Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Studies in Mycology logoLink to Studies in Mycology
. 2018 Feb 7;89:105–115. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.01.002

Two different R gene loci co-evolved with Avr2 of Phytophthora infestans and confer distinct resistance specificities in potato

C Aguilera-Galvez 1, N Champouret 1,3, H Rietman 1,4, X Lin 1, D Wouters 1, Z Chu 2,5, JDG Jones 2, JH Vossen 1, RGF Visser 1, PJ Wolters 1, VGAA Vleeshouwers 1,∗
PMCID: PMC6002340  PMID: 29910517

Abstract

Late blight, caused by the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans, is the most devastating disease in potato. For sustainable management of this economically important disease, resistance breeding relies on the availability of resistance (R) genes. Such R genes against P. infestans have evolved in wild tuber-bearing Solanum species from North, Central and South America, upon co-evolution with cognate avirulence (Avr) genes. Here, we report how effectoromics screens with Avr2 of P. infestans revealed defense responses in diverse Solanum species that are native to Mexico and Peru. We found that the response to AVR2 in the Mexican Solanum species is mediated by R genes of the R2 family that resides on a major late blight locus on chromosome IV. In contrast, the response to AVR2 in Peruvian Solanum species is mediated by Rpi-mcq1, which resides on chromosome IX and does not belong to the R2 family. The data indicate that AVR2 recognition has evolved independently on two genetic loci in Mexican and Peruvian Solanum species, respectively. Detached leaf tests on potato cultivar ‘Désirée’ transformed with R genes from either the R2 or the Rpi-mcq1 locus revealed an overlapping, but distinct resistance profile to a panel of 18 diverse P. infestans isolates. The achieved insights in the molecular R – Avr gene interaction can lead to more educated exploitation of R genes and maximize the potential of generating more broad-spectrum, and potentially more durable control of the late blight disease in potato.

Key words: Avr gene, Co-evolution, Late blight, Phytophthora infestans, Potato, R gene, Resistance, Solanum

Introduction

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is the most important non-cereal crop consumed worldwide and is affected by the destructive late blight disease. The oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans is the causal agent of the disease, which destroys leaves, stems and tubers from growing potato plants (Fry 2008). In Ireland, late blight destroyed a large portion of the crop and led to the Irish potato famine between 1845 and 1849, causing the death of over one million people and the emigration of one million more (Zadoks 2008). Currently, late blight is the major threat to potato production, responsible for yield losses of around 16 % of the global crop and representing an annual financial loss of approximately € 6 billion (Haverkort et al. 2016).

Johanna Westerdijk believed that studying mechanisms that underlie plant immunity would help the breeding of resistant genotypes. In her inaugural lecture in 1917, when she became Professor of Phytopathology at Utrecht University, she described that diseases were most severe when pathogens or hosts are introduced in novel environments. She argued that co-evolution of hosts and pathogens is required for the evolution of resistance (Westerdijk 1917). In the meantime, significant progress has been made in understanding plant immunity, and this knowledge has led to the development of resistant plants. Several R genes conferring resistance to Phytophthora infestans (Rpi) have been introgressed into potato cultivars from Solanum species native to Mexico (Malcolmson & Black 1966). The Toluca Valley in Mexico is a center of diversity for P. infestans and suggested to be its center of origin (Goodwin et al., 1992, Fry et al., 1993, Grunwald and Flier, 2005). The Mexican resistance (R) genes include R1-R11 from Solanum demissum, Rpi-blb1, Rpi-blb2 and Rpi-blb3 from Solanum bulbocastanum, Rpi-sto1 and Rpi-pta from Solanum stoloniferum, Rpi-amr3 from Solanum americanum, Rpi-mch1 from Solanum michoacanum and Rpi1 from Solanum pinnatisectum (Kuhl et al. 2001, Hein et al., 2009, de Vetten et al., 2011, Vleeshouwers et al., 2011b, Jo et al., 2015, Witek et al., 2016, Sliwka et al. 2012b). Some of these Mexican R genes belong to large gene families, such as R2 that occurs at a major late blight resistance locus (MLB) on chromosome IV (Park et al., 2005a, Lokossou et al., 2009). In the Andean region in South America, the other center of genetic diversity of tuber-bearing Solanum (Hijmans and Spooner, 2001, Spooner et al., 2004) as well as P. infestans (Abad and Abad, 1997, Alpizar-Gomez et al., 2007), additional R genes have been identified. These include Rpi-mcq1, Rpi-vnt1, Rpi-ber, Rpi-chc1, Rpi-tar1, Rpi-rzc1 from Solanum mochiquense, Solanum venturii, Solanum berthaultii, Solanum chacoense, Solanum tarijense and Solanum sparsipilum, respectively (Smilde et al., 2005, Jones et al., 2007, Foster et al., 2009, Park et al., 2009, Pel et al., 2009, Vossen et al., 2009, Jones et al., 2014a, Sliwka et al. 2012a).

R gene-mediated resistance is generally based on a strong hypersensitive response (HR), but in potato, single R genes have failed to provide durable resistance against late blight. Therefore, the modern breeding approach is to isolate a variation of R genes and deploy them in pyramids. This is expected to lead to broad-spectrum recognition of P. infestans isolates and might provide a more durable resistance (Jo et al. 2016). The originally laborious job of cloning new R genes has accelerated in recent years. Map-based cloning approaches have been greatly facilitated by the availability of the potato genome sequence, and modern approaches such as R gene enrichment sequencing (RenSeq) promise to speed up the R gene identification to unprecedented rate (Jupe et al., 2013, Witek et al., 2016). In addition, functional genomics approaches such as effectoromics can be exploited to probe resistant germplasm for specific recognition to P. infestans effectors to identify new R genes and speed up complementation studies (Vleeshouwers et al., 2008, Haas et al., 2009). Functional studies on effectors of P. infestans are key to understanding the specificity and potential durability of R genes (Vleeshouwers et al. 2011b).

AVR2, a cytoplasmic RxLR-EER effector from P. infestans, is the cognate avirulence protein matching R2 (Gilroy et al. 2011). Overexpression of AVR2 in potato plants results in enhancement of susceptibility to P. infestans isolates (Turnbull et al. 2017), and therefore, AVR2 is considered an important effector for P. infestans. We hypothesize that host species evolve immune receptors that target important effectors such as AVR2 during the tight co-evolution with the pathogen in centers of diversity.

