Abstract
Transcriptional coactivator PGC-1α and its splice variant NT-PGC-1α play crucial roles in regulating cold-induced thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue (BAT). PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α are highly induced by cold in BAT and subsequently bind to and coactivate many transcription factors to regulate expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, respiration and thermogenesis. To identify the complete repertoire of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α target genes in BAT, we analyzed genome-wide DNA-binding and gene expression profiles. We find that PGC-1α-/NT-PGC-1α binding broadly associates with cold-mediated transcriptional activation. In addition to their known target genes in mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism, PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α additionally target a broad spectrum of genes involved in diverse biological pathways including ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolism, ribonucleoprotein complex biosynthesis, phospholipid biosynthesis, angiogenesis, glycogen metabolism, phosphorylation, and autophagy. Our findings expand the number of genes and biological pathways that may be regulated by PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α and provide further insight into the transcriptional regulatory network in which PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α coordinate a comprehensive transcriptional response in BAT in response to cold.
Introduction
Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is specialized for heat production in rodents and humans1,2. Upon cold exposure, non-shivering thermogenesis in BAT is rapidly activated by the sympathetic nervous system that releases noradrenaline and concomitantly stimulates β-adrenergic receptors (AR) on BAT. This stimulation drives transcription of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, respiration and thermogenesis. High levels of electron transport chain complexes create a fuel-derived proton electrochemical gradient across the mitochondrial inner membrane. A key thermogenic uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) in turn decreases this proton gradient by promoting proton leak from the outer to the inner mitochondrial membrane, resulting in heat production instead of ATP synthesis3,4. Although mitochondrial respiration and UCP1-driven uncoupling are critical for maximal heat production in BAT, effective thermogenesis also relies on diverse biological processes, such as lipolysis1,5, fatty acid uptake and β-oxidation6–8, lipogenesis9,10, glucose uptake and metabolism11,12, etc. Genome-wide BAT transcriptome analyses have revealed that a number of genes associated with these processes are upregulated by cold/β-adrenergic stimulation of BAT10,13–16.
Transcriptional coactivator PGC-1α (797 aa), encoded by the PPARGC1A gene, is a key regulator of cold-induced BAT thermogenesis17. PGC-1α is highly induced by β-adrenergic stimulation and coordinates a transcription program resulting in increased mitochondrial biogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, respiration and thermogenesis by binding to and coactivating many different transcription factors, such as PPARs, ERRs, TRs and NRFs17–19. We previously reported a splice variant of the PPARGC1A gene that encodes a shorter isoform of PGC-1α (NT-PGC-1α, 270 aa) in rodents and humans20. NT-PGC-1α is a functional transcriptional coactivator retaining the transcriptional activation and nuclear receptor binding domains of full-length PGC-1α20–24. NT-PGC-1α is co-expressed with PGC-1α in BAT and is highly induced by cold20,21. Our previous microarray analysis showed that NT-PGC-1α significantly upregulates genes involved in fatty acid transport and β-oxidation, TCA cycle, electron transport system, glycolysis, lipogenesis, and PPARα activation pathways in PGC-1α−/− brown adipocytes23. In agreement with in vitro gene expression data, NT-PGC-1α is sufficient to activate cold/β-AR-stimulated thermogenesis in BAT deficient in full-length PGC-1α21. In contrast, deficiency in both PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α significantly impairs BAT thermogenic function25. These findings thus suggest that PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α cooperate together to activate cold-induced thermogenesis in BAT. To map the transcriptional network mediated by PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α in greater detail, we have now conducted chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) in BAT from cold-exposed mice to assess genome-wide DNA-binding patterns of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α using a well-characterized PGC-1α antibody that recognizes both PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α isoforms21,22. In parallel, we have also analyzed cold-responsive gene expression profiles in BAT. Our combined analyses of ChIP-seq and gene expression data sets reveal a more comprehensive repertoire of PGC-1α-/NT-PGC-1α target genes induced by cold/β-AR stimulation in BAT.
