Abstract
Background
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a serious complication in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Objective
To study associations between relevant co-morbidities and CHF in patients with AF.
Methods
Study population included all adults (n=12,283) ≥45 years diagnosed with AF at 75 primary care centers in Sweden 2001–2007. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between co-morbidities, and prevalent CHF. In a subsample (n=9,424), (excluding patients with earlier CHF), Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios with 95% CIs for the association between co-morbidities, and a first hospital diagnosis of CHF, after adjustment for age and socioeconomic factors.
Results
During 5.4 years’ follow-up (standard deviation 2.5), 2,259 patients (24.0%; 1,135 men, 21.8%, and 1,124 women, 26.7%) were diagnosed with CHF. Patients with hypertension were less likely to have CHF, while a diagnosis of coronary heart disease, valvular heart disease, diabetes, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), was consistently associated with CHF among men and women. CHF was more common among women with depression. The relative fully adjusted risk of incident CHF was increased for the following diseases in men with AF: valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and diabetes; and for the following diseases in women: valvular heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and COPD. The corresponding risk was decreased among women for hypertension.
Conclusions
In this clinical setting we found hypertension to be associated with a decreased risk of CHF among women; valvular heart disease and diabetes to be associated with an increased risk of CHF in both sexes; and cardiomyopathy to be associated with an increased risk of CHF among men.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Congestive heart failure, Gender, Hypertension
1. Introduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the population, with a prevalence of 2% in Sweden, defined as a recorded diagnoses in the nationwide patient register [1]. Even if ischemic stroke is the most important complication among patients with AF [2], i.e. with a five times higher risk compared to individuals without AF [3], there are also other risks with AF. Congestive heart failure (CHF) and AF are interrelated [4, 5], with CHF being three times more common among AF patients compared to non-AF individuals [6]. Among elderly, CHF is the most common cardiovascular disease (CVD) [7], and, according to a recent study in the USA, the development of CHF after a diagnosis of AF has not declined over time [8]. Furthermore, CHF in AF patients is also associated with an increased mortality [6], with one study finding a doubled mortality compared to AF patients without CHF [8]. CHF is also the most common cause of death among AF patients, corresponding to 30% of deaths [9].
AF is also associated with other CVDs. Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common comorbidity in AF [10], as well as an important risk factor for both CHF [11], and mortality [12] among AF patients. In a Japanese study, the existence of structural heart disease, i.e. myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathy, was found to be the only predictive factor for development of CHF among AF patients [13]. In a study of women with AF in the USA, modifiable risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, smoking, and diabetes accounted for the majority of the female population’s risk of incident CHF [14]. In addition, hypertension is common in CHF and also regarded as a risk factor for future CHF [15]. Additionally, some respiratory diseases are associated with AF, i.e. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [16, 17], and obstructive sleep apnea [18], and with CHF [19, 20]. Furthermore, the rate of CHF among AF patients varies in different countries, and other than clinical factors seems to be of importance for the development of CHF [9].
Thus, it is important to study risk factors for the development of CHF in patients with AF. Actually, one study in the USA found a 2-fold higher rate of CHF than those of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) [8], suggesting why it is possible that prevention of CHF needs to be prioritized in AF treatment as much as the prevention of ischemic stroke.
There are also gender differences as regards to AF, with AF being more common among men [1], and being diagnosed on average five years earlier among men than among women [21]. On the other hand, women with AF exhibit both a higher risk of stroke as well as of mortality than men with AF [22]. Thus, it is important to analyze men and women separately.
CHF could be prevented in AF, provided that the relevant risk factors are known, and under the hypothesis that cardiovascular co-morbidities and sociodemographic factors are important for the development of CHF. The aims herein were therefore to study the association between relevant co-morbidities and CHF among men and women with AF in Swedish primary care, and to study factors associated with a first hospital diagnosis of CHF among patients with AF who still had not developed CHF. We hypothesized that both co-morbid CVD conditions, such as hypertension, CHD, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and cerebrovascular diseases, as well as other important diseases, including diabetes, depression and anxiety, and socio-demographic factors, could affect the risk of incident CHF in AF patients.
2. Methods
2.1 Design
The study used individual-level patient data from 75 primary health care centers (PHCCs), 48 of which were located in Stockholm County. Individuals attending any of the participating PHCCs between 2001 and 2008 were included in the study. We used Extractor software (http://www.slso.sll.se/SLPOtemplates/SLPOPage1____10400.aspx; accessed September 19, 2010) to extract individual electronic patient records (EPRs). National identification numbers were replaced with new unique serial numbers to ensure anonymity. The files were linked to a dataset including data from the Total Population Register, the National Patient Register (NPR), and the Swedish Cause of Death Register, which contains individual-level data on age, sex, education, cause of death, and hospital diagnosis for all residents registered in Sweden. Thus, a new research dataset containing clinical data and information on socioeconomic status on the individuals (n=1,098,420) registered at the 75 PHCCs was created. Data from the Cause of Death Register were used for the follow-up.
The investigation conforms with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approvals were obtained from regional boards at Karolinska Institutet and the University of Lund.