In this study, a diverse collection of wild Solanum genotypes was screened for responses to AVR2 in order to identify AVR2-responding genotypes. Cell death responses were found in Mexican, as well as in South American Solanum spp. We studied the genetic basis of the response to AVR2 in both centres of diversity, and investigated the spectrum of resistance caused by respective R genes. The data show that R genes mediating the recognition of AVR2 have evolved independently, resulting in different genes at unrelated genetic loci in two different centers of diversity of Solanum spp. and cause different resistance specificities.

Results

AVR2 induces cell death responses in Solanum species from Mexico and Peru

To identify plants that recognize AVR2 of P. infestans, functional screens were performed on a highly diverse set of 80 wild Solanum genotypes that belong to nine different taxonomic series (Table 1) (Hawkes, 1990, Vleeshouwers et al., 2011a). AVR2 was transiently expressed in leaves by agroinfiltration and responses were scored at 3–4 days post infiltration (dpi). Specific cell death responses to AVR2 were observed in twelve wild Solanum genotypes. These belong to Solanum schenckii (Snk) 213-1 and 212-5, Solanum edinense (Edn) 151-1 and 150-4, Solanum hjertingii (Hjt) 349-3, 350-1 and 640-1 and Solanum bulbocastanum (Blb) 520-21 that all occur in the central highlands of Mexico (Champouret 2010), but also in S. mochiquense (Mcq) 717-3 and 186-2 and Solanum huancabambense (Hcb) 353-8 and 354-1, which originate from Peru (Table 1, Fig. 1A). These results indicate that AVR2 is specifically recognized in various wild Solanum species, which reside in two geographically distinct locations (Fig. 1B).

Table 1.

List of Solanum genotypes used in this study.

Series Solanum species GenBank accession Genotype Agro infiltration
 Accession origin
pK7WG2:AVR2 pK7WG2: empty R3a/AVR3a Country Collection site
II. Bulbocastana S. bulbocastanum partitum GLKS 35322 120-2 − − + Guatemala
S. bulbocastanum CGN 23075 525-1 − − + Guatemala
S. bulbocastanum CGN 23074 949-1 − − + Guatemala
S. bulbocastanum CGN 23074 949-5 − − + Guatemala
S. bulbocastanum CGN 22732 950-5 − − + Guatemala
S. bulbocastanum CGN 17693 331-2 − − + Mexico
S. bulbocastanum CGN 17689 945-2 − − + Mexico
S. bulbocastanum CGN 22698 517-1 − − + Mexico
S. bulbocastanum CGN 18310 520-21 + − + Mexico 8
S. bulbocastanum GLKS 31741 522-1 − − + Mexico
S. bulbocastanum CGN 22367 946-1 − − + Mexico
S. bulbocastanum PI 275199 947-1 − − + Mexico
S. bulbocastanum CGN 23010 948-1 − − + Mexico
S. bulbocastanum CGN 23010 948-2 − − + Mexico
III. Pinnatisecta S. brachistotrichum CGN 17681 325-3 − − + Mexico
S. brachistotrichum GLKS 32714 118-22 − − + Mexico
S. cardiophyllum CGN 18325 336-1 − − + Mexico
S. cardiophyllum CGN 22387 541-2 − − + Mexico
S. cardiophyllum CGN 18326 337-2 − − + Mexico
S. cardiophyllum GLKS 30099 124-1 − − + Mexico
S. cardiophyllum CGN 18326 337-1 − − + Mexico
S. cardiophyllum BGRC 55227 539-2 − − + Mexico
S. pinnatisectum CGN 17742 775-1 − − + Mexico
S. pinnatisectum GLKS 31586 204-1 − − + Mexico
S. trifidum CGN 22371 882-4 − − + Mexico
S. tarnii PI 545742 226-3 − − + Mexico
S. tarnii PI 545808 229-2 − − + Mexico
S. jamesii CGN 18349 355-10 − − + USA
S. jamesii CGN 18349 355-1 − − + USA
S. jamesii CGN 18346 674-1 − − + USA
IV. Polyadenia S. lesteri CGN 18337 358-2 − − + Mexico
S. lesteri CGN 18337 358-4 − − + Mexico
S. polyadenium CGN 17749 376-4 − − + Mexico
VI. Circaeifolia S. capsicibaccatum CGN 18254 335-10 − − + Bolivia
S. capsicibaccatum CGN 22388 536-1 − − + Bolivia
S. circaeifolium CGN 18133 564-2 − − + Bolivia
S. circaeifolium CGN 18133 564-3 − − + Bolivia
S. circaeifolium quimense CGN 18158 567-1 − − + Bolivia
IX. Yungasensa S. chacoense CGN 18365 544-5 − − + Bolivia
S. arnesii CGN 23986 4-11 − − + Bolivia
S. huancabambense CGN 18306 353-8 + − + Peru 9
S. huancabambense CGN 17719 354-1 + − + Peru 10
S. huancabambense CGN 18306 354-2 − − + Peru
S. huancabambense CGN 17719 354-10 − − + Peru
X. Megistacroloba S. astleyi GLKS 32836 114-4 − − + Bolivia
XVI. Tuberosa S. verrucosum CGN 17768 393-10 − − + Mexico
S. verrucosum CGN 17770 912-2 − − + Mexico
S. mochiquense GLKS 32319 186-1 − − + Peru
S. mochiquense CGN 18263 717-3 + − + Peru 12
S. mochiquense GLKS 32319 186-2 + − + Peru 11
S. avilesii CGN 18255 477-1 − − + Bolivia
S. avilesii CGN 18256 478-2 − − + Bolivia
S. berthaultii CGN 18190 481-3 − − + Bolivia
S. gourlayi vidaurrei CGN 23045 626-2 − − + Argentina
S. microdontum gigantophyllum CGN 18200 712-6 − − + Bolivia
S. microdontum gigantophyllum CGN 23050 714-1 − − + Argentina
S. microdontum gigantophyllum CGN 18295 956-1 − − + Argentina
S. microdontum gigantophyllum CGN 18049 963-3 − − + Argentina
S. okade PI 458368 283-1 − − + Argentina
S. okade CGN 18109 366-1 − − + Argentina
S. okade CGN 18108 367-1 − − + Argentina
S. okade CGN 17998 368-6 − − + Argentina
S. okade CGN 18279 741-1 − − + Argentina
XVIII. Longipedicellata S. fendleri CGN 18116 596-2 − − + USA
S. papita CGN 17830 369-7 − − + Mexico
S. papita CGN 18303 765-1 − − + Mexico
S. papita CGN 17832 370-5 − − + Mexico
S. stoloniferum CGN 18333 842-9 − − + Mexico
S. stoloniferum CGN 17606 837-2 − − + Mexico
S. stoloniferum CGN 18333 842-6 − − + Mexico
S. stoloniferum CGN 18348 838-5 − − + Peru
S. hjertingii CGN 22370 640-1 + − + Mexico 5
S. hjertingii CGN 17718 350-1 + − + Mexico 6
S. hjertingii CGN 17717 349-3 + − + Mexico 7
S. polytrichon CGN 17750 378-2 − − + Mexico
XIX. Demissa S. edinense PI 611104 150-4 + − + Mexico 1
S. edinense PI 607474 151-1 + − + Mexico 2
S. schenkii GLKS 30659 213-1 + − + Mexico 3
S. schenkii GLKS 30658 212-5 + − + Mexico 4
S. hougasii CGN 21361 655-1 − − + Mexico
Open in a new tab

