 histones, which show similar K/R ratio and DNA binding mode. These results indicate that arginine residues could affect these H1 histones properties and provide new insights into copper toxicity mechanisms.
Introduction
Copper ions play important roles in many chemical and biochemical processes and are required for cellular respiration, peptide amidation, neurotransmitter biosynthesis, pigment formation and connective tissue strength1. In many cases, the functions in these processes result from copper ions either as mono-metal or multi-metal complexes of peptides or proteins2–5. Copper works also as cofactor for numerous enzymes and plays an important role in central nervous system development; low concentrations of copper may result in incomplete development, whereas excess copper maybe injurious, in fact copper is considered one of the strongly suspected etiological factors in some neurodegenerative disorders6. Many studies indicated that copper-overload readily leads to oxidative stress, indeed most of the toxicity of oxygen and hydrogen peroxide in vivo arises from metal ion-catalyzed production of highly reactive hydroxyl radical (·OH) by the Fenton reaction, which is illustrated as follows:
1 |
The hydroxyl radical is extremely reactive and can further react with practically any biological molecules in the near vicinity, causing catastrophic damages to lipids, proteins and DNA7 and is critically involved in copper cytotoxicity8–12. Also Cu(II) ions can participate in formation of ·OH through the Fenton reaction and appear to be potentially more reactive in mediating oxygen radical-induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity than iron ions13. Moreover, copper can induce oxidative stress also by significantly decreasing of glutathione levels14.
In addition, copper being a non-degradable heavy metal, can accumulate in soil or leach into water sources. Its accumulation has impacted micro and macro organisms15,16; expecially marine organisms17,18 spurring scientists to research in situ copper removal methods15.
It has been previously reported19 that DNA damage in the presence of copper and H2O2 occurs in a multistage mechanism in which, firstly Cu(II) but not Cu(I) binds to an electronegative region involving at least two guanosines. As a second step Cu(II) reacts with DNA, perhaps through proton transfer involving guanine. This reduction of Cu(II) could yield oxidation products of guanine which are piperidine sensitive. In the last step H2O2 reacts with the Cu(I) formed, either still bound or in the proximity of DNA, generating ·OH and regenerating Cu(II). In turn, ·OH produces (additional) piperidine- sensitive base damage and/or strand breaks at short range from the original Cu(II)-binding site. Furthermore, it has also been reported20 that a class of binuclear and trinuclear copper complexes show high selectivity in oxidizing DNA at ss/ds DNA junctions, but an efficient cleavage was not observed for ss or ds DNA alone, and that also the flexibility of the DNA strand is an important factor in the ss/ds junction selectivity. In living cells, DNA is not free but complexed with histones to form chromatin21. Although histone proteins are known to protect DNA from a variety of potentially dangerous reactive species, such as hydroxyl radicals (·OH), the packaging within the nucleosome does not protect DNA from metal ion-dependent free radical damage22. Since DNA is blocked by the physiological cation Mg2+, copper is likely to associate predominantly with histones, which may also react with free radicals. DNA bases may participate in the formation of DNA-protein cross-links in chromatin21 and electron transfer easily occurs from the histone to DNA, leading to DNA damage23.
In particular, it seems that some interactions of DNA with peptides can increase metal/H2O2 induced DNA breakage24 and/or these reactions can lead to oxygen activation that in turn can proceed in vivo around and inside the cell nucleus25. For example, the peptides H2B32-62 and H2B63-93, as well as the N terminal tail (H2B1-31) of histone H2B are able to enhance copper induced single and double strand scission of plasmid DNA26 and H4 histone peptide of AKRHRK efficiently enhanced Cu(II)/H2O2 induced DNA damage, especially at cytosine residues27. As a matter of fact DNA damage induced by Cu(II)/H2O2 is enhanced in the nucleosomal compared to the isolated DNA28. In addition to the free radical-induced oxidative damage, information available suggests that the cellular response to copper overload, particularly at the early stages of copper accumulation, involves more specific mechanisms and pathways. In order to provide new insights in the mechanism of copper toxicity, in this work we evaluated the possible involvement of arginine residues in Cu(II)/H2O2-induced DNA breakage since in literature it has been reported the possibility of several binary and ternary copper compounds of arginine29. To this aim we analyzed Cu(II)/H2O2-induced DNA breakage in presence of sperm and somatic H1 histones. Sperm H1 histone was extracted from the sperm chromatin of the annelid worm Chaetopterus variopedatus (Ch.v.); somatic one was from calf thymus (C.T.). These H1 histones show different K/R ratios (2 and 15 respectively) because differ substantially only in their arginine content (12.6 mol % and 1.8 mol % respectively). This different arginine content affects the H1 histones DNA binding mode30. Furthermore, since proteins are the most abundant target within cells for radicals such as ·OH31 and heavily oxidized proteins generally show decreased susceptibility to proteolytic attack by most proteinases32,33, we studied also the relevance of arginine residues in Cu(II)-induced proteinase K resistance of these two types of H1 histones also because in literature several studies have suggested that Cu(II) ions convert some proteins to a proteinase K-resistant conformation34,35.
