Abstract
Background
Many studies have examined long-term outcomes after childhood cancer, but few address outcomes for adolescent and young adult (AYA, age 15-39) cancer survivors. Conditional survival reflects changing mortality risk with time since cancer diagnosis and is a useful measure for planning long-term follow-up care.
Methods
Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER9) database, we identified a cohort of AYAs diagnosed with a first malignant cancer during 1973-2009 and followed through 2014. We estimated 5-year relative survival at diagnosis, and at each additional year survived up to 25 years post-diagnosis, conditional on being alive at the beginning of that year.
Results
A total of 205,954 AYA cancer patients were identified. Thyroid, melanoma, testicular, breast, lymphoma, leukemia, and central nervous system tumors (CNS) made up 67% of all cancers. For all cancers combined, 5-year relative survival was 84.5% (95% CI: 84.3, 84.7) at 1 year post-diagnosis and 94.0% (95% CI: 93.9, 94.2) at 5 years. Relative survival first exceeded 95%, reflecting minimal excess mortality compared to the general population, at 7 years. Patients with thyroid, testicular, melanoma, and breast cancers reached >95% relative survival at diagnosis, 1, 3, and 18 years post-diagnosis, respectively. Estimates for Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia were >95% at 6 and 13 years, respectively, but declined to <95% at 20 years. AYAs with CNS tumors did not reach 95% by 25 years post-diagnosis.
Conclusions
For AYA survivors of breast cancer, CNS tumors, and hematologic malignancies, long-term excess mortality should be considered when planning follow-up care.
Keywords: adolescents and young adults, cancer, conditional survival, relative survival, cancer survivors
Introduction
Over 70,000 adolescents and young adults (AYAs, ages 15-39 years) are diagnosed with cancer each year in the United States.1 Although considerable variability exists according to cancer site and stage, five-year relative survival at diagnosis has been estimated at over 80% for all AYA cancer patients combined.2 Extensive survivorship research in recent decades has focused on patients diagnosed with cancer as children and older adults, yet few studies to date have reported outcomes specifically for patients diagnosed as AYAs. With most AYA cancer patients expected to become long-term survivors, there is a critical need for research efforts to inform the survivorship care of this growing population.
Estimates of conditional survival represent clinically useful measures for cancer patients and their physicians when planning appropriate follow-up care after initial cancer treatment, and provide survivors with relevant indicators of prognosis at various stages of survivorship. Conditional survival is the probability of surviving for a specified time interval, given that one has already survived a certain length of time after cancer diagnosis, and, when plotted over time, reflects the changing risk of death with increasing time since diagnosis. Examining conditional survival among cancer patients relative to expected survival among comparable groups in the general population can reveal excess mortality remaining among cancer patients at a given point after diagnosis. Excess mortality, identified by a conditional relative survival of <100%, may reflect death from cancer recurrences, second primary cancers, or treatment-related late effects. Long-term conditional relative survival estimates have been published for various cancer sites, particularly those most common in older adults,3–8 but have not been reported specifically among AYAs with cancer. Using population-based data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, the objective of this study was to estimate five-year relative survival for AYAs with cancer, at diagnosis and for each additional year survived (i.e. conditional five-year relative survival) up to 25 years post-diagnosis.
Methods
Using the SEER 9 database,9 we identified all patients diagnosed with a cancer at ages 15-39 years during 1973-2009 and followed through 2014. We included patients diagnosed with a first primary cancer with malignant behavior. Patients diagnosed with Kaposi sarcoma, death certificate or autopsy only cases, and patients recorded as alive with no survival time were excluded. Cancer site was classified according to AYA-specific recodes of ICD-O-3 site and histology codes, available through SEER.10 For testicular cancer, which does not have an AYA-specific recode, we used the regular SEER Site recode (ICD-O-3/WHO 2008). We classified stage using SEER Historic Stage A for applicable sites. Other patient characteristics obtained from SEER included age at diagnosis and sex. This study was considered exempt by the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina.