2.2 Study population
The study included all patients with diagnosed AF, identified by the presence of the ICD-10 code (10th version of the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases) for atrial fibrillation (I48) in patients’ medical records at the PHCCs. The following cardiovascular-related disorders were used as covariates: hypertension, CHD, cerebrovascular diseases (CVD), and diabetes mellitus (for specific codes, see below). Patients with CHF during the study period were identified in two ways, either through a diagnosis in the EPR in the PHCC or through a hospital diagnosis. In total, 12,283 individuals (6,646 men and 5,637 women), aged 45 years or older at the time of AF diagnosis and who visited any of the 75 participating PHCCs from January 1, 2001, until December 31, 2007, with data on neighborhood socioeconomic status available, were included in the study. In the subset studying first hospital CHF diagnosis, patients with an earlier CHF were excluded (n=2,859), yielding 9,424 patients (5,211 men and 4,213 women) in the analysis.
2.3 Outcome variable
For logistic regression: prevalent CHF. For Cox and Laplace regression: time from first AF diagnosis to first hospital diagnosis of CHF (until December 31, 2010).
2.4 Demographic and socio-economic variables
Sex was stratified into men and women.
Individuals were divided into the following age groups 45–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84, and >85 years. Individuals younger than 45 years were excluded.
Educational level was categorized as ≤9 years (partial or complete compulsory schooling), 10–12 years (partial or complete secondary schooling), and >12 years (college and/or university studies).
Marital status was classified as married, unmarried, divorced, or widowed.
Neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) was categorized into three groups according to the neighborhood index: more than one standard deviation (SD) below the mean (high SES or low deprivation), more than one SD above the mean (low SES or high deprivation), and within one SD of the mean (middle SES or deprivation). The neighborhood index was based derived from the following four variables: low educational status (<10 years of formal education), low income (<50% of the median individual income from all sources), unemployment, and receipt of social welfare. The neighborhood deprivation index was categorized into three groups: more than one standard deviation (SD) below the mean (high SES or low deprivation level), more than one SD above the mean (low SES or high deprivation level), and within one SD of the mean (moderate SES or moderate deprivation level).
2.5 Co-morbidities
We identified the following cardiovascular co-morbidities from the EPRs among the individuals in the study population: hypertension (I10–15); CHD (I20–25), also including registered hospitalizations for myocardial infarction from the NPR; CHF (I50 or I110), also including hospitalizations for CHF from the NPR; non-rheumatic valvular diseases (I34–38); cardiomyopathy (I42); CVD (I60–69), also including registered hospitalizations for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke from the NPR; diabetes mellitus (E10–14); obesity (E65–E68); COPD (J40–J47); obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (G47); depression (F32–F34, F38–F39); and anxiety disorders (F40–41). No diagnosis of rheumatic valvular diseases (I05–08) was recorded.
Results were also estimated by CHA2DS2-VASc scores, however after omitting the CHF item, with scores between 0 and 7 for men, and 1 and 8 for women.
2.7 Statistical analyses
Analyses were performed stratified by sex. Differences in means and distributions between individuals with or without CHF were compared by Student’s t-test, chi-square analysis, and Fisher’s exact test. Age-adjustment for co-morbidity was performed by logistic regression, and for marital status and socio-economic factors by ANCOVA.
For individuals with prevalent CHF, i.e. earlier or newly diagnosed, multivariate logistic regression was performed to study the associations with background factors (n=11,659, with data missing on marital status in 51 and educational level in 1,042 individuals). A significant interaction was found regarding marital status and sex.
For patients with incident CHF, excluding those with a CHF diagnosis before the first registered AF diagnosis (n=2,859), follow-up analyses were performed, firstly by using Cox regression estimating hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using time to the first hospital diagnosis of CHF as the outcome (n=9,424). Secondly, Laplace regression was used to calculate the difference in years until the first 25% had had a first hospital diagnosis of CHF [23]. As a consequence of this approach, different distributions and calculations were used to obtain estimates from both Cox and Laplace regression. Thus, we considered the results to be more robust when findings were statistically significant with both methods. The regression models were also tested for possible interactions, and a significant interaction was found between sex and hypertension. All models were presented stratified by sex. The Cox and Laplace regression models were adjusted for the following variables in separate models: age, socio-demographic factors (educational level, marital status, and neighborhood socio-economic status), co-morbidities (hypertension, CHD, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, diabetes, obesity, COPD, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, depression, and anxiety). In the fully adjusted models, only those co-morbidities that were significantly associated with the outcome for either men or women (in models adjusted for age and socio-demographic factors) were included.
Results for newly diagnosed CHF were also calculated including CHA2DS2-VASc scores, with incidence rates per 100 patient-years, and trend analysis by Cuzick’s non-parametric trend test, stratified by sex.
A p-value for two-sided tests of <0.01 was considered statistically significant in baseline comparisons due to the multiple comparisons between men and women. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for variables in the logistic regression, Cox regression, and Laplace regression analyses. All analyses were performed in STATA 11.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA), with an amendment for Laplace regression provided by Professor Bottai [23].
