Abstract
The capture of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) by mobile genetic elements (MGEs) plays a critical role in resistance acquisition for human-associated bacteria. Although aquaculture environments are recognized as important reservoirs of ARGs, intra- and intercellular mobility of MGEs discovered in marine organisms is poorly characterized. Here, we show a new pattern of interspecies ARGs transfer involving a ‘non-conjugative’ integrative element. To identify active MGEs in a Vibrio ponticus isolate, we conducted whole-genome sequencing of a transconjugant obtained by mating between Escherichia coli and Vibrio ponticus. This revealed integration of a plasmid (designated pSEA1) into the chromosome, consisting of a self-transmissible plasmid backbone of the MOBH group, ARGs, and a 13.8-kb integrative element Tn6283. Molecular genetics analysis suggested a two-step gene transfer model. First, Tn6283 integrates into the recipient chromosome during suicidal plasmid transfer, followed by homologous recombination between the Tn6283 copy in the chromosome and that in the newly transferred pSEA1. Tn6283 is unusual among integrative elements in that it apparently does not encode transfer function and its excision barely generates unoccupied donor sites. Thus, its movement is analogous to the transposition of insertion sequences rather than to that of canonical integrative and conjugative elements. Overall, this study reveals the presence of a previously unrecognized type of MGE in a marine organism, highlighting diversity in the mode of interspecies gene transfer.
Introduction
Aquaculture environments are now noticed to have an important impact on human health by contributing to the emergence of antibiotic resistant strains [1]. Similar to other environments, the ARGs found in aquatic environments are frequently accompanied by mobile genetic elements (MGEs) such as conjugative plasmids, integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), transposons, and integrons [2–5]. Thus, the capture of ARGs by MGEs is considered to play a critical role in introducing ARGs to human-associated pathogens from an environmental reservoir [6]. Furthermore, since identical ARGs have been discovered in different bacterial species obtained from the same aquaculture site, they are assumed to be transmitted by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) [7, 8, 9]. In particular, conjugative transferable elements, including A/C plasmids [10], pAQU1-like plasmids [4, 11], and SXT/R391-like ICEs [5, 12, 13], all belonging to the MOBH group of conjugative elements [14], have frequently been identified in members of Gammaproteobacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae and Vibrionaceae isolated from aquatic environments. However, novel types of plasmids also most likely exist in marine isolates [4]. Thus, aquatic environments might preserve diverse and distinct MGEs and HGT mechanisms. Identification of this diversity is important for understanding the mechanisms and key players of HGT in the environment, which can help to inform the development of effective strategies for controlling the emergence and dissemination of ARGs in aquaculture environments.
Previously, we isolated Vibrio ponticus strain 04Ya108 from an aquaculture site in Japan, which showed a multidrug-resistance phenotype [7]. This strain did not possess known transfer operon (tra) genes based on PCR detection, but could nevertheless transfer some known ARGs to an E. coli laboratory strain through mating, which integrated in the chromosome of transconjugants [4]. This finding suggested the presence of an MGE in strain 04Ya108 that mediates interspecies gene transfer.
To test this hypothesis, in this study, we sought to identify relevant MGEs in the E. coli transconjugant by conducting genome sequencing. We further characterized the MGE and determined its relationship to known MGEs. This revealed a novel ‘non-conjugative’ integrative element embedded in a plasmid. To date, integrative elements without mobilization function have not been well studied, and little information is available for their excision and integration pattern or survival strategy as genetic parasites. Thus, we conducted further experiments to obtain this basic information by determining the mobility unit of the MGE and sequenced the expected recombination joint formed upon its excision. Further, the effects of the non-conjugative integrative element on growth and fitness in the E. coli host were evaluated. The results of this study can help to shed light on the diversity in the mode of interspecies gene transfer and highlight the potential of the sea environment as an important reservoir of unrecognized types of MGEs.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and culture media
Vibrio ponticus strain 04Ya108 was isolated from the sediment of a coastal aquaculture site (latitude, 34.378499; longitude, 134.103576) near Yashima, Kagawa prefecture, Japan [7]. This strain was cultured at 25°C in a modified brain heart infusion medium (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) containing 2.5% NaCl and 10 μg/ml of tetracycline (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). The E. coli strains used were W3110, W3110Rifr [11], BW25113, JW2669 (BW25113 ΔrecA::kan), TJ108W0 (W3110 bcp::Tn6283::pSEA1, carrying three copies of Tn6283), LN3 (W3110 Δbcp::FRT), LN5 (W3110 bcp::Tn6283, one copy of Tn6283), and LN7 (W3110 bcp::Tn6283::pSEA1, two copies of Tn6283). W3110, BW25113 [15], and JW2669 [15] were obtained from the National Bio Resource Project (National Institute of Genetics, Japan). Strain LN3 was constructed by removing the bcp gene from strain W3110 using lambda-Red recombinase expressed from pKD46 and the PCR-amplified chloramphenicol resistance gene (cat) cassette of pKD3 [16] using the primer set LN054-LN055 (Table 1). The cat gene in the LN3 parental strain was removed from the chromosome using pFLP3 [17]. TJ108W0 is an E. coli transconjugant obtained by mating of strain W3110 and strain 04Ya108, with subsequent selection for growth at 42°C and tetracycline resistance [11]. Strain LN5 is one of the randomly selected tetracycline-sensitive clones derived from transconjugant LN7, which initially carried two copies of Tn6283 in the chromosome. Strain LN5 was obtained by conducting three cycles of serial batch-culture transfer of LN7 in LB at 37°C. In one cycle, 3 μl of 12-hr-old culture was transferred into 3 ml of fresh medium. The absence of the pSEA1 backbone in strain LN5 was confirmed by PCR [4]. E. coli strains were cultured at 37°C in LB medium (10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, 10 g NaCl per liter of water; BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). Antibiotics were added to the medium at the following concentrations: tetracycline, 10 μg/ml for liquid media and 20 μg/ml for solid media; kanamycin, 25 μg/ml; rifampicin, 100 μg/ml.