Statistical analysis
Relative survival was calculated as the ratio of observed survival among cancer patients to expected survival in the general population with a similar distribution of age, sex, and race during the same time period. The actuarial method was used for survival calculations. General population mortality data, provided by the National Center for Health Statistics and accessed through SEER, was used to generate expected survival using the Ederer II method.11 We estimated five-year relative survival among AYA cancer patients at diagnosis, and for each additional year survived up to 25 years post-diagnosis, conditional on being alive at the beginning of that year. Relative survival estimates >100% were adjusted and are reported as 100%. Estimates were generated for all cancer sites combined, and for selected common cancers diagnosed among AYAs. We also report the years at which conditional relative survival exceeded 90% and 95%, considered to reflect little and minimal excess mortality, respectively.3 In subgroup analyses, we examined site-specific estimates according to diagnosis year, sex, age at diagnosis, and stage. Patients with distant stage disease were excluded from analyses according to stage due to small numbers with extended follow-up for most cancer sites. Analyses were performed using SEER*Stat version 8.3.4.
Results
A total of 205,954 AYA cancer patients contributed to these analyses. Thyroid, melanoma, testicular, breast, lymphoma, leukemia, and central nervous system tumors (CNS) made up 67% of all cancers. For all cancers combined, 5-year relative survival was 84.5% (95% CI: 84.3, 84.7) and 94.0% (95% CI: 93.9, 94.2) at 1 year and 5 years post-diagnosis, respectively (Table 1; Supplemental Table 1). Relative survival first exceeded 95%, reflecting minimal excess mortality, by 7 years after diagnosis. Patients with thyroid and testicular cancers exhibited >95% five-year relative survival beginning at diagnosis and 1 year, respectively, while those with melanoma and cervical/uterine cancers reached >95% by 3 years. Relative survival increased rapidly for colorectal cancer, from 69.9% at 1 year, to 97.0% at 10 years. In contrast, gains were more gradual for female breast cancer, with >95% relative survival not achieved until 18 years after diagnosis. Estimates exceeded 95% by 7 years for soft tissue sarcomas, and 9 years for Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Those for Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia were >95% at 6 and 13 years, respectively, but were slightly less than 95% at 20 years. Across types of leukemia, 95% relative survival was exceeded at 8 years for patients with acute lymphoid leukemia and 9 years for those with acute myeloid leukemia, but was not achieved by 25 years post-diagnosis for those with chronic myeloid leukemia (data not shown). For patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors, five-year relative survival did not exceed 90% by 25 years post-diagnosis. In analyses according to year of diagnosis, relative survival was generally greater for patients diagnosed in 1988-2009 compared to those diagnosed in 1973-1987. Improvements over time were observed for most cancer types, but were especially apparent for leukemias, female breast cancer, lymphomas, and CNS tumors within the first 10 years of diagnosis.
Table 1.
Five-year relative survival among AYAs with cancer, conditional on surviving to 1, 5, 10, and 20 years after diagnosis, overall and according to year of diagnosis