Results
Analysis of Cu(II)-induced effects on sperm and somatic H1 histones in DNA binding
In order to evaluate the effect of CuCl2 on DNA binding of sperm and somatic H1 histones, we performed EMSA with these two types of H1 histones using pGEM3 plasmid DNA. The results obtained without CuCl2, shown in Fig. 1a (lanes 1–6) and Fig. 1b (lanes 1–6) are in agreement with those reported in Piscopo et al.26 regarding the different DNA binding modes that we defined: “all or nothing” and “intermediate” mode for sperm and somatic H1 histones respectively. EMSA performed with pGEM3 DNA plasmid somatic and sperm and H1 histones in presence of 10 µM CuCl2 (Fig. 1a, lanes 7–12; Fig. 1b, lanes 7–12) showed that this salt, at this concentration, didn’t change the DNA binding mode of both H1 histones but produced only on native sperm H1 histone an increase of DNA binding affinity. In fact, in presence of 10 µM CuCl2, we observed the formation of the single DNA band with low mobility, close to the well30, already at H1/DNA (w/w) ratio 0.8 instead of 1.2 (Fig. 1b, lanes 9 and 5), while in the case of somatic H1 histones the results obtained with or without CuCl2 were very similar (Fig. 1a). The same analysis performed on deguanidinated derivatives of sperm H1 histones, in which 80% of arginine were converted in ornithine residues (K/R = 14), showed a DNA binding mode more similar to that of somatic H1 histones and not influenced by CuCl2 (Fig. 1c). Moreover, we observed a lower DNA binding affinity of deguanidinated derivatives with respect to native molecules, as shown in Fig. 1c because the single DNA band with low mobility, close to the well, was not achieved even at H1/DNA (w/w) ratio 3. The decrease of DNA binding affinity of deguanidinated sperm H1 histones could depend only on the conversion of arginine in ornithine residues because as shown in the AU-PAGE of Fig. 1d (lane 2), the molecule, after deguanidination, appears not degradated and with similar mobility with respect to native one (Fig. 1d, lane 1).
Cu(II)/H2O2-induced DNA breakage in presence of H1 histones
In Fig. 2, the results of the analyses of Cu(II)/H2O2-induced DNA breakage in presence of H1 histones, are shown. The analyses were performed using pGEM3 DNA plasmid and native and deguanidinated sperm H1 histones and somatic ones, in presence of 10 μM CuCl2 and 10 μM H2O2. DNA breakage was evaluated by the conversion of supercoiled to relaxed form of plasmid DNA. In our conditions, DNA breakage is not observed when plasmid is mixed with CuCl2 in absence or presence of H2O2 (Fig. 2a–c, lanes 2–3), being necessary higher H2O2 concentration, at least 100 µM in order to cause DNA breakage (Supplementary Figure S1). Similarly, the absence of a DNA breakage is also observed using H1 histones in presence or absence of CuCl2 (Fig. 2a–c, lanes 4–5, 7–8). The addition of CuCl2 to a mixture of native sperm H1 histones/DNA in a 0.1 (w/w) ratio in presence of H2O2, determines an increase of the amount of relaxed plasmid DNA form at detriment of the supercoiled one (Fig. 2b, lane 6). This effect resulted more relevant with sperm H1 histone/DNA 0.2 (w/w) ratio, because in this case, plasmid DNA appears almost completely in the relaxed form (Fig. 2b, lane 9). The same analysis performed with somatic H1 histones didn’t show DNA breakage in none of the conditions but only a reduction of plasmid DNA supercoiling degree at H1 histone/DNA 0.2 (w/w) ratio in presence of H2O2 and CuCl2 (Fig. 2a, lane 9). Deguanidinated sperm H1 histone derivatives instead were still able to induce DNA breakage but with lesser efficiency respect to native molecules at H1 histone/DNA 0.1 and 0.2 (w/w) ratio in presence of H2O2 and CuCl2 (Fig. 2c, lanes 6 and 9).
H1 histones resistance to PK digestion
In Fig. 3, the AU-PAGE of the results of PK digestions of native and deguanidinated sperm H1 histones and somatic ones in presence of 10 µM CuCl2 are shown. Native sperm H1 histones, (Fig. 3a, lanes 1–4) showed higher PK resistance compared with the somatic ones (Fig. 3b, lanes 1–4), since complete digestion of native sperm H1 histones was obtained only after an overnight PK treatment (Fig. 3a, lane 10), while somatic H1 histones were completely digested, (Fig. 3b, lanes 1–4), already within 3 h of PK treatment. In presence of 10 µM CuCl2, PK digestion of native sperm H1 histones was completely inhibited (Fig. 3a, lanes 6–9), even with an overnight PK treatment (Fig. 3a, lane 12). In presence of CuCl2, also somatic H1 histones acquired PK resistance (Fig. 3b, lanes 6–9), but were completely digested after an overnight treatment with PK (Fig. 3b, lanes 10 and 12). On the other hand, the deguanidinated sperm H1 histone derivatives resulted more susceptible to PK digestion than native molecules regardless of the presence of CuCl2. In fact a progressive degradation of these molecules, in short times (30 minutes) was observed also in presence of CuCl2 (Fig. 3c lanes 6–9) while without CuCl2 these molecules were completely digested within 30′ (Fig. 3c lanes 1–4). In order to exclude the possibility of a dependence from Cl− of H1 histones resistance to PK digestion, we performed experiments in presence of 10 µM NiCl2. The results obtained on native sperm H1 histones clearly indicated that PK resistance depends just on Cu(II) because the histones were digested regardless of the presence of NiCl2 already after 30′ (Fig. 3d, lanes 10 and 12).