Results
Genome-wide identification and characterization of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α binding sites in brown adipose tissue
Transcriptional coactivators PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α play a key role in transcriptional activation of cold-induced BAT thermogenesis17,21,25. To identify the complete repertoire of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α target genes in BAT, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation with a previously validated PGC-1α antibody that recognizes both PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α isoforms21,22, followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq). Since mRNA and protein levels of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α are upregulated by cold in BAT20, we exposed C57BL/6 J mice to 4 °C for different amounts of time to find the condition where PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α protein levels are maximal in BAT. PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α were hardly detectable in BAT of mice housed at 28 °C and 23 °C, but their protein levels rapidly reached to a maximum at 6 h of cold exposure and decreased with longer exposure to cold (Fig. 1A). ChIP-seq was performed using 6h-cold exposed BAT samples where both PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α protein levels are high. Given that both isoforms are immunoprecipitated by PGC-1α antibody (Fig. 1B), the binding profiles generated by ChIP-seq include targets of both PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α (Fig. 1C). In parallel, to evaluate the functional association between genomic binding and gene expression, we conducted a genome-wide BAT transcriptome analysis using RNA isolated from BAT of mice housed at 28 °C or exposed to 4 °C for 6 h (Fig. 1C).
Peak calling by the Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) algorithm identified 3,654 PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites (FDR < 5%). Compared with the distribution of features in the mouse genome, PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites were located within the 5 kb upstream of the transcription start sites (TSS) of the genes with 12.3% of all binding sites (Fig. 2A). Among the remaining sites, PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites were located in ≤ 5 kb downstream of the transcription termination sites (6.2%), intragenic regions (44.6%), 5′- and 3′- UTR regions (1.9%), exons (1.3%), and intergenic regions (33.7%). The average peak signal at PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites was highly enriched at the center of the binding regions (Fig. 2B). Binding events occurring at distal regions may suggest that PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α regulate transcription of genes by binding to distal regulatory elements such as enhancers. In support of the validity of our ChIP-seq results, PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α peaks were found adjacent to numerous previously identified target genes, including UCP1, GYK, ESRRA, PDK4 and COX7b (Fig. 2C)17,26–28. In case of UCP1 and PDK4, there were additional peaks located at the distal regions in addition to the peak at the promoter regions (≤5 kb of the TSS), suggesting that PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α regulate gene expression at multiple sites at promoter and/or enhancer regions through cooperating with different transcription factors.
A de novo motif search within the PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites revealed the greatest enrichment for the sequences TGACCTT and AAGGTCA that correspond to a NR half-site closely resembling the consensus motif of estrogen-related receptors (ESRRs) (Fig. 3A). ESRRs are key nuclear receptors that function with PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α to regulate the expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, fatty acid oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation29. When queried for enrichment of known transcription factor binding motifs, PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites had significant enrichment for the consensus motifs of ESRRs, PPARs, RXRs, RARs and HNF4α that are known to cooperate with PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α (Fig. 3B). Another enriched motif was the consensus motif for CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (CEBPs). A previous study has shown that PGC-1α binds to the CEBPβ binding motif30, although functional cooperation between CEBPβ and PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α has not been determined. Taken together, the unbiased identification of these motifs supports the validity of our ChIP-seq data set.
Functional annotation of PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites using the Genomic Regions Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT)31 further revealed that PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α-occupied genes were clustered with a range of gene ontology (GO) biological processes including fatty acid metabolism, carboxylic acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, brown adipocyte differentiation and insulin signaling (Fig. 3C, top panel). MSigDB pathway analysis identified significant enrichment with fatty acid and lipid metabolism, TCA cycle, electron transport system, insulin signaling, PPAR signaling, adipocytokine signaling, and heat production (Fig. 3C, bottom panel). Our ChIP-seq results are consistent with the known functions of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α in BAT.