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Primer name | Primer sequence (5' to 3') | Target gene or region(s); purpose | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
3F a | CCAAAAGTGAGCTGGGTGGCAAT | Primer set 3, 6 in S4 Fig; attTn6283 in Fig 4 and S5 Fig; integration pattern analysis, joint sequencing | This study |
3R a | GCGTCACTTCTCCAGTGTCGATA | Primer set 2, 5 in S4 Fig; attTn6283 in Fig 4 and S5 Fig; integration pattern analysis | This study |
2F a | CTCGGTTGACGTTGTTGGTTTGC | Primer set 4, 5 in S4 Fig; integration pattern analysis, joint sequencing |
This study |
2F2 a | CAATGCCCCCTTTTCACTTA | Primer set 1, 3 in S4 Fig; Scar1/Scar2 in S5 Fig; integration pattern analysis, joint sequencing | This study |
1R3 b | CGGTCAATATGGCACCTTTT | Scar1/Scar2 in S5 Fig; joint sequencing | This study |
2599370F a | CCGTTTTGCGGAAAAAGAGCTGC | Primer set 1, 2, 7 in S4 Fig, attB*/ Scar in Fig 4; integration pattern analysis, joint sequencing, qPCR | This study |
2599572R a | CGTCGTGGTGATTGCTGGTTTTG | Primer set 4, 6, 7 in S4 Fig, attB*/ Scar in Fig 4; integration pattern analysis, qPCR | This study |
LN005 | CTCAACCTTTGCAACCCATT | intA [pSEA1_001]; qPCR, probe | This study |
LN006 | TTGAGTGCCCCATTAACTCC | intA [pSEA1_001]; qPCR, probe | This study |
LN009 | CGATAGAGGGAGCTGACGAG | traI [pSEA1_097]; qPCR | This study |
LN010 | CGGTTCAGTTCCAGGTTGTT | traI [pSEA1_097]; qPCR | This study |
LN011 | TGACAACTGCTATGCTTGAGATT | attTn6283; qPCR | This study |
LN012 | ACCCTCGATATGTTAGCCACA | attTn6283; qPCR | This study |
LN015 | TCAAACGATGGCGTCTATGCT | Scar1/ Scar2, attpSEA1; qPCR | This study |
LN016 | TCGTCCTCACCTGAATCCTGC | Scar1/ Scar2, attpSEA1; qPCR | This study |
LN054 | ATAAGAAAACTCATTTCAGAGTAAATTAAAGAAAGTAAGGATAATCCATGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTCG | bcp; lambda-RED recombination in E. coli | This study |
LN055 | TTGACTTTACCTCTTACCAGTTGGGCTGTGTTAGATTTTAATTCGGTTTACATATGAATATCCTCCTTA | bcp; lambda-RED recombination in E. coli | This study |
dxs-F | CGAGAAACTGGCGATCCTTA | dxs; qPCR | [18] |
dxs-R | CTTCATCAAGCGGTTTCACA | dxs; qPCR | [18] |
tet(m)-1 | GTTAAATAGTGTTCTTGGAG | tet(M) [pSEA1_229]; probe | [7] |
tet(m)-2 | CTAAGATATGGCTCTAACAA | tet(M) [pSEA1_229]; probe | [7] |
aPrimers used in primer sets 1 to 7, and their respective PCR product size are shown in S4 Fig.
b1R3 anneals to the 39-bp upstream region of the 2F annealing region.
General DNA manipulations
Genomic DNA was extracted using the QuickGene DNA tissue kit (KURABO INDUSTRIES LTD., Osaka, Japan). Conventional PCR was performed using Taq polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Long PCR was performed as follows. The PCR mixture (total volume, 10 μl) contained 20 pmol each of the primers, 1 μl of 10x LA PCR buffer II (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan), 4 mM each dNTP, 25 mM of MgCl2, 0.5 U of LA Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio Inc.), and template DNA (20–50 ng). Two-step PCR was performed with 30 cycles of denaturation at 96°C for 20 sec and extension at 69°C for 16 min. When necessary, PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T easy vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA) using Competent High DH5α competent cells (TOYOBO CO., LTD., Osaka, Japan). Sanger sequencing was performed using BigDye v 3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Genome sequencing of a transconjugant
The transconjugant TJ108W0 was previously obtained by conjugation using strain 04Ya108 and strain W3110 as the donor and recipient, respectively [4]. The short reads for the TJ108W0 genome were obtained by pyrosequencing using the Genome Sequence FLX454+ platform. Two types of libraries were constructed and sequenced separately. One was an approximately 800-bp-long library designed to obtain up to 700-bp-long single-end reads. The other was an approximately 8-kb-long library designed to obtain up to 400-bp paired-end reads.
We conducted read assembly twice to identify MGEs in the transconjugant genome. First, 700-bp reads (225,251 reads) were mapped to the W3110 genome. The unmapped reads were then collected and assembled de novo using the GS assembler (Newbler 2.8). This yielded eight contigs potentially derived from MGEs of V. ponticus. Next, the ~400-bp paired reads (271,612 reads) and ~700-bp reads were assembled together. This yielded 82 scaffolds for a total of 151 contigs. One scaffold containing an MGE was detected by conducting a homology search against scaffolds obtained in the second assembly using the eight contigs obtained from the first assembly as queries. Gaps in the scaffold containing the MGE were filled by sequencing of the PCR products amplified with primers corresponding to the sequences close to the terminal ends of each contig using Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer. The integration site of pSEA1 in the chromosome was identified as described in the Results section. The exact integration position was determined by PCR with primers 2599370F and 2599572R that anneal to the sequences in the flanking regions of the estimated target site (Table 1). Tn6283-flanking regions on pSEA1 in strain 04Ya108 was determined by PCR amplification of the Tn6283-pSEA1 backbone borders and subsequent direct sequencing of the PCR products. Annotation for the protein-coding regions in pSEA1 was first carried out using MetaGeneAnnotator [19] and then manually curated as described previously [11]. The circular plasmid map was drawn using In Silico Molecular Cloning Genomics Edition (In Silico Biology, Yokohama, Japan). Annotation for pSEA1 is shown in S1 Dataset.
Conjugation experiments
Filter mating was performed as previously described [11]. Mating of V. ponticus 04Ya108 with E. coli strains was performed at 25°C on a 0.45-μm pore size nitrocellulose filter (Merck Millipore Ltd. Co., Cork, Ireland) placed on Marine agar plates (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA USA). E. coli transconjugants were selected on LB agar plates with 20 μg/ml of tetracycline at 42°C, which is the temperature that inhibits growth of the donor strain. We obtained 20 E. coli transconjugants from independent filter mating of V. ponticus 04Ya108 and E. coli W3110, designated as strains LN7 to LN26.
The transferability of pSEA1 from the E. coli transconjugants to a secondary E. coli recipient was tested using the rifampicin-resistant strain W3110Rifr as the recipient strain. The transconjugants were selected as previously described [4]. The transfer frequencies are expressed as CFU of the transconjugants per CFU of the donors.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and Southern hybridization
To investigate whether the integration of pSEA1 into the bcp gene in the E. coli chromosome is reproducible, genomes of the 20 newly obtained transconjugants were separated by PFGE and the position of the tet(M) gene was analyzed by Southern hybridization. Cells from 1-ml overnight culture of transconjugants (BW25113 derivatives) were collected in 1.5-ml tubes and respectively embedded in plugs, and then the DNA was separated using PFGE as previously described [4]. The probe was prepared by PCR amplification of tet(M) with the primer set tet(m)-1/ tet(m)-2, and detected using DIG DNA Labeling and Detection Kit for color metric detection (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The fragment size was inferred based on the position of ProMega-Markers Lambda Ladders (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) in the ethidium bromide stained gel. Additional Southern hybridization experiments were performed to investigate variation of the Tn6283 integration pattern in the chromosome. Genomic DNA (2.5 μg) from each strain was digested with EcoNI and EcoRI or SacI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), separated on 0.8% SeaKem Gold agarose gels (Lonza Rockland, ME, USA), and transferred to Hybond-N+ using standard methods. The position of Tn6238 DNA was determined by Southern hybridization using intA as a probe, which was obtained using PCR DIG Synthesis Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with the primer set LN005-LN006 (Table 1). The probe was detected using DIG Luminescent Detection Kit and CDP-star (Roche). The fragment size was inferred based on the position of the 2-Log DNA Ladder and lambda DNA-HindIII Digest (New England Biolabs) in the ethidium bromide-stained gel.