Cu(II) induced effects on H1 histones secondary structure
In order to explore the effects of Cu(II) on the structure of sperm and somatic H1 histones, we used Far-UV CD measurements, a useful tool to investigate the changes in protein secondary structure. CD spectra of H1 histones, measured in absence and in presence of increasing Cu(II) concentrations, kept similar shape (Supplementary Figure S2), retaining the molar ellipticity values at 208 and 222 nm wavelengths, as shown in the plot of molar ellipticity versus Cu(II) concentration (Fig. 4). Differences were observed between the spectra of native sperm H1 histones and its deguanidinated derivatives, which presented a loss in the molar ellipticity values of spectra peaks, indicative of changes in the secondary structure following the conversion of arginine in ornithine residues. In fact, an estimation of the content in secondary structure highlight a reduction in alpha-helix structures for the benefit of beta-sheet structures in the deguanidinated derivatives with respect the native molecules (Supplementary Figure S3A and B). Underlining that the secondary structure estimation is not a precise measure of the amount of these structures, from the box-plot of the calculated data (Supplementary Figure S3) appeared that the addition of CuCl2 essentially didn’t affect the amount of alpha-helix and beta-sheet structures in H1 histones, while more evident changes were observed for turn and unordered structures, that are more flexible, less structured and susceptible to environmental rearrangement of amino acid side chains.
Fluorescence analyses of H1 histones in presence of Cu(II)
The measurements of intrinsic fluorescence of H1 histones were carried out following the emission signal of tyrosine residues. The absence of a strong fluorescence signal at the excitation wavelength of 290 nm of somatic H1 histones, due to the low amount of tyrosine residues in this molecule and probably to their exposition to polar environment, made impossible to measure differences in spectra of intrinsic fluorescence for this molecule in absence and in presence of Cu(II) (Fig. 5, spectra 1, 2).
The addition of CuCl2 resulted in a quenching of the tyrosine fluorescence either for native sperm H1 histones (Fig. 5, spectrum 3) and its deguanidinated derivatives (Fig. 5, spectrum 4) with respect their corresponding molecules without CuCl2 (Fig. 5, spectra 6 and 5). The Stern–Volmer plot of F0/F versus CuCl2 concentration at 15, 25 and 35 °C on native sperm H1 histones, resulted in non-linear curve, downwarding at increasing CuCl2 concentrations at 25 °C, and decreasing the Δ of quencing at higher temperatures (35 °C) (Supplementary Figure S4). These results suggested a complex mechanism of action. In order to understand the nature of interaction between Cu(II) and H1 histones, we used a hydrophobic dye such as ANS36 to investigate the structural changes of H1 histones Cu(II) induced. In particular, we observed an increase in the ANS fluorescence intensity of 4 and 10 times for somatic and native/deguanidinated derivatives of sperm H1 histones, respectively, with a blue shift of 515, 490 and 480 nm for somatic, deguanidinated and native sperm H1 histones, respectively (Supplementary Figure S5). These differences indicated strong binding between native sperm H1 histones and ANS with respect to somatic H1 histones. Addition of increasing concentrations of CuCl2 caused a decrease in the fluorescence intensity (Supplementary Figure S4) for all H1 histones-ANS complexes suggesting that Cu(II) displaces ANS from its binding site, since the decrease of fluorescence intensity is indicative of the transfer of the probe from a non-polar to an aqueous environment.
In Fig. 6, the plot of relative fluorescence intensity of protein-ANS complexes (F/F0, where F and F0 are the fluorescence intensity of ANS in the presence and absence of CuCl2, respectively) versus CuCl2 concentration, is shown. The extent of quenching by addition of CuCl2 was lower for somatic and deguanidinated derivatives sperm H1 histones as compared to native sperm H1 histones, indicating the presence of an higher amount of polar external binding sites for ANS on the protein surface of native sperm H1 histones.