Differential gene expression profile of BAT transcriptome in response to cold
Because transcriptional coactivator/transcription factor binding does not necessarily result in transcription of nearby genes, we wanted to determine how many PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α-occupied genes are transcriptionally regulated in BAT in response to cold. As described in Fig. 1C, we thus performed genome-wide gene expression analysis using BAT samples collected from mice housed at 28 °C or exposed to 4 °C for 6 h. Cold significantly changed the transcriptome in BAT, of which 4680 genes were differentially expressed between 28 °C- and 4 °C-exposed groups with a P value cutoff of 0.05 and a relative fold change cutoff of ±1.5 (Fig. 4A). Pathway enrichment analysis was performed on the full gene list using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)32. KEGG pathway databases identified significant enrichment with proteasome, glycerolipid metabolism, antigen processing and presentation, ribosome, spliceosome, basal transcription factors and oxidative phosphorylation pathways (Fig. 4B). The majority of genes in these pathways were upregulated. In contrast, cold-responsive genes associated with mismatch repair and DNA replication tended to be downregulated (Fig. 4B).
Novel and expanded functional roles for PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α in BAT
We next performed a Binding and Expression Target Analysis (BETA)33 with default parameters (peaks within ±100 kb of TSS) to assess the association of PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites with gene expression changes in response to cold. Figure 5A shows cumulative faction of genes ranked by the regulatory potential score from high to low. Supporting that PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α function as transcriptional coactivators, PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites were highly associated with cold-activated genes (Fig. 5A). Motif analysis further revealed that the PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites associated with cold-activated genes were greatly enriched for the consensus motif corresponding to the hormone-nuclear receptor family including ESRRs (Fig. 5B). To predict which of the putative PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α direct target genes might contribute to cold-induced changes of BAT function, we used DAVID database to analyze the functional categories associated with the candidate direct target genes. PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α-activated target genes were enriched for GO biological processes such as fatty acid metabolism, macromolecule catabolism, protein catabolism, ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis, phospholipid biosynthesis, and ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process (Fig. 5C). In addition, KEGG pathway analysis identified significant enrichment with proteasome, glycerolipid metabolism, ether lipid metabolism, glycerophospholipid and tyrosine metabolism pathways (Fig. 5C). These results not only support the known role of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α in fatty acid and lipid metabolism but also suggest their novel role in protein catabolism, ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis, and ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
Further investigation into a subset of PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α target genes (328 genes) that have peaks within ±5 kb from the TSS revealed a significant enrichment of these genes in GO biological processes related to lipid metabolism, angiogenesis, glycogen metabolism, transport of nutrient/protein/solute/electron/proton, phosphorylation, autophagy, mitochondrial organization, cell-cell adhesion, and lipid storage (Fig. 5D,E). The list of genes in each pathway can be found as Supplementary Table S1. KEGG pathway analysis identified enrichment of PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α target genes in AMPK signaling, insulin signaling, central carbon metabolism, adipocytokine signaling, PPAR signaling, and oxidative phosphorylation (Fig. 5D,E). Taken together, these results suggest that PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α play a more extensive role in diverse biological processes and signaling pathways involved in cold-induced remodeling of BAT.
Discussion
PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α are key transcriptional regulators of cold-induced BAT thermogenesis. In response to cold/β-AR stimulation, PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α activate transcription of many genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, respiration, and thermogenesis. In this study, we have utilized an unbiased genomic approach to identify the complete repertoire of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α target genes in BAT. We mapped PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites across the mouse genome in cold-activated BAT (ChIP-seq) and assessed gene expression profile (SAGE-seq) in response to cold. Functional categories enriched in both data sets revealed that PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α binding sites were highly associated with cold-activated genes and that PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α affected diverse biological processes associated with fatty acid metabolism, macromolecule catabolism, and protein catabolism, ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis, phospholipid biosynthesis, and ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process. These findings not only support the known roles of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α in fatty acid and lipid metabolism but also suggest their novel roles in protein catabolism, ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis, and ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Many PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites were located at the proximal and/or distal regions of the TSS, indicating that PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α regulate transcription of these genes by binding to promoter and/or enhancer regions. Moreover, PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites contained the consensus motifs corresponding to nuclear receptors (ESRRs, PPARs, RXRs and RARs), suggesting that PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α cooperate with these nuclear receptors at promoter and/or enhancer regions to activate expression of genes involved in the above mentioned biological processes. However, our results do not provide deeper insight into the relative contribution of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α to their target gene expression in BAT since the PGC-1α antibody used for ChIP experiments did not allow to discriminate between the two isoforms. We recently identified an isoform-specific role for NT-PGC-1α in the regulation of mitochondrial DNA transcription34. However, our ChIP-seq had a limitation to analyze our previous finding because ChIP samples were prepared from nuclear extracts of BAT.
