Abstract
Integrin β3 is seen as a key anti‐angiogenic target for cancer treatment due to its expression on neovasculature, but the role it plays in the process is complex; whether it is pro‐ or anti‐angiogenic depends on the context in which it is expressed. To understand precisely β3's role in regulating integrin adhesion complexes in endothelial cells, we characterised, by mass spectrometry, the β3‐dependent adhesome. We show that depletion of β3‐integrin in this cell type leads to changes in microtubule behaviour that control cell migration. β3‐integrin regulates microtubule stability in endothelial cells through Rcc2/Anxa2‐driven control of active Rac1 localisation. Our findings reveal that angiogenic processes, both in vitro and in vivo, are more sensitive to microtubule targeting agents when β3‐integrin levels are reduced.
Keywords: adhesome, endothelial, integrins, microtubules
Subject Categories: Cell Adhesion, Polarity & Cytoskeleton; Methods & Resources; Vascular Biology & Angiogenesis
Introduction
Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from those that already exist, plays an essential role in tumour growth 1. As such, targeting angiogenesis is seen as crucial in many anti‐cancer strategies 2. Therapies directed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its major receptor, VEGF‐receptor‐2 (VEGFR2), whilst effective in a number of cancers, are not without side‐effects due to the role this signalling pathway plays in vascular homeostasis 3. Fibronectin (FN)‐binding endothelial integrins, especially αvβ3‐ and α5β1‐integrins, have emerged as alternative anti‐angiogenic targets because of their expression in neovasculature 4, 5. However, neither global nor conditional knockouts of these integrins block tumour angiogenesis in the long term 6, 7, 8, and clinical trials of blocking antibodies and peptides directed against these extracellular matrix (ECM) receptors have been disappointing 9, 10. To gain novel insight into how αvβ3‐integrin regulates outside‐in signal transmission 11, we have undertaken an unbiased analysis of the molecular composition of the mature endothelial adhesome and profiled changes that occur when β3‐integrin expression is manipulated. In so doing, we have uncovered β3‐integrin‐dependent changes in microtubule behaviour that regulate cell migration.
Results and Discussion
The isolation and analysis of integrin adhesion complexes (IACs) by mass spectrometry (MS) is difficult because of the low affinity and transient nature of the molecular interactions occurring at these sites. However, using cell‐permeant chemical cross‐linkers improves recovery of IAC proteins bound to either FN‐coated microbeads 12 or plastic dishes 13. These advances have led to the characterisation of IACs from a number of cell types. Whilst a core consensus adhesome (the network of structural and signalling proteins involved in regulating cell‐matrix adhesion 14) can be defined 12, the composition and stoichiometry of the meta‐adhesome depend on the cell type being analysed, the integrin‐receptor repertoire expressed by that cell type, and any imposed experimental conditions. To examine the composition of the endothelial adhesome, we isolated lung microvascular endothelial cells (ECs) from C57BL6/129Sv mixed background mice and immortalised them with polyoma‐middle‐T‐antigen by retroviral transduction 15. As our main interest was in establishing how β3‐integrin influences the endothelial adhesome, we adhered cells to FN for 90 min, which allows β3‐rich (mature) focal adhesions (FAs) to form 16. To distinguish integrin‐mediated recruitment of proteins from non‐specific background, we also plated cells on poly‐l‐lysine (PLL) as a negative control (adhesion to PLL does not depend on integrins). Visualisation of neuropilin‐1 staining in whole cells showed that this protein, which we previously demonstrated is present in the mature EC adhesome 17, co‐localises with talin‐1 in FAs when cells are plated on FN, but not PLL (Fig 1A). For all proteomics experiments, we cross‐linked FAs using the cell‐permeant and reversible cross‐linkers DPDPB and DSP (see Materials and Methods) for 5 min. Cells were lysed and subjected to a high shear flow water wash to remove non‐cross‐linked material. Crosslinking was reversed, and samples were precipitated and concentrated for analyses. Prior to MS, samples were quality‐controlled by SDS–PAGE and silver staining to ensure efficient removal of non‐cross‐linked material had occurred (Fig 1B).
Label‐free proteomic analyses of the FN + VEGF, FN, and PLL adhesomes (Fig 1C; Table EV1) initially detected and quantified 1,468 proteins. Stringent filtering, requiring proteins to be detected in all three repeats of at least one condition, left 1,064 proteins—a high confidence dataset that was used to define the endothelial adhesome. Hierarchical clustering based on average Euclidian distance identified 12 clusters (A–L), which could be considered VEGF‐enriched (A–C), FN‐enriched (D–F) and PLL‐enriched (G–L) proteins. Fisher's exact test enrichment analysis was carried out to identify which pathway, process or component proteins within these clusters belong to using Gene Ontology annotations. Cell projection (GOCC, P = 8.62 × 10−5) and microtubule (GOCC, P = 1.6 × 10−4) categories were significantly enriched when cells were treated with growth factor, suggesting they are important in VEGF‐mediated processes. Leucocyte trans‐endothelial migration (KEGG, P = 9.71 × 10−5) proteins were enriched in the FN adhesome, but not in the VEGF‐stimulated adhesome, suggesting our cells represent quiescent vasculature without VEGF stimulation. This same category contains many endothelial‐specific proteins (e.g. VE‐cadherin, Cdh5), further confirming that the cells have an endothelial identity. Focal adhesion (KEGG, P = 9.31 × 10−7) proteins were enriched in the FN adhesome but depleted in the PLL adhesome, confirming the success of the adhesome enrichment process, MS and downstream analysis. Other adhesion/migration‐associated categories, focal adhesion (GOCC, P = 5.99 × 10−5), cell projection (GOCC, P = 3.03 × 10−5), cell adhesion (GOBP, P = 1.61 × 10−6) and lamellipodium (GOCC, P = 1.38 × 10−4), were depleted in the PLL adhesome.