The 80 genotypes are derived from wild Solanum accessions native to diverse geographic locations and belong to 9 taxonomic series of Solanum section Petota (Hawkes 1990). Plants were subjected agro-infiltration and occurrence of cell death responses (+) or no responses (−) is indicated. The pK7WG2 empty vector and agro-coinfiltration with R3a/Avr3a were included as negative and positive controls, respectively. Collection sites 1–12 correspond to Fig. 1, Fig. 2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Solanum species that respond to AVR2 occur in Mexico and Peru. (A) Representative leaf panels of AVR2-recognizing Solanum species from Mexico (Hjt349-3) and Peru (Mcq717-3). Leaves were agro-infiltrated with pK7WG2:AVR2, with pK7WG2: empty and co-infiltrated R3a/AVR3a as negative and positive controls, respectively. Pictures were taken at 4 dpi. (B) Geographic map representing the origins of all tested Solanum genotypes (white circles) including those that respond to AVR2 (red circle), listed in Table 1.

Genetic diversity of Mexican and South American Solanum genotypes

The Solanum species for which an AVR2 response was detected, belong to taxonomically separate series. The AVR2-responding Mexican genotypes belong to Demissa, Longipedicellata and Bulbocastana, whereas the Peruvian genotypes belong to Yungasensa and Tuberosa (Table 1). To further determine the genetic relationship between the 12 AVR2-recognizing Solanum genotypes on the DNA level, we classified them using the division described by Bonierbale et al. (1990) and Spooner et al. (2014). Genomic DNA from all functionally screened Solanum genotypes (Table 1) was subjected to AFLP analysis according to the method described by Jacobs et al. (2008), and subsequently, a tree was constructed using Bayesian interference. The tree shows that the AVR2-responding Solanum genotypes from Mexico and Peru cluster in separate groups (Fig. 2), and suggests a different evolutionary origin of the Mexican vs. Peruvian AVR2-responding Solanum species.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Classification of tested wild Solanum genotypes. Bayesian rooted tree of 80 screened Solanum genotypes and 6 Solanum etuberosum genotypes. The branch length represents expected changes per site and posterior probability values are shown near the respective nodes. Indicated clades are based on Spooner et al. (2014). The AVR2-responding Solanum genotypes are marked with red dots, and numbers correspond to their geographic location (Fig. 1). n.d. not determined.

Two R gene clusters from Mexico and Peru mediate AVR2 recognition

R proteins of the nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) class have a conserved region ARC, which was found in Apaf-1 in humans, R proteins in plants and Ced4 in Caenorhabditis elegans (van der Biezen & Jones 1998). The nucleotide binding (NB) and ARC domains are contiguous and the combined domain is known as the NB-ARC, which activation triggers cell death (Rairdan & Moffett 2006). To investigate the relationship between previously identified R genes against late blight (Vleeshouwers et al. 2011a), we aligned their full NB-ARC domains. In total, 27 NB-ARC domains of Rpi proteins were used in the alignment and a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on these data (Fig. 3). Additionally, all of the Rpi proteins contain a coil–coil domain in the N-terminus and belong to the CNL family. The Rpi proteins were classified in different CNL clades (Jupe et al. 2012) (Fig. 3, Supplemental Table 1).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Classification of Rpi proteins. Phylogenetic tree derived from the full NB-ARC domains (range of amino acid sequences in Supplemental Table 1) obtained from 27 Rpi proteins. Rpi cloned from Mexican (red) and South American (blue) Solanum are highlighted. CNL clades are indicated. The nematode resistance protein Gro1.4 was used as outgroup in a Maximum-Likelihood analysis. The Bootstrap values of 60 % and higher are indicated in the nodes. Horizontal branches lengths and scale bar correspond to the evolutionary distances that are measured as the proportion of amino acid substitutions between sequences.

The R2 family from MLB locus on chromosome IV is present in various Mexican Solanum spp. including S. demissum, S. bulbocastanum, S. edinense, S. schenckii and S. hjertjingii, which are, respectively, the donors of R2, Rpi-blb3, Rpi-edn1.1 Rpi-snk1.1, Rpi-snk1.2, Rpi-hjt1.1, Rpi-hjt1.2 and Rpi-hjt1.3 (Lokossou et al., 2009, Champouret, 2010). Also, functional members of the R gene clusters on chromosome IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, and XI, containing Rpi-amr3, R1, Rpi-blb2, Rpi-mch1 and Rpi1, Rpi-blb1, R8 & R9a, (plus its allelic variants) and R3a/R3b, respectively, seem to be restricted to Solanum species of Mexican origin.