Investigation into a subset of target genes in which PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites are located within ±5 kb of the TSS revealed a number of genes involved in lipid metabolism, angiogenesis, glycogen metabolism, transport of nutrient/protein/solute/electron/proton, phosphorylation, autophagy, mitochondrial organization, and fat storage. These results are in agreement with previous findings that one or more genes involved in these pathways are regulated by PGC-1α and/or NT-PGC-1α at their promoter regions17–19,23,35–37. Although 75% of PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α target genes identified (Table S1) were upregulated by cold, 25% of genes were downregulated. This downregulation may be explained in part by previous findings that transcriptional repressors (e.g. RIP140 and Bhlhe40) co-occupy PGC-1α-targeted gene promoters/enhancers and suppress PGC-1α activity38,39.
Collectively, our integrated data sets not only validate the role of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α in BAT but also expand the repertoire of PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α functional target genes. Moreover, identification of PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding sites across the genome and their putative regulatory transcription factors establishes the foundation for further investigation into how PGC-1α and NT-PGC-1α regulate gene expression programs in BAT in response to cold.
Methods
Mice
The animal experimental protocol for the study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center, and the procedures were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. All mice were housed on a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. For a cold exposure experiment, 11 to 12-week-old C57BL/6 J male mice were acclimated at 28 °C for 4 days and exposed to 4 °C for 6 h. Mice acclimated at 28 °C for 4 days were used as a control group.
Western blot and Immunoprecipitation
Brown adipose tissues were lysed in RIPA buffer40 and subjected to Western blot analysis using monoclonal anti-PGC-1α20 and anti-β-actin antibodies (Sigma). For immuno-precipitation, the protein lysates were incubated with IgG or polyclonal anti-PGC-1α20,22 overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with protein A agarose beads for 3 h at 4 °C. After washings, immunoprecipitates were subjected to Western blot analysis. Protein concentration was determined using Bio-Rad DC protein assay reagents according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
ChIP assays
Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments were performed using interscapular brown adipose tissues (BAT) extracted from mice exposed to 4 °C for 6 h. Briefly, BAT tissues were chopped into small pieces, disaggregated by passing through a 20 G needle, and fixed with formaldehyde. After incubation for 10 min, 2.5 M glycine was added to a final concentration of 0.125 M and the material was pelleted by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm and resuspended in ChIP lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5% (vol/vol) NP-40, protease inhibitors). The homogenates were centrifuged at 1,200 × g and the nuclear pellets were resuspended in ChIP shearing buffer (0.25% SDS, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, protease inhibitors) and sonicated in Covaris MicroTubes to obtain the average DNA fragment size to ~200 bp. For each IP, the sheared chromatin was pooled from at least three mice to minimize the effects of biological variability. Two independent IPs were conducted with rabbit polyclonal PGC-1α antibody directed against the N-terminus of PGC-1α20,22. DNA-protein complexes were eluted from protein A beads with elution buffer (100 mM NaHCO3, 1% SDS) and reverse crosslinked by adding NaCl to a final concentration of 0.2 M and incubating at 65 °C. ChIP and input samples obtained from two independent experiments were submitted for ChIP-seq library construction.