Copy number determination of the recombination sites
We quantitated copy numbers of recombination sites using qPCR following absolute quantitation protocol using standard template solutions for which concentrations of target molecule included were known. Standard templates were obtained by cloning PCR products into pGEM-T easy vector (Promega Corp.). The target molecule copy number in standard solution was estimated according to absorbance at 260 nm and molecular weights. Serially diluted standard solutions were used to generate standard curves with R2 value > 0.996. The joint on the expected circular form of Tn6283 (attTn6283) in strains TJ108W0 and 04Ya108 was quantified with primers LN011 and LN012 in a 20-μl final volume on a Thermal Cycler Dice Real-Time System (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan). The program was as follows: denaturation for 5 sec at 95°C and annealing/extension for 8 sec at 64°C for the primer set 2599370F-2599572R, and 30 sec at 60°C for the other primer sets. Specific amplification was confirmed by melting curve analysis for each amplicon. Each reaction was performed with at least two technical replicates and each quantification was conducted for five biological replicates. The copy number of Tn6283 was quantified by amplification of intA (Fig 1) with the primer set LN005-LN006. The total copy number of E. coli chromosome and pSEA1 was quantified by amplification of dxs and traI, with primer sets dxsF-dxsR [18] and LN009-LN010, respectively. The Tn6283-free integration sites resulting from Tn6283 excision from the E. coli chromosome and pSEA1 in 04Ya108 were quantified by PCR with primer sets 2599370F-2599572R and LN015-LN016, respectively.
Persistence of Tn6283 in the E. coli cell population
Three replicate cultures of LN5 (bcp::Tn6283) were prepared in 5 ml LB without antibiotics, and then 5 μl of each culture was transferred into 5 ml fresh medium and incubated at 37°C for 24 hr; this cycle was repeated 10 times. Cultures at day 1, day 6, and day 11 were serially diluted in saline and propagated on LB agar to isolate colonies. The fraction of Tn6283-containing viable cells was monitored for 10 days (approx. 100 generations) using colony PCR for 40 colonies per culture lineage to detect “attL” in the chromosome.
Growth curve analysis
Three E. coli strains, W3110, LN3 (Δbcp), and LN5 (bcp::Tn6283), were cultured to the stationary growth phase, and the OD600nm of the cultures were normalized to 0.3 (in 96-well microtiter plates) across samples by diluting the cultures with fresh media. The OD600nm-normalized cultures were again diluted 1000-fold in fresh medium, and then incubated in a 150 μl scale in a 96-well microtiter plate covered with Breathe-Easy film (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., St. Louis, MO, USA) and read on a microplate reader (SunriseTM Rainbow Thermo RC-R, TECAN, Zürich, Switzerland). Incubation was continued for up to 20 hr with agitation at 37°C. The OD600nm value of each well was recorded every 10 min. Growth parameters (lag phase time, maximum growth rate, maximum OD) were estimated using the smooth.spline function with the 100-times bootstrapping run option implemented in the Grofit program [20].
Microscopy and flow cytometry
For cell morphology analysis, cells were cultured in the microplate up to an appropriate growth phase as described above. The cells were then transferred to 1.5-ml tubes, washed once with saline, and then stained with a solution containing 1 μM SYTOX-Green (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) and 1 μg/ml DAPI (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) for 10 min. Stained cells were spotted on an agarose film prepared on slide glasses. Images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 780 inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The number of dead cells was estimated using 0.03 μM SYTOX-Green staining, washed, re-suspended in saline, and the number of stained cells in a total of 100,000 cells was counted using a flow cytometer (LE-SH800ZFP cell sorter, Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). A 488-nm laser was used for excitation of SYTOX-Green, and the emitted signals were detected with a 525/50-nm bandpass filter. Before fluorescence analysis, the cells were gated using FSC-A and SSC-A, and possible doublet cells and cell aggregates were excluded with FSC-A and FSC-H gating (S1 Fig). Finally, data from 55,167 to 69,949 single cells at the exponential phase (4-hr incubation in the microtiter plate) were obtained per sample to estimate the proportion of dead cells in the culture. The data were analyzed using FlowJo software v10.2 (FLOWJO, LLC. Ashland, OR, USA).
Phylogenetic analysis
Amino acid sequences of TraI homologs were retrieved from the NCBI database, considering representative homologs previously reported [14]. The TraI alignment was generated using PROMALS3D [21], and then trimmed to the N-terminal region equivalent to position 1–475 in pSEA1 TraI. The relaxase sequences from the MOBH3 group poorly aligned with the sequences of homologs from other MOBH subgroups, and were thus omitted from the alignment to improve the accuracy of phylogenetic inference. The phylogenetic relationships among members in the MOBH group were inferred based on the filtered TraI alignment (398-aa sequence without gaps) using the maximum-likelihood method and the JTT+G model in PhyML [22]. Bootstrapping was performed 100 times.
Statistical analysis
Quantitative data were subjected to Bartlett’s test to determine the statistical significance of variance homogeneity. Comparison of means between two groups was conducted using Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test as appropriate. Multiple comparisons were conducted using ANOVA, Tukey test, Kruskal-Wallis test, or Steel-Dwass test. All tests were performed using the functions implemented in R version 3.3.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform).
Accession number
The entire sequence of pSEA1 was deposited in GenBank/DDBJ/EMBL databases under the accession number LC081338.
Results
Identification of the MOBH group plasmid pSEA1
To identify active MGEs in a V. ponticus aquaculture isolate, we used our previously generated transconjugant, named strain TJ108W0, from mating of V. ponticus 04Ya108 with E. coli W3110 [4]. The assembled scaffold from short reads of the TJ108W0 genome revealed a plasmid-like sequence containing 13.8-kb repeats at both ends, which did not match any E. coli-derived sequence. The terminal sequences of the reads that mapped to the edge of the scaffold were identical to the bcp gene sequence in the W3110 chromosome, indicating that an MGE was integrated into the E. coli chromosome. This integration was confirmed through PCR amplification and sequencing of the expected borders between the insert (MGE) and the E. coli chromosome, which revealed an approximately 346-kb insert in the chromosome. Two copies of the 13.8-kb repeat were identified at one chromosome–MGE border, and one copy of the repeat was identified at the other border (see the following sections). Southern hybridization identified a sequence equivalent to the chromosome insert existing as a plasmid in a donor V. ponticus strain (S2 Fig). We designated this chromosome insert with a single copy of the 13.8-kb region as plasmid pSEA1.
The plasmid pSEA1 was 320,058 bp in size and contained 324 coding sequences (CDSs) (Fig 1A), which were nearly symmetrically distributed; i.e., 169 CDSs were oriented clockwise and 155 CDSs were oriented counterclockwise. Two hundred two CDSs (74.9%) showed similarity to the homologs from Vibrionaceae, and 178 CDSs (55.1%) showed relatively high similarity to the homologs from Vibrio nigripulchritudo, which is a new emerging shrimp pathogen (NC_010733) [23] (S1 Dataset). Fifteen CDSs showed similarity to the type IV secretion system components, and seven CDSs showed similarity to known ARGs, including tet(B), tet(M) [24], mef(C), mph(G) [25], sul2 [26], catII [27], and a class A beta-lactamase gene [28], respectively. Except for catII, these ARGs were common to pAQU1 and pAQU1-like plasmids found in isolates at the same aquaculture site in Japan [4, 11], and mef(C) and mph(G) have been identified in erythromycin-resistant isolates from an aquaculture site in Taiwan and a pig farm wastewater in Thailand [29]. This array of ARGs did not exhibit the characteristic features of an integron [30].
The phylogenetic relationship of this replicon with other MGEs was inferred using the amino acid (aa) sequence of relaxase (TraI) following sequence alignment of pSEA1 TraI with homologs from the MOBH family of conjugative transferable elements [14]. Conserved aa sequence motifs in the MOBH1 and MOBH2 groups were identified in pSEA1 (S3 Fig). Phylogenetic analysis based on a 475-aa alignment indicated that pSEA1 forms a subclade with a plasmid-like contig found in the draft genome of Vibrio nigripulchritudo strain FTn2 (Fig 1B) [31]. pSEA1 is thus a novel member of the MOBH family of conjugative elements [14], and can be grouped in the MOBH1 subgroup with plasmids pCAR1, Rts, and SXT-related elements (Fig 1B).