R genes from South American origin are Rpi-vnt1 and its allelic variants from S. venturi from Argentina (Foster et al., 2009, Pel et al., 2009), Rpi-chc1 from S. chacoense, Rpi-ber from S. berthaultii and Rpi-tar1 from S. tarijense from Bolivia, (Vossen et al. 2009), Rpi-rzc1 from Solanum sparsipilum from Bolivia and Peru (Sliwka et al. 2012a) and Rpi-mcq1 from S. mochiquense from Peru (Smilde et al., 2005, Jones et al., 2014a), the same Solanum species as was found to respond to AVR2 (Fig. 1, Table 1). To test whether Rpi-mcq1 can recognize AVR2, we performed an agroinfiltration experiment in potato cv. ‘Bintje’ (Fig. 4). Specific cell death responses occurred in leaf panels co-infiltrated with AVR2 and the R2 homolog Rpi-blb3 or Rpi-mcq1, respectively. This indicates that AVR2 recognition can be mediated by both Rpi-blb3 and Rpi-mcq1. These R genes are localized at different chromosomes (Supplemental Table 1) and different phylogenetic clades (Fig. 3), which supports the theory of different evolutionary origin between R2/Rpi-blb3 and Rpi-mcq1 genes.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Rpi-mcq1 and Rpi-blb3 confer response to AVR2. Leaves of potato cv. ‘Bintje’ were co-infiltrated with AVR2 and Rpi-mcq1 (A) and Rpi-blb3 (B) as a cell death control trigger by AVR2. Single infiltrations of AVR2, Rpi-mcq1, Rpi-blb3 and empty vector were included as negatives controls and co-infiltration of R3a/AVR3a was included as positive control. Each effector is tested twice on three leaves, over two plants and two biological replicates. Representative photographs of cell death symptoms were taken at 4 dpi.

Transgenic Désirée-Rpi-blb3 and Désirée-Rpi-mcq1 display a different resistance spectrum to P. infestans isolates

Transgenic potato cv. ‘Désirée’ were generated that express Rpi-blb3 and Rpi-mcq1, respectively, under the control of their native promoters. To functionally analyze the R gene activity, leaves of Désirée-Rpi-blb3 and Désirée-Rpi-mcq1 were agroinfiltrated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying the pK7WG2 vector harboring AVR2. Infiltrations using pK7WG2: empty vector and co-infiltration of R3a/AVR3a were included as negative and positive controls, respectively. In both transformants, cell death responses were observed in AVR2 infiltrations sites and with the positive control at 4 dpi (Supplemental Fig. 1), confirming that Rpi-mcq1 and Rpi-blb3 are functional in these plants and lead to the recognition of AVR2.

The resistance spectrum of Désirée-Rpi-blb3, Désirée-Rpi-mcq1 and wild type ‘Désirée’ control was investigated by performing detached leaf assays with 18 P. infestans isolates (Supplemental Table 2). Macroscopic observations were carried out at 6 dpi. The susceptible ‘Désirée’ control was infected by all tested isolates, but three distinct resistance patterns (I–III) were observed on Désirée-Rpi-blb3 and Désirée-Rpi-mcq1 (Fig. 5). Group I contains seven isolates that are avirulent on both Désirée-Rpi-blb3 and Désirée-Rpi-mcq1, whereas Group III contains eight isolates that are virulent on these plants. Interestingly, group II consists of three isolates that display a distinct virulence profile on Désirée-Rpi-blb3 compared with Désirée-Rpi-mcq1. All of the three isolates are avirulent on Désirée-Rpi-blb3 but virulent on Désirée-Rpi-mcq1. Considering the virulence pattern observed, Désirée-Rpi-blb3 displays a slightly broader and partly overlapping disease resistance spectrum as compared to Désirée-Rpi-mcq1.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Disease index on ‘Désirée’, Désirée-Rpi-mcq1 and Désirée-Rpi-blb3 with isolates from group I–III. (A) Representative pictures of isolates from group I to III tested in ‘Désirée’ (WT), Désiree-Rpi-mcq1 (Rpi-mcq1) and Désirée-Rpi-blb3 (Rpi-blb3) are displayed. Pictures were taken after 6 dpi. (B) Disease symptoms were scored on a scale from 1 to 9: 1 represents intensive sporulation; 2–3, macroscopically visible sporulation, but to a less extend as 1. 4–5, represent sporulation only visible under the binocular; 6–7 represent necrotic lesion ≥ 10 mm of diameter and between 4–10 mm, respectively; 8, small necrotic lesion not exceeding 4 mm and 9 represents no symptoms. The percent of each category is shown with isolates of group I–III.

Discussion

This manuscript presents a study of AVR2 effector recognition in a wide diversity of wild Solanum species. We detected AVR2 responses in Solanum genotypes from two different geographical locations, Mexico and Peru, which are both recognized as centers of diversity of P. infestans (Goodwin et al., 1992, Fry et al., 1993, Abad and Abad, 1997, Grunwald and Flier, 2005, Alpizar-Gomez et al., 2007). The recognition in Mexican Solanum species is conferred by genes from the R2 family that resides at an MLB locus on the short arm of chromosome IV (Lokossou et al., 2009, Champouret, 2010, Lokossou et al., 2010). In contrast, the AVR2 response in Peruvian Solanum species is conferred by Rpi-mcq1 or allelic variants, which exhibits distinct resistance specificities to a range of P. infestans isolates. Rpi-mcq1 belongs to the CNL4 family (Fig. 3) and is located on chromosome IX (Smilde et al. 2005).

The AVR2-responding Solanum species identified in this study occur in separate groups based on geographic origin (Fig. 1), taxonomic classification (Table 1) and phylogenetic analysis using AFLP data (Fig. 2). Several studies point the origin of P. infestans to Mexico and to the Andes, and as a consequence, Mexican and South American Solanum may have independently evolved distinct R genes to adapt to local pathogen populations (Westerdijk, 1917, Grunwald and Flier, 2005, Alpizar-Gomez et al., 2007, Goss et al., 2014). The fact that Rpi genes from Mexican and Peruvian Solanum species are present in different loci and belong to different classes (Fig. 3), supports the hypothesis that recognition of AVR2 has evolved independently in those geographic regions and has led to the evolution of two different R genes that mediate AVR2-based resistance to P. infestans. Comparably, in Phytophthora sojae, two distinct genes conferring resistance to Phytophthora sojae (Rps genes), Rps3a and Rps5, were found to mediate recognition of the product of the AVR3a/5 alleles from P. sojae. These Rps genes are located on different chromosomes (Li et al. 2016) and specific residues of AVR3a/5 were identified that are required for recognition by Rps5, but not Rps3a (Dong et al. 2011), suggesting that Rps3a and Rps5 evolved independently. Research using other systems show that the recognition of an AVR protein by multiple, unrelated, R proteins is sometimes also observed in other plant-pathogen systems (Feyter et al., 1993, Ashfield et al., 2004, Anh et al., 2015). Recently, it was found that distinct immune receptors can be involved in the recognition of conserved molecules like bacterial flagellin as well (Hind et al. 2016).