ChIP-seq data analysis
ChIP-seq libraries were produced using the SOLiD ChIP-Seq Sample Prep Kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction and sequenced using the Life Technologies 5500XL SOLiD system at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center Genomics Core. Sequence reads that passed quality control filtering were mapped to the mouse reference genome (mm10) using Bowtie41 (v1.1.2) and the data from two sequencing runs were concatenated. Peak calling were performed using the MACS algorithm42 (v1.0.1) by applying default settings and a P-value cutoff of 10−5 and by comparing with the input control without immunoprecipitation. Peaks with a FDR < 0.05 were incorporated into further analysis. Mapping of ChIP-seq peaks to the nearest transcription start site (TSS) of the mouse reference genome (mm10) and functional annotation of ChIP-seq peaks were obtained using GREAT31 (v3.0.0) with the basal plus extension gene association rule, including curated regulatory domains. For visualization of ChIP-seq peaks on the gene promoters, the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV)43,44 (v2.3) was used. The web-based application Cistrome Integrative Analysis Pipeline45 (http://cistrome.org/ap/) was employed for following analyses: The cis-regulatory element annotation system (CEAS) tool used for genomic distribution analysis of ChIP-seq peaks; the SitePro tool used for signal profiling near given peaks; To identify the consensus motifs that are enriched closed to the ChIP-seq peak centers, de novo and motif enrichment analyses were performed using the SeqPro motif algorithm with the default parameters (width of region to be scanned, 600 bp; P-value < 0.001; mac output hits, 0) and the results were sorted on the basis of z-score. ChIP-seq data are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (accession number GSE110056).
Analysis of gene expression by SAGE-seq
Interscapular BAT was obtained from mice housed at 28 °C or exposed to 4 °C for 6 h. Total RNA was isolated from six biological replicates per each group using TRI Reagent and RNeasy mini kit. The quantity and quality of purified RNA were determined using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Only samples with a RIN number (RNA integrity number) greater than 7.0 were processed further. The SOLiD SAGE technology (Serial Analysis of Gene Expression) was utilized to determine mRNA expression levels by generating the SOLiD SAGE libraries of unique 27-bp sequence tags for all mRNAs and sequencing unique sequence tags isolated from the 3′ ends of mRNAs using the Life Technologies 5500XL SOLiD system. The alignment of sequencing reads to a reference genome was performed using a modified version of the Applied Biosystems SOLiD™ SAGE™ Analysis Software v1.10. Raw count files were analyzed by the R/Bioconductor program DESeq46; significance and predictive analyses were performed using SAM (http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/SAM/index.html) and PAM, respectively47,48. The mean values of six biological replicates were determined to identify differentially expressed genes between 28 °C and 4 °C-exposed groups with a P value cutoff of 0.05 and a relative fold change cutoff of ±1.5. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and heat maps were generated using the Morpheus49. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)32. Gene expression data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database with accession number GSE110056.
Integrative analysis of ChIP-seq and expression data
The combined analysis of our ChIP-seq and transcriptomic data was performed using the Binding and Expression Target Analysis (BETA) software available as part of the Cistrome Integrative Analysis Pipeline33 (http://cistrome.org/BETA/). The BETA with default settings was used to predict the active or repressive function of PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α, to identify the candidate target genes that are transcriptionally regulated by PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α in response to cold, and to identify PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α binding motifs that are associated with candidate target regions. PGC-1α/NT-PGC-1α target genes were screened out and their significantly enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms and KEGG pathways were obtained using the web-based DAVID Bioinformatics Resources database50,51. A P value cutoff of 0.05 was used to identify significantly enriched categories.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Tom Gettys (Pennington Biomedical Research Center) for kindly providing anti-PGC-1α antibodies. The authors also thank Dr. Hee-Jin Jun and Mr. Richard Carmouche for technical assistance and Ms. Cindi Tramonte for administrative support. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant NIH R01DK104748 (JSC) and in part by 2 U54 GM104940 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH which funds the Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center (SG). The work used Cell Biology & Bioimaging and Genomics Core facilities that are supported in part by COBRE (NIH8 1P30GM118430-01) and NORC (NIH P30-DK072476) center grants from the National Institutes of Health.