Integrative element Tn6283
The 15 CDSs of the 13.8-kb repeat region identified in the transconjugant chromosome include two tyrosine recombinase genes, intA and intB (Fig 2A). The intA product (467 aa) showed a lambda-Int family recombinase-like secondary structure consisting of an arm-type site-binding domain at the N-terminus [32], whereas the intB product (731 aa) is a larger protein containing a tyrosine recombinase C-terminal catalytic domain fold (cd00397). None of the CDSs encodes homologs of known relaxases, replication proteins, or recombination directionality factor protein Xis. No apparent ARGs were detected in this region, although a Group II intron reverse transcriptase gene (locus_tag = pSEA1_013) and thioredoxin-dependent thiol peroxidase gene (locus_tag = pSEA1_005) were identified. Two imperfect 19-bp repeats were detected near the termini of this 13.8-kb region, motif C on the left end (Fig 2A) and motif C’ on the right end, which are expected to function as core sites for site-specific recombination [33]. Since the 13.8-kb region could be excised from the plasmid pSEA1 and inserted into the E. coli chromosome, it was designated as a novel integrative element, Tn6283, with approval of the Tn number at the transposon registry site (http://transposon.lstmed.ac.uk/). Since the intA product was predicted to possess an extended N-terminus as Lambda Int, the Tn6283 region may contain motifs conserved in representative ICEs and phages; e.g., an integrase-binding arm-type site, integration host factor (IHF)-binding sites, and Xis-binding regions [33, 34]. However, these motifs could not be identified in the Tn6283 region based on the nucleotide sequence.
Tn6283 integrates into a specific site in E. coli
An integration site of pSEA1 with an additional copy of Tn6283 in the chromosome was initially revealed by genome sequencing, and a target site was identified in the bcp gene that encodes thiol peroxidase (Fig 2B). We next investigated (i) whether the integration of pSEA1 into the E. coli chromosome is reproducible, and (ii) whether the bcp gene is a preferred target site for Tn6283.
One tetracycline-resistant transconjugant was selected from each of 20 independent mating experiments between V. ponticus 04Ya108 and E. coli W3110, and the integration of pSEA1 into the chromosome was by PFGE and subsequent Southern hybridization (S2 Fig). Thus, pSEA1 integration into the recipient chromosome was reproducible. However, no transconjugants showing the tetracycline-resistance phenotype were obtained when the E. coli transconjugant strain TJ108W0 was used as a donor and E. coli strain W3110Rifr was the recipient. This suggested that pSEA1 cannot replicate in E. coli, and that its transfer function is not active once integrated in E. coli.
We next investigated variation of the integration pattern of pSEA1 and Tn6283 in the transconjugant chromosome. We chose seven transconjugants (TJ108W0, LN7, LN8, LN9, LN10, LN11, LN15) for this analysis, and conducted Southern hybridization for their digested genomic DNA using the intA region as a probe (Fig 2B). The results suggested the existence of three pSEA1 integration forms (Fig 2C). The first form, form 1, was detected in TJ108W0, which was subjected to genome sequencing. Three Tn6283 copies were present in TJ108W0 as expected from the sequence data (Fig 2B). The second form, form 2, was detected in five clones (LN7, LN8, LN9, LN10, LN11), which carried two Tn6283 copies. In LN15, only one intA copy was present (form 4 in Fig 2B). Subsequent PCR analysis revealed that the intact bcp gene and two pSEA1 backbone–Tn6283 borders (attLpSEA1, attRpSEA1) were present in LN15 (B in S4 Fig, pattern C). Therefore, Tn6283 did not move from the original locus and is therefore unlikely to be involved in pSEA1 integration of the chromosome upon the generation of LN15.
The integration forms of pSEA1 in the remaining 14 transconjugants were analyzed by long PCR, assuming form 1, form 2, or form 4 (Fig 2B and S4 Fig). Since homologous recombination can occur between Tn6283 copies in form 1 and form 2, cells carrying a single copy of Tn6283 (form 3 in Fig 2C) can emerge in the cell population. PCR detection of the Tn6283–chromosome borders suggested that the cell populations of the remaining 15 transconjugants contained a mixture of form 2 and form 3 (B in S4 Fig, pattern A), whereas the cell population of TJ108W0 contained a mixture of all expected forms (S4 Fig). The tandem repeat structure of Tn6283 in form 1 can be explained by additional excision and insertion of Tn6283 into attR in form 2. Collectively, these results indicate that Tn6283 mainly targets the bcp gene when E. coli is used as recipient. The integration site in the bcp gene did not contain sequence motifs such as an inverted repeat and direct repeat, and showed no homology to repeat sequences (C, C’) in Tn6283; however, the central part of the target sequence tended to be flanked by A at the 5′ end and by CA at the 3′ end (Fig 2D).
These analyses also revealed that V. poniticus strain 04Ya108 carries two copies of Tn6283, one in pSEA1 and the other in the chromosome (Fig 2B). However, the precise insertion position of Tn6283 in the V. ponticus chromosome is currently unclear.
Resistance gene integration requires a homologous recombination system
Since the most common pSEA1 integration form, form 2 (Fig 2C), can be formed through homologous recombination between one copy of Tn6283 integrated into the chromosome and the other copy on the circularized pSEA1, the observed interspecies ARGs transfer was hypothesized to involve two types of recombination with support of the DNA mobilization function of the conjugative plasmid: (i) suicidal transfer of pSEA1 followed by excision and integration of Tn6283, and (ii) follow-up suicidal transfer of pSEA1 and its chromosomal integration using the homologous recombination system of the recipient cell (Fig 3A). A structure similar to from 2 can be formed by replicative transposition such as that mediated by Tn3 transposase [35]. However, Tn3-like replicative transposition is unlikely in this case because Tn6283 transposition seems to occur through its circle formation (see below). To test whether the homologous recombination system was actually involved in the integration of pSEA1 into the chromosome and the resulting interspecies transfer of ARGs, we used the recA-null mutant (JW2669) as a recipient strain, and then compared the transfer frequency of the tet(M) gene between the wild-type and mutant recipient. Besides its recA-null status, JW2669 is otherwise isogenic with BW25113. When the parental strain BW25113 was used as a recipient, the resistance gene transfer was detected at a frequency of 7.2 × 10−7 copies per donor (Fig 3B). However, the transfer frequency was under the detection limit (<1.2 × 10−8 copies per donor) when strain JW2669 was used as the recipient.
We next tested whether the presence of a Tn6283 copy in the recipient chromosome can increase the frequency of pSEA1 integration using E. coli strain LN5 and its isogeneic parent strain W3110 as recipient. Strain LN5 carries a single copy of Tn6283 in the bcp gene, which was obtained by serial batch-culture transfer of one Tcr transconjugant in a non-selective medium. Although the transfer of the resistance gene was detected for both strain W3110 (Tn6283-) and LN5 (Tn6283+), the transfer frequency was about 60-fold higher in LN5 than that in W3110 (N = 5, P = 0.007937 in a two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; Fig 3C).
Collectively, these results suggest that the integrative transfer of pSEA1 from V. ponticus into the E. coli chromosome highly depends on the homology of the Tn6283 copy, as well as on the homologous recombination system of the recipient cell.