Conditional 5-year relative survival
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
At 1 year | At 5 years | At 10 years | At 20 years | |||||||
|
||||||||||
N survived to 1 year | 5-year relative survival, % (95% CI) | N survived to 5 years | 5-year relative survival, % (95% CI) | N survived to 10 years | 5-year relative survival, % (95% CI) | N survived to 20 years | 5-year relative survival, % (95% CI) | >90% from year: | >95% from year: | |
All sites | 185,236 | 84.5 (84.3, 84.7) | 155,465 | 94.0 (93.9, 94.2) | 118,273 | 96.5 (96.4, 96.6) | 64,148 | 97.1 (96.9, 97.3) | 3 | 7 |
1973-1987 | 60,779 | 80.3 (80.0, 80.7) | 49,224 | 92.6 (92.4, 92.9) | 44,784 | 95.9 (95.7, 96.1) | 39,517 | 97.0 (96.8, 97.3) | 4 | 8 |
1988-2009 | 124,457 | 86.6 (86.4, 86.8) | 106,241 | 94.8 (94.6, 94.9) | 73,489 | 97.0 (96.8, 97.1) | 24,631 | 97.2 (96.8, 97.6) | 2 | 6 |
Female breast | 30,421 | 78.3 (77.8, 78.8) | 24,194 | 87.6 (87.2, 88.1) | 17,392 | 92.8 (92.3, 93.2) | 8,836 | 95.6 (95.0, 96.2) | 7 | 18 |
1973-1987 | 10,456 | 71.7 (70.9, 72.6) | 7,750 | 84.9 (84.0, 85.7) | 6,483 | 92.1 (91.3, 92.7) | 5,379 | 95.7 (94.9, 96.4) | 8 | 18 |
1988-2009 | 19,965 | 81.7 (81.2, 82.3) | 16,444 | 89.0 (88.5, 89.6) | 10,909 | 93.3 (92.7, 93.8) | 3,457 | 95.3 (93.9, 96.3) | 6 | 17 |
Thyroid | 20,060 | 99.7 (99.6, 99.8) | 19,486 | 99.8 (99.6, 99.9) | 14,804 | 99.7 (99.5, 99.9) | 8,004 | 99.9 (90.9, 100.0) | 0 | 0 |
1973-1987 | 5,540 | 99.4 (99.1, 99.7) | 5,436 | 99.5 (99.1, 99.7) | 5,322 | 99.6 (99.1, 99.8) | 5,050 | 99.9 (94.2, 100.0) | 0 | 0 |
1988-2009 | 14,520 | 99.8 (99.6, 99.9) | 14,050 | 99.9 (99.5, 100.0) | 9,482 | 99.8 (99.3, 100.0) | 2,954 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 |
Melanoma | 24,061 | 93.3 (93.0, 93.6) | 21,999 | 96.9 (96.7, 97.2) | 17,332 | 98.4 (98.1, 98.6) | 9,494 | 99.5 (98.9, 99.8) | 0 | 3 |
1973-1987 | 7,684 | 89.1 (88.4, 89.8) | 6,823 | 95.6 (95.0, 96.1) | 6,384 | 97.5 (97.0, 97.9) | 5,808 | 99.2 (98.6, 99.6) | 2 | 5 |
1988-2009 | 16,377 | 95.3 (94.9, 95.6) | 15,176 | 97.6 (97.3, 97.9) | 10,948 | 98.9 (98.6, 99.2) | 3,686 | 99.8 (99.1, 99.9) | 0 | 1 |
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma | 9,794 | 81.9 (81.1, 82.7) | 7,970 | 93.0 (92.4, 93.6) | 5,717 | 95.2 (94.5, 95.9) | 2,614 | 95.4 (94.0, 96.4) | 3 | 9 |
1973-1987 | 2,549 | 75.9 (74.2, 77.6) | 1,973 | 87.8 (86.2, 89.2) | 1,698 | 92.5 (91.0, 93.7) | 1,418 | 95.0 (93.4, 96.2) | 7 | 16a |
1988-2009 | 7,245 | 84.1 (83.2, 84.9) | 5,997 | 95.0 (94.3, 95.6) | 4,019 | 96.6 (95.8, 97.3) | 1,196 | 95.6 (92.7, 97.3) | 2 | 6 |
Hodgkin lymphoma | 13,721 | 90.5 (90.0, 91.0) | 12,409 | 94.8 (94.4, 95.2) | 9,814 | 96.0 (95.6, 96.5) | 5,603 | 93.7 (92.8, 94.4) | 1 | 6a |
1973-1987 | 5,119 | 86.6 (85.6, 87.5) | 4,490 | 92.3 (91.4, 93.1) | 4,084 | 94.1 (93.2, 94.8) | 3,470 | 93.4 (92.4, 94.3) | 3 | – |
1988-2009 | 8,602 | 92.9 (92.3, 93.4) | 7,919 | 96.4 (95.9, 96.9) | 5,730 | 97.7 (97.1, 98.1) | 2,133 | 94.7 (92.9, 96.0) | 0 | 3a |
Leukemias | 6,492 | 58.9 (57.7, 60.1) | 3,883 | 86.9 (85.7, 88.0) | 2,506 | 94.1 (92.9, 95.1) | 1,028 | 94.5 (92.3, 96.0) | 7 | 13a |
1973-1987 | 2,073 | 39.7 (37.5, 41.8) | 890 | 74.0 (70.9, 76.8) | 647 | 89.9 (87.2, 92.1) | 516 | 94.5 (91.6, 96.5) | 11 | 22a |
1988-2009 | 4,419 | 68.1 (66.7, 69.5) | 2,993 | 91.3 (90.1, 92.4) | 1,859 | 95.8 (94.5, 96.8) | 512 | 94.2 (89.9, 96.7) | 5 | 10a |
Colorectal | 7,513 | 69.9 (68.8, 70.9) | 5,275 | 91.6 (90.7, 92.4) | 3,759 | 97.0 (96.2, 97.7) | 1,878 | 96.6 (95.1, 97.7) | 5 | 7 |