3. Results
Characteristics of the entire study population consisting of patients with AF (n=12,283), stratified by sex (6,646 men and 5,637 women), and into those with a diagnosis of CHF (yes/no) are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Men | Women | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Number of patients | (N=6,646) | Difference | (N=5,637) | Difference | ||||
No CHF | CHF | p-values | No CHF | CHF | p-values | |||
n=3,790 (57.0%) | n=2,856 (43.0%) | Crude | Age-adjusted | n=2,809 (49.8%) | n=2,828 (50.2%) | Crude | Age-adjusted | |
Number of deaths | 687 (18.1%) | 1,296 (45.4) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 600 (21.4) | 1,371 (48.5) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Age (years), mean (SD) | 70.0 (10.1) | 75.0 (9.5) | <0.001 | - | 74.6 (9.7) | 79.6 (8.1) | <0.001 | - |
Age groups (years) | <0.001 | - | <0.001 | - | ||||
45–54 | 280 (7.4) | 90 (3.2) | 86 (3.1) | 19 (0.7) | ||||
55–64 | 885 (23.4) | 337 (11.8) | 386 (13.7) | 135 (4.8) | ||||
65–74 | 1,259 (33.2) | 783 (27.4) | 791 (28.2) | 475 (16.8) | ||||
75–79 | 645 (17.0) | 612 (21.4) | 565 (20.1) | 605 (21.4) | ||||
80–84 | 481 (12.7) | 602 (21.1) | 551 (19.6) | 813 (28.8) | ||||
≥85 | 240 (6.3) | 432 (15.1) | 430 (15.3) | 781 (27.6) | ||||
Educational level | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
Compulsory schooling | 1,334 (36.4) | 1,152 (43.9) | 1,239 (47.6) | 1,360 (57.9) | ||||
Secondary schooling | 1,400 (38.2) | 967 (36.9) | 915 (35.2) | 713 (30.4) | ||||
College and/or university studies | 932 (25.4) | 505 (19.3) | 449 (17.3) | 275 (11.7) | ||||
Marital status | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
Married | 2,410 (63.8) | 1,540 (54.2) | 987 (35.3) | 676 (24.0) | ||||
Unmarried | 340 (9.0) | 290 (10.2) | 215 (7.7) | 184 (6.5) | ||||
Divorced | 582 (15.4) | 439 (15.5) | 411 (14.7) | 381 (13.5) | ||||
Widowed | 447 (11.8) | 573 (20.2) | 1,184 (42.3) | 1,573 (55.9) | ||||
Neighborhood SES | 0.009 | 0.93 | 0.48 | 0.043 | ||||
High | 1,575 (41.6) | 1,081 (37.9) | 982 (35.0) | 966 (34.2) | ||||
Middle | 1,687 (44.5) | 1,343 (47.0) | 1,389 (49.5) | 1,388 (49.1) | ||||
Low | 528 (13.9) | 432 (15.1) | 438 (15.6) | 474 (16.8) | ||||
Diagnosis | ||||||||
Hypertension | 1,650 (43.5) | 1,149 (40.2) | 0.007 | 0.003 | 1,488 (53.0) | 1,299 (45.9) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Coronary heart disease | 690 (18.2) | 1,032 (36.1) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 501 (17.8) | 1,011 (35.8) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Valvular heart disease | 84 (2.2) | 210 (7.4) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 86 (3.1) | 191 (6.8) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Cardiomyopathy | 12 (0.3) | 48 (1.7) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 11 (0.4) | 19 (0.7) | 0.15 | 0.019 |
Cerebrovascular diseases | 676 (17.8) | 601 (21.0) | 0.001 | 0.56 | 612 (21.8) | 677 (23.9) | 0.054 | 0.67 |
Diabetes mellitus | 623 (16.4) | 689 (24.1) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 441 (15.7) | 652 (23.1) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Obesity | 201 (5.3) | 151 (5.3) | 0.98 | <0.001 | 124 (4.4) | 138 (4.9) | 0.41 | <0.001 |
COPD | 287 (7.6) | 423 (14.8) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 267 (9.5) | 439 (15.5) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome | 35 (0.9) | 29 (1.0) | 0.70 | 0.16 | 8 (0.3) | 18 (0.6) | 0.051 | 0.010 |
Depression | 230 (6.1) | 182 (6.4) | 0.61 | 0.56 | 287 (10.2) | 340 (12.0) | 0.031 | 0.010 |
Anxiety | 100 (2.6) | 83 (2.9) | 0.51 | 0.57 | 151 (5.4) | 162 (5.7) | 0.56 | 0.42 |
Information on educational level and marital status is missing for some individuals.
CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SD, standard deviation; SES, socioeconomic status.
Odds from the multivariate logistic regression models of the association with prevalent CHF are shown in Table 2, stratified by sex, and also stratified by age group, i.e. 45–74 years and ≥75 years. Lower ORs were found for the highest educational level among both men and women, but when stratified by age only among men and women <75 years of age. A significant interaction was found regarding marital status and sex. CHF was more common among unmarried, divorced, or widowed men than in married men. However, CHF was not significantly more common in divorced men aged ≥75 years, and no significant differences were found among women with different marital status. CHF was more common among women living in low SES neighborhoods. CHF was significantly less common among men and women with hypertension in all analyses, including both age categories, i.e. 45–74 years and ≥75 years. CHF was consistently more common in those with valvular heart disease, CVD, and diabetes in both men and women and both in age-groups 45–74 years, and ≥75 years, while for cardiomyopathy this was not the case in the age category ≥75 years. CHF was also more common among women with obesity and sleep apnea disorder, but not significantly more common among women aged ≥75 years. COPD was consistently more common in both men and women with CHF.