Discussion
A number of studies exist on DNA oxidative damage induced by copper and H2O237. Furthermore, some papers have previously reported DNA oxidative damage induced by histone peptides, in presence of metals and H2O2 used at least 100 μM27,38,39. The common feature of these peptides was the presence of arginine residues and the authors explained an additional site-specific damage at guanine residues of DNA by and a selective binding between arginine and guanine. To date, nobody has investigated in detail the role of arginines in this process, in particular in complex with metals. In fact, it has long been known the possibility of formation of several binary and ternary copper-arginine complexes40–44 and it has been reported the involvement of the amidic groups on the backbone of arginine residues in the coordination mode of Cu(II) ion as the case of Cap43 protein fragment T1R2S3R4S5H6T7S8E9G1045. So, in this work, we investigated the involvement of arginine residues, present in H1 histones, in DNA breakage in presence of low concentrations of CuCl2 and H2O2. To this aim we used sperm and somatic H1 histones from Ch.v and C.T., respectively. These two types of H1 histones differ substantially in their arginine content (12.6 mol % and 1.8 mol % respectively). First of all we performed EMSA using plasmid pGEM3 DNA and the two types of H1 histones with and without CuCl2. The results indicated that CuCl2 doesn’t change the DNA binding mode of the two types of H1 histones, previously defined “intermediate mode” for somatic H1 histones and “all or nothing mode” for sperm H1 histones30. Somatic H1 histones DNA binding mode was reported also for Mytilus galloprovincialis protamine-like proteins PLII and PLIV46. Sperm H1 histones DNA binding mode was instead observed also for Mytilus galloprovincialis protamine-like proteins PL-III46 and for Chaetopterus variopedatus protamine-like (CvPL)47. In these latter three types of proteins the possibility exists of interactions between ε-amine groups of lysine and guanidino groups of arginines mediated by an intermediate anion30,48–50. Such type of interactions, lead to self-association of these proteins and are favored in presence of DNA, where the DNA phosphates represent the intermediate anions48.
Although, CuCl2 doesn’t change the DNA binding mode, in the case of native sperm H1 histones, determines an increase of DNA binding affinity (Fig. 1b lanes 5 and 9) and promotes DNA breakage, Cu(II)/H2O2-induced, at low H1/DNA (w/w) ratios (Fig. 2b, lanes 6 and 9). At these H1/DNA ratios it’s possible to evaluate the DNA breakage by the changes of plasmid DNA topological state from supercoiled to relaxed form. Our results are in line with those reported by Zavitsanos et al.38 that demonstrated that peptides mimicking the H2B histone fold domain (i.e. H2B32-62 and H2B63-93), as well as its N terminal tail (H2B1-31) are able to enhance copper induced single and double strand scission of plasmid DNA38. The authors demonstrated also that among all three peptides analyzed, the H2B1-31, arginine rich, seems to cause the highest yield of plasmid relaxation, having the highest affinity for plasmid DNA38 as we demonstrated for native sperm H1 histones. The ability to induce DNA breakage, observed in H1 histones, in the presence of Cu(II), can be ascribed to structural changes, but the CD analysis highlighted that the general organization of the secondary structure of sperm H1 histone remains unchanged (Supplementary Figure S2), supporting the hypothesis that the observed effects Cu(II) induced on the functional/structural behavior of the proteins should be due to tertiary/quaternary structure interactions. Changes in intrinsic fluorescence of a protein, such as fluorescence quenching, is a sensitive tool to obtain information about protein-ligand interactions. So we exploited the fluorescence quenching of tyrosine residues present in the sperm H1 histone, as determined by amino acid composition51, to obtain information on the type of interactions between copper and the protein surface. In fact, fluorescence quenching could be classified as dynamic or static depending on if caused by collisional encounters between the fluorophore and the quencher, or resulted from the formation of stable compound between fluorophore and quencher, respectively52. However, measuring the dependence of the Stern-Volmer constant (KSV) on temperature, we obtained non-linear Stern-Volmer plots at 25 °C and the absence of quenching at 35 °C, indicative of complex interactions52,53. As a matter of fact a specific interaction between Cu(II) and H1 histones, was supported by their PK resistance in presence of CuCl2 and not in presence of NiCl2 (Fig. 3d lanes 10 and 12). We exclude also a possible inhibitory effect of CuCl2 on the PK activity, since the copper-induced inhibition of PK activity was reported only at concentrations higher than 200 μM54,55. PK resistence observed on H1 histones could be ascribed just to a protein conformational change, copper-induced, in this molecule as reported for ovine prion protein34. Moreover, native sperm H1 histones result highly resistant to PK digestion even after an overnight treatment in presence of CuCl2, differently from somatic H1 histones which contain a low amount of arginine residues.
In order to analyze the possible involvement of arginines in the different PK resistance of somatic and sperm H1 histones, we have chemically modified arginine in ornithine residues in sperm H1 histones. The deguanidinated sperm H1 histone derivatives (K/R = 14) resulted more susceptible to PK digestion than native molecule (K/R = 2) in a manner more similar to somatic H1 histones (K/R = 15), indicating that the conversion of arginine to ornithine residues causes a decrease in PK resistance. These results indicate the relevance of K/R ratio in these H1 histones properties because the deguanidinated sperm H1 histone derivatives present PK resistance and K/R ratio similar to somatic H1 histones. Unfortunately, the low content in aromatic residues of H1 histones make difficult to use intrinsic fluorescence for structural studies of these proteins. An alternative to the use of intrinsic fluorescence for measuring changes on protein surface was the use of external probes, such as ANS. The increase of fluorescence intensity and blue shift of fluorescence emission maxima observed for ANS are generally attributed to the hydrophobicity of binding sites and the restricted mobility of ANS36. However, it has been reported that ANS binds also to polar external sites of proteins, which are exposed to the aqueous phase56, in particular strongly binds arginine and lysine residues of proteins through ion pair formation, although, the contribution of ANS fluorescence from these external binding sites is much less compared to that from buried sites.