Author Contributions
J.S.C. conceived the study, performed the experiments, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript. S.G. analyzed the results. S.N. analyzed the results. J.M.S. conceived the study and analyzed the results. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-26244-4.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Cannon B, Nedergaard J. Brown adipose tissue: function and physiological significance. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:277–359. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Betz MJ, Enerback S. Human Brown Adipose Tissue: What We Have Learned So Far. Diabetes. 2015;64:2352–2360. doi: 10.2337/db15-0146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nedergaard, J. et al. UCP1: the only protein able to mediate adaptive non-shivering thermogenesis and metabolic inefficiency. Biochim Biophys Acta1504, 82–106, doi:S0005-2728(00)00247-4 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4.Golozoubova V, et al. Only UCP1 can mediate adaptive nonshivering thermogenesis in the cold. FASEB J. 2001;15:2048–2050. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0536fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Souza SC, et al. Perilipin regulates the thermogenic actions of norepinephrine in brown adipose tissue. J Lipid Res. 2007;48:1273–1279. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M700047-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wu Q, et al. Fatty acid transport protein 1 is required for nonshivering thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue. Diabetes. 2006;55:3229–3237. doi: 10.2337/db06-0749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee J, Ellis JM, Wolfgang MJ. Adipose fatty acid oxidation is required for thermogenesis and potentiates oxidative stress-induced inflammation. Cell Rep. 2015;10:266–279. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bartelt A, et al. Brown adipose tissue activity controls triglyceride clearance. Nat Med. 2011;17:200–205. doi: 10.1038/nm.2297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mccormack JG, Denton RM. Evidence That Fatty-Acid Synthesis in Interscapular Brown Adipose-Tissue of Cold-Adapted Rats Is Increased In vivo by Insulin by Mechanisms Involving Parallel Activation of Pyruvate-Dehydrogenase and Acetyl-Coenzyme-a Carboxylase. Biochemical Journal. 1977;166:627–630. doi: 10.1042/bj1660627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sanchez-Gurmaches, J. et al. Brown Fat AKT2 Is a Cold-Induced Kinase that Stimulates ChREBP-Mediated De Novo Lipogenesis to Optimize Fuel Storage and Thermogenesis. Cell Metab, 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.10.008 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Shimizu Y, Nikami H, Saito M. Sympathetic activation of glucose utilization in brown adipose tissue in rats. J Biochem. 1991;110:688–692. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a123642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vallerand AL, Perusse F, Bukowiecki LJ. Stimulatory effects of cold exposure and cold acclimation on glucose uptake in rat peripheral tissues. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:R1043–1049. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1990.259.5.R1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yu XX, Lewin DA, Forrest W, Adams SH. Cold elicits the simultaneous induction of fatty acid synthesis and beta-oxidation in murine brown adipose tissue: prediction from differential gene expression and confirmation in vivo. FASEB J. 2002;16:155–168. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0568com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rosell M, et al. Brown and white adipose tissues: intrinsic differences in gene expression and response to cold exposure in mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;306:E945–964. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00473.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shore AM, et al. Cold-induced changes in gene expression in brown adipose tissue, white adipose tissue and liver. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hao Q, et al. Transcriptome profiling of brown adipose tissue during cold exposure reveals extensive regulation of glucose metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;308:E380–392. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00277.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Puigserver P, et al. A cold-inducible coactivator of nuclear receptors linked to adaptive thermogenesis. Cell. 1998;92:829–839. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81410-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu Z, et al. Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Cell. 1999;98:115–124. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80611-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schreiber SN, et al. The estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) functions in PPARgamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1alpha)-induced mitochondrial biogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:6472–6477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308686101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang Y, et al. Alternative mRNA splicing produces a novel biologically active short isoform of PGC-1{alpha} J Biol Chem. 2009;284:32813–32826. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.037556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chang JS, et al. NT-PGC-1alpha protein is sufficient to link beta3-adrenergic receptor activation to transcriptional and physiological components of adaptive thermogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:9100–9111. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.320200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jun HJ, Joshi Y, Patil Y, Noland RC, Chang JS. NT-PGC-1alpha activation attenuates high-fat diet-induced obesity by enhancing brown fat thermogenesis and adipose tissue oxidative metabolism. Diabetes. 