Table 2.
Men | Women | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
All | < 75 years | ≥75 years | All | < 75 years | ≥75 years | |
Number of patients | N=6,273 | N=3,578 | N=2,695 | N=4,936 | N=1,842 | N=3,094 |
| ||||||
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
Age, years | 1.05 (1.05–1.06) | 1.04 (1.03–1.06) | 1.06 (1.04–1.09) | 1.07 (1.06–1.08) | 1.06 (1.04–1.08) | 1.05 (1.03–1.07) |
Educational level | ||||||
Compulsory schooling | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) |
Secondary schooling | 0.95 (0.84–1.08) | 0.85 (0.72–1.01) | 1.04 (0.86–1.25) | 0.86 (0.75–0.98) | 0.82 (0.65–1.04) | 0.88 (0.74–1.04) |
College and/or university studies | 0.84 (0.72–0.97) | 0.76 (0.62–0.93) | 0.93 (0.74–1.16) | 0.80 (0.66–0.97) | 0.71 (0.52–0.97) | 0.89 (0.69–1.14) |
Marital status | ||||||
Married | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) |
Unmarried | 1.87 (1.55–2.27) | 1.92 (1.52–2.42) | 1.75 (1.24–2.47) | 1.26 (0.98–1.63) | 1.44 (0.98–2.12) | 1.10 (0.78–1.54) |
Divorced | 1.38 (1.18–1.60) | 1.49 (1.24–1.81) | 1.17 (0.90–1.53) | 1.15 (0.95–1.40) | 1.25 (0.94–1.67) | 1.04 (0.80–1.36) |
Widowed | 1.36 (1.16–1.60) | 1.61 (1.20–2.17) | 1.24 (1.02–1.51) | 1.13 (0.97–1.31) | 1.22 (0.93–1.59) | 1.05 (0.87–1.26) |
Neighborhood SES | ||||||
High | 0.93 (0.82–1.05) | 0.91 (0.76–1.09) | 0.96 (0.79–1.15) | 1.11 (0.96–1.28) | 1.07 (0.83–1.38) | 1.14 (0.96–1.36) |
Middle | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) |
Low | 1.07 (0.89–1.29) | 1.19 (0.93–1.52) | 0.94 (0.71–1.24) | 1.25 (1.02–1.52) | 1.19 (0.86–1.66) | 1.25 (0.98–1.59) |
Diagnosis | ||||||
Hypertension | 0.80 (0.71–0.89) | 0.80 (0.69–0.94) | 0.80 (0.68–0.94) | 0.66 (0.59–0.75) | 0.63 (0.50–0.78) | 0.68 (0.58–0.79) |
Coronary heart disease | 2.11 (1.86–2.38) | 2.16 (1.81–2.58) | 2.04 (1.72–2.43) | 2.25 (1.96–2.59) | 2.23 (1.72–2.88) | 2.25 (1.90–2.66) |
Valvular heart disease | 3.47 (2.62–4.59) | 3.70 (2.49–5.49) | 3.30 (2.22–4.89) | 2.37 (1.77–3.17) | 2.94 (1.81–4.76) | 2.07 (1.44–2.98) |
Cardiomyopathy | 9.43 (4.81–18.47) | 9.69 (4.79–19.58) | 5.47 (0.64–45.47) | 2.24 (0.99–5.07) | 3.36 (1.09–10.28) | 1.28 (0.38–4.23) |
Cerebrovascular diseases | 1.09 (0.95–1.25) | 1.23 (1.00–1.51) | 0.96 (0.80–1.16) | 1.11 (0.96–1.28) | 1.29 (0.97–1.70) | 1.06 (0.89–1.25) |
Diabetes mellitus | 1.63 (1.42–1.86) | 1.73 (1.45–2.08) | 1.50 (1.21–1.85) | 1.68 (1.44–1.96) | 2.01 (1.55–2.60) | 1.53 (1.26–1.86) |
Obesity | 1.27 (0.99–1.62) | 1.26 (0.96–1.66) | 1.20 (0.68–2.13) | 1.79 (1.34–2.38) | 1.87 (1.31–2.68) | 1.53 (0.95–2.47) |
COPD | 1.86 (1.56–2.21) | 1.57 (1.23–2.01) | 2.25 (1.75–2.90) | 1.83 (1.52–2.20) | 2.13 (1.58–2.86) | 1.63 (1.29–2.06) |
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome | 1.32 (0.77–2.28) | 1.24 (0.68–2.28) | 1.68 (0.46–6.16) | 2.86 (1.13–7.23) | 3.93 (1.13–13.74) | 2.09 (0.53–8.19) |
Depression | 1.00 (0.80–1.25) | 0.86 (0.63–1.19) | 1.14 (0.82–1.59) | 1.20 (0.98–1.45) | 1.19 (0.85–1.66) | 1.20 (0.94–1.53) |
Anxiety | 0.97 (0.69–1.36) | 0.87 (0.54–1.41) | 1.03 (0.63–1.68) | 1.06 (0.81–1.39) | 1.31 (0.84–2.05) | 0.94 (0.68–1.31) |
Information on educational level and marital status is missing for some individuals.