In our experiments, we observed a decrease of blue shift of ANS fluorescence emission maxima in sperm H1 histone deguanidinated derivatives with respect to native molecules that could be explained by the lesser number of arginine residues that bind ANS, following the conversion of arginine in ornithine residues.
We measured a decrease in the fluorescence intensity of H1 histones-ANS complexes after addition of CuCl2, indicating a competition from the same binding sites on the protein surface between Cu(II) and the fluorescent probe. The percentage quenching [(F0 − F)/F0 × 100] of the native sperm H1 histones-ANS complex in presence of 10 μM CuCl2 was 31,5%, about 3 times higher respect to the percentage quenching observed for deguanidinated sperm H1 histone derivatives (10,7%) and somatic H1 histones (12,9%). These observations strongly support the involvement of arginine residues on the protein surface in H1 histones-Cu(II) interactions.
All the data obtained in this work permit to hypothesize a model of interaction between Cu(II) and backbone of arginine residues, since arginine guanidinium groups are not potential donors for Cu(II), on protein surface of sperm H1 histones (Fig. 7). Evidences that amidic groups in the backbone of peptides and proteins are involved in the coordination mode of Cu(II)45, support the hypothesis that Cu(II) interacts with negatively charged groups on the protein backbone, such as the amidic groups on the backbone of arginine residues, favored by a reorganization of the side-chains of arginine residues metal-induced29,45. This arrangement generates more wide positively charged patches on protein surface, because of the inclusion of charged Cu(II) ions in the structure, that could produce several effects. First of all an increase in DNA binding surface, affecting the strength of interactions between the negatively charged phosphate groups and the positive arginine-Cu(II) patches, that in turn results in a higher DNA binding affinity of sperm H1 histones. Consequently, the availability of Cu(II) ions near the binding surface between DNA and native sperm H1 histones, make possible that the addition of H2O2 to this complex promotes the Fenton reaction in DNA proximity, determining its breakage. Moreover, these patches could represent a sort of barrier to protease accessibility to its target residues, because of the increase of repulsive forces for the addition of positive charges and a probable steric hindrance due to the side-chains reorganization. This could explain the higher PK digestion resistance of sperm H1 histones in presence of copper. In conclusion, these observations support the existence of Cu(II) effects arginine-dependent, that provides new insight in copper toxicity mechanisms. Further, although histones are known to protect DNA, in particular conditions, arginine-rich histones appear to participate in copper-dependent oxidative damage of DNA. Of course, the precise mechanisms by which arginine residues, interacting with copper ions, can induce a higher PK resistance in native sperm H1 histones and make they able of inducing oxidative DNA damage will have to be elucidated by further studies.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Chemical reagents and somatic H1 histone from C.T. were obtained from Sigma (USA).
Preparation of Ch.v. histone H1
Ch.v. sperm H1 histone was purified as described in De Petrocellis et al.51. The protein concentration was determined on the basis of the known tyrosine content: one tyrosine in C.T. somatic H1 molecule57 and two tyrosines in Ch.v. sperm H1 molecule51 using ε276 = 1340 cm−1 M−1 according to Giancotti et al.58.
Amino-acid side chain modifications
Deguanidination reaction on Ch.v. sperm H1 histone was performed as described in Piscopo et al.30. Unreacted amino groups were titrated with 2,4,6 trinitro-benzene-sulfonic acid59.
Acetic acid–urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (AU-PAGE)
Native and modified Ch. v. sperm H1 histones and C.T. H1 histones were analyzed by AU-PAGE as described in Vassalli et al.46.
PK digestions on H1 histones
Digestion of H1 histones with PK (Promega) was carried out as followed: 100 µg of H1 histone were resuspended in 500 µL of 10 mM Tris HCl pH 8 and digested at 37 °C with 5 µg of PK in presence of 10 µM CuCl2 in the range from 5′ to overnight. The products of reaction were analyzed by AU-PAGE using the H1 histones not digested as control. All experiments were performed at least three times.
Far-UV CD spectroscopy
The circular dichroism (CD) analyses was carried out using a Jasco spectropolarimeter model J-810, which was equipped with a Julabo F25-ME temperature controller (Julabo GmbH) and calibrated with a standard solution of (+)-10-camphorsulfonic acid. CD measurement in the far-UV was performed in a 0.1 cm optical path length cuvette (STARNA), using a protein concentration of 0.1 mg/mL in 10 mM TRIS-HCl pH 8.0 buffer. CD spectra were acquired in presence of increasing concentrations of CuCl2 in the range from 0 to 10 mM. Photomultiplier absorbance did not exceed 600 V in the spectral regions measured. Each spectrum was signal averaged at least three times and smoothed with CD software Spectra Manager Ver. 1.53 (Jasco Corporation). All measurements were performed at least three times at room temperatures under a nitrogen flow of 3 L/h.