Tn6283 circle originates from one specific strand
Since Tn6283 contains two tyrosine recombinase genes, it would be expected to excise itself in the typical ICE circular form [34]. To precisely define the mobility unit of Tn6283, we determined the sequence of the expected recombination joint “attTn6283” formed upon excision of the element. In addition, we investigated how the Tn6283 insertion site in the donor replicon pSEA1 is joined upon excision of Tn6283 by determining the sequence of the hypothetical recombination joint "attpSEA1". For this analysis, we used E. coli strain LN5 that carries a single copy of Tn6283 (Fig 4), and V. ponticus harboring pSEA1 (S5 Fig).
In the E. coli chromosome, motifs C and C’ of Tn6283 were not flanked by a direct repeat (Fig 2D). Thus, attTn6283 was initially hypothesized to contain a heteroduplex spacer (Fig 4A), equivalent to the “coupling sequence” of Tn916 [36, 37]. Excision of Tn6283 from the E. coli chromosome integration site (attB within the bcp gene) was detected (Fig 4B). The PCR products were cloned into the pGEM-T easy vector and sequenced to determine the spacer sequence. The attTn6283 on the excised form of Tn6283 consisted of motif C, a 6-bp spacer (AAGGAC), and C’ (Fig 4C). Thus, the termini of Tn6283 in the E. coli chromosome were 6 bp downstream of the 3’ end from C and C’. These results indicated that Tn6283 is excised as a circle by introducing a nick at a position 6 bp from the two terminal repeats. Although two types of attpSEA1 sequences were expected, the ten cloned PCR products contained only one type (Fig 4C), which could be generated by strand transfer between two nicked sites on the top strand in Fig 4A (blue arrowheads). This suggests that the excised Tn6283 circle carries a homoduplex (complementary sequences) at the spacer region, and thus strand transfer preferentially occurs on one specific strand of the donor molecule.
The original attB sequence, before the Tn6283 insertion, can be generated by recombination between “attL” and “attR” (Fig 4A). The PCR product with the expected size of attB was detected at a relatively low level (Fig 4B). Seventeen of the 19 clones from PCR products expected to carry the attB sequence contained an attB variant, designated attB*, that contained a 6-bp spacer region originating from one terminus of Tn6283 on pSEA1. This product was also generated by strand transfer between two nicked sites in the top strand (Fig 4A and 4D blue arrowheads). Two clones showed the scar sequence (Scar in Fig 4D), containing of a partial (11-bp) sequence of motif C. This scar sequence is not the product generated by strand exchange between the two primary nicking sites (Fig 4A). In other word, the detected joints on the two products (Fig 4C and 4D bottom) were not the products derived from one excision event.
Tn6283 is inserted into a hypothetical protein gene on pSEA1 in V. ponticus, whose homolog was found in V. nigripulchritudo, and motifs C and C’ of Tn6283 were not flanked by a direct repeat (A, B in S5 Fig). Sequencing of the PCR products of the expected recombination joint attTn6283 in five clones showed that the attTn6283 sequence contained motifs C and C’ and two 6-bp sequences (CCCTCT, AACTTC) between the two motifs, which were identical to the 6-bp sequences next to C and C’ on pSEA1 (A, C, D in S5 Fig). We could not determine whether the circularized Tn6283 originated from its copy in the chromosome, pSEA1, or both (Fig 2D). The empty donor site, attpSEA1, was not as efficiently amplified as attTn6283 in PCR (B in S5 Fig). The cloned fragment of attpSEA1 contained scar sequences that include entire motif C (F in S5 Fig), similar to the case for attB in E. coli (Fig 4E). These results confirm that Tn6283 circularizes itself upon its excision but does not mediate equivalent strand exchange for the replicon side on the substrate in vivo.
Tn6283 excision does not generate an unoccupied donor site in vivo
Since the unoccupied Tn6283 donor sites (attB*, attpSEA1) were detected at low levels in the Tn6283-containing cell population, and scar sequences were detected as the recombination joints on the donor site, we hypothesized that the replicon backbone is not efficiently joined upon Tn6283 excision (Fig 5A, conservative transposition) or that Tn6283 is excised via a copy-out mechanism, which leaves the original copy upon excision (Fig 5A, copy-out model). To test this idea, we quantified the copy numbers of, intA (total Tn6283 copies), attTn6283 (joint on the circularized Tn6283), dxs (E. coli chromosome), attB* (joint formed on the chromosome side of the recombination products in the E.coli strain), traI (a reporter for total pSEA1 copies in the Vibrio strain), and Scar1 (joint formed on the pSEA1 side of the recombination products in the Vibrio strain) using qPCR.
In E. coli, the mean copy number of attTn6283 was 2.9 × 10−3 per total chromosome copies and 2.0 × 10−3 per total Tn6283 copies (Fig 5D). The mean copy number of the joints on the replicon (attB*) was 3.8 × 10−7 per total replicon copies (Fig 5C). Thus, the copy number of the unoccupied donor site was below 0.1% of the joints on the excised Tn6283 molecule. In V. ponticus stationary cultures, the mean copy number of attTn6283 on the circularized Tn6283 was 5.6 × 10−4 per total pSEA1 copies and 3.2 × 10−4 per total Tn6283 copies (Fig 5D). Scar1 was detected at a low level, and the product-to-substrate ratio (Scar1/traI) was below the detection limit of quantitative analysis (<1 × 10−7 per replicon copies) (Fig 5D). Again, the copy number of unoccupied donor sites was below 0.1% that of the joint on the excised Tn6283 molecule in vivo. These results suggest that the majority of the products of the replicon side were not joined, and were eventually lost from the cell population, or that Tn6283 is excised via a mechanism similar to the copy-out-paste-in transposition model of an insertion sequence (Fig 5B).
To test whether Tn6283 excision is growth phase-dependent, we conducted the same qPCR experiment using E. coli cell cultures at three different growth phases (S6 Fig). The results indicated that the product-to-substrate ratios in vivo were consistent across growth phases, and the excision frequency deduced from the attTn6283/traI ratio was 4.1 × 10−3 to 5.1 × 10−3 (S6 Fig).
Tn6283 has a marginal negative fitness effect
Since the transfer of mobile DNA into new hosts can have negative impacts on fitness [38, 39], we next evaluated whether the integration of Tn6383 into E. coli imposes a detectable fitness cost (assessed by growth parameters) on the recipient strain, which would potentially arise from its constant excision and the expression of genes embedded in the integrative element. There was no significant difference in the maximum growth rate between the parental strain W3110 and strain LN5 carrying Tn6283 (Fig 6A), indicating that Tn6283 does not negatively influence growth of the host. However, the bcp-knockout strain LN3 (Δbcp strain) showed a higher growth rate compared to that of the other two strains (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons in a Tukey test). The maximum culture optical density (OD) was significantly lower in LN5 compared with that of the other two strains (Fig 6A) (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons in the Tukey test). There was no detectable difference in the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) among the three strains (Fig 6B; P = 0.45 in ANOVA), indicating that the relatively low OD of LN5 was not due to cell death. However, LN5 contained a considerably higher number of cell aggregates compared with the other strains at the late stationary phase according to microscopy observation (Fig 6C), suggesting that its decreased OD was likely due to cell aggregation, which was either a direct or indirect effect of having Tn6283 inserted at the bcp locus in this strain.
The excision frequency of Tn6283 was estimated to be 5.0 x 10−3 ± 0.1 x 10−3 (n = 5) per replicon at the exponential phase in the LN5 cell population (Fig 5B). If the excision of Tn6283 accompanies double-stranded breaks of the Tn6283-carrying chromosome, the Tn6283-containing cell population would contain relatively more dead cells than the other populations. Indeed, flow cytometry observation of dead-stained cells was consistent with this hypothesis. The fraction of dead cells was lowest in Δbcp (0.0011 ± 0.0002) (Fig 6D), whereas the highest fraction was detected in LN5 harboring Tn6283 (0.0087 ± 0.0009); the fraction of dead cells of W3110 was intermediate between the other two strains (0.0040 ± 0.0014).