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SES, socioeconomic status.
In the analysis of incident CHF, i.e. a first hospital diagnosis of CHF, excluding patients with a recorded earlier CHF (n=2,859), the study sample consisted of 9,424 individuals (5,211 men and 4,213 women). In total, 2,259 patients (24.0%) were diagnosed with CHF during the follow-up of whom 1,135 were men (21.8%) and 1,124 were women (26.7%). The mean follow-up time until first hospital diagnosis of CHF in those without previous CHF was 5.4 years (standard deviation 2.5). Patients were followed for a total of 51,228 person-years: 28,974 person-years for men and 22,254 person-years for women.
The risks of a first hospital diagnosis for CHF are shown in Table 3. Time until the first 25% of patients were diagnosed with incident CHF are shown in Table 4. After adjustments for age, socio-demographic factors, and co-morbidities, an increased risk both for a first hospitalization and a shorter time until the first 25% had been diagnosed with CHF was found in men with valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, diabetes, COPD, or obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and, in women, with valvular heart disease, diabetes, or COPD. Among women with obesity, Cox regression showed a significantly increased risk for CHF albeit with no significant result when using Laplace regression. Among women with cardiomyopathy or obstructive sleep apnea syndrome a significantly shorter time until 25% had been diagnosed with CHF was found, albeit with a non-significant increased risk in Cox regression. Women with hypertension had a reduced risk of a hospital diagnosis for CHF and an increased time to a first hospital diagnosis for CHF.
Table 3.
Men | Women | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age-adjusted | Adjusted for age and socio-demography | Fully adjusted | Age-adjusted | Adjusted for age and socio-demography | Fully adjusted | |
Diagnosis | ||||||
Hypertension | 1.11 (0.99–1.25) | 1.12 (0.99–1.26) | 1.08 (0.95–1.22) | 0.87 (0.77–0.98) | 0.87 (0.76–0.98) | 0.83 (0.73–0.95) |
Myocardial infarction | 1.12 (0.91–1.37) | 1.13 (0.91–1.39) | - | 1.05 (0.84–1.31) | 1.07 (0.84–1.37) | - |
Valvular heart disease | 2.20 (1.77–2.73) | 2.10 (1.67–2.64) | 2.12 (1.68–2.67) | 1.70 (1.33–2.17) | 1.66 (1.27–2.16) | 1.64 (1.26–2.14) |
Cardiomyopathy | 4.04 (2.28–7.17) | 4.12 (2.32–7.31) | 4.25 (2.39–7.56) | 2.04 (0.97–4.30) | 1.62 (0.67–3.90) | 1.67 (0.69–4.04) |
Cerebrovascular diseases | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Diabetes mellitus | 1.53 (1.34–1.75) | 1.52 (1.32–1.75) | 1.47 (1.27–1.69) | 1.40 (1.21–1.61) | 1.39 (1.19–1.61) | 1.39 (1.19–1.62) |
Obesity | 1.43 (1.09–1.88) | 1.34 (1.01–1.77) | 1.15 (0.86–1.52) | 1.55 (1.17–2.04) | 1.53 (1.14–2.04) | 1.36 (1.01–1.83) |
COPD | 1.63 (1.37–1.92) | 1.61 (1.36–1.92) | 1.60 (1.35–1.90) | 1.53 (1.30–1.81) | 1.55 (1.30–1.85) | 1.51 (1.26–1.80) |
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome | 2.04 (1.20–3.47) | 2.11 (1.24–3.58) | 1.92 (1.13–3.29) | 2.23 (1.06–4.70) | 2.20 (0.90–5.34) | 2.15 (0.88–5.25) |
Depression | 1.02 (0.80–1.30) | 1.01 (0.79–1.30) | - | 1.06 (0.88–1.27) | 1.11 (0.92–1.36) | - |
Anxiety | 1.16 (0.83–1.62) | 1.11 (0.78–1.58) | - | 1.14 (0.90–1.45) | 1.23 (0.96–1.58) | - |
Models are harmonized to include the same variables among men and women, otherwise are non-significant variables excluded. Fully adjusted includes adjustment for age, socio-demographic and all significant co-morbidity(hypertension, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, diabetes, obesity, COPD, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome) in models adjusted for age and socio-demographic factors (educational level, marital status, and neighborhood socio-economic status). (Model check did not reveal any significant interactions in full models).
CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Table 4.