To test the consequences of excluding β3‐integrin from the EC adhesome, we decided to profile changes in β3‐heterozygous (β3HET) ECs, which carry one wild‐type allele of β3‐integrin and one knockout allele. These cells express 50% wild‐type levels of β3‐integrin. As in previous studies, we decided to use β3HET cells for these initial analyses, rather than β3‐integrin knockout (β3NULL) cells, hypothesising this would circumvent potential developmental changes arising from the complete loss of the protein, which we felt might confound quantitative interpretations of the EC adhesome; we have shown these cells are a good model for studying the role of αvβ3‐integrin in cell migration, whilst evading changes arising from the complete loss of the integrin on both alleles (e.g. up‐regulated total VEGFR2 expression) 17. Both wild‐type (β3WT) and β3HET ECs adhere equally to saturating concentrations (10 μg ml−1) of FN (see Ellison et al 17). To compare the size distribution of FAs between β3WT and β3HET ECs (which might affect the stoichiometry of components in the adhesome), we seeded cells for 90 min on FN, immunostained for paxillin, and measured FA area; we noted no differences in the percentage of FA size distributions between the two genotypes (Fig 2A). Therefore, MS analyses comparing the adhesome between β3WT and β3HET ECs were performed (Fig 2B; Table EV2). Enrichment analysis showed a depletion of cytoskeletal components (GOCC, P = 4.73 × 10−5) in the β3WT adhesome when compared with the β3HET adhesome, despite the enrichment of adhesion/migration‐associated categories previously noted in the FN adhesome of β3WT ECs (Fig 1C). Whilst a majority of individual FA components in the mature adhesome do not change upon β3‐integrin depletion, downstream connections to cytoskeletal components do. We took a particular interest in microtubules (MTs) because by SAM analysis all detected tubulins were significantly up‐regulated in the β3HET adhesome. To confirm this finding by other means, we probed Western blots for α‐tubulin and showed a significant increase in FA‐enriched samples from β3HET cells compared with β3WT cells (Fig 2C).
Our findings intimated that αvβ3‐integrin drives MT localisation away from FAs. To increase the power of our downstream mechanistic analyses, we felt it was appropriate to now also include β3NULL ECs in our studies. We examined MT organisation in β3WT, β3HET and β3NULL ECs by immunolabelling for α‐tubulin in whole cells (Fig 3A). No gross changes in cell microtubule arrays were observed. Furthermore, total cellular levels of α‐tubulin were similar across all three genotypes (Fig 3B). However, co‐localisation of MTs at peripheral FAs was greater in β3HET and β3NULL ECs, compared to β3WT ECs, as was extension into lamellipodia (Fig 3C; for an example of quantification of the latter, see Fig EV1). Overall, the findings suggest that β3‐integrin limits the targeting of MTs to FAs.
Given that MTs can drive FA turnover and thus cell migration 18, we next tested whether EC migration is differentially sensitive to microtubule targeting agents (MTAs) in β3HET and β3NULL ECs. For each MTA examined, we first determined the dose of the compound that allowed 90% survival of β3WT ECs (see Materials and Methods) and then tested the effects of this dose on random migration in β3WT, β3HET and β3NULL cells (Fig 3D; raw migration data shown in Fig EV2). Random migration was affected by MT stabilisers (Paclitaxel, Epothilone B) in cells of all three genotypes, However, β3WT ECs were insensitive to the MT destabilisers tested (Colchicine, Mebendazole, Fosbretabulin) and the mechanistically unique MTA Eribulin (which functions through an end poisoning mechanism 19), whilst β3HET and β3NULL ECs generally showed a sensitivity to all classes of compounds tested. We extended these types of analyses in vivo to examine the effects of Eribulin and Fosbretabulin on tumour growth and angiogenesis. We chose these two MTAs as they are well tolerated in mice 20, 21 and used clinically in humans. We settled on suboptimal doses (see Materials and Methods) that would allow us to observe potential synergy with endothelial depletion of β3‐integrin. β3‐integrin‐floxed/floxed mice 22 were bred with Tie1Cre mice 23 to generate β3‐integrin‐floxed/floxed Cre‐positive animals (Cre‐negative littermates were used as controls). CMT19T lung carcinoma cells were injected subcutaneously and allowed to establish for 7 days, at which point the MTAs were administered (see Materials and Methods for dosing regimes). Neither Eribulin nor Fosbretabulin had any effect on tumour growth in Cre‐negative animals compared with vehicle‐treated animals, but tumour growth was reduced in MTA‐treated Cre‐positive animals (Fig 3E). Analysis of tumours by immunostaining for blood vessels showed a reduction in intratumoral microvascular density only in sections from MTA‐treated Cre‐positive animals (Fig 3F). These studies suggested that the loss of endothelial β3‐integrin sensitises angiogenic responses to MT destabilisers both in vitro and in vivo.
The increased sensitivity to destabilising MTAs suggested to us that there is an increased population of stable MTs in β3HET and β3NULL ECs compared with their wild‐type counterparts. We explored this premise by exposing ECs to cold temperatures (which destabilises MTs), washing out tubulin monomers 24, followed by immunolabelling for α‐tubulin. We noted elevated stable MTs in both β3HET and β3NULL cells (Fig 4A). Re‐introducing β3‐integrin into β3NULL cells restored MT sensitivity to cold; MTs were more sensitive to cold treatment in NULL cells expressing full‐length human β3‐integrin, than MTs in cells transfected with an empty vector control (Fig EV3). We also measured MT stability biochemically by extracting both cold‐sensitive and cold‐stable MTs from the same sample of cold‐treated cells and Western blotting for α‐tubulin (Fig 4B). On whole, β3HET and β3NULL ECs showed decreased cold‐sensitive and increased cold‐stable MTs compared with β3WT ECs.
To gain further mechanistic insight into how β3‐integrin at FAs might be regulating MT function, we delved deeper into our β3‐dependent adhesome data. We noted that Rcc2 clusters with β3‐integrin in the β3WT adhesome, but is significantly decreased in that of β3HET ECs. Rcc2 (also known as telophase disc protein of 60 kDa, TD‐60) has previously been shown to associate with integrin complexes 25 and to regulate MTs 26. We therefore examined whether Rcc2 was regulating MT stability in ECs. Knocking down Rcc2 by siRNA in β3WT ECs elicited a significant increase in cold‐stable MTs (Fig 5A; see Fig EV4 for representative MT staining). This finding suggested to us that Rcc2 plays a β3‐dependent role in regulating MTs in ECs, but does not do so in isolation. We therefore cross‐referenced our adhesome data with an Rcc2 pull‐down assay performed from HEK‐293T cells (Table EV3) 27. Some obvious potential candidates (e.g. Coronin‐1C) were present in both the β3WT and β3HET adhesomes, but at the same level, so were ruled out from further analysis. However, annexin‐a2 (Anxa2) co‐precipitates with Rcc2 in HEK‐293T cells and, like Rcc2, was reduced in the β3HET adhesome. Therefore, we examined whether Anxa2 was also regulating MT stability in ECs via siRNA‐mediated knockdown. Like Rcc2 knockdown, even a relatively small (~ 30%) Anxa2 knockdown in β3WT ECs elicited a significant increase in cold‐stable MTs (Fig 5B; see Fig EV4 for representative MT staining). Moreover, a double knockdown of both targets led to an additive increase in cold‐stable MTs in β3WT ECs (Fig EV4).
Both Rcc2 25, 27 and Anxa2 28 have been identified as regulators of Rac1, and work by a number of groups has demonstrated that cortical Rac1 activity promotes MT stability 29, 30, 31. Because total Rac1 stoichiometry was unchanged when comparing β3WT and β3HET EC adhesomes, we hypothesised that Rcc2/Anxa2‐dependent alterations in Rac1 activity were responsible for altered MT stability in β3HET and β3NULL ECs. First, we tested the premise that Rac1 plays a differential role in regulating MT stability in β3WT and β3‐depleted ECs by testing the effects of the Rac1 inhibitor NSC23766. NSC23766 had no effect on MT stability in β3WT cells, but the number of cold‐stable MTs in both β3HET and β3NULL ECs was reduced in the presence of the inhibitor (Fig 5C; see Fig EV4 for representative MT staining). We also demonstrated that the increases observed in MT stability upon Rcc2 or Anxa2 knockdown were abrogated in the presence of NSC23766 (Fig EV5), suggesting that both proteins regulate MT stability in ECs in a Rac1‐dependent manner.
Rcc2 has previously been reported to limit the activation of both Rac1 and Arf6 25. Indeed, Rcc2 can guide mesenchymal cell migration by trafficking Rac1 and controlling its exposure to GEFs 27. We therefore tested whether there were differences in Rcc2/Anxa2/active‐Rac1 associations between β3WT and β3‐depleted ECs. First, we examined total cellular levels or Rac1 and showed they were equivalent in all three cell lines (Fig 5D). PAK‐PBD pull‐downs of GTP‐bound Rac1 showed co‐association of all three proteins in β3WT, β3HET and β3NULL ECs (Fig 5E), so we concluded that changes in Rac1 activity alone were not responsible for alterations in MT stability in β3‐depleted cells. Humphries et al 25 showed that Rcc2 is recruited to α5β1‐FN complexes but not α4β1‐Vcam1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1) complexes in cells expressing both α4‐ and α5‐integrins. Thus, we also tested associations between Rcc2, Anxa2 and α5‐integrin in β3WT and β3‐depleted ECs by PAK‐PBD pull‐downs. Rcc2, Anxa2, β3‐integrin and α5‐integrin were pulled down with Rac1‐GTP in β3WT ECs. Rcc2 and Anxa2 were also pulled down with Rac1‐GTP in β3HET and β3NULL ECS, whilst β3‐integrin‐Rac1‐GTP associations were lost and α5‐integrin‐Rac1‐GTP associations were increased (Fig 5E). Given the stoichiometry of α5‐integrin in the β3‐depleted adhesome is unchanged compared to the β3WT adhesome (Fig 2) whilst Rcc2 and Anxa2 levels are decreased, we speculated that a substantial proportion of the observed increase in Rcc2/Anxa2/active‐Rac1/Itga5 associations in β3‐depleted cells occur away from β3‐rich FAs, perhaps in recycling endosomes. Endocytic trafficking of Rac1 is required for the spatial restriction of signalling during mammalian cell migration 32. In support of this hypothesis, we demonstrated a redistribution of Rac1‐GTP in β3‐depleted ECs using a Raichu‐Rac1 biosensor (Fig 5F); compared to β3WT ECs, a substantial proportion of active Rac1 in β3HET and β3NULL cells appeared cytoplasmic. This redistribution of active Rac1 appeared to be independent of the total level of active Rac1 present in the cells; active Rac1 levels were only noticeably elevated in β3HET cells (Fig 5F).
By mining the FN‐β3‐integrin EC adhesome, not only we have generated a valuable tool for the integrin and angiogenesis communities, but also we have utilised the data to uncover a novel role for β3‐integrin in regulating MT function/stability during EC migration. We previously showed that endothelial Rac1 is only required for tumour growth and angiogenesis when β3‐integrin is absent 33, but the underlying mechanism for this observation has remained unclear. Our working hypothesis is that engagement of αvβ3‐integrin with FN at mature FAs localises an Rcc2/Anxa2/Rac1 containing complex to these sites, either preventing GTP‐Rac1 from participating in MT stability or actively destabilising MTs (our experiments do not allow us to distinguish between these two possibilities), perhaps by controlling its exposure to GEFs. When αvβ3 is not present, the complex associates with α5β1‐integrin instead, where it now has the opposite effect on MTs (see synopsis). This re‐positioning of Rac1 activity means that it plays a role in MT‐linked EC migration only when αvβ3 is not present in mature FAs. There is certainly precedence for β3‐integrin regulating spatial distribution of signalling pathway components in cells. For example, we previously showed that β3‐integrin plays a role in locally suppressing β1‐integrin in fibroblasts to promote persistent cell protrusion and migration by regulating interactions between vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein (Vasp) and Rap1‐GTP‐interacting adaptor molecule (Apbb1ip/RIAM) 34. Moreover, MTs have recently been shown to target active β1‐integrins 35. Thus, it will be particularly pertinent to next determine the full composition of the Rcc2/Anxa2/Rac1‐GTP complex as many of the proteins that might be suspected to play a role in MT capture (e.g. Clip170 and Clasps) do not appear to be present in the EC adhesome 36; to gain a full picture of how MT stability/FA targeting is regulated in ECs, it will also be essential to establish how this complex behaves in α5β1‐deficient ECs.
Finally, it is worth considering how changes in levels of integrin expression might affect the cellular responses we have examined. Whilst, in general (e.g. sensitivity to MTAs, including cold), β3HET and β3NULL cells behaved similarly in the assays we employed, there are two notable differences: (i) β3NULL cells showed increased MT targeting to lamellipodia, compared to β3HET cells (Fig 3C), which might suggest altered MT dynamics between the two genotypes. It will be important to examine microtubule dynamics in greater detail (e.g. rates of growth, catastrophe and rescue) with changes in integrin expression patterns/levels. (ii) On fibronectin, β3HET cells showed increased Rac1‐GTP levels compared to β3NULL cells (Fig 5). This might relate to the increased total VEGFR2 levels noted in β3NULL 37 but not β3HET 17 cells. If VEGFR2 is playing a role here, we speculate it is separate from its known interactions with αvβ3‐integrin. VEGFR2 and αvβ3‐integrin interactions are augmented on vitronectin 38, and we do not detect VEGFR2 in our FN‐dependent EC adhesome (Fig 1). Notwithstanding, our findings suggest that once effective αvβ3‐integrin antagonists are available (e.g. ProAgio 39), they may be particularly useful as anti‐angiogenic agents when used in combination with already approved MTAs, such as Eribulin.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals used were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (Poole, UK). Vascular endothelial growth factor (mouse VEGF‐A164) was made in house according to Krilleke et al 40.
Animals
All animals were on a mixed C57BL6/129 background. Littermate controls were used for all in vivo experiments. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with UK Home Office regulations and the European Legal Framework for the Protection of Animals used for Scientific Purposes (European Directive 86/609/EEC).
Mouse endothelial cell isolation and culture
Mouse lung ECs were isolated from adult mice on a mixed C57BL6/129 background as per Reynolds and Hodivala‐dilke 41 and then subsequently immortalised and cultured as per Ellison et al 17. The cell lines used in the studies presented here were cross‐referenced to a pure C57BL6 genetic background via a 384 single nucleotide polymorphism panel (Charles River Genetic Testing Services, Wilmington, MA, USA). These analyses showed the following: β3WT = 91.99% C57BL6; β3HET = 93.03% C57BL6; β3NULL = 44.75% C57BL6.
Adhesion assay
Ninety‐six‐well plates were coated in 10 μg ml−1 fibronectin (FN) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C and then blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. A total of 20,000 cells were seeded into each well and allowed to adhere for 90 min. Cells were then washed with PBS with 1 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM CaCl2 three times to remove non‐adherent cells and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min at room temperature. After a further PBS wash, cells were stained with 1% methylene blue in 10 mM borate buffer pH 8.5/50% methanol for 30 min at room temperature. Excess stain was removed with RO water before a 50% 0.1 M HCl/50% ethanol destain solution was used for 10 min at room temperature. The destain solution was then moved to a new plate, and absorbance was measured at 630 nm.
Focal adhesion enrichment
Focal adhesion enrichment was carried out as described in Ellison et al 17 and Schiller et al 13. A small amount of each focal adhesion sample generated was quality‐controlled by running a 10% SDS–PAGE gel followed by silver staining (Pierce™ Silver Stain Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cramlington, UK). Good‐quality samples were then analysed by Western blotting or mass spectrometry.
Mass spectrometry (MS)
Mass spectrometry was carried out by the Fingerprints Proteomics Facility (Dundee University, Dundee, UK) as per Schiller et al 13. Peptides were identified and quantified using MaxQuant 42 software using the Andromeda peptide database. To achieve label‐free quantitative results, three biological repeats were pooled and each of these pooled samples was analysed via three technical repeats through the spectrometer.
MS statistical analysis
All mass spec analysis was performed using the Perseus 43 bioinformatics toolbox for MaxQuant. Statistical significance was identified using the significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) method 44. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using Perseus’ built in tools. KEGG and GO annotations were obtained from the mouse annotations package via Perseus (downloaded 20/06/2015) and used to identify angiogenesis, cytoskeleton and focal adhesion‐related genes.
Random migration
Twenty‐four‐well plates were coated with 10 μg ml−1 FN in PBS overnight at 4°C and then blocked with 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. A total of 10,000 ECs were seeded per well and allowed to recover overnight. Media were then replaced with media containing one of the following microtubule targeting agents (MTAs—from Abcam, Abingdon, UK, unless otherwise noted): Paclitaxel 5 nM, Epothilone B 1 nM, Colchicine 10 μM, Mebendazole 0.4 μM, Fosbretabulin 0.5 μM or Eribulin 1 μM (a kind gift from Katherine Weilbaecher, Washington University, MO, USA); DMSO was used as a vehicle control. A phase contrast image was taken of each well every 20 min using an inverted Axiovert (Zeiss) microscope for 15 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. The ImageJ plugin MTrackJ 45 was then used to manually track individual cells, and the speed of random migration was calculated.
Microtubule stability assays
Microtubule cold stability assays were carried out as described in Ochoa et al 24. Briefly, 750,000 ECs were seeded per well of a six‐well plate (FN‐coated/BSA‐blocked as described earlier) and allowed to adhere for 75 min at 37°C before being moved to ice for 15 min. Cells were washed with PBS and then 100 μl of PEM buffer (80 μM PIPES pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Triton X‐100 and 25% (w/v) glycerol) for 3 min. A second brief wash was performed with 50 μl PEM buffer. All PEM buffer was collected and pooled together with 150 μl EB buffer (3% SDS, 60 mM Sucrose, 65 mM Tris–HCL pH 6.8) at 2× concentration (representing cold‐soluble microtubules). Remaining material on the plate was then extracted using 300 μl of EB buffer (representing cold‐stable microtubules). Samples were then used in Western blotting analysis.
Additionally, the same procedure was used on ECs adhered to FN‐coated/BSA‐blocked coverslips (acid washed and bake‐sterilised before coating). They were treated as above except that after PEM washing, the slides were immediately immersed in −20°C 100% methanol for 20 min. Coverslips were then used in immunolabelling analysis.
In vivo tumour growth assays
The syngeneic mouse lung carcinoma cell line (derived from C57BL6 mice) CMT19T was used to grow subcutaneous tumours in β3 fl/fl Tie1Cre‐positive (and Cre‐negative littermate control) mice. Under anaesthetic, mice were injected subcutaneously in the flank with 1 × 106 cells. Tumours then grew for 7 days, at which point they were palpable through the skin, before the mice were treated with: (i) 0.15 mg kg−1 Eribulin (kindly provided by Katherine Weilbaecher, Washington, USA) intravenously once a week for 2 weeks; or (ii) 50 mg kg−1 Fosbretabulin intraperitoneally every 4 days. After 21 days, mice were culled and tumours were excised, photographed and measured for volume using a digital calliper. Tumours were bisected along the midline, fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde, preserved for several days in cryoprotectant (20% sucrose, 2% poly(vinylpyrrolidone) in PBS), embedded in gelatine (8% gelatine, 20% sucrose, 2% poly(vinylpyrrolidone) in PBS) before being snap‐frozen and stored at −80°C.
Focal adhesion and microtubule tracking
1 × 106 ECs were transfected with a GFP‐tagged paxillin cDNA expression construct (provided by Maddy Parsons, KCL) by nucleofection. Cells were allowed to recover overnight before a fraction was seeded on FN‐coated/BSA‐blocked coverslips (acid washed and baked before coating) and adhered for 3 h. Cells were then treated with 100 nM SiRTubulin (Cytoskeleton Inc CY‐SC002) and 1 μM Verapamil overnight. Coverslips were imaged individually on an Axiovert (Zeiss) inverted microscope where one image of a GFP‐positive cell was taken every minute for 30 min at 37°C and 5% CO2 in green and far‐red channels. During imaging, media were replaced with Phenol red‐free OptiMEM® + 2% FBS containing 100 nM SiRTubulin and 1 μM Verapamil. The total area of adhesive fronts was assessed by measuring the growth of paxillin–GFP‐positive areas between the 1st and 30th image, and then, the number of microtubules that entered the adhesive front over 30 min was counted.
Western blotting
For Western blot analysis of total tubulin levels, ECs were seeded at 750,000 per well of a FN‐coated/BSA‐blocked six‐well plate and allowed to adhere for 90 min before being lysed in EB buffer. For the microtubule stability assay and focal adhesion enrichment, samples were prepared as above. 20 μg from each sample was loaded onto 10% polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and incubated for 1 h in 5% milk powder in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 (PBSTw), followed by overnight incubation in primary antibody diluted 1:1,000 in 5% BSA in PBSTw at 4°C. Primaries used were against integrin beta 3 (Cell Signalling 4702), alpha‐tubulin (Abcam 7291), Gapdh (Abcam 9484), Rcc2 (Abcam 70788), Hspa1a (clone B‐6 Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Anxa2 (Abcam 41803) and Itga5 (Cell Signalling 4705). The membranes were then incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)‐conjugated secondary antibody (Dako) diluted 1:2,000 in 5% milk in PBSTw for 1 h at room temperature. The blot was visualised using Piece® ECL Western Blotting Substrate Kit (Thermo Fisher) and chemiluminescence detected on a Fujifilm LAS‐3000 darkroom (Fujifilm UK Ltd, Bedford, UK).
Immunolabelling cells
A total of 20,000 ECs were seeded onto FN‐coated/BSA‐blocked coverslips and adhered for 90 min before being washed with PBS and immersed in −20°C methanol for 20 min. Alternatively, cells were prepared as per the microtubule stability assay protocol described above. Coverslips were then washed with PBS, blocked for 10 min at room temperature with 0.5% BSA, 1% goat serum in PBS with 0.25% Triton X‐100 and incubated with primary antibody diluted 1:250 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. After subsequent PBS washes, the coverslips were incubated with Alexa Fluor®‐conjugated secondary antibodies raised in donkey (Fisher Scientific) diluted 1:500 in PBS. Coverslips were washed again in PBS before being mounted onto slides using Prolong Gold® with DAPI (Fisher Scientific). Primaries used were anti‐alpha‐tubulin (Abcam 52866), anti‐paxillin (Abcam 32084) anti‐talin (Sigma T3287) and anti‐Nrp1 (R&D Systems AF566).
To quantify microtubule targeting focal adhesions, images were taken of stained cells using an epifluorescent microtubule, and then, the number of microtubules with an end overlapping with a focal adhesion was counted for each cell.
Simultaneous phalloidin (Thermo Fisher A12380) and alpha‐tubulin staining were carried out using PHEMO fixation 46.
Immunolabelling tissue sections
Five‐micrometer cryosections were prepared from frozen tumours and stained as described previously 17. Primaries used were anti‐CD31 (R&D Systems AF3628, 1:500) and alpha‐smooth muscle actin (Abcam 5694; 1:1,000). Images were acquired on an Axioplan (Zeiss) epifluorescent microscope. Vessel density (immediately adjacent to, but not including, the tumour border) was measured by hand in three hot spots per section. The area of each counted region was calculated using ImageJ.
siRNA knockdown
Knockdowns of Rcc2 and Anxa2 were achieved using 3 μg of Dharmacon ON‐TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNA (control smart pool used as knockdown control) per 1 × 106 ECs in an Amaxa Nucleofector II (T‐005 setting). Cells were allowed to recover for 48 h to allow knockdown to take effect.
Generation of human β3 integrin expressing cells
1 × 106 β3NULL endothelial cells were transfected with 10 μg of MfeI (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK) linearised full‐length human β3‐integrin (see Robinson et al 47) cloned into pcDNA™ 6.2/C‐EmGFP (see Amaxa nucleofection above). An empty vector (EV) was used as a control. Forty‐eight hours post‐transfection cells were selected with 10 μg ml−1 of blasticidin (Thermo Fisher). Cells surviving 2 weeks were analysed for β3‐integrin expression by Western blotting.
Active Rac1 pull‐down
6 × 106 ECs were seeded onto FN‐coated/BSA‐blocked (as described above) 10‐cm plates and allowed to adhere for 90 min. Rac1 Activation Magnetic Beads Pull‐down Assay Kit (Millipore 17‐10393) was then used per manufacturer's instructions. Pull‐down material was then loaded directly onto a gel for Western blotting.
Rac1 biosensor analyses
1 × 106 ECs were transfected with 10 μg of Raichu‐1011X (a gift from Maddy Parsons, KCL) via an Amaxa Nucleofector II (T‐005 setting). Cells were allowed to recover for 48 h and then plated onto FN‐coated/BSA‐blocked (as described above) coverslips for 90 min. Cells were fixed for 10 min in 4% PFA and then mounted in Prolong Gold® without DAPI (Thermo Fisher).
Samples for analysis of the Rac FRET biosensor by acceptor photobleaching were imaged and analysed as previously described 48. Briefly, images were acquired using an inverted Nikon A1R laser scanning confocal microscope. The CFP and YFP channels were excited using the 440‐nm diode laser and the 514‐nm argon line, respectively. The two emission channels were split using a 545‐nm dichroic mirror, which was followed by a 475‐ to 525‐nm bandpass filter for CFP and a 530‐nm longpass filter for YFP (Chroma). Pinholes were opened to give a depth of focus of 2 μm for each channel. Scanning was performed on a sequential line‐by‐line basis for each channel. The gain for each channel was set to approximately 75% of dynamic range (12‐bit, 4,096 grey levels), and offsets were set such that backgrounds were zero. Time‐lapse mode was used to collect one pre‐bleach image for each channel followed by bleaching with a minimum of 20 iterations of the 514‐nm argon laser line at maximum power (to bleach YFP). A second post‐bleach image was then collected for each channel. Control non‐bleached areas were acquired for all samples in the same field of view as bleached cells to confirm specificity of FRET detection. Pre‐ and post‐bleach TFP and Venus images were then imported into ImageJ for processing. Briefly, images were smoothed using a 3 × 3 box mean filter, background subtracted and post‐bleach images fade‐compensated. A FRET efficiency ratio map over the whole cell was calculated using the following formula: (TFPpost‐bleach − TFPpre‐bleach)/TFPpost‐bleach. Ratio values were then extracted from pixels falling inside the bleach region as well as an equally sized region outside of the bleach region, and the mean ratio was determined for each region and is plotted on a histogram. The non‐bleach ratio was then subtracted from the bleach region ratio to give a final value for the FRET efficiency ratio. Data from images were used only if YFP bleaching efficiency was > 70%.
Statistical analyses
All statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism™ Software. Significant differences between means were evaluated by unpaired two‐tailed Student's t‐test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Exact P‐values are shown in figures, except where P < 0.0001; ns = P > 0.05.
Data availability
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE 49 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD008591. All additional data can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.
Author contributions
SJA designed and performed experiments, analysed data, and helped write and edit the manuscript. AMG, TSE, RTJ, BEH and MP designed and performed experiments, analysed data and helped edit the manuscript. BMK, AAAA, WJF and BCS performed experiments, analysed data and helped edit the manuscript. JGS, KNW and MDB provided essential data and helped edit the manuscript. MMM and DRE analysed data and helped edit the manuscript. SDR designed experiments, performed experiments, analysed data and wrote the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
This work was part funded by: BBSRC DTP PhD studentships to SJA (BB/J014524/1), RTJ (BB/M011216/1), WJF (BB/M011216/1) and BMK (BB/J014524/1); a BigC PhD studentship to AMG (14‐06R); BBSRC funding to MMM (BB/J009040/1); Wellcome Trust funding to MDB (088419); Université du Luxembourg core funding to JGS (DFG SCH682/3‐1, FNR Core ITGB3 VascIn); and BHF funding to SDR (PG/15/25/31369). The authors acknowledge special thanks to both Drs Sophie Akbareian and Peng Liu for their undying enthusiastic and critical support of this project. Additionally, we thank Norfolk Fundraisers, Mrs Margaret Doggett, and the Colin Wright Fund for their kind support and fundraising over the years.
EMBO Reports (2018) 19: e44578
References
- 1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144: 646–674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhao Y, Adjei AA (2015) Targeting angiogenesis in cancer therapy: moving beyond vascular endothelial growth factor. Oncologist 20: 660–673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chen CT, Hung MC (2013) Beyond anti‐VEGF: dual‐targeting antiangiogenic and antiproliferative therapy. Am J Transl Res 5: 393–403 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Brooks PC, Clark RA, Cheresh DA (1994) Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis. Science 264: 569–571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kim S, Bell K, Mousa SA, Varner JA (2000) Regulation of angiogenesis in vivo by ligation of integrin alpha5beta1 with the central cell‐binding domain of fibronectin. Am J Pathol 156: 1345–1362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Reynolds LE, Wyder L, Lively JC, Taverna D, Robinson SD, Huang X, Sheppard D, Hynes RO, Hodivala‐Dilke KM (2002) Enhanced pathological angiogenesis in mice lacking beta3 integrin or beta3 and beta5 integrins. Nat Med 8: 27–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Steri V, Ellison TS, Gontarczyk AM, Weilbaecher K, Schneider JG, Edwards D, Fruttiger M, Hodivala‐Dilke KM, Robinson SD (2014) Acute depletion of endothelial beta3‐integrin transiently inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis in mice. Circ Res 114: 79–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Murphy PA, Begum S, Hynes RO (2015) Tumor angiogenesis in the absence of fibronectin or its cognate integrin receptors. PLoS One 10: e0120872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Schaffner F, Ray AM, Dontenwill M (2013) Integrin alpha5beta1, the fibronectin receptor, as a pertinent therapeutic target in solid tumors. Cancers (Basel) 5: 27–47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Gorlia T, Erridge SC, Perry J, Hong YK, Aldape KD, Lhermitte B, Pietsch T, Grujicic D et al (2014) Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071‐22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open‐label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15: 1100–1108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hynes RO (2002) Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110: 673–687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Horton ER, Byron A, Askari JA, Ng DH, Millon‐Fremillon A, Robertson J, Koper EJ, Paul NR, Warwood S, Knight D et al (2015) Definition of a consensus integrin adhesome and its dynamics during adhesion complex assembly and disassembly. Nat Cell Biol 17: 1577–1587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Schiller HB, Friedel CC, Boulegue C, Fassler R (2011) Quantitative proteomics of the integrin adhesome show a myosin II‐dependent recruitment of LIM domain proteins. EMBO Rep 12: 259–266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zaidel‐Bar R, Itzkovitz S, Ma'ayan A, Iyengar R, Geiger B (2007) Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat Cell Biol 9: 858–867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. May T, Mueller PP, Weich H, Froese N, Deutsch U, Wirth D, Kroger A, Hauser H (2005) Establishment of murine cell lines by constitutive and conditional immortalization. J Biotechnol 120: 99–110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Schiller HB, Hermann MR, Polleux J, Vignaud T, Zanivan S, Friedel CC, Sun Z, Raducanu A, Gottschalk KE, Thery M et al (2013) beta1‐ and alphav‐class integrins cooperate to regulate myosin II during rigidity sensing of fibronectin‐based microenvironments. Nat Cell Biol 15: 625–636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ellison TS, Atkinson SJ, Steri V, Kirkup BM, Preedy ME, Johnson RT, Ruhrberg C, Edwards DR, Schneider JG, Weilbaecher K et al (2015) Suppressing beta3‐integrin triggers a neuropilin‐1 dependent change in focal adhesion remodelling that can be targeted to block pathological angiogenesis. Dis Model Mech 8: 1105–1119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kaverina I, Straube A (2011) Regulation of cell migration by dynamic microtubules. Semin Cell Dev Biol 22: 968–974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Jordan MA, Kamath K, Manna T, Okouneva T, Miller HP, Davis C, Littlefield BA, Wilson L (2005) The primary antimitotic mechanism of action of the synthetic halichondrin E7389 is suppression of microtubule growth. Mol Cancer Ther 4: 1086–1095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Dorr RT, Dvorakova K, Snead K, Alberts DS, Salmon SE, Pettit GR (1996) Antitumor activity of combretastatin‐A4 phosphate, a natural product tubulin inhibitor. Invest New Drugs 14: 131–137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Su X, Esser AK, Amend SR, Xiang J, Xu Y, Ross MH, Fox GC, Kobayashi T, Steri V, Roomp K et al (2016) Antagonizing integrin beta3 Increases immunosuppression in cancer. Cancer Res 76: 3484–3495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Morgan EA, Schneider JG, Baroni TE, Uluckan O, Heller E, Hurchla MA, Deng H, Floyd D, Berdy A, Prior JL et al (2010) Dissection of platelet and myeloid cell defects by conditional targeting of the beta3‐integrin subunit. FASEB J 24: 1117–1127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gustafsson E, Brakebusch C, Hietanen K, Fassler R (2001) Tie‐1‐directed expression of Cre recombinase in endothelial cells of embryoid bodies and transgenic mice. J Cell Sci 114: 671–676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ochoa CD, Stevens T, Balczon R (2011) Cold exposure reveals two populations of microtubules in pulmonary endothelia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 300: L132–L138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Humphries JD, Byron A, Bass MD, Craig SE, Pinney JW, Knight D, Humphries MJ (2009) Proteomic analysis of integrin‐associated complexes identifies RCC2 as a dual regulator of Rac1 and Arf6. Sci Signal 2: ra51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Mollinari C, Reynaud C, Martineau‐Thuillier S, Monier S, Kieffer S, Garin J, Andreassen PR, Boulet A, Goud B, Kleman JP et al (2003) The mammalian passenger protein TD‐60 is an RCC1 family member with an essential role in prometaphase to metaphase progression. Dev Cell 5: 295–307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Williamson RC, Cowell CA, Hammond CL, Bergen DJ, Roper JA, Feng Y, Rendall TC, Race PR, Bass MD (2014) Coronin‐1C and RCC2 guide mesenchymal migration by trafficking Rac1 and controlling GEF exposure. J Cell Sci 127: 4292–4307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hansen MD, Ehrlich JS, Nelson WJ (2002) Molecular mechanism for orienting membrane and actin dynamics to nascent cell‐cell contacts in epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 277: 45371–45376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Daub H, Gevaert K, Vandekerckhove J, Sobel A, Hall A (2001) Rac/Cdc42 and p65PAK regulate the microtubule‐destabilizing protein stathmin through phosphorylation at serine 16. J Biol Chem 276: 1677–1680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Banerjee M, Worth D, Prowse DM, Nikolic M (2002) Pak1 phosphorylation on t212 affects microtubules in cells undergoing mitosis. Curr Biol 12: 1233–1239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wittmann T, Bokoch GM, Waterman‐Storer CM (2004) Regulation of microtubule destabilizing activity of Op18/stathmin downstream of Rac1. J Biol Chem 279: 6196–6203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Palamidessi A, Frittoli E, Garre M, Faretta M, Mione M, Testa I, Diaspro A, Lanzetti L, Scita G, Di Fiore PP (2008) Endocytic trafficking of Rac is required for the spatial restriction of signaling in cell migration. Cell 134: 135–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. D'Amico G, Robinson SD, Germain M, Reynolds LE, Thomas GJ, Elia G, Saunders G, Fruttiger M, Tybulewicz V, Mavria G et al (2010) Endothelial‐Rac1 is not required for tumor angiogenesis unless alphavbeta3‐integrin is absent. PLoS One 5: e9766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Worth DC, Hodivala‐Dilke K, Robinson SD, King SJ, Morton PE, Gertler FB, Humphries MJ, Parsons M (2010) Alpha v beta3 integrin spatially regulates VASP and RIAM to control adhesion dynamics and migration. J Cell Biol 189: 369–383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Byron A, Askari JA, Humphries JD, Jacquemet G, Koper EJ, Warwood S, Choi CK, Stroud MJ, Chen CS, Knight D et al (2015) A proteomic approach reveals integrin activation state‐dependent control of microtubule cortical targeting. Nat Commun 6: 6135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Fukata M, Watanabe T, Noritake J, Nakagawa M, Yamaga M, Kuroda S, Matsuura Y, Iwamatsu A, Perez F, Kaibuchi K (2002) Rac1 and Cdc42 capture microtubules through IQGAP1 and CLIP‐170. Cell 109: 873–885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Reynolds AR, Reynolds LE, Nagel TE, Lively JC, Robinson SD, Hicklin DJ, Bodary SC, Hodivala‐Dilke KM (2004) Elevated Flk1 (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2) signaling mediates enhanced angiogenesis in beta3‐integrin‐deficient mice. Cancer Res 64: 8643–8650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Mahabeleshwar GH, Feng W, Reddy K, Plow EF, Byzova TV (2007) Mechanisms of integrin‐vascular endothelial growth factor receptor cross‐activation in angiogenesis. Circ Res 101: 570–580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Turaga RC, Yin L, Yang JJ, Lee H, Ivanov I, Yan C, Yang H, Grossniklaus HE, Wang S, Ma C et al (2016) Rational design of a protein that binds integrin alphavbeta3 outside the ligand binding site. Nat Commun 7: 11675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Krilleke D, Deerkenez A, Schubert W, Giri I, Robinson GS, Ng YS, Shima DT (2007) Molecular mapping and functional characterization of the VEGF164 heparin‐binding domain. J Biol Chem 282: 280450–280456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Reynolds LE, Hodivala‐Dilke KM (2006) Primary mouse endothelial cell culture for assays of angiogenesis. Methods Mol Med 120: 503–509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Cox J, Mann M (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.‐range mass accuracies and proteome‐wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26: 1367–1372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tyanova S, Temu T, Sinitcyn P, Carlson A, Hein MY, Geiger T, Mann M, Cox J (2016) The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat Methods 13: 731–740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 5116–5121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Meijering E, Dzyubachyk O, Smal I (2012) Methods for cell and particle tracking. Methods Enzymol 504: 183–200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bellett G, Carter JM, Keynton J, Goldspink D, James C, Moss DK, Mogensen MM (2009) Microtubule plus‐end and minus‐end capture at adherens junctions is involved in the assembly of apico‐basal arrays in polarised epithelial cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 66: 893–908 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Robinson SD, Reynolds LE, Kostourou V, Reynolds AR, da Silva RG, Tavora B, Baker M, Marshall JF, Hodivala‐Dilke KM (2009) Alphav beta3 integrin limits the contribution of neuropilin‐1 to vascular endothelial growth factor‐induced angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 284: 33966–33981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Scarpa E, Szabo A, Bibonne A, Theveneau E, Parsons M, Mayor R (2015) Cadherin switch during EMT in neural crest cells leads to contact inhibition of locomotion via repolarization of forces. Dev Cell 34: 421–434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Vizcaino JA, Csordas A, del‐Toro N, Dianes JA, Griss J, Lavidas I, Mayer G, Perez‐Riverol Y, Reisinger F, Ternent T et al (2016) 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res 44: D447–D456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE 49 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD008591. All additional data can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.