This low burden could explain the stable maintenance of Tn6283 in the cell population despite its constant generation of the empty donor site at a low frequency. Thus, we tested whether Tn6283 can be stably maintained in a host cell population using E. coli LN5 as the model host. In three replicate assays, we did not detect the emergence of Tn6283-free colonies (S7 Fig). This confirms that Tn6283 can persist in the cell population without particular selection for its carriage once it has integrated into the genome.
Discussion
Despite increasing concern on the accumulation of ARGs in aquaculture, little is known about the genetic entities and mechanisms involved in gene transfer in these environments [40]. The current paradigm is that the dissemination of ARGs is largely mediated by MGEs that support intercellular mobility, such as autonomously replicating conjugative plasmids and ICEs represented by SXT/R391-elements, CTnDOT, and Tn916 [3, 34, 41]. Dissemination of ARGs is also mediated by the interplay between the MGEs that encode conjugation factors and other sets of mobile elements that exhibit intracellular mobility, such as integron gene cassettes, mobilizable plasmids, and mobilizable integrative elements [30, 42, 43, 44]. However, these concepts of HGT have been established based on findings from human pathogens, and may not fully explain the pattern of emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in aquaculture environments [4]. Here, we identified a new pattern of ARG transfer from an aquaculture isolate.
Previous studies have demonstrated the integration of a foreign plasmid into the recipient chromosome in actinomycetes [45], Myxococcus xanthus [46], Acidiphilium facilis [47], and Acidocella sp. [48]. Although some of the plasmids reported above are now known to be ICEs with replication function [49, 50], the underlying plasmid integration mechanism of the others has thus far remained elusive. Based on our results with plasmid pSEA1 that was integrated into the E. coli chromosome [4], we can suggest a two-step gene integration model, in which a conjugative plasmid integrates into the chromosome using the homology of an integrative element. The transposition of insertion sequences should also mediate integration of a plasmid, as known for the generation of Hfr strains in E. coli [51]. Such integrative elements can provide a larger homology stretch than the insertion sequences (1–3 kb in length). Our findings suggest that even an integrative element without mobilization function could assist with HGT in the presence of other MGEs.
Among the integrative elements that encode a tyrosine recombinase, some mainly target sequences that are identical or highly homologous to the spacer sequence in the attP-equivalent site [52, 53, 54] and generate a direct repeat when in the integrated form. Conversely, Tn916, CTnDOT, and SXT/R391 elements do not integrate into the sequences that show homology to the attP-equivalent site [34, 36, 55]. Their excision generates a heteroduplex spacer (also called a coupling sequence) at both att sites, one on the excised integrative element and the other on the donor site [36, 37]. This is somewhat similar to the detected behavior of Tn6283, which integrates into the bcp gene that also has no homology to the attTn6283 spacer. However, there are at least a few notable differences in the excision mode between the well-characterized elements (SXT, Tn916, CTnDot) and the newly identified element Tn6283.
First, Tn916 and SXT generate unoccupied donor sites at a comparable frequency to the generation of circularized elements [56, 57], whereas these sites are barely generated by Tn6283 (i.e., 7,000 copies of attTn6283/the empty donor site in E. coli). Furthermore, the detected joint on the donor site showed a high frequency of scar sequences, which would result in damage to the functionality of the target gene. The generation of scar sequences may be due to incorrect excisions occurring at a low frequency.
Second, excised Tn6283 in vivo does not seem to carry a heteroduplex joint at attTn6283, and instead contains a homoduplex joint according to the sequencing results of ten cloned attTn6283-derived fragments (Fig 4D). Based on this evidence, we propose two excision models for Tn6283, which contrast with the canonical ICE excision model. One is a conservative transposition model, in which a Tn6283 circle is generated after two rounds of unpaired strand transfer (Fig 7, middle). The other is a copy-out-paste-in transposition model, in which the replication machinery is assembled at the recombination joint and the replication fork proceeds in one direction after the first unpaired strand transfer (Fig 7, right). The latter model is employed by several IS families [58]. Since the 5′ overhangs of two Tn6283 ends were not complementary, two rounds of strand transfer should generate a heteroduplex joint at attTn6283 (Fig 7, left and middle). Although the number of sequenced clones was limited, the absence of sequence heterogeneity in the attTn6283 region in strain LN5 (one copy of Tn6283) suggests that the Tn6283 circle is replicated out immediately in vivo after the first unpaired strand transfer occurring between two sites on one specific strand of the donor molecule (Fig 4A, blue arrowheads; Fig 7, right). Together, these results suggest that copy-out-paste-in transposition is more likely than conservative transposition as an excision model for Tn6283.
The detailed mechanisms underlying the strand bias of Tn6283 excision remain to be investigated. Generation of scar sequences occurring at the empty donor site suggests that nicking at attR (Fig 4D and 4F in S5 Fig) is a concrete process, whereas nicking at attL is not. The secondary nicking site was located near motif C in both E. coli and V. ponticus (A in S5 Fig, red arrows). Moreover, a motif C-like sequence, named C1, is present near motif C (A in S5 Fig), and 14 of 19 bp are conserved between motif C and motif C1. This situation is reminiscent of the “nearly precise excision” of Tn10, which involves internally located inverted repeat sequences [59]. We speculate that the IntA-binding to motif C1 or another recombinase IntB may be involved in generation of the scar sequence (G in S5 Fig) as well as in the strand bias of Tn6283 excision. These hypotheses will be tested in future research.
Most ICEs such as Tn916, SXT, and CTnDot carry a gene encoding recombination directionality factor (RDF) to control excision and integration, whereas Tn6283 does not encode obvious RDF homologs. Furthermore, Tn6283 does not apparently encode mobilization proteins. These features collectively suggest that Tn6283 is a more primitive integrative element that behaves similarly to cut-and-paste or copy-and-paste type DNA transposons.
Based on the growth assay and cell morphology analysis, Tn6283 does not seem to negatively affect fitness of recipient E. coli, at least under the laboratory condition (incubation in Luria-Bertani medium with extensive agitation), although it did show effects on cell physiology. Tn6283 encodes a thioredoxin-dependent thiol peroxidase, which also happens to be the product of the bcp gene [62], although the protein identity between the two products was only 54.8% (90.3% similarity). Thus, gene inactivation caused by Tn6283 integration may be in part compensated by the genetic cargo in Tn6283. This speculation is congruent with the evidence that the Δbcp strain showed a deviated maximum growth rate compared with that of the wild-type strain, whereas the wild-type and LN5 strains exhibited indistinguishable growth rates. This possible gene inactivation and its compensation is analogous to the method of a family of ICEs called recA-mobile elements (RME) discovered in V. cholera, which disrupt the host’s recA gene, but complement the functional loss through a divergent recA homolog embedded within the elements [63]. Sequence comparison between pSEA1 and a plasmid-like contig from V. nigripulchritudo strain FTn2 revealed that Tn6283 disrupted one hypothetical protein gene that was likely present in the pSEA1 ancestor (B in S5 Fig). However, we currently cannot determine whether such functional compensation occurred on pSEA1.