R gene specificity is known to be determined by specific recognition of AVR proteins of pathogens. The largely overlapping resistance spectra mediated by Rpi-mcq1 and R2/Rpi-blb3 can be explained by Avr2, which was found to be the cognate Avr for both R genes (Gilroy et al. 2011). AVR2 is a member of a highly diverse gene family (Champouret, 2010, Vleeshouwers et al., 2011b) and the difference in resistance specificity between Rpi-blb3 and Rpi-mcq1 might be explained by differential recognition of other AVR2 family members, or additional alleles of AVR2. It has been demonstrated in P. sojae that recognition of the same effector is not always linked with the same race specificity and the differential specificities in effector recognition may be attributed to the presence of additional alleles or paralogs of the effector (Kaitany et al., 2001, Dong et al., 2011). Therefore, the study of recognition of AVR2 family members and their allelic variants in diverse P. infestans isolates by Rpi-blb3 and Rpi-mcq1 could contribute to better understanding of race-specific resistances and subsequently contribute to more educated deployment of respective R genes.

According to the Achilles' heel theory (Homer 1999), proteins that fulfill essential functions for a pathogen are less likely to become mutated or lost from the invaders genome. Therefore, targeting such proteins is expected to lead to more broad-spectrum, and even more sustainable disease resistance (Laugé et al. 1998). AVR2 interacts with the host target StBSL1, a putative phosphatase that acts as a positive regulator of the brassinosteroid (BR) pathway. Enhanced BR-signaling results in up-regulation of the basic-Helix-Loop-Helix transcription factor StCHL1, which acts as a negative regulator of immunity (Saunders et al., 2012, Turnbull et al., 2017). AVR2 was found to contribute to virulence of P. infestans (Gilroy et al. 2011). The fact that two independent R gene families have evolved in Solanum to detect AVR2, supports the idea that AVR2 is an important effector of P. infestans. Avr2 thus seems an important target for obtaining resistance.

Besides targeting important or conserved effectors, it has been proposed that the stacking of R genes can contribute to obtaining a broader and more durable type of resistance (Pink & Puddephat 1999). In the past, some breeders have used the geographic origin of the resistant genotypes as a criterion to decide which resistance sources to include in their breeding program. However, since allelic variants of R genes are found across Solanum spp., e.g like Rpi-blb1, Rpi-sto1 and Rpi-pta1 from S. bulbocastanum and S. stoloniferum (Vleeshouwers et al., 2008, Champouret et al., 2009) and the members of R2 from S. demissum, from at least 5 Mexican Solanum species (Park et al., 2005a, Park et al., 2005b, Park et al., 2005c, Vleeshouwers et al., 2008, Lokossou et al., 2009, Champouret, 2010), this appears not a very robust criterion. In more modern breeding approaches, breeders select R genes by locus, as it has been proposed that R genes that originate from different R gene clusters recognize different effectors and are thus preferred (Zhu et al. 2012). Marker-assisted breeding is then considered efficient for breeding, although R gene activity by functional effector assays seems the best method to distinguish between mechanistically different R genes (Vleeshouwers et al., 2011b, Jo et al., 2016). In this study however, we show that R genes that recognize the same effector (AVR2) can still confer different resistance patterns, which further nuances the strategy to discriminate race-specificity of R genes.

To conclude, the effectoromics approach can aid identification of R genes with new resistance specificities and facilitates the detailed characterization of R genes. A better understanding of how R genes contribute to resistance is essential to select the best genes for resistance breeding. This information can be the basis for an educated breeding effort, which will contribute to the goal of obtaining broad-spectrum and durable resistance against P. infestans.

Materials and methods

Plant material

The wild Solanum plant material used in functional effector screening for cell death responses to AVR2 is listed in Table 1 (Vleeshouwers et al. 2011a). Plant genotypes were maintained in vitro in sterile jars containing MS20 medium (Murashige & Skoog 1962) at 24 °C under 16/8h day/night regime. Top shoots were transferred to fresh medium for rooting, and 2 weeks later transferred to pots containing sterilized soil in climate regulated greenhouse compartments within the temperature range of 18–22 °C and under 16 h/8 h day/night regime.

Agroinfiltration

AVR2 from P. infestans (NCBI Genbank code XM_002902940.1) was previously cloned in the pK7WG2 vector (Karimi et al. 2002) and was transiently expressed in Solanum plants using Agro-infiltrations (Vleeshouwers & Rietman 2008). Single infiltrations of pK7WG2: empty were included as a negative control and R3a/AVR3a were co-expressed as a positive control. Agro-infiltration was performed on 4–5-week-old potato plants using a suspension of A. tumefaciens strain AGL1 containing the appropriate expression vectors at an OD600 of 0.2. Each individual effector was tested twice on three leaves of two plants in two separated experiments. Local symptoms of cell death responses were assessed at 3–4 dpi.

Phylogenetic data analysis

A phylogenetic tree of 80 screened Solanum genotypes and Solanum etuberosum (Etb) 594-2, 591-3, 591-4, 591-5, 595-5 and 593-2 was constructed by MrBayes v3.2.6 (Huelsenberck & Ronquist 2001) using 224 AFLP markers scored as presence/absence of polymorphisms (Jacobs et al. 2008). Mesquite v3.3 (Maddison & Maddison 2017) was used for formatting data and MrBayes was used to estimate the posterior distribution by Markov Chian Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods (Larget & Simon 1999). Trees were sampled every 1000 generations from four chains run for 10 000 000 generations with a temperature setting for the heated chains of 0.25. Solanum etuberosum genotypes represented the outgroup.