Fluorescence spectroscopy
The fluorescence analyses was carried out in a 1 cm optical path length cuvette (STARNA) using a Jasco spectrofluorimeter model FP 8200, equipped with a Julabo F25-HD temperature controller (Julabo GmbH). Intrinsic fluorescence measurements were performed measuring the fluorescence emission of Tryptophan residues in the range from 310 to 460 nm after excitation at 290 nm. Measure of the fluorescence quenching has been carried out on sperm H1 histones at the concentrations of 0,10 mg/mL in 10 mM TRIS-HCl pH 8.0 buffer, at 15, 25 and 35 °C. Measurement in presence of ANS (5 μ concentration) was performed measuring the fluorescence emission in the range from 420 to 600 nm after excitation at 350 nm, in presence of a protein concentration of 0.10 mg/mL in 10 mM TRIS-HCl pH 8.0 buffer. Spectra of intrinsic and extrinsic fluorescence were acquired in presence of increasing concentrations of CuCl2 in the range from 0 to 10 μM. Photomultiplier absorbance did not exceed 600 V in the spectral regions measured. Each spectrum was signal averaged at least three times and smoothed with the software Spectra Manager Ver. 2.09 (Jasco Corporation). All measurements were performed at least three times at room temperatures.
Preparation of DNA
The DNA used in all experiments was pGEM3 DNA (2867 bp) prepared from Escherichia coli HB 101 cells transformed by the plasmid. Plasmid pGEM3 was purified using the method described in Carbone et al.60 and analyzed by gel electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels in 89 mM Tris-HC1 pH 8.0, 2 mM EDTA and 89 mM boric acid (TBE).
Analysis of the effect of CuCl2 on DNA binding of sperm and somatic H1 histones by EMSA
The effect of sperm and somatic H1 histones on DNA was analyzed by Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA). Protein to DNA (w/w) ratios were between 0 and 3 as indicated in each experiment. The reported amounts (see results) of H1 histones were added to 250 ng of circular pGEM3 DNA in a final volume of 27 µL. In the samples containing 10 µM CuCl2, H1 histones were incubated for 10 min with CuCl2, at room temperature before incubation with DNA which was for 10 min at room temperature. At the end of incubation, just before electrophoresis analysis, all samples were added with 3 µL of TBE 10X (in order to obtain TBE 1X final concentration) and analyzed on 1% agarose gel in TBE 1X final concentration. TBE was added to the samples just before running the gels in order to avoid EDTA coordination of Cu ions. Electrophoresis was carried out at 100 V for 30 minutes. DNA migration was visualized by staining gels with ethidium bromide (2 mg/mL) after electrophoresis. All experiments were performed at least three times.
Analysis of Cu(II)/H2O2-induced DNA breakage in presence of H1 histones
pGEM3 plasmid DNA breakage in presence of sperm and somatic H1 histones, 10 μM CuCl2 and 10 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), was analyzed on 1% agarose gel in TBE 1X final concentration. The preparation of samples followed the same modality described in the previous paragraph with the only difference that protein to DNA (w/w) ratios were 0.1 and 0.2. H2O2 was the last component to be added and the samples were incubated for 30 minutes at 37 °C. At the end of incubation, samples were added with 3 µL of TBE 10X (in order to obtain TBE 1X final concentration) just before electrophoresis analysis in order to avoid EDTA coordination of Cu ions. Samples containing DNA alone; DNA + CuCl2; DNA + CuCl2 and H2O2 were used as control. Electrophoresis was carried out at 100 V for 30 minutes. DNA migration was visualized by staining agarose gels with ethidium bromide (2 µg/mL) after electrophoresis. All experiments were performed at least three times.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The present work was supported by departmental funding 000020-PRD-2017-M-PISCOPO_001_001.
Author Contributions
M.P. and F.F. designed the research and analyzed the data. C.S., A.G. and C.G. performed the experiments. M.P., F.F. and M.T. provided materials and resources. M.P. and F.F. wrote the paper and revised the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript before submission.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-25784-z.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Marina Piscopo, Email: marina.piscopo@unina.it.
Ferdinando Febbraio, Email: f.febbraio@ibp.cnr.it.