2014;63:3615–3625. doi: 10.2337/db13-1837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim J, et al. Regulation of Brown and White Adipocyte Transcriptome by the Transcriptional Coactivator NT-PGC-1alpha. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chang, J. S., Jun, H. J. & Park, M. Transcriptional coactivator NT-PGC-1alpha promotes gluconeogenic gene expression and enhances hepatic gluconeogenesis. Physiol Rep4, 10.14814/phy2.13013 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Lin J, et al. Defects in adaptive energy metabolism with CNS-linked hyperactivity in PGC-1alpha null mice. Cell. 2004;119:121–135. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mazzucotelli A, et al. The transcriptional coactivator peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)gamma coactivator-1 alpha and the nuclear receptor PPAR alpha control the expression of glycerol kinase and metabolism genes independently of PPAR gamma activation in human white adipocytes. Diabetes. 2007;56:2467–2475. doi: 10.2337/db06-1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schreiber SN, Knutti D, Brogli K, Uhlmann T, Kralli A. The transcriptional coactivator PGC-1 regulates the expression and activity of the orphan nuclear receptor estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) J Biol Chem. 2003;278:9013–9018. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212923200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wende AR, Huss JM, Schaeffer PJ, Giguere V, Kelly DP. PGC-1alpha coactivates PDK4 gene expression via the orphan nuclear receptor ERRalpha: a mechanism for transcriptional control of muscle glucose metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:10684–10694. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.24.10684-10694.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Giguere V. Transcriptional control of energy homeostasis by the estrogen-related receptors. Endocr Rev. 2008;29:677–696. doi: 10.1210/er.2008-0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Charos AE, et al. A highly integrated and complex PPARGC1A transcription factor binding network in HepG2 cells. Genome Res. 2012;22:1668–1679. doi: 10.1101/gr.127761.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McLean CY, et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:495–501. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Subramanian A, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang S, et al. Target analysis by integration of transcriptome and ChIP-seq data with BETA. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:2502–2515. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chang JS, Ha K. An unexpected role for the transcriptional coactivator isoform NT-PGC-1alpha in the regulation of mitochondrial respiration in brown adipocytes. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:9958–9966. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.778373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chinsomboon J, et al. The transcriptional coactivator PGC-1alpha mediates exercise-induced angiogenesis in skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:21401–21406. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909131106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mandard S, et al. Glycogen synthase 2 is a novel target gene of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:1145–1157. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-7006-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vainshtein A, Tryon LD, Pauly M, Hood DA. Role of PGC-1alpha during acute exercise-induced autophagy and mitophagy in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2015;308:C710–719. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00380.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hallberg M, et al. A functional interaction between RIP140 and PGC-1alpha regulates the expression of the lipid droplet protein CIDEA. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:6785–6795. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00504-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chung SY, et al. Bhlhe40 Represses PGC-1alpha Activity on Metabolic Gene Promoters in Myogenic Cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2015;35:2518–2529. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00387-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chang JS, et al. Regulation of NT-PGC-1alpha subcellular localization and function by protein kinase A-dependent modulation of nuclear export by CRM1. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:18039–18050. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.083121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang Y, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) Genome Biol. 2008;9:R137. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Robinson JT, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Thorvaldsdottir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:178–192. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liu T, et al. Cistrome: an integrative platform for transcriptional regulation studies. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R83. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-8-r83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:5116–5121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091062498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tibshirani R, Hastie T, Narasimhan B, Chu G. Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:6567–6572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082099299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Starruss J, de Back W, Brusch L, Deutsch A. Morpheus: a user-friendly modeling environment for multiscale and multicellular systems biology. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1331–1332. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dennis G, Jr, et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:P3. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-p3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.