A Maximum-Likelihood (ML) tree was generated with the NB-ARC domains of 27 Rpi proteins obtained by InterProScan (Jones et al. 2014b) (Supplementary Table 1). The domain sequences were aligned using Muscle (Edgar 2004) and the resulting alignment was used for phylogenetic analysis. The ML tree was built in PhyML v3.0 (Guindon et al. 2010) using the nearest Neighbor Interchange (NNI) as the heuristic method for finding the best tree topology. The three was rooted using Gro1.4 (NCBI Genbank code AAP44390.1) and was visualized by Figtree v1.4.3 (Rambaut 2009).

Generation of transgenic Rpi-blb3 and Rpi-mcq1 potato cv. ‘Désirée’

Stable transformation of potato cv. ‘Désirée’ (event A03-142) was previously performed using A. tumefaciens strain AGL1 harboring pBINPLUS: Rpi-blb3 under the control of native expression elements (Zhu et al. 2012). For Rpi-mcq1 transformation to Désirée, Rpi-mcq1 was subcloned from the library clone pSLJ2115 (Jones et al. 2007) into the binary vector pBINPLUS under the control of native regulatory elements and was transferred to A. tumefaciens strain AGL1. The transformation of potato cv. ‘Désirée’ was performed using routine transformation protocols (Fillatti et al., 1987, Hoekema et al., 1991). Among 35 independent primary transformants, the resistant event A31-47 was selected after growth under greenhouse conditions (18–22 °C, 16 h of light and 8 h of dark) and field condition.

Phytophthora infestans isolates, culture conditions and inoculum preparation

The P. infestans isolates used in this study are listed in Supplemental Table 2 and were retrieved from our in-house collection. Isolates were routinely grown in the dark at 15 °C on solid rye sucrose medium prior to the disease test (Caten & Jinks 1968). To isolate zoospores for plant inoculations, sporulating mycelium was flooded with cold water and incubated at 4 °C for 1–3 h.

Disease test

Leaves from 6–8-week-old plants grown in greenhouse conditions (18–22 °C, 16 h of light and 8 h of dark) were detached and placed in water-saturated oasis in trays. The leaves were spot-inoculated at the abaxial leaf side with 10 μl droplets containing 5*104 zoospores per ml. 12 inoculations in each leave, three leaves per isolate and 3 independent experiments were performed. After inoculation, the trays were incubated in a climate chamber at 15 °C with a 16 h photoperiod. Development of lesions and presence of sporulation was determined at 5 dpi (Vleeshouwers et al., 1999, Champouret, 2010). Disease index was estimated using a scale ranging from 1 to 9 scale, where 1 corresponds to expanding lesions with massive sporulation (susceptible), 7–8 to occurrence of the hypersensitive response (resistant) and 9 to no symptoms (fully resistant).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NWO-VIDI grant 12378 (V.G.A.A.V), COLCIENCIAS doctoral grant 617-2013 (C.A-G), The Veenhuizen Tulp Fund (C.A-G), COST action FA1208 (V.G.A.A.V, C.A-G, and P.J.W). We thank Gert Kessel, Francine Govers and David Cook for providing Phytophthora isolates, Gert van Arkel, Gerard Bijsterbosch, and Arianne van Lierop for technical assistance and Marjan Bergervoet and Isolde Pereira for plant transformation and maintenance.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute.

Appendix A

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2018.01.002.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the supplementary data related to this article:

mmc1

Supplementary Fig. 1. Cell death responses upon expressing of AVR2 on Désirée-Rpi-mcq1 and Désirée-Rpi-blb3. Agroinfiltration using A. tumefaciens strain carrying pK7WG2: AVR2, pK7WG2: empty and co-infiltrations of R3a/AVR3a on Désirée-Rpi-mcq1 (A), Désirée-Rpi-blb3 (B), and untransformed ‘Désirée’ (Wild type) (C). Each effector is tested twice on three leaves, over two plants and two biological replicates. Representative photographs of symptoms were taken at 4 dpi.

mmc1.zip (41.3KB, zip)

Supplementary Table 1. List of known Rpi genes cloned from wild Solanum genotypes. For each Rpi gene, the donor species, geographic origin, chromosome, and position of NB-ARC domain (used for generating Fig. 3) are presented.

Supplementary Table 2. List of P. infestans isolates used in this study. The country and year of collection, the genotype source, as well as the group classification (I–III) of the strain are indicated.

mmc2
mmc2.zip (11.9MB, zip)