1973-1987 | 2,144 | 66.1 (64.0, 68.1) | 1,438 | 92.3 (90.7, 93.7) | 1,302 | 97.5 (96.1, 98.4) | 1,164 | 96.7 (94.8, 97.9) | 5 | 7 |
1988-2009 | 5,369 | 71.4 (70.2, 72.6) | 3,837 | 91.2 (90.1, 92.2) | 2,457 | 96.6 (95.5, 97.5) | 714 | 96.8 (93.5, 98.4) | 5 | 8 |
Cervical/uterine | 14,201 | 89.5 (89.0, 90.1) | 12,481 | 97.3 (97.0, 97.6) | 10,387 | 98.1 (97.8, 98.5) | 6,416 | 97.3 (96.6, 97.8) | 2 | 3 |
1973-1987 | 5,580 | 89.2 (88.3, 90.0) | 4,933 | 97.1 (96.5, 97.6) | 4,679 | 97.8 (97.3, 98.3) | 4,231 | 97.2 (96.4, 97.8) | 2 | 3 |
1988-2009 | 8,621 | 89.8 (89.1, 90.4) | 7,548 | 97.5 (97.0, 97.9) | 5,708 | 98.4 (97.9, 98.8) | 2,185 | 97.7 (96.1, 98.6) | ||
Testicular | 15,606 | 96.2 (95.9, 96.6) | 14,744 | 99.5 (99.2, 99.6) | 11,930 | 99.3 (98.9, 99.5) | 6,839 | 98.6 (97.9, 99.0) | 0 | 1 |
1973-1987 | 4,774 | 93.0 (92.2, 93.8) | 4,406 | 99.2 (98.7, 99.6) | 4,305 | 98.4 (97.8, 98.9) | 3,993 | 98.3 (97.5, 98.9) | 1 | 2 |
1988-2009 | 10,832 | 97.7 (97.3, 98.0) | 10,338 | 99.6 (99.2, 99.7) | 7,625 | 99.7 (99.4, 99.9) | 2,846 | 99.2 (97.2, 99.8) | 0 | 0 |
CNS | 8,173 | 66.4 (65.4, 67.5) | 5,631 | 80.8 (79.6, 81.9) | 3,657 | 86.5 (95.2, 87.7) | 1,596 | 89.1 (87.1, 90.8) | – | – |
1973-1987 | 2,707 | 58.8 (56.9, 60.7) | 1,690 | 76.3 (74.2, 78.3) | 1,270 | 85.3 (83.1, 87.2) | 905 | 89.7 (87.3, 91.7) | – | – |
1988-2009 | 5,466 | 70.2 (69.0, 71.4) | 3,941 | 83.0 (81.6, 84.2) | 2,387 | 87.2 (85.6, 88.7) | 691 | 88.0 (83.8, 91.1) | 15b | – |
Soft tissue sarcomasc | 6,794 | 81.4 (80.4, 82.3) | 5,492 | 93.8 (93.0, 94.4) | 4,310 | 97.3 (96.7, 97.9) | 2,516 | 98.0 (96.9, 98.7) | 3 | 7 |
1973-1987 | 2,371 | 81.4 (79.7, 82.9) | 1,942 | 94.7 (93.5, 95.7) | 1,808 | 97.6 (96.5, 98.3) | 1,638 | 98.3 (97.0, 99.0) | 3 | 6 |
1988-2009 | 4,423 | 81.4 (80.2, 82.5) | 3,550 | 93.1 (92.1, 94.0) | 2,502 | 97.2 (96.2, 97.9) | 878 | 97.2 (94.3, 98.6) | 3 | 7 |
Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system tumors
Exceeds 95% at indicated year but decreases to <95% before 25 years after diagnosis
Exceeds 90% at indicated year but decreases to <90% before 25 years after diagnosis
Excludes Kaposi sarcoma patients
For most cancer sites, including melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, leukemia, colorectal cancer, and soft tissue sarcomas, conditional relative survival estimates were somewhat better for females than males, particularly in the years closest to diagnosis (Supplemental Table 2). Estimates were generally similar according to age at diagnosis, but were consistently slightly higher among those aged 15-29 than those aged 30-39 (Figure 1; Supplemental Table 3), particularly for central nervous system tumors and leukemia. Within the first few years of diagnosis, the opposite pattern was observed for female breast cancer, with slightly higher estimates for patients diagnosed at ages 30-39, though differences between age groups appeared negligible by about 7 years post-diagnosis. For colorectal cancer and soft tissue sarcomas, five-year relative survival estimates among patients with regional stage disease approached those among patients with localized disease by or before 10 years post-diagnosis (Figure 2; Supplemental Table 4). Estimates for patients with regional stage melanoma and cervical/uterine cancers exceeded 95% before 10 years, but remained slightly lower than estimates for patients with localized disease throughout the study period. Among women with regional stage breast cancer, five-year relative survival remained consistently lower than among those with localized stage, and did not exceed 95% by 25 years post-diagnosis.