Men | Women | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age-adjusted | Adjusted for age and socio-demography | Fully adjusted | Age-adjusted | Adjusted for age and socio-demography | Fully adjusted | |
Diagnosis | ||||||
Hypertension | −0.24 (−0.59; 0.11) | −0.47 (−0.92; −0.01) | −0.30 (−0.74; 0.13) | 0.66 (0.03; 1.30) | 0.78 (0.28; 1.28) | 0.80 (0.26; 1.35) |
Myocardial infarction | −0.52 (−1.68; 0.64) | −0.55 (−1.27; 0.17) | - | 0.00 (−1.24; 1.24) | −0.22 (−1.25; 0.80) | - |
Valvular heart disease | −2.00 (−2.54; −1.46) | −2.41 (−3.29; −1.52) | −2.45 (−3.52; −1.38) | −2.00 (−2.72; −1.28) | −2.06 (−2.78; −1.35) | −1.99 (−3.08; −0.91) |
Cardiomyopathy | −5.43 (−8.19; −2.67) | −6.99 (−8.60; −5.38) | −5.78 (−7.15; −4.41) | −2.99 (−5.10; −0.88) | −2.42 (−9.88; 5.03) | −2.12 (−3.99; −0.26) |
Cerebrovascular diseases | 0.00 | - | - | 0.00 | - | - |
Diabetes mellitus | −1.34 (−2.15; −0.54) | −1.45 (−1.97; −0.94) | −1.47 (−2.05; −0.91) | −1.12 (−1.53; −0.71) | −1.13 (−1.73; −0.53) | −1.16 (−1.85; −0.46) |
Obesity | −1.03 (−1.85; −0.21) | −1.14 (−2.33; 0.05) | - | −1.24 (−3.10; 0.62) | −1.22 (−2.95; 0.51) | - |
COPD | −1.72 (−2.34; −1.11) | −1.66 (−2.47; −0.86) | −1.53 (−2.14; −0.91) | −1.93 (−2.55; −1.32) | −2.00 (−2.72; −1.28) | −1.76 (−2.45; −1.07) |
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome | −2.61 (−4.69; −0.53) | −3.13 (−4.79; −1.48) | −2.11 (−3.92; −0.31) | −1.99 (−3.03; −0.96) | −1.46 (−3.49; 0.57) | −2.68 (−4.78; −0.58) |
Depression | −0.14 (−0.76; 0.48) | −0.27 (−1.27; 0.73) | - | −0.20 (−0.87; 0.46) | −0.36 (−0.97; 0.26) | - |
Anxiety | −0.64 (−2.13; 0.86) | −0.68 (−1.85; 0.48) | - | −0.63 (−1.87; 0.61) | −0.34 (−1.11; 0.43) | - |
Models are harmonized to include the same variables among men and women, otherwise are non-significant variables excluded. Fully adjusted includes adjustment forage, socio-demographic and all significant co-morbidity(hypertension, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, diabetes, COPD, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome) in models adjusted for age and socio-demographic factors (educational level, marital status, and neighborhood socio-economic status). (Model check did not reveal any significant interactions in full models).
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Results were also estimated for a first hospital diagnosis of CHF by CHA2DS2-VASc score, showing a statistically significant trend for men and women (Table 5), and with incidence rates per 100 person-years of 3.92 (95% CI 3.70–4.15) for men, and 5.05 (95% CI 4.76–5.35) for women.
Table 5.
CHA2DS2-VASc score | Men | Women | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | CHF events | All | CHF events | |||
n | n (%) | Incidence rate | n | n (%) | Incidence rate | |
0 | 383 | 30 (7.8) | 1.41 (0.99–2.03) | - | - | |
1 | 755 | 89 (11.8) | 2.03 (1.65–2.50) | 131 | 19 (14.5) | 2.60 (1.66–4.07) |
2 | 1,876 | 423 (22.6) | 4.04 (3.67–4.44) | 338 | 47 (13.9) | 2.50 (1.88–3.33) |
3 | 1,379 | 356 (25.8) | 4.66 (4.20–5.17) | 1.427 | 385 (27.0) | 5.13 (4.64–5.67) |
4 | 586 | 165 (28.2) | 5.16 (4.43–6.01) | 1,496 | 410 (27.4) | 5.16 (4.68–5.68) |
5 | 193 | 60 (31.1) | 6.02 (4.67–7.75) | 608 | 192 (31.6) | 6.11 (5.30–7.04) |
6 | 38 | 12 (31.6) | 7.19 (4.93–12.50) | 170 | 55 (32.4) | 6.47 (4.96–8.43) |
7 | 1 | 0 (0.0) | - | 39 | 14 (35.9) | 7.95 (7.71–13.43) |
8 | - | - | - | 4 | 2 (50.0) | 12.12 (3.03–48.46) |
All | 5,211 | 1,135 (21.8) | 3.92 (3.70–4.15) | 4,213 | 1,124 (26.7) | 5.05 (4.76–5.35) |
Incidence ratios for newly diagnosed CHF with 95% confidence intervals are shown per 100 patient-years at risk.
CHF, congestive heart failure.
4. Discussion
The main finding of this study was the different risk factor patterns between men and women for incident CHF, defined as a first hospital diagnosis of CHF, with hypertension seeming to decrease the risk of CHF among women but not among men. In contrast, cardiomyopathy was associated with an increased risk of CHF in men but not in women (even if no significant interactions by gender were noted). Valvular heart disease, diabetes, and COPD were significantly associated with incident CHF in both men and women with AF. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome was also significantly associated with incident CHF among men but not among women.