References

  1. Abad Z.G., Abad J.A. Another look at the origin of late blight of potatoes, tomatoes, and pear melon in the Andes of South America. Plant Disease. 1997;81:682–688. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.6.682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alpizar-Gomez L., Carbone I., Ristaino J.B. An Andean origin of Phytophthora infestans inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear gene genealogies. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America. 2007;104:3306–3311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611479104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anh V.L., Anh N.T., Tagle A.G. Rmg8, a new gene for resistance to Triticum isolates of Pyricularia oryzae in hexaploid wheat. Phytopathology. 2015;105:1568–1572. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-02-15-0034-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashfield T., Ong L.E., Nobuta K. Convergent evolution of disease resistance gene specificity in two flowering plant families. Plant Cell. 2004;16:309–318. doi: 10.1105/tpc.016725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonierbale M., Ganal W., Tanksley S.D. Applications of restriction fragment length polymorphisms and genetic mapping in potato breeding and molecular genetics. In: Vayda MEaP W.D., editor. The molecular and cellular biology of the potato. CAB International; Wallingford, U.K.: 1990. pp. 13–24. [Google Scholar]
  6. Caten C.E., Jinks J.L. Spontaneous variability of single isolates of Phytophthora infestans. I Cultural variation. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1968;46:329–348. [Google Scholar]
  7. Champouret N., Bouwmeester K., Rietman H. Phytophthora infestans isolates lacking class I ipiO variants are virulent on Rpi-blb1 potato. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions. 2009;22:1535–1545. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-12-1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Champouret N. Experimental Plant Sciences, Wageningen University; The Netherlands: 2010. Functional genomics of Phytophthora infestans effectors and Solanum resistance genes. Ph.D. Dissertation. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dong S., Yu D., Cui L. Sequence variants of the Phytophthora sojae RXLR effector Avr3a/5 are differentially recognized by Rps3a and Rps5 in soybean. PLoS One. 2011;6:1–8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edgar R. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feyter R.D., Yang Y., Gabriel D.W. Gene-for genes interactions between cotton R genes and Xanthomonas campestris pv malvacearum avr genes. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions. 1993;6:225–237. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-6-225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fillatti J.J., Kiser J., Rose R. Efficient transfer of a glyphosate tolerance gene into tomato using a binary Agrobacterium Tumefaciens vector. Bio/Technology. 1987;5:726–730. [Google Scholar]
  13. Foster S.J., Park T.H., Pel M. Rpi-vnt1.1, a Tm-22 homolog from Solanum venturii, confers resistance to potato late blight. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions. 2009;22:589–600. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-5-0589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fry W., Goodwin S.B., Dyer A.T. Historical and recent migrations of Phytophthora infestans: chronology, pathways, and implications. Plant Disease. 1993;77:635–661. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fry W. Phytophthora infestans: the plant (and R gene) destroyer. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2008;9:385–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00465.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilroy E.M., Breen S., Whisson S.C. Presence/absence, differential expression and sequence polymorphisms between PiAVR2 and PiAVR2-like in Phytophthora infestans determine virulence on R2 plants. New Phytologist. 2011;191:763–776. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03736.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodwin S.B., Spielman L.J., Matuszak J.M. Clonal diversity and genetic differentiation of Phytophthora infestans populations in northern and central Mexico. Phytopathology. 1992;82:955–961. [Google Scholar]
  18. Goss E.M., Tabima J.F., Cooke D.E.L. The Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans originated in central Mexico rather than the Andes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111:8791–8796. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401884111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grunwald N.J., Flier W.G. The biology of Phytophthora infestans at its center of origin. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2005;43:171–190. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guindon S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology. 2010;59:307–328. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haas B.J., Kamoun S., Zody M.C. Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Nature. 2009;461:393–398. doi: 10.1038/nature08358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Haverkort A.J., Boonekamp P.M., Hutten R. Durable late blight resistance in potato through dynamic varieties obtained by cisgenesis: scientific and societal advances in the DuRPh project. Potato Research. 2016;59:35–66. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hawkes J.G. Belhaven Press; United Kingdom: 1990. The potato: evolution, biodiversity, and genetic resources. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hein I., Birch P.R.J., Danan S. Progress in mapping and cloning qualitative and quantitative resistance against Phytophthora infestans in potato and its wild relatives. Potato Research. 2009;52:215–227. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hijmans R.J., Spooner D.M. Geographic distribution of wild potato species. American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:2101–2112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hind S.R., Strickler S.R., Boyle P.C. Tomato receptor FLAGELLIN-SENSING 3 binds flgII-28 and activates the plant immune system. Nature plants. 2016;2:1–8. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hoekema A., Huisman M.J., Willink D.P.-L. Transgenic potato cultivars resistant to potato virus X. In: Herrmann R.G., Larkins B.A., editors. Plant Molecular Biology 2. Springer US; Boston, MA: 1991. pp. 183–192. [Google Scholar]
  28. Homer . Harvard University Press; Cambridge, MA: 1999. The iliad. [Google Scholar]
  29. Huelsenberck J.P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:754–755. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jacobs M.M., van der Berg R.G., Vleeshouwers V.G.A.A. AFLP analysis reveals a lack of phylogenetic structure within Solanum section Petota. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2008;8:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jo K.-R., Visser R.G.F., Jacobsen E. Characterisation of the late blight resistance in potato differential MaR9 reveals a qualitative resistance gene, R9a, residing in a cluster of Tm-22 homologs on chromosome IX. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2015;128:931–941. doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2480-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jo K.-R., Zhu S., Bai Y. Plant pathogen resistance biotechnology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2016. Problematic crops: 1. Potatoes: towards sustainable potato late blight resistance by cisgenic R gene pyramiding; pp. 171–191. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones J.D.G., Foster S.J., Chu Z. 2007. Late blight resistance genes and methods. US Patent W0 2009013468 A2. Published by the world intellectual property organization 20 July 2007. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jones P., Binns D., Chang H.Y. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jones J.D.G., Witek K., Verweij W. Elevating crop disease resistance with cloned genes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 2014;369 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jupe F., Pritchard L., Etherington G. Identification and localisation of the NB-LRR gene family within the potato genome. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:75–89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jupe F., Witek K., Verweij W. Resistance gene enrichment sequencing (RenSeq) enables reannotation of the NB-LRR gene family from sequenced plant genomes and rapid mapping of resistance loci in segregating populations. The Plant Journal. 2013;76:530–544. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kaitany R.C., Hart L.P., Safir G.R. Virulence composition of Phytophthora sojae in Michigan. Plant Disease. 2001;85:1103–1106. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.10.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Karimi M., Inzé D., Depicker A. GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends in Plant Science. 2002;7:193–195. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02251-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kuhl J.C., Hanneman R.E.J., Havey M.J. Characterization and mapping of Rpi1, a late blight resistance locus from diploid (1EBN) Mexican Solanum pinnatisectum. Molecular genetics and genomics. 2001;265:977–985. doi: 10.1007/s004380100490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Larget B., Simon D. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1999;16:750–759. [Google Scholar]