References
- 1.Desai V, Kaler SG. Role of copper in human neurological disorders. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;88:855S–8S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/88.3.855S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sancenón V, Puig S, Mira H, Thiele DJ, Peñarrubia L. Identification of a copper transporter family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003;51:577–587. doi: 10.1023/A:1022345507112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Raffa DF, Gómez-Balderas R, Brunelle P, Rickard GA, Rauk A. Ab initio model studies of copper binding to peptides containing a His-His sequence: relevance to the beta-amyloid peptide of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. JBIC Publ. Soc. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2005;10:887–902. doi: 10.1007/s00775-005-0038-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hong L, Simon JD. Insights into the thermodynamics of copper association with amyloid-β, α-synuclein and prion proteins. Met. Integr. Biometal Sci. 2011;3:262–266. doi: 10.1039/C0MT00052C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lin C-J, Huang H-C, Jiang Z-F. Cu(II) interaction with amyloid-beta peptide: a review of neuroactive mechanisms in AD brains. Brain Res. Bull. 2010;82:235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tamano H, Takeda A. Is interaction of amyloid β-peptides with metals involved in cognitive activity? Met. Integr. Biometal Sci. 2015;7:1205–1212. doi: 10.1039/C5MT00076A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Govindaraju M, et al. Copper interactions with DNA of chromatin and its role in neurodegenerative disorders. J. Pharm. Anal. 2013;3:354–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hartter DE, Barnea A. Brain tissue accumulates 67copper by two ligand-dependent saturable processes. A high affinity, low capacity and a low affinity, high capacity process. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:799–805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM. Oxygen toxicity, oxygen radicals, transition metals and disease. Biochem. J. 1984;219:1–14. doi: 10.1042/bj2190001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Theophanides T, Anastassopoulou J. Copper and carcinogenesis. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2002;42:57–64. doi: 10.1016/S1040-8428(02)00007-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gaetke LM, Chow CK. Copper toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidant nutrients. Toxicology. 2003;189:147–163. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(03)00159-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Scarpa S, Fuso A, D’Anselmi F, Cavallaro RA. Presenilin 1 gene silencing by S-adenosylmethionine: a treatment for Alzheimer disease? FEBS Lett. 2003;541:145–148. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00277-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cai L, Koropatnick J, Cherian MG. Metallothionein protects DNA from copper-induced but not iron-induced cleavage in vitro. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1995;96:143–155. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(94)03585-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Speisky H, et al. Generation of superoxide radicals by copper-glutathione complexes: redox-consequences associated with their interaction with reduced glutathione. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009;17:1803–1810. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.01.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gaetke LM, Chow-Johnson HS, Chow CK. Copper: toxicological relevance and mechanisms. Arch. Toxicol. 2014;88:1929–1938. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1355-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mackie KA, Müller T, Kandeler E. Remediation of copper in vineyards–a mini review. Environ. Pollut. Barking Essex 1987. 2012;167:16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lebrun JD, Uher E, Tusseau-Vuillemin M-H, Gourlay-Francé C. Essential metal contents in indigenous gammarids related to exposure levels at the river basin scale: metal-dependent models of bioaccumulation and geochemical correlations. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;466–467:100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Arnold WR, Cotsifas JS, Smith DS, Le Page S, Gruenthal KM. A comparison of the copper sensitivity of two economically important saltwater mussel species and a review of previously reported copper toxicity data for mussels: important implications for determining future ambient copper saltwater criteria in the USA. Environ. Toxicol. 2009;24:618–628. doi: 10.1002/tox.20452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sagripanti JL, Kraemer KH. Site-specific oxidative DNA damage at polyguanosines produced by copper plus hydrogen peroxide. J. Biol. Chem. 1989;264:1729–1734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haas KL, Franz KJ. Application of metal coordination chemistry to explore and manipulate cell biology. Chem. Rev. 2009;109:4921–4960. doi: 10.1021/cr900134a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nelson WG, Pienta KJ, Barrack ER, Coffey DS. The role of the nuclear matrix in the organization and function of DNA. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1986;15:457–475. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.002325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Piscopo M, Ricciardiello M, Palumbo G, Troisi J. Selectivity of metal bioaccumulation and its relationship with glutathione S-transferase levels in gonadal and gill tissues of Mytilus galloprovincialis exposed to Ni (II), Cu (II) and Cd (II) Rendiconti Lincei. 2016;27:737–748. doi: 10.1007/s12210-016-0564-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dizdaroglu M, Rao G, Halliwell B, Gajewski E. Damage to the DNA bases in mammalian chromatin by hydrogen peroxide in the presence of ferric and cupric ions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1991;285:317–324. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90366-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Oleinick NL, Chiu SM, Ramakrishnan N, Xue LY. The formation, identification, and significance of DNA-protein cross-links in mammalian cells. Br. J. Cancer. Suppl. 1987;8:135–140. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cullis PM, Jones GD, Symons MC, Lea JS. Electron transfer from protein to DNA in irradiated chromatin. Nature. 1987;330:773–774. doi: 10.1038/330773a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liang R, et al. Effects of Ni(II) and Cu(II) on DNA interaction with the N-terminal sequence of human protamine P2: enhancement of binding and mediation of oxidative DNA strand scission and base damage. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20:893–898. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.5.893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Midorikawa K, Murata M, Kawanishi S. Histone peptide AKRHRK enhances H(2)O(2)-induced DNA damage and alters its site specificity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;333:1073–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liang Q, Dedon PC. Cu(II)/H2O2-induced DNA damage is enhanced by packaging of DNA as a nucleosome. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001;14:416–422. doi: 10.1021/tx0002278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Santana RC, Cunha RO, Carvalho JF, Vencato I, Calvo R. Single crystal EPR study of electronic structure and exchange interactions for copper(II)(L-arginine)2(SO4).