When examining associations between all patients with a prevalent diagnosis of CHF and background factors, a significant interaction was found regarding marital status and sex. Being unmarried, divorced or widowed were significantly more common in men with both AF and CHF, but non-significant in women. Among the co-morbidities, hypertension was less common in those with both AF and CHF and in both men and women. As expected, CHD, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy (in those under 75 years), diabetes, and COPD were more common in patients with both AF and CHF compared with patients with AF but without CHF.
As regards to incident CHF, hypertension was associated with a reduced CHF risk and a longer time until first CHF diagnosis among women but not among men. Female sex has been associated with CHF with preserved ejection fraction in AF, and an effective antihypertensive treatment could be one possible explanation to the seemingly “protective” effect of hypertension towards CHF development among women. This could be supported by findings in an earlier study where treatment with non-selective beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers were associated with a reduced mortality [24]. Interestingly, left ventricular hypertrophy, often associated with hypertension, was not found to be an independent risk factor for CHF among AF patients [13]. Valvular heart disease among men and women, and cardiomyopathy among men, were associated with incident CHF in accordance with an earlier study [13]. Cardiomyopathy was not associated with incident CHF among women, which could be due to few cases and low statistical power. Diabetes was associated with incident CHF among both men and women, and is a known risk factor for both AF and CHF, including CHF in AF [8]. We found no significant effect from an earlier myocardial infarction; in contrast to the study by Fukuda et al., myocardial infarction was one of the included signs of structural heart disease of significance for incident CHF [13].
Some discrepancies between the Cox and Laplace regression models were found among women, i.e. regarding cardiomyopathy, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, as these diagnoses were seldom present, especially among women, results should be interpreted with caution.
We also found CHA2DS2-VASc to be related to incident CHF. CHA2DS2-VASc, which is intended to estimate the risk of ischemic stroke in AF patients, seems to be useful to estimate the risk of CHF as well. This represents a novel and potentially important finding that needs to be further explored.
There are several limitations of this study. The study sample is a subgroup of the AF population, i.e. patients with concomitant diagnoses of AF and CHF registered in primary health care. In another study it was found that 36% of all registered AF patients in Stockholm County were not registered with a diagnosis in primary health care [1]. Results cannot be generalized to all AF or CHF patients or to patients in other settings. The findings may have been subject to confounding by indication and to survival bias [25]. All these mentioned factors could have affected the results, and yielded discrepant findings. Severity of CHF and CHD were not classified in the patient records, even if it is likely that patients from primary care had less severe CHF than patients from hospital care, and probably more often CHF with relative well-preserved ejection fraction. Patients could, however, not be classified regarding ejection fraction, where CHF with reduced ejection fraction in AF patients is associated with a higher mortality [26]. Additionally, we could not classify whether the patients had left ventricular hypertrophy or not. Furthermore, we did not have access to some other risk factors for CHF, i.e. metabolic factors such as insulin resistance or the metabolic syndrome. Moreover, a diagnosis of obesity is rarely registered in the electronic patient records, and an obesity diagnosis probably reflects a more severe condition. Similarly, a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea disorder was also relatively rare, which may be due to under-diagnosis. As severity of CHF is an important factor for mortality, the lack of access to data on severity of CHF is also a major limitation of the study. In addition, data on ejection fraction and criteria for diagnosis of CHF were not available. Moreover, AF could not be classified as paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent and heart rhythm could not be classified as sinus rhythm or fibrillation rhythm.
A major strength of this study was that we were able to link clinical data from individual EPRs to data from national demographic and socioeconomic registers with less than 1% of information missing. While many previous follow-up studies of AF have used hospital data, the current study used data from primary care, which may better reflect the risks associated with AF in less severe cases. Moreover, randomized controlled trials often exclude individuals with co-morbidities, such as AF patients with concomitant diabetes and CHF. In the current study, we had the possibility to include these patients in the analyses, which means that the findings are more representative of the variety of patients encountered in clinical practice today.
In conclusion, in this clinical setting with patients with AF treated in primary care, we found valvular heart disease, diabetes, and COPD to be consistently associated with increased risk of CHF in men and women, cardiomyopathy and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome with an increased risk of CHF among men, and hypertension with a decreased risk of CHF among women. Further studies in patients with AF from a primary care setting with data on severity of CHF, on ejection fraction, and of use of anti-hypertensive agents in relation to incident CHF are needed to further understand our findings. Based on the presence of relevant co-morbidities, preventive therapy could possibly be tailored to prevent the development of CHF in patients with AF.
Highlights.
Valvular disease, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease showed a higher congestive heart failure (CHF) risk in men and women.
Cardiomyopathy and sleep apnea syndrome showed a higher CHF risk in men.
Hypertension was associated with a lower CHF risk among women but not among men.