Figure 1.
Five-year relative survival at diagnosis and at each additional year survived after diagnosis among AYA cancer patients according to age at diagnosis: a) all cancer sites, b) thyroid cancer, c) testicular cancer, d) melanoma, e) cervical/uterine cancers, f) colorectal cancer, g) leukemias, h) non-Hodgkin lymphoma, i) Hodgkin lymphoma, j) central nervous system tumors, k) soft tissue sarcomas (excluding Kaposi sarcoma), l) female breast cancer. Dotted line indicates 95% relative survival, or minimal excess mortality relative to the general population.
Figure 2.
Five-year relative survival at diagnosis and at each additional year survived after diagnosis among AYA cancer patients according to stage: a) thyroid cancer, b) testicular cancer, c) melanoma, d) cervical/uterine cancer, e) colorectal cancer, f) soft tissue sarcomas (excluding Kaposi sarcoma), g) female breast cancer. Dotted line indicates 95% relative survival, or minimal excess mortality relative to the general population. Distant stage disease not shown due to small sample sizes for most cancer sites.
Discussion
In this study, we examined conditional relative survival up to 25 years after diagnosis among AYAs with cancer, an understudied patient subgroup with respect to long-term health outcomes. For all cancer types combined, five-year relative survival exceeded 95% by 7 years post-diagnosis, suggesting minimal excess mortality beyond this point, and there was some evidence of a survival improvement over time. However, for specific cancer types, including central nervous system tumors, female breast cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, and leukemia, our analyses suggested evidence of excess mortality risk that persisted, or re-emerged, more than 10 years after cancer diagnosis.
In recent years, AYAs with cancer have increasingly been distinguished from childhood and older adult cancer patients in their cancer type distribution, disease biology, treatment efficacy, and psychosocial barriers to care, and short-term relative survival estimates among AYA patients have been reported.2, 12 However, little research exists to inform the follow-up care of AYAs who have already survived several years beyond diagnosis. Potential contributors to excess mortality among long-term cancer survivors include cancer recurrences, second primary malignancies, and non-cancer treatment-related late effects, but long-term survival measures among AYAs with cancer have rarely been described.
Although our overall analyses indicated minimal survival deficits for AYAs with cancer after 7 years post-diagnosis, patterns of relative survival gains over time were not uniform across cancer types. Much of the high relative survival close to diagnosis was driven by a few cancer types, particularly thyroid and testicular cancers, with both high incidence and high survival in this age group. Cervical/uterine cancers and melanoma also quickly achieved >95% relative survival, though other cancer types still exhibited some excess mortality beyond five years post-diagnosis.
The slight decline in relative survival after 10 years among Hodgkin lymphoma patients is of note, and may largely reflect late effects of cancer treatment in this population.13 In the modern era of radiation and chemotherapy, Hodgkin lymphoma is generally considered a curable malignancy, with relatively high survival in the years immediately following diagnosis.13 However, studies have consistently documented significantly elevated risks of second cancers and cardiovascular disease among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors, with three- to six-fold increases in risk of coronary heart disease, valvular heart disease, and heart failure,13–15 and two- to greater than twenty-fold increases in risk of various types of second malignancies,13, 16–22 compared to the general population. Anthracycline-based chemotherapies and mediastinal radiation have often been implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors, while alkylating chemotherapies and radiation likely account for most of the excess in second cancers.13
In our analyses, conditional relative survival was lowest among AYA patients with CNS tumors. Although neither age group exceeded 95% relative survival within 25 years of diagnosis, our results demonstrated poorer long-term survival for patients diagnosed with CNS tumors at ages 30-39 than at 15-29 years. Differences according to age were also apparent for AYAs with leukemia. Patients in the 15-29 year age group exhibited minimal excess mortality after 10 years post-diagnosis, while those aged 30-39 at diagnosis showed evidence of a slight decline in relative survival after 10 years, and remained below 95% relative survival at 25 years, potentially reflecting differences in pediatric versus adult treatment regimens for leukemia.23, 24 These findings are informative for comparison with prior studies of long-term outcomes among childhood cancer survivors (diagnosed before age 21), which have reported somewhat higher survival at 20 years post-diagnosis for CNS and leukemia patients than we observed in older AYAs.25 Our results further highlight the critical importance of long-term surveillance for patients diagnosed with these malignancies at the upper end of the AYA age range.