pSEA1 was classified into the MOBH group of MGEs [14]. Of the six MOB families identified to date, MOBH contains the smallest number of plasmids [14]. Some MGEs detected from aquatic isolates are included in the MOBH group, such as A/C plasmids and the SXT/R391 family ICEs detected in marine isolates belonging to the families Enterobacteriaceae and Vibrionaceae [4, 42, 64, 65]. Further, pAQU1 and its relatives have been found in multidrug-resistant isolates from an aquaculture site [4]. pASa4 [66] and Plasmid1 [67] were discovered from the salmon pathogen Aeromonas salmonicida and Shewanella sp. isolated from an eel pond, respectively. Thus, members of the MOBH group are likely one of the greatest contributors to the distribution of ARGs among Gammaproteobacteria in the aquatic environments. We also found intA and intB homologs in Vibrio and Photobacterium species in the NCBI database (S1 Dataset), suggesting that related integrative elements may be distributed among Vibrionaceae nested in the sea. A previous report indicated that approximately 1010 copies of the 16S rRNA gene were present in 1 g of aquaculture sediments [68]. This suggests that bacteria reside in the aquaculture sediment at a high density, comparable to the condition used in our mating assays. Thus, the interplay between primitive integrative elements and conjugative elements may contribute to the dissemination of resistance genes in the sea and to interspecies gene transfer among prokaryotes.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Takashi Namatame, Yuki Shinozaki, Satomi Yoshida for technical assistance and Kayoko Kobayashi for secretarial assistance. We also thank Didier Mazel (Pasteur Institute) for his comments on this study. We appreciate the constructive comments received from Vincent Burrus (Université de Sherbrooke) and an anonymous reviewer for improving this manuscript.
Data Availability
Complete sequence of pSEA1 is available from GenBank under accession number LC081338.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by JSPS (https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/index.html) KAKENHI grant number JP15K07531 (LN), JP18K05790 (LN), JP16H01782 (SS), and funds from Fundamental Research Developing Association for Shipbuilding and Offshore (https://www.sajn.or.jp/redas/) to LN, The Japan Prize Foundation (http://www.japanprize.jp/en/) to LN. This research was also supported by Japan Science and Technology Agency ERATO (http://www.jst.go.jp/erato/) project number JPMJER1502 (NN, TY, HY). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Internationa Office of Epizootics Report of a joint FAO/OIE/WHO Expert Consultation on antimicrobial use in aquaculture and antimicrobial resistance, Seoul, Republic of korea, 13–16 June 2006. Avaiable from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/133869 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cabello FC, Godfrey HP, Tomova A, Ivanova L, Dolz H, Millanao A, et al. Antimicrobial use in aquaculture re-examined: its relevance to antimicrobial resistance and to animal and human health. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15(7):1917–1942. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Johnson CM, Grossman AD. Integrative and Conjugative Elements (ICEs): What They Do and How They Work. Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:577–601. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-055018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nonaka L, Maruyama F, Onishi Y, Kobayashi T, Ogura Y, Hayashi T, et al. Various pAQU plasmids possibly contribute to disseminate tetracycline resistance gene tet(M) among marine bacterial community. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:152 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rodriguez-Blanco A, Lemos ML, Osorio CR. Integrating conjugative elements as vectors of antibiotic, mercury, and quaternary ammonium compound resistance in marine aquaculture environments. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2619–2626. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.05997-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martinez JL, Coque TM, Baquero F. What is a resistance gene? Ranking risk in resistomes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(2):116–123. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nonaka L, Ikeno K, Suzuki S. Distribution of tetracycline resistance gene, tet(M), in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria isolated from sediment and seawater at a coastal aquaculture site in Japan. Microbes Environ. 2007;22(4):355–364. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.22.355 [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim SR, Nonaka L, Suzuki S. Occurrence of tetracycline resistance genes tet(M) and tet(S) in bacteria from marine aquaculture sites. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;237(1):147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2004.06.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nikolakopoulou TL, Giannoutsou EP, Karabatsou AA, Karagouni AD. Prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes in Greek seawater habitats. J Microbiol. 2008;46(6):633–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-008-0080-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fricke WF, Welch TJ, McDermott PF, Mammel MK, LeClerc JE, White DG, et al. Comparative genomics of the IncA/C multidrug resistance plasmid family. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(15):4750–4757. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00189-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nonaka L, Maruyama F, Miyamoto M, Miyakoshi M, Kurokawa K, Masuda M. Novel conjugative transferable multiple drug resistance plasmid pAQU1 from Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae isolated from marine aquaculture environment. Microbes Environ. 2012;27(3):263–272. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME11338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Song Y, Yu P, Li B, Pan Y, Zhang X, Cong J, et al. The mosaic accessory gene structures of the SXT/R391-like integrative and conjugative elements derived from Vibrio spp. isolated from aquatic products and environment in the Yangtze River Estuary, China. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:214 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Juiz-Rio S, Osorio CR, de Lorenzo V, Lemos ML. Subtractive hybridization reveals a high genetic diversity in the fish pathogen Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida: evidence of a SXT-like element. Microbiology. 2005;151(Pt 8):2659–2669. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27891-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Garcillan-Barcia MP, Francia MV, de la Cruz F. The diversity of conjugative relaxases and its application in plasmid classification. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33(3):657–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00168.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(12):6640–6645. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.120163297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Choi KH, Gaynor JB, White KG, Lopez C, Bosio CM, Karkhoff-Schweizer RR, et al. A Tn7-based broad-range bacterial cloning and expression system. Nat Methods. 2005;2(6):443–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee C, Lee S, Shin SG, Hwang S. Real-time PCR determination of rRNA gene copy number: absolute and relative quantification assays with Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;78(2):371–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1300-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Noguchi H, Taniguchi T, Itoh T. MetaGeneAnnotator: detecting species-specific patterns of ribosomal binding site for precise gene prediction in anonymous prokaryotic and phage genomes. DNA Res. 2008;15(6):387–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsn027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kahm M, Hasenbrink G, Lichtenberg-Frate H, Luwig J, Kschischo M. groft: Fitting Biological Growth Curves with R. J Stat Softw. 2010;33(7):1–21. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i0720808728 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pei J, Grishin NV. PROMALS3D: multiple protein sequence alignment enhanced with evolutionary and three-dimensional structural information. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1079:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-646-7_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lefort V, Longueville JE, Gascuel O. SMS: Smart Model Selection in PhyML. Mol Biol Evol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Le Roux F, Labreuche Y, Davis BM, Iqbal N, Mangenot S, Goarant C, et al. Virulence of an emerging pathogenic lineage of Vibrio nigripulchritudo is dependent on two plasmids. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13(2):296–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02329.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Roberts MC. Update on acquired tetracycline resistance genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;245(2):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.02.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nonaka L, Maruyama F, Suzuki S, Masuda M. Novel macrolide-resistance genes, mef(C) and mph(G), carried by plasmids from Vibrio and Photobacterium isolated from sediment and seawater of a coastal aquaculture site. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2015;61(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sköld O. Resistance to trimethoprim and sulfonamides. Vet Res. 2001;32(3–4):261–273. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2001123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schwarz S, Kehrenberg C, Doublet B, Cloeckaert A. Molecular basis of bacterial resistance to chloramphenicol and florfenicol. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004;28(5):519–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Morii H. Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of the ampicililin resistance gene on a conjugative R plasmid from the fish pathogen Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida. Journal of aquatic animal health. 2004;16:197–207. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao053107 PMID: 12650243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sugimoto Y, S S., Nonaka L, Boonla C, Sukpanyatham N, Chou H, et al. The novel mef(C)–mph(G) macrolide resistance genes are conveyed in the environment on various vectors. Journal of global antimirobial resistance. 