(H2O)6: a model system to study exchange interactions between unpaired spins in proteins. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2005;99:415–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Piscopo M, et al. Relevance of arginines in the mode of binding of H1 histones to DNA. DNA Cell Biol. 2010;29:339–347. doi: 10.1089/dna.2009.0993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Du J, Gebicki JM. Proteins are major initial cell targets of hydroxyl free radicals. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004;36:2334–2343. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dean RT, Fu S, Stocker R, Davies MJ. Biochemistry and pathology of radical-mediated protein oxidation. Biochem. J. 1997;324(Pt 1):1–18. doi: 10.1042/bj3240001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Davies KJ, Lin SW, Pacifici RE. Protein damage and degradation by oxygen radicals. IV. Degradation of denatured protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1987;262:9914–9920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu M, Yu S, Yang J, Yin X, Zhao D. RNA and CuCl2 induced conformational changes of the recombinant ovine prion protein. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2007;294:197–203. doi: 10.1007/s11010-006-9260-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stone LA, Jackson GS, Collinge J, Wadsworth JDF, Clarke AR. Inhibition of proteinase K activity by copper(II) ions. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 2007;46:245–252. doi: 10.1021/bi061646s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Slavík J. Anilinonaphthalene sulfonate as a probe of membrane composition and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1982;694:1–25. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(82)90012-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Linder MC. The relationship of copper to DNA damage and damage prevention in humans. Mutat. Res. 2012;733:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zavitsanos K, Nunes AM, Malandrinos G, Hadjiliadis N. DNA strand breakage induced by CuII and NiII, in the presence of peptide models of histone H2B. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2011;105:1329–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Furukawa A, et al. Guanine-specific DNA damage induced by gamma-irradiated histone. Biochem. J. 2005;388:813–818. doi: 10.1042/BJ20050186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tosi L, Garnier A. Formation and structure of Cu (II) - poly (L-arginine) complexes in aqueous solution. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1974;58:427–432. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(74)90382-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cabelli DE, Bielski BHJ, Holcman J. Interaction between copper(II)-arginine complexes and HO2/O2- radicals, a pulse radiolysis study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:3665–3669. doi: 10.1021/ja00246a024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Patra AK, Bhowmick T, Roy S, Ramakumar S, Chakravarty AR. Copper(II) complexes of L-arginine as netropsin mimics showing DNA cleavage activity in red light. Inorg. Chem. 2009;48:2932–2943. doi: 10.1021/ic8017425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hakimi, M. & Aliabadi, T. S. Coordination Chemistry of Copper a - Amino Acid Complexes - TI Journals. World Appl. Program (2012).
- 44.Wojciechowska A, et al. Metal–organic framework in an l -arginine copper(ii) ion polymer: structure, properties, theoretical studies and microbiological activity. RSC Adv. 2015;5:36295–36306. doi: 10.1039/C5RA02790J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zoroddu MA, Kowalik-Jankowska T, Medici S, Peana M, Kozlowski H. Copper(II) binding to Cap43 protein fragments. Dalton Trans. Camb. Engl. 2008;2003:6127–6134. doi: 10.1039/b808600a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Vassalli QA, et al. New insights into protamine-like component organization in Mytilus galloprovincialis’ sperm chromatin. DNA Cell Biol. 2015;34:162–169. doi: 10.1089/dna.2014.2631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fioretti FM, et al. A sperm nuclear basic protein from the sperm of the marine worm Chaetopterus variopedatus with sequence similarity to the arginine-rich C-termini of chordate protamine-likes. DNA Cell Biol. 2012;31:1392–1402. doi: 10.1089/dna.2011.1547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Salvati D, et al. Self-association of Chaetopterus variopedatus sperm histone H1-like. Relevance of arginine content and possible physiological role. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2008;55:701–706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Piscopo M, De Petrocellis L, Conte M, Pulcrano G, Geraci G. On the possibility that H1 histone interaction with DNA occurs through phosphates connecting lysine and arginine side chain groups. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2006;53:507–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Piscopo M, Tomei L, De Petrocellis L, Geraci G. Anion-mediated lysine-arginine interaction. Evidence in Chaetopterus variopedatus sperm protamine. FEBS Lett. 1993;334:125–127. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81696-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.De Petrocellis B, Parente A, Tomei L, Geraci G. An H1 histone and a protamine molecule organize the sperm chromatin of the marine worm Chaetopterus variopedatus. Cell Differ. 1983;12:129–135. doi: 10.1016/0045-6039(83)90002-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lakowicz, J. R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 10.1007/978-0-387-46312-4 (Springer US, 2006).
- 53.Eftink MR, Ghiron CA. Fluorescence quenching studies with proteins. Anal. Biochem. 1981;114:199–227. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90474-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Müller A, Saenger W. Studies on the inhibitory action of mercury upon proteinase K. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:26150–26154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Saxena AK, et al. Structure of a ternary complex of proteinase K, mercury, and a substrate-analogue hexa-peptide at 2.2 A resolution. Proteins. 1996;25:195–201. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199606)25:2<195::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gasymov OK, Glasgow BJ. ANS fluorescence: potential to augment the identification of the external binding sites of proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1774:403–411. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Phillips, D. M. P. Histones and Nucleohistones, 10.1007/978-1-4684-1815-6 (Springer US, 1995).
- 58.Giancotti V, Cosimi S, Cary PD, Crane-Robinson C, Geraci G. Preparation and characterization of histone H1 from the sperm of the sea-urchin Sphaerechinus granularis. Biochem. J. 1981;195:171–176. doi: 10.1042/bj1950171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang D, Wilson G, Moore S. Preparation of cross-linked dimers of pancreatic ribonuclease. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 1976;15:660–665. doi: 10.1021/bi00648a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Carbone A, Fioretti FM, Fucci L, Ausió J, Piscopo M. High efficiency method to obtain supercoiled DNA with a commercial plasmid purification kit. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2012;59:275–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.