For all stages combined, five-year relative survival in AYA breast cancer patients remained below 95% until 18 years after diagnosis. Although differences according to stage decreased over time, women with regional breast cancer continued to have poorer survival than those with localized breast up to 25 years post-diagnosis. Late recurrences, even 10 to 20 years after diagnosis, are likely contributors to the slower gains in relative survival in breast cancer patients, particularly in those with hormone receptor-positive tumors.26 However, the risk of a second primary cancer is also increased among younger breast cancer survivors,27 and several studies have suggested elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among women with a breast cancer history, especially those treated with radiation prior to the 1980s or with high doses of anthracycline-based chemotherapies.28–32 Continued follow up of patients treated in the last two to three decades will be needed to gauge how the recent evolution of therapies for breast cancer, including improvements in radiation techniques,33 decreased use of anthracyclines,34 and the introduction of trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancers,35 will affect long-term relative survival in AYA patients.
Strengths of this study include the long follow-up period and the large sample of AYA patients from population-based registries across the U.S. Our study also has limitations to consider. Recurrence information is not available in registry data, but would help to further stratify patients for evaluation of conditional survival estimates. Detailed information on cancer treatments would also be informative for assessing the potential impact of treatment-related late effects on long-term survival, but is not captured in SEER. Lastly, recent changes in cancer treatments would not be reflected in our estimates of relative survival at 20+ years post-diagnosis, since these analyses were necessarily restricted to patients diagnosed in the 1970s and 1980s. Further research will be needed to monitor trends in long-term conditional survival for AYA patients diagnosed in more recent years.
Overall, our analyses suggest that most AYAs with cancer who have survived at least 7 years after diagnosis will experience little difference in survival from the general population. However, for cancer types such as leukemia, CNS tumors, Hodgkin lymphoma, and breast cancer, the potential for long-term excess mortality should be considered when planning follow-up care.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding: C.A. was supported by the UNC Lineberger Cancer Control Education Program (T32 CA057726). A.B.S. was supported by the North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (UL1TR001111) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant KL2TR001109. H.B.N. received funding from St. Baldrick’s Foundation.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: None
Author contributions: Chelsea Anderson: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing- original draft, writing- review and editing. Andrew B. Smitherman: writing- review and editing. Hazel B. Nichols: project administration, writing- review and editing.
References
- 1.United States Cancer Statistics: 1999 - 2012 Archive Incidence, WONDER Online Database. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2015. Accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/cancer-v2012.html on Dec 3, 2017 5:20:03 AM. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Keegan TH, Ries LA, Barr RD, et al. Comparison of cancer survival trends in the United States of adolescents and young adults with those in children and older adults. Cancer. 2016;122:1009–1016. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Janssen-Heijnen ML, Gondos A, Bray F, et al. Clinical relevance of conditional survival of cancer patients in europe: age-specific analyses of 13 cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2520–2528. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Janssen-Heijnen ML, van Steenbergen LN, Steyerberg E, Visser O, De Ruysscher DK, Groen HJ. Long-term excess mortality for survivors of non-small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:496–502. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318241f80b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Janssen-Heijnen ML, van Steenbergen LN, Voogd AC, et al. Small but significant excess mortality compared with the general population for long-term survivors of breast cancer in the Netherlands. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:64–68. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bouvier AM, Remontet L, Hedelin G, et al. Conditional relative survival of cancer patients and conditional probability of death: a French National Database analysis. Cancer. 2009;115:4616–4624. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van Steenbergen LN, Steur M, Lemmens VE, Rutten HJ, van Spronsen DJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML. Minimal excess mortality for long-term colon cancer survivors in the Netherlands 1989-2008. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:585–592. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fuller CD, Wang SJ, Thomas CR, Jr, Hoffman HT, Weber RS, Rosenthal DI. Conditional survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: results from the SEER dataset 1973-1998. Cancer. 2007;109:1331–1343. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 9 Regs Research Data, Nov 2016 Sub (1973-2014) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment> - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2015 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, released April 2017, based on the November 2016 submission.