2017;10:47–53. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2017.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Deng Y, Bao X, Ji L, Chen L, Liu J, Miao J, et al. Resistance integrons: class 1, 2 and 3 integrons. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2015;14:45 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0100-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goudenege D, Labreuche Y, Krin E, Ansquer D, Mangenot S, Calteau A, et al. Comparative genomics of pathogenic lineages of Vibrio nigripulchritudo identifies virulence-associated traits. Isme j. 2013;7(10):1985–1996. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Van Duyne GD. Lambda integrase: armed for recombination. Curr Biol. 2005;15(17):R658–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Landy A. The lambda Integrase Site-specific Recombination Pathway. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3(2):Mdna3-0051-2014. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0051-2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wood MM, Gardner JF. The Integration and Excision of CTnDOT. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3(2):Mdna3-0020-2014. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0020-2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nicolas E, Lambin M, Dandoy D, Galloy C, Nguyen N, Oger CA, et al. The Tn3-family of Replicative Transposons. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0060-2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Caparon MG, Scott JR. Excision and insertion of the conjugative transposon Tn916 involves a novel recombination mechanism. Cell. 1989;59(6):1027–1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rajeev L, Malanowska K, Gardner JF. Challenging a paradigm: the role of DNA homology in tyrosine recombinase reactions. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;73(2):300–309. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00038-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Harrison E, Dytham C, Hall JP, Guymer D, Spiers AJ, Paterson S, et al. Rapid compensatory evolution promotes the survival of conjugative plasmids. Mob Genet Elements. 2016;6(3):e1179074 https://doi.org/10.1080/2159256x.2016.1179074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yano H, Wegrzyn K, Loftie-Eaton W, Johnson J, Deckert GE, Rogers LM, et al. Evolved plasmid-host interactions reduce plasmid interference cost. Mol Microbiol. 2016;101(5):743–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Watts JEM, Schreier HJ, Lanska L, Hale MS. The Rising Tide of Antimicrobial Resistance in Aquaculture: Sources, Sinks and Solutions. Mar Drugs. 2017;15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/md15060158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Roberts AP, Mullany P. Tn916-like genetic elements: a diverse group of modular mobile elements conferring antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35(5):856–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00283.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Carraro N, Rivard N, Burrus V, Ceccarelli D. Mobilizable genomic islands, different strategies for the dissemination of multidrug resistance and other adaptive traits. Mob Genet Elements. 2017;7(2):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159256x.2017.1304193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mazel D. Integrons: agents of bacterial evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4(8):608–620. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Smillie C, Garcillan-Barcia MP, Francia MV, Rocha EP, de la Cruz F. Mobility of plasmids. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74(3):434–452. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00020-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Campbell AM. Chromosomal insertion sites for phages and plasmids. J Bacteriol. 1992;174(23):7495–7499. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.174.23.7495-7499.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Breton AM, Jaoua S, Guespin-Michel J. Transfer of plasmid RP4 to Myxococcus xanthus and evidence for its integration into the chromosome. J Bacteriol. 1985;161(2):523–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Inagaki K, Tomono J, Kishimoto N, Tano T, Tanaka H. Transformation of the acidophilic heterotroph Acidiphilium facilis by electroporation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1993;57(10):1770–1771. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.57.1770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ghosh S, Mahapatra NR, Nandi S, Banerjee PC. Integration of metal-resistant determinants from the plasmid of an Acidocella strain into the chromosome of Escherichia coli DH5alpha. Curr Microbiol. 2005;50(1):28–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-004-4370-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.te Poele EM, Bolhuis H, Dijkhuizen L. Actinomycete integrative and conjugative elements. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008;94(1):127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-008-9255-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ghinet MG, Bordeleau E, Beaudin J, Brzezinski R, Roy S, Burrus V. Uncovering the prevalence and diversity of integrating conjugative elements in actinobacteria. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27846 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ohtsubo E, Zenilman M, Ohtsubo H, McCormick M, Machida C, Machida Y. Mechanism of insertion and cointegration mediated by IS1 and Tn3. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1981;45 Pt 1:283–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lee CA, Auchtung JM, Monson RE, Grossman AD. Identification and characterization of int (integrase), xis (excisionase) and chromosomal attachment sites of the integrative and conjugative element ICEBs1 of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2007;66(6):1356–1369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06000.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ohtsubo Y, Ishibashi Y, Naganawa H, Hirokawa S, Atobe S, Nagata Y, et al. Conjugal transfer of polychlorinated biphenyl/biphenyl degradation genes in Acidovorax sp. strain KKS102, which are located on an integrative and conjugative element. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(16):4237–4248. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00352-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ravatn R, Studer S, Zehnder AJ, van der Meer JR. Int-B13, an unusual site-specific recombinase of the bacteriophage P4 integrase family, is responsible for chromosomal insertion of the 105-kilobase clc element of Pseudomonas sp. Strain B13. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(21):5505–5514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hochhut B, Waldor MK. Site-specific integration of the conjugal Vibrio cholerae SXT element into prfC. Mol Microbiol. 1999;32(1):99–110. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01330.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Burrus V, Waldor MK. Control of SXT integration and excision. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(17):5045–5054. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.17.5045-5054.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Marra D, Scott JR. Regulation of excision of the conjugative transposon Tn916. Mol Microbiol. 1999;31(2):609–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chandler M, Fayet O, Rousseau P, Ton Hoang B, Duval-Valentin G. Copy-out-Paste-in Transposition of IS911: A Major Transposition Pathway. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0031-2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Foster TJ, Lundblad V, Hanley-Way S, Halling SM, Kleckner N. Three Tn10-associated excision events: relationship to transposition and role of direct and inverted repeats. Cell. 1981;23(1):215–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hagemann AT, Craig NL. Tn7 transposition creates a hotspot for homologous recombination at the transposon donor site. Genetics. 1993;133(1):9–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bender J, Kuo J, Kleckner N. Genetic evidence against intramolecular rejoining of the donor DNA molecule following IS10 transposition. Genetics. 1991;128(4):687–694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jeong W, Cha MK, Kim IH. Thioredoxin-dependent hydroperoxide peroxidase activity of bacterioferritin comigratory protein (BCP) as a new member of the thiol-specific antioxidant protein (TSA)/Alkyl hydroperoxide peroxidase C (AhpC) family. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(4):2924–2930. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.4.2924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rapa RA, Islam A, Monahan LG, Mutreja A, Thomson N, Charles IG, et al. A genomic island integrated into recA of Vibrio cholerae contains a divergent recA and provides multi-pathway protection from DNA damage. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17(4):1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Johnson TJ, Lang KS. IncA/C plasmids: An emerging threat to human and animal health? Mob Genet Elements. 2012;2(1):55–58. https://doi.org/10.4161/mge.19626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Carraro N, Burrus V. Biology of Three ICE Families: SXT/R391, ICEBs1, and ICESt1/ICESt3. Microbiol Spectr. 2014;2(6). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0008-2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Reith ME, Singh RK, Curtis B, Boyd JM, Bouevitch A, Kimball J, et al. The genome of Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida A449: insights into the evolution of a fish pathogen. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:427 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Saltikov CW, Cifuentes A, Venkateswaran K, Newman DK. The ars detoxification system is advantageous but not required for As(V) respiration by the genetically tractable Shewanella species strain ANA-3. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(5):2800–2809. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.5.2800-2809.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Pitkanen LK, Tamminen M, Hynninen A, Karkman A, Corander J, Kotilainen A, et al. Fish farming affects the abundance and diversity of the mercury resistance gene merA in marine sediments. Microbes Environ. 2011;26(3):205–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Complete sequence of pSEA1 is available from GenBank under accession number LC081338.