The CHA2DS2-VASc score was related to incident CHF.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by ALF funding awarded to Jan Sundquist and Kristina Sundquist and by grants from the Swedish Research Council (awarded to Kristina Sundquist), the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (Jan Sundquist), and the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HL116381 to Kristina Sundquist.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
Dr Holzmann received consultancy honoraria from Pfizer and Actelion. The other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Sponsors had no influence on analyses or on writing process.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Forslund T, Wettermark B, Wandell P, von Euler M, Hasselstrom J, Hjemdahl P. Risk scoring and thromboprophylactic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation with and without access to primary healthcare data: experience from the Stockholm health care system. Int J Cardiol. 2013;170:208–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hobbs FR, Taylor CJ, Jan Geersing G, Rutten FH, Brouwer JR European Primary Care Cardiovascular Society (EPCCS) SPAF working group. European Primary Care Cardiovascular Society (EPCCS) consensus guidance on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) in primary care. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23:460–73. doi: 10.1177/2047487315571890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study. Stroke. 1991;22:983–8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.8.983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Seiler J, Stevenson WG. Atrial fibrillation in congestive heart failure. Cardiol Rev. 2010;18:38–50. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181c21cff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ling LH, Kistler PM, Kalman JM, Schilling RJ, Hunter RJ. Comorbidity of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:131–47. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.O'Neal WT, Salahuddin T, Broughton ST, Soliman EZ. Atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39:907–13. doi: 10.1111/pace.12907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Piccini JP, Hammill BG, Sinner MF, Hernandez AF, Walkey AJ, Benjamin EJ, et al. Clinical course of atrial fibrillation in older adults: the importance of cardiovascular events beyond stroke. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:250–6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chamberlain AM, Gersh BJ, Alonso A, Kopecky SL, Killian JM, Weston SA, et al. No decline in the risk of heart failure after incident atrial fibrillation: A community study assessing trends overall and by ejection fraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:791–8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.01.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Healey JS, Oldgren J, Ezekowitz M, Zhu J, Pais P, Wang J, et al. Occurrence of death and stroke in patients in 47 countries 1 year after presenting with atrial fibrillation: a cohort study. Lancet. 2016;388:1161–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30968-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Violi F, Soliman EZ, Pignatelli P, Pastori D. Atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction: a systematic review and appraisal of pathophysiologic mechanisms. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003347. pii: e003347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shafazand M, Rosengren A, Lappas G, Swedberg K, Schaufelberger M. Decreasing trends in the incidence of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction from 1993–2004: a study of 175,216 patients with a first acute myocardial infarction in Sweden. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13:135–41. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shafazand M, Schaufelberger M, Lappas G, Swedberg K, Rosengren A. Survival trends in men and women with heart failure of ischaemic and non-ischaemic origin: data for the period 1987–2003 from the Swedish Hospital Discharge Registry. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:671–8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fukuda T, Yamashita T, Sagara K, Kato T, Sawada H, Aizawa T. Development of congestive heart failure in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2007;71:308–12. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chatterjee NA, Chae CU, Kim E, Moorthy MV, Conen D, Sandhu RK, et al. Modifiable risk factors for incident heart failure in atrial fibrillation. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5:552–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ushigome R, Sakata Y, Nochioka K, Miyata S, Miura M, Tadaki S, et al. Temporal trends in clinical characteristics, management and prognosis of patients with symptomatic heart failure in Japan -- report from the CHART Studies. Circ J. 2015;79:2396–407. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shibata Y, Watanabe T, Osaka D, Abe S, Inoue S, Tokairin Y, et al. Impairment of pulmonary function is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation: the Takahata study. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8:514–22. doi: 10.7150/ijms.8.514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zoni-Berisso M, Lercari F, Carazza T, Domenicucci S. Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: European perspective. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:213–20. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S47385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rivas M, Ratra A, Nugent K. Obstructive sleep apnea and its effects on cardiovascular diseases: a narrative review. Anatol J Cardiol. 2015;15:944–50. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Roversi S, Fabbri LM, Sin DD, Hawkins NM, Agusti A. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiac diseases. An urgent need for integrated care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:1319–36. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0690SO. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Drager LF, McEvoy RD, Barbe F, Lorenzi-Filho G, Redline S. Sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease: lessons from recent trials and need for team science. Circulation. 2017;136:1840–50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Humphries KH, Kerr CR, Connolly SJ, Klein G, Boone JA, Green M, et al. New-onset atrial fibrillation: sex differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome. Circulation. 2001;103:2365–70. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.19.2365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Michelena HI, Powell BD, Brady PA, Friedman PA, Ezekowitz MD. Gender in atrial fibrillation: Ten years later. Gend Med. 2010;7:206–17. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bottai M, Zhang J. Laplace regression with censored data. Biom J. 2010;52:487–503. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Carlsson AC, Wandell P, Sundquist K, Johansson SE, Sundquist J. Effects of prescribed antihypertensives and other cardiovascular drugs on mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertension: a cohort study from Sweden. Hypertens Res. 2014;37:553–9. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Delgado-Rodriguez M, Llorca J. Bias. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:635–41. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.008466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kotecha D, Chudasama R, Lane DA, Kirchhof P, Lip GY. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure due to reduced versus preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of death and adverse outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2016;203:660–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]