  42. Laugé R., Joosten M.H.A.J., Haanstra J.P.W. Successful search for a resistance gene in tomato targeted against a virulence factor of a fungal pathogen. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America. 1998;95(15):9014–9018. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.9014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Li L., Lin F., Wang W. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of two loci conferring resistance to Phytophthora sojae in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2016;129:2379–2386. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2777-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lokossou A.A., Park T-h, van Arkel G. Exploiting knowledge of R/Avr genes to rapidly clone a new LZ-NBS-LRR family of late blight resistance genes from potato linkage group IV. Molecular plant-microbe interactions. 2009;22:630–641. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-6-0630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lokossou A.A., Rietman H., Wang M. Diversity, distribution, and evolution of Solanum bulbocastanum late blight resistance genes. Molecular plant microbe interactions. 2010, 1206–1216;23 doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-9-1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Maddison W.P., Maddison D.R. 2017. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis.http://mesquiteproject.org/ Version 3.3. [Google Scholar]
  47. Malcolmson J.F., Black W. New R genes in Solanum demissum Lindl. and their complementary races of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary. Euphytica. 1966;15:199–203. [Google Scholar]
  48. Murashige T., Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum. 1962;15:473–497. [Google Scholar]
  49. Park T.H., Gros J., Sikkema A. The late blight resistance locus Rpi-blb3 from Solanum bulbocastanum belongs to a major late blight R gene cluster on chromosome 4 of potato. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions. 2005;18:722–729. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-18-0722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Park T.H., Vleeshouwers V.G., Huigen D.J. Characterization and high-resolution mapping of a late blight resistance locus similar to R2 in potato. Theoretical Applied Genetics. 2005;111:591–597. doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-2050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Park T.H., Vleeshouwers V.G., Hutten R.C. High-resolution mapping and analysis of the resistance locus Rpi-abpt against Phytophthora infestans in potato. Molecular Breeding. 2005;16:33–43. [Google Scholar]
  52. Park T.H., Foster S., Brigneti G. Two distinct potato late blight resistance genes from Solanum berthaultii are located on chromosome 10. Euphytica. 2009;165:269–278. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pel M.A., Foster S.J., Park T.-H. Mapping and cloning of late blight resistance genes from Solanum venturii using an interspecific candidate gene approach. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions. 2009;22:601–615. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-5-0601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pink D., Puddephat I. Deployment of disease resistance genes by plant transformation – a ‘mix and match’ approach. Trends in Plant Science. 1999;4:71–75. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(98)01372-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Rairdan G.J., Moffett P. Distinct domains in ARC region of the potato resistance protein Rx mediate LRR binding and inhibition of activation. The Plant Cell. 2006;18:2082–2093. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.042747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rambaut A. 2009. FigTree V1.4.3.http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/ Computer program and documentation distributed by the author at. [Google Scholar]
  57. Saunders D.G.O., Breen S., Win J. Host Protein BSL1 associates with Phytophthora infestans RXLR effector AVR2 and the Solanum demissum Immune Receptor R2 to mediate disease resistance. The Plant Cell. 2012;24:3420–3434. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.099861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sliwka J., Jakuczun H., Chmielarz M. Late blight resistance gene from Solanum ruiz-ceballosii is located on potato chromosome X and linked to violet flower colour. BMC Genetics. 2012;13:1–12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sliwka J., Jakuczun H., Chmielarz M. A resistance gene against potato late blight originating from Solanum michoacanum maps to potato chromosome VII. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2012;124:397–406. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1715-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Smilde W.D., Brigneti G., Jagger L. Solanum mochiquense chromosome IX carries a novel late blight resistance gene Rpi-moc1. Theoretical Applied Genetics. 2005;110:252–258. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1820-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Spooner D.M., Ghislain M., Simon R. Systematic, diversity, genetics and evolution of wild and cultivated potatoes. The Botanical Review. 2014;80:238–383. [Google Scholar]
  62. Spooner D.M., van den Berg R.G., Rodriguez A. Systematic botany monographs. 2004. Wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota) of North and central America. [Google Scholar]
  63. Turnbull D., Yang L., Naqvi S. RXLR effector AVR2 Up-regulates a brassinosteroid-responsive bHLH transcription factor to suppress immunity. Plant Physiology. 2017;174:356–369. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. van der Biezen E.A., Jones J.D.G. The NB-ARC domain: a novel signalling motif share by plant resistance gene products and regulators of cell death in animals. Current Biology. 1998;8:226–228. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. de Vetten N.C.M.H., Verzaux E.C., Vossen J.H. 2011. Cloning and exploitation of a functional R-gene from Solanum x edinense. US patent 20140041072 A1, Published by the world intellectual property organization, 6 February 2014. [Google Scholar]
  66. Vleeshouwers V.G.A.A., van Dooijeweert W., Paul Keizer L.C. A Laboratory assay for Phytophthora infestans resistance in various Solanum Species reflects the field situation. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 1999;105:241–250. [Google Scholar]
  67. Vleeshouwers V.G.A.A., Rietman H. Oomycete genetics and genomics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2008. In planta expression systems; pp. 455–475. [Google Scholar]
  68. Vleeshouwers V.G.A.A., Rietman H., Krenek P. Effector genomics accelerates discovery and functional profiling of potato disease resistance and Phytophthora infestans avirulence genes. PLoS One. 2008;3:1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Vleeshouwers V.G.A.A., Finkers R., Budding D. SolRgene: an online database to explore disease resistance genes in tuber-bearing Solanum species. BMC Plant Biology. 2011;11:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Vleeshouwers V.G.A.A., Raffaele S., Vossen J.H. Understanding and exploiting late blight resistance in the age of effectors. Annual Review Phytopathology. 2011;49:507–531. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Vossen J.H., Nijenhuis M., Arens-de Reuver M.J.B. 2009. Cloning and exploitation of a functional R gene from Solanum chacoense. US Patent WO 2011034433 A1. Published by the world intellectual property organization 18 September 2009. [Google Scholar]
  72. Westerdijk J. J.H de Bussy; Utrecht (NL): 1917. De nieuwe wegen van het phytopathologisch onderzoek; pp. 1–38. Inaugurele Rede. [Google Scholar]
  73. Witek K., Jupe F., Witek A.I. Accelerated cloning of a potato late blight-resistance gene using RenSeq and SMRT sequencing. Nature Biotechnology. 2016;34:656–660. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zadoks J.C. The potato murrain on the European continent and the revolutions of 1848. Potato Research. 2008;51:5–45. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhu S., Li Y., Vossen J.H. Functional stacking of three resistance genes against Phytophthora infestans in potato. Transgenic Research. 2012;21:89–99. doi: 10.1007/s11248-011-9510-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1

Supplementary Fig. 1. Cell death responses upon expressing of AVR2 on Désirée-Rpi-mcq1 and Désirée-Rpi-blb3. Agroinfiltration using A. tumefaciens strain carrying pK7WG2: AVR2, pK7WG2: empty and co-infiltrations of R3a/AVR3a on Désirée-Rpi-mcq1 (A), Désirée-Rpi-blb3 (B), and untransformed ‘Désirée’ (Wild type) (C). Each effector is tested twice on three leaves, over two plants and two biological replicates. Representative photographs of symptoms were taken at 4 dpi.

mmc1.zip (41.3KB, zip)
mmc2
mmc2.zip (11.9MB, zip)

Articles from Studies in Mycology are provided here courtesy of Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute

RESOURCES