- 10. (AYA Site Recode/WHO 2008 Definition).Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/ayarecode/aya-who2008.html.
- 11.Cho H, Howlader N, Mariotto AB, Cronin KA. (Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Technical Report #2011-01).Estimating relative survival for cancer patients from the SEER Program using expected rates based on Ederer I versus Ederer II method. Available from: https://surveillance.cancer.gov/reports/tech2011.01.pdf.
- 12.Bleyer A, Choi M, Fuller CD, Thomas CR, Jr, Wang SJ. Relative lack of conditional survival improvement in young adults with cancer. Semin Oncol. 2009;36:460–467. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ng AK, van Leeuwen FE. Hodgkin lymphoma: Late effects of treatment and guidelines for surveillance. Semin Hematol. 2016;53:209–215. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2016.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aleman BM, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, De Bruin ML, et al. Late cardiotoxicity after treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2007;109:1878–1886. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-034405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.van Nimwegen FA, Schaapveld M, Janus CP, et al. Cardiovascular disease after Hodgkin lymphoma treatment: 40-year disease risk. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1007–1017. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schaapveld M, Aleman BM, van Eggermond AM, et al. Second Cancer Risk Up to 40 Years after Treatment for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2499–2511. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Smith P, et al. Second cancer risk after chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a collaborative British cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4096–4104. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ibrahim EM, Kazkaz GA, Abouelkhair KM, et al. Increased risk of second lung cancer in Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors: a meta-analysis. Lung. 2013;191:117–134. doi: 10.1007/s00408-012-9418-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hodgson DC, Gilbert ES, Dores GM, et al. Long-term solid cancer risk among 5-year survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1489–1497. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dores GM, Metayer C, Curtis RE, et al. Second malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s disease: a population-based evaluation over 25 years. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3484–3494. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bhatia S, Yasui Y, Robison LL, et al. High risk of subsequent neoplasms continues with extended follow-up of childhood Hodgkin’s disease: report from the Late Effects Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4386–4394. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.De Bruin ML, Sparidans J, van’t Veer MB, et al. Breast cancer risk in female survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: lower risk after smaller radiation volumes. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4239–4246. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stock W, La M, Sanford B, et al. What determines the outcomes for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on cooperative group protocols? A comparison of Children’s Cancer Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies. Blood. 2008;112:1646–1654. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-130237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Burke PW, Douer D. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults. Acta Haematol. 2014;132:264–273. doi: 10.1159/000360204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mertens AC, Yong J, Dietz AC, et al. Conditional survival in pediatric malignancies: analysis of data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer. 2015;121:1108–1117. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN, et al. Annual Hazard Rates of Recurrence for Breast Cancer During 24 Years of Follow-Up: Results From the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I to V. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:927–935. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Molina-Montes E, Requena M, Sanchez-Cantalejo E, et al. Risk of second cancers cancer after a first primary breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136:158–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hooning MJ, Aleman BM, van Rosmalen AJ, Kuenen MA, Klijn JG, van Leeuwen FE. Cause-specific mortality in long-term survivors of breast cancer: A 25-year follow-up study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:1081–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Azim HA, Jr, de Azambuja E, Colozza M, Bines J, Piccart MJ. Long-term toxic effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1939–1947. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gernaat SAM, Ho PJ, Rijnberg N, et al. Risk of death from cardiovascular disease following breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;164:537–555. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4282-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Giordano SH, Kuo YF, Freeman JL, Buchholz TA, Hortobagyi GN, Goodwin JS. Risk of cardiac death after adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:419–424. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jensen BV. Cardiotoxic consequences of anthracycline-containing therapy in patients with breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2006;33:S15–21. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ewer MS, Ewer SM. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments: what the cardiologist needs to know. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:564–575. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Giordano SH, Lin YL, Kuo YF, Hortobagyi GN, Goodwin JS. Decline in the use of anthracyclines for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2232–2239. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Perez EA, Rodeheffer R. Clinical cardiac tolerability of trastuzumab